1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
283 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
287 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
288 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
289 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
290 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
292 Handling Context Dependencies
294 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
295 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
296 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
297 error recovery rules must be written.
299 Debugging Your Parser
301 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
302 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
303 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
304 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
308 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
309 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
310 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
314 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
315 in alphabetical order by short options.
316 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
317 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
319 Parsers Written In Other Languages
321 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
322 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
326 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
327 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
328 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
329 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
330 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
331 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
335 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
336 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
337 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
339 A Complete C++ Example
341 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
342 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
343 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
344 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
345 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
349 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
350 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
351 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
352 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
353 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
354 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
355 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
356 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
358 Frequently Asked Questions
360 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
361 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
362 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
363 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
364 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
365 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
366 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
367 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
368 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
369 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
370 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
371 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
375 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
381 @unnumbered Introduction
384 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
385 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
386 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
387 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
388 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
389 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
390 calculators to complex programming languages.
392 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
393 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
394 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
395 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
396 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
399 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
400 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
401 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
402 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
405 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
406 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
407 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
408 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
409 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
410 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
413 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
416 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
418 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
419 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
420 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
421 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
422 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
424 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
426 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
427 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
428 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
429 License to all of the Bison source code.
431 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
432 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
433 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
434 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
435 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
436 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
437 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
439 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
440 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
441 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
442 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
443 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
444 using the other GNU tools.
446 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
447 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
448 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
449 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
453 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
454 @include gpl-3.0.texi
457 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
459 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
460 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
461 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
464 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
465 as mathematical ideas.
466 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
467 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
468 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
469 the name of an identifier, etc.).
470 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
471 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
472 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
473 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
474 how is the output used?
475 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
476 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
479 @node Language and Grammar
480 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
482 @cindex context-free grammar
483 @cindex grammar, context-free
484 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
485 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
486 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
487 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
488 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
489 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
490 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
491 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
495 @cindex Backus-Naur form
496 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
497 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
498 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
499 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
500 essentially machine-readable BNF.
502 @cindex LALR grammars
503 @cindex IELR grammars
505 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
506 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
507 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
508 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
509 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
510 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
511 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
512 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
513 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
514 Construction}, to learn how.
517 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
518 @cindex ambiguous grammars
519 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
521 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
522 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
523 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
524 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
525 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
526 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
527 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
528 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
529 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
530 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
531 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
532 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
533 possible parses of any given string is finite.
535 @cindex symbols (abstract)
537 @cindex syntactic grouping
538 @cindex grouping, syntactic
539 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
540 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
541 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
542 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
543 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
544 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
545 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
547 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
548 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
549 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
550 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
551 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
552 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
553 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
554 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
555 lexicography, not grammar.)
557 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
560 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
561 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
562 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
563 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
564 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
565 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
566 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
569 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
570 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
571 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
572 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
573 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
574 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
575 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
576 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
578 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
579 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
580 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
581 reads informally as follows:
584 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
589 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
593 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
594 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
595 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
596 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
599 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
600 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
601 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
602 not the start symbol.
604 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
605 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
606 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
607 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
608 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
609 reports a syntax error.
611 @node Grammar in Bison
612 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
613 @cindex Bison grammar
614 @cindex grammar, Bison
615 @cindex formal grammar
617 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
618 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
619 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
621 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
622 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
623 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
625 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
626 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
627 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
628 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
629 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
630 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
631 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
634 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
635 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
636 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
637 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
639 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
640 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
642 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
643 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
644 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
645 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
649 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
653 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
655 @node Semantic Values
656 @section Semantic Values
657 @cindex semantic value
658 @cindex value, semantic
660 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
661 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
662 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
663 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
664 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
667 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
668 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
669 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
670 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
671 ,Defining Language Semantics},
674 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
675 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
676 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
677 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
680 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
681 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
682 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
683 need to have any semantic value.)
685 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
686 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
687 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
688 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
689 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
690 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
692 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
693 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
694 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
695 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
696 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
698 @node Semantic Actions
699 @section Semantic Actions
700 @cindex semantic actions
701 @cindex actions, semantic
703 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
704 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
705 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
706 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
709 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
710 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
711 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
712 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
713 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
714 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
715 newly recognized larger expression.
717 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
721 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
725 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
726 from the values of the two subexpressions.
729 @section Writing GLR Parsers
731 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
734 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
735 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
737 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
738 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
739 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
740 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
741 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
742 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
743 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
744 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
745 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
747 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
748 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
749 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
750 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
751 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
752 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
753 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
754 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
755 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
756 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
757 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
758 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
759 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
760 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
761 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
762 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
763 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
764 identical set of symbols.
766 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
767 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
768 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
769 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
770 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
771 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
772 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
773 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
774 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
778 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
779 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
780 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
781 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
782 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
785 @node Simple GLR Parsers
786 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
787 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
788 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
792 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
793 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
795 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
796 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
797 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
799 Consider a problem that
800 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
801 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
804 type subrange = lo .. hi;
805 type enum = (a, b, c);
809 The original language standard allows only numeric
810 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
811 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
812 10206) and many other
813 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
814 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
818 type subrange = (a) .. b;
822 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
823 type with only one value:
830 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
831 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
833 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
834 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
835 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
836 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
837 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
838 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
839 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
840 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
842 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
843 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
844 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
845 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
848 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
849 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
850 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
851 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
852 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
853 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
856 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
857 use the GLR algorithm.
858 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
859 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
860 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
861 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
862 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
863 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
864 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
865 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
866 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
868 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
869 reports a syntax error as usual.
871 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
872 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
873 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
874 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
875 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
877 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
878 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
879 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
880 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
881 The present example contains only one conflict between two
882 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
883 cannot be nested. So the number of
884 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
885 and the parsing time is still linear.
887 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
888 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
891 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
901 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
930 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
931 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
932 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
933 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
940 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
941 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
942 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
951 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
952 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
953 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
954 notice when the parser splits.
956 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
957 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
958 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
959 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
960 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
961 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
962 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
963 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
964 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
965 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
966 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
967 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
968 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
971 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
972 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
973 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
974 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
975 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
976 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
978 @node Merging GLR Parses
979 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
980 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
981 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
985 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
987 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
992 #define YYSTYPE char const *
994 void yyerror (char const *);
1008 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1017 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1018 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1019 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1020 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1021 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1025 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1026 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1027 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1028 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1032 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1033 | '(' declarator ')'
1038 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1039 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1046 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1047 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1048 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1049 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1050 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1051 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1052 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1053 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1054 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1055 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1056 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1057 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1058 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1059 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1061 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1062 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1063 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1064 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1065 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1066 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1067 The parser therefore prints
1070 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1073 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1074 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1081 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1082 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1083 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1084 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1085 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1086 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1087 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1088 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1089 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1090 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1096 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1097 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1098 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1099 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1104 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1105 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1110 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1114 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1122 with an accompanying forward declaration
1123 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1127 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1128 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1133 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1134 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1137 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1140 Bison requires that all of the
1141 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1142 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1143 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1144 the offending merge.
1146 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1147 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1149 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1150 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1152 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1153 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1154 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1155 the associated reduction.
1156 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1157 action in a GLR parser.
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1162 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1164 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1165 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1166 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1167 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1168 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1169 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1170 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1171 influence syntax analysis.
1172 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1175 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1176 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1177 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1178 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1179 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1180 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1181 future versions of Bison.
1182 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1183 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1184 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1186 @subsubsection YYERROR
1188 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1189 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1190 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1191 initiate error recovery.
1192 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1193 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1194 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1195 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1196 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1197 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1198 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1199 the parse that invoked the test.
1201 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1202 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1203 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1206 @node Semantic Predicates
1207 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1209 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1211 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1213 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1214 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1215 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1216 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1220 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1221 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1226 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1227 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1228 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1229 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1230 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1231 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1232 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1234 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1235 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1236 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1237 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1240 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1241 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1242 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1246 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1247 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1248 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1249 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1254 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1255 false). However, this
1256 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1257 have overlapping syntax.
1258 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1259 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1260 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1261 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1264 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1265 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1267 @node Compiler Requirements
1268 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1269 @cindex @code{inline}
1270 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1272 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1273 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1274 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1275 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1276 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1277 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1286 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1290 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1291 && ! defined inline)
1300 @cindex textual location
1301 @cindex location, textual
1303 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1304 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1305 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1306 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1308 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1309 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1310 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1311 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1314 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1315 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1316 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1319 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1320 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1321 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1322 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1323 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1324 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1325 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1328 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1329 @cindex Bison parser
1330 @cindex Bison utility
1331 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1334 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1335 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1336 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1337 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1338 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1339 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1340 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1343 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1344 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1345 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1348 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1349 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1350 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1351 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1352 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1353 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1354 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1356 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1357 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1358 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1359 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1360 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1361 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1362 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1363 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1364 C-Language Interface}.
1366 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1367 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1368 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1369 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1370 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1371 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1372 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1373 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1374 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1375 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1376 anything other than their usual meanings.
1378 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1379 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1380 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1381 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1382 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1383 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1384 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1385 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1386 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1389 @section Stages in Using Bison
1390 @cindex stages in using Bison
1393 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1394 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1398 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1399 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1400 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1401 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1402 sequence of C statements.
1405 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1406 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1407 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1408 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1411 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1414 Write error-reporting routines.
1417 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1418 must follow these steps:
1422 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1425 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1428 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1431 @node Grammar Layout
1432 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1433 @cindex grammar file
1435 @cindex format of grammar file
1436 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1438 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1439 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1446 @var{Bison declarations}
1455 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1456 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1458 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1459 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1460 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1461 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1462 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1463 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1465 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1466 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1467 semantic values of various symbols.
1469 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1472 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1473 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1474 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1478 @cindex simple examples
1479 @cindex examples, simple
1481 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1482 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1483 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1484 and a multi-function calculator. All
1485 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1487 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1488 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1489 source file to try them.
1492 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1493 a first example with no operator precedence.
1494 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1495 Operator precedence is introduced.
1496 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1497 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1498 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1499 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1500 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1504 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1505 @cindex reverse polish notation
1506 @cindex polish notation calculator
1507 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1508 @cindex calculator, simple
1510 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1511 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1512 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1513 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1515 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1516 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1519 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1520 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1521 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1522 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1523 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1524 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1525 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1528 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1529 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1531 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1532 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1534 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1536 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1539 #define YYSTYPE double
1543 void yyerror (char const *);
1548 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1551 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1552 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1554 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1555 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1556 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1557 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1558 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1559 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1560 which is a floating point number.
1562 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1563 function @code{pow}.
1565 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1566 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1567 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1568 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1571 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1572 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1573 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1574 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1575 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1576 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1577 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1578 type for numeric constants.
1581 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1583 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1585 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1597 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1604 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1605 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1606 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1607 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1608 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1609 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1615 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1616 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1617 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1618 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1619 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1622 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1623 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1624 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1626 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1627 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1628 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1629 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1630 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1631 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1634 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1635 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1636 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1640 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1642 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1651 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1652 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1653 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1654 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1655 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1657 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1658 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1659 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1660 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1661 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1662 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1664 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1665 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1666 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1667 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1670 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1671 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1672 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1675 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1677 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1682 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1686 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1687 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1688 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1689 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1690 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1691 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1692 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1694 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1695 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1696 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1697 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1698 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1701 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1703 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1704 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1705 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1706 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1711 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1712 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1717 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1718 equally well have written them separately:
1722 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1723 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1727 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1728 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1729 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1730 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1731 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1732 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1733 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1734 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1736 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1737 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1738 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1740 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1741 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1745 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1749 means the same thing as this:
1754 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1760 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1763 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1764 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1765 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1767 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1768 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1769 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1770 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1772 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1774 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1775 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1776 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1777 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1779 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1780 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1781 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1782 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1783 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1784 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1785 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1786 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1787 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1789 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1790 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1791 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1792 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1793 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1795 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1796 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1798 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1800 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1803 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1804 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1805 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1806 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1817 /* Skip white space. */
1818 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1822 /* Process numbers. */
1823 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1826 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1831 /* Return end-of-input. */
1834 /* Return a single char. */
1841 @subsection The Controlling Function
1842 @cindex controlling function
1843 @cindex main function in simple example
1845 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1846 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1847 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1849 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1861 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1862 @cindex error reporting routine
1864 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1865 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1866 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1867 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1868 here is the definition we will use:
1870 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1877 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1879 yyerror (char const *s)
1881 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1886 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1887 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1888 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1889 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1890 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1891 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1893 @node Rpcalc Generate
1894 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1895 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1897 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1898 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1899 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1900 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1901 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1902 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1904 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1905 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1907 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1908 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1915 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1916 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1917 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1918 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1919 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1920 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1921 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1923 @node Rpcalc Compile
1924 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1925 @cindex compiling the parser
1927 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1931 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1933 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1937 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1938 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1939 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1943 # @r{List files again.}
1945 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1949 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1950 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1956 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1958 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1961 @result{} -3.166666667
1962 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1964 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1969 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1970 @cindex infix notation calculator
1972 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1974 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1975 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1976 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1977 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1980 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1984 #define YYSTYPE double
1988 void yyerror (char const *);
1993 /* Bison declarations. */
1997 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1998 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2001 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2012 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2019 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2020 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2021 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2022 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2023 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2024 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2025 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2032 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2035 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2037 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2038 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2039 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2040 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2041 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2042 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2043 the associativity/precedence.)
2045 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2046 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2047 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2048 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2049 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2050 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2053 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2054 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2055 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2056 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2057 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2059 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2064 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2072 @node Simple Error Recovery
2073 @section Simple Error Recovery
2074 @cindex error recovery, simple
2076 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2077 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2078 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2079 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2080 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2081 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2083 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2084 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2085 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2091 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2092 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2097 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2098 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2099 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2100 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2101 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2102 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2103 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2104 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2107 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2108 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2109 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2110 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2111 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2112 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2115 @node Location Tracking Calc
2116 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2117 @cindex location tracking calculator
2118 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2119 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2121 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2122 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2123 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2124 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2128 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2129 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2130 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2133 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2134 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2136 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2137 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2140 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2146 void yyerror (char const *);
2149 /* Bison declarations. */
2157 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2161 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2162 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2163 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2164 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2165 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2166 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2167 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2171 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2173 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2174 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2175 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2176 from the new information.
2178 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2179 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2192 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2199 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2200 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2201 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2211 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2212 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2213 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2218 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2219 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2220 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2224 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2225 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2226 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2228 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2229 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2230 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2231 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2232 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2233 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2237 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2239 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2240 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2241 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2244 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2245 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2256 /* Skip white space. */
2257 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2258 ++yylloc.last_column;
2263 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2264 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2268 /* Process numbers. */
2272 ++yylloc.last_column;
2273 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2275 ++yylloc.last_column;
2276 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2283 /* Return end-of-input. */
2288 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2292 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2295 ++yylloc.last_column;
2301 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2302 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2303 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2304 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2306 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2307 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2308 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2309 controlling function:
2316 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2317 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2323 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2324 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2325 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2327 @node Multi-function Calc
2328 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2329 @cindex multi-function calculator
2330 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2331 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2333 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2334 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2335 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2336 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2337 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2339 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2340 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2341 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2342 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2343 functions whose syntax has this form:
2346 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2350 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2351 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2352 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2357 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2358 @result{} 3.1415926536
2362 @result{} 0.0000000000
2364 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2365 @result{} 2.3000000000
2367 @result{} 2.3000000000
2369 @result{} 0.8329091229
2370 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2371 @result{} 2.3000000000
2375 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2378 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2379 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2380 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2381 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2382 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2385 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2386 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2388 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2390 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2394 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2395 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2396 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2398 void yyerror (char const *);
2404 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2405 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2408 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2409 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2416 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2417 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2421 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2422 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2423 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2425 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2426 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2427 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2428 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2430 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2431 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2432 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2433 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2434 between angle brackets).
2436 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2437 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2438 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2439 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2440 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2441 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2444 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2446 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2447 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2448 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2450 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2452 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2463 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2464 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2471 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2472 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2473 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2474 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2475 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2476 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2477 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2478 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2479 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2480 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2483 /* End of grammar. */
2487 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2488 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2489 @cindex symbol table example
2491 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2492 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2493 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2494 requires some additional C functions for support.
2496 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2497 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2498 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2500 @comment file: calc.h
2503 /* Function type. */
2504 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2508 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2511 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2512 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2515 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2516 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2518 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2523 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2525 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2526 extern symrec *sym_table;
2528 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2529 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2533 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2536 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2542 double (*fnct) (double);
2547 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2560 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2565 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2571 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2573 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2574 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2580 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2581 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2583 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2584 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2585 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2586 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2587 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2588 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2590 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2592 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2593 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2597 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2599 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2600 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2601 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2602 ptr->type = sym_type;
2603 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2604 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2612 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2615 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2616 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2617 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2625 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2627 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2628 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2629 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2630 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2632 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2633 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2634 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2635 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2636 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2637 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2639 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2640 operators in @code{yylex}.
2642 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2654 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2655 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2663 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2664 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2667 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2673 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2676 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2677 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2678 static size_t length = 40;
2679 static char *symbuf = 0;
2684 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2690 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2694 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2696 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2698 /* Get another character. */
2703 while (isalnum (c));
2710 s = getsym (symbuf);
2712 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2717 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2724 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2726 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2727 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2728 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2730 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2733 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2735 yyerror (char const *s)
2737 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2743 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2746 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2747 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2748 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2756 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2757 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2758 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2766 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2769 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2770 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2771 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2774 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2775 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2779 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2781 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2782 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2784 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2785 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2788 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2789 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2790 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2791 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2792 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2793 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2794 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2795 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2796 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2799 @node Grammar Outline
2800 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2802 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2803 appropriate delimiters:
2810 @var{Bison declarations}
2819 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2820 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2821 continues until end of line.
2824 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2825 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2826 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2827 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2828 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2832 @subsection The prologue
2833 @cindex declarations section
2835 @cindex declarations
2837 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2838 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2839 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2840 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2841 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2842 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2843 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2845 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2846 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2849 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2850 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2851 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2852 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2853 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2854 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2855 @code{%union} declaration.
2866 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2870 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2871 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2877 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2878 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2879 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2880 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2881 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2882 @code{#include} directives.
2884 @node Prologue Alternatives
2885 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2886 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2889 @findex %code requires
2890 @findex %code provides
2893 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2894 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2895 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2896 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2897 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2898 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2899 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2901 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2912 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2916 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2917 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2924 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2925 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2926 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2927 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2928 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2929 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2930 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2931 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2932 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2933 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2934 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2936 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2937 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2938 This behavior raises a few questions.
2939 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2940 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2941 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2942 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2943 This behavior is not intuitive.
2945 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2946 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2947 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2948 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2955 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2956 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2959 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2960 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2972 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2976 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2977 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2978 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2985 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2986 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2987 explicit which kind you intend.
2988 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2990 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2991 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2992 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2993 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2994 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2995 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2996 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2997 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2998 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3001 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3002 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3004 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3022 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3028 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3029 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3042 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3043 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3044 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3052 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3053 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3054 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3055 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3056 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3057 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3059 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3060 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3061 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3062 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3063 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3064 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3065 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3066 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3067 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3068 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3069 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3072 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3073 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3074 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3075 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3076 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3077 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3078 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3079 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3080 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3081 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3099 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3105 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3106 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3119 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3125 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3126 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3134 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3135 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3136 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3139 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3140 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3141 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3142 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3143 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3144 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3147 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3148 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3149 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3150 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3152 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3153 organize your grammar file.
3154 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3159 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3160 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3161 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3162 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3166 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3167 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3168 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3169 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3174 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3175 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3177 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3179 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3180 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3181 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3182 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3184 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3185 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3186 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3187 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3188 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3189 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3190 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3191 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3194 @node Bison Declarations
3195 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3196 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3197 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3199 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3200 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3201 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3202 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3205 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3206 @cindex grammar rules section
3207 @cindex rules section for grammar
3209 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3210 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3212 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3213 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3214 if it is the first thing in the file.
3217 @subsection The epilogue
3218 @cindex additional C code section
3220 @cindex C code, section for additional
3222 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3223 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3224 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3225 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3226 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3227 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3228 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3229 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3230 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3231 C-Language Interface}.
3233 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3234 from the grammar rules.
3236 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3237 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3238 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3239 of the grammar file.
3242 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3243 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3244 @cindex terminal symbol
3248 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3251 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3252 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3253 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3254 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3255 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3256 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3257 the symbol to stand for it.
3259 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3260 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3261 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3263 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3264 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3265 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3266 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3267 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3268 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3269 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3271 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3275 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3276 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3277 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3278 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3281 @cindex character token
3282 @cindex literal token
3283 @cindex single-character literal
3284 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3285 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3286 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3287 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3288 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3289 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3290 ,Operator Precedence}).
3292 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3293 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3294 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3295 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3296 your program will confuse other readers.
3298 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3299 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3300 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3301 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3302 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3303 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3307 @cindex string token
3308 @cindex literal string token
3309 @cindex multicharacter literal
3310 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3311 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3312 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3313 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3314 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3316 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3317 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3318 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3319 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3320 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3322 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3324 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3325 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3326 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3327 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3328 read your program will be confused.
3330 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3331 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3332 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3333 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3334 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3335 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3338 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3339 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3340 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3342 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3343 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3344 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3345 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3346 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3347 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3348 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3349 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3350 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3351 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3352 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3353 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3355 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3356 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3357 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3358 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3359 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3361 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3362 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3363 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3364 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3365 characters in the following C-language string:
3368 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3371 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3372 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3373 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3374 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3375 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3376 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3377 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3378 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3379 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3380 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3383 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3384 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3385 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3386 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3387 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3390 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3392 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3393 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3395 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3399 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3404 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3405 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3406 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3417 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3418 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3420 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3421 extra white space as you wish.
3423 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3424 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3427 @{@var{C statements}@}
3432 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3433 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3434 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3435 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3436 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3437 compiler can check it.
3439 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3440 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3441 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3442 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3443 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3444 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3445 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3446 character constants.
3448 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3452 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3453 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3458 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3459 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3466 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3468 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3469 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3470 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3489 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3493 @section Recursive Rules
3494 @cindex recursive rule
3496 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3497 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3498 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3499 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3500 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3511 @cindex left recursion
3512 @cindex right recursion
3514 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3515 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3516 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3528 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3529 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3530 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3531 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3532 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3533 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3534 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3537 @cindex mutual recursion
3538 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3539 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3540 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3549 | primary '+' primary
3562 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3566 @section Defining Language Semantics
3567 @cindex defining language semantics
3568 @cindex language semantics, defining
3570 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3571 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3572 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3574 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3575 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3576 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3577 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3580 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3581 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3582 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3583 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3584 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3585 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3586 action in the middle of a rule.
3590 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3591 @cindex semantic value type
3592 @cindex value type, semantic
3593 @cindex data types of semantic values
3594 @cindex default data type
3596 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3597 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3598 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3599 Notation Calculator}).
3601 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3602 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3603 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3606 #define YYSTYPE double
3610 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3611 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3612 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3613 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3615 @node Multiple Types
3616 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3618 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3619 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3620 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3621 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3624 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3625 requires you to do two things:
3629 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3630 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3631 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3632 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3636 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3637 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3638 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3639 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3640 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3649 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3651 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3652 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3653 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3654 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3656 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3657 placed at any position in the rule;
3658 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3659 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3660 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3661 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3663 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3664 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3665 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3666 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3667 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3668 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3669 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3670 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3671 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3672 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3675 Here is a typical example:
3681 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3685 Or, in terms of named references:
3691 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3696 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3697 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3698 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3699 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3700 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3701 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3703 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3704 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3705 referred to as @code{$2}.
3707 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3708 references construct.
3710 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3711 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3712 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3713 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3714 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3718 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3722 @cindex default action
3723 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3724 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3725 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3726 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3727 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3728 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3730 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3731 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3732 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3733 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3734 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3739 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3740 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3746 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3751 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3752 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3753 definition of @code{foo}.
3756 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3757 any, from a semantic action.
3758 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3759 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3762 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3763 @cindex action data types
3764 @cindex data types in actions
3766 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3767 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3769 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3770 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3771 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3772 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3773 in the rule. In this example,
3779 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3784 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3785 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3786 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3787 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3789 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3790 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3791 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3803 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3804 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3806 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3807 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3808 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3809 @cindex mid-rule actions
3811 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3812 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3813 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3815 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3816 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3817 it is run before they are parsed.
3819 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3820 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3821 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3822 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3825 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3826 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3827 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3828 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3829 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3830 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3832 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3833 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3834 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3835 at the end of the rule.
3837 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3838 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3839 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3840 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3841 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3842 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3848 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3850 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3855 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3856 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3857 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3858 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3859 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3860 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3861 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3862 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3864 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3865 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3866 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3867 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3868 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3871 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3872 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3873 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3874 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3875 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3877 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3878 Discarded Symbols}).
3879 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3880 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3882 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3883 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3888 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3902 $$ = push_context ();
3903 declare_variable ($3);
3910 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3911 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3912 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3914 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3915 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3916 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3917 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3918 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3924 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3925 | '@{' statements '@}'
3931 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3936 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3937 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3940 | '@{' statements '@}'
3946 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3947 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3948 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3949 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3950 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3951 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3953 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3954 actions into the two rules, like this:
3959 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3960 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3961 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3962 '@{' statements '@}'
3968 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3969 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3971 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3972 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3973 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3978 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3979 declarations statements '@}'
3980 | '@{' statements '@}'
3986 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3987 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3989 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3990 serves as a subroutine:
3995 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4001 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4002 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4008 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4009 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4011 @node Tracking Locations
4012 @section Tracking Locations
4014 @cindex textual location
4015 @cindex location, textual
4017 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4018 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4019 especially symbol locations.
4021 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4022 actions to take when rules are matched.
4025 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4026 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4027 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4031 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4032 @cindex data type of locations
4033 @cindex default location type
4035 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4036 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4038 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4039 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4040 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4041 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4045 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4054 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4055 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4056 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4057 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4058 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4060 @node Actions and Locations
4061 @subsection Actions and Locations
4062 @cindex location actions
4063 @cindex actions, location
4066 @vindex @@@var{name}
4067 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4069 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4070 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4072 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4073 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4074 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4075 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4076 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4079 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4080 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4081 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4082 references construct.
4084 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4092 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4093 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4094 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4095 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4102 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4103 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4104 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4110 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4111 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4112 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4115 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4116 example above simply rewrites this way:
4130 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4131 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4132 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4139 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4140 from a semantic action.
4141 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4142 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4144 @node Location Default Action
4145 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4146 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4147 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4149 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4150 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4151 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4152 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4153 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4154 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4155 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4156 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4159 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4160 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4162 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4163 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4164 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4165 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4166 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4167 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4168 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4169 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4170 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4171 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4173 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4177 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4181 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4182 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4183 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4184 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4188 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4189 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4190 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4191 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4198 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4199 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4200 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4202 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4206 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4207 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4210 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4211 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4212 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4213 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4216 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4217 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4218 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4219 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4222 @node Named References
4223 @section Named References
4224 @cindex named references
4226 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4227 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4228 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4229 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4230 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4231 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4233 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4234 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4235 used as named references. For example:
4239 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4240 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4245 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4249 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4250 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4255 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4261 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4264 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4267 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4272 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4273 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4274 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4277 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4278 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4283 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4284 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4285 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4288 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4289 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4295 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4296 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4299 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4300 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4304 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4305 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4306 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4307 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4308 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4309 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4310 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4312 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4316 @section Bison Declarations
4317 @cindex declarations, Bison
4318 @cindex Bison declarations
4320 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4321 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4324 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4325 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4326 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4327 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4329 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4330 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4331 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4332 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4335 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4336 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4337 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4338 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4339 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4340 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4341 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4342 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4343 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4344 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4345 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4346 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4347 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4348 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4349 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4353 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4354 @cindex version requirement
4355 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4358 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4359 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4363 %require "@var{version}"
4367 @subsection Token Type Names
4368 @cindex declaring token type names
4369 @cindex token type names, declaring
4370 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4373 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4379 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4380 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4381 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4383 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4384 @code{%precedence}, or
4385 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4386 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4389 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4390 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4391 following the token name:
4395 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4399 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4400 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4401 with each other or with normal characters.
4403 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4404 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4405 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4406 Than One Value Type}).
4412 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4416 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4420 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4421 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4422 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4429 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4430 equivalent literal string tokens:
4433 %token <operator> OR "||"
4434 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4439 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4440 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4441 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4442 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4443 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4444 the literal string instead of the token name.
4446 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4447 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4451 %token END 0 "end of file"
4454 @node Precedence Decl
4455 @subsection Operator Precedence
4456 @cindex precedence declarations
4457 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4458 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4460 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4461 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4462 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4463 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4464 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4465 operator precedence.
4467 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4468 @code{%token}: either
4471 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4478 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4481 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4482 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4483 all the @var{symbols}:
4487 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4488 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4489 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4490 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4491 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4492 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4493 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4494 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4495 considered a syntax error.
4497 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4498 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4499 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4502 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4503 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4504 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4505 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4506 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4509 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4510 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4511 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4512 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4517 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4518 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4522 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4523 @cindex declaring value types
4524 @cindex value types, declaring
4527 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4528 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4529 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4544 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4545 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4546 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4547 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4549 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4550 @code{union}. For example:
4562 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4563 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4566 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4567 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4568 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4570 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4571 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4573 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4574 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4575 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4576 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4584 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4589 and then your grammar can use the following
4590 instead of @code{%union}:
4603 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4604 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4605 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4609 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4610 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4611 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4614 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4618 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4619 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4620 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4621 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4622 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4625 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4626 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4627 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4628 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4630 @node Initial Action Decl
4631 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4632 @findex %initial-action
4634 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4635 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4638 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4639 @findex %initial-action
4640 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4641 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4642 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4643 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4646 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4649 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4652 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4657 @node Destructor Decl
4658 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4659 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4663 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4664 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4665 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4666 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4667 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4668 must discard the start symbol.
4670 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4671 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4672 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4673 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4675 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4676 symbol is automatically discarded.
4678 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4680 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4681 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4682 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4683 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4684 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4687 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4688 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4689 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4690 tag among @var{symbols}.
4691 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4692 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4693 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4695 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4696 (These default forms are experimental.
4697 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4699 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4700 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4701 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4702 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4704 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4705 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4706 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4707 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4708 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4715 %union @{ char *string; @}
4716 %token <string> STRING1
4717 %token <string> STRING2
4718 %type <string> string1
4719 %type <string> string2
4720 %union @{ char character; @}
4721 %token <character> CHR
4722 %type <character> chr
4725 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4726 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4727 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4728 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4732 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4733 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4734 to @code{free} by default.
4735 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4736 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4737 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4738 @code{free} only once.
4739 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4740 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4742 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4743 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4744 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4745 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4746 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4747 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4748 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4749 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4750 reference it in your grammar.
4751 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4752 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4758 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4759 @cindex mid-rule actions
4760 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4761 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4762 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4763 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4764 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4765 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4766 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4767 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4771 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4772 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4773 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4778 @cindex discarded symbols
4779 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4783 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4785 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4787 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4788 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4790 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4791 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4794 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4797 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4798 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4801 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4802 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4803 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4807 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4808 @cindex printing semantic values
4812 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4813 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4814 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4815 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4817 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4818 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4819 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4821 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4824 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4825 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4826 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4827 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4828 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4829 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4830 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4833 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4834 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4835 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4836 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4844 %union @{ char *string; @}
4845 %token <string> STRING1
4846 %token <string> STRING2
4847 %type <string> string1
4848 %type <string> string2
4849 %union @{ char character; @}
4850 %token <character> CHR
4851 %type <character> chr
4854 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4855 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4856 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4857 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4861 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4862 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4863 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4864 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4865 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4866 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4867 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4871 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4872 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4873 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4874 @cindex warnings, preventing
4875 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4879 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4880 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4881 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4882 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4883 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4884 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4886 The declaration looks like this:
4892 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4893 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4894 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4895 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4897 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4898 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4899 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4900 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4901 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4902 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4903 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4909 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4913 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4914 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4915 print the number of conflicts.
4918 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4919 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4920 go back to the beginning.
4923 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4924 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4925 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4928 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4929 but will keep silent otherwise.
4932 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4933 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4934 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4935 @cindex default start symbol
4938 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4939 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4940 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4947 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4948 @cindex reentrant parser
4950 @findex %define api.pure
4952 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4953 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4954 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4955 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4956 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4957 program must be called only within interlocks.
4959 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4960 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4961 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4962 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4963 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4965 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4966 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4967 reentrant. It looks like this:
4973 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4974 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4975 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4976 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4977 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4978 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4979 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4980 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4981 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4983 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4984 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4988 @subsection A Push Parser
4991 @findex %define api.push-pull
4993 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4994 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4996 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4997 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4998 each time a new token is made available.
5000 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5001 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5002 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5003 within a certain time period.
5005 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5006 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5007 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5010 %define api.push-pull push
5013 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5014 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5015 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5016 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5017 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5021 %define api.push-pull push
5024 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5025 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5026 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5027 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5029 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5030 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5031 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5032 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5033 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5034 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5035 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5036 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5040 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5042 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5043 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5044 yypstate_delete (ps);
5047 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5048 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5049 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5050 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5051 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5052 example would thus look like this:
5057 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5060 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5061 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5062 yypstate_delete (ps);
5065 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5066 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5068 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5069 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5070 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5071 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5072 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5073 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5074 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5075 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5076 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5077 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5078 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5079 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5080 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5081 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5082 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5083 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5084 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5088 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5089 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5090 yypstate_delete (ps);
5093 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5094 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5095 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5098 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5099 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5100 @cindex declaration summary
5101 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5103 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5105 @deffn {Directive} %union
5106 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5107 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5110 @deffn {Directive} %token
5111 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5112 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5115 @deffn {Directive} %right
5116 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5117 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5120 @deffn {Directive} %left
5121 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5122 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5125 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5126 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5127 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5128 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5132 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5133 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5134 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5138 @deffn {Directive} %type
5139 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5140 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5143 @deffn {Directive} %start
5144 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5148 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5149 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5150 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5156 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5159 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5160 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5162 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5163 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5164 @xref{%code Summary}.
5167 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5168 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5170 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5173 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5174 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5175 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5176 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5179 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5180 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5181 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5182 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5183 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5185 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5186 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5187 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5188 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5189 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5190 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5191 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5192 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5193 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5194 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5196 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5197 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5198 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5200 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5201 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5202 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5204 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5205 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5206 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5207 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5208 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5210 @findex %code requires
5211 @findex %code provides
5212 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5213 header also contains their code.
5214 @xref{%code Summary}.
5216 @cindex Header guard
5217 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5218 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5219 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5220 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5221 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5224 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5225 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5227 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5228 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5230 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5234 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5235 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5238 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5239 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5240 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5243 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5244 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5245 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5248 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5249 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5250 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5251 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5253 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5257 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5258 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5259 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5260 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5261 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5262 accurate syntax error messages.
5265 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5266 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5267 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5269 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5270 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5271 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5272 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5273 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5274 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5275 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5276 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5278 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5282 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5283 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5284 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5289 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5290 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5291 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5292 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5293 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5294 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5295 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5299 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5300 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5303 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5304 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5305 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5309 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5310 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5311 Require a Version of Bison}.
5314 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5315 Specify the skeleton to use.
5317 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5318 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5319 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5320 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5322 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5323 file in the Bison installation directory.
5324 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5325 directory of the grammar file.
5326 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5329 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5330 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5331 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5332 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5333 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5334 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5335 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5338 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5339 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5340 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5341 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5342 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5343 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5344 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5347 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5348 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5349 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5353 The highest token number, plus one.
5355 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5357 The number of grammar rules,
5359 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5363 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5364 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5365 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5366 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5370 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5371 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5372 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5376 @node %define Summary
5377 @subsection %define Summary
5379 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5380 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5381 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5382 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5383 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5384 @code{%define} directive:
5386 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5387 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5388 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5389 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5391 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5392 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5393 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5394 to specifying @code{""}.
5396 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5397 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5398 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5401 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5402 @code{%define} accepts.
5404 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5405 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5409 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5411 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5412 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5414 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5416 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5417 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5420 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5421 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5422 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5423 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5424 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5425 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5428 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5430 @findex %define api.namespace
5432 @item Languages(s): C++
5434 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5435 For example, if you specify:
5438 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5441 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5444 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5447 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5448 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5451 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5457 @item Accepted Values:
5458 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5459 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5461 @item Default Value:
5462 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5463 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5464 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5465 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5466 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5467 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5468 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5471 %define api.namespace "foo"
5472 %name-prefix "bar::"
5475 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5480 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5481 @item @code{api.location.type}
5482 @findex %define api.location.type
5485 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5487 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5488 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5490 @item Accepted Values: String
5492 @item Default Value: none
5494 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5497 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5499 @findex %define api.prefix
5502 @item Language(s): All
5504 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5505 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5507 @item Accepted Values: String
5509 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5511 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5514 @c ================================================== api.pure
5516 @findex %define api.pure
5519 @item Language(s): C
5521 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5522 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5524 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5526 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5532 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5534 @findex %define api.push-pull
5537 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5539 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5540 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5541 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5542 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5544 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5546 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5552 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5553 @item api.token.constructor
5554 @findex %define api.token.constructor
5561 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5562 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5563 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5565 @item Accepted Values:
5568 @item Default Value:
5571 introduced in Bison 2.8
5573 @c api.token.constructor
5576 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5577 @item api.token.prefix
5578 @findex %define api.token.prefix
5581 @item Languages(s): all
5584 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5585 target language. For instance
5588 %token FILE for ERROR
5589 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5591 start: FILE for ERROR;
5595 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5596 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5597 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5598 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5599 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5600 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5601 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5603 @item Accepted Values:
5604 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5605 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5606 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5608 @item Default Value:
5611 introduced in Bison 2.8
5616 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5618 @item lr.default-reduction
5619 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
5622 @item Language(s): all
5624 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5625 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5626 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5627 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5629 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5630 @item Default Value:
5632 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5633 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5636 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5637 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5640 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5642 @item lr.keep-unreachable-state
5643 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
5646 @item Language(s): all
5647 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5648 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5649 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5650 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5652 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5653 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.5, and as
5654 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5655 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5657 @c ================================================== lr.type
5660 @findex %define lr.type
5663 @item Language(s): all
5665 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5666 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5667 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5669 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5671 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5675 @c ================================================== namespace
5677 @findex %define namespace
5678 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5682 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5684 @findex %define parse.assert
5687 @item Languages(s): C++
5689 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5690 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5692 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5694 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5696 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5701 @c ================================================== parse.error
5703 @findex %define parse.error
5708 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5709 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5711 @item Accepted Values:
5714 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5716 @item @code{verbose}
5717 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5718 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5722 @item Default Value:
5728 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5730 @findex %define parse.lac
5733 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5735 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5736 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5737 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5738 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5742 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5744 @findex %define parse.trace
5747 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5749 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5750 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5752 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5753 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5754 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5755 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5758 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5760 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5764 @c ================================================== variant
5766 @findex %define variant
5773 Request variant-based semantic values.
5774 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5776 @item Accepted Values:
5779 @item Default Value:
5787 @subsection %code Summary
5791 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5792 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5793 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5794 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5795 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5796 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5797 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5798 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5800 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5801 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5802 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5803 in the parser implementation.
5805 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5806 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5807 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5809 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5812 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5813 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5814 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5815 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5816 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5817 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5821 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5822 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5823 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5826 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5827 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5831 @findex %code requires
5834 @item Language(s): C, C++
5836 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5837 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5838 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5839 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5840 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5842 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5843 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5848 @findex %code provides
5851 @item Language(s): C, C++
5853 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5854 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5856 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5857 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5865 @item Language(s): C, C++
5867 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5868 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5869 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5870 parser implementation file. For example:
5879 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5883 @findex %code imports
5886 @item Language(s): Java
5888 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5890 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5891 before any class definitions.
5895 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5896 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5897 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5898 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5901 @node Multiple Parsers
5902 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5904 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5905 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5906 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5907 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5908 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5909 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5910 exported in the generated header.
5912 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5913 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5914 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5915 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5916 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5917 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5918 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5919 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5920 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5922 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5923 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5924 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5925 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5926 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5927 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5928 specifically --- more about this below.
5930 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5931 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5934 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5935 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5936 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5937 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5940 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5941 #define yyparse cparse
5942 #define yylval clval
5948 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5949 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5950 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5952 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5956 extern CSTYPE clval;
5960 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5961 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5962 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5965 /* Enabling traces. */
5967 # if defined YYDEBUG
5984 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5985 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5986 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5989 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5990 @cindex C-language interface
5993 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5994 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5995 functions that it needs to use.
5997 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5998 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5999 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6000 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6003 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6004 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6005 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6006 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6007 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6008 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6010 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6011 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6012 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6016 @node Parser Function
6017 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6020 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6021 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6022 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6023 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6024 without reading further.
6027 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6028 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6029 is due to end-of-input).
6031 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6032 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6035 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6038 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6043 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6048 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6051 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6052 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6053 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6055 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6056 @findex %parse-param
6057 Declare that one or more
6058 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6059 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6060 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6061 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6064 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6067 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6071 Then call the parser like this:
6075 int nastiness, randomness;
6076 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6077 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6083 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6086 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6089 @node Push Parser Function
6090 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6091 @findex yypush_parse
6093 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6094 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6096 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6097 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6098 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6099 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6101 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6102 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6103 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6104 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6107 @node Pull Parser Function
6108 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6109 @findex yypull_parse
6111 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6112 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6114 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6115 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6116 declaration is used.
6117 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6119 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
6120 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6123 @node Parser Create Function
6124 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6125 @findex yypstate_new
6127 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6128 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6130 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6131 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6132 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6133 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6135 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6136 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6137 or 0 if no memory was available.
6138 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6142 @node Parser Delete Function
6143 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6144 @findex yypstate_delete
6146 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6147 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6149 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6150 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6151 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6152 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6154 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6155 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6156 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6160 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6162 @cindex lexical analyzer
6164 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6165 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6166 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6167 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6169 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6170 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6171 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6172 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6173 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6174 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6175 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6179 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6180 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6181 of the token it has read.
6182 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6183 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6185 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6186 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6189 @node Calling Convention
6190 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6192 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6193 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6194 signifies end-of-input.
6196 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6197 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6198 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6199 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6201 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6202 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6203 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6204 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6205 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6206 signifies end-of-input.
6208 Here is an example showing these things:
6215 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6218 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6219 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6221 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6227 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6228 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6230 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6231 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6235 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6236 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6237 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6238 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6241 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6242 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6243 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6244 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6245 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6248 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6249 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6250 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6251 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6254 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6257 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6258 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6259 strlen (token_buffer))
6260 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6261 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6266 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6267 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6271 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6274 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6275 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6276 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6277 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6283 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6284 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6289 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6290 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6291 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6292 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6293 declaration looks like this:
6306 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6311 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6312 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6317 @node Token Locations
6318 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6321 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6322 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6323 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6324 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6325 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6326 data in that variable.
6328 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6329 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6330 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6331 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6332 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6335 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6338 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6340 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6341 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6342 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6343 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6344 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6345 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6350 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6353 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6354 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6359 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6360 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6361 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6364 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6365 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6366 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6367 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6369 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6371 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6372 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6373 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6376 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6378 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6379 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6380 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6381 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6382 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6388 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6389 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6390 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6394 results in the following signatures:
6397 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6398 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6401 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6404 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6405 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6409 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6412 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6413 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6414 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6417 @node Error Reporting
6418 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6419 @cindex error reporting function
6422 @cindex syntax error
6424 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6425 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6426 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6427 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6430 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6431 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6432 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6433 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6434 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6436 @findex %define parse.error
6437 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6438 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6439 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6440 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6441 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6443 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6444 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6445 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6446 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6447 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6448 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6450 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6451 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6452 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6454 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6459 yyerror (char const *s)
6463 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6468 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6469 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6470 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6471 immediately return 1.
6473 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6474 an access to the current location.
6475 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6476 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6477 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6481 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6482 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6485 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6488 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6489 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6492 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6493 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6494 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6495 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6499 /* Location tracking. */
6503 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6505 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6506 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6510 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6513 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6514 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6515 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6516 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6521 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6522 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6523 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6524 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6525 message is always passed last.
6527 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6528 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6529 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6533 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6534 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6535 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6536 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6538 @node Action Features
6539 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6540 @cindex summary, action features
6541 @cindex action features summary
6543 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6544 are useful in actions.
6546 @deffn {Variable} $$
6547 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6548 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6551 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6552 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6553 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6556 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6557 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6558 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6559 Types of Values in Actions}.
6562 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6563 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6564 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6565 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6568 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6569 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6570 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6573 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6574 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6575 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6578 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6580 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6581 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6582 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6583 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6584 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6585 going to be reduced by this rule.
6587 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6588 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6589 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6592 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6595 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6596 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6599 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6600 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6604 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6605 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6606 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6607 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6608 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6609 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6612 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6613 @findex YYRECOVERING
6614 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6615 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6616 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6619 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6620 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6621 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6622 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6623 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6625 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6628 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6629 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6631 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6633 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6636 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6637 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6638 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6639 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6642 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6643 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6644 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6645 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6647 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6650 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6651 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6652 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6653 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6655 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6660 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6661 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6664 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6668 @c int first_line, last_line;
6669 @c int first_column, last_column;
6673 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6674 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6676 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6677 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6678 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6681 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6684 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6686 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6687 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6691 @node Internationalization
6692 @section Parser Internationalization
6693 @cindex internationalization
6699 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6700 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6701 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6702 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6703 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6704 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6705 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6706 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6709 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6710 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6711 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6716 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6717 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6718 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6719 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6720 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6724 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6729 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6730 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6731 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6732 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6733 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6734 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6735 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6736 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6737 Bison-generated parser.
6740 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6741 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6742 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6746 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6749 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6750 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6751 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6755 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6756 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6757 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6760 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6766 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6770 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6776 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6777 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6778 @cindex algorithm of parser
6781 @cindex parser stack
6782 @cindex stack, parser
6784 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6785 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6786 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6788 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6789 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6792 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6793 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6794 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6795 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6796 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6797 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6798 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6800 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6807 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6808 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6811 expr: expr '*' expr;
6815 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6822 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6823 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6825 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6826 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6827 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6829 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6832 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6833 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6834 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6835 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6836 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6837 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6838 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6839 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6840 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6841 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6845 @section Lookahead Tokens
6846 @cindex lookahead token
6848 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6849 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6850 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6851 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6852 token in order to decide what to do.
6854 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6855 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6856 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6857 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6858 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6859 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6860 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6863 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6864 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6865 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6884 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6885 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6886 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6887 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6888 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6890 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6891 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6892 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6893 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6894 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6895 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6900 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6901 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6902 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6903 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6906 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6908 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6909 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6910 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6912 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6913 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6918 "if" expr "then" stmt
6919 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6925 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6926 specific keyword tokens.
6928 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6929 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6930 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6931 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6934 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6935 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6936 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6937 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6938 contrast it with the other alternative.
6940 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6941 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6945 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6947 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6950 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6951 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6952 making these two inputs equivalent:
6955 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6957 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6960 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6961 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6962 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6963 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6964 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6965 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6966 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6967 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6969 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6970 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6971 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6972 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6974 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6975 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6976 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6977 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6978 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6981 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6982 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6983 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6999 "if" expr "then" stmt
7000 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7010 @section Operator Precedence
7011 @cindex operator precedence
7012 @cindex precedence of operators
7014 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7015 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7016 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7017 shift and when to reduce.
7020 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7021 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7022 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7023 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7024 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7025 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7028 @node Why Precedence
7029 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7031 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7032 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7047 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7048 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7049 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7050 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7051 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7052 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7053 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7056 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7057 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7058 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7059 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7060 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7061 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7062 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7063 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7066 @cindex associativity
7067 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7068 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7069 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7070 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7071 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7072 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7073 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7074 makes right-associativity.
7076 @node Using Precedence
7077 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7083 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7084 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7085 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7086 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7087 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7088 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7089 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7091 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7092 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7093 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7094 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7095 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7096 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7097 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7098 what expected the grammar author.
7100 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7101 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7102 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7103 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7104 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7106 @node Precedence Only
7107 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7110 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7111 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7112 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7113 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7114 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7115 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7116 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7118 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7119 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7120 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7124 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7127 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7128 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7129 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7130 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7131 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7132 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7133 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7140 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7141 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7142 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7143 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7144 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7145 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7146 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7148 @node Precedence Examples
7149 @subsection Precedence Examples
7151 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7159 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7160 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7161 declared with @code{'-'}:
7164 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7169 @node How Precedence
7170 @subsection How Precedence Works
7172 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7173 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7174 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7175 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7176 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7177 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7179 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7180 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7181 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7182 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7183 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7184 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7185 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7188 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7189 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7192 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7194 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7195 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7196 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7197 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7199 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7200 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7201 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7202 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7203 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7204 instance as follows:
7213 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7214 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7215 use right associativity:
7218 %right "then" "else"
7221 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7222 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7223 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7224 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7225 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7226 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7227 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7229 @node Contextual Precedence
7230 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7231 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7232 @cindex unary operator precedence
7233 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7234 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7237 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7238 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7239 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7240 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7242 The Bison precedence declarations
7243 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7244 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7245 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7248 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7249 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7250 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7251 modifier's syntax is:
7254 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7258 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7259 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7260 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7261 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7262 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7264 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7265 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7266 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7276 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7284 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7289 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7290 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7291 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7292 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7294 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7295 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7296 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7297 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7299 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7300 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7301 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7302 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7303 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7304 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7306 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7307 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7311 @section Parser States
7312 @cindex finite-state machine
7313 @cindex parser state
7314 @cindex state (of parser)
7316 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7317 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7318 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7319 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7320 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7322 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7323 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7324 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7325 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7326 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7327 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7328 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7329 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7332 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7333 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7334 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7337 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7338 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7339 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7341 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7342 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7345 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7346 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7351 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7353 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7359 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7360 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7366 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7367 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7368 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7369 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7370 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7371 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7373 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7374 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7375 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7377 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7378 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7379 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7380 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7381 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7383 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7384 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7385 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7386 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7391 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7392 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7397 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7404 | sequence redirects
7418 | redirects redirect
7424 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7425 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7426 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7427 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7428 in infinitely many ways!
7430 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7431 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7432 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7433 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7435 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7446 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7454 | sequence redirects
7468 | redirects redirect
7473 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7474 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7475 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7476 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7477 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7480 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7481 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7483 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7484 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7485 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7486 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7487 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7492 %nonassoc "sequence"
7497 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7498 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7510 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7511 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7514 %right "word" "redirect"
7519 | sequence word %prec "word"
7520 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7525 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7526 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7527 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7529 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7535 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7538 | name_list ':' type
7554 | name ',' name_list
7559 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7560 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7561 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7562 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7566 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7568 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7569 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7570 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7572 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7573 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7574 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7575 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7576 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7577 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7578 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7581 @cindex canonical LR
7582 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7583 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7584 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7585 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7586 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7587 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7588 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7589 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7591 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7592 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7593 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7594 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7595 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7603 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7608 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7609 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7610 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7611 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7612 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7613 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7615 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7616 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7617 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7618 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7619 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7620 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7625 | name_list ':' type
7633 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7634 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7639 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7640 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7641 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7642 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7643 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7644 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7645 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7647 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7648 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7649 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7650 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7652 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7653 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7656 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7657 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7658 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7659 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7662 @node LR Table Construction
7663 @subsection LR Table Construction
7664 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7667 @cindex canonical LR
7668 @findex %define lr.type
7670 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7671 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7672 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7673 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7676 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7677 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7678 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7679 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7682 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7683 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7684 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7687 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7688 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7689 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7692 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7694 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7697 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7701 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7705 %define lr.type ielr
7708 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7709 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7710 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7711 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7712 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7713 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7714 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7715 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7716 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7717 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7719 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7720 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7721 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7722 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7728 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7731 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7733 @cindex GLR with LALR
7734 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7735 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7736 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7737 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7738 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7739 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7740 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7741 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7742 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7743 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7745 @item Malformed grammars.
7747 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7748 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7749 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7750 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7751 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7756 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7757 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7758 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7759 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7760 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7761 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7762 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7763 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7764 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7768 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7771 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7772 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7773 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7774 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7775 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7776 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7777 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7778 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7779 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7780 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7781 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7782 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7785 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7786 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7787 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7789 @node Default Reductions
7790 @subsection Default Reductions
7791 @cindex default reductions
7792 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7795 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7796 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7797 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7798 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7799 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7801 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7802 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7805 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7807 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7808 @cindex consistent states
7809 @cindex defaulted states
7810 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7811 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7812 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7813 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7814 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7815 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7816 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7817 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7818 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7819 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7820 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7822 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7823 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7824 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7825 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7826 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7827 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7828 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7829 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7830 should already be considered closed.
7832 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7834 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7835 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7836 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7837 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7838 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7839 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7840 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7841 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7842 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7846 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7847 @c sentence from being rejected.
7848 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7849 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7850 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7851 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7852 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7853 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7856 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7857 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7858 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7859 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7860 because the accept action ends the parse.
7862 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7863 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7864 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7865 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7866 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7867 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7868 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7869 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7870 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7871 split the parse instead.
7873 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7874 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
7876 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction @var{WHERE}}
7877 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7878 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7880 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7881 @item @code{consistent}
7882 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7885 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7886 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7891 @findex %define parse.lac
7893 @cindex lookahead correction
7895 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7896 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7897 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7898 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7899 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7900 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7901 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7902 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7903 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7905 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7906 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7907 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7908 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7909 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7911 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7912 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7913 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7914 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7916 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7917 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7919 @item @code{none} (default)
7922 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7923 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7927 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7928 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7929 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7930 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7931 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7932 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7933 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7934 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7935 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7936 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7939 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7940 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7941 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7942 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7943 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7944 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7945 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7946 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7947 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7948 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7950 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7951 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7952 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7953 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7954 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7955 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7956 language-recognition power.
7958 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7961 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7963 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7964 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7965 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7966 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7969 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7971 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7972 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7973 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7974 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7975 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7976 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7980 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7981 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7982 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7983 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7984 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7985 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7986 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7987 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7988 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7989 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7990 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7993 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7994 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7995 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7997 @node Unreachable States
7998 @subsection Unreachable States
7999 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8000 @cindex unreachable states
8002 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8003 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8004 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8005 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8007 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8008 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8009 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8010 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8012 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state @var{VALUE}}
8013 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8014 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8017 There are a few caveats to consider:
8020 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8022 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8023 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8024 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8025 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8026 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8027 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8029 @item Other useless states.
8031 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8032 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8033 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8034 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8035 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8036 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8037 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8040 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8041 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8043 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8044 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8045 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8047 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8048 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8049 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8050 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8051 context-free languages.
8052 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8053 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8054 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8055 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8056 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8057 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8058 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8059 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8061 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8062 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8063 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8064 parser uses the same basic
8065 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8066 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8067 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8068 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8070 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8071 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8072 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8073 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8074 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8076 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8077 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8078 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8079 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8080 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8081 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8082 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8083 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8084 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8085 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8086 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8089 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8090 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8091 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8092 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8093 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8094 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8095 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8096 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8097 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8098 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8099 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8100 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8102 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8103 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8104 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8106 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8107 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8108 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8109 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8110 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8111 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8112 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8113 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8114 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8115 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8116 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8117 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8119 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8122 @node Memory Management
8123 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8124 @cindex memory exhaustion
8125 @cindex memory management
8126 @cindex stack overflow
8127 @cindex parser stack overflow
8128 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8130 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8131 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8132 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8134 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8135 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8136 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8139 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8140 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8141 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8142 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8144 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8145 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8146 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8147 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8148 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8149 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8151 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8152 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8153 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8156 @cindex default stack limit
8157 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8161 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8162 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8163 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8164 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8165 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8167 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8169 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8170 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8171 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8172 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8173 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8174 non-trivial copy constructors.
8175 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8178 @node Error Recovery
8179 @chapter Error Recovery
8180 @cindex error recovery
8181 @cindex recovery from errors
8183 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8184 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8185 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8188 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8189 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8190 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8191 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8192 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8193 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8194 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8197 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8198 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8199 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8200 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8201 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8202 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8214 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8215 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8217 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8218 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8219 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8220 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8221 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8222 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8223 applicable in the ordinary way.
8225 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8226 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8227 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8228 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8229 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8230 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8231 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8232 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8233 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8234 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8235 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8236 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8238 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8239 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8240 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8243 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8246 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8247 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8248 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8249 spurious error message:
8259 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8260 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8261 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8262 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8263 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8264 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8265 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8268 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8269 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8270 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8271 error messages resume.
8273 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8274 as any other rules can.
8277 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8278 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8279 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8280 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8283 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8284 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8285 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8287 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8289 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8290 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8291 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8292 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8293 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8295 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8296 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8297 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8298 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8301 @node Context Dependency
8302 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8304 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8305 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8306 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8307 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8311 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8312 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8313 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8314 error recovery rules must be written.
8317 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8318 neither clean nor robust.)
8320 @node Semantic Tokens
8321 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8323 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8324 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8330 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8331 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8332 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8334 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8335 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8336 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8337 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8338 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8340 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8341 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8342 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8343 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8344 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8345 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8346 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8348 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8349 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8350 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8351 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8355 typedef int foo, bar;
8359 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8360 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8366 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8367 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8369 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8370 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8371 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8372 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8373 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8378 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8379 | declarator maybeasm
8385 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8386 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8392 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8393 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8394 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8396 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8397 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8398 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8399 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8400 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8401 the syntactic context.
8403 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8404 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8405 @cindex lexical tie-in
8407 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8408 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8411 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8412 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8413 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8414 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8415 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8422 void yyerror (char const *);
8431 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8432 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8433 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8447 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8448 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8449 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8451 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8452 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8453 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8456 @node Tie-in Recovery
8457 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8459 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8460 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8462 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8463 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8464 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8465 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8470 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8472 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8476 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8477 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8478 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8479 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8480 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8482 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8484 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8485 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8486 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8492 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8498 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8499 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8500 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8501 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8503 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8504 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8505 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8506 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8507 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8508 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8511 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8514 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8516 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8517 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8518 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8519 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8522 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8523 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8524 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8525 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8529 @section Understanding Your Parser
8531 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8532 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8533 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8534 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8535 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8537 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8538 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8539 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8540 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8541 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8542 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8543 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8545 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8563 @command{bison} reports:
8566 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8567 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8568 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8569 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8570 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8573 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8574 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8575 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8576 interpretation is the same.
8579 @cindex token, useless
8580 @cindex useless token
8581 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8582 @cindex useless nonterminal
8583 @cindex rule, useless
8584 @cindex useless rule
8585 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8586 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8587 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8588 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8591 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8594 Terminals unused in grammar
8597 Rules useless in grammar
8602 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8605 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8606 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8607 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8608 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8612 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8627 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8631 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8644 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8649 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8655 @cindex pointed rule
8656 @cindex rule, pointed
8657 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8658 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8659 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8660 the location of the input cursor.
8665 0 $accept: . exp $end
8667 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8672 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8673 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8674 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8675 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8676 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8677 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8678 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8679 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8681 @cindex core, item set
8682 @cindex item set core
8683 @cindex kernel, item set
8684 @cindex item set core
8685 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8686 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8687 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8688 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8689 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8690 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8695 0 $accept: . exp $end
8696 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8702 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8708 In the state 1@dots{}
8715 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8719 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8720 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8721 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8722 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8727 0 $accept: exp . $end
8728 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8733 $end shift, and go to state 3
8734 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8735 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8736 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8737 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8741 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8742 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8743 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8744 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8745 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8748 @cindex accepting state
8749 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8755 0 $accept: exp $end .
8761 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8762 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8764 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8770 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8772 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8779 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8781 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8788 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8790 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8797 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8799 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8804 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8810 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8816 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8817 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8819 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8820 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8823 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8824 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8825 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8826 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8827 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8828 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8829 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8830 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8832 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8833 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8834 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8837 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8838 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8839 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8840 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8841 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8842 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8843 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8844 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8845 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8846 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8847 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8848 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8853 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8854 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8859 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8860 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8862 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8863 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8866 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8867 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8868 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8869 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8870 conflicts in the report:
8873 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8874 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8875 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8879 The remaining states are similar:
8885 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8891 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8892 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8894 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8895 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8901 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8907 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8909 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8910 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8916 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8922 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8923 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8924 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8925 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8927 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8928 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8929 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8930 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8931 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8936 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8937 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8938 @samp{*}, but also because the
8939 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8941 Note that Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
8942 file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8944 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8947 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8950 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8951 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8952 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8953 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8954 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8955 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8956 to help them understand LR parsers.
8958 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8959 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8960 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8961 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8962 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8964 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8975 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8976 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8977 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8980 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8982 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8983 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8984 about transitions, for examples
8986 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8987 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8988 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8993 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8996 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8998 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8999 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9007 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9011 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9013 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9015 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9017 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9018 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9019 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9020 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9022 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9029 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9030 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9033 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9035 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9037 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9038 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9039 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9040 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9041 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9043 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
9044 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
9046 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9048 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9049 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9051 Note that a DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and XSLT
9052 processing (@pxref{Xml}).
9054 @c ================================================= XML
9057 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9060 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9061 (@pxref{Understanding}) when invoked with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9062 (@pxref{Graphviz}) when invoked with option @option{--graph}. However,
9063 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9064 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9065 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9066 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9067 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9068 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9070 The textual file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9071 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9072 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9073 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9074 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9075 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9077 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9078 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9082 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9084 Used to output a copy of the .output file.
9086 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the .output file.
9089 Sample usage (requires @code{xsltproc}):
9093 $ bison --print-datadir
9094 /usr/local/share/bison
9096 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl input.xml > input.html
9099 @c ================================================= Tracing
9102 @section Tracing Your Parser
9105 @cindex tracing the parser
9107 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9108 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9111 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9112 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9113 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9116 @node Enabling Traces
9117 @subsection Enabling Traces
9118 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9121 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9123 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9124 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9125 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9126 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9129 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9130 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9131 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9132 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9133 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9135 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9136 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9137 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9138 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9139 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9141 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9143 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9144 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9145 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9147 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9148 @findex %define parse.trace
9149 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9150 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9151 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9152 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9153 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9156 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9160 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9161 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9162 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9163 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9164 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9165 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9167 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9168 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9169 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9170 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9172 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9173 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9174 messages tell you these things:
9178 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9181 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9182 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9185 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9186 of the state stack afterward.
9189 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9190 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9191 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9192 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9193 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9194 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9195 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9196 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9197 grammar are to blame.
9199 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9200 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9201 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9202 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9203 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9206 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9208 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9209 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9210 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9211 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9212 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9213 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9215 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9216 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9217 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9220 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9222 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9224 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9227 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9228 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9229 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9230 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9233 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9234 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9235 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9236 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9237 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9238 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9240 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9241 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9242 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9243 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9244 printer will be used for them.
9246 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9247 are sent onto standard error.
9250 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9253 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9254 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9260 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9261 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9262 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9263 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9265 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9267 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9268 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9273 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9274 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9275 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9279 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9280 Shifting token '(' ()
9282 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9283 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9285 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9286 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9287 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9293 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9294 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
9295 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9298 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9299 Shifting token '-' ()
9301 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9302 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9304 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9305 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9306 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9307 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9309 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9310 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9311 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9313 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9314 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9320 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9321 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9324 Next token is token ')' ()
9325 Shifting token ')' ()
9327 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9328 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9330 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9332 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9338 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9342 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9343 Shifting token '\n' ()
9345 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9346 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9349 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9352 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9355 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9360 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9361 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9362 completion of the parsing.
9365 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9366 Shifting token $end ()
9369 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9370 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9374 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9375 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9378 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9379 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9380 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9382 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9384 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9385 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9386 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9388 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9391 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9392 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9396 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9397 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9398 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9401 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9404 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9407 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9408 else if (type == NUM)
9409 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9413 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9416 @chapter Invoking Bison
9417 @cindex invoking Bison
9418 @cindex Bison invocation
9419 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9421 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9427 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9428 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9429 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9430 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9431 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9432 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9433 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9434 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9435 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9436 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9437 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9442 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9445 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9448 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9451 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9453 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9454 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9455 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9458 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9459 in alphabetical order by short options.
9460 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9461 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9465 @section Bison Options
9467 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9468 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9469 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9470 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9471 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9474 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9475 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9478 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9484 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9488 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9490 @item --print-localedir
9491 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9493 @item --print-datadir
9494 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9498 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9499 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9500 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9501 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9502 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9503 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9504 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9505 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9506 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9507 for compatibility with POSIX:
9514 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9515 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9516 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9517 this option is specified.
9519 @item -W [@var{category}]
9520 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9521 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9524 @item midrule-values
9525 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9527 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9530 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9533 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9534 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9537 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9540 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9541 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9542 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9545 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9549 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9550 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9551 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9552 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9553 no effect on the conflict report.
9556 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9560 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9562 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9563 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9569 Turn off all the warnings.
9571 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9574 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9575 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9576 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9578 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9579 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9580 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9581 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9583 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9584 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9586 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9587 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9590 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9591 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9592 S/R conflicts as errors.
9595 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9596 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9606 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9607 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9608 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9610 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9611 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9612 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9613 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9614 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9615 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9616 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9620 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9623 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9624 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9625 definition for @var{name}.
9627 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9628 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9629 definitions for @var{name}.
9631 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9632 definitions for @var{name}.
9635 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9636 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9637 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9639 @item -L @var{language}
9640 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9641 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9642 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9643 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9644 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9646 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9650 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9652 @item -p @var{prefix}
9653 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9654 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9655 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9656 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9660 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9661 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9662 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9663 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9664 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9665 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9668 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9669 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9670 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9672 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9673 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9674 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9675 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9677 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9678 file in the Bison installation directory.
9679 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9680 current working directory.
9681 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9684 @itemx --token-table
9685 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9692 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9693 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9694 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9695 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9698 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9699 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9700 with other short options.
9702 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9703 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9704 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9705 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9707 @item -r @var{things}
9708 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9709 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9710 separated list of @var{things} among:
9714 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9718 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9719 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9722 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9723 each rule's lookahead set.
9726 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9727 precedence and associativity directives.
9730 Enable all the items.
9733 Do not generate the report.
9736 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9737 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9741 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9742 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9743 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9746 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9747 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9749 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9750 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9752 @item -g [@var{file}]
9753 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9754 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9755 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9756 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9757 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9758 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9761 @item -x [@var{file}]
9762 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9763 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9764 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9765 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9767 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9768 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9771 @node Option Cross Key
9772 @section Option Cross Key
9774 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9775 the corresponding short option and directive.
9777 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9778 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9779 @include cross-options.texi
9783 @section Yacc Library
9785 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9786 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9787 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9788 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9789 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9790 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9791 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9793 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9794 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9797 int yyerror (char const *);
9800 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9801 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9802 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9808 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9810 @node Other Languages
9811 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9814 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9815 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9819 @section C++ Parsers
9822 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9823 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9824 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9825 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9826 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9827 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9830 @node C++ Bison Interface
9831 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9832 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9836 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9837 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9838 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9839 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9841 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9843 @findex %define api.namespace
9844 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9845 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9846 in the following files:
9851 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9852 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
9853 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
9857 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9860 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9861 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9862 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9863 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9864 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9866 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9867 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9868 @samp{%defines} directive.
9871 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9872 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9874 @node C++ Semantic Values
9875 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9876 @c - No objects in unions
9878 @c - Printer and destructor
9880 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9881 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9882 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9883 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9886 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9887 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9891 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9893 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9894 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9895 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9898 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9899 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9900 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9902 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9903 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9904 to such objects are allowed.
9907 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9908 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9909 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9913 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9915 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9916 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9917 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9918 types can be used without pointers.
9920 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9921 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9922 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9923 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9925 For instance, instead of
9933 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9934 %token <sval> STRING;
9941 %token <int> NUMBER;
9942 %token <std::string> STRING;
9945 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9946 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9949 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9950 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9951 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9953 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9954 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9955 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9956 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9957 eventually, destroyed.
9959 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9960 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9961 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9964 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9965 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9969 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9970 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9971 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9972 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9973 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9974 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9975 that would be duplicating the information.
9977 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9978 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9979 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9980 (the current implementation of) variants:
9983 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9984 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9985 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9986 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9987 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9988 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9991 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9992 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9993 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9994 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9995 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9996 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9999 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10002 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10003 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10005 @node C++ Location Values
10006 @subsection C++ Location Values
10008 @c - class Position
10009 @c - class Location
10010 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10012 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10013 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10015 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10016 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10017 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10018 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10019 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10022 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10023 genuine code only the latter is used.
10026 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10027 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10028 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10032 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10034 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10035 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10036 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10040 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10041 Reset the position to the given values.
10044 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10045 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10046 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10047 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10048 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10051 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10052 The line, starting at 1.
10055 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10056 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10059 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10060 The column, starting at 1.
10063 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10064 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10067 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10068 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10069 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10070 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10071 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10074 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10075 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10076 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10079 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10080 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10081 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10082 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10086 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10088 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10089 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10092 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10093 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10094 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10097 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10098 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10101 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10102 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10103 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10106 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10107 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10108 Advance the @code{end} position.
10111 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10112 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10113 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10114 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10117 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10118 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10121 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10122 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10123 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10127 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10128 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10129 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10132 @node User Defined Location Type
10133 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10134 @findex %define api.location.type
10136 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10137 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10140 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10143 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10146 it must be copyable;
10149 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10150 parser basically runs
10152 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10153 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10156 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10159 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10160 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10163 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10164 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10169 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10170 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10171 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10172 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10177 %define namespace "master::"
10181 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10182 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10185 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10186 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10189 @node C++ Parser Interface
10190 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10191 @c - define parser_class_name
10193 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10195 @c - Reporting errors
10197 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10198 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10199 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10200 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10201 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10202 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10203 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10204 additional argument for its constructor.
10206 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10207 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10208 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10211 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10212 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10213 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10214 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10215 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10216 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10219 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10220 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10221 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10222 equivalent with first
10223 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10224 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10225 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10226 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10227 function invoked from the user action.
10230 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10231 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10232 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10235 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10236 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10237 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10240 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10241 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10244 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10245 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10246 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10249 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10250 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10251 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10255 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10256 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10257 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10258 or nonzero, full tracing.
10261 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10262 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10263 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10264 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10265 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10270 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10271 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10272 @c - prefix for yylex.
10273 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10276 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10277 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10278 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10279 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10282 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10283 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10286 @node Split Symbols
10287 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10289 Therefore the interface is as follows.
10291 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10292 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10293 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10294 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10295 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10298 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10299 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10301 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10305 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10306 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10309 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10310 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10314 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10315 initialized. So the code would look like:
10319 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10320 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10323 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10324 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10333 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10334 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10337 yylval.build(yytext);
10338 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10343 @node Complete Symbols
10344 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10346 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and
10347 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10348 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10349 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10350 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10351 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10353 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10354 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10355 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10356 the @var{location}.
10359 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10360 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10361 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10362 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10364 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10366 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10367 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10368 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10369 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10370 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10371 also pass the @var{location}.
10374 For instance, given the following declarations:
10377 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10378 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10379 %token <int> INTEGER;
10384 Bison generates the following functions:
10387 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10388 const location_type& l);
10389 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10390 const location_type& loc);
10391 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10395 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10398 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10399 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10400 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10403 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10404 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10406 @node A Complete C++ Example
10407 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10409 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10410 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10411 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10412 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10413 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10414 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10415 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10416 actually easier to interface with.
10419 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10420 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10421 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10422 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10423 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10426 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10427 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10429 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10430 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10431 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10432 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10433 of valid input follows.
10437 seven := one + two * three
10441 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10442 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10444 @c - A place to store error messages
10445 @c - A place for the result
10447 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10448 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10449 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10450 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10451 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10452 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10453 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10455 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10456 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10457 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10460 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10462 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10463 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10466 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10471 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10472 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10473 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10474 factor both as follows.
10476 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10478 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10480 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10481 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10486 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10489 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10491 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10492 class calcxx_driver
10496 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10498 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10504 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10505 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10507 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10509 // Handling the scanner.
10510 void scan_begin ();
10512 bool trace_scanning;
10516 Similarly for the parser itself.
10518 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10520 // Run the parser on file F.
10521 // Return 0 on success.
10522 int parse (const std::string& f);
10523 // The name of the file being parsed.
10524 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10526 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10527 bool trace_parsing;
10531 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10532 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10533 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10534 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10536 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10539 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10540 void error (const std::string& m);
10542 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10545 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10546 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10547 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10548 messages and set error state.
10550 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10552 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10553 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10555 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10556 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10558 variables["one"] = 1;
10559 variables["two"] = 2;
10562 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10567 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10571 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10572 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10573 int res = parser.parse ();
10579 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10581 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10585 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10587 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10591 @node Calc++ Parser
10592 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10594 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10595 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10596 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10597 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10600 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10602 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10603 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10605 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10609 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10610 @findex %define variant
10611 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10612 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10613 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10614 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10616 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10618 %define api.token.constructor
10619 %define parse.assert
10624 @findex %code requires
10625 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10626 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10627 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10628 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10629 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10630 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10631 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10633 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10638 class calcxx_driver;
10643 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10644 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10647 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10649 // The parsing context.
10650 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10654 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10655 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10656 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10659 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10664 // Initialize the initial location.
10665 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10670 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10671 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10674 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10676 %define parse.trace
10677 %define parse.error verbose
10682 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10683 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10685 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10689 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10695 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10696 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10697 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10698 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10699 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10701 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10703 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10705 END 0 "end of file"
10717 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10718 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10721 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10723 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10724 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10729 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10730 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10731 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10732 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
10734 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10736 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10740 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10741 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10743 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10747 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10750 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10751 | assignments assignment @{@};
10754 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10759 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10760 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10761 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10762 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10763 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10764 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10765 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10770 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10773 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10776 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10777 const std::string& m)
10779 driver.error (l, m);
10783 @node Calc++ Scanner
10784 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10786 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10787 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10789 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10791 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10793 # include <climits>
10794 # include <cstdlib>
10796 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10797 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10799 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10800 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10801 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10802 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10804 # define yywrap() 1
10806 // The location of the current token.
10807 static yy::location loc;
10812 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10813 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10814 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10815 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10817 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10819 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10823 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10825 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10827 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10833 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10834 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10835 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10836 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10837 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10838 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10839 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10841 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10845 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10846 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10852 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10856 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10857 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10861 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10863 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10865 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10866 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10867 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10868 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10869 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10870 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10871 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10876 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10877 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10878 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10879 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10882 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10883 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10884 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10889 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10890 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10892 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10896 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10898 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10899 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10901 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10903 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10904 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10911 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10918 @node Calc++ Top Level
10919 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10921 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10923 @comment file: calc++.cc
10925 #include <iostream>
10926 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10930 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10933 calcxx_driver driver;
10934 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10935 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10936 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10937 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10938 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10939 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10940 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10949 @section Java Parsers
10952 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10953 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10954 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10955 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10956 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10957 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10958 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10959 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10962 @node Java Bison Interface
10963 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10964 @c - %language "Java"
10966 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10967 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10969 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10970 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10972 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10973 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10974 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10975 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10976 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10977 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10978 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10979 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10980 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10981 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10983 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10985 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10986 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10987 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10988 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10991 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10992 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10994 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10995 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10997 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10998 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11000 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11001 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11002 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11004 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11005 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11006 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11008 if needed. Also, in the future the
11009 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11010 access the token names and codes.
11012 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11013 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11014 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11015 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11018 @node Java Semantic Values
11019 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11020 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11022 @c - Printer and destructor
11024 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11025 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11026 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11029 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11030 %type <Integer> number
11033 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11034 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11035 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11036 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
11037 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11040 %define stype "ASTNode"
11044 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11045 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11047 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11048 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11049 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11050 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11051 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11052 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11054 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11055 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11056 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11058 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11059 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11060 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11063 @node Java Location Values
11064 @subsection Java Location Values
11066 @c - class Position
11067 @c - class Location
11069 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11070 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11071 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11072 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11073 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11074 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11075 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11077 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11078 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11079 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11080 be supplied by the user.
11083 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11084 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11085 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11088 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11089 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11092 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11093 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11096 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11097 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11098 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11099 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11103 @node Java Parser Interface
11104 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11105 @c - define parser_class_name
11107 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11109 @c - Reporting errors
11111 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11112 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11113 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11114 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11115 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11117 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11118 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11119 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11120 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11121 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11122 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11123 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11124 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11126 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11127 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11128 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11129 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11131 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11132 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11133 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11134 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11135 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11136 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11138 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11139 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11140 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11141 which initialize them automatically.
11143 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11144 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11145 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11146 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11148 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11149 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11150 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11153 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11154 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11155 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11158 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11159 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11160 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11162 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11163 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11164 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11167 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11168 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11169 @code{false} otherwise.
11172 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11173 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11174 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11175 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11176 verbose error messages.
11179 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11180 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11181 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11182 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11183 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11184 available only if location tracking is active.
11187 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11188 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11189 from a syntax error.
11190 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11193 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11194 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11195 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11199 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11200 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11201 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11202 or nonzero, full tracing.
11205 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11206 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11207 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11211 @node Java Scanner Interface
11212 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11215 @c - Lexer interface
11217 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11218 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11219 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11220 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11221 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11224 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11225 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11226 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11227 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11230 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11231 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11232 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11233 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11236 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11238 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11239 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11240 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11241 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11244 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11245 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11246 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11249 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11250 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11253 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11254 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11255 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11256 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11257 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11259 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11260 "@var{class-name}".}
11263 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11264 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11266 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
11267 "@var{class-name}".}
11271 @node Java Action Features
11272 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11274 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11275 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11277 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11278 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11281 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11282 This may not be assigned to.
11283 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11286 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11287 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11288 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11292 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11293 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11294 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11295 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11296 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11297 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11300 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11301 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11302 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11303 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11305 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11309 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11310 This may not be assigned to.
11311 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11315 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11316 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11319 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11320 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11321 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11324 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11325 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11326 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11329 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11330 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11331 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11334 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11335 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11336 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11338 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11341 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11342 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11343 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11344 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11345 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11346 available only if location tracking is active.
11350 @node Java Differences
11351 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11353 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11354 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11355 section summarizes these differences.
11359 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11360 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11361 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11362 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11363 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11364 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11365 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11367 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11368 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11369 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11370 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11371 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11374 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11375 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11376 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11377 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11378 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11379 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11380 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11381 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11382 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11385 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11387 @item @code{%code imports}
11388 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11389 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11390 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11392 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11393 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11395 @item @code{%code lexer}
11396 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11397 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11398 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11402 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11403 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11404 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11406 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11407 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11412 @node Java Declarations Summary
11413 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11415 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11416 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11418 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11419 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11422 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11423 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11424 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11425 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11426 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11429 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11430 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11431 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11432 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11435 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11436 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11437 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11438 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11441 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11442 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11443 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11446 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11447 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11448 a Java @emph{type}.
11449 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11452 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11453 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11454 @xref{Java Differences}.
11457 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11458 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11459 @xref{Java Differences}.
11462 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11463 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11464 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11467 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11468 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11469 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11472 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11473 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11474 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11475 @xref{Java Differences}.
11478 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11479 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11480 @xref{Java Differences}.
11483 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11484 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11485 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11488 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11489 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11490 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11493 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11494 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11495 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11498 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11499 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11500 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11503 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11504 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11506 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11509 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11510 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11511 constructor. Default is none.
11512 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11515 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11516 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11517 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11518 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11521 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11522 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11523 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11524 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11525 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11526 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11529 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11530 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11531 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11534 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11535 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11536 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11537 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11540 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11541 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11542 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11543 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11544 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11547 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11548 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11549 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11552 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11553 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11554 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11557 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11558 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11559 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11562 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11563 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11564 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11565 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11569 @c ================================================= FAQ
11572 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11573 @cindex frequently asked questions
11576 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11580 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11581 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11582 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11583 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11584 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11585 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11586 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11587 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11588 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11589 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11590 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11591 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11594 @node Memory Exhausted
11595 @section Memory Exhausted
11598 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11599 message. What can I do?
11602 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11605 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11606 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11608 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11609 following typical questions:
11612 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11613 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11614 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11621 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11622 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11623 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11626 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11627 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11628 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11629 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11630 @file{first-line.l}:
11636 #include <stdlib.h>
11640 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11644 yyparse (char const *file)
11646 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11650 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11654 /* One token only. */
11656 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11659 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11677 If the file @file{input} contains
11685 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11688 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11689 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11690 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11695 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11696 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11697 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11698 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11699 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11700 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11701 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11702 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11705 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11706 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11707 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11708 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11710 @node Strings are Destroyed
11711 @section Strings are Destroyed
11714 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11715 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11716 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11719 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11720 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11721 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11727 char *yylval = NULL;
11732 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11740 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11741 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11742 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11743 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11749 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11752 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11753 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11754 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11760 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11761 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11762 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11763 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11764 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11765 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11768 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11769 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11770 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11775 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11776 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11779 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11780 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11783 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11784 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11785 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11786 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11787 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11788 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11789 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11791 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11793 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11794 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11795 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11796 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11797 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11798 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11801 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11802 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11805 @node Multiple start-symbols
11806 @section Multiple start-symbols
11809 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11810 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11811 multiple entry points.
11814 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11815 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11816 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11817 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11821 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11828 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11829 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11831 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11832 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11833 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11834 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11835 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11836 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11837 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11838 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11841 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11846 int t = start_token;
11851 /* @r{The rules.} */
11855 @node Secure? Conform?
11856 @section Secure? Conform?
11859 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11862 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11863 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11864 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11865 please send us a bug report.
11867 @node I can't build Bison
11868 @section I can't build Bison
11871 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11872 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11876 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11877 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11878 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11879 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11880 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11881 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11882 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11885 @node Where can I find help?
11886 @section Where can I find help?
11889 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11892 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11893 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11894 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11895 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11896 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11897 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11898 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11899 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11903 @section Bug Reports
11906 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11909 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11910 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11911 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11912 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11913 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11915 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11916 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11917 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11918 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11919 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11921 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11922 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11923 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11924 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11925 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11926 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11928 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11929 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11931 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11933 @node More Languages
11934 @section More Languages
11937 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11938 favorite language here}?
11941 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11942 languages; contributions are welcome.
11945 @section Beta Testing
11948 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11951 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11952 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11953 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11954 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11955 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11956 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11957 essentially halted.
11959 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11960 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11961 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11962 systems are especially welcome.
11964 @node Mailing Lists
11965 @section Mailing Lists
11968 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11971 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11973 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11975 @node Table of Symbols
11976 @appendix Bison Symbols
11977 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11978 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11980 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11981 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11982 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11985 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11986 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11987 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11990 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11991 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11995 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11996 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
12000 @deffn {Variable} $$
12001 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12005 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12006 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12007 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12010 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12011 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
12015 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12016 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
12020 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12021 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12022 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12023 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12026 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12027 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12028 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12029 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12030 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12034 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12035 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12036 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12037 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12038 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12039 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12040 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12042 This feature is experimental.
12043 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12047 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
12048 Comment delimiters, as in C.
12051 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12052 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12056 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12057 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12060 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12061 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12062 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12065 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12066 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12069 This feature is experimental.
12070 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12073 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12076 @deffn {Directive} <>
12077 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12080 This feature is experimental.
12081 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12084 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12087 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12088 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12089 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12090 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12093 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12094 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12095 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12096 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12097 @xref{%code Summary}.
12100 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12101 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12105 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12106 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12107 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12112 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12113 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12114 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12115 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12118 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12119 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12120 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12123 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12124 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12125 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12128 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12129 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12130 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12133 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12134 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12135 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12139 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12140 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12141 used in the grammar.
12144 @deffn {Symbol} error
12145 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12146 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12147 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12148 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12149 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12150 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12151 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12152 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12155 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12156 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12157 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12160 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12161 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12165 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12166 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12167 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12170 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12171 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12174 @deffn {Directive} %language
12175 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12176 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12179 @deffn {Directive} %left
12180 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12181 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12184 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12185 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12186 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12190 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12191 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12192 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12193 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12194 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12197 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12198 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12199 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12201 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12202 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12203 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12205 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12206 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12207 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12208 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12209 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12210 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12211 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12212 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12217 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12218 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12219 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12224 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12225 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12226 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12229 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12230 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12231 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12234 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12235 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12236 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12239 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12240 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12241 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12242 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12245 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12246 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12247 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12250 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12251 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12252 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12255 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12256 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12257 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12260 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12261 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12262 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12263 unreasonable usage.
12266 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12267 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12268 Require a Version of Bison}.
12271 @deffn {Directive} %right
12272 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12273 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12276 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12277 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12278 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12281 @deffn {Directive} %start
12282 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12286 @deffn {Directive} %token
12287 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12288 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12291 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12292 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12293 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12296 @deffn {Directive} %type
12297 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12298 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12301 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12302 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12303 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12307 @deffn {Directive} %union
12308 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12309 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12312 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12313 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12314 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12315 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12316 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12318 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12322 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12323 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12324 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12325 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12327 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12331 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12332 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12333 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12336 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12337 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12338 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12339 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12340 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12343 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12344 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12345 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12348 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12349 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12350 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12353 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12354 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12355 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12356 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12359 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12360 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12361 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12364 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12365 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12366 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12367 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12368 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12369 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12371 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12375 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12376 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12377 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12380 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12381 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12382 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12383 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12384 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12385 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12386 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12389 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12390 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12391 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12394 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12395 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12396 @xref{Memory Management}.
12399 @deffn {Function} yylex
12400 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12401 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12405 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
12406 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
12407 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
12408 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
12409 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
12412 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12413 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12414 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12415 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12417 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12419 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12420 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12421 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12424 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12425 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12426 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12429 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12430 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12431 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12432 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12434 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12435 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12436 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12439 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12440 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12444 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12445 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12446 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12447 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
12448 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12451 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12452 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12453 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12456 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12457 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12458 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12459 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12462 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12463 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12464 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12465 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12466 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12467 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12468 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12471 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12472 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12473 call this function to create a new parser.
12474 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12475 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12476 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12477 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12480 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12481 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12482 parse the rest of the input stream.
12483 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12484 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12485 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12486 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12489 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12490 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12491 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12492 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12493 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12494 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12497 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12498 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12499 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12500 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12503 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12504 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12505 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12506 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12507 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12508 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12509 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12511 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12512 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12513 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12514 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12515 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12516 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12517 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12520 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12521 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12522 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12530 @item Accepting state
12531 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12532 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12533 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12535 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12536 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12537 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12538 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12539 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12541 @item Consistent state
12542 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12544 @item Context-free grammars
12545 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12546 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12547 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12548 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12551 @item Default reduction
12552 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12553 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12554 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12555 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12558 @item Defaulted state
12559 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12561 @item Dynamic allocation
12562 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12563 compile time or on entry to a function.
12566 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12567 character string of length zero.
12569 @item Finite-state stack machine
12570 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12571 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12572 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12573 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12574 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12575 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12577 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12578 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12579 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12580 deterministic parsing
12581 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12582 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12583 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12587 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12588 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12589 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12591 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12592 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12593 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12594 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12595 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12596 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12597 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12598 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12599 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12600 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12602 @item Infix operator
12603 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12604 performs some operation.
12607 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12609 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12610 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12611 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12612 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12613 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12614 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12615 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12617 @item Language construct
12618 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12619 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12620 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12622 @item Left associativity
12623 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12624 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12625 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12627 @item Left recursion
12628 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12629 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12632 @item Left-to-right parsing
12633 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12634 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12636 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12637 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12638 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12640 @item Lexical tie-in
12641 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12642 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12644 @item Literal string token
12645 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12647 @item Lookahead token
12648 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12652 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12653 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12654 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12657 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12658 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12660 @item Nonterminal symbol
12661 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12662 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12663 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12666 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12667 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12670 @item Postfix operator
12671 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12672 performs some operation.
12675 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12676 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12680 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12681 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12682 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12684 @item Reverse polish notation
12685 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12687 @item Right recursion
12688 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12689 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12693 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12694 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12695 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12698 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12699 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12700 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12702 @item Single-character literal
12703 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12704 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12707 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12708 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12709 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12710 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12713 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12714 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12715 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12718 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12719 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12722 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12723 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12724 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12725 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12727 @item Terminal symbol
12728 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12729 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12730 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12732 @item Unreachable state
12733 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12734 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12735 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12738 @node Copying This Manual
12739 @appendix Copying This Manual
12743 @unnumbered Bibliography
12747 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12748 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12749 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12750 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12752 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12753 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12754 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12755 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12756 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12758 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12759 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12760 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12761 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12762 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12764 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12765 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12766 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12767 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12768 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12771 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12772 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12773 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12776 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12777 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12778 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12779 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12782 @node Index of Terms
12783 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12789 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12790 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12791 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12792 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12793 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12794 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12795 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12796 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12797 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12798 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12799 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12800 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12801 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12802 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12803 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12804 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12805 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12806 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12807 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12808 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12809 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12810 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12811 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12812 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12813 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12814 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12815 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12816 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12817 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12818 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12819 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12820 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12821 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12822 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12823 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12824 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12825 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12826 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12827 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12828 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12829 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12830 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12831 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12832 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12833 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12834 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12835 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12836 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12837 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12838 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12839 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12840 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12841 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12842 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12843 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12844 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12845 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12846 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12848 @c Local Variables:
12849 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"