1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
319 A Complete C++ Example
321 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
322 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
323 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
324 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
325 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
338 Frequently Asked Questions
340 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
341 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
342 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
343 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
344 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
345 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
346 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
347 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
348 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
349 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
350 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
351 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
355 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
361 @unnumbered Introduction
364 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
365 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
366 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
367 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
368 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
369 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
370 calculators to complex programming languages.
372 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
373 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
374 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
375 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
376 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
379 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
380 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
381 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
382 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
385 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
386 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
387 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
388 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
389 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
390 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
393 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
396 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
398 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
399 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
400 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
401 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
402 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
404 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
406 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
407 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
408 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
409 License to all of the Bison source code.
411 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
412 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
413 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
414 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
415 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
416 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
417 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
419 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
420 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
421 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
422 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
423 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
424 using the other GNU tools.
426 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
427 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
428 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
429 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
433 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
434 @include gpl-3.0.texi
437 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
439 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
440 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
441 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
444 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
445 as mathematical ideas.
446 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
447 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
448 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
449 the name of an identifier, etc.).
450 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
451 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
452 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
453 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
454 how is the output used?
455 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
456 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
459 @node Language and Grammar
460 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
462 @cindex context-free grammar
463 @cindex grammar, context-free
464 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
465 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
466 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
467 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
468 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
469 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
470 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
471 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
475 @cindex Backus-Naur form
476 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
477 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
478 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
479 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
480 essentially machine-readable BNF.
482 @cindex LALR grammars
483 @cindex IELR grammars
485 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
486 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
487 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
488 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
489 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
490 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
491 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
492 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
493 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
494 Construction}, to learn how.
497 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
498 @cindex ambiguous grammars
499 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
501 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
502 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
503 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
504 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
505 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
506 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
507 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
508 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
509 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
510 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
511 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
512 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
513 possible parses of any given string is finite.
515 @cindex symbols (abstract)
517 @cindex syntactic grouping
518 @cindex grouping, syntactic
519 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
520 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
521 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
522 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
523 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
524 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
525 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
527 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
528 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
529 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
530 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
531 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
532 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
533 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
534 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
535 lexicography, not grammar.)
537 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
541 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
542 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
543 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
544 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
545 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
546 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
554 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
555 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
556 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
560 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
561 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
562 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
563 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
564 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
565 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
566 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
567 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
570 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
571 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
572 reads informally as follows:
575 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
580 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
584 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
585 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
586 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
587 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
590 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
591 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
592 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
593 not the start symbol.
595 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
596 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
597 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
598 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
599 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
600 reports a syntax error.
602 @node Grammar in Bison
603 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
604 @cindex Bison grammar
605 @cindex grammar, Bison
606 @cindex formal grammar
608 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
609 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
610 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
613 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
614 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
617 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
618 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
619 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
620 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
621 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
622 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
625 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
626 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
627 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
628 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
631 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
634 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
635 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
636 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
640 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
644 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
646 @node Semantic Values
647 @section Semantic Values
648 @cindex semantic value
649 @cindex value, semantic
651 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
652 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
653 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
654 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
655 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
658 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
659 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
660 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
661 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
662 ,Defining Language Semantics},
665 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
666 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
667 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
668 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
671 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
672 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
673 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
674 need to have any semantic value.)
676 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
677 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
678 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
679 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
680 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
681 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
683 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
684 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
685 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
686 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
687 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
689 @node Semantic Actions
690 @section Semantic Actions
691 @cindex semantic actions
692 @cindex actions, semantic
694 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
695 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
696 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
697 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
700 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
701 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
702 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
703 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
704 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
705 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
706 newly recognized larger expression.
708 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
712 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
716 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
717 from the values of the two subexpressions.
720 @section Writing GLR Parsers
722 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
725 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
726 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
728 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
729 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
730 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
731 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
732 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
733 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
734 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
735 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
736 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
738 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
739 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
740 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
741 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
742 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
743 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
744 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
745 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
746 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
747 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
748 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
749 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
750 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
751 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
752 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
753 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
754 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
755 identical set of symbols.
757 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
758 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
759 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
760 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
761 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
762 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
763 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
764 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
765 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
769 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
770 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
771 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
772 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
775 @node Simple GLR Parsers
776 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
777 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
778 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
782 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
783 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
785 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
786 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
787 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
789 Consider a problem that
790 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
791 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
794 type subrange = lo .. hi;
795 type enum = (a, b, c);
799 The original language standard allows only numeric
800 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
801 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
802 10206) and many other
803 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
804 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
808 type subrange = (a) .. b;
812 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
813 type with only one value:
820 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
821 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
823 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
824 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
825 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
826 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
827 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
828 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
829 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
830 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
832 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
833 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
834 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
835 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
838 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
839 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
840 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
841 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
842 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
843 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
846 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
847 use the GLR algorithm.
848 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
849 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
850 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
851 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
852 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
853 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
854 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
855 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
856 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
858 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
859 reports a syntax error as usual.
861 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
862 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
863 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
864 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
865 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
867 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
868 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
869 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
870 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
871 The present example contains only one conflict between two
872 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
873 cannot be nested. So the number of
874 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
875 and the parsing time is still linear.
877 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
878 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
881 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
891 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
920 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
921 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
922 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
923 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
930 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
931 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
932 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
941 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
942 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
943 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
944 notice when the parser splits.
946 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
947 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
948 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
949 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
950 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
951 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
952 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
953 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
954 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
955 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
956 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
957 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
958 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
961 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
962 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
963 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
964 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
965 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
966 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968 @node Merging GLR Parses
969 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
970 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
971 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
982 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 void yyerror (char const *);
998 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1007 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1008 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1009 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1010 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1011 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1015 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1016 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1017 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1018 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1022 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1023 | '(' declarator ')'
1028 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1029 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1036 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1037 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1038 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1039 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1040 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1041 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1042 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1043 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1044 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1045 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1046 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1047 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1048 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1049 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1051 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1052 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1053 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1054 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1055 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1056 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1057 The parser therefore prints
1060 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1063 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1064 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1071 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1072 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1073 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1074 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1075 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1076 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1077 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1078 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1079 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1080 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1086 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1087 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1088 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1089 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1094 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1095 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1100 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1104 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1112 with an accompanying forward declaration
1113 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1117 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1118 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1123 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1124 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1127 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1130 Bison requires that all of the
1131 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1132 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1133 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1134 the offending merge.
1136 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1137 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1139 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1140 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1141 the associated reduction.
1142 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1143 action in a GLR parser.
1146 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1148 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1150 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1151 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1152 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1153 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1154 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1155 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1156 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1157 influence syntax analysis.
1158 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1161 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1162 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1163 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1164 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1165 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1166 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1167 future versions of Bison.
1168 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1169 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1170 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1174 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1175 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1176 initiate error recovery.
1177 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1178 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1179 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1180 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1182 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1183 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1185 @node Compiler Requirements
1186 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1187 @cindex @code{inline}
1188 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1190 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1191 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1192 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1193 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1194 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1195 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1204 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1208 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1209 && ! defined inline)
1218 @cindex textual location
1219 @cindex location, textual
1221 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1222 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1223 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1224 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1226 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1227 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1228 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1229 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1232 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1233 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1234 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1237 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1238 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1239 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1240 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1241 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1242 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1243 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1246 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1247 @cindex Bison parser
1248 @cindex Bison utility
1249 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1252 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1253 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1254 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1255 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1256 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1257 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1258 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1261 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1262 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1263 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1266 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1267 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1268 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1269 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1270 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1271 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1272 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1274 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1275 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1276 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1277 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1278 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1279 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1280 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1281 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1282 C-Language Interface}.
1284 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1285 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1286 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1287 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1288 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1289 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1290 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1291 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1292 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1293 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1294 anything other than their usual meanings.
1296 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1297 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1298 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1299 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1300 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1301 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1302 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1303 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1304 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1307 @section Stages in Using Bison
1308 @cindex stages in using Bison
1311 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1312 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1316 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1317 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1318 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1319 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1320 sequence of C statements.
1323 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1324 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1325 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1326 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1329 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1332 Write error-reporting routines.
1335 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1336 must follow these steps:
1340 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1343 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1346 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1349 @node Grammar Layout
1350 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1351 @cindex grammar file
1353 @cindex format of grammar file
1354 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1356 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1357 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1364 @var{Bison declarations}
1373 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1374 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1376 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1377 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1378 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1379 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1380 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1381 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1383 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1384 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1385 semantic values of various symbols.
1387 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1390 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1391 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1392 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1396 @cindex simple examples
1397 @cindex examples, simple
1399 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1400 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1401 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1402 and a multi-function calculator. All
1403 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1405 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1406 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1407 source file to try them.
1410 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1411 a first example with no operator precedence.
1412 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1413 Operator precedence is introduced.
1414 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1415 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1416 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1417 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1418 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1422 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1423 @cindex reverse polish notation
1424 @cindex polish notation calculator
1425 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1426 @cindex calculator, simple
1428 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1429 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1430 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1431 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1433 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1434 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1437 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1438 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1439 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1440 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1441 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1442 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1443 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1446 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1447 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1449 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1450 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1453 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1456 #define YYSTYPE double
1459 void yyerror (char const *);
1464 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1467 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1468 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1470 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1471 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1472 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1473 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1474 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1475 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1476 which is a floating point number.
1478 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1479 function @code{pow}.
1481 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1482 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1483 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1484 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1487 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1488 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1489 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1490 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1491 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1492 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1493 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1494 type for numeric constants.
1497 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1499 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1512 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1519 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1520 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1521 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1522 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1523 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1524 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1530 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1531 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1532 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1533 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1534 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1537 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1538 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1539 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1541 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1542 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1543 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1544 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1545 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1546 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1555 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1557 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1566 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1567 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1568 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1569 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1570 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1572 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1573 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1574 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1575 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1576 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1577 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1579 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1580 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1581 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1582 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1585 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1586 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1587 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1590 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1592 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1597 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1601 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1602 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1603 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1604 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1605 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1606 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1607 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1609 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1610 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1611 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1612 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1613 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1616 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1618 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1619 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1620 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1621 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1626 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1627 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1632 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1633 equally well have written them separately:
1637 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1638 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1642 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1643 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1644 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1645 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1646 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1647 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1648 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1649 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1651 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1652 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1653 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1655 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1656 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1660 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1664 means the same thing as this:
1669 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1675 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1678 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1679 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1680 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1682 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1683 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1684 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1685 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1687 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1689 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1690 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1691 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1692 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1694 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1695 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1696 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1697 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1698 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1699 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1700 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1701 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1702 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1704 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1705 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1706 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1707 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1708 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1710 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1711 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1713 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1717 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1718 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1719 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1720 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1731 /* Skip white space. */
1732 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1736 /* Process numbers. */
1737 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1740 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1745 /* Return end-of-input. */
1748 /* Return a single char. */
1755 @subsection The Controlling Function
1756 @cindex controlling function
1757 @cindex main function in simple example
1759 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1760 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1761 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1774 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1775 @cindex error reporting routine
1777 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1778 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1779 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1780 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1781 here is the definition we will use:
1789 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1791 yyerror (char const *s)
1793 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1798 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1799 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1800 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1801 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1802 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1803 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1805 @node Rpcalc Generate
1806 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1807 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1809 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1810 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1811 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1812 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1813 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1814 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1816 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1817 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1819 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1820 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1827 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1828 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1829 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1830 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1831 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1832 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1833 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1835 @node Rpcalc Compile
1836 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1837 @cindex compiling the parser
1839 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1843 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1845 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1849 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1850 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1851 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1855 # @r{List files again.}
1857 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1861 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1862 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1868 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1870 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1874 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1876 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1881 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1882 @cindex infix notation calculator
1884 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1886 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1887 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1888 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1889 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1892 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1896 #define YYSTYPE double
1900 void yyerror (char const *);
1905 /* Bison declarations. */
1909 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1910 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1913 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1924 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1931 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1932 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1933 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1934 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1935 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1936 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1937 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1944 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1947 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1949 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1950 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1951 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1952 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1953 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1954 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1957 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1958 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1959 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1960 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1961 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1964 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1965 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1966 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1967 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1968 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1970 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1975 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1983 @node Simple Error Recovery
1984 @section Simple Error Recovery
1985 @cindex error recovery, simple
1987 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1988 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1989 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1990 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1991 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1992 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1994 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1995 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1996 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2002 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2003 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2008 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2009 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2010 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2011 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2012 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2013 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2014 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2015 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2018 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2019 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2020 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2021 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2022 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2023 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2026 @node Location Tracking Calc
2027 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2028 @cindex location tracking calculator
2029 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2030 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2032 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2033 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2034 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2035 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2039 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2040 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2041 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2044 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2045 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2047 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2048 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2051 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2057 void yyerror (char const *);
2060 /* Bison declarations. */
2068 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2072 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2073 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2074 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2075 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2076 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2077 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2078 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2082 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2084 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2085 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2086 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2087 from the new information.
2089 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2090 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2103 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2110 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2111 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2112 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2122 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2123 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2124 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2129 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2130 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2131 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2135 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2136 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2137 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2139 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2140 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2141 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2142 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2143 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2144 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2148 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2150 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2151 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2152 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2155 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2156 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2167 /* Skip white space. */
2168 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2169 ++yylloc.last_column;
2174 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2175 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2179 /* Process numbers. */
2183 ++yylloc.last_column;
2184 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2186 ++yylloc.last_column;
2187 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2194 /* Return end-of-input. */
2199 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2203 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2206 ++yylloc.last_column;
2212 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2213 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2214 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2215 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2217 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2218 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2219 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2220 controlling function:
2227 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2228 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2234 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2235 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2236 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2238 @node Multi-function Calc
2239 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2240 @cindex multi-function calculator
2241 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2242 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2244 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2245 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2246 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2247 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2248 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2250 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2251 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2252 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2253 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2254 functions whose syntax has this form:
2257 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2261 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2262 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2263 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2267 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2271 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2277 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2282 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2285 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2286 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2287 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2290 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2291 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2293 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2295 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2299 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2300 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2302 void yyerror (char const *);
2307 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2308 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2311 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2312 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2319 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2320 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2322 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2325 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2326 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2327 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2329 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2330 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2331 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2332 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2334 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2335 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2336 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2337 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2338 between angle brackets).
2340 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2341 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2342 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2343 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2344 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2345 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2348 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2350 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2351 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2352 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2354 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2366 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2367 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2374 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2375 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2376 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2377 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2378 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2379 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2380 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2381 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2382 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2383 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2386 /* End of grammar. */
2390 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2391 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2392 @cindex symbol table example
2394 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2395 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2396 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2397 requires some additional C functions for support.
2399 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2400 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2401 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2403 @comment file: calc.h
2406 /* Function type. */
2407 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2411 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2414 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2415 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2418 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2419 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2421 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2426 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2428 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2429 extern symrec *sym_table;
2431 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2432 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2436 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2437 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2438 @code{init_table} as well:
2444 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2446 yyerror (char const *s)
2456 double (*fnct) (double);
2461 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2474 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2479 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2484 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2486 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2487 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2502 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2503 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2505 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2506 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2507 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2508 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2509 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2510 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2512 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2514 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2515 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2519 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2521 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2522 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2523 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2524 ptr->type = sym_type;
2525 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2526 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2534 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2537 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2538 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2539 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2546 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2547 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2548 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2549 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2551 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2552 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2553 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2554 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2555 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2556 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2558 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2559 operators in @code{yylex}.
2561 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2573 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2574 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2582 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2583 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2586 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2592 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2595 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2596 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2597 static size_t length = 40;
2598 static char *symbuf = 0;
2604 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2610 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2614 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2616 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2618 /* Get another character. */
2623 while (isalnum (c));
2630 s = getsym (symbuf);
2632 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2637 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2643 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2644 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2645 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2653 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2656 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2657 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2658 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2661 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2662 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2666 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2668 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2669 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2671 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2672 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2675 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2676 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2677 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2678 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2679 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2680 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2681 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2682 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2683 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2686 @node Grammar Outline
2687 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2689 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2690 appropriate delimiters:
2697 @var{Bison declarations}
2706 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2707 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2708 continues until end of line.
2711 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2712 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2713 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2714 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2715 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2719 @subsection The prologue
2720 @cindex declarations section
2722 @cindex declarations
2724 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2725 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2726 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2727 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2728 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2729 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2730 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2732 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2733 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2736 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2737 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2738 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2739 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2740 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2741 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2742 @code{%union} declaration.
2753 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2757 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2758 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2764 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2765 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2766 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2767 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2768 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2769 @code{#include} directives.
2771 @node Prologue Alternatives
2772 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2773 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2776 @findex %code requires
2777 @findex %code provides
2780 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2781 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2782 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2783 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2784 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2785 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2786 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2788 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2799 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2803 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2804 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2811 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2812 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2813 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2814 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2815 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2816 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2817 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2818 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2819 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2820 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2821 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2823 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2824 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2825 This behavior raises a few questions.
2826 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2827 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2828 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2829 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2830 This behavior is not intuitive.
2832 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2833 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2834 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2835 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2842 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2843 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2846 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2847 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2859 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2863 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2864 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2865 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2872 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2873 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2874 explicit which kind you intend.
2875 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2877 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2878 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2879 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2880 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2881 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2882 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2883 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2884 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2885 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2888 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2889 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2891 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2909 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2915 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2916 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2929 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2930 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2931 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2939 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2940 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2941 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2942 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2943 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2944 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2946 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2947 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2948 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2949 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2950 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2951 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2952 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2953 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2954 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2955 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2956 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2959 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2960 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2961 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2962 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2963 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2964 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2965 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2966 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2967 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2968 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2986 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2992 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2993 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3006 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3012 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3013 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3021 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3022 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3023 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3026 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3027 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3028 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3029 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3030 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3031 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3034 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3035 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3036 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3037 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3039 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3040 organize your grammar file.
3041 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3046 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3047 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3048 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3049 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3053 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3054 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3055 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3056 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3061 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3062 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3064 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3066 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3067 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3068 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3069 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3071 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3072 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3073 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3074 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3075 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3076 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3077 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3078 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3081 @node Bison Declarations
3082 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3083 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3084 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3086 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3087 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3088 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3089 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3092 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3093 @cindex grammar rules section
3094 @cindex rules section for grammar
3096 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3097 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3099 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3100 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3101 if it is the first thing in the file.
3104 @subsection The epilogue
3105 @cindex additional C code section
3107 @cindex C code, section for additional
3109 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3110 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3111 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3112 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3113 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3114 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3115 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3116 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3117 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3118 C-Language Interface}.
3120 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3121 from the grammar rules.
3123 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3124 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3125 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3126 of the grammar file.
3129 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3130 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3131 @cindex terminal symbol
3135 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3138 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3139 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3140 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3141 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3142 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3143 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3144 the symbol to stand for it.
3146 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3147 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3148 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3150 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3151 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3152 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3153 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3154 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3155 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3156 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3158 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3162 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3163 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3164 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3165 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3168 @cindex character token
3169 @cindex literal token
3170 @cindex single-character literal
3171 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3172 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3173 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3174 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3175 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3176 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3177 ,Operator Precedence}).
3179 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3180 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3181 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3182 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3183 your program will confuse other readers.
3185 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3186 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3187 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3188 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3189 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3190 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3194 @cindex string token
3195 @cindex literal string token
3196 @cindex multicharacter literal
3197 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3198 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3199 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3200 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3201 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3203 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3204 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3205 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3206 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3207 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3209 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3211 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3212 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3213 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3214 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3215 read your program will be confused.
3217 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3218 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3219 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3220 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3221 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3222 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3225 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3226 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3227 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3229 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3230 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3231 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3232 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3233 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3234 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3235 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3236 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3237 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3238 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3239 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3240 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3242 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3243 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3244 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3245 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3246 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3248 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3249 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3250 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3251 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3252 characters in the following C-language string:
3255 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3258 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3259 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3260 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3261 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3262 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3263 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3264 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3265 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3266 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3267 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3270 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3271 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3272 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3273 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3274 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3277 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3279 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3280 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3282 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3286 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3291 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3292 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3293 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3304 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3305 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3307 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3308 extra white space as you wish.
3310 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3311 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3314 @{@var{C statements}@}
3319 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3320 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3321 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3322 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3323 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3324 compiler can check it.
3326 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3327 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3328 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3329 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3330 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3331 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3332 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3333 character constants.
3335 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3339 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3340 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3345 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3346 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3353 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3355 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3356 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3357 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3376 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3380 @section Recursive Rules
3381 @cindex recursive rule
3383 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3384 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3385 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3386 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3387 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3398 @cindex left recursion
3399 @cindex right recursion
3401 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3402 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3403 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3415 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3416 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3417 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3418 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3419 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3420 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3421 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3424 @cindex mutual recursion
3425 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3426 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3427 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3436 | primary '+' primary
3449 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3453 @section Defining Language Semantics
3454 @cindex defining language semantics
3455 @cindex language semantics, defining
3457 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3458 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3459 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3461 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3462 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3463 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3464 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3467 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3468 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3469 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3470 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3471 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3472 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3473 action in the middle of a rule.
3477 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3478 @cindex semantic value type
3479 @cindex value type, semantic
3480 @cindex data types of semantic values
3481 @cindex default data type
3483 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3484 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3485 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3486 Notation Calculator}).
3488 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3489 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3490 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3493 #define YYSTYPE double
3497 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3498 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3499 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3500 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3502 @node Multiple Types
3503 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3505 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3506 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3507 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3508 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3511 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3512 requires you to do two things:
3516 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3517 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3518 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3519 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3523 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3524 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3525 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3526 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3527 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3536 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3538 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3539 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3540 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3541 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3543 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3544 placed at any position in the rule;
3545 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3546 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3547 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3548 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3550 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3551 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3552 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3553 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3554 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3555 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3556 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3557 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3558 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3559 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3562 Here is a typical example:
3568 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3572 Or, in terms of named references:
3578 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3583 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3584 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3585 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3586 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3587 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3588 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3590 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3591 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3592 referred to as @code{$2}.
3594 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3595 references construct.
3597 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3598 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3599 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3600 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3601 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3605 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3609 @cindex default action
3610 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3611 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3612 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3613 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3614 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3615 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3617 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3618 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3619 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3620 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3621 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3626 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3627 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3633 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3638 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3639 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3640 definition of @code{foo}.
3643 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3644 any, from a semantic action.
3645 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3646 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3649 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3650 @cindex action data types
3651 @cindex data types in actions
3653 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3654 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3656 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3657 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3658 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3659 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3660 in the rule. In this example,
3666 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3671 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3672 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3673 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3674 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3676 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3677 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3678 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3690 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3691 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3693 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3694 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3695 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3696 @cindex mid-rule actions
3698 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3699 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3700 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3702 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3703 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3704 it is run before they are parsed.
3706 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3707 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3708 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3709 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3712 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3713 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3714 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3715 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3716 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3717 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3719 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3720 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3721 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3722 at the end of the rule.
3724 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3725 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3726 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3727 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3728 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3729 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3735 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3737 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3742 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3743 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3744 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3745 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3746 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3747 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3748 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3749 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3751 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3752 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3753 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3754 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3755 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3758 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3759 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3760 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3761 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3762 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3764 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3765 Discarded Symbols}).
3766 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3767 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3769 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3770 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3775 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3789 $$ = push_context ();
3790 declare_variable ($3);
3797 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3798 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3799 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3801 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3802 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3803 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3804 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3805 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3811 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3812 | '@{' statements '@}'
3818 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3823 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3824 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3827 | '@{' statements '@}'
3833 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3834 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3835 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3836 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3837 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3838 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3840 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3841 actions into the two rules, like this:
3846 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3847 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3848 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3849 '@{' statements '@}'
3855 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3856 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3858 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3859 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3860 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3865 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3866 declarations statements '@}'
3867 | '@{' statements '@}'
3873 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3874 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3876 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3877 serves as a subroutine:
3882 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3888 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3889 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3895 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3896 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3898 @node Tracking Locations
3899 @section Tracking Locations
3901 @cindex textual location
3902 @cindex location, textual
3904 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3905 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3906 especially symbol locations.
3908 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3909 actions to take when rules are matched.
3912 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3913 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3914 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3918 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3919 @cindex data type of locations
3920 @cindex default location type
3922 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3923 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3925 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3926 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3927 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3928 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3932 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3941 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3942 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3943 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3944 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3945 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3947 @node Actions and Locations
3948 @subsection Actions and Locations
3949 @cindex location actions
3950 @cindex actions, location
3953 @vindex @@@var{name}
3954 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3956 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3957 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3959 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3960 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3961 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3962 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3963 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3966 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3967 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3968 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3969 references construct.
3971 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3979 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3980 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3981 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3982 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3989 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3990 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3991 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3997 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3998 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3999 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4002 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4003 example above simply rewrites this way:
4017 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4018 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4019 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4026 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4027 from a semantic action.
4028 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4029 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4031 @node Location Default Action
4032 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4033 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4034 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4036 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4037 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4038 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4039 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4040 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4041 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4042 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4043 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4046 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4047 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4049 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4050 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4051 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4052 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4053 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4054 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4055 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4056 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4057 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4058 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4060 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4064 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4068 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4069 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4070 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4071 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4075 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4076 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4077 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4078 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4085 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4086 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4087 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4089 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4093 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4094 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4097 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4098 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4099 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4100 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4103 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4104 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4105 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4106 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4109 @node Named References
4110 @section Named References
4111 @cindex named references
4113 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4114 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4115 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4116 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4117 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4118 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4120 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4121 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4122 used as named references. For example:
4126 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4127 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4132 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4136 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4137 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4142 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4148 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4151 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4154 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4159 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4160 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4161 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4164 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4165 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4170 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4171 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4172 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4175 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4176 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4182 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4183 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4186 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4187 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4191 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4192 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4193 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4194 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4195 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4196 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4197 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4199 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4203 @section Bison Declarations
4204 @cindex declarations, Bison
4205 @cindex Bison declarations
4207 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4208 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4211 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4212 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4213 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4214 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4216 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4217 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4218 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4219 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4229 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4230 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4231 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4232 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4233 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4234 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4235 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4239 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4240 @cindex version requirement
4241 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4244 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4245 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4249 %require "@var{version}"
4253 @subsection Token Type Names
4254 @cindex declaring token type names
4255 @cindex token type names, declaring
4256 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4259 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4265 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4266 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4267 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4269 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4270 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4271 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4274 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4275 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4276 following the token name:
4280 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4284 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4285 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4286 with each other or with normal characters.
4288 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4289 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4290 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4291 Than One Value Type}).
4297 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4301 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4305 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4306 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4307 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4314 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4315 equivalent literal string tokens:
4318 %token <operator> OR "||"
4319 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4324 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4325 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4326 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4327 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4328 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4329 the literal string instead of the token name.
4331 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4332 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4336 %token END 0 "end of file"
4339 @node Precedence Decl
4340 @subsection Operator Precedence
4341 @cindex precedence declarations
4342 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4343 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4345 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4346 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4347 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4348 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4349 operator precedence.
4351 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4352 @code{%token}: either
4355 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4362 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4365 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4366 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4367 all the @var{symbols}:
4371 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4372 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4373 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4374 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4375 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4376 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4377 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4378 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4379 considered a syntax error.
4382 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4383 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4384 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4385 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4386 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4389 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4390 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4391 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4392 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4397 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4398 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4402 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4403 @cindex declaring value types
4404 @cindex value types, declaring
4407 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4408 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4409 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4424 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4425 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4426 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4427 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4429 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4430 @code{union}. For example:
4442 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4443 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4446 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4447 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4448 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4450 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4451 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4453 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4454 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4455 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4456 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4464 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4469 and then your grammar can use the following
4470 instead of @code{%union}:
4483 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4484 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4485 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4489 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4490 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4491 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4494 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4498 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4499 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4500 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4501 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4502 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4505 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4506 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4507 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4508 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4510 @node Initial Action Decl
4511 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4512 @findex %initial-action
4514 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4515 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4518 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4519 @findex %initial-action
4520 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4521 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4522 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4523 @code{%parse-param}.
4526 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4529 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4532 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4537 @node Destructor Decl
4538 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4539 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4543 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4544 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4545 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4546 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4547 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4548 must discard the start symbol.
4550 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4551 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4552 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4553 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4555 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4556 symbol is automatically discarded.
4558 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4560 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4562 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4563 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4564 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4565 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4567 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4568 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4569 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4570 tag among @var{symbols}.
4571 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4572 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4573 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4575 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4576 (These default forms are experimental.
4577 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4579 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4580 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4581 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4582 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4584 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4585 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4586 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4587 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4588 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4595 %union @{ char *string; @}
4596 %token <string> STRING1
4597 %token <string> STRING2
4598 %type <string> string1
4599 %type <string> string2
4600 %union @{ char character; @}
4601 %token <character> CHR
4602 %type <character> chr
4605 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4606 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4607 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4608 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4612 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4613 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4614 to @code{free} by default.
4615 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4616 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4617 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4618 @code{free} only once.
4619 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4620 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4622 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4623 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4624 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4625 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4626 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4627 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4628 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4629 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4630 reference it in your grammar.
4631 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4632 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4638 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4639 @cindex mid-rule actions
4640 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4641 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4642 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4643 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4644 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4645 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4646 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4647 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4651 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4652 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4653 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4658 @cindex discarded symbols
4659 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4663 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4665 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4667 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4668 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4670 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4673 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4674 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4677 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4678 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4679 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4683 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4684 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4685 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4686 @cindex warnings, preventing
4687 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4691 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4692 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4693 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4694 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4695 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4696 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4698 The declaration looks like this:
4704 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4705 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4706 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4707 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4709 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4710 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4711 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4712 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4713 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4714 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4715 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4721 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4725 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4726 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4727 print the number of conflicts.
4730 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4731 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4732 go back to the beginning.
4735 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4736 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4737 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4740 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4741 but will keep silent otherwise.
4744 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4745 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4746 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4747 @cindex default start symbol
4750 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4751 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4752 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4759 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4760 @cindex reentrant parser
4762 @findex %define api.pure
4764 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4765 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4766 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4767 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4768 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4769 program must be called only within interlocks.
4771 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4772 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4773 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4774 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4775 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4777 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4778 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4779 reentrant. It looks like this:
4785 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4786 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4787 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4788 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4789 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4790 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4791 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4792 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4793 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4795 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4796 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4800 @subsection A Push Parser
4803 @findex %define api.push-pull
4805 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4806 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4808 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4809 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4810 each time a new token is made available.
4812 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4813 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4814 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4815 within a certain time period.
4817 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4818 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4819 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4822 %define api.push-pull push
4825 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4826 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4827 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4828 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4829 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4833 %define api.push-pull push
4836 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4837 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4838 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4839 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4841 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4842 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4843 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4844 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4845 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4846 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4847 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4848 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4852 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4854 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4855 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4856 yypstate_delete (ps);
4859 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4860 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4861 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4862 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4863 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4864 example would thus look like this:
4869 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4872 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4873 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4874 yypstate_delete (ps);
4877 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4878 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4880 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4881 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4882 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4883 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4884 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4885 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4886 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4887 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4888 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4889 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4890 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4891 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4892 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4893 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4894 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4895 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4896 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4900 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4901 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4902 yypstate_delete (ps);
4905 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4906 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4907 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4910 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4911 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4912 @cindex declaration summary
4913 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4915 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4917 @deffn {Directive} %union
4918 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4919 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4922 @deffn {Directive} %token
4923 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4924 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4927 @deffn {Directive} %right
4928 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4929 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4932 @deffn {Directive} %left
4933 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4934 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4937 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4938 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4939 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4940 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4944 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4945 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4946 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4950 @deffn {Directive} %type
4951 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4952 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4955 @deffn {Directive} %start
4956 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4960 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4961 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4962 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4968 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4971 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4972 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4974 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4975 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4976 @xref{%code Summary}.
4979 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4980 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4981 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4982 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4985 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4986 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4987 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4988 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4991 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4992 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4993 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4994 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4995 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4997 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4998 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4999 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5000 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5001 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5002 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5003 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5004 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5005 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5006 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5008 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5009 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5010 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5012 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5013 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5014 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5016 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5017 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5018 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5019 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5020 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5022 @findex %code requires
5023 @findex %code provides
5024 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5025 header also contains their code.
5026 @xref{%code Summary}.
5029 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5030 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5033 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5034 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5035 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5038 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5039 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5040 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5043 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5044 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5045 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5046 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5048 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5052 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5053 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5054 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5055 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5056 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5057 accurate syntax error messages.
5060 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5061 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5062 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5064 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5065 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5066 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5067 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5068 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5069 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5070 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5071 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5073 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5077 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5078 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5079 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5084 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5085 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5086 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5087 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5088 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5089 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5090 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5094 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5095 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5098 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5099 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5100 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5104 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5105 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5106 Require a Version of Bison}.
5109 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5110 Specify the skeleton to use.
5112 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5113 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5114 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5115 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5117 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5118 file in the Bison installation directory.
5119 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5120 directory of the grammar file.
5121 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5124 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5125 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5126 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5127 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5128 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5129 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5130 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5133 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5134 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5135 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5136 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5137 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5138 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5139 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5142 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5143 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5144 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5148 The highest token number, plus one.
5150 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5152 The number of grammar rules,
5154 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5158 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5159 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5160 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5161 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5165 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5166 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5167 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5171 @node %define Summary
5172 @subsection %define Summary
5174 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5175 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5176 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5177 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5178 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5179 @code{%define} directive:
5181 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5182 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5183 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5184 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5186 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5187 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5188 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5189 to specifying @code{""}.
5191 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5192 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5193 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5196 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5197 @code{%define} accepts.
5199 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5200 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5204 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5206 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5207 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5209 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5211 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5212 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5215 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5216 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5217 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5218 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5219 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5220 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5223 @c ================================================== api.pure
5225 @findex %define api.pure
5228 @item Language(s): C
5230 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5231 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5233 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5235 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5239 @findex %define api.push-pull
5242 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5244 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5245 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5246 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5247 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5249 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5251 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5254 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5256 @item lr.default-reductions
5257 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5260 @item Language(s): all
5262 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5263 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5264 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5265 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5267 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5268 @item Default Value:
5270 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5271 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5275 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5277 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5278 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5281 @item Language(s): all
5282 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5283 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5284 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5285 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5288 @c ================================================== lr.type
5291 @findex %define lr.type
5294 @item Language(s): all
5296 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5297 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5298 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5300 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5302 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5306 @findex %define namespace
5309 @item Languages(s): C++
5311 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5312 For example, if you specify:
5315 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5318 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5321 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5324 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5325 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5328 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5334 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5335 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5336 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5338 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5340 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5341 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5342 lexical analyzer function.
5343 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5344 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5345 lexical analyzer function.
5346 For example, if you specify:
5349 %define namespace "foo"
5350 %name-prefix "bar::"
5353 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5357 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5359 @findex %define parse.lac
5362 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5364 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5365 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5366 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5367 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5373 @subsection %code Summary
5377 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5378 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5379 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5380 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5381 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5382 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5383 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5384 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5386 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5387 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5388 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5389 in the parser implementation.
5391 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5392 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5393 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5395 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5398 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5399 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5400 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5401 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5402 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5403 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5407 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5408 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5409 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5412 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5413 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5417 @findex %code requires
5420 @item Language(s): C, C++
5422 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5423 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5424 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5425 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5426 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5428 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5429 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5434 @findex %code provides
5437 @item Language(s): C, C++
5439 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5440 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5442 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5443 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5451 @item Language(s): C, C++
5453 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5454 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5455 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5456 parser implementation file. For example:
5465 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5469 @findex %code imports
5472 @item Language(s): Java
5474 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5476 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5477 before any class definitions.
5481 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5482 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5483 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5484 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5487 @node Multiple Parsers
5488 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5490 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5491 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5492 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5493 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5495 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5496 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5497 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5498 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5499 names that do not conflict.
5501 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5502 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5503 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5504 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5505 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5506 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5507 @code{clex}, and so on.
5509 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5510 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5511 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5512 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5513 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5515 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5516 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5517 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5518 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5521 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5522 @cindex C-language interface
5525 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5526 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5527 functions that it needs to use.
5529 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5530 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5531 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5532 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5535 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5536 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5537 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5538 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5539 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5540 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5542 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5543 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5544 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5548 @node Parser Function
5549 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5552 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5553 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5554 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5555 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5556 without reading further.
5559 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5560 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5561 is due to end-of-input).
5563 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5564 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5567 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5570 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5575 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5580 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5583 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5584 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5585 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5587 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5588 @findex %parse-param
5589 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5590 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5591 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5592 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5593 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5596 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5599 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5600 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5604 Then call the parser like this:
5608 int nastiness, randomness;
5609 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5610 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5616 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5619 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5622 @node Push Parser Function
5623 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5624 @findex yypush_parse
5626 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5627 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5629 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5630 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5631 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5632 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5634 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5635 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5636 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5637 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5640 @node Pull Parser Function
5641 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5642 @findex yypull_parse
5644 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5645 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5647 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5648 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5649 declaration is used.
5650 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5652 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5653 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5656 @node Parser Create Function
5657 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5658 @findex yypstate_new
5660 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5661 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5663 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5664 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5665 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5666 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5668 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5669 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5670 or 0 if no memory was available.
5671 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5675 @node Parser Delete Function
5676 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5677 @findex yypstate_delete
5679 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5680 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5682 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5683 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5684 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5685 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5687 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5688 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5689 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5693 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5695 @cindex lexical analyzer
5697 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5698 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5699 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5700 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5702 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5703 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5704 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5705 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5706 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5707 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5708 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5712 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5713 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5714 of the token it has read.
5715 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5716 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5718 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5719 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5722 @node Calling Convention
5723 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5725 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5726 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5727 signifies end-of-input.
5729 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5730 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5731 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5732 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5734 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5735 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5736 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5737 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5738 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5739 signifies end-of-input.
5741 Here is an example showing these things:
5748 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5751 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5752 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5754 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5760 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5761 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5763 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5764 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5768 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5769 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5770 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5771 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5774 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5775 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5776 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5777 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5778 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5781 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5782 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5783 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5784 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5787 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5790 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5791 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5792 strlen (token_buffer))
5793 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5794 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5799 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5800 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5804 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5807 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5808 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5809 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5810 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5816 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5817 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5822 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5823 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5824 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5825 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5826 declaration looks like this:
5839 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5844 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5845 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5850 @node Token Locations
5851 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5854 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5855 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5856 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5857 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5858 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5859 data in that variable.
5861 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5862 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5863 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5864 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5865 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5868 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5871 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5873 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5874 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5875 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5876 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5877 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5878 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5883 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5886 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5887 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5892 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5893 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5894 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5898 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5899 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5902 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5904 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5905 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5911 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5912 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5913 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5917 results in the following signature:
5920 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5921 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5924 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5927 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5928 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5932 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5935 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5936 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5939 @node Error Reporting
5940 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5941 @cindex error reporting function
5944 @cindex syntax error
5946 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5947 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5948 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5949 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5952 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5953 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5954 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5955 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5956 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5958 @findex %error-verbose
5959 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5960 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5961 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5962 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5963 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5965 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5966 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5967 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5968 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5969 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5970 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5972 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5973 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5974 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5976 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5981 yyerror (char const *s)
5985 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5990 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5991 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5992 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5993 immediately return 1.
5995 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5996 an access to the current location.
5997 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5998 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5999 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6003 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6004 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6007 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6010 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6011 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6014 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6015 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6016 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6017 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6021 /* Location tracking. */
6025 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6027 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6028 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6032 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6035 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6036 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6037 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6038 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6043 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6044 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6045 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6046 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6047 message is always passed last.
6049 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6050 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6051 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6055 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6056 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6057 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6058 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6060 @node Action Features
6061 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6062 @cindex summary, action features
6063 @cindex action features summary
6065 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6066 are useful in actions.
6068 @deffn {Variable} $$
6069 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6070 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6073 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6074 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6075 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6078 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6079 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6080 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6081 Types of Values in Actions}.
6084 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6085 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6086 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6087 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6090 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6091 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6092 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6095 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6096 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6097 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6100 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6102 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6103 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6104 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6105 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6106 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6107 going to be reduced by this rule.
6109 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6110 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6111 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6114 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6117 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6119 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6122 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6124 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6128 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6130 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6131 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6132 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6133 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6134 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6137 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6138 @findex YYRECOVERING
6139 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6140 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6141 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6144 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6145 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6146 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6147 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6148 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6150 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6153 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6154 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6156 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6158 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6161 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6162 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6163 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6164 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6167 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6168 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6169 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6170 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6172 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6175 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6176 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6177 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6178 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6180 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6185 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6186 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6189 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6193 @c int first_line, last_line;
6194 @c int first_column, last_column;
6198 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6199 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6201 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6202 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6203 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6206 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6209 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6211 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6212 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6216 @node Internationalization
6217 @section Parser Internationalization
6218 @cindex internationalization
6224 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6225 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6226 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6227 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6228 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6229 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6230 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6231 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6234 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6235 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6236 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6241 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6242 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6243 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6244 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6245 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6249 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6254 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6255 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6256 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6257 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6258 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6259 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6260 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6261 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6262 Bison-generated parser.
6265 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6266 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6267 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6271 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6274 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6275 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6276 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6280 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6281 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6282 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6285 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6291 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6295 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6301 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6302 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6303 @cindex algorithm of parser
6306 @cindex parser stack
6307 @cindex stack, parser
6309 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6310 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6311 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6313 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6314 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6317 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6318 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6319 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6320 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6321 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6322 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6323 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6325 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6332 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6333 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6336 expr: expr '*' expr;
6340 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6347 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6348 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6350 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6351 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6352 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6354 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6357 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6358 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6359 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6360 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6361 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6362 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6363 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6364 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6365 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6366 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6370 @section Lookahead Tokens
6371 @cindex lookahead token
6373 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6374 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6375 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6376 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6377 token in order to decide what to do.
6379 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6380 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6381 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6382 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6383 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6384 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6385 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6388 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6389 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6390 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6409 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6410 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6411 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6412 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6413 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6415 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6416 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6417 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6418 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6419 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6420 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6425 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6426 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6427 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6428 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6431 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6433 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6434 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6435 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6437 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6438 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6444 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6450 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6451 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6453 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6454 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6455 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6456 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6459 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6460 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6461 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6462 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6463 contrast it with the other alternative.
6465 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6466 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6470 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6472 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6475 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6476 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6477 making these two inputs equivalent:
6480 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6482 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6485 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6486 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6487 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6488 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6489 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6490 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6491 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6492 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6494 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6495 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6496 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6497 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6499 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6501 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6502 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6503 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6508 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6521 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6531 @section Operator Precedence
6532 @cindex operator precedence
6533 @cindex precedence of operators
6535 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6536 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6537 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6538 shift and when to reduce.
6541 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6542 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6543 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6544 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6547 @node Why Precedence
6548 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6550 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6551 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6566 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6567 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6568 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6569 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6570 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6571 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6572 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6575 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6576 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6577 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6578 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6579 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6580 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6581 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6582 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6585 @cindex associativity
6586 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6587 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6588 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6589 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6590 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6591 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6592 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6593 makes right-associativity.
6595 @node Using Precedence
6596 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6601 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6602 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6603 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6604 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6605 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6606 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6607 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6610 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6611 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6612 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6613 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6614 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6616 @node Precedence Examples
6617 @subsection Precedence Examples
6619 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6627 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6628 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6629 declared with @code{'-'}:
6632 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6638 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6639 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6640 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6642 @node How Precedence
6643 @subsection How Precedence Works
6645 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6646 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6647 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6648 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6649 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6650 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6652 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6653 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6654 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6655 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6656 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6657 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6658 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6661 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6662 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6664 @node Contextual Precedence
6665 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6666 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6667 @cindex unary operator precedence
6668 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6669 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6672 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6673 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6674 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6675 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6677 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6678 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6679 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6680 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6683 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6684 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6685 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6686 modifier's syntax is:
6689 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6693 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6694 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6695 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6696 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6697 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6699 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6700 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6701 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6711 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6719 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6724 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6725 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6726 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6727 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6729 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6730 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6731 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6732 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6734 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6735 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6736 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6737 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6738 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6739 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6741 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6742 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6746 @section Parser States
6747 @cindex finite-state machine
6748 @cindex parser state
6749 @cindex state (of parser)
6751 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6752 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6753 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6754 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6755 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6757 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6758 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6759 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6760 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6761 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6762 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6763 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6764 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6767 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6768 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6769 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6772 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6773 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6774 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6776 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6777 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6780 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6781 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6786 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6788 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6794 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6795 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6801 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6802 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6803 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6804 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6805 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6806 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6808 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6809 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6810 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6812 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6813 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6814 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6815 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6816 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6818 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6819 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6820 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6821 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6825 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6826 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6830 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6836 | sequence redirects
6846 | redirects redirect
6851 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6852 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6853 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6854 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6855 in infinitely many ways!
6857 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6858 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6859 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6860 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6862 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6873 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6881 | sequence redirects
6895 | redirects redirect
6900 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6901 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6902 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6904 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6912 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
6915 | name_list ':' type
6931 | name ',' name_list
6936 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6937 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6938 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6939 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6943 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6945 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6946 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6947 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6949 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6950 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6951 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6952 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6953 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6954 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6955 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6958 @cindex canonical LR
6959 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6960 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6961 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6962 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6963 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6964 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6965 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6966 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6968 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6969 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6970 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6971 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6972 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6983 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
6988 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6989 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6990 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6991 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6992 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6993 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6995 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6996 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6997 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6998 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6999 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7000 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7005 | name_list ':' type
7013 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7014 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7019 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7020 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7021 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7022 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7023 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7024 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7025 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7027 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7028 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7029 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7030 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7032 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7033 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7036 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7037 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7038 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7039 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7042 @node LR Table Construction
7043 @subsection LR Table Construction
7044 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7047 @cindex canonical LR
7048 @findex %define lr.type
7050 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7051 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7052 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7053 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7056 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7057 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7058 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7059 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7062 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7063 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7064 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7067 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7068 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7069 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7072 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7074 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7077 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7081 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7085 %define lr.type ielr
7088 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7089 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7090 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7091 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7092 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7093 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7094 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7095 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7096 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7097 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7099 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7100 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7101 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7102 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7108 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7111 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7113 @cindex GLR with LALR
7114 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7115 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7116 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7117 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7118 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7119 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7120 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7121 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7122 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7123 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7125 @item Malformed grammars.
7127 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7128 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7129 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7130 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7131 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7136 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7137 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7138 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7139 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7140 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7141 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7142 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7143 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7144 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7148 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7151 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7152 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7153 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7154 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7155 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7156 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7157 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7158 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7159 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7160 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7161 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7162 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7165 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7166 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7167 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7169 @node Default Reductions
7170 @subsection Default Reductions
7171 @cindex default reductions
7172 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7175 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7176 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7177 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7178 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7179 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7181 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7182 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7185 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7187 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7188 @cindex consistent states
7189 @cindex defaulted states
7190 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7191 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7192 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7193 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7194 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7195 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7196 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7197 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7198 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7199 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7200 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7202 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7203 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7204 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7205 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7206 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7207 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7208 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7209 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7210 should already be considered closed.
7212 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7214 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7215 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7216 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7217 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7218 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7219 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7220 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7221 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7222 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7226 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7227 @c sentence from being rejected.
7228 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7229 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7230 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7231 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7232 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7233 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7236 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7237 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7238 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7239 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7240 because the accept action ends the parse.
7242 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7243 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7244 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7245 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7246 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7247 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7248 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7249 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7250 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7251 split the parse instead.
7253 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7254 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7256 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7257 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7258 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7260 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7261 @item @code{consistent}
7262 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7265 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7266 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7271 @findex %define parse.lac
7273 @cindex lookahead correction
7275 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7276 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7277 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7278 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7279 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7280 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7281 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7282 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7283 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7285 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7286 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7287 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7288 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7289 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7291 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7292 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7293 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7294 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7296 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7297 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7299 @item @code{none} (default)
7302 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7303 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7307 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7308 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7309 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7310 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7311 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7312 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7313 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7314 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7315 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7316 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7319 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7320 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7321 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7322 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7323 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7324 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7325 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7326 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7327 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7328 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7330 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7331 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7332 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7333 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7334 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7335 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7336 language-recognition power.
7338 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7341 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7343 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7344 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7345 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7346 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7349 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7351 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7352 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7353 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7354 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7355 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7356 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7360 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7361 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7362 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7363 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7364 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7365 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7366 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7367 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7368 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7369 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7370 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7373 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7374 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7375 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7377 @node Unreachable States
7378 @subsection Unreachable States
7379 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7380 @cindex unreachable states
7382 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7383 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7384 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7385 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7387 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7388 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7389 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7390 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7392 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7393 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7394 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7397 There are a few caveats to consider:
7400 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7402 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7403 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7404 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7405 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7406 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7407 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7409 @item Other useless states.
7411 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7412 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7413 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7414 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7415 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7416 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7417 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7420 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7421 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7423 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7424 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7425 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7427 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7428 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7429 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7430 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7431 context-free languages.
7432 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7433 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7434 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7435 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7436 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7437 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7438 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7439 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7441 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7442 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7443 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7444 parser uses the same basic
7445 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7446 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7447 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7448 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7450 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7451 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7452 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7453 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7454 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7456 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7457 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7458 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7459 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7460 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7461 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7462 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7463 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7464 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7465 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7466 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7469 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7470 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7471 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7472 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7473 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7474 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7475 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7476 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7477 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7478 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7479 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7480 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7482 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7483 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7484 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7486 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7487 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7488 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7489 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7490 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7491 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7492 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7493 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7494 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7495 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7496 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7497 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7499 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7502 @node Memory Management
7503 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7504 @cindex memory exhaustion
7505 @cindex memory management
7506 @cindex stack overflow
7507 @cindex parser stack overflow
7508 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7510 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7511 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7512 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7514 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7515 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7516 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7519 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7520 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7521 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7522 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7524 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7525 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7526 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7527 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7528 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7529 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7531 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7532 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7533 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7536 @cindex default stack limit
7537 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7541 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7542 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7543 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7544 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7545 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7547 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7549 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7550 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7551 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7552 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7553 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7554 this deficiency in a future release.
7556 @node Error Recovery
7557 @chapter Error Recovery
7558 @cindex error recovery
7559 @cindex recovery from errors
7561 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7562 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7563 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7566 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7567 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7568 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7569 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7570 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7571 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7572 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7575 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7576 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7577 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7578 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7579 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7580 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7592 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7593 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7595 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7596 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7597 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7598 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7599 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7600 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7601 applicable in the ordinary way.
7603 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7604 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7605 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7606 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7607 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7608 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7609 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7610 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7611 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7612 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7613 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7614 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7616 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7617 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7618 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7621 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7624 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7625 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7626 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7627 spurious error message:
7637 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7638 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7639 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7640 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7641 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7642 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7643 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7646 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7647 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7648 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7649 error messages resume.
7651 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7652 as any other rules can.
7655 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7656 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7657 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7658 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7661 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7662 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7663 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7665 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7667 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7668 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7669 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7670 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7671 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7673 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7674 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7675 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7676 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7679 @node Context Dependency
7680 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7682 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7683 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7684 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7685 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7689 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7690 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7691 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7692 error recovery rules must be written.
7695 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7696 neither clean nor robust.)
7698 @node Semantic Tokens
7699 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7701 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7702 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7708 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7709 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7710 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7712 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7713 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7714 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7715 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7716 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7718 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7719 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7720 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7721 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7722 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7723 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7724 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7726 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7727 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7728 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7729 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7733 typedef int foo, bar;
7737 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7738 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7744 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7745 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7747 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7748 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7749 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7750 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7751 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7756 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7757 | declarator maybeasm
7763 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7764 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7770 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7771 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7772 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7774 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7775 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7776 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7777 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7778 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7779 the syntactic context.
7781 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7782 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7783 @cindex lexical tie-in
7785 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7786 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7789 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7790 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7791 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7792 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7793 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7800 void yyerror (char const *);
7809 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
7810 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
7811 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7825 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7826 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7827 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7829 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7830 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7831 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7834 @node Tie-in Recovery
7835 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7837 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7838 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7840 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7841 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7842 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7843 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7848 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7850 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
7854 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7855 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7856 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7857 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7858 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7860 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7862 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7863 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7864 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7870 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
7876 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7877 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7878 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7879 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7881 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7882 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7883 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7884 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7885 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7886 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7889 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7892 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7894 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7895 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7896 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7897 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7898 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7899 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7902 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7903 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7907 @section Understanding Your Parser
7909 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7910 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7911 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7912 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7913 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7915 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7916 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7917 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7918 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7919 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7920 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7921 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7923 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7941 @command{bison} reports:
7944 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7945 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7946 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7947 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7948 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7951 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7952 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7953 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7954 interpretation is the same.
7956 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7957 to precedence and/or associativity:
7960 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7961 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7962 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7967 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7970 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7971 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7972 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7973 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7977 @cindex token, useless
7978 @cindex useless token
7979 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7980 @cindex useless nonterminal
7981 @cindex rule, useless
7982 @cindex useless rule
7983 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7984 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7985 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7986 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7990 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7993 Terminals unused in grammar:
7996 Rules useless in grammar:
8001 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
8007 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
8008 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
8009 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
8010 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
8011 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
8016 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8020 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8032 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8037 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8043 @cindex pointed rule
8044 @cindex rule, pointed
8045 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8046 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8047 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8048 the location of the input cursor.
8053 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8055 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8060 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8061 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8062 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8063 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8064 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8065 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8066 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8067 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8069 @cindex core, item set
8070 @cindex item set core
8071 @cindex kernel, item set
8072 @cindex item set core
8073 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8074 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8075 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8076 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8077 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8078 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8083 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8084 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8085 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8086 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8087 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8088 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8090 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8101 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8103 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8107 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8108 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8109 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8110 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8115 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8116 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8117 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8118 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8119 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8121 $ shift, and go to state 3
8122 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8123 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8124 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8125 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8129 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8130 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8131 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8132 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp '+' . exp}.
8133 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8136 @cindex accepting state
8137 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8143 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8149 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8150 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8152 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8158 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8160 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8166 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8168 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8174 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8176 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8182 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8184 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8189 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8195 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8196 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8197 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8198 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8199 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8201 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8202 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8204 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8205 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8208 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8209 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8210 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8211 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8212 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8213 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8214 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8215 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8217 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8218 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8219 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8222 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8223 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8224 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8225 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8226 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8227 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8228 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8229 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8230 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8231 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8232 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8233 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8238 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8239 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8240 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8241 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8242 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8244 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8245 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8247 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8248 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8251 The remaining states are similar:
8257 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8258 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8259 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8260 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8261 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8263 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8264 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8266 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8267 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8273 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8274 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8275 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8276 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8277 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8279 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8281 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8282 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8288 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8289 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8290 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8291 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8292 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8294 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8295 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8296 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8297 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8299 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8300 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8301 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8302 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8303 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8308 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8309 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8310 @samp{*}, but also because the
8311 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8315 @section Tracing Your Parser
8318 @cindex tracing the parser
8320 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8321 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8323 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8326 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8328 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8329 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8330 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8331 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8334 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8335 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8336 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8338 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8340 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8341 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8342 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8343 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8345 the preferred solution.
8348 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8351 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8352 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8353 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8354 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8355 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8356 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8358 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8359 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8360 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8361 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8363 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8364 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8365 messages tell you these things:
8369 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8372 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8373 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8376 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8377 of the state stack afterward.
8380 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8381 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8382 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8383 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8384 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8385 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8386 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8387 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8388 grammar are to blame.
8390 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8391 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8392 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8393 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8394 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8397 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8398 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8399 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8400 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8401 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8402 value (from @code{yylval}).
8404 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8405 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8409 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8410 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) \
8411 print_token_value (file, type, value)
8414 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8417 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8420 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8421 else if (type == NUM)
8422 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8426 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8429 @chapter Invoking Bison
8430 @cindex invoking Bison
8431 @cindex Bison invocation
8432 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8434 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8440 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8441 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8442 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8443 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8444 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8445 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8446 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8447 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8448 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8449 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8450 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8455 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8458 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8461 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8464 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8466 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8467 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8468 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8471 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8472 in alphabetical order by short options.
8473 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8474 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8478 @section Bison Options
8480 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8481 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8482 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8483 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8484 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8487 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8488 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8491 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8497 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8501 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8503 @item --print-localedir
8504 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8506 @item --print-datadir
8507 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8511 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8512 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8513 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8514 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8515 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8516 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8517 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8518 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8519 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8520 for compatibility with POSIX:
8527 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8528 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8529 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8530 this option is specified.
8532 @item -W [@var{category}]
8533 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8534 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8537 @item midrule-values
8538 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8540 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8543 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8546 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8547 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8550 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8553 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8554 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8555 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8558 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8562 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8563 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8564 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8565 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8566 no effect on the conflict report.
8569 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8571 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8572 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8578 Turn off all the warnings.
8580 Treat warnings as errors.
8583 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8584 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8585 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8594 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8595 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8596 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8598 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8599 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8600 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8601 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8602 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8603 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8604 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8608 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8611 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8612 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8613 definition for @var{name}.
8615 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8616 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8617 definitions for @var{name}.
8619 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8620 definitions for @var{name}.
8623 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8624 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8625 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8627 @item -L @var{language}
8628 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8629 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8630 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8631 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8632 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8634 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8638 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8640 @item -p @var{prefix}
8641 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8642 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8643 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8647 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8648 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8649 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8650 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8651 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8652 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8655 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8656 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8657 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8659 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8660 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8661 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8662 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8664 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8665 file in the Bison installation directory.
8666 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8667 current working directory.
8668 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8671 @itemx --token-table
8672 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8679 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8680 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8681 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8682 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8685 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8686 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8687 with other short options.
8689 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8690 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8691 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8692 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8694 @item -r @var{things}
8695 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8696 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8697 separated list of @var{things} among:
8701 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8705 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8706 each rule's lookahead set.
8709 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8710 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8713 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8714 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8718 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8719 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8720 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8723 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8724 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8726 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8727 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8729 @item -g [@var{file}]
8730 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8731 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8732 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8733 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8734 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8735 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8738 @item -x [@var{file}]
8739 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8740 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8741 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8742 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8744 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8745 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8748 @node Option Cross Key
8749 @section Option Cross Key
8751 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8752 the corresponding short option and directive.
8754 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8755 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8756 @include cross-options.texi
8760 @section Yacc Library
8762 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8763 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8764 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8765 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8766 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8767 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8768 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8770 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8771 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8774 int yyerror (char const *);
8777 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8778 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8779 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8785 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8787 @node Other Languages
8788 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8791 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8792 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8796 @section C++ Parsers
8799 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8800 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8801 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8802 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8803 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8804 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8807 @node C++ Bison Interface
8808 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8809 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8813 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8814 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8815 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8816 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8818 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8820 @findex %define namespace
8821 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8822 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8823 generated in the following files:
8828 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8829 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8832 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8835 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8836 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8837 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8838 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8839 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8841 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8842 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8843 @samp{%defines} directive.
8846 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8847 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8849 @node C++ Semantic Values
8850 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8851 @c - No objects in unions
8853 @c - Printer and destructor
8855 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8856 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8857 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8858 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8859 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8862 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8863 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8864 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8866 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8867 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8868 to such objects are allowed.
8871 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8872 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8873 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8877 @node C++ Location Values
8878 @subsection C++ Location Values
8882 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8884 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8885 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8886 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8887 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8890 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8891 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8892 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8893 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8894 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8897 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8898 The line, starting at 1.
8901 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8902 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8905 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8906 The column, starting at 0.
8909 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8910 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8913 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8914 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8915 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8916 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8917 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8920 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8921 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8922 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8923 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8926 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8927 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8928 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8931 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8932 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8933 Advance the @code{end} position.
8936 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8937 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8938 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8939 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8942 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8943 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8947 @node C++ Parser Interface
8948 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8949 @c - define parser_class_name
8951 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8953 @c - Reporting errors
8955 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8956 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8957 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8958 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8959 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8960 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8961 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8962 additional argument for its constructor.
8964 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8965 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8966 The types for semantics value and locations.
8969 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8970 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
8971 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
8972 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8973 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8974 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8977 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8978 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8979 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8982 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8983 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8986 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8987 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8988 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8992 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8993 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8994 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8995 or nonzero, full tracing.
8998 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8999 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9000 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9001 described by @var{m}.
9005 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9006 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9007 @c - prefix for yylex.
9008 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9011 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9012 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9013 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9015 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9016 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9017 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9018 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9022 @node A Complete C++ Example
9023 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9025 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9026 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9027 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9028 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9029 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9030 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9031 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9032 actually easier to interface with.
9035 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9036 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9037 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9038 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9039 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9042 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9043 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9045 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9046 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9047 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9048 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9049 of valid input follows.
9053 seven := one + two * three
9057 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9058 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9060 @c - A place to store error messages
9061 @c - A place for the result
9063 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9064 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9065 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9066 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9067 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9068 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9069 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9071 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9072 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9073 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9076 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9078 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9079 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9082 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9087 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9088 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9089 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9090 factor both as follows.
9092 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9094 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9096 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9097 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9098 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9099 calcxx_driver& driver)
9100 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9105 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9108 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9110 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9115 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9117 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9123 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9124 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9126 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9128 // Handling the scanner.
9131 bool trace_scanning;
9135 Similarly for the parser itself.
9137 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9139 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9140 int parse (const std::string& f);
9146 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9147 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9148 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9149 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9151 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9154 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9155 void error (const std::string& m);
9157 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9160 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9161 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9162 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9163 messages and set error state.
9165 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9167 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9168 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9170 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9171 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9173 variables["one"] = 1;
9174 variables["two"] = 2;
9177 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9182 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9186 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9187 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9188 int res = parser.parse ();
9194 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9196 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9200 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9202 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9207 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9209 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9210 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9211 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9212 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9215 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9217 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9218 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9220 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9224 @findex %code requires
9225 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9226 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9227 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9228 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9229 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9230 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9231 @xref{%code Summary}.
9233 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9237 class calcxx_driver;
9242 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9243 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9246 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9248 // The parsing context.
9249 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9250 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9254 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9255 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9256 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9257 automatically propagated.
9259 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9264 // Initialize the initial location.
9265 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9270 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9271 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9274 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9281 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9284 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9296 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9297 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9299 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9302 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9308 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9309 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9310 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9311 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9314 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9316 %token END 0 "end of file"
9318 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9319 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9324 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9327 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9328 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9330 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9331 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9333 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9337 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9339 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9343 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9347 | assignments assignment @{@};
9350 "identifier" ":=" exp
9351 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9355 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9356 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9357 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9358 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9359 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9360 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9365 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9368 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9371 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9372 const std::string& m)
9374 driver.error (l, m);
9378 @node Calc++ Scanner
9379 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9381 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9382 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9384 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9386 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9391 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9392 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9394 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9395 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9396 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9397 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9401 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9402 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9403 not of token_type. */
9404 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9409 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9410 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9411 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9412 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9414 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9416 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9420 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9422 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9424 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9430 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9431 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9432 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9433 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9434 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9435 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9436 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9438 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9442 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9449 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9450 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9454 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9455 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9456 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9457 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9459 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9462 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9464 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9465 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9466 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9469 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9470 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9471 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9473 return token::NUMBER;
9475 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9476 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9481 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9482 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9484 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9488 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9490 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9493 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9495 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9496 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9503 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9510 @node Calc++ Top Level
9511 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9513 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9515 @comment file: calc++.cc
9518 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9522 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9524 calcxx_driver driver;
9525 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9526 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9527 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9528 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9529 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9530 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9531 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9537 @section Java Parsers
9540 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9541 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9542 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9543 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9544 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9545 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9546 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9547 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9550 @node Java Bison Interface
9551 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9552 @c - %language "Java"
9554 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9555 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9557 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9558 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9560 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9561 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9562 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9563 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9564 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9565 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9566 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9567 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9568 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9569 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9571 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9573 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9574 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9575 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9576 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9579 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9580 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9582 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9583 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9585 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9586 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9588 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9589 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9590 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9591 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9592 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9593 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9594 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9595 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9596 access the token names and codes.
9598 @node Java Semantic Values
9599 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9600 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9602 @c - Printer and destructor
9604 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9605 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9606 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9609 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9610 %type <Integer> number
9613 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9614 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9615 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9616 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9617 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9620 %define stype "ASTNode"
9624 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9625 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9627 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9628 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9629 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9630 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9631 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9632 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9634 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9635 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9636 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9638 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9639 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9640 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9643 @node Java Location Values
9644 @subsection Java Location Values
9649 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9650 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9651 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9652 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9653 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9654 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9655 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9657 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9658 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9659 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9660 be supplied by the user.
9663 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9664 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9665 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9668 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9669 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9672 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9673 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9676 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9677 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9678 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9679 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9683 @node Java Parser Interface
9684 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9685 @c - define parser_class_name
9687 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9689 @c - Reporting errors
9691 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9692 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9693 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9694 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9695 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9697 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9698 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9699 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9700 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9701 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9702 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9704 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9705 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9706 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9707 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9709 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9710 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9711 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9712 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9713 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9714 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9716 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9717 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9719 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9720 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9721 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9722 which initialize them automatically.
9724 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9725 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9727 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9728 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9729 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9733 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9734 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9735 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9737 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9738 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9739 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9742 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9743 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9744 @code{false} otherwise.
9747 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9748 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9749 from a syntax error.
9750 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9753 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9754 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9755 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9759 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9760 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9761 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9762 or nonzero, full tracing.
9766 @node Java Scanner Interface
9767 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9770 @c - Lexer interface
9772 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9773 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9774 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9775 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9777 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9778 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9779 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9780 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9783 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9784 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9785 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9786 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9789 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9791 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9792 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9793 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9794 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9797 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9798 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9799 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9802 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9803 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9806 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9807 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9808 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9809 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9810 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9812 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9813 "@var{class-name}".}
9816 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9817 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9819 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9820 "@var{class-name}".}
9824 @node Java Action Features
9825 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9827 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9828 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9830 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9831 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9834 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9835 This may not be assigned to.
9836 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9839 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9840 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9841 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9845 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9846 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9847 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9848 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9849 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9850 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9853 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9854 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9855 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9856 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9858 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9862 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9863 This may not be assigned to.
9864 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9868 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9869 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9872 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9873 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9874 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9877 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9878 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9879 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9882 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9883 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9884 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9887 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9888 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9889 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9891 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9894 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9895 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9896 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9897 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9902 @node Java Differences
9903 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9905 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9906 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9907 section summarizes these differences.
9911 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9912 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9913 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9914 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9915 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9916 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9917 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9919 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9920 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9921 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9922 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9923 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9926 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9927 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9928 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9929 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9930 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9931 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9932 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9933 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9934 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9937 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9939 @item @code{%code imports}
9940 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9941 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9942 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9944 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9945 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9947 @item @code{%code lexer}
9948 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9949 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9950 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9954 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9955 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9956 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9958 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9959 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9964 @node Java Declarations Summary
9965 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9967 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9968 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9970 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9971 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9974 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9975 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9976 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9977 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9978 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9981 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9982 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9983 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9984 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9987 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9988 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9989 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9990 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9993 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9994 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9995 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9998 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9999 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10000 a Java @emph{type}.
10001 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10004 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10005 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10006 @xref{Java Differences}.
10009 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10010 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10011 @xref{Java Differences}.
10014 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10015 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10016 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10019 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10020 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10021 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10022 @xref{Java Differences}.
10025 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10026 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10027 @xref{Java Differences}.
10030 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10031 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10032 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10035 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10036 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10037 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10040 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10041 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10042 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10045 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10046 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10048 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10051 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10052 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10053 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10054 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10057 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10058 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10059 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10060 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10061 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10064 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10065 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10066 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10069 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10070 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10071 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10072 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10075 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10076 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10077 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10078 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10081 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10082 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10083 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10086 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10087 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10088 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10091 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10092 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10093 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10096 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10097 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10098 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10099 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10103 @c ================================================= FAQ
10106 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10107 @cindex frequently asked questions
10110 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10114 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10115 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10116 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10117 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10118 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10119 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10120 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10121 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10122 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10123 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10124 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10125 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10128 @node Memory Exhausted
10129 @section Memory Exhausted
10132 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10133 message. What can I do?
10136 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10139 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10140 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10142 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10143 following typical questions:
10146 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10147 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10148 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10155 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10156 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10157 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10160 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10161 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10162 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10163 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10164 @file{first-line.l}:
10170 #include <stdlib.h>
10174 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10178 yyparse (char const *file)
10180 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10184 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10188 /* One token only. */
10190 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10193 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10211 If the file @file{input} contains
10219 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10222 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10223 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10224 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10229 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10230 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10231 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10232 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10233 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10234 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10235 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10236 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10239 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10240 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10241 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10242 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10244 @node Strings are Destroyed
10245 @section Strings are Destroyed
10248 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10249 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10250 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10253 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10254 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10255 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10261 char *yylval = NULL;
10266 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10274 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10275 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10276 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10277 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10283 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10286 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10287 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10288 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10294 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10295 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10296 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10297 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10298 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10299 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10302 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10303 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10304 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10309 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10310 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10313 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10314 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10317 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10318 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10319 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10320 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10321 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10322 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10323 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10325 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10327 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10328 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10329 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10330 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10331 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10332 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10335 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10336 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10339 @node Multiple start-symbols
10340 @section Multiple start-symbols
10343 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10344 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10345 multiple entry points.
10348 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10349 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10350 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10351 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10355 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10362 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10363 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10365 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10366 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10367 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10368 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10369 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10370 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10371 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10372 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10375 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10380 int t = start_token;
10385 /* @r{The rules.} */
10389 @node Secure? Conform?
10390 @section Secure? Conform?
10393 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10396 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10397 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10398 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10399 please send us a bug report.
10401 @node I can't build Bison
10402 @section I can't build Bison
10405 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10406 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10410 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10411 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10412 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10413 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10414 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10415 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10416 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10419 @node Where can I find help?
10420 @section Where can I find help?
10423 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10426 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10427 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10428 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10429 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10430 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10431 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10432 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10433 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10437 @section Bug Reports
10440 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10443 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10444 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10445 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10446 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10447 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10449 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10450 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10451 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10452 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10453 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10455 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10456 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10457 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10458 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10459 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10460 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10462 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10463 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10465 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10467 @node More Languages
10468 @section More Languages
10471 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10472 favorite language here}?
10475 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10476 languages; contributions are welcome.
10479 @section Beta Testing
10482 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10485 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10486 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10487 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10488 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10489 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10490 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10491 essentially halted.
10493 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10494 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10495 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10496 systems are especially welcome.
10498 @node Mailing Lists
10499 @section Mailing Lists
10502 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10505 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10507 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10509 @node Table of Symbols
10510 @appendix Bison Symbols
10511 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10512 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10514 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10515 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10516 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10519 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10520 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10521 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10524 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10525 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10529 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10530 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10534 @deffn {Variable} $$
10535 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10539 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10540 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10541 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10544 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10545 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10549 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10550 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10554 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10555 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10556 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10557 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10560 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10561 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10562 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10563 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10564 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10568 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10569 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10572 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10573 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10577 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10578 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10581 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10582 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10583 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10586 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10587 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10590 This feature is experimental.
10591 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10594 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10597 @deffn {Directive} <>
10598 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10601 This feature is experimental.
10602 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10605 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10608 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10609 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10610 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10611 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10614 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10615 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10616 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10617 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10618 @xref{%code Summary}.
10621 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10622 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10626 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10627 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10628 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10633 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10634 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10635 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10636 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10639 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10640 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10641 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10644 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10645 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10646 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10649 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10650 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10651 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10654 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10655 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10656 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10660 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10661 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10662 used in the grammar.
10665 @deffn {Symbol} error
10666 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10667 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10668 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10669 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10670 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10671 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10672 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10673 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10676 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10677 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10678 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10681 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10682 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10686 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10687 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10688 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10691 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10692 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10695 @deffn {Directive} %language
10696 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10697 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10700 @deffn {Directive} %left
10701 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10702 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10705 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10706 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10707 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10711 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10712 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10713 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10714 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10715 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10718 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10719 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10723 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10724 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10725 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10730 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10731 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10732 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10735 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10736 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10737 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10740 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10741 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10742 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10745 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10746 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10747 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10748 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10751 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10752 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10753 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10756 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10757 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10758 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10759 unreasonable usage.
10762 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10763 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10764 Require a Version of Bison}.
10767 @deffn {Directive} %right
10768 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10769 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10772 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10773 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10774 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10777 @deffn {Directive} %start
10778 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10782 @deffn {Directive} %token
10783 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10784 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10787 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10788 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10789 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10792 @deffn {Directive} %type
10793 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10794 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10797 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10798 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10799 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10803 @deffn {Directive} %union
10804 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10805 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10808 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10809 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10810 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10811 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10812 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10814 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10818 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10819 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10820 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10821 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10823 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10827 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10828 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10829 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10832 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10833 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10834 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10835 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10836 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10839 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10840 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10841 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10844 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10845 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10846 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10849 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10850 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10851 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10852 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10855 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10856 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10857 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10860 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10861 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10862 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10863 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10864 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10866 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10870 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10871 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10872 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10873 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10876 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10877 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10878 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10879 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10880 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10881 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10884 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10885 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10886 @xref{Memory Management}.
10889 @deffn {Function} yylex
10890 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10891 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10895 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10896 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10897 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10898 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10899 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10902 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10903 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10904 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10905 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10907 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10909 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10910 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10911 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10914 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10915 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10916 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10919 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10920 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10921 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10922 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10924 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10925 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10926 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10929 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10930 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10934 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10935 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10936 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10937 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10938 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10941 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10942 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10943 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10946 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10947 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10948 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10949 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10950 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10951 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10952 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10955 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10956 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10957 call this function to create a new parser.
10958 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10959 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10960 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10961 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10964 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10965 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10966 parse the rest of the input stream.
10967 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10968 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10969 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10970 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10973 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10974 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10975 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10976 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10977 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10978 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10981 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10982 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10983 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10984 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10985 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10988 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10989 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10990 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10991 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10994 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10995 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10996 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10997 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10998 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10999 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11000 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11002 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11003 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11004 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11005 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11006 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11007 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11008 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11011 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11012 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11013 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11021 @item Accepting state
11022 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11023 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11024 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11026 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11027 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11028 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11029 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11030 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11032 @item Consistent state
11033 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11035 @item Context-free grammars
11036 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11037 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11038 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11039 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11042 @item Default reduction
11043 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11044 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11045 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11046 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11049 @item Defaulted state
11050 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11052 @item Dynamic allocation
11053 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11054 compile time or on entry to a function.
11057 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11058 character string of length zero.
11060 @item Finite-state stack machine
11061 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11062 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11063 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11064 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11065 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11066 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11068 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11069 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11070 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11071 deterministic parsing
11072 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11073 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11074 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11078 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11079 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11080 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11082 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11083 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11084 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11085 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11086 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11087 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11088 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11089 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11090 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11091 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11093 @item Infix operator
11094 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11095 performs some operation.
11098 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11100 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11101 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11102 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11103 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11104 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11105 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11106 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11108 @item Language construct
11109 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11110 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11111 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11113 @item Left associativity
11114 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11115 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11116 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11118 @item Left recursion
11119 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11120 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11123 @item Left-to-right parsing
11124 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11125 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11127 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11128 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11129 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11131 @item Lexical tie-in
11132 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11133 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11135 @item Literal string token
11136 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11138 @item Lookahead token
11139 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11143 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11144 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11145 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11148 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11149 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11151 @item Nonterminal symbol
11152 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11153 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11154 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11157 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11158 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11161 @item Postfix operator
11162 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11163 performs some operation.
11166 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11167 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11171 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11172 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11173 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11175 @item Reverse polish notation
11176 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11178 @item Right recursion
11179 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11180 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11184 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11185 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11186 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11189 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11190 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11191 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11193 @item Single-character literal
11194 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11195 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11198 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11199 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11200 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11201 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11204 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11205 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11206 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11209 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11210 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11213 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11214 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11215 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11216 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11218 @item Terminal symbol
11219 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11220 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11221 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11223 @item Unreachable state
11224 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11225 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11226 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11229 @node Copying This Manual
11230 @appendix Copying This Manual
11234 @unnumbered Bibliography
11238 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11239 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11240 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11241 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11243 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11244 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11245 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11246 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11247 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11249 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11250 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11251 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11252 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11253 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11255 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11256 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11257 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11258 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11259 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11262 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11263 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11264 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11267 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11268 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11269 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11270 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11280 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11281 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11282 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11283 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11284 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11285 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11286 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11287 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11288 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11289 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11290 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11291 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11292 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11293 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11294 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11295 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11296 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11297 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11298 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11299 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11300 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11301 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11302 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11303 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11304 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11305 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11306 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11307 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11308 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11309 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11310 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11311 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11312 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11313 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11314 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11315 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11316 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11317 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11318 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11319 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11320 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11321 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11322 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11323 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11324 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11325 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11326 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11327 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11328 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11329 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11330 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11331 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11333 @c Local Variables:
11334 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"