1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
195 Outline of a Bison Grammar
197 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
205 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
215 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
216 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
217 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
218 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
219 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
220 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
221 action in the middle of a rule.
225 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
226 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
227 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
231 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
232 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
233 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
237 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
238 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
239 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
240 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
241 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
242 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
243 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
244 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
245 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
246 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
247 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
248 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
249 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
250 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
252 Parser C-Language Interface
254 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
255 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
256 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
257 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
258 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
259 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
261 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
262 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
263 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
266 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
268 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
269 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
270 of the token it has read.
271 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
272 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
274 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
275 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
277 The Bison Parser Algorithm
279 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
280 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
281 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
282 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
283 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
284 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
285 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
286 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
287 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
288 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
292 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
293 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
294 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
295 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
296 * How Precedence:: How they work.
297 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
301 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
302 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
303 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
304 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
306 Handling Context Dependencies
308 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
309 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
310 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
311 error recovery rules must be written.
313 Debugging Your Parser
315 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
316 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
317 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
318 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
322 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
323 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
324 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
328 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
329 in alphabetical order by short options.
330 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
331 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
333 Parsers Written In Other Languages
335 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
336 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
340 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
341 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
342 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
343 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
344 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
345 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
349 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
350 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
351 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
353 A Complete C++ Example
355 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
356 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
357 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
358 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
359 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
363 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
364 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
365 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
366 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
367 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
368 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
369 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
370 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
372 Frequently Asked Questions
374 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
375 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
376 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
377 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
378 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
379 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
380 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
381 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
382 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
383 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
384 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
385 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
389 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
395 @unnumbered Introduction
398 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
399 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
400 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
401 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
402 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
403 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
404 calculators to complex programming languages.
406 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
407 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
408 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
409 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
410 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
413 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
414 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
415 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
416 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
419 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
420 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
421 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
422 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
423 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
424 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
427 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
430 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
432 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
433 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
434 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
435 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
436 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
438 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
440 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
441 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
442 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
443 License to all of the Bison source code.
445 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
446 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
447 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
448 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
449 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
450 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
451 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
453 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
454 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
455 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
456 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
457 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
458 using the other GNU tools.
460 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
461 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
462 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
463 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
467 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
468 @include gpl-3.0.texi
471 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
473 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
474 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
475 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
478 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
479 as mathematical ideas.
480 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
481 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
482 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
483 the name of an identifier, etc.).
484 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
485 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
486 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
487 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
488 how is the output used?
489 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
490 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
493 @node Language and Grammar
494 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
496 @cindex context-free grammar
497 @cindex grammar, context-free
498 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
499 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
500 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
501 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
502 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
503 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
504 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
505 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
509 @cindex Backus-Naur form
510 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
511 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
512 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
513 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
514 essentially machine-readable BNF.
516 @cindex LALR grammars
517 @cindex IELR grammars
519 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
520 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
521 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
522 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
523 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
524 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
525 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
526 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
527 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
528 Construction}, to learn how.
531 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
532 @cindex ambiguous grammars
533 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
535 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
536 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
537 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
538 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
539 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
540 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
541 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
542 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
543 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
544 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
545 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
546 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
547 possible parses of any given string is finite.
549 @cindex symbols (abstract)
551 @cindex syntactic grouping
552 @cindex grouping, syntactic
553 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
554 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
555 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
556 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
557 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
558 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
559 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
561 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
562 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
563 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
564 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
565 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
566 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
567 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
568 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
569 lexicography, not grammar.)
571 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
574 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
575 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
576 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
577 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
578 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
579 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
580 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
583 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
584 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
585 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
586 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
587 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
588 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
589 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
590 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
592 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
593 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
594 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
595 reads informally as follows:
598 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
603 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
607 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
608 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
609 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
610 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
613 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
614 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
615 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
616 not the start symbol.
618 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
619 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
620 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
621 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
622 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
623 reports a syntax error.
625 @node Grammar in Bison
626 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
627 @cindex Bison grammar
628 @cindex grammar, Bison
629 @cindex formal grammar
631 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
632 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
633 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
635 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
636 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
637 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
639 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
640 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
641 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
642 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
643 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
644 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
645 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
648 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
649 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
650 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
651 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
653 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
654 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
656 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
657 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
658 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
659 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
663 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
667 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
669 @node Semantic Values
670 @section Semantic Values
671 @cindex semantic value
672 @cindex value, semantic
674 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
675 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
676 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
677 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
678 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
681 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
682 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
683 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
684 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
685 ,Defining Language Semantics},
688 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
689 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
690 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
691 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
694 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
695 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
696 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
697 need to have any semantic value.)
699 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
700 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
701 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
702 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
703 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
704 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
706 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
707 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
708 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
709 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
710 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
712 @node Semantic Actions
713 @section Semantic Actions
714 @cindex semantic actions
715 @cindex actions, semantic
717 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
718 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
719 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
720 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
723 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
724 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
725 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
726 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
727 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
728 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
729 newly recognized larger expression.
731 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
735 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
739 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
740 from the values of the two subexpressions.
743 @section Writing GLR Parsers
745 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
748 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
749 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
751 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
752 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
753 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
754 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
755 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
756 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
757 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
758 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
759 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
761 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
762 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
763 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
764 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
765 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
766 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
767 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
768 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
769 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
770 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
771 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
772 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
773 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
774 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
775 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
776 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
777 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
778 identical set of symbols.
780 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
781 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
782 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
783 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
784 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
785 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
786 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
787 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
788 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
792 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
793 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
794 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
795 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
796 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
799 @node Simple GLR Parsers
800 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
801 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
802 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
806 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
807 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
809 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
810 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
811 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
813 Consider a problem that
814 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
815 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
818 type subrange = lo .. hi;
819 type enum = (a, b, c);
823 The original language standard allows only numeric
824 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
825 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
826 10206) and many other
827 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
828 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
832 type subrange = (a) .. b;
836 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
837 type with only one value:
844 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
845 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
847 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
848 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
849 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
850 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
851 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
852 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
853 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
854 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
856 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
857 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
858 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
859 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
862 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
863 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
864 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
865 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
866 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
867 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
870 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
871 use the GLR algorithm.
872 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
873 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
874 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
875 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
876 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
877 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
878 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
879 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
880 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
882 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
883 reports a syntax error as usual.
885 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
886 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
887 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
888 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
889 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
891 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
892 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
893 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
894 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
895 The present example contains only one conflict between two
896 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
897 cannot be nested. So the number of
898 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
899 and the parsing time is still linear.
901 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
902 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
905 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
913 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
941 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
942 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
943 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
944 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
951 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
952 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
953 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
962 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
963 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
964 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
965 notice when the parser splits.
967 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
968 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
969 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
970 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
971 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
972 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
973 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
974 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
975 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
976 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
977 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
978 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
979 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
982 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
983 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
984 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
985 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
986 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
987 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
989 @node Merging GLR Parses
990 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
991 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
992 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
996 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
998 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1003 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1005 void yyerror (char const *);
1019 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1028 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1029 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1030 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1031 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1032 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1036 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1037 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1038 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1039 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1043 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1044 | '(' declarator ')'
1049 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1050 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1057 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1058 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1059 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1060 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1061 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1062 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1063 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1064 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1065 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1066 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1067 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1068 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1069 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1070 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1072 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1073 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1074 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1075 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1076 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1077 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1078 The parser therefore prints
1081 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1084 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1085 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1092 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1093 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1094 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1095 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1096 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1097 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1098 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1099 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1100 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1101 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1107 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1108 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1109 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1110 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1115 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1116 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1121 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1125 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1133 with an accompanying forward declaration
1134 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1138 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1139 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1144 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1145 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1148 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1151 Bison requires that all of the
1152 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1153 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1154 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1155 the offending merge.
1157 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1158 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1160 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1161 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1163 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1164 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1165 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1166 the associated reduction.
1167 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1168 action in a GLR parser.
1171 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1175 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1176 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1177 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1178 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1179 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1180 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1181 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1182 influence syntax analysis.
1183 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1186 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1187 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1188 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1189 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1190 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1191 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1192 future versions of Bison.
1193 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1194 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1195 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1197 @subsubsection YYERROR
1199 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1200 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1201 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1202 initiate error recovery.
1203 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1204 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1205 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1206 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1207 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1208 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1209 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1210 the parse that invoked the test.
1212 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1213 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1214 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1217 @node Semantic Predicates
1218 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1220 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1222 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1224 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1225 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1226 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1227 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1231 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1232 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1237 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1238 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1239 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1240 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1241 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1242 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1243 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1245 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1246 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1247 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1248 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1251 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1252 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1253 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1257 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1258 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1259 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1260 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1265 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1266 false). However, this
1267 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1268 have overlapping syntax.
1269 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1270 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1271 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1272 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1275 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1276 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1278 @node Compiler Requirements
1279 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1280 @cindex @code{inline}
1281 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1283 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1284 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1285 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1286 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1287 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1288 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1297 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1301 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1302 && ! defined inline)
1311 @cindex textual location
1312 @cindex location, textual
1314 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1315 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1316 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1317 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1319 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1320 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1321 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1322 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1325 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1326 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1327 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1330 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1331 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1332 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1333 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1334 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1335 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1336 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1339 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1340 @cindex Bison parser
1341 @cindex Bison utility
1342 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1345 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1346 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1347 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1348 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1349 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1350 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1351 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1354 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1355 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1356 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1359 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1360 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1361 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1362 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1363 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1364 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1365 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1367 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1368 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1369 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1370 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1371 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1372 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1373 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1374 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1375 C-Language Interface}.
1377 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1378 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1379 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1380 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1381 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1382 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1383 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1384 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1385 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1386 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1387 anything other than their usual meanings.
1389 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1390 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1391 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1392 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1393 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1394 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1395 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1396 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1397 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1400 @section Stages in Using Bison
1401 @cindex stages in using Bison
1404 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1405 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1409 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1410 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1411 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1412 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1413 sequence of C statements.
1416 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1417 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1418 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1419 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1422 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1425 Write error-reporting routines.
1428 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1429 must follow these steps:
1433 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1436 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1439 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1442 @node Grammar Layout
1443 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1444 @cindex grammar file
1446 @cindex format of grammar file
1447 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1449 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1450 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1457 @var{Bison declarations}
1466 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1467 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1469 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1470 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1471 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1472 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1473 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1474 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1476 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1477 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1478 semantic values of various symbols.
1480 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1483 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1484 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1485 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1489 @cindex simple examples
1490 @cindex examples, simple
1492 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1493 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1494 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1495 and a multi-function calculator. All
1496 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1498 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1499 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1500 source file to try them.
1503 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1504 a first example with no operator precedence.
1505 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1506 Operator precedence is introduced.
1507 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1508 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1509 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1510 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1511 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1515 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1516 @cindex reverse polish notation
1517 @cindex polish notation calculator
1518 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1519 @cindex calculator, simple
1521 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1522 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1523 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1524 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1526 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1527 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1530 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1531 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1532 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1533 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1534 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1535 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1536 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1539 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1540 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1542 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1543 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1545 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1547 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1554 void yyerror (char const *);
1558 %define api.value.type @{double@}
1561 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1564 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1565 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1567 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1568 function @code{pow}.
1570 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1571 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1572 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1573 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1576 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison about
1577 the tokens and their types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1578 Declarations Section}).
1580 The @code{%define} directive defines the variable @code{api.value.type},
1581 thus specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1582 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The Bison
1583 parser will use whatever type @code{api.value.type} is defined as; if you
1584 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1585 @samp{@{double@}}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1586 which is a floating point number. C code can use @code{YYSTYPE} to refer to
1587 the value @code{api.value.type}.
1589 Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character literal must be
1590 declared. (Single-character literals normally don't need to be declared.)
1591 In this example, all the arithmetic operators are designated by
1592 single-character literals, so the only terminal symbol that needs to be
1593 declared is @code{NUM}, the token type for numeric constants.
1596 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1598 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1600 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1612 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1619 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1620 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1621 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1622 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1623 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1624 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1630 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1631 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1632 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1633 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1634 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1637 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1638 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1639 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1641 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1642 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1643 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1644 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1645 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1646 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1649 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1650 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1651 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1655 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1657 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1666 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1667 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1668 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1669 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1670 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1672 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1673 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1674 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1675 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1676 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1677 (optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1678 */} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1680 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1681 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1682 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1683 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1686 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1687 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1688 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1691 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1693 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1698 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1702 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1703 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1704 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1705 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1706 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1707 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1708 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1710 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1711 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1712 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1713 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1714 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1717 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1719 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1720 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1721 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1722 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1727 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1728 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1733 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1734 equally well have written them separately:
1738 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1739 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1743 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1744 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1745 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1746 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1747 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1748 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1749 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1750 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1752 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1753 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1754 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1756 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1757 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1761 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1765 means the same thing as this:
1770 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1776 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1779 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1780 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1781 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1783 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1784 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1785 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1786 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1788 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1790 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1791 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1792 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1793 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1795 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1796 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1797 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1798 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1799 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1800 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1801 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1802 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1803 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1805 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1806 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1807 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, whose value
1808 was defined at the beginning of the grammar via @samp{%define api.value.type
1809 @{double@}}; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1811 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1812 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1814 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1816 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1819 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1820 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1821 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1822 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1833 /* Skip white space. */
1834 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1838 /* Process numbers. */
1839 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1842 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1847 /* Return end-of-input. */
1850 /* Return a single char. */
1857 @subsection The Controlling Function
1858 @cindex controlling function
1859 @cindex main function in simple example
1861 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1862 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1863 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1865 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1877 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1878 @cindex error reporting routine
1880 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1881 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1882 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1883 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1884 here is the definition we will use:
1886 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1891 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1893 yyerror (char const *s)
1895 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1900 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1901 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1902 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1903 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1904 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1905 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1907 @node Rpcalc Generate
1908 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1909 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1911 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1912 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1913 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1914 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1915 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1916 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1918 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1919 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1921 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1922 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1929 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1930 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1931 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1932 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1933 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1934 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1935 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1937 @node Rpcalc Compile
1938 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1939 @cindex compiling the parser
1941 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1945 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1947 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1951 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1952 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1953 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1957 # @r{List files again.}
1959 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1963 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1964 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1970 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1972 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1975 @result{} -3.166666667
1976 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1978 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1983 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1984 @cindex infix notation calculator
1986 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1988 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1989 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1990 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1991 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1994 /* Infix notation calculator. */
2001 void yyerror (char const *);
2006 /* Bison declarations. */
2007 %define api.value.type @{double@}
2011 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2012 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2015 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2026 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2033 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2034 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2035 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2036 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2037 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2038 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2039 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2046 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2049 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2051 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2052 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2053 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2054 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2055 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2056 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2057 the associativity/precedence.)
2059 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2060 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2061 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2062 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2063 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2064 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2067 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2068 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2069 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2070 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2071 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2073 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2078 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2086 @node Simple Error Recovery
2087 @section Simple Error Recovery
2088 @cindex error recovery, simple
2090 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2091 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2092 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2093 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2094 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2095 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2097 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2098 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2099 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2105 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2106 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2111 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2112 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2113 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2114 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2115 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2116 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2117 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2118 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2121 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2122 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2123 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2124 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2125 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2126 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2129 @node Location Tracking Calc
2130 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2131 @cindex location tracking calculator
2132 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2133 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2135 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2136 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2137 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2138 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2142 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2143 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2144 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2147 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2148 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2150 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2151 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2154 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2159 void yyerror (char const *);
2162 /* Bison declarations. */
2163 %define api.value.type @{int@}
2171 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2175 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2176 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2177 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2178 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2179 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2180 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2181 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2185 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2187 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2188 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2189 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2190 from the new information.
2192 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2193 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2206 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2213 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2214 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2215 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2225 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2226 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2227 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2232 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2233 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2234 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2238 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2239 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2240 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2242 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2243 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2244 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2245 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2246 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2247 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2251 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2253 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2254 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2255 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2258 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2259 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2270 /* Skip white space. */
2271 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2272 ++yylloc.last_column;
2277 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2278 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2282 /* Process numbers. */
2286 ++yylloc.last_column;
2287 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2289 ++yylloc.last_column;
2290 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2297 /* Return end-of-input. */
2302 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2306 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2309 ++yylloc.last_column;
2315 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2316 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2317 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2318 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2320 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2321 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2322 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2323 controlling function:
2330 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2331 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2337 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2338 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2339 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2341 @node Multi-function Calc
2342 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2343 @cindex multi-function calculator
2344 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2345 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2347 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2348 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2349 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2350 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2351 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2353 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2354 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2355 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2356 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2357 functions whose syntax has this form:
2360 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2364 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2365 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2366 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2371 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2372 @result{} 3.1415926536
2376 @result{} 0.0000000000
2378 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2379 @result{} 2.3000000000
2381 @result{} 2.3000000000
2383 @result{} 0.8329091229
2384 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2385 @result{} 2.3000000000
2389 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2392 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2393 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2394 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2395 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2396 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2399 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2400 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2402 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2404 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2408 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2409 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2410 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2412 void yyerror (char const *);
2416 %define api.value.type union /* Generate YYSTYPE from these types: */
2417 %token <double> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2418 %token <symrec*> VAR FNCT /* Symbol table pointer: variable and function. */
2425 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2426 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2430 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2431 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2432 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2434 The special @code{union} value assigned to the @code{%define} variable
2435 @code{api.value.type} specifies that the symbols are defined with their data
2436 types. Bison will generate an appropriate definition of @code{YYSTYPE} to
2439 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a type
2440 with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols are
2441 @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their declarations are
2442 augmented with their data type (placed between angle brackets). For
2443 instance, values of @code{NUM} are stored in @code{double}.
2445 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal symbols,
2446 just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. Previously we did
2447 not use @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are normally
2448 declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But @code{exp} must be
2449 declared explicitly so we can specify its value type. @xref{Type Decl,
2450 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2453 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2455 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2456 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2457 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2459 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2461 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2472 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2473 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2480 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2481 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2482 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2483 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2484 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2485 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2486 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2487 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2488 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2489 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2492 /* End of grammar. */
2496 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2497 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2498 @cindex symbol table example
2500 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2501 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2502 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2503 requires some additional C functions for support.
2505 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2506 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2507 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2509 @comment file: calc.h
2512 /* Function type. */
2513 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2517 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2520 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2521 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2524 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2525 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2527 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2532 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2534 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2535 extern symrec *sym_table;
2537 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2538 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2542 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2545 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2551 double (*fnct) (double);
2556 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2569 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2574 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2580 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2582 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2583 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2589 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2590 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2592 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2593 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2594 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2595 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2596 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2597 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2599 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2601 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2602 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2606 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2608 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2609 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2610 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2611 ptr->type = sym_type;
2612 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2613 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2621 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2624 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2625 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2626 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2634 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2636 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2637 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2638 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2639 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2641 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2642 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2643 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2644 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2645 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2646 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2648 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2649 operators in @code{yylex}.
2651 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2661 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2662 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2670 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2671 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2674 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.NUM);
2681 Bison generated a definition of @code{YYSTYPE} with a member named
2682 @code{NUM} to store value of @code{NUM} symbols.
2684 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2687 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2690 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2691 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2692 static size_t length = 40;
2693 static char *symbuf = 0;
2698 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2704 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2708 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2710 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2712 /* Get another character. */
2717 while (isalnum (c));
2724 s = getsym (symbuf);
2726 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2727 *((symrec**) &yylval) = s;
2731 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2738 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2740 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2741 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2742 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2744 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2747 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2749 yyerror (char const *s)
2751 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2757 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2760 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2761 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2762 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2770 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2771 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2772 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2780 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2783 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2784 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2785 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2788 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2789 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2793 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2795 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2796 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2798 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2799 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2802 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2803 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2804 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2805 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2806 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2807 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2808 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2809 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2812 @node Grammar Outline
2813 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2816 @findex /* @dots{} */
2818 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2819 appropriate delimiters:
2826 @var{Bison declarations}
2835 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2836 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2840 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2841 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2842 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2843 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2844 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2848 @subsection The prologue
2849 @cindex declarations section
2851 @cindex declarations
2853 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2854 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2855 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2856 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2857 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2858 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2859 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2861 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2862 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2865 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2866 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2867 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2868 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2869 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2870 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2871 @code{%union} declaration.
2885 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2891 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2892 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2899 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2900 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2901 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2902 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2903 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2904 @code{#include} directives.
2906 @node Prologue Alternatives
2907 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2908 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2911 @findex %code requires
2912 @findex %code provides
2915 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2916 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2917 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2918 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2919 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2920 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2921 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2923 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2937 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2943 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2944 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2952 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2953 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2954 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2955 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2956 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2957 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2958 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2959 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2960 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2961 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2962 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2964 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2965 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2966 This behavior raises a few questions.
2967 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2968 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2969 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2970 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2971 This behavior is not intuitive.
2973 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2974 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2975 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2976 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2983 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2984 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2987 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2988 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3001 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3007 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3008 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3009 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3017 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3018 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3019 explicit which kind you intend.
3020 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3022 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3023 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3024 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3025 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3026 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3027 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3028 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3029 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3030 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3033 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3034 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3036 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3054 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3060 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3061 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3074 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3075 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3076 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3084 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3085 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3086 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3087 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3088 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3089 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3091 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3092 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3093 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3094 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3095 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3096 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3097 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3098 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3099 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3100 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3101 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3104 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3105 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3106 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3107 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3108 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3109 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3110 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3111 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3112 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3113 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3131 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3137 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3138 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3151 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3157 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3158 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3166 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3167 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3168 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3171 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3172 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3173 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3174 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3175 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3176 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3179 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3180 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3181 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3182 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3184 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3185 organize your grammar file.
3186 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3191 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3192 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3193 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3194 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3198 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3199 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3200 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3201 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3206 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3207 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3209 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3211 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3212 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3213 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3214 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3216 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3217 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3218 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3219 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3220 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3221 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3222 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3223 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3226 @node Bison Declarations
3227 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3228 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3229 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3231 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3232 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3233 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3234 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3237 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3238 @cindex grammar rules section
3239 @cindex rules section for grammar
3241 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3242 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3244 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3245 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3246 if it is the first thing in the file.
3249 @subsection The epilogue
3250 @cindex additional C code section
3252 @cindex C code, section for additional
3254 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3255 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3256 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3257 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3258 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3259 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3260 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3261 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3262 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3263 C-Language Interface}.
3265 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3266 from the grammar rules.
3268 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3269 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3270 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3271 of the grammar file.
3274 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3275 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3276 @cindex terminal symbol
3280 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3283 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3284 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3285 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3286 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3287 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3288 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3289 the symbol to stand for it.
3291 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3292 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3293 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3295 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3296 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3297 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3298 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3299 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3300 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3301 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3303 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3307 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3308 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3309 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3310 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3313 @cindex character token
3314 @cindex literal token
3315 @cindex single-character literal
3316 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3317 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3318 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3319 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3320 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3321 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3322 ,Operator Precedence}).
3324 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3325 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3326 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3327 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3328 your program will confuse other readers.
3330 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3331 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3332 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3333 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3334 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3335 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3339 @cindex string token
3340 @cindex literal string token
3341 @cindex multicharacter literal
3342 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3343 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3344 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3345 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3346 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3348 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3349 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3350 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3351 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3352 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3354 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3356 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3357 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3358 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3359 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3360 read your program will be confused.
3362 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3363 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3364 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3365 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3366 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3367 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3370 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3371 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3372 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3374 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3375 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3376 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3377 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3378 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3379 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3380 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3381 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3382 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3383 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3384 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3385 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3387 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3388 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3389 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3390 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3391 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3393 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3394 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3395 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3396 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3397 characters in the following C-language string:
3400 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3403 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3404 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3405 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3406 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3407 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3408 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3409 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3410 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3411 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3412 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3415 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3416 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3417 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3418 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3419 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3422 @section Grammar Rules
3424 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3427 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3428 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3429 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3433 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3435 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3436 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3438 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3441 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3445 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3446 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3447 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3456 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3457 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3459 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3460 extra white space as you wish.
3462 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3463 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3466 @{@var{C statements}@}
3471 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3472 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3473 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3474 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3475 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3476 compiler can check it.
3478 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3479 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3480 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3481 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3482 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3483 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3484 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3485 character constants.
3487 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3491 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3492 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3497 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3498 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3505 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3508 @subsection Empty Rules
3513 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3514 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3515 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3518 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3522 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3523 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3535 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3536 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3537 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3538 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3540 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3541 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3542 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3555 @subsection Recursive Rules
3556 @cindex recursive rule
3557 @cindex rule, recursive
3559 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3560 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3561 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3562 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3563 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3574 @cindex left recursion
3575 @cindex right recursion
3577 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3578 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3579 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3591 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3592 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3593 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3594 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3595 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3596 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3597 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3600 @cindex mutual recursion
3601 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3602 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3603 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3612 | primary '+' primary
3625 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3629 @section Defining Language Semantics
3630 @cindex defining language semantics
3631 @cindex language semantics, defining
3633 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3634 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3635 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3637 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3638 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3639 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3640 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3643 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3644 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3645 * Type Generation:: Generating the semantic value type.
3646 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3647 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
3648 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3649 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3650 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3651 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3652 action in the middle of a rule.
3656 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3657 @cindex semantic value type
3658 @cindex value type, semantic
3659 @cindex data types of semantic values
3660 @cindex default data type
3662 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3663 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3664 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3665 Notation Calculator}).
3667 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3668 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3669 specify some other type, define the @code{%define} variable
3670 @code{api.value.type} like this:
3673 %define api.value.type @{double@}
3680 %define api.value.type @{struct semantic_type@}
3683 The value of @code{api.value.type} should be a type name that does not
3684 contain parentheses or square brackets.
3686 Alternatively, instead of relying of Bison's @code{%define} support, you may
3687 rely on the C/C++ preprocessor and define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like
3691 #define YYSTYPE double
3695 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3696 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}). If compatibility
3697 with POSIX Yacc matters to you, use this. Note however that Bison cannot
3698 know @code{YYSTYPE}'s value, not even whether it is defined, so there are
3699 services it cannot provide. Besides this works only for languages that have
3702 @node Multiple Types
3703 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3705 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3706 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3707 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3708 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3711 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3712 requires you to do two things:
3716 Specify the entire collection of possible data types. There are several
3720 let Bison compute the union type from the tags you assign to symbols;
3723 use the @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union
3727 define the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type} to be a union type
3728 whose members are the type tags (@pxref{Structured Value Type,, Providing a
3729 Structured Semantic Value Type});
3732 use a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a
3733 union type whose member names are the type tags.
3737 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3738 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3739 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3740 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3741 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3744 @node Type Generation
3745 @subsection Generating the Semantic Value Type
3746 @cindex declaring value types
3747 @cindex value types, declaring
3748 @findex %define api.value.type union
3750 The special value @code{union} of the @code{%define} variable
3751 @code{api.value.type} instructs Bison that the tags used with the
3752 @code{%token} and @code{%type} directives are genuine types, not names of
3753 members of @code{YYSTYPE}.
3758 %define api.value.type union
3759 %token <int> INT "integer"
3762 %token <char const *> ID "identifier"
3766 generates an appropriate value of @code{YYSTYPE} to support each symbol
3767 type. The name of the member of @code{YYSTYPE} for tokens than have a
3768 declared identifier @var{id} (such as @code{INT} and @code{ID} above, but
3769 not @code{'n'}) is @code{@var{id}}. The other symbols have unspecified
3770 names on which you should not depend; instead, relying on C casts to access
3771 the semantic value with the appropriate type:
3774 /* For an "integer". */
3778 /* For an 'n', also declared as int. */
3779 *((int*)&yylval) = 42;
3782 /* For an "identifier". */
3787 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.token.prefix} is defined
3788 (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}), then it is also used to prefix
3789 the union member names. For instance, with @samp{%define api.token.prefix
3793 /* For an "integer". */
3794 yylval.TOK_INT = 42;
3798 This Bison extension cannot work if @code{%yacc} (or
3799 @option{-y}/@option{--yacc}) is enabled, as POSIX mandates that Yacc
3800 generate tokens as macros (e.g., @samp{#define INT 258}, or @samp{#define
3803 This feature is new, and user feedback would be most welcome.
3805 A similar feature is provided for C++ that in addition overcomes C++
3806 limitations (that forbid non-trivial objects to be part of a @code{union}):
3807 @samp{%define api.value.type variant}, see @ref{C++ Variants}.
3810 @subsection The Union Declaration
3811 @cindex declaring value types
3812 @cindex value types, declaring
3815 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3816 data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by
3817 braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in C@.
3831 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3832 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3833 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3834 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3836 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the @code{%union}. For
3849 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3850 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3853 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple @code{%union}
3854 declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
3855 @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3857 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3858 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3860 @node Structured Value Type
3861 @subsection Providing a Structured Semantic Value Type
3862 @cindex declaring value types
3863 @cindex value types, declaring
3866 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
3867 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one @samp{<@var{type}>}
3868 tag. For example, you can put the following into a header file
3881 and then your grammar can use the following instead of @code{%union}:
3888 %define api.value.type @{union YYSTYPE@}
3894 Actually, you may also provide a @code{struct} rather that a @code{union},
3895 which may be handy if you want to track information for every symbol (such
3896 as preceding comments).
3898 The type you provide may even be structured and include pointers, in which
3899 case the type tags you provide may be composite, with @samp{.} and @samp{->}
3908 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3910 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3911 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3912 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3913 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3915 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3916 placed at any position in the rule;
3917 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3918 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3919 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3920 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3922 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3923 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3924 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3925 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3926 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3927 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3928 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3929 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3930 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3931 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3934 Here is a typical example:
3940 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3944 Or, in terms of named references:
3950 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3955 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3956 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3957 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3958 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3959 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3960 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3962 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3963 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3964 referred to as @code{$2}.
3966 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3967 references construct.
3969 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3970 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3971 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3972 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3973 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3976 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3979 @cindex default action
3980 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3981 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3982 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3983 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3984 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3985 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3987 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3988 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3989 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3990 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3991 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3996 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3997 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
4003 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
4008 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
4009 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
4010 definition of @code{foo}.
4013 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
4014 any, from a semantic action.
4015 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
4016 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4019 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
4020 @cindex action data types
4021 @cindex data types in actions
4023 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
4024 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
4026 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
4027 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
4028 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
4029 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
4030 in the rule. In this example,
4036 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
4041 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
4042 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
4043 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
4044 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
4046 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
4047 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
4048 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
4060 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
4061 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
4063 @node Mid-Rule Actions
4064 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
4065 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4066 @cindex mid-rule actions
4068 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
4069 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
4070 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
4073 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
4074 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
4075 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
4078 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
4079 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
4081 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
4082 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
4083 it is run before they are parsed.
4085 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
4086 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
4087 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
4088 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
4091 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
4092 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
4093 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
4094 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
4095 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
4096 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
4098 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
4099 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
4100 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
4101 at the end of the rule.
4103 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
4104 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
4105 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
4106 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
4107 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
4108 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
4115 $<context>$ = push_context ();
4116 declare_variable ($3);
4121 pop_context ($<context>5);
4127 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
4128 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
4129 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
4130 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
4131 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
4132 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
4135 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
4136 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
4137 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
4144 $<context>let = push_context ();
4145 declare_variable ($3);
4150 pop_context ($<context>let);
4155 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
4156 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
4157 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
4158 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
4159 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
4162 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
4163 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
4164 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
4165 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
4166 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
4168 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
4169 Discarded Symbols}).
4170 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
4171 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
4173 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
4174 declare a destructor for that symbol:
4179 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
4197 $let = push_context ();
4198 declare_variable ($3);
4205 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4206 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4207 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4209 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4210 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4214 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4215 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4216 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4217 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4221 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4228 $@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4229 $@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4230 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4231 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4235 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4237 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4238 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4239 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4242 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4249 @@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4250 @@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4251 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4252 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4255 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4256 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4257 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4258 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4259 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4263 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4265 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4266 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4270 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4271 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4277 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4278 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4279 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4280 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4281 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4282 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4283 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4289 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4290 | '@{' statements '@}'
4296 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4301 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4302 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4305 | '@{' statements '@}'
4311 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4312 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4313 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4314 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4315 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4316 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4318 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4319 actions into the two rules, like this:
4324 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4325 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4326 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4327 '@{' statements '@}'
4333 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4334 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4336 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4337 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4338 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4343 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4344 declarations statements '@}'
4345 | '@{' statements '@}'
4351 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4352 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4354 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4355 serves as a subroutine:
4360 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4366 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4367 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4373 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4374 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4377 @node Tracking Locations
4378 @section Tracking Locations
4380 @cindex textual location
4381 @cindex location, textual
4383 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4384 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4385 especially symbol locations.
4387 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4388 actions to take when rules are matched.
4391 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4392 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4393 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4397 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4398 @cindex data type of locations
4399 @cindex default location type
4401 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4402 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4404 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4405 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4406 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4407 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4411 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4420 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4421 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4422 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4423 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4424 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4426 @node Actions and Locations
4427 @subsection Actions and Locations
4428 @cindex location actions
4429 @cindex actions, location
4432 @vindex @@@var{name}
4433 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4435 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4436 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4438 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4439 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4440 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4441 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4442 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4445 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4446 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4447 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4448 references construct.
4450 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4458 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4459 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4460 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4461 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4467 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4468 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4469 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4475 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4476 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4477 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4480 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4481 example above simply rewrites this way:
4494 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
4495 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4496 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4503 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4504 from a semantic action.
4505 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4506 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4508 @node Location Default Action
4509 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4510 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4511 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4513 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4514 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4515 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4516 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4517 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4518 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4519 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4520 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4523 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4524 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4526 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4527 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4528 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4529 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4530 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4531 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4532 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4533 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4534 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4535 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4537 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4541 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4545 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4546 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4547 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4548 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4552 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4553 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4554 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4555 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4562 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4563 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4564 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4566 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4570 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4571 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4574 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4575 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4576 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4577 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4580 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4581 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4582 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4583 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4586 @node Named References
4587 @section Named References
4588 @cindex named references
4590 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4591 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4592 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4593 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4594 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4595 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4597 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4598 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4599 used as named references. For example:
4603 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4604 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4609 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4613 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4614 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4619 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4625 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4628 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4631 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4636 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4637 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4638 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4641 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4642 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4647 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4648 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4649 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4652 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4653 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4659 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4660 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4663 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4664 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4668 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4669 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4670 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4671 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4672 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4673 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4674 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4676 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4680 @section Bison Declarations
4681 @cindex declarations, Bison
4682 @cindex Bison declarations
4684 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4685 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4688 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4689 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4690 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4691 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4693 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4694 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4695 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4696 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4699 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4700 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4701 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4702 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4703 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4704 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4705 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4706 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4707 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4708 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4709 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4710 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4711 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4712 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4716 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4717 @cindex version requirement
4718 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4721 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4722 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4726 %require "@var{version}"
4730 @subsection Token Type Names
4731 @cindex declaring token type names
4732 @cindex token type names, declaring
4733 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4736 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4742 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4743 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4744 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4746 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4747 @code{%precedence}, or
4748 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4749 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4752 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4753 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4754 following the token name:
4758 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4762 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4763 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4764 with each other or with normal characters.
4766 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4767 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4768 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4769 Than One Value Type}).
4775 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4779 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4783 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4784 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4785 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4792 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4793 equivalent literal string tokens:
4796 %token <operator> OR "||"
4797 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4802 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4803 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4804 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4805 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4806 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4807 the literal string instead of the token name.
4809 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4810 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4814 %token END 0 "end of file"
4817 @node Precedence Decl
4818 @subsection Operator Precedence
4819 @cindex precedence declarations
4820 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4821 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4823 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4824 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4825 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4826 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4827 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4828 operator precedence.
4830 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4831 @code{%token}: either
4834 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4841 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4844 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4845 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4846 all the @var{symbols}:
4850 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4851 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4852 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4853 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4854 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4855 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4856 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4857 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4858 considered a syntax error.
4860 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4861 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4862 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4865 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4866 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4867 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4868 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4869 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4872 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4873 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4874 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4875 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4880 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4881 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4885 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4886 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4887 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4891 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4892 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4893 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4896 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4900 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4901 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4902 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}). You
4903 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4904 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4907 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4908 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4909 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4910 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4912 @node Initial Action Decl
4913 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4914 @findex %initial-action
4916 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4917 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4920 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4921 @findex %initial-action
4922 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4923 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4924 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4925 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4928 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4931 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4934 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4939 @node Destructor Decl
4940 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4941 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4945 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4946 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4947 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4948 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4949 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4950 must discard the start symbol.
4952 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4953 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4954 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4955 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4957 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4958 symbol is automatically discarded.
4960 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4962 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4963 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4964 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4965 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4966 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4969 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4970 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4971 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4972 tag among @var{symbols}.
4973 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4974 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4975 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4977 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4978 (These default forms are experimental.
4979 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4981 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4982 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4983 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4984 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4986 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4987 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4988 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4989 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4990 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4997 %union @{ char *string; @}
4998 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
4999 %type <string> string1 string2
5000 %union @{ char character; @}
5001 %token <character> CHR
5002 %type <character> chr
5005 %destructor @{ @} <character>
5006 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
5007 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
5008 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
5012 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
5013 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
5014 to @code{free} by default.
5015 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
5016 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
5017 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
5018 @code{free} only once.
5019 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
5020 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
5022 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
5023 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
5024 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
5025 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
5026 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
5027 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
5028 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
5029 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
5030 reference it in your grammar.
5031 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
5032 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
5038 @cindex actions in mid-rule
5039 @cindex mid-rule actions
5040 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
5041 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
5042 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
5043 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
5044 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
5045 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
5046 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
5047 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
5051 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
5052 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
5053 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
5058 @cindex discarded symbols
5059 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
5063 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
5065 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
5067 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
5068 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
5070 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
5071 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
5074 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
5077 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
5078 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
5081 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
5082 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
5083 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
5087 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
5088 @cindex printing semantic values
5092 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
5093 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
5094 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
5095 know how semantic values should be formatted.
5097 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
5098 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5099 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
5101 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
5104 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
5105 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
5106 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
5107 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
5108 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
5109 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
5110 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
5113 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5114 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
5115 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5116 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5124 %union @{ char *string; @}
5125 %token <string> STRING1 STRING2
5126 %type <string> string1 string2
5127 %union @{ char character; @}
5128 %token <character> CHR
5129 %type <character> chr
5132 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5133 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5134 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5135 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5139 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5140 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5141 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5142 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5143 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5144 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5145 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5149 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5150 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5151 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5152 @cindex warnings, preventing
5153 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5157 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5158 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5159 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5160 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5161 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5162 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5164 The declaration looks like this:
5170 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5171 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5172 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5173 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5175 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5176 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5177 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5178 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5179 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5180 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5181 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5187 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5191 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5192 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5193 print the number of conflicts.
5196 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5197 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5198 go back to the beginning.
5201 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5202 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5203 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5206 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5207 but will keep silent otherwise.
5210 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5211 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5212 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5213 @cindex default start symbol
5216 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5217 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5218 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5225 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5226 @cindex reentrant parser
5228 @findex %define api.pure
5230 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5231 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5232 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5233 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5234 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5235 program must be called only within interlocks.
5237 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5238 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5239 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5240 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5241 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5243 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5244 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5245 reentrant. It looks like this:
5248 %define api.pure full
5251 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5252 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5253 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5254 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5255 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5256 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5257 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5258 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5259 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5261 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5262 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5266 @subsection A Push Parser
5269 @findex %define api.push-pull
5271 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5272 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5274 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5275 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5276 each time a new token is made available.
5278 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5279 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5280 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5281 within a certain time period.
5283 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5284 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5285 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5288 %define api.push-pull push
5291 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5292 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5293 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5294 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5295 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5298 %define api.pure full
5299 %define api.push-pull push
5302 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5303 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5304 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5305 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5307 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5308 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5309 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5310 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5311 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5312 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5313 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5314 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5318 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5320 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5321 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5322 yypstate_delete (ps);
5325 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5326 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5327 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5328 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5329 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5330 example would thus look like this:
5335 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5338 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5339 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5340 yypstate_delete (ps);
5343 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5344 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5346 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5347 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5348 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5349 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5350 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5351 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5352 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5353 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5354 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5355 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5356 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5357 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5358 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5359 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5360 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5361 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5362 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5366 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5367 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5368 yypstate_delete (ps);
5371 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5372 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5373 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5376 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5377 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5378 @cindex declaration summary
5379 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5381 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5383 @deffn {Directive} %union
5384 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5385 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}).
5388 @deffn {Directive} %token
5389 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5390 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5393 @deffn {Directive} %right
5394 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5395 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5398 @deffn {Directive} %left
5399 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5400 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5403 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5404 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5405 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5406 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5410 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5411 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5412 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5416 @deffn {Directive} %type
5417 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5418 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5421 @deffn {Directive} %start
5422 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5426 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5427 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5428 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5434 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5437 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5438 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5440 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5441 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5442 @xref{%code Summary}.
5445 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5446 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5448 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5451 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5452 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5453 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5454 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5455 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5458 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5459 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5460 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5461 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5462 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5464 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5465 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5466 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5467 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5468 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5469 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5470 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5471 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5472 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5473 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5475 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5476 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5477 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5479 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5480 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5481 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5483 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5484 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5485 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5486 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5487 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5489 @findex %code requires
5490 @findex %code provides
5491 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5492 header also contains their code.
5493 @xref{%code Summary}.
5495 @cindex Header guard
5496 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5497 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5498 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5499 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5500 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5503 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix @{calc@}} and @samp{%defines
5504 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5506 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5507 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5509 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5513 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5514 Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5517 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5518 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5519 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5522 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5523 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5524 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5527 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5528 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5529 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5530 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5534 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5535 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5536 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5537 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5538 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5539 accurate syntax error messages.
5542 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5543 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5544 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5546 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5547 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5548 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5549 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5550 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5551 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5552 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5553 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5555 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5559 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5560 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5561 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5566 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5567 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5568 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5569 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5570 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5571 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5572 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5576 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5577 Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5580 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5581 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5582 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5586 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5587 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5588 Require a Version of Bison}.
5591 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5592 Specify the skeleton to use.
5594 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5595 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5596 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5597 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5599 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5600 file in the Bison installation directory.
5601 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5602 directory of the grammar file.
5603 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5606 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5607 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5608 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5609 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5610 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5611 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5612 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5615 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5616 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5617 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5618 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5619 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5620 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5621 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5624 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5625 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5626 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5630 The highest token number, plus one.
5632 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5634 The number of grammar rules,
5636 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5640 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5641 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5642 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5643 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5647 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5648 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5649 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5653 @node %define Summary
5654 @subsection %define Summary
5656 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5657 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5658 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5659 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5660 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5661 @code{%define} directive:
5663 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5664 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5665 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
5666 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5667 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5669 The type of the values depend on the syntax. Braces denote value in the
5670 target language (e.g., a namespace, a type, etc.). Keyword values (no
5671 delimiters) denote finite choice (e.g., a variation of a feature). String
5672 values denote remaining cases (e.g., a file name).
5674 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5675 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5678 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5679 @code{%define} accepts.
5681 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5682 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5686 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5688 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5689 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5691 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5693 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5694 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5697 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5698 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5699 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5700 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5701 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5702 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5704 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5705 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5707 @item Languages(s): C++
5709 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5710 For example, if you specify:
5713 %define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5716 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5719 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5722 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5723 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5726 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5732 @item Accepted Values:
5733 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5734 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5736 @item Default Value:
5737 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5738 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5739 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5740 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5741 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5742 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5743 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5746 %define api.namespace @{foo@}
5747 %name-prefix "bar::"
5750 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5756 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5757 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{type}@}
5760 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5762 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5763 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5765 @item Accepted Values: String
5767 @item Default Value: none
5770 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5771 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5775 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5776 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5779 @item Language(s): All
5781 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5782 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5784 @item Accepted Values: String
5786 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5788 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5792 @c ================================================== api.pure
5793 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure} @var{purity}
5796 @item Language(s): C
5798 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5799 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5801 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5803 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5804 the case for Boolean values.
5806 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5807 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5808 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5811 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5812 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5813 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5815 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5819 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5820 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5823 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5824 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5827 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5830 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5831 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5833 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5836 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5843 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5844 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5847 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5849 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5850 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5851 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5852 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5854 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5856 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5863 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5864 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5871 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5872 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5873 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5875 @item Accepted Values:
5878 @item Default Value:
5881 introduced in Bison 3.0
5884 @c api.token.constructor
5887 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5888 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @{@var{prefix}@}
5891 @item Languages(s): all
5894 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5895 target language. For instance
5898 %token FILE for ERROR
5899 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
5901 start: FILE for ERROR;
5905 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5906 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5907 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5908 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5909 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5910 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix.
5912 Bison also prefixes the generated member names of the semantic value union.
5913 @xref{Type Generation,, Generating the Semantic Value Type}, for more
5916 See @ref{Calc++ Parser} and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5918 @item Accepted Values:
5919 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5920 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5921 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5923 @item Default Value:
5926 introduced in Bison 3.0
5932 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5933 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{support}
5934 @deffnx Directive {%define api.value.type} @{@var{type}@}
5940 The type for semantic values.
5942 @item Accepted Values:
5945 This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5947 @item @samp{union-directive} (C, C++)
5948 The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5949 to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5950 @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
5953 %define api.value.type union-directive
5959 %token <ival> INT "integer"
5960 %token <sval> STR "string"
5963 @item @samp{union} (C, C++)
5964 The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5965 @code{union}. For instance:
5967 %define api.value.type union
5968 %token <int> INT "integer"
5969 %token <char *> STR "string"
5971 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5972 cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5974 @item @samp{variant} (C++)
5975 This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5976 allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5978 %define api.value.type variant
5979 %token <int> INT "integer"
5980 %token <std::string> STR "string"
5982 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5983 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5985 @item @samp{@{@var{type}@}}
5986 Use this @var{type} as semantic value.
6003 %define api.value.type @{struct my_value@}
6004 %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
6005 %token <u.sval> STR "string"
6009 @item Default Value:
6012 @code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
6014 @code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
6015 @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
6021 introduced in Bison 3.0. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
6028 @c ================================================== location_type
6029 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
6030 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
6034 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
6036 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
6039 @item Language(s): all
6041 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
6042 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
6043 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
6044 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6046 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
6047 @item Default Value:
6049 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
6050 @item @code{most} otherwise.
6053 introduced as @code{lr.default-reductions} in 2.5, renamed as
6054 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 3.0.
6058 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
6060 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
6063 @item Language(s): all
6064 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
6065 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
6066 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6067 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6069 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
6070 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
6071 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 3.0.
6074 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
6076 @c ================================================== lr.type
6078 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
6081 @item Language(s): all
6083 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
6084 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
6085 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6087 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
6089 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
6093 @c ================================================== namespace
6094 @deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
6095 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
6099 @c ================================================== parse.assert
6100 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
6103 @item Languages(s): C++
6105 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
6106 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
6108 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
6110 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6112 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6118 @c ================================================== parse.error
6119 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error} @var{verbosity}
6124 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6125 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6127 @item Accepted Values:
6130 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6132 @item @code{verbose}
6133 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6134 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6138 @item Default Value:
6145 @c ================================================== parse.lac
6146 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac} @var{when}
6149 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6151 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6152 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6153 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6154 @item Default Value: @code{none}
6159 @c ================================================== parse.trace
6160 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6163 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6165 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6166 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6168 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6169 @samp{%define api.prefix @{@var{prefix}@}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6170 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6171 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6174 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6176 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6182 @subsection %code Summary
6186 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6187 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6188 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6189 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6190 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6191 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6192 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6193 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6195 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6196 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6197 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6198 in the parser implementation.
6200 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6201 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6202 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6204 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6207 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6208 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6209 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6210 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6211 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6212 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6216 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6217 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6218 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6221 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6222 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6226 @findex %code requires
6229 @item Language(s): C, C++
6231 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6232 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}. In other words, it's the best place to
6233 define types referenced in @code{%union} directives. If you use
6234 @code{#define} to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6235 definitions, then it is also the best place. However you should rather
6236 @code{%define} @code{api.value.type} and @code{api.location.type}.
6238 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6239 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6244 @findex %code provides
6247 @item Language(s): C, C++
6249 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6250 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6252 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6253 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6261 @item Language(s): C, C++
6263 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6264 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6265 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6266 parser implementation file. For example:
6275 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6279 @findex %code imports
6282 @item Language(s): Java
6284 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6286 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6287 before any class definitions.
6291 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6292 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6293 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6294 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6297 @node Multiple Parsers
6298 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6300 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6301 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6302 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6303 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6304 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6305 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6306 exported in the generated header.
6308 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6309 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6310 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6311 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6312 @{@var{prefix}@}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@{@var{prefix}@}}, see
6313 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6314 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6315 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6316 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6318 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6319 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6320 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6321 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6322 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6323 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6324 specifically --- more about this below.
6326 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, the names become
6327 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6330 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6331 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6332 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6333 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6336 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6337 #define yyparse cparse
6338 #define yylval clval
6344 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6345 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6346 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6348 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6352 extern CSTYPE clval;
6356 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6357 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6358 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6363 # if defined YYDEBUG
6380 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6381 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6382 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6385 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6386 @cindex C-language interface
6389 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6390 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6391 functions that it needs to use.
6393 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6394 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6395 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6396 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6399 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6400 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6401 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6402 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6403 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6404 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6406 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6407 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6408 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6412 @node Parser Function
6413 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6416 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6417 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6418 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6419 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6420 without reading further.
6423 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6424 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6425 is due to end-of-input).
6427 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6428 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6431 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6434 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6439 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6444 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6447 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6448 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6449 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6451 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6452 @findex %parse-param
6453 Declare that one or more
6454 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6455 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6456 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6457 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6460 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6463 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6467 Then call the parser like this:
6471 int nastiness, randomness;
6472 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6473 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6479 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6482 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6486 Using the following:
6488 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6491 Results in these signatures:
6493 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6494 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6498 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6499 and @code{%locations} are used:
6502 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6503 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6506 @node Push Parser Function
6507 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6508 @findex yypush_parse
6510 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6511 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6513 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6514 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6515 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6516 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6518 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6519 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6520 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6521 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6524 @node Pull Parser Function
6525 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6526 @findex yypull_parse
6528 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6529 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6531 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6532 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6533 declaration is used.
6534 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6536 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6537 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6540 @node Parser Create Function
6541 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6542 @findex yypstate_new
6544 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6545 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6547 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6548 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6549 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6550 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6552 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6553 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6554 or 0 if no memory was available.
6555 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6559 @node Parser Delete Function
6560 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6561 @findex yypstate_delete
6563 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6564 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6566 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6567 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6568 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6569 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6571 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6572 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6573 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6577 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6579 @cindex lexical analyzer
6581 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6582 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6583 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6584 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6586 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6587 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6588 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6589 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6590 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6591 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6592 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6596 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6597 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6598 of the token it has read.
6599 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6600 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6602 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6603 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6606 @node Calling Convention
6607 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6609 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6610 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6611 signifies end-of-input.
6613 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6614 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6615 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6616 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6618 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6619 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6620 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6621 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6622 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6623 signifies end-of-input.
6625 Here is an example showing these things:
6632 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6635 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6636 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6638 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6644 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6645 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6647 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6648 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6652 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6653 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6654 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6655 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6658 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6659 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6660 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6661 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6662 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6665 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6666 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6667 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6668 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6671 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6674 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6675 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6676 strlen (token_buffer))
6677 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6678 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6683 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6684 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6688 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6691 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6692 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6693 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6694 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6700 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6701 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6706 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6707 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6708 Union Declaration}). So when you store a token's value, you
6709 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6710 declaration looks like this:
6723 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6728 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6729 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6734 @node Token Locations
6735 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6738 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6739 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6740 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6741 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6742 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6743 data in that variable.
6745 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6746 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6747 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6748 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6749 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6752 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6755 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6757 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6758 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6759 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6760 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6761 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6762 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6767 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6770 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6771 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6776 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6777 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6778 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6781 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6782 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6783 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6784 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6786 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6788 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6789 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6790 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6793 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6795 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6796 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6797 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6798 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6799 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6806 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6807 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6808 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6812 results in the following signatures:
6815 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6816 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6819 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6822 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6823 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6827 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6831 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6832 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6833 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6836 @node Error Reporting
6837 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6838 @cindex error reporting function
6841 @cindex syntax error
6843 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6844 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6845 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6846 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6849 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6850 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6851 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6852 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6853 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6855 @findex %define parse.error
6856 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6857 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6858 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6859 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6860 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6862 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6863 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6864 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6865 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6866 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6867 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6869 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6870 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6871 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6873 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6878 yyerror (char const *s)
6882 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6887 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6888 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6889 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6890 immediately return 1.
6892 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6893 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6894 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6895 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6896 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6898 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6899 following signature:
6902 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6906 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6907 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6908 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6909 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6910 message is always passed last.
6912 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6913 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6914 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6918 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6919 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6920 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6921 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6923 @node Action Features
6924 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6925 @cindex summary, action features
6926 @cindex action features summary
6928 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6929 are useful in actions.
6931 @deffn {Variable} $$
6932 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6933 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6936 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6937 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6938 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6941 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6942 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6943 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6944 Types of Values in Actions}.
6947 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6948 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6949 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6950 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6953 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6954 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6955 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6958 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6959 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6960 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6963 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6965 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6966 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6967 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6968 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6969 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6970 going to be reduced by this rule.
6972 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6973 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6974 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6977 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6980 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6981 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6984 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6985 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6989 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6990 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6991 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6992 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6993 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6994 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6997 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6998 @findex YYRECOVERING
6999 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7000 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7001 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7004 @deffn {Variable} yychar
7005 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
7006 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
7007 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
7008 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7010 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
7013 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
7014 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
7016 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
7018 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7021 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
7022 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
7023 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
7024 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7027 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
7028 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
7029 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7030 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7032 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
7035 @deffn {Variable} yylval
7036 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
7037 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
7038 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
7040 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
7044 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7045 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7048 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
7052 @c int first_line, last_line;
7053 @c int first_column, last_column;
7057 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
7058 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
7060 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
7061 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
7062 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
7065 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
7068 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
7070 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
7071 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7075 @node Internationalization
7076 @section Parser Internationalization
7077 @cindex internationalization
7083 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
7084 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
7085 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
7086 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
7087 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
7088 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
7089 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
7090 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
7093 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
7094 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
7095 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
7100 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
7101 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
7102 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
7103 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
7104 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
7108 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
7113 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
7114 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
7115 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
7116 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
7117 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
7118 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
7119 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
7120 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
7121 Bison-generated parser.
7124 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7125 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7126 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7130 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7133 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7134 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7135 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7139 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7140 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7141 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7144 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7150 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7154 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7160 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7161 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
7162 @cindex algorithm of parser
7165 @cindex parser stack
7166 @cindex stack, parser
7168 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7169 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7170 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7172 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7173 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7176 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7177 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7178 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7179 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7180 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7181 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7182 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7184 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7191 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7192 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7195 expr: expr '*' expr;
7199 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7206 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7207 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7209 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7210 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7211 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7213 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7216 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7217 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7218 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7219 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7220 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7221 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7222 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7223 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7224 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7225 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7229 @section Lookahead Tokens
7230 @cindex lookahead token
7232 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7233 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7234 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7235 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7236 token in order to decide what to do.
7238 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7239 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7240 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7241 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7242 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7243 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7244 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7247 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7248 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7249 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7268 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7269 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7270 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7271 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7272 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7274 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7275 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7276 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7277 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7278 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7279 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7284 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7285 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7286 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7287 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7290 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7292 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7293 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7294 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7296 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7297 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7302 "if" expr "then" stmt
7303 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7309 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7310 specific keyword tokens.
7312 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7313 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7314 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7315 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7318 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7319 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7320 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7321 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7322 contrast it with the other alternative.
7324 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7325 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7329 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7331 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7334 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7335 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7336 making these two inputs equivalent:
7339 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7341 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7344 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7345 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7346 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7347 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7348 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7349 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7350 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7351 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7353 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7354 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7355 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7356 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7358 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7359 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7360 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7361 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7362 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7365 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7366 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7367 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7381 "if" expr "then" stmt
7382 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7392 @section Operator Precedence
7393 @cindex operator precedence
7394 @cindex precedence of operators
7396 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7397 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7398 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7399 shift and when to reduce.
7402 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7403 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7404 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7405 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7406 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7407 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7410 @node Why Precedence
7411 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7413 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7414 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7429 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7430 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7431 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7432 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7433 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7434 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7435 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7438 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7439 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7440 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7441 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7442 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7443 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7444 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7445 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7448 @cindex associativity
7449 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7450 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7451 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7452 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7453 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7454 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7455 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7456 makes right-associativity.
7458 @node Using Precedence
7459 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7465 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7466 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7467 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7468 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7469 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7470 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7471 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7473 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7474 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7475 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7476 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7477 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7478 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7479 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7480 what expected the grammar author.
7482 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7483 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7484 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7485 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7486 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7488 @node Precedence Only
7489 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7492 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7493 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7494 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7495 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7496 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7497 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7498 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7500 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7501 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7502 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7506 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7509 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7510 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7511 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7512 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7513 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7514 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7515 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7522 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7523 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7524 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7525 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7526 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7527 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7528 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7530 @node Precedence Examples
7531 @subsection Precedence Examples
7533 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7541 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7542 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7543 declared with @code{'-'}:
7546 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7551 @node How Precedence
7552 @subsection How Precedence Works
7554 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7555 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7556 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7557 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7558 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7559 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7561 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7562 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7563 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7564 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7565 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7566 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7567 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7570 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7571 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7574 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7576 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7577 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7578 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7579 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7581 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7582 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7583 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7584 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7585 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7586 instance as follows:
7595 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7596 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7597 use right associativity:
7600 %right "then" "else"
7603 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7604 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7605 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7606 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7607 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7608 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7609 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7611 @node Contextual Precedence
7612 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7613 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7614 @cindex unary operator precedence
7615 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7616 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7619 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7620 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7621 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7622 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7624 The Bison precedence declarations
7625 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7626 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7627 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7630 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7631 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7632 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7633 modifier's syntax is:
7636 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7640 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7641 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7642 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7643 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7644 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7646 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7647 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7648 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7658 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7666 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7671 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7672 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7673 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7674 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7676 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7677 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7678 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7679 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7681 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7682 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7683 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7684 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7685 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7686 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7688 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7689 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7693 @section Parser States
7694 @cindex finite-state machine
7695 @cindex parser state
7696 @cindex state (of parser)
7698 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7699 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7700 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7701 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7702 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7704 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7705 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7706 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7707 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7708 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7709 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7710 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7711 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7714 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7715 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7716 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7719 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7720 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7721 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7723 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7724 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7727 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7728 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7733 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7735 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7741 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7742 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7748 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7749 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7750 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7751 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7752 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7753 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7755 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7756 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7757 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7759 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7760 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7761 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7762 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7763 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7765 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7766 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7767 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7768 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7773 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7774 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7779 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7786 | sequence redirects
7800 | redirects redirect
7806 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7807 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7808 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7809 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7810 in infinitely many ways!
7812 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7813 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7814 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7815 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7817 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7828 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7836 | sequence redirects
7850 | redirects redirect
7855 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7856 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7857 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7858 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7859 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7862 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7863 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7865 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7866 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7867 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7868 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7869 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7874 %precedence "sequence"
7879 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7880 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7892 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7893 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7896 %right "word" "redirect"
7901 | sequence word %prec "word"
7902 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7907 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7908 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7909 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7911 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7917 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7920 | name_list ':' type
7937 | name ',' name_list
7942 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7943 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7944 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7945 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7949 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7951 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7952 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7953 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7955 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7956 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7957 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7958 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7959 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7960 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7961 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7964 @cindex canonical LR
7965 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7966 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7967 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7968 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7969 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7970 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7971 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7972 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7974 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7975 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7976 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7977 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7978 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7986 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7991 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7992 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7993 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7994 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7995 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7996 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7998 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7999 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
8000 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
8001 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
8002 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
8003 rather than the one for @code{name}.
8009 | name_list ':' type
8021 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
8022 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
8027 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
8028 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
8029 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
8030 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
8031 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
8032 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
8033 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
8035 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
8036 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
8037 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
8038 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
8040 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
8041 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
8044 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
8045 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
8046 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
8047 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
8050 @node LR Table Construction
8051 @subsection LR Table Construction
8052 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
8055 @cindex canonical LR
8056 @findex %define lr.type
8058 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
8059 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
8060 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
8061 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
8064 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
8065 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
8066 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
8067 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
8070 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
8071 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
8072 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
8075 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
8076 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
8077 values for @var{type} are:
8080 @item @code{lalr} (default)
8082 @item @code{canonical-lr}
8085 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8089 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
8093 %define lr.type ielr
8096 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
8097 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
8098 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
8099 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
8100 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
8101 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
8102 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
8103 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
8104 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
8105 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
8107 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
8108 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
8109 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
8110 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
8116 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
8119 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
8121 @cindex GLR with LALR
8122 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8123 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8125 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8126 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8127 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8128 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8129 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8130 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8131 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8132 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8134 @item Malformed grammars.
8136 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8137 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8138 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8139 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8140 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8145 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8146 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8147 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8148 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8149 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8150 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8151 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8152 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8153 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8157 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8160 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8161 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8162 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8163 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8164 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8165 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8166 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8167 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8168 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8169 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8170 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8171 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8174 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8175 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8176 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8178 @node Default Reductions
8179 @subsection Default Reductions
8180 @cindex default reductions
8181 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
8184 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8185 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8186 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8187 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8188 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8190 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8191 also affect the behavior of the parser:
8194 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8196 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
8197 @cindex consistent states
8198 @cindex defaulted states
8199 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8200 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8201 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8202 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8203 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8204 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8205 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8206 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8207 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8208 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8209 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8211 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8212 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8213 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8214 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8215 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8216 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8217 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8218 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8219 should already be considered closed.
8221 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8223 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8224 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8225 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8226 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8227 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8228 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8229 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8230 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8231 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8235 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8236 @c sentence from being rejected.
8237 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8238 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8239 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8240 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8241 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8242 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8245 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8246 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8247 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8248 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8249 because the accept action ends the parse.
8251 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8252 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8253 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8254 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8255 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8256 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8257 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8258 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8259 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8260 split the parse instead.
8262 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8263 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8265 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8266 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8267 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8269 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8270 @item @code{consistent}
8271 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8274 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8275 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8280 @findex %define parse.lac
8282 @cindex lookahead correction
8284 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8285 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8286 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8287 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8288 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8289 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8290 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8291 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8292 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8294 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8295 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8296 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8297 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8298 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8300 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8301 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8302 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8303 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8305 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8306 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8308 @item @code{none} (default)
8311 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8312 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8316 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8317 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8318 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8319 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8320 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8321 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8322 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8323 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8324 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8325 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8328 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8329 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8330 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8331 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8332 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8333 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8334 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8335 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8336 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8337 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8339 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8340 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8341 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8342 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8343 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8344 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8345 language-recognition power.
8347 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8350 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8352 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8353 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8354 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8355 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8358 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8360 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8361 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8362 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8363 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8364 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8365 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8369 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8370 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8371 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8372 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8373 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8374 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8375 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8376 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8377 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8378 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8379 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8382 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8383 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8384 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8386 @node Unreachable States
8387 @subsection Unreachable States
8388 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8389 @cindex unreachable states
8391 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8392 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8393 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8394 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8396 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8397 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8398 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8399 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8401 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8402 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8403 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8406 There are a few caveats to consider:
8409 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8411 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8412 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8413 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8414 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8415 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8416 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8418 @item Other useless states.
8420 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8421 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8422 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8423 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8424 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8425 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8426 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8429 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8430 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8432 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8433 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8434 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8436 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8437 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8438 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8439 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8440 context-free languages.
8441 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8442 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8443 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8444 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8445 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8446 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8447 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8448 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8450 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8451 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8452 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8453 parser uses the same basic
8454 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8455 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8456 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8457 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8459 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8460 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8461 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8462 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8463 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8465 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8466 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8467 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8468 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8469 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8470 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8471 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8472 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8473 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8474 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8475 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8478 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8479 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8480 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8481 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8482 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8483 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8484 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8485 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8486 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8487 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8488 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8489 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8491 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8492 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8493 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8495 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8496 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8497 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8498 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8499 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8500 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8501 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8502 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8503 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8504 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8505 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8506 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8508 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8511 @node Memory Management
8512 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8513 @cindex memory exhaustion
8514 @cindex memory management
8515 @cindex stack overflow
8516 @cindex parser stack overflow
8517 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8519 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8520 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8521 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8523 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8524 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8525 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8528 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8529 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8530 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8531 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8533 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8534 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8535 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8536 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8537 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8538 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8540 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8541 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8542 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8545 @cindex default stack limit
8546 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8550 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8551 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8552 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8553 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8554 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8556 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8558 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8559 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8560 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8561 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8562 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8563 non-trivial copy constructors.
8564 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8567 @node Error Recovery
8568 @chapter Error Recovery
8569 @cindex error recovery
8570 @cindex recovery from errors
8572 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8573 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8574 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8577 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8578 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8579 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8580 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8581 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8582 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8583 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8586 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8587 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8588 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8589 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8590 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8591 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8603 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8604 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8606 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8607 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8608 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8609 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8610 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8611 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8612 applicable in the ordinary way.
8614 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8615 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8616 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8617 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8618 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8619 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8620 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8621 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8622 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8623 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8624 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8625 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8627 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8628 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8629 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8632 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8635 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8636 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8637 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8638 spurious error message:
8648 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8649 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8650 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8651 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8652 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8653 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8654 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8657 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8658 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8659 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8660 error messages resume.
8662 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8663 as any other rules can.
8666 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8667 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8668 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8669 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8672 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8673 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8674 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8676 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8678 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8679 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8680 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8681 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8682 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8684 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8685 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8686 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8687 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8690 @node Context Dependency
8691 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8693 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8694 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8695 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8696 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8700 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8701 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8702 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8703 error recovery rules must be written.
8706 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8707 neither clean nor robust.)
8709 @node Semantic Tokens
8710 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8712 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8713 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8719 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8720 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8721 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8723 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8724 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8725 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8726 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8727 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8729 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8730 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8731 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8732 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8733 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8734 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8735 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8737 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8738 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8739 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8740 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8744 typedef int foo, bar;
8748 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8749 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8755 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8756 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8758 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8759 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8760 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8761 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8762 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8767 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8768 | declarator maybeasm
8774 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8775 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8781 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8782 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8783 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8785 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8786 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8787 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8788 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8789 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8790 the syntactic context.
8792 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8793 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8794 @cindex lexical tie-in
8796 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8797 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8800 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8801 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8802 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8803 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8804 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8811 void yyerror (char const *);
8820 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8821 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8822 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8836 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8837 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8838 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8840 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8841 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8842 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8845 @node Tie-in Recovery
8846 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8848 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8849 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8851 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8852 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8853 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8854 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8859 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8861 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8865 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8866 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8867 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8868 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8869 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8871 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8873 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8874 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8875 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8881 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8887 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8888 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8889 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8890 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8892 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8893 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8894 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8895 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8896 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8897 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8900 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8903 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8905 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8906 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8907 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8909 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8910 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8911 automaton. There are several formats available:
8914 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8917 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8920 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8921 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8924 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8925 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8929 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8930 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8931 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8932 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8936 @section Understanding Your Parser
8938 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8939 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8940 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8941 tune or simply fix a parser.
8943 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8944 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8945 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8946 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8947 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8948 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8949 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8951 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8973 @command{bison} reports:
8976 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8977 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8978 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8979 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8980 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8983 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8984 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8985 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8986 interpretation is the same.
8989 @cindex token, useless
8990 @cindex useless token
8991 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8992 @cindex useless nonterminal
8993 @cindex rule, useless
8994 @cindex useless rule
8995 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8996 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8997 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8998 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
9001 Nonterminals useless in grammar
9004 Terminals unused in grammar
9007 Rules useless in grammar
9012 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
9015 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9016 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9017 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
9018 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
9022 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
9037 and reports the uses of the symbols:
9041 Terminals, with rules where they appear
9054 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
9059 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
9065 @cindex pointed rule
9066 @cindex rule, pointed
9067 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
9068 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
9069 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
9070 the location of the input cursor.
9075 0 $accept: . exp $end
9077 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9082 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
9083 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
9084 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
9085 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
9086 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
9087 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
9088 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
9089 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
9091 @cindex core, item set
9092 @cindex item set core
9093 @cindex kernel, item set
9094 @cindex item set core
9095 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
9096 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
9097 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
9098 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
9099 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
9100 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
9105 0 $accept: . exp $end
9106 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
9112 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9118 In the state 1@dots{}
9125 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9129 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9130 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9131 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9132 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9137 0 $accept: exp . $end
9138 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9143 $end shift, and go to state 3
9144 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9145 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9146 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9147 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9151 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9152 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9153 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9154 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9155 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9158 @cindex accepting state
9159 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9165 0 $accept: exp $end .
9171 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9172 read), the parsing exits successfully.
9174 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9180 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9182 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9189 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9191 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9198 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9200 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9207 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9209 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9214 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9220 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9226 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9227 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9229 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9230 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9233 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9234 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9235 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9236 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9237 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9238 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9239 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9240 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9242 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9243 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9244 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9247 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9248 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9249 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9250 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9251 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9252 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9253 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9254 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9255 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9256 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9257 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9258 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9263 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9264 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9269 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9270 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9272 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9273 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9276 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9277 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9278 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9279 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9280 conflicts in the report:
9283 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9284 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9285 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9289 The remaining states are similar:
9295 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9301 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9302 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9304 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9305 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9311 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9317 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9319 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9320 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9326 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9332 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9333 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9334 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9335 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9337 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9338 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9339 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9340 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9341 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9346 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9347 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9348 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9350 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9351 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9353 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9356 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9359 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9360 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9361 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9362 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9363 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9364 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9365 to help them understand LR parsers.
9367 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9368 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9369 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9370 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9371 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9372 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9373 parser in multiple formats}).
9376 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9387 The graphical output
9389 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9391 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9392 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9393 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9396 @float Figure,fig:graph
9397 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9398 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9402 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9404 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9405 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9406 about transitions, for examples
9408 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9409 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9410 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9415 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9418 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9420 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9421 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9429 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9433 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9435 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9437 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9439 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9440 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9441 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9442 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9444 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9451 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9452 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9455 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9457 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9459 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9460 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9461 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9462 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9463 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9465 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9466 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9468 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9470 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9471 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9473 @c ================================================= XML
9476 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9479 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9480 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9481 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9482 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9483 option @option{--graph}. However,
9484 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9485 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9486 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9487 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9488 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9489 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9491 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9492 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9493 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9494 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9495 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9496 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9498 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9499 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9503 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9505 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9507 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9510 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9514 $ bison --print-datadir
9515 /usr/local/share/bison
9517 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9520 @c ================================================= Tracing
9523 @section Tracing Your Parser
9526 @cindex tracing the parser
9528 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9529 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9532 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9533 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9534 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9537 @node Enabling Traces
9538 @subsection Enabling Traces
9539 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9542 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9544 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9545 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9546 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9547 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9550 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9551 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9552 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9553 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9554 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9556 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9557 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9558 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9559 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix @{c@}}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9560 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9562 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9564 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9565 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9566 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9568 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9569 @findex %define parse.trace
9570 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9571 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9572 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9573 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9574 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9577 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9581 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9582 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9583 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9584 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9585 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9586 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9588 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9589 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9590 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9591 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9593 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9594 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9595 messages tell you these things:
9599 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9602 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9603 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9606 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9607 of the state stack afterward.
9610 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9611 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9612 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9613 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9614 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9615 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9616 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9617 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9618 grammar are to blame.
9620 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9621 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9622 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9623 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9624 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9627 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9629 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9630 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9631 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9632 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9633 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9634 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9636 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9637 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9638 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9641 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9643 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9645 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9648 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9649 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9650 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9651 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <double>;
9654 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9655 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9656 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9657 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9658 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9659 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9661 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9662 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9663 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9664 tag: since @code{<double>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp},
9665 this printer will be used for them.
9667 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9668 are sent onto standard error.
9671 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9674 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9675 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9681 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9682 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9683 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9684 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9686 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9688 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9689 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9694 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9695 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9696 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9700 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9701 Shifting token '(' ()
9703 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9704 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9706 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9707 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9708 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9714 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9715 @code{<double>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9716 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9719 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9720 Shifting token '-' ()
9722 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9723 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9725 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9726 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9727 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9728 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9730 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9731 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9732 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9734 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9735 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9741 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9742 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9745 Next token is token ')' ()
9746 Shifting token ')' ()
9748 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9749 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9751 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9753 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9759 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9763 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9764 Shifting token '\n' ()
9766 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9767 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9770 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9773 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9776 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9781 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9782 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9783 completion of the parsing.
9786 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9787 Shifting token $end ()
9790 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9791 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9795 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9796 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9799 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9800 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9801 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9803 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9805 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9806 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9807 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9809 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9812 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9813 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9817 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9818 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9819 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9822 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9825 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9828 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9829 else if (type == NUM)
9830 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9834 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9837 @chapter Invoking Bison
9838 @cindex invoking Bison
9839 @cindex Bison invocation
9840 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9842 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9848 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9849 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9850 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9851 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9852 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9853 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9854 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9855 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9856 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9857 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9858 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9863 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9866 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9869 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9872 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9874 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9875 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9876 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9879 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9880 in alphabetical order by short options.
9881 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9882 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9886 @section Bison Options
9888 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9889 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9890 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9891 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9892 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9895 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9896 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9899 @c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9905 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9909 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9911 @item --print-localedir
9912 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9914 @item --print-datadir
9915 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9919 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9920 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9921 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9922 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9923 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9924 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9925 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9926 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9927 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9928 for compatibility with POSIX:
9935 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9936 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9937 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9938 this option is specified.
9940 @item -W [@var{category}]
9941 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9942 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9945 @item midrule-values
9946 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9948 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9951 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9954 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9955 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9958 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9961 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9962 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9963 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9966 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9970 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9971 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9972 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9973 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9974 no effect on the conflict report.
9977 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9981 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9982 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9983 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9986 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9988 Consider for instance the following grammar:
10017 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
10021 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
10026 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
10031 warning: useless precedence for "("
10037 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
10047 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
10049 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
10050 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
10054 All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
10057 Turn off all the warnings.
10060 See @option{-Werror}, below.
10063 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
10064 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
10065 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
10067 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
10068 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
10069 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
10070 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
10072 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
10073 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
10075 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
10076 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
10079 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
10080 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
10081 S/R conflicts as errors.
10084 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
10085 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
10088 @item -f [@var{feature}]
10089 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
10090 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
10093 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
10094 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
10095 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
10096 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
10097 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
10098 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
10103 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10106 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
10110 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
10111 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10115 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10116 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10120 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10121 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10125 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10126 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10130 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10131 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10136 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10140 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10141 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10142 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10143 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10144 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10148 This option is activated by default.
10159 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
10160 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10161 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10163 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10164 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10165 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10166 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10167 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10168 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10169 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10173 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10176 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10177 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10178 definition for @var{name}.
10180 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10181 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10182 definitions for @var{name}.
10184 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10185 definitions for @var{name}.
10188 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10189 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10190 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10192 @item -L @var{language}
10193 @itemx --language=@var{language}
10194 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10195 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10196 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10197 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
10200 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10202 @item -p @var{prefix}
10203 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10204 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10205 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10206 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10210 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10211 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10212 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10213 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10214 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10215 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10217 @item -S @var{file}
10218 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10219 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10220 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10222 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10223 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10224 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10225 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10227 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10228 file in the Bison installation directory.
10229 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10230 current working directory.
10231 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10234 @itemx --token-table
10235 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10242 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10243 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10244 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10245 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10248 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10249 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10250 with other short options.
10252 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10253 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10254 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10255 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10257 @item -r @var{things}
10258 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10259 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10260 separated list of @var{things} among:
10264 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10265 parser's automaton.
10268 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10269 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10272 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10273 each rule's lookahead set.
10276 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10277 precedence and associativity directives.
10280 Enable all the items.
10283 Do not generate the report.
10286 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10287 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10291 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10292 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10293 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10295 @item -o @var{file}
10296 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10297 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10299 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10300 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10302 @item -g [@var{file}]
10303 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10304 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10305 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10306 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10307 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10308 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10311 @item -x [@var{file}]
10312 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10313 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10314 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10315 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10317 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10318 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10321 @node Option Cross Key
10322 @section Option Cross Key
10324 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10325 the corresponding short option and directive.
10327 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10328 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10329 @include cross-options.texi
10333 @section Yacc Library
10335 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10336 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10337 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10338 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10339 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10340 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10341 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10343 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10344 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10347 int yyerror (char const *);
10350 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10351 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10352 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10355 int yyparse (void);
10358 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10360 @node Other Languages
10361 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10364 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10365 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10369 @section C++ Parsers
10372 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10373 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10374 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10375 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10376 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10377 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10380 @node C++ Bison Interface
10381 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10382 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10384 @c - initial action
10386 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10387 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10388 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10389 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10391 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10393 @findex %define api.namespace
10394 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10395 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10396 in the following files:
10401 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10402 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10403 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10407 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10409 @item @var{file}.hh
10410 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10411 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10412 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10413 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10414 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10416 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10417 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10418 @samp{%defines} directive.
10421 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10422 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10424 @node C++ Semantic Values
10425 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10426 @c - No objects in unions
10428 @c - Printer and destructor
10430 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10431 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10432 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10433 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10436 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10437 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10441 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10443 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10444 Union Declaration}. In particular it produces a genuine
10445 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10448 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10449 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10450 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10452 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10453 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10454 to such objects are allowed.
10457 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10458 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10459 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10463 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10465 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10466 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10467 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10469 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10470 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10471 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10472 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10474 For instance, instead of
10482 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10483 %token <sval> STRING;
10490 %token <int> NUMBER;
10491 %token <std::string> STRING;
10494 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10495 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10498 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10499 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10500 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10502 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10503 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10504 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10505 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10506 eventually, destroyed.
10508 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10509 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10510 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10513 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10514 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10518 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10519 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10520 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10521 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10522 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10523 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10524 that would be duplicating the information.
10526 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10527 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10528 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10529 (the current implementation of) variants:
10532 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10533 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10534 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10535 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10536 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10537 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10540 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10543 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10544 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10546 @node C++ Location Values
10547 @subsection C++ Location Values
10549 @c - class Position
10550 @c - class Location
10551 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10553 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10554 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10556 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10557 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10558 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10559 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10560 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10563 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10564 genuine code only the latter is used.
10567 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10568 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10569 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10573 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10575 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10576 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10577 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10581 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10582 Reset the position to the given values.
10585 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10586 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10587 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10588 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10589 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10592 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10593 The line, starting at 1.
10596 @deftypemethod {position} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10597 If @var{height} is not null, advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the
10598 column number. The resulting line number cannot be less than 1.
10601 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10602 The column, starting at 1.
10605 @deftypemethod {position} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10606 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number. The
10607 resulting column number cannot be less than 1.
10610 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10611 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10612 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10613 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10614 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10617 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10618 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10619 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10622 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10623 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10624 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10625 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10629 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10631 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10632 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10635 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10636 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10637 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10640 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10641 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10644 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10645 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10646 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10649 @deftypemethod {location} {void} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10650 @deftypemethodx {location} {void} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10651 Forwarded to the @code{end} position.
10654 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10655 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10656 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10657 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator- (int @var{width})
10658 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator-= (int @var{width})
10659 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10662 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10663 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10666 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10667 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10668 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10672 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10673 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10674 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10677 @node User Defined Location Type
10678 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10679 @findex %define api.location.type
10681 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10682 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10685 %define api.location.type @{@var{LocationType}@}
10688 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10691 it must be copyable;
10694 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10695 parser basically runs
10697 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10698 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10701 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10704 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10705 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10708 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10709 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10714 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10715 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10716 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10717 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10722 %define api.namespace @{master::@}
10726 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10727 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10730 %define api.location.type @{master::location@}
10731 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10734 @node C++ Parser Interface
10735 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10736 @c - define parser_class_name
10738 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10740 @c - Reporting errors
10742 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10743 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10744 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10745 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}}. The interface of
10746 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10747 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10748 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10749 additional argument for its constructor.
10751 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10752 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10753 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10756 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10757 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10758 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10759 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10760 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10761 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10764 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10765 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10766 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10767 equivalent with first
10768 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10769 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10770 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10771 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10772 function invoked from the user action.
10775 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10776 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10777 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10780 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10781 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10782 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10785 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10786 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10789 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10790 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10791 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10794 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10795 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10796 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10800 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10801 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10802 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10803 or nonzero, full tracing.
10806 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10807 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10808 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10809 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10810 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10815 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10816 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10817 @c - prefix for yylex.
10818 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10821 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10822 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10823 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10824 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10827 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10828 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10831 @node Split Symbols
10832 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10834 The interface is as follows.
10836 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10837 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10838 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10839 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10840 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10843 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10844 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10846 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10850 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10851 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10854 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10855 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10859 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10860 initialized. So the code would look like:
10864 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10865 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10868 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10869 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10878 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10879 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10882 yylval.build(yytext);
10883 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10888 @node Complete Symbols
10889 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10891 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10892 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10893 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10894 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10895 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10896 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10898 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10899 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10900 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10901 the @var{location}.
10904 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10905 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10906 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10907 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10909 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10911 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10912 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10913 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10914 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10915 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10916 also pass the @var{location}.
10919 For instance, given the following declarations:
10922 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
10923 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10924 %token <int> INTEGER;
10929 Bison generates the following functions:
10932 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10933 const location_type& l);
10934 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10935 const location_type& loc);
10936 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10940 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10943 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10944 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10945 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10948 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10949 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10951 @node A Complete C++ Example
10952 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10954 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10955 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10956 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10957 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10958 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10959 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10960 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10961 actually easier to interface with.
10964 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10965 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10966 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10967 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10968 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10971 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10972 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10974 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10975 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10976 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10977 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10978 of valid input follows.
10982 seven := one + two * three
10986 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10987 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10989 @c - A place to store error messages
10990 @c - A place for the result
10992 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10993 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10994 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10995 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10996 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10997 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10998 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
11000 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
11001 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
11002 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
11005 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11007 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11008 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11011 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11016 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
11017 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
11018 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
11019 factor both as follows.
11021 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11023 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
11025 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
11026 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
11031 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
11034 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11036 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
11037 class calcxx_driver
11041 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
11043 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
11049 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
11050 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
11052 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11054 // Handling the scanner.
11055 void scan_begin ();
11057 bool trace_scanning;
11061 Similarly for the parser itself.
11063 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11065 // Run the parser on file F.
11066 // Return 0 on success.
11067 int parse (const std::string& f);
11068 // The name of the file being parsed.
11069 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
11071 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
11072 bool trace_parsing;
11076 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
11077 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
11078 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
11079 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
11081 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11084 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
11085 void error (const std::string& m);
11087 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11090 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
11091 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
11092 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
11093 messages and set error state.
11095 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
11097 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11098 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
11100 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
11101 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
11103 variables["one"] = 1;
11104 variables["two"] = 2;
11107 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
11112 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
11116 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
11117 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
11118 int res = parser.parse ();
11124 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11126 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11130 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11132 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11136 @node Calc++ Parser
11137 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11139 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11140 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11141 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11142 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11145 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11147 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11148 %require "@value{VERSION}"
11150 %define parser_class_name @{calcxx_parser@}
11154 @findex %define api.token.constructor
11155 @findex %define api.value.type variant
11156 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11157 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11158 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11159 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11161 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11163 %define api.token.constructor
11164 %define api.value.type variant
11165 %define parse.assert
11169 @findex %code requires
11170 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11171 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11172 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11173 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11174 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11175 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11176 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11178 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11183 class calcxx_driver;
11188 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11189 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11192 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11194 // The parsing context.
11195 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11199 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11200 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11201 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11204 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11209 // Initialize the initial location.
11210 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11215 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11216 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11219 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11221 %define parse.trace
11222 %define parse.error verbose
11227 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11228 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11230 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11234 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11240 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11241 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11242 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11243 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11244 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11246 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11248 %define api.token.prefix @{TOK_@}
11250 END 0 "end of file"
11262 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11263 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11266 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11268 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11269 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11274 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11275 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11276 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11277 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11279 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11281 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11285 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11286 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11288 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11292 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11296 | assignments assignment @{@};
11299 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11304 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11305 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11306 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11307 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11308 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11309 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11310 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11315 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11318 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11321 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11322 const std::string& m)
11324 driver.error (l, m);
11328 @node Calc++ Scanner
11329 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11331 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11332 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11334 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11336 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11338 # include <climits>
11339 # include <cstdlib>
11341 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11342 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11344 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11345 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11346 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11347 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11349 # define yywrap() 1
11351 // The location of the current token.
11352 static yy::location loc;
11357 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11358 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11359 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11360 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11362 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11364 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11368 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11370 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11372 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11378 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11379 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11380 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11381 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11382 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11383 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11384 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11386 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11390 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11391 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11397 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11401 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11402 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11406 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11408 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11410 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11411 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11412 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11413 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11414 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11415 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11416 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11421 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11422 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11423 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11424 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11427 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11428 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11429 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11434 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11435 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11437 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11441 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11443 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11444 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11446 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11448 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11449 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11456 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11463 @node Calc++ Top Level
11464 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11466 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11468 @comment file: calc++.cc
11470 #include <iostream>
11471 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11475 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11478 calcxx_driver driver;
11479 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11480 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11481 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11482 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11483 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11484 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11485 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11494 @section Java Parsers
11497 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11498 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11499 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11500 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11501 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11502 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11503 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11504 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11507 @node Java Bison Interface
11508 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11509 @c - %language "Java"
11511 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11512 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11514 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11515 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11517 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11518 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11519 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11520 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11521 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11522 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11523 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11524 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11525 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11526 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11528 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11530 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11531 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11532 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11533 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11535 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11536 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11538 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11539 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11541 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11542 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11544 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11545 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11546 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11548 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11549 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11550 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11552 if needed. Also, in the future the
11553 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11554 access the token names and codes.
11556 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11557 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11558 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11559 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11562 @node Java Semantic Values
11563 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11564 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11566 @c - Printer and destructor
11568 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11569 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11570 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11573 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11574 %type <Integer> number
11577 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11578 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11579 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11580 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11581 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11584 %define api.value.type @{ASTNode@}
11588 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11589 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11591 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11592 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11593 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11594 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11595 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11596 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11598 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11599 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11600 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11602 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11603 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11604 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11607 @node Java Location Values
11608 @subsection Java Location Values
11610 @c - class Position
11611 @c - class Location
11613 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11614 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11615 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11616 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11617 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11618 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11619 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11621 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11622 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11623 with @code{%define api.position.type @{@var{class-name}@}}. This class must
11624 be supplied by the user.
11627 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11628 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11629 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11632 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11633 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11636 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11637 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11640 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11641 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11642 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11643 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11647 @node Java Parser Interface
11648 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11649 @c - define parser_class_name
11651 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11653 @c - Reporting errors
11655 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11656 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11657 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11658 @samp{%define parser_class_name @{@var{name}@}} to give a custom name to
11659 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11661 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11662 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11663 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11664 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11665 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11666 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11667 A single @samp{%define annotations @{@var{annotations}@}} directive can
11668 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11670 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11671 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11672 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11673 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11675 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11676 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11677 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11678 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11679 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11680 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11682 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11683 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11684 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11685 which initialize them automatically.
11687 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11688 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11689 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11690 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11692 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11693 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11694 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11697 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11698 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11699 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11702 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11703 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11704 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11706 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11707 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11708 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11711 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11712 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11713 @code{false} otherwise.
11716 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11717 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11718 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11719 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11720 verbose error messages.
11723 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11724 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11725 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11726 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11727 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11728 available only if location tracking is active.
11731 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11732 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11733 from a syntax error.
11734 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11737 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11738 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11739 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11743 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11744 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11745 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11746 or nonzero, full tracing.
11749 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11750 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11751 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11755 @node Java Scanner Interface
11756 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11759 @c - Lexer interface
11761 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11762 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11763 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11764 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11765 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11768 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11769 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11770 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11771 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11774 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11775 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11776 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11777 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11780 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11782 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11783 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11784 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11785 changed using @code{%define api.location.type @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11788 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11789 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11790 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11793 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11794 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11797 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11798 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11799 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11800 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11801 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11803 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11804 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11807 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11808 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11810 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11811 @{@var{class-name}@}}.
11815 @node Java Action Features
11816 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11818 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11819 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11821 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11822 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11825 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11826 This may not be assigned to.
11827 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11830 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11831 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11832 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11836 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11837 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11838 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11839 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11840 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11841 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11844 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11845 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11846 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11847 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11849 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11853 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11854 This may not be assigned to.
11855 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11859 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11860 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11863 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11864 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11865 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11868 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11869 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11870 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11873 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11874 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11875 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11878 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11879 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11880 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11882 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11885 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11886 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11887 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11888 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11889 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11890 available only if location tracking is active.
11894 @node Java Differences
11895 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11897 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11898 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11899 section summarizes these differences.
11903 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11904 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11905 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11906 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11907 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11908 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11909 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11911 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11912 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11913 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11914 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11915 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11918 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11919 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11920 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11921 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11922 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11923 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11924 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11925 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11926 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11929 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11931 @item @code{%code imports}
11932 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11933 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11934 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11936 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11937 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11939 @item @code{%code lexer}
11940 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11941 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11942 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11946 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11947 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11948 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11950 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11951 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11956 @node Java Declarations Summary
11957 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11959 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11960 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11962 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11963 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11966 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11967 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11968 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11969 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11970 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11973 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11974 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11975 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11976 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11979 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11980 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11981 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11982 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11985 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11986 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11987 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11990 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11991 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11992 a Java @emph{type}.
11993 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11996 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11997 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11998 @xref{Java Differences}.
12001 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12002 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
12003 @xref{Java Differences}.
12006 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12007 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
12008 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12011 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
12012 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
12013 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12016 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
12017 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
12018 @emph{outside} the parser class.
12019 @xref{Java Differences}.
12022 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
12023 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
12024 @xref{Java Differences}.
12027 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
12028 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
12029 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12032 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} @{@var{annotations}@}
12033 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
12034 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12037 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} @{@var{superclass}@}
12038 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
12039 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12042 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
12043 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
12044 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12047 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} @{@var{interfaces}@}
12048 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
12050 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12053 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12054 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
12055 constructor. Default is none.
12056 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12059 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12060 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
12061 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
12062 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
12065 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @{@var{class}@}
12066 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
12067 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
12068 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
12069 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
12070 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12073 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} @{@var{package}@}
12074 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
12075 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12078 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} @{@var{name}@}
12079 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
12080 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
12081 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12084 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} @{@var{class}@}
12085 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
12086 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
12087 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
12088 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12091 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
12092 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
12093 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12096 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} @{@var{class}@}
12097 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
12098 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12101 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
12102 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
12103 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12106 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} @{@var{exceptions}@}
12107 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
12108 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
12109 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12113 @c ================================================= FAQ
12116 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
12117 @cindex frequently asked questions
12120 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
12124 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
12125 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12126 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12127 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12128 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12129 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12130 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12131 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12132 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12133 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12134 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12135 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12138 @node Memory Exhausted
12139 @section Memory Exhausted
12142 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12143 message. What can I do?
12146 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12149 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
12150 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
12152 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12153 following typical questions:
12156 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12157 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12158 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12165 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12166 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12167 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12170 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12171 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12172 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12173 demonstration, consider the following source file,
12174 @file{first-line.l}:
12180 #include <stdlib.h>
12184 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
12188 yyparse (char const *file)
12190 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12194 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12198 /* One token only. */
12200 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12203 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12221 If the file @file{input} contains
12229 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12232 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12233 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12234 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12239 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12240 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12241 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12242 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12243 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12244 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12245 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12246 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12249 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12250 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12251 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12252 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12254 @node Strings are Destroyed
12255 @section Strings are Destroyed
12258 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12259 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12260 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12263 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12264 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12265 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12271 char *yylval = NULL;
12276 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12284 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12285 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12286 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12287 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12293 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12296 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12297 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12298 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12304 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12305 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12306 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12307 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12308 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12309 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12312 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12313 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12314 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12319 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12320 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12323 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12324 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12327 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12328 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12329 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12330 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12331 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12332 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12333 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12335 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12337 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12338 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12339 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12340 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12341 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12342 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12345 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12346 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12349 @node Multiple start-symbols
12350 @section Multiple start-symbols
12353 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12354 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12355 multiple entry points.
12358 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12359 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12360 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12361 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12365 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12372 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12373 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12375 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12376 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12377 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12378 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12379 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12380 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12381 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12382 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12385 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12390 int t = start_token;
12395 /* @r{The rules.} */
12399 @node Secure? Conform?
12400 @section Secure? Conform?
12403 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12406 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12407 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12408 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12409 please send us a bug report.
12411 @node I can't build Bison
12412 @section I can't build Bison
12415 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12416 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12420 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12421 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12422 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12423 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12424 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12425 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12426 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12429 @node Where can I find help?
12430 @section Where can I find help?
12433 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12436 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12437 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12438 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12439 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12440 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12441 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12442 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12443 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12447 @section Bug Reports
12450 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12453 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12454 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12455 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12456 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12457 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12459 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12460 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12461 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12462 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12463 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12465 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12466 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12467 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12468 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12469 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12470 send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12472 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12473 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12475 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12477 @node More Languages
12478 @section More Languages
12481 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12482 favorite language here}?
12485 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12486 languages; contributions are welcome.
12489 @section Beta Testing
12492 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12495 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12496 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12497 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12498 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12499 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12500 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12501 essentially halted.
12503 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12504 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12505 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12506 systems are especially welcome.
12508 @node Mailing Lists
12509 @section Mailing Lists
12512 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12515 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12517 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12519 @node Table of Symbols
12520 @appendix Bison Symbols
12521 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12522 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12524 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12525 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12526 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12529 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12530 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12531 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12532 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12534 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12535 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12538 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12539 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12540 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12541 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12544 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12545 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12546 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12549 @deffn {Variable} $$
12550 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12554 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12555 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12556 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12559 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12560 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12561 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12565 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12566 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12567 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12568 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12571 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12572 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12573 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12574 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12575 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12579 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12580 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12581 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12582 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12583 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12584 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12585 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12587 This feature is experimental.
12588 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12592 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12593 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12594 Comments, as in C/C++.
12597 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12598 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12602 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12603 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12606 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12607 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12608 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12611 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12612 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12615 This feature is experimental.
12616 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12619 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12622 @deffn {Directive} <>
12623 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12626 This feature is experimental.
12627 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12630 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12633 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12634 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12635 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12636 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12639 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12640 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12641 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12642 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12643 @xref{%code Summary}.
12646 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12647 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12651 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12652 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12653 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12658 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12659 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12660 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @{@var{value}@}
12661 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12662 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12665 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12666 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12667 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12670 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12671 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12672 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12675 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12676 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12677 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12680 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12681 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12682 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12686 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12687 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12688 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12691 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12692 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12693 used in the grammar.
12696 @deffn {Symbol} error
12697 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12698 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12699 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12700 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12701 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12702 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12703 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12704 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12707 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12708 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12709 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12712 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12713 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12717 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12718 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12719 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12722 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12723 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12726 @deffn {Directive} %language
12727 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12728 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12731 @deffn {Directive} %left
12732 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12733 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12736 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12737 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12738 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12742 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12743 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12744 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12745 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12746 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12749 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12750 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12751 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12753 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12754 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12755 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12757 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12758 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12759 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12760 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12761 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12762 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12763 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12764 @code{%define api.namespace} documentation in this section.
12769 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12770 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12771 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12776 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12777 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12778 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12781 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12782 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12783 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12786 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12787 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12788 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12791 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12792 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12793 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12794 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12797 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12798 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12799 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12802 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12803 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12804 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12807 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12808 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12809 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12812 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12813 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12814 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12815 unreasonable usage.
12818 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12819 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12820 Require a Version of Bison}.
12823 @deffn {Directive} %right
12824 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12825 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12828 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12829 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12830 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12833 @deffn {Directive} %start
12834 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12838 @deffn {Directive} %token
12839 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12840 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12843 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12844 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12845 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12848 @deffn {Directive} %type
12849 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12850 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12853 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12854 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12855 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12859 @deffn {Directive} %union
12860 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12861 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
12864 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12865 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12866 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12867 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12868 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12870 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12874 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12875 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12876 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12877 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12879 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12883 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12884 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12885 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12888 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12889 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12890 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12891 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12892 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12895 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12896 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12897 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12900 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12901 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12902 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12905 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12906 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12907 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12908 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12911 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12912 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12913 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12916 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12917 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12918 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12919 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12920 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12921 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12923 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12927 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12928 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12929 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12932 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12933 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12934 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12935 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12936 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12937 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12938 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12941 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12942 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12943 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12946 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12947 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12948 @xref{Memory Management}.
12951 @deffn {Function} yylex
12952 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12953 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12957 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12958 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12959 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12960 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12962 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12964 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12965 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12966 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12969 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12970 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12971 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12974 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12975 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12976 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12977 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12979 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12980 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12981 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12984 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12985 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12989 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12990 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12991 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12992 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12993 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12996 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12997 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12998 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
13001 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
13002 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
13003 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
13004 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
13007 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
13008 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13009 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
13010 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
13011 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
13012 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13013 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13016 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
13017 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
13018 call this function to create a new parser.
13019 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
13020 @code{yypstate_new}}.
13021 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13022 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13025 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
13026 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13027 parse the rest of the input stream.
13028 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
13029 @code{yypull_parse}}.
13030 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13031 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13034 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
13035 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
13036 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
13037 @code{yypush_parse}}.
13038 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
13039 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
13042 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
13043 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
13044 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
13045 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
13048 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
13049 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
13050 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
13051 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
13052 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
13053 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
13054 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
13056 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
13057 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
13058 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
13059 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
13060 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
13061 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
13062 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
13065 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
13066 Deprecated in favor of the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type}.
13067 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
13068 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
13076 @item Accepting state
13077 A state whose only action is the accept action.
13078 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
13079 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
13081 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
13082 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
13083 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
13084 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
13085 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13087 @item Consistent state
13088 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13090 @item Context-free grammars
13091 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
13092 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
13093 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
13094 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
13097 @item Default reduction
13098 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
13099 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
13100 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
13101 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
13104 @item Defaulted state
13105 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13107 @item Dynamic allocation
13108 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
13109 compile time or on entry to a function.
13112 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
13113 character string of length zero.
13115 @item Finite-state stack machine
13116 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
13117 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
13118 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
13119 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
13120 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
13121 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13123 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
13124 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
13125 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
13126 deterministic parsing
13127 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13128 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13129 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13133 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13134 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13135 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13137 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13138 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13139 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13140 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13141 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13142 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13143 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13144 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13145 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13146 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13148 @item Infix operator
13149 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13150 performs some operation.
13153 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13155 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13156 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13157 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13158 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13159 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13160 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13161 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13163 @item Language construct
13164 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13165 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13166 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13168 @item Left associativity
13169 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13170 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13171 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13173 @item Left recursion
13174 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13175 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13178 @item Left-to-right parsing
13179 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13180 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13182 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13183 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13184 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13186 @item Lexical tie-in
13187 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13188 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13190 @item Literal string token
13191 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13193 @item Lookahead token
13194 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13198 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13199 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13200 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13203 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13204 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13206 @item Nonterminal symbol
13207 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13208 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13209 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13212 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13213 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13216 @item Postfix operator
13217 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13218 performs some operation.
13221 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13222 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13226 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13227 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13228 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13230 @item Reverse polish notation
13231 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13233 @item Right recursion
13234 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13235 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13239 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13240 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13241 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13244 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13245 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13246 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13248 @item Single-character literal
13249 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13250 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13253 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13254 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13255 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13256 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13259 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13260 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13261 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13264 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13265 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13268 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13269 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13270 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13271 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13273 @item Terminal symbol
13274 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13275 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13276 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13278 @item Unreachable state
13279 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13280 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13281 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13284 @node Copying This Manual
13285 @appendix Copying This Manual
13289 @unnumbered Bibliography
13293 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13294 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13295 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13296 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13298 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13299 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13300 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13301 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13302 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13304 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13305 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13306 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13307 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13308 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13310 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13311 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13312 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13313 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13314 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13317 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13318 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13319 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13322 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13323 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13324 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13325 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13328 @node Index of Terms
13329 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13335 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13336 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13337 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13338 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13339 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13340 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13341 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13342 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13343 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13344 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13345 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13346 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13347 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13348 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13349 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13350 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13351 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13352 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13353 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13354 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13355 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13356 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13357 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13358 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13359 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13360 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13361 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13362 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13363 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13364 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13365 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13366 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13367 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13368 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13369 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13370 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13371 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13372 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13373 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13374 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13375 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13376 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13377 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13378 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13379 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13380 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13381 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13382 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13383 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13384 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13385 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13386 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13387 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13388 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13389 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13390 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13391 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13392 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13394 @c Local Variables:
13395 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"