1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
195 Outline of a Bison Grammar
197 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
205 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
215 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
216 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
217 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
218 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
219 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
220 action in the middle of a rule.
224 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
225 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
226 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
230 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
231 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
232 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
236 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
237 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
238 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
239 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
240 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
241 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
242 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
243 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
244 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
245 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
246 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
247 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
248 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
249 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
251 Parser C-Language Interface
253 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
254 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
255 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
256 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
257 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
258 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
260 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
261 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
262 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
265 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
267 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
268 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
269 of the token it has read.
270 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
271 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
273 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
274 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
276 The Bison Parser Algorithm
278 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
279 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
280 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
281 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
282 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
283 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
284 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
285 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
286 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
287 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
291 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
292 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
293 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
294 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
295 * How Precedence:: How they work.
296 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
300 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
301 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
302 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
303 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
305 Handling Context Dependencies
307 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
308 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
309 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
310 error recovery rules must be written.
312 Debugging Your Parser
314 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
315 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
316 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
317 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
321 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
322 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
323 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
327 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
328 in alphabetical order by short options.
329 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
330 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
332 Parsers Written In Other Languages
334 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
335 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
339 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
340 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
341 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
342 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
343 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
344 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
348 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
349 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
350 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
352 A Complete C++ Example
354 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
355 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
356 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
357 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
358 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
362 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
363 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
364 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
365 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
366 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
367 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
368 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
369 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
371 Frequently Asked Questions
373 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
374 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
375 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
376 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
377 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
378 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
379 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
380 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
381 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
382 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
383 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
384 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
388 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
394 @unnumbered Introduction
397 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
398 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
399 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
400 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
401 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
402 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
403 calculators to complex programming languages.
405 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
406 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
407 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
408 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
409 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
412 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
413 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
414 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
415 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
418 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
419 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
420 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
421 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
422 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
423 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
426 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
429 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
431 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
432 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
433 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
434 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
435 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
437 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
439 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
440 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
441 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
442 License to all of the Bison source code.
444 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
445 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
446 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
447 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
448 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
449 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
450 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
452 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
453 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
454 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
455 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
456 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
457 using the other GNU tools.
459 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
460 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
461 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
462 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
466 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
467 @include gpl-3.0.texi
470 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
472 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
473 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
474 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
477 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
478 as mathematical ideas.
479 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
480 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
481 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
482 the name of an identifier, etc.).
483 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
484 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
485 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
486 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
487 how is the output used?
488 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
489 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
492 @node Language and Grammar
493 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
495 @cindex context-free grammar
496 @cindex grammar, context-free
497 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
498 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
499 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
500 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
501 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
502 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
503 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
504 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
508 @cindex Backus-Naur form
509 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
510 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
511 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
512 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
513 essentially machine-readable BNF.
515 @cindex LALR grammars
516 @cindex IELR grammars
518 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
519 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
520 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
521 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
522 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
523 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
524 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
525 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
526 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
527 Construction}, to learn how.
530 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
531 @cindex ambiguous grammars
532 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
534 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
535 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
536 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
537 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
538 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
539 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
540 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
541 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
542 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
543 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
544 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
545 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
546 possible parses of any given string is finite.
548 @cindex symbols (abstract)
550 @cindex syntactic grouping
551 @cindex grouping, syntactic
552 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
553 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
554 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
555 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
556 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
557 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
558 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
560 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
561 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
562 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
563 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
564 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
565 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
566 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
567 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
568 lexicography, not grammar.)
570 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
573 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
574 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
575 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
576 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
577 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
578 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
579 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
582 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
583 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
584 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
585 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
586 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
587 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
588 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
589 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
591 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
592 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
593 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
594 reads informally as follows:
597 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
602 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
606 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
607 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
608 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
609 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
612 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
613 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
614 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
615 not the start symbol.
617 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
618 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
619 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
620 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
621 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
622 reports a syntax error.
624 @node Grammar in Bison
625 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
626 @cindex Bison grammar
627 @cindex grammar, Bison
628 @cindex formal grammar
630 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
631 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
632 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
634 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
635 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
636 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
638 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
639 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
640 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
641 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
642 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
643 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
644 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
647 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
648 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
649 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
650 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
652 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
653 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
655 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
656 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
657 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
658 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
662 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
666 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
668 @node Semantic Values
669 @section Semantic Values
670 @cindex semantic value
671 @cindex value, semantic
673 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
674 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
675 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
676 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
677 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
680 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
681 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
682 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
683 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
684 ,Defining Language Semantics},
687 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
688 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
689 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
690 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
693 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
694 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
695 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
696 need to have any semantic value.)
698 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
699 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
700 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
701 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
702 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
703 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
705 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
706 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
707 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
708 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
709 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
711 @node Semantic Actions
712 @section Semantic Actions
713 @cindex semantic actions
714 @cindex actions, semantic
716 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
717 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
718 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
719 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
722 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
723 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
724 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
725 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
726 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
727 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
728 newly recognized larger expression.
730 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
734 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
738 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
739 from the values of the two subexpressions.
742 @section Writing GLR Parsers
744 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
747 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
748 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
750 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
751 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
752 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
753 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
754 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
755 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
756 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
757 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
758 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
760 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
761 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
762 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
763 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
764 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
765 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
766 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
767 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
768 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
769 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
770 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
771 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
772 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
773 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
774 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
775 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
776 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
777 identical set of symbols.
779 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
780 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
781 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
782 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
783 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
784 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
785 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
786 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
787 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
791 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
792 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
793 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
794 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
795 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
798 @node Simple GLR Parsers
799 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
800 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
801 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
805 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
806 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
808 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
809 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
810 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
812 Consider a problem that
813 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
814 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
817 type subrange = lo .. hi;
818 type enum = (a, b, c);
822 The original language standard allows only numeric
823 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
824 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
825 10206) and many other
826 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
827 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
831 type subrange = (a) .. b;
835 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
836 type with only one value:
843 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
844 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
846 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
847 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
848 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
849 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
850 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
851 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
852 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
853 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
855 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
856 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
857 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
858 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
861 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
862 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
863 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
864 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
865 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
866 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
869 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
870 use the GLR algorithm.
871 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
872 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
873 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
874 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
875 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
876 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
877 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
878 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
879 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
881 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
882 reports a syntax error as usual.
884 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
885 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
886 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
887 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
888 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
890 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
891 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
892 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
893 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
894 The present example contains only one conflict between two
895 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
896 cannot be nested. So the number of
897 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
898 and the parsing time is still linear.
900 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
901 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
904 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
912 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
940 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
941 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
942 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
943 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
950 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
951 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
952 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
961 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
962 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
963 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
964 notice when the parser splits.
966 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
967 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
968 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
969 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
970 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
971 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
972 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
973 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
974 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
975 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
976 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
977 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
978 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
981 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
982 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
983 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
984 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
985 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
986 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
988 @node Merging GLR Parses
989 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
990 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
991 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
995 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
997 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1002 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1004 void yyerror (char const *);
1018 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1027 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1028 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1029 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1030 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1031 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1035 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1036 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1037 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1038 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1042 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1043 | '(' declarator ')'
1048 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1049 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1056 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1057 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1058 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1059 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1060 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1061 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1062 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1063 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1064 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1065 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1066 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1067 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1068 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1069 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1071 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1072 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1073 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1074 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1075 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1076 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1077 The parser therefore prints
1080 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1083 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1084 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1091 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1092 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1093 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1094 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1095 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1096 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1097 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1098 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1099 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1100 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1106 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1107 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1108 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1109 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1114 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1115 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1120 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1124 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1132 with an accompanying forward declaration
1133 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1137 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1138 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1143 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1144 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1147 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1150 Bison requires that all of the
1151 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1152 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1153 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1154 the offending merge.
1156 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1157 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1159 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1160 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1162 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1163 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1164 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1165 the associated reduction.
1166 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1167 action in a GLR parser.
1170 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1172 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1174 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1175 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1176 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1177 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1178 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1179 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1180 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1181 influence syntax analysis.
1182 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1185 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1186 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1187 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1188 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1189 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1190 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1191 future versions of Bison.
1192 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1193 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1194 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1196 @subsubsection YYERROR
1198 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1199 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1200 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1201 initiate error recovery.
1202 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1203 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1204 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1205 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1206 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1207 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1208 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1209 the parse that invoked the test.
1211 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1212 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1213 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1216 @node Semantic Predicates
1217 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1219 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1221 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1223 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1224 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1225 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1226 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1230 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1231 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1236 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1237 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1238 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1239 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1240 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1241 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1242 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1244 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1245 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1246 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1247 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1250 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1251 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1252 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1256 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1257 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1258 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1259 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1264 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1265 false). However, this
1266 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1267 have overlapping syntax.
1268 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1269 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1270 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1271 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1274 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1275 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1277 @node Compiler Requirements
1278 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1279 @cindex @code{inline}
1280 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1282 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1283 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1284 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1285 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1286 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1287 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1296 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1300 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1301 && ! defined inline)
1310 @cindex textual location
1311 @cindex location, textual
1313 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1314 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1315 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1316 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1318 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1319 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1320 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1321 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1324 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1325 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1326 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1329 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1330 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1331 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1332 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1333 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1334 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1335 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1338 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1339 @cindex Bison parser
1340 @cindex Bison utility
1341 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1344 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1345 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1346 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1347 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1348 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1349 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1350 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1353 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1354 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1355 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1358 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1359 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1360 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1361 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1362 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1363 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1364 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1366 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1367 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1368 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1369 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1370 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1371 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1372 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1373 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1374 C-Language Interface}.
1376 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1377 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1378 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1379 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1380 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1381 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1382 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1383 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1384 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1385 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1386 anything other than their usual meanings.
1388 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1389 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1390 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1391 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1392 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1393 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1394 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1395 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1396 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1399 @section Stages in Using Bison
1400 @cindex stages in using Bison
1403 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1404 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1408 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1409 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1410 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1411 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1412 sequence of C statements.
1415 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1416 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1417 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1418 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1421 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1424 Write error-reporting routines.
1427 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1428 must follow these steps:
1432 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1435 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1438 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1441 @node Grammar Layout
1442 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1443 @cindex grammar file
1445 @cindex format of grammar file
1446 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1448 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1449 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1456 @var{Bison declarations}
1465 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1466 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1468 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1469 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1470 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1471 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1472 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1473 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1475 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1476 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1477 semantic values of various symbols.
1479 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1482 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1483 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1484 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1488 @cindex simple examples
1489 @cindex examples, simple
1491 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1492 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1493 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1494 and a multi-function calculator. All
1495 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1497 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1498 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1499 source file to try them.
1502 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1503 a first example with no operator precedence.
1504 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1505 Operator precedence is introduced.
1506 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1507 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1508 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1509 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1510 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1514 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1515 @cindex reverse polish notation
1516 @cindex polish notation calculator
1517 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1518 @cindex calculator, simple
1520 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1521 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1522 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1523 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1525 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1526 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1529 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1530 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1531 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1532 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1533 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1534 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1535 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1538 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1539 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1541 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1542 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1544 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1546 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1553 void yyerror (char const *);
1557 %define api.value.type double
1560 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1563 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1564 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1566 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1567 function @code{pow}.
1569 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1570 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1571 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1572 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1575 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison about
1576 the tokens and their types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1577 Declarations Section}).
1579 The @code{%define} directive defines the variable @code{api.value.type},
1580 thus specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1581 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The Bison
1582 parser will use whatever type @code{api.value.type} is defined as; if you
1583 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1584 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value, which
1585 is a floating point number. C code can use @code{YYSTYPE} to refer to the
1586 value @code{api.value.type}.
1588 Each terminal symbol that is not a single-character literal must be
1589 declared. (Single-character literals normally don't need to be declared.)
1590 In this example, all the arithmetic operators are designated by
1591 single-character literals, so the only terminal symbol that needs to be
1592 declared is @code{NUM}, the token type for numeric constants.
1595 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1597 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1599 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1611 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1618 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1619 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1620 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1621 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1622 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1623 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1629 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1630 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1631 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1632 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1633 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1636 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1637 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1638 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1640 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1641 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1642 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1643 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1644 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1645 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1648 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1649 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1650 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1654 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1656 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1665 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1666 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1667 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1668 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1669 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1671 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1672 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1673 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1674 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1675 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1676 (optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1677 */} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1679 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1680 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1681 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1682 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1685 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1686 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1687 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1690 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1692 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1697 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1701 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1702 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1703 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1704 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1705 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1706 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1707 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1709 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1710 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1711 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1712 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1713 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1716 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1718 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1719 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1720 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1721 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1726 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1727 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1732 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1733 equally well have written them separately:
1737 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1738 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1742 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1743 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1744 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1745 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1746 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1747 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1748 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1749 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1751 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1752 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1753 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1755 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1756 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1760 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1764 means the same thing as this:
1769 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1775 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1778 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1779 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1780 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1782 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1783 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1784 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1785 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1787 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1789 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1790 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1791 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1792 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1794 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1795 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1796 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1797 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1798 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1799 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1800 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1801 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1802 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1804 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1805 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1806 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, whose value
1807 was defined at the beginning of the grammar via @samp{%define api.value.type
1808 double}; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1810 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1811 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1813 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1815 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1818 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1819 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1820 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1821 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1832 /* Skip white space. */
1833 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1837 /* Process numbers. */
1838 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1841 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1846 /* Return end-of-input. */
1849 /* Return a single char. */
1856 @subsection The Controlling Function
1857 @cindex controlling function
1858 @cindex main function in simple example
1860 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1861 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1862 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1864 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1876 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1877 @cindex error reporting routine
1879 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1880 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1881 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1882 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1883 here is the definition we will use:
1885 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1890 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1892 yyerror (char const *s)
1894 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1899 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1900 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1901 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1902 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1903 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1904 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1906 @node Rpcalc Generate
1907 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1908 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1910 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1911 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1912 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1913 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1914 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1915 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1917 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1918 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1920 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1921 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1928 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1929 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1930 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1931 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1932 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1933 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1934 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1936 @node Rpcalc Compile
1937 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1938 @cindex compiling the parser
1940 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1944 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1946 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1950 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1951 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1952 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1956 # @r{List files again.}
1958 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1962 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1963 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1969 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1971 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1974 @result{} -3.166666667
1975 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1977 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1982 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1983 @cindex infix notation calculator
1985 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1987 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1988 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1989 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1990 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1993 /* Infix notation calculator. */
2000 void yyerror (char const *);
2005 /* Bison declarations. */
2006 %define api.value.type double
2010 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2011 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2014 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2025 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2032 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2033 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2034 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2035 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2036 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2037 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2038 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2045 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2048 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2050 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2051 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2052 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2053 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2054 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2055 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2056 the associativity/precedence.)
2058 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2059 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2060 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2061 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2062 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2063 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2066 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2067 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2068 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2069 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2070 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2072 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2077 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2085 @node Simple Error Recovery
2086 @section Simple Error Recovery
2087 @cindex error recovery, simple
2089 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2090 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2091 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2092 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2093 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2094 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2096 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2097 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2098 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2104 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2105 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2110 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2111 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2112 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2113 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2114 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2115 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2116 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2117 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2120 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2121 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2122 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2123 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2124 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2125 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2128 @node Location Tracking Calc
2129 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2130 @cindex location tracking calculator
2131 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2132 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2134 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2135 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2136 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2137 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2141 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2142 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2143 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2146 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2147 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2149 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2150 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2153 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2158 void yyerror (char const *);
2161 /* Bison declarations. */
2162 %define api.value.type int
2170 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2174 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2175 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2176 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2177 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2178 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2179 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2180 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2184 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2186 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2187 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2188 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2189 from the new information.
2191 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2192 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2205 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2212 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2213 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2214 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2224 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2225 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2226 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2231 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2232 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2233 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2237 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2238 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2239 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2241 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2242 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2243 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2244 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2245 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2246 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2250 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2252 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2253 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2254 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2257 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2258 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2269 /* Skip white space. */
2270 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2271 ++yylloc.last_column;
2276 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2277 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2281 /* Process numbers. */
2285 ++yylloc.last_column;
2286 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2288 ++yylloc.last_column;
2289 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2296 /* Return end-of-input. */
2301 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2305 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2308 ++yylloc.last_column;
2314 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2315 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2316 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2317 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2319 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2320 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2321 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2322 controlling function:
2329 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2330 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2336 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2337 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2338 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2340 @node Multi-function Calc
2341 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2342 @cindex multi-function calculator
2343 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2344 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2346 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2347 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2348 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2349 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2350 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2352 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2353 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2354 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2355 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2356 functions whose syntax has this form:
2359 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2363 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2364 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2365 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2370 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2371 @result{} 3.1415926536
2375 @result{} 0.0000000000
2377 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2378 @result{} 2.3000000000
2380 @result{} 2.3000000000
2382 @result{} 0.8329091229
2383 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2384 @result{} 2.3000000000
2388 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2391 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2392 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2393 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2394 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2395 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2398 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2399 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2401 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2403 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2407 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2408 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2409 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2411 void yyerror (char const *);
2417 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2418 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2421 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2422 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2429 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2430 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2434 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2435 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2436 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2438 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2439 this is instead of defining @code{api.value.type}. The allowable types are now
2440 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2441 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
2443 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2444 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2445 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2446 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2447 between angle brackets).
2449 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2450 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2451 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2452 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2453 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2454 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2457 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2459 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2460 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2461 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2463 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2465 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2476 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2477 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2484 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2485 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2486 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2487 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2488 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2489 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2490 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2491 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2492 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2493 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2496 /* End of grammar. */
2500 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2501 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2502 @cindex symbol table example
2504 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2505 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2506 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2507 requires some additional C functions for support.
2509 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2510 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2511 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2513 @comment file: calc.h
2516 /* Function type. */
2517 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2521 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2524 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2525 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2528 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2529 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2531 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2536 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2538 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2539 extern symrec *sym_table;
2541 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2542 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2546 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2549 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2555 double (*fnct) (double);
2560 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2573 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2578 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2584 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2586 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2587 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2593 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2594 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2596 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2597 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2598 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2599 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2600 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2601 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2603 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2605 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2606 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2610 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2612 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2613 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2614 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2615 ptr->type = sym_type;
2616 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2617 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2625 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2628 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2629 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2630 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2638 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2640 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2641 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2642 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2643 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2645 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2646 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2647 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2648 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2649 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2650 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2652 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2653 operators in @code{yylex}.
2655 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2665 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2666 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2674 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2675 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2678 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2684 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2687 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2688 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2689 static size_t length = 40;
2690 static char *symbuf = 0;
2695 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2701 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2705 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2707 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2709 /* Get another character. */
2714 while (isalnum (c));
2721 s = getsym (symbuf);
2723 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2728 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2735 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2737 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2738 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2739 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2741 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2744 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2746 yyerror (char const *s)
2748 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2754 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2757 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2758 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2759 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2767 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2768 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2769 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2777 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2780 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2781 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2782 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2785 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2786 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2790 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2792 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2793 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2795 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2796 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2799 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2800 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2801 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2802 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2803 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2804 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2805 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2806 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2809 @node Grammar Outline
2810 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2813 @findex /* @dots{} */
2815 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2816 appropriate delimiters:
2823 @var{Bison declarations}
2832 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2833 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2837 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2838 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2839 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2840 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2841 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2845 @subsection The prologue
2846 @cindex declarations section
2848 @cindex declarations
2850 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2851 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2852 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2853 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2854 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2855 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2856 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2858 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2859 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2862 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2863 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2864 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2865 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2866 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2867 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2868 @code{%union} declaration.
2882 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2888 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2889 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2896 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2897 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2898 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2899 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2900 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2901 @code{#include} directives.
2903 @node Prologue Alternatives
2904 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2905 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2908 @findex %code requires
2909 @findex %code provides
2912 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2913 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2914 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2915 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2916 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2917 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2918 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2920 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2934 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2940 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2941 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2949 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2950 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2951 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2952 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2953 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2954 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2955 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2956 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2957 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2958 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2959 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2961 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2962 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2963 This behavior raises a few questions.
2964 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2965 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2966 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2967 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2968 This behavior is not intuitive.
2970 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2971 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2972 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2973 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2980 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2981 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2984 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2985 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2998 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3004 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3005 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3006 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3014 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3015 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3016 explicit which kind you intend.
3017 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3019 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3020 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3021 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3022 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3023 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3024 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3025 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3026 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3027 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3030 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3031 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3033 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3051 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3057 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3058 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3071 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3072 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3073 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3081 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3082 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3083 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3084 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3085 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3086 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3088 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3089 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3090 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3091 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3092 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3093 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3094 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3095 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3096 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3097 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3098 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3101 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3102 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3103 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3104 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3105 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3106 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3107 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3108 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3109 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3110 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3128 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3134 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3135 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3148 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3154 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3155 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3163 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3164 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3165 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3168 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3169 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3170 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3171 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3172 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3173 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3176 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3177 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3178 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3179 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3181 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3182 organize your grammar file.
3183 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3188 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3189 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3190 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3191 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3195 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3196 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3197 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3198 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3203 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3204 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3206 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3208 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3209 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3210 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3211 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3213 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3214 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3215 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3216 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3217 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3218 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3219 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3220 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3223 @node Bison Declarations
3224 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3225 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3226 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3228 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3229 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3230 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3231 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3234 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3235 @cindex grammar rules section
3236 @cindex rules section for grammar
3238 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3239 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3241 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3242 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3243 if it is the first thing in the file.
3246 @subsection The epilogue
3247 @cindex additional C code section
3249 @cindex C code, section for additional
3251 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3252 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3253 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3254 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3255 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3256 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3257 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3258 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3259 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3260 C-Language Interface}.
3262 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3263 from the grammar rules.
3265 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3266 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3267 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3268 of the grammar file.
3271 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3272 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3273 @cindex terminal symbol
3277 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3280 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3281 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3282 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3283 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3284 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3285 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3286 the symbol to stand for it.
3288 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3289 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3290 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3292 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3293 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3294 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3295 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3296 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3297 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3298 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3300 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3304 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3305 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3306 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3307 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3310 @cindex character token
3311 @cindex literal token
3312 @cindex single-character literal
3313 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3314 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3315 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3316 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3317 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3318 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3319 ,Operator Precedence}).
3321 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3322 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3323 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3324 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3325 your program will confuse other readers.
3327 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3328 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3329 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3330 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3331 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3332 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3336 @cindex string token
3337 @cindex literal string token
3338 @cindex multicharacter literal
3339 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3340 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3341 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3342 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3343 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3345 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3346 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3347 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3348 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3349 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3351 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3353 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3354 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3355 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3356 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3357 read your program will be confused.
3359 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3360 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3361 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3362 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3363 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3364 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3367 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3368 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3369 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3371 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3372 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3373 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3374 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3375 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3376 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3377 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3378 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3379 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3380 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3381 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3382 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3384 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3385 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3386 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3387 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3388 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3390 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3391 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3392 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3393 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3394 characters in the following C-language string:
3397 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3400 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3401 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3402 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3403 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3404 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3405 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3406 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3407 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3408 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3409 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3412 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3413 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3414 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3415 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3416 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3419 @section Grammar Rules
3421 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3424 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3425 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3426 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3430 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3432 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3433 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3435 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3438 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3442 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3443 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3444 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3453 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3454 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3456 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3457 extra white space as you wish.
3459 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3460 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3463 @{@var{C statements}@}
3468 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3469 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3470 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3471 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3472 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3473 compiler can check it.
3475 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3476 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3477 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3478 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3479 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3480 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3481 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3482 character constants.
3484 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3488 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3489 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3494 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3495 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3502 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3505 @subsection Empty Rules
3510 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3511 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3512 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3515 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3519 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3520 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3532 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3533 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3534 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3535 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3537 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3538 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3539 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3552 @subsection Recursive Rules
3553 @cindex recursive rule
3554 @cindex rule, recursive
3556 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3557 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3558 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3559 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3560 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3571 @cindex left recursion
3572 @cindex right recursion
3574 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3575 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3576 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3588 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3589 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3590 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3591 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3592 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3593 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3594 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3597 @cindex mutual recursion
3598 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3599 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3600 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3609 | primary '+' primary
3622 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3626 @section Defining Language Semantics
3627 @cindex defining language semantics
3628 @cindex language semantics, defining
3630 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3631 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3632 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3634 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3635 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3636 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3637 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3640 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3641 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3642 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3643 * Structured Value Type:: Providing a structured semantic value type.
3644 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3645 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3646 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3647 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3648 action in the middle of a rule.
3652 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3653 @cindex semantic value type
3654 @cindex value type, semantic
3655 @cindex data types of semantic values
3656 @cindex default data type
3658 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3659 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3660 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3661 Notation Calculator}).
3663 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3664 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3665 specify some other type, define the @code{%define} variable
3666 @code{api.value.type} like this:
3669 %define api.value.type double
3676 %define api.value.type "struct semantic_type"
3679 The value of @code{api.value.type} should be a type name that does not
3680 contain parentheses or square brackets.
3682 Alternatively, instead of relying of Bison's @code{%define} support, you may
3683 rely on the C/C++ preprocessor and define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like
3687 #define YYSTYPE double
3691 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3692 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}). If compatibility
3693 with POSIX Yacc matters to you, use this. Note however that Bison cannot
3694 know @code{YYSTYPE}'s value, not even whether it is defined, so there are
3695 services it cannot provide. Besides this works only for languages that have
3698 @node Multiple Types
3699 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3701 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3702 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3703 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3704 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3707 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3708 requires you to do two things:
3712 Specify the entire collection of possible data types. There are several
3716 use the @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union
3720 define the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type} to be a union type
3721 whose members are the type tags (@pxref{Structured Value Type,, Providing a
3722 Structured Semantic Value Type});
3725 use a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a
3726 union type whose member names are the type tags.
3730 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3731 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3732 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3733 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3734 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3738 @subsection The Union Declaration
3739 @cindex declaring value types
3740 @cindex value types, declaring
3743 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
3744 data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is followed by
3745 braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a @code{union} in C@.
3759 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
3760 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
3761 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
3762 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3764 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the @code{%union}. For
3777 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
3778 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
3781 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple @code{%union}
3782 declarations; their contents are concatenated. However, only the first
3783 @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
3785 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
3786 a semicolon after the closing brace.
3788 @node Structured Value Type
3789 @subsection Providing a Structured Semantic Value Type
3790 @cindex declaring value types
3791 @cindex value types, declaring
3794 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
3795 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one @samp{<@var{type}>}
3796 tag. For example, you can put the following into a header file
3809 and then your grammar can use the following instead of @code{%union}:
3816 %define api.value.type "union YYSTYPE"
3822 Actually, you may also provide a @code{struct} rather that a @code{union},
3823 which may be handy if you want to track information for every symbol (such
3824 as preceding comments).
3826 The type you provide may even be structured and include pointers, in which
3827 case the type tags you provide may be composite, with @samp{.} and @samp{->}
3836 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3838 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3839 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3840 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3841 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3843 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3844 placed at any position in the rule;
3845 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3846 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3847 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3848 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3850 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3851 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3852 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3853 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3854 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3855 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3856 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3857 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3858 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3859 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3862 Here is a typical example:
3868 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3872 Or, in terms of named references:
3878 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3883 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3884 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3885 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3886 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3887 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3888 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3890 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3891 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3892 referred to as @code{$2}.
3894 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3895 references construct.
3897 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3898 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3899 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3900 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3901 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3904 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3907 @cindex default action
3908 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3909 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3910 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3911 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3912 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3913 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3915 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3916 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3917 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3918 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3919 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3924 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3925 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3931 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3936 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3937 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3938 definition of @code{foo}.
3941 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3942 any, from a semantic action.
3943 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3944 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3947 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3948 @cindex action data types
3949 @cindex data types in actions
3951 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3952 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3954 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3955 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3956 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3957 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3958 in the rule. In this example,
3964 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3969 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3970 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3971 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3972 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3974 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3975 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3976 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3988 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3989 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3991 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3992 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3993 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3994 @cindex mid-rule actions
3996 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3997 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3998 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
4001 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
4002 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
4003 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
4006 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
4007 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
4009 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
4010 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
4011 it is run before they are parsed.
4013 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
4014 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
4015 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
4016 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
4019 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
4020 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
4021 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
4022 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
4023 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
4024 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
4026 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
4027 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
4028 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
4029 at the end of the rule.
4031 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
4032 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
4033 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
4034 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
4035 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
4036 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
4043 $<context>$ = push_context ();
4044 declare_variable ($3);
4049 pop_context ($<context>5);
4055 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
4056 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
4057 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
4058 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
4059 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
4060 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
4063 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
4064 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
4065 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
4072 $<context>let = push_context ();
4073 declare_variable ($3);
4078 pop_context ($<context>let);
4083 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
4084 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
4085 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
4086 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
4087 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
4090 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
4091 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
4092 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
4093 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
4094 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
4096 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
4097 Discarded Symbols}).
4098 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
4099 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
4101 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
4102 declare a destructor for that symbol:
4107 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
4125 $let = push_context ();
4126 declare_variable ($3);
4133 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4134 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4135 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4137 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4138 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4142 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4143 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4144 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4145 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4149 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4156 $@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4157 $@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4158 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4159 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4163 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4165 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4166 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4167 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4170 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4177 @@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4178 @@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4179 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4180 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4183 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4184 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4185 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4186 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4187 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4191 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4193 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4194 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4198 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4199 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4205 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4206 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4207 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4208 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4209 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4210 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4211 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4217 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4218 | '@{' statements '@}'
4224 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4229 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4230 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4233 | '@{' statements '@}'
4239 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4240 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4241 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4242 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4243 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4244 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4246 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4247 actions into the two rules, like this:
4252 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4253 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4254 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4255 '@{' statements '@}'
4261 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4262 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4264 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4265 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4266 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4271 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4272 declarations statements '@}'
4273 | '@{' statements '@}'
4279 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4280 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4282 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4283 serves as a subroutine:
4288 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4294 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4295 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4301 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4302 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4305 @node Tracking Locations
4306 @section Tracking Locations
4308 @cindex textual location
4309 @cindex location, textual
4311 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4312 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4313 especially symbol locations.
4315 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4316 actions to take when rules are matched.
4319 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4320 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4321 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4325 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4326 @cindex data type of locations
4327 @cindex default location type
4329 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4330 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4332 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4333 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4334 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4335 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4339 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4348 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4349 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4350 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4351 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4352 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4354 @node Actions and Locations
4355 @subsection Actions and Locations
4356 @cindex location actions
4357 @cindex actions, location
4360 @vindex @@@var{name}
4361 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4363 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4364 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4366 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4367 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4368 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4369 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4370 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4373 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4374 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4375 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4376 references construct.
4378 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4386 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4387 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4388 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4389 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4396 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4397 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4398 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4404 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4405 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4406 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4409 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4410 example above simply rewrites this way:
4424 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4425 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4426 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4433 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4434 from a semantic action.
4435 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4436 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4438 @node Location Default Action
4439 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4440 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4441 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4443 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4444 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4445 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4446 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4447 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4448 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4449 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4450 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4453 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4454 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4456 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4457 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4458 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4459 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4460 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4461 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4462 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4463 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4464 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4465 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4467 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4471 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4475 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4476 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4477 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4478 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4482 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4483 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4484 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4485 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4492 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4493 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4494 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4496 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4500 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4501 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4504 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4505 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4506 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4507 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4510 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4511 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4512 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4513 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4516 @node Named References
4517 @section Named References
4518 @cindex named references
4520 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4521 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4522 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4523 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4524 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4525 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4527 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4528 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4529 used as named references. For example:
4533 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4534 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4539 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4543 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4544 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4549 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4555 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4558 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4561 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4566 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4567 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4568 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4571 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4572 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4577 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4578 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4579 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4582 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4583 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4589 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4590 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4593 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4594 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4598 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4599 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4600 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4601 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4602 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4603 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4604 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4606 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4610 @section Bison Declarations
4611 @cindex declarations, Bison
4612 @cindex Bison declarations
4614 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4615 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4618 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4619 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4620 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4621 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4623 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4624 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4625 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4626 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4629 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4630 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4631 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4632 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4633 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4634 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4635 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4636 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4637 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4638 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4639 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4640 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4641 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4642 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4646 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4647 @cindex version requirement
4648 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4651 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4652 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4656 %require "@var{version}"
4660 @subsection Token Type Names
4661 @cindex declaring token type names
4662 @cindex token type names, declaring
4663 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4666 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4672 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4673 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4674 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4676 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4677 @code{%precedence}, or
4678 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4679 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4682 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4683 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4684 following the token name:
4688 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4692 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4693 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4694 with each other or with normal characters.
4696 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4697 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4698 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4699 Than One Value Type}).
4705 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4709 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4713 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4714 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4715 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4722 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4723 equivalent literal string tokens:
4726 %token <operator> OR "||"
4727 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4732 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4733 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4734 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4735 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4736 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4737 the literal string instead of the token name.
4739 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4740 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4744 %token END 0 "end of file"
4747 @node Precedence Decl
4748 @subsection Operator Precedence
4749 @cindex precedence declarations
4750 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4751 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4753 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4754 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4755 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4756 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4757 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4758 operator precedence.
4760 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4761 @code{%token}: either
4764 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4771 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4774 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4775 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4776 all the @var{symbols}:
4780 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4781 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4782 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4783 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4784 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4785 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4786 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4787 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4788 considered a syntax error.
4790 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4791 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4792 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4795 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4796 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4797 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4798 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4799 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4802 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4803 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4804 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4805 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4810 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4811 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4815 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4816 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4817 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4821 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4822 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4823 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4826 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4830 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4831 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4832 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}). You
4833 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4834 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4837 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4838 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4839 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4840 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4842 @node Initial Action Decl
4843 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4844 @findex %initial-action
4846 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4847 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4850 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4851 @findex %initial-action
4852 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4853 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4854 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4855 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4858 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4861 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4864 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4869 @node Destructor Decl
4870 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4871 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4875 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4876 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4877 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4878 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4879 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4880 must discard the start symbol.
4882 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4883 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4884 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4885 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4887 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4888 symbol is automatically discarded.
4890 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4892 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4893 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4894 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4895 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4896 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4899 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4900 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4901 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4902 tag among @var{symbols}.
4903 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4904 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4905 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4907 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4908 (These default forms are experimental.
4909 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4911 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4912 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4913 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4914 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4916 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4917 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4918 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4919 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4920 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4927 %union @{ char *string; @}
4928 %token <string> STRING1
4929 %token <string> STRING2
4930 %type <string> string1
4931 %type <string> string2
4932 %union @{ char character; @}
4933 %token <character> CHR
4934 %type <character> chr
4937 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4938 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4939 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4940 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4944 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4945 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4946 to @code{free} by default.
4947 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4948 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4949 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4950 @code{free} only once.
4951 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4952 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4954 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4955 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4956 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4957 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4958 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4959 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4960 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4961 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4962 reference it in your grammar.
4963 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4964 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4970 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4971 @cindex mid-rule actions
4972 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4973 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4974 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4975 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4976 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4977 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4978 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4979 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4983 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4984 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4985 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4990 @cindex discarded symbols
4991 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4995 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4997 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4999 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
5000 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
5002 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
5003 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
5006 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
5009 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
5010 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
5013 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
5014 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
5015 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
5019 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
5020 @cindex printing semantic values
5024 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
5025 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
5026 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
5027 know how semantic values should be formatted.
5029 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
5030 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5031 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
5033 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
5036 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
5037 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
5038 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
5039 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
5040 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
5041 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
5042 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
5045 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
5046 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
5047 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5048 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5056 %union @{ char *string; @}
5057 %token <string> STRING1
5058 %token <string> STRING2
5059 %type <string> string1
5060 %type <string> string2
5061 %union @{ char character; @}
5062 %token <character> CHR
5063 %type <character> chr
5066 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5067 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5068 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5069 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5073 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5074 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5075 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5076 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5077 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5078 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5079 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5083 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5084 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5085 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5086 @cindex warnings, preventing
5087 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5091 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5092 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5093 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5094 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5095 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5096 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5098 The declaration looks like this:
5104 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5105 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5106 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5107 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5109 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5110 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5111 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5112 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5113 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5114 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5115 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5121 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5125 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5126 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5127 print the number of conflicts.
5130 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5131 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5132 go back to the beginning.
5135 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5136 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5137 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5140 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5141 but will keep silent otherwise.
5144 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5145 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5146 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5147 @cindex default start symbol
5150 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5151 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5152 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5159 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5160 @cindex reentrant parser
5162 @findex %define api.pure
5164 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5165 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5166 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5167 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5168 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5169 program must be called only within interlocks.
5171 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5172 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5173 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5174 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5175 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5177 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5178 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5179 reentrant. It looks like this:
5182 %define api.pure full
5185 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5186 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5187 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5188 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5189 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5190 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5191 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5192 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5193 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5195 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5196 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5200 @subsection A Push Parser
5203 @findex %define api.push-pull
5205 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5206 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5208 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5209 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5210 each time a new token is made available.
5212 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5213 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5214 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5215 within a certain time period.
5217 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5218 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5219 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5222 %define api.push-pull push
5225 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5226 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5227 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5228 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5229 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5232 %define api.pure full
5233 %define api.push-pull push
5236 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5237 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5238 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5239 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5241 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5242 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5243 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5244 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5245 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5246 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5247 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5248 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5252 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5254 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5255 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5256 yypstate_delete (ps);
5259 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5260 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5261 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5262 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5263 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5264 example would thus look like this:
5269 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5272 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5273 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5274 yypstate_delete (ps);
5277 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5278 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5280 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5281 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5282 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5283 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5284 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5285 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5286 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5287 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5288 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5289 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5290 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5291 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5292 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5293 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5294 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5295 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5296 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5300 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5301 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5302 yypstate_delete (ps);
5305 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5306 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5307 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5310 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5311 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5312 @cindex declaration summary
5313 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5315 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5317 @deffn {Directive} %union
5318 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5319 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}).
5322 @deffn {Directive} %token
5323 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5324 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5327 @deffn {Directive} %right
5328 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5329 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5332 @deffn {Directive} %left
5333 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5334 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5337 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5338 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5339 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5340 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5344 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5345 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5346 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5350 @deffn {Directive} %type
5351 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5352 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5355 @deffn {Directive} %start
5356 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5360 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5361 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5362 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5368 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5371 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5372 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5374 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5375 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5376 @xref{%code Summary}.
5379 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5380 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5382 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5385 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5386 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5387 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5388 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5391 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5392 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5393 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5394 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5395 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5397 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5398 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5399 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5400 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5401 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5402 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5403 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5404 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5405 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5406 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5408 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5409 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5410 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5412 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5413 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5414 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5416 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5417 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5418 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5419 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5420 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5422 @findex %code requires
5423 @findex %code provides
5424 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5425 header also contains their code.
5426 @xref{%code Summary}.
5428 @cindex Header guard
5429 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5430 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5431 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5432 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5433 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5436 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5437 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5439 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5440 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5442 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5446 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5447 Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5450 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5451 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5452 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5455 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5456 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5457 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5460 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5461 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5462 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5463 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5467 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5468 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5469 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5470 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5471 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5472 accurate syntax error messages.
5475 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5476 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5477 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5479 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5480 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5481 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5482 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5483 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5484 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5485 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5486 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5488 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5492 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5493 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5494 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5499 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5500 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5501 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5502 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5503 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5504 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5505 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5509 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5510 Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5513 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5514 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5515 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5519 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5520 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5521 Require a Version of Bison}.
5524 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5525 Specify the skeleton to use.
5527 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5528 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5529 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5530 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5532 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5533 file in the Bison installation directory.
5534 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5535 directory of the grammar file.
5536 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5539 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5540 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5541 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5542 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5543 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5544 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5545 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5548 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5549 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5550 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5551 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5552 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5553 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5554 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5557 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5558 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5559 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5563 The highest token number, plus one.
5565 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5567 The number of grammar rules,
5569 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5573 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5574 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5575 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5576 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5580 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5581 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5582 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5586 @node %define Summary
5587 @subsection %define Summary
5589 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5590 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5591 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5592 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5593 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5594 @code{%define} directive:
5596 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5597 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5598 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5599 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5601 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5602 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5603 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5604 to specifying @code{""}.
5606 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5607 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5608 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5611 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5612 @code{%define} accepts.
5614 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5615 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5619 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5621 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5622 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5624 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5626 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5627 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5630 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5631 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5632 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5633 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5634 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5635 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5637 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5638 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5640 @item Languages(s): C++
5642 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5643 For example, if you specify:
5646 %define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5649 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5652 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5655 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5656 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5659 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5665 @item Accepted Values:
5666 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5667 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5669 @item Default Value:
5670 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5671 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5672 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5673 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5674 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5675 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5676 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5679 %define api.namespace @{foo@}
5680 %name-prefix "bar::"
5683 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5689 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5690 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @var{type}
5693 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5695 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5696 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5698 @item Accepted Values: String
5700 @item Default Value: none
5703 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5704 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5708 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5709 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @var{prefix}
5712 @item Language(s): All
5714 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5715 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5717 @item Accepted Values: String
5719 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5721 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5725 @c ================================================== api.pure
5726 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure}
5729 @item Language(s): C
5731 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5732 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5734 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5736 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5737 the case for Boolean values.
5739 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5740 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5741 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5744 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5745 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5746 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5748 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5752 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5753 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5756 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5757 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5760 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5763 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5764 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5766 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5769 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5776 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5777 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5780 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5782 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5783 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5784 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5785 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5787 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5789 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5796 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5797 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5804 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5805 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5806 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5808 @item Accepted Values:
5811 @item Default Value:
5814 introduced in Bison 2.8
5817 @c api.token.constructor
5820 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5821 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @var{prefix}
5824 @item Languages(s): all
5827 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5828 target language. For instance
5831 %token FILE for ERROR
5832 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5834 start: FILE for ERROR;
5838 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5839 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5840 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5841 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5842 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5843 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5844 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5846 @item Accepted Values:
5847 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5848 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5849 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5851 @item Default Value:
5854 introduced in Bison 2.8
5860 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5861 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{type}
5867 The type for semantic values.
5869 @item Accepted Values:
5872 This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5874 @item @code{%union} (C, C++)
5875 The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5876 to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5877 @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
5880 %define api.value.type "%union"
5886 %token <ival> INT "integer"
5887 %token <sval> STR "string"
5890 @item @code{union} (C, C++)
5891 The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5892 @code{union}. For instance:
5894 %define api.value.type "union"
5895 %token <int> INT "integer"
5896 %token <char *> STR "string"
5898 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5899 cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5901 @item @code{variant} (C++)
5902 This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5903 allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5905 %define api.value.type "variant"
5906 %token <int> INT "integer"
5907 %token <std::string> STR "string"
5909 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5910 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5912 @item any other identifier
5913 Use this name as semantic value.
5930 %define api.value.type "struct my_value"
5931 %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
5932 %token <u.sval> STR "string"
5936 @item Default Value:
5939 @code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
5941 @code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
5942 @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
5948 introduced in Bison 2.8. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
5955 @c ================================================== location_type
5956 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
5957 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
5961 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5963 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
5966 @item Language(s): all
5968 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5969 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5970 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5971 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5973 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5974 @item Default Value:
5976 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5977 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5980 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5981 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5985 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5987 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
5990 @item Language(s): all
5991 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5992 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5993 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5994 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5996 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5997 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
5998 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
6001 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
6003 @c ================================================== lr.type
6005 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
6008 @item Language(s): all
6010 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
6011 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
6012 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6014 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
6016 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
6020 @c ================================================== namespace
6021 @deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
6022 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
6026 @c ================================================== parse.assert
6027 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
6030 @item Languages(s): C++
6032 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
6033 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
6035 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
6037 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6039 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6045 @c ================================================== parse.error
6046 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error}
6051 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6052 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6054 @item Accepted Values:
6057 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6059 @item @code{verbose}
6060 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6061 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6065 @item Default Value:
6072 @c ================================================== parse.lac
6073 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac}
6076 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6078 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6079 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6080 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6081 @item Default Value: @code{none}
6086 @c ================================================== parse.trace
6087 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6090 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6092 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6093 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6095 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6096 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6097 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6098 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6101 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6103 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6109 @subsection %code Summary
6113 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6114 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6115 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6116 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6117 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6118 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6119 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6120 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6122 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6123 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6124 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6125 in the parser implementation.
6127 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6128 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6129 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6131 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6134 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6135 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6136 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6137 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6138 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6139 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6143 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6144 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6145 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6148 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6149 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6153 @findex %code requires
6156 @item Language(s): C, C++
6158 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6159 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}. In other words, it's the best place to
6160 define types referenced in @code{%union} directives. If you use
6161 @code{#define} to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6162 definitions, then it is also the best place. However you should rather
6163 @code{%define} @code{api.value.type} and @code{api.location.type}.
6165 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6166 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6171 @findex %code provides
6174 @item Language(s): C, C++
6176 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6177 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6179 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6180 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6188 @item Language(s): C, C++
6190 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6191 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6192 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6193 parser implementation file. For example:
6202 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6206 @findex %code imports
6209 @item Language(s): Java
6211 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6213 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6214 before any class definitions.
6218 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6219 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6220 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6221 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6224 @node Multiple Parsers
6225 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6227 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6228 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6229 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6230 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6231 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6232 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6233 exported in the generated header.
6235 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6236 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6237 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6238 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6239 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
6240 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6241 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6242 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6243 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6245 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6246 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6247 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6248 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6249 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6250 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6251 specifically --- more about this below.
6253 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
6254 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6257 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6258 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6259 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6260 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6263 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6264 #define yyparse cparse
6265 #define yylval clval
6271 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6272 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6273 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6275 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6279 extern CSTYPE clval;
6283 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6284 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6285 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6290 # if defined YYDEBUG
6307 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6308 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6309 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6312 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6313 @cindex C-language interface
6316 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6317 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6318 functions that it needs to use.
6320 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6321 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6322 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6323 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6326 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6327 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6328 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6329 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6330 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6331 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6333 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6334 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6335 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6339 @node Parser Function
6340 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6343 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6344 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6345 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6346 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6347 without reading further.
6350 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6351 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6352 is due to end-of-input).
6354 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6355 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6358 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6361 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6366 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6371 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6374 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6375 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6376 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6378 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6379 @findex %parse-param
6380 Declare that one or more
6381 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6382 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6383 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6384 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6387 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6390 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6394 Then call the parser like this:
6398 int nastiness, randomness;
6399 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6400 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6406 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6409 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6413 Using the following:
6415 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6418 Results in these signatures:
6420 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6421 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6425 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6426 and @code{%locations} are used:
6429 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6430 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6433 @node Push Parser Function
6434 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6435 @findex yypush_parse
6437 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6438 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6440 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6441 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6442 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6443 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6445 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6446 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6447 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6448 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6451 @node Pull Parser Function
6452 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6453 @findex yypull_parse
6455 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6456 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6458 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6459 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6460 declaration is used.
6461 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6463 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6464 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6467 @node Parser Create Function
6468 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6469 @findex yypstate_new
6471 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6472 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6474 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6475 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6476 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6477 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6479 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6480 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6481 or 0 if no memory was available.
6482 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6486 @node Parser Delete Function
6487 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6488 @findex yypstate_delete
6490 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6491 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6493 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6494 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6495 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6496 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6498 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6499 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6500 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6504 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6506 @cindex lexical analyzer
6508 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6509 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6510 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6511 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6513 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6514 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6515 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6516 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6517 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6518 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6519 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6523 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6524 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6525 of the token it has read.
6526 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6527 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6529 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6530 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6533 @node Calling Convention
6534 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6536 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6537 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6538 signifies end-of-input.
6540 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6541 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6542 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6543 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6545 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6546 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6547 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6548 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6549 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6550 signifies end-of-input.
6552 Here is an example showing these things:
6559 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6562 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6563 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6565 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6571 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6572 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6574 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6575 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6579 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6580 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6581 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6582 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6585 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6586 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6587 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6588 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6589 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6592 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6593 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6594 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6595 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6598 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6601 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6602 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6603 strlen (token_buffer))
6604 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6605 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6610 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6611 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6615 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6618 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6619 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6620 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6621 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6627 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6628 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6633 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6634 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6635 Union Declaration}). So when you store a token's value, you
6636 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6637 declaration looks like this:
6650 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6655 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6656 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6661 @node Token Locations
6662 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6665 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6666 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6667 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6668 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6669 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6670 data in that variable.
6672 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6673 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6674 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6675 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6676 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6679 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6682 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6684 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6685 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6686 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6687 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6688 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6689 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6694 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6697 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6698 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6703 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6704 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6705 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6708 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6709 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6710 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6711 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6713 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6715 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6716 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6717 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6720 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6722 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6723 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6724 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6725 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6726 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6733 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6734 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6735 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6739 results in the following signatures:
6742 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6743 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6746 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6749 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6750 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6754 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6758 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6759 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6760 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6763 @node Error Reporting
6764 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6765 @cindex error reporting function
6768 @cindex syntax error
6770 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6771 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6772 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6773 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6776 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6777 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6778 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6779 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6780 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6782 @findex %define parse.error
6783 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6784 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6785 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6786 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6787 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6789 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6790 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6791 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6792 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6793 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6794 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6796 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6797 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6798 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6800 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6805 yyerror (char const *s)
6809 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6814 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6815 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6816 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6817 immediately return 1.
6819 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6820 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6821 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6822 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6823 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6825 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6826 following signature:
6829 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6833 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6834 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6835 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6836 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6837 message is always passed last.
6839 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6840 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6841 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6845 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6846 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6847 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6848 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6850 @node Action Features
6851 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6852 @cindex summary, action features
6853 @cindex action features summary
6855 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6856 are useful in actions.
6858 @deffn {Variable} $$
6859 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6860 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6863 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6864 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6865 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6868 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6869 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6870 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6871 Types of Values in Actions}.
6874 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6875 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6876 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6877 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6880 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6881 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6882 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6885 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6886 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6887 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6890 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6892 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6893 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6894 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6895 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6896 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6897 going to be reduced by this rule.
6899 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6900 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6901 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6904 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6907 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6908 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6911 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6912 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6916 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6917 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6918 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6919 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6920 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6921 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6924 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6925 @findex YYRECOVERING
6926 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6927 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6928 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6931 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6932 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6933 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6934 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6935 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6937 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6940 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6941 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6943 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6945 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6948 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6949 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6950 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6951 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6954 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6955 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6956 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6957 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6959 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6962 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6963 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6964 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6965 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6967 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6971 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6972 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6975 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6979 @c int first_line, last_line;
6980 @c int first_column, last_column;
6984 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6985 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6987 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6988 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6989 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6992 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6995 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6997 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6998 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
7002 @node Internationalization
7003 @section Parser Internationalization
7004 @cindex internationalization
7010 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
7011 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
7012 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
7013 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
7014 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
7015 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
7016 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
7017 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
7020 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
7021 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
7022 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
7027 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
7028 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
7029 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
7030 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
7031 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
7035 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
7040 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
7041 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
7042 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
7043 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
7044 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
7045 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
7046 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
7047 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
7048 Bison-generated parser.
7051 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7052 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7053 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7057 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7060 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7061 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7062 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7066 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7067 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7068 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7071 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7077 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7081 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7087 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7088 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
7089 @cindex algorithm of parser
7092 @cindex parser stack
7093 @cindex stack, parser
7095 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7096 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7097 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7099 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7100 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7103 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7104 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7105 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7106 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7107 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7108 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7109 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7111 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7118 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7119 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7122 expr: expr '*' expr;
7126 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7133 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7134 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7136 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7137 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7138 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7140 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7143 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7144 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7145 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7146 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7147 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7148 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7149 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7150 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7151 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7152 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7156 @section Lookahead Tokens
7157 @cindex lookahead token
7159 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7160 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7161 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7162 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7163 token in order to decide what to do.
7165 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7166 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7167 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7168 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7169 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7170 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7171 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7174 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7175 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7176 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7195 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7196 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7197 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7198 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7199 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7201 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7202 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7203 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7204 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7205 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7206 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7211 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7212 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7213 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7214 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7217 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7219 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7220 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7221 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7223 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7224 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7229 "if" expr "then" stmt
7230 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7236 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7237 specific keyword tokens.
7239 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7240 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7241 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7242 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7245 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7246 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7247 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7248 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7249 contrast it with the other alternative.
7251 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7252 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7256 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7258 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7261 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7262 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7263 making these two inputs equivalent:
7266 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7268 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7271 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7272 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7273 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7274 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7275 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7276 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7277 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7278 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7280 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7281 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7282 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7283 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7285 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7286 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7287 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7288 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7289 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7292 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7293 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7294 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7308 "if" expr "then" stmt
7309 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7319 @section Operator Precedence
7320 @cindex operator precedence
7321 @cindex precedence of operators
7323 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7324 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7325 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7326 shift and when to reduce.
7329 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7330 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7331 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7332 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7333 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7334 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7337 @node Why Precedence
7338 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7340 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7341 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7356 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7357 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7358 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7359 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7360 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7361 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7362 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7365 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7366 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7367 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7368 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7369 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7370 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7371 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7372 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7375 @cindex associativity
7376 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7377 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7378 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7379 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7380 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7381 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7382 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7383 makes right-associativity.
7385 @node Using Precedence
7386 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7392 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7393 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7394 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7395 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7396 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7397 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7398 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7400 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7401 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7402 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7403 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7404 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7405 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7406 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7407 what expected the grammar author.
7409 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7410 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7411 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7412 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7413 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7415 @node Precedence Only
7416 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7419 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7420 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7421 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7422 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7423 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7424 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7425 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7427 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7428 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7429 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7433 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7436 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7437 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7438 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7439 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7440 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7441 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7442 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7449 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7450 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7451 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7452 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7453 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7454 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7455 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7457 @node Precedence Examples
7458 @subsection Precedence Examples
7460 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7468 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7469 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7470 declared with @code{'-'}:
7473 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7478 @node How Precedence
7479 @subsection How Precedence Works
7481 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7482 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7483 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7484 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7485 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7486 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7488 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7489 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7490 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7491 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7492 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7493 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7494 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7497 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7498 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7501 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7503 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7504 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7505 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7506 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7508 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7509 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7510 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7511 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7512 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7513 instance as follows:
7522 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7523 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7524 use right associativity:
7527 %right "then" "else"
7530 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7531 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7532 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7533 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7534 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7535 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7536 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7538 @node Contextual Precedence
7539 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7540 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7541 @cindex unary operator precedence
7542 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7543 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7546 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7547 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7548 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7549 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7551 The Bison precedence declarations
7552 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7553 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7554 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7557 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7558 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7559 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7560 modifier's syntax is:
7563 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7567 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7568 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7569 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7570 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7571 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7573 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7574 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7575 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7585 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7593 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7598 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7599 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7600 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7601 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7603 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7604 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7605 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7606 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7608 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7609 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7610 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7611 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7612 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7613 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7615 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7616 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7620 @section Parser States
7621 @cindex finite-state machine
7622 @cindex parser state
7623 @cindex state (of parser)
7625 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7626 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7627 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7628 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7629 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7631 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7632 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7633 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7634 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7635 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7636 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7637 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7638 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7641 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7642 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7643 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7646 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7647 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7648 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7650 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7651 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7654 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7655 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7660 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7662 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7668 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7669 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7675 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7676 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7677 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7678 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7679 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7680 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7682 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7683 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7684 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7686 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7687 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7688 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7689 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7690 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7692 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7693 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7694 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7695 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7700 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7701 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7706 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7713 | sequence redirects
7727 | redirects redirect
7733 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7734 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7735 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7736 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7737 in infinitely many ways!
7739 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7740 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7741 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7742 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7744 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7755 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7763 | sequence redirects
7777 | redirects redirect
7782 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7783 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7784 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7785 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7786 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7789 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7790 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7792 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7793 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7794 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7795 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7796 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7801 %precedence "sequence"
7806 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7807 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7819 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7820 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7823 %right "word" "redirect"
7828 | sequence word %prec "word"
7829 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7834 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7835 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7836 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7838 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7844 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7847 | name_list ':' type
7864 | name ',' name_list
7869 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7870 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7871 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7872 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7876 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7878 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7879 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7880 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7882 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7883 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7884 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7885 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7886 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7887 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7888 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7891 @cindex canonical LR
7892 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7893 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7894 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7895 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7896 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7897 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7898 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7899 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7901 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7902 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7903 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7904 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7905 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7913 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7918 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7919 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7920 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7921 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7922 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7923 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7925 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7926 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7927 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7928 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7929 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7930 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7936 | name_list ':' type
7948 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7949 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7954 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7955 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7956 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7957 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7958 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7959 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7960 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7962 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7963 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7964 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7965 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7967 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7968 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7971 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7972 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7973 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7974 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7977 @node LR Table Construction
7978 @subsection LR Table Construction
7979 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7982 @cindex canonical LR
7983 @findex %define lr.type
7985 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7986 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7987 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7988 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7991 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7992 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7993 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7994 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7997 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7998 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7999 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
8002 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
8003 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
8004 values for @var{type} are:
8007 @item @code{lalr} (default)
8009 @item @code{canonical-lr}
8012 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8016 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
8020 %define lr.type ielr
8023 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
8024 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
8025 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
8026 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
8027 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
8028 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
8029 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
8030 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
8031 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
8032 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
8034 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
8035 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
8036 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
8037 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
8043 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
8046 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
8048 @cindex GLR with LALR
8049 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8050 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8052 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8053 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8054 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8055 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8056 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8057 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8058 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8059 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8061 @item Malformed grammars.
8063 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8064 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8065 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8066 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8067 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8072 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8073 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8074 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8075 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8076 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8077 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8078 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8079 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8080 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8084 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8087 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8088 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8089 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8090 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8091 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8092 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8093 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8094 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8095 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8096 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8097 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8098 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8101 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8102 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8103 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8105 @node Default Reductions
8106 @subsection Default Reductions
8107 @cindex default reductions
8108 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
8111 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8112 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8113 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8114 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8115 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8117 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8118 also affect the behavior of the parser:
8121 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8123 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
8124 @cindex consistent states
8125 @cindex defaulted states
8126 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8127 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8128 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8129 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8130 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8131 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8132 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8133 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8134 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8135 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8136 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8138 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8139 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8140 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8141 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8142 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8143 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8144 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8145 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8146 should already be considered closed.
8148 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8150 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8151 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8152 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8153 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8154 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8155 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8156 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8157 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8158 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8162 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8163 @c sentence from being rejected.
8164 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8165 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8166 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8167 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8168 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8169 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8172 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8173 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8174 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8175 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8176 because the accept action ends the parse.
8178 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8179 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8180 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8181 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8182 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8183 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8184 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8185 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8186 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8187 split the parse instead.
8189 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8190 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8192 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8193 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8194 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8196 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8197 @item @code{consistent}
8198 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8201 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8202 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8207 @findex %define parse.lac
8209 @cindex lookahead correction
8211 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8212 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8213 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8214 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8215 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8216 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8217 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8218 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8219 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8221 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8222 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8223 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8224 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8225 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8227 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8228 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8229 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8230 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8232 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8233 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8235 @item @code{none} (default)
8238 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8239 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8243 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8244 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8245 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8246 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8247 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8248 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8249 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8250 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8251 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8252 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8255 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8256 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8257 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8258 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8259 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8260 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8261 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8262 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8263 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8264 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8266 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8267 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8268 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8269 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8270 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8271 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8272 language-recognition power.
8274 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8277 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8279 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8280 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8281 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8282 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8285 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8287 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8288 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8289 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8290 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8291 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8292 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8296 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8297 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8298 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8299 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8300 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8301 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8302 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8303 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8304 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8305 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8306 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8309 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8310 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8311 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8313 @node Unreachable States
8314 @subsection Unreachable States
8315 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8316 @cindex unreachable states
8318 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8319 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8320 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8321 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8323 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8324 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8325 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8326 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8328 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8329 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8330 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8333 There are a few caveats to consider:
8336 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8338 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8339 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8340 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8341 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8342 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8343 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8345 @item Other useless states.
8347 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8348 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8349 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8350 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8351 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8352 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8353 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8356 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8357 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8359 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8360 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8361 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8363 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8364 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8365 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8366 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8367 context-free languages.
8368 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8369 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8370 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8371 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8372 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8373 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8374 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8375 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8377 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8378 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8379 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8380 parser uses the same basic
8381 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8382 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8383 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8384 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8386 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8387 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8388 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8389 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8390 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8392 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8393 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8394 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8395 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8396 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8397 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8398 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8399 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8400 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8401 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8402 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8405 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8406 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8407 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8408 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8409 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8410 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8411 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8412 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8413 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8414 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8415 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8416 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8418 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8419 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8420 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8422 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8423 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8424 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8425 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8426 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8427 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8428 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8429 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8430 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8431 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8432 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8433 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8435 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8438 @node Memory Management
8439 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8440 @cindex memory exhaustion
8441 @cindex memory management
8442 @cindex stack overflow
8443 @cindex parser stack overflow
8444 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8446 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8447 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8448 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8450 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8451 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8452 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8455 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8456 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8457 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8458 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8460 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8461 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8462 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8463 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8464 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8465 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8467 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8468 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8469 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8472 @cindex default stack limit
8473 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8477 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8478 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8479 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8480 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8481 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8483 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8485 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8486 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8487 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8488 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8489 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8490 non-trivial copy constructors.
8491 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8494 @node Error Recovery
8495 @chapter Error Recovery
8496 @cindex error recovery
8497 @cindex recovery from errors
8499 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8500 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8501 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8504 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8505 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8506 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8507 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8508 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8509 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8510 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8513 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8514 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8515 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8516 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8517 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8518 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8530 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8531 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8533 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8534 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8535 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8536 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8537 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8538 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8539 applicable in the ordinary way.
8541 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8542 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8543 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8544 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8545 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8546 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8547 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8548 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8549 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8550 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8551 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8552 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8554 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8555 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8556 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8559 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8562 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8563 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8564 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8565 spurious error message:
8575 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8576 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8577 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8578 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8579 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8580 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8581 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8584 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8585 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8586 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8587 error messages resume.
8589 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8590 as any other rules can.
8593 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8594 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8595 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8596 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8599 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8600 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8601 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8603 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8605 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8606 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8607 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8608 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8609 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8611 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8612 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8613 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8614 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8617 @node Context Dependency
8618 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8620 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8621 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8622 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8623 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8627 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8628 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8629 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8630 error recovery rules must be written.
8633 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8634 neither clean nor robust.)
8636 @node Semantic Tokens
8637 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8639 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8640 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8646 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8647 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8648 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8650 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8651 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8652 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8653 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8654 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8656 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8657 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8658 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8659 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8660 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8661 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8662 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8664 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8665 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8666 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8667 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8671 typedef int foo, bar;
8675 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8676 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8682 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8683 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8685 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8686 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8687 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8688 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8689 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8694 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8695 | declarator maybeasm
8701 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8702 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8708 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8709 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8710 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8712 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8713 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8714 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8715 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8716 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8717 the syntactic context.
8719 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8720 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8721 @cindex lexical tie-in
8723 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8724 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8727 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8728 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8729 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8730 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8731 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8738 void yyerror (char const *);
8747 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8748 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8749 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8763 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8764 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8765 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8767 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8768 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8769 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8772 @node Tie-in Recovery
8773 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8775 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8776 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8778 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8779 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8780 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8781 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8786 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8788 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8792 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8793 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8794 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8795 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8796 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8798 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8800 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8801 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8802 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8808 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8814 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8815 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8816 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8817 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8819 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8820 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8821 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8822 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8823 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8824 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8827 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8830 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8832 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8833 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8834 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8836 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8837 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8838 automaton. There are several formats available:
8841 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8844 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8847 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8848 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8851 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8852 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8856 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8857 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8858 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8859 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8863 @section Understanding Your Parser
8865 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8866 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8867 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8868 tune or simply fix a parser.
8870 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8871 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8872 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8873 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8874 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8875 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8876 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8878 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8900 @command{bison} reports:
8903 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8904 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8905 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8906 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8907 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8910 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8911 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8912 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8913 interpretation is the same.
8916 @cindex token, useless
8917 @cindex useless token
8918 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8919 @cindex useless nonterminal
8920 @cindex rule, useless
8921 @cindex useless rule
8922 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8923 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8924 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8925 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8928 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8931 Terminals unused in grammar
8934 Rules useless in grammar
8939 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8942 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8943 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8944 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8945 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8949 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8964 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8968 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8981 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8986 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8992 @cindex pointed rule
8993 @cindex rule, pointed
8994 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8995 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8996 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8997 the location of the input cursor.
9002 0 $accept: . exp $end
9004 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9009 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
9010 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
9011 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
9012 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
9013 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
9014 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
9015 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
9016 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
9018 @cindex core, item set
9019 @cindex item set core
9020 @cindex kernel, item set
9021 @cindex item set core
9022 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
9023 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
9024 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
9025 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
9026 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
9027 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
9032 0 $accept: . exp $end
9033 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
9039 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9045 In the state 1@dots{}
9052 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9056 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9057 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9058 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9059 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9064 0 $accept: exp . $end
9065 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9070 $end shift, and go to state 3
9071 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9072 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9073 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9074 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9078 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9079 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9080 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9081 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9082 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9085 @cindex accepting state
9086 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9092 0 $accept: exp $end .
9098 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9099 read), the parsing exits successfully.
9101 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9107 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9109 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9116 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9118 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9125 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9127 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9134 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9136 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9141 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9147 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9153 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9154 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9156 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9157 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9160 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9161 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9162 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9163 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9164 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9165 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9166 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9167 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9169 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9170 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9171 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9174 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9175 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9176 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9177 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9178 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9179 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9180 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9181 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9182 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9183 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9184 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9185 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9190 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9191 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9196 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9197 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9199 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9200 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9203 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9204 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9205 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9206 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9207 conflicts in the report:
9210 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9211 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9212 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9216 The remaining states are similar:
9222 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9228 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9229 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9231 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9232 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9238 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9244 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9246 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9247 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9253 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9259 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9260 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9261 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9262 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9264 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9265 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9266 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9267 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9268 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9273 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9274 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9275 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9277 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9278 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9280 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9283 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9286 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9287 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9288 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9289 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9290 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9291 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9292 to help them understand LR parsers.
9294 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9295 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9296 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9297 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9298 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9299 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9300 parser in multiple formats}).
9303 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9314 The graphical output
9316 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9318 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9319 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9320 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9323 @float Figure,fig:graph
9324 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9325 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9329 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9331 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9332 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9333 about transitions, for examples
9335 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9336 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9337 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9342 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9345 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9347 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9348 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9356 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9360 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9362 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9364 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9366 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9367 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9368 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9369 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9371 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9378 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9379 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9382 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9384 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9386 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9387 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9388 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9389 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9390 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9392 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9393 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9395 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9397 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9398 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9400 @c ================================================= XML
9403 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9406 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9407 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9408 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9409 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9410 option @option{--graph}. However,
9411 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9412 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9413 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9414 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9415 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9416 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9418 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9419 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9420 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9421 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9422 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9423 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9425 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9426 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9430 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9432 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9434 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9437 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9441 $ bison --print-datadir
9442 /usr/local/share/bison
9444 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9447 @c ================================================= Tracing
9450 @section Tracing Your Parser
9453 @cindex tracing the parser
9455 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9456 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9459 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9460 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9461 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9464 @node Enabling Traces
9465 @subsection Enabling Traces
9466 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9469 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9471 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9472 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9473 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9474 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9477 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9478 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9479 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9480 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9481 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9483 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9484 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9485 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9486 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9487 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9489 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9491 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9492 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9493 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9495 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9496 @findex %define parse.trace
9497 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9498 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9499 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9500 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9501 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9504 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9508 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9509 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9510 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9511 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9512 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9513 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9515 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9516 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9517 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9518 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9520 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9521 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9522 messages tell you these things:
9526 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9529 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9530 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9533 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9534 of the state stack afterward.
9537 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9538 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9539 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9540 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9541 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9542 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9543 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9544 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9545 grammar are to blame.
9547 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9548 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9549 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9550 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9551 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9554 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9556 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9557 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9558 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9559 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9560 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9561 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9563 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9564 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9565 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9568 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9570 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9572 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9575 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9576 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9577 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9578 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9581 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9582 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9583 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9584 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9585 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9586 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9588 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9589 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9590 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9591 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9592 printer will be used for them.
9594 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9595 are sent onto standard error.
9598 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9601 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9602 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9608 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9609 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9610 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9611 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9613 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9615 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9616 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9621 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9622 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9623 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9627 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9628 Shifting token '(' ()
9630 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9631 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9633 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9634 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9635 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9641 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9642 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9643 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9646 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9647 Shifting token '-' ()
9649 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9650 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9652 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9653 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9654 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9655 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9657 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9658 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9659 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9661 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9662 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9668 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9669 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9672 Next token is token ')' ()
9673 Shifting token ')' ()
9675 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9676 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9678 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9680 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9686 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9690 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9691 Shifting token '\n' ()
9693 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9694 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9697 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9700 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9703 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9708 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9709 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9710 completion of the parsing.
9713 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9714 Shifting token $end ()
9717 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9718 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9722 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9723 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9726 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9727 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9728 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9730 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9732 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9733 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9734 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9736 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9739 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9740 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9744 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9745 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9746 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9749 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9752 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9755 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9756 else if (type == NUM)
9757 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9761 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9764 @chapter Invoking Bison
9765 @cindex invoking Bison
9766 @cindex Bison invocation
9767 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9769 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9775 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9776 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9777 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9778 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9779 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9780 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9781 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9782 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9783 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9784 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9785 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9790 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9793 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9796 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9799 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9801 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9802 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9803 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9806 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9807 in alphabetical order by short options.
9808 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9809 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9813 @section Bison Options
9815 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9816 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9817 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9818 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9819 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9822 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9823 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9826 @c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9832 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9836 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9838 @item --print-localedir
9839 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9841 @item --print-datadir
9842 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9846 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9847 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9848 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9849 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9850 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9851 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9852 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9853 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9854 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9855 for compatibility with POSIX:
9862 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9863 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9864 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9865 this option is specified.
9867 @item -W [@var{category}]
9868 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9869 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9872 @item midrule-values
9873 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9875 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9878 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9881 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9882 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9885 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9888 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9889 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9890 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9893 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9897 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9898 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9899 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9900 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9901 no effect on the conflict report.
9904 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9908 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9909 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9910 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9913 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9915 Consider for instance the following grammar:
9944 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
9948 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
9953 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
9958 warning: useless precedence for "("
9964 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
9974 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9976 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9977 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9981 All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
9984 Turn off all the warnings.
9987 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9990 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9991 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9992 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9994 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9995 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9996 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9997 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9999 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
10000 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
10002 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
10003 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
10006 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
10007 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
10008 S/R conflicts as errors.
10011 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
10012 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
10015 @item -f [@var{feature}]
10016 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
10017 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
10020 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
10021 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
10022 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
10023 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
10024 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
10025 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
10030 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10033 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
10037 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
10038 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10042 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10043 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10047 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10048 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10052 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10053 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10057 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10058 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10063 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10067 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10068 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10069 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10070 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10071 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10075 This option is activated by default.
10086 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
10087 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10088 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10090 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10091 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10092 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10093 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10094 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10095 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10096 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10100 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10103 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10104 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10105 definition for @var{name}.
10107 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10108 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10109 definitions for @var{name}.
10111 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10112 definitions for @var{name}.
10115 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10116 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10117 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10119 @item -L @var{language}
10120 @itemx --language=@var{language}
10121 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10122 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10123 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10124 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
10127 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10129 @item -p @var{prefix}
10130 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10131 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10132 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10133 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10137 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10138 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10139 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10140 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10141 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10142 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10144 @item -S @var{file}
10145 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10146 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10147 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10149 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10150 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10151 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10152 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10154 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10155 file in the Bison installation directory.
10156 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10157 current working directory.
10158 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10161 @itemx --token-table
10162 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10169 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10170 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10171 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10172 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10175 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10176 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10177 with other short options.
10179 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10180 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10181 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10182 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10184 @item -r @var{things}
10185 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10186 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10187 separated list of @var{things} among:
10191 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10192 parser's automaton.
10195 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10196 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10199 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10200 each rule's lookahead set.
10203 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10204 precedence and associativity directives.
10207 Enable all the items.
10210 Do not generate the report.
10213 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10214 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10218 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10219 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10220 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10222 @item -o @var{file}
10223 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10224 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10226 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10227 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10229 @item -g [@var{file}]
10230 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10231 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10232 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10233 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10234 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10235 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10238 @item -x [@var{file}]
10239 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10240 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10241 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10242 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10244 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10245 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10248 @node Option Cross Key
10249 @section Option Cross Key
10251 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10252 the corresponding short option and directive.
10254 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10255 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10256 @include cross-options.texi
10260 @section Yacc Library
10262 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10263 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10264 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10265 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10266 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10267 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10268 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10270 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10271 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10274 int yyerror (char const *);
10277 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10278 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10279 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10282 int yyparse (void);
10285 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10287 @node Other Languages
10288 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10291 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10292 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10296 @section C++ Parsers
10299 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10300 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10301 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10302 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10303 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10304 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10307 @node C++ Bison Interface
10308 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10309 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10311 @c - initial action
10313 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10314 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10315 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10316 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10318 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10320 @findex %define api.namespace
10321 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10322 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10323 in the following files:
10328 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10329 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10330 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10334 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10336 @item @var{file}.hh
10337 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10338 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10339 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10340 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10341 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10343 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10344 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10345 @samp{%defines} directive.
10348 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10349 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10351 @node C++ Semantic Values
10352 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10353 @c - No objects in unions
10355 @c - Printer and destructor
10357 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10358 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10359 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10360 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10363 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10364 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10368 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10370 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10371 Union Declaration}. In particular it produces a genuine
10372 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10375 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10376 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10377 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10379 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10380 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10381 to such objects are allowed.
10384 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10385 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10386 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10390 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10392 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10393 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10394 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10396 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10397 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10398 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10399 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10401 For instance, instead of
10409 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10410 %token <sval> STRING;
10417 %token <int> NUMBER;
10418 %token <std::string> STRING;
10421 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10422 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10425 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10426 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10427 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10429 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10430 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10431 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10432 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10433 eventually, destroyed.
10435 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10436 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10437 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10440 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10441 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10445 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10446 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10447 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10448 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10449 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10450 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10451 that would be duplicating the information.
10453 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10454 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10455 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10456 (the current implementation of) variants:
10459 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10460 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10461 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10462 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10463 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10464 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10467 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10470 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10471 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10473 @node C++ Location Values
10474 @subsection C++ Location Values
10476 @c - class Position
10477 @c - class Location
10478 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10480 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10481 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10483 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10484 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10485 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10486 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10487 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10490 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10491 genuine code only the latter is used.
10494 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10495 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10496 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10500 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10502 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10503 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10504 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10508 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10509 Reset the position to the given values.
10512 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10513 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10514 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10515 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10516 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10519 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10520 The line, starting at 1.
10523 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10524 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10527 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10528 The column, starting at 1.
10531 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10532 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10535 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10536 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10537 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10538 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10539 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10542 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10543 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10544 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10547 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10548 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10549 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10550 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10554 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10556 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10557 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10560 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10561 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10562 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10565 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10566 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10569 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10570 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10571 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10574 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10575 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10576 Advance the @code{end} position.
10579 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10580 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10581 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10582 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10585 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10586 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10589 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10590 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10591 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10595 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10596 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10597 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10600 @node User Defined Location Type
10601 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10602 @findex %define api.location.type
10604 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10605 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10608 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10611 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10614 it must be copyable;
10617 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10618 parser basically runs
10620 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10621 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10624 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10627 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10628 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10631 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10632 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10637 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10638 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10639 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10640 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10645 %define namespace "master::"
10649 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10650 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10653 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10654 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10657 @node C++ Parser Interface
10658 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10659 @c - define parser_class_name
10661 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10663 @c - Reporting errors
10665 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10666 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10667 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10668 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10669 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10670 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10671 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10672 additional argument for its constructor.
10674 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10675 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10676 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10679 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10680 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10681 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10682 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10683 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10684 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10687 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10688 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10689 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10690 equivalent with first
10691 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10692 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10693 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10694 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10695 function invoked from the user action.
10698 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10699 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10700 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10703 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10704 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10705 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10708 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10709 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10712 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10713 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10714 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10717 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10718 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10719 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10723 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10724 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10725 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10726 or nonzero, full tracing.
10729 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10730 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10731 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10732 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10733 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10738 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10739 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10740 @c - prefix for yylex.
10741 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10744 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10745 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10746 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10747 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10750 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10751 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10754 @node Split Symbols
10755 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10757 The interface is as follows.
10759 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10760 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10761 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10762 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10763 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10766 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10767 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10769 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10773 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10774 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10777 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10778 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10782 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10783 initialized. So the code would look like:
10787 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10788 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10791 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10792 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10801 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10802 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10805 yylval.build(yytext);
10806 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10811 @node Complete Symbols
10812 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10814 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10815 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10816 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10817 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10818 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10819 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10821 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10822 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10823 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10824 the @var{location}.
10827 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10828 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10829 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10830 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10832 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10834 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10835 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10836 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10837 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10838 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10839 also pass the @var{location}.
10842 For instance, given the following declarations:
10845 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10846 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10847 %token <int> INTEGER;
10852 Bison generates the following functions:
10855 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10856 const location_type& l);
10857 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10858 const location_type& loc);
10859 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10863 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10866 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10867 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10868 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10871 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10872 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10874 @node A Complete C++ Example
10875 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10877 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10878 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10879 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10880 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10881 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10882 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10883 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10884 actually easier to interface with.
10887 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10888 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10889 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10890 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10891 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10894 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10895 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10897 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10898 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10899 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10900 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10901 of valid input follows.
10905 seven := one + two * three
10909 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10910 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10912 @c - A place to store error messages
10913 @c - A place for the result
10915 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10916 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10917 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10918 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10919 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10920 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10921 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10923 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10924 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10925 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10928 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10930 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10931 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10934 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10939 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10940 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10941 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10942 factor both as follows.
10944 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10946 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10948 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10949 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10954 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10957 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10959 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10960 class calcxx_driver
10964 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10966 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10972 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10973 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10975 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10977 // Handling the scanner.
10978 void scan_begin ();
10980 bool trace_scanning;
10984 Similarly for the parser itself.
10986 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10988 // Run the parser on file F.
10989 // Return 0 on success.
10990 int parse (const std::string& f);
10991 // The name of the file being parsed.
10992 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10994 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10995 bool trace_parsing;
10999 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
11000 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
11001 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
11002 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
11004 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
11007 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
11008 void error (const std::string& m);
11010 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
11013 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
11014 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
11015 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
11016 messages and set error state.
11018 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
11020 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11021 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
11023 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
11024 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
11026 variables["one"] = 1;
11027 variables["two"] = 2;
11030 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
11035 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
11039 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
11040 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
11041 int res = parser.parse ();
11047 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11049 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11053 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11055 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11059 @node Calc++ Parser
11060 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11062 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11063 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11064 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11065 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11068 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11070 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11071 %require "@value{VERSION}"
11073 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
11077 @findex %define api.token.constructor
11078 @findex %define api.value.type variant
11079 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11080 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11081 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11082 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11084 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11086 %define api.token.constructor
11087 %define api.value.type variant
11088 %define parse.assert
11092 @findex %code requires
11093 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11094 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11095 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11096 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11097 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11098 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11099 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11101 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11106 class calcxx_driver;
11111 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11112 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11115 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11117 // The parsing context.
11118 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11122 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11123 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11124 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11127 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11132 // Initialize the initial location.
11133 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11138 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11139 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11142 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11144 %define parse.trace
11145 %define parse.error verbose
11150 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11151 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11153 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11157 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11163 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11164 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11165 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11166 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11167 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11169 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11171 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
11173 END 0 "end of file"
11185 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11186 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11189 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11191 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11192 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11197 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11198 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11199 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11200 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11202 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11204 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11208 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11209 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11211 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11215 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11219 | assignments assignment @{@};
11222 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11227 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11228 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11229 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11230 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11231 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11232 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11233 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11238 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11241 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11244 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11245 const std::string& m)
11247 driver.error (l, m);
11251 @node Calc++ Scanner
11252 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11254 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11255 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11257 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11259 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11261 # include <climits>
11262 # include <cstdlib>
11264 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11265 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11267 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11268 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11269 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11270 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11272 # define yywrap() 1
11274 // The location of the current token.
11275 static yy::location loc;
11280 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11281 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11282 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11283 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11285 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11287 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11291 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11293 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11295 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11301 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11302 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11303 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11304 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11305 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11306 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11307 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11309 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11313 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11314 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11320 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11324 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11325 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11329 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11331 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11333 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11334 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11335 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11336 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11337 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11338 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11339 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11344 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11345 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11346 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11347 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11350 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11351 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11352 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11357 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11358 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11360 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11364 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11366 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11367 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11369 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11371 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11372 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11379 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11386 @node Calc++ Top Level
11387 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11389 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11391 @comment file: calc++.cc
11393 #include <iostream>
11394 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11398 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11401 calcxx_driver driver;
11402 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11403 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11404 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11405 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11406 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11407 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11408 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11417 @section Java Parsers
11420 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11421 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11422 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11423 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11424 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11425 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11426 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11427 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11430 @node Java Bison Interface
11431 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11432 @c - %language "Java"
11434 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11435 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11437 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11438 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11440 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11441 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11442 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11443 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11444 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11445 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11446 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11447 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11448 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11449 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11451 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11453 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11454 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11455 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11456 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11458 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11459 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11461 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11462 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11464 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11465 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11467 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11468 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11469 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11471 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11472 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11473 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11475 if needed. Also, in the future the
11476 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11477 access the token names and codes.
11479 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11480 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11481 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11482 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11485 @node Java Semantic Values
11486 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11487 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11489 @c - Printer and destructor
11491 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11492 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11493 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11496 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11497 %type <Integer> number
11500 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11501 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11502 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11503 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11504 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11507 %define api.value.type "ASTNode"
11511 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11512 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11514 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11515 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11516 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11517 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11518 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11519 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11521 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11522 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11523 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11525 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11526 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11527 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11530 @node Java Location Values
11531 @subsection Java Location Values
11533 @c - class Position
11534 @c - class Location
11536 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11537 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11538 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11539 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11540 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11541 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11542 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11544 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11545 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11546 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11547 be supplied by the user.
11550 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11551 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11552 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11555 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11556 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11559 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11560 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11563 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11564 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11565 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11566 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11570 @node Java Parser Interface
11571 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11572 @c - define parser_class_name
11574 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11576 @c - Reporting errors
11578 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11579 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11580 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11581 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11582 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11584 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11585 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11586 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11587 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11588 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11589 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11590 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11591 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11593 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11594 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11595 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11596 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11598 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11599 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11600 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11601 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11602 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11603 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11605 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11606 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11607 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11608 which initialize them automatically.
11610 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11611 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11612 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11613 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11615 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11616 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11617 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11620 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11621 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11622 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11625 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11626 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11627 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11629 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11630 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11631 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11634 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11635 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11636 @code{false} otherwise.
11639 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11640 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11641 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11642 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11643 verbose error messages.
11646 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11647 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11648 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11649 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11650 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11651 available only if location tracking is active.
11654 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11655 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11656 from a syntax error.
11657 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11660 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11661 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11662 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11666 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11667 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11668 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11669 or nonzero, full tracing.
11672 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11673 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11674 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11678 @node Java Scanner Interface
11679 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11682 @c - Lexer interface
11684 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11685 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11686 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11687 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11688 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11691 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11692 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11693 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11694 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11697 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11698 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11699 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11700 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11703 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11705 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11706 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11707 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11708 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11711 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11712 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11713 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11716 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11717 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11720 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11721 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11722 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11723 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11724 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11726 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11727 "@var{class-name}".}
11730 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11731 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11733 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11734 "@var{class-name}".}
11738 @node Java Action Features
11739 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11741 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11742 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11744 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11745 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11748 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11749 This may not be assigned to.
11750 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11753 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11754 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11755 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11759 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11760 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11761 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11762 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11763 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11764 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11767 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11768 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11769 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11770 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11772 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11776 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11777 This may not be assigned to.
11778 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11782 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11783 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11786 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11787 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11788 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11791 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11792 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11793 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11796 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11797 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11798 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11801 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11802 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11803 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11805 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11808 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11809 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11810 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11811 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11812 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11813 available only if location tracking is active.
11817 @node Java Differences
11818 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11820 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11821 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11822 section summarizes these differences.
11826 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11827 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11828 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11829 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11830 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11831 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11832 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11834 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11835 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11836 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11837 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11838 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11841 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11842 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11843 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11844 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11845 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11846 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11847 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11848 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11849 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11852 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11854 @item @code{%code imports}
11855 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11856 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11857 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11859 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11860 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11862 @item @code{%code lexer}
11863 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11864 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11865 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11869 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11870 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11871 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11873 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11874 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11879 @node Java Declarations Summary
11880 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11882 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11883 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11885 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11886 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11889 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11890 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11891 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11892 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11893 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11896 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11897 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11898 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11899 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11902 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11903 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11904 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11905 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11908 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11909 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11910 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11913 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11914 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11915 a Java @emph{type}.
11916 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11919 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11920 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11921 @xref{Java Differences}.
11924 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11925 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11926 @xref{Java Differences}.
11929 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11930 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11931 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11934 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11935 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11936 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11939 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11940 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11941 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11942 @xref{Java Differences}.
11945 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11946 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11947 @xref{Java Differences}.
11950 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11951 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11952 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11955 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11956 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11957 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11960 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11961 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11962 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11965 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11966 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11967 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11970 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11971 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11973 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11976 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11977 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11978 constructor. Default is none.
11979 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11982 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11983 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11984 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11985 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11988 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11989 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11990 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11991 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11992 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11993 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11996 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11997 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11998 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12001 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
12002 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
12003 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
12004 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12007 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
12008 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
12009 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
12010 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
12011 @xref{Java Location Values}.
12014 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
12015 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
12016 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12019 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} "@var{class}"
12020 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
12021 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
12024 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
12025 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
12026 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
12029 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
12030 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
12031 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
12032 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
12036 @c ================================================= FAQ
12039 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
12040 @cindex frequently asked questions
12043 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
12047 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
12048 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12049 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12050 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12051 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12052 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12053 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12054 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12055 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12056 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12057 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12058 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12061 @node Memory Exhausted
12062 @section Memory Exhausted
12065 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12066 message. What can I do?
12069 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12072 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
12073 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
12075 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12076 following typical questions:
12079 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12080 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12081 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12088 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12089 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12090 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12093 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12094 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12095 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12096 demonstration, consider the following source file,
12097 @file{first-line.l}:
12103 #include <stdlib.h>
12107 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
12111 yyparse (char const *file)
12113 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12117 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12121 /* One token only. */
12123 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12126 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12144 If the file @file{input} contains
12152 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12155 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12156 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12157 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12162 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12163 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12164 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12165 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12166 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12167 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12168 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12169 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12172 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12173 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12174 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12175 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12177 @node Strings are Destroyed
12178 @section Strings are Destroyed
12181 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12182 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12183 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12186 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12187 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12188 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12194 char *yylval = NULL;
12199 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12207 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12208 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12209 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12210 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12216 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12219 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12220 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12221 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12227 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12228 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12229 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12230 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12231 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12232 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12235 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12236 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12237 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12242 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12243 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12246 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12247 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12250 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12251 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12252 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12253 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12254 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12255 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12256 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12258 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12260 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12261 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12262 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12263 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12264 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12265 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12268 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12269 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12272 @node Multiple start-symbols
12273 @section Multiple start-symbols
12276 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12277 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12278 multiple entry points.
12281 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12282 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12283 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12284 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12288 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12295 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12296 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12298 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12299 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12300 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12301 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12302 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12303 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12304 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12305 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12308 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12313 int t = start_token;
12318 /* @r{The rules.} */
12322 @node Secure? Conform?
12323 @section Secure? Conform?
12326 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12329 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12330 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12331 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12332 please send us a bug report.
12334 @node I can't build Bison
12335 @section I can't build Bison
12338 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12339 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12343 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12344 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12345 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12346 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12347 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12348 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12349 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12352 @node Where can I find help?
12353 @section Where can I find help?
12356 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12359 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12360 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12361 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12362 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12363 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12364 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12365 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12366 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12370 @section Bug Reports
12373 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12376 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12377 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12378 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12379 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12380 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12382 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12383 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12384 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12385 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12386 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12388 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12389 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12390 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12391 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12392 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12393 send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12395 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12396 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12398 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12400 @node More Languages
12401 @section More Languages
12404 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12405 favorite language here}?
12408 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12409 languages; contributions are welcome.
12412 @section Beta Testing
12415 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12418 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12419 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12420 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12421 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12422 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12423 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12424 essentially halted.
12426 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12427 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12428 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12429 systems are especially welcome.
12431 @node Mailing Lists
12432 @section Mailing Lists
12435 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12438 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12440 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12442 @node Table of Symbols
12443 @appendix Bison Symbols
12444 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12445 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12447 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12448 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12449 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12452 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12453 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12454 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12455 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12457 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12458 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12461 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12462 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12463 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12464 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12467 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12468 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12469 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12472 @deffn {Variable} $$
12473 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12477 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12478 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12479 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12482 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12483 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12484 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12488 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12489 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12490 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12491 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12494 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12495 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12496 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12497 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12498 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12502 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12503 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12504 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12505 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12506 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12507 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12508 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12510 This feature is experimental.
12511 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12515 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12516 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12517 Comments, as in C/C++.
12520 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12521 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12525 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12526 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12529 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12530 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12531 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12534 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12535 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12538 This feature is experimental.
12539 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12542 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12545 @deffn {Directive} <>
12546 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12549 This feature is experimental.
12550 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12553 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12556 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12557 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12558 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12559 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12562 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12563 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12564 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12565 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12566 @xref{%code Summary}.
12569 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12570 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12574 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12575 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12576 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12581 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12582 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12583 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12584 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12587 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12588 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12589 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12592 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12593 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12594 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12597 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12598 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12599 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12602 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12603 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12604 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12608 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12609 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12610 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12613 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12614 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12615 used in the grammar.
12618 @deffn {Symbol} error
12619 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12620 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12621 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12622 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12623 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12624 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12625 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12626 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12629 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12630 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12631 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12634 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12635 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12639 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12640 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12641 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12644 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12645 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12648 @deffn {Directive} %language
12649 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12650 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12653 @deffn {Directive} %left
12654 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12655 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12658 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12659 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12660 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12664 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12665 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12666 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12667 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12668 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12671 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12672 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12673 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12675 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12676 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12677 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12679 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12680 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12681 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12682 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12683 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12684 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12685 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12686 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12691 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12692 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12693 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12698 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12699 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12700 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12703 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12704 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12705 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12708 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12709 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12710 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12713 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12714 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12715 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12716 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12719 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12720 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12721 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12724 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12725 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12726 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12729 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12730 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12731 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12734 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12735 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12736 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12737 unreasonable usage.
12740 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12741 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12742 Require a Version of Bison}.
12745 @deffn {Directive} %right
12746 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12747 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12750 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12751 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12752 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12755 @deffn {Directive} %start
12756 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12760 @deffn {Directive} %token
12761 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12762 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12765 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12766 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12767 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12770 @deffn {Directive} %type
12771 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12772 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12775 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12776 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12777 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12781 @deffn {Directive} %union
12782 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12783 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Union Declaration}.
12786 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12787 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12788 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12789 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12790 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12792 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12796 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12797 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12798 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12799 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12801 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12805 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12806 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12807 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12810 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12811 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12812 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12813 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12814 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12817 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12818 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12819 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12822 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12823 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12824 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12827 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12828 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12829 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12830 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12833 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12834 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12835 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12838 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12839 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12840 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12841 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12842 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12843 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12845 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12849 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12850 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12851 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12854 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12855 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12856 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12857 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12858 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12859 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12860 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12863 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12864 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12865 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12868 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12869 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12870 @xref{Memory Management}.
12873 @deffn {Function} yylex
12874 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12875 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12879 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12880 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12881 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12882 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12884 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12886 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12887 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12888 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12891 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12892 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12893 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12896 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12897 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12898 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12899 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12901 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12902 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12903 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12906 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12907 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12911 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12912 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12913 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12914 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12915 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12918 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12919 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12920 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12923 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12924 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12925 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12926 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12929 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12930 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12931 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12932 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12933 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12934 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12935 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12938 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12939 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12940 call this function to create a new parser.
12941 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12942 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12943 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12944 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12947 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12948 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12949 parse the rest of the input stream.
12950 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12951 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12952 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12953 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12956 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12957 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12958 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12959 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12960 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12961 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12964 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12965 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12966 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12967 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12970 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12971 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12972 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12973 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12974 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12975 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12976 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12978 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12979 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12980 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12981 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12982 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12983 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12984 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12987 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12988 Deprecated in favor of the @code{%define} variable @code{api.value.type}.
12989 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12990 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12998 @item Accepting state
12999 A state whose only action is the accept action.
13000 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
13001 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
13003 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
13004 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
13005 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
13006 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
13007 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13009 @item Consistent state
13010 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13012 @item Context-free grammars
13013 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
13014 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
13015 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
13016 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
13019 @item Default reduction
13020 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
13021 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
13022 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
13023 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
13026 @item Defaulted state
13027 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
13029 @item Dynamic allocation
13030 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
13031 compile time or on entry to a function.
13034 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
13035 character string of length zero.
13037 @item Finite-state stack machine
13038 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
13039 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
13040 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
13041 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
13042 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
13043 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13045 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
13046 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
13047 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
13048 deterministic parsing
13049 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13050 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13051 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13055 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13056 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13057 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13059 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13060 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13061 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13062 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13063 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13064 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13065 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13066 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13067 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13068 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13070 @item Infix operator
13071 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13072 performs some operation.
13075 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13077 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13078 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13079 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13080 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13081 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13082 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13083 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13085 @item Language construct
13086 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13087 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13088 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13090 @item Left associativity
13091 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13092 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13093 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13095 @item Left recursion
13096 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13097 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13100 @item Left-to-right parsing
13101 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13102 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13104 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13105 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13106 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13108 @item Lexical tie-in
13109 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13110 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13112 @item Literal string token
13113 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13115 @item Lookahead token
13116 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13120 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13121 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13122 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13125 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13126 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13128 @item Nonterminal symbol
13129 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13130 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13131 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13134 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13135 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13138 @item Postfix operator
13139 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13140 performs some operation.
13143 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13144 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13148 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13149 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13150 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13152 @item Reverse polish notation
13153 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13155 @item Right recursion
13156 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13157 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13161 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13162 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13163 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13166 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13167 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13168 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13170 @item Single-character literal
13171 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13172 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13175 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13176 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13177 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13178 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13181 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13182 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13183 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13186 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13187 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13190 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13191 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13192 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13193 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13195 @item Terminal symbol
13196 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13197 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13198 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13200 @item Unreachable state
13201 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13202 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13203 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13206 @node Copying This Manual
13207 @appendix Copying This Manual
13211 @unnumbered Bibliography
13215 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13216 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13217 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13218 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13220 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13221 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13222 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13223 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13224 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13226 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13227 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13228 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13229 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13230 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13232 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13233 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13234 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13235 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13236 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13239 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13240 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13241 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13244 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13245 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13246 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13247 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13250 @node Index of Terms
13251 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13257 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13258 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13259 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13260 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13261 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13262 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13263 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13264 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13265 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13266 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13267 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13268 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13269 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13270 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13271 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13272 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13273 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13274 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13275 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13276 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13277 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13278 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13279 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13280 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13281 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13282 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13283 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13284 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13285 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13286 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13287 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13288 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13289 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13290 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13291 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13292 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13293 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13294 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13295 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13296 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13297 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13298 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13299 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13300 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13301 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13302 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13303 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13304 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13305 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13306 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13307 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13308 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13309 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13310 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13311 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13312 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13313 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13314 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13316 @c Local Variables:
13317 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"