--- /dev/null
+Redis Cluster - Alternative 1
+
+28 Apr 2010: Ver 1.0 - initial version
+
+Overview
+========
+
+The motivations and design goals of Redis Cluster are already outlined in the
+first design document of Redis Cluster. This document is just an attempt to
+provide a completely alternative approach in order to explore more ideas.
+
+In this document the alternative explored is a cluster where communication is
+performed directly from client to the target node, without intermediate layer.
+
+The intermediate layer can be used, in the form of a proxy, in order to provide
+the same functionality to clients not able to directly use the cluster protocol.
+So in a first stage clients can use a proxy to implement the hash ring, but
+later this clients can switch to a native implementation, following a
+specification that the Redis project will provide.
+
+In this new design fault tolerance is achieved by replicating M-1 times every
+data node instead of storing the same key M times across nodes.
+
+From the point of view of CAP our biggest sacrifice is about "P", that is
+resistance to partitioning. Only M-1 nodes can go down for the cluster still
+be functional. Also when possible "A" is somewhat sacrificed for "L", that
+is, Latency. Not really in the CAP equation but a very important parameter.
+
+Network layout
+==============
+
+In this alternative design the network layout is simple as there are only
+clients talking directly to N data nodes. So we can imagine to have:
+
+- K Redis clients, directly talking to the data nodes.
+- N Redis data nodes, that are, normal Redis instances.
+
+Data nodes are replicate M-1 times (so there are a total of M copies for
+every node). If M is one, the system is not fault tolerant. If M is 2 one
+data node can go off line without affecting the operations. And so forth.
+
+Hash slots
+==========
+
+The key space is divided into 1024 slots.
+
+Given a key, the SHA1 function is applied to it.
+The first 10 bytes of the SHA1 digest are interpreted as an unsigned integer
+from 0 to 1023. This is the hash slot of the key.
+
+Data nodes
+==========
+
+Data nodes are normal Redis instances, but a few additional commands are
+provided.
+
+HASHRING ADD ... list of hash slots ...
+HASHRING DEL ... list of hash slots ...
+HASHRING REHASHING slot
+HASHRING SLOTS => returns the list of configured slots
+HSAHRING KEYS ... list of hash slots ...
+
+By default Redis instances are configured to accept operations about all
+the hash slots. With this commands it's possible to configure a Redis instance
+to accept only a subset of the key space.
+
+If an operation is performed against a key hashing to a slot that is not
+configured to be accepted, the Redis instance will reply with:
+
+ "-ERR wrong hash slot"
+
+More details on the HASHRING command and sub commands will be showed later
+in this document.
+
+Additionally three other commands are added:
+
+DUMP key
+RESTORE key <dump data>
+MIGRATE key host port
+
+DUMP is used to output a very compact binary representation of the data stored at key.
+
+RESTORE re-creates a value (storing it at key) starting from the output produced by DUMP.
+
+MIGRATE is like a server-side DUMP+RESTORE command. This atomic command moves one key from the connected instance to another instance, returning the status code of the operation (+OK or an error).
+
+The protocol described in this draft only uses the MIGRATE command, but this in turn will use RESTORE internally when connecting to another server, and DUMP is provided for symmetry.
+
+Querying the cluster
+====================
+
+1) Reading the cluster config
+-----------------------------
+
+Clients of the cluster are required to have the cluster configuration loaded
+into memory. The cluster configuration is the sum of the following info:
+
+- Number of data nodes in the cluster, for instance, 10
+- A map between hash slots and nodes, so for instnace:
+ hash slot 1 -> node 0
+ hash slot 2 -> node 5
+ hash slot 3 -> node 3
+ ... and so forth ...
+- Physical address of nodes, and their replicas.
+ node 0 addr -> 192.168.1.100
+ node 0 replicas -> 192.168.1.101, 192.168.1.105
+- Configuration version: the SHA1 of the whole configuration
+
+The configuration is stored in every single data node of the cluster.
+
+A client without the configuration in memory is require, as a first step, to
+read the config. In order to do so the client requires to have a list of IPs
+that are with good probability data nodes of the cluster.
+
+The client will try to get the config from all this nodes. If no node is found
+responding, an error is reported to the user.
+
+2) Caching and refreshing the configuration
+-------------------------------------------
+
+A node is allowed to cache the configuration in memory or in a different way
+(for instance storing the configuration into a file), but every client is
+required to check if the configuration changed at max every 10 seconds, asking
+for the configuration version key with a single GET call, and checking if the
+configuration version matches the one loaded in memory.
+
+Also a client is required to refresh the configuration every time a node
+replies with:
+
+ "-ERR wrong hash slot"
+
+As this means that hash slots were reassigned in some way.
+
+Checking the configuration every 10 seconds is not required in theory but is
+a good protection against errors and failures that may happen in real world
+environments. It is also very cheap to perform, as a GET operation from time
+to time is going to have no impact in the overall performance.
+
+3) Read query
+-------------
+
+To perform a read query the client hashes the key argument from the command
+(in the intiial version of Redis Cluster only single-key commands are
+allowed). Using the in memory configuration it maps the hash key to the
+node ID.
+
+If the client is configured to support read-after-write consistency, then
+the "master" node for this hash slot is queried.
+
+Otherwise the client picks a random node from the master and the replicas
+available.
+
+4) Write query
+--------------
+
+A write query is exactly like a read query, with the difference that the
+write always targets the master node, instead of the replicas.
+
+Creating a cluster
+==================
+
+In order to create a new cluster, the redis-cluster command line utility is
+used. It gets a list of available nodes and replicas, in order to write the
+initial configuration in all the nodes.
+
+At this point the cluster is usable by clients.
+
+Adding nodes to the cluster
+===========================
+
+The command line utility redis-cluster is used in order to add a node to the
+cluster:
+
+1) The cluster configuration is loaded.
+2) A fair number of hash slots are assigned to the new data node.
+3) Hash slots moved to the new node are marked as "REHASHING" in the old
+ nodes, using the HASHRING command:
+
+ HASHRING SETREHASHING 1 192.168.1.103 6380
+
+The above command set the hash slot "1" in rehashing state, with the
+"forwarding address" to 192.168.1.103:6380. As a result if this node receives
+a query about a key hashing to hash slot 1, that *is not present* in the
+current data set, it replies with:
+
+ "-MIGRATED 192.168.1.103:6380"
+
+The client can then reissue the query against the new node.
+
+Instead even if the hash slot is marked as rehashing but the requested key
+is still there, the query is processed. This allows for non blocking
+rehashing.
+
+Note that no additional memory is used by Redis in order to provide such a
+feature.
+
+4) While the Hash slot is marked as "REHASHING", redis-cluster asks this node
+the list of all the keys matching the specified hash slot. Then all the keys
+are moved to the new node using the MIGRATE command.
+5) Once all the keys are migrated, the hash slot is deleted from the old
+node configuration with "HASHRING DEL 1". And the configuration is update.
+
+Using this algorithm all the hash slots are migrated one after the other to the new node. In practical implementation before to start the migration the
+redis-cluster utility should write a log into the configuration so that
+in case of crash or any other problem the utility is able to recover from
+were it left.
+
+Fault tolerance
+===============
+
+Fault tolerance is reached replicating every data node M-1 times, so that we
+have one master and M-1 replicas for a total of M nodes holding the same
+hash slots. Up to M-1 nodes can go down without affecting the cluster.
+
+The tricky part about fault tolerance is detecting when a node is failing and
+signaling it to all the other clients.
+
+When a master node is failing in a permanent way, promoting the first slave
+is easy:
+1) At some point a client will notice there are problems accessing a given node. It will try to refresh the config, but will notice that the config is already up to date.
+2) In order to make sure the problem is not about the client connectivity itself, it will try to reach other nodes as well. If more than M-1 nodes appear to be down, it's either a client networking problem or alternatively the cluster can't be fixed as too many nodes are down anyway. So no action is taken, but an error is reported.
+3) If instead only 1 or at max M-1 nodes appear to be down, the client promotes a slave as master and writes the new configuration to all the data nodes.
+
+All the other clients will see the data node not working, and as a first step will try to refresh the configuration. They will successful refresh the configuration and the cluster will work again.
+
+Every time a slave is promoted, the information is written in a log that is actually a Redis list, in all the data nodes, so that system administration tools can detect what happened in order to send notifications to the admin.
+
+Intermittent problems
+---------------------
+
+In the above scenario a master was failing in a permanent way. Now instead
+let's think to a case where a network cable is not working well so a node
+appears to be a few seconds up and a few seconds down.
+
+When this happens recovering can be much harder, as a client may notice the
+problem and will promote a slave to master as a result, but then the host
+will be up again and the other clients will not see the problem, writing to
+the old master for at max 10 seconds (after 10 seconds all the clients are
+required to perform a few GETs to check the configuration version of the
+cluster and update if needed).
+
+One way to fix this problem is to delegate the fail over mechanism to a
+failover agent. When clients notice problems will not take any active action
+but will just log the problem into a redis list in all the reachable nodes,
+wait, check for configuration change, and retry.
+
+The failover agent constantly monitor this logs: if some client is reporting
+a failing node, it can take appropriate actions, checking if the failure is
+permanent or not. If it's not he can send a SHUTDOWN command to the failing
+master if possible. The failover agent can also consider better the problem
+checking if the failing mode is advertised by all the clients or just a single
+one, and can check itself if there is a real problem before to proceed with
+the fail over.
+
+Redis proxy
+===========
+
+In order to make the switch to the clustered version of Redis simpler, and
+because the client-side protocol is non trivial to implement compared to the
+usual Redis client lib protocol (where a minimal lib can be as small as
+100 lines of code), a proxy will be provided to implement the cluster protocol
+as a proxy.
+
+Every client will talk to a redis-proxy node that is responsible of using
+the new protocol and forwarding back the replies.
+
+In the long run the aim is to switch all the major client libraries to the
+new protocol in a native way.
+
+Supported commands
+==================
+
+Because with this design we talk directly to data nodes and there is a single
+"master" version of every value (that's the big gain dropping "P" from CAP!)
+almost all the redis commands can be supported by the clustered version
+including MULTI/EXEC and multi key commands as long as all the keys will hash
+to the same hash slot. In order to guarantee this, key tags can be used,
+where when a specific pattern is present in the key name, only that part is
+hashed in order to obtain the hash index.
+
+EOF