]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - doc/bison.info-3
* src/lex.c (percent_table): Add tok_define.
[bison.git] / doc / bison.info-3
1 Ceci est le fichier Info bison.info, produit par Makeinfo version 4.0b
2 à partir bison.texinfo.
3
4 START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
5 * bison: (bison). GNU Project parser generator (yacc replacement).
6 END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
7
8 This file documents the Bison parser generator.
9
10 Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998, 1999,
11 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
12
13 Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of this
14 manual provided the copyright notice and this permission notice are
15 preserved on all copies.
16
17 Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of
18 this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided also
19 that the sections entitled "GNU General Public License" and "Conditions
20 for Using Bison" are included exactly as in the original, and provided
21 that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms
22 of a permission notice identical to this one.
23
24 Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this
25 manual into another language, under the above conditions for modified
26 versions, except that the sections entitled "GNU General Public
27 License", "Conditions for Using Bison" and this permission notice may be
28 included in translations approved by the Free Software Foundation
29 instead of in the original English.
30
31 \1f
32 File: bison.info, Node: Mid-Rule Actions, Prev: Action Types, Up: Semantics
33
34 Actions in Mid-Rule
35 -------------------
36
37 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
38 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
39 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
40
41 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
42 `$N', but it may not refer to subsequent components because it is run
43 before they are parsed.
44
45 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the
46 rule. This makes a difference when there is another action later in
47 the same rule (and usually there is another at the end): you have to
48 count the actions along with the symbols when working out which number
49 N to use in `$N'.
50
51 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can
52 set its value with an assignment to `$$', and actions later in the rule
53 can refer to the value using `$N'. Since there is no symbol to name
54 the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value in
55 advance, so you must use the `$<...>N' construct to specify a data type
56 each time you refer to this value.
57
58 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
59 action, because assignments to `$$' do not have that effect. The only
60 way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action at
61 the end of the rule.
62
63 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a `let'
64 statement that looks like `let (VARIABLE) STATEMENT' and serves to
65 create a variable named VARIABLE temporarily for the duration of
66 STATEMENT. To parse this construct, we must put VARIABLE into the
67 symbol table while STATEMENT is parsed, then remove it afterward. Here
68 is how it is done:
69
70 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
71 { $<context>$ = push_context ();
72 declare_variable ($3); }
73 stmt { $$ = $6;
74 pop_context ($<context>5); }
75
76 As soon as `let (VARIABLE)' has been recognized, the first action is
77 run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the list of
78 accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
79 `context' in the data-type union. Then it calls `declare_variable' to
80 add the new variable to that list. Once the first action is finished,
81 the embedded statement `stmt' can be parsed. Note that the mid-rule
82 action is component number 5, so the `stmt' is component number 6.
83
84 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes
85 the value of the entire `let'-statement. Then the semantic value from
86 the earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
87 removes the temporary `let'-variable from the list so that it won't
88 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
89
90 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
91 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute
92 the action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule
93 actions, can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift
94 the open-brace token and look at what follows before deciding whether
95 there is a declaration or not:
96
97 compound: '{' declarations statements '}'
98 | '{' statements '}'
99 ;
100
101 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become
102 nonfunctional:
103
104 compound: { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
105 '{' declarations statements '}'
106 | '{' statements '}'
107 ;
108
109 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
110 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
111 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
112 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
113 the "look-ahead" token at this time, since the parser is still deciding
114 what to do about it. *Note Look-Ahead Tokens: Look-Ahead.)
115
116 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting
117 identical actions into the two rules, like this:
118
119 compound: { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
120 '{' declarations statements '}'
121 | { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
122 '{' statements '}'
123 ;
124
125 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two
126 actions are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in
127 an action.)
128
129 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
130 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution
131 which does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
132
133 compound: '{' { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
134 declarations statements '}'
135 | '{' statements '}'
136 ;
137
138 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement, which
139 would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
140
141 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol
142 which serves as a subroutine:
143
144 subroutine: /* empty */
145 { prepare_for_local_variables (); }
146 ;
147
148 compound: subroutine
149 '{' declarations statements '}'
150 | subroutine
151 '{' statements '}'
152 ;
153
154 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for `subroutine' without
155 deciding which rule for `compound' it will eventually use. Note that
156 the action is now at the end of its rule. Any mid-rule action can be
157 converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and this is what Bison
158 actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
159
160 \1f
161 File: bison.info, Node: Locations, Next: Declarations, Prev: Semantics, Up: Grammar File
162
163 Tracking Locations
164 ==================
165
166 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
167 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additionnal
168 informations, especially symbol locations.
169
170 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type,
171 and actions to take when rules are matched.
172
173 * Menu:
174
175 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
176 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
177 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
178
179 \1f
180 File: bison.info, Node: Location Type, Next: Actions and Locations, Up: Locations
181
182 Data Type of Locations
183 ----------------------
184
185 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic
186 values, since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
187
188 The type of locations is specified by defining a macro called
189 `YYLTYPE'. When `YYLTYPE' is not defined, Bison uses a default
190 structure type with four members:
191
192 struct
193 {
194 int first_line;
195 int first_column;
196 int last_line;
197 int last_column;
198 }
199
200 \1f
201 File: bison.info, Node: Actions and Locations, Next: Location Default Action, Prev: Location Type, Up: Locations
202
203 Actions and Locations
204 ---------------------
205
206 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but
207 also for describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
208
209 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings
210 is very similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given
211 rule, several constructs can be used to access the locations of the
212 elements being matched. The location of the Nth component of the right
213 hand side is `@N', while the location of the left hand side grouping is
214 `@$'.
215
216 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
217
218 exp: ...
219 | exp '/' exp
220 {
221 @$.first_column = @1.first_column;
222 @$.first_line = @1.first_line;
223 @$.last_column = @3.last_column;
224 @$.last_line = @3.last_line;
225 if ($3)
226 $$ = $1 / $3;
227 else
228 {
229 $$ = 1;
230 printf("Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
231 @3.first_line, @3.first_column,
232 @3.last_line, @3.last_column);
233 }
234 }
235
236 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that
237 is run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of `@$' to the
238 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of `@$' to the end of the
239 last symbol.
240
241 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully
242 automatic. The example above simply rewrites this way:
243
244 exp: ...
245 | exp '/' exp
246 {
247 if ($3)
248 $$ = $1 / $3;
249 else
250 {
251 $$ = 1;
252 printf("Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
253 @3.first_line, @3.first_column,
254 @3.last_line, @3.last_column);
255 }
256 }
257
258 \1f
259 File: bison.info, Node: Location Default Action, Prev: Actions and Locations, Up: Locations
260
261 Default Action for Locations
262 ----------------------------
263
264 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
265 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
266 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each rule.
267 The `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' macro is called each time a rule is matched,
268 before the associated action is run.
269
270 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
271 dedicated code from semantic actions.
272
273 The `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' macro takes three parameters. The first one is
274 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). The
275 second one is an array holding locations of all right hand side
276 elements of the rule being matched. The last one is the size of the
277 right hand side rule.
278
279 By default, it is defined this way:
280
281 #define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
282 Current.last_line = Rhs[N].last_line; \
283 Current.last_column = Rhs[N].last_column;
284
285 When defining `YYLLOC_DEFAULT', you should consider that:
286
287 * All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first
288 one (the result) should be modified by `YYLLOC_DEFAULT'.
289
290 * Before `YYLLOC_DEFAULT' is executed, the output parser sets `@$'
291 to `@1'.
292
293 * For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes for the
294 location array range from 1 to N.
295
296 \1f
297 File: bison.info, Node: Declarations, Next: Multiple Parsers, Prev: Locations, Up: Grammar File
298
299 Bison Declarations
300 ==================
301
302 The "Bison declarations" section of a Bison grammar defines the
303 symbols used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic
304 values. *Note Symbols::.
305
306 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
307 `'+'' and `'*'') must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
308 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
309 value (*note More Than One Value Type: Multiple Types.).
310
311 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by
312 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
313 must declare it explicitly (*note Languages and Context-Free Grammars:
314 Language and Grammar.).
315
316 * Menu:
317
318 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
319 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
320 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
321 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
322 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about shift/reduce conflicts.
323 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
324 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
325 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
326
327 \1f
328 File: bison.info, Node: Token Decl, Next: Precedence Decl, Up: Declarations
329
330 Token Type Names
331 ----------------
332
333 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as
334 follows:
335
336 %token NAME
337
338 Bison will convert this into a `#define' directive in the parser, so
339 that the function `yylex' (if it is in this file) can use the name NAME
340 to stand for this token type's code.
341
342 Alternatively, you can use `%left', `%right', or `%nonassoc' instead
343 of `%token', if you wish to specify associativity and precedence.
344 *Note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.
345
346 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by
347 appending an integer value in the field immediately following the token
348 name:
349
350 %token NUM 300
351
352 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
353 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't
354 conflict with each other or with ASCII characters.
355
356 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
357 `%token' or other token declaration to include the data type
358 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (*note More Than One Value
359 Type: Multiple Types.).
360
361 For example:
362
363 %union { /* define stack type */
364 double val;
365 symrec *tptr;
366 }
367 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
368
369 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
370 writing the literal string at the end of a `%token' declaration which
371 declares the name. For example:
372
373 %token arrow "=>"
374
375 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
376 equivalent literal string tokens:
377
378 %token <operator> OR "||"
379 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
380 %left OR "<="
381
382 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
383 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
384 `yylex' function can use the token name or the literal string to obtain
385 the token type code number (*note Calling Convention::).
386
387 \1f
388 File: bison.info, Node: Precedence Decl, Next: Union Decl, Prev: Token Decl, Up: Declarations
389
390 Operator Precedence
391 -------------------
392
393 Use the `%left', `%right' or `%nonassoc' declaration to declare a
394 token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at once. These
395 are called "precedence declarations". *Note Operator Precedence:
396 Precedence, for general information on operator precedence.
397
398 The syntax of a precedence declaration is the same as that of
399 `%token': either
400
401 %left SYMBOLS...
402
403 or
404
405 %left <TYPE> SYMBOLS...
406
407 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of `%token'.
408 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence
409 for all the SYMBOLS:
410
411 * The associativity of an operator OP determines how repeated uses
412 of the operator nest: whether `X OP Y OP Z' is parsed by grouping
413 X with Y first or by grouping Y with Z first. `%left' specifies
414 left-associativity (grouping X with Y first) and `%right'
415 specifies right-associativity (grouping Y with Z first).
416 `%nonassoc' specifies no associativity, which means that `X OP Y
417 OP Z' is considered a syntax error.
418
419 * The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other
420 operators. All the tokens declared in a single precedence
421 declaration have equal precedence and nest together according to
422 their associativity. When two tokens declared in different
423 precedence declarations associate, the one declared later has the
424 higher precedence and is grouped first.
425
426 \1f
427 File: bison.info, Node: Union Decl, Next: Type Decl, Prev: Precedence Decl, Up: Declarations
428
429 The Collection of Value Types
430 -----------------------------
431
432 The `%union' declaration specifies the entire collection of possible
433 data types for semantic values. The keyword `%union' is followed by a
434 pair of braces containing the same thing that goes inside a `union' in
435 C.
436
437 For example:
438
439 %union {
440 double val;
441 symrec *tptr;
442 }
443
444 This says that the two alternative types are `double' and `symrec *'.
445 They are given names `val' and `tptr'; these names are used in the
446 `%token' and `%type' declarations to pick one of the types for a
447 terminal or nonterminal symbol (*note Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.).
448
449 Note that, unlike making a `union' declaration in C, you do not write
450 a semicolon after the closing brace.
451
452 \1f
453 File: bison.info, Node: Type Decl, Next: Expect Decl, Prev: Union Decl, Up: Declarations
454
455 Nonterminal Symbols
456 -------------------
457
458 When you use `%union' to specify multiple value types, you must declare
459 the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are used.
460 This is done with a `%type' declaration, like this:
461
462 %type <TYPE> NONTERMINAL...
463
464 Here NONTERMINAL is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and TYPE is the
465 name given in the `%union' to the alternative that you want (*note The
466 Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.). You can give any number of
467 nonterminal symbols in the same `%type' declaration, if they have the
468 same value type. Use spaces to separate the symbol names.
469
470 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do
471 this, use the same `<TYPE>' construction in a declaration for the
472 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow `<TYPE>'.
473
474 \1f
475 File: bison.info, Node: Expect Decl, Next: Start Decl, Prev: Type Decl, Up: Declarations
476
477 Suppressing Conflict Warnings
478 -----------------------------
479
480 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
481 (*note Shift/Reduce Conflicts: Shift/Reduce.), but most real grammars
482 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a
483 predictable way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable
484 to suppress the warning about these conflicts unless the number of
485 conflicts changes. You can do this with the `%expect' declaration.
486
487 The declaration looks like this:
488
489 %expect N
490
491 Here N is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should be no
492 warning if there are N shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce
493 conflicts. The usual warning is given if there are either more or fewer
494 conflicts, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
495
496 In general, using `%expect' involves these steps:
497
498 * Compile your grammar without `%expect'. Use the `-v' option to
499 get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
500 print the number of conflicts.
501
502 * Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
503 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar
504 and go back to the beginning.
505
506 * Add an `%expect' declaration, copying the number N from the number
507 which Bison printed.
508
509 Now Bison will stop annoying you about the conflicts you have
510 checked, but it will warn you again if changes in the grammar result in
511 additional conflicts.
512
513 \1f
514 File: bison.info, Node: Start Decl, Next: Pure Decl, Prev: Expect Decl, Up: Declarations
515
516 The Start-Symbol
517 ----------------
518
519 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is
520 the first nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section.
521 The programmer may override this restriction with the `%start'
522 declaration as follows:
523
524 %start SYMBOL
525
526 \1f
527 File: bison.info, Node: Pure Decl, Next: Decl Summary, Prev: Start Decl, Up: Declarations
528
529 A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
530 -------------------------
531
532 A "reentrant" program is one which does not alter in the course of
533 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of "pure" (read-only)
534 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is
535 possible; for example, a non-reentrant program may not be safe to call
536 from a signal handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a
537 non-reentrant program must be called only within interlocks.
538
539 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
540 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with YACC. (The
541 standard YACC interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
542 statically allocated variables for communication with `yylex',
543 including `yylval' and `yylloc'.)
544
545 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
546 declaration `%pure_parser' says that you want the parser to be
547 reentrant. It looks like this:
548
549 %pure_parser
550
551 The result is that the communication variables `yylval' and `yylloc'
552 become local variables in `yyparse', and a different calling convention
553 is used for the lexical analyzer function `yylex'. *Note Calling
554 Conventions for Pure Parsers: Pure Calling, for the details of this.
555 The variable `yynerrs' also becomes local in `yyparse' (*note The Error
556 Reporting Function `yyerror': Error Reporting.). The convention for
557 calling `yyparse' itself is unchanged.
558
559 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
560 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
561 valid grammar.
562
563 \1f
564 File: bison.info, Node: Decl Summary, Prev: Pure Decl, Up: Declarations
565
566 Bison Declaration Summary
567 -------------------------
568
569 Here is a summary of all Bison declarations:
570
571 `%union'
572 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
573 (*note The Collection of Value Types: Union Decl.).
574
575 `%token'
576 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence or
577 associativity specified (*note Token Type Names: Token Decl.).
578
579 `%right'
580 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is
581 right-associative (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.).
582
583 `%left'
584 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is
585 left-associative (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.).
586
587 `%nonassoc'
588 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
589 (using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error)
590 (*note Operator Precedence: Precedence Decl.).
591
592 `%type'
593 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
594 (*note Nonterminal Symbols: Type Decl.).
595
596 `%start'
597 Specify the grammar's start symbol (*note The Start-Symbol: Start
598 Decl.).
599
600 `%expect'
601 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts (*note
602 Suppressing Conflict Warnings: Expect Decl.).
603
604 `%yacc'
605 `%fixed_output_files'
606 Pretend the option `--yacc' was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
607 including its naming conventions. *Note Bison Options::, for more.
608
609 `%locations'
610 Generate the code processing the locations (*note Special Features
611 for Use in Actions: Action Features.). This mode is enabled as
612 soon as the grammar uses the special `@N' tokens, but if your
613 grammar does not use it, using `%locations' allows for more
614 accurate parse error messages.
615
616 `%pure_parser'
617 Request a pure (reentrant) parser program (*note A Pure
618 (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.).
619
620 `%no_parser'
621 Do not include any C code in the parser file; generate tables
622 only. The parser file contains just `#define' directives and
623 static variable declarations.
624
625 This option also tells Bison to write the C code for the grammar
626 actions into a file named `FILENAME.act', in the form of a
627 brace-surrounded body fit for a `switch' statement.
628
629 `%no_lines'
630 Don't generate any `#line' preprocessor commands in the parser
631 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file
632 so that the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and
633 object code with your source file (the grammar file). This
634 directive causes them to associate errors with the parser file,
635 treating it an independent source file in its own right.
636
637 `%debug'
638 Output a definition of the macro `YYDEBUG' into the parser file, so
639 that the debugging facilities are compiled. *Note Debugging Your
640 Parser: Debugging.
641
642 `%defines'
643 Write an extra output file containing macro definitions for the
644 token type names defined in the grammar and the semantic value type
645 `YYSTYPE', as well as a few `extern' variable declarations.
646
647 If the parser output file is named `NAME.c' then this file is
648 named `NAME.h'.
649
650 This output file is essential if you wish to put the definition of
651 `yylex' in a separate source file, because `yylex' needs to be
652 able to refer to token type codes and the variable `yylval'.
653 *Note Semantic Values of Tokens: Token Values.
654
655 `%verbose'
656 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
657 parser states and what is done for each type of look-ahead token in
658 that state.
659
660 This file also describes all the conflicts, both those resolved by
661 operator precedence and the unresolved ones.
662
663 The file's name is made by removing `.tab.c' or `.c' from the
664 parser output file name, and adding `.output' instead.
665
666 Therefore, if the input file is `foo.y', then the parser file is
667 called `foo.tab.c' by default. As a consequence, the verbose
668 output file is called `foo.output'.
669
670 `%token_table'
671 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of
672 the array is `yytname'; `yytname[I]' is the name of the token
673 whose internal Bison token code number is I. The first three
674 elements of `yytname' are always `"$"', `"error"', and
675 `"$illegal"'; after these come the symbols defined in the grammar
676 file.
677
678 For single-character literal tokens and literal string tokens, the
679 name in the table includes the single-quote or double-quote
680 characters: for example, `"'+'"' is a single-character literal and
681 `"\"<=\""' is a literal string token. All the characters of the
682 literal string token appear verbatim in the string found in the
683 table; even double-quote characters are not escaped. For example,
684 if the token consists of three characters `*"*', its string in
685 `yytname' contains `"*"*"'. (In C, that would be written as
686 `"\"*\"*\""').
687
688 When you specify `%token_table', Bison also generates macro
689 definitions for macros `YYNTOKENS', `YYNNTS', and `YYNRULES', and
690 `YYNSTATES':
691
692 `YYNTOKENS'
693 The highest token number, plus one.
694
695 `YYNNTS'
696 The number of nonterminal symbols.
697
698 `YYNRULES'
699 The number of grammar rules,
700
701 `YYNSTATES'
702 The number of parser states (*note Parser States::).
703
704 \1f
705 File: bison.info, Node: Multiple Parsers, Prev: Declarations, Up: Grammar File
706
707 Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
708 ====================================
709
710 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore
711 contain only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than
712 one language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name
713 conflict between different definitions of `yyparse', `yylval', and so
714 on.
715
716 The easy way to do this is to use the option `-p PREFIX' (*note
717 Invoking Bison: Invocation.). This renames the interface functions and
718 variables of the Bison parser to start with PREFIX instead of `yy'.
719 You can use this to give each parser distinct names that do not
720 conflict.
721
722 The precise list of symbols renamed is `yyparse', `yylex',
723 `yyerror', `yynerrs', `yylval', `yychar' and `yydebug'. For example,
724 if you use `-p c', the names become `cparse', `clex', and so on.
725
726 *All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
727 renamed.* These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
728 name is used in different parsers. For example, `YYSTYPE' is not
729 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
730 no trouble (*note Data Types of Semantic Values: Value Type.).
731
732 The `-p' option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
733 of the parser source file, defining `yyparse' as `PREFIXparse', and so
734 on. This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire
735 parser file.
736
737 \1f
738 File: bison.info, Node: Interface, Next: Algorithm, Prev: Grammar File, Up: Top
739
740 Parser C-Language Interface
741 ***************************
742
743 The Bison parser is actually a C function named `yyparse'. Here we
744 describe the interface conventions of `yyparse' and the other functions
745 that it needs to use.
746
747 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
748 `yy' and `YY' for internal purposes. If you use such an identifier
749 (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in additional C code
750 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
751
752 * Menu:
753
754 * Parser Function:: How to call `yyparse' and what it returns.
755 * Lexical:: You must supply a function `yylex'
756 which reads tokens.
757 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function `yyerror'.
758 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
759
760 \1f
761 File: bison.info, Node: Parser Function, Next: Lexical, Up: Interface
762
763 The Parser Function `yyparse'
764 =============================
765
766 You call the function `yyparse' to cause parsing to occur. This
767 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
768 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
769 write an action which directs `yyparse' to return immediately without
770 reading further.
771
772 The value returned by `yyparse' is 0 if parsing was successful
773 (return is due to end-of-input).
774
775 The value is 1 if parsing failed (return is due to a syntax error).
776
777 In an action, you can cause immediate return from `yyparse' by using
778 these macros:
779
780 `YYACCEPT'
781 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
782
783 `YYABORT'
784 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
785
786 \1f
787 File: bison.info, Node: Lexical, Next: Error Reporting, Prev: Parser Function, Up: Interface
788
789 The Lexical Analyzer Function `yylex'
790 =====================================
791
792 The "lexical analyzer" function, `yylex', recognizes tokens from the
793 input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
794 this function automatically; you must write it so that `yyparse' can
795 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
796
797 In simple programs, `yylex' is often defined at the end of the Bison
798 grammar file. If `yylex' is defined in a separate source file, you
799 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available
800 there. To do this, use the `-d' option when you run Bison, so that it
801 will write these macro definitions into a separate header file
802 `NAME.tab.h' which you can include in the other source files that need
803 it. *Note Invoking Bison: Invocation.
804
805 * Menu:
806
807 * Calling Convention:: How `yyparse' calls `yylex'.
808 * Token Values:: How `yylex' must return the semantic value
809 of the token it has read.
810 * Token Positions:: How `yylex' must return the text position
811 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
812 actions want that.
813 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
814 in a pure parser (*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.).
815
816 \1f
817 File: bison.info, Node: Calling Convention, Next: Token Values, Up: Lexical
818
819 Calling Convention for `yylex'
820 ------------------------------
821
822 The value that `yylex' returns must be the numeric code for the type
823 of token it has just found, or 0 for end-of-input.
824
825 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
826 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
827 numeric code for that token type. So `yylex' can use the name to
828 indicate that type. *Note Symbols::.
829
830 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character
831 literal, the numeric code for that character is also the code for the
832 token type. So `yylex' can simply return that character code. The
833 null character must not be used this way, because its code is zero and
834 that is what signifies end-of-input.
835
836 Here is an example showing these things:
837
838 int
839 yylex (void)
840 {
841 ...
842 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end of file. */
843 return 0;
844 ...
845 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
846 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
847 ...
848 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
849 ...
850 }
851
852 This interface has been designed so that the output from the `lex'
853 utility can be used without change as the definition of `yylex'.
854
855 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
856 `yylex' can determine the token type codes for them:
857
858 * If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
859 literal string tokens, `yylex' can use these symbolic names like
860 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
861 the grammar file has no effect on `yylex'.
862
863 * `yylex' can find the multicharacter token in the `yytname' table.
864 The index of the token in the table is the token type's code. The
865 name of a multicharacter token is recorded in `yytname' with a
866 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote.
867 The token's characters are not escaped in any way; they appear
868 verbatim in the contents of the string in the table.
869
870 Here's code for looking up a token in `yytname', assuming that the
871 characters of the token are stored in `token_buffer'.
872
873 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
874 {
875 if (yytname[i] != 0
876 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
877 && strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
878 strlen (token_buffer))
879 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
880 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
881 break;
882 }
883
884 The `yytname' table is generated only if you use the
885 `%token_table' declaration. *Note Decl Summary::.
886
887 \1f
888 File: bison.info, Node: Token Values, Next: Token Positions, Prev: Calling Convention, Up: Lexical
889
890 Semantic Values of Tokens
891 -------------------------
892
893 In an ordinary (non-reentrant) parser, the semantic value of the
894 token must be stored into the global variable `yylval'. When you are
895 using just one data type for semantic values, `yylval' has that type.
896 Thus, if the type is `int' (the default), you might write this in
897 `yylex':
898
899 ...
900 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
901 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
902 ...
903
904 When you are using multiple data types, `yylval''s type is a union
905 made from the `%union' declaration (*note The Collection of Value
906 Types: Union Decl.). So when you store a token's value, you must use
907 the proper member of the union. If the `%union' declaration looks like
908 this:
909
910 %union {
911 int intval;
912 double val;
913 symrec *tptr;
914 }
915
916 then the code in `yylex' might look like this:
917
918 ...
919 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
920 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
921 ...
922
923 \1f
924 File: bison.info, Node: Token Positions, Next: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Values, Up: Lexical
925
926 Textual Positions of Tokens
927 ---------------------------
928
929 If you are using the `@N'-feature (*note Tracking Locations:
930 Locations.) in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens
931 and groupings, then you must provide this information in `yylex'. The
932 function `yyparse' expects to find the textual location of a token just
933 parsed in the global variable `yylloc'. So `yylex' must store the
934 proper data in that variable.
935
936 By default, the value of `yylloc' is a structure and you need only
937 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
938 four members are called `first_line', `first_column', `last_line' and
939 `last_column'. Note that the use of this feature makes the parser
940 noticeably slower.
941
942 The data type of `yylloc' has the name `YYLTYPE'.
943
944 \1f
945 File: bison.info, Node: Pure Calling, Prev: Token Positions, Up: Lexical
946
947 Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
948 ------------------------------------
949
950 When you use the Bison declaration `%pure_parser' to request a pure,
951 reentrant parser, the global communication variables `yylval' and
952 `yylloc' cannot be used. (*Note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.)
953 In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by pointers
954 passed as arguments to `yylex'. You must declare them as shown here,
955 and pass the information back by storing it through those pointers.
956
957 int
958 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
959 {
960 ...
961 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
962 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
963 ...
964 }
965
966 If the grammar file does not use the `@' constructs to refer to
967 textual positions, then the type `YYLTYPE' will not be defined. In
968 this case, omit the second argument; `yylex' will be called with only
969 one argument.
970
971 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
972 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, define the
973 macro `YYPARSE_PARAM' as a variable name. This modifies the `yyparse'
974 function to accept one argument, of type `void *', with that name.
975
976 When you call `yyparse', pass the address of an object, casting the
977 address to `void *'. The grammar actions can refer to the contents of
978 the object by casting the pointer value back to its proper type and
979 then dereferencing it. Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
980
981 %{
982 struct parser_control
983 {
984 int nastiness;
985 int randomness;
986 };
987
988 #define YYPARSE_PARAM parm
989 %}
990
991 Then call the parser like this:
992
993 struct parser_control
994 {
995 int nastiness;
996 int randomness;
997 };
998
999 ...
1000
1001 {
1002 struct parser_control foo;
1003 ... /* Store proper data in `foo'. */
1004 value = yyparse ((void *) &foo);
1005 ...
1006 }
1007
1008 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
1009
1010 ((struct parser_control *) parm)->randomness
1011
1012 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to `yylex', define
1013 the macro `YYLEX_PARAM' just like `YYPARSE_PARAM', as shown here:
1014
1015 %{
1016 struct parser_control
1017 {
1018 int nastiness;
1019 int randomness;
1020 };
1021
1022 #define YYPARSE_PARAM parm
1023 #define YYLEX_PARAM parm
1024 %}
1025
1026 You should then define `yylex' to accept one additional
1027 argument--the value of `parm'. (This makes either two or three
1028 arguments in total, depending on whether an argument of type `YYLTYPE'
1029 is passed.) You can declare the argument as a pointer to the proper
1030 object type, or you can declare it as `void *' and access the contents
1031 as shown above.
1032
1033 You can use `%pure_parser' to request a reentrant parser without
1034 also using `YYPARSE_PARAM'. Then you should call `yyparse' with no
1035 arguments, as usual.
1036
1037 \1f
1038 File: bison.info, Node: Error Reporting, Next: Action Features, Prev: Lexical, Up: Interface
1039
1040 The Error Reporting Function `yyerror'
1041 ======================================
1042
1043 The Bison parser detects a "parse error" or "syntax error" whenever
1044 it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An action in
1045 the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the macro
1046 `YYERROR' (*note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.).
1047
1048 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
1049 reporting function named `yyerror', which you must supply. It is
1050 called by `yyparse' whenever a syntax error is found, and it receives
1051 one argument. For a parse error, the string is normally
1052 `"parse error"'.
1053
1054 If you define the macro `YYERROR_VERBOSE' in the Bison declarations
1055 section (*note The Bison Declarations Section: Bison Declarations.),
1056 then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string
1057 instead of just plain `"parse error"'. It doesn't matter what
1058 definition you use for `YYERROR_VERBOSE', just whether you define it.
1059
1060 The parser can detect one other kind of error: stack overflow. This
1061 happens when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
1062 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
1063 parser extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
1064 if overflow happens, `yyparse' calls `yyerror' in the usual fashion,
1065 except that the argument string is `"parser stack overflow"'.
1066
1067 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
1068
1069 void
1070 yyerror (char *s)
1071 {
1072 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1073 }
1074
1075 After `yyerror' returns to `yyparse', the latter will attempt error
1076 recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
1077 (*note Error Recovery::). If recovery is impossible, `yyparse' will
1078 immediately return 1.
1079
1080 The variable `yynerrs' contains the number of syntax errors
1081 encountered so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
1082 request a pure parser (*note A Pure (Reentrant) Parser: Pure Decl.)
1083 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
1084
1085 \1f
1086 File: bison.info, Node: Action Features, Prev: Error Reporting, Up: Interface
1087
1088 Special Features for Use in Actions
1089 ===================================
1090
1091 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that are
1092 useful in actions.
1093
1094 `$$'
1095 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
1096 grouping made by the current rule. *Note Actions::.
1097
1098 `$N'
1099 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the Nth
1100 component of the current rule. *Note Actions::.
1101
1102 `$<TYPEALT>$'
1103 Like `$$' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified
1104 by the `%union' declaration. *Note Data Types of Values in
1105 Actions: Action Types.
1106
1107 `$<TYPEALT>N'
1108 Like `$N' but specifies alternative TYPEALT in the union specified
1109 by the `%union' declaration. *Note Data Types of Values in
1110 Actions: Action Types.
1111
1112 `YYABORT;'
1113 Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating failure. *Note The
1114 Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
1115
1116 `YYACCEPT;'
1117 Return immediately from `yyparse', indicating success. *Note The
1118 Parser Function `yyparse': Parser Function.
1119
1120 `YYBACKUP (TOKEN, VALUE);'
1121 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
1122 a single value, and only when there is no look-ahead token. It
1123 installs a look-ahead token with token type TOKEN and semantic
1124 value VALUE; then it discards the value that was going to be
1125 reduced by this rule.
1126
1127 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is a
1128 look-ahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with a
1129 message `cannot back up' and performs ordinary error recovery.
1130
1131 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
1132
1133 `YYEMPTY'
1134 Value stored in `yychar' when there is no look-ahead token.
1135
1136 `YYERROR;'
1137 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
1138 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error;
1139 however, it does not call `yyerror', and does not print any
1140 message. If you want to print an error message, call `yyerror'
1141 explicitly before the `YYERROR;' statement. *Note Error
1142 Recovery::.
1143
1144 `YYRECOVERING'
1145 This macro stands for an expression that has the value 1 when the
1146 parser is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 the rest of the
1147 time. *Note Error Recovery::.
1148
1149 `yychar'
1150 Variable containing the current look-ahead token. (In a pure
1151 parser, this is actually a local variable within `yyparse'.) When
1152 there is no look-ahead token, the value `YYEMPTY' is stored in the
1153 variable. *Note Look-Ahead Tokens: Look-Ahead.
1154
1155 `yyclearin;'
1156 Discard the current look-ahead token. This is useful primarily in
1157 error rules. *Note Error Recovery::.
1158
1159 `yyerrok;'
1160 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
1161 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules. *Note Error
1162 Recovery::.
1163
1164 `@$'
1165 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the
1166 textual position of the grouping made by the current rule. *Note
1167 Tracking Locations: Locations.
1168
1169 `@N'
1170 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the
1171 textual position of the Nth component of the current rule. *Note
1172 Tracking Locations: Locations.
1173
1174 \1f
1175 File: bison.info, Node: Algorithm, Next: Error Recovery, Prev: Interface, Up: Top
1176
1177 The Bison Parser Algorithm
1178 **************************
1179
1180 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
1181 semantic values. The stack is called the "parser stack". Pushing a
1182 token is traditionally called "shifting".
1183
1184 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read `1 + 5 *', with a
1185 `3' to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
1186 that was shifted.
1187
1188 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read.
1189 When the last N tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
1190 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is
1191 called "reduction". Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the
1192 stack by a single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side)
1193 of that rule. Running the rule's action is part of the process of
1194 reduction, because this is what computes the semantic value of the
1195 resulting grouping.
1196
1197 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
1198
1199 1 + 5 * 3
1200
1201 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
1202 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
1203
1204 expr: expr '*' expr;
1205
1206 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
1207
1208 1 + 15
1209
1210 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single
1211 value 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
1212
1213 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire
1214 input down to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's
1215 start-symbol (*note Languages and Context-Free Grammars: Language and
1216 Grammar.).
1217
1218 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
1219
1220 * Menu:
1221
1222 * Look-Ahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
1223 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
1224 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
1225 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
1226 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
1227 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
1228 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
1229 * Stack Overflow:: What happens when stack gets full. How to avoid it.
1230
1231 \1f
1232 File: bison.info, Node: Look-Ahead, Next: Shift/Reduce, Up: Algorithm
1233
1234 Look-Ahead Tokens
1235 =================
1236
1237 The Bison parser does _not_ always reduce immediately as soon as the
1238 last N tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
1239 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
1240 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes "looks ahead" at the next
1241 token in order to decide what to do.
1242
1243 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it
1244 becomes the "look-ahead token", which is not on the stack. Now the
1245 parser can perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on
1246 the stack, while the look-ahead token remains off to the side. When no
1247 more reductions should take place, the look-ahead token is shifted onto
1248 the stack. This does not mean that all possible reductions have been
1249 done; depending on the token type of the look-ahead token, some rules
1250 may choose to delay their application.
1251
1252 Here is a simple case where look-ahead is needed. These three rules
1253 define expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix
1254 unary factorial operators (`!'), and allow parentheses for grouping.
1255
1256 expr: term '+' expr
1257 | term
1258 ;
1259
1260 term: '(' expr ')'
1261 | term '!'
1262 | NUMBER
1263 ;
1264
1265 Suppose that the tokens `1 + 2' have been read and shifted; what
1266 should be done? If the following token is `)', then the first three
1267 tokens must be reduced to form an `expr'. This is the only valid
1268 course, because shifting the `)' would produce a sequence of symbols
1269 `term ')'', and no rule allows this.
1270
1271 If the following token is `!', then it must be shifted immediately so
1272 that `2 !' can be reduced to make a `term'. If instead the parser were
1273 to reduce before shifting, `1 + 2' would become an `expr'. It would
1274 then be impossible to shift the `!' because doing so would produce on
1275 the stack the sequence of symbols `expr '!''. No rule allows that
1276 sequence.
1277
1278 The current look-ahead token is stored in the variable `yychar'.
1279 *Note Special Features for Use in Actions: Action Features.
1280