1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
217 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
218 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
222 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
223 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
224 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
228 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
229 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
230 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
231 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
232 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
233 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
234 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
235 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
236 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
237 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
238 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
239 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
240 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
241 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
242 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
244 Parser C-Language Interface
246 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
247 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
248 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
249 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
250 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
251 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
253 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
254 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
255 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
258 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
260 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
261 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
262 of the token it has read.
263 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
264 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
266 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
267 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
269 The Bison Parser Algorithm
271 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
272 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
273 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
274 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
275 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
276 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
277 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
278 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
279 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
280 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
284 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
285 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
286 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
287 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
288 * How Precedence:: How they work.
289 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
293 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
294 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
295 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
296 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
298 Handling Context Dependencies
300 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
301 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
302 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
303 error recovery rules must be written.
305 Debugging Your Parser
307 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
308 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
309 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
310 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
314 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
315 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
316 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
320 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
321 in alphabetical order by short options.
322 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
323 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
325 Parsers Written In Other Languages
327 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
328 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
332 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
333 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
334 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
335 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
336 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
337 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
341 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
342 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
343 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
345 A Complete C++ Example
347 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
348 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
349 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
350 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
351 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
355 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
356 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
357 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
358 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
359 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
360 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
361 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
362 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
364 Frequently Asked Questions
366 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
367 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
368 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
369 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
370 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
371 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
372 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
373 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
374 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
375 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
376 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
377 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
381 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
387 @unnumbered Introduction
390 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
391 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
392 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
393 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
394 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
395 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
396 calculators to complex programming languages.
398 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
399 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
400 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
401 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
402 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
405 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
406 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
407 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
408 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
411 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
412 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
413 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
414 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
415 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
416 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
419 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
422 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
424 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
425 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
426 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
427 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
428 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
430 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
432 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
433 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
434 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
435 License to all of the Bison source code.
437 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
438 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
439 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
440 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
441 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
442 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
443 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
445 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
446 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
447 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
448 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
449 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
450 using the other GNU tools.
452 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
453 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
454 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
455 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
459 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
460 @include gpl-3.0.texi
463 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
465 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
466 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
467 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
470 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
471 as mathematical ideas.
472 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
473 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
474 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
475 the name of an identifier, etc.).
476 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
477 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
478 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
479 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
480 how is the output used?
481 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
482 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
485 @node Language and Grammar
486 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
488 @cindex context-free grammar
489 @cindex grammar, context-free
490 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
491 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
492 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
493 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
494 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
495 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
496 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
497 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
501 @cindex Backus-Naur form
502 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
503 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
504 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
505 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
506 essentially machine-readable BNF.
508 @cindex LALR grammars
509 @cindex IELR grammars
511 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
512 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
513 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
514 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
515 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
516 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
517 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
518 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
519 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
520 Construction}, to learn how.
523 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
524 @cindex ambiguous grammars
525 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
527 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
528 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
529 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
530 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
531 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
532 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
533 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
534 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
535 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
536 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
537 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
538 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
539 possible parses of any given string is finite.
541 @cindex symbols (abstract)
543 @cindex syntactic grouping
544 @cindex grouping, syntactic
545 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
546 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
547 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
548 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
549 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
550 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
551 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
553 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
554 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
555 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
556 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
557 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
558 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
559 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
560 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
561 lexicography, not grammar.)
563 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
566 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
567 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
568 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
569 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
570 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
571 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
572 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
575 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
576 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
577 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
578 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
579 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
580 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
581 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
582 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
584 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
585 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
586 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
587 reads informally as follows:
590 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
595 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
599 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
600 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
601 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
602 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
605 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
606 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
607 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
608 not the start symbol.
610 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
611 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
612 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
613 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
614 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
615 reports a syntax error.
617 @node Grammar in Bison
618 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
619 @cindex Bison grammar
620 @cindex grammar, Bison
621 @cindex formal grammar
623 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
624 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
625 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
627 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
628 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
629 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
631 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
632 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
633 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
634 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
635 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
636 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
637 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
640 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
641 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
642 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
643 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
645 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
646 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
648 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
649 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
650 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
651 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
655 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
659 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
661 @node Semantic Values
662 @section Semantic Values
663 @cindex semantic value
664 @cindex value, semantic
666 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
667 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
668 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
669 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
670 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
673 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
674 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
675 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
676 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
677 ,Defining Language Semantics},
680 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
681 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
682 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
683 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
686 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
687 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
688 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
689 need to have any semantic value.)
691 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
692 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
693 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
694 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
695 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
696 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
698 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
699 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
700 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
701 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
702 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
704 @node Semantic Actions
705 @section Semantic Actions
706 @cindex semantic actions
707 @cindex actions, semantic
709 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
710 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
711 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
712 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
715 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
716 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
717 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
718 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
719 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
720 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
721 newly recognized larger expression.
723 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
727 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
731 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
732 from the values of the two subexpressions.
735 @section Writing GLR Parsers
737 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
740 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
741 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
743 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
744 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
745 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
746 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
747 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
748 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
749 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
750 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
751 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
753 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
754 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
755 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
756 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
757 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
758 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
759 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
760 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
761 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
762 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
763 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
764 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
765 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
766 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
767 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
768 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
769 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
770 identical set of symbols.
772 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
773 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
774 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
775 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
776 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
777 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
778 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
779 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
780 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
784 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
785 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
786 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
787 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
788 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
791 @node Simple GLR Parsers
792 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
793 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
794 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
798 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
799 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
801 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
802 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
803 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
805 Consider a problem that
806 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
807 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
810 type subrange = lo .. hi;
811 type enum = (a, b, c);
815 The original language standard allows only numeric
816 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
817 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
818 10206) and many other
819 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
820 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
824 type subrange = (a) .. b;
828 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
829 type with only one value:
836 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
837 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
839 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
840 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
841 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
842 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
843 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
844 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
845 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
846 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
848 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
849 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
850 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
851 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
854 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
855 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
856 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
857 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
858 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
859 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
862 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
863 use the GLR algorithm.
864 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
865 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
866 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
867 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
868 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
869 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
870 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
871 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
872 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
874 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
875 reports a syntax error as usual.
877 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
878 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
879 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
880 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
881 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
883 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
884 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
885 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
886 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
887 The present example contains only one conflict between two
888 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
889 cannot be nested. So the number of
890 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
891 and the parsing time is still linear.
893 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
894 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
897 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
905 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
933 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
934 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
935 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
936 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
943 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
944 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
945 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
954 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
955 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
956 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
957 notice when the parser splits.
959 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
960 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
961 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
962 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
963 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
964 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
965 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
966 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
967 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
968 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
969 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
970 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
971 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
974 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
975 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
976 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
977 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
978 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
979 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
981 @node Merging GLR Parses
982 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
983 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
984 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
988 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
990 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
995 #define YYSTYPE char const *
997 void yyerror (char const *);
1011 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1020 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1021 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1022 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1023 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1024 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1028 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1029 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1030 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1031 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1035 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1036 | '(' declarator ')'
1041 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1042 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1049 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1050 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1051 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1052 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1053 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1054 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1055 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1056 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1057 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1058 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1059 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1060 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1061 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1062 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1064 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1065 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1066 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1067 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1068 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1069 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1070 The parser therefore prints
1073 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1076 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1077 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1084 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1085 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1086 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1087 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1088 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1089 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1090 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1091 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1092 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1093 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1099 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1100 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1101 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1102 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1107 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1108 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1113 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1117 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1125 with an accompanying forward declaration
1126 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1130 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1131 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1136 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1137 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1140 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1143 Bison requires that all of the
1144 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1145 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1146 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1147 the offending merge.
1149 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1150 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1152 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1153 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1155 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1156 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1157 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1158 the associated reduction.
1159 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1160 action in a GLR parser.
1163 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1165 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1168 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1169 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1170 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1171 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1172 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1173 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1174 influence syntax analysis.
1175 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1179 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1180 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1181 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1182 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1183 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1184 future versions of Bison.
1185 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1186 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1187 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1189 @subsubsection YYERROR
1191 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1192 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1193 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1194 initiate error recovery.
1195 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1196 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1197 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1198 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1199 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1200 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1201 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1202 the parse that invoked the test.
1204 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1205 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1206 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1209 @node Semantic Predicates
1210 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1212 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1214 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1216 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1217 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1218 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1219 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1223 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1224 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1229 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1230 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1231 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1232 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1233 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1234 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1235 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1237 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1238 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1239 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1240 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1243 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1244 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1245 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1249 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1250 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1251 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1252 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1257 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1258 false). However, this
1259 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1260 have overlapping syntax.
1261 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1262 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1263 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1264 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1267 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1268 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1270 @node Compiler Requirements
1271 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1272 @cindex @code{inline}
1273 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1275 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1276 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1277 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1278 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1279 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1280 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1289 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1293 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1294 && ! defined inline)
1303 @cindex textual location
1304 @cindex location, textual
1306 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1307 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1308 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1309 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1311 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1312 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1313 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1314 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1317 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1318 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1319 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1322 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1323 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1324 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1325 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1326 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1327 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1328 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1331 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1332 @cindex Bison parser
1333 @cindex Bison utility
1334 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1337 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1338 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1339 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1340 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1341 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1342 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1343 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1346 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1347 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1348 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1351 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1352 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1353 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1354 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1355 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1356 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1357 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1359 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1360 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1361 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1362 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1363 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1364 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1365 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1366 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1367 C-Language Interface}.
1369 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1370 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1371 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1372 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1373 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1374 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1375 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1376 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1377 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1378 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1379 anything other than their usual meanings.
1381 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1382 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1383 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1384 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1385 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1386 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1387 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1388 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1389 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1392 @section Stages in Using Bison
1393 @cindex stages in using Bison
1396 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1397 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1401 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1402 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1403 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1404 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1405 sequence of C statements.
1408 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1409 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1410 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1411 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1414 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1417 Write error-reporting routines.
1420 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1421 must follow these steps:
1425 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1428 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1431 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1434 @node Grammar Layout
1435 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1436 @cindex grammar file
1438 @cindex format of grammar file
1439 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1441 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1442 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1449 @var{Bison declarations}
1458 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1459 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1461 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1462 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1463 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1464 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1465 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1466 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1468 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1469 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1470 semantic values of various symbols.
1472 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1475 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1476 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1477 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1481 @cindex simple examples
1482 @cindex examples, simple
1484 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1485 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1486 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1487 and a multi-function calculator. All
1488 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1490 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1491 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1492 source file to try them.
1495 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1496 a first example with no operator precedence.
1497 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1498 Operator precedence is introduced.
1499 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1500 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1501 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1502 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1503 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1507 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1508 @cindex reverse polish notation
1509 @cindex polish notation calculator
1510 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1511 @cindex calculator, simple
1513 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1514 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1515 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1516 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1518 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1519 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1522 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1523 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1524 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1525 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1526 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1527 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1528 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1531 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1532 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1534 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1535 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1537 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1539 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1542 #define YYSTYPE double
1546 void yyerror (char const *);
1551 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1554 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1555 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1557 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1558 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1559 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1560 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1561 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1562 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1563 which is a floating point number.
1565 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1566 function @code{pow}.
1568 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1569 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1570 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1571 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1574 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1575 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1576 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1577 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1578 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1579 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1580 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1581 type for numeric constants.
1584 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1586 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1588 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1600 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1607 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1608 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1609 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1610 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1611 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1612 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1618 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1619 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1620 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1621 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1622 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1625 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1626 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1627 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1629 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1630 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1631 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1632 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1633 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1634 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1637 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1638 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1639 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1643 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1645 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1654 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1655 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1656 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1657 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1658 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1660 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1661 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1662 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1663 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1664 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1665 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1667 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1668 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1669 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1670 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1673 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1674 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1675 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1678 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1680 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1685 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1689 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1690 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1691 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1692 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1693 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1694 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1695 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1697 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1698 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1699 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1700 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1701 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1704 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1706 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1707 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1708 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1709 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1714 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1715 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1720 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1721 equally well have written them separately:
1725 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1726 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1730 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1731 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1732 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1733 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1734 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1735 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1736 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1737 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1739 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1740 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1741 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1743 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1744 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1748 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1752 means the same thing as this:
1757 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1763 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1766 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1767 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1768 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1770 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1771 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1772 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1773 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1775 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1777 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1778 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1779 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1780 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1782 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1783 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1784 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1785 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1786 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1787 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1788 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1789 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1790 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1792 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1793 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1794 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1795 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1796 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1798 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1799 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1801 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1803 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1806 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1807 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1808 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1809 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1820 /* Skip white space. */
1821 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1825 /* Process numbers. */
1826 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1829 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1834 /* Return end-of-input. */
1837 /* Return a single char. */
1844 @subsection The Controlling Function
1845 @cindex controlling function
1846 @cindex main function in simple example
1848 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1849 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1850 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1852 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1864 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1865 @cindex error reporting routine
1867 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1868 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1869 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1870 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1871 here is the definition we will use:
1873 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1878 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1880 yyerror (char const *s)
1882 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1887 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1888 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1889 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1890 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1891 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1892 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1894 @node Rpcalc Generate
1895 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1896 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1898 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1899 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1900 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1901 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1902 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1903 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1905 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1906 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1908 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1909 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1916 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1917 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1918 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1919 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1920 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1921 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1922 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1924 @node Rpcalc Compile
1925 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1926 @cindex compiling the parser
1928 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1932 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1934 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1938 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1939 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1940 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1944 # @r{List files again.}
1946 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1950 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1951 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1957 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1959 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1962 @result{} -3.166666667
1963 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1965 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1970 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1971 @cindex infix notation calculator
1973 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1975 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1976 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1977 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1978 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1981 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1985 #define YYSTYPE double
1989 void yyerror (char const *);
1994 /* Bison declarations. */
1998 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1999 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2002 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2013 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2020 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2021 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2022 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2023 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2024 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2025 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2026 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2033 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2036 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2038 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2039 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2040 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2041 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2042 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2043 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2044 the associativity/precedence.)
2046 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2047 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2048 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2049 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2050 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2051 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2054 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2055 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2056 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2057 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2058 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2060 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2065 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2073 @node Simple Error Recovery
2074 @section Simple Error Recovery
2075 @cindex error recovery, simple
2077 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2078 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2079 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2080 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2081 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2082 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2084 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2085 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2086 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2092 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2093 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2098 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2099 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2100 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2101 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2102 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2103 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2104 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2105 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2108 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2109 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2110 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2111 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2112 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2113 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2116 @node Location Tracking Calc
2117 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2118 @cindex location tracking calculator
2119 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2120 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2122 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2123 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2124 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2125 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2129 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2130 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2131 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2134 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2135 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2137 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2138 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2141 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2147 void yyerror (char const *);
2150 /* Bison declarations. */
2158 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2162 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2163 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2164 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2165 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2166 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2167 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2168 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2172 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2174 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2175 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2176 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2177 from the new information.
2179 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2180 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2193 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2200 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2201 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2202 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2212 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2213 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2214 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2219 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2220 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2221 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2225 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2226 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2227 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2229 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2230 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2231 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2232 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2233 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2234 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2238 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2240 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2241 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2242 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2245 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2246 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2257 /* Skip white space. */
2258 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2259 ++yylloc.last_column;
2264 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2265 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2269 /* Process numbers. */
2273 ++yylloc.last_column;
2274 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2276 ++yylloc.last_column;
2277 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2284 /* Return end-of-input. */
2289 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2293 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2296 ++yylloc.last_column;
2302 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2303 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2304 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2305 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2307 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2308 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2309 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2310 controlling function:
2317 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2318 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2324 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2325 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2326 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2328 @node Multi-function Calc
2329 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2330 @cindex multi-function calculator
2331 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2332 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2334 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2335 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2336 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2337 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2338 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2340 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2341 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2342 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2343 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2344 functions whose syntax has this form:
2347 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2351 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2352 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2353 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2358 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2359 @result{} 3.1415926536
2363 @result{} 0.0000000000
2365 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2366 @result{} 2.3000000000
2368 @result{} 2.3000000000
2370 @result{} 0.8329091229
2371 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2372 @result{} 2.3000000000
2376 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2379 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2380 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2381 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2382 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2383 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2386 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2387 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2389 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2391 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2395 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2396 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2397 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2399 void yyerror (char const *);
2405 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2406 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2409 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2410 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2417 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2418 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2422 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2423 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2424 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2426 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2427 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2428 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2429 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2431 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2432 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2433 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2434 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2435 between angle brackets).
2437 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2438 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2439 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2440 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2441 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2442 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2445 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2447 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2448 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2449 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2451 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2453 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2464 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2465 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2472 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2473 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2474 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2475 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2476 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2477 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2478 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2479 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2480 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2481 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2484 /* End of grammar. */
2488 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2489 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2490 @cindex symbol table example
2492 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2493 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2494 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2495 requires some additional C functions for support.
2497 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2498 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2499 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2501 @comment file: calc.h
2504 /* Function type. */
2505 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2509 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2512 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2513 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2516 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2517 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2519 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2524 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2526 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2527 extern symrec *sym_table;
2529 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2530 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2534 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2537 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2543 double (*fnct) (double);
2548 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2561 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2566 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2572 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2574 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2575 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2581 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2582 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2584 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2585 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2586 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2587 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2588 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2589 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2591 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2593 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2594 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2598 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2600 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2601 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2602 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2603 ptr->type = sym_type;
2604 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2605 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2613 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2616 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2617 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2618 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2626 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2628 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2629 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2630 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2631 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2633 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2634 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2635 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2636 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2637 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2638 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2640 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2641 operators in @code{yylex}.
2643 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2653 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2654 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2662 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2663 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2666 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2672 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2675 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2676 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2677 static size_t length = 40;
2678 static char *symbuf = 0;
2683 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2689 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2693 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2695 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2697 /* Get another character. */
2702 while (isalnum (c));
2709 s = getsym (symbuf);
2711 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2716 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2723 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2725 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2726 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2727 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2729 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2732 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2734 yyerror (char const *s)
2736 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2742 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2745 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2746 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2747 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2755 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2756 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2757 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2765 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2768 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2769 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2770 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2773 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2774 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2778 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2780 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2781 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2783 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2784 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2787 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2788 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2789 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2790 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2791 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2792 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2793 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2794 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2795 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2798 @node Grammar Outline
2799 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2802 @findex /* @dots{} */
2804 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2805 appropriate delimiters:
2812 @var{Bison declarations}
2821 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2822 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2826 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2827 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2828 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2829 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2830 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2834 @subsection The prologue
2835 @cindex declarations section
2837 @cindex declarations
2839 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2840 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2841 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2842 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2843 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2844 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2845 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2847 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2848 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2851 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2852 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2853 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2854 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2855 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2856 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2857 @code{%union} declaration.
2868 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2872 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2873 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2879 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2880 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2881 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2882 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2883 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2884 @code{#include} directives.
2886 @node Prologue Alternatives
2887 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2888 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2891 @findex %code requires
2892 @findex %code provides
2895 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2896 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2897 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2898 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2899 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2900 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2901 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2903 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2914 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2918 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2919 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2926 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2927 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2928 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2929 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2930 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2931 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2932 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2933 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2934 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2935 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2936 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2938 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2939 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2940 This behavior raises a few questions.
2941 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2942 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2943 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2944 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2945 This behavior is not intuitive.
2947 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2948 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2949 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2950 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2957 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2958 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2961 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2962 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2974 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2978 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2979 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2980 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2987 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2988 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2989 explicit which kind you intend.
2990 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2992 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2993 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2994 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2995 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2996 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2997 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2998 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2999 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3000 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3003 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3004 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3006 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3024 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3030 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3031 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3044 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3045 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3046 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3054 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3055 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3056 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3057 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3058 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3059 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3061 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3062 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3063 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3064 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3065 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3066 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3067 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3068 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3069 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3070 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3071 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3074 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3075 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3076 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3077 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3078 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3079 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3080 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3081 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3082 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3083 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3101 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3107 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3108 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3121 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3127 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3128 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3136 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3137 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3138 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3141 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3142 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3143 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3144 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3145 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3146 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3149 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3150 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3151 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3152 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3154 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3155 organize your grammar file.
3156 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3161 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3162 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3163 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3164 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3168 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3169 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3170 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3171 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3176 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3177 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3179 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3181 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3182 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3183 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3184 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3186 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3187 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3188 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3189 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3190 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3191 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3192 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3193 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3196 @node Bison Declarations
3197 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3198 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3199 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3201 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3202 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3203 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3204 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3207 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3208 @cindex grammar rules section
3209 @cindex rules section for grammar
3211 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3212 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3214 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3215 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3216 if it is the first thing in the file.
3219 @subsection The epilogue
3220 @cindex additional C code section
3222 @cindex C code, section for additional
3224 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3225 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3226 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3227 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3228 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3229 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3230 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3231 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3232 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3233 C-Language Interface}.
3235 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3236 from the grammar rules.
3238 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3239 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3240 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3241 of the grammar file.
3244 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3245 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3246 @cindex terminal symbol
3250 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3253 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3254 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3255 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3256 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3257 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3258 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3259 the symbol to stand for it.
3261 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3262 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3263 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3265 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3266 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3267 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3268 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3269 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3270 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3271 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3273 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3277 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3278 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3279 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3280 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3283 @cindex character token
3284 @cindex literal token
3285 @cindex single-character literal
3286 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3287 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3288 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3289 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3290 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3291 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3292 ,Operator Precedence}).
3294 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3295 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3296 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3297 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3298 your program will confuse other readers.
3300 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3301 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3302 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3303 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3304 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3305 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3309 @cindex string token
3310 @cindex literal string token
3311 @cindex multicharacter literal
3312 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3313 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3314 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3315 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3316 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3318 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3319 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3320 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3321 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3322 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3324 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3326 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3327 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3328 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3329 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3330 read your program will be confused.
3332 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3333 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3334 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3335 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3336 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3337 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3340 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3341 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3342 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3344 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3345 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3346 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3347 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3348 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3349 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3350 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3351 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3352 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3353 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3354 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3355 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3357 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3358 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3359 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3360 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3361 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3363 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3364 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3365 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3366 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3367 characters in the following C-language string:
3370 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3373 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3374 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3375 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3376 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3377 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3378 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3379 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3380 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3381 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3382 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3385 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3386 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3387 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3388 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3389 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3392 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3394 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3395 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3397 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3400 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3404 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3405 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3406 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3415 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3416 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3418 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3419 extra white space as you wish.
3421 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3422 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3425 @{@var{C statements}@}
3430 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3431 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3432 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3433 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3434 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3435 compiler can check it.
3437 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3438 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3439 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3440 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3441 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3442 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3443 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3444 character constants.
3446 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3450 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3451 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3456 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3457 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3464 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3466 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3467 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3468 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3487 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3491 @section Recursive Rules
3492 @cindex recursive rule
3494 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3495 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3496 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3497 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3498 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3509 @cindex left recursion
3510 @cindex right recursion
3512 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3513 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3514 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3526 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3527 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3528 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3529 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3530 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3531 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3532 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3535 @cindex mutual recursion
3536 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3537 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3538 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3547 | primary '+' primary
3560 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3564 @section Defining Language Semantics
3565 @cindex defining language semantics
3566 @cindex language semantics, defining
3568 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3569 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3570 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3572 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3573 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3574 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3575 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3578 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3579 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3580 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3581 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3582 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3583 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3584 action in the middle of a rule.
3588 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3589 @cindex semantic value type
3590 @cindex value type, semantic
3591 @cindex data types of semantic values
3592 @cindex default data type
3594 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3595 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3596 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3597 Notation Calculator}).
3599 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3600 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3601 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3604 #define YYSTYPE double
3608 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3609 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3610 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3611 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3613 @node Multiple Types
3614 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3616 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3617 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3618 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3619 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3622 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3623 requires you to do two things:
3627 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3628 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3629 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3630 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3634 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3635 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3636 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3637 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3638 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3647 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3649 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3650 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3651 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3652 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3654 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3655 placed at any position in the rule;
3656 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3657 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3658 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3659 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3661 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3662 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3663 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3664 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3665 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3666 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3667 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3668 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3669 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3670 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3673 Here is a typical example:
3679 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3683 Or, in terms of named references:
3689 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3694 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3695 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3696 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3697 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3698 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3699 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3701 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3702 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3703 referred to as @code{$2}.
3705 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3706 references construct.
3708 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3709 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3710 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3711 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3712 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3715 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3718 @cindex default action
3719 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3720 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3721 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3722 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3723 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3724 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3726 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3727 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3728 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3729 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3730 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3735 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3736 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3742 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3747 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3748 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3749 definition of @code{foo}.
3752 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3753 any, from a semantic action.
3754 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3755 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3758 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3759 @cindex action data types
3760 @cindex data types in actions
3762 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3763 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3765 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3766 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3767 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3768 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3769 in the rule. In this example,
3775 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3780 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3781 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3782 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3783 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3785 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3786 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3787 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3799 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3800 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3802 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3803 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3804 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3805 @cindex mid-rule actions
3807 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3808 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3809 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3812 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
3813 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
3814 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
3817 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
3818 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
3820 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3821 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3822 it is run before they are parsed.
3824 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3825 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3826 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3827 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3830 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3831 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3832 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3833 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3834 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3835 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3837 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3838 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3839 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3840 at the end of the rule.
3842 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3843 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3844 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3845 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3846 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3847 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3854 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3855 declare_variable ($3);
3860 pop_context ($<context>5);
3866 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3867 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3868 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3869 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3870 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3871 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3874 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
3875 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
3876 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
3883 $<context>let = push_context ();
3884 declare_variable ($3);
3889 pop_context ($<context>let);
3894 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3895 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3896 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3897 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3898 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3901 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3902 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3903 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3904 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3905 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3907 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3908 Discarded Symbols}).
3909 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3910 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3912 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3913 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3918 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3932 $let = push_context ();
3933 declare_variable ($3);
3940 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3941 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3942 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3944 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
3945 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
3949 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
3950 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
3951 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
3952 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
3956 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
3963 $@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
3964 $@@2: /* empty */ @{ c(); @};
3965 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
3966 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
3970 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
3972 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
3973 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
3974 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
3977 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
3984 @@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
3985 @@2: /* empty */ @{ $$ = c(); @};
3986 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
3987 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
3990 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
3991 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
3992 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
3993 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
3994 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
3998 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4000 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4001 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4005 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4006 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4012 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4013 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4014 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4015 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4016 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4017 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4018 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4024 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4025 | '@{' statements '@}'
4031 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4036 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4037 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4040 | '@{' statements '@}'
4046 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4047 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4048 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4049 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4050 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4051 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4053 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4054 actions into the two rules, like this:
4059 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4060 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4061 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4062 '@{' statements '@}'
4068 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4069 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4071 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4072 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4073 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4078 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4079 declarations statements '@}'
4080 | '@{' statements '@}'
4086 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4087 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4089 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4090 serves as a subroutine:
4095 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4101 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4102 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4108 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4109 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4112 @node Tracking Locations
4113 @section Tracking Locations
4115 @cindex textual location
4116 @cindex location, textual
4118 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4119 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4120 especially symbol locations.
4122 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4123 actions to take when rules are matched.
4126 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4127 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4128 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4132 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4133 @cindex data type of locations
4134 @cindex default location type
4136 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4137 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4139 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4140 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4141 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4142 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4146 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4155 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4156 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4157 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4158 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4159 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4161 @node Actions and Locations
4162 @subsection Actions and Locations
4163 @cindex location actions
4164 @cindex actions, location
4167 @vindex @@@var{name}
4168 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4170 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4171 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4173 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4174 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4175 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4176 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4177 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4180 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4181 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4182 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4183 references construct.
4185 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4193 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4194 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4195 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4196 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4203 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4204 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4205 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4211 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4212 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4213 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4216 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4217 example above simply rewrites this way:
4231 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4232 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4233 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4240 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4241 from a semantic action.
4242 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4243 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4245 @node Location Default Action
4246 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4247 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4248 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4250 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4251 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4252 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4253 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4254 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4255 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4256 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4257 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4260 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4261 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4263 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4264 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4265 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4266 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4267 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4268 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4269 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4270 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4271 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4272 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4274 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4278 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4282 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4283 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4284 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4285 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4289 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4290 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4291 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4292 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4299 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4300 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4301 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4303 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4307 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4308 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4311 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4312 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4313 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4314 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4317 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4318 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4319 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4320 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4323 @node Named References
4324 @section Named References
4325 @cindex named references
4327 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4328 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4329 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4330 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4331 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4332 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4334 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4335 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4336 used as named references. For example:
4340 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4341 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4346 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4350 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4351 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4356 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4362 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4365 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4368 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4373 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4374 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4375 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4378 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4379 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4384 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4385 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4386 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4389 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4390 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4396 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4397 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4400 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4401 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4405 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4406 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4407 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4408 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4409 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4410 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4411 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4413 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4417 @section Bison Declarations
4418 @cindex declarations, Bison
4419 @cindex Bison declarations
4421 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4422 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4425 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4426 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4427 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4428 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4430 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4431 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4432 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4433 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4436 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4437 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4438 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4439 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4440 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4441 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4442 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4443 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4444 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4445 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4446 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4447 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4448 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4449 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4450 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4454 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4455 @cindex version requirement
4456 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4459 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4460 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4464 %require "@var{version}"
4468 @subsection Token Type Names
4469 @cindex declaring token type names
4470 @cindex token type names, declaring
4471 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4474 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4480 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4481 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4482 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4484 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4485 @code{%precedence}, or
4486 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4487 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4490 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4491 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4492 following the token name:
4496 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4500 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4501 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4502 with each other or with normal characters.
4504 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4505 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4506 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4507 Than One Value Type}).
4513 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4517 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4521 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4522 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4523 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4530 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4531 equivalent literal string tokens:
4534 %token <operator> OR "||"
4535 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4540 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4541 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4542 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4543 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4544 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4545 the literal string instead of the token name.
4547 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4548 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4552 %token END 0 "end of file"
4555 @node Precedence Decl
4556 @subsection Operator Precedence
4557 @cindex precedence declarations
4558 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4559 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4561 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4562 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4563 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4564 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4565 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4566 operator precedence.
4568 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4569 @code{%token}: either
4572 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4579 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4582 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4583 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4584 all the @var{symbols}:
4588 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4589 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4590 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4591 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4592 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4593 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4594 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4595 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4596 considered a syntax error.
4598 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4599 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4600 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4603 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4604 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4605 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4606 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4607 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4610 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4611 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4612 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4613 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4618 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4619 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4623 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4624 @cindex declaring value types
4625 @cindex value types, declaring
4628 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4629 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4630 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4645 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4646 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4647 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4648 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4650 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4651 @code{union}. For example:
4663 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4664 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4667 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4668 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4669 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4671 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4672 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4674 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4675 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4676 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4677 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4685 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4690 and then your grammar can use the following
4691 instead of @code{%union}:
4704 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4705 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4706 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4710 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4711 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4712 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4715 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4719 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4720 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4721 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4722 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4723 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4726 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4727 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4728 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4729 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4731 @node Initial Action Decl
4732 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4733 @findex %initial-action
4735 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4736 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4739 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4740 @findex %initial-action
4741 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4742 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4743 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4744 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4747 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4750 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4753 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4758 @node Destructor Decl
4759 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4760 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4764 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4765 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4766 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4767 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4768 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4769 must discard the start symbol.
4771 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4772 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4773 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4774 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4776 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4777 symbol is automatically discarded.
4779 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4781 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4782 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4783 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4784 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4785 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4788 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4789 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4790 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4791 tag among @var{symbols}.
4792 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4793 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4794 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4796 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4797 (These default forms are experimental.
4798 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4800 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4801 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4802 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4803 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4805 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4806 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4807 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4808 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4809 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4816 %union @{ char *string; @}
4817 %token <string> STRING1
4818 %token <string> STRING2
4819 %type <string> string1
4820 %type <string> string2
4821 %union @{ char character; @}
4822 %token <character> CHR
4823 %type <character> chr
4826 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4827 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4828 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4829 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4833 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4834 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4835 to @code{free} by default.
4836 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4837 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4838 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4839 @code{free} only once.
4840 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4841 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4843 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4844 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4845 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4846 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4847 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4848 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4849 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4850 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4851 reference it in your grammar.
4852 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4853 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4859 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4860 @cindex mid-rule actions
4861 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4862 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4863 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4864 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4865 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4866 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4867 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4868 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4872 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4873 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4874 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4879 @cindex discarded symbols
4880 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4884 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4886 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4888 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4889 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4891 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4892 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4895 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4898 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4899 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4902 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4903 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4904 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4908 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4909 @cindex printing semantic values
4913 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4914 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4915 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4916 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4918 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4919 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4920 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4922 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4925 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4926 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4927 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4928 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4929 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4930 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4931 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4934 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4935 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4936 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4937 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4945 %union @{ char *string; @}
4946 %token <string> STRING1
4947 %token <string> STRING2
4948 %type <string> string1
4949 %type <string> string2
4950 %union @{ char character; @}
4951 %token <character> CHR
4952 %type <character> chr
4955 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4956 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4957 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4958 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4962 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4963 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4964 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4965 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4966 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4967 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4968 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4972 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4973 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4974 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4975 @cindex warnings, preventing
4976 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4980 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4981 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4982 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4983 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4984 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4985 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4987 The declaration looks like this:
4993 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4994 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4995 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4996 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4998 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4999 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5000 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5001 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5002 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5003 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5004 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5010 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5014 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5015 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5016 print the number of conflicts.
5019 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5020 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5021 go back to the beginning.
5024 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5025 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5026 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5029 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5030 but will keep silent otherwise.
5033 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5034 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5035 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5036 @cindex default start symbol
5039 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5040 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5041 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5048 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5049 @cindex reentrant parser
5051 @findex %define api.pure
5053 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5054 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5055 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5056 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5057 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5058 program must be called only within interlocks.
5060 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5061 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5062 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5063 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5064 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5066 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5067 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5068 reentrant. It looks like this:
5071 %define api.pure full
5074 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5075 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5076 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5077 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5078 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5079 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5080 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5081 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5082 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5084 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5085 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5089 @subsection A Push Parser
5092 @findex %define api.push-pull
5094 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5095 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5097 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5098 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5099 each time a new token is made available.
5101 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5102 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5103 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5104 within a certain time period.
5106 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5107 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5108 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5111 %define api.push-pull push
5114 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5115 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5116 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5117 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5118 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5121 %define api.pure full
5122 %define api.push-pull push
5125 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5126 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5127 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5128 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5130 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5131 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5132 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5133 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5134 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5135 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5136 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5137 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5141 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5143 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5144 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5145 yypstate_delete (ps);
5148 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5149 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5150 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5151 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5152 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5153 example would thus look like this:
5158 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5161 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5162 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5163 yypstate_delete (ps);
5166 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5167 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5169 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5170 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5171 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5172 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5173 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5174 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5175 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5176 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5177 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5178 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5179 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5180 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5181 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5182 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5183 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5184 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5185 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5189 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5190 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5191 yypstate_delete (ps);
5194 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5195 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5196 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5199 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5200 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5201 @cindex declaration summary
5202 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5204 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5206 @deffn {Directive} %union
5207 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5208 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5211 @deffn {Directive} %token
5212 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5213 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5216 @deffn {Directive} %right
5217 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5218 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5221 @deffn {Directive} %left
5222 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5223 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5226 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5227 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5228 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5229 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5233 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5234 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5235 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5239 @deffn {Directive} %type
5240 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5241 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5244 @deffn {Directive} %start
5245 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5249 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5250 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5251 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5257 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5260 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5261 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5263 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5264 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5265 @xref{%code Summary}.
5268 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5269 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5271 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5274 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5275 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5276 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5277 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5280 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5281 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5282 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5283 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5284 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5286 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5287 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5288 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5289 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5290 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5291 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5292 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5293 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5294 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5295 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5297 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5298 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5299 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5301 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5302 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5303 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5305 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5306 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5307 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5308 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5309 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5311 @findex %code requires
5312 @findex %code provides
5313 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5314 header also contains their code.
5315 @xref{%code Summary}.
5317 @cindex Header guard
5318 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5319 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5320 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5321 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5322 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5325 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5326 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5328 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5329 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5331 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5335 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5336 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5339 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5340 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5341 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5344 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5345 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5346 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5349 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5350 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5351 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5352 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5356 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5357 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5358 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5359 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5360 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5361 accurate syntax error messages.
5364 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5365 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5366 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5368 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5369 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5370 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5371 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5372 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5373 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5374 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5375 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5377 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5381 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5382 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5383 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5388 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5389 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5390 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5391 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5392 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5393 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5394 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5398 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5399 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5402 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5403 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5404 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5408 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5409 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5410 Require a Version of Bison}.
5413 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5414 Specify the skeleton to use.
5416 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5417 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5418 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5419 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5421 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5422 file in the Bison installation directory.
5423 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5424 directory of the grammar file.
5425 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5428 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5429 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5430 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5431 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5432 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5433 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5434 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5437 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5438 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5439 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5440 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5441 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5442 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5443 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5446 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5447 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5448 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5452 The highest token number, plus one.
5454 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5456 The number of grammar rules,
5458 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5462 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5463 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5464 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5465 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5469 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5470 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5471 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5475 @node %define Summary
5476 @subsection %define Summary
5478 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5479 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5480 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5481 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5482 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5483 @code{%define} directive:
5485 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5486 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5487 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5488 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5490 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5491 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5492 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5493 to specifying @code{""}.
5495 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5496 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5497 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5500 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5501 @code{%define} accepts.
5503 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5504 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5508 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5510 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5511 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5513 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5515 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5516 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5519 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5520 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5521 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5522 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5523 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5524 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5526 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} "@var{namespace}"
5528 @item Languages(s): C++
5530 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5531 For example, if you specify:
5534 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5537 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5540 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5543 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5544 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5547 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5553 @item Accepted Values:
5554 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5555 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5557 @item Default Value:
5558 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5559 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5560 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5561 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5562 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5563 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5564 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5567 %define api.namespace "foo"
5568 %name-prefix "bar::"
5571 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5577 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5578 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @var{type}
5581 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5583 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5584 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5586 @item Accepted Values: String
5588 @item Default Value: none
5591 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5592 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5596 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5597 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @var{prefix}
5600 @item Language(s): All
5602 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5603 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5605 @item Accepted Values: String
5607 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5609 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5613 @c ================================================== api.pure
5614 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure}
5617 @item Language(s): C
5619 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5620 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5622 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5624 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5625 the case for Boolean values.
5627 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5628 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5629 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5632 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5633 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5634 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5636 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5640 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5641 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5644 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5645 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5648 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5651 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5652 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5654 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5657 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5664 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5665 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5668 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5670 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5671 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5672 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5673 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5675 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5677 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5684 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5685 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5692 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5693 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5694 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5696 @item Accepted Values:
5699 @item Default Value:
5702 introduced in Bison 2.8
5705 @c api.token.constructor
5708 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5709 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @var{prefix}
5712 @item Languages(s): all
5715 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5716 target language. For instance
5719 %token FILE for ERROR
5720 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5722 start: FILE for ERROR;
5726 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5727 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5728 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5729 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5730 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5731 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5732 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5734 @item Accepted Values:
5735 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5736 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5737 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5739 @item Default Value:
5742 introduced in Bison 2.8
5748 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5749 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{type}
5755 Request variant-based semantic values.
5756 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5758 @item Default Value:
5761 introduced in Bison 2.8. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
5768 @c ================================================== location_type
5769 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
5770 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
5774 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5776 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
5779 @item Language(s): all
5781 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5782 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5783 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5784 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5786 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5787 @item Default Value:
5789 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5790 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5793 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5794 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5798 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5800 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
5803 @item Language(s): all
5804 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5805 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5806 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5807 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5809 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5810 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
5811 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5814 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5816 @c ================================================== lr.type
5818 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
5821 @item Language(s): all
5823 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5824 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5825 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5827 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5829 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5833 @c ================================================== namespace
5834 @deffn Directive %define namespace @var{namespace}
5835 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5839 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5840 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
5843 @item Languages(s): C++
5845 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5846 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5848 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5850 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5852 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5858 @c ================================================== parse.error
5859 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error}
5864 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5865 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5867 @item Accepted Values:
5870 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5872 @item @code{verbose}
5873 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5874 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5878 @item Default Value:
5885 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5886 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac}
5889 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5891 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5892 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5893 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5894 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5899 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5900 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
5903 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5905 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5906 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5908 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5909 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5910 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5911 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5914 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5916 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5922 @subsection %code Summary
5926 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5927 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5928 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5929 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5930 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5931 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5932 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5933 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5935 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5936 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5937 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5938 in the parser implementation.
5940 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5941 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5942 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5944 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5947 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5948 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5949 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5950 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5951 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5952 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5956 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5957 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5958 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5961 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5962 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5966 @findex %code requires
5969 @item Language(s): C, C++
5971 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5972 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5973 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5974 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5975 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5977 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5978 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5983 @findex %code provides
5986 @item Language(s): C, C++
5988 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5989 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5991 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5992 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6000 @item Language(s): C, C++
6002 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6003 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6004 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6005 parser implementation file. For example:
6014 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6018 @findex %code imports
6021 @item Language(s): Java
6023 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6025 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6026 before any class definitions.
6030 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6031 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6032 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6033 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6036 @node Multiple Parsers
6037 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6039 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6040 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6041 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6042 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6043 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6044 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6045 exported in the generated header.
6047 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6048 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6049 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6050 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6051 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
6052 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6053 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6054 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6055 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6057 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6058 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6059 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6060 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6061 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6062 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6063 specifically --- more about this below.
6065 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
6066 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6069 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6070 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6071 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6072 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6075 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6076 #define yyparse cparse
6077 #define yylval clval
6083 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6084 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6085 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6087 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6091 extern CSTYPE clval;
6095 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6096 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6097 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6102 # if defined YYDEBUG
6119 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6120 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6121 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6124 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6125 @cindex C-language interface
6128 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6129 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6130 functions that it needs to use.
6132 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6133 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6134 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6135 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6138 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6139 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6140 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6141 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6142 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6143 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6145 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6146 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6147 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6151 @node Parser Function
6152 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6155 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6156 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6157 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6158 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6159 without reading further.
6162 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6163 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6164 is due to end-of-input).
6166 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6167 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6170 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6173 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6178 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6183 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6186 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6187 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6188 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6190 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6191 @findex %parse-param
6192 Declare that one or more
6193 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6194 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6195 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6196 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6199 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6202 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6206 Then call the parser like this:
6210 int nastiness, randomness;
6211 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6212 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6218 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6221 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6225 Using the following:
6227 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6230 Results in these signatures:
6232 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6233 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6237 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6238 and @code{%locations} are used:
6241 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6242 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6245 @node Push Parser Function
6246 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6247 @findex yypush_parse
6249 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6250 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6252 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6253 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6254 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6255 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6257 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6258 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6259 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6260 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6263 @node Pull Parser Function
6264 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6265 @findex yypull_parse
6267 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6268 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6270 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6271 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6272 declaration is used.
6273 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6275 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6276 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6279 @node Parser Create Function
6280 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6281 @findex yypstate_new
6283 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6284 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6286 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6287 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6288 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6289 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6291 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6292 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6293 or 0 if no memory was available.
6294 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6298 @node Parser Delete Function
6299 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6300 @findex yypstate_delete
6302 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6303 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6305 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6306 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6307 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6308 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6310 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6311 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6312 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6316 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6318 @cindex lexical analyzer
6320 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6321 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6322 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6323 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6325 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6326 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6327 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6328 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6329 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6330 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6331 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6335 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6336 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6337 of the token it has read.
6338 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6339 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6341 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6342 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6345 @node Calling Convention
6346 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6348 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6349 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6350 signifies end-of-input.
6352 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6353 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6354 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6355 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6357 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6358 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6359 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6360 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6361 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6362 signifies end-of-input.
6364 Here is an example showing these things:
6371 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6374 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6375 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6377 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6383 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6384 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6386 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6387 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6391 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6392 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6393 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6394 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6397 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6398 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6399 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6400 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6401 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6404 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6405 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6406 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6407 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6410 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6413 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6414 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6415 strlen (token_buffer))
6416 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6417 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6422 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6423 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6427 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6430 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6431 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6432 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6433 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6439 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6440 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6445 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6446 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6447 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6448 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6449 declaration looks like this:
6462 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6467 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6468 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6473 @node Token Locations
6474 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6477 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6478 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6479 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6480 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6481 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6482 data in that variable.
6484 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6485 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6486 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6487 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6488 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6491 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6494 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6496 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6497 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6498 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6499 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6500 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6501 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6506 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6509 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6510 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6515 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6516 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6517 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6520 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6521 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6522 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6523 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6525 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6527 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6528 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6529 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6532 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6534 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6535 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6536 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6537 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6538 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6545 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6546 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6547 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6551 results in the following signatures:
6554 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6555 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6558 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6561 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6562 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6566 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6570 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6571 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6572 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6575 @node Error Reporting
6576 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6577 @cindex error reporting function
6580 @cindex syntax error
6582 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6583 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6584 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6585 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6588 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6589 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6590 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6591 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6592 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6594 @findex %define parse.error
6595 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6596 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6597 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6598 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6599 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6601 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6602 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6603 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6604 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6605 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6606 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6608 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6609 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6610 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6612 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6617 yyerror (char const *s)
6621 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6626 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6627 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6628 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6629 immediately return 1.
6631 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6632 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6633 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6634 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6635 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6637 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6638 following signature:
6641 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6645 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6646 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6647 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6648 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6649 message is always passed last.
6651 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6652 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6653 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6657 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6658 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6659 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6660 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6662 @node Action Features
6663 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6664 @cindex summary, action features
6665 @cindex action features summary
6667 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6668 are useful in actions.
6670 @deffn {Variable} $$
6671 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6672 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6675 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6676 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6677 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6680 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6681 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6682 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6683 Types of Values in Actions}.
6686 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6687 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6688 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6689 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6692 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6693 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6694 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6697 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6698 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6699 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6702 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6704 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6705 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6706 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6707 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6708 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6709 going to be reduced by this rule.
6711 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6712 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6713 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6716 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6719 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6720 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6723 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6724 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6728 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6729 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6730 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6731 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6732 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6733 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6736 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6737 @findex YYRECOVERING
6738 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6739 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6740 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6743 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6744 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6745 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6746 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6747 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6749 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6752 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6753 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6755 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6757 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6760 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6761 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6762 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6763 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6766 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6767 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6768 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6769 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6771 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6774 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6775 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6776 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6777 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6779 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6783 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6784 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6787 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6791 @c int first_line, last_line;
6792 @c int first_column, last_column;
6796 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6797 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6799 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6800 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6801 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6804 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6807 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6809 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6810 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6814 @node Internationalization
6815 @section Parser Internationalization
6816 @cindex internationalization
6822 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6823 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6824 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6825 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6826 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6827 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6828 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6829 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6832 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6833 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6834 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6839 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6840 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6841 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6842 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6843 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6847 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6852 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6853 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6854 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6855 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6856 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6857 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6858 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6859 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6860 Bison-generated parser.
6863 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6864 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6865 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6869 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6872 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6873 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6874 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6878 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6879 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6880 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6883 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6889 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6893 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6899 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6900 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6901 @cindex algorithm of parser
6904 @cindex parser stack
6905 @cindex stack, parser
6907 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6908 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6909 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6911 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6912 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6915 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6916 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6917 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6918 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6919 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6920 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6921 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6923 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6930 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6931 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6934 expr: expr '*' expr;
6938 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6945 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6946 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6948 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6949 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6950 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6952 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6955 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6956 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6957 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6958 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6959 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6960 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6961 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6962 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6963 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6964 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6968 @section Lookahead Tokens
6969 @cindex lookahead token
6971 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6972 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6973 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6974 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6975 token in order to decide what to do.
6977 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6978 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6979 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6980 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6981 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6982 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6983 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6986 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6987 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6988 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7007 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7008 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7009 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7010 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7011 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7013 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7014 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7015 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7016 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7017 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7018 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7023 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7024 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7025 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7026 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7029 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7031 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7032 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7033 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7035 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7036 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7041 "if" expr "then" stmt
7042 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7048 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7049 specific keyword tokens.
7051 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7052 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7053 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7054 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7057 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7058 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7059 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7060 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7061 contrast it with the other alternative.
7063 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7064 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7068 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7070 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7073 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7074 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7075 making these two inputs equivalent:
7078 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7080 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7083 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7084 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7085 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7086 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7087 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7088 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7089 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7090 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7092 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7093 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7094 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7095 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7097 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7098 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7099 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7100 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7101 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7104 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7105 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7106 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7120 "if" expr "then" stmt
7121 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7131 @section Operator Precedence
7132 @cindex operator precedence
7133 @cindex precedence of operators
7135 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7136 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7137 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7138 shift and when to reduce.
7141 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7142 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7143 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7144 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7145 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7146 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7149 @node Why Precedence
7150 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7152 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7153 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7168 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7169 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7170 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7171 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7172 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7173 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7174 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7177 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7178 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7179 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7180 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7181 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7182 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7183 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7184 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7187 @cindex associativity
7188 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7189 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7190 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7191 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7192 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7193 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7194 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7195 makes right-associativity.
7197 @node Using Precedence
7198 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7204 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7205 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7206 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7207 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7208 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7209 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7210 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7212 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7213 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7214 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7215 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7216 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7217 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7218 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7219 what expected the grammar author.
7221 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7222 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7223 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7224 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7225 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7227 @node Precedence Only
7228 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7231 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7232 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7233 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7234 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7235 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7236 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7237 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7239 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7240 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7241 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7245 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7248 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7249 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7250 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7251 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7252 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7253 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7254 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7261 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7262 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7263 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7264 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7265 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7266 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7267 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7269 @node Precedence Examples
7270 @subsection Precedence Examples
7272 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7280 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7281 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7282 declared with @code{'-'}:
7285 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7290 @node How Precedence
7291 @subsection How Precedence Works
7293 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7294 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7295 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7296 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7297 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7298 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7300 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7301 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7302 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7303 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7304 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7305 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7306 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7309 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7310 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7313 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7315 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7316 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7317 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7318 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7320 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7321 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7322 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7323 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7324 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7325 instance as follows:
7334 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7335 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7336 use right associativity:
7339 %right "then" "else"
7342 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7343 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7344 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7345 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7346 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7347 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7348 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7350 @node Contextual Precedence
7351 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7352 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7353 @cindex unary operator precedence
7354 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7355 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7358 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7359 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7360 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7361 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7363 The Bison precedence declarations
7364 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7365 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7366 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7369 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7370 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7371 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7372 modifier's syntax is:
7375 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7379 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7380 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7381 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7382 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7383 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7385 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7386 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7387 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7397 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7405 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7410 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7411 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7412 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7413 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7415 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7416 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7417 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7418 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7420 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7421 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7422 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7423 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7424 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7425 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7427 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7428 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7432 @section Parser States
7433 @cindex finite-state machine
7434 @cindex parser state
7435 @cindex state (of parser)
7437 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7438 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7439 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7440 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7441 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7443 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7444 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7445 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7446 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7447 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7448 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7449 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7450 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7453 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7454 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7455 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7458 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7459 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7460 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7462 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7463 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7466 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7467 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7472 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7474 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7480 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7481 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7487 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7488 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7489 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7490 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7491 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7492 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7494 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7495 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7496 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7498 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7499 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7500 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7501 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7502 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7504 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7505 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7506 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7507 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7512 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7513 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7518 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7525 | sequence redirects
7539 | redirects redirect
7545 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7546 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7547 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7548 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7549 in infinitely many ways!
7551 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7552 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7553 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7554 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7556 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7567 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7575 | sequence redirects
7589 | redirects redirect
7594 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7595 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7596 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7597 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7598 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7601 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7602 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7604 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7605 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7606 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7607 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7608 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7613 %precedence "sequence"
7618 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7619 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7631 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7632 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7635 %right "word" "redirect"
7640 | sequence word %prec "word"
7641 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7646 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7647 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7648 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7650 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7656 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7659 | name_list ':' type
7676 | name ',' name_list
7681 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7682 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7683 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7684 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7688 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7690 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7691 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7692 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7694 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7695 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7696 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7697 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7698 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7699 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7700 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7703 @cindex canonical LR
7704 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7705 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7706 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7707 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7708 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7709 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7710 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7711 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7713 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7714 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7715 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7716 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7717 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7725 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7730 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7731 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7732 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7733 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7734 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7735 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7737 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7738 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7739 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7740 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7741 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7742 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7748 | name_list ':' type
7760 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7761 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7766 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7767 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7768 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7769 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7770 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7771 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7772 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7774 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7775 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7776 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7777 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7779 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7780 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7783 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7784 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7785 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7786 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7789 @node LR Table Construction
7790 @subsection LR Table Construction
7791 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7794 @cindex canonical LR
7795 @findex %define lr.type
7797 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7798 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7799 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7800 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7803 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7804 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7805 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7806 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7809 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7810 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7811 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7814 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7815 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7816 values for @var{type} are:
7819 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7821 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7824 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7828 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7832 %define lr.type ielr
7835 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7836 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7837 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7838 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7839 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7840 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7841 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7842 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7843 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7844 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7846 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7847 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7848 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7849 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7855 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7858 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7860 @cindex GLR with LALR
7861 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7862 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
7864 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7865 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7866 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7867 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7868 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7869 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7870 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7871 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7873 @item Malformed grammars.
7875 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7876 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7877 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7878 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7879 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7884 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7885 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7886 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7887 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7888 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7889 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7890 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7891 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7892 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7896 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7899 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7900 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7901 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7902 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7903 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7904 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7905 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7906 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7907 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7908 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7909 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7910 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7913 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7914 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7915 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7917 @node Default Reductions
7918 @subsection Default Reductions
7919 @cindex default reductions
7920 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7923 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7924 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7925 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7926 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7927 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7929 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7930 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7933 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7935 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7936 @cindex consistent states
7937 @cindex defaulted states
7938 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7939 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7940 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7941 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7942 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7943 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7944 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7945 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7946 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7947 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7948 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7950 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7951 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7952 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7953 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7954 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7955 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7956 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7957 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7958 should already be considered closed.
7960 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7962 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7963 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7964 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7965 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7966 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7967 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7968 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7969 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7970 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7974 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7975 @c sentence from being rejected.
7976 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7977 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7978 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7979 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7980 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7981 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7984 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7985 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7986 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7987 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7988 because the accept action ends the parse.
7990 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7991 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7992 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7993 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7994 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7995 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7996 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7997 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7998 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7999 split the parse instead.
8001 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8002 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8004 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8005 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8006 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8008 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8009 @item @code{consistent}
8010 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8013 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8014 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8019 @findex %define parse.lac
8021 @cindex lookahead correction
8023 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8024 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8025 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8026 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8027 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8028 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8029 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8030 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8031 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8033 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8034 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8035 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8036 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8037 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8039 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8040 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8041 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8042 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8044 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8045 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8047 @item @code{none} (default)
8050 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8051 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8055 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8056 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8057 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8058 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8059 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8060 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8061 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8062 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8063 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8064 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8067 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8068 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8069 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8070 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8071 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8072 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8073 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8074 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8075 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8076 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8078 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8079 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8080 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8081 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8082 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8083 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8084 language-recognition power.
8086 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8089 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8091 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8092 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8093 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8094 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8097 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8099 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8100 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8101 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8102 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8103 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8104 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8108 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8109 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8110 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8111 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8112 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8113 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8114 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8115 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8116 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8117 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8118 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8121 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8122 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8123 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8125 @node Unreachable States
8126 @subsection Unreachable States
8127 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8128 @cindex unreachable states
8130 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8131 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8132 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8133 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8135 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8136 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8137 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8138 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8140 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8141 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8142 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8145 There are a few caveats to consider:
8148 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8150 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8151 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8152 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8153 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8154 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8155 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8157 @item Other useless states.
8159 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8160 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8161 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8162 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8163 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8164 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8165 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8168 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8169 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8171 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8172 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8173 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8175 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8176 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8177 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8178 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8179 context-free languages.
8180 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8181 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8182 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8183 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8184 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8185 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8186 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8187 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8189 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8190 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8191 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8192 parser uses the same basic
8193 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8194 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8195 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8196 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8198 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8199 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8200 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8201 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8202 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8204 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8205 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8206 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8207 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8208 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8209 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8210 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8211 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8212 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8213 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8214 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8217 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8218 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8219 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8220 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8221 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8222 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8223 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8224 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8225 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8226 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8227 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8228 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8230 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8231 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8232 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8234 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8235 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8236 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8237 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8238 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8239 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8240 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8241 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8242 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8243 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8244 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8245 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8247 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8250 @node Memory Management
8251 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8252 @cindex memory exhaustion
8253 @cindex memory management
8254 @cindex stack overflow
8255 @cindex parser stack overflow
8256 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8258 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8259 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8260 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8262 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8263 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8264 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8267 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8268 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8269 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8270 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8272 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8273 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8274 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8275 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8276 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8277 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8279 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8280 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8281 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8284 @cindex default stack limit
8285 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8289 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8290 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8291 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8292 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8293 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8295 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8297 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8298 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8299 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8300 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8301 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8302 non-trivial copy constructors.
8303 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8306 @node Error Recovery
8307 @chapter Error Recovery
8308 @cindex error recovery
8309 @cindex recovery from errors
8311 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8312 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8313 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8316 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8317 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8318 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8319 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8320 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8321 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8322 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8325 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8326 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8327 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8328 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8329 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8330 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8342 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8343 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8345 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8346 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8347 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8348 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8349 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8350 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8351 applicable in the ordinary way.
8353 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8354 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8355 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8356 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8357 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8358 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8359 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8360 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8361 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8362 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8363 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8364 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8366 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8367 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8368 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8371 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8374 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8375 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8376 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8377 spurious error message:
8387 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8388 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8389 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8390 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8391 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8392 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8393 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8396 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8397 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8398 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8399 error messages resume.
8401 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8402 as any other rules can.
8405 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8406 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8407 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8408 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8411 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8412 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8413 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8415 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8417 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8418 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8419 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8420 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8421 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8423 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8424 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8425 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8426 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8429 @node Context Dependency
8430 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8432 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8433 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8434 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8435 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8439 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8440 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8441 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8442 error recovery rules must be written.
8445 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8446 neither clean nor robust.)
8448 @node Semantic Tokens
8449 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8451 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8452 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8458 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8459 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8460 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8462 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8463 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8464 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8465 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8466 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8468 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8469 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8470 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8471 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8472 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8473 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8474 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8476 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8477 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8478 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8479 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8483 typedef int foo, bar;
8487 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8488 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8494 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8495 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8497 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8498 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8499 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8500 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8501 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8506 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8507 | declarator maybeasm
8513 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8514 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8520 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8521 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8522 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8524 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8525 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8526 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8527 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8528 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8529 the syntactic context.
8531 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8532 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8533 @cindex lexical tie-in
8535 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8536 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8539 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8540 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8541 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8542 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8543 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8550 void yyerror (char const *);
8559 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8560 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8561 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8575 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8576 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8577 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8579 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8580 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8581 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8584 @node Tie-in Recovery
8585 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8587 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8588 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8590 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8591 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8592 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8593 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8598 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8600 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8604 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8605 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8606 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8607 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8608 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8610 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8612 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8613 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8614 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8620 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8626 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8627 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8628 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8629 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8631 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8632 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8633 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8634 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8635 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8636 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8639 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8642 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8644 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8645 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8646 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8648 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8649 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8650 automaton. There are several formats available:
8653 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8656 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8659 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8660 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8663 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8664 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8668 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8669 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8670 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8671 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8675 @section Understanding Your Parser
8677 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8678 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8679 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8680 tune or simply fix a parser.
8682 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8683 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8684 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8685 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8686 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8687 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8688 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8690 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8712 @command{bison} reports:
8715 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8716 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8717 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8718 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8719 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8722 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8723 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8724 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8725 interpretation is the same.
8728 @cindex token, useless
8729 @cindex useless token
8730 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8731 @cindex useless nonterminal
8732 @cindex rule, useless
8733 @cindex useless rule
8734 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8735 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8736 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8737 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8740 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8743 Terminals unused in grammar
8746 Rules useless in grammar
8751 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8754 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8755 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8756 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8757 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8761 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8776 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8780 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8793 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8798 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8804 @cindex pointed rule
8805 @cindex rule, pointed
8806 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8807 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8808 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8809 the location of the input cursor.
8814 0 $accept: . exp $end
8816 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8821 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8822 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8823 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8824 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8825 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8826 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8827 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8828 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8830 @cindex core, item set
8831 @cindex item set core
8832 @cindex kernel, item set
8833 @cindex item set core
8834 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8835 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8836 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8837 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8838 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8839 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8844 0 $accept: . exp $end
8845 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8851 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8857 In the state 1@dots{}
8864 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8868 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8869 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8870 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8871 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8876 0 $accept: exp . $end
8877 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8882 $end shift, and go to state 3
8883 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8884 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8885 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8886 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8890 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8891 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8892 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8893 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8894 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8897 @cindex accepting state
8898 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8904 0 $accept: exp $end .
8910 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8911 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8913 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8919 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8921 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8928 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8930 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8937 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8939 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8946 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8948 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8953 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8959 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8965 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8966 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8968 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8969 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8972 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8973 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8974 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8975 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8976 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8977 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8978 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8979 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8981 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8982 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8983 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8986 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8987 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8988 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8989 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8990 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8991 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8992 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8993 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8994 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8995 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8996 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8997 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9002 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9003 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9008 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9009 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9011 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9012 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9015 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9016 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9017 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9018 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9019 conflicts in the report:
9022 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9023 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9024 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9028 The remaining states are similar:
9034 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9040 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9041 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9043 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9044 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9050 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9056 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9058 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9059 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9065 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9071 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9072 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9073 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9074 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9076 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9077 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9078 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9079 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9080 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9085 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9086 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9087 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9089 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9090 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9092 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9095 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9098 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9099 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9100 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9101 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9102 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9103 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9104 to help them understand LR parsers.
9106 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9107 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9108 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9109 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9110 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9111 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9112 parser in multiple formats}).
9115 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9126 The graphical output
9128 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9130 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9131 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9132 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9135 @float Figure,fig:graph
9136 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9137 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9141 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9143 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9144 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9145 about transitions, for examples
9147 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9148 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9149 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9154 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9157 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9159 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9160 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9168 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9172 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9174 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9176 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9178 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9179 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9180 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9181 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9183 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9190 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9191 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9194 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9196 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9198 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9199 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9200 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9201 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9202 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9204 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9205 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9207 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9209 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9210 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9212 @c ================================================= XML
9215 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9218 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9219 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9220 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9221 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9222 option @option{--graph}. However,
9223 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9224 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9225 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9226 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9227 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9228 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9230 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9231 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9232 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9233 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9234 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9235 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9237 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9238 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9242 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9244 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9246 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9249 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9253 $ bison --print-datadir
9254 /usr/local/share/bison
9256 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9259 @c ================================================= Tracing
9262 @section Tracing Your Parser
9265 @cindex tracing the parser
9267 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9268 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9271 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9272 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9273 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9276 @node Enabling Traces
9277 @subsection Enabling Traces
9278 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9281 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9283 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9284 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9285 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9286 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9289 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9290 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9291 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9292 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9293 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9295 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9296 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9297 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9298 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9299 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9301 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9303 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9304 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9305 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9307 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9308 @findex %define parse.trace
9309 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9310 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9311 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9312 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9313 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9316 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9320 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9321 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9322 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9323 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9324 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9325 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9327 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9328 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9329 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9330 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9332 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9333 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9334 messages tell you these things:
9338 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9341 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9342 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9345 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9346 of the state stack afterward.
9349 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9350 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9351 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9352 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9353 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9354 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9355 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9356 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9357 grammar are to blame.
9359 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9360 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9361 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9362 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9363 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9366 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9368 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9369 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9370 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9371 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9372 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9373 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9375 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9376 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9377 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9380 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9382 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9384 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9387 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9388 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9389 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9390 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9393 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9394 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9395 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9396 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9397 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9398 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9400 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9401 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9402 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9403 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9404 printer will be used for them.
9406 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9407 are sent onto standard error.
9410 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9413 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9414 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9420 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9421 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9422 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9423 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9425 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9427 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9428 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9433 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9434 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9435 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9439 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9440 Shifting token '(' ()
9442 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9443 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9445 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9446 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9447 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9453 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9454 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9455 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9458 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9459 Shifting token '-' ()
9461 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9462 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9464 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9465 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9466 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9467 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9469 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9470 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9471 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9473 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9474 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9480 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9481 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9484 Next token is token ')' ()
9485 Shifting token ')' ()
9487 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9488 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9490 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9492 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9498 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9502 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9503 Shifting token '\n' ()
9505 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9506 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9509 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9512 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9515 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9520 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9521 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9522 completion of the parsing.
9525 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9526 Shifting token $end ()
9529 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9530 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9534 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9535 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9538 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9539 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9540 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9542 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9544 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9545 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9546 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9548 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9551 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9552 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9556 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9557 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9558 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9561 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9564 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9567 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9568 else if (type == NUM)
9569 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9573 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9576 @chapter Invoking Bison
9577 @cindex invoking Bison
9578 @cindex Bison invocation
9579 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9581 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9587 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9588 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9589 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9590 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9591 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9592 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9593 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9594 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9595 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9596 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9597 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9602 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9605 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9608 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9611 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9613 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9614 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9615 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9618 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9619 in alphabetical order by short options.
9620 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9621 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9625 @section Bison Options
9627 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9628 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9629 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9630 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9631 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9634 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9635 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9638 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9644 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9648 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9650 @item --print-localedir
9651 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9653 @item --print-datadir
9654 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9658 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9659 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9660 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9661 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9662 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9663 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9664 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9665 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9666 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9667 for compatibility with POSIX:
9674 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9675 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9676 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9677 this option is specified.
9679 @item -W [@var{category}]
9680 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9681 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9684 @item midrule-values
9685 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9687 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9690 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9693 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9694 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9697 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9700 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9701 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9702 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9705 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9709 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9710 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9711 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9712 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9713 no effect on the conflict report.
9716 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9720 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9722 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9723 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9729 Turn off all the warnings.
9731 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9734 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9735 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9736 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9738 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9739 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9740 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9741 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9743 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9744 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9746 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9747 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9750 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9751 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9752 S/R conflicts as errors.
9755 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9756 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9759 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9760 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9761 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9764 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9765 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9766 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9767 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9768 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9769 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9774 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9777 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
9781 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9782 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9786 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9787 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9791 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9792 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9796 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9797 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9801 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
9802 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9807 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
9811 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
9812 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9813 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9814 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9815 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
9819 This option is activated by default.
9830 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9831 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9832 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9834 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9835 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9836 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9837 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9838 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9839 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9840 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9844 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9847 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9848 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9849 definition for @var{name}.
9851 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9852 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9853 definitions for @var{name}.
9855 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9856 definitions for @var{name}.
9859 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9860 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9861 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9863 @item -L @var{language}
9864 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9865 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9866 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9867 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9868 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9871 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9873 @item -p @var{prefix}
9874 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9875 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9876 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9877 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9881 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9882 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9883 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9884 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9885 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9886 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9889 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9890 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9891 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9893 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9894 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9895 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9896 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9898 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9899 file in the Bison installation directory.
9900 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9901 current working directory.
9902 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9905 @itemx --token-table
9906 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9913 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9914 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9915 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9916 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9919 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9920 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9921 with other short options.
9923 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9924 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9925 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9926 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9928 @item -r @var{things}
9929 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9930 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9931 separated list of @var{things} among:
9935 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9939 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9940 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9943 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9944 each rule's lookahead set.
9947 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9948 precedence and associativity directives.
9951 Enable all the items.
9954 Do not generate the report.
9957 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9958 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9962 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9963 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9964 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9967 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9968 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9970 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9971 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9973 @item -g [@var{file}]
9974 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9975 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9976 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9977 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9978 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9979 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9982 @item -x [@var{file}]
9983 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9984 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9985 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9986 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9988 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9989 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9992 @node Option Cross Key
9993 @section Option Cross Key
9995 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9996 the corresponding short option and directive.
9998 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9999 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10000 @include cross-options.texi
10004 @section Yacc Library
10006 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10007 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10008 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10009 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10010 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10011 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10012 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10014 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10015 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10018 int yyerror (char const *);
10021 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10022 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10023 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10026 int yyparse (void);
10029 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10031 @node Other Languages
10032 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10035 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10036 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10040 @section C++ Parsers
10043 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10044 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10045 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10046 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10047 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10048 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10051 @node C++ Bison Interface
10052 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10053 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10055 @c - initial action
10057 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10058 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10059 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10060 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10062 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10064 @findex %define api.namespace
10065 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10066 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10067 in the following files:
10072 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10073 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10074 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10078 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10080 @item @var{file}.hh
10081 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10082 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10083 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10084 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10085 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10087 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10088 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10089 @samp{%defines} directive.
10092 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10093 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10095 @node C++ Semantic Values
10096 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10097 @c - No objects in unions
10099 @c - Printer and destructor
10101 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10102 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10103 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10104 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10107 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10108 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10112 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10114 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10115 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
10116 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10119 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10120 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10121 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10123 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10124 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10125 to such objects are allowed.
10128 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10129 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10130 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10134 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10136 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10137 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10138 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10140 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10141 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10142 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10143 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10145 For instance, instead of
10153 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10154 %token <sval> STRING;
10161 %token <int> NUMBER;
10162 %token <std::string> STRING;
10165 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10166 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10169 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10170 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10171 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10173 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10174 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10175 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10176 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10177 eventually, destroyed.
10179 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10180 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10181 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10184 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10185 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10189 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10190 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10191 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10192 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10193 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10194 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10195 that would be duplicating the information.
10197 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10198 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10199 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10200 (the current implementation of) variants:
10203 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10204 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10205 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10206 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10207 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10208 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10211 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
10212 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
10213 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
10214 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
10215 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
10216 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
10219 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10222 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10223 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10225 @node C++ Location Values
10226 @subsection C++ Location Values
10228 @c - class Position
10229 @c - class Location
10230 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10232 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10233 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10235 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10236 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10237 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10238 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10239 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10242 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10243 genuine code only the latter is used.
10246 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10247 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10248 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10252 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10254 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10255 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10256 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10260 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10261 Reset the position to the given values.
10264 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10265 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10266 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10267 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10268 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10271 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10272 The line, starting at 1.
10275 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10276 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10279 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10280 The column, starting at 1.
10283 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10284 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10287 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10288 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10289 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10290 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10291 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10294 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10295 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10296 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10299 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10300 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10301 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10302 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10306 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10308 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10309 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10312 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10313 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10314 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10317 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10318 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10321 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10322 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10323 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10326 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10327 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10328 Advance the @code{end} position.
10331 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10332 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10333 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10334 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10337 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10338 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10341 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10342 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10343 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10347 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10348 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10349 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10352 @node User Defined Location Type
10353 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10354 @findex %define api.location.type
10356 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10357 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10360 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10363 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10366 it must be copyable;
10369 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10370 parser basically runs
10372 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10373 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10376 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10379 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10380 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10383 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10384 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10389 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10390 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10391 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10392 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10397 %define namespace "master::"
10401 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10402 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10405 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10406 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10409 @node C++ Parser Interface
10410 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10411 @c - define parser_class_name
10413 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10415 @c - Reporting errors
10417 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10418 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10419 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10420 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10421 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10422 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10423 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10424 additional argument for its constructor.
10426 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10427 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10428 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10431 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10432 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10433 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10434 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10435 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10436 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10439 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10440 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10441 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10442 equivalent with first
10443 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10444 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10445 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10446 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10447 function invoked from the user action.
10450 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10451 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10452 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10455 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10456 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10457 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10460 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10461 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10464 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10465 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10466 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10469 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10470 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10471 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10475 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10476 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10477 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10478 or nonzero, full tracing.
10481 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10482 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10483 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10484 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10485 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10490 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10491 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10492 @c - prefix for yylex.
10493 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10496 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10497 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10498 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10499 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10502 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10503 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10506 @node Split Symbols
10507 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10509 The interface is as follows.
10511 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10512 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10513 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10514 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10515 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10518 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10519 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10521 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10525 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10526 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10529 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10530 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10534 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10535 initialized. So the code would look like:
10539 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10540 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10543 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10544 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10553 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10554 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10557 yylval.build(yytext);
10558 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10563 @node Complete Symbols
10564 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10566 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10567 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10568 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10569 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10570 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10571 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10573 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10574 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10575 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10576 the @var{location}.
10579 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10580 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10581 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10582 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10584 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10586 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10587 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10588 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10589 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10590 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10591 also pass the @var{location}.
10594 For instance, given the following declarations:
10597 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10598 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10599 %token <int> INTEGER;
10604 Bison generates the following functions:
10607 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10608 const location_type& l);
10609 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10610 const location_type& loc);
10611 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10615 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10618 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10619 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10620 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10623 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10624 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10626 @node A Complete C++ Example
10627 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10629 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10630 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10631 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10632 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10633 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10634 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10635 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10636 actually easier to interface with.
10639 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10640 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10641 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10642 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10643 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10646 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10647 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10649 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10650 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10651 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10652 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10653 of valid input follows.
10657 seven := one + two * three
10661 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10662 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10664 @c - A place to store error messages
10665 @c - A place for the result
10667 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10668 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10669 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10670 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10671 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10672 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10673 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10675 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10676 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10677 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10680 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10682 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10683 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10686 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10691 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10692 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10693 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10694 factor both as follows.
10696 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10698 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10700 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10701 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10706 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10709 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10711 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10712 class calcxx_driver
10716 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10718 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10724 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10725 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10727 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10729 // Handling the scanner.
10730 void scan_begin ();
10732 bool trace_scanning;
10736 Similarly for the parser itself.
10738 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10740 // Run the parser on file F.
10741 // Return 0 on success.
10742 int parse (const std::string& f);
10743 // The name of the file being parsed.
10744 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10746 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10747 bool trace_parsing;
10751 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10752 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10753 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10754 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10756 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10759 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10760 void error (const std::string& m);
10762 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10765 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10766 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10767 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10768 messages and set error state.
10770 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10772 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10773 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10775 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10776 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10778 variables["one"] = 1;
10779 variables["two"] = 2;
10782 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10787 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10791 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10792 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10793 int res = parser.parse ();
10799 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10801 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10805 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10807 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10811 @node Calc++ Parser
10812 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10814 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10815 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10816 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10817 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10820 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10822 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10823 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10825 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10829 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10830 @findex %define api.value.type variant
10831 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10832 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10833 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10834 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10836 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10838 %define api.token.constructor
10839 %define api.value.type variant
10840 %define parse.assert
10844 @findex %code requires
10845 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10846 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10847 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10848 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10849 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10850 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10851 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10853 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10858 class calcxx_driver;
10863 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10864 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10867 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10869 // The parsing context.
10870 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10874 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10875 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10876 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10879 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10884 // Initialize the initial location.
10885 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10890 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10891 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10894 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10896 %define parse.trace
10897 %define parse.error verbose
10902 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10903 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10905 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10909 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10915 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10916 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10917 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10918 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10919 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10921 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10923 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10925 END 0 "end of file"
10937 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10938 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10941 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10943 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10944 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10949 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10950 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10951 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10952 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10954 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10956 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10960 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10961 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10963 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10967 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10970 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10971 | assignments assignment @{@};
10974 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10979 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10980 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10981 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10982 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10983 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10984 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10985 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10990 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10993 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10996 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10997 const std::string& m)
10999 driver.error (l, m);
11003 @node Calc++ Scanner
11004 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11006 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11007 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11009 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11011 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11013 # include <climits>
11014 # include <cstdlib>
11016 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11017 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11019 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11020 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11021 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11022 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11024 # define yywrap() 1
11026 // The location of the current token.
11027 static yy::location loc;
11032 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11033 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11034 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11035 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11037 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11039 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11043 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11045 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11047 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11053 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11054 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11055 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11056 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11057 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11058 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11059 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11061 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11065 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11066 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11072 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11076 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11077 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11081 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11083 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11085 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11086 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11087 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11088 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11089 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11090 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11091 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11096 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11097 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11098 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11099 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11102 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11103 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11104 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11109 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11110 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11112 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11116 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11118 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11119 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11121 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11123 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11124 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11131 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11138 @node Calc++ Top Level
11139 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11141 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11143 @comment file: calc++.cc
11145 #include <iostream>
11146 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11150 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11153 calcxx_driver driver;
11154 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11155 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11156 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11157 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11158 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11159 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11160 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11169 @section Java Parsers
11172 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11173 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11174 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11175 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11176 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11177 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11178 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11179 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11182 @node Java Bison Interface
11183 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11184 @c - %language "Java"
11186 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11187 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11189 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11190 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11192 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11193 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11194 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11195 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11196 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11197 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11198 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11199 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11200 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11201 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11203 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11205 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11206 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11207 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11208 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11210 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11211 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11213 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11214 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11216 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11217 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11219 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11220 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11221 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11223 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11224 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11225 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11227 if needed. Also, in the future the
11228 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11229 access the token names and codes.
11231 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11232 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11233 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11234 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11237 @node Java Semantic Values
11238 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11239 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11241 @c - Printer and destructor
11243 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11244 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11245 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11248 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11249 %type <Integer> number
11252 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11253 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11254 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11255 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11256 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11259 %define api.value.type "ASTNode"
11263 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11264 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11266 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11267 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11268 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11269 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11270 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11271 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11273 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11274 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11275 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11277 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11278 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11279 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11282 @node Java Location Values
11283 @subsection Java Location Values
11285 @c - class Position
11286 @c - class Location
11288 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11289 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11290 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11291 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11292 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11293 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11294 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11296 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11297 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11298 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11299 be supplied by the user.
11302 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11303 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11304 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11307 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11308 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11311 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11312 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11315 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11316 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11317 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11318 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11322 @node Java Parser Interface
11323 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11324 @c - define parser_class_name
11326 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11328 @c - Reporting errors
11330 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11331 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11332 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11333 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11334 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11336 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11337 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11338 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11339 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11340 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11341 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11342 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11343 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11345 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11346 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11347 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11348 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11350 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11351 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11352 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11353 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11354 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11355 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11357 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11358 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11359 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11360 which initialize them automatically.
11362 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11363 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11364 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11365 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11367 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11368 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11369 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11372 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11373 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11374 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11377 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11378 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11379 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11381 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11382 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11383 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11386 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11387 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11388 @code{false} otherwise.
11391 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11392 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11393 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11394 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11395 verbose error messages.
11398 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11399 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11400 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11401 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11402 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11403 available only if location tracking is active.
11406 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11407 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11408 from a syntax error.
11409 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11412 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11413 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11414 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11418 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11419 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11420 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11421 or nonzero, full tracing.
11424 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11425 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11426 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11430 @node Java Scanner Interface
11431 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11434 @c - Lexer interface
11436 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11437 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11438 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11439 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11440 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11443 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11444 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11445 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11446 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11449 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11450 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11451 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11452 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11455 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11457 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11458 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11459 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11460 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11463 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11464 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11465 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11468 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11469 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11472 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11473 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11474 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11475 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11476 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11478 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11479 "@var{class-name}".}
11482 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11483 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11485 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11486 "@var{class-name}".}
11490 @node Java Action Features
11491 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11493 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11494 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11496 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11497 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11500 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11501 This may not be assigned to.
11502 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11505 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11506 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11507 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11511 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11512 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11513 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11514 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11515 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11516 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11519 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11520 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11521 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11522 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11524 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11528 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11529 This may not be assigned to.
11530 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11534 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11535 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11538 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11539 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11540 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11543 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11544 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11545 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11548 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11549 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11550 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11553 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11554 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11555 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11557 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11560 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11561 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11562 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11563 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11564 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11565 available only if location tracking is active.
11569 @node Java Differences
11570 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11572 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11573 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11574 section summarizes these differences.
11578 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11579 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11580 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11581 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11582 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11583 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11584 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11586 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11587 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11588 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11589 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11590 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11593 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11594 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11595 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11596 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11597 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11598 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11599 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11600 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11601 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11604 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11606 @item @code{%code imports}
11607 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11608 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11609 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11611 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11612 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11614 @item @code{%code lexer}
11615 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11616 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11617 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11621 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11622 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11623 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11625 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11626 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11631 @node Java Declarations Summary
11632 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11634 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11635 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11637 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11638 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11641 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11642 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11643 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11644 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11645 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11648 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11649 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11650 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11651 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11654 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11655 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11656 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11657 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11660 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11661 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11662 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11665 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11666 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11667 a Java @emph{type}.
11668 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11671 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11672 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11673 @xref{Java Differences}.
11676 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11677 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11678 @xref{Java Differences}.
11681 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11682 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11683 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11686 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11687 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11688 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11691 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11692 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11693 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11694 @xref{Java Differences}.
11697 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11698 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11699 @xref{Java Differences}.
11702 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11703 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11704 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11707 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11708 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11709 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11712 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11713 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11714 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11717 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11718 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11719 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11722 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11723 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11725 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11728 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11729 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11730 constructor. Default is none.
11731 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11734 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11735 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11736 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11737 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11740 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11741 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11742 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11743 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11744 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11745 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11748 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11749 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11750 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11753 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11754 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11755 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11756 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11759 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11760 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11761 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11762 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11763 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11766 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11767 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11768 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11771 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} "@var{class}"
11772 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11773 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11776 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11777 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11778 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11781 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11782 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11783 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11784 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11788 @c ================================================= FAQ
11791 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11792 @cindex frequently asked questions
11795 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11799 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11800 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11801 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11802 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11803 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11804 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11805 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11806 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11807 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11808 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11809 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11810 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11813 @node Memory Exhausted
11814 @section Memory Exhausted
11817 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11818 message. What can I do?
11821 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11824 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11825 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11827 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11828 following typical questions:
11831 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11832 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11833 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11840 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11841 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11842 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
11845 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11846 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11847 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11848 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11849 @file{first-line.l}:
11855 #include <stdlib.h>
11859 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11863 yyparse (char const *file)
11865 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11869 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11873 /* One token only. */
11875 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11878 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11896 If the file @file{input} contains
11904 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11907 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11908 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11909 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11914 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11915 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11916 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11917 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11918 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11919 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11920 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11921 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11924 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11925 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11926 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11927 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11929 @node Strings are Destroyed
11930 @section Strings are Destroyed
11933 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11934 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11935 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11938 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11939 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11940 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11946 char *yylval = NULL;
11951 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11959 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11960 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11961 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11962 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11968 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11971 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11972 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11973 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11979 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11980 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11981 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11982 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11983 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11984 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11987 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11988 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11989 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11994 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11995 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11998 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11999 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12002 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12003 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12004 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12005 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12006 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12007 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12008 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12010 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12012 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12013 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12014 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12015 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12016 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12017 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12020 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12021 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12024 @node Multiple start-symbols
12025 @section Multiple start-symbols
12028 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12029 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12030 multiple entry points.
12033 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12034 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12035 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12036 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12040 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12047 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12048 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12050 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12051 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12052 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12053 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12054 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12055 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12056 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12057 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12060 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12065 int t = start_token;
12070 /* @r{The rules.} */
12074 @node Secure? Conform?
12075 @section Secure? Conform?
12078 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12081 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12082 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12083 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12084 please send us a bug report.
12086 @node I can't build Bison
12087 @section I can't build Bison
12090 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12091 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12095 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12096 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12097 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12098 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12099 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12100 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12101 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12104 @node Where can I find help?
12105 @section Where can I find help?
12108 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12111 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12112 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12113 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12114 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12115 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12116 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12117 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12118 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12122 @section Bug Reports
12125 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12128 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12129 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12130 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12131 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12132 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12134 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12135 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12136 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12137 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12138 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12140 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12141 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12142 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12143 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12144 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12145 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
12147 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12148 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12150 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12152 @node More Languages
12153 @section More Languages
12156 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12157 favorite language here}?
12160 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12161 languages; contributions are welcome.
12164 @section Beta Testing
12167 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12170 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12171 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12172 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12173 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12174 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12175 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12176 essentially halted.
12178 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12179 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12180 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12181 systems are especially welcome.
12183 @node Mailing Lists
12184 @section Mailing Lists
12187 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12190 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12192 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12194 @node Table of Symbols
12195 @appendix Bison Symbols
12196 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12197 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12199 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12200 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12201 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12204 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12205 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12206 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12207 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12209 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12210 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12213 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12214 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12215 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12216 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12219 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12220 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12221 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12224 @deffn {Variable} $$
12225 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12229 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12230 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12231 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12234 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12235 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12236 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12240 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12241 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12242 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12243 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12246 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12247 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12248 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12249 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12250 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12254 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12255 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12256 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12257 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12258 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12259 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12260 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12262 This feature is experimental.
12263 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12267 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12268 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12269 Comments, as in C/C++.
12272 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12273 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12277 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12278 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12281 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12282 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12283 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12286 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12287 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12290 This feature is experimental.
12291 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12294 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12297 @deffn {Directive} <>
12298 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12301 This feature is experimental.
12302 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12305 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12308 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12309 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12310 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12311 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12314 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12315 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12316 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12317 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12318 @xref{%code Summary}.
12321 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12322 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12326 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12327 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12328 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12333 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12334 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12335 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12336 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12339 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12340 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12341 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12344 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12345 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12346 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12349 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12350 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12351 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12354 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12355 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12356 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12360 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12361 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12362 used in the grammar.
12365 @deffn {Symbol} error
12366 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12367 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12368 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12369 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12370 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12371 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12372 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12373 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12376 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12377 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12378 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12381 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12382 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12386 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12387 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12388 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12391 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12392 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12395 @deffn {Directive} %language
12396 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12397 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12400 @deffn {Directive} %left
12401 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12402 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12405 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12406 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12407 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12411 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12412 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12413 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12414 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12415 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12418 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12419 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12420 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12422 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12423 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12424 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12426 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12427 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12428 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12429 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12430 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12431 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12432 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12433 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12438 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12439 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12440 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12445 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12446 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12447 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12450 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12451 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12452 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12455 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12456 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12457 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12460 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12461 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12462 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12463 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12466 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12467 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12468 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12471 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12472 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12473 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12476 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12477 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12478 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12481 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12482 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12483 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12484 unreasonable usage.
12487 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12488 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12489 Require a Version of Bison}.
12492 @deffn {Directive} %right
12493 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12494 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12497 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12498 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12499 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12502 @deffn {Directive} %start
12503 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12507 @deffn {Directive} %token
12508 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12509 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12512 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12513 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12514 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12517 @deffn {Directive} %type
12518 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12519 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12522 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12523 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12524 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12528 @deffn {Directive} %union
12529 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12530 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12533 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12534 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12535 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12536 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12537 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12539 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12543 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12544 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12545 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12546 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12548 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12552 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12553 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12554 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12557 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12558 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12559 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12560 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12561 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12564 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12565 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12566 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12569 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12570 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12571 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12574 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12575 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12576 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12577 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12580 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12581 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12582 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12585 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12586 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12587 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12588 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12589 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12590 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12592 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12596 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12597 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12598 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12601 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12602 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12603 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12604 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12605 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12606 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12607 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12610 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12611 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12612 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12615 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12616 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12617 @xref{Memory Management}.
12620 @deffn {Function} yylex
12621 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12622 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12626 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12627 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12628 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12629 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12631 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12633 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12634 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12635 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12638 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12639 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12640 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12643 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12644 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12645 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12646 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12648 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12649 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12650 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12653 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12654 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12658 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12659 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12660 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12661 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12662 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12665 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12666 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12667 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12670 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12671 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12672 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12673 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12676 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12677 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12678 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12679 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12680 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12681 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12682 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12685 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12686 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12687 call this function to create a new parser.
12688 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12689 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12690 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12691 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12694 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12695 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12696 parse the rest of the input stream.
12697 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12698 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12699 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12700 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12703 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12704 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12705 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12706 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12707 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12708 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12711 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12712 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12713 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12714 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12717 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12718 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12719 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12720 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12721 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12722 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12723 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12725 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12726 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12727 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12728 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12729 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12730 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12731 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12734 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12735 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12736 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12744 @item Accepting state
12745 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12746 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12747 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
12749 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12750 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12751 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12752 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12753 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12755 @item Consistent state
12756 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12758 @item Context-free grammars
12759 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12760 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12761 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12762 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12765 @item Default reduction
12766 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12767 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12768 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12769 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12772 @item Defaulted state
12773 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12775 @item Dynamic allocation
12776 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12777 compile time or on entry to a function.
12780 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12781 character string of length zero.
12783 @item Finite-state stack machine
12784 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12785 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12786 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12787 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12788 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12789 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12791 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12792 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12793 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12794 deterministic parsing
12795 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12796 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12797 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12801 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12802 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12803 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12805 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12806 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12807 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12808 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12809 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12810 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12811 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12812 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12813 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12814 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12816 @item Infix operator
12817 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12818 performs some operation.
12821 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12823 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12824 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12825 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12826 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12827 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12828 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12829 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12831 @item Language construct
12832 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12833 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12834 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12836 @item Left associativity
12837 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12838 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12839 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12841 @item Left recursion
12842 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12843 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12846 @item Left-to-right parsing
12847 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12848 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12850 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12851 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12852 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12854 @item Lexical tie-in
12855 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12856 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12858 @item Literal string token
12859 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12861 @item Lookahead token
12862 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12866 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12867 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12868 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12871 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12872 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12874 @item Nonterminal symbol
12875 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12876 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12877 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12880 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12881 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12884 @item Postfix operator
12885 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12886 performs some operation.
12889 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12890 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12894 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12895 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12896 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12898 @item Reverse polish notation
12899 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12901 @item Right recursion
12902 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12903 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12907 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12908 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12909 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12912 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12913 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12914 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12916 @item Single-character literal
12917 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12918 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12921 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12922 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12923 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12924 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12927 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12928 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12929 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12932 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12933 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12936 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12937 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12938 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12939 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12941 @item Terminal symbol
12942 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12943 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12944 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12946 @item Unreachable state
12947 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12948 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12949 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12952 @node Copying This Manual
12953 @appendix Copying This Manual
12957 @unnumbered Bibliography
12961 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12962 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12963 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12964 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12966 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12967 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12968 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12969 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12970 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12972 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12973 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12974 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12975 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12976 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12978 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12979 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12980 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12981 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12982 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12985 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12986 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12987 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12990 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12991 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12992 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12993 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12996 @node Index of Terms
12997 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13003 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13004 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13005 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13006 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13007 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13008 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13009 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13010 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13011 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13012 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13013 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13014 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13015 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13016 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13017 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13018 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13019 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13020 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13021 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13022 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13023 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13024 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13025 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13026 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13027 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13028 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13029 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13030 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13031 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13032 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13033 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13034 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13035 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13036 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13037 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13038 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13039 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13040 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13041 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13042 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13043 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13044 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13045 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13046 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13047 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13048 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13049 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13050 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13051 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13052 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13053 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13054 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13055 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13056 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13057 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13058 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13059 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13060 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13062 @c Local Variables:
13063 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"