git-svn-id: https://svn.wxwidgets.org/svn/wx/wxWidgets/trunk@3871
c3d73ce0-8a6f-49c7-b76d-
6d57e0e08775
<LI><A HREF="#no_stl">Don't use STL</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="#no_fordecl">Don't declare variables inside <TT>for()</TT></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="#no_nestedclasses">Don't use nested classes</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="#no_stl">Don't use STL</A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="#no_fordecl">Don't declare variables inside <TT>for()</TT></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="#no_nestedclasses">Don't use nested classes</A></LI>
+ <LI><A HREF="#no_ternarywithobjects">Use ternary operator ?: carefully</A></LI>
</OL>
<BR>
<LI>General recommendations</LI>
</OL>
<BR>
<LI>General recommendations</LI>
<P>A nice side effect is that you don't need to recompile all the files
including the header if you change the PrivateLibClass declaration (it's
an example of a more general interface/implementation separation idea).
<P>A nice side effect is that you don't need to recompile all the files
including the header if you change the PrivateLibClass declaration (it's
an example of a more general interface/implementation separation idea).
+
+ <P><LI><A NAME="no_ternarywithobjects"></A><B>Use ternary operator ?: carefully</B></LI><P>
+ The ternary operator <TT>?:</TT> shouldn't be used with objects (i.e. if any
+of its operands are objects) because some compilers (notable Borland C++) fail
+to compile such code.
+<P><U>Workaround</U>: use <TT>if/else</TT> instead.
+<PRE>
+ wxString s1, s2;
+
+ // Borland C++ won't compile the line below
+ wxString s = s1.Len() < s2.Len() ? s1 : s2;
+
+ // but any C++ compiler will compile this
+ wxString s;
+ if ( s1.Len() < s2.Len() )
+ s = s1;
+ else
+ s = s2;
+</PRE>