1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
184 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
185 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
186 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
187 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
188 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
189 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
190 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
191 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
192 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
194 Outline of a Bison Grammar
196 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
197 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
198 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
199 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
200 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
202 Defining Language Semantics
204 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
205 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
206 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
207 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
208 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
209 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
210 action in the middle of a rule.
214 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
215 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
216 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
220 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
221 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
222 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
223 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
224 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
225 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
226 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
277 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
278 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
279 * How Precedence:: How they work.
283 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
284 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
285 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
286 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
288 Handling Context Dependencies
290 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
291 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
292 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
293 error recovery rules must be written.
295 Debugging Your Parser
297 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
298 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
302 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
303 in alphabetical order by short options.
304 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
305 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
307 Parsers Written In Other Languages
309 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
310 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
314 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
315 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
316 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
317 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
318 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
319 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
321 A Complete C++ Example
323 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
324 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
325 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
326 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
327 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
331 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
332 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
333 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
334 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
335 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
336 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
337 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
338 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
340 Frequently Asked Questions
342 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
343 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
344 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
345 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
346 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
347 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
348 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
349 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
350 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
351 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
352 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
353 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
357 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
363 @unnumbered Introduction
366 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
367 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
368 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
369 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
370 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
371 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
372 calculators to complex programming languages.
374 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
375 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
376 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
377 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
378 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
381 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
382 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
383 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
384 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
387 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
388 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
389 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
390 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
391 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
392 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
395 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
398 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
400 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
401 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
402 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
403 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
404 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
406 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
408 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
409 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
410 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
411 License to all of the Bison source code.
413 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
414 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
415 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
416 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
417 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
418 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
419 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
421 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
422 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
423 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
424 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
425 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
426 using the other GNU tools.
428 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
429 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
430 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
431 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
435 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
436 @include gpl-3.0.texi
439 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
441 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
442 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
443 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
446 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
447 as mathematical ideas.
448 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
449 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
450 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
451 the name of an identifier, etc.).
452 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
453 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
454 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
455 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
456 how is the output used?
457 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
458 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
461 @node Language and Grammar
462 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
464 @cindex context-free grammar
465 @cindex grammar, context-free
466 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
467 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
468 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
469 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
470 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
471 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
472 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
473 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
477 @cindex Backus-Naur form
478 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
479 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
480 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
481 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
482 essentially machine-readable BNF.
484 @cindex LALR grammars
485 @cindex IELR grammars
487 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
488 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
489 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
490 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
491 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
492 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
493 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
494 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
495 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
496 Construction}, to learn how.
499 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
500 @cindex ambiguous grammars
501 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
503 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
504 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
505 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
506 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
507 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
508 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
509 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
510 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
511 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
512 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
513 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
514 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
515 possible parses of any given string is finite.
517 @cindex symbols (abstract)
519 @cindex syntactic grouping
520 @cindex grouping, syntactic
521 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
522 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
523 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
524 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
525 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
526 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
527 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
529 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
530 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
531 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
532 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
533 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
534 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
535 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
536 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
537 lexicography, not grammar.)
539 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
543 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
544 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
545 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
546 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
547 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
548 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
549 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
554 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
555 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
556 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
557 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
558 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
562 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
563 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
564 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
565 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
566 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
567 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
568 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
569 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
571 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
572 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
573 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
574 reads informally as follows:
577 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
582 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
586 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
587 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
588 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
589 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
592 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
593 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
594 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
595 not the start symbol.
597 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
598 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
599 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
600 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
601 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
602 reports a syntax error.
604 @node Grammar in Bison
605 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
606 @cindex Bison grammar
607 @cindex grammar, Bison
608 @cindex formal grammar
610 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
611 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
612 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
614 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
615 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
616 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
618 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
619 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
620 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
621 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
622 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
623 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
624 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
627 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
628 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
629 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
630 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
632 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
633 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
635 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
636 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
637 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
638 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
642 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
647 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
649 @node Semantic Values
650 @section Semantic Values
651 @cindex semantic value
652 @cindex value, semantic
654 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
655 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
656 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
657 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
658 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
661 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
662 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
663 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
664 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
665 ,Defining Language Semantics},
668 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
669 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
670 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
671 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
674 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
675 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
676 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
677 need to have any semantic value.)
679 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
680 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
681 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
682 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
683 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
684 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
686 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
687 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
688 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
689 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
690 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
692 @node Semantic Actions
693 @section Semantic Actions
694 @cindex semantic actions
695 @cindex actions, semantic
697 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
698 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
699 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
700 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
703 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
704 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
705 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
706 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
707 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
708 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
709 newly recognized larger expression.
711 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
715 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
720 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
721 from the values of the two subexpressions.
724 @section Writing GLR Parsers
726 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
729 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
730 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
732 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
733 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
734 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
735 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
736 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
737 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
738 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
739 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
742 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
743 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
744 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
745 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
746 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
747 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
748 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
749 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
750 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
751 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
752 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
753 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
754 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
755 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
756 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
757 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
758 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
759 identical set of symbols.
761 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
762 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
763 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
764 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
765 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
766 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
767 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
768 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
769 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
773 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
774 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
775 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
776 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
777 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
780 @node Simple GLR Parsers
781 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
782 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
787 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
788 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
790 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
791 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
792 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
794 Consider a problem that
795 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
796 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
799 type subrange = lo .. hi;
800 type enum = (a, b, c);
804 The original language standard allows only numeric
805 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
806 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
807 10206) and many other
808 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
809 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
813 type subrange = (a) .. b;
817 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
818 type with only one value:
825 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
826 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
828 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
829 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
830 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
831 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
832 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
833 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
834 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
835 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
837 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
838 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
839 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
840 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
843 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
844 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
845 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
846 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
847 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
848 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
851 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
852 use the GLR algorithm.
853 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
854 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
855 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
856 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
857 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
858 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
859 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
860 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
861 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
863 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
864 reports a syntax error as usual.
866 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
867 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
868 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
869 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
870 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
872 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
873 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
874 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
875 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
876 The present example contains only one conflict between two
877 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
878 cannot be nested. So the number of
879 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
880 and the parsing time is still linear.
882 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
883 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
886 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
896 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
901 type : '(' id_list ')'
923 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
924 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
925 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
926 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
933 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
934 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
935 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
944 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
945 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
946 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
947 notice when the parser splits.
949 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
950 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
951 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
952 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
953 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
954 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
955 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
956 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
957 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
958 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
959 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
960 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
961 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
964 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
965 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
966 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
967 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
968 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
969 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
971 @node Merging GLR Parses
972 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
973 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
974 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
978 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
980 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
985 #define YYSTYPE char const *
987 void yyerror (char const *);
1000 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1003 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1007 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1008 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1009 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1010 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1011 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1014 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1015 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1016 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1017 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1020 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1021 | '(' declarator ')'
1026 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1027 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1034 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1035 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1036 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1037 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1038 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1039 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1040 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1041 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1042 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1043 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1044 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1045 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1046 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1047 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1049 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1050 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1051 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1052 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1053 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1054 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1055 The parser therefore prints
1058 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1061 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1062 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1069 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1070 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1071 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1072 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1073 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1074 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1075 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1076 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1077 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1078 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1084 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1085 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1086 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1087 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1091 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1092 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1097 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1101 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1109 with an accompanying forward declaration
1110 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1114 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1115 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1120 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1121 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1124 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1127 Bison requires that all of the
1128 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1129 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1130 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1131 the offending merge.
1133 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1134 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1136 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1137 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1139 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1140 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1141 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1142 the associated reduction.
1143 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1144 action in a GLR parser.
1147 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1149 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1152 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1153 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1154 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1155 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1156 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1157 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1158 influence syntax analysis.
1159 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1162 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1163 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1164 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1165 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1166 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1167 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1168 future versions of Bison.
1169 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1170 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1171 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1173 @subsubsection YYERROR
1175 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1176 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1177 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1178 initiate error recovery.
1179 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1180 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1181 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1182 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1183 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1184 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1185 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1186 the parse that invoked the test.
1188 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1189 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1190 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1193 @node Semantic Predicates
1194 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1196 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1198 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1200 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1201 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1202 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1203 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1207 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1208 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1213 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1214 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1215 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1216 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1217 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1218 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1219 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1221 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1222 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1223 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1224 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1227 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1228 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1229 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1233 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1234 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1239 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1240 false). However, this
1241 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1242 have overlapping syntax.
1243 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1244 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1245 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1246 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1249 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1250 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1252 @node Compiler Requirements
1253 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1254 @cindex @code{inline}
1255 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1257 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1258 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1259 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1260 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1261 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1262 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1271 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1275 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1284 @cindex textual location
1285 @cindex location, textual
1287 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1288 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1289 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1290 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1292 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1293 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1294 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1295 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1298 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1299 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1300 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1303 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1304 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1305 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1306 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1307 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1308 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1309 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1312 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1313 @cindex Bison parser
1314 @cindex Bison utility
1315 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1318 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1319 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1320 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1321 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1322 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1323 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1324 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1327 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1328 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1329 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1332 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1333 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1334 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1335 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1336 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1337 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1338 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1340 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1341 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1342 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1343 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1344 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1345 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1346 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1347 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1348 C-Language Interface}.
1350 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1351 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1352 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1353 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1354 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1355 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1356 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1357 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1358 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1359 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1360 anything other than their usual meanings.
1362 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1363 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1364 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1365 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1366 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1367 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1368 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1369 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1370 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1373 @section Stages in Using Bison
1374 @cindex stages in using Bison
1377 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1378 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1382 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1383 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1384 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1385 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1386 sequence of C statements.
1389 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1390 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1391 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1392 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1395 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1398 Write error-reporting routines.
1401 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1402 must follow these steps:
1406 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1409 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1412 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1415 @node Grammar Layout
1416 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1417 @cindex grammar file
1419 @cindex format of grammar file
1420 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1422 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1423 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1430 @var{Bison declarations}
1439 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1440 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1442 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1443 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1444 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1445 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1446 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1447 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1449 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1450 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1451 semantic values of various symbols.
1453 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1456 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1457 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1458 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1462 @cindex simple examples
1463 @cindex examples, simple
1465 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1466 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1467 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1468 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1469 desk-top calculator.
1471 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1472 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1473 source file to try them.
1476 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1477 a first example with no operator precedence.
1478 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1479 Operator precedence is introduced.
1480 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1481 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1482 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1483 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1484 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1488 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1489 @cindex reverse polish notation
1490 @cindex polish notation calculator
1491 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1492 @cindex calculator, simple
1494 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1495 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1496 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1497 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1499 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1500 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1503 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1504 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1505 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1506 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1507 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1508 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1509 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1512 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1513 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1515 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1516 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1519 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1522 #define YYSTYPE double
1525 void yyerror (char const *);
1530 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1533 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1534 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1536 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1537 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1538 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1539 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1540 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1541 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1542 which is a floating point number.
1544 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1545 function @code{pow}.
1547 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1548 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1549 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1550 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1553 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1554 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1555 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1556 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1557 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1558 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1559 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1560 type for numeric constants.
1563 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1565 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1573 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1576 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1577 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1578 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1579 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1580 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1581 /* Exponentiation */
1582 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1584 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1589 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1590 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1591 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1592 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1593 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1596 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1597 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1598 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1600 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1601 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1602 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1603 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1604 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1605 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1614 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1616 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1624 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1625 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1626 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1627 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1628 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1630 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1631 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1632 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1633 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1634 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1635 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1637 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1638 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1639 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1640 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1643 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1644 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1645 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1648 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1650 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1654 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1658 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1659 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1660 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1661 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1662 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1663 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1664 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1666 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1667 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1668 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1669 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1670 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1673 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1675 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1676 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1677 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1678 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1682 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1683 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1688 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1689 equally well have written them separately:
1693 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1694 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1698 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1699 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1700 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1701 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1702 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1703 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1704 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1705 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1707 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1708 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1709 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1711 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1712 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1716 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1720 means the same thing as this:
1724 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1730 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1733 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1734 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1735 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1737 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1738 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1739 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1740 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1742 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1744 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1745 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1746 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1747 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1749 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1750 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1751 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1752 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1753 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1754 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1755 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1756 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1757 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1759 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1760 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1761 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1762 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1763 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1765 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1766 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1768 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1772 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1773 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1774 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1775 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1786 /* Skip white space. */
1787 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1791 /* Process numbers. */
1792 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1795 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1800 /* Return end-of-input. */
1803 /* Return a single char. */
1810 @subsection The Controlling Function
1811 @cindex controlling function
1812 @cindex main function in simple example
1814 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1815 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1816 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1829 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1830 @cindex error reporting routine
1832 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1833 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1834 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1835 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1836 here is the definition we will use:
1842 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1844 yyerror (char const *s)
1846 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1851 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1852 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1853 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1854 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1855 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1856 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1858 @node Rpcalc Generate
1859 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1860 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1862 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1863 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1864 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1865 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1866 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1867 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1869 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1870 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1872 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1873 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1880 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1881 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1882 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1883 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1884 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1885 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1886 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1888 @node Rpcalc Compile
1889 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1890 @cindex compiling the parser
1892 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1896 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1898 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1902 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1903 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1904 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1908 # @r{List files again.}
1910 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1914 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1915 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1921 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1923 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1927 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1929 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1934 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1935 @cindex infix notation calculator
1937 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1939 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1940 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1941 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1942 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1945 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1948 #define YYSTYPE double
1952 void yyerror (char const *);
1955 /* Bison declarations. */
1959 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1960 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1962 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1968 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1971 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1972 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1973 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1974 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1975 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1976 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1977 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1978 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1984 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1987 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1989 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1990 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1991 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1992 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1993 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1994 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1995 the associativity/precedence.)
1997 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1998 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1999 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2000 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2001 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2002 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2005 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2006 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2007 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2008 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2009 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2011 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2016 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2024 @node Simple Error Recovery
2025 @section Simple Error Recovery
2026 @cindex error recovery, simple
2028 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2029 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2030 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2031 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2032 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2033 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2035 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2036 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2037 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2042 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2043 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2048 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2049 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2050 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2051 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2052 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2053 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2054 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2055 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2058 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2059 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2060 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2061 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2062 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2063 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2066 @node Location Tracking Calc
2067 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2068 @cindex location tracking calculator
2069 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2070 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2072 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2073 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2074 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2075 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2079 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2080 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2081 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2084 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2085 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2087 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2088 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2091 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2097 void yyerror (char const *);
2100 /* Bison declarations. */
2108 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2112 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2113 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2114 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2115 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2116 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2117 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2118 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2122 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2124 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2125 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2126 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2127 from the new information.
2129 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2130 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2141 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2146 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2147 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2148 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2149 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2159 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2160 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2161 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2166 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2167 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2168 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2172 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2173 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2174 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2176 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2177 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2178 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2179 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2180 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2181 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2185 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2187 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2188 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2189 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2192 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2193 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2204 /* Skip white space. */
2205 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2206 ++yylloc.last_column;
2211 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2212 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2216 /* Process numbers. */
2220 ++yylloc.last_column;
2221 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2223 ++yylloc.last_column;
2224 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2231 /* Return end-of-input. */
2235 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2239 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2242 ++yylloc.last_column;
2247 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2248 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2249 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2250 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2252 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2253 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2254 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2255 controlling function:
2262 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2263 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2269 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2270 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2271 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2273 @node Multi-function Calc
2274 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2275 @cindex multi-function calculator
2276 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2277 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2279 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2280 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2281 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2282 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2283 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2285 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2286 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2287 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2288 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2289 functions whose syntax has this form:
2292 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2296 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2297 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2298 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2302 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2303 @result{} 3.1415926536
2305 @result{} 0.0000000000
2306 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2307 @result{} 2.3000000000
2309 @result{} 2.3000000000
2311 @result{} 0.8329091229
2312 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2313 @result{} 2.3000000000
2317 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2320 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2321 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2322 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2325 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2326 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2328 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2330 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2334 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2335 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2337 void yyerror (char const *);
2342 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2343 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2346 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2347 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2354 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2355 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2357 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2360 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2361 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2362 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2364 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2365 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2366 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2367 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2369 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2370 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2371 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2372 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2373 between angle brackets).
2375 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2376 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2377 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2378 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2379 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2380 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2383 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2385 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2386 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2387 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2389 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2400 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2401 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2406 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2407 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2408 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2409 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2410 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2411 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2412 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2413 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2414 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2415 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2416 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2419 /* End of grammar. */
2423 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2424 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2425 @cindex symbol table example
2427 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2428 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2429 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2430 requires some additional C functions for support.
2432 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2433 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2434 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2436 @comment file: calc.h
2439 /* Function type. */
2440 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2444 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2447 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2448 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2451 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2452 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2454 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2459 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2461 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2462 extern symrec *sym_table;
2464 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2465 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2469 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2470 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2471 @code{init_table} as well:
2473 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2478 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2480 yyerror (char const *s)
2490 double (*fnct) (double);
2495 #include <math.h> /* Math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2496 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2509 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2514 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2521 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2523 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2524 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2539 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2540 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2542 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2543 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2544 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2545 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2546 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2547 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2549 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2551 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2552 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2555 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2558 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2559 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2560 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2561 ptr->type = sym_type;
2562 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2563 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2569 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2572 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2573 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2574 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2580 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2581 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2582 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2583 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2585 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2586 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2587 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2588 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2589 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2590 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2592 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2593 operators in @code{yylex}.
2595 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2607 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2608 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2615 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2616 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2619 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2625 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2629 static char *symbuf = 0;
2630 static int length = 0;
2635 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2636 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2640 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2648 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2652 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2654 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2656 /* Get another character. */
2661 while (isalnum (c));
2668 s = getsym (symbuf);
2670 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2675 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2681 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2682 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2683 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2691 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2694 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2695 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2696 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2699 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2700 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2704 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2706 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2707 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2709 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2710 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2713 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2714 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2715 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2716 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2717 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2718 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2719 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2720 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2721 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2724 @node Grammar Outline
2725 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2727 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2728 appropriate delimiters:
2735 @var{Bison declarations}
2744 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2745 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2746 continues until end of line.
2749 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2750 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2751 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2752 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2753 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2757 @subsection The prologue
2758 @cindex declarations section
2760 @cindex declarations
2762 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2763 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2764 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2765 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2766 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2767 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2768 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2770 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2771 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2774 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2775 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2776 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2777 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2778 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2779 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2780 @code{%union} declaration.
2791 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2795 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2796 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2802 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2803 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2804 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2805 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2806 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2807 @code{#include} directives.
2809 @node Prologue Alternatives
2810 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2811 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2814 @findex %code requires
2815 @findex %code provides
2818 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2819 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2820 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2821 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2822 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2823 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2824 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2826 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2837 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2841 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2842 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2849 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2850 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2851 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2852 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2853 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2854 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2855 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2856 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2857 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2858 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2859 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2861 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2862 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2863 This behavior raises a few questions.
2864 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2865 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2866 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2867 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2868 This behavior is not intuitive.
2870 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2871 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2872 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2873 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2880 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2881 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2884 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2885 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2897 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2901 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2902 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2903 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2910 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2911 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2912 explicit which kind you intend.
2913 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2915 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2916 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2917 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2918 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2919 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2920 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2921 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2922 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2923 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2926 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2927 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2929 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2942 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2946 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2947 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2958 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2959 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2960 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2967 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2968 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2969 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2970 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2971 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2972 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2974 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2975 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2976 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2977 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2978 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2979 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2980 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2981 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2982 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2983 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2984 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2987 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2988 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2989 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2990 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2991 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2992 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2993 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2994 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2995 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2996 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3009 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3013 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3014 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3025 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3029 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3030 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3037 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3038 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3039 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3042 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3043 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3044 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3045 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3046 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3047 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3050 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3051 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3052 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3053 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3055 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3056 organize your grammar file.
3057 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3061 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3062 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3063 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3064 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3066 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3067 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3068 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3069 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3073 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3074 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3076 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3078 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3079 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3080 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3081 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3083 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3084 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3085 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3086 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3087 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3088 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3089 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3090 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3093 @node Bison Declarations
3094 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3095 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3096 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3098 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3099 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3100 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3101 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3104 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3105 @cindex grammar rules section
3106 @cindex rules section for grammar
3108 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3109 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3111 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3112 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3113 if it is the first thing in the file.
3116 @subsection The epilogue
3117 @cindex additional C code section
3119 @cindex C code, section for additional
3121 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3122 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3123 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3124 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3125 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3126 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3127 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3128 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3129 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3130 C-Language Interface}.
3132 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3133 from the grammar rules.
3135 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3136 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3137 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3138 of the grammar file.
3141 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3142 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3143 @cindex terminal symbol
3147 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3150 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3151 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3152 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3153 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3154 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3155 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3156 the symbol to stand for it.
3158 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3159 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3160 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3162 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3163 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3164 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3165 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3166 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3167 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3168 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3170 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3174 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3175 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3176 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3177 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3180 @cindex character token
3181 @cindex literal token
3182 @cindex single-character literal
3183 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3184 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3185 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3186 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3187 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3188 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3189 ,Operator Precedence}).
3191 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3192 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3193 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3194 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3195 your program will confuse other readers.
3197 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3198 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3199 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3200 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3201 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3202 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3206 @cindex string token
3207 @cindex literal string token
3208 @cindex multicharacter literal
3209 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3210 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3211 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3212 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3213 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3215 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3216 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3217 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3218 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3219 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3221 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3223 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3224 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3225 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3226 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3227 read your program will be confused.
3229 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3230 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3231 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3232 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3233 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3234 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3237 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3238 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3239 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3241 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3242 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3243 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3244 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3245 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3246 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3247 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3248 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3249 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3250 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3251 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3252 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3254 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3255 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3256 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3257 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3258 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3260 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3261 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3262 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3263 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3264 characters in the following C-language string:
3267 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3270 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3271 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3272 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3273 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3274 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3275 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3276 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3277 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3278 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3279 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3282 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3283 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3284 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3285 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3286 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3289 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3291 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3292 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3294 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3298 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3304 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3305 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3306 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3318 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3319 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3321 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3322 extra white space as you wish.
3324 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3325 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3328 @{@var{C statements}@}
3333 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3334 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3335 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3336 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3337 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3338 compiler can check it.
3340 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3341 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3342 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3343 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3344 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3345 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3346 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3347 character constants.
3349 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3353 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3354 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3358 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3359 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3366 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3368 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3369 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3370 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3387 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3391 @section Recursive Rules
3392 @cindex recursive rule
3394 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3395 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3396 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3397 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3398 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3408 @cindex left recursion
3409 @cindex right recursion
3411 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3412 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3413 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3424 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3425 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3426 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3427 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3428 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3429 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3430 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3433 @cindex mutual recursion
3434 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3435 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3436 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3444 | primary '+' primary
3456 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3460 @section Defining Language Semantics
3461 @cindex defining language semantics
3462 @cindex language semantics, defining
3464 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3465 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3466 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3468 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3469 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3470 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3471 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3474 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3475 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3476 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3477 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3478 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3479 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3480 action in the middle of a rule.
3484 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3485 @cindex semantic value type
3486 @cindex value type, semantic
3487 @cindex data types of semantic values
3488 @cindex default data type
3490 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3491 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3492 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3493 Notation Calculator}).
3495 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3496 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3497 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3500 #define YYSTYPE double
3504 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3505 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3506 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3507 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3509 @node Multiple Types
3510 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3512 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3513 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3514 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3515 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3518 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3519 requires you to do two things:
3523 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3524 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3525 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3526 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3530 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3531 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3532 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3533 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3534 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3543 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3545 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3546 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3547 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3548 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3550 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3551 placed at any position in the rule;
3552 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3553 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3554 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3555 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3557 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3558 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3559 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3560 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3561 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3562 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3563 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3564 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3565 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3566 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3569 Here is a typical example:
3579 Or, in terms of named references:
3583 exp[result]: @dots{}
3584 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3585 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3590 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3591 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3592 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3593 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3594 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3595 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3597 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3598 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3599 referred to as @code{$2}.
3601 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3602 references construct.
3604 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3605 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3606 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3607 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3608 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3612 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3616 @cindex default action
3617 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3618 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3619 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3620 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3621 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3622 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3624 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3625 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3626 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3627 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3628 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3632 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3633 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3639 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3644 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3645 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3646 definition of @code{foo}.
3649 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3650 any, from a semantic action.
3651 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3652 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3655 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3656 @cindex action data types
3657 @cindex data types in actions
3659 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3660 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3662 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3663 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3664 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3665 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3666 in the rule. In this example,
3677 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3678 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3679 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3680 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3682 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3683 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3684 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3696 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3697 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3699 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3700 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3701 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3702 @cindex mid-rule actions
3704 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3705 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3706 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3708 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3709 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3710 it is run before they are parsed.
3712 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3713 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3714 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3715 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3718 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3719 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3720 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3721 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3722 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3723 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3725 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3726 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3727 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3728 at the end of the rule.
3730 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3731 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3732 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3733 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3734 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3735 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3739 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3740 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3741 declare_variable ($3); @}
3743 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3748 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3749 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3750 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3751 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3752 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3753 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3754 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3755 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3757 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3758 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3759 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3760 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3761 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3764 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3765 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3766 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3767 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3768 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3770 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3771 Discarded Symbols}).
3772 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3773 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3775 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3776 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3781 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3787 pop_context ($1); @}
3790 let: LET '(' var ')'
3791 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3792 declare_variable ($3); @}
3799 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3800 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3801 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3803 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3804 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3805 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3806 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3807 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3812 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3813 | '@{' statements '@}'
3819 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3823 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3824 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3827 | '@{' statements '@}'
3833 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3834 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3835 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3836 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3837 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3838 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3840 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3841 actions into the two rules, like this:
3845 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3846 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3847 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3848 '@{' statements '@}'
3854 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3855 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3857 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3858 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3859 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3863 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3864 declarations statements '@}'
3865 | '@{' statements '@}'
3871 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3872 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3874 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3875 serves as a subroutine:
3879 subroutine: /* empty */
3880 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3886 compound: subroutine
3887 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3889 '@{' statements '@}'
3895 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3896 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3898 @node Tracking Locations
3899 @section Tracking Locations
3901 @cindex textual location
3902 @cindex location, textual
3904 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3905 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3906 especially symbol locations.
3908 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3909 actions to take when rules are matched.
3912 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3913 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3914 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3918 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3919 @cindex data type of locations
3920 @cindex default location type
3922 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3923 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3925 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3926 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3927 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3928 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3932 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3941 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3942 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3943 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3944 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3945 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3947 @node Actions and Locations
3948 @subsection Actions and Locations
3949 @cindex location actions
3950 @cindex actions, location
3953 @vindex @@@var{name}
3954 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3956 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3957 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3959 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3960 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3961 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3962 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3963 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3966 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3967 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3968 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3969 references construct.
3971 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3978 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3979 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3980 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3981 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3988 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3989 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3990 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3996 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3997 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3998 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4001 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4002 example above simply rewrites this way:
4015 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4016 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4017 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4024 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4025 from a semantic action.
4026 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4027 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4029 @node Location Default Action
4030 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4031 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4032 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4034 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4035 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4036 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4037 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4038 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4039 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4040 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4041 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4044 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4045 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4047 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4048 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4049 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4050 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4051 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4052 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4053 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4054 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4055 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4056 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4058 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4062 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4066 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4067 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4068 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4069 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4073 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4074 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4075 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4076 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4082 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4083 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4084 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4086 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4090 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4091 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4094 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4095 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4096 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4097 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4100 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4101 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4102 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4103 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4106 @node Named References
4107 @section Named References
4108 @cindex named references
4110 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4111 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4112 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4113 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4114 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4115 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4117 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4118 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4119 used as named references. For example:
4123 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4124 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4129 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4133 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4134 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4139 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4145 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4148 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4151 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4156 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4157 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4158 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4161 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4162 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4167 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4168 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4169 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4172 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4173 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4179 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4180 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4183 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
4184 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4188 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4189 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4190 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4191 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4192 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4193 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4194 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4196 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4200 @section Bison Declarations
4201 @cindex declarations, Bison
4202 @cindex Bison declarations
4204 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4205 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4208 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4209 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4210 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4211 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4213 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4214 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4215 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4216 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4236 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4237 @cindex version requirement
4238 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4241 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4242 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4246 %require "@var{version}"
4250 @subsection Token Type Names
4251 @cindex declaring token type names
4252 @cindex token type names, declaring
4253 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4256 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4262 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4263 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4264 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4266 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4267 @code{%precedence}, or
4268 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4269 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4272 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4273 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4274 following the token name:
4278 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4282 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4283 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4284 with each other or with normal characters.
4286 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4287 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4288 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4289 Than One Value Type}).
4295 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4299 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4303 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4304 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4305 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4312 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4313 equivalent literal string tokens:
4316 %token <operator> OR "||"
4317 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4322 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4323 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4324 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4325 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4326 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4327 the literal string instead of the token name.
4329 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4330 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4334 %token END 0 "end of file"
4337 @node Precedence Decl
4338 @subsection Operator Precedence
4339 @cindex precedence declarations
4340 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4341 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4343 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4344 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4345 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4346 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4347 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4348 operator precedence.
4350 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4351 @code{%token}: either
4354 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4361 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4364 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4365 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4366 all the @var{symbols}:
4370 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4371 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4372 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4373 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4374 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4375 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4376 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4377 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4378 considered a syntax error.
4380 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4381 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4382 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4385 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4386 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4387 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4388 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4389 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4392 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4393 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4394 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4395 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4400 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4401 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4405 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4406 @cindex declaring value types
4407 @cindex value types, declaring
4410 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4411 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4412 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4427 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4428 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4429 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4430 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4432 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4433 @code{union}. For example:
4445 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4446 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4449 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4450 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4451 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4453 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4454 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4456 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4457 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4458 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4459 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4467 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4472 and then your grammar can use the following
4473 instead of @code{%union}:
4486 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4487 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4488 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4492 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4493 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4494 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4497 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4501 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4502 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4503 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4504 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4505 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4508 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4509 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4510 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4511 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4513 @node Initial Action Decl
4514 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4515 @findex %initial-action
4517 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4518 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4521 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4522 @findex %initial-action
4523 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4524 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4525 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4526 @code{%parse-param}.
4529 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4532 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4535 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4540 @node Destructor Decl
4541 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4542 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4546 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4547 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4548 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4549 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4550 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4551 must discard the start symbol.
4553 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4554 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4555 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4556 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4558 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4559 symbol is automatically discarded.
4561 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4563 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4565 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4566 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4567 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4568 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4570 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4571 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4572 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4573 tag among @var{symbols}.
4574 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4575 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4576 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4578 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4579 (These default forms are experimental.
4580 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4582 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4583 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4584 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4585 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4587 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4588 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4589 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4590 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4591 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4598 %union @{ char *string; @}
4599 %token <string> STRING1
4600 %token <string> STRING2
4601 %type <string> string1
4602 %type <string> string2
4603 %union @{ char character; @}
4604 %token <character> CHR
4605 %type <character> chr
4608 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4609 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4610 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4611 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4615 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4616 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4617 to @code{free} by default.
4618 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4619 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4620 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4621 @code{free} only once.
4622 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4623 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4625 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4626 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4627 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4628 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4629 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4630 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4631 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4632 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4633 reference it in your grammar.
4634 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4635 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4641 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4642 @cindex mid-rule actions
4643 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4644 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4645 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4646 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4647 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4648 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4649 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4650 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4654 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4655 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4656 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4661 @cindex discarded symbols
4662 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4666 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4668 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4670 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4671 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4673 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4676 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4677 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4680 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4681 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4682 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4686 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4687 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4688 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4689 @cindex warnings, preventing
4690 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4694 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4695 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4696 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4697 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4698 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4699 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4701 The declaration looks like this:
4707 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4708 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4709 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4710 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4712 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4713 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4714 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4715 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4716 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4717 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4718 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4724 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4728 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4729 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4730 print the number of conflicts.
4733 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4734 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4735 go back to the beginning.
4738 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4739 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4740 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4743 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4744 but will keep silent otherwise.
4747 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4748 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4749 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4750 @cindex default start symbol
4753 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4754 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4755 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4762 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4763 @cindex reentrant parser
4765 @findex %define api.pure
4767 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4768 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4769 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4770 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4771 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4772 program must be called only within interlocks.
4774 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4775 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4776 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4777 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4778 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4780 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4781 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4782 reentrant. It looks like this:
4788 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4789 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4790 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4791 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4792 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4793 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4794 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4795 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4796 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4798 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4799 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4803 @subsection A Push Parser
4806 @findex %define api.push-pull
4808 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4809 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4811 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4812 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4813 each time a new token is made available.
4815 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4816 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4817 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4818 within a certain time period.
4820 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4821 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4822 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4825 %define api.push-pull push
4828 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4829 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4830 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4831 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4832 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4836 %define api.push-pull push
4839 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4840 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4841 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4842 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4844 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4845 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4846 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4847 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4848 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4849 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4850 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4851 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4855 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4857 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4858 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4859 yypstate_delete (ps);
4862 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4863 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4864 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4865 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4866 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4867 example would thus look like this:
4872 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4875 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4876 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4877 yypstate_delete (ps);
4880 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4881 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4883 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4884 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4885 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4886 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4887 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4888 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4889 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4890 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4891 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4892 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4893 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4894 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4895 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4896 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4897 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4898 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4899 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4903 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4904 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4905 yypstate_delete (ps);
4908 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4909 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4910 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
4913 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4914 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4915 @cindex declaration summary
4916 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4918 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4920 @deffn {Directive} %union
4921 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4922 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4925 @deffn {Directive} %token
4926 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4927 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4930 @deffn {Directive} %right
4931 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4932 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4935 @deffn {Directive} %left
4936 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4937 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4940 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4941 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4942 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4943 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4947 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4948 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4949 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4953 @deffn {Directive} %type
4954 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4955 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4958 @deffn {Directive} %start
4959 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4963 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4964 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4965 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4971 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4974 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4975 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4977 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4978 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4979 @xref{%code Summary}.
4982 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4983 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
4985 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4988 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4989 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4990 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4991 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4994 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4995 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4996 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4997 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4998 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5000 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5001 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5002 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5003 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5004 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5005 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5006 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5007 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5008 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5009 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5011 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5012 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5013 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5015 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5016 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5017 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5019 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5020 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5021 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5022 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5023 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5025 @findex %code requires
5026 @findex %code provides
5027 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5028 header also contains their code.
5029 @xref{%code Summary}.
5032 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5033 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5036 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5037 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5038 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5041 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5042 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5043 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5046 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5047 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5048 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5049 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5051 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5055 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5056 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5057 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5058 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5059 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5060 accurate syntax error messages.
5063 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5064 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5065 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5067 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5068 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5069 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5070 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5071 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5072 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5073 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5074 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5076 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5080 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5081 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5082 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5087 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5088 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5089 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5090 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5091 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5092 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5093 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5097 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5098 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5101 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5102 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5103 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5107 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5108 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5109 Require a Version of Bison}.
5112 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5113 Specify the skeleton to use.
5115 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5116 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5117 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5118 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5120 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5121 file in the Bison installation directory.
5122 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5123 directory of the grammar file.
5124 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5127 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5128 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5129 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5130 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5131 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5132 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5133 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5136 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5137 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5138 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5139 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5140 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5141 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5142 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5145 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5146 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5147 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5151 The highest token number, plus one.
5153 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5155 The number of grammar rules,
5157 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5161 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5162 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5163 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5164 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5168 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5169 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5170 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5174 @node %define Summary
5175 @subsection %define Summary
5177 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5178 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5179 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5180 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5181 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5182 @code{%define} directive:
5184 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5185 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5186 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5187 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5189 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5190 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5191 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5192 to specifying @code{""}.
5194 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5195 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5196 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5199 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5200 @code{%define} accepts.
5202 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5203 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5207 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5209 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5210 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5212 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5214 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5215 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5218 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5219 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5220 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5221 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5222 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5223 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5226 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5228 @findex %define api.namespace
5230 @item Languages(s): C++
5232 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5233 For example, if you specify:
5236 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5239 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5242 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5245 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5246 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5249 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5255 @item Accepted Values:
5256 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5257 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5259 @item Default Value:
5260 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5261 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5262 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5263 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5264 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5265 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5266 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5269 %define api.namespace "foo"
5270 %name-prefix "bar::"
5273 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5280 @c ================================================== api.pure
5282 @findex %define api.pure
5285 @item Language(s): C
5287 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5288 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5290 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5292 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5298 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5300 @findex %define api.push-pull
5303 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5305 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5306 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5307 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5308 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5310 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5312 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5318 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5319 @item api.tokens.prefix
5320 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5323 @item Languages(s): all
5326 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5327 target language. For instance
5330 %token FILE for ERROR
5331 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5333 start: FILE for ERROR;
5337 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5338 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5339 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5340 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5341 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5342 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5343 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5345 @item Accepted Values:
5346 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5347 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5348 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5350 @item Default Value:
5353 @c api.tokens.prefix
5356 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5358 @findex %define lex_symbol
5365 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5366 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5367 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5369 @item Accepted Values:
5372 @item Default Value:
5378 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5380 @item lr.default-reductions
5381 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5384 @item Language(s): all
5386 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5387 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5388 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5389 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5391 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5392 @item Default Value:
5394 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5395 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5399 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5401 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5402 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5405 @item Language(s): all
5406 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5407 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5408 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5409 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5411 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5413 @c ================================================== lr.type
5416 @findex %define lr.type
5419 @item Language(s): all
5421 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5422 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5423 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5425 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5427 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5431 @c ================================================== namespace
5433 @findex %define namespace
5434 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5438 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5440 @findex %define parse.assert
5443 @item Languages(s): C++
5445 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5446 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5448 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5450 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5452 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5457 @c ================================================== parse.error
5459 @findex %define parse.error
5464 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5465 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5467 @item Accepted Values:
5470 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5472 @item @code{verbose}
5473 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5474 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5478 @item Default Value:
5484 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5486 @findex %define parse.lac
5489 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5491 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5492 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5493 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5494 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5498 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5500 @findex %define parse.trace
5503 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5505 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5506 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser implementation
5507 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5508 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5510 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5512 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5516 @c ================================================== variant
5518 @findex %define variant
5525 Request variant-based semantic values.
5526 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5528 @item Accepted Values:
5531 @item Default Value:
5539 @subsection %code Summary
5543 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5544 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5545 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5546 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5547 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5548 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5549 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5550 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5552 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5553 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5554 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5555 in the parser implementation.
5557 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5558 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5559 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5561 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5564 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5565 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5566 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5567 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5568 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5569 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5573 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5574 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5575 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5578 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5579 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5583 @findex %code requires
5586 @item Language(s): C, C++
5588 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5589 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5590 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5591 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5592 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5594 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5595 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5600 @findex %code provides
5603 @item Language(s): C, C++
5605 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5606 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5608 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5609 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5617 @item Language(s): C, C++
5619 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5620 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5621 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5622 parser implementation file. For example:
5631 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5635 @findex %code imports
5638 @item Language(s): Java
5640 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5642 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5643 before any class definitions.
5647 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5648 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5649 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5650 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5653 @node Multiple Parsers
5654 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5656 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5657 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5658 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5659 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5661 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5662 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5663 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5664 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5665 names that do not conflict.
5667 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5668 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5669 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5670 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5671 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5672 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5673 @code{clex}, and so on.
5675 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5676 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5677 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5678 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5679 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5681 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5682 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5683 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5684 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5687 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5688 @cindex C-language interface
5691 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5692 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5693 functions that it needs to use.
5695 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5696 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5697 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5698 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5701 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5702 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5703 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5704 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5705 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5706 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5708 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5709 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5710 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5714 @node Parser Function
5715 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5718 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5719 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5720 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5721 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5722 without reading further.
5725 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5726 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5727 is due to end-of-input).
5729 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5730 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5733 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5736 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5741 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5746 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5749 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5750 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5751 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5753 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5754 @findex %parse-param
5755 Declare that one or more
5756 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5757 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5758 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5759 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5762 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5765 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5769 Then call the parser like this:
5773 int nastiness, randomness;
5774 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5775 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5781 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5784 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5787 @node Push Parser Function
5788 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5789 @findex yypush_parse
5791 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5792 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5794 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5795 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5796 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5797 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5799 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5800 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5801 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5802 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5805 @node Pull Parser Function
5806 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5807 @findex yypull_parse
5809 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5810 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5812 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5813 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5814 declaration is used.
5815 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5817 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5818 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5821 @node Parser Create Function
5822 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5823 @findex yypstate_new
5825 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5826 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5828 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5829 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5830 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5831 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5833 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5834 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5835 or 0 if no memory was available.
5836 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5840 @node Parser Delete Function
5841 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5842 @findex yypstate_delete
5844 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5845 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5847 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5848 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5849 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5850 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5852 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5853 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5854 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5858 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5860 @cindex lexical analyzer
5862 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5863 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5864 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5865 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5867 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5868 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5869 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5870 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5871 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5872 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5873 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5877 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5878 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5879 of the token it has read.
5880 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5881 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5883 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5884 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5887 @node Calling Convention
5888 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5890 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5891 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5892 signifies end-of-input.
5894 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5895 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5896 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5897 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5899 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5900 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5901 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5902 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5903 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5904 signifies end-of-input.
5906 Here is an example showing these things:
5913 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5916 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5917 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5919 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5925 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5926 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5928 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5929 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5933 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5934 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5935 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5936 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5939 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5940 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5941 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5942 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5943 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5946 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5947 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5948 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5949 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5952 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5955 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5956 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5957 strlen (token_buffer))
5958 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5959 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5964 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5965 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5969 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5972 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5973 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5974 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5975 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5981 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5982 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5987 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5988 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5989 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5990 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5991 declaration looks like this:
6004 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6009 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6010 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6015 @node Token Locations
6016 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6019 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6020 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6021 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6022 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6023 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6024 data in that variable.
6026 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6027 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6028 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6029 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6030 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6033 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6036 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6038 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6039 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6040 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6041 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6042 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6043 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6048 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6051 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6052 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6057 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6058 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6059 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6062 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6063 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6064 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6065 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6067 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6069 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6070 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6071 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6074 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6076 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6077 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6078 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6079 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6080 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6086 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6087 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6088 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6092 results in the following signature:
6095 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6096 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6099 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6102 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6103 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6107 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6110 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6111 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6112 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6115 @node Error Reporting
6116 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6117 @cindex error reporting function
6120 @cindex syntax error
6122 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6123 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6124 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6125 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6128 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6129 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6130 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6131 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6132 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6134 @findex %define parse.error
6135 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6136 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6137 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6138 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6139 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6141 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6142 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6143 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6144 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6145 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6146 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6148 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6149 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6150 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6152 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6157 yyerror (char const *s)
6161 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6166 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6167 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6168 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6169 immediately return 1.
6171 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6172 an access to the current location.
6173 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6174 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6175 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6179 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6180 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6183 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6186 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6187 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6190 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6191 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6192 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6193 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6197 /* Location tracking. */
6201 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6203 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6204 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6208 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6211 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6212 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6213 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6214 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6219 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6220 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6221 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6222 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6223 message is always passed last.
6225 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6226 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6227 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6231 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6232 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6233 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6234 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6236 @node Action Features
6237 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6238 @cindex summary, action features
6239 @cindex action features summary
6241 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6242 are useful in actions.
6244 @deffn {Variable} $$
6245 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6246 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6249 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6250 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6251 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6254 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6255 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6256 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6257 Types of Values in Actions}.
6260 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6261 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6262 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6263 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6266 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6267 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6268 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6271 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6272 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6273 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6276 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6278 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6279 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6280 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6281 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6282 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6283 going to be reduced by this rule.
6285 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6286 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6287 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6290 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6293 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6295 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6298 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6300 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6304 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6306 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6307 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6308 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6309 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6310 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6313 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6314 @findex YYRECOVERING
6315 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6316 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6317 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6320 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6321 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6322 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6323 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6324 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6326 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6329 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6330 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6332 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6334 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6337 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6338 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6339 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6340 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6343 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6344 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6345 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6346 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6348 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6351 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6352 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6353 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6354 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6356 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6361 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6362 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6365 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6369 @c int first_line, last_line;
6370 @c int first_column, last_column;
6374 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6375 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6377 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6378 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6379 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6382 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6385 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6387 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6388 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6392 @node Internationalization
6393 @section Parser Internationalization
6394 @cindex internationalization
6400 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6401 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6402 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6403 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6404 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6405 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6406 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6407 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6410 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6411 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6412 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6417 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6418 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6419 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6420 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6421 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6425 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6430 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6431 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6432 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6433 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6434 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6435 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6436 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6437 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6438 Bison-generated parser.
6441 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6442 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6443 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6447 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6450 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6451 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6452 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6456 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6457 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6458 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6461 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6467 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6471 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6477 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6478 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6479 @cindex algorithm of parser
6482 @cindex parser stack
6483 @cindex stack, parser
6485 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6486 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6487 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6489 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6490 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6493 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6494 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6495 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6496 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6497 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6498 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6499 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6501 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6508 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6509 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6512 expr: expr '*' expr;
6516 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6523 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6524 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6526 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6527 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6528 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6530 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6533 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6534 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6535 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6536 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6537 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6538 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6539 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6540 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6541 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6542 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6546 @section Lookahead Tokens
6547 @cindex lookahead token
6549 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6550 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6551 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6552 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6553 token in order to decide what to do.
6555 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6556 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6557 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6558 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6559 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6560 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6561 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6564 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6565 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6566 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6583 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6584 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6585 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6586 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6587 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6589 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6590 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6591 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6592 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6593 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6594 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6599 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6600 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6601 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6602 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6605 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6607 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6608 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6609 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6611 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6612 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6618 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6624 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6625 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6627 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6628 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6629 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6630 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6633 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6634 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6635 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6636 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6637 contrast it with the other alternative.
6639 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6640 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6644 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6646 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6649 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6650 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6651 making these two inputs equivalent:
6654 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6656 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6659 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6660 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6661 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6662 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6663 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6664 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6665 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6666 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6668 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6669 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6670 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6671 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6673 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6675 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6676 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6677 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6682 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6694 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6703 @section Operator Precedence
6704 @cindex operator precedence
6705 @cindex precedence of operators
6707 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6708 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6709 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6710 shift and when to reduce.
6713 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6714 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6715 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6716 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6717 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6720 @node Why Precedence
6721 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6723 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6724 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6738 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6739 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6740 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6741 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6742 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6743 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6744 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6747 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6748 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6749 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6750 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6751 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6752 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6753 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6754 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6757 @cindex associativity
6758 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6759 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6760 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6761 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6762 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6763 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6764 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6765 makes right-associativity.
6767 @node Using Precedence
6768 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6774 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6775 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6776 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6777 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6778 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6779 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6780 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6782 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6783 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6784 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6785 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6786 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6787 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6788 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6789 what expected the grammar author.
6791 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6792 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6793 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6794 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6795 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6797 @node Precedence Only
6798 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6801 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6802 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6803 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6804 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6805 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6806 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6807 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6809 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6810 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6811 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6815 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6818 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6819 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6820 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6821 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
6822 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
6823 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
6824 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
6831 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
6832 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
6833 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
6834 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
6835 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
6836 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
6837 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
6839 @node Precedence Examples
6840 @subsection Precedence Examples
6842 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6850 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6851 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6852 declared with @code{'-'}:
6855 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6861 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6862 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6863 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6865 @node How Precedence
6866 @subsection How Precedence Works
6868 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6869 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6870 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6871 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6872 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6873 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6875 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6876 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6877 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6878 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6879 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6880 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6881 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6884 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6885 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6887 @node Contextual Precedence
6888 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6889 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6890 @cindex unary operator precedence
6891 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6892 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6895 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6896 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6897 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6898 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6900 The Bison precedence declarations
6901 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6902 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6903 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6906 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6907 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6908 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6909 modifier's syntax is:
6912 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6916 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6917 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6918 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6919 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6920 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6922 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6923 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6924 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6934 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6941 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6946 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6947 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6948 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6949 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6951 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6952 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6953 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6954 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6956 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6957 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6958 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6959 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6960 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6961 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6963 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6964 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6968 @section Parser States
6969 @cindex finite-state machine
6970 @cindex parser state
6971 @cindex state (of parser)
6973 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6974 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6975 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6976 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6977 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6979 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6980 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6981 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6982 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6983 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6984 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6985 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6986 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6989 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6990 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6991 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6994 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6995 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6996 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6998 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6999 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7002 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7003 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7006 sequence: /* empty */
7007 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7010 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7013 maybeword: /* empty */
7014 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7016 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7021 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7022 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7023 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7024 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7025 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7026 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7028 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7029 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7030 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7032 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7033 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7034 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7035 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7036 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7038 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7039 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7040 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7041 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7044 sequence: /* empty */
7045 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7047 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7051 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7054 sequence: /* empty */
7056 | sequence redirects
7063 redirects:/* empty */
7064 | redirects redirect
7069 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7070 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7071 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7072 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7073 in infinitely many ways!
7075 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7076 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7077 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7078 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7080 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7084 sequence: /* empty */
7090 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7094 sequence: /* empty */
7096 | sequence redirects
7104 | redirects redirect
7108 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7109 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7110 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7112 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7120 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7124 | name_list ':' type
7142 | name ',' name_list
7147 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7148 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7149 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7150 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7154 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7156 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7157 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7158 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7160 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7161 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7162 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7163 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7164 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7165 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7166 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7169 @cindex canonical LR
7170 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7171 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7172 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7173 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7174 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7175 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7176 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7177 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7179 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7180 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7181 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7182 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7183 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7194 /* This rule is never used. */
7200 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7201 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7202 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7203 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7204 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7205 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7207 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7208 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7209 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7210 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7211 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7212 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7217 | name_list ':' type
7225 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7226 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7231 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7232 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7233 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7234 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7235 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7236 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7237 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7239 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7240 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7241 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7242 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7244 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7245 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7248 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7249 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7250 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7251 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7254 @node LR Table Construction
7255 @subsection LR Table Construction
7256 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7259 @cindex canonical LR
7260 @findex %define lr.type
7262 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7263 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7264 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7265 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7268 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7269 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7270 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7271 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7274 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7275 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7276 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7279 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7280 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7281 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7284 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7286 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7289 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7293 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7297 %define lr.type ielr
7300 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7301 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7302 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7303 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7304 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7305 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7306 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7307 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7308 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7309 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7311 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7312 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7313 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7314 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7320 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7323 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7325 @cindex GLR with LALR
7326 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7327 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7328 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7329 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7330 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7331 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7332 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7333 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7334 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7335 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7337 @item Malformed grammars.
7339 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7340 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7341 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7342 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7343 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7348 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7349 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7350 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7351 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7352 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7353 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7354 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7355 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7356 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7360 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7363 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7364 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7365 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7366 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7367 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7368 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7369 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7370 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7371 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7372 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7373 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7374 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7377 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7378 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7379 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7381 @node Default Reductions
7382 @subsection Default Reductions
7383 @cindex default reductions
7384 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7387 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7388 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7389 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7390 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7391 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7393 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7394 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7397 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7399 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7400 @cindex consistent states
7401 @cindex defaulted states
7402 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7403 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7404 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7405 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7406 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7407 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7408 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7409 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7410 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7411 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7412 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7414 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7415 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7416 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7417 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7418 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7419 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7420 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7421 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7422 should already be considered closed.
7424 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7426 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7427 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7428 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7429 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7430 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7431 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7432 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7433 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7434 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7438 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7439 @c sentence from being rejected.
7440 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7441 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7442 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7443 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7444 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7445 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7448 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7449 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7450 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7451 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7452 because the accept action ends the parse.
7454 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7455 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7456 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7457 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7458 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7459 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7460 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7461 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7462 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7463 split the parse instead.
7465 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7466 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7468 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7469 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7470 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7472 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7473 @item @code{consistent}
7474 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7477 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7478 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7483 @findex %define parse.lac
7485 @cindex lookahead correction
7487 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7488 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7489 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7490 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7491 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7492 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7493 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7494 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7495 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7497 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7498 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7499 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7500 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7501 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7503 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7504 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7505 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7506 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7508 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7509 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7511 @item @code{none} (default)
7514 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7515 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7519 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7520 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7521 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7522 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7523 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7524 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7525 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7526 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7527 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7528 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7531 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7532 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7533 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7534 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7535 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7536 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7537 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7538 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7539 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7540 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7542 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7543 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7544 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7545 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7546 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7547 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7548 language-recognition power.
7550 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7553 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7555 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7556 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7557 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7558 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7561 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7563 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7564 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7565 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7566 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7567 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7568 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7572 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7573 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7574 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7575 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7576 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7577 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7578 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7579 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7580 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7581 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7582 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7585 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7586 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7587 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7589 @node Unreachable States
7590 @subsection Unreachable States
7591 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7592 @cindex unreachable states
7594 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7595 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7596 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7597 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7599 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7600 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7601 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7602 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7604 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7605 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7606 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7609 There are a few caveats to consider:
7612 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7614 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7615 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7616 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7617 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7618 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7619 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7621 @item Other useless states.
7623 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7624 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7625 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7626 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7627 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7628 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7629 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7632 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7633 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7635 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7636 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7637 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7639 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7640 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7641 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7642 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7643 context-free languages.
7644 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7645 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7646 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7647 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7648 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7649 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7650 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7651 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7653 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7654 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7655 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7656 parser uses the same basic
7657 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7658 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7659 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7660 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7662 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7663 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7664 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7665 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7666 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7668 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7669 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7670 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7671 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7672 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7673 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7674 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7675 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7676 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7677 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7678 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7681 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7682 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7683 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7684 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7685 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7686 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7687 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7688 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7689 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7690 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7691 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7692 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7694 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7695 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7696 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7698 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7699 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7700 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7701 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7702 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7703 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7704 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7705 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7706 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7707 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7708 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7709 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7711 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7714 @node Memory Management
7715 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7716 @cindex memory exhaustion
7717 @cindex memory management
7718 @cindex stack overflow
7719 @cindex parser stack overflow
7720 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7722 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7723 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7724 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7726 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7727 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7728 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7731 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7732 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7733 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7734 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7736 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7737 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7738 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7739 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7740 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7741 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7743 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7744 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7745 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7748 @cindex default stack limit
7749 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7753 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7754 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7755 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7756 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7757 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7759 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7761 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7762 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7763 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7764 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7765 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7766 non-trivial copy constructors.
7767 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7770 @node Error Recovery
7771 @chapter Error Recovery
7772 @cindex error recovery
7773 @cindex recovery from errors
7775 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7776 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7777 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7780 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7781 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7782 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7783 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7784 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7785 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7786 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7789 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7790 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7791 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7792 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7793 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7794 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7799 stmnts: /* empty string */
7805 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7806 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7808 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7809 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7810 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7811 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7812 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7813 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7814 applicable in the ordinary way.
7816 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7817 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7818 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7819 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7820 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7821 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7822 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7823 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7824 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7825 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7826 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7827 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7829 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7830 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7831 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7834 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7837 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7838 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7839 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7840 spurious error message:
7843 primary: '(' expr ')'
7849 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7850 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7851 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7852 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7853 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7854 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7855 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7858 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7859 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7860 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7861 error messages resume.
7863 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7864 as any other rules can.
7867 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7868 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7869 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7870 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7873 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7874 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7875 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7877 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7879 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7880 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7881 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7882 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7883 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7885 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7886 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7887 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7888 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7891 @node Context Dependency
7892 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7894 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7895 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7896 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7897 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7901 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7902 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7903 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7904 error recovery rules must be written.
7907 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7908 neither clean nor robust.)
7910 @node Semantic Tokens
7911 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7913 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7914 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7920 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7921 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7922 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7924 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7925 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7926 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7927 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7928 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7930 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7931 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7932 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7933 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7934 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7935 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7936 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7938 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7939 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7940 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7941 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7945 typedef int foo, bar;
7948 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7949 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7954 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7955 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7957 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7958 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7959 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7960 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7961 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7965 declarator maybeasm '='
7967 | declarator maybeasm
7971 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7973 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7978 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7979 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7980 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7982 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7983 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7984 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7985 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7986 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7987 the syntactic context.
7989 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7990 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7991 @cindex lexical tie-in
7993 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7994 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7997 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7998 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7999 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8000 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8001 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8008 void yyerror (char const *);
8022 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8036 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8037 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8038 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8040 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8041 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8042 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8045 @node Tie-in Recovery
8046 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8048 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8049 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8051 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8052 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8053 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8054 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8058 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8065 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8066 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8067 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8068 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8069 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8071 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8073 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8074 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8075 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8087 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8088 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8089 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8090 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8092 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8093 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8094 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8095 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8096 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8097 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8100 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8103 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8105 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
8106 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
8107 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
8108 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
8109 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
8110 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
8113 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8114 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8118 @section Understanding Your Parser
8120 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8121 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8122 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8123 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8124 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8126 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8127 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
8128 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8129 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8130 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8131 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8132 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8134 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8151 @command{bison} reports:
8154 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8155 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8156 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8157 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8158 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8161 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8162 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8163 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8164 interpretation is the same.
8166 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
8167 to precedence and/or associativity:
8170 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
8171 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
8172 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
8177 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8180 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8181 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8182 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8183 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8187 @cindex token, useless
8188 @cindex useless token
8189 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8190 @cindex useless nonterminal
8191 @cindex rule, useless
8192 @cindex useless rule
8193 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
8194 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
8195 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
8196 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
8200 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
8203 Terminals unused in grammar:
8206 Rules useless in grammar:
8211 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
8217 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
8218 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
8219 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
8220 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
8221 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
8226 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8229 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8239 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8244 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8249 @cindex pointed rule
8250 @cindex rule, pointed
8251 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8252 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8253 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
8254 that the input cursor.
8259 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8261 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8266 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8267 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8268 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8269 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8270 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8271 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
8272 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8273 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8275 @cindex core, item set
8276 @cindex item set core
8277 @cindex kernel, item set
8278 @cindex item set core
8279 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8280 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8281 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8282 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8283 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8284 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
8290 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8291 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8292 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8293 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8294 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8295 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8297 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8308 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8310 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8314 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8315 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8316 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8317 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8322 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8323 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8324 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8325 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8326 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8328 $ shift, and go to state 3
8329 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8330 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8331 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8332 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8336 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8337 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
8338 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
8339 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
8340 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
8341 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
8343 @cindex accepting state
8344 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8350 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8356 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8357 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8359 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8365 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8367 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8373 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8375 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8381 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8383 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8389 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8391 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8396 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8402 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8403 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8404 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8405 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8406 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8408 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8409 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8411 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8412 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8415 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8416 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8417 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8418 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8419 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8420 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8421 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8422 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8424 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8425 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8426 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8429 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8430 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8431 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8432 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8433 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8434 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8435 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8436 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8437 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8438 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8439 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8440 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8445 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8446 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8447 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8448 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8449 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8451 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8452 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8454 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8455 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8458 The remaining states are similar:
8463 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8464 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8465 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8466 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8467 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8469 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8470 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8472 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8473 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8477 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8478 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8479 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8480 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8481 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8483 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8485 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8486 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8490 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8491 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8492 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8493 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8494 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8496 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8497 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8498 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8499 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8501 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8502 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8503 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8504 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8505 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8509 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8510 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8511 @samp{*}, but also because the
8512 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8516 @section Tracing Your Parser
8519 @cindex tracing the parser
8521 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8522 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8524 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8527 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8529 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8530 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8531 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8532 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8535 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8536 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8537 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8539 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8541 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8542 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8543 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8545 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8546 @findex %define parse.trace
8547 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
8548 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8549 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8550 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
8551 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
8554 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8557 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8558 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8559 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8560 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8561 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8562 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8564 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8565 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8566 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8567 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8569 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8570 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8571 messages tell you these things:
8575 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8578 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8579 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8582 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8583 of the state stack afterward.
8586 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8587 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8588 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8589 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8590 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8591 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8592 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8593 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8594 grammar are to blame.
8596 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8597 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8598 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8599 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8600 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8603 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8604 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8605 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8606 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8607 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8608 value (from @code{yylval}).
8610 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8611 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8615 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8616 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8619 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8622 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8625 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8626 else if (type == NUM)
8627 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8631 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8634 @chapter Invoking Bison
8635 @cindex invoking Bison
8636 @cindex Bison invocation
8637 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8639 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8645 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8646 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8647 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8648 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8649 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8650 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8651 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8652 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8653 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8654 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8655 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8660 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8663 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8666 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8669 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8671 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8672 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8673 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8676 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8677 in alphabetical order by short options.
8678 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8679 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8683 @section Bison Options
8685 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8686 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8687 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8688 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8689 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8692 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8693 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8696 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8702 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8706 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8708 @item --print-localedir
8709 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8711 @item --print-datadir
8712 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8716 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8717 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8718 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8719 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8720 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8721 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8722 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8723 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8724 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8725 for compatibility with POSIX:
8732 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8733 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8734 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8735 this option is specified.
8737 @item -W [@var{category}]
8738 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8739 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8742 @item midrule-values
8743 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8745 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8748 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8751 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8752 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8755 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8758 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8759 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8760 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8763 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8767 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8768 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8769 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8770 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8771 no effect on the conflict report.
8774 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8776 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8777 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8783 Turn off all the warnings.
8785 Treat warnings as errors.
8788 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8789 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8790 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8799 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8800 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8801 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8803 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8804 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8805 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8806 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8807 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8808 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8809 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8813 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8816 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8817 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8818 definition for @var{name}.
8820 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8821 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8822 definitions for @var{name}.
8824 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8825 definitions for @var{name}.
8828 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8829 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8830 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8832 @item -L @var{language}
8833 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8834 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8835 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8836 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8837 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8839 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8843 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8845 @item -p @var{prefix}
8846 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8847 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8848 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8852 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8853 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8854 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8855 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8856 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8857 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8860 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8861 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8862 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8864 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8865 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8866 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8867 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8869 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8870 file in the Bison installation directory.
8871 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8872 current working directory.
8873 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8876 @itemx --token-table
8877 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8884 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8885 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8886 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8887 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8890 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8891 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8892 with other short options.
8894 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8895 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8896 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8897 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8899 @item -r @var{things}
8900 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8901 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8902 separated list of @var{things} among:
8906 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8910 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8911 each rule's lookahead set.
8914 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8915 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8918 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8919 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8923 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8924 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8925 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8928 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8929 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8931 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8932 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8934 @item -g [@var{file}]
8935 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8936 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8937 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8938 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8939 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8940 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8943 @item -x [@var{file}]
8944 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8945 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8946 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8947 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8949 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8950 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8953 @node Option Cross Key
8954 @section Option Cross Key
8956 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8957 the corresponding short option and directive.
8959 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8960 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8961 @include cross-options.texi
8965 @section Yacc Library
8967 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8968 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8969 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8970 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8971 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8972 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8973 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8975 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8976 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8979 int yyerror (char const *);
8982 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8983 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8984 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8990 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8992 @node Other Languages
8993 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8996 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8997 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9001 @section C++ Parsers
9004 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9005 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9006 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9007 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9008 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9009 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9012 @node C++ Bison Interface
9013 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9014 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9018 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9019 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9020 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9021 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9023 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9025 @findex %define api.namespace
9026 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9027 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9028 in the following files:
9033 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9034 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9037 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9040 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9041 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9042 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9043 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9044 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9046 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9047 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9048 @samp{%defines} directive.
9051 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9052 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9054 @node C++ Semantic Values
9055 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9056 @c - No objects in unions
9058 @c - Printer and destructor
9060 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9061 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9062 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9063 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9066 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9067 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9071 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9073 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9074 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9075 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9078 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9079 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9080 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9082 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9083 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9084 to such objects are allowed.
9087 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9088 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9089 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9093 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9095 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9096 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9097 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9098 types can be used without pointers.
9100 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9101 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9102 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9103 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9105 For instance, instead of
9113 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9114 %token <sval> STRING;
9121 %token <int> NUMBER;
9122 %token <std::string> STRING;
9125 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9126 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9129 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9130 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9131 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9133 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9134 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9135 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9136 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9137 eventually, destroyed.
9139 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9140 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9141 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9144 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9145 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9149 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9150 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9151 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9152 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9153 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9154 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9155 that would be duplicating the information.
9157 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9158 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9159 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9160 (the current implementation of) variants:
9163 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9164 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9165 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9166 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9167 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9168 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9171 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9172 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9173 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9174 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9175 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9176 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9179 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9182 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9183 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9185 @node C++ Location Values
9186 @subsection C++ Location Values
9190 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9192 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9193 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9194 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9195 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9198 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
9199 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9200 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9201 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9202 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9205 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
9206 The line, starting at 1.
9209 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9210 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9213 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
9214 The column, starting at 0.
9217 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9218 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9221 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9222 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9223 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9224 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9225 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9228 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9229 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9230 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9231 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9234 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
9235 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
9236 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9239 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9240 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9241 Advance the @code{end} position.
9244 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
9245 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
9246 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
9247 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9250 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9251 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9255 @node C++ Parser Interface
9256 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9257 @c - define parser_class_name
9259 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9261 @c - Reporting errors
9263 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9264 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9265 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9266 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9267 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9268 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9269 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9270 additional argument for its constructor.
9272 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9273 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9274 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9277 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9278 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
9279 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
9280 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9281 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9282 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9285 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9286 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9287 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
9288 equivalent with first
9289 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9290 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9291 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9292 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9293 function invoked from the user action.
9296 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9297 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9298 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9301 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9302 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9303 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9306 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9307 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9310 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9311 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9312 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9316 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9317 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9318 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9319 or nonzero, full tracing.
9322 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9323 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9324 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9325 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9326 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9331 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9332 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9333 @c - prefix for yylex.
9334 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9337 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9338 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9339 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9340 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9343 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9344 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9348 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9350 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9352 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9353 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9354 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9355 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9356 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9359 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9360 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9362 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9366 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9367 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9370 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9371 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9375 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9376 initialized. So the code would look like:
9380 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9381 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9384 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9385 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9394 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9395 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9398 yylval.build(yytext);
9399 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9404 @node Complete Symbols
9405 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9407 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9408 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9409 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9410 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9411 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9413 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9414 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9415 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9419 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9420 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9421 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9422 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9424 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9426 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9427 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9428 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9429 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9430 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9431 also pass the @var{location}.
9434 For instance, given the following declarations:
9437 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9438 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9439 %token <int> INTEGER;
9444 Bison generates the following functions:
9447 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9448 const location_type& l);
9449 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9450 const location_type& loc);
9451 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9455 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9458 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9459 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9460 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9463 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9464 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9466 @node A Complete C++ Example
9467 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9469 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9470 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9471 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9472 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9473 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9474 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9475 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9476 actually easier to interface with.
9479 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9480 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9481 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9482 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9483 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9486 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9487 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9489 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9490 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9491 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9492 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9493 of valid input follows.
9497 seven := one + two * three
9501 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9502 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9504 @c - A place to store error messages
9505 @c - A place for the result
9507 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9508 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9509 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9510 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9511 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9512 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9513 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9515 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9516 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9517 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9520 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9522 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9523 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9526 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9531 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9532 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9533 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9534 factor both as follows.
9536 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9538 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9540 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9541 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9546 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9549 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9551 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9556 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9558 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9564 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
9565 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
9567 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9569 // Handling the scanner.
9572 bool trace_scanning;
9576 Similarly for the parser itself.
9578 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9580 // Run the parser on file F.
9581 // Return 0 on success.
9582 int parse (const std::string& f);
9583 // The name of the file being parsed.
9584 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
9586 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
9591 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9592 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9593 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9594 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9596 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9599 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9600 void error (const std::string& m);
9602 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9605 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9606 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9607 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9608 messages and set error state.
9610 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9612 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9613 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9615 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9616 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9618 variables["one"] = 1;
9619 variables["two"] = 2;
9622 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9627 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9631 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9632 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9633 int res = parser.parse ();
9639 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9641 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9645 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9647 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9652 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9654 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9655 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9656 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9657 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9660 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9662 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9663 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9665 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9669 @findex %define variant
9670 @findex %define lex_symbol
9671 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
9672 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
9673 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
9674 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
9676 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9679 %define parse.assert
9684 @findex %code requires
9685 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
9686 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
9687 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
9688 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
9689 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9690 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
9691 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
9693 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9698 class calcxx_driver;
9703 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9704 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9707 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9709 // The parsing context.
9710 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9714 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
9715 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9716 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9719 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9724 // Initialize the initial location.
9725 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9730 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9731 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9734 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9737 %define parse.error verbose
9742 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9743 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9745 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9749 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9755 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9756 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
9757 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
9758 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
9759 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.tokens.prefix}).
9761 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9763 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9777 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
9778 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
9781 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9783 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9784 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
9789 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
9790 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
9791 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
9794 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9795 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9797 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <*>;
9801 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
9802 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
9804 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9808 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9811 assignments assignment @{@}
9812 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9815 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
9820 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9821 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9822 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9823 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9824 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
9825 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
9826 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
9831 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9834 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9837 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
9838 const std::string& m)
9840 driver.error (l, m);
9844 @node Calc++ Scanner
9845 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9847 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9848 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9850 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9852 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9857 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9858 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9860 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9861 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9862 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9863 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
9867 // The location of the current token.
9868 static yy::location loc;
9873 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9874 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9875 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9876 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
9878 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9880 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9884 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9886 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9888 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9894 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9895 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9896 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
9897 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
9898 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9899 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9900 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9902 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9905 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
9906 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
9910 // Code run each time yylex is called.
9913 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
9914 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
9918 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
9920 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9922 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
9923 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
9924 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
9925 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
9926 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
9927 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
9928 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
9932 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9933 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9934 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
9935 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
9937 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9938 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
9939 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
9944 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
9945 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9947 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9950 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9952 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9955 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9957 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9963 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9969 @node Calc++ Top Level
9970 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9972 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9974 @comment file: calc++.cc
9977 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9980 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9983 calcxx_driver driver;
9984 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9985 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9986 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9987 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9988 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9989 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9990 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9998 @section Java Parsers
10001 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10002 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10003 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10004 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10005 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10006 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10007 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10008 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10011 @node Java Bison Interface
10012 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10013 @c - %language "Java"
10015 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10016 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10018 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10019 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10021 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10022 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10023 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10024 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10025 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10026 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10027 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10028 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10029 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10030 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10032 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10034 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10035 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10036 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10037 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10040 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10041 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10043 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10044 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10046 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10047 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10049 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10050 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10051 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10053 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10054 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10055 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10057 if needed. Also, in the future the
10058 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10059 access the token names and codes.
10061 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10062 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10063 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10064 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10067 @node Java Semantic Values
10068 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10069 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10071 @c - Printer and destructor
10073 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10074 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10075 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10078 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10079 %type <Integer> number
10082 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10083 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10084 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10085 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10086 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10089 %define stype "ASTNode"
10093 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10094 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10096 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10097 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10098 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10099 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10100 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10101 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10103 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10104 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10105 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10107 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10108 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10109 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10112 @node Java Location Values
10113 @subsection Java Location Values
10115 @c - class Position
10116 @c - class Location
10118 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10119 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10120 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10121 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10122 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10123 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10124 renamed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10126 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10127 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10128 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10129 be supplied by the user.
10132 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10133 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10134 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10137 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10138 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10141 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10142 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10145 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10146 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10147 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10148 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10152 @node Java Parser Interface
10153 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10154 @c - define parser_class_name
10156 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10158 @c - Reporting errors
10160 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10161 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10162 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10163 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10164 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10166 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10167 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10168 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10169 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10170 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10171 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10172 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10173 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10175 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10176 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10177 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10178 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10180 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10181 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10182 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10183 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10184 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10185 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10187 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10188 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10189 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10190 which initialize them automatically.
10192 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10193 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10194 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10195 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10197 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10198 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10199 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10202 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10203 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10204 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
10207 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10208 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10209 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
10211 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10212 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10213 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncatch exceptions.
10216 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10217 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10218 @code{false} otherwise.
10221 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
10222 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
10223 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
10224 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
10225 verbose error messages.
10228 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10229 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
10230 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10231 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10232 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10233 available only if location tracking is active.
10236 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10237 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10238 from a syntax error.
10239 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10242 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10243 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10244 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10248 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10249 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10250 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10251 or nonzero, full tracing.
10254 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
10255 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
10256 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
10260 @node Java Scanner Interface
10261 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10264 @c - Lexer interface
10266 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10267 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10268 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10269 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10270 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10273 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10274 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10275 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10276 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10279 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10280 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10281 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10282 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10285 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10287 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10288 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10289 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10290 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10293 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10294 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10295 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10298 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10299 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10302 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10303 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10304 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10305 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10306 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10308 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10309 "@var{class-name}".}
10312 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10313 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10315 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10316 "@var{class-name}".}
10320 @node Java Action Features
10321 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10323 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10324 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10326 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10327 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10330 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10331 This may not be assigned to.
10332 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10335 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10336 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10337 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10341 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10342 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10343 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10344 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10345 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10346 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10349 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10350 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10351 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10352 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10354 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10358 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10359 This may not be assigned to.
10360 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10364 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10365 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10368 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
10369 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10370 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10373 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
10374 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10375 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10378 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
10379 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
10380 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10383 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10384 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10385 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10387 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10390 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10391 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10392 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10393 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10394 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10395 available only if location tracking is active.
10399 @node Java Differences
10400 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10402 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10403 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10404 section summarizes these differences.
10408 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10409 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10410 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10411 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10412 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10413 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10414 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10416 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10417 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10418 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10419 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10420 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10423 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10424 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10425 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10426 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10427 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10428 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10429 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10430 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10431 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10434 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10436 @item @code{%code imports}
10437 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10438 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10439 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10441 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10442 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10444 @item @code{%code lexer}
10445 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10446 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10447 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10451 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10452 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10453 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10455 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10456 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10461 @node Java Declarations Summary
10462 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10464 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10465 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10467 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10468 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10471 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10472 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10473 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10474 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10475 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10478 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10479 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10480 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10481 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10484 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10485 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10486 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10487 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10490 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10491 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10492 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10495 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10496 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10497 a Java @emph{type}.
10498 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10501 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10502 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10503 @xref{Java Differences}.
10506 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10507 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10508 @xref{Java Differences}.
10511 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10512 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10513 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10516 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10517 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10518 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10521 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10522 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10523 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10524 @xref{Java Differences}.
10527 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10528 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10529 @xref{Java Differences}.
10532 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10533 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10534 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10537 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10538 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10539 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10542 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10543 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10544 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10547 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10548 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10549 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10552 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10553 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10555 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10558 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10559 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
10560 constructor. Default is none.
10561 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10564 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10565 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10566 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10567 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10570 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10571 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10572 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10573 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10574 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10577 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10578 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10579 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10582 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10583 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10584 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10585 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10588 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10589 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10590 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10591 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10594 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10595 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10596 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10599 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10600 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10601 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10604 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10605 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10606 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10609 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10610 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10611 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10612 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10616 @c ================================================= FAQ
10619 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10620 @cindex frequently asked questions
10623 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10627 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10628 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10629 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10630 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10631 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10632 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10633 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10634 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10635 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10636 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10637 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10638 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10641 @node Memory Exhausted
10642 @section Memory Exhausted
10645 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10646 message. What can I do?
10649 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10652 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10653 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10655 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10656 following typical questions:
10659 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10660 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10661 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10668 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10669 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10670 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10673 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10674 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10675 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10676 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10677 @file{first-line.l}:
10682 #include <stdlib.h>
10685 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10688 yyparse (char const *file)
10690 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10693 /* One token only. */
10695 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10710 If the file @file{input} contains
10718 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10721 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10722 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10723 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10728 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10729 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10730 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10731 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10732 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10733 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10734 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10735 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10738 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10739 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10740 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10741 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10743 @node Strings are Destroyed
10744 @section Strings are Destroyed
10747 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10748 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10749 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10752 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10753 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10754 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10759 char *yylval = NULL;
10762 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10768 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10769 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10770 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10771 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10776 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10779 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10780 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10781 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10787 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10788 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10789 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10790 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10791 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10792 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10795 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10796 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10797 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10802 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10803 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10806 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10807 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10810 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10811 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10812 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10813 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10814 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10815 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10816 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10818 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10820 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10821 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10822 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10823 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10824 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10825 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10828 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10829 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10832 @node Multiple start-symbols
10833 @section Multiple start-symbols
10836 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10837 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10838 multiple entry points.
10841 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10842 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10843 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10844 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10848 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10850 start: START_FOO foo
10854 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10855 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10857 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10858 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10859 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10860 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10861 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10862 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10863 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10864 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10867 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10872 int t = start_token;
10877 /* @r{The rules.} */
10881 @node Secure? Conform?
10882 @section Secure? Conform?
10885 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10888 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10889 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10890 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10891 please send us a bug report.
10893 @node I can't build Bison
10894 @section I can't build Bison
10897 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10898 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10902 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10903 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10904 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10905 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10906 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10907 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10908 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10911 @node Where can I find help?
10912 @section Where can I find help?
10915 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10918 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10919 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10920 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10921 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10922 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10923 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10924 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10925 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10929 @section Bug Reports
10932 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10935 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10936 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10937 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10938 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10939 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10941 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10942 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10943 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10944 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10945 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10947 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10948 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10949 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10950 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10951 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10952 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10954 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10955 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10957 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10959 @node More Languages
10960 @section More Languages
10963 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10964 favorite language here}?
10967 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10968 languages; contributions are welcome.
10971 @section Beta Testing
10974 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10977 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10978 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10979 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10980 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10981 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10982 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10983 essentially halted.
10985 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10986 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10987 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10988 systems are especially welcome.
10990 @node Mailing Lists
10991 @section Mailing Lists
10994 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10997 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10999 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11001 @node Table of Symbols
11002 @appendix Bison Symbols
11003 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11004 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11006 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11007 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11008 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11011 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11012 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11013 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11016 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11017 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11021 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11022 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11026 @deffn {Variable} $$
11027 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11031 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11032 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11033 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11036 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11037 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11041 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11042 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11046 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11047 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11048 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11049 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11052 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11053 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11054 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11055 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11056 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11060 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11061 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11062 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11063 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11064 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11065 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11066 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11068 This feature is experimental.
11069 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11073 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11074 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11077 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11078 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11082 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11083 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11086 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11087 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11088 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11091 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11092 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11095 This feature is experimental.
11096 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11099 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11102 @deffn {Directive} <>
11103 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11106 This feature is experimental.
11107 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11110 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11113 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11114 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11115 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11116 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11119 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11120 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11121 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11122 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11123 @xref{%code Summary}.
11126 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11127 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11131 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11132 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11133 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11138 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11139 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11140 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11141 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11144 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11145 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11146 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11149 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11150 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11151 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11154 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11155 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11156 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11159 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11160 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11161 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11165 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11166 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11167 used in the grammar.
11170 @deffn {Symbol} error
11171 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11172 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11173 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11174 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11175 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11176 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11177 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11178 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11181 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11182 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
11183 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11186 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11187 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11191 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11192 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11193 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11196 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11197 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11200 @deffn {Directive} %language
11201 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11202 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11205 @deffn {Directive} %left
11206 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
11207 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11210 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11211 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
11212 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11216 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11217 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11218 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11219 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11220 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11223 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11224 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11228 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11229 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11230 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11235 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11236 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11237 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11240 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11241 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
11242 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11245 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11246 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11247 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11250 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11251 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
11252 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
11253 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11256 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11257 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
11258 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11261 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11262 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11263 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11266 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
11267 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
11268 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11271 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11272 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11273 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11274 unreasonable usage.
11277 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11278 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11279 Require a Version of Bison}.
11282 @deffn {Directive} %right
11283 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11284 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11287 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11288 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11289 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11292 @deffn {Directive} %start
11293 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11297 @deffn {Directive} %token
11298 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11299 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11302 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11303 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11304 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11307 @deffn {Directive} %type
11308 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11309 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11312 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11313 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11314 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11318 @deffn {Directive} %union
11319 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11320 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11323 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11324 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11325 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11326 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11327 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11329 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11333 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11334 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11335 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11336 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11338 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11342 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11343 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11344 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11347 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11348 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11349 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11350 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11351 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11354 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11355 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11356 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11359 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11360 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11361 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11364 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11365 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11366 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11367 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11370 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11371 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11372 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11375 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11376 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
11377 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
11378 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
11379 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11381 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11385 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11386 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11387 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11390 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11391 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11392 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11393 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11394 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11395 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11396 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11399 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11400 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11401 @xref{Memory Management}.
11404 @deffn {Function} yylex
11405 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11406 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11410 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11411 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11412 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11413 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11414 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11417 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11418 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11419 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11420 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11422 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11424 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11425 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11426 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11429 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11430 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11431 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11434 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11435 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11436 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11437 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11439 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11440 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11441 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11444 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11445 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11449 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11450 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11451 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11452 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11453 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11456 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11457 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11458 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11461 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11462 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11463 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11464 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11465 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11466 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11467 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11470 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11471 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11472 call this function to create a new parser.
11473 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11474 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11475 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11476 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11479 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11480 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11481 parse the rest of the input stream.
11482 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11483 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11484 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11485 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11488 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11489 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11490 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11491 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11492 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11493 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11496 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11497 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11498 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11499 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11500 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11503 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11504 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11505 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11506 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11509 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11510 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11511 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11512 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11513 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11514 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11515 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11517 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11518 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11519 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11520 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11521 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11522 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11523 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11526 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11527 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11528 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11536 @item Accepting state
11537 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11538 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11539 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11541 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11542 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11543 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11544 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11545 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11547 @item Consistent state
11548 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11550 @item Context-free grammars
11551 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11552 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11553 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11554 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11557 @item Default reduction
11558 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11559 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11560 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11561 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11564 @item Defaulted state
11565 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11567 @item Dynamic allocation
11568 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11569 compile time or on entry to a function.
11572 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11573 character string of length zero.
11575 @item Finite-state stack machine
11576 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11577 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11578 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11579 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11580 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11581 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11583 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11584 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11585 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11586 deterministic parsing
11587 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11588 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11589 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11593 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11594 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11595 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11597 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11598 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11599 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11600 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11601 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11602 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11603 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11604 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11605 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11606 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11608 @item Infix operator
11609 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11610 performs some operation.
11613 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11615 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11616 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11617 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11618 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11619 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11620 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11621 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11623 @item Language construct
11624 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11625 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11626 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11628 @item Left associativity
11629 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11630 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11631 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11633 @item Left recursion
11634 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11635 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11638 @item Left-to-right parsing
11639 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11640 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11642 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11643 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11644 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11646 @item Lexical tie-in
11647 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11648 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11650 @item Literal string token
11651 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11653 @item Lookahead token
11654 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11658 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11659 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11660 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11663 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11664 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11666 @item Nonterminal symbol
11667 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11668 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11669 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11672 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11673 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11676 @item Postfix operator
11677 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11678 performs some operation.
11681 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11682 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11686 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11687 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11688 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11690 @item Reverse polish notation
11691 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11693 @item Right recursion
11694 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11695 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11699 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11700 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11701 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11704 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11705 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11706 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11708 @item Single-character literal
11709 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11710 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11713 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11714 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11715 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11716 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11719 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11720 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11721 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11724 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11725 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11728 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11729 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11730 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11731 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11733 @item Terminal symbol
11734 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11735 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11736 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11738 @item Unreachable state
11739 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11740 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11741 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11744 @node Copying This Manual
11745 @appendix Copying This Manual
11749 @unnumbered Bibliography
11753 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11754 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11755 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11756 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11758 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11759 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11760 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11761 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11762 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11764 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11765 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11766 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11767 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11768 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11770 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11771 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11772 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11773 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11774 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11777 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11778 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11779 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11782 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11783 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11784 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11785 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11795 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11796 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11797 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11798 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11799 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11800 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11801 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11802 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11803 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11804 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11805 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11806 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11807 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11808 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11809 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11810 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11811 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11812 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11813 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11814 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11815 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11816 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11817 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11818 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11819 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11820 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11821 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11822 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11823 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11824 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11825 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11826 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11827 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11828 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11829 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11830 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11831 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11832 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11833 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11834 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11835 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11836 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11837 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11838 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11839 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11840 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11841 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11842 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11843 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11844 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11845 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11846 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11848 @c Local Variables:
11849 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"