]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - tests/conflicts.at
c++: please G++ 4.8 with -O3: type puning issue
[bison.git] / tests / conflicts.at
1 # Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3 # Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
9 #
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
14 #
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18 AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
19
20
21 ## ------------------------ ##
22 ## Token declaration order. ##
23 ## ------------------------ ##
24
25 # This test checks that token are declared left to right when in a precedence
26 # statement.
27
28 AT_SETUP([Token declaration order])
29
30 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
31
32 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
33 [[%code {
34 #include <stdio.h>
35 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
36 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
37 }
38 %token A B C
39 %token D
40 %right E F G
41 %right H I
42 %right J
43 %left K
44 %left L M N
45 %nonassoc O P Q
46 %precedence R S T U
47 %precedence V W
48 %%
49 exp: A
50 %%
51 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
52 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE[
53 int main (void)
54 {
55 assert (A < B);
56 assert (B < C);
57 assert (C < D);
58 assert (D < E);
59 assert (E < F);
60 assert (F < G);
61 assert (G < H);
62 assert (H < I);
63 assert (I < J);
64 assert (J < K);
65 assert (K < L);
66 assert (L < M);
67 assert (M < N);
68 assert (N < O);
69 assert (O < P);
70 assert (P < Q);
71 assert (Q < R);
72 assert (R < S);
73 assert (S < T);
74 assert (T < U);
75 assert (U < V);
76 assert (V < W);
77 return 0;
78 }
79 ]])
80
81 AT_FULL_COMPILE([input])
82
83 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input])
84
85 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
86
87 AT_CLEANUP
88
89
90 ## ---------------- ##
91 ## S/R in initial. ##
92 ## ---------------- ##
93
94 # I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
95 # initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
96 # took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
97 # make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
98
99 AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
100
101 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
102 [[%expect 1
103 %%
104 exp: e 'e';
105 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
106 ]])
107
108 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
109 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: e: /* empty */ [-Wother]
110 ]])
111
112 AT_BISON_CHECK([-fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
113 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
114 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
115 ^
116 ]])
117
118 AT_CLEANUP
119
120
121 ## ------------------- ##
122 ## %nonassoc and eof. ##
123 ## ------------------- ##
124
125 AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
126
127 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
128 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
129 [[
130 %{
131 #include <stdio.h>
132 #include <stdlib.h>
133 #include <string.h>
134 #include <assert.h>
135
136 #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
137 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
138 /* The current argument. */
139 static const char *input;
140
141 static int
142 yylex (void)
143 {
144 static size_t toknum;
145 assert (toknum <= strlen (input));
146 return input[toknum++];
147 }
148
149 %}
150
151 %nonassoc '<' '>'
152
153 %%
154 expr: expr '<' expr
155 | expr '>' expr
156 | '0'
157 ;
158 %%
159 int
160 main (int argc, const char *argv[])
161 {
162 input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
163 return yyparse ();
164 }
165 ]])
166 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
167
168 m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
169 [AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
170 AT_COMPILE([input])
171
172 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
173
174 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
175 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
176 [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
177 ])
178
179 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
180 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
181 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
182 ])
183
184 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
185 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
186 ])
187
188 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
189
190 # Expected token list is missing.
191 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
192
193 # We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
194 # have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
195 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]],
196 [[correct]])
197
198 # lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case.
199 # However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
200 # different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
201 # expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
202 # can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
203 # result as above.
204 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
205
206 # parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
207 # any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the
208 # language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
209 # the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
210 # would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
211 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
212
213 m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
214
215 AT_CLEANUP
216
217
218
219 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
220 ## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
221 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
222
223 AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors]])
224
225 m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
226
227 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
228
229 m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
230 [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
231 [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
232
233 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
234 [AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
235
236 %code imports {
237 import java.io.IOException;
238 }]], [[
239
240 %code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
241 #include <string>]], [[
242 #include <assert.h>
243 #include <stdio.h>
244 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[
245 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
246 #define USE(Var)
247 }
248
249 ]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
250
251 ]$1[
252
253 %define parse.error verbose
254
255 %%
256
257 ]$2[
258
259 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
260
261 /*--------.
262 | yylex. |
263 `--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
264
265 public String input = "]$3[";
266 public int index = 0;
267 public int yylex ()
268 {
269 if (index < input.length ())
270 return input.charAt (index++);
271 else
272 return 0;
273 }
274 public Object getLVal ()
275 {
276 return new Integer(1);
277 }]], [[
278
279 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
280 {
281 static char const *input = "]$3[";
282 *lvalp = 1;
283 return *input++;
284 }]])[
285 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
286 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
287 };
288
289 %%]])[
290
291 /*-------.
292 | main. |
293 `-------*/
294 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
295 ])
296
297 AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
298
299 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
300 $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
301 $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
302
303 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
304 [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
305 [[]],
306 [[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
307 ]])
308
309 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
310 m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
311 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
312
313 ])
314
315 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
316 [[%nonassoc 'a';
317
318 start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
319
320 consistent-error-on-a-a:
321 'a' default-reduction
322 | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
323 | 'a' shift
324 ;
325
326 default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
327 shift: 'b' ;
328
329 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
330 // test case looks a little more realistic.
331 start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
332 ]])
333
334 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
335
336 # Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
337 # accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
338 # that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version
339 # of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
340 # consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
341 # the simple "syntax error" message.
342 #
343 # The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
344 # complicate this example.
345 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
346 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
347 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
348 [[$end]], [[none]])
349 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
350 %glr-parser]],
351 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
352 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
353 [[$end]], [[none]])
354 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
355 %language "c++"]],
356 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
357 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
358 [[$end]], [[none]])
359 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
360 %language "java"]],
361 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
362 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
363 [[end of input]], [[none]])
364
365 # Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
366 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
367 %define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
368 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
369 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
370 [[$end]], [[ab]])
371 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
372 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
373 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
374 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
375 [[$end]], [[ab]])
376 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
377 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
378 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
379 [[$end]], [[ab]])
380
381 # Only LAC gets it right.
382 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
383 %define parse.lac full]],
384 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
385 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
386 [[$end]], [[b]])
387 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
388 %define parse.lac full]],
389 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
390 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
391 [[$end]], [[b]])
392
393 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
394 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
395
396 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
397 [[%nonassoc 'a';
398
399 // If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
400 // incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a'
401 // tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
402 %destructor {
403 if (!$$)
404 fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
405 } 'a';
406
407 // Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
408 // lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
409 // semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error
410 // action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a
411 // problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
412 // either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
413 // destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
414 // first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
415 // except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
416 // unexpected token was not reported at all.
417 start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
418
419 error-reduce:
420 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
421 { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
422 | 'a' error
423 { USE ($][1); }
424 ;
425
426 consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
427 assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
428 yylval = 0;
429 yychar = 'b';
430 } ;
431
432 consistent-error:
433 'a' { USE ($][1); }
434 | /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
435 ;
436
437 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
438 // test case looks a little more realistic.
439 start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
440 ]])
441 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
442
443 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
444 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
445 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
446 [['b']], [[none]])
447 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
448 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
449 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
450 [['b']], [[none]])
451 # No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
452
453 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
454 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
455 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
456 [['b']], [[none]])
457
458 # Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
459 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
460 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
461 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
462 [[$end]], [[a]])
463 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
464 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
465 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
466 [[$end]], [[a]])
467
468 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
469 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
470 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
471 [['b']], [[none]])
472 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
473 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
474 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
475 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
476 [[$end]], [[none]])
477
478 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
479 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
480
481 m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
482
483 AT_CLEANUP
484
485
486
487 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
488 ## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ##
489 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
490
491 # This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
492 # LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
493 # without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
494 # parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
495 # token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even
496 # with minimal LR parser tables.
497
498 AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
499 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
500 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
501 [[%code {
502 #include <stdio.h>
503 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
504 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
505 }
506
507 %error-verbose
508 %nonassoc 'a'
509
510 %%
511
512 start:
513 'a' problem 'a' // First context.
514 | 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
515 | 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
516 ;
517
518 problem:
519 look reduce-nonassoc
520 | look 'a'
521 | look 'b'
522 ;
523
524 // For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
525 // lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
526 // Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However,
527 // the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
528 // error action only in the first context. In order to immediately
529 // detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
530 // canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
531 // 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
532 look:
533 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
534 | 'a' 'b'
535 | 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
536 ;
537
538 reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
539
540 %%
541 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
542 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[
543 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
544 ])
545 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
546
547 # Show canonical LR's failure.
548 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
549 [[0]], [[]],
550 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
551 ]])
552 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
553 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
554 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
555 ]])
556
557 # It's corrected by LAC.
558 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
559 -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
560 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
561 ]])
562 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
563 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
564 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
565 ]])
566
567 # IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
568 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
569 [[0]], [[]],
570 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
571 ]])
572 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
573 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
574 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
575 ]])
576
577 AT_CLEANUP
578
579 ## ------------------------- ##
580 ## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
581 ## ------------------------- ##
582
583 AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
584
585 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
586
587 AT_DATA([input.y],
588 [[%token NUM OP
589 %%
590 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
591 ]])
592
593 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
594 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
595 ]])
596
597 # Check the contents of the report.
598 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
599 [[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
600
601
602 Grammar
603
604 0 $accept: exp $end
605
606 1 exp: exp OP exp
607 2 | NUM
608
609
610 Terminals, with rules where they appear
611
612 $end (0) 0
613 error (256)
614 NUM (258) 2
615 OP (259) 1
616
617
618 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
619
620 $accept (5)
621 on left: 0
622 exp (6)
623 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
624
625
626 State 0
627
628 0 $accept: . exp $end
629 1 exp: . exp OP exp
630 2 | . NUM
631
632 NUM shift, and go to state 1
633
634 exp go to state 2
635
636
637 State 1
638
639 2 exp: NUM .
640
641 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
642
643
644 State 2
645
646 0 $accept: exp . $end
647 1 exp: exp . OP exp
648
649 $end shift, and go to state 3
650 OP shift, and go to state 4
651
652
653 State 3
654
655 0 $accept: exp $end .
656
657 $default accept
658
659
660 State 4
661
662 1 exp: . exp OP exp
663 1 | exp OP . exp
664 2 | . NUM
665
666 NUM shift, and go to state 1
667
668 exp go to state 5
669
670
671 State 5
672
673 1 exp: exp . OP exp
674 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
675
676 OP shift, and go to state 4
677
678 OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
679 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
680 ]])
681
682 AT_CLEANUP
683
684
685
686 ## ----------------------- ##
687 ## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
688 ## ----------------------- ##
689
690 AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
691
692 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
693
694 AT_DATA([input.y],
695 [[%token NUM OP
696 %left OP
697 %%
698 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
699 ]])
700
701 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
702
703 # Check the contents of the report.
704 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
705 [[Grammar
706
707 0 $accept: exp $end
708
709 1 exp: exp OP exp
710 2 | NUM
711
712
713 Terminals, with rules where they appear
714
715 $end (0) 0
716 error (256)
717 NUM (258) 2
718 OP (259) 1
719
720
721 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
722
723 $accept (5)
724 on left: 0
725 exp (6)
726 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
727
728
729 State 0
730
731 0 $accept: . exp $end
732 1 exp: . exp OP exp
733 2 | . NUM
734
735 NUM shift, and go to state 1
736
737 exp go to state 2
738
739
740 State 1
741
742 2 exp: NUM .
743
744 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
745
746
747 State 2
748
749 0 $accept: exp . $end
750 1 exp: exp . OP exp
751
752 $end shift, and go to state 3
753 OP shift, and go to state 4
754
755
756 State 3
757
758 0 $accept: exp $end .
759
760 $default accept
761
762
763 State 4
764
765 1 exp: . exp OP exp
766 1 | exp OP . exp
767 2 | . NUM
768
769 NUM shift, and go to state 1
770
771 exp go to state 5
772
773
774 State 5
775
776 1 exp: exp . OP exp
777 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
778
779 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
780
781 Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
782 ]])
783
784 AT_CLEANUP
785
786
787 ## ---------------------- ##
788 ## %precedence suffices. ##
789 ## ---------------------- ##
790
791 AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
792
793 AT_DATA([input.y],
794 [[%precedence "then"
795 %precedence "else"
796 %%
797 stmt:
798 "if" cond "then" stmt
799 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
800 | "stmt"
801 ;
802
803 cond:
804 "exp"
805 ;
806 ]])
807
808 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
809
810 AT_CLEANUP
811
812
813 ## ------------------------------ ##
814 ## %precedence does not suffice. ##
815 ## ------------------------------ ##
816
817 AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
818
819 AT_DATA([input.y],
820 [[%precedence "then"
821 %precedence "else"
822 %%
823 stmt:
824 "if" cond "then" stmt
825 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
826 | "stmt"
827 ;
828
829 cond:
830 "exp"
831 | cond "then" cond
832 ;
833 ]])
834
835 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
836 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
837 input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: cond: cond "then" cond [-Wother]
838 ]])
839
840 AT_CLEANUP
841
842
843 ## -------------------------------- ##
844 ## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
845 ## -------------------------------- ##
846
847 # When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
848 # simply displayed as:
849 #
850 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
851 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
852 #
853 # But when `reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
854 #
855 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
856 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
857 #
858 # In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
859 # reduction), we make the `reduce 3' explicit:
860 #
861 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
862 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
863 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
864 #
865 # Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
866 # else.
867
868 AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
869 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
870
871 AT_DATA([input.y],
872 [[%%
873 exp: num | id;
874 num: '0';
875 id : '0';
876 %%
877 ]])
878
879 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
880 [[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
881 input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: id: '0' [-Wother]
882 ]])
883
884 # Check the contents of the report.
885 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
886 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
887
888 4 id: '0'
889
890
891 State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
892
893
894 Grammar
895
896 0 $accept: exp $end
897
898 1 exp: num
899 2 | id
900
901 3 num: '0'
902
903 4 id: '0'
904
905
906 Terminals, with rules where they appear
907
908 $end (0) 0
909 '0' (48) 3 4
910 error (256)
911
912
913 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
914
915 $accept (4)
916 on left: 0
917 exp (5)
918 on left: 1 2, on right: 0
919 num (6)
920 on left: 3, on right: 1
921 id (7)
922 on left: 4, on right: 2
923
924
925 State 0
926
927 0 $accept: . exp $end
928 1 exp: . num
929 2 | . id
930 3 num: . '0'
931 4 id: . '0'
932
933 '0' shift, and go to state 1
934
935 exp go to state 2
936 num go to state 3
937 id go to state 4
938
939
940 State 1
941
942 3 num: '0' . [$end]
943 4 id: '0' . [$end]
944
945 $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
946 $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
947 $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
948
949
950 State 2
951
952 0 $accept: exp . $end
953
954 $end shift, and go to state 5
955
956
957 State 3
958
959 1 exp: num .
960
961 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
962
963
964 State 4
965
966 2 exp: id .
967
968 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
969
970
971 State 5
972
973 0 $accept: exp $end .
974
975 $default accept
976 ]])
977
978 AT_CLEANUP
979
980
981
982
983 ## -------------------- ##
984 ## %expect not enough. ##
985 ## -------------------- ##
986
987 AT_SETUP([%expect not enough])
988
989 AT_DATA([input.y],
990 [[%token NUM OP
991 %expect 0
992 %%
993 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
994 ]])
995
996 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
997 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
998 ]])
999 AT_CLEANUP
1000
1001
1002 ## --------------- ##
1003 ## %expect right. ##
1004 ## --------------- ##
1005
1006 AT_SETUP([%expect right])
1007
1008 AT_DATA([input.y],
1009 [[%token NUM OP
1010 %expect 1
1011 %%
1012 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1013 ]])
1014
1015 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1016 AT_CLEANUP
1017
1018
1019 ## ------------------ ##
1020 ## %expect too much. ##
1021 ## ------------------ ##
1022
1023 AT_SETUP([%expect too much])
1024
1025 AT_DATA([input.y],
1026 [[%token NUM OP
1027 %expect 2
1028 %%
1029 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1030 ]])
1031
1032 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1033 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected
1034 ]])
1035 AT_CLEANUP
1036
1037
1038 ## ------------------------------- ##
1039 ## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
1040 ## ------------------------------- ##
1041
1042 AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
1043
1044 AT_DATA([input.y],
1045 [[%expect 0
1046 %%
1047 program: a 'a' | a a;
1048 a: 'a';
1049 ]])
1050
1051 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1052 [[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
1053 ]])
1054 AT_CLEANUP
1055
1056
1057 ## ------------------------- ##
1058 ## %prec with user strings. ##
1059 ## ------------------------- ##
1060
1061 AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
1062
1063 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1064 [[%%
1065 exp:
1066 "foo" %prec "foo"
1067 ;
1068 ]])
1069
1070 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1071 AT_CLEANUP
1072
1073
1074 ## -------------------------------- ##
1075 ## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
1076 ## -------------------------------- ##
1077
1078 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
1079
1080 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1081 [[%left '+'
1082 %left '*'
1083
1084 %%
1085
1086 %no-default-prec;
1087
1088 e: e '+' e
1089 | e '*' e
1090 | '0'
1091 ;
1092 ]])
1093
1094 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1095 [[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1096 ]])
1097 AT_CLEANUP
1098
1099
1100 ## ----------------------------- ##
1101 ## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
1102 ## ----------------------------- ##
1103
1104 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
1105
1106 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1107 [[%left '+'
1108 %left '*'
1109
1110 %%
1111
1112 %no-default-prec;
1113
1114 e: e '+' e %prec '+'
1115 | e '*' e %prec '*'
1116 | '0'
1117 ;
1118 ]])
1119
1120 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1121 AT_CLEANUP
1122
1123
1124 ## --------------- ##
1125 ## %default-prec. ##
1126 ## --------------- ##
1127
1128 AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
1129
1130 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1131 [[%left '+'
1132 %left '*'
1133
1134 %%
1135
1136 %default-prec;
1137
1138 e: e '+' e
1139 | e '*' e
1140 | '0'
1141 ;
1142 ]])
1143
1144 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1145 AT_CLEANUP
1146
1147
1148 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1149 ## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
1150 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1151
1152 AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
1153
1154 # If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
1155 # rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
1156 # what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
1157 # since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
1158
1159 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1160 [[%output "input.c"
1161 %left 'a'
1162
1163 %%
1164
1165 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
1166
1167 /* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
1168 * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
1169 * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
1170 resolved_conflict:
1171 'a' unreachable1
1172 | %prec 'a'
1173 ;
1174
1175 /* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
1176 * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
1177 * productions are useless. */
1178 unreachable1:
1179 'a' unreachable2
1180 |
1181 ;
1182
1183 /* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
1184 unreachable2: | ;
1185
1186 /* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
1187 * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
1188 reported_conflicts:
1189 'a'
1190 | 'a'
1191 |
1192 ;
1193
1194 ]])
1195
1196 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
1197 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1198 input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1199 input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1 [-Wother]
1200 input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2 [-Wother]
1201 input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1202 input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1203 input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1204 input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a' [-Wother]
1205 input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1206 ]])
1207
1208 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
1209 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1210
1211 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1212
1213 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1214 5 | /* empty */
1215
1216 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
1217 7 | /* empty */
1218
1219 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1220 10 | /* empty */
1221
1222
1223 State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1224 State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1225
1226
1227 Grammar
1228
1229 0 $accept: start $end
1230
1231 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1232
1233 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1234 3 | /* empty */
1235
1236 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1237 5 | /* empty */
1238
1239 6 unreachable2: /* empty */
1240 7 | /* empty */
1241
1242 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1243 9 | 'a'
1244 10 | /* empty */
1245
1246
1247 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1248
1249 $end (0) 0
1250 'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
1251 error (256)
1252
1253
1254 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1255
1256 $accept (4)
1257 on left: 0
1258 start (5)
1259 on left: 1, on right: 0
1260 resolved_conflict (6)
1261 on left: 2 3, on right: 1
1262 unreachable1 (7)
1263 on left: 4 5, on right: 2
1264 unreachable2 (8)
1265 on left: 6 7, on right: 4
1266 reported_conflicts (9)
1267 on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
1268
1269
1270 State 0
1271
1272 0 $accept: . start $end
1273 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1274 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
1275 3 | . ['a']
1276
1277 $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
1278
1279 start go to state 1
1280 resolved_conflict go to state 2
1281
1282 Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1283
1284
1285 State 1
1286
1287 0 $accept: start . $end
1288
1289 $end shift, and go to state 3
1290
1291
1292 State 2
1293
1294 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1295
1296 'a' shift, and go to state 4
1297
1298
1299 State 3
1300
1301 0 $accept: start $end .
1302
1303 $default accept
1304
1305
1306 State 4
1307
1308 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
1309 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
1310 9 | . 'a'
1311 10 | . ['a']
1312
1313 'a' shift, and go to state 5
1314
1315 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
1316
1317 reported_conflicts go to state 6
1318
1319
1320 State 5
1321
1322 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
1323 9 | 'a' . ['a']
1324
1325 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1326 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
1327 $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1328
1329
1330 State 6
1331
1332 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
1333
1334 'a' shift, and go to state 7
1335
1336
1337 State 7
1338
1339 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
1340
1341 $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
1342 ]])
1343
1344 AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
1345 [[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state
1346 ]])
1347 AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
1348
1349 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
1350 [[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1351 input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
1352 input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable1: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1353 input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: unreachable2: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1354 input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: 'a' [-Wother]
1355 input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: reported_conflicts: /* empty */ [-Wother]
1356 ]])
1357
1358 AT_CLEANUP
1359
1360
1361 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1362 ## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1363 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1364
1365 AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
1366
1367 # Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
1368
1369 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1370 [[%left 'a'
1371 %right 'b'
1372 %right 'c'
1373 %right 'd'
1374 %%
1375 start:
1376 'a'
1377 | empty_a 'a'
1378 | 'b'
1379 | empty_b 'b'
1380 | 'c'
1381 | empty_c1 'c'
1382 | empty_c2 'c'
1383 | empty_c3 'c'
1384 ;
1385 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1386 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1387 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1388 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1389 empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
1390 ]])
1391 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1392 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1393 [[State 0
1394
1395 0 $accept: . start $end
1396 1 start: . 'a'
1397 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1398 3 | . 'b'
1399 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1400 5 | . 'c'
1401 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1402 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1403 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1404 9 empty_a: . ['a']
1405 10 empty_b: . []
1406 11 empty_c1: . []
1407 12 empty_c2: . []
1408 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
1409
1410 'b' shift, and go to state 1
1411
1412 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
1413 $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
1414
1415 start go to state 2
1416 empty_a go to state 3
1417 empty_b go to state 4
1418 empty_c1 go to state 5
1419 empty_c2 go to state 6
1420 empty_c3 go to state 7
1421
1422 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1423 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
1424 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1425 Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1426 Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
1427
1428
1429 State 1
1430 ]])
1431
1432 AT_CLEANUP
1433
1434
1435 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1436 ## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1437 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1438
1439 # Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
1440 # multiple reductions in a state.
1441
1442 # For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
1443 # reduction on that token without brackets.
1444
1445 AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
1446
1447 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1448 [[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
1449 %%
1450 start:
1451 'a'
1452 | empty_a 'a'
1453 | 'b'
1454 | empty_b 'b'
1455 | 'c'
1456 | empty_c1 'c'
1457 | empty_c2 'c'
1458 | empty_c3 'c'
1459 ;
1460 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1461 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1462 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1463 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1464 empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
1465 ]])
1466
1467 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1468 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1469 [[State 0
1470
1471 0 $accept: . start $end
1472 1 start: . 'a'
1473 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1474 3 | . 'b'
1475 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1476 5 | . 'c'
1477 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1478 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1479 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1480 9 empty_a: . []
1481 10 empty_b: . []
1482 11 empty_c1: . []
1483 12 empty_c2: . ['c']
1484 13 empty_c3: . ['c']
1485
1486 'a' error (nonassociative)
1487 'b' error (nonassociative)
1488 'c' error (nonassociative)
1489
1490 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
1491 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
1492
1493 start go to state 1
1494 empty_a go to state 2
1495 empty_b go to state 3
1496 empty_c1 go to state 4
1497 empty_c2 go to state 5
1498 empty_c3 go to state 6
1499
1500 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
1501 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
1502 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
1503
1504
1505 State 1
1506 ]])
1507 AT_CLEANUP
1508
1509
1510 ## -------------------- ##
1511 ## %expect-rr non GLR. ##
1512 ## -------------------- ##
1513
1514 AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]])
1515
1516 AT_DATA([[1.y]],
1517 [[%expect-rr 0
1518 %%
1519 exp: 'a'
1520 ]])
1521
1522 AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [],
1523 [[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1524 ]])
1525
1526 AT_DATA([[2.y]],
1527 [[%expect-rr 1
1528 %%
1529 exp: 'a' | 'a';
1530 ]])
1531
1532 AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [],
1533 [[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1534 2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1535 2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts: exp: 'a' [-Wother]
1536 ]])
1537
1538 AT_CLEANUP
1539
1540
1541 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1542 ## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr. ##
1543 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1544
1545 AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
1546
1547 AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
1548 [[%glr-parser
1549 %%
1550 start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
1551 A: ;
1552 B: ;
1553 ]])
1554 AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
1555 [[%glr-parser
1556 %%
1557 start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
1558 A: ;
1559 ]])
1560 AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
1561 [[%glr-parser
1562 %%
1563 start: A | B ;
1564 A: ;
1565 B: ;
1566 ]])
1567
1568 AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1569 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1570 sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1571 ]])
1572 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1573 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1574 ]])
1575 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1576 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1577 ]])
1578
1579 [
1580 # This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every
1581 # combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect
1582 # or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2
1583 # RR).
1584
1585 # Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar.
1586 for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
1587 # Number of expected s/r conflicts.
1588 for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1589 # Number of expected r/r conflicts.
1590 for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1591 test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
1592
1593 # Build grammar file.
1594 sr_exp=0
1595 rr_exp=0
1596 file=$gram
1597 directives=
1598 if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
1599 sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
1600 file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
1601 directives="%expect $sr_exp"
1602 fi
1603 if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
1604 rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
1605 file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
1606 directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
1607 fi
1608 file=$file.y
1609 echo "$directives" > $file
1610 cat $gram.y >> $file
1611
1612 # Number of found conflicts.
1613 case $gram in
1614 (sr) sr_count=1; rr_count=0;;
1615 (rr) sr_count=0; rr_count=1;;
1616 (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;;
1617 esac
1618
1619 # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then
1620 # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa. Leave empty if
1621 # nothing expected.
1622 case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in
1623 ?:) rr_exp_i=0;;
1624 :?) sr_exp_i=0;;
1625 esac
1626
1627 # Run tests.
1628 if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
1629 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
1630 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
1631 else
1632 {
1633 if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then
1634 echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts"
1635 elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then
1636 echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected"
1637 fi
1638 if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then
1639 echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts"
1640 elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then
1641 echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected"
1642 fi
1643 } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr
1644 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1645 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1646 fi
1647 done
1648 done
1649 done]
1650
1651 AT_CLEANUP