1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
214 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
215 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
219 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
220 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
221 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
225 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
226 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
227 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
228 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
229 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
230 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
231 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
232 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
233 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
234 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
235 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
236 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
237 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
238 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
239 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
241 Parser C-Language Interface
243 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
244 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
245 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
246 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
247 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
248 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
250 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
251 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
252 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
255 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
257 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
258 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
259 of the token it has read.
260 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
261 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
263 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
264 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
266 The Bison Parser Algorithm
268 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
269 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
270 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
271 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
272 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
273 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
274 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
275 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
276 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
277 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
281 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
282 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
283 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
284 * How Precedence:: How they work.
285 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
289 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
290 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
291 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
292 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
294 Handling Context Dependencies
296 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
297 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
298 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
299 error recovery rules must be written.
301 Debugging Your Parser
303 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
304 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
305 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
306 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
310 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
311 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
312 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
316 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
317 in alphabetical order by short options.
318 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
319 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
321 Parsers Written In Other Languages
323 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
324 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
328 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
329 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
330 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
331 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
332 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
333 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
337 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
338 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
339 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
341 A Complete C++ Example
343 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
344 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
345 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
346 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
347 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
351 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
352 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
353 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
354 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
355 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
356 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
357 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
358 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
360 Frequently Asked Questions
362 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
363 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
364 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
365 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
366 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
367 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
368 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
369 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
370 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
371 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
372 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
373 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
377 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
383 @unnumbered Introduction
386 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
387 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
388 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
389 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
390 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
391 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
392 calculators to complex programming languages.
394 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
395 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
396 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
397 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
398 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
401 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
402 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
403 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
404 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
407 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
408 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
409 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
410 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
411 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
412 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
415 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
418 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
420 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
421 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
422 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
423 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
424 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
426 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
428 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
429 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
430 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
431 License to all of the Bison source code.
433 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
434 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
435 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
436 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
437 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
438 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
439 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
441 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
442 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
443 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
444 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
445 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
446 using the other GNU tools.
448 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
449 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
450 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
451 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
455 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
456 @include gpl-3.0.texi
459 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
461 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
462 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
463 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
466 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
467 as mathematical ideas.
468 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
469 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
470 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
471 the name of an identifier, etc.).
472 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
473 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
474 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
475 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
476 how is the output used?
477 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
478 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
481 @node Language and Grammar
482 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
484 @cindex context-free grammar
485 @cindex grammar, context-free
486 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
487 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
488 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
489 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
490 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
491 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
492 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
493 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
497 @cindex Backus-Naur form
498 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
499 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
500 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
501 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
502 essentially machine-readable BNF.
504 @cindex LALR grammars
505 @cindex IELR grammars
507 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
508 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
509 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
510 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
511 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
512 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
513 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
514 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
515 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
516 Construction}, to learn how.
519 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
520 @cindex ambiguous grammars
521 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
523 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
524 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
525 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
526 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
527 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
528 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
529 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
530 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
531 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
532 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
533 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
534 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
535 possible parses of any given string is finite.
537 @cindex symbols (abstract)
539 @cindex syntactic grouping
540 @cindex grouping, syntactic
541 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
542 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
543 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
544 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
545 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
546 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
547 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
549 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
550 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
551 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
552 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
553 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
554 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
555 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
556 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
557 lexicography, not grammar.)
559 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
562 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
563 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
564 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
565 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
566 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
567 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
568 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
571 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
572 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
573 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
574 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
575 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
576 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
577 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
578 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
580 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
581 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
582 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
583 reads informally as follows:
586 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
591 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
595 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
596 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
597 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
598 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
601 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
602 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
603 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
604 not the start symbol.
606 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
607 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
608 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
609 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
610 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
611 reports a syntax error.
613 @node Grammar in Bison
614 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
615 @cindex Bison grammar
616 @cindex grammar, Bison
617 @cindex formal grammar
619 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
620 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
621 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
623 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
624 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
625 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
627 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
628 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
629 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
630 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
631 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
632 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
633 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
636 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
637 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
638 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
639 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
641 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
642 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
644 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
645 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
646 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
647 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
651 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
655 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
657 @node Semantic Values
658 @section Semantic Values
659 @cindex semantic value
660 @cindex value, semantic
662 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
663 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
664 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
665 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
666 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
669 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
670 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
671 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
672 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
673 ,Defining Language Semantics},
676 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
677 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
678 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
679 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
682 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
683 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
684 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
685 need to have any semantic value.)
687 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
688 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
689 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
690 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
691 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
692 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
694 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
695 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
696 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
697 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
698 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
700 @node Semantic Actions
701 @section Semantic Actions
702 @cindex semantic actions
703 @cindex actions, semantic
705 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
706 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
707 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
708 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
711 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
712 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
713 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
714 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
715 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
716 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
717 newly recognized larger expression.
719 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
723 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
727 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
728 from the values of the two subexpressions.
731 @section Writing GLR Parsers
733 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
736 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
737 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
739 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
740 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
741 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
742 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
743 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
744 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
745 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
746 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
747 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
749 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
750 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
751 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
752 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
753 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
754 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
755 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
756 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
757 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
758 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
759 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
760 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
761 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
762 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
763 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
764 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
765 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
766 identical set of symbols.
768 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
769 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
770 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
771 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
772 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
773 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
774 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
775 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
776 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
780 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
781 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
782 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
783 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
786 @node Simple GLR Parsers
787 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
788 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
789 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
793 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
794 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
796 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
797 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
798 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
800 Consider a problem that
801 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
802 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
805 type subrange = lo .. hi;
806 type enum = (a, b, c);
810 The original language standard allows only numeric
811 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
812 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
813 10206) and many other
814 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
815 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
819 type subrange = (a) .. b;
823 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
824 type with only one value:
831 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
832 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
834 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
835 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
836 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
837 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
838 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
839 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
840 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
841 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
843 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
844 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
845 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
846 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
849 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
850 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
851 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
852 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
853 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
854 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
857 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
858 use the GLR algorithm.
859 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
860 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
861 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
862 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
863 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
864 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
865 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
866 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
867 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
869 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
870 reports a syntax error as usual.
872 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
873 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
874 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
875 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
876 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
878 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
879 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
880 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
881 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
882 The present example contains only one conflict between two
883 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
884 cannot be nested. So the number of
885 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
886 and the parsing time is still linear.
888 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
889 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
892 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
902 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
931 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
932 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
933 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
934 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
941 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
942 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
943 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
952 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
953 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
954 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
955 notice when the parser splits.
957 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
958 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
959 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
960 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
961 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
962 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
963 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
964 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
965 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
966 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
967 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
968 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
969 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
972 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
973 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
974 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
975 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
976 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
977 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
979 @node Merging GLR Parses
980 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
981 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
982 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
986 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
988 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
993 #define YYSTYPE char const *
995 void yyerror (char const *);
1009 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1018 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1019 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1020 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1021 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1022 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1026 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1027 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1028 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1029 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1033 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1034 | '(' declarator ')'
1039 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1040 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1047 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1048 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1049 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1050 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1051 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1052 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1053 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1054 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1055 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1056 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1057 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1058 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1059 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1060 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1062 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1063 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1064 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1065 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1066 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1067 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1068 The parser therefore prints
1071 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1074 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1075 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1082 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1083 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1084 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1085 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1086 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1087 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1088 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1089 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1090 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1091 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1097 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1098 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1099 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1100 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1105 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1106 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1111 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1115 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1123 with an accompanying forward declaration
1124 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1128 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1129 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1134 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1135 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1138 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1141 Bison requires that all of the
1142 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1143 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1144 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1145 the offending merge.
1147 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1148 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1150 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1151 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1152 the associated reduction.
1153 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1154 action in a GLR parser.
1157 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1159 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1161 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1162 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1163 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1164 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1165 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1166 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1167 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1168 influence syntax analysis.
1169 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1172 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1173 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1174 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1175 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1176 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1177 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1178 future versions of Bison.
1179 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1180 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1181 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1184 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1185 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1186 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1187 initiate error recovery.
1188 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1189 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1190 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1191 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1193 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1194 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1196 @node Compiler Requirements
1197 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1198 @cindex @code{inline}
1199 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1201 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1202 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1203 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1204 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1205 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1206 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1215 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1219 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1220 && ! defined inline)
1229 @cindex textual location
1230 @cindex location, textual
1232 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1233 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1234 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1235 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1237 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1238 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1239 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1240 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1243 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1244 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1245 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1248 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1249 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1250 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1251 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1252 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1253 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1254 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1257 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1258 @cindex Bison parser
1259 @cindex Bison utility
1260 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1263 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1264 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1265 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1266 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1267 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1268 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1269 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1272 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1273 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1274 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1277 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1278 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1279 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1280 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1281 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1282 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1283 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1285 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1286 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1287 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1288 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1289 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1290 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1291 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1292 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1293 C-Language Interface}.
1295 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1296 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1297 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1298 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1299 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1300 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1301 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1302 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1303 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1304 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1305 anything other than their usual meanings.
1307 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1308 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1309 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1310 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1311 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1312 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1313 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1314 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1315 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1318 @section Stages in Using Bison
1319 @cindex stages in using Bison
1322 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1323 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1327 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1328 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1329 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1330 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1331 sequence of C statements.
1334 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1335 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1336 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1337 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1340 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1343 Write error-reporting routines.
1346 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1347 must follow these steps:
1351 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1354 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1357 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1360 @node Grammar Layout
1361 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1362 @cindex grammar file
1364 @cindex format of grammar file
1365 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1367 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1368 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1375 @var{Bison declarations}
1384 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1385 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1387 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1388 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1389 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1390 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1391 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1392 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1394 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1395 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1396 semantic values of various symbols.
1398 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1401 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1402 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1403 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1407 @cindex simple examples
1408 @cindex examples, simple
1410 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1411 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1412 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1413 and a multi-function calculator. All
1414 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1416 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1417 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1418 source file to try them.
1421 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1422 a first example with no operator precedence.
1423 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1424 Operator precedence is introduced.
1425 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1426 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1427 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1428 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1429 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1433 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1434 @cindex reverse polish notation
1435 @cindex polish notation calculator
1436 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1437 @cindex calculator, simple
1439 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1440 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1441 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1442 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1444 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1445 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1448 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1449 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1450 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1451 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1452 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1453 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1454 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1457 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1458 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1460 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1461 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1464 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1467 #define YYSTYPE double
1470 void yyerror (char const *);
1475 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1478 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1479 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1481 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1482 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1483 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1484 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1485 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1486 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1487 which is a floating point number.
1489 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1490 function @code{pow}.
1492 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1493 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1494 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1495 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1498 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1499 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1500 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1501 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1502 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1503 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1504 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1505 type for numeric constants.
1508 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1510 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1523 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1530 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1531 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1532 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1533 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1534 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1535 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1541 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1542 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1543 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1544 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1545 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1548 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1549 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1550 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1552 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1553 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1554 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1555 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1556 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1557 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1566 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1568 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1577 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1578 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1579 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1580 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1581 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1583 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1584 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1585 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1586 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1587 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1588 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1590 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1591 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1592 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1593 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1596 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1597 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1598 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1601 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1603 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1608 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1612 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1613 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1614 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1615 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1616 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1617 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1618 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1620 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1621 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1622 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1623 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1624 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1627 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1629 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1630 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1631 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1632 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1637 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1638 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1643 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1644 equally well have written them separately:
1648 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1649 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1653 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1654 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1655 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1656 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1657 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1658 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1659 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1660 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1662 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1663 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1664 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1666 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1667 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1671 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1675 means the same thing as this:
1680 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1686 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1689 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1690 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1691 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1693 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1694 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1695 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1696 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1698 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1700 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1701 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1702 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1703 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1705 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1706 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1707 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1708 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1709 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1710 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1711 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1712 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1713 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1715 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1716 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1717 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1718 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1719 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1721 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1722 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1724 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1728 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1729 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1730 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1731 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1742 /* Skip white space. */
1743 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1747 /* Process numbers. */
1748 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1751 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1756 /* Return end-of-input. */
1759 /* Return a single char. */
1766 @subsection The Controlling Function
1767 @cindex controlling function
1768 @cindex main function in simple example
1770 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1771 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1772 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1785 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1786 @cindex error reporting routine
1788 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1789 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1790 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1791 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1792 here is the definition we will use:
1800 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1802 yyerror (char const *s)
1804 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1809 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1810 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1811 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1812 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1813 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1814 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1816 @node Rpcalc Generate
1817 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1818 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1820 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1821 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1822 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1823 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1824 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1825 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1827 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1828 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1830 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1831 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1838 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1839 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1840 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1841 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1842 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1843 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1844 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1846 @node Rpcalc Compile
1847 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1848 @cindex compiling the parser
1850 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1854 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1856 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1860 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1861 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1862 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1866 # @r{List files again.}
1868 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1872 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1873 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1879 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1881 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1885 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1887 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1892 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1893 @cindex infix notation calculator
1895 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1897 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1898 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1899 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1900 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1903 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1907 #define YYSTYPE double
1911 void yyerror (char const *);
1916 /* Bison declarations. */
1920 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1921 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1924 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1935 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1942 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1943 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1944 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1945 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1946 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1947 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1948 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1955 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1958 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1960 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1961 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1962 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1963 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1964 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1965 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1968 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1969 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1970 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1971 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1972 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1975 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1976 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1977 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1978 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1979 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1981 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1986 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1994 @node Simple Error Recovery
1995 @section Simple Error Recovery
1996 @cindex error recovery, simple
1998 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1999 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2000 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2001 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2002 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2003 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2005 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2006 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2007 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2013 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2014 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2019 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2020 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2021 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2022 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2023 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2024 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2025 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2026 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2029 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2030 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2031 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2032 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2033 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2034 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2037 @node Location Tracking Calc
2038 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2039 @cindex location tracking calculator
2040 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2041 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2043 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2044 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2045 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2046 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2050 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2051 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2052 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2055 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2056 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2058 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2059 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2062 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2068 void yyerror (char const *);
2071 /* Bison declarations. */
2079 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2083 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2084 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2085 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2086 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2087 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2088 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2089 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2093 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2095 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2096 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2097 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2098 from the new information.
2100 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2101 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2114 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2121 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2122 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2123 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2133 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2134 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2135 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2140 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2141 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2142 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2146 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2147 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2148 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2150 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2151 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2152 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2153 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2154 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2155 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2159 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2161 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2162 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2163 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2166 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2167 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2178 /* Skip white space. */
2179 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2180 ++yylloc.last_column;
2185 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2186 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2190 /* Process numbers. */
2194 ++yylloc.last_column;
2195 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2197 ++yylloc.last_column;
2198 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2205 /* Return end-of-input. */
2210 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2214 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2217 ++yylloc.last_column;
2223 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2224 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2225 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2226 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2228 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2229 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2230 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2231 controlling function:
2238 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2239 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2245 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2246 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2247 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2249 @node Multi-function Calc
2250 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2251 @cindex multi-function calculator
2252 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2253 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2255 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2256 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2257 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2258 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2259 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2261 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2262 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2263 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2264 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2265 functions whose syntax has this form:
2268 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2272 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2273 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2274 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2278 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2282 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2288 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2293 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2296 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2297 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2298 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2301 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2302 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2304 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2306 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2310 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2311 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2313 void yyerror (char const *);
2319 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2320 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2323 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2324 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2331 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2332 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2336 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2337 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2338 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2340 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2341 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2342 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2343 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2345 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2346 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2347 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2348 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2349 between angle brackets).
2351 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2352 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2353 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2354 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2355 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2356 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2359 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2361 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2362 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2363 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2365 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2367 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2378 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2379 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2386 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2387 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2388 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2389 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2390 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2391 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2392 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2393 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2394 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2395 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2398 /* End of grammar. */
2402 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2403 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2404 @cindex symbol table example
2406 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2407 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2408 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2409 requires some additional C functions for support.
2411 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2412 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2413 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2415 @comment file: calc.h
2418 /* Function type. */
2419 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2423 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2426 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2427 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2430 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2431 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2433 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2438 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2440 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2441 extern symrec *sym_table;
2443 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2444 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2448 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2449 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2450 @code{init_table} as well:
2452 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2457 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2459 yyerror (char const *s)
2461 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2469 double (*fnct) (double);
2474 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2487 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2492 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2497 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2499 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2500 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2515 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2516 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2518 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2519 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2520 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2521 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2522 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2523 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2525 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2527 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2528 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2532 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2534 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2535 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2536 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2537 ptr->type = sym_type;
2538 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2539 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2547 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2550 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2551 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2552 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2559 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2560 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2561 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2562 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2564 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2565 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2566 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2567 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2568 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2569 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2571 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2572 operators in @code{yylex}.
2574 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2586 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2587 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2595 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2596 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2599 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2605 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2608 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2609 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2610 static size_t length = 40;
2611 static char *symbuf = 0;
2617 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2623 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2627 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2629 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2631 /* Get another character. */
2636 while (isalnum (c));
2643 s = getsym (symbuf);
2645 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2650 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2656 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2657 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2658 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2660 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2663 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2665 yyerror (char const *s)
2667 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2673 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2676 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2677 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2678 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2686 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2687 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2688 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2696 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2699 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2700 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2701 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2704 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2705 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2709 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2711 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2712 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2714 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2715 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2718 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2719 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2720 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2721 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2722 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2723 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2724 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2725 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2726 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2729 @node Grammar Outline
2730 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2733 @findex /* @dots{} */
2735 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2736 appropriate delimiters:
2743 @var{Bison declarations}
2752 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2753 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2757 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2758 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2759 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2760 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2761 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2765 @subsection The prologue
2766 @cindex declarations section
2768 @cindex declarations
2770 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2771 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2772 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2773 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2774 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2775 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2776 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2778 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2779 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2782 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2783 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2784 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2785 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2786 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2787 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2788 @code{%union} declaration.
2799 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2803 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2804 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2810 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2811 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2812 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2813 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2814 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2815 @code{#include} directives.
2817 @node Prologue Alternatives
2818 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2819 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2822 @findex %code requires
2823 @findex %code provides
2826 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2827 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2828 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2829 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2830 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2831 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2832 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2834 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2845 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2849 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2850 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2857 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2858 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2859 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2860 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2861 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2862 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2863 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2864 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2865 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2866 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2867 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2869 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2870 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2871 This behavior raises a few questions.
2872 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2873 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2874 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2875 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2876 This behavior is not intuitive.
2878 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2879 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2880 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2881 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2888 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2889 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2892 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2893 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2905 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2909 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2910 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2911 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2918 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2919 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2920 explicit which kind you intend.
2921 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2923 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2924 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2925 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2926 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2927 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2928 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2929 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2930 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2931 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2934 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2935 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2937 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2955 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2961 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2962 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2975 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2976 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2977 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2985 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2986 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2987 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2988 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2989 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2990 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2992 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2993 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2994 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2995 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2996 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2997 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2998 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2999 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3000 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3001 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3002 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3005 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3006 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3007 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3008 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3009 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3010 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3011 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3012 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3013 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3014 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3032 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3038 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3039 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3052 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3058 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3059 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3067 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3068 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3069 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3072 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3073 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3074 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3075 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3076 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3077 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3080 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3081 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3082 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3083 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3085 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3086 organize your grammar file.
3087 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3092 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3093 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3094 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3095 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3099 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3100 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3101 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3102 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3107 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3108 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3110 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3112 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3113 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3114 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3115 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3117 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3118 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3119 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3120 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3121 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3122 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3123 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3124 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3127 @node Bison Declarations
3128 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3129 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3130 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3132 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3133 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3134 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3135 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3138 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3139 @cindex grammar rules section
3140 @cindex rules section for grammar
3142 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3143 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3145 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3146 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3147 if it is the first thing in the file.
3150 @subsection The epilogue
3151 @cindex additional C code section
3153 @cindex C code, section for additional
3155 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3156 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3157 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3158 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3159 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3160 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3161 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3162 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3163 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3164 C-Language Interface}.
3166 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3167 from the grammar rules.
3169 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3170 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3171 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3172 of the grammar file.
3175 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3176 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3177 @cindex terminal symbol
3181 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3184 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3185 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3186 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3187 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3188 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3189 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3190 the symbol to stand for it.
3192 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3193 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3194 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3196 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3197 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3198 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3199 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3200 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3201 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3202 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3204 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3208 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3209 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3210 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3211 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3214 @cindex character token
3215 @cindex literal token
3216 @cindex single-character literal
3217 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3218 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3219 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3220 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3221 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3222 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3223 ,Operator Precedence}).
3225 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3226 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3227 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3228 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3229 your program will confuse other readers.
3231 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3232 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3233 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3234 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3235 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3236 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3240 @cindex string token
3241 @cindex literal string token
3242 @cindex multicharacter literal
3243 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3244 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3245 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3246 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3247 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3249 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3250 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3251 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3252 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3253 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3255 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3257 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3258 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3259 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3260 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3261 read your program will be confused.
3263 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3264 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3265 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3266 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3267 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3268 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3271 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3272 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3273 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3275 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3276 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3277 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3278 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3279 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3280 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3281 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3282 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3283 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3284 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3285 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3286 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3288 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3289 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3290 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3291 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3292 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3294 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3295 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3296 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3297 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3298 characters in the following C-language string:
3301 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3304 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3305 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3306 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3307 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3308 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3309 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3310 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3311 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3312 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3313 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3316 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3317 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3318 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3319 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3320 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3323 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3325 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3326 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3328 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3332 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3337 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3338 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3339 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3350 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3351 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3353 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3354 extra white space as you wish.
3356 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3357 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3360 @{@var{C statements}@}
3365 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3366 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3367 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3368 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3369 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3370 compiler can check it.
3372 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3373 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3374 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3375 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3376 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3377 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3378 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3379 character constants.
3381 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3385 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3386 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3391 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3392 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3399 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3401 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3402 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3403 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3422 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3426 @section Recursive Rules
3427 @cindex recursive rule
3429 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3430 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3431 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3432 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3433 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3444 @cindex left recursion
3445 @cindex right recursion
3447 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3448 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3449 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3461 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3462 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3463 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3464 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3465 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3466 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3467 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3470 @cindex mutual recursion
3471 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3472 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3473 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3482 | primary '+' primary
3495 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3499 @section Defining Language Semantics
3500 @cindex defining language semantics
3501 @cindex language semantics, defining
3503 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3504 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3505 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3507 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3508 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3509 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3510 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3513 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3514 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3515 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3516 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3517 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3518 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3519 action in the middle of a rule.
3523 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3524 @cindex semantic value type
3525 @cindex value type, semantic
3526 @cindex data types of semantic values
3527 @cindex default data type
3529 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3530 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3531 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3532 Notation Calculator}).
3534 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3535 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3536 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3539 #define YYSTYPE double
3543 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3544 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3545 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3546 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3548 @node Multiple Types
3549 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3551 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3552 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3553 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3554 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3557 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3558 requires you to do two things:
3562 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3563 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3564 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3565 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3569 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3570 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3571 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3572 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3573 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3582 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3584 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3585 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3586 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3587 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3589 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3590 placed at any position in the rule;
3591 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3592 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3593 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3594 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3596 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3597 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3598 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3599 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3600 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3601 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3602 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3603 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3604 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3605 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3608 Here is a typical example:
3614 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3618 Or, in terms of named references:
3624 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3629 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3630 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3631 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3632 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3633 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3634 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3636 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3637 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3638 referred to as @code{$2}.
3640 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3641 references construct.
3643 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3644 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3645 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3646 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3647 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3651 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3655 @cindex default action
3656 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3657 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3658 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3659 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3660 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3661 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3663 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3664 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3665 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3666 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3667 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3672 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3673 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3679 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3684 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3685 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3686 definition of @code{foo}.
3689 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3690 any, from a semantic action.
3691 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3692 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3695 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3696 @cindex action data types
3697 @cindex data types in actions
3699 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3700 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3702 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3703 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3704 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3705 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3706 in the rule. In this example,
3712 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3717 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3718 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3719 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3720 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3722 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3723 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3724 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3736 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3737 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3739 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3740 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3741 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3742 @cindex mid-rule actions
3744 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3745 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3746 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3749 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
3750 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
3751 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
3754 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
3755 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
3757 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3758 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3759 it is run before they are parsed.
3761 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3762 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3763 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3764 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3767 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3768 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3769 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3770 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3771 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3772 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3774 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3775 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3776 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3777 at the end of the rule.
3779 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3780 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3781 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3782 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3783 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3784 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3791 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3792 declare_variable ($3);
3797 pop_context ($<context>5);
3803 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3804 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3805 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3806 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3807 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3808 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3811 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
3812 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
3813 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
3820 $<context>let = push_context ();
3821 declare_variable ($3);
3826 pop_context ($<context>let);
3831 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3832 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3833 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3834 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3835 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3838 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3839 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3840 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3841 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3842 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3844 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3845 Discarded Symbols}).
3846 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3847 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3849 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3850 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3855 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3869 $let = push_context ();
3870 declare_variable ($3);
3877 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3878 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3879 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3881 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
3882 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
3886 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
3887 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
3888 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
3889 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
3893 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
3900 $@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
3901 $@@2: /* empty */ @{ c(); @};
3902 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
3903 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
3907 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
3909 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
3910 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
3911 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
3914 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
3921 @@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
3922 @@2: /* empty */ @{ $$ = c(); @};
3923 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
3924 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
3927 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
3928 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
3929 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
3930 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
3931 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
3935 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
3937 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
3938 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
3942 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
3943 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
3949 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
3950 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
3951 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3952 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3953 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3954 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3955 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3961 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3962 | '@{' statements '@}'
3968 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3973 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3974 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3977 | '@{' statements '@}'
3983 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3984 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3985 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3986 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3987 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3988 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3990 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3991 actions into the two rules, like this:
3996 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3997 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3998 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3999 '@{' statements '@}'
4005 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4006 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4008 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4009 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4010 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4015 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4016 declarations statements '@}'
4017 | '@{' statements '@}'
4023 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4024 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4026 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4027 serves as a subroutine:
4032 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4038 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4039 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4045 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4046 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4049 @node Tracking Locations
4050 @section Tracking Locations
4052 @cindex textual location
4053 @cindex location, textual
4055 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4056 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4057 especially symbol locations.
4059 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4060 actions to take when rules are matched.
4063 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4064 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4065 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4069 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4070 @cindex data type of locations
4071 @cindex default location type
4073 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4074 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4076 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4077 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4078 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4079 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4083 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4092 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4093 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4094 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4095 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4096 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4098 @node Actions and Locations
4099 @subsection Actions and Locations
4100 @cindex location actions
4101 @cindex actions, location
4104 @vindex @@@var{name}
4105 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4107 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4108 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4110 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4111 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4112 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4113 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4114 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4117 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4118 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4119 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4120 references construct.
4122 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4130 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4131 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4132 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4133 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4140 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4141 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4142 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4148 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4149 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4150 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4153 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4154 example above simply rewrites this way:
4168 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4169 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4170 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4177 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4178 from a semantic action.
4179 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4180 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4182 @node Location Default Action
4183 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4184 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4185 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4187 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4188 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4189 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4190 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4191 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4192 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4193 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4194 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4197 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4198 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4200 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4201 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4202 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4203 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4204 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4205 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4206 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4207 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4208 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4209 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4211 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4215 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4219 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4220 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4221 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4222 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4226 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4227 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4228 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4229 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4236 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4237 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4238 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4240 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4244 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4245 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4248 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4249 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4250 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4251 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4254 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4255 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4256 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4257 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4260 @node Named References
4261 @section Named References
4262 @cindex named references
4264 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4265 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4266 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4267 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4268 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4269 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4271 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4272 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4273 used as named references. For example:
4277 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4278 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4283 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4287 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4288 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4293 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4299 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4302 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4305 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4310 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4311 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4312 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4315 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4316 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4321 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4322 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4323 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4326 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4327 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4333 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4334 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4337 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4338 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4342 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4343 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4344 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4345 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4346 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4347 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4348 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4350 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4354 @section Bison Declarations
4355 @cindex declarations, Bison
4356 @cindex Bison declarations
4358 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4359 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4362 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4363 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4364 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4365 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4367 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4368 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4369 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4370 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4373 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4374 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4375 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4376 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4377 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4378 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4379 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4380 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4381 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4382 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4383 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4384 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4385 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4386 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4387 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4391 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4392 @cindex version requirement
4393 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4396 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4397 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4401 %require "@var{version}"
4405 @subsection Token Type Names
4406 @cindex declaring token type names
4407 @cindex token type names, declaring
4408 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4411 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4417 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4418 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4419 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4421 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4422 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4423 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4426 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4427 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4428 following the token name:
4432 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4436 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4437 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4438 with each other or with normal characters.
4440 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4441 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4442 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4443 Than One Value Type}).
4449 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4453 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4457 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4458 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4459 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4466 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4467 equivalent literal string tokens:
4470 %token <operator> OR "||"
4471 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4476 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4477 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4478 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4479 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4480 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4481 the literal string instead of the token name.
4483 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4484 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4488 %token END 0 "end of file"
4491 @node Precedence Decl
4492 @subsection Operator Precedence
4493 @cindex precedence declarations
4494 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4495 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4497 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4498 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4499 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4500 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4501 operator precedence.
4503 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4504 @code{%token}: either
4507 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4514 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4517 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4518 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4519 all the @var{symbols}:
4523 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4524 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4525 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4526 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4527 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4528 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4529 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4530 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4531 considered a syntax error.
4534 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4535 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4536 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4537 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4538 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4541 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4542 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4543 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4544 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4549 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4550 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4554 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4555 @cindex declaring value types
4556 @cindex value types, declaring
4559 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4560 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4561 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4576 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4577 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4578 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4579 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4581 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4582 @code{union}. For example:
4594 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4595 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4598 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4599 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4600 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4602 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4603 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4605 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4606 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4607 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4608 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4616 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4621 and then your grammar can use the following
4622 instead of @code{%union}:
4635 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4636 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4637 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4641 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4642 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4643 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4646 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4650 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4651 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4652 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4653 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4654 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4657 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4658 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4659 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4660 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4662 @node Initial Action Decl
4663 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4664 @findex %initial-action
4666 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4667 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4670 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4671 @findex %initial-action
4672 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4673 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4674 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4675 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4678 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4681 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4684 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4689 @node Destructor Decl
4690 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4691 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4695 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4696 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4697 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4698 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4699 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4700 must discard the start symbol.
4702 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4703 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4704 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4705 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4707 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4708 symbol is automatically discarded.
4710 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4712 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4713 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4714 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4715 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4716 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4719 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4720 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4721 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4722 tag among @var{symbols}.
4723 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4724 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4725 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4727 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4728 (These default forms are experimental.
4729 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4731 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4732 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4733 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4734 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4736 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4737 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4738 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4739 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4740 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4747 %union @{ char *string; @}
4748 %token <string> STRING1
4749 %token <string> STRING2
4750 %type <string> string1
4751 %type <string> string2
4752 %union @{ char character; @}
4753 %token <character> CHR
4754 %type <character> chr
4757 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4758 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4759 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4760 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4764 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4765 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4766 to @code{free} by default.
4767 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4768 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4769 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4770 @code{free} only once.
4771 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4772 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4774 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4775 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4776 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4777 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4778 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4779 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4780 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4781 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4782 reference it in your grammar.
4783 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4784 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4790 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4791 @cindex mid-rule actions
4792 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4793 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4794 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4795 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4796 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4797 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4798 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4799 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4803 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4804 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4805 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4810 @cindex discarded symbols
4811 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4815 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4817 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4819 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4820 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4822 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4823 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4826 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4829 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4830 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4833 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4834 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4835 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4839 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4840 @cindex printing semantic values
4844 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4845 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4846 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4847 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4849 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4850 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4851 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4853 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4856 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4857 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4858 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4859 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4860 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4861 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4862 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4865 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4866 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4867 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4868 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4876 %union @{ char *string; @}
4877 %token <string> STRING1
4878 %token <string> STRING2
4879 %type <string> string1
4880 %type <string> string2
4881 %union @{ char character; @}
4882 %token <character> CHR
4883 %type <character> chr
4886 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4887 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4888 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4889 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4893 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4894 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4895 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4896 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4897 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4898 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4899 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4903 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4904 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4905 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4906 @cindex warnings, preventing
4907 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4911 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4912 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4913 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4914 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4915 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4916 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4918 The declaration looks like this:
4924 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4925 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4926 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4927 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4929 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4930 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4931 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4932 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4933 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4934 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4935 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4941 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4945 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4946 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4947 print the number of conflicts.
4950 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4951 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4952 go back to the beginning.
4955 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4956 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4957 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4960 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4961 but will keep silent otherwise.
4964 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4965 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4966 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4967 @cindex default start symbol
4970 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4971 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4972 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4979 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4980 @cindex reentrant parser
4982 @findex %define api.pure
4984 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4985 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4986 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4987 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4988 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4989 program must be called only within interlocks.
4991 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4992 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4993 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4994 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4995 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4997 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4998 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4999 reentrant. It looks like this:
5002 %define api.pure full
5005 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5006 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5007 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5008 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5009 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5010 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5011 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5012 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5013 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5015 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5016 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5020 @subsection A Push Parser
5023 @findex %define api.push-pull
5025 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5026 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5028 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5029 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5030 each time a new token is made available.
5032 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5033 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5034 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5035 within a certain time period.
5037 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5038 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5039 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5042 %define api.push-pull push
5045 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5046 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5047 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5048 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5049 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5052 %define api.pure full
5053 %define api.push-pull push
5056 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5057 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5058 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5059 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5061 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5062 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5063 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5064 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5065 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5066 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5067 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5068 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5072 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5074 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5075 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5076 yypstate_delete (ps);
5079 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5080 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5081 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5082 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5083 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5084 example would thus look like this:
5089 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5092 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5093 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5094 yypstate_delete (ps);
5097 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5098 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5100 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5101 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5102 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5103 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5104 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5105 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5106 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5107 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5108 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5109 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5110 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5111 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5112 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5113 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5114 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5115 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5116 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5120 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5121 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5122 yypstate_delete (ps);
5125 Adding the @code{%define api.pure full} declaration does exactly the same thing
5126 to the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5127 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5130 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5131 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5132 @cindex declaration summary
5133 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5135 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5137 @deffn {Directive} %union
5138 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5139 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5142 @deffn {Directive} %token
5143 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5144 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5147 @deffn {Directive} %right
5148 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5149 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5152 @deffn {Directive} %left
5153 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5154 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5157 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5158 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5159 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5160 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5164 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5165 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5166 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5170 @deffn {Directive} %type
5171 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5172 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5175 @deffn {Directive} %start
5176 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5180 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5181 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5182 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5188 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5191 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5192 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5194 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5195 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5196 @xref{%code Summary}.
5199 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5200 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5201 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5202 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5203 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5204 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5207 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5208 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5209 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5210 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5213 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5214 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5215 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5216 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5217 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5219 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5220 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5221 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5222 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5223 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5224 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5225 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5226 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5227 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5228 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5230 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5231 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5232 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5234 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5235 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5236 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5238 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5239 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5240 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5241 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5242 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5244 @findex %code requires
5245 @findex %code provides
5246 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5247 header also contains their code.
5248 @xref{%code Summary}.
5250 @cindex Header guard
5251 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5252 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5253 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5254 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5255 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5258 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5259 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5261 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5262 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5264 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5268 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5269 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5272 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5273 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5274 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5277 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5278 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5279 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5282 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5283 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5284 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5285 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5289 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5290 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5291 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5292 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5293 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5294 accurate syntax error messages.
5298 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5299 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5300 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5305 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5306 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5307 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5308 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5309 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5310 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5311 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5315 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5316 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5319 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5320 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5321 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5325 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5326 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5327 Require a Version of Bison}.
5330 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5331 Specify the skeleton to use.
5333 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5334 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5335 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5336 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5338 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5339 file in the Bison installation directory.
5340 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5341 directory of the grammar file.
5342 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5345 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5346 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5347 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5348 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5349 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5350 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5351 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5354 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5355 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5356 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5357 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5358 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5359 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5360 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5363 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5364 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5365 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5369 The highest token number, plus one.
5371 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5373 The number of grammar rules,
5375 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5379 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5380 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5381 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5382 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5386 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5387 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5388 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5392 @node %define Summary
5393 @subsection %define Summary
5395 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5396 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5397 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5398 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5399 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5400 @code{%define} directive:
5402 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5403 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5404 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5405 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5407 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5408 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5409 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5410 to specifying @code{""}.
5412 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5413 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5414 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5417 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5418 @code{%define} accepts.
5420 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5421 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5425 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5427 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5428 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5430 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5432 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5433 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5436 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5437 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5438 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5439 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5440 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5441 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5444 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5445 @item @code{api.location.type}
5446 @findex %define api.location.type
5449 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5451 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5452 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5454 @item Accepted Values: String
5456 @item Default Value: none
5458 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5461 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5462 @item @code{api.prefix}
5463 @findex %define api.prefix
5466 @item Language(s): All
5468 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5469 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5471 @item Accepted Values: String
5473 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5475 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5478 @c ================================================== api.pure
5479 @item @code{api.pure}
5480 @findex %define api.pure
5483 @item Language(s): C
5485 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5486 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5488 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5490 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5491 the case for Boolean values.
5493 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5494 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5495 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5498 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5499 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5500 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5502 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5506 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5507 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5510 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5511 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5514 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5517 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5518 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5520 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5522 @item History: the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5525 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5527 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5528 @findex %define api.push-pull
5531 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5533 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5534 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5535 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5536 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5538 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5540 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5543 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5545 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5546 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5549 @item Language(s): all
5551 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5552 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5553 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5554 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5556 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5557 @item Default Value:
5559 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5560 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5564 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5566 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5567 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5570 @item Language(s): all
5571 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5572 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5573 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5574 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5577 @c ================================================== lr.type
5579 @item @code{lr.type}
5580 @findex %define lr.type
5583 @item Language(s): all
5585 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5586 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5587 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5589 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5591 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5594 @c ================================================== namespace
5596 @item @code{namespace}
5597 @findex %define namespace
5600 @item Languages(s): C++
5602 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5603 For example, if you specify:
5606 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5609 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5612 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5615 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5616 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5619 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5625 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5626 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5627 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5629 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5631 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5632 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5633 lexical analyzer function.
5634 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5635 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5636 lexical analyzer function.
5637 For example, if you specify:
5640 %define namespace "foo"
5641 %name-prefix "bar::"
5644 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5648 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5649 @item @code{parse.lac}
5650 @findex %define parse.lac
5653 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5655 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5656 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5657 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5658 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5664 @subsection %code Summary
5668 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5669 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5670 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5671 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5672 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5673 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5674 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5675 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5677 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5678 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5679 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5680 in the parser implementation.
5682 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5683 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5684 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5686 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5689 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5690 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5691 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5692 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5693 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5694 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5698 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5699 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5700 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5703 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5704 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5708 @findex %code requires
5711 @item Language(s): C, C++
5713 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5714 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5715 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5716 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5717 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5719 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5720 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5725 @findex %code provides
5728 @item Language(s): C, C++
5730 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5731 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5733 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5734 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5742 @item Language(s): C, C++
5744 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5745 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5746 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5747 parser implementation file. For example:
5756 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5760 @findex %code imports
5763 @item Language(s): Java
5765 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5767 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5768 before any class definitions.
5772 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5773 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5774 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5775 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5778 @node Multiple Parsers
5779 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5781 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5782 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5783 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5784 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5785 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5786 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5787 exported in the generated header.
5789 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5790 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5791 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5792 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5793 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5794 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5795 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5796 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5797 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5799 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5800 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5801 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5802 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5803 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5804 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5805 specifically --- more about this below.
5807 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5808 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5811 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5812 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5813 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5814 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5817 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5818 #define yyparse cparse
5819 #define yylval clval
5825 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5826 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5827 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5829 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5833 extern CSTYPE clval;
5837 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5838 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5839 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5842 /* Enabling traces. */
5844 # if defined YYDEBUG
5861 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5862 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5863 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5866 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5867 @cindex C-language interface
5870 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5871 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5872 functions that it needs to use.
5874 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5875 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5876 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5877 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5880 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5881 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5882 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5883 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5884 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5885 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5887 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5888 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5889 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5893 @node Parser Function
5894 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5897 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5898 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5899 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5900 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5901 without reading further.
5904 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5905 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5906 is due to end-of-input).
5908 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5909 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5912 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5915 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5920 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5925 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5928 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5929 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5930 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5932 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5933 @findex %parse-param
5934 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5935 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5936 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5937 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5938 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5941 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5944 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5945 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5949 Then call the parser like this:
5953 int nastiness, randomness;
5954 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5955 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5961 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5964 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5968 Using the following:
5970 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5973 Results in these signatures:
5975 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
5976 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5980 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
5981 and @code{%locations} are used:
5984 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
5985 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5988 @node Push Parser Function
5989 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5990 @findex yypush_parse
5992 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5993 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5995 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5996 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5997 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5998 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6000 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6001 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6002 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6003 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6006 @node Pull Parser Function
6007 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6008 @findex yypull_parse
6010 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6011 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6013 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6014 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
6015 declaration is used.
6016 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6018 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6019 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6022 @node Parser Create Function
6023 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6024 @findex yypstate_new
6026 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6027 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6029 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6030 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
6031 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6032 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6034 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6035 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6036 or 0 if no memory was available.
6037 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6041 @node Parser Delete Function
6042 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6043 @findex yypstate_delete
6045 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6046 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6048 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6049 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
6050 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6051 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6053 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6054 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6055 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6059 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6061 @cindex lexical analyzer
6063 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6064 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6065 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6066 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6068 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6069 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6070 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6071 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6072 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6073 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6074 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6078 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6079 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6080 of the token it has read.
6081 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6082 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6084 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6085 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6088 @node Calling Convention
6089 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6091 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6092 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6093 signifies end-of-input.
6095 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6096 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6097 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6098 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6100 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6101 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6102 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6103 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6104 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6105 signifies end-of-input.
6107 Here is an example showing these things:
6114 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6117 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6118 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6120 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6126 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6127 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6129 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6130 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6134 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6135 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6136 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6137 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6140 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6141 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6142 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6143 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6144 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6147 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6148 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6149 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6150 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6153 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6156 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6157 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6158 strlen (token_buffer))
6159 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6160 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6165 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6166 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6170 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6173 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6174 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6175 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6176 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6182 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6183 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6188 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6189 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6190 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6191 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6192 declaration looks like this:
6205 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6210 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6211 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6216 @node Token Locations
6217 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6220 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6221 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6222 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6223 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6224 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6225 data in that variable.
6227 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6228 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6229 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6230 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6231 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6234 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6237 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6239 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6240 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6241 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6242 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6243 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6244 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6249 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6252 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6253 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6258 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6259 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6260 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6264 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6265 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6268 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6270 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6271 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6278 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6282 results in the following signature:
6285 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6289 If @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure}) is added:
6292 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6295 @node Error Reporting
6296 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6297 @cindex error reporting function
6300 @cindex syntax error
6302 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6303 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6304 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6305 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6308 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6309 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6310 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6311 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6312 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6314 @findex %error-verbose
6315 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6316 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6317 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6318 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6319 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6321 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6322 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6323 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6324 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6325 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6326 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6328 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6329 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6330 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6332 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6337 yyerror (char const *s)
6341 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6346 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6347 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6348 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6349 immediately return 1.
6351 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6352 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6353 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6354 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6355 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6357 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6358 following signature:
6361 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6365 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6366 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6367 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6368 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6369 message is always passed last.
6371 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6372 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6373 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6377 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6378 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6379 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6380 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6382 @node Action Features
6383 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6384 @cindex summary, action features
6385 @cindex action features summary
6387 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6388 are useful in actions.
6390 @deffn {Variable} $$
6391 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6392 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6395 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6396 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6397 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6400 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6401 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6402 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6403 Types of Values in Actions}.
6406 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6407 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6408 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6409 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6412 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6413 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6414 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6417 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6418 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6419 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6422 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6424 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6425 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6426 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6427 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6428 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6429 going to be reduced by this rule.
6431 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6432 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6433 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6436 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6439 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6440 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6443 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6444 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6448 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6449 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6450 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6451 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6452 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6453 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6456 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6457 @findex YYRECOVERING
6458 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6459 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6460 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6463 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6464 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6465 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6466 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6467 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6469 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6472 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6473 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6475 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6477 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6480 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6481 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6482 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6483 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6486 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6487 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6488 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6489 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6491 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6494 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6495 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6496 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6497 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6499 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6503 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6504 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6507 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6511 @c int first_line, last_line;
6512 @c int first_column, last_column;
6516 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6517 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6519 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6520 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6521 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6524 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6527 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6529 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6530 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6534 @node Internationalization
6535 @section Parser Internationalization
6536 @cindex internationalization
6542 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6543 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6544 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6545 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6546 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6547 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6548 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6549 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6552 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6553 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6554 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6559 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6560 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6561 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6562 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6563 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6567 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6572 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6573 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6574 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6575 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6576 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6577 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6578 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6579 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6580 Bison-generated parser.
6583 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6584 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6585 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6589 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6592 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6593 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6594 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6598 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6599 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6600 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6603 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6609 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6613 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6619 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6620 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6621 @cindex algorithm of parser
6624 @cindex parser stack
6625 @cindex stack, parser
6627 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6628 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6629 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6631 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6632 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6635 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6636 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6637 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6638 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6639 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6640 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6641 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6643 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6650 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6651 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6654 expr: expr '*' expr;
6658 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6665 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6666 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6668 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6669 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6670 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6672 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6675 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6676 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6677 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6678 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6679 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6680 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6681 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6682 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6683 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6684 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6688 @section Lookahead Tokens
6689 @cindex lookahead token
6691 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6692 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6693 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6694 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6695 token in order to decide what to do.
6697 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6698 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6699 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6700 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6701 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6702 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6703 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6706 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6707 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6708 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6727 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6728 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6729 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6730 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6731 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6733 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6734 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6735 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6736 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6737 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6738 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6743 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6744 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6745 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6746 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6749 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6751 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6752 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6753 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6755 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6756 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6761 "if" expr "then" stmt
6762 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6768 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6769 specific keyword tokens.
6771 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6772 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6773 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6774 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6777 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6778 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6779 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6780 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6781 contrast it with the other alternative.
6783 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6784 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6788 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6790 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6793 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6794 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6795 making these two inputs equivalent:
6798 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6800 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6803 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6804 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6805 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6806 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6807 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6808 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6809 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6810 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6812 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6813 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6814 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6815 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6817 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6818 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6819 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6820 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6821 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6824 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6825 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6826 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6842 "if" expr "then" stmt
6843 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6853 @section Operator Precedence
6854 @cindex operator precedence
6855 @cindex precedence of operators
6857 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6858 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6859 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6860 shift and when to reduce.
6863 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6864 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6865 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6866 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6867 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
6870 @node Why Precedence
6871 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6873 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6874 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6889 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6890 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6891 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6892 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6893 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6894 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6895 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6898 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6899 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6900 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6901 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6902 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6903 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6904 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6905 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6908 @cindex associativity
6909 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6910 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6911 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6912 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6913 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6914 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6915 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6916 makes right-associativity.
6918 @node Using Precedence
6919 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6924 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6925 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6926 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6927 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6928 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6929 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6930 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6933 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6934 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6935 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6936 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6937 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6939 @node Precedence Examples
6940 @subsection Precedence Examples
6942 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6950 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6951 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6952 declared with @code{'-'}:
6955 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
6960 @node How Precedence
6961 @subsection How Precedence Works
6963 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6964 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6965 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6966 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6967 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6968 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6970 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6971 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6972 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6973 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6974 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6975 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6976 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6979 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6980 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6983 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
6985 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
6986 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
6987 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6988 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
6990 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
6991 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
6992 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
6993 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
6994 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
6995 instance as follows:
7004 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7005 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7006 use right associativity:
7009 %right "then" "else"
7012 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7013 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7014 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7015 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7016 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7017 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7018 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7020 @node Contextual Precedence
7021 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7022 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7023 @cindex unary operator precedence
7024 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7025 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7028 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7029 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7030 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7031 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7033 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
7034 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7035 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7036 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7039 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7040 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7041 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7042 modifier's syntax is:
7045 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7049 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7050 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7051 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7052 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7053 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7055 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7056 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7057 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7067 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7075 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7080 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7081 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7082 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7083 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7085 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7086 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7087 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7088 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7090 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7091 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7092 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7093 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7094 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7095 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7097 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7098 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7102 @section Parser States
7103 @cindex finite-state machine
7104 @cindex parser state
7105 @cindex state (of parser)
7107 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7108 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7109 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7110 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7111 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7113 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7114 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7115 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7116 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7117 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7118 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7119 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7120 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7123 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7124 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7125 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7128 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7129 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7130 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7132 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7133 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7136 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7137 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7142 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7144 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7150 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7151 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7157 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7158 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7159 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7160 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7161 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7162 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7164 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7165 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7166 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7168 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7169 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7170 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7171 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7172 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7174 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7175 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7176 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7177 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7182 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7183 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7188 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7195 | sequence redirects
7209 | redirects redirect
7215 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7216 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7217 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7218 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7219 in infinitely many ways!
7221 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7222 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7223 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7224 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7226 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7237 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7245 | sequence redirects
7259 | redirects redirect
7264 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7265 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7266 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7267 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7268 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7271 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7272 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7274 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7275 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7276 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7277 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7278 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7283 %nonassoc "sequence"
7288 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7289 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7301 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7302 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7305 %right "word" "redirect"
7310 | sequence word %prec "word"
7311 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7316 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7317 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7318 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7320 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7326 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7329 | name_list ':' type
7345 | name ',' name_list
7350 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7351 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7352 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7353 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7357 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7359 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7360 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7361 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7363 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7364 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7365 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7366 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7367 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7368 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7369 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7372 @cindex canonical LR
7373 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7374 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7375 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7376 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7377 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7378 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7379 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7380 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7382 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7383 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7384 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7385 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7386 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7394 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7399 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7400 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7401 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7402 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7403 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7404 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7406 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7407 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7408 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7409 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7410 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7411 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7416 | name_list ':' type
7424 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7425 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7430 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7431 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7432 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7433 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7434 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7435 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7436 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7438 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7439 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7440 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7441 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7443 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7444 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7447 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7448 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7449 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7450 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7453 @node LR Table Construction
7454 @subsection LR Table Construction
7455 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7458 @cindex canonical LR
7459 @findex %define lr.type
7461 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7462 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7463 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7464 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7467 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7468 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7469 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7470 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7473 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7474 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7475 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7478 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7479 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7480 values for @var{type} are:
7483 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7485 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7488 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7492 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7496 %define lr.type ielr
7499 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7500 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7501 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7502 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7503 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7504 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7505 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7506 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7507 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7508 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7510 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7511 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7512 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7513 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7519 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7522 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7524 @cindex GLR with LALR
7525 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7526 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7527 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7528 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7529 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7530 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7531 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7532 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7533 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7534 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7536 @item Malformed grammars.
7538 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7539 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7540 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7541 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7542 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7547 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7548 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7549 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7550 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7551 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7552 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7553 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7554 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7555 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7559 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7562 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7563 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7564 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7565 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7566 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7567 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7568 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7569 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7570 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7571 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7572 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7573 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7576 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7577 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7578 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7580 @node Default Reductions
7581 @subsection Default Reductions
7582 @cindex default reductions
7583 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7586 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7587 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7588 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7589 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7590 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7592 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7593 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7596 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7598 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7599 @cindex consistent states
7600 @cindex defaulted states
7601 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7602 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7603 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7604 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7605 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7606 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7607 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7608 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7609 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7610 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7611 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7613 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7614 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7615 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7616 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7617 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7618 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7619 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7620 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7621 should already be considered closed.
7623 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7625 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7626 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7627 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7628 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7629 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7630 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7631 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7632 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7633 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7637 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7638 @c sentence from being rejected.
7639 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7640 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7641 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7642 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7643 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7644 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7647 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7648 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7649 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7650 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7651 because the accept action ends the parse.
7653 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7654 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7655 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7656 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7657 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7658 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7659 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7660 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7661 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7662 split the parse instead.
7664 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7665 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7667 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions} @var{where}
7668 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7669 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
7671 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7672 @item @code{consistent}
7673 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7676 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7677 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7682 @findex %define parse.lac
7684 @cindex lookahead correction
7686 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7687 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7688 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7689 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7690 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7691 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7692 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7693 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7694 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7696 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7697 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7698 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7699 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7700 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7702 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7703 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7704 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7705 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7707 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
7708 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7710 @item @code{none} (default)
7713 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7714 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7718 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7719 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7720 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7721 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7722 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7723 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7724 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7725 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7726 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7727 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7730 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7731 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7732 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7733 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7734 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7735 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7736 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7737 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7738 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7739 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7741 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7742 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7743 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7744 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7745 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7746 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7747 language-recognition power.
7749 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7752 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7754 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7755 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7756 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7757 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7760 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7762 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7763 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7764 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7765 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7766 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7767 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7771 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7772 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7773 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7774 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7775 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7776 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7777 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7778 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7779 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7780 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7781 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7784 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7785 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7786 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7788 @node Unreachable States
7789 @subsection Unreachable States
7790 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7791 @cindex unreachable states
7793 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7794 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7795 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7796 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7798 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7799 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7800 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7801 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7803 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states} @var{value}
7804 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7805 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7808 There are a few caveats to consider:
7811 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7813 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7814 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7815 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7816 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7817 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7818 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7820 @item Other useless states.
7822 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7823 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7824 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7825 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7826 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7827 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7828 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7831 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7832 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7834 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7835 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7836 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7838 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7839 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7840 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7841 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7842 context-free languages.
7843 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7844 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7845 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7846 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7847 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7848 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7849 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7850 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7852 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7853 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7854 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7855 parser uses the same basic
7856 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7857 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7858 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7859 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7861 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7862 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7863 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7864 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7865 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7867 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7868 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7869 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7870 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7871 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7872 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7873 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7874 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7875 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7876 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7877 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7880 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7881 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7882 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7883 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7884 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7885 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7886 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7887 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7888 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7889 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7890 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7891 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7893 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7894 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7895 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7897 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7898 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7899 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7900 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7901 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7902 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7903 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7904 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7905 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7906 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7907 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7908 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7910 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7913 @node Memory Management
7914 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7915 @cindex memory exhaustion
7916 @cindex memory management
7917 @cindex stack overflow
7918 @cindex parser stack overflow
7919 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7921 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7922 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7923 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7925 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7926 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7927 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7930 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7931 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7932 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7933 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7935 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7936 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7937 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7938 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7939 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7940 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7942 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7943 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7944 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7947 @cindex default stack limit
7948 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7952 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7953 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7954 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7955 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7956 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7958 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7960 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7961 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7962 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7963 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7964 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7965 this deficiency in a future release.
7967 @node Error Recovery
7968 @chapter Error Recovery
7969 @cindex error recovery
7970 @cindex recovery from errors
7972 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7973 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7974 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7977 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7978 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7979 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7980 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7981 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7982 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7983 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7986 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7987 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7988 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7989 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7990 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7991 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8003 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8004 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8006 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8007 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8008 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8009 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8010 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8011 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8012 applicable in the ordinary way.
8014 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8015 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8016 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8017 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8018 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8019 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8020 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8021 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8022 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8023 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8024 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8025 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8027 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8028 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8029 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8032 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8035 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8036 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8037 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8038 spurious error message:
8048 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8049 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8050 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8051 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8052 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8053 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8054 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8057 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8058 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8059 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8060 error messages resume.
8062 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8063 as any other rules can.
8066 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8067 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8068 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8069 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8072 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8073 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8074 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8076 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8078 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8079 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8080 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8081 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8082 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8084 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8085 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8086 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8087 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8090 @node Context Dependency
8091 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8093 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8094 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8095 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8096 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8100 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8101 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8102 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8103 error recovery rules must be written.
8106 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8107 neither clean nor robust.)
8109 @node Semantic Tokens
8110 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8112 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8113 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8119 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8120 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8121 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8123 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8124 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8125 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8126 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8127 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8129 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8130 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8131 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8132 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8133 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8134 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8135 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8137 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8138 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8139 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8140 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8144 typedef int foo, bar;
8148 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8149 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8155 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8156 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8158 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8159 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8160 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8161 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8162 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8167 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8168 | declarator maybeasm
8174 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8175 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8181 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8182 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8183 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8185 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8186 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8187 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8188 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8189 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8190 the syntactic context.
8192 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8193 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8194 @cindex lexical tie-in
8196 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8197 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8200 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8201 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8202 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8203 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8204 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8211 void yyerror (char const *);
8220 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8221 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8222 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8236 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8237 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8238 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8240 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8241 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8242 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8245 @node Tie-in Recovery
8246 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8248 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8249 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8251 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8252 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8253 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8254 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8259 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8261 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8265 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8266 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8267 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8268 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8269 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8271 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8273 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8274 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8275 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8281 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8287 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8288 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8289 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8290 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8292 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8293 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8294 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8295 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8296 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8297 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8300 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8303 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8305 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8306 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8307 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8309 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8310 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8311 automaton. There are several formats available:
8314 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8317 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8320 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8321 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8324 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8325 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8329 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8330 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8331 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8332 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8336 @section Understanding Your Parser
8338 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8339 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8340 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8341 tune or simply fix a parser.
8343 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8344 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8345 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8346 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8347 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8348 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8349 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8351 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8373 @command{bison} reports:
8376 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8377 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8378 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8379 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8380 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8383 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8384 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8385 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8386 interpretation is the same.
8389 @cindex token, useless
8390 @cindex useless token
8391 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8392 @cindex useless nonterminal
8393 @cindex rule, useless
8394 @cindex useless rule
8395 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8396 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8397 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8398 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8401 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8404 Terminals unused in grammar
8407 Rules useless in grammar
8412 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8415 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8416 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8417 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8418 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8422 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8437 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8441 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8454 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8459 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8465 @cindex pointed rule
8466 @cindex rule, pointed
8467 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8468 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8469 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8470 the location of the input cursor.
8475 0 $accept: . exp $end
8477 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8482 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8483 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8484 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8485 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8486 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8487 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8488 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8489 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8491 @cindex core, item set
8492 @cindex item set core
8493 @cindex kernel, item set
8494 @cindex item set core
8495 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8496 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8497 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8498 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8499 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8500 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8505 0 $accept: . exp $end
8506 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8512 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8518 In the state 1@dots{}
8525 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8529 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8530 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8531 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8532 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8537 0 $accept: exp . $end
8538 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8543 $end shift, and go to state 3
8544 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8545 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8546 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8547 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8551 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8552 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8553 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8554 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8555 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8558 @cindex accepting state
8559 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8565 0 $accept: exp $end .
8571 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8572 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8574 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8580 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8582 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8589 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8591 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8598 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8600 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8607 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8609 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8614 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8620 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8626 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8627 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8629 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8630 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8633 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8634 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8635 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8636 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8637 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8638 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8639 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8640 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8642 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8643 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8644 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8647 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8648 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8649 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8650 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8651 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8652 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8653 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8654 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8655 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8656 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8657 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8658 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8663 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8664 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8669 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8670 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8672 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8673 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8676 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8677 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8678 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8679 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8680 conflicts in the report:
8683 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8684 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8685 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8689 The remaining states are similar:
8695 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8701 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8702 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8704 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8705 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8711 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8717 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8719 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8720 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8726 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8732 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8733 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8734 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8735 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8737 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8738 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8739 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8740 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8741 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8746 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8747 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
8748 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8750 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
8751 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
8753 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8756 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8759 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8760 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8761 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8762 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8763 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8764 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8765 to help them understand LR parsers.
8767 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8768 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8769 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8770 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8771 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
8772 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
8773 parser in multiple formats}).
8776 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8787 The graphical output
8789 (see @ref{fig:graph})
8791 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
8792 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
8793 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
8796 @float Figure,fig:graph
8797 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
8798 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
8802 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8804 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8805 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8806 about transitions, for examples
8808 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8809 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8810 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8815 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8818 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8820 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8821 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8829 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8833 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8835 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8837 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8839 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8840 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8841 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8842 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8844 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8851 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8852 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8855 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8857 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8859 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8860 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8861 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8862 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8863 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8865 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
8866 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
8868 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8870 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8871 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8873 @c ================================================= XML
8876 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
8879 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
8880 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
8881 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
8882 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
8883 option @option{--graph}. However,
8884 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
8885 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
8886 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
8887 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
8888 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
8889 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
8891 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
8892 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
8893 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
8894 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
8895 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
8896 file is @file{foo.xml}.
8898 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
8899 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
8903 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
8905 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
8907 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
8910 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
8914 $ bison --print-datadir
8915 /usr/local/share/bison
8917 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
8920 @c ================================================= Tracing
8923 @section Tracing Your Parser
8926 @cindex tracing the parser
8928 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8929 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8932 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8933 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8934 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8937 @node Enabling Traces
8938 @subsection Enabling Traces
8939 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8942 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8944 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8945 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8946 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8947 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8950 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8951 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8952 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8953 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8954 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8956 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8957 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8958 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8959 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8960 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8962 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8964 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8965 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8966 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8967 this is the preferred solution.
8970 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8974 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8975 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8976 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8977 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8978 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8979 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8981 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8982 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8983 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8984 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8986 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8987 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8988 messages tell you these things:
8992 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8995 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8996 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8999 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9000 of the state stack afterward.
9003 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9004 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9005 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9006 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9007 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9008 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9009 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9010 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9011 grammar are to blame.
9013 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9014 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9015 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9016 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9017 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9020 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9022 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9023 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9024 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9025 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9026 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9027 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9029 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9030 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9031 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9034 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9036 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9038 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9041 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9042 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9043 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9044 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9047 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9048 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9049 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9050 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9051 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9052 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9054 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9055 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9056 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9057 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9058 printer will be used for them.
9060 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9061 are sent onto standard error.
9064 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9067 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9068 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9074 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9075 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9076 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9077 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9079 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9081 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9082 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9087 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9088 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9089 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9093 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9094 Shifting token '(' ()
9096 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9097 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9099 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9100 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9101 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9107 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9108 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9109 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9112 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9113 Shifting token '-' ()
9115 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9116 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9118 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9119 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9120 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9121 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9123 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9124 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9125 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9127 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9128 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9134 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9135 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9138 Next token is token ')' ()
9139 Shifting token ')' ()
9141 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9142 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9144 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9146 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9152 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9156 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9157 Shifting token '\n' ()
9159 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9160 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9163 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9166 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9169 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9174 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9175 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9176 completion of the parsing.
9179 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9180 Shifting token $end ()
9183 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9184 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9188 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9189 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9192 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9193 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9194 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9196 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9198 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9199 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9200 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9202 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9205 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9206 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9210 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9211 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9212 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9215 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9218 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9221 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9222 else if (type == NUM)
9223 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9227 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9230 @chapter Invoking Bison
9231 @cindex invoking Bison
9232 @cindex Bison invocation
9233 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9235 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9241 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9242 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9243 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9244 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9245 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9246 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9247 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9248 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9249 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9250 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9251 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9256 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9259 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9262 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9265 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9267 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9268 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9269 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9272 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9273 in alphabetical order by short options.
9274 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9275 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9279 @section Bison Options
9281 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9282 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9283 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9284 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9285 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9288 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9289 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9292 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9298 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9302 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9304 @item --print-localedir
9305 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9307 @item --print-datadir
9308 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9312 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9313 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9314 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9315 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9316 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9317 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9318 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9319 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9320 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9321 for compatibility with POSIX:
9328 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9329 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9330 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9331 this option is specified.
9333 @item -W [@var{category}]
9334 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9335 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9338 @item midrule-values
9339 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9341 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9344 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9347 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9348 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9351 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9354 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9355 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9356 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9359 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9363 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9364 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9365 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9366 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9367 no effect on the conflict report.
9370 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9372 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9373 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9379 Turn off all the warnings.
9381 Treat warnings as errors.
9384 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9385 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9386 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9388 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9389 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9390 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9393 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9394 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9395 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9396 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9397 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9398 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9403 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9406 When invoked with @option{-fcaret}, Bison will report:
9410 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9411 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9415 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9416 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9420 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9421 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9425 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9426 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9430 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
9431 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9445 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9446 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9447 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9449 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9450 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9451 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9452 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9453 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9454 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9455 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9459 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9462 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9463 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9464 definition for @var{name}.
9466 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9467 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9468 definitions for @var{name}.
9470 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9471 definitions for @var{name}.
9474 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9475 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9476 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9478 @item -L @var{language}
9479 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9480 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9481 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9482 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9483 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9486 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9488 @item -p @var{prefix}
9489 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9490 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9491 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9492 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9496 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9497 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9498 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9499 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9500 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9501 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9504 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9505 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9506 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9508 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9509 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9510 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9511 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9513 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9514 file in the Bison installation directory.
9515 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9516 current working directory.
9517 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9520 @itemx --token-table
9521 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9528 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9529 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9530 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9531 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9534 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9535 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9536 with other short options.
9538 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9539 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9540 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9541 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9543 @item -r @var{things}
9544 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9545 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9546 separated list of @var{things} among:
9550 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9554 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9555 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9558 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9559 each rule's lookahead set.
9562 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9563 precedence and associativity directives.
9566 Enable all the items.
9569 Do not generate the report.
9572 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9573 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9577 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9578 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9579 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9582 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9583 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9585 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9586 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9588 @item -g [@var{file}]
9589 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9590 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9591 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9592 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9593 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9594 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9597 @item -x [@var{file}]
9598 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9599 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9600 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9601 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9603 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9604 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9607 @node Option Cross Key
9608 @section Option Cross Key
9610 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9611 the corresponding short option and directive.
9613 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9614 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9615 @include cross-options.texi
9619 @section Yacc Library
9621 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9622 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9623 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9624 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9625 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9626 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9627 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9629 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9630 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9633 int yyerror (char const *);
9636 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9637 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9638 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9644 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9646 @node Other Languages
9647 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9650 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9651 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9655 @section C++ Parsers
9658 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9659 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9660 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9661 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9662 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9663 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9666 @node C++ Bison Interface
9667 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9668 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9672 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9673 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9674 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9675 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9677 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9679 @findex %define namespace
9680 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9681 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9682 generated in the following files:
9687 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9688 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9689 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9692 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9695 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9696 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9697 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9698 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9699 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9701 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9702 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9703 @samp{%defines} directive.
9706 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9707 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9709 @node C++ Semantic Values
9710 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9711 @c - No objects in unions
9713 @c - Printer and destructor
9715 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9716 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9717 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9718 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9719 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9722 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9723 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9724 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9726 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9727 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9728 to such objects are allowed.
9731 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9732 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9733 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9737 @node C++ Location Values
9738 @subsection C++ Location Values
9742 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9744 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9745 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9747 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9748 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9749 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9750 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9751 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9754 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9755 genuine code only the latter is used.
9758 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9759 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9760 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9764 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9766 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9767 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9768 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9772 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9773 Reset the position to the given values.
9776 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9777 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9778 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9779 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9780 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9783 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9784 The line, starting at 1.
9787 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9788 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9791 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9792 The column, starting at 1.
9795 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9796 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9799 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9800 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9801 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9802 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9803 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9806 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9807 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9808 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9811 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9812 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9813 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9814 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9818 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9820 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9821 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9824 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9825 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9826 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9829 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9830 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9833 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9834 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9835 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9838 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9839 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9840 Advance the @code{end} position.
9843 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9844 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9845 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9846 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9849 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9850 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9853 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9854 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9855 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9859 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9860 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9861 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9864 @node User Defined Location Type
9865 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9866 @findex %define api.location.type
9868 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9869 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9872 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9875 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9878 it must be copyable;
9881 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9882 parser basically runs
9884 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9885 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9888 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9891 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9892 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9895 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9896 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9901 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9902 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9903 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9904 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9909 %define namespace "master::"
9913 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9914 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9917 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9918 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9921 @node C++ Parser Interface
9922 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9923 @c - define parser_class_name
9925 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9927 @c - Reporting errors
9929 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9930 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9931 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9932 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9933 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9934 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9935 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9936 additional argument for its constructor.
9938 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9939 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9940 The types for semantics value and locations.
9943 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9944 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9945 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9946 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9947 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9948 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9951 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9952 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9953 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9956 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9957 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9960 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9961 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9962 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9965 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9966 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9967 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9971 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9972 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9973 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9974 or nonzero, full tracing.
9977 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9978 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9979 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9980 described by @var{m}.
9984 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9985 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9986 @c - prefix for yylex.
9987 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9990 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9991 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9992 @code{%define api.pure full} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9994 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9995 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9996 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9997 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10001 @node A Complete C++ Example
10002 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10004 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10005 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10006 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10007 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10008 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10009 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10010 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
10011 actually easier to interface with.
10014 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10015 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10016 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10017 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10018 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10021 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10022 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10024 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10025 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10026 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10027 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10028 of valid input follows.
10032 seven := one + two * three
10036 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10037 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10039 @c - A place to store error messages
10040 @c - A place for the result
10042 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10043 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10044 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10045 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10046 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10047 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10048 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10050 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10051 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10052 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10055 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10057 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10058 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10061 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10066 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10067 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10068 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10069 factor both as follows.
10071 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10073 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10075 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
10076 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
10077 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
10078 calcxx_driver& driver)
10079 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10084 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10087 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10089 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10090 class calcxx_driver
10094 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10096 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10102 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
10103 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
10105 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10107 // Handling the scanner.
10108 void scan_begin ();
10110 bool trace_scanning;
10114 Similarly for the parser itself.
10116 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10118 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
10119 int parse (const std::string& f);
10121 bool trace_parsing;
10125 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10126 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10127 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10128 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10130 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10133 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10134 void error (const std::string& m);
10136 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10139 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10140 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10141 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10142 messages and set error state.
10144 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10146 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10147 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10149 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10150 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10152 variables["one"] = 1;
10153 variables["two"] = 2;
10156 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10161 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10165 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10166 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10167 int res = parser.parse ();
10173 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10175 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10179 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10181 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10185 @node Calc++ Parser
10186 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10188 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10189 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10190 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10191 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10194 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10196 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10197 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10199 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10203 @findex %code requires
10204 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
10205 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
10206 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
10207 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10208 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
10209 use a forward declaration of the driver.
10210 @xref{%code Summary}.
10212 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10216 class calcxx_driver;
10221 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10222 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10225 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10227 // The parsing context.
10228 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10229 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10233 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
10234 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10235 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10236 automatically propagated.
10238 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10243 // Initialize the initial location.
10244 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10249 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10250 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10253 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10260 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
10263 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10275 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10276 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10278 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10281 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10287 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10288 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
10289 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
10290 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
10291 avoid name clashes.
10293 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10295 %token END 0 "end of file"
10297 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10298 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
10303 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
10304 @code{%destructor}.
10306 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10307 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10309 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
10310 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
10312 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
10316 The grammar itself is straightforward.
10318 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10322 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10325 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10326 | assignments assignment @{@};
10329 "identifier" ":=" exp
10330 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
10334 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10335 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10336 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10337 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10338 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
10339 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
10344 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10347 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10350 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10351 const std::string& m)
10353 driver.error (l, m);
10357 @node Calc++ Scanner
10358 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10360 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10361 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10363 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10365 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10366 # include <cstdlib>
10368 # include <climits>
10370 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10371 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10373 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10374 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10375 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10376 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10378 # define yywrap() 1
10380 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10381 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10382 not of token_type. */
10383 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10388 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10389 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10390 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10391 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10393 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10395 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10399 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10401 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10403 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10409 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10410 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10411 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10412 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10413 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10414 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10415 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10417 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10421 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10428 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10429 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10433 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10434 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10435 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10436 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10438 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10441 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10443 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10444 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10446 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10451 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10452 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10453 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10455 return token::NUMBER;
10461 yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext);
10462 return token::IDENTIFIER;
10466 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10471 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10472 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10474 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10478 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10480 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10481 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10483 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10485 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10486 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10493 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10500 @node Calc++ Top Level
10501 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10503 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10505 @comment file: calc++.cc
10507 #include <iostream>
10508 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10512 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10514 calcxx_driver driver;
10515 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10516 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10517 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10518 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10519 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10520 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10521 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10527 @section Java Parsers
10530 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10531 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10532 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10533 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10534 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10535 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10536 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10537 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10540 @node Java Bison Interface
10541 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10542 @c - %language "Java"
10544 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10545 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10547 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10548 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10550 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10551 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10552 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10553 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10554 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10555 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10556 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10557 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10558 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10559 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10561 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10563 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10564 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10565 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10566 and @code{%define api.pure full} directives does not do anything when used in
10569 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10570 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10572 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10573 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10575 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10576 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10578 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10579 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10580 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10581 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10582 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10583 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10584 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10585 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10586 access the token names and codes.
10588 @node Java Semantic Values
10589 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10590 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10592 @c - Printer and destructor
10594 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10595 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10596 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10599 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10600 %type <Integer> number
10603 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10604 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10605 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10606 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10607 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10610 %define stype "ASTNode"
10614 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10615 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10617 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10618 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10619 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10620 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10621 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10622 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10624 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10625 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10626 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10628 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10629 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10630 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10633 @node Java Location Values
10634 @subsection Java Location Values
10636 @c - class Position
10637 @c - class Location
10639 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10640 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10641 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10642 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10643 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10644 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10645 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10647 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10648 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10649 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10650 be supplied by the user.
10653 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10654 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10655 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10658 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10659 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10662 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10663 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10666 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10667 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10668 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10669 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10673 @node Java Parser Interface
10674 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10675 @c - define parser_class_name
10677 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10679 @c - Reporting errors
10681 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10682 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10683 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10684 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10685 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10687 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10688 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10689 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10690 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10691 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10692 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10694 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10695 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10696 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10697 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10699 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10700 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10701 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10702 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10703 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10704 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10706 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10707 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10709 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10710 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10711 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10712 which initialize them automatically.
10714 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10715 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10717 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10718 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10719 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10723 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10724 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10725 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10727 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10728 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10729 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10732 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10733 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10734 @code{false} otherwise.
10737 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10738 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10739 from a syntax error.
10740 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10743 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10744 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10745 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10749 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10750 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10751 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10752 or nonzero, full tracing.
10756 @node Java Scanner Interface
10757 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10760 @c - Lexer interface
10762 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10763 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10764 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10765 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10767 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10768 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10769 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10770 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10773 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10774 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10775 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10776 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10779 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10781 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10782 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10783 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10784 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10787 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10788 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10789 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10792 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10793 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10796 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10797 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10798 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10799 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10800 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10802 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10803 "@var{class-name}".}
10806 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10807 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10809 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10810 "@var{class-name}".}
10814 @node Java Action Features
10815 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10817 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10818 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10820 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10821 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10824 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10825 This may not be assigned to.
10826 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10829 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10830 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10831 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10835 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10836 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10837 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10838 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10839 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10840 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10843 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10844 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10845 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10846 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10848 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10852 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10853 This may not be assigned to.
10854 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10858 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10859 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10862 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10863 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10864 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10867 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10868 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10869 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10872 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10873 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10874 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10877 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10878 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10879 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10881 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10884 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10885 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10886 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10887 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10892 @node Java Differences
10893 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10895 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10896 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10897 section summarizes these differences.
10901 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10902 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10903 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10904 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10905 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10906 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10907 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10909 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10910 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10911 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10912 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10913 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10916 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10917 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10918 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10919 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10920 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10921 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10922 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10923 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10924 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10927 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10929 @item @code{%code imports}
10930 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10931 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10932 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10934 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10935 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10937 @item @code{%code lexer}
10938 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10939 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10940 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10944 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10945 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10946 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10948 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10949 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10954 @node Java Declarations Summary
10955 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10957 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10958 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10960 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10961 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10964 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10965 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10966 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10967 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10968 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10971 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10972 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10973 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10974 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10977 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10978 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10979 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10980 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10983 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10984 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10985 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10988 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10989 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10990 a Java @emph{type}.
10991 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10994 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10995 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10996 @xref{Java Differences}.
10999 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11000 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11001 @xref{Java Differences}.
11004 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11005 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11006 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11009 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11010 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11011 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11012 @xref{Java Differences}.
11015 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11016 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
11017 @xref{Java Differences}.
11020 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11021 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11022 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11025 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11026 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11027 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11030 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11031 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11032 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11035 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11036 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11038 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11041 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11042 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11043 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11044 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11047 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11048 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11049 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11050 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11051 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11052 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11055 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11056 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11057 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11060 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11061 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11062 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11063 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11066 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11067 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11068 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11069 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11070 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11073 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11074 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11075 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11078 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11079 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11080 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11083 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11084 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11085 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11088 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11089 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11090 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11091 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11095 @c ================================================= FAQ
11098 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11099 @cindex frequently asked questions
11102 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11106 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11107 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11108 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11109 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11110 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11111 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11112 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11113 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11114 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11115 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11116 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11117 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11120 @node Memory Exhausted
11121 @section Memory Exhausted
11124 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11125 message. What can I do?
11128 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11131 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11132 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11134 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11135 following typical questions:
11138 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11139 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11140 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11147 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11148 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11149 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
11152 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11153 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11154 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11155 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11156 @file{first-line.l}:
11162 #include <stdlib.h>
11166 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11170 yyparse (char const *file)
11172 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11176 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11180 /* One token only. */
11182 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11185 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11203 If the file @file{input} contains
11211 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11214 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11215 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11216 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11221 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11222 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11223 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11224 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11225 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11226 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11227 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11228 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11231 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11232 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11233 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11234 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11236 @node Strings are Destroyed
11237 @section Strings are Destroyed
11240 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11241 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11242 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11245 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11246 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11247 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11253 char *yylval = NULL;
11258 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11266 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11267 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11268 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11269 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11275 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11278 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11279 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11280 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11286 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11287 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11288 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11289 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11290 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11291 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11294 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11295 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11296 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11301 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11302 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11305 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11306 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11309 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11310 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11311 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11312 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11313 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11314 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11315 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11317 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11319 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11320 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11321 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11322 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11323 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11324 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11327 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11328 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11331 @node Multiple start-symbols
11332 @section Multiple start-symbols
11335 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11336 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11337 multiple entry points.
11340 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11341 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11342 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11343 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11347 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11354 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11355 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11357 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11358 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11359 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11360 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11361 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11362 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11363 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11364 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11367 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11372 int t = start_token;
11377 /* @r{The rules.} */
11381 @node Secure? Conform?
11382 @section Secure? Conform?
11385 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11388 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11389 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11390 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11391 please send us a bug report.
11393 @node I can't build Bison
11394 @section I can't build Bison
11397 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11398 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11402 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11403 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11404 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11405 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11406 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11407 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11408 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11411 @node Where can I find help?
11412 @section Where can I find help?
11415 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11418 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11419 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11420 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11421 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11422 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11423 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11424 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11425 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11429 @section Bug Reports
11432 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11435 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11436 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11437 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11438 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11439 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11441 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11442 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11443 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11444 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11445 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11447 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11448 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11449 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11450 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11451 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11452 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11454 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11455 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11457 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11459 @node More Languages
11460 @section More Languages
11463 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11464 favorite language here}?
11467 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11468 languages; contributions are welcome.
11471 @section Beta Testing
11474 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11477 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11478 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11479 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11480 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11481 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11482 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11483 essentially halted.
11485 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11486 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11487 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11488 systems are especially welcome.
11490 @node Mailing Lists
11491 @section Mailing Lists
11494 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11497 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11499 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11501 @node Table of Symbols
11502 @appendix Bison Symbols
11503 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11504 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11506 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11507 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11508 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11511 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11512 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
11513 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11514 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11516 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
11517 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
11520 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11521 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11522 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
11523 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11526 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
11527 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
11528 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
11531 @deffn {Variable} $$
11532 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11536 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11537 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11538 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11541 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11542 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11543 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
11547 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11548 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11549 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11550 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11553 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11554 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11555 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11556 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11557 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11561 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
11562 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
11563 Comments, as in C/C++.
11566 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11567 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11571 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11572 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11575 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11576 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11577 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11580 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11581 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11584 This feature is experimental.
11585 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11588 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11591 @deffn {Directive} <>
11592 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11595 This feature is experimental.
11596 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11599 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11602 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11603 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11604 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11605 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11608 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11609 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11610 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11611 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11612 @xref{%code Summary}.
11615 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11616 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11620 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11621 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11622 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11627 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11628 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11629 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11630 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11633 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11634 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11635 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11638 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11639 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11640 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11643 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11644 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11645 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11648 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11649 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11650 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11654 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11655 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11656 used in the grammar.
11659 @deffn {Symbol} error
11660 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11661 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11662 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11663 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11664 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11665 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11666 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11667 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11670 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11671 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11672 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11675 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11676 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11680 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11681 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11682 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11685 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11686 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11689 @deffn {Directive} %language
11690 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11691 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11694 @deffn {Directive} %left
11695 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11696 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11699 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11700 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11701 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11705 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11706 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11707 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11708 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11709 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11712 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11713 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11714 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11716 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11717 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11718 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11720 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11721 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11722 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11723 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11724 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11725 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11726 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11727 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11732 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11733 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11734 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11739 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11740 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11741 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11744 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11745 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11746 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11749 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11750 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11751 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11754 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11755 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11756 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11757 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11760 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11761 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11762 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11765 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11766 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11767 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11768 unreasonable usage.
11771 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11772 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11773 Require a Version of Bison}.
11776 @deffn {Directive} %right
11777 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11778 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11781 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11782 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11783 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11786 @deffn {Directive} %start
11787 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11791 @deffn {Directive} %token
11792 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11793 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11796 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11797 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11798 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11801 @deffn {Directive} %type
11802 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11803 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11806 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11807 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11808 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11812 @deffn {Directive} %union
11813 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11814 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11817 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11818 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11819 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11820 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11821 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11823 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11827 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11828 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11829 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11830 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11832 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11836 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11837 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11838 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11841 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11842 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11843 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11844 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11845 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11848 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11849 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11850 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11853 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11854 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11855 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11858 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11859 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11860 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11861 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11864 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11865 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11866 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11869 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11870 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11871 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11872 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11873 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11874 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11876 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11880 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11881 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11882 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11883 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11886 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11887 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11888 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11889 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11890 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11891 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11892 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11895 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11896 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11897 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11900 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11901 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11902 @xref{Memory Management}.
11905 @deffn {Function} yylex
11906 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11907 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11911 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11912 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11913 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11914 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11915 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11918 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11919 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11920 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11921 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11923 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11925 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11926 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11927 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11930 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11931 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11932 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11935 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11936 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11937 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11938 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11940 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11941 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11942 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11945 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11946 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11950 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11951 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11952 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11953 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11954 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11957 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11958 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11959 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11962 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11963 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11964 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11965 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11968 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11969 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11970 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11971 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11972 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11973 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11974 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11977 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11978 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11979 call this function to create a new parser.
11980 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11981 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11982 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11983 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11986 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11987 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11988 parse the rest of the input stream.
11989 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11990 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11991 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11992 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11995 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11996 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11997 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11998 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11999 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12000 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12003 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
12004 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
12005 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
12006 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
12007 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12010 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12011 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12012 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12013 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12016 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12017 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12018 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12019 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12020 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12021 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12022 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12024 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12025 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12026 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12027 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12028 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12029 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12030 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12033 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12034 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12035 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12043 @item Accepting state
12044 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12045 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12046 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
12048 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12049 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12050 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12051 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12052 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12054 @item Consistent state
12055 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12057 @item Context-free grammars
12058 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12059 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12060 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12061 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12064 @item Default reduction
12065 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12066 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12067 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12068 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12071 @item Defaulted state
12072 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12074 @item Dynamic allocation
12075 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12076 compile time or on entry to a function.
12079 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12080 character string of length zero.
12082 @item Finite-state stack machine
12083 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12084 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12085 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12086 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12087 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12088 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12090 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12091 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12092 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12093 deterministic parsing
12094 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12095 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12096 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12100 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12101 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12102 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12104 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12105 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12106 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12107 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12108 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12109 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12110 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12111 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12112 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12113 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12115 @item Infix operator
12116 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12117 performs some operation.
12120 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12122 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12123 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12124 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12125 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12126 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12127 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12128 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12130 @item Language construct
12131 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12132 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12133 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12135 @item Left associativity
12136 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12137 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12138 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12140 @item Left recursion
12141 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12142 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12145 @item Left-to-right parsing
12146 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12147 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12149 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12150 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12151 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12153 @item Lexical tie-in
12154 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12155 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12157 @item Literal string token
12158 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12160 @item Lookahead token
12161 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12165 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12166 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12167 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12170 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12171 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12173 @item Nonterminal symbol
12174 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12175 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12176 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12179 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12180 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12183 @item Postfix operator
12184 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12185 performs some operation.
12188 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12189 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12193 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12194 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12195 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12197 @item Reverse polish notation
12198 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12200 @item Right recursion
12201 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12202 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12206 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12207 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12208 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12211 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12212 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12213 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12215 @item Single-character literal
12216 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12217 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12220 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12221 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12222 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12223 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12226 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12227 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12228 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12231 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12232 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12235 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12236 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12237 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12238 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12240 @item Terminal symbol
12241 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12242 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12243 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12245 @item Unreachable state
12246 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12247 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12248 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12251 @node Copying This Manual
12252 @appendix Copying This Manual
12256 @unnumbered Bibliography
12260 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12261 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12262 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12263 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12265 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12266 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12267 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12268 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12269 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12271 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12272 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12273 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12274 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12275 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12277 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12278 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12279 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12280 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12281 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12284 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12285 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12286 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12289 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12290 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12291 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12292 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12295 @node Index of Terms
12296 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12302 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12303 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12304 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12305 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12306 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12307 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12308 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12309 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12310 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12311 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12312 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12313 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12314 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12315 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12316 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12317 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12318 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12319 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12320 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12321 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12322 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12323 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12324 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12325 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12326 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12327 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12328 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12329 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12330 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12331 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12332 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12333 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12334 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12335 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12336 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12337 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12338 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12339 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12340 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12341 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12342 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12343 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12344 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12345 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12346 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12347 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12348 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12349 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12350 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12351 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12352 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12353 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12354 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12355 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12356 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12357 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12358 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12359 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12361 @c Local Variables:
12362 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"