1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
286 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
287 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
288 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
289 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
291 Handling Context Dependencies
293 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
294 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
295 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
296 error recovery rules must be written.
298 Debugging Your Parser
300 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
301 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
305 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
306 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
307 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
311 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
312 in alphabetical order by short options.
313 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
314 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
316 Parsers Written In Other Languages
318 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
319 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
323 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
324 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
325 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
326 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
327 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
328 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
332 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
333 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
334 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
336 A Complete C++ Example
338 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
339 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
340 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
341 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
342 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
346 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
347 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
348 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
349 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
350 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
351 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
352 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
353 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
355 Frequently Asked Questions
357 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
358 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
359 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
360 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
361 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
362 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
363 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
364 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
365 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
366 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
367 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
368 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
372 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
378 @unnumbered Introduction
381 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
382 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
383 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
384 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
385 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
386 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
387 calculators to complex programming languages.
389 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
390 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
391 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
392 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
393 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
396 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
397 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
398 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
399 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
402 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
403 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
404 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
405 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
406 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
407 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
410 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
413 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
415 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
416 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
417 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
418 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
419 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
421 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
423 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
424 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
425 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
426 License to all of the Bison source code.
428 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
429 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
430 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
431 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
432 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
433 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
434 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
436 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
437 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
438 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
439 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
440 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
441 using the other GNU tools.
443 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
444 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
445 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
446 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
450 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
451 @include gpl-3.0.texi
454 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
456 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
457 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
458 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
461 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
462 as mathematical ideas.
463 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
464 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
465 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
466 the name of an identifier, etc.).
467 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
468 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
469 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
470 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
471 how is the output used?
472 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
473 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
476 @node Language and Grammar
477 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
479 @cindex context-free grammar
480 @cindex grammar, context-free
481 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
482 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
483 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
484 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
485 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
486 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
487 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
488 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
492 @cindex Backus-Naur form
493 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
494 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
495 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
496 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
497 essentially machine-readable BNF.
499 @cindex LALR grammars
500 @cindex IELR grammars
502 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
503 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
504 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
505 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
506 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
507 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
508 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
509 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
510 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
511 Construction}, to learn how.
514 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
515 @cindex ambiguous grammars
516 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
518 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
519 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
520 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
521 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
522 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
523 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
524 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
525 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
526 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
527 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
528 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
529 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
530 possible parses of any given string is finite.
532 @cindex symbols (abstract)
534 @cindex syntactic grouping
535 @cindex grouping, syntactic
536 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
537 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
538 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
539 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
540 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
541 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
542 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
544 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
545 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
546 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
547 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
548 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
549 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
550 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
551 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
552 lexicography, not grammar.)
554 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
557 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
558 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
559 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
560 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
561 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
562 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
563 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
566 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
567 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
568 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
569 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
570 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
571 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
572 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
573 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
575 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
576 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
577 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
578 reads informally as follows:
581 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
586 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
590 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
591 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
592 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
593 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
596 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
597 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
598 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
599 not the start symbol.
601 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
602 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
603 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
604 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
605 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
606 reports a syntax error.
608 @node Grammar in Bison
609 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
610 @cindex Bison grammar
611 @cindex grammar, Bison
612 @cindex formal grammar
614 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
615 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
616 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
618 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
619 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
620 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
622 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
623 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
624 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
625 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
626 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
627 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
628 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
631 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
632 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
633 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
634 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
636 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
637 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
639 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
640 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
641 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
642 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
646 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
650 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
652 @node Semantic Values
653 @section Semantic Values
654 @cindex semantic value
655 @cindex value, semantic
657 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
658 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
659 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
660 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
661 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
664 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
665 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
666 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
667 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
668 ,Defining Language Semantics},
671 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
672 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
673 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
674 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
677 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
678 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
679 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
680 need to have any semantic value.)
682 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
683 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
684 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
685 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
686 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
687 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
689 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
690 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
691 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
692 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
693 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
695 @node Semantic Actions
696 @section Semantic Actions
697 @cindex semantic actions
698 @cindex actions, semantic
700 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
701 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
702 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
703 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
706 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
707 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
708 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
709 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
710 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
711 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
712 newly recognized larger expression.
714 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
718 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
722 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
723 from the values of the two subexpressions.
726 @section Writing GLR Parsers
728 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
731 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
732 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
734 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
735 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
736 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
737 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
738 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
739 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
740 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
742 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
744 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
745 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
746 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
747 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
748 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
749 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
750 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
751 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
752 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
753 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
754 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
755 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
756 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
757 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
758 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
759 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
760 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
761 identical set of symbols.
763 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
764 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
765 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
766 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
767 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
768 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
769 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
770 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
771 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
775 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
776 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
777 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
778 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
779 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
782 @node Simple GLR Parsers
783 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
784 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
785 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
789 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
790 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
792 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
793 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
794 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
796 Consider a problem that
797 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
798 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
801 type subrange = lo .. hi;
802 type enum = (a, b, c);
806 The original language standard allows only numeric
807 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
808 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
809 10206) and many other
810 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
811 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
815 type subrange = (a) .. b;
819 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
820 type with only one value:
827 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
828 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
830 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
831 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
832 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
833 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
834 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
835 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
836 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
837 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
839 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
840 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
841 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
842 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
845 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
846 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
847 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
848 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
849 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
850 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
853 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
854 use the GLR algorithm.
855 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
856 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
857 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
858 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
859 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
860 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
861 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
862 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
863 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
865 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
866 reports a syntax error as usual.
868 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
869 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
870 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
871 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
872 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
874 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
875 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
876 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
877 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
878 The present example contains only one conflict between two
879 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
880 cannot be nested. So the number of
881 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
882 and the parsing time is still linear.
884 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
885 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
888 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
898 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
927 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
928 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
929 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
930 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
937 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
938 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
939 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
948 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
949 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
950 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
951 notice when the parser splits.
953 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
954 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
955 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
956 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
957 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
958 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
959 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
960 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
961 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
962 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
963 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
964 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
965 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
968 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
969 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
970 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
971 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
972 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
973 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
975 @node Merging GLR Parses
976 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
977 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
978 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
982 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
984 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
989 #define YYSTYPE char const *
991 void yyerror (char const *);
1005 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1014 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1015 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1016 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1017 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1018 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1022 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1024 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1025 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1029 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1030 | '(' declarator ')'
1035 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1036 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1043 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1044 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1045 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1046 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1047 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1048 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1049 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1050 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1051 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1052 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1053 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1054 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1055 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1056 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1058 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1059 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1060 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1061 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1062 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1063 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1064 The parser therefore prints
1067 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1070 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1071 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1078 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1079 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1080 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1081 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1082 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1083 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1084 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1085 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1086 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1087 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1093 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1094 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1095 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1096 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1101 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1102 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1107 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1111 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1119 with an accompanying forward declaration
1120 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1124 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1125 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1130 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1131 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1134 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1137 Bison requires that all of the
1138 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1139 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1140 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1141 the offending merge.
1143 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1144 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1146 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1147 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1149 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1150 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1151 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1152 the associated reduction.
1153 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1154 action in a GLR parser.
1157 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1159 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1161 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1162 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1163 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1164 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1165 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1166 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1167 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1168 influence syntax analysis.
1169 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1172 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1173 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1174 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1175 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1176 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1177 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1178 future versions of Bison.
1179 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1180 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1181 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1183 @subsubsection YYERROR
1185 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1186 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1187 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1188 initiate error recovery.
1189 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1190 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1191 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1192 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1193 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1194 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1195 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1196 the parse that invoked the test.
1198 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1199 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1200 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1203 @node Semantic Predicates
1204 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1206 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1208 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1210 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1211 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1212 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1213 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1217 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1218 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1223 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1224 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1225 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1226 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1227 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1228 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1229 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1231 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1232 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1233 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1234 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1237 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1238 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1239 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1243 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1244 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1245 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1246 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1251 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1252 false). However, this
1253 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1254 have overlapping syntax.
1255 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1256 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1257 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1258 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1261 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1262 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1264 @node Compiler Requirements
1265 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1266 @cindex @code{inline}
1267 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1269 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1270 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1271 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1272 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1273 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1274 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1283 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1287 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1288 && ! defined inline)
1297 @cindex textual location
1298 @cindex location, textual
1300 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1301 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1302 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1303 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1305 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1306 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1307 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1308 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1311 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1312 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1313 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1316 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1317 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1318 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1319 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1320 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1321 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1322 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1325 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1326 @cindex Bison parser
1327 @cindex Bison utility
1328 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1331 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1332 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1333 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1334 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1335 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1336 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1337 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1340 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1341 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1342 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1345 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1346 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1347 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1348 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1349 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1350 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1351 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1353 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1354 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1355 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1356 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1357 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1358 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1359 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1360 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1361 C-Language Interface}.
1363 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1364 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1365 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1366 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1367 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1368 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1369 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1370 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1371 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1372 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1373 anything other than their usual meanings.
1375 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1376 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1377 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1378 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1379 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1380 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1381 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1382 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1383 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1386 @section Stages in Using Bison
1387 @cindex stages in using Bison
1390 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1391 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1395 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1396 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1397 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1398 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1399 sequence of C statements.
1402 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1403 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1404 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1405 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1408 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1411 Write error-reporting routines.
1414 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1415 must follow these steps:
1419 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1422 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1425 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1428 @node Grammar Layout
1429 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1430 @cindex grammar file
1432 @cindex format of grammar file
1433 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1435 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1436 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1443 @var{Bison declarations}
1452 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1453 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1455 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1456 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1457 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1458 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1459 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1460 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1462 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1463 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1464 semantic values of various symbols.
1466 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1469 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1470 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1471 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1475 @cindex simple examples
1476 @cindex examples, simple
1478 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1479 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1480 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1481 and a multi-function calculator. All
1482 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1484 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1485 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1486 source file to try them.
1489 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1490 a first example with no operator precedence.
1491 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1492 Operator precedence is introduced.
1493 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1494 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1495 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1496 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1497 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1501 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1502 @cindex reverse polish notation
1503 @cindex polish notation calculator
1504 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1505 @cindex calculator, simple
1507 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1508 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1509 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1510 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1512 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1513 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1516 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1517 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1518 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1519 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1520 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1521 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1522 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1525 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1526 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1528 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1529 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1531 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1533 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1536 #define YYSTYPE double
1540 void yyerror (char const *);
1545 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1548 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1549 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1551 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1552 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1553 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1554 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1555 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1556 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1557 which is a floating point number.
1559 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1560 function @code{pow}.
1562 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1563 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1564 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1565 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1568 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1569 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1570 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1571 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1572 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1573 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1574 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1575 type for numeric constants.
1578 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1580 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1582 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1594 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1601 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1602 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1604 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1605 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1606 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1612 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1613 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1614 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1615 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1616 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1619 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1620 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1621 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1623 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1624 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1625 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1626 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1627 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1628 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1631 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1632 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1633 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1637 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1639 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1648 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1649 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1650 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1651 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1652 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1654 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1655 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1656 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1657 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1658 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1659 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1661 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1662 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1663 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1664 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1667 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1668 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1669 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1672 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1674 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1679 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1683 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1684 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1685 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1686 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1687 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1688 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1689 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1691 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1692 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1693 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1694 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1695 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1698 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1700 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1701 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1702 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1703 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1708 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1709 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1714 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1715 equally well have written them separately:
1719 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1720 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1724 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1725 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1726 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1727 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1728 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1729 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1730 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1731 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1733 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1734 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1735 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1737 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1738 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1742 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1746 means the same thing as this:
1751 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1757 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1760 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1761 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1762 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1764 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1765 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1766 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1767 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1769 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1771 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1772 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1773 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1774 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1776 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1777 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1778 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1779 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1780 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1781 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1782 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1783 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1784 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1786 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1787 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1788 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1789 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1790 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1792 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1793 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1795 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1797 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1800 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1801 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1802 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1803 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1814 /* Skip white space. */
1815 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1819 /* Process numbers. */
1820 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1823 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1828 /* Return end-of-input. */
1831 /* Return a single char. */
1838 @subsection The Controlling Function
1839 @cindex controlling function
1840 @cindex main function in simple example
1842 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1843 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1844 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1846 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1858 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1859 @cindex error reporting routine
1861 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1862 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1863 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1864 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1865 here is the definition we will use:
1867 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1874 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1876 yyerror (char const *s)
1878 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1883 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1884 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1885 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1886 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1887 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1888 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1890 @node Rpcalc Generate
1891 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1892 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1894 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1895 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1896 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1897 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1898 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1899 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1901 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1902 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1904 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1905 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1912 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1913 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1914 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1915 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1916 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1917 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1918 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1920 @node Rpcalc Compile
1921 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1922 @cindex compiling the parser
1924 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1928 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1930 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1934 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1935 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1936 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1940 # @r{List files again.}
1942 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1946 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1947 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1953 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1955 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1958 @result{} -3.166666667
1959 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1961 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1966 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1967 @cindex infix notation calculator
1969 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1971 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1972 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1973 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1974 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1977 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1981 #define YYSTYPE double
1985 void yyerror (char const *);
1990 /* Bison declarations. */
1994 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1995 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1998 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2009 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2016 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2017 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2018 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2019 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2020 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2021 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2022 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2029 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2032 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2034 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2035 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2036 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2037 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2038 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2039 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2040 the associativity/precedence.)
2042 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2043 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2044 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2045 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2046 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2047 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2050 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2051 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2052 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2053 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2054 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2056 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2061 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2069 @node Simple Error Recovery
2070 @section Simple Error Recovery
2071 @cindex error recovery, simple
2073 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2074 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2075 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2076 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2077 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2078 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2080 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2081 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2082 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2088 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2089 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2094 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2095 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2096 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2097 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2098 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2099 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2100 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2101 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2104 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2105 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2106 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2107 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2108 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2109 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2112 @node Location Tracking Calc
2113 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2114 @cindex location tracking calculator
2115 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2116 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2118 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2119 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2120 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2121 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2125 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2126 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2127 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2130 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2131 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2133 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2134 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2137 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2143 void yyerror (char const *);
2146 /* Bison declarations. */
2154 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2158 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2159 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2160 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2161 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2162 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2163 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2164 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2168 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2170 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2171 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2172 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2173 from the new information.
2175 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2176 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2189 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2196 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2197 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2198 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2208 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2209 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2210 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2215 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2216 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2217 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2221 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2222 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2223 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2225 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2226 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2227 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2228 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2229 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2230 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2234 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2236 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2237 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2238 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2241 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2242 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2253 /* Skip white space. */
2254 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2255 ++yylloc.last_column;
2260 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2261 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2265 /* Process numbers. */
2269 ++yylloc.last_column;
2270 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2272 ++yylloc.last_column;
2273 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2280 /* Return end-of-input. */
2285 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2289 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2292 ++yylloc.last_column;
2298 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2299 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2300 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2301 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2303 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2304 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2305 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2306 controlling function:
2313 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2314 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2320 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2321 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2322 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2324 @node Multi-function Calc
2325 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2326 @cindex multi-function calculator
2327 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2328 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2330 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2331 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2332 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2333 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2334 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2336 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2337 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2338 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2339 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2340 functions whose syntax has this form:
2343 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2347 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2348 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2349 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2354 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2355 @result{} 3.1415926536
2359 @result{} 0.0000000000
2361 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2362 @result{} 2.3000000000
2364 @result{} 2.3000000000
2366 @result{} 0.8329091229
2367 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2368 @result{} 2.3000000000
2372 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2375 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2376 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2377 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2378 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2379 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2382 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2383 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2385 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2387 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2391 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2392 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2393 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2395 void yyerror (char const *);
2401 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2402 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2405 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2406 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2413 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2414 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2418 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2419 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2420 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2422 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2423 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2424 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2425 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2427 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2428 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2429 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2430 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2431 between angle brackets).
2433 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2434 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2435 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2436 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2437 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2438 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2441 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2443 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2444 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2445 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2447 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2449 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2460 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2461 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2468 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2469 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2470 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2471 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2472 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2473 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2474 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2475 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2476 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2477 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2480 /* End of grammar. */
2484 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2485 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2486 @cindex symbol table example
2488 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2489 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2490 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2491 requires some additional C functions for support.
2493 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2494 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2495 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2497 @comment file: calc.h
2500 /* Function type. */
2501 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2505 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2508 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2509 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2512 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2513 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2515 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2520 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2522 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2523 extern symrec *sym_table;
2525 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2526 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2530 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2533 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2539 double (*fnct) (double);
2544 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2557 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2562 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2568 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2570 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2571 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2577 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2578 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2580 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2581 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2582 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2583 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2584 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2585 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2587 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2589 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2590 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2594 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2596 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2597 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2598 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2599 ptr->type = sym_type;
2600 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2601 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2609 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2612 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2613 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2614 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2622 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2624 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2625 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2626 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2627 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2629 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2630 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2631 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2632 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2633 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2634 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2636 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2637 operators in @code{yylex}.
2639 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2651 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2652 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2660 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2661 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2664 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2670 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2673 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2674 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2675 static size_t length = 40;
2676 static char *symbuf = 0;
2681 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2687 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2691 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2693 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2695 /* Get another character. */
2700 while (isalnum (c));
2707 s = getsym (symbuf);
2709 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2714 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2721 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2723 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2724 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2725 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2727 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2730 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2732 yyerror (char const *s)
2734 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2740 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2743 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2744 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2745 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2753 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2754 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2755 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2763 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2766 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2767 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2768 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2771 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2772 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2776 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2778 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2779 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2781 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2782 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2785 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2786 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2787 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2788 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2789 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2790 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2791 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2792 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2793 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2796 @node Grammar Outline
2797 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2799 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2800 appropriate delimiters:
2807 @var{Bison declarations}
2816 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2817 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2818 continues until end of line.
2821 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2822 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2823 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2824 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2825 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2829 @subsection The prologue
2830 @cindex declarations section
2832 @cindex declarations
2834 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2835 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2836 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2837 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2838 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2839 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2840 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2842 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2843 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2846 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2847 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2848 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2849 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2850 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2851 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2852 @code{%union} declaration.
2863 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2867 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2868 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2874 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2875 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2876 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2877 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2878 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2879 @code{#include} directives.
2881 @node Prologue Alternatives
2882 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2883 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2886 @findex %code requires
2887 @findex %code provides
2890 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2891 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2892 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2893 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2894 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2895 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2896 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2898 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2909 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2913 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2914 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2921 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2922 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2923 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2924 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2925 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2926 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2927 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2928 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2929 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2930 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2931 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2933 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2934 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2935 This behavior raises a few questions.
2936 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2937 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2938 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2939 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2940 This behavior is not intuitive.
2942 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2943 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2944 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2945 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2952 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2953 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2956 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2957 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2969 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2973 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2974 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2975 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2982 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2983 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2984 explicit which kind you intend.
2985 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2987 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2988 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2989 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2990 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2991 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2992 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2993 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2994 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2995 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2998 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2999 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3001 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3019 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3025 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3026 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3039 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3040 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3041 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3049 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3050 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3051 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3052 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3053 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3054 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3056 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3057 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3058 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3059 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3060 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3061 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3062 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3063 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3064 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3065 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3066 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3069 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3070 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3071 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3072 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3073 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3074 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3075 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3076 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3077 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3078 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3096 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3102 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3103 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3116 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3122 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3123 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3131 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3132 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3133 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3136 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3137 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3138 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3139 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3140 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3141 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3144 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3145 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3146 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3147 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3149 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3150 organize your grammar file.
3151 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3156 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3157 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3158 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3159 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3163 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3164 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3165 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3166 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3171 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3172 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3174 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3176 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3177 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3178 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3179 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3181 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3182 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3183 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3184 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3185 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3186 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3187 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3188 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3191 @node Bison Declarations
3192 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3193 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3194 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3196 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3197 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3198 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3199 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3202 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3203 @cindex grammar rules section
3204 @cindex rules section for grammar
3206 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3207 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3209 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3210 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3211 if it is the first thing in the file.
3214 @subsection The epilogue
3215 @cindex additional C code section
3217 @cindex C code, section for additional
3219 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3220 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3221 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3222 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3223 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3224 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3225 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3226 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3227 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3228 C-Language Interface}.
3230 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3231 from the grammar rules.
3233 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3234 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3235 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3236 of the grammar file.
3239 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3240 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3241 @cindex terminal symbol
3245 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3248 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3249 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3250 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3251 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3252 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3253 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3254 the symbol to stand for it.
3256 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3257 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3258 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3260 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3261 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3262 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3263 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3264 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3265 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3266 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3268 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3272 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3273 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3274 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3275 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3278 @cindex character token
3279 @cindex literal token
3280 @cindex single-character literal
3281 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3282 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3283 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3284 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3285 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3286 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3287 ,Operator Precedence}).
3289 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3290 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3291 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3292 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3293 your program will confuse other readers.
3295 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3296 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3297 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3298 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3299 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3300 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3304 @cindex string token
3305 @cindex literal string token
3306 @cindex multicharacter literal
3307 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3308 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3309 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3310 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3311 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3313 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3314 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3315 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3316 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3317 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3319 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3321 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3322 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3323 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3324 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3325 read your program will be confused.
3327 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3328 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3329 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3330 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3331 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3332 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3335 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3336 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3337 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3339 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3340 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3341 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3342 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3343 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3344 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3345 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3346 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3347 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3348 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3349 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3350 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3352 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3353 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3354 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3355 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3356 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3358 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3359 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3360 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3361 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3362 characters in the following C-language string:
3365 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3368 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3369 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3370 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3371 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3372 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3373 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3374 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3375 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3376 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3377 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3380 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3381 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3382 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3383 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3384 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3387 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3389 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3390 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3392 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3396 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3401 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3402 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3403 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3414 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3415 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3417 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3418 extra white space as you wish.
3420 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3421 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3424 @{@var{C statements}@}
3429 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3430 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3431 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3432 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3433 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3434 compiler can check it.
3436 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3437 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3438 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3439 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3440 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3441 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3442 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3443 character constants.
3445 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3449 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3450 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3455 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3456 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3463 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3465 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3466 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3467 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3486 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3490 @section Recursive Rules
3491 @cindex recursive rule
3493 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3494 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3495 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3496 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3497 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3508 @cindex left recursion
3509 @cindex right recursion
3511 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3512 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3513 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3525 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3526 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3527 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3528 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3529 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3530 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3531 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3534 @cindex mutual recursion
3535 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3536 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3537 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3546 | primary '+' primary
3559 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3563 @section Defining Language Semantics
3564 @cindex defining language semantics
3565 @cindex language semantics, defining
3567 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3568 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3569 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3571 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3572 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3573 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3574 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3577 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3578 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3579 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3580 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3581 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3582 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3583 action in the middle of a rule.
3587 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3588 @cindex semantic value type
3589 @cindex value type, semantic
3590 @cindex data types of semantic values
3591 @cindex default data type
3593 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3594 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3595 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3596 Notation Calculator}).
3598 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3599 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3600 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3603 #define YYSTYPE double
3607 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3608 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3609 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3610 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3612 @node Multiple Types
3613 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3615 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3616 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3617 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3618 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3621 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3622 requires you to do two things:
3626 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3627 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3628 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3629 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3633 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3634 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3635 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3636 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3637 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3646 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3648 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3649 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3650 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3651 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3653 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3654 placed at any position in the rule;
3655 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3656 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3657 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3658 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3660 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3661 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3662 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3663 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3664 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3665 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3666 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3667 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3668 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3669 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3672 Here is a typical example:
3678 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3682 Or, in terms of named references:
3688 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3693 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3694 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3695 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3696 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3697 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3698 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3700 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3701 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3702 referred to as @code{$2}.
3704 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3705 references construct.
3707 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3708 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3709 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3710 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3711 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3715 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3719 @cindex default action
3720 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3721 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3722 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3723 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3724 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3725 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3727 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3728 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3729 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3730 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3731 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3736 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3737 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3743 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3748 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3749 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3750 definition of @code{foo}.
3753 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3754 any, from a semantic action.
3755 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3756 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3759 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3760 @cindex action data types
3761 @cindex data types in actions
3763 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3764 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3766 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3767 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3768 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3769 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3770 in the rule. In this example,
3776 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3781 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3782 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3783 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3784 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3786 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3787 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3788 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3800 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3801 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3803 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3804 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3805 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3806 @cindex mid-rule actions
3808 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3809 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3810 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3812 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3813 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3814 it is run before they are parsed.
3816 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3817 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3818 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3819 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3822 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3823 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3824 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3825 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3826 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3827 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3829 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3830 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3831 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3832 at the end of the rule.
3834 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3835 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3836 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3837 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3838 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3839 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3845 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3847 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3852 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3853 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3854 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3855 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3856 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3857 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3858 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3859 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3861 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3862 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3863 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3864 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3865 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3868 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3869 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3870 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3871 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3872 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3874 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3875 Discarded Symbols}).
3876 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3877 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3879 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3880 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3885 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3899 $$ = push_context ();
3900 declare_variable ($3);
3907 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3908 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3909 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3911 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3912 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3913 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3914 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3915 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3921 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3922 | '@{' statements '@}'
3928 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3933 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3934 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3937 | '@{' statements '@}'
3943 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3944 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3945 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3946 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3947 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3948 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3950 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3951 actions into the two rules, like this:
3956 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3957 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3958 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3959 '@{' statements '@}'
3965 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3966 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3968 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3969 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3970 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3975 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3976 declarations statements '@}'
3977 | '@{' statements '@}'
3983 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3984 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3986 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3987 serves as a subroutine:
3992 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3998 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3999 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4005 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4006 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4008 @node Tracking Locations
4009 @section Tracking Locations
4011 @cindex textual location
4012 @cindex location, textual
4014 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4015 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4016 especially symbol locations.
4018 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4019 actions to take when rules are matched.
4022 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4023 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4024 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4028 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4029 @cindex data type of locations
4030 @cindex default location type
4032 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4033 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4035 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4036 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4037 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4038 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4042 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4051 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4052 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4053 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4054 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4055 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4057 @node Actions and Locations
4058 @subsection Actions and Locations
4059 @cindex location actions
4060 @cindex actions, location
4063 @vindex @@@var{name}
4064 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4066 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4067 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4069 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4070 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4071 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4072 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4073 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4076 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4077 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4078 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4079 references construct.
4081 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4089 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4090 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4091 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4092 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4099 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4100 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4101 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4107 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4108 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4109 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4112 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4113 example above simply rewrites this way:
4127 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4128 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4129 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4136 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4137 from a semantic action.
4138 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4139 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4141 @node Location Default Action
4142 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4143 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4146 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4147 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4148 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4149 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4150 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4151 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4152 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4153 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4156 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4157 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4159 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4160 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4161 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4162 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4163 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4164 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4165 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4166 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4167 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4168 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4170 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4174 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4178 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4179 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4180 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4181 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4185 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4186 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4187 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4188 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4195 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4196 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4197 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4199 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4203 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4204 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4207 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4208 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4209 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4210 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4213 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4214 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4215 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4216 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4219 @node Named References
4220 @section Named References
4221 @cindex named references
4223 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4224 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4225 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4226 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4227 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4228 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4230 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4231 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4232 used as named references. For example:
4236 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4237 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4242 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4246 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4247 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4252 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4258 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4261 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4264 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4269 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4270 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4271 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4274 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4275 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4280 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4281 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4282 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4285 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4286 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4292 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4293 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4296 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4297 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4301 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4302 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4303 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4304 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4305 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4306 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4307 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4309 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4313 @section Bison Declarations
4314 @cindex declarations, Bison
4315 @cindex Bison declarations
4317 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4318 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4321 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4322 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4323 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4324 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4326 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4327 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4328 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4329 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4332 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4333 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4334 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4335 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4336 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4337 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4338 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4339 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4340 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4341 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4342 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4343 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4344 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4345 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4346 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4350 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4351 @cindex version requirement
4352 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4355 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4356 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4360 %require "@var{version}"
4364 @subsection Token Type Names
4365 @cindex declaring token type names
4366 @cindex token type names, declaring
4367 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4370 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4376 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4377 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4378 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4380 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4381 @code{%precedence}, or
4382 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4383 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4386 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4387 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4388 following the token name:
4392 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4396 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4397 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4398 with each other or with normal characters.
4400 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4401 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4402 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4403 Than One Value Type}).
4409 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4413 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4417 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4418 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4419 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4426 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4427 equivalent literal string tokens:
4430 %token <operator> OR "||"
4431 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4436 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4437 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4438 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4439 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4440 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4441 the literal string instead of the token name.
4443 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4444 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4448 %token END 0 "end of file"
4451 @node Precedence Decl
4452 @subsection Operator Precedence
4453 @cindex precedence declarations
4454 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4455 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4457 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4458 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4459 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4460 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4461 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4462 operator precedence.
4464 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4465 @code{%token}: either
4468 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4475 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4478 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4479 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4480 all the @var{symbols}:
4484 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4485 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4486 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4487 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4488 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4489 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4490 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4491 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4492 considered a syntax error.
4494 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4495 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4496 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4499 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4500 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4501 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4502 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4503 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4506 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4507 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4508 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4509 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4514 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4515 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4519 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4520 @cindex declaring value types
4521 @cindex value types, declaring
4524 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4525 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4526 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4541 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4542 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4543 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4544 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4546 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4547 @code{union}. For example:
4559 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4560 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4563 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4564 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4565 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4567 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4568 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4570 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4571 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4572 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4573 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4581 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4586 and then your grammar can use the following
4587 instead of @code{%union}:
4600 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4601 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4602 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4606 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4607 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4608 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4611 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4615 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4616 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4617 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4618 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4619 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4622 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4623 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4624 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4625 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4627 @node Initial Action Decl
4628 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4629 @findex %initial-action
4631 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4632 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4635 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4636 @findex %initial-action
4637 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4638 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4639 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4640 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4643 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4646 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4649 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4654 @node Destructor Decl
4655 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4656 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4660 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4661 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4662 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4663 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4664 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4665 must discard the start symbol.
4667 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4668 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4669 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4670 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4672 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4673 symbol is automatically discarded.
4675 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4677 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4678 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4679 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4680 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4681 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4684 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4685 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4686 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4687 tag among @var{symbols}.
4688 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4689 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4690 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4692 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4693 (These default forms are experimental.
4694 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4696 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4697 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4698 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4699 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4701 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4702 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4703 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4704 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4705 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4712 %union @{ char *string; @}
4713 %token <string> STRING1
4714 %token <string> STRING2
4715 %type <string> string1
4716 %type <string> string2
4717 %union @{ char character; @}
4718 %token <character> CHR
4719 %type <character> chr
4722 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4723 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4724 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4725 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4729 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4730 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4731 to @code{free} by default.
4732 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4733 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4734 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4735 @code{free} only once.
4736 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4737 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4739 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4740 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4741 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4742 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4743 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4744 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4745 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4746 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4747 reference it in your grammar.
4748 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4749 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4755 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4756 @cindex mid-rule actions
4757 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4758 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4759 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4760 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4761 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4762 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4763 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4764 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4768 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4769 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4770 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4775 @cindex discarded symbols
4776 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4780 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4782 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4784 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4785 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4787 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4788 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4791 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4794 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4795 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4798 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4799 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4800 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4804 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4805 @cindex printing semantic values
4809 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4810 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4811 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4812 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4814 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4815 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4816 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4818 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4821 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4822 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4823 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4824 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4825 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4826 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4827 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4830 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4831 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4832 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4833 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4841 %union @{ char *string; @}
4842 %token <string> STRING1
4843 %token <string> STRING2
4844 %type <string> string1
4845 %type <string> string2
4846 %union @{ char character; @}
4847 %token <character> CHR
4848 %type <character> chr
4851 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4852 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4853 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4854 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4858 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4859 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4860 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4861 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4862 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4863 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4864 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4868 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4869 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4870 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4871 @cindex warnings, preventing
4872 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4876 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4877 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4878 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4879 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4880 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4881 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4883 The declaration looks like this:
4889 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4890 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4891 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4892 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4894 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4895 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4896 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4897 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4898 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4899 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4900 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4906 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4910 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4911 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4912 print the number of conflicts.
4915 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4916 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4917 go back to the beginning.
4920 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4921 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4922 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4925 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4926 but will keep silent otherwise.
4929 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4930 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4931 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4932 @cindex default start symbol
4935 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4936 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4937 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4944 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4945 @cindex reentrant parser
4947 @findex %define api.pure
4949 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4950 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4951 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4952 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4953 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4954 program must be called only within interlocks.
4956 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4957 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4958 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4959 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4960 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4962 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4963 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4964 reentrant. It looks like this:
4970 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4971 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4972 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4973 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4974 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4975 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4976 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4977 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4978 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4980 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4981 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4985 @subsection A Push Parser
4988 @findex %define api.push-pull
4990 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4991 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4993 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4994 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4995 each time a new token is made available.
4997 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4998 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4999 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5000 within a certain time period.
5002 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5003 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5004 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5007 %define api.push-pull push
5010 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5011 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5012 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5013 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5014 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5018 %define api.push-pull push
5021 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5022 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5023 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5024 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5026 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5027 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5028 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5029 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5030 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5031 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5032 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5033 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5037 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5039 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5040 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5041 yypstate_delete (ps);
5044 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5045 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5046 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5047 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5048 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5049 example would thus look like this:
5054 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5057 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5058 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5059 yypstate_delete (ps);
5062 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5063 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5065 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5066 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5067 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5068 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5069 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5070 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5071 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5072 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5073 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5074 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5075 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5076 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5077 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5078 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5079 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5080 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5081 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5085 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5086 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5087 yypstate_delete (ps);
5090 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5091 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5092 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5095 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5096 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5097 @cindex declaration summary
5098 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5100 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5102 @deffn {Directive} %union
5103 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5104 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5107 @deffn {Directive} %token
5108 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5109 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5112 @deffn {Directive} %right
5113 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5114 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5117 @deffn {Directive} %left
5118 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5119 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5122 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5123 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5124 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5125 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5129 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5130 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5131 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5135 @deffn {Directive} %type
5136 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5137 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5140 @deffn {Directive} %start
5141 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5145 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5146 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5147 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5153 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5156 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5157 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5159 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5160 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5161 @xref{%code Summary}.
5164 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5165 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5167 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5170 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5171 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5172 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5173 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5176 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5177 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5178 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5179 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5180 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5182 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5183 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5184 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5185 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5186 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5187 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5188 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5189 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5190 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5191 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5193 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5194 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5195 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5197 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5198 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5199 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5201 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5202 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5203 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5204 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5205 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5207 @findex %code requires
5208 @findex %code provides
5209 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5210 header also contains their code.
5211 @xref{%code Summary}.
5213 @cindex Header guard
5214 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5215 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5216 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5217 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5218 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5221 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5222 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5224 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5225 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5227 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5231 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5232 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5235 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5236 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5237 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5240 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5241 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5242 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5245 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5246 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5247 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5248 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5250 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5254 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5255 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5256 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5257 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5258 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5259 accurate syntax error messages.
5262 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5263 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5264 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5266 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5267 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5268 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5269 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5270 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5271 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5272 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5273 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5275 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5279 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5280 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5281 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5286 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5287 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5288 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5289 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5290 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5291 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5292 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5296 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5297 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5300 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5301 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5302 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5306 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5307 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5308 Require a Version of Bison}.
5311 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5312 Specify the skeleton to use.
5314 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5315 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5316 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5317 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5319 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5320 file in the Bison installation directory.
5321 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5322 directory of the grammar file.
5323 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5326 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5327 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5328 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5329 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5330 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5331 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5332 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5335 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5336 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5337 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5338 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5339 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5340 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5341 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5344 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5345 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5346 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5350 The highest token number, plus one.
5352 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5354 The number of grammar rules,
5356 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5360 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5361 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5362 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5363 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5367 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5368 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5369 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5373 @node %define Summary
5374 @subsection %define Summary
5376 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5377 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5378 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5379 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5380 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5381 @code{%define} directive:
5383 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5384 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5385 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5386 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5388 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5389 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5390 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5391 to specifying @code{""}.
5393 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5394 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5395 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5398 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5399 @code{%define} accepts.
5401 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5402 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5406 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5408 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5409 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5411 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5413 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5414 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5417 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5418 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5419 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5420 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5421 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5422 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5425 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5427 @findex %define api.namespace
5429 @item Languages(s): C++
5431 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5432 For example, if you specify:
5435 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5438 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5441 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5444 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5445 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5448 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5454 @item Accepted Values:
5455 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5456 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5458 @item Default Value:
5459 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5460 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5461 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5462 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5463 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5464 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5465 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5468 %define api.namespace "foo"
5469 %name-prefix "bar::"
5472 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5477 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5478 @item @code{api.location.type}
5479 @findex %define api.location.type
5482 @item Language(s): C++
5484 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5485 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5487 @item Accepted Values: String
5489 @item Default Value: none
5491 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5494 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5496 @findex %define api.prefix
5499 @item Language(s): All
5501 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5502 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5504 @item Accepted Values: String
5506 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5508 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5511 @c ================================================== api.pure
5513 @findex %define api.pure
5516 @item Language(s): C
5518 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5519 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5521 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5523 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5529 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5531 @findex %define api.push-pull
5534 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5536 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5537 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5538 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5539 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5541 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5543 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5549 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5550 @item api.tokens.prefix
5551 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5554 @item Languages(s): all
5557 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5558 target language. For instance
5561 %token FILE for ERROR
5562 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5564 start: FILE for ERROR;
5568 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5569 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5570 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5571 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5572 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5573 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5574 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5576 @item Accepted Values:
5577 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5578 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5579 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5581 @item Default Value:
5584 @c api.tokens.prefix
5587 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5589 @findex %define lex_symbol
5596 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5597 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5598 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5600 @item Accepted Values:
5603 @item Default Value:
5609 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5611 @item lr.default-reductions
5612 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5615 @item Language(s): all
5617 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5618 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5619 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5620 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5622 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5623 @item Default Value:
5625 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5626 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5630 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5632 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5633 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5636 @item Language(s): all
5637 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5638 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5639 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5640 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5642 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5644 @c ================================================== lr.type
5647 @findex %define lr.type
5650 @item Language(s): all
5652 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5653 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5654 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5656 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5658 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5662 @c ================================================== namespace
5664 @findex %define namespace
5665 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5669 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5671 @findex %define parse.assert
5674 @item Languages(s): C++
5676 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5677 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5679 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5681 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5683 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5688 @c ================================================== parse.error
5690 @findex %define parse.error
5695 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5696 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5698 @item Accepted Values:
5701 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5703 @item @code{verbose}
5704 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5705 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5709 @item Default Value:
5715 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5717 @findex %define parse.lac
5720 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5722 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5723 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5724 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5725 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5729 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5731 @findex %define parse.trace
5734 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5736 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5737 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5739 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5740 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5741 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5742 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5745 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5747 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5751 @c ================================================== variant
5753 @findex %define variant
5760 Request variant-based semantic values.
5761 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5763 @item Accepted Values:
5766 @item Default Value:
5774 @subsection %code Summary
5778 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5779 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5780 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5781 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5782 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5783 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5784 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5785 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5787 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5788 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5789 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5790 in the parser implementation.
5792 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5793 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5794 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5796 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5799 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5800 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5801 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5802 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5803 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5804 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5808 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5809 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5810 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5813 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5814 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5818 @findex %code requires
5821 @item Language(s): C, C++
5823 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5824 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5825 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5826 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5827 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5829 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5830 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5835 @findex %code provides
5838 @item Language(s): C, C++
5840 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5841 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5843 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5844 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5852 @item Language(s): C, C++
5854 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5855 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5856 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5857 parser implementation file. For example:
5866 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5870 @findex %code imports
5873 @item Language(s): Java
5875 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5877 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5878 before any class definitions.
5882 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5883 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5884 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5885 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5888 @node Multiple Parsers
5889 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5891 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5892 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5893 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5894 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5895 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5896 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5897 exported in the generated header.
5899 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5900 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5901 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5902 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5903 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5904 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5905 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5906 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5907 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5909 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5910 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5911 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5912 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5913 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5914 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5915 specifically --- more about this below.
5917 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5918 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5921 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5922 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5923 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5924 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5927 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5928 #define yyparse cparse
5929 #define yylval clval
5935 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5936 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5937 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5939 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5943 extern CSTYPE clval;
5947 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5948 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5949 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5952 /* Enabling traces. */
5954 # if defined YYDEBUG
5971 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5972 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5973 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5976 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5977 @cindex C-language interface
5980 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5981 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5982 functions that it needs to use.
5984 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5985 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5986 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5987 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5990 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5991 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5992 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5993 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5994 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5995 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5997 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5998 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5999 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6003 @node Parser Function
6004 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6007 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6008 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6009 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6010 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6011 without reading further.
6014 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6015 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6016 is due to end-of-input).
6018 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6019 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6022 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6025 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6030 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6035 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6038 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6039 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6040 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6042 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6043 @findex %parse-param
6044 Declare that one or more
6045 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6046 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6047 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6048 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6051 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6054 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6058 Then call the parser like this:
6062 int nastiness, randomness;
6063 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6064 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6070 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6073 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6076 @node Push Parser Function
6077 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6078 @findex yypush_parse
6080 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6081 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6083 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6084 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6085 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6086 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6088 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6089 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6090 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6091 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6094 @node Pull Parser Function
6095 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6096 @findex yypull_parse
6098 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6099 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6101 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6102 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6103 declaration is used.
6104 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6106 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6107 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6110 @node Parser Create Function
6111 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6112 @findex yypstate_new
6114 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6115 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6117 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6118 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6119 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6120 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6122 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6123 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6124 or 0 if no memory was available.
6125 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6129 @node Parser Delete Function
6130 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6131 @findex yypstate_delete
6133 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6134 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6136 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6137 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6138 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6139 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6141 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6142 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6143 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6147 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6149 @cindex lexical analyzer
6151 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6152 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6153 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6154 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6156 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6157 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6158 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6159 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6160 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6161 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6162 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6166 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6167 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6168 of the token it has read.
6169 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6170 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6172 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6173 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6176 @node Calling Convention
6177 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6179 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6180 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6181 signifies end-of-input.
6183 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6184 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6185 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6186 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6188 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6189 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6190 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6191 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6192 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6193 signifies end-of-input.
6195 Here is an example showing these things:
6202 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6205 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6206 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6208 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6214 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6215 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6217 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6218 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6222 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6223 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6224 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6225 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6228 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6229 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6230 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6231 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6232 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6235 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6236 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6237 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6238 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6241 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6244 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6245 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6246 strlen (token_buffer))
6247 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6248 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6253 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6254 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6258 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6261 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6262 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6263 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6264 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6270 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6271 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6276 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6277 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6278 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6279 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6280 declaration looks like this:
6293 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6298 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6299 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6304 @node Token Locations
6305 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6308 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6309 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6310 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6311 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6312 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6313 data in that variable.
6315 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6316 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6317 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6318 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6319 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6322 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6325 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6327 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6328 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6329 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6330 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6331 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6332 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6337 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6340 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6341 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6346 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6347 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6348 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6351 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6352 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6353 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6354 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6356 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6358 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6359 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6360 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6363 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6365 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6366 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6367 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6368 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6369 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6375 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6376 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6377 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6381 results in the following signatures:
6384 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6385 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6388 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6391 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6392 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6396 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6399 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6400 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6401 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6404 @node Error Reporting
6405 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6406 @cindex error reporting function
6409 @cindex syntax error
6411 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6412 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6413 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6414 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6417 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6418 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6419 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6420 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6421 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6423 @findex %define parse.error
6424 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6425 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6426 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6427 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6428 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6430 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6431 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6432 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6433 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6434 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6435 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6437 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6438 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6439 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6441 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6446 yyerror (char const *s)
6450 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6455 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6456 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6457 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6458 immediately return 1.
6460 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6461 an access to the current location.
6462 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6463 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6464 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6468 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6469 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6472 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6475 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6476 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6479 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6480 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6481 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6482 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6486 /* Location tracking. */
6490 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6492 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6493 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6497 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6500 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6501 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6502 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6503 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6508 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6509 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6510 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6511 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6512 message is always passed last.
6514 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6515 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6516 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6520 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6521 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6522 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6523 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6525 @node Action Features
6526 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6527 @cindex summary, action features
6528 @cindex action features summary
6530 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6531 are useful in actions.
6533 @deffn {Variable} $$
6534 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6535 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6538 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6539 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6540 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6543 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6544 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6545 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6546 Types of Values in Actions}.
6549 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6550 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6551 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6552 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6555 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6556 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6557 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6560 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6561 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6562 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6565 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6567 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6568 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6569 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6570 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6571 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6572 going to be reduced by this rule.
6574 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6575 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6576 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6579 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6582 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6583 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6586 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6587 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6591 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6592 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6593 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6594 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6595 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6596 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6599 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6600 @findex YYRECOVERING
6601 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6602 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6603 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6606 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6607 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6608 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6609 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6610 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6612 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6615 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6616 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6618 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6620 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6623 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6624 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6625 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6626 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6629 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6630 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6631 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6632 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6634 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6637 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6638 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6639 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6640 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6642 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6647 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6648 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6651 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6655 @c int first_line, last_line;
6656 @c int first_column, last_column;
6660 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6661 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6663 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6664 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6665 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6668 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6671 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6673 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6674 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6678 @node Internationalization
6679 @section Parser Internationalization
6680 @cindex internationalization
6686 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6687 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6688 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6689 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6690 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6691 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6692 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6693 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6696 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6697 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6698 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6703 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6704 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6705 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6706 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6707 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6711 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6716 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6717 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6718 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6719 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6720 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6721 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6722 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6723 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6724 Bison-generated parser.
6727 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6728 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6729 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6733 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6736 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6737 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6738 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6742 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6743 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6744 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6747 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6753 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6757 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6763 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6764 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6765 @cindex algorithm of parser
6768 @cindex parser stack
6769 @cindex stack, parser
6771 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6772 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6773 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6775 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6776 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6779 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6780 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6781 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6782 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6783 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6784 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6785 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6787 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6794 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6795 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6798 expr: expr '*' expr;
6802 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6809 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6810 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6812 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6813 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6814 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6816 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6819 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6820 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6821 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6822 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6823 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6824 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6825 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6826 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6827 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6828 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6832 @section Lookahead Tokens
6833 @cindex lookahead token
6835 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6836 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6837 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6838 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6839 token in order to decide what to do.
6841 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6842 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6843 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6844 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6845 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6846 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6847 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6850 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6851 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6852 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6871 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6872 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6873 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6874 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6875 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6877 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6878 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6879 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6880 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6881 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6882 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6887 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6888 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6889 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6890 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6893 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6895 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6896 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6897 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6899 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6900 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6906 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6912 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6913 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6915 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6916 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6917 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6918 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6921 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6922 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6923 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6924 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6925 contrast it with the other alternative.
6927 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6928 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6932 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6934 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6937 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6938 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6939 making these two inputs equivalent:
6942 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6944 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6947 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6948 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6949 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6950 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6951 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6952 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6953 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6954 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6956 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6957 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6958 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6959 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6961 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6963 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6964 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6965 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6970 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6983 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6993 @section Operator Precedence
6994 @cindex operator precedence
6995 @cindex precedence of operators
6997 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6998 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6999 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7000 shift and when to reduce.
7003 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7004 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7005 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7006 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7007 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7010 @node Why Precedence
7011 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7013 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7014 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7029 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7030 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7031 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7032 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7033 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7034 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7035 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7038 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7039 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7040 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7041 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7042 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7043 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7044 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7045 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7048 @cindex associativity
7049 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7050 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7051 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7052 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7053 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7054 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7055 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7056 makes right-associativity.
7058 @node Using Precedence
7059 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7065 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7066 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7067 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7068 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7069 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7070 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7071 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7073 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7074 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7075 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7076 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7077 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7078 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7079 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7080 what expected the grammar author.
7082 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7083 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7084 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7085 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7086 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7088 @node Precedence Only
7089 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7092 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7093 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7094 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7095 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7096 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7097 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7098 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7100 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7101 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7102 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7106 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7109 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7110 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7111 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7112 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7113 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7114 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7115 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7122 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7123 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7124 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7125 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7126 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7127 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7128 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7130 @node Precedence Examples
7131 @subsection Precedence Examples
7133 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7141 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7142 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7143 declared with @code{'-'}:
7146 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
7152 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7153 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7154 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7156 @node How Precedence
7157 @subsection How Precedence Works
7159 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7160 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7161 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7162 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7163 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7164 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7166 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7167 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7168 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7169 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7170 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7171 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7172 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7175 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7176 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7178 @node Contextual Precedence
7179 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7180 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7181 @cindex unary operator precedence
7182 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7183 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7186 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7187 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7188 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7189 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7191 The Bison precedence declarations
7192 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7193 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7194 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7197 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7198 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7199 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7200 modifier's syntax is:
7203 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7207 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7208 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7209 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7210 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7211 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7213 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7214 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7215 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7225 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7233 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7238 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7239 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7240 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7241 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7243 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7244 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7245 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7246 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7248 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7249 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7250 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7251 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7252 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7253 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7255 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7256 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7260 @section Parser States
7261 @cindex finite-state machine
7262 @cindex parser state
7263 @cindex state (of parser)
7265 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7266 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7267 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7268 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7269 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7271 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7272 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7273 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7274 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7275 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7276 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7277 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7278 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7281 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7282 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7283 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7286 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7287 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7288 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7290 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7291 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7294 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7295 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7300 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7302 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7308 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7309 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7315 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7316 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7317 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7318 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7319 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7320 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7322 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7323 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7324 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7326 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7327 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7328 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7329 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7330 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7332 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7333 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7334 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7335 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7339 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7340 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7344 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7350 | sequence redirects
7360 | redirects redirect
7365 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7366 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7367 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7368 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7369 in infinitely many ways!
7371 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7372 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7373 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7374 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7376 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7387 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7395 | sequence redirects
7409 | redirects redirect
7414 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7415 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7416 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7418 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7426 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7429 | name_list ':' type
7445 | name ',' name_list
7450 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7451 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7452 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7453 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7457 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7459 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7460 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7461 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7463 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7464 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7465 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7466 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7467 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7468 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7469 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7472 @cindex canonical LR
7473 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7474 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7475 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7476 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7477 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7478 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7479 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7480 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7482 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7483 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7484 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7485 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7486 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7497 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7502 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7503 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7504 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7505 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7506 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7507 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7509 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7510 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7511 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7512 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7513 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7514 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7519 | name_list ':' type
7527 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7528 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7533 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7534 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7535 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7536 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7537 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7538 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7539 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7541 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7542 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7543 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7544 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7546 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7547 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7550 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7551 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7552 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7553 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7556 @node LR Table Construction
7557 @subsection LR Table Construction
7558 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7561 @cindex canonical LR
7562 @findex %define lr.type
7564 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7565 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7566 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7567 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7570 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7571 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7572 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7573 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7576 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7577 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7578 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7581 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7582 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7583 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7586 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7588 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7591 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7595 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7599 %define lr.type ielr
7602 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7603 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7604 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7605 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7606 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7607 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7608 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7609 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7610 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7611 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7613 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7614 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7615 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7616 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7622 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7625 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7627 @cindex GLR with LALR
7628 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7629 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7630 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7631 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7632 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7633 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7634 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7635 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7636 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7637 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7639 @item Malformed grammars.
7641 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7642 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7643 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7644 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7645 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7650 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7651 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7652 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7653 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7654 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7655 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7656 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7657 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7658 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7662 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7665 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7666 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7667 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7668 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7669 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7670 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7671 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7672 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7673 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7674 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7675 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7676 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7679 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7680 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7681 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7683 @node Default Reductions
7684 @subsection Default Reductions
7685 @cindex default reductions
7686 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7689 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7690 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7691 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7692 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7693 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7695 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7696 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7699 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7701 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7702 @cindex consistent states
7703 @cindex defaulted states
7704 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7705 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7706 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7707 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7708 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7709 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7710 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7711 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7712 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7713 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7714 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7716 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7717 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7718 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7719 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7720 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7721 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7722 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7723 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7724 should already be considered closed.
7726 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7728 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7729 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7730 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7731 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7732 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7733 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7734 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7735 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7736 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7740 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7741 @c sentence from being rejected.
7742 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7743 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7744 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7745 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7746 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7747 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7750 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7751 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7752 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7753 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7754 because the accept action ends the parse.
7756 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7757 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7758 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7759 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7760 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7761 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7762 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7763 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7764 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7765 split the parse instead.
7767 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7768 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7770 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7771 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7772 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7774 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7775 @item @code{consistent}
7776 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7779 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7780 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7785 @findex %define parse.lac
7787 @cindex lookahead correction
7789 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7790 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7791 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7792 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7793 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7794 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7795 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7796 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7797 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7799 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7800 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7801 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7802 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7803 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7805 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7806 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7807 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7808 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7810 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7811 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7813 @item @code{none} (default)
7816 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7817 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7821 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7822 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7823 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7824 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7825 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7826 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7827 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7828 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7829 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7830 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7833 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7834 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7835 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7836 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7837 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7838 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7839 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7840 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7841 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7842 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7844 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7845 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7846 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7847 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7848 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7849 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7850 language-recognition power.
7852 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7855 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7857 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7858 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7859 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7860 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7863 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7865 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7866 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7867 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7868 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7869 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7870 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7874 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7875 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7876 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7877 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7878 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7879 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7880 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7881 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7882 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7883 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7884 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7887 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7888 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7889 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7891 @node Unreachable States
7892 @subsection Unreachable States
7893 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7894 @cindex unreachable states
7896 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7897 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7898 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7899 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7901 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7902 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7903 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7904 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7906 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7907 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7908 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7911 There are a few caveats to consider:
7914 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7916 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7917 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7918 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7919 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7920 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7921 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7923 @item Other useless states.
7925 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7926 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7927 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7928 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7929 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7930 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7931 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7934 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7935 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7937 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7938 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7939 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7941 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7942 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7943 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7944 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7945 context-free languages.
7946 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7947 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7948 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7949 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7950 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7951 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7952 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7953 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7955 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7956 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7957 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7958 parser uses the same basic
7959 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7960 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7961 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7962 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7964 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7965 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7966 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7967 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7968 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7970 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7971 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7972 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7973 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7974 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7975 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7976 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7977 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7978 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7979 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7980 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7983 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7984 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7985 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7986 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7987 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7988 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7989 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7990 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7991 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7992 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7993 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7994 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7996 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7997 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7998 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8000 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8001 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8002 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8003 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8004 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8005 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8006 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8007 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8008 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8009 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8010 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8011 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8013 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8016 @node Memory Management
8017 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8018 @cindex memory exhaustion
8019 @cindex memory management
8020 @cindex stack overflow
8021 @cindex parser stack overflow
8022 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8024 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8025 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8026 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8028 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8029 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8030 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8033 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8034 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8035 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8036 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8038 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8039 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8040 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8041 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8042 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8043 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8045 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8046 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8047 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8050 @cindex default stack limit
8051 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8055 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8056 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8057 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8058 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8059 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8061 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8063 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8064 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8065 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8066 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8067 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8068 non-trivial copy constructors.
8069 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8072 @node Error Recovery
8073 @chapter Error Recovery
8074 @cindex error recovery
8075 @cindex recovery from errors
8077 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8078 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8079 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8082 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8083 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8084 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8085 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8086 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8087 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8088 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8091 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8092 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8093 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8094 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8095 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8096 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8108 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8109 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8111 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8112 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8113 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8114 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8115 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8116 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8117 applicable in the ordinary way.
8119 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8120 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8121 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8122 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8123 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8124 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8125 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8126 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8127 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8128 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8129 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8130 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8132 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8133 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8134 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8137 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8140 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8141 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8142 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8143 spurious error message:
8153 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8154 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8155 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8156 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8157 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8158 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8159 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8162 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8163 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8164 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8165 error messages resume.
8167 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8168 as any other rules can.
8171 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8172 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8173 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8174 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8177 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8178 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8179 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8181 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8183 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8184 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8185 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8186 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8187 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8189 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8190 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8191 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8192 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8195 @node Context Dependency
8196 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8198 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8199 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8200 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8201 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8205 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8206 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8207 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8208 error recovery rules must be written.
8211 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8212 neither clean nor robust.)
8214 @node Semantic Tokens
8215 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8217 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8218 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8224 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8225 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8226 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8228 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8229 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8230 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8231 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8232 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8234 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8235 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8236 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8237 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8238 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8239 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8240 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8242 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8243 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8244 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8245 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8249 typedef int foo, bar;
8253 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8254 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8260 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8261 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8263 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8264 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8265 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8266 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8267 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8272 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8273 | declarator maybeasm
8279 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8280 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8286 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8287 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8288 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8290 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8291 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8292 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8293 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8294 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8295 the syntactic context.
8297 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8298 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8299 @cindex lexical tie-in
8301 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8302 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8305 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8306 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8307 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8308 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8309 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8316 void yyerror (char const *);
8325 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8326 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8327 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8341 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8342 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8343 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8345 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8346 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8347 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8350 @node Tie-in Recovery
8351 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8353 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8354 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8356 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8357 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8358 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8359 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8364 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8366 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8370 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8371 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8372 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8373 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8374 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8376 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8378 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8379 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8380 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8386 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8392 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8393 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8394 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8395 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8397 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8398 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8399 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8400 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8401 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8402 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8405 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8408 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8410 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8411 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8412 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8413 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8416 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8417 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8421 @section Understanding Your Parser
8423 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8424 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8425 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8426 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8427 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8429 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8430 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8431 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8432 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8433 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8434 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8435 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8437 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8455 @command{bison} reports:
8458 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8459 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8460 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8461 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8462 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8465 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8466 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8467 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8468 interpretation is the same.
8471 @cindex token, useless
8472 @cindex useless token
8473 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8474 @cindex useless nonterminal
8475 @cindex rule, useless
8476 @cindex useless rule
8477 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8478 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8479 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8480 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8483 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8486 Terminals unused in grammar
8489 Rules useless in grammar
8494 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8497 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8498 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8499 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8500 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8504 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8519 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8523 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8536 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8541 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8547 @cindex pointed rule
8548 @cindex rule, pointed
8549 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8550 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8551 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8552 the location of the input cursor.
8557 0 $accept: . exp $end
8559 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8564 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8565 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8566 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8567 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8568 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8569 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8570 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8571 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8573 @cindex core, item set
8574 @cindex item set core
8575 @cindex kernel, item set
8576 @cindex item set core
8577 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8578 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8579 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8580 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8581 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8582 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8587 0 $accept: . exp $end
8588 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8594 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8600 In the state 1@dots{}
8607 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8611 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8612 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8613 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8614 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8619 0 $accept: exp . $end
8620 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8625 $end shift, and go to state 3
8626 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8627 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8628 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8629 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8633 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8634 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8635 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8636 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8637 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8640 @cindex accepting state
8641 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8647 0 $accept: exp $end .
8653 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8654 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8656 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8662 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8664 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8671 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8673 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8680 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8682 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8689 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8691 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8696 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8702 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8708 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8709 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8711 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8712 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8715 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8716 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8717 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8718 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8719 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8720 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8721 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8722 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8724 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8725 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8726 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8729 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8730 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8731 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8732 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8733 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8734 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8735 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8736 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8737 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8738 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8739 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8740 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8745 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8746 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8751 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8752 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8754 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8755 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8758 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8759 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8760 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8761 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8762 conflicts in the report:
8765 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8766 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8767 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8771 The remaining states are similar:
8777 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8783 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8784 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8786 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8787 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8793 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8799 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8801 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8802 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8808 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8814 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8815 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8816 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8817 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8819 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8820 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8821 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8822 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8823 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8828 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8829 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8830 @samp{*}, but also because the
8831 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8835 @section Tracing Your Parser
8838 @cindex tracing the parser
8840 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8841 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8844 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8845 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8846 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8849 @node Enabling Traces
8850 @subsection Enabling Traces
8851 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8854 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8856 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8857 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8858 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8859 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8862 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8863 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8864 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8865 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8866 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8868 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8869 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8870 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8871 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8872 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8874 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8876 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8877 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8878 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8880 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8881 @findex %define parse.trace
8882 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
8883 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8884 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8885 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
8886 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
8889 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8893 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8894 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8895 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8896 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8897 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8898 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8900 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8901 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8902 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8903 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8905 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8906 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8907 messages tell you these things:
8911 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8914 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8915 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8918 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8919 of the state stack afterward.
8922 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8923 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8924 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8925 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8926 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8927 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8928 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8929 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8930 grammar are to blame.
8932 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8933 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8934 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8935 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8936 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8939 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8941 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8942 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8943 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8944 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8945 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8946 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8948 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8949 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8950 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8953 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8955 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8957 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8960 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8961 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8962 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8963 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8966 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8967 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8968 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8969 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8970 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8971 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8973 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8974 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8975 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8976 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8977 printer will be used for them.
8979 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8980 are sent onto standard error.
8983 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8986 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8987 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8993 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8994 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8995 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8996 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8998 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9000 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9001 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9006 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9007 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9008 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9012 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9013 Shifting token '(' ()
9015 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9016 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9018 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9019 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9020 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9026 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9027 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
9028 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9031 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9032 Shifting token '-' ()
9034 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9035 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9037 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9038 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9039 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9040 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9042 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9043 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9044 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9046 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9047 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9053 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9054 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9057 Next token is token ')' ()
9058 Shifting token ')' ()
9060 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9061 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9063 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9065 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9071 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9075 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9076 Shifting token '\n' ()
9078 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9079 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9082 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9085 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9088 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9093 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9094 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9095 completion of the parsing.
9098 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9099 Shifting token $end ()
9102 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9103 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9107 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9108 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9111 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9112 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9113 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9115 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9117 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9118 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9119 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9121 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9124 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9125 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9129 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9130 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9131 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9134 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9137 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9140 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9141 else if (type == NUM)
9142 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9146 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9149 @chapter Invoking Bison
9150 @cindex invoking Bison
9151 @cindex Bison invocation
9152 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9154 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9160 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9161 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9162 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9163 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9164 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9165 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9166 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9167 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9168 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9169 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9170 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9175 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9178 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9181 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9184 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9186 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9187 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9188 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9191 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9192 in alphabetical order by short options.
9193 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9194 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9198 @section Bison Options
9200 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9201 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9202 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9203 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9204 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9207 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9208 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9211 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9217 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9221 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9223 @item --print-localedir
9224 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9226 @item --print-datadir
9227 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9231 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9232 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9233 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9234 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9235 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9236 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9237 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9238 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9239 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9240 for compatibility with POSIX:
9247 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9248 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9249 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9250 this option is specified.
9252 @item -W [@var{category}]
9253 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9254 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9257 @item midrule-values
9258 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9260 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9263 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9266 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9267 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9270 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9273 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9274 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9275 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9278 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9282 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9283 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9284 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9285 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9286 no effect on the conflict report.
9289 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9293 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9295 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9296 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9302 Turn off all the warnings.
9304 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9307 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9308 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9309 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9311 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9312 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9313 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9314 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9316 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9317 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9319 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9320 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9323 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9324 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9325 S/R conflicts as errors.
9328 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9329 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9339 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9340 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9341 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9343 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9344 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9345 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9346 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9347 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9348 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9349 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9353 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9356 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9357 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9358 definition for @var{name}.
9360 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9361 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9362 definitions for @var{name}.
9364 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9365 definitions for @var{name}.
9368 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9369 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9370 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9372 @item -L @var{language}
9373 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9374 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9375 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9376 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9377 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9379 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9383 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9385 @item -p @var{prefix}
9386 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9387 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9388 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9389 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9393 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9394 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9395 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9396 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9397 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9398 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9401 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9402 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9403 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9405 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9406 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9407 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9408 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9410 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9411 file in the Bison installation directory.
9412 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9413 current working directory.
9414 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9417 @itemx --token-table
9418 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9425 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9426 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9427 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9428 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9431 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9432 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9433 with other short options.
9435 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9436 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9437 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9438 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9440 @item -r @var{things}
9441 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9442 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9443 separated list of @var{things} among:
9447 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9451 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9452 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9455 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9456 each rule's lookahead set.
9459 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9460 precedence and associativity directives.
9463 Enable all the items.
9466 Do not generate the report.
9469 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9470 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9474 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9475 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9476 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9479 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9480 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9482 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9483 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9485 @item -g [@var{file}]
9486 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9487 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9488 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9489 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9490 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9491 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9494 @item -x [@var{file}]
9495 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9496 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9497 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9498 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9500 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9501 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9504 @node Option Cross Key
9505 @section Option Cross Key
9507 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9508 the corresponding short option and directive.
9510 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9511 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9512 @include cross-options.texi
9516 @section Yacc Library
9518 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9519 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9520 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9521 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9522 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9523 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9524 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9526 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9527 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9530 int yyerror (char const *);
9533 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9534 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9535 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9541 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9543 @node Other Languages
9544 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9547 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9548 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9552 @section C++ Parsers
9555 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9556 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9557 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9558 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9559 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9560 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9563 @node C++ Bison Interface
9564 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9565 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9569 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9570 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9571 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9572 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9574 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9576 @findex %define api.namespace
9577 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9578 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9579 in the following files:
9584 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9585 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
9586 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
9590 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9593 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9594 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9595 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9596 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9597 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9599 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9600 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9601 @samp{%defines} directive.
9604 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9605 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9607 @node C++ Semantic Values
9608 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9609 @c - No objects in unions
9611 @c - Printer and destructor
9613 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9614 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9615 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9616 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9619 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9620 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9624 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9626 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9627 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9628 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9631 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9632 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9633 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9635 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9636 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9637 to such objects are allowed.
9640 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9641 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9642 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9646 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9648 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9649 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9650 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9651 types can be used without pointers.
9653 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9654 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9655 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9656 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9658 For instance, instead of
9666 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9667 %token <sval> STRING;
9674 %token <int> NUMBER;
9675 %token <std::string> STRING;
9678 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9679 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9682 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9683 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9684 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9686 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9687 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9688 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9689 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9690 eventually, destroyed.
9692 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9693 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9694 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9697 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9698 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9702 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9703 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9704 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9705 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9706 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9707 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9708 that would be duplicating the information.
9710 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9711 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9712 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9713 (the current implementation of) variants:
9716 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9717 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9718 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9719 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9720 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9721 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9724 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9725 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9726 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9727 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9728 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9729 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9732 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9735 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9736 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9738 @node C++ Location Values
9739 @subsection C++ Location Values
9743 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9745 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9746 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9748 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9749 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9750 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9751 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9752 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9755 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9756 genuine code only the latter is used.
9759 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9760 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9761 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9765 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9767 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9768 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9769 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9773 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9774 Reset the position to the given values.
9777 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9778 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9779 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9780 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9781 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9784 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9785 The line, starting at 1.
9788 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9789 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9792 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9793 The column, starting at 1.
9796 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9797 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9800 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9801 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9802 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9803 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9804 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9807 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9808 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9809 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9812 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9813 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9814 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9815 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9819 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9821 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9822 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9825 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9826 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9827 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9830 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9831 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9834 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9835 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9836 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9839 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9840 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9841 Advance the @code{end} position.
9844 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9845 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9846 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9847 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9850 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9851 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9854 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9855 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9856 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9860 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9861 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9862 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9865 @node User Defined Location Type
9866 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9867 @findex %define api.location.type
9869 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9870 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9873 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9876 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9879 it must be copyable;
9882 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9883 parser basically runs
9885 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9886 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9889 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9892 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9893 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9896 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9897 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9902 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9903 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9904 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9905 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9910 %define namespace "master::"
9914 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9915 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9918 %define location_type "master::location"
9919 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9922 @node C++ Parser Interface
9923 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9924 @c - define parser_class_name
9926 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9928 @c - Reporting errors
9930 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9931 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9932 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9933 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9934 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9935 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9936 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9937 additional argument for its constructor.
9939 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9940 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9941 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9944 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9945 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9946 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9947 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9948 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9949 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9952 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9953 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9954 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
9955 equivalent with first
9956 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9957 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9958 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9959 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9960 function invoked from the user action.
9963 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9964 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9965 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9968 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9969 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9970 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9973 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9974 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9977 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9978 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9979 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9982 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9983 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9984 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9988 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9989 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9990 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9991 or nonzero, full tracing.
9994 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9995 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9996 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9997 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9998 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10003 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10004 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10005 @c - prefix for yylex.
10006 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10009 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10010 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10011 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10012 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10015 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10016 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10019 @node Split Symbols
10020 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10022 Therefore the interface is as follows.
10024 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10025 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10026 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10027 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10028 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10031 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10032 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10034 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10038 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10039 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10042 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10043 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10047 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10048 initialized. So the code would look like:
10052 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10053 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10056 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10057 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10066 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10067 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10070 yylval.build(yytext);
10071 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10076 @node Complete Symbols
10077 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10079 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
10080 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10081 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10082 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10083 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10085 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10086 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10087 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10088 the @var{location}.
10091 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10092 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10093 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10094 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10096 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10098 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10099 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10100 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10101 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10102 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10103 also pass the @var{location}.
10106 For instance, given the following declarations:
10109 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
10110 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10111 %token <int> INTEGER;
10116 Bison generates the following functions:
10119 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10120 const location_type& l);
10121 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10122 const location_type& loc);
10123 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10127 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10130 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10131 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10132 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10135 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10136 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10138 @node A Complete C++ Example
10139 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10141 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10142 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10143 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10144 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10145 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10146 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10147 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10148 actually easier to interface with.
10151 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10152 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10153 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10154 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10155 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10158 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10159 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10161 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10162 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10163 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10164 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10165 of valid input follows.
10169 seven := one + two * three
10173 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10174 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10176 @c - A place to store error messages
10177 @c - A place for the result
10179 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10180 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10181 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10182 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10183 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10184 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10185 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10187 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10188 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10189 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10192 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10194 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10195 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10198 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10203 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10204 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10205 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10206 factor both as follows.
10208 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10210 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10212 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10213 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10218 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10221 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10223 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10224 class calcxx_driver
10228 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10230 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10236 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10237 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10239 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10241 // Handling the scanner.
10242 void scan_begin ();
10244 bool trace_scanning;
10248 Similarly for the parser itself.
10250 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10252 // Run the parser on file F.
10253 // Return 0 on success.
10254 int parse (const std::string& f);
10255 // The name of the file being parsed.
10256 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10258 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10259 bool trace_parsing;
10263 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10264 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10265 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10266 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10268 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10271 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10272 void error (const std::string& m);
10274 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10277 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10278 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10279 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10280 messages and set error state.
10282 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10284 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10285 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10287 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10288 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10290 variables["one"] = 1;
10291 variables["two"] = 2;
10294 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10299 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10303 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10304 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10305 int res = parser.parse ();
10311 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10313 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10317 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10319 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10323 @node Calc++ Parser
10324 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10326 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10327 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10328 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10329 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10332 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10334 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10335 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10337 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10341 @findex %define variant
10342 @findex %define lex_symbol
10343 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10344 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10345 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10346 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
10348 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10351 %define parse.assert
10356 @findex %code requires
10357 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10358 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10359 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10360 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10361 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10362 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10363 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10365 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10370 class calcxx_driver;
10375 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10376 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10379 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10381 // The parsing context.
10382 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10386 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10387 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10388 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10391 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10396 // Initialize the initial location.
10397 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10402 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10403 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10406 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10408 %define parse.trace
10409 %define parse.error verbose
10414 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10415 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10417 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10421 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10427 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10428 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10429 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10430 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10431 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.tokens.prefix}).
10433 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10435 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
10437 END 0 "end of file"
10449 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10450 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10453 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10455 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10456 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10461 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10462 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10463 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10464 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10466 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10468 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10472 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10473 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10475 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10479 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10482 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10483 | assignments assignment @{@};
10486 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10491 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10492 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10493 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10494 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10495 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10496 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10497 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10502 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10505 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10508 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10509 const std::string& m)
10511 driver.error (l, m);
10515 @node Calc++ Scanner
10516 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10518 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10519 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10521 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10523 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10525 # include <climits>
10526 # include <cstdlib>
10528 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10529 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10531 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10532 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10533 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10534 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10536 # define yywrap() 1
10538 // The location of the current token.
10539 static yy::location loc;
10544 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10545 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10546 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10547 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10549 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10551 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10555 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10557 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10559 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10565 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10566 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10567 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10568 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10569 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10570 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10571 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10573 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10577 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10578 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10584 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10588 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10589 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10593 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10595 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10597 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10598 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10599 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10600 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10601 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10602 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10603 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10608 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10609 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10610 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10611 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10614 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10615 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10616 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10621 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10622 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10624 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10628 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10630 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10631 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10633 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10635 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10636 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10643 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10650 @node Calc++ Top Level
10651 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10653 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10655 @comment file: calc++.cc
10657 #include <iostream>
10658 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10662 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10665 calcxx_driver driver;
10666 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10667 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10668 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10669 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10670 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10671 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10672 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10681 @section Java Parsers
10684 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10685 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10686 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10687 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10688 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10689 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10690 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10691 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10694 @node Java Bison Interface
10695 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10696 @c - %language "Java"
10698 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10699 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10701 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10702 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10704 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10705 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10706 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10707 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10708 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10709 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10710 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10711 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10712 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10713 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10715 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10717 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10718 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10719 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10720 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10723 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10724 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10726 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10727 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10729 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10730 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10732 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10733 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10734 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10736 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10737 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10738 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10740 if needed. Also, in the future the
10741 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10742 access the token names and codes.
10744 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10745 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10746 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10747 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10750 @node Java Semantic Values
10751 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10752 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10754 @c - Printer and destructor
10756 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10757 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10758 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10761 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10762 %type <Integer> number
10765 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10766 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10767 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10768 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10769 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10772 %define stype "ASTNode"
10776 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10777 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10779 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10780 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10781 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10782 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10783 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10784 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10786 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10787 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10788 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10790 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10791 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10792 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10795 @node Java Location Values
10796 @subsection Java Location Values
10798 @c - class Position
10799 @c - class Location
10801 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10802 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10803 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10804 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10805 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10806 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10807 renamed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10809 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10810 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10811 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10812 be supplied by the user.
10815 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10816 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10817 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10820 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10821 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10824 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10825 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10828 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10829 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10830 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10831 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10835 @node Java Parser Interface
10836 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10837 @c - define parser_class_name
10839 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10841 @c - Reporting errors
10843 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10844 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10845 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10846 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10847 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10849 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10850 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10851 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10852 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10853 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10854 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10855 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10856 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10858 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10859 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10860 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10861 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10863 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10864 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10865 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10866 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10867 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10868 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10870 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10871 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10872 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10873 which initialize them automatically.
10875 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10876 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10877 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10878 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10880 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10881 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10882 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10885 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10886 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10887 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
10890 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10891 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10892 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
10894 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10895 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10896 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10899 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10900 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10901 @code{false} otherwise.
10904 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
10905 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
10906 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
10907 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
10908 verbose error messages.
10911 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10912 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
10913 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10914 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10915 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10916 available only if location tracking is active.
10919 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10920 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10921 from a syntax error.
10922 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10925 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10926 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10927 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10931 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10932 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10933 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10934 or nonzero, full tracing.
10937 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
10938 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
10939 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
10943 @node Java Scanner Interface
10944 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10947 @c - Lexer interface
10949 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10950 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10951 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10952 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10953 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10956 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10957 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10958 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10959 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10962 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10963 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10964 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10965 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10968 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10970 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10971 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10972 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10973 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10976 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10977 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10978 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10981 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10982 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10985 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10986 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10987 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10988 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10989 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10991 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10992 "@var{class-name}".}
10995 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10996 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10998 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10999 "@var{class-name}".}
11003 @node Java Action Features
11004 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11006 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11007 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11009 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11010 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11013 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11014 This may not be assigned to.
11015 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11018 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11019 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11020 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11024 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11025 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11026 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11027 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11028 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11029 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11032 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11033 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11034 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11035 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11037 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11041 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11042 This may not be assigned to.
11043 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11047 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11048 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11051 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11052 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11053 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11056 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11057 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11058 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11061 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11062 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11063 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11066 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11067 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11068 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11070 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11073 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11074 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11075 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11076 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11077 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11078 available only if location tracking is active.
11082 @node Java Differences
11083 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11085 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11086 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11087 section summarizes these differences.
11091 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11092 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11093 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11094 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11095 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11096 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11097 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11099 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11100 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11101 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11102 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11103 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11106 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11107 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11108 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11109 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11110 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11111 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11112 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11113 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11114 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11117 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11119 @item @code{%code imports}
11120 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11121 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11122 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11124 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11125 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11127 @item @code{%code lexer}
11128 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11129 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11130 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11134 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11135 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11136 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11138 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11139 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11144 @node Java Declarations Summary
11145 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11147 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11148 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11150 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11151 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11154 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11155 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11156 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11157 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11158 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11161 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11162 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11163 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11164 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11167 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11168 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11169 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11170 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11173 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11174 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11175 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11178 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11179 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11180 a Java @emph{type}.
11181 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11184 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11185 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11186 @xref{Java Differences}.
11189 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11190 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11191 @xref{Java Differences}.
11194 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11195 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11196 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11199 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11200 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11201 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11204 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11205 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11206 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11207 @xref{Java Differences}.
11210 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11211 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11212 @xref{Java Differences}.
11215 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11216 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11217 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11220 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11221 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11222 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11225 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11226 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11227 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11230 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11231 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11232 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11235 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11236 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11238 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11241 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11242 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11243 constructor. Default is none.
11244 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11247 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11248 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11249 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11250 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11253 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
11254 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11255 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11256 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11257 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11260 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11261 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11262 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11265 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11266 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11267 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11268 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11271 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
11272 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11273 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11274 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11277 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11278 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11279 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11282 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11283 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11284 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11287 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11288 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11289 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11292 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11293 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11294 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11295 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11299 @c ================================================= FAQ
11302 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11303 @cindex frequently asked questions
11306 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11310 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11311 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11312 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11313 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11314 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11315 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11316 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11317 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11318 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11319 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11320 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11321 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11324 @node Memory Exhausted
11325 @section Memory Exhausted
11328 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11329 message. What can I do?
11332 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11335 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11336 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11338 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11339 following typical questions:
11342 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11343 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11344 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11351 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11352 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11353 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11356 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11357 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11358 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11359 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11360 @file{first-line.l}:
11366 #include <stdlib.h>
11370 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11374 yyparse (char const *file)
11376 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11380 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11384 /* One token only. */
11386 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11389 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11407 If the file @file{input} contains
11415 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11418 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11419 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11420 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11425 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11426 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11427 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11428 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11429 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11430 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11431 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11432 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11435 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11436 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11437 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11438 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11440 @node Strings are Destroyed
11441 @section Strings are Destroyed
11444 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11445 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11446 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11449 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11450 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11451 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11457 char *yylval = NULL;
11462 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11470 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11471 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11472 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11473 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11479 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11482 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11483 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11484 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11490 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11491 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11492 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11493 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11494 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11495 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11498 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11499 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11500 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11505 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11506 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11509 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11510 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11513 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11514 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11515 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11516 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11517 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11518 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11519 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11521 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11523 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11524 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11525 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11526 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11527 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11528 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11531 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11532 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11535 @node Multiple start-symbols
11536 @section Multiple start-symbols
11539 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11540 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11541 multiple entry points.
11544 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11545 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11546 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11547 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11551 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11558 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11559 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11561 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11562 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11563 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11564 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11565 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11566 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11567 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11568 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11571 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11576 int t = start_token;
11581 /* @r{The rules.} */
11585 @node Secure? Conform?
11586 @section Secure? Conform?
11589 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11592 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11593 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11594 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11595 please send us a bug report.
11597 @node I can't build Bison
11598 @section I can't build Bison
11601 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11602 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11606 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11607 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11608 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11609 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11610 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11611 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11612 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11615 @node Where can I find help?
11616 @section Where can I find help?
11619 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11622 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11623 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11624 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11625 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11626 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11627 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11628 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11629 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11633 @section Bug Reports
11636 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11639 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11640 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11641 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11642 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11643 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11645 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11646 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11647 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11648 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11649 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11651 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11652 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11653 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11654 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11655 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11656 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11658 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11659 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11661 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11663 @node More Languages
11664 @section More Languages
11667 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11668 favorite language here}?
11671 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11672 languages; contributions are welcome.
11675 @section Beta Testing
11678 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11681 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11682 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11683 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11684 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11685 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11686 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11687 essentially halted.
11689 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11690 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11691 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11692 systems are especially welcome.
11694 @node Mailing Lists
11695 @section Mailing Lists
11698 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11701 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11703 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11705 @node Table of Symbols
11706 @appendix Bison Symbols
11707 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11708 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11710 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11711 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11712 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11715 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11716 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11717 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11720 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11721 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11725 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11726 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11730 @deffn {Variable} $$
11731 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11735 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11736 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11737 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11740 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11741 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11745 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11746 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11750 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11751 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11752 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11753 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11756 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11757 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11758 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11759 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11760 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11764 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11765 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11766 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11767 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11768 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11769 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11770 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11772 This feature is experimental.
11773 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11777 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11778 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11781 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11782 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11786 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11787 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11790 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11791 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11792 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11795 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11796 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11799 This feature is experimental.
11800 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11803 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11806 @deffn {Directive} <>
11807 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11810 This feature is experimental.
11811 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11814 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11817 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11818 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11819 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11820 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11823 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11824 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11825 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11826 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11827 @xref{%code Summary}.
11830 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11831 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11835 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11836 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11837 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11842 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11843 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11844 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11845 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11848 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11849 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11850 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11853 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11854 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11855 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11858 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11859 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11860 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11863 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11864 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11865 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11869 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11870 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11871 used in the grammar.
11874 @deffn {Symbol} error
11875 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11876 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11877 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11878 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11879 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11880 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11881 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11882 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11885 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11886 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
11887 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11890 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11891 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11895 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11896 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11897 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11900 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11901 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11904 @deffn {Directive} %language
11905 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11906 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11909 @deffn {Directive} %left
11910 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
11911 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11914 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11915 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
11916 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11920 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11921 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11922 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11923 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11924 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11927 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11928 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11929 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11931 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11932 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11933 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11935 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11936 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11937 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11938 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11939 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11940 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11941 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11942 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11947 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11948 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11949 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11954 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11955 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11956 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11959 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11960 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
11961 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11964 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11965 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11966 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11969 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11970 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
11971 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
11972 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11975 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11976 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
11977 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11980 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11981 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11982 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11985 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
11986 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
11987 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11990 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11991 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11992 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11993 unreasonable usage.
11996 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11997 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11998 Require a Version of Bison}.
12001 @deffn {Directive} %right
12002 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12003 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12006 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12007 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12008 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12011 @deffn {Directive} %start
12012 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12016 @deffn {Directive} %token
12017 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12018 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12021 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12022 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12023 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12026 @deffn {Directive} %type
12027 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12028 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12031 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12032 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12033 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12037 @deffn {Directive} %union
12038 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12039 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12042 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12043 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12044 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12045 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12046 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12048 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12052 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12053 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12054 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12055 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12057 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12061 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12062 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12063 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12066 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12067 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12068 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12069 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12070 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12073 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12074 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12075 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12078 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12079 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12080 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12083 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12084 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12085 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12086 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12089 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12090 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12091 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12094 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12095 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12096 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12097 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12098 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12099 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12101 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12105 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12106 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12107 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12110 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12111 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12112 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12113 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12114 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12115 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12116 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12119 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12120 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12121 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12124 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12125 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12126 @xref{Memory Management}.
12129 @deffn {Function} yylex
12130 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12131 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12135 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
12136 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
12137 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
12138 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
12139 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12142 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12143 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12144 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12145 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12147 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12149 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12150 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12151 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12154 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12155 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12156 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12159 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12160 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12161 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12162 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12164 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12165 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12166 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12169 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12170 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12174 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12175 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12176 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12177 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
12178 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12181 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12182 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12183 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12186 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12187 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12188 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12189 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12192 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12193 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12194 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12195 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12196 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12197 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12198 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12201 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12202 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12203 call this function to create a new parser.
12204 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12205 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12206 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12207 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12210 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12211 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12212 parse the rest of the input stream.
12213 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12214 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12215 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12216 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12219 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12220 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12221 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12222 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12223 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12224 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12227 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12228 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12229 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12230 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12233 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12234 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12235 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12236 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12237 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12238 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12239 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12241 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12242 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12243 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12244 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12245 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12246 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12247 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12250 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12251 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12252 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12260 @item Accepting state
12261 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12262 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12263 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12265 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12266 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12267 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12268 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12269 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12271 @item Consistent state
12272 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12274 @item Context-free grammars
12275 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12276 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12277 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12278 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12281 @item Default reduction
12282 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12283 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12284 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12285 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12288 @item Defaulted state
12289 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12291 @item Dynamic allocation
12292 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12293 compile time or on entry to a function.
12296 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12297 character string of length zero.
12299 @item Finite-state stack machine
12300 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12301 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12302 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12303 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12304 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12305 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12307 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12308 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12309 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12310 deterministic parsing
12311 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12312 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12313 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12317 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12318 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12319 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12321 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12322 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12323 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12324 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12325 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12326 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12327 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12328 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12329 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12330 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12332 @item Infix operator
12333 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12334 performs some operation.
12337 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12339 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12340 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12341 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12342 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12343 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12344 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12345 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12347 @item Language construct
12348 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12349 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12350 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12352 @item Left associativity
12353 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12354 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12355 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12357 @item Left recursion
12358 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12359 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12362 @item Left-to-right parsing
12363 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12364 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12366 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12367 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12368 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12370 @item Lexical tie-in
12371 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12372 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12374 @item Literal string token
12375 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12377 @item Lookahead token
12378 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12382 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12383 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12384 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12387 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12388 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12390 @item Nonterminal symbol
12391 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12392 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12393 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12396 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12397 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12400 @item Postfix operator
12401 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12402 performs some operation.
12405 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12406 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12410 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12411 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12412 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12414 @item Reverse polish notation
12415 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12417 @item Right recursion
12418 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12419 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12423 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12424 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12425 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12428 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12429 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12430 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12432 @item Single-character literal
12433 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12434 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12437 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12438 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12439 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12440 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12443 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12444 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12445 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12448 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12449 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12452 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12453 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12454 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12455 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12457 @item Terminal symbol
12458 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12459 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12460 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12462 @item Unreachable state
12463 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12464 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12465 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12468 @node Copying This Manual
12469 @appendix Copying This Manual
12473 @unnumbered Bibliography
12477 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12478 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12479 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12480 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12482 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12483 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12484 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12485 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12486 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12488 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12489 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12490 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12491 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12492 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12494 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12495 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12496 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12497 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12498 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12501 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12502 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12503 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12506 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12507 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12508 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12509 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12512 @node Index of Terms
12513 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12519 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12520 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12521 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12522 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12523 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12524 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12525 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12526 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12527 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12528 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12529 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12530 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12531 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12532 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12533 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12534 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12535 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12536 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12537 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12538 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12539 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12540 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12541 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12542 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12543 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12544 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12545 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12546 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12547 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12548 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12549 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12550 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12551 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12552 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12553 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12554 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12555 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12556 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12557 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12558 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12559 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12560 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12561 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12562 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12563 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12564 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12565 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12566 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12567 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12568 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12569 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12570 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12571 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12572 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate
12574 @c Local Variables:
12575 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"