1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
283 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
287 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
288 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
289 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
290 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
292 Handling Context Dependencies
294 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
295 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
296 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
297 error recovery rules must be written.
299 Debugging Your Parser
301 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
302 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
303 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
304 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
308 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
309 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
310 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
314 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
315 in alphabetical order by short options.
316 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
317 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
319 Parsers Written In Other Languages
321 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
322 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
326 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
327 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
328 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
329 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
330 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
331 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
335 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
336 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
337 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
339 A Complete C++ Example
341 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
342 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
343 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
344 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
345 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
349 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
350 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
351 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
352 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
353 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
354 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
355 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
356 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
358 Frequently Asked Questions
360 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
361 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
362 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
363 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
364 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
365 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
366 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
367 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
368 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
369 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
370 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
371 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
375 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
381 @unnumbered Introduction
384 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
385 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
386 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
387 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
388 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
389 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
390 calculators to complex programming languages.
392 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
393 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
394 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
395 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
396 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
399 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
400 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
401 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
402 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
405 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
406 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
407 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
408 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
409 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
410 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
413 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
416 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
418 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
419 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
420 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
421 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
422 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
424 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
426 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
427 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
428 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
429 License to all of the Bison source code.
431 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
432 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
433 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
434 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
435 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
436 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
437 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
439 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
440 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
441 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
442 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
443 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
444 using the other GNU tools.
446 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
447 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
448 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
449 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
453 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
454 @include gpl-3.0.texi
457 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
459 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
460 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
461 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
464 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
465 as mathematical ideas.
466 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
467 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
468 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
469 the name of an identifier, etc.).
470 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
471 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
472 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
473 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
474 how is the output used?
475 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
476 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
479 @node Language and Grammar
480 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
482 @cindex context-free grammar
483 @cindex grammar, context-free
484 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
485 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
486 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
487 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
488 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
489 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
490 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
491 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
495 @cindex Backus-Naur form
496 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
497 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
498 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
499 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
500 essentially machine-readable BNF.
502 @cindex LALR grammars
503 @cindex IELR grammars
505 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
506 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
507 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
508 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
509 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
510 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
511 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
512 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
513 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
514 Construction}, to learn how.
517 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
518 @cindex ambiguous grammars
519 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
521 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
522 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
523 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
524 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
525 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
526 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
527 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
528 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
529 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
530 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
531 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
532 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
533 possible parses of any given string is finite.
535 @cindex symbols (abstract)
537 @cindex syntactic grouping
538 @cindex grouping, syntactic
539 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
540 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
541 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
542 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
543 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
544 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
545 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
547 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
548 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
549 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
550 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
551 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
552 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
553 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
554 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
555 lexicography, not grammar.)
557 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
560 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
561 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
562 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
563 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
564 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
565 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
566 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
569 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
570 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
571 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
572 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
573 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
574 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
575 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
576 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
578 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
579 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
580 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
581 reads informally as follows:
584 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
589 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
593 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
594 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
595 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
596 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
599 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
600 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
601 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
602 not the start symbol.
604 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
605 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
606 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
607 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
608 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
609 reports a syntax error.
611 @node Grammar in Bison
612 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
613 @cindex Bison grammar
614 @cindex grammar, Bison
615 @cindex formal grammar
617 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
618 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
619 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
621 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
622 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
623 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
625 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
626 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
627 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
628 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
629 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
630 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
631 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
634 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
635 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
636 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
637 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
639 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
640 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
642 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
643 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
644 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
645 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
649 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
653 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
655 @node Semantic Values
656 @section Semantic Values
657 @cindex semantic value
658 @cindex value, semantic
660 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
661 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
662 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
663 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
664 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
667 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
668 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
669 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
670 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
671 ,Defining Language Semantics},
674 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
675 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
676 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
677 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
680 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
681 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
682 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
683 need to have any semantic value.)
685 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
686 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
687 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
688 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
689 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
690 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
692 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
693 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
694 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
695 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
696 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
698 @node Semantic Actions
699 @section Semantic Actions
700 @cindex semantic actions
701 @cindex actions, semantic
703 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
704 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
705 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
706 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
709 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
710 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
711 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
712 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
713 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
714 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
715 newly recognized larger expression.
717 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
721 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
725 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
726 from the values of the two subexpressions.
729 @section Writing GLR Parsers
731 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
734 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
735 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
737 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
738 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
739 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
740 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
741 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
742 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
743 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
744 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
745 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
747 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
748 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
749 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
750 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
751 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
752 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
753 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
754 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
755 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
756 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
757 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
758 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
759 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
760 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
761 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
762 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
763 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
764 identical set of symbols.
766 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
767 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
768 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
769 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
770 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
771 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
772 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
773 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
774 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
778 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
779 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
780 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
781 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
782 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
785 @node Simple GLR Parsers
786 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
787 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
788 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
792 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
793 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
795 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
796 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
797 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
799 Consider a problem that
800 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
801 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
804 type subrange = lo .. hi;
805 type enum = (a, b, c);
809 The original language standard allows only numeric
810 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
811 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
812 10206) and many other
813 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
814 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
818 type subrange = (a) .. b;
822 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
823 type with only one value:
830 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
831 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
833 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
834 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
835 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
836 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
837 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
838 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
839 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
840 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
842 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
843 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
844 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
845 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
848 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
849 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
850 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
851 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
852 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
853 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
856 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
857 use the GLR algorithm.
858 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
859 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
860 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
861 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
862 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
863 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
864 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
865 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
866 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
868 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
869 reports a syntax error as usual.
871 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
872 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
873 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
874 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
875 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
877 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
878 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
879 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
880 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
881 The present example contains only one conflict between two
882 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
883 cannot be nested. So the number of
884 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
885 and the parsing time is still linear.
887 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
888 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
891 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
899 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
927 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
928 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
929 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
930 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
937 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
938 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
939 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
948 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
949 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
950 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
951 notice when the parser splits.
953 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
954 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
955 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
956 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
957 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
958 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
959 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
960 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
961 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
962 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
963 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
964 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
965 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
968 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
969 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
970 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
971 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
972 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
973 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
975 @node Merging GLR Parses
976 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
977 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
978 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
982 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
984 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
989 #define YYSTYPE char const *
991 void yyerror (char const *);
1005 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1014 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1015 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1016 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1017 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1018 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1022 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1024 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1025 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1029 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1030 | '(' declarator ')'
1035 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1036 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1043 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1044 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1045 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1046 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1047 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1048 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1049 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1050 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1051 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1052 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1053 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1054 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1055 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1056 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1058 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1059 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1060 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1061 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1062 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1063 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1064 The parser therefore prints
1067 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1070 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1071 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1078 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1079 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1080 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1081 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1082 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1083 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1084 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1085 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1086 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1087 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1093 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1094 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1095 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1096 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1101 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1102 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1107 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1111 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1119 with an accompanying forward declaration
1120 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1124 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1125 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1130 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1131 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1134 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1137 Bison requires that all of the
1138 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1139 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1140 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1141 the offending merge.
1143 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1144 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1146 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1147 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1149 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1150 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1151 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1152 the associated reduction.
1153 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1154 action in a GLR parser.
1157 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1159 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1161 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1162 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1163 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1164 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1165 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1166 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1167 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1168 influence syntax analysis.
1169 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1172 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1173 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1174 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1175 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1176 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1177 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1178 future versions of Bison.
1179 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1180 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1181 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1183 @subsubsection YYERROR
1185 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1186 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1187 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1188 initiate error recovery.
1189 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1190 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1191 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1192 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1193 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1194 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1195 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1196 the parse that invoked the test.
1198 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1199 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1200 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1203 @node Semantic Predicates
1204 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1206 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1208 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1210 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1211 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1212 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1213 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1217 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1218 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1223 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1224 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1225 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1226 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1227 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1228 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1229 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1231 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1232 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1233 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1234 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1237 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1238 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1239 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1243 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1244 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1245 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1246 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1251 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1252 false). However, this
1253 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1254 have overlapping syntax.
1255 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1256 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1257 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1258 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1261 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1262 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1264 @node Compiler Requirements
1265 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1266 @cindex @code{inline}
1267 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1269 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1270 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1271 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1272 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1273 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1274 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1283 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1287 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1288 && ! defined inline)
1297 @cindex textual location
1298 @cindex location, textual
1300 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1301 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1302 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1303 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1305 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1306 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1307 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1308 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1311 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1312 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1313 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1316 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1317 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1318 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1319 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1320 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1321 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1322 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1325 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1326 @cindex Bison parser
1327 @cindex Bison utility
1328 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1331 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1332 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1333 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1334 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1335 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1336 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1337 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1340 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1341 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1342 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1345 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1346 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1347 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1348 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1349 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1350 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1351 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1353 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1354 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1355 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1356 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1357 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1358 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1359 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1360 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1361 C-Language Interface}.
1363 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1364 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1365 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1366 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1367 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1368 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1369 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1370 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1371 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1372 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1373 anything other than their usual meanings.
1375 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1376 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1377 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1378 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1379 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1380 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1381 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1382 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1383 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1386 @section Stages in Using Bison
1387 @cindex stages in using Bison
1390 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1391 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1395 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1396 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1397 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1398 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1399 sequence of C statements.
1402 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1403 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1404 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1405 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1408 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1411 Write error-reporting routines.
1414 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1415 must follow these steps:
1419 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1422 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1425 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1428 @node Grammar Layout
1429 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1430 @cindex grammar file
1432 @cindex format of grammar file
1433 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1435 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1436 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1443 @var{Bison declarations}
1452 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1453 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1455 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1456 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1457 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1458 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1459 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1460 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1462 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1463 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1464 semantic values of various symbols.
1466 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1469 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1470 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1471 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1475 @cindex simple examples
1476 @cindex examples, simple
1478 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1479 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1480 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1481 and a multi-function calculator. All
1482 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1484 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1485 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1486 source file to try them.
1489 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1490 a first example with no operator precedence.
1491 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1492 Operator precedence is introduced.
1493 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1494 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1495 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1496 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1497 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1501 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1502 @cindex reverse polish notation
1503 @cindex polish notation calculator
1504 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1505 @cindex calculator, simple
1507 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1508 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1509 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1510 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1512 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1513 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1516 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1517 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1518 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1519 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1520 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1521 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1522 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1525 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1526 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1528 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1529 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1531 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1533 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1536 #define YYSTYPE double
1540 void yyerror (char const *);
1545 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1548 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1549 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1551 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1552 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1553 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1554 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1555 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1556 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1557 which is a floating point number.
1559 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1560 function @code{pow}.
1562 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1563 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1564 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1565 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1568 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1569 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1570 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1571 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1572 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1573 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1574 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1575 type for numeric constants.
1578 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1580 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1582 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1594 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1601 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1602 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1604 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1605 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1606 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1612 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1613 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1614 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1615 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1616 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1619 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1620 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1621 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1623 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1624 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1625 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1626 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1627 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1628 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1631 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1632 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1633 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1637 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1639 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1648 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1649 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1650 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1651 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1652 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1654 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1655 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1656 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1657 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1658 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1659 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1661 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1662 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1663 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1664 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1667 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1668 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1669 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1672 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1674 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1679 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1683 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1684 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1685 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1686 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1687 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1688 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1689 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1691 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1692 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1693 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1694 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1695 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1698 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1700 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1701 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1702 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1703 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1708 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1709 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1714 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1715 equally well have written them separately:
1719 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1720 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1724 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1725 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1726 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1727 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1728 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1729 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1730 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1731 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1733 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1734 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1735 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1737 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1738 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1742 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1746 means the same thing as this:
1751 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1757 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1760 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1761 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1762 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1764 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1765 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1766 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1767 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1769 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1771 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1772 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1773 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1774 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1776 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1777 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1778 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1779 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1780 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1781 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1782 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1783 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1784 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1786 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1787 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1788 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1789 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1790 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1792 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1793 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1795 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1797 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1800 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1801 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1802 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1803 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1814 /* Skip white space. */
1815 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1819 /* Process numbers. */
1820 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1823 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1828 /* Return end-of-input. */
1831 /* Return a single char. */
1838 @subsection The Controlling Function
1839 @cindex controlling function
1840 @cindex main function in simple example
1842 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1843 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1844 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1846 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1858 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1859 @cindex error reporting routine
1861 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1862 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1863 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1864 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1865 here is the definition we will use:
1867 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1872 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1874 yyerror (char const *s)
1876 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1881 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1882 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1883 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1884 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1885 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1886 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1888 @node Rpcalc Generate
1889 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1890 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1892 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1893 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1894 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1895 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1896 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1897 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1899 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1900 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1902 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1903 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1910 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1911 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1912 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1913 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1914 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1915 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1916 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1918 @node Rpcalc Compile
1919 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1920 @cindex compiling the parser
1922 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1926 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1928 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1932 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1933 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1934 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1938 # @r{List files again.}
1940 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1944 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1945 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1951 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1953 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1956 @result{} -3.166666667
1957 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1959 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1964 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1965 @cindex infix notation calculator
1967 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1969 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1970 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1971 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1972 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1975 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1979 #define YYSTYPE double
1983 void yyerror (char const *);
1988 /* Bison declarations. */
1992 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1993 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1996 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2007 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2014 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2015 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2016 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2017 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2018 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2019 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2020 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2027 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2030 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2032 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2033 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2034 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2035 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2036 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2037 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2038 the associativity/precedence.)
2040 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2041 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2042 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2043 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2044 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2045 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2048 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2049 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2050 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2051 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2052 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2054 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2059 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2067 @node Simple Error Recovery
2068 @section Simple Error Recovery
2069 @cindex error recovery, simple
2071 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2072 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2073 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2074 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2075 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2076 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2078 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2079 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2080 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2086 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2087 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2092 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2093 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2094 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2095 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2096 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2097 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2098 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2099 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2102 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2103 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2104 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2105 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2106 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2107 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2110 @node Location Tracking Calc
2111 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2112 @cindex location tracking calculator
2113 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2114 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2116 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2117 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2118 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2119 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2123 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2124 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2125 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2128 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2129 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2131 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2132 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2135 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2141 void yyerror (char const *);
2144 /* Bison declarations. */
2152 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2156 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2157 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2158 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2159 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2160 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2161 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2162 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2166 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2168 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2169 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2170 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2171 from the new information.
2173 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2174 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2187 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2194 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2195 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2196 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2206 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2207 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2208 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2213 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2214 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2215 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2219 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2220 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2221 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2223 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2224 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2225 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2226 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2227 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2228 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2232 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2234 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2235 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2236 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2239 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2240 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2251 /* Skip white space. */
2252 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2253 ++yylloc.last_column;
2258 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2259 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2263 /* Process numbers. */
2267 ++yylloc.last_column;
2268 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2270 ++yylloc.last_column;
2271 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2278 /* Return end-of-input. */
2283 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2287 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2290 ++yylloc.last_column;
2296 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2297 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2298 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2299 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2301 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2302 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2303 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2304 controlling function:
2311 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2312 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2318 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2319 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2320 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2322 @node Multi-function Calc
2323 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2324 @cindex multi-function calculator
2325 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2326 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2328 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2329 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2330 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2331 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2332 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2334 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2335 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2336 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2337 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2338 functions whose syntax has this form:
2341 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2345 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2346 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2347 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2352 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2353 @result{} 3.1415926536
2357 @result{} 0.0000000000
2359 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2360 @result{} 2.3000000000
2362 @result{} 2.3000000000
2364 @result{} 0.8329091229
2365 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2366 @result{} 2.3000000000
2370 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2373 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2374 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2375 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2376 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2377 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2380 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2381 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2383 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2385 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2389 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2390 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2391 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2393 void yyerror (char const *);
2399 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2400 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2403 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2404 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2411 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2412 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2416 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2417 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2418 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2420 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2421 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2422 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2423 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2425 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2426 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2427 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2428 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2429 between angle brackets).
2431 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2432 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2433 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2434 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2435 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2436 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2439 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2441 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2442 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2443 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2445 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2447 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2458 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2459 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2466 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2467 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2468 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2469 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2470 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2471 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2472 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2473 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2474 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2475 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2478 /* End of grammar. */
2482 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2483 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2484 @cindex symbol table example
2486 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2487 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2488 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2489 requires some additional C functions for support.
2491 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2492 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2493 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2495 @comment file: calc.h
2498 /* Function type. */
2499 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2503 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2506 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2507 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2510 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2511 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2513 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2518 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2520 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2521 extern symrec *sym_table;
2523 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2524 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2528 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2531 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2537 double (*fnct) (double);
2542 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2555 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2560 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2566 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2568 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2569 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2575 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2576 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2578 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2579 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2580 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2581 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2582 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2583 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2585 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2587 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2588 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2592 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2594 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2595 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2596 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2597 ptr->type = sym_type;
2598 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2599 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2607 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2610 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2611 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2612 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2620 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2622 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2623 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2624 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2625 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2627 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2628 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2629 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2630 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2631 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2632 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2634 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2635 operators in @code{yylex}.
2637 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2647 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2648 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2656 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2657 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2660 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2666 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2669 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2670 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2671 static size_t length = 40;
2672 static char *symbuf = 0;
2677 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2683 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2687 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2689 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2691 /* Get another character. */
2696 while (isalnum (c));
2703 s = getsym (symbuf);
2705 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2710 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2717 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2719 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2720 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2721 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2723 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2726 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2728 yyerror (char const *s)
2730 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2736 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2739 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2740 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2741 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2749 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2750 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2751 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2759 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2762 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2763 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2764 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2767 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2768 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2772 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2774 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2775 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2777 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2778 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2781 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2782 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2783 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2784 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2785 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2786 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2787 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2788 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2789 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2792 @node Grammar Outline
2793 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2795 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2796 appropriate delimiters:
2803 @var{Bison declarations}
2812 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2813 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2814 continues until end of line.
2817 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2818 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2819 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2820 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2821 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2825 @subsection The prologue
2826 @cindex declarations section
2828 @cindex declarations
2830 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2831 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2832 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2833 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2834 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2835 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2836 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2838 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2839 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2842 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2843 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2844 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2845 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2846 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2847 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2848 @code{%union} declaration.
2859 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2863 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2864 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2870 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2871 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2872 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2873 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2874 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2875 @code{#include} directives.
2877 @node Prologue Alternatives
2878 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2879 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2882 @findex %code requires
2883 @findex %code provides
2886 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2887 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2888 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2889 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2890 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2891 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2892 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2894 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2905 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2909 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2910 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2917 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2918 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2919 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2920 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2921 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2922 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2923 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2924 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2925 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2926 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2927 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2929 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2930 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2931 This behavior raises a few questions.
2932 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2933 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2934 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2935 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2936 This behavior is not intuitive.
2938 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2939 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2940 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2941 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2948 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2949 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2952 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2953 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2965 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2969 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2970 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2971 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2978 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2979 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2980 explicit which kind you intend.
2981 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2983 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2984 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2985 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2986 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2987 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2988 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2989 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2990 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2991 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2994 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2995 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2997 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3015 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3021 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3022 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3035 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3036 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3037 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3045 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3046 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3047 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3048 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3049 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3050 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3052 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3053 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3054 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3055 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3056 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3057 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3058 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3059 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3060 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3061 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3062 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3065 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3066 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3067 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3068 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3069 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3070 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3071 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3072 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3073 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3074 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3092 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3098 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3099 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3112 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3118 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3119 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3127 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3128 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3129 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3132 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3133 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3134 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3135 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3136 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3137 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3140 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3141 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3142 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3143 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3145 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3146 organize your grammar file.
3147 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3152 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3153 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3154 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3155 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3159 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3160 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3161 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3162 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3167 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3168 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3170 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3172 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3173 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3174 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3175 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3177 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3178 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3179 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3180 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3181 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3182 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3183 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3184 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3187 @node Bison Declarations
3188 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3189 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3190 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3192 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3193 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3194 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3195 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3198 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3199 @cindex grammar rules section
3200 @cindex rules section for grammar
3202 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3203 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3205 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3206 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3207 if it is the first thing in the file.
3210 @subsection The epilogue
3211 @cindex additional C code section
3213 @cindex C code, section for additional
3215 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3216 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3217 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3218 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3219 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3220 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3221 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3222 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3223 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3224 C-Language Interface}.
3226 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3227 from the grammar rules.
3229 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3230 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3231 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3232 of the grammar file.
3235 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3236 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3237 @cindex terminal symbol
3241 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3244 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3245 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3246 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3247 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3248 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3249 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3250 the symbol to stand for it.
3252 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3253 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3254 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3256 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3257 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3258 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3259 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3260 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3261 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3262 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3264 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3268 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3269 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3270 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3271 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3274 @cindex character token
3275 @cindex literal token
3276 @cindex single-character literal
3277 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3278 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3279 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3280 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3281 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3282 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3283 ,Operator Precedence}).
3285 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3286 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3287 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3288 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3289 your program will confuse other readers.
3291 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3292 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3293 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3294 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3295 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3296 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3300 @cindex string token
3301 @cindex literal string token
3302 @cindex multicharacter literal
3303 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3304 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3305 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3306 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3307 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3309 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3310 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3311 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3312 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3313 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3315 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3317 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3318 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3319 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3320 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3321 read your program will be confused.
3323 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3324 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3325 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3326 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3327 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3328 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3331 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3332 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3333 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3335 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3336 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3337 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3338 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3339 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3340 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3341 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3342 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3343 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3344 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3345 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3346 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3348 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3349 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3350 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3351 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3352 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3354 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3355 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3356 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3357 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3358 characters in the following C-language string:
3361 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3364 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3365 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3366 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3367 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3368 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3369 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3370 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3371 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3372 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3373 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3376 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3377 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3378 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3379 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3380 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3383 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3385 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3386 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3388 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3391 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3395 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3396 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3397 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3406 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3407 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3409 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3410 extra white space as you wish.
3412 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3413 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3416 @{@var{C statements}@}
3421 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3422 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3423 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3424 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3425 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3426 compiler can check it.
3428 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3429 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3430 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3431 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3432 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3433 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3434 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3435 character constants.
3437 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3441 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3442 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3447 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3448 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3455 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3457 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3458 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3459 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3478 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3482 @section Recursive Rules
3483 @cindex recursive rule
3485 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3486 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3487 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3488 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3489 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3500 @cindex left recursion
3501 @cindex right recursion
3503 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3504 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3505 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3517 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3518 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3519 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3520 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3521 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3522 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3523 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3526 @cindex mutual recursion
3527 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3528 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3529 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3538 | primary '+' primary
3551 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3555 @section Defining Language Semantics
3556 @cindex defining language semantics
3557 @cindex language semantics, defining
3559 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3560 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3561 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3563 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3564 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3565 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3566 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3569 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3570 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3571 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3572 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3573 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3574 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3575 action in the middle of a rule.
3579 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3580 @cindex semantic value type
3581 @cindex value type, semantic
3582 @cindex data types of semantic values
3583 @cindex default data type
3585 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3586 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3587 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3588 Notation Calculator}).
3590 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3591 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3592 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3595 #define YYSTYPE double
3599 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3600 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3601 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3602 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3604 @node Multiple Types
3605 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3607 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3608 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3609 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3610 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3613 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3614 requires you to do two things:
3618 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3619 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3620 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3621 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3625 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3626 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3627 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3628 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3629 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3638 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3640 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3641 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3642 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3643 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3645 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3646 placed at any position in the rule;
3647 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3648 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3649 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3650 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3652 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3653 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3654 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3655 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3656 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3657 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3658 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3659 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3660 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3661 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3664 Here is a typical example:
3670 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3674 Or, in terms of named references:
3680 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3685 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3686 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3687 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3688 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3689 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3690 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3692 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3693 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3694 referred to as @code{$2}.
3696 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3697 references construct.
3699 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3700 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3701 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3702 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3703 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3706 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3709 @cindex default action
3710 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3711 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3712 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3713 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3714 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3715 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3717 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3718 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3719 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3720 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3721 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3726 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3727 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3733 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3738 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3739 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3740 definition of @code{foo}.
3743 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3744 any, from a semantic action.
3745 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3746 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3749 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3750 @cindex action data types
3751 @cindex data types in actions
3753 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3754 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3756 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3757 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3758 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3759 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3760 in the rule. In this example,
3766 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3771 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3772 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3773 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3774 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3776 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3777 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3778 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3790 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3791 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3793 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3794 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3795 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3796 @cindex mid-rule actions
3798 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3799 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3800 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3802 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3803 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3804 it is run before they are parsed.
3806 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3807 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3808 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3809 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3812 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3813 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3814 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3815 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3816 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3817 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3819 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3820 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3821 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3822 at the end of the rule.
3824 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3825 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3826 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3827 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3828 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3829 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3835 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3837 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3842 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3843 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3844 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3845 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3846 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3847 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3848 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3849 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3851 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3852 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3853 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3854 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3855 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3858 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3859 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3860 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3861 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3862 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3864 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3865 Discarded Symbols}).
3866 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3867 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3869 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3870 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3875 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3889 $$ = push_context ();
3890 declare_variable ($3);
3897 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3898 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3899 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3901 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3902 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3903 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3904 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3905 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3911 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3912 | '@{' statements '@}'
3918 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3923 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3924 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3927 | '@{' statements '@}'
3933 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3934 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3935 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3936 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3937 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3938 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3940 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3941 actions into the two rules, like this:
3946 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3947 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3948 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3949 '@{' statements '@}'
3955 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3956 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3958 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3959 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3960 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3965 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3966 declarations statements '@}'
3967 | '@{' statements '@}'
3973 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3974 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3976 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3977 serves as a subroutine:
3982 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3988 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3989 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3995 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3996 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3998 @node Tracking Locations
3999 @section Tracking Locations
4001 @cindex textual location
4002 @cindex location, textual
4004 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4005 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4006 especially symbol locations.
4008 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4009 actions to take when rules are matched.
4012 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4013 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4014 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4018 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4019 @cindex data type of locations
4020 @cindex default location type
4022 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4023 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4025 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4026 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4027 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4028 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4032 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4041 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4042 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4043 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4044 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4045 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4047 @node Actions and Locations
4048 @subsection Actions and Locations
4049 @cindex location actions
4050 @cindex actions, location
4053 @vindex @@@var{name}
4054 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4056 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4057 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4059 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4060 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4061 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4062 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4063 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4066 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4067 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4068 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4069 references construct.
4071 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4079 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4080 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4081 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4082 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4089 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4090 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4091 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4097 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4098 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4099 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4102 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4103 example above simply rewrites this way:
4117 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4118 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4119 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4126 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4127 from a semantic action.
4128 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4129 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4131 @node Location Default Action
4132 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4133 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4134 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4136 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4137 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4138 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4139 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4140 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4141 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4142 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4143 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4146 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4147 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4149 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4150 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4151 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4152 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4153 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4154 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4155 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4156 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4157 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4158 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4160 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4164 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4168 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4169 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4170 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4171 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4175 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4176 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4177 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4178 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4185 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4186 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4187 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4189 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4193 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4194 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4197 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4198 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4199 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4200 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4203 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4204 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4205 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4206 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4209 @node Named References
4210 @section Named References
4211 @cindex named references
4213 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4214 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4215 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4216 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4217 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4218 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4220 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4221 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4222 used as named references. For example:
4226 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4227 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4232 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4236 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4237 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4242 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4248 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4251 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4254 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4259 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4260 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4261 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4264 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4265 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4270 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4271 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4272 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4275 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4276 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4282 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4283 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4286 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4287 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4291 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4292 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4293 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4294 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4295 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4296 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4297 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4299 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4303 @section Bison Declarations
4304 @cindex declarations, Bison
4305 @cindex Bison declarations
4307 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4308 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4311 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4312 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4313 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4314 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4316 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4317 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4318 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4319 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4322 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4323 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4324 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4325 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4326 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4327 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4328 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4329 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4330 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4331 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4332 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4333 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4334 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4335 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4336 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4340 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4341 @cindex version requirement
4342 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4345 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4346 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4350 %require "@var{version}"
4354 @subsection Token Type Names
4355 @cindex declaring token type names
4356 @cindex token type names, declaring
4357 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4360 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4366 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4367 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4368 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4370 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4371 @code{%precedence}, or
4372 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4373 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4376 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4377 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4378 following the token name:
4382 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4386 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4387 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4388 with each other or with normal characters.
4390 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4391 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4392 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4393 Than One Value Type}).
4399 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4403 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4407 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4408 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4409 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4416 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4417 equivalent literal string tokens:
4420 %token <operator> OR "||"
4421 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4426 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4427 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4428 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4429 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4430 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4431 the literal string instead of the token name.
4433 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4434 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4438 %token END 0 "end of file"
4441 @node Precedence Decl
4442 @subsection Operator Precedence
4443 @cindex precedence declarations
4444 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4445 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4447 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4448 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4449 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4450 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4451 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4452 operator precedence.
4454 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4455 @code{%token}: either
4458 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4465 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4468 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4469 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4470 all the @var{symbols}:
4474 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4475 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4476 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4477 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4478 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4479 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4480 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4481 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4482 considered a syntax error.
4484 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4485 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4486 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4489 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4490 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4491 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4492 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4493 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4496 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4497 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4498 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4499 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4504 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4505 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4509 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4510 @cindex declaring value types
4511 @cindex value types, declaring
4514 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4515 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4516 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4531 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4532 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4533 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4534 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4536 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4537 @code{union}. For example:
4549 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4550 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4553 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4554 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4555 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4557 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4558 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4560 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4561 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4562 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4563 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4571 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4576 and then your grammar can use the following
4577 instead of @code{%union}:
4590 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4591 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4592 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4596 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4597 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4598 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4601 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4605 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4606 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4607 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4608 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4609 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4612 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4613 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4614 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4615 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4617 @node Initial Action Decl
4618 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4619 @findex %initial-action
4621 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4622 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4625 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4626 @findex %initial-action
4627 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4628 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4629 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4630 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4633 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4636 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4639 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4644 @node Destructor Decl
4645 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4646 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4650 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4651 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4652 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4653 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4654 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4655 must discard the start symbol.
4657 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4658 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4659 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4660 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4662 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4663 symbol is automatically discarded.
4665 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4667 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4668 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4669 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4670 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4671 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4674 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4675 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4676 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4677 tag among @var{symbols}.
4678 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4679 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4680 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4682 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4683 (These default forms are experimental.
4684 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4686 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4687 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4688 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4689 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4691 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4692 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4693 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4694 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4695 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4702 %union @{ char *string; @}
4703 %token <string> STRING1
4704 %token <string> STRING2
4705 %type <string> string1
4706 %type <string> string2
4707 %union @{ char character; @}
4708 %token <character> CHR
4709 %type <character> chr
4712 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4713 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4714 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4715 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4719 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4720 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4721 to @code{free} by default.
4722 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4723 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4724 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4725 @code{free} only once.
4726 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4727 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4729 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4730 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4731 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4732 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4733 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4734 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4735 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4736 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4737 reference it in your grammar.
4738 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4739 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4745 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4746 @cindex mid-rule actions
4747 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4748 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4749 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4750 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4751 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4752 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4753 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4754 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4758 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4759 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4760 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4765 @cindex discarded symbols
4766 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4770 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4772 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4774 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4775 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4777 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4778 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4781 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4784 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4785 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4788 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4789 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4790 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4794 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4795 @cindex printing semantic values
4799 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4800 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4801 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4802 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4804 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4805 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4806 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4808 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4811 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4812 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4813 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4814 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4815 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4816 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4817 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4820 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4821 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4822 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4823 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4831 %union @{ char *string; @}
4832 %token <string> STRING1
4833 %token <string> STRING2
4834 %type <string> string1
4835 %type <string> string2
4836 %union @{ char character; @}
4837 %token <character> CHR
4838 %type <character> chr
4841 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4842 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4843 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4844 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4848 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4849 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4850 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4851 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4852 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4853 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4854 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4858 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4859 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4860 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4861 @cindex warnings, preventing
4862 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4866 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4867 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4868 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4869 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4870 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4871 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4873 The declaration looks like this:
4879 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4880 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4881 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4882 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4884 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4885 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4886 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4887 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4888 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4889 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4890 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4896 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4900 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4901 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4902 print the number of conflicts.
4905 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4906 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4907 go back to the beginning.
4910 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4911 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4912 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4915 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4916 but will keep silent otherwise.
4919 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4920 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4921 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4922 @cindex default start symbol
4925 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4926 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4927 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4934 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4935 @cindex reentrant parser
4937 @findex %define api.pure
4939 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4940 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4941 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4942 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4943 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4944 program must be called only within interlocks.
4946 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4947 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4948 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4949 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4950 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4952 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4953 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4954 reentrant. It looks like this:
4960 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4961 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4962 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4963 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4964 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4965 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4966 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4967 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4968 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4970 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4971 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4975 @subsection A Push Parser
4978 @findex %define api.push-pull
4980 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4981 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4983 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4984 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4985 each time a new token is made available.
4987 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4988 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4989 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4990 within a certain time period.
4992 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4993 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4994 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4997 %define api.push-pull push
5000 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5001 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5002 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5003 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5004 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5008 %define api.push-pull push
5011 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5012 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5013 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5014 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5016 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5017 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5018 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5019 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5020 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5021 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5022 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5023 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5027 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5029 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5030 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5031 yypstate_delete (ps);
5034 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5035 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5036 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5037 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5038 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5039 example would thus look like this:
5044 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5047 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5048 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5049 yypstate_delete (ps);
5052 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5053 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5055 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5056 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5057 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5058 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5059 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5060 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5061 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5062 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5063 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5064 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5065 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5066 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5067 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5068 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5069 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5070 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5071 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5075 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5076 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5077 yypstate_delete (ps);
5080 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5081 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5082 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5085 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5086 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5087 @cindex declaration summary
5088 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5090 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5092 @deffn {Directive} %union
5093 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5094 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5097 @deffn {Directive} %token
5098 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5099 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5102 @deffn {Directive} %right
5103 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5104 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5107 @deffn {Directive} %left
5108 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5109 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5112 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5113 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5114 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5115 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5119 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5120 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5121 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5125 @deffn {Directive} %type
5126 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5127 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5130 @deffn {Directive} %start
5131 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5135 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5136 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5137 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5143 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5146 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5147 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5149 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5150 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5151 @xref{%code Summary}.
5154 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5155 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5157 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5160 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5161 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5162 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5163 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5166 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5167 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5168 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5169 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5170 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5172 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5173 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5174 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5175 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5176 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5177 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5178 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5179 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5180 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5181 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5183 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5184 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5185 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5187 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5188 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5189 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5191 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5192 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5193 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5194 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5195 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5197 @findex %code requires
5198 @findex %code provides
5199 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5200 header also contains their code.
5201 @xref{%code Summary}.
5203 @cindex Header guard
5204 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5205 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5206 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5207 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5208 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5211 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5212 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5214 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5215 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5217 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5221 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5222 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5225 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5226 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5227 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5230 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5231 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5232 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5235 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5236 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5237 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5238 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5240 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5244 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5245 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5246 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5247 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5248 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5249 accurate syntax error messages.
5252 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5253 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5254 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5256 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5257 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5258 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5259 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5260 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5261 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5262 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5263 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5265 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5269 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5270 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5271 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5276 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5277 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5278 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5279 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5280 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5281 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5282 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5286 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5287 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5290 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5291 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5292 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5296 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5297 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5298 Require a Version of Bison}.
5301 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5302 Specify the skeleton to use.
5304 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5305 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5306 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5307 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5309 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5310 file in the Bison installation directory.
5311 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5312 directory of the grammar file.
5313 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5316 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5317 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5318 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5319 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5320 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5321 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5322 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5325 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5326 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5327 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5328 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5329 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5330 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5331 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5334 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5335 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5336 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5340 The highest token number, plus one.
5342 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5344 The number of grammar rules,
5346 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5350 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5351 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5352 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5353 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5357 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5358 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5359 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5363 @node %define Summary
5364 @subsection %define Summary
5366 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5367 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5368 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5369 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5370 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5371 @code{%define} directive:
5373 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5374 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5375 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5376 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5378 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5379 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5380 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5381 to specifying @code{""}.
5383 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5384 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5385 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5388 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5389 @code{%define} accepts.
5391 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5392 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5396 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5398 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5399 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5401 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5403 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5404 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5407 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5408 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5409 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5410 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5411 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5412 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5415 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5417 @findex %define api.namespace
5419 @item Languages(s): C++
5421 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5422 For example, if you specify:
5425 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5428 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5431 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5434 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5435 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5438 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5444 @item Accepted Values:
5445 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5446 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5448 @item Default Value:
5449 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5450 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5451 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5452 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5453 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5454 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5455 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5458 %define api.namespace "foo"
5459 %name-prefix "bar::"
5462 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5467 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5468 @item @code{api.location.type}
5469 @findex %define api.location.type
5472 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5474 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5475 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5477 @item Accepted Values: String
5479 @item Default Value: none
5481 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5484 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5486 @findex %define api.prefix
5489 @item Language(s): All
5491 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5492 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5494 @item Accepted Values: String
5496 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5498 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5501 @c ================================================== api.pure
5503 @findex %define api.pure
5506 @item Language(s): C
5508 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5509 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5511 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5513 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5519 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5521 @findex %define api.push-pull
5524 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5526 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5527 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5528 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5529 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5531 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5533 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5539 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5540 @item api.token.constructor
5541 @findex %define api.token.constructor
5548 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5549 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5550 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5552 @item Accepted Values:
5555 @item Default Value:
5558 introduced in Bison 2.8
5560 @c api.token.constructor
5563 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5564 @item api.token.prefix
5565 @findex %define api.token.prefix
5568 @item Languages(s): all
5571 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5572 target language. For instance
5575 %token FILE for ERROR
5576 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5578 start: FILE for ERROR;
5582 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5583 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5584 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5585 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5586 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5587 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5588 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5590 @item Accepted Values:
5591 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5592 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5593 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5595 @item Default Value:
5598 introduced in Bison 2.8
5603 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5605 @item lr.default-reduction
5606 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
5609 @item Language(s): all
5611 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5612 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5613 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5614 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5616 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5617 @item Default Value:
5619 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5620 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5623 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5624 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5627 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5629 @item lr.keep-unreachable-state
5630 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
5633 @item Language(s): all
5634 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5635 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5636 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5637 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5639 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5640 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.5, and as
5641 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5642 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5644 @c ================================================== lr.type
5647 @findex %define lr.type
5650 @item Language(s): all
5652 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5653 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5654 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5656 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5658 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5662 @c ================================================== namespace
5664 @findex %define namespace
5665 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5669 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5671 @findex %define parse.assert
5674 @item Languages(s): C++
5676 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5677 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5679 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5681 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5683 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5688 @c ================================================== parse.error
5690 @findex %define parse.error
5695 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5696 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5698 @item Accepted Values:
5701 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5703 @item @code{verbose}
5704 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5705 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5709 @item Default Value:
5715 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5717 @findex %define parse.lac
5720 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5722 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5723 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5724 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5725 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5729 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5731 @findex %define parse.trace
5734 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5736 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5737 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5739 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5740 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5741 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5742 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5745 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5747 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5751 @c ================================================== variant
5753 @findex %define variant
5760 Request variant-based semantic values.
5761 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5763 @item Accepted Values:
5766 @item Default Value:
5774 @subsection %code Summary
5778 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5779 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5780 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5781 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5782 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5783 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5784 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5785 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5787 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5788 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5789 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5790 in the parser implementation.
5792 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5793 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5794 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5796 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5799 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5800 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5801 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5802 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5803 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5804 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5808 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5809 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5810 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5813 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5814 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5818 @findex %code requires
5821 @item Language(s): C, C++
5823 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5824 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5825 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5826 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5827 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5829 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5830 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5835 @findex %code provides
5838 @item Language(s): C, C++
5840 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5841 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5843 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5844 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5852 @item Language(s): C, C++
5854 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5855 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5856 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5857 parser implementation file. For example:
5866 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5870 @findex %code imports
5873 @item Language(s): Java
5875 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5877 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5878 before any class definitions.
5882 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5883 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5884 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5885 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5888 @node Multiple Parsers
5889 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5891 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5892 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5893 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5894 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5895 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5896 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5897 exported in the generated header.
5899 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5900 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5901 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5902 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5903 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5904 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5905 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5906 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5907 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5909 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5910 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5911 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5912 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5913 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5914 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5915 specifically --- more about this below.
5917 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5918 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5921 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5922 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5923 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5924 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5927 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5928 #define yyparse cparse
5929 #define yylval clval
5935 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5936 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5937 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5939 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5943 extern CSTYPE clval;
5947 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5948 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5949 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5952 /* Enabling traces. */
5954 # if defined YYDEBUG
5971 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5972 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5973 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5976 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5977 @cindex C-language interface
5980 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5981 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5982 functions that it needs to use.
5984 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5985 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5986 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5987 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5990 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5991 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5992 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5993 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5994 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5995 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5997 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5998 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5999 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6003 @node Parser Function
6004 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6007 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6008 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6009 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6010 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6011 without reading further.
6014 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6015 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6016 is due to end-of-input).
6018 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6019 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6022 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6025 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6030 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6035 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6038 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6039 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6040 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6042 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6043 @findex %parse-param
6044 Declare that one or more
6045 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6046 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6047 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6048 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6051 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6054 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6058 Then call the parser like this:
6062 int nastiness, randomness;
6063 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6064 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6070 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6073 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6076 @node Push Parser Function
6077 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6078 @findex yypush_parse
6080 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6081 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6083 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6084 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6085 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6086 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6088 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6089 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6090 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6091 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6094 @node Pull Parser Function
6095 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6096 @findex yypull_parse
6098 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6099 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6101 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6102 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6103 declaration is used.
6104 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6106 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6107 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6110 @node Parser Create Function
6111 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6112 @findex yypstate_new
6114 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6115 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6117 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6118 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6119 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6120 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6122 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6123 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6124 or 0 if no memory was available.
6125 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6129 @node Parser Delete Function
6130 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6131 @findex yypstate_delete
6133 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6134 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6136 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6137 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6138 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6139 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6141 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6142 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6143 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6147 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6149 @cindex lexical analyzer
6151 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6152 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6153 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6154 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6156 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6157 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6158 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6159 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6160 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6161 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6162 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6166 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6167 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6168 of the token it has read.
6169 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6170 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6172 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6173 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6176 @node Calling Convention
6177 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6179 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6180 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6181 signifies end-of-input.
6183 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6184 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6185 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6186 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6188 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6189 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6190 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6191 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6192 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6193 signifies end-of-input.
6195 Here is an example showing these things:
6202 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6205 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6206 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6208 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6214 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6215 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6217 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6218 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6222 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6223 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6224 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6225 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6228 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6229 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6230 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6231 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6232 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6235 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6236 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6237 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6238 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6241 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6244 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6245 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6246 strlen (token_buffer))
6247 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6248 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6253 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6254 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6258 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6261 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6262 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6263 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6264 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6270 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6271 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6276 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6277 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6278 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6279 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6280 declaration looks like this:
6293 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6298 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6299 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6304 @node Token Locations
6305 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6308 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6309 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6310 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6311 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6312 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6313 data in that variable.
6315 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6316 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6317 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6318 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6319 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6322 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6325 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6327 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6328 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6329 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6330 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6331 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6332 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6337 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6340 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6341 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6346 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6347 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6348 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6351 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6352 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6353 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6354 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6356 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6358 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6359 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6360 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6363 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6365 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6366 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6367 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6368 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6369 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6375 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6376 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6377 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6381 results in the following signatures:
6384 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6385 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6388 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6391 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6392 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6396 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6399 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6400 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6401 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6404 @node Error Reporting
6405 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6406 @cindex error reporting function
6409 @cindex syntax error
6411 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6412 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6413 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6414 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6417 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6418 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6419 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6420 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6421 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6423 @findex %define parse.error
6424 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6425 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6426 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6427 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6428 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6430 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6431 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6432 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6433 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6434 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6435 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6437 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6438 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6439 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6441 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6446 yyerror (char const *s)
6450 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6455 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6456 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6457 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6458 immediately return 1.
6460 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6461 an access to the current location.
6462 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6463 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6464 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6468 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6469 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6472 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6475 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6476 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6479 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6480 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6481 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6482 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6486 /* Location tracking. */
6490 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6492 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6493 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6497 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6500 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6501 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6502 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6503 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6508 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6509 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6510 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6511 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6512 message is always passed last.
6514 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6515 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6516 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6520 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6521 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6522 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6523 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6525 @node Action Features
6526 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6527 @cindex summary, action features
6528 @cindex action features summary
6530 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6531 are useful in actions.
6533 @deffn {Variable} $$
6534 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6535 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6538 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6539 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6540 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6543 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6544 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6545 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6546 Types of Values in Actions}.
6549 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6550 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6551 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6552 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6555 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6556 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6557 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6560 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6561 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6562 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6565 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6567 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6568 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6569 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6570 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6571 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6572 going to be reduced by this rule.
6574 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6575 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6576 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6579 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6582 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6583 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6586 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6587 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6591 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6592 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6593 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6594 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6595 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6596 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6599 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6600 @findex YYRECOVERING
6601 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6602 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6603 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6606 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6607 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6608 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6609 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6610 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6612 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6615 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6616 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6618 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6620 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6623 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6624 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6625 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6626 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6629 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6630 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6631 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6632 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6634 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6637 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6638 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6639 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6640 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6642 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6647 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6648 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6651 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6655 @c int first_line, last_line;
6656 @c int first_column, last_column;
6660 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6661 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6663 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6664 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6665 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6668 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6671 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6673 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6674 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6678 @node Internationalization
6679 @section Parser Internationalization
6680 @cindex internationalization
6686 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6687 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6688 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6689 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6690 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6691 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6692 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6693 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6696 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6697 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6698 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6703 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6704 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6705 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6706 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6707 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6711 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6716 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6717 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6718 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6719 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6720 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6721 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6722 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6723 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6724 Bison-generated parser.
6727 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6728 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6729 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6733 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6736 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6737 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6738 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6742 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6743 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6744 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6747 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6753 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6757 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6763 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6764 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6765 @cindex algorithm of parser
6768 @cindex parser stack
6769 @cindex stack, parser
6771 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6772 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6773 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6775 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6776 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6779 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6780 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6781 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6782 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6783 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6784 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6785 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6787 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6794 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6795 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6798 expr: expr '*' expr;
6802 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6809 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6810 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6812 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6813 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6814 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6816 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6819 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6820 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6821 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6822 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6823 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6824 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6825 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6826 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6827 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6828 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6832 @section Lookahead Tokens
6833 @cindex lookahead token
6835 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6836 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6837 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6838 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6839 token in order to decide what to do.
6841 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6842 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6843 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6844 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6845 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6846 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6847 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6850 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6851 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6852 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6871 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6872 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6873 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6874 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6875 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6877 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6878 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6879 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6880 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6881 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6882 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6887 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6888 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6889 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6890 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6893 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6895 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6896 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6897 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6899 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6900 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6905 "if" expr "then" stmt
6906 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6912 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6913 specific keyword tokens.
6915 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6916 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6917 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6918 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6921 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6922 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6923 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6924 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6925 contrast it with the other alternative.
6927 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6928 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6932 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6934 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6937 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6938 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6939 making these two inputs equivalent:
6942 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6944 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6947 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6948 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6949 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6950 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6951 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6952 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6953 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6954 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6956 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6957 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6958 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6959 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6961 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6962 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6963 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6964 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6965 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6968 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6969 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6970 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6984 "if" expr "then" stmt
6985 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6995 @section Operator Precedence
6996 @cindex operator precedence
6997 @cindex precedence of operators
6999 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7000 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7001 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7002 shift and when to reduce.
7005 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7006 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7007 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7008 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7009 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7010 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7013 @node Why Precedence
7014 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7016 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7017 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7032 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7033 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7034 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7035 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7036 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7037 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7038 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7041 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7042 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7043 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7044 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7045 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7046 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7047 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7048 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7051 @cindex associativity
7052 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7053 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7054 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7055 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7056 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7057 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7058 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7059 makes right-associativity.
7061 @node Using Precedence
7062 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7068 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7069 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7070 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7071 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7072 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7073 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7074 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7076 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7077 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7078 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7079 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7080 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7081 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7082 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7083 what expected the grammar author.
7085 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7086 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7087 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7088 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7089 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7091 @node Precedence Only
7092 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7095 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7096 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7097 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7098 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7099 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7100 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7101 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7103 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7104 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7105 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7109 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7112 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7113 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7114 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7115 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7116 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7117 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7118 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7125 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7126 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7127 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7128 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7129 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7130 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7131 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7133 @node Precedence Examples
7134 @subsection Precedence Examples
7136 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7144 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7145 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7146 declared with @code{'-'}:
7149 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7154 @node How Precedence
7155 @subsection How Precedence Works
7157 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7158 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7159 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7160 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7161 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7162 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7164 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7165 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7166 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7167 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7168 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7169 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7170 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7173 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7174 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7177 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7179 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7180 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7181 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7182 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7184 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7185 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7186 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7187 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7188 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7189 instance as follows:
7198 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7199 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7200 use right associativity:
7203 %right "then" "else"
7206 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7207 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7208 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7209 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7210 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7211 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7212 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7214 @node Contextual Precedence
7215 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7216 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7217 @cindex unary operator precedence
7218 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7219 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7222 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7223 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7224 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7225 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7227 The Bison precedence declarations
7228 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7229 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7230 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7233 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7234 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7235 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7236 modifier's syntax is:
7239 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7243 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7244 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7245 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7246 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7247 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7249 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7250 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7251 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7261 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7269 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7274 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7275 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7276 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7277 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7279 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7280 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7281 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7282 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7284 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7285 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7286 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7287 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7288 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7289 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7291 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7292 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7296 @section Parser States
7297 @cindex finite-state machine
7298 @cindex parser state
7299 @cindex state (of parser)
7301 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7302 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7303 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7304 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7305 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7307 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7308 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7309 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7310 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7311 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7312 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7313 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7314 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7317 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7318 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7319 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7322 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7323 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7324 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7326 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7327 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7330 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7331 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7336 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7338 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7344 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7345 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7351 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7352 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7353 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7354 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7355 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7356 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7358 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7359 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7360 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7362 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7363 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7364 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7365 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7366 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7368 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7369 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7370 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7371 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7376 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7377 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7382 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7389 | sequence redirects
7403 | redirects redirect
7409 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7410 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7411 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7412 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7413 in infinitely many ways!
7415 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7416 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7417 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7418 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7420 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7431 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7439 | sequence redirects
7453 | redirects redirect
7458 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7459 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7460 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7461 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7462 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7465 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7466 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7468 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7469 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7470 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7471 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7472 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7477 %precedence "sequence"
7482 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7483 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7495 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7496 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7499 %right "word" "redirect"
7504 | sequence word %prec "word"
7505 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7510 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7511 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7512 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7514 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7520 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7523 | name_list ':' type
7540 | name ',' name_list
7545 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7546 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7547 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7548 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7552 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7554 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7555 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7556 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7558 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7559 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7560 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7561 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7562 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7563 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7564 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7567 @cindex canonical LR
7568 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7569 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7570 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7571 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7572 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7573 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7574 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7575 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7577 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7578 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7579 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7580 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7581 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7589 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7594 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7595 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7596 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7597 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7598 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7599 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7601 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7602 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7603 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7604 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7605 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7606 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7612 | name_list ':' type
7624 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7625 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7630 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7631 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7632 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7633 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7634 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7635 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7636 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7638 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7639 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7640 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7641 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7643 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7644 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7647 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7648 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7649 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7650 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7653 @node LR Table Construction
7654 @subsection LR Table Construction
7655 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7658 @cindex canonical LR
7659 @findex %define lr.type
7661 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7662 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7663 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7664 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7667 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7668 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7669 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7670 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7673 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7674 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7675 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7678 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7679 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7680 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7683 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7685 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7688 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7692 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7696 %define lr.type ielr
7699 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7700 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7701 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7702 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7703 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7704 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7705 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7706 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7707 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7708 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7710 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7711 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7712 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7713 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7719 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7722 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7724 @cindex GLR with LALR
7725 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7726 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
7728 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7729 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7730 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7731 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7732 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7733 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7734 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7735 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7737 @item Malformed grammars.
7739 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7740 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7741 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7742 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7743 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7748 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7749 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7750 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7751 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7752 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7753 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7754 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7755 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7756 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7760 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7763 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7764 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7765 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7766 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7767 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7768 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7769 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7770 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7771 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7772 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7773 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7774 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7777 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7778 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7779 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7781 @node Default Reductions
7782 @subsection Default Reductions
7783 @cindex default reductions
7784 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7787 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7788 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7789 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7790 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7791 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7793 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7794 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7797 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7799 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7800 @cindex consistent states
7801 @cindex defaulted states
7802 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7803 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7804 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7805 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7806 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7807 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7808 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7809 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7810 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7811 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7812 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7814 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7815 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7816 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7817 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7818 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7819 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7820 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7821 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7822 should already be considered closed.
7824 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7826 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7827 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7828 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7829 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7830 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7831 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7832 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7833 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7834 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7838 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7839 @c sentence from being rejected.
7840 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7841 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7842 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7843 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7844 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7845 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7848 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7849 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7850 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7851 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7852 because the accept action ends the parse.
7854 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7855 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7856 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7857 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7858 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7859 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7860 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7861 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7862 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7863 split the parse instead.
7865 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7866 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
7868 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction @var{WHERE}}
7869 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7870 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7872 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7873 @item @code{consistent}
7874 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7877 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7878 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7883 @findex %define parse.lac
7885 @cindex lookahead correction
7887 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7888 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7889 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7890 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7891 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7892 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7893 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7894 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7895 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7897 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7898 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7899 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7900 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7901 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7903 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7904 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7905 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7906 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7908 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7909 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7911 @item @code{none} (default)
7914 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7915 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7919 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7920 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7921 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7922 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7923 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7924 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7925 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7926 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7927 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7928 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7931 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7932 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7933 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7934 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7935 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7936 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7937 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7938 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7939 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7940 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7942 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7943 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7944 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7945 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7946 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7947 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7948 language-recognition power.
7950 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7953 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7955 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7956 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7957 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7958 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7961 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7963 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7964 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7965 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7966 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7967 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7968 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7972 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7973 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7974 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7975 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7976 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7977 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7978 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7979 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7980 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7981 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7982 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7985 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7986 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7987 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7989 @node Unreachable States
7990 @subsection Unreachable States
7991 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
7992 @cindex unreachable states
7994 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7995 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7996 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7997 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7999 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8000 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8001 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8002 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8004 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state @var{VALUE}}
8005 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8006 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8009 There are a few caveats to consider:
8012 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8014 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8015 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8016 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8017 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8018 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8019 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8021 @item Other useless states.
8023 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8024 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8025 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8026 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8027 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8028 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8029 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8032 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8033 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8035 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8036 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8037 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8039 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8040 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8041 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8042 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8043 context-free languages.
8044 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8045 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8046 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8047 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8048 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8049 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8050 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8051 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8053 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8054 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8055 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8056 parser uses the same basic
8057 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8058 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8059 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8060 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8062 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8063 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8064 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8065 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8066 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8068 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8069 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8070 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8071 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8072 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8073 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8074 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8075 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8076 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8077 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8078 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8081 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8082 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8083 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8084 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8085 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8086 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8087 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8088 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8089 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8090 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8091 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8092 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8094 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8095 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8096 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8098 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8099 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8100 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8101 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8102 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8103 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8104 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8105 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8106 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8107 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8108 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8109 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8111 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8114 @node Memory Management
8115 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8116 @cindex memory exhaustion
8117 @cindex memory management
8118 @cindex stack overflow
8119 @cindex parser stack overflow
8120 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8122 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8123 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8124 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8126 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8127 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8128 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8131 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8132 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8133 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8134 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8136 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8137 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8138 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8139 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8140 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8141 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8143 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8144 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8145 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8148 @cindex default stack limit
8149 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8153 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8154 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8155 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8156 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8157 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8159 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8161 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8162 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8163 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8164 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8165 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8166 non-trivial copy constructors.
8167 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8170 @node Error Recovery
8171 @chapter Error Recovery
8172 @cindex error recovery
8173 @cindex recovery from errors
8175 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8176 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8177 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8180 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8181 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8182 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8183 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8184 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8185 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8186 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8189 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8190 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8191 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8192 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8193 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8194 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8206 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8207 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8209 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8210 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8211 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8212 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8213 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8214 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8215 applicable in the ordinary way.
8217 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8218 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8219 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8220 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8221 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8222 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8223 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8224 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8225 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8226 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8227 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8228 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8230 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8231 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8232 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8235 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8238 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8239 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8240 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8241 spurious error message:
8251 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8252 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8253 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8254 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8255 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8256 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8257 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8260 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8261 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8262 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8263 error messages resume.
8265 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8266 as any other rules can.
8269 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8270 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8271 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8272 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8275 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8276 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8277 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8279 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8281 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8282 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8283 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8284 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8285 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8287 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8288 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8289 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8290 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8293 @node Context Dependency
8294 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8296 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8297 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8298 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8299 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8303 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8304 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8305 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8306 error recovery rules must be written.
8309 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8310 neither clean nor robust.)
8312 @node Semantic Tokens
8313 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8315 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8316 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8322 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8323 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8324 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8326 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8327 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8328 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8329 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8330 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8332 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8333 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8334 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8335 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8336 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8337 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8338 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8340 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8341 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8342 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8343 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8347 typedef int foo, bar;
8351 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8352 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8358 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8359 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8361 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8362 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8363 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8364 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8365 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8370 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8371 | declarator maybeasm
8377 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8378 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8384 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8385 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8386 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8388 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8389 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8390 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8391 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8392 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8393 the syntactic context.
8395 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8396 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8397 @cindex lexical tie-in
8399 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8400 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8403 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8404 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8405 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8406 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8407 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8414 void yyerror (char const *);
8423 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8424 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8425 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8439 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8440 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8441 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8443 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8444 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8445 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8448 @node Tie-in Recovery
8449 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8451 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8452 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8454 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8455 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8456 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8457 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8462 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8464 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8468 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8469 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8470 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8471 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8472 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8474 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8476 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8477 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8478 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8484 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8490 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8491 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8492 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8493 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8495 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8496 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8497 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8498 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8499 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8500 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8503 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8506 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8508 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8509 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8510 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8511 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8514 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8515 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8516 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8517 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8521 @section Understanding Your Parser
8523 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8524 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8525 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8526 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8527 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8529 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8530 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8531 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8532 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8533 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8534 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8535 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8537 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8555 @command{bison} reports:
8558 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8559 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8560 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8561 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8562 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8565 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8566 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8567 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8568 interpretation is the same.
8571 @cindex token, useless
8572 @cindex useless token
8573 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8574 @cindex useless nonterminal
8575 @cindex rule, useless
8576 @cindex useless rule
8577 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8578 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8579 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8580 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8583 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8586 Terminals unused in grammar
8589 Rules useless in grammar
8594 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8597 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8598 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8599 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8600 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8604 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8619 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8623 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8636 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8641 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8647 @cindex pointed rule
8648 @cindex rule, pointed
8649 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8650 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8651 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8652 the location of the input cursor.
8657 0 $accept: . exp $end
8659 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8664 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8665 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8666 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8667 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8668 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8669 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8670 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8671 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8673 @cindex core, item set
8674 @cindex item set core
8675 @cindex kernel, item set
8676 @cindex item set core
8677 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8678 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8679 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8680 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8681 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8682 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8687 0 $accept: . exp $end
8688 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8694 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8700 In the state 1@dots{}
8707 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8711 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8712 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8713 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8714 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8719 0 $accept: exp . $end
8720 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8725 $end shift, and go to state 3
8726 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8727 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8728 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8729 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8733 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8734 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8735 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8736 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8737 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8740 @cindex accepting state
8741 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8747 0 $accept: exp $end .
8753 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8754 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8756 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8762 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8764 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8771 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8773 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8780 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8782 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8789 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8791 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8796 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8802 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8808 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8809 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8811 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8812 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8815 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8816 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8817 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8818 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8819 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8820 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8821 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8822 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8824 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8825 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8826 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8829 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8830 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8831 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8832 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8833 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8834 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8835 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8836 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8837 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8838 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8839 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8840 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8845 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8846 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8851 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8852 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8854 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8855 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8858 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8859 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8860 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8861 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8862 conflicts in the report:
8865 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8866 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8867 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8871 The remaining states are similar:
8877 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8883 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8884 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8886 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8887 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8893 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8899 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8901 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8902 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8908 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8914 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8915 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8916 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8917 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8919 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8920 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8921 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8922 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8923 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8928 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8929 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8930 @samp{*}, but also because the
8931 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8933 Note that Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
8934 file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8936 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8939 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8942 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8943 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8944 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8945 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8946 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8947 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8948 to help them understand LR parsers.
8950 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8951 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8952 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8953 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8954 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8956 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8967 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8968 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8969 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8972 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8974 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8975 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8976 about transitions, for examples
8978 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8979 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8980 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8985 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8988 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8990 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8991 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8999 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9003 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9005 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9007 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9009 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9010 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9011 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9012 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9014 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9021 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9022 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9025 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9027 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9029 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9030 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9031 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9032 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9033 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9035 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
9036 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
9038 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9040 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9041 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9043 Note that a DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and XSLT
9044 processing (@pxref{Xml}).
9046 @c ================================================= XML
9049 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9052 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9053 (@pxref{Understanding}) when invoked with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9054 (@pxref{Graphviz}) when invoked with option @option{--graph}. However,
9055 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9056 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9057 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9058 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9059 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9060 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9062 The textual file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9063 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9064 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9065 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9066 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9067 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9069 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9070 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9074 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9076 Used to output a copy of the .output file.
9078 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the .output file.
9081 Sample usage (requires @code{xsltproc}):
9085 $ bison --print-datadir
9086 /usr/local/share/bison
9088 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl input.xml > input.html
9091 @c ================================================= Tracing
9094 @section Tracing Your Parser
9097 @cindex tracing the parser
9099 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9100 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9103 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9104 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9105 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9108 @node Enabling Traces
9109 @subsection Enabling Traces
9110 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9113 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9115 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9116 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9117 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9118 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9121 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9122 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9123 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9124 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9125 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9127 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9128 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9129 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9130 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9131 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9133 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9135 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9136 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9137 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9139 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9140 @findex %define parse.trace
9141 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9142 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9143 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9144 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9145 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9148 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9152 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9153 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9154 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9155 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9156 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9157 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9159 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9160 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9161 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9162 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9164 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9165 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9166 messages tell you these things:
9170 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9173 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9174 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9177 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9178 of the state stack afterward.
9181 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9182 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9183 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9184 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9185 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9186 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9187 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9188 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9189 grammar are to blame.
9191 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9192 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9193 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9194 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9195 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9198 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9200 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9201 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9202 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9203 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9204 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9205 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9207 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9208 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9209 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9212 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9214 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9216 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9219 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9220 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9221 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9222 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9225 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9226 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9227 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9228 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9229 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9230 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9232 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9233 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9234 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9235 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9236 printer will be used for them.
9238 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9239 are sent onto standard error.
9242 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9245 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9246 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9252 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9253 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9254 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9255 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9257 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9259 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9260 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9265 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9266 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9267 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9271 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9272 Shifting token '(' ()
9274 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9275 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9277 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9278 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9279 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9285 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9286 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
9287 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9290 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9291 Shifting token '-' ()
9293 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9294 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9296 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9297 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9298 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9299 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9301 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9302 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9303 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9305 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9306 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9312 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9313 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9316 Next token is token ')' ()
9317 Shifting token ')' ()
9319 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9320 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9322 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9324 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9330 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9334 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9335 Shifting token '\n' ()
9337 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9338 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9341 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9344 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9347 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9352 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9353 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9354 completion of the parsing.
9357 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9358 Shifting token $end ()
9361 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9362 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9366 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9367 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9370 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9371 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9372 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9374 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9376 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9377 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9378 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9380 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9383 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9384 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9388 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9389 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9390 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9393 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9396 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9399 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9400 else if (type == NUM)
9401 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9405 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9408 @chapter Invoking Bison
9409 @cindex invoking Bison
9410 @cindex Bison invocation
9411 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9413 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9419 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9420 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9421 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9422 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9423 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9424 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9425 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9426 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9427 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9428 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9429 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9434 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9437 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9440 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9443 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9445 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9446 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9447 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9450 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9451 in alphabetical order by short options.
9452 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9453 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9457 @section Bison Options
9459 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9460 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9461 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9462 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9463 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9466 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9467 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9470 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9476 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9480 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9482 @item --print-localedir
9483 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9485 @item --print-datadir
9486 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9490 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9491 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9492 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9493 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9494 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9495 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9496 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9497 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9498 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9499 for compatibility with POSIX:
9506 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9507 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9508 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9509 this option is specified.
9511 @item -W [@var{category}]
9512 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9513 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9516 @item midrule-values
9517 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9519 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9522 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9525 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9526 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9529 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9532 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9533 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9534 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9537 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9541 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9542 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9543 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9544 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9545 no effect on the conflict report.
9548 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9552 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9554 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9555 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9561 Turn off all the warnings.
9563 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9566 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9567 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9568 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9570 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9571 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9572 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9573 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9575 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9576 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9578 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9579 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9582 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9583 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9584 S/R conflicts as errors.
9587 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9588 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9598 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9599 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9600 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9602 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9603 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9604 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9605 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9606 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9607 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9608 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9612 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9615 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9616 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9617 definition for @var{name}.
9619 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9620 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9621 definitions for @var{name}.
9623 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9624 definitions for @var{name}.
9627 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9628 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9629 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9631 @item -L @var{language}
9632 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9633 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9634 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9635 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9636 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9638 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9642 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9644 @item -p @var{prefix}
9645 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9646 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9647 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9648 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9652 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9653 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9654 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9655 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9656 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9657 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9660 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9661 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9662 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9664 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9665 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9666 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9667 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9669 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9670 file in the Bison installation directory.
9671 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9672 current working directory.
9673 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9676 @itemx --token-table
9677 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9684 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9685 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9686 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9687 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9690 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9691 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9692 with other short options.
9694 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9695 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9696 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9697 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9699 @item -r @var{things}
9700 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9701 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9702 separated list of @var{things} among:
9706 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9710 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9711 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9714 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9715 each rule's lookahead set.
9718 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9719 precedence and associativity directives.
9722 Enable all the items.
9725 Do not generate the report.
9728 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9729 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9733 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9734 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9735 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9738 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9739 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9741 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9742 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9744 @item -g [@var{file}]
9745 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9746 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9747 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9748 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9749 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9750 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9753 @item -x [@var{file}]
9754 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9755 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9756 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9757 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9759 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9760 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9763 @node Option Cross Key
9764 @section Option Cross Key
9766 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9767 the corresponding short option and directive.
9769 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9770 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9771 @include cross-options.texi
9775 @section Yacc Library
9777 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9778 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9779 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9780 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9781 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9782 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9783 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9785 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9786 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9789 int yyerror (char const *);
9792 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9793 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9794 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9800 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9802 @node Other Languages
9803 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9806 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9807 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9811 @section C++ Parsers
9814 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9815 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9816 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9817 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9818 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9819 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9822 @node C++ Bison Interface
9823 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9824 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9828 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9829 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9830 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9831 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9833 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9835 @findex %define api.namespace
9836 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9837 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9838 in the following files:
9843 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9844 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
9845 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
9849 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9852 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9853 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9854 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9855 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9856 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9858 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9859 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9860 @samp{%defines} directive.
9863 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9864 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9866 @node C++ Semantic Values
9867 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9868 @c - No objects in unions
9870 @c - Printer and destructor
9872 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9873 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9874 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9875 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9878 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9879 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9883 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9885 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9886 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9887 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9890 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9891 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9892 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9894 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9895 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9896 to such objects are allowed.
9899 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9900 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9901 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9905 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9907 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9908 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9909 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9910 types can be used without pointers.
9912 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9913 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9914 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9915 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9917 For instance, instead of
9925 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9926 %token <sval> STRING;
9933 %token <int> NUMBER;
9934 %token <std::string> STRING;
9937 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9938 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9941 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9942 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9943 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9945 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9946 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9947 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9948 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9949 eventually, destroyed.
9951 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9952 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9953 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9956 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9957 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9961 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9962 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9963 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9964 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9965 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9966 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9967 that would be duplicating the information.
9969 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9970 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9971 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9972 (the current implementation of) variants:
9975 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9976 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9977 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9978 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9979 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9980 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9983 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9984 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9985 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9986 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9987 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9988 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9991 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9994 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9995 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9997 @node C++ Location Values
9998 @subsection C++ Location Values
10000 @c - class Position
10001 @c - class Location
10002 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10004 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10005 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10007 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10008 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10009 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10010 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10011 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10014 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10015 genuine code only the latter is used.
10018 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10019 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10020 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10024 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10026 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10027 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10028 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10032 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10033 Reset the position to the given values.
10036 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10037 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10038 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10039 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10040 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10043 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10044 The line, starting at 1.
10047 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10048 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10051 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10052 The column, starting at 1.
10055 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10056 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10059 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10060 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10061 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10062 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10063 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10066 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10067 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10068 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10071 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10072 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10073 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10074 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10078 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10080 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10081 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10084 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10085 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10086 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10089 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10090 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10093 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10094 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10095 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10098 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10099 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10100 Advance the @code{end} position.
10103 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10104 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10105 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10106 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10109 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10110 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10113 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10114 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10115 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10119 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10120 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10121 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10124 @node User Defined Location Type
10125 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10126 @findex %define api.location.type
10128 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10129 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10132 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10135 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10138 it must be copyable;
10141 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10142 parser basically runs
10144 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10145 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10148 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10151 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10152 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10155 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10156 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10161 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10162 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10163 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10164 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10169 %define namespace "master::"
10173 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10174 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10177 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10178 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10181 @node C++ Parser Interface
10182 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10183 @c - define parser_class_name
10185 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10187 @c - Reporting errors
10189 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10190 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10191 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10192 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10193 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10194 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10195 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10196 additional argument for its constructor.
10198 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10199 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10200 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10203 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10204 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10205 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10206 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10207 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10208 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10211 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10212 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10213 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10214 equivalent with first
10215 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10216 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10217 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10218 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10219 function invoked from the user action.
10222 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10223 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10224 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10227 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10228 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10229 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10232 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10233 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10236 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10237 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10238 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10241 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10242 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10243 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10247 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10248 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10249 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10250 or nonzero, full tracing.
10253 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10254 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10255 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10256 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10257 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10262 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10263 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10264 @c - prefix for yylex.
10265 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10268 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10269 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10270 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10271 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10274 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10275 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10278 @node Split Symbols
10279 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10281 Therefore the interface is as follows.
10283 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10284 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10285 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10286 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10287 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10290 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10291 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10293 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10297 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10298 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10301 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10302 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10306 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10307 initialized. So the code would look like:
10311 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10312 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10315 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10316 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10325 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10326 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10329 yylval.build(yytext);
10330 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10335 @node Complete Symbols
10336 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10338 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and
10339 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10340 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10341 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10342 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10343 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10345 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10346 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10347 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10348 the @var{location}.
10351 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10352 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10353 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10354 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10356 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10358 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10359 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10360 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10361 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10362 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10363 also pass the @var{location}.
10366 For instance, given the following declarations:
10369 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10370 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10371 %token <int> INTEGER;
10376 Bison generates the following functions:
10379 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10380 const location_type& l);
10381 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10382 const location_type& loc);
10383 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10387 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10390 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10391 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10392 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10395 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10396 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10398 @node A Complete C++ Example
10399 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10401 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10402 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10403 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10404 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10405 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10406 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10407 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10408 actually easier to interface with.
10411 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10412 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10413 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10414 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10415 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10418 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10419 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10421 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10422 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10423 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10424 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10425 of valid input follows.
10429 seven := one + two * three
10433 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10434 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10436 @c - A place to store error messages
10437 @c - A place for the result
10439 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10440 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10441 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10442 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10443 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10444 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10445 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10447 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10448 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10449 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10452 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10454 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10455 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10458 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10463 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10464 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10465 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10466 factor both as follows.
10468 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10470 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10472 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10473 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10478 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10481 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10483 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10484 class calcxx_driver
10488 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10490 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10496 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10497 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10499 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10501 // Handling the scanner.
10502 void scan_begin ();
10504 bool trace_scanning;
10508 Similarly for the parser itself.
10510 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10512 // Run the parser on file F.
10513 // Return 0 on success.
10514 int parse (const std::string& f);
10515 // The name of the file being parsed.
10516 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10518 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10519 bool trace_parsing;
10523 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10524 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10525 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10526 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10528 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10531 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10532 void error (const std::string& m);
10534 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10537 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10538 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10539 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10540 messages and set error state.
10542 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10544 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10545 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10547 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10548 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10550 variables["one"] = 1;
10551 variables["two"] = 2;
10554 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10559 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10563 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10564 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10565 int res = parser.parse ();
10571 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10573 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10577 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10579 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10583 @node Calc++ Parser
10584 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10586 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10587 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10588 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10589 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10592 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10594 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10595 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10597 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10601 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10602 @findex %define variant
10603 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10604 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10605 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10606 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10608 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10610 %define api.token.constructor
10611 %define parse.assert
10616 @findex %code requires
10617 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10618 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10619 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10620 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10621 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10622 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10623 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10625 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10630 class calcxx_driver;
10635 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10636 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10639 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10641 // The parsing context.
10642 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10646 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10647 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10648 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10651 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10656 // Initialize the initial location.
10657 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10662 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10663 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10666 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10668 %define parse.trace
10669 %define parse.error verbose
10674 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10675 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10677 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10681 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10687 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10688 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10689 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10690 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10691 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10693 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10695 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10697 END 0 "end of file"
10709 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10710 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10713 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10715 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10716 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10721 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10722 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10723 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10724 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10726 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10728 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10732 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10733 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10735 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10739 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10742 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10743 | assignments assignment @{@};
10746 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10751 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10752 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10753 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10754 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10755 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10756 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10757 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10762 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10765 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10768 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10769 const std::string& m)
10771 driver.error (l, m);
10775 @node Calc++ Scanner
10776 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10778 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10779 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10781 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10783 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10785 # include <climits>
10786 # include <cstdlib>
10788 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10789 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10791 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10792 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10793 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10794 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10796 # define yywrap() 1
10798 // The location of the current token.
10799 static yy::location loc;
10804 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10805 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10806 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10807 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10809 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10811 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10815 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10817 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10819 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10825 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10826 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10827 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10828 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10829 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10830 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10831 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10833 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10837 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10838 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10844 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10848 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10849 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10853 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10855 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10857 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10858 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10859 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10860 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10861 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10862 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10863 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10868 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10869 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10870 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10871 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10874 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10875 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10876 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10881 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10882 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10884 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10888 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10890 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10891 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10893 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10895 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10896 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10903 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10910 @node Calc++ Top Level
10911 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10913 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10915 @comment file: calc++.cc
10917 #include <iostream>
10918 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10922 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10925 calcxx_driver driver;
10926 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10927 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10928 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10929 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10930 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10931 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10932 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10941 @section Java Parsers
10944 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10945 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10946 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10947 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10948 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10949 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10950 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10951 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10954 @node Java Bison Interface
10955 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10956 @c - %language "Java"
10958 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10959 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10961 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10962 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10964 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10965 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10966 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10967 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10968 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10969 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10970 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10971 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10972 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10973 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10975 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10977 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10978 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10979 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10980 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10983 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10984 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10986 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10987 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10989 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10990 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10992 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10993 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10994 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10996 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10997 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10998 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11000 if needed. Also, in the future the
11001 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11002 access the token names and codes.
11004 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11005 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11006 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11007 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11010 @node Java Semantic Values
11011 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11012 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11014 @c - Printer and destructor
11016 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11017 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11018 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11021 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11022 %type <Integer> number
11025 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11026 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11027 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11028 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
11029 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11032 %define stype "ASTNode"
11036 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11037 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11039 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11040 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11041 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11042 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11043 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11044 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11046 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11047 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11048 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11050 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11051 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11052 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11055 @node Java Location Values
11056 @subsection Java Location Values
11058 @c - class Position
11059 @c - class Location
11061 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11062 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11063 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11064 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11065 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11066 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11067 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11069 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11070 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11071 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11072 be supplied by the user.
11075 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11076 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11077 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11080 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11081 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11084 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11085 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11088 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11089 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11090 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11091 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11095 @node Java Parser Interface
11096 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11097 @c - define parser_class_name
11099 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11101 @c - Reporting errors
11103 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11104 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11105 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11106 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11107 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11109 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11110 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11111 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11112 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11113 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11114 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11115 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11116 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11118 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11119 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11120 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11121 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11123 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11124 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11125 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11126 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11127 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11128 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11130 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11131 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11132 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11133 which initialize them automatically.
11135 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11136 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11137 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11138 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11140 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11141 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11142 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11145 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11146 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11147 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11150 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11151 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11152 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11154 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11155 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11156 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11159 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11160 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11161 @code{false} otherwise.
11164 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11165 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11166 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11167 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11168 verbose error messages.
11171 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11172 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11173 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11174 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11175 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11176 available only if location tracking is active.
11179 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11180 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11181 from a syntax error.
11182 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11185 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11186 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11187 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11191 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11192 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11193 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11194 or nonzero, full tracing.
11197 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11198 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11199 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11203 @node Java Scanner Interface
11204 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11207 @c - Lexer interface
11209 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11210 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11211 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11212 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11213 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11216 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11217 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11218 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11219 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11222 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11223 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11224 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11225 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11228 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11230 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11231 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11232 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11233 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11236 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11237 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11238 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11241 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11242 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11245 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11246 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11247 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11248 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11249 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11251 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11252 "@var{class-name}".}
11255 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11256 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11258 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
11259 "@var{class-name}".}
11263 @node Java Action Features
11264 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11266 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11267 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11269 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11270 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11273 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11274 This may not be assigned to.
11275 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11278 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11279 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11280 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11284 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11285 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11286 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11287 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11288 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11289 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11292 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11293 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11294 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11295 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11297 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11301 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11302 This may not be assigned to.
11303 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11307 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11308 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11311 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11312 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11313 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11316 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11317 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11318 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11321 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11322 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11323 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11326 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11327 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11328 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11330 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11333 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11334 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11335 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11336 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11337 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11338 available only if location tracking is active.
11342 @node Java Differences
11343 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11345 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11346 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11347 section summarizes these differences.
11351 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11352 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11353 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11354 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11355 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11356 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11357 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11359 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11360 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11361 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11362 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11363 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11366 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11367 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11368 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11369 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11370 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11371 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11372 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11373 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11374 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11377 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11379 @item @code{%code imports}
11380 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11381 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11382 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11384 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11385 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11387 @item @code{%code lexer}
11388 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11389 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11390 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11394 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11395 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11396 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11398 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11399 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11404 @node Java Declarations Summary
11405 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11407 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11408 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11410 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11411 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11414 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11415 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11416 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11417 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11418 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11421 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11422 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11423 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11424 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11427 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11428 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11429 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11430 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11433 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11434 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11435 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11438 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11439 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11440 a Java @emph{type}.
11441 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11444 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11445 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11446 @xref{Java Differences}.
11449 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11450 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11451 @xref{Java Differences}.
11454 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11455 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11456 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11459 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11460 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11461 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11464 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11465 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11466 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11467 @xref{Java Differences}.
11470 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11471 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11472 @xref{Java Differences}.
11475 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11476 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11477 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11480 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11481 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11482 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11485 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11486 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11487 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11490 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11491 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11492 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11495 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11496 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11498 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11501 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11502 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11503 constructor. Default is none.
11504 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11507 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11508 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11509 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11510 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11513 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11514 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11515 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11516 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11517 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11518 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11521 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11522 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11523 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11526 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11527 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11528 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11529 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11532 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11533 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11534 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11535 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11536 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11539 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11540 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11541 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11544 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11545 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11546 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11549 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11550 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11551 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11554 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11555 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11556 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11557 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11561 @c ================================================= FAQ
11564 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11565 @cindex frequently asked questions
11568 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11572 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11573 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11574 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11575 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11576 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11577 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11578 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11579 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11580 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11581 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11582 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11583 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11586 @node Memory Exhausted
11587 @section Memory Exhausted
11590 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11591 message. What can I do?
11594 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11597 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11598 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11600 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11601 following typical questions:
11604 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11605 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11606 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11613 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11614 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11615 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11618 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11619 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11620 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11621 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11622 @file{first-line.l}:
11628 #include <stdlib.h>
11632 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11636 yyparse (char const *file)
11638 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11642 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11646 /* One token only. */
11648 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11651 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11669 If the file @file{input} contains
11677 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11680 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11681 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11682 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11687 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11688 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11689 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11690 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11691 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11692 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11693 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11694 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11697 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11698 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11699 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11700 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11702 @node Strings are Destroyed
11703 @section Strings are Destroyed
11706 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11707 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11708 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11711 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11712 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11713 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11719 char *yylval = NULL;
11724 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11732 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11733 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11734 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11735 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11741 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11744 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11745 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11746 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11752 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11753 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11754 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11755 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11756 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11757 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11760 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11761 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11762 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11767 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11768 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11771 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11772 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11775 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11776 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11777 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11778 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11779 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11780 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11781 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11783 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11785 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11786 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11787 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11788 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11789 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11790 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11793 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11794 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11797 @node Multiple start-symbols
11798 @section Multiple start-symbols
11801 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11802 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11803 multiple entry points.
11806 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11807 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11808 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11809 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11813 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11820 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11821 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11823 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11824 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11825 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11826 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11827 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11828 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11829 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11830 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11833 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11838 int t = start_token;
11843 /* @r{The rules.} */
11847 @node Secure? Conform?
11848 @section Secure? Conform?
11851 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11854 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11855 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11856 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11857 please send us a bug report.
11859 @node I can't build Bison
11860 @section I can't build Bison
11863 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11864 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11868 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11869 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11870 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11871 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11872 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11873 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11874 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11877 @node Where can I find help?
11878 @section Where can I find help?
11881 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11884 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11885 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11886 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11887 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11888 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11889 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11890 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11891 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11895 @section Bug Reports
11898 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11901 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11902 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11903 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11904 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11905 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11907 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11908 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11909 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11910 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11911 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11913 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11914 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11915 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11916 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11917 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11918 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11920 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11921 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11923 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11925 @node More Languages
11926 @section More Languages
11929 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11930 favorite language here}?
11933 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11934 languages; contributions are welcome.
11937 @section Beta Testing
11940 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11943 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11944 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11945 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11946 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11947 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11948 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11949 essentially halted.
11951 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11952 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11953 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11954 systems are especially welcome.
11956 @node Mailing Lists
11957 @section Mailing Lists
11960 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11963 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11965 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11967 @node Table of Symbols
11968 @appendix Bison Symbols
11969 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11970 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11972 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11973 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11974 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11977 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11978 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11979 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11982 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11983 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11987 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11988 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11992 @deffn {Variable} $$
11993 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11997 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11998 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11999 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12002 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12003 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
12007 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12008 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
12012 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12013 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12014 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12015 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12018 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12019 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12020 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12021 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12022 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12026 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12027 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12028 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12029 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12030 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12031 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12032 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12034 This feature is experimental.
12035 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12039 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
12040 Comment delimiters, as in C.
12043 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12044 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12048 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12049 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12052 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12053 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12054 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12057 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12058 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12061 This feature is experimental.
12062 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12065 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12068 @deffn {Directive} <>
12069 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12072 This feature is experimental.
12073 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12076 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12079 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12080 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12081 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12082 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12085 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12086 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12087 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12088 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12089 @xref{%code Summary}.
12092 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12093 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12097 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12098 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12099 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12104 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12105 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12106 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12107 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12110 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12111 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12112 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12115 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12116 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12117 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12120 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12121 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12122 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12125 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12126 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12127 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12131 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12132 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12133 used in the grammar.
12136 @deffn {Symbol} error
12137 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12138 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12139 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12140 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12141 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12142 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12143 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12144 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12147 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12148 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12149 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12152 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12153 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12157 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12158 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12159 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12162 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12163 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12166 @deffn {Directive} %language
12167 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12168 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12171 @deffn {Directive} %left
12172 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12173 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12176 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12177 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12178 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12182 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12183 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12184 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12185 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12186 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12189 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12190 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12191 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12193 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12194 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12195 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12197 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12198 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12199 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12200 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12201 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12202 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12203 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12204 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12209 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12210 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12211 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12216 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12217 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12218 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12221 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12222 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12223 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12226 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12227 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12228 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12231 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12232 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12233 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12234 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12237 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12238 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12239 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12242 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12243 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12244 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12247 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12248 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12249 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12252 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12253 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12254 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12255 unreasonable usage.
12258 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12259 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12260 Require a Version of Bison}.
12263 @deffn {Directive} %right
12264 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12265 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12268 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12269 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12270 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12273 @deffn {Directive} %start
12274 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12278 @deffn {Directive} %token
12279 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12280 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12283 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12284 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12285 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12288 @deffn {Directive} %type
12289 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12290 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12293 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12294 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12295 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12299 @deffn {Directive} %union
12300 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12301 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12304 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12305 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12306 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12307 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12308 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12310 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12314 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12315 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12316 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12317 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12319 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12323 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12324 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12325 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12328 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12329 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12330 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12331 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12332 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12335 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12336 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12337 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12340 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12341 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12342 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12345 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12346 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12347 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12348 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12351 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12352 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12353 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12356 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12357 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12358 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12359 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12360 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12361 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12363 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12367 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12368 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12369 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12372 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12373 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12374 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12375 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12376 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12377 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12378 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12381 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12382 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12383 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12386 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12387 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12388 @xref{Memory Management}.
12391 @deffn {Function} yylex
12392 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12393 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12397 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
12398 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
12399 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
12400 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
12401 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12404 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12405 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12406 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12407 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12409 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12411 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12412 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12413 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12416 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12417 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12418 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12421 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12422 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12423 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12424 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12426 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12427 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12428 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12431 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12432 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12436 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12437 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12438 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12439 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
12440 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12443 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12444 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12445 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12448 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12449 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12450 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12451 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12454 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12455 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12456 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12457 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12458 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12459 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12460 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12463 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12464 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12465 call this function to create a new parser.
12466 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12467 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12468 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12469 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12472 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12473 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12474 parse the rest of the input stream.
12475 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12476 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12477 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12478 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12481 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12482 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12483 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12484 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12485 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12486 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12489 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12490 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12491 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12492 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12495 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12496 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12497 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12498 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12499 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12500 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12501 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12503 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12504 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12505 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12506 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12507 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12508 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12509 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12512 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12513 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12514 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12522 @item Accepting state
12523 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12524 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12525 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12527 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12528 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12529 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12530 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12531 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12533 @item Consistent state
12534 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12536 @item Context-free grammars
12537 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12538 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12539 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12540 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12543 @item Default reduction
12544 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12545 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12546 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12547 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12550 @item Defaulted state
12551 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12553 @item Dynamic allocation
12554 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12555 compile time or on entry to a function.
12558 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12559 character string of length zero.
12561 @item Finite-state stack machine
12562 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12563 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12564 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12565 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12566 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12567 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12569 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12570 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12571 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12572 deterministic parsing
12573 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12574 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12575 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12579 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12580 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12581 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12583 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12584 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12585 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12586 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12587 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12588 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12589 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12590 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12591 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12592 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12594 @item Infix operator
12595 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12596 performs some operation.
12599 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12601 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12602 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12603 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12604 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12605 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12606 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12607 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12609 @item Language construct
12610 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12611 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12612 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12614 @item Left associativity
12615 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12616 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12617 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12619 @item Left recursion
12620 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12621 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12624 @item Left-to-right parsing
12625 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12626 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12628 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12629 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12630 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12632 @item Lexical tie-in
12633 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12634 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12636 @item Literal string token
12637 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12639 @item Lookahead token
12640 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12644 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12645 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12646 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12649 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12650 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12652 @item Nonterminal symbol
12653 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12654 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12655 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12658 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12659 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12662 @item Postfix operator
12663 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12664 performs some operation.
12667 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12668 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12672 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12673 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12674 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12676 @item Reverse polish notation
12677 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12679 @item Right recursion
12680 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12681 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12685 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12686 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12687 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12690 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12691 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12692 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12694 @item Single-character literal
12695 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12696 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12699 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12700 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12701 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12702 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12705 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12706 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12707 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12710 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12711 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12714 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12715 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12716 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12717 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12719 @item Terminal symbol
12720 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12721 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12722 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12724 @item Unreachable state
12725 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12726 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12727 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12730 @node Copying This Manual
12731 @appendix Copying This Manual
12735 @unnumbered Bibliography
12739 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12740 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12741 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12742 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12744 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12745 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12746 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12747 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12748 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12750 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12751 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12752 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12753 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12754 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12756 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12757 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12758 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12759 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12760 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12763 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12764 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12765 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12768 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12769 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12770 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12771 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12774 @node Index of Terms
12775 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12781 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12782 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12783 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12784 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12785 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12786 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12787 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12788 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12789 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12790 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12791 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12792 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12793 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12794 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12795 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12796 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12797 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12798 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12799 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12800 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12801 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12802 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12803 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12804 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12805 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12806 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12807 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12808 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12809 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12810 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12811 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12812 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12813 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12814 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12815 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12816 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12817 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12818 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12819 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12820 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12821 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12822 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12823 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12824 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12825 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12826 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12827 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12828 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12829 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12830 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12831 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12832 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12833 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12834 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12835 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12836 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12837 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12838 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12840 @c Local Variables:
12841 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"