1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
279 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
283 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
284 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
285 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
286 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
288 Handling Context Dependencies
290 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
291 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
292 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
293 error recovery rules must be written.
295 Debugging Your Parser
297 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
298 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
299 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
300 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
304 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
305 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
306 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
310 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
311 in alphabetical order by short options.
312 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
313 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
315 Parsers Written In Other Languages
317 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
318 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
322 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
323 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
324 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
325 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
326 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
327 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
331 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
332 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
333 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
335 A Complete C++ Example
337 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
338 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
339 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
340 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
341 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
345 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
346 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
347 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
348 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
349 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
350 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
351 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
352 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
354 Frequently Asked Questions
356 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
357 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
358 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
359 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
360 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
361 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
362 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
363 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
364 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
365 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
366 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
367 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
371 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
377 @unnumbered Introduction
380 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
381 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
382 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
383 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
384 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
385 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
386 calculators to complex programming languages.
388 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
389 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
390 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
391 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
392 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
395 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
396 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
397 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
398 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
401 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
402 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
403 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
404 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
405 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
406 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
409 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
412 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
414 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
415 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
416 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
417 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
418 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
420 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
422 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
423 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
424 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
425 License to all of the Bison source code.
427 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
428 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
429 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
430 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
431 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
432 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
433 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
435 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
436 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
437 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
438 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
439 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
440 using the other GNU tools.
442 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
443 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
444 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
445 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
449 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
450 @include gpl-3.0.texi
453 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
455 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
456 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
457 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
460 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
461 as mathematical ideas.
462 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
463 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
464 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
465 the name of an identifier, etc.).
466 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
467 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
468 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
469 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
470 how is the output used?
471 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
472 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
475 @node Language and Grammar
476 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
478 @cindex context-free grammar
479 @cindex grammar, context-free
480 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
481 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
482 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
483 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
484 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
485 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
486 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
487 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
491 @cindex Backus-Naur form
492 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
493 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
494 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
495 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
496 essentially machine-readable BNF.
498 @cindex LALR grammars
499 @cindex IELR grammars
501 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
502 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
503 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
504 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
505 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
506 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
507 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
508 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
509 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
510 Construction}, to learn how.
513 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
514 @cindex ambiguous grammars
515 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
517 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
518 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
519 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
520 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
521 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
522 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
523 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
524 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
525 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
526 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
527 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
528 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
529 possible parses of any given string is finite.
531 @cindex symbols (abstract)
533 @cindex syntactic grouping
534 @cindex grouping, syntactic
535 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
536 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
537 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
538 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
539 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
540 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
541 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
543 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
544 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
545 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
546 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
547 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
548 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
549 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
550 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
551 lexicography, not grammar.)
553 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
558 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
559 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
560 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
561 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
562 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
565 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
566 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
567 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
568 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
569 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
570 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
571 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
572 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
574 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
575 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
576 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
577 reads informally as follows:
580 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
585 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
589 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
590 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
591 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
592 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
595 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
596 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
597 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
598 not the start symbol.
600 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
601 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
602 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
603 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
604 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
605 reports a syntax error.
607 @node Grammar in Bison
608 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
609 @cindex Bison grammar
610 @cindex grammar, Bison
611 @cindex formal grammar
613 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
614 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
615 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
617 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
618 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
619 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
621 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
622 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
623 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
624 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
625 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
626 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
627 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
630 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
631 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
632 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
633 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
635 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
636 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
638 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
639 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
640 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
641 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
645 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
649 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
651 @node Semantic Values
652 @section Semantic Values
653 @cindex semantic value
654 @cindex value, semantic
656 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
657 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
658 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
659 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
660 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
663 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
664 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
665 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
666 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
667 ,Defining Language Semantics},
670 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
671 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
672 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
673 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
676 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
677 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
678 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
679 need to have any semantic value.)
681 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
682 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
683 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
684 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
685 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
686 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
688 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
689 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
690 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
691 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
692 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
694 @node Semantic Actions
695 @section Semantic Actions
696 @cindex semantic actions
697 @cindex actions, semantic
699 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
700 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
701 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
702 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
705 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
706 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
707 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
708 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
709 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
710 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
711 newly recognized larger expression.
713 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
717 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
721 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
722 from the values of the two subexpressions.
725 @section Writing GLR Parsers
727 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
730 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
731 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
733 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
734 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
735 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
736 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
737 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
738 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
739 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
743 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
744 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
745 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
746 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
747 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
748 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
749 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
750 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
751 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
752 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
753 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
754 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
755 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
756 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
757 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
758 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
759 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
760 identical set of symbols.
762 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
763 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
764 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
765 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
766 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
767 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
768 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
769 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
770 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
774 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
775 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
776 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
777 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
780 @node Simple GLR Parsers
781 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
782 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
787 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
788 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
790 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
791 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
792 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
794 Consider a problem that
795 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
796 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
799 type subrange = lo .. hi;
800 type enum = (a, b, c);
804 The original language standard allows only numeric
805 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
806 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
807 10206) and many other
808 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
809 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
813 type subrange = (a) .. b;
817 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
818 type with only one value:
825 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
826 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
828 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
829 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
830 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
831 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
832 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
833 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
834 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
835 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
837 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
838 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
839 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
840 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
843 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
844 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
845 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
846 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
847 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
848 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
851 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
852 use the GLR algorithm.
853 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
854 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
855 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
856 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
857 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
858 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
859 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
860 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
861 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
863 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
864 reports a syntax error as usual.
866 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
867 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
868 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
869 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
870 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
872 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
873 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
874 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
875 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
876 The present example contains only one conflict between two
877 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
878 cannot be nested. So the number of
879 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
880 and the parsing time is still linear.
882 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
883 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
886 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
896 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
925 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
926 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
927 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
928 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
935 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
936 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
937 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
946 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
947 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
948 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
949 notice when the parser splits.
951 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
952 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
953 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
954 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
955 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
956 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
957 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
958 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
959 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
960 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
961 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
962 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
963 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
966 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
967 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
968 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
969 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
970 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
971 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
973 @node Merging GLR Parses
974 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
975 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
980 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
982 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
987 #define YYSTYPE char const *
989 void yyerror (char const *);
1003 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1012 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1013 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1015 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1016 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1020 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1021 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1022 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1027 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1028 | '(' declarator ')'
1033 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1034 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1041 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1042 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1043 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1044 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1045 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1046 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1047 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1048 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1049 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1050 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1051 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1052 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1053 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1054 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1056 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1057 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1058 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1059 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1060 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1061 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1062 The parser therefore prints
1065 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1068 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1069 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1076 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1077 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1078 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1079 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1080 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1081 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1082 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1083 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1084 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1085 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1091 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1092 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1093 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1094 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1099 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1100 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1105 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1109 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1117 with an accompanying forward declaration
1118 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1122 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1123 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1128 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1129 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1132 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1135 Bison requires that all of the
1136 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1137 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1138 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1139 the offending merge.
1141 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1142 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1144 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1145 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1146 the associated reduction.
1147 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1148 action in a GLR parser.
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1156 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1157 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1158 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1159 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1160 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1161 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1162 influence syntax analysis.
1163 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1166 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1167 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1168 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1169 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1170 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1171 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1172 future versions of Bison.
1173 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1174 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1175 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1179 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1180 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1181 initiate error recovery.
1182 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1183 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1184 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1185 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1187 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1188 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1190 @node Compiler Requirements
1191 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1192 @cindex @code{inline}
1193 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1195 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1196 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1197 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1198 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1199 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1200 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1209 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1213 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1214 && ! defined inline)
1223 @cindex textual location
1224 @cindex location, textual
1226 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1227 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1228 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1229 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1231 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1232 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1233 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1234 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1237 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1238 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1239 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1242 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1243 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1244 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1245 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1246 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1247 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1248 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1251 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1252 @cindex Bison parser
1253 @cindex Bison utility
1254 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1257 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1258 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1259 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1260 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1261 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1262 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1263 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1266 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1267 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1268 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1271 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1272 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1273 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1274 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1275 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1276 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1277 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1279 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1280 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1281 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1282 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1283 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1284 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1285 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1286 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1287 C-Language Interface}.
1289 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1290 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1291 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1292 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1293 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1294 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1295 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1296 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1297 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1298 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1299 anything other than their usual meanings.
1301 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1302 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1303 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1304 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1305 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1306 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1307 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1308 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1309 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1312 @section Stages in Using Bison
1313 @cindex stages in using Bison
1316 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1317 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1321 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1322 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1323 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1324 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1325 sequence of C statements.
1328 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1329 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1330 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1331 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1334 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1337 Write error-reporting routines.
1340 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1341 must follow these steps:
1345 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1348 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1351 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1354 @node Grammar Layout
1355 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1356 @cindex grammar file
1358 @cindex format of grammar file
1359 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1361 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1362 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1369 @var{Bison declarations}
1378 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1379 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1381 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1382 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1383 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1384 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1385 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1386 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1388 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1389 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1390 semantic values of various symbols.
1392 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1395 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1396 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1397 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1401 @cindex simple examples
1402 @cindex examples, simple
1404 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1405 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1406 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1407 and a multi-function calculator. All
1408 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1410 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1411 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1412 source file to try them.
1415 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1416 a first example with no operator precedence.
1417 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1418 Operator precedence is introduced.
1419 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1420 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1421 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1422 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1423 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1427 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1428 @cindex reverse polish notation
1429 @cindex polish notation calculator
1430 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1431 @cindex calculator, simple
1433 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1434 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1435 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1436 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1438 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1439 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1442 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1443 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1444 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1445 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1446 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1447 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1448 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1451 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1452 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1454 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1455 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1458 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1461 #define YYSTYPE double
1464 void yyerror (char const *);
1469 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1472 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1473 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1475 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1476 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1477 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1478 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1479 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1480 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1481 which is a floating point number.
1483 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1484 function @code{pow}.
1486 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1487 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1488 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1489 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1492 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1493 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1494 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1495 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1496 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1497 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1498 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1499 type for numeric constants.
1502 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1504 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1517 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1524 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1527 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1528 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1529 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1535 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1536 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1537 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1538 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1539 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1542 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1543 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1544 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1546 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1547 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1548 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1549 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1550 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1551 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1560 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1562 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1571 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1572 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1573 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1574 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1575 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1577 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1578 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1579 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1580 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1581 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1582 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1584 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1585 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1586 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1587 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1590 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1591 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1592 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1595 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1597 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1602 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1606 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1607 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1608 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1609 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1610 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1611 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1612 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1614 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1615 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1616 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1617 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1618 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1621 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1623 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1624 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1625 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1626 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1631 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1632 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1637 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1638 equally well have written them separately:
1642 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1643 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1647 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1648 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1649 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1650 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1651 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1652 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1653 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1654 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1656 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1657 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1658 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1660 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1661 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1665 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1669 means the same thing as this:
1674 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1680 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1683 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1684 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1685 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1687 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1688 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1689 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1690 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1692 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1694 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1695 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1696 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1697 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1699 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1700 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1701 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1702 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1703 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1704 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1705 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1706 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1707 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1709 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1710 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1711 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1712 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1713 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1715 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1716 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1718 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1722 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1723 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1724 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1725 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1736 /* Skip white space. */
1737 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1741 /* Process numbers. */
1742 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1745 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1750 /* Return end-of-input. */
1753 /* Return a single char. */
1760 @subsection The Controlling Function
1761 @cindex controlling function
1762 @cindex main function in simple example
1764 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1765 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1766 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1779 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1780 @cindex error reporting routine
1782 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1783 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1784 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1785 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1786 here is the definition we will use:
1794 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1796 yyerror (char const *s)
1798 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1803 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1804 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1805 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1806 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1807 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1808 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1810 @node Rpcalc Generate
1811 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1812 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1814 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1815 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1816 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1817 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1818 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1819 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1821 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1822 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1824 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1825 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1832 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1833 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1834 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1835 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1836 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1837 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1838 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1840 @node Rpcalc Compile
1841 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1842 @cindex compiling the parser
1844 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1848 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1850 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1854 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1855 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1856 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1860 # @r{List files again.}
1862 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1866 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1867 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1873 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1875 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1879 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1881 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1886 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1887 @cindex infix notation calculator
1889 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1891 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1892 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1893 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1894 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1897 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1901 #define YYSTYPE double
1905 void yyerror (char const *);
1910 /* Bison declarations. */
1914 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1915 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1918 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1929 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1936 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1937 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1938 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1939 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1940 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1941 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1942 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1949 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1952 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1954 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1955 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1956 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1957 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1958 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1959 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1962 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1963 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1964 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1965 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1966 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1969 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1970 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1971 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1972 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1973 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1975 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1980 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1988 @node Simple Error Recovery
1989 @section Simple Error Recovery
1990 @cindex error recovery, simple
1992 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1993 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1994 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1995 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1996 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1997 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1999 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2000 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2001 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2007 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2008 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2013 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2014 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2015 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2016 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2017 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2018 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2019 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2020 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2023 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2024 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2025 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2026 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2027 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2028 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2031 @node Location Tracking Calc
2032 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2033 @cindex location tracking calculator
2034 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2035 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2037 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2038 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2039 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2040 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2044 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2045 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2046 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2049 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2050 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2052 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2053 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2056 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2062 void yyerror (char const *);
2065 /* Bison declarations. */
2073 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2077 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2078 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2079 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2080 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2081 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2082 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2083 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2087 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2089 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2090 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2091 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2092 from the new information.
2094 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2095 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2108 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2115 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2116 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2117 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2127 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2128 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2129 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2134 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2135 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2136 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2140 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2141 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2142 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2144 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2145 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2146 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2147 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2148 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2149 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2153 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2155 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2156 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2157 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2160 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2161 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2172 /* Skip white space. */
2173 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2174 ++yylloc.last_column;
2179 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2180 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2184 /* Process numbers. */
2188 ++yylloc.last_column;
2189 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2191 ++yylloc.last_column;
2192 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2199 /* Return end-of-input. */
2204 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2208 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2211 ++yylloc.last_column;
2217 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2218 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2219 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2220 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2222 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2223 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2224 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2225 controlling function:
2232 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2233 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2239 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2240 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2241 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2243 @node Multi-function Calc
2244 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2245 @cindex multi-function calculator
2246 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2247 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2249 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2250 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2251 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2252 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2253 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2255 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2256 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2257 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2258 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2259 functions whose syntax has this form:
2262 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2266 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2267 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2268 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2272 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2276 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2282 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2287 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2290 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2291 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2292 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2295 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2296 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2298 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2300 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2304 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2305 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2307 void yyerror (char const *);
2313 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2314 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2317 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2318 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2325 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2326 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2330 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2331 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2332 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2334 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2335 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2336 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2337 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2339 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2340 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2341 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2342 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2343 between angle brackets).
2345 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2346 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2347 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2348 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2349 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2350 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2353 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2355 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2356 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2357 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2359 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2361 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2372 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2373 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2380 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2381 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2382 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2383 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2384 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2385 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2386 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2387 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2388 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2389 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2392 /* End of grammar. */
2396 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2397 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2398 @cindex symbol table example
2400 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2401 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2402 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2403 requires some additional C functions for support.
2405 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2406 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2407 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2409 @comment file: calc.h
2412 /* Function type. */
2413 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2417 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2420 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2421 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2424 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2425 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2427 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2432 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2434 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2435 extern symrec *sym_table;
2437 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2438 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2442 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2443 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2444 @code{init_table} as well:
2446 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2451 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2453 yyerror (char const *s)
2455 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2463 double (*fnct) (double);
2468 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2481 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2486 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2491 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2493 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2494 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2509 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2510 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2512 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2513 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2514 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2515 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2516 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2517 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2519 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2521 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2522 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2526 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2528 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2529 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2530 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2531 ptr->type = sym_type;
2532 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2533 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2541 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2544 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2545 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2546 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2553 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2554 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2555 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2556 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2558 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2559 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2560 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2561 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2562 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2563 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2565 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2566 operators in @code{yylex}.
2568 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2580 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2581 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2589 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2590 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2593 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2599 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2602 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2603 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2604 static size_t length = 40;
2605 static char *symbuf = 0;
2611 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2617 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2621 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2623 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2625 /* Get another character. */
2630 while (isalnum (c));
2637 s = getsym (symbuf);
2639 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2644 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2650 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2651 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2652 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2654 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2657 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2659 yyerror (char const *s)
2661 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2667 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2670 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2671 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2672 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2680 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2681 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2682 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2690 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2693 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2694 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2695 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2698 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2699 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2703 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2705 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2706 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2708 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2709 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2712 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2713 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2714 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2715 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2716 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2717 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2718 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2719 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2720 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2723 @node Grammar Outline
2724 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2727 @findex /* @dots{} */
2729 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2730 appropriate delimiters:
2737 @var{Bison declarations}
2746 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2747 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2751 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2752 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2753 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2754 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2755 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2759 @subsection The prologue
2760 @cindex declarations section
2762 @cindex declarations
2764 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2765 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2766 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2767 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2768 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2769 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2770 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2772 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2773 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2776 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2777 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2778 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2779 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2780 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2781 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2782 @code{%union} declaration.
2793 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2797 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2798 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2804 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2805 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2806 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2807 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2808 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2809 @code{#include} directives.
2811 @node Prologue Alternatives
2812 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2813 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2816 @findex %code requires
2817 @findex %code provides
2820 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2821 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2822 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2823 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2824 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2825 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2826 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2828 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2839 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2843 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2844 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2851 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2852 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2853 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2854 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2855 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2856 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2857 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2858 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2859 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2860 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2861 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2863 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2864 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2865 This behavior raises a few questions.
2866 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2867 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2868 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2869 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2870 This behavior is not intuitive.
2872 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2873 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2874 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2875 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2882 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2883 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2886 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2887 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2899 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2903 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2904 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2905 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2912 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2913 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2914 explicit which kind you intend.
2915 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2917 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2918 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2919 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2920 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2921 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2922 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2923 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2924 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2925 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2928 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2929 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2931 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2949 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2955 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2956 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2969 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2970 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2971 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2979 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2980 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2981 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2982 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2983 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2984 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2986 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2987 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2988 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2989 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2990 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2991 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2992 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2993 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2994 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2995 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2996 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2999 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3000 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3001 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3002 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3003 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3004 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3005 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3006 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3007 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3008 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3026 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3032 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3033 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3046 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3052 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3053 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3061 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3062 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3063 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3066 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3067 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3068 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3069 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3070 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3071 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3074 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3075 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3076 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3077 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3079 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3080 organize your grammar file.
3081 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3086 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3087 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3088 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3089 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3093 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3094 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3095 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3096 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3101 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3102 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3104 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3106 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3107 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3108 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3109 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3111 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3112 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3113 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3114 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3115 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3116 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3117 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3118 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3121 @node Bison Declarations
3122 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3123 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3124 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3126 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3127 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3128 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3129 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3132 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3133 @cindex grammar rules section
3134 @cindex rules section for grammar
3136 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3137 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3139 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3140 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3141 if it is the first thing in the file.
3144 @subsection The epilogue
3145 @cindex additional C code section
3147 @cindex C code, section for additional
3149 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3150 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3151 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3152 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3153 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3154 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3155 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3156 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3157 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3158 C-Language Interface}.
3160 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3161 from the grammar rules.
3163 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3164 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3165 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3166 of the grammar file.
3169 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3170 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3171 @cindex terminal symbol
3175 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3178 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3179 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3180 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3181 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3182 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3183 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3184 the symbol to stand for it.
3186 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3187 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3188 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3190 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3191 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3192 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3193 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3194 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3195 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3196 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3198 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3202 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3203 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3204 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3205 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3208 @cindex character token
3209 @cindex literal token
3210 @cindex single-character literal
3211 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3212 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3213 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3214 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3215 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3216 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3217 ,Operator Precedence}).
3219 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3220 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3221 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3222 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3223 your program will confuse other readers.
3225 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3226 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3227 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3228 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3229 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3230 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3234 @cindex string token
3235 @cindex literal string token
3236 @cindex multicharacter literal
3237 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3238 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3239 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3240 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3241 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3243 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3244 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3245 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3246 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3247 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3249 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3251 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3252 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3253 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3254 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3255 read your program will be confused.
3257 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3258 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3259 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3260 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3261 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3262 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3265 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3266 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3267 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3269 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3270 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3271 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3272 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3273 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3274 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3275 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3276 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3277 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3278 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3279 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3280 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3282 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3283 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3284 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3285 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3286 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3288 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3289 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3290 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3291 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3292 characters in the following C-language string:
3295 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3298 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3299 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3300 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3301 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3302 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3303 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3304 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3305 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3306 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3307 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3310 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3311 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3312 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3313 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3314 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3317 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3319 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3320 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3322 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3326 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3331 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3332 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3333 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3344 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3345 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3347 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3348 extra white space as you wish.
3350 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3351 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3354 @{@var{C statements}@}
3359 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3360 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3361 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3362 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3363 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3364 compiler can check it.
3366 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3367 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3368 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3369 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3370 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3371 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3372 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3373 character constants.
3375 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3379 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3380 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3385 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3386 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3393 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3395 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3396 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3397 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3416 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3420 @section Recursive Rules
3421 @cindex recursive rule
3423 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3424 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3425 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3426 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3427 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3438 @cindex left recursion
3439 @cindex right recursion
3441 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3442 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3443 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3455 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3456 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3457 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3458 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3459 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3460 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3461 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3464 @cindex mutual recursion
3465 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3466 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3467 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3476 | primary '+' primary
3489 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3493 @section Defining Language Semantics
3494 @cindex defining language semantics
3495 @cindex language semantics, defining
3497 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3498 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3499 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3501 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3502 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3503 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3504 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3507 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3508 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3509 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3510 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3511 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3512 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3513 action in the middle of a rule.
3517 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3518 @cindex semantic value type
3519 @cindex value type, semantic
3520 @cindex data types of semantic values
3521 @cindex default data type
3523 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3524 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3525 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3526 Notation Calculator}).
3528 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3529 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3530 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3533 #define YYSTYPE double
3537 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3538 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3539 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3540 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3542 @node Multiple Types
3543 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3545 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3546 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3547 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3548 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3551 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3552 requires you to do two things:
3556 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3557 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3558 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3559 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3563 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3564 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3565 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3566 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3567 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3576 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3578 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3579 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3580 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3581 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3583 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3584 placed at any position in the rule;
3585 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3586 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3587 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3588 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3590 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3591 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3592 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3593 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3594 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3595 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3596 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3597 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3598 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3599 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3602 Here is a typical example:
3608 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3612 Or, in terms of named references:
3618 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3623 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3624 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3625 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3626 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3627 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3628 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3630 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3631 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3632 referred to as @code{$2}.
3634 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3635 references construct.
3637 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3638 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3639 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3640 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3641 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3645 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3649 @cindex default action
3650 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3651 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3652 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3653 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3654 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3655 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3657 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3658 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3659 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3660 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3661 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3666 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3667 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3673 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3678 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3679 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3680 definition of @code{foo}.
3683 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3684 any, from a semantic action.
3685 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3686 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3689 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3690 @cindex action data types
3691 @cindex data types in actions
3693 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3694 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3696 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3697 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3698 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3699 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3700 in the rule. In this example,
3706 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3711 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3712 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3713 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3714 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3716 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3717 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3718 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3730 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3731 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3733 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3734 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3735 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3736 @cindex mid-rule actions
3738 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3739 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3740 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3742 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3743 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3744 it is run before they are parsed.
3746 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3747 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3748 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3749 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3752 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3753 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3754 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3755 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3756 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3757 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3759 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3760 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3761 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3762 at the end of the rule.
3764 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3765 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3766 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3767 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3768 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3769 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3776 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3777 declare_variable ($3);
3782 pop_context ($<context>5);
3788 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3789 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3790 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3791 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3792 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3793 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3794 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3795 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3797 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3798 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3799 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3800 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3801 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3804 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3805 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3806 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3807 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3808 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3810 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3811 Discarded Symbols}).
3812 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3813 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3815 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3816 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3821 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3835 $$ = push_context ();
3836 declare_variable ($3);
3843 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3844 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3845 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3847 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3848 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3849 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3850 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3851 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3857 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3858 | '@{' statements '@}'
3864 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3869 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3870 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3873 | '@{' statements '@}'
3879 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3880 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3881 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3882 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3883 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3884 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3886 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3887 actions into the two rules, like this:
3892 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3893 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3894 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3895 '@{' statements '@}'
3901 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3902 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3904 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3905 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3906 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3911 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3912 declarations statements '@}'
3913 | '@{' statements '@}'
3919 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3920 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3922 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3923 serves as a subroutine:
3928 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3934 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3935 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3941 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3942 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3944 @node Tracking Locations
3945 @section Tracking Locations
3947 @cindex textual location
3948 @cindex location, textual
3950 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3951 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3952 especially symbol locations.
3954 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3955 actions to take when rules are matched.
3958 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3959 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3960 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3964 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3965 @cindex data type of locations
3966 @cindex default location type
3968 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3969 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3971 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3972 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3973 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3974 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3978 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3987 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3988 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3989 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3990 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3991 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3993 @node Actions and Locations
3994 @subsection Actions and Locations
3995 @cindex location actions
3996 @cindex actions, location
3999 @vindex @@@var{name}
4000 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4002 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4003 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4005 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4006 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4007 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4008 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4009 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4012 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4013 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4014 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4015 references construct.
4017 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4025 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4026 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4027 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4028 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4035 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4036 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4037 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4043 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4044 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4045 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4048 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4049 example above simply rewrites this way:
4063 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4064 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4065 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4072 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4073 from a semantic action.
4074 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4075 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4077 @node Location Default Action
4078 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4079 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4080 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4082 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4083 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4084 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4085 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4086 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4087 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4088 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4089 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4092 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4093 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4095 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4096 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4097 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4098 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4099 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4100 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4101 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4102 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4103 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4104 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4106 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4110 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4114 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4115 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4116 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4117 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4121 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4122 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4123 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4124 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4131 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4132 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4133 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4135 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4139 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4140 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4143 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4144 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4145 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4146 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4149 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4150 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4151 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4152 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4155 @node Named References
4156 @section Named References
4157 @cindex named references
4159 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4160 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4161 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4162 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4163 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4164 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4166 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4167 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4168 used as named references. For example:
4172 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4173 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4178 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4182 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4183 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4188 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4194 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4197 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4200 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4205 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4206 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4207 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4210 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4211 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4216 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4217 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4218 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4221 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4222 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4228 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4229 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4232 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4233 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4237 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4238 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4239 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4240 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4241 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4242 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4243 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4245 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4249 @section Bison Declarations
4250 @cindex declarations, Bison
4251 @cindex Bison declarations
4253 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4254 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4257 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4258 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4259 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4260 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4262 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4263 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4264 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4265 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4268 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4269 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4270 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4271 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4272 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4273 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4274 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4275 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4276 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4277 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4278 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4279 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4280 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4281 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4282 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4286 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4287 @cindex version requirement
4288 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4291 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4292 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4296 %require "@var{version}"
4300 @subsection Token Type Names
4301 @cindex declaring token type names
4302 @cindex token type names, declaring
4303 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4306 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4312 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4313 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4314 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4316 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4317 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4318 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4321 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4322 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4323 following the token name:
4327 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4331 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4332 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4333 with each other or with normal characters.
4335 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4336 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4337 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4338 Than One Value Type}).
4344 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4348 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4352 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4353 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4354 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4361 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4362 equivalent literal string tokens:
4365 %token <operator> OR "||"
4366 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4371 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4372 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4373 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4374 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4375 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4376 the literal string instead of the token name.
4378 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4379 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4383 %token END 0 "end of file"
4386 @node Precedence Decl
4387 @subsection Operator Precedence
4388 @cindex precedence declarations
4389 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4390 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4392 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4393 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4394 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4395 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4396 operator precedence.
4398 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4399 @code{%token}: either
4402 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4409 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4412 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4413 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4414 all the @var{symbols}:
4418 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4419 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4420 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4421 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4422 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4423 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4424 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4425 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4426 considered a syntax error.
4429 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4430 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4431 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4432 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4433 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4436 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4437 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4438 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4439 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4444 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4445 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4449 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4450 @cindex declaring value types
4451 @cindex value types, declaring
4454 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4455 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4456 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4471 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4472 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4473 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4474 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4476 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4477 @code{union}. For example:
4489 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4490 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4493 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4494 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4495 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4497 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4498 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4500 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4501 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4502 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4503 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4511 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4516 and then your grammar can use the following
4517 instead of @code{%union}:
4530 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4531 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4532 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4536 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4537 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4538 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4541 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4545 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4546 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4547 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4548 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4549 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4552 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4553 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4554 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4555 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4557 @node Initial Action Decl
4558 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4559 @findex %initial-action
4561 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4562 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4565 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4566 @findex %initial-action
4567 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4568 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4569 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4570 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4573 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4576 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4579 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4584 @node Destructor Decl
4585 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4586 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4590 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4591 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4592 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4593 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4594 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4595 must discard the start symbol.
4597 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4598 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4599 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4600 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4602 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4603 symbol is automatically discarded.
4605 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4607 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4608 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4609 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4610 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4611 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4614 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4615 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4616 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4617 tag among @var{symbols}.
4618 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4619 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4620 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4622 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4623 (These default forms are experimental.
4624 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4626 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4627 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4628 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4629 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4631 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4632 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4633 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4634 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4635 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4642 %union @{ char *string; @}
4643 %token <string> STRING1
4644 %token <string> STRING2
4645 %type <string> string1
4646 %type <string> string2
4647 %union @{ char character; @}
4648 %token <character> CHR
4649 %type <character> chr
4652 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4653 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4654 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4655 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4659 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4660 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4661 to @code{free} by default.
4662 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4663 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4664 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4665 @code{free} only once.
4666 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4667 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4669 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4670 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4671 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4672 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4673 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4674 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4675 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4676 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4677 reference it in your grammar.
4678 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4679 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4685 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4686 @cindex mid-rule actions
4687 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4688 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4689 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4690 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4691 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4692 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4693 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4694 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4698 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4699 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4700 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4705 @cindex discarded symbols
4706 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4710 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4712 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4714 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4715 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4717 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4718 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4721 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4724 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4725 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4728 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4729 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4730 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4734 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4735 @cindex printing semantic values
4739 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4740 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4741 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4742 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4744 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4745 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4746 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4748 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4751 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4752 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4753 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4754 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4755 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4756 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4757 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4760 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4761 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4762 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4763 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4771 %union @{ char *string; @}
4772 %token <string> STRING1
4773 %token <string> STRING2
4774 %type <string> string1
4775 %type <string> string2
4776 %union @{ char character; @}
4777 %token <character> CHR
4778 %type <character> chr
4781 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4782 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4783 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4784 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4788 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4789 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4790 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4791 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4792 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4793 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4794 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4798 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4799 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4800 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4801 @cindex warnings, preventing
4802 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4806 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4807 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4808 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4809 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4810 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4811 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4813 The declaration looks like this:
4819 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4820 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4821 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4822 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4824 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4825 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4826 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4827 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4828 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4829 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4830 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4836 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4840 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4841 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4842 print the number of conflicts.
4845 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4846 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4847 go back to the beginning.
4850 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4851 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4852 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4855 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4856 but will keep silent otherwise.
4859 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4860 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4861 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4862 @cindex default start symbol
4865 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4866 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4867 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4874 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4875 @cindex reentrant parser
4877 @findex %define api.pure
4879 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4880 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4881 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4882 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4883 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4884 program must be called only within interlocks.
4886 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4887 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4888 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4889 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4890 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4892 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4893 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4894 reentrant. It looks like this:
4897 %define api.pure full
4900 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4901 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4902 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4903 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4904 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4905 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4906 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4907 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4908 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4910 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4911 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4915 @subsection A Push Parser
4918 @findex %define api.push-pull
4920 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4921 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4923 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4924 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4925 each time a new token is made available.
4927 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4928 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4929 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4930 within a certain time period.
4932 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4933 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4934 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4937 %define api.push-pull push
4940 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4941 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4942 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4943 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4944 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4947 %define api.pure full
4948 %define api.push-pull push
4951 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4952 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4953 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4954 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4956 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4957 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4958 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4959 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4960 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4961 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4962 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4963 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4967 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4969 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4970 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4971 yypstate_delete (ps);
4974 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4975 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4976 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4977 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4978 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4979 example would thus look like this:
4984 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4987 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4988 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4989 yypstate_delete (ps);
4992 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4993 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4995 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4996 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4997 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4998 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4999 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5000 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5001 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5002 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5003 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5004 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5005 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5006 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5007 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5008 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5009 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5010 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5011 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5015 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5016 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5017 yypstate_delete (ps);
5020 Adding the @code{%define api.pure full} declaration does exactly the same thing
5021 to the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5022 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5025 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5026 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5027 @cindex declaration summary
5028 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5030 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5032 @deffn {Directive} %union
5033 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5034 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5037 @deffn {Directive} %token
5038 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5039 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5042 @deffn {Directive} %right
5043 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5044 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5047 @deffn {Directive} %left
5048 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5049 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5052 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5053 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5054 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5055 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5059 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5060 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5061 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5065 @deffn {Directive} %type
5066 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5067 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5070 @deffn {Directive} %start
5071 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5075 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5076 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5077 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5083 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5086 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5087 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5089 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5090 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5091 @xref{%code Summary}.
5094 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5095 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5096 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5097 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5098 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5099 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5102 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5103 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5104 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5105 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5108 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5109 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5110 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5111 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5112 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5114 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5115 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5116 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5117 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5118 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5119 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5120 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5121 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5122 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5123 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5125 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5126 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5127 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5129 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5130 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5131 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5133 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5134 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5135 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5136 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5137 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5139 @findex %code requires
5140 @findex %code provides
5141 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5142 header also contains their code.
5143 @xref{%code Summary}.
5145 @cindex Header guard
5146 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5147 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5148 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5149 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5150 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5153 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5154 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5156 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5157 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5159 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5163 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5164 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5167 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5168 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5169 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5172 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5173 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5174 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5177 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5178 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5179 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5180 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5184 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5185 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5186 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5187 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5188 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5189 accurate syntax error messages.
5193 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5194 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5195 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5200 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5201 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5202 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5203 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5204 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5205 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5206 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5210 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5211 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5214 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5215 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5216 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5220 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5221 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5222 Require a Version of Bison}.
5225 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5226 Specify the skeleton to use.
5228 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5229 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5230 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5231 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5233 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5234 file in the Bison installation directory.
5235 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5236 directory of the grammar file.
5237 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5240 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5241 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5242 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5243 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5244 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5245 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5246 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5249 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5250 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5251 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5252 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5253 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5254 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5255 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5258 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5259 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5260 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5264 The highest token number, plus one.
5266 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5268 The number of grammar rules,
5270 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5274 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5275 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5276 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5277 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5281 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5282 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5283 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5287 @node %define Summary
5288 @subsection %define Summary
5290 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5291 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5292 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5293 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5294 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5295 @code{%define} directive:
5297 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5298 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5299 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5300 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5302 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5303 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5304 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5305 to specifying @code{""}.
5307 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5308 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5309 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5312 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5313 @code{%define} accepts.
5315 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5316 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5320 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5322 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5323 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5325 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5327 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5328 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5331 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5332 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5333 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5334 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5335 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5336 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5339 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5340 @item @code{api.location.type}
5341 @findex %define api.location.type
5344 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5346 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5347 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5349 @item Accepted Values: String
5351 @item Default Value: none
5353 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5356 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5357 @item @code{api.prefix}
5358 @findex %define api.prefix
5361 @item Language(s): All
5363 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5364 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5366 @item Accepted Values: String
5368 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5370 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5373 @c ================================================== api.pure
5374 @item @code{api.pure}
5375 @findex %define api.pure
5378 @item Language(s): C
5380 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5381 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5383 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5385 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5386 the case for Boolean values.
5388 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5389 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5390 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5393 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5394 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5395 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5397 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5401 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5402 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5405 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5406 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5409 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5412 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5413 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5415 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5417 @item History: the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5420 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5422 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5423 @findex %define api.push-pull
5426 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5428 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5429 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5430 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5431 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5433 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5435 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5438 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5440 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5441 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5444 @item Language(s): all
5446 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5447 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5448 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5449 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5451 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5452 @item Default Value:
5454 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5455 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5459 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5461 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5462 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5465 @item Language(s): all
5466 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5467 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5468 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5469 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5472 @c ================================================== lr.type
5474 @item @code{lr.type}
5475 @findex %define lr.type
5478 @item Language(s): all
5480 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5481 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5482 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5484 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5486 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5489 @c ================================================== namespace
5491 @item @code{namespace}
5492 @findex %define namespace
5495 @item Languages(s): C++
5497 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5498 For example, if you specify:
5501 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5504 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5507 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5510 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5511 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5514 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5520 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5521 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5522 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5524 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5526 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5527 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5528 lexical analyzer function.
5529 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5530 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5531 lexical analyzer function.
5532 For example, if you specify:
5535 %define namespace "foo"
5536 %name-prefix "bar::"
5539 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5543 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5544 @item @code{parse.lac}
5545 @findex %define parse.lac
5548 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5550 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5551 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5552 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5553 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5559 @subsection %code Summary
5563 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5564 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5565 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5566 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5567 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5568 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5569 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5570 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5572 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5573 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5574 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5575 in the parser implementation.
5577 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5578 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5579 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5581 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5584 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5585 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5586 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5587 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5588 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5589 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5593 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5594 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5595 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5598 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5599 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5603 @findex %code requires
5606 @item Language(s): C, C++
5608 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5609 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5610 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5611 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5612 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5614 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5615 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5620 @findex %code provides
5623 @item Language(s): C, C++
5625 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5626 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5628 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5629 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5637 @item Language(s): C, C++
5639 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5640 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5641 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5642 parser implementation file. For example:
5651 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5655 @findex %code imports
5658 @item Language(s): Java
5660 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5662 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5663 before any class definitions.
5667 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5668 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5669 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5670 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5673 @node Multiple Parsers
5674 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5676 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5677 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5678 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5679 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5680 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5681 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5682 exported in the generated header.
5684 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5685 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5686 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5687 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5688 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5689 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5690 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5691 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5692 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5694 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5695 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5696 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5697 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5698 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5699 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5700 specifically --- more about this below.
5702 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5703 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5706 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5707 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5708 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5709 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5712 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5713 #define yyparse cparse
5714 #define yylval clval
5720 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5721 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5722 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5724 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5728 extern CSTYPE clval;
5732 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5733 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5734 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5737 /* Enabling traces. */
5739 # if defined YYDEBUG
5756 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5757 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5758 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5761 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5762 @cindex C-language interface
5765 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5766 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5767 functions that it needs to use.
5769 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5770 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5771 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5772 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5775 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5776 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5777 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5778 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5779 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5780 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5782 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5783 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5784 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5788 @node Parser Function
5789 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5792 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5793 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5794 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5795 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5796 without reading further.
5799 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5800 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5801 is due to end-of-input).
5803 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5804 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5807 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5810 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5815 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5820 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5823 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5824 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5825 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5827 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5828 @findex %parse-param
5829 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5830 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5831 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5832 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5833 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5836 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5839 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5840 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5844 Then call the parser like this:
5848 int nastiness, randomness;
5849 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5850 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5856 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5859 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5863 Using the following:
5865 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5868 Results in these signatures:
5870 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
5871 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5875 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
5876 and @code{%locations} are used:
5879 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
5880 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5883 @node Push Parser Function
5884 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5885 @findex yypush_parse
5887 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5888 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5890 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5891 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5892 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5893 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5895 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5896 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5897 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5898 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5901 @node Pull Parser Function
5902 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5903 @findex yypull_parse
5905 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5906 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5908 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5909 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5910 declaration is used.
5911 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5913 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5914 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5917 @node Parser Create Function
5918 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5919 @findex yypstate_new
5921 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5922 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5924 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5925 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5926 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5927 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5929 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5930 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5931 or 0 if no memory was available.
5932 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5936 @node Parser Delete Function
5937 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5938 @findex yypstate_delete
5940 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5941 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5943 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5944 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5945 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5946 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5948 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5949 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5950 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5954 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5956 @cindex lexical analyzer
5958 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5959 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5960 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5961 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5963 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5964 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5965 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5966 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5967 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5968 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5969 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5973 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5974 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5975 of the token it has read.
5976 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5977 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5979 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5980 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5983 @node Calling Convention
5984 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5986 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5987 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5988 signifies end-of-input.
5990 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5991 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5992 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5993 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5995 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5996 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5997 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5998 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5999 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6000 signifies end-of-input.
6002 Here is an example showing these things:
6009 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6012 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6013 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6015 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6021 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6022 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6024 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6025 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6029 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6030 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6031 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6032 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6035 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6036 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6037 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6038 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6039 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6042 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6043 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6044 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6045 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6048 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6051 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6052 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6053 strlen (token_buffer))
6054 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6055 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6060 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6061 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6065 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6068 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6069 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6070 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6071 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6077 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6078 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6083 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6084 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6085 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6086 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6087 declaration looks like this:
6100 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6105 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6106 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6111 @node Token Locations
6112 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6115 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6116 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6117 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6118 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6119 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6120 data in that variable.
6122 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6123 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6124 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6125 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6126 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6129 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6132 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6134 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6135 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6136 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6137 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6138 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6139 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6144 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6147 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6148 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6153 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6154 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6155 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6159 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6160 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6163 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6165 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6166 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6173 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6177 results in the following signature:
6180 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6184 If @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure}) is added:
6187 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6190 @node Error Reporting
6191 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6192 @cindex error reporting function
6195 @cindex syntax error
6197 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6198 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6199 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6200 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6203 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6204 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6205 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6206 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6207 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6209 @findex %error-verbose
6210 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6211 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6212 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6213 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6214 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6216 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6217 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6218 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6219 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6220 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6221 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6223 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6224 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6225 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6227 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6232 yyerror (char const *s)
6236 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6241 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6242 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6243 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6244 immediately return 1.
6246 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6247 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6248 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6249 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6250 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6252 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6253 following signature:
6256 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6260 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6261 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6262 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6263 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6264 message is always passed last.
6266 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6267 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6268 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6272 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6273 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6274 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6275 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6277 @node Action Features
6278 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6279 @cindex summary, action features
6280 @cindex action features summary
6282 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6283 are useful in actions.
6285 @deffn {Variable} $$
6286 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6287 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6290 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6291 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6292 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6295 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6296 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6297 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6298 Types of Values in Actions}.
6301 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6302 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6303 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6304 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6307 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6308 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6309 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6312 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6313 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6314 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6317 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6319 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6320 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6321 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6322 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6323 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6324 going to be reduced by this rule.
6326 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6327 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6328 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6331 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6334 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6335 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6338 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6339 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6343 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6344 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6345 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6346 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6347 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6348 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6351 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6352 @findex YYRECOVERING
6353 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6354 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6355 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6358 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6359 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6360 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6361 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6362 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6364 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6367 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6368 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6370 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6372 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6375 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6376 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6377 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6378 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6381 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6382 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6383 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6384 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6386 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6389 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6390 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6391 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6392 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6394 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6398 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6399 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6402 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6406 @c int first_line, last_line;
6407 @c int first_column, last_column;
6411 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6412 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6414 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6415 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6416 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6419 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6422 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6424 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6425 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6429 @node Internationalization
6430 @section Parser Internationalization
6431 @cindex internationalization
6437 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6438 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6439 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6440 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6441 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6442 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6443 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6444 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6447 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6448 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6449 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6454 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6455 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6456 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6457 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6458 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6462 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6467 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6468 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6469 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6470 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6471 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6472 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6473 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6474 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6475 Bison-generated parser.
6478 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6479 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6480 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6484 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6487 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6488 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6489 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6493 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6494 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6495 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6498 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6504 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6508 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6514 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6515 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6516 @cindex algorithm of parser
6519 @cindex parser stack
6520 @cindex stack, parser
6522 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6523 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6524 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6526 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6527 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6530 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6531 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6532 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6533 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6534 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6535 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6536 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6538 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6545 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6546 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6549 expr: expr '*' expr;
6553 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6560 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6561 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6563 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6564 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6565 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6567 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6570 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6571 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6572 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6573 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6574 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6575 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6576 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6577 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6578 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6579 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6583 @section Lookahead Tokens
6584 @cindex lookahead token
6586 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6587 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6588 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6589 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6590 token in order to decide what to do.
6592 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6593 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6594 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6595 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6596 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6597 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6598 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6601 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6602 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6603 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6622 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6623 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6624 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6625 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6626 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6628 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6629 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6630 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6631 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6632 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6633 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6638 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6639 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6640 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6641 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6644 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6646 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6647 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6648 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6650 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6651 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6656 "if" expr "then" stmt
6657 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6663 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6664 specific keyword tokens.
6666 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6667 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6668 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6669 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6672 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6673 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6674 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6675 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6676 contrast it with the other alternative.
6678 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6679 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6683 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6685 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6688 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6689 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6690 making these two inputs equivalent:
6693 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6695 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6698 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6699 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6700 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6701 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6702 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6703 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6704 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6705 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6707 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6708 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6709 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6710 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6712 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6713 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6714 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6715 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6716 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6719 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6720 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6721 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6737 "if" expr "then" stmt
6738 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6748 @section Operator Precedence
6749 @cindex operator precedence
6750 @cindex precedence of operators
6752 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6753 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6754 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6755 shift and when to reduce.
6758 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6759 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6760 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6761 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6762 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
6765 @node Why Precedence
6766 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6768 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6769 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6784 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6785 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6786 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6787 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6788 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6789 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6790 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6793 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6794 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6795 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6796 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6797 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6798 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6799 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6800 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6803 @cindex associativity
6804 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6805 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6806 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6807 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6808 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6809 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6810 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6811 makes right-associativity.
6813 @node Using Precedence
6814 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6819 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6820 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6821 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6822 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6823 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6824 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6825 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6828 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6829 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6830 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6831 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6832 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6834 @node Precedence Examples
6835 @subsection Precedence Examples
6837 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6845 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6846 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6847 declared with @code{'-'}:
6850 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
6855 @node How Precedence
6856 @subsection How Precedence Works
6858 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6859 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6860 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6861 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6862 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6863 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6865 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6866 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6867 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6868 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6869 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6870 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6871 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6874 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6875 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6878 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
6880 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
6881 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
6882 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6883 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
6885 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
6886 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
6887 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
6888 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
6889 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
6890 instance as follows:
6899 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
6900 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
6901 use right associativity:
6904 %right "then" "else"
6907 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
6908 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
6909 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
6910 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
6911 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
6912 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
6913 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
6915 @node Contextual Precedence
6916 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6917 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6918 @cindex unary operator precedence
6919 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6920 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6923 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6924 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6925 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6926 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6928 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6929 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6930 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6931 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6934 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6935 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6936 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6937 modifier's syntax is:
6940 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6944 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6945 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6946 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6947 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6948 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6950 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6951 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6952 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6962 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6970 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6975 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6976 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6977 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6978 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6980 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6981 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6982 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6983 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6985 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6986 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6987 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6988 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6989 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6990 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6992 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6993 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6997 @section Parser States
6998 @cindex finite-state machine
6999 @cindex parser state
7000 @cindex state (of parser)
7002 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7003 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7004 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7005 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7006 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7008 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7009 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7010 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7011 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7012 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7013 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7014 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7015 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7018 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7019 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7020 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7023 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7024 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7025 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7027 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7028 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7031 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7032 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7037 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7039 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7045 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7046 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7052 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7053 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7054 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7055 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7056 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7057 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7059 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7060 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7061 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7063 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7064 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7065 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7066 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7067 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7069 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7070 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7071 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7072 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7077 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7078 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7083 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7090 | sequence redirects
7104 | redirects redirect
7110 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7111 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7112 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7113 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7114 in infinitely many ways!
7116 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7117 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7118 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7119 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7121 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7132 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7140 | sequence redirects
7154 | redirects redirect
7159 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7160 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7161 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7162 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7163 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7166 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7167 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7169 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7170 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7171 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7172 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7173 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7178 %nonassoc "sequence"
7183 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7184 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7196 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7197 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7200 %right "word" "redirect"
7205 | sequence word %prec "word"
7206 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7211 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7212 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7213 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7215 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7221 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7224 | name_list ':' type
7240 | name ',' name_list
7245 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7246 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7247 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7248 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7252 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7254 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7255 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7256 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7258 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7259 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7260 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7261 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7262 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7263 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7264 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7267 @cindex canonical LR
7268 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7269 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7270 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7271 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7272 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7273 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7274 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7275 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7277 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7278 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7279 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7280 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7281 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7289 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7294 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7295 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7296 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7297 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7298 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7299 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7301 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7302 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7303 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7304 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7305 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7306 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7311 | name_list ':' type
7319 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7320 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7325 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7326 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7327 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7328 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7329 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7330 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7331 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7333 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7334 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7335 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7336 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7338 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7339 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7342 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7343 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7344 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7345 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7348 @node LR Table Construction
7349 @subsection LR Table Construction
7350 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7353 @cindex canonical LR
7354 @findex %define lr.type
7356 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7357 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7358 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7359 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7362 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7363 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7364 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7365 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7368 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7369 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7370 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7373 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7374 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7375 values for @var{type} are:
7378 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7380 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7383 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7387 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7391 %define lr.type ielr
7394 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7395 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7396 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7397 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7398 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7399 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7400 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7401 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7402 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7403 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7405 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7406 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7407 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7408 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7414 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7417 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7419 @cindex GLR with LALR
7420 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7421 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7422 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7423 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7424 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7425 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7426 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7427 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7428 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7429 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7431 @item Malformed grammars.
7433 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7434 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7435 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7436 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7437 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7442 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7443 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7444 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7445 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7446 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7447 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7448 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7449 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7450 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7454 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7457 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7458 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7459 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7460 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7461 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7462 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7463 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7464 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7465 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7466 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7467 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7468 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7471 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7472 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7473 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7475 @node Default Reductions
7476 @subsection Default Reductions
7477 @cindex default reductions
7478 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7481 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7482 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7483 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7484 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7485 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7487 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7488 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7491 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7493 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7494 @cindex consistent states
7495 @cindex defaulted states
7496 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7497 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7498 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7499 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7500 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7501 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7502 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7503 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7504 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7505 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7506 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7508 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7509 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7510 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7511 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7512 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7513 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7514 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7515 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7516 should already be considered closed.
7518 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7520 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7521 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7522 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7523 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7524 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7525 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7526 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7527 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7528 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7532 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7533 @c sentence from being rejected.
7534 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7535 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7536 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7537 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7538 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7539 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7542 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7543 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7544 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7545 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7546 because the accept action ends the parse.
7548 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7549 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7550 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7551 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7552 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7553 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7554 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7555 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7556 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7557 split the parse instead.
7559 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7560 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7562 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions} @var{where}
7563 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7564 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
7566 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7567 @item @code{consistent}
7568 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7571 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7572 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7577 @findex %define parse.lac
7579 @cindex lookahead correction
7581 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7582 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7583 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7584 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7585 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7586 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7587 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7588 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7589 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7591 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7592 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7593 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7594 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7595 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7597 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7598 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7599 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7600 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7602 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
7603 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7605 @item @code{none} (default)
7608 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7609 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7613 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7614 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7615 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7616 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7617 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7618 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7619 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7620 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7621 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7622 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7625 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7626 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7627 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7628 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7629 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7630 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7631 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7632 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7633 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7634 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7636 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7637 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7638 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7639 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7640 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7641 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7642 language-recognition power.
7644 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7647 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7649 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7650 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7651 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7652 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7655 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7657 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7658 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7659 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7660 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7661 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7662 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7666 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7667 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7668 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7669 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7670 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7671 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7672 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7673 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7674 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7675 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7676 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7679 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7680 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7681 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7683 @node Unreachable States
7684 @subsection Unreachable States
7685 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7686 @cindex unreachable states
7688 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7689 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7690 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7691 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7693 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7694 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7695 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7696 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7698 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states} @var{value}
7699 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7700 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7703 There are a few caveats to consider:
7706 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7708 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7709 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7710 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7711 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7712 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7713 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7715 @item Other useless states.
7717 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7718 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7719 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7720 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7721 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7722 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7723 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7726 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7727 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7729 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7730 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7731 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7733 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7734 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7735 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7736 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7737 context-free languages.
7738 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7739 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7740 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7741 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7742 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7743 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7744 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7745 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7747 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7748 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7749 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7750 parser uses the same basic
7751 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7752 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7753 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7754 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7756 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7757 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7758 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7759 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7760 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7762 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7763 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7764 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7765 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7766 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7767 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7768 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7769 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7770 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7771 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7772 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7775 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7776 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7777 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7778 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7779 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7780 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7781 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7782 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7783 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7784 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7785 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7786 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7788 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7789 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7790 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7792 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7793 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7794 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7795 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7796 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7797 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7798 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7799 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7800 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7801 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7802 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7803 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7805 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7808 @node Memory Management
7809 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7810 @cindex memory exhaustion
7811 @cindex memory management
7812 @cindex stack overflow
7813 @cindex parser stack overflow
7814 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7816 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7817 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7818 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7820 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7821 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7822 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7825 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7826 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7827 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7828 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7830 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7831 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7832 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7833 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7834 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7835 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7837 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7838 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7839 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7842 @cindex default stack limit
7843 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7847 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7848 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7849 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7850 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7851 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7853 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7855 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7856 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7857 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7858 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7859 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7860 this deficiency in a future release.
7862 @node Error Recovery
7863 @chapter Error Recovery
7864 @cindex error recovery
7865 @cindex recovery from errors
7867 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7868 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7869 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7872 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7873 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7874 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7875 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7876 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7877 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7878 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7881 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7882 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7883 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7884 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7885 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7886 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7898 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7899 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7901 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7902 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7903 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7904 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7905 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7906 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7907 applicable in the ordinary way.
7909 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7910 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7911 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7912 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7913 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7914 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7915 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7916 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7917 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7918 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7919 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7920 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7922 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7923 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7924 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7927 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7930 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7931 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7932 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7933 spurious error message:
7943 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7944 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7945 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7946 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7947 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7948 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7949 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7952 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7953 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7954 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7955 error messages resume.
7957 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7958 as any other rules can.
7961 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7962 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7963 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7964 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7967 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7968 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7969 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7971 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7973 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7974 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7975 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7976 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7977 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7979 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7980 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7981 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7982 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7985 @node Context Dependency
7986 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7988 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7989 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7990 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7991 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7995 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7996 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7997 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7998 error recovery rules must be written.
8001 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8002 neither clean nor robust.)
8004 @node Semantic Tokens
8005 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8007 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8008 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8014 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8015 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8016 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8018 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8019 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8020 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8021 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8022 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8024 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8025 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8026 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8027 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8028 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8029 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8030 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8032 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8033 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8034 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8035 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8039 typedef int foo, bar;
8043 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8044 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8050 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8051 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8053 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8054 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8055 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8056 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8057 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8062 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8063 | declarator maybeasm
8069 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8070 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8076 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8077 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8078 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8080 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8081 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8082 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8083 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8084 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8085 the syntactic context.
8087 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8088 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8089 @cindex lexical tie-in
8091 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8092 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8095 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8096 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8097 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8098 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8099 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8106 void yyerror (char const *);
8115 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8116 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8117 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8131 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8132 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8133 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8135 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8136 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8137 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8140 @node Tie-in Recovery
8141 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8143 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8144 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8146 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8147 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8148 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8149 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8154 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8156 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8160 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8161 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8162 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8163 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8164 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8166 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8168 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8169 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8170 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8176 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8182 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8183 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8184 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8185 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8187 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8188 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8189 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8190 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8191 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8192 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8195 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8198 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8200 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8201 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8202 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8204 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8205 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8206 automaton. There are several formats available:
8209 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8212 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8215 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8216 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8219 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8220 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8224 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8225 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8226 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8227 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8231 @section Understanding Your Parser
8233 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8234 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8235 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8236 tune or simply fix a parser.
8238 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8239 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8240 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8241 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8242 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8243 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8244 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8246 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8268 @command{bison} reports:
8271 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8272 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8273 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8274 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8275 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8278 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8279 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8280 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8281 interpretation is the same.
8284 @cindex token, useless
8285 @cindex useless token
8286 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8287 @cindex useless nonterminal
8288 @cindex rule, useless
8289 @cindex useless rule
8290 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8291 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8292 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8293 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8296 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8299 Terminals unused in grammar
8302 Rules useless in grammar
8307 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8310 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8311 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8312 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8313 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8317 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8332 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8336 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8349 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8354 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8360 @cindex pointed rule
8361 @cindex rule, pointed
8362 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8363 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8364 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8365 the location of the input cursor.
8370 0 $accept: . exp $end
8372 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8377 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8378 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8379 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8380 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8381 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8382 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8383 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8384 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8386 @cindex core, item set
8387 @cindex item set core
8388 @cindex kernel, item set
8389 @cindex item set core
8390 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8391 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8392 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8393 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8394 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8395 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8400 0 $accept: . exp $end
8401 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8407 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8413 In the state 1@dots{}
8420 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8424 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8425 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8426 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8427 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8432 0 $accept: exp . $end
8433 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8438 $end shift, and go to state 3
8439 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8440 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8441 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8442 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8446 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8447 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8448 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8449 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8450 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8453 @cindex accepting state
8454 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8460 0 $accept: exp $end .
8466 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8467 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8469 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8475 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8477 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8484 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8486 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8493 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8495 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8502 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8504 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8509 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8515 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8521 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8522 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8524 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8525 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8528 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8529 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8530 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8531 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8532 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8533 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8534 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8535 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8537 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8538 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8539 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8542 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8543 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8544 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8545 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8546 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8547 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8548 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8549 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8550 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8551 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8552 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8553 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8558 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8559 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8564 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8565 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8567 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8568 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8571 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8572 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8573 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8574 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8575 conflicts in the report:
8578 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8579 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8580 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8584 The remaining states are similar:
8590 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8596 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8597 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8599 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8600 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8606 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8612 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8614 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8615 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8621 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8627 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8628 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8629 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8630 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8632 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8633 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8634 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8635 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8636 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8641 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8642 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
8643 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8645 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
8646 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
8648 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8651 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8654 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8655 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8656 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8657 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8658 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8659 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8660 to help them understand LR parsers.
8662 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8663 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8664 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8665 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8666 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
8667 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
8668 parser in multiple formats}).
8671 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8682 The graphical output
8684 (see @ref{fig:graph})
8686 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
8687 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
8688 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
8691 @float Figure,fig:graph
8692 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
8693 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
8697 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8699 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8700 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8701 about transitions, for examples
8703 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8704 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8705 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8710 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8713 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8715 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8716 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8724 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8728 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8730 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8732 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8734 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8735 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8736 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8737 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8739 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8746 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8747 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8750 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8752 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8754 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8755 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8756 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8757 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8758 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8760 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
8761 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
8763 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8765 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8766 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8768 @c ================================================= XML
8771 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
8774 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
8775 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
8776 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
8777 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
8778 option @option{--graph}. However,
8779 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
8780 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
8781 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
8782 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
8783 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
8784 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
8786 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
8787 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
8788 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
8789 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
8790 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
8791 file is @file{foo.xml}.
8793 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
8794 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
8798 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
8800 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
8802 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
8805 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
8809 $ bison --print-datadir
8810 /usr/local/share/bison
8812 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
8815 @c ================================================= Tracing
8818 @section Tracing Your Parser
8821 @cindex tracing the parser
8823 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8824 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8827 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8828 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8829 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8832 @node Enabling Traces
8833 @subsection Enabling Traces
8834 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8837 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8839 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8840 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8841 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8842 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8845 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8846 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8847 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8848 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8849 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8851 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8852 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8853 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8854 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8855 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8857 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8859 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8860 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8861 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8862 this is the preferred solution.
8865 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8869 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8870 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8871 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8872 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8873 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8874 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8876 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8877 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8878 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8879 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8881 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8882 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8883 messages tell you these things:
8887 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8890 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8891 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8894 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8895 of the state stack afterward.
8898 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8899 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8900 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8901 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8902 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8903 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8904 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8905 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8906 grammar are to blame.
8908 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8909 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8910 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8911 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8912 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8915 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8917 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8918 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8919 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8920 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8921 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8922 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8924 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8925 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8926 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8929 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8931 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8933 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8936 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8937 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8938 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8939 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8942 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8943 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8944 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8945 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8946 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8947 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8949 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8950 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8951 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8952 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8953 printer will be used for them.
8955 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8956 are sent onto standard error.
8959 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8962 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8963 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8969 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8970 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8971 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8972 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8974 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8976 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8977 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8982 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8983 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8984 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8988 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8989 Shifting token '(' ()
8991 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8992 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8994 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8995 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8996 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9002 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9003 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9004 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9007 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9008 Shifting token '-' ()
9010 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9011 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9013 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9014 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9015 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9016 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9018 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9019 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9020 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9022 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9023 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9029 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9030 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9033 Next token is token ')' ()
9034 Shifting token ')' ()
9036 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9037 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9039 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9041 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9047 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9051 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9052 Shifting token '\n' ()
9054 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9055 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9058 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9061 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9064 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9069 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9070 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9071 completion of the parsing.
9074 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9075 Shifting token $end ()
9078 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9079 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9083 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9084 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9087 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9088 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9089 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9091 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9093 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9094 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9095 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9097 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9100 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9101 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9105 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9106 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9107 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9110 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9113 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9116 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9117 else if (type == NUM)
9118 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9122 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9125 @chapter Invoking Bison
9126 @cindex invoking Bison
9127 @cindex Bison invocation
9128 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9130 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9136 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9137 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9138 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9139 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9140 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9141 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9142 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9143 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9144 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9145 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9146 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9151 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9154 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9157 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9160 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9162 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9163 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9164 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9167 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9168 in alphabetical order by short options.
9169 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9170 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9174 @section Bison Options
9176 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9177 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9178 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9179 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9180 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9183 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9184 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9187 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9193 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9197 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9199 @item --print-localedir
9200 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9202 @item --print-datadir
9203 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9207 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9208 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9209 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9210 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9211 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9212 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9213 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9214 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9215 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9216 for compatibility with POSIX:
9223 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9224 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9225 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9226 this option is specified.
9228 @item -W [@var{category}]
9229 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9230 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9233 @item midrule-values
9234 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9236 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9239 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9242 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9243 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9246 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9249 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9250 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9251 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9254 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9258 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9259 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9260 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9261 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9262 no effect on the conflict report.
9265 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9267 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9268 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9274 Turn off all the warnings.
9276 Treat warnings as errors.
9279 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9280 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9281 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9283 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9284 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9285 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9288 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9289 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9290 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9291 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9292 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9293 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9298 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9301 When invoked with @option{-fcaret}, Bison will report:
9305 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9306 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9310 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9311 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9315 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9316 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9320 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9321 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9325 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
9326 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9340 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9341 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9342 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9344 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9345 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9346 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9347 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9348 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9349 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9350 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9354 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9357 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9358 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9359 definition for @var{name}.
9361 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9362 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9363 definitions for @var{name}.
9365 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9366 definitions for @var{name}.
9369 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9370 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9371 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9373 @item -L @var{language}
9374 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9375 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9376 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9377 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9378 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9381 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9383 @item -p @var{prefix}
9384 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9385 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9386 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9387 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9391 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9392 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9393 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9394 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9395 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9396 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9399 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9400 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9401 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9403 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9404 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9405 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9406 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9408 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9409 file in the Bison installation directory.
9410 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9411 current working directory.
9412 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9415 @itemx --token-table
9416 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9423 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9424 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9425 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9426 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9429 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9430 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9431 with other short options.
9433 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9434 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9435 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9436 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9438 @item -r @var{things}
9439 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9440 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9441 separated list of @var{things} among:
9445 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9449 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9450 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9453 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9454 each rule's lookahead set.
9457 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9458 precedence and associativity directives.
9461 Enable all the items.
9464 Do not generate the report.
9467 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9468 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9472 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9473 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9474 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9477 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9478 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9480 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9481 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9483 @item -g [@var{file}]
9484 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9485 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9486 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9487 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9488 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9489 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9492 @item -x [@var{file}]
9493 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9494 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9495 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9496 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9498 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9499 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9502 @node Option Cross Key
9503 @section Option Cross Key
9505 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9506 the corresponding short option and directive.
9508 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9509 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9510 @include cross-options.texi
9514 @section Yacc Library
9516 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9517 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9518 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9519 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9520 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9521 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9522 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9524 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9525 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9528 int yyerror (char const *);
9531 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9532 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9533 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9539 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9541 @node Other Languages
9542 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9545 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9546 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9550 @section C++ Parsers
9553 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9554 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9555 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9556 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9557 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9558 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9561 @node C++ Bison Interface
9562 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9563 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9567 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9568 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9569 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9570 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9572 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9574 @findex %define namespace
9575 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9576 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9577 generated in the following files:
9582 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9583 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9584 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9587 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9590 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9591 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9592 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9593 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9594 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9596 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9597 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9598 @samp{%defines} directive.
9601 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9602 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9604 @node C++ Semantic Values
9605 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9606 @c - No objects in unions
9608 @c - Printer and destructor
9610 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9611 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9612 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9613 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9614 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9617 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9618 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9619 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9621 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9622 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9623 to such objects are allowed.
9626 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9627 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9628 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9632 @node C++ Location Values
9633 @subsection C++ Location Values
9637 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9639 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9640 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9642 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9643 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9644 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9645 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9646 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9649 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9650 genuine code only the latter is used.
9653 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9654 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9655 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9659 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9661 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9662 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9663 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9667 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9668 Reset the position to the given values.
9671 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9672 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9673 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9674 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9675 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9678 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9679 The line, starting at 1.
9682 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9683 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9686 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9687 The column, starting at 1.
9690 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9691 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9694 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9695 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9696 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9697 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9698 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9701 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9702 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9703 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9706 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9707 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9708 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9709 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9713 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9715 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9716 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9719 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9720 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9721 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9724 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9725 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9728 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9729 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9730 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9733 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9734 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9735 Advance the @code{end} position.
9738 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9739 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9740 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9741 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9744 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9745 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9748 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9749 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9750 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9754 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9755 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9756 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9759 @node User Defined Location Type
9760 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9761 @findex %define api.location.type
9763 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9764 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9767 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9770 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9773 it must be copyable;
9776 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9777 parser basically runs
9779 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9780 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9783 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9786 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9787 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9790 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9791 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9796 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9797 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9798 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9799 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9804 %define namespace "master::"
9808 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9809 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9812 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9813 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9816 @node C++ Parser Interface
9817 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9818 @c - define parser_class_name
9820 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9822 @c - Reporting errors
9824 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9825 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9826 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9827 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9828 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9829 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9830 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9831 additional argument for its constructor.
9833 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9834 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9835 The types for semantics value and locations.
9838 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9839 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9840 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9841 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9842 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9843 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9846 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9847 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9848 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9851 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9852 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9855 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9856 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9857 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9860 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9861 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9862 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9866 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9867 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9868 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9869 or nonzero, full tracing.
9872 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9873 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9874 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9875 described by @var{m}.
9879 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9880 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9881 @c - prefix for yylex.
9882 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9885 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9886 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9887 @code{%define api.pure full} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9889 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9890 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9891 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9892 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9896 @node A Complete C++ Example
9897 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9899 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9900 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9901 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9902 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9903 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9904 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9905 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9906 actually easier to interface with.
9909 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9910 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9911 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9912 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9913 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9916 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9917 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9919 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9920 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9921 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9922 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9923 of valid input follows.
9927 seven := one + two * three
9931 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9932 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9934 @c - A place to store error messages
9935 @c - A place for the result
9937 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9938 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9939 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9940 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9941 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9942 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9943 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9945 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9946 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9947 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9950 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9952 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9953 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9956 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9961 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9962 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9963 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9964 factor both as follows.
9966 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9968 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9970 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9971 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9972 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9973 calcxx_driver& driver)
9974 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9979 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9982 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9984 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9989 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9991 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9997 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9998 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
10000 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10002 // Handling the scanner.
10003 void scan_begin ();
10005 bool trace_scanning;
10009 Similarly for the parser itself.
10011 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10013 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
10014 int parse (const std::string& f);
10016 bool trace_parsing;
10020 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10021 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10022 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10023 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10025 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10028 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10029 void error (const std::string& m);
10031 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10034 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10035 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10036 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10037 messages and set error state.
10039 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10041 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10042 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10044 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10045 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10047 variables["one"] = 1;
10048 variables["two"] = 2;
10051 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10056 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10060 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10061 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10062 int res = parser.parse ();
10068 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10070 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10074 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10076 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10080 @node Calc++ Parser
10081 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10083 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10084 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10085 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10086 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10089 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10091 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10092 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10094 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10098 @findex %code requires
10099 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
10100 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
10101 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
10102 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10103 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
10104 use a forward declaration of the driver.
10105 @xref{%code Summary}.
10107 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10111 class calcxx_driver;
10116 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10117 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10120 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10122 // The parsing context.
10123 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10124 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10128 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
10129 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10130 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10131 automatically propagated.
10133 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10138 // Initialize the initial location.
10139 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10144 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10145 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10148 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10155 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
10158 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10170 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10171 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10173 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10176 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10182 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10183 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
10184 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
10185 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
10186 avoid name clashes.
10188 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10190 %token END 0 "end of file"
10192 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10193 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
10198 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
10199 @code{%destructor}.
10201 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10202 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10204 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
10205 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
10207 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
10211 The grammar itself is straightforward.
10213 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10217 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10220 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10221 | assignments assignment @{@};
10224 "identifier" ":=" exp
10225 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
10229 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10230 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10231 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10232 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10233 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
10234 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
10239 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10242 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10245 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10246 const std::string& m)
10248 driver.error (l, m);
10252 @node Calc++ Scanner
10253 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10255 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10256 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10258 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10260 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10261 # include <cstdlib>
10263 # include <climits>
10265 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10266 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10268 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10269 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10270 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10271 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10273 # define yywrap() 1
10275 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10276 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10277 not of token_type. */
10278 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10283 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10284 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10285 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10286 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10288 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10290 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10294 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10296 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10298 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10304 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10305 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10306 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10307 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10308 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10309 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10310 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10312 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10316 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10323 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10324 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10328 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10329 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10330 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10331 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10333 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10336 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10338 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10339 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10341 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10346 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10347 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10348 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10350 return token::NUMBER;
10356 yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext);
10357 return token::IDENTIFIER;
10361 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10366 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10367 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10369 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10373 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10375 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10376 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10378 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10380 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10381 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10388 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10395 @node Calc++ Top Level
10396 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10398 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10400 @comment file: calc++.cc
10402 #include <iostream>
10403 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10407 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10409 calcxx_driver driver;
10410 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10411 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10412 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10413 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10414 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10415 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10416 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10422 @section Java Parsers
10425 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10426 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10427 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10428 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10429 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10430 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10431 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10432 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10435 @node Java Bison Interface
10436 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10437 @c - %language "Java"
10439 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10440 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10442 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10443 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10445 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10446 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10447 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10448 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10449 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10450 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10451 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10452 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10453 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10454 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10456 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10458 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10459 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10460 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10461 and @code{%define api.pure full} directives does not do anything when used in
10464 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10465 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10467 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10468 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10470 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10471 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10473 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10474 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10475 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10476 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10477 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10478 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10479 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10480 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10481 access the token names and codes.
10483 @node Java Semantic Values
10484 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10485 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10487 @c - Printer and destructor
10489 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10490 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10491 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10494 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10495 %type <Integer> number
10498 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10499 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10500 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10501 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10502 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10505 %define stype "ASTNode"
10509 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10510 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10512 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10513 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10514 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10515 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10516 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10517 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10519 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10520 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10521 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10523 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10524 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10525 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10528 @node Java Location Values
10529 @subsection Java Location Values
10531 @c - class Position
10532 @c - class Location
10534 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10535 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10536 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10537 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10538 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10539 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10540 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10542 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10543 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10544 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10545 be supplied by the user.
10548 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10549 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10550 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10553 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10554 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10557 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10558 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10561 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10562 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10563 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10564 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10568 @node Java Parser Interface
10569 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10570 @c - define parser_class_name
10572 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10574 @c - Reporting errors
10576 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10577 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10578 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10579 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10580 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10582 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10583 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10584 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10585 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10586 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10587 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10589 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10590 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10591 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10592 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10594 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10595 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10596 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10597 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10598 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10599 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10601 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10602 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10604 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10605 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10606 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10607 which initialize them automatically.
10609 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10610 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10612 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10613 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10614 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10618 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10619 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10620 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10622 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10623 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10624 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10627 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10628 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10629 @code{false} otherwise.
10632 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10633 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10634 from a syntax error.
10635 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10638 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10639 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10640 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10644 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10645 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10646 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10647 or nonzero, full tracing.
10651 @node Java Scanner Interface
10652 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10655 @c - Lexer interface
10657 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10658 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10659 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10660 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10662 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10663 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10664 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10665 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10668 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10669 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10670 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10671 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10674 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10676 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10677 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10678 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10679 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10682 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10683 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10684 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10687 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10688 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10691 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10692 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10693 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10694 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10695 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10697 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10698 "@var{class-name}".}
10701 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10702 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10704 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10705 "@var{class-name}".}
10709 @node Java Action Features
10710 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10712 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10713 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10715 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10716 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10719 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10720 This may not be assigned to.
10721 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10724 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10725 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10726 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10730 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10731 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10732 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10733 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10734 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10735 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10738 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10739 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10740 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10741 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10743 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10747 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10748 This may not be assigned to.
10749 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10753 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10754 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10757 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10758 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10759 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10762 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10763 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10764 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10767 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10768 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10769 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10772 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10773 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10774 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10776 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10779 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10780 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10781 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10782 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10787 @node Java Differences
10788 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10790 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10791 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10792 section summarizes these differences.
10796 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10797 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10798 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10799 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10800 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10801 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10802 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10804 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10805 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10806 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10807 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10808 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10811 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10812 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10813 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10814 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10815 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10816 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10817 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10818 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10819 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10822 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10824 @item @code{%code imports}
10825 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10826 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10827 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10829 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10830 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10832 @item @code{%code lexer}
10833 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10834 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10835 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10839 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10840 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10841 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10843 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10844 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10849 @node Java Declarations Summary
10850 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10852 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10853 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10855 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10856 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10859 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10860 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10861 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10862 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10863 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10866 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10867 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10868 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10869 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10872 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10873 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10874 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10875 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10878 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10879 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10880 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10883 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10884 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10885 a Java @emph{type}.
10886 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10889 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10890 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10891 @xref{Java Differences}.
10894 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10895 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10896 @xref{Java Differences}.
10899 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10900 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10901 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10904 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10905 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10906 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10907 @xref{Java Differences}.
10910 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10911 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10912 @xref{Java Differences}.
10915 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10916 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10917 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10920 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10921 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10922 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10925 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10926 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10927 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10930 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10931 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10933 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10936 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10937 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10938 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10939 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10942 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
10943 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10944 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10945 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10946 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
10947 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10950 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10951 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10952 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10955 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10956 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10957 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10958 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10961 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
10962 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10963 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10964 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
10965 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10968 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10969 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10970 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10973 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10974 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10975 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10978 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10979 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10980 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10983 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10984 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10985 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10986 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10990 @c ================================================= FAQ
10993 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10994 @cindex frequently asked questions
10997 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11001 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11002 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11003 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11004 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11005 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11006 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11007 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11008 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11009 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11010 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11011 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11012 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11015 @node Memory Exhausted
11016 @section Memory Exhausted
11019 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11020 message. What can I do?
11023 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11026 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11027 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11029 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11030 following typical questions:
11033 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11034 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11035 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11042 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11043 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11044 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
11047 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11048 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11049 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11050 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11051 @file{first-line.l}:
11057 #include <stdlib.h>
11061 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11065 yyparse (char const *file)
11067 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11071 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11075 /* One token only. */
11077 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11080 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11098 If the file @file{input} contains
11106 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11109 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11110 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11111 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11116 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11117 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11118 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11119 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11120 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11121 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11122 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11123 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11126 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11127 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11128 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11129 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11131 @node Strings are Destroyed
11132 @section Strings are Destroyed
11135 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11136 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11137 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11140 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11141 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11142 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11148 char *yylval = NULL;
11153 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11161 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11162 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11163 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11164 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11170 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11173 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11174 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11175 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11181 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11182 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11183 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11184 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11185 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11186 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11189 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11190 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11191 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11196 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11197 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11200 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11201 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11204 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11205 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11206 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11207 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11208 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11209 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11210 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11212 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11214 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11215 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11216 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11217 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11218 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11219 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11222 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11223 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11226 @node Multiple start-symbols
11227 @section Multiple start-symbols
11230 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11231 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11232 multiple entry points.
11235 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11236 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11237 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11238 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11242 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11249 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11250 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11252 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11253 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11254 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11255 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11256 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11257 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11258 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11259 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11262 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11267 int t = start_token;
11272 /* @r{The rules.} */
11276 @node Secure? Conform?
11277 @section Secure? Conform?
11280 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11283 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11284 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11285 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11286 please send us a bug report.
11288 @node I can't build Bison
11289 @section I can't build Bison
11292 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11293 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11297 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11298 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11299 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11300 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11301 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11302 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11303 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11306 @node Where can I find help?
11307 @section Where can I find help?
11310 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11313 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11314 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11315 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11316 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11317 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11318 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11319 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11320 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11324 @section Bug Reports
11327 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11330 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11331 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11332 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11333 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11334 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11336 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11337 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11338 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11339 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11340 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11342 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11343 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11344 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11345 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11346 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11347 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11349 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11350 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11352 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11354 @node More Languages
11355 @section More Languages
11358 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11359 favorite language here}?
11362 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11363 languages; contributions are welcome.
11366 @section Beta Testing
11369 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11372 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11373 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11374 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11375 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11376 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11377 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11378 essentially halted.
11380 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11381 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11382 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11383 systems are especially welcome.
11385 @node Mailing Lists
11386 @section Mailing Lists
11389 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11392 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11394 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11396 @node Table of Symbols
11397 @appendix Bison Symbols
11398 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11399 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11401 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11402 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11403 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11406 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11407 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11408 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11411 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11412 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11413 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
11414 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11417 @deffn {Variable} $$
11418 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11422 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11423 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11424 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11427 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11428 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11429 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
11433 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11434 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11435 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11436 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11439 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11440 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11441 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11442 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11443 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11447 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
11448 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
11449 Comments, as in C/C++.
11452 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11453 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11457 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11458 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11461 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11462 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11463 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11466 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11467 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11470 This feature is experimental.
11471 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11474 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11477 @deffn {Directive} <>
11478 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11481 This feature is experimental.
11482 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11485 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11488 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11489 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11490 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11491 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11494 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11495 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11496 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11497 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11498 @xref{%code Summary}.
11501 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11502 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11506 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11507 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11508 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11513 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11514 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11515 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11516 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11519 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11520 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11521 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11524 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11525 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11526 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11529 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11530 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11531 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11534 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11535 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11536 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11540 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11541 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11542 used in the grammar.
11545 @deffn {Symbol} error
11546 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11547 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11548 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11549 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11550 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11551 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11552 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11553 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11556 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11557 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11558 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11561 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11562 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11566 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11567 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11568 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11571 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11572 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11575 @deffn {Directive} %language
11576 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11577 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11580 @deffn {Directive} %left
11581 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11582 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11585 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11586 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11587 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11591 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11592 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11593 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11594 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11595 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11598 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11599 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11600 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11602 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11603 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11604 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11606 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11607 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11608 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11609 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11610 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11611 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11612 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11613 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11618 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11619 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11620 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11625 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11626 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11627 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11630 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11631 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11632 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11635 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11636 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11637 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11640 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11641 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11642 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11643 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11646 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11647 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11648 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11651 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11652 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11653 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11654 unreasonable usage.
11657 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11658 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11659 Require a Version of Bison}.
11662 @deffn {Directive} %right
11663 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11664 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11667 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11668 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11669 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11672 @deffn {Directive} %start
11673 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11677 @deffn {Directive} %token
11678 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11679 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11682 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11683 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11684 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11687 @deffn {Directive} %type
11688 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11689 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11692 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11693 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11694 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11698 @deffn {Directive} %union
11699 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11700 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11703 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11704 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11705 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11706 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11707 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11709 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11713 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11714 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11715 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11716 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11718 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11722 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11723 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11724 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11727 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11728 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11729 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11730 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11731 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11734 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11735 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11736 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11739 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11740 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11741 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11744 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11745 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11746 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11747 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11750 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11751 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11752 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11755 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11756 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11757 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11758 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11759 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11760 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11762 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11766 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11767 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11768 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11769 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11772 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11773 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11774 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11775 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11776 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11777 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11778 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11781 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11782 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11783 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11786 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11787 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11788 @xref{Memory Management}.
11791 @deffn {Function} yylex
11792 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11793 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11797 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11798 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11799 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11800 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11801 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11804 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11805 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11806 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11807 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11809 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11811 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11812 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11813 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11816 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11817 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11818 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11821 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11822 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11823 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11824 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11826 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11827 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11828 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11831 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11832 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11836 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11837 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11838 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11839 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11840 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11843 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11844 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11845 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11848 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11849 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11850 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11851 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11854 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11855 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11856 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11857 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11858 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11859 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11860 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11863 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11864 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11865 call this function to create a new parser.
11866 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11867 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11868 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11869 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11872 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11873 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11874 parse the rest of the input stream.
11875 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11876 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11877 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11878 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11881 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11882 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11883 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11884 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11885 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11886 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11889 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11890 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11891 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11892 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11893 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11896 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11897 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11898 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11899 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11902 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11903 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11904 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11905 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11906 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11907 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11908 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11910 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11911 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11912 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11913 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11914 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11915 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11916 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11919 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11920 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11921 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11929 @item Accepting state
11930 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11931 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11932 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
11934 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11935 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11936 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11937 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11938 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11940 @item Consistent state
11941 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11943 @item Context-free grammars
11944 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11945 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11946 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11947 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11950 @item Default reduction
11951 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11952 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11953 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11954 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11957 @item Defaulted state
11958 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11960 @item Dynamic allocation
11961 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11962 compile time or on entry to a function.
11965 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11966 character string of length zero.
11968 @item Finite-state stack machine
11969 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11970 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11971 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11972 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11973 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11974 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11976 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11977 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11978 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11979 deterministic parsing
11980 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11981 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11982 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11986 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11987 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11988 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11990 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11991 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11992 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11993 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11994 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11995 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11996 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11997 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11998 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11999 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12001 @item Infix operator
12002 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12003 performs some operation.
12006 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12008 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12009 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12010 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12011 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12012 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12013 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12014 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12016 @item Language construct
12017 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12018 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12019 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12021 @item Left associativity
12022 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12023 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12024 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12026 @item Left recursion
12027 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12028 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12031 @item Left-to-right parsing
12032 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12033 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12035 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12036 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12037 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12039 @item Lexical tie-in
12040 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12041 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12043 @item Literal string token
12044 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12046 @item Lookahead token
12047 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12051 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12052 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12053 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12056 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12057 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12059 @item Nonterminal symbol
12060 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12061 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12062 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12065 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12066 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12069 @item Postfix operator
12070 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12071 performs some operation.
12074 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12075 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12079 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12080 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12081 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12083 @item Reverse polish notation
12084 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12086 @item Right recursion
12087 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12088 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12092 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12093 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12094 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12097 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12098 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12099 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12101 @item Single-character literal
12102 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12103 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12106 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12107 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12108 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12109 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12112 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12113 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12114 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12117 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12118 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12121 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12122 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12123 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12124 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12126 @item Terminal symbol
12127 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12128 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12129 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12131 @item Unreachable state
12132 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12133 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12134 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12137 @node Copying This Manual
12138 @appendix Copying This Manual
12142 @unnumbered Bibliography
12146 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12147 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12148 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12149 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12151 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12152 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12153 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12154 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12155 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12157 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12158 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12159 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12160 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12161 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12163 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12164 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12165 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12166 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12167 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12170 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12171 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12172 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12175 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12176 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12177 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12178 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12181 @node Index of Terms
12182 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12188 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12189 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12190 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12191 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12192 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12193 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12194 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12195 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12196 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12197 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12198 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12199 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12200 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12201 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12202 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12203 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12204 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12205 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12206 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12207 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12208 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12209 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12210 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12211 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12212 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12213 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12214 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12215 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12216 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12217 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12218 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12219 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12220 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12221 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12222 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12223 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12224 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12225 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12226 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12227 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12228 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12229 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12230 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12231 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12232 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12233 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12234 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12235 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12236 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12237 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12238 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12239 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12240 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12241 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12242 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12243 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12244 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12245 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12247 @c Local Variables:
12248 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"