1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
279 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
283 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
284 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
285 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
286 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
288 Handling Context Dependencies
290 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
291 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
292 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
293 error recovery rules must be written.
295 Debugging Your Parser
297 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
298 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
302 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
303 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
304 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
308 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
309 in alphabetical order by short options.
310 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
311 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
313 Parsers Written In Other Languages
315 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
316 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
320 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
321 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
322 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
323 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
324 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
325 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
329 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
330 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
332 A Complete C++ Example
334 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
335 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
336 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
337 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
338 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
342 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
343 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
344 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
345 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
346 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
347 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
348 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
349 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
351 Frequently Asked Questions
353 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
354 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
355 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
356 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
357 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
358 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
359 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
360 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
361 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
362 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
363 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
364 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
368 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
374 @unnumbered Introduction
377 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
378 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
379 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
380 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
381 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
382 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
383 calculators to complex programming languages.
385 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
386 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
387 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
388 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
389 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
392 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
393 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
394 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
395 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
398 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
399 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
400 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
401 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
402 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
403 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
406 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
409 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
411 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
412 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
413 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
414 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
415 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
417 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
419 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
420 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
421 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
422 License to all of the Bison source code.
424 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
425 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
426 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
427 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
428 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
429 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
430 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
432 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
433 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
434 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
435 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
436 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
437 using the other GNU tools.
439 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
440 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
441 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
442 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
446 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
447 @include gpl-3.0.texi
450 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
452 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
453 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
454 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
457 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
458 as mathematical ideas.
459 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
460 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
461 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
462 the name of an identifier, etc.).
463 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
464 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
465 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
466 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
467 how is the output used?
468 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
469 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
472 @node Language and Grammar
473 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
475 @cindex context-free grammar
476 @cindex grammar, context-free
477 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
478 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
479 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
480 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
481 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
482 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
483 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
484 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
488 @cindex Backus-Naur form
489 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
490 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
491 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
492 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
493 essentially machine-readable BNF.
495 @cindex LALR grammars
496 @cindex IELR grammars
498 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
499 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
500 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
501 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
502 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
503 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
504 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
505 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
506 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
507 Construction}, to learn how.
510 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
511 @cindex ambiguous grammars
512 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
514 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
515 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
516 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
517 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
518 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
519 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
520 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
521 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
522 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
523 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
524 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
525 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
526 possible parses of any given string is finite.
528 @cindex symbols (abstract)
530 @cindex syntactic grouping
531 @cindex grouping, syntactic
532 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
533 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
534 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
535 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
536 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
537 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
538 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
540 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
541 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
542 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
543 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
544 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
545 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
546 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
547 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
548 lexicography, not grammar.)
550 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
553 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
554 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
555 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
556 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
557 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
558 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
559 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
562 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
563 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
564 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
565 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
566 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
567 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
568 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
569 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
571 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
572 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
573 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
574 reads informally as follows:
577 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
582 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
586 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
587 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
588 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
589 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
592 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
593 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
594 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
595 not the start symbol.
597 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
598 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
599 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
600 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
601 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
602 reports a syntax error.
604 @node Grammar in Bison
605 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
606 @cindex Bison grammar
607 @cindex grammar, Bison
608 @cindex formal grammar
610 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
611 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
612 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
614 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
615 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
616 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
618 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
619 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
620 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
621 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
622 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
623 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
624 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
627 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
628 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
629 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
630 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
632 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
633 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
635 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
636 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
637 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
638 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
642 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
646 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
648 @node Semantic Values
649 @section Semantic Values
650 @cindex semantic value
651 @cindex value, semantic
653 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
654 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
655 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
656 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
657 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
660 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
661 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
662 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
663 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
664 ,Defining Language Semantics},
667 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
668 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
669 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
670 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
673 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
674 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
675 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
676 need to have any semantic value.)
678 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
679 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
680 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
681 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
682 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
683 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
685 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
686 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
687 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
688 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
689 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
691 @node Semantic Actions
692 @section Semantic Actions
693 @cindex semantic actions
694 @cindex actions, semantic
696 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
697 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
698 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
699 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
702 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
703 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
704 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
705 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
706 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
707 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
708 newly recognized larger expression.
710 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
714 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
718 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
719 from the values of the two subexpressions.
722 @section Writing GLR Parsers
724 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
727 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
728 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
730 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
731 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
732 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
733 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
734 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
735 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
736 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
740 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
741 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
742 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
743 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
744 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
745 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
746 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
747 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
748 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
749 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
750 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
751 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
752 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
753 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
754 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
755 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
756 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
757 identical set of symbols.
759 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
760 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
761 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
762 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
763 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
764 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
765 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
766 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
767 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
771 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
772 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
773 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
774 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
777 @node Simple GLR Parsers
778 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
779 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
780 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
785 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
787 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
788 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
789 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
791 Consider a problem that
792 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
793 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
796 type subrange = lo .. hi;
797 type enum = (a, b, c);
801 The original language standard allows only numeric
802 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
803 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
804 10206) and many other
805 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
806 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
810 type subrange = (a) .. b;
814 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
815 type with only one value:
822 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
823 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
825 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
826 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
827 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
828 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
829 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
830 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
831 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
832 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
834 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
835 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
836 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
837 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
840 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
841 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
842 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
843 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
844 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
845 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
848 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
849 use the GLR algorithm.
850 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
851 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
852 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
853 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
854 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
855 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
856 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
857 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
858 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
860 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
861 reports a syntax error as usual.
863 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
864 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
865 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
866 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
867 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
869 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
870 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
871 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
872 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
873 The present example contains only one conflict between two
874 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
875 cannot be nested. So the number of
876 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
877 and the parsing time is still linear.
879 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
880 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
883 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
893 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
922 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
923 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
924 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
925 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
932 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
933 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
934 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
943 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
944 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
945 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
946 notice when the parser splits.
948 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
949 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
950 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
951 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
952 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
953 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
954 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
955 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
956 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
957 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
958 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
959 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
960 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
963 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
964 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
965 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
966 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
967 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
968 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
970 @node Merging GLR Parses
971 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
972 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
973 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
977 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
979 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
984 #define YYSTYPE char const *
986 void yyerror (char const *);
1000 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1009 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1010 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1011 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1012 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1013 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1017 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1018 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1019 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1020 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1024 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1025 | '(' declarator ')'
1030 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1031 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1038 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1039 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1040 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1041 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1042 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1043 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1044 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1045 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1046 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1047 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1048 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1049 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1050 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1051 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1053 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1054 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1055 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1056 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1057 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1058 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1059 The parser therefore prints
1062 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1065 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1066 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1073 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1074 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1075 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1076 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1077 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1078 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1079 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1080 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1081 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1082 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1088 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1089 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1090 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1091 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1096 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1097 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1102 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1106 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1114 with an accompanying forward declaration
1115 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1119 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1120 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1125 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1126 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1129 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1132 Bison requires that all of the
1133 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1134 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1135 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1136 the offending merge.
1138 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1139 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1141 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1142 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1143 the associated reduction.
1144 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1145 action in a GLR parser.
1148 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1150 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1152 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1153 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1154 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1155 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1156 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1157 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1158 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1159 influence syntax analysis.
1160 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1163 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1164 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1165 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1166 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1167 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1168 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1169 future versions of Bison.
1170 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1171 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1172 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1175 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1176 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1177 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1178 initiate error recovery.
1179 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1180 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1181 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1182 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1184 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1185 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1187 @node Compiler Requirements
1188 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1189 @cindex @code{inline}
1190 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1192 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1193 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1194 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1195 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1196 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1197 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1206 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1210 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1211 && ! defined inline)
1220 @cindex textual location
1221 @cindex location, textual
1223 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1224 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1225 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1226 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1228 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1229 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1230 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1231 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1234 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1235 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1236 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1239 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1240 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1241 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1242 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1243 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1244 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1245 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1248 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1249 @cindex Bison parser
1250 @cindex Bison utility
1251 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1254 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1255 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1256 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1257 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1258 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1259 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1260 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1263 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1264 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1265 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1268 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1269 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1270 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1271 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1272 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1273 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1274 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1276 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1277 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1278 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1279 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1280 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1281 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1282 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1283 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1284 C-Language Interface}.
1286 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1287 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1288 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1289 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1290 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1291 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1292 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1293 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1294 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1295 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1296 anything other than their usual meanings.
1298 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1299 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1300 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1301 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1302 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1303 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1304 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1305 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1306 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1309 @section Stages in Using Bison
1310 @cindex stages in using Bison
1313 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1314 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1318 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1319 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1320 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1321 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1322 sequence of C statements.
1325 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1326 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1327 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1328 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1331 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1334 Write error-reporting routines.
1337 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1338 must follow these steps:
1342 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1345 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1348 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1351 @node Grammar Layout
1352 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1353 @cindex grammar file
1355 @cindex format of grammar file
1356 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1358 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1359 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1366 @var{Bison declarations}
1375 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1376 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1378 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1379 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1380 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1381 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1382 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1383 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1385 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1386 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1387 semantic values of various symbols.
1389 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1392 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1393 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1394 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1398 @cindex simple examples
1399 @cindex examples, simple
1401 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1402 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1403 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1404 and a multi-function calculator. All
1405 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1407 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1408 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1409 source file to try them.
1412 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1413 a first example with no operator precedence.
1414 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1415 Operator precedence is introduced.
1416 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1417 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1418 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1419 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1420 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1424 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1425 @cindex reverse polish notation
1426 @cindex polish notation calculator
1427 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1428 @cindex calculator, simple
1430 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1431 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1432 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1433 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1435 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1436 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1439 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1440 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1441 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1442 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1443 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1444 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1445 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1448 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1449 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1451 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1452 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1455 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1458 #define YYSTYPE double
1461 void yyerror (char const *);
1466 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1469 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1470 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1472 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1473 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1474 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1475 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1476 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1477 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1478 which is a floating point number.
1480 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1481 function @code{pow}.
1483 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1484 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1485 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1486 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1489 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1490 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1491 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1492 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1493 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1494 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1495 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1496 type for numeric constants.
1499 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1501 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1514 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1521 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1522 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1523 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1524 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1526 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1532 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1533 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1534 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1535 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1536 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1539 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1540 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1541 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1543 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1544 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1545 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1546 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1547 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1548 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1557 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1559 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1568 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1569 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1570 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1571 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1572 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1574 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1575 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1576 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1577 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1578 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1579 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1581 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1582 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1583 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1584 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1587 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1588 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1589 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1592 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1594 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1599 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1603 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1604 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1605 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1606 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1607 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1608 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1609 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1611 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1612 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1613 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1614 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1615 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1618 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1620 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1621 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1622 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1623 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1628 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1629 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1634 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1635 equally well have written them separately:
1639 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1640 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1644 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1645 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1646 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1647 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1648 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1649 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1650 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1651 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1653 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1654 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1655 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1657 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1658 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1662 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1666 means the same thing as this:
1671 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1677 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1680 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1681 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1682 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1684 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1685 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1686 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1687 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1689 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1691 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1692 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1693 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1694 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1696 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1697 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1698 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1699 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1700 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1701 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1702 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1703 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1704 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1706 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1707 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1708 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1709 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1710 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1712 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1713 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1715 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1719 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1720 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1721 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1722 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1733 /* Skip white space. */
1734 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1738 /* Process numbers. */
1739 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1742 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1747 /* Return end-of-input. */
1750 /* Return a single char. */
1757 @subsection The Controlling Function
1758 @cindex controlling function
1759 @cindex main function in simple example
1761 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1762 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1763 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1776 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1777 @cindex error reporting routine
1779 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1780 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1781 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1782 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1783 here is the definition we will use:
1791 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1793 yyerror (char const *s)
1795 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1800 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1801 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1802 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1803 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1804 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1805 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1807 @node Rpcalc Generate
1808 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1809 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1811 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1812 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1813 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1814 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1815 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1816 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1818 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1819 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1821 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1822 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1829 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1830 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1831 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1832 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1833 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1834 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1835 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1837 @node Rpcalc Compile
1838 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1839 @cindex compiling the parser
1841 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1845 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1847 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1851 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1852 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1853 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1857 # @r{List files again.}
1859 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1863 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1864 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1870 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1872 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1876 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1878 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1883 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1884 @cindex infix notation calculator
1886 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1888 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1889 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1890 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1891 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1894 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1898 #define YYSTYPE double
1902 void yyerror (char const *);
1907 /* Bison declarations. */
1911 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1912 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1915 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1926 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1933 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1934 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1935 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1936 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1937 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1938 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1939 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1946 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1949 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1951 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1952 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1953 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1954 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1955 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1956 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1959 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1960 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1961 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1962 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1963 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1966 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1967 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1968 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1969 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1970 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1972 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1977 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1985 @node Simple Error Recovery
1986 @section Simple Error Recovery
1987 @cindex error recovery, simple
1989 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1990 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1991 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1992 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1993 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1994 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1996 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1997 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1998 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2004 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2005 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2010 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2011 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2012 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2013 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2014 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2015 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2016 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2017 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2020 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2021 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2022 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2023 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2024 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2025 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2028 @node Location Tracking Calc
2029 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2030 @cindex location tracking calculator
2031 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2032 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2034 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2035 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2036 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2037 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2041 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2042 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2043 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2046 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2047 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2049 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2050 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2053 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2059 void yyerror (char const *);
2062 /* Bison declarations. */
2070 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2074 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2075 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2076 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2077 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2078 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2079 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2080 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2084 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2086 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2087 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2088 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2089 from the new information.
2091 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2092 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2105 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2112 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2113 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2114 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2124 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2125 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2126 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2131 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2132 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2133 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2137 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2138 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2139 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2141 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2142 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2143 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2144 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2145 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2146 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2150 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2152 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2153 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2154 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2157 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2158 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2169 /* Skip white space. */
2170 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2171 ++yylloc.last_column;
2176 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2177 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2181 /* Process numbers. */
2185 ++yylloc.last_column;
2186 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2188 ++yylloc.last_column;
2189 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2196 /* Return end-of-input. */
2201 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2205 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2208 ++yylloc.last_column;
2214 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2215 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2216 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2217 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2219 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2220 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2221 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2222 controlling function:
2229 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2230 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2236 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2237 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2238 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2240 @node Multi-function Calc
2241 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2242 @cindex multi-function calculator
2243 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2244 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2246 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2247 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2248 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2249 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2250 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2252 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2253 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2254 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2255 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2256 functions whose syntax has this form:
2259 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2263 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2264 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2265 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2269 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2273 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2279 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2284 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2287 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2288 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2289 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2292 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2293 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2295 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2297 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2301 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2302 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2304 void yyerror (char const *);
2310 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2311 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2314 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2315 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2322 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2323 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2327 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2328 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2329 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2331 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2332 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2333 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2334 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2336 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2337 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2338 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2339 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2340 between angle brackets).
2342 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2343 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2344 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2345 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2346 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2347 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2350 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2352 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2353 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2354 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2356 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2358 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2369 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2370 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2377 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2378 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2379 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2380 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2381 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2382 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2383 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2384 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2385 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2386 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2389 /* End of grammar. */
2393 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2394 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2395 @cindex symbol table example
2397 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2398 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2399 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2400 requires some additional C functions for support.
2402 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2403 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2404 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2406 @comment file: calc.h
2409 /* Function type. */
2410 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2414 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2417 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2418 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2421 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2422 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2424 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2429 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2431 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2432 extern symrec *sym_table;
2434 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2435 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2439 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2440 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2441 @code{init_table} as well:
2443 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2448 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2450 yyerror (char const *s)
2460 double (*fnct) (double);
2465 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2478 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2483 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2488 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2490 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2491 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2506 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2507 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2509 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2510 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2511 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2512 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2513 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2514 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2516 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2518 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2519 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2523 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2525 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2526 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2527 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2528 ptr->type = sym_type;
2529 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2530 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2538 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2541 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2542 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2543 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2550 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2551 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2552 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2553 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2555 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2556 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2557 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2558 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2559 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2560 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2562 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2563 operators in @code{yylex}.
2565 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2577 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2578 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2586 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2587 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2590 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2596 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2599 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2600 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2601 static size_t length = 40;
2602 static char *symbuf = 0;
2608 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2614 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2618 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2620 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2622 /* Get another character. */
2627 while (isalnum (c));
2634 s = getsym (symbuf);
2636 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2641 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2647 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2648 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2649 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2651 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2654 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2656 yyerror (char const *s)
2658 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2664 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2667 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2668 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2669 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2677 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2678 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2679 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2687 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2690 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2691 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2692 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2695 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2696 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2700 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2702 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2703 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2705 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2706 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2709 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2710 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2711 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2712 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2713 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2714 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2715 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2716 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2717 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2720 @node Grammar Outline
2721 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2723 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2724 appropriate delimiters:
2731 @var{Bison declarations}
2740 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2741 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2742 continues until end of line.
2745 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2746 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2747 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2748 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2749 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2753 @subsection The prologue
2754 @cindex declarations section
2756 @cindex declarations
2758 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2759 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2760 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2761 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2762 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2763 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2764 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2766 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2767 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2770 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2771 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2772 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2773 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2774 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2775 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2776 @code{%union} declaration.
2787 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2791 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2792 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2798 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2799 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2800 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2801 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2802 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2803 @code{#include} directives.
2805 @node Prologue Alternatives
2806 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2807 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2810 @findex %code requires
2811 @findex %code provides
2814 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2815 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2816 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2817 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2818 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2819 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2820 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2822 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2833 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2837 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2838 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2845 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2846 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2847 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2848 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2849 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2850 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2851 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2852 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2853 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2854 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2855 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2857 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2858 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2859 This behavior raises a few questions.
2860 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2861 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2862 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2863 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2864 This behavior is not intuitive.
2866 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2867 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2868 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2869 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2876 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2877 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2880 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2881 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2893 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2897 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2898 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2899 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2906 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2907 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2908 explicit which kind you intend.
2909 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2911 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2912 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2913 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2914 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2915 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2916 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2917 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2918 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2919 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2922 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2923 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2925 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2943 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2949 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2950 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2963 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2964 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2965 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2973 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2974 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2975 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2976 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2977 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2978 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2980 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2981 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2982 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2983 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2984 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2985 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2986 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2987 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2988 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2989 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2990 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2993 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2994 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2995 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2996 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2997 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2998 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2999 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3000 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3001 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3002 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3020 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3026 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3027 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3040 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3046 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3047 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3055 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3056 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3057 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3060 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3061 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3062 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3063 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3064 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3065 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3068 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3069 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3070 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3071 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3073 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3074 organize your grammar file.
3075 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3080 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3081 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3082 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3083 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3087 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3088 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3089 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3090 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3095 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3096 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3098 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3100 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3101 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3102 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3103 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3105 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3106 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3107 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3108 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3109 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3110 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3111 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3112 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3115 @node Bison Declarations
3116 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3117 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3118 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3120 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3121 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3122 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3123 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3126 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3127 @cindex grammar rules section
3128 @cindex rules section for grammar
3130 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3131 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3133 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3134 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3135 if it is the first thing in the file.
3138 @subsection The epilogue
3139 @cindex additional C code section
3141 @cindex C code, section for additional
3143 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3144 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3145 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3146 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3147 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3148 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3149 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3150 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3151 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3152 C-Language Interface}.
3154 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3155 from the grammar rules.
3157 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3158 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3159 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3160 of the grammar file.
3163 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3164 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3165 @cindex terminal symbol
3169 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3172 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3173 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3174 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3175 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3176 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3177 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3178 the symbol to stand for it.
3180 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3181 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3182 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3184 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3185 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3186 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3187 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3188 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3189 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3190 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3192 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3196 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3197 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3198 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3199 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3202 @cindex character token
3203 @cindex literal token
3204 @cindex single-character literal
3205 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3206 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3207 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3208 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3209 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3210 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3211 ,Operator Precedence}).
3213 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3214 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3215 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3216 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3217 your program will confuse other readers.
3219 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3220 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3221 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3222 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3223 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3224 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3228 @cindex string token
3229 @cindex literal string token
3230 @cindex multicharacter literal
3231 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3232 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3233 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3234 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3235 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3237 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3238 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3239 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3240 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3241 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3243 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3245 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3246 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3247 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3248 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3249 read your program will be confused.
3251 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3252 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3253 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3254 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3255 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3256 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3259 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3260 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3261 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3263 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3264 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3265 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3266 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3267 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3268 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3269 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3270 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3271 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3272 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3273 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3274 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3276 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3277 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3278 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3279 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3280 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3282 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3283 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3284 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3285 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3286 characters in the following C-language string:
3289 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3292 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3293 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3294 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3295 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3296 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3297 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3298 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3299 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3300 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3301 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3304 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3305 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3306 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3307 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3308 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3311 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3313 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3314 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3316 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3320 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3325 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3326 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3327 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3338 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3339 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3341 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3342 extra white space as you wish.
3344 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3345 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3348 @{@var{C statements}@}
3353 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3354 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3355 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3356 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3357 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3358 compiler can check it.
3360 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3361 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3362 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3363 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3364 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3365 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3366 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3367 character constants.
3369 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3373 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3374 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3379 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3380 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3387 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3389 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3390 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3391 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3410 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3414 @section Recursive Rules
3415 @cindex recursive rule
3417 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3418 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3419 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3420 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3421 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3432 @cindex left recursion
3433 @cindex right recursion
3435 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3436 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3437 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3449 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3450 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3451 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3452 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3453 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3454 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3455 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3458 @cindex mutual recursion
3459 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3460 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3461 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3470 | primary '+' primary
3483 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3487 @section Defining Language Semantics
3488 @cindex defining language semantics
3489 @cindex language semantics, defining
3491 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3492 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3493 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3495 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3496 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3497 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3498 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3501 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3502 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3503 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3504 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3505 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3506 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3507 action in the middle of a rule.
3511 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3512 @cindex semantic value type
3513 @cindex value type, semantic
3514 @cindex data types of semantic values
3515 @cindex default data type
3517 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3518 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3519 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3520 Notation Calculator}).
3522 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3523 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3524 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3527 #define YYSTYPE double
3531 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3532 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3533 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3534 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3536 @node Multiple Types
3537 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3539 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3540 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3541 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3542 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3545 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3546 requires you to do two things:
3550 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3551 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3552 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3553 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3557 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3558 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3559 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3560 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3561 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3570 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3572 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3573 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3574 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3575 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3577 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3578 placed at any position in the rule;
3579 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3580 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3581 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3582 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3584 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3585 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3586 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3587 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3588 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3589 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3590 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3591 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3592 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3593 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3596 Here is a typical example:
3602 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3606 Or, in terms of named references:
3612 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3617 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3618 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3619 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3620 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3621 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3622 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3624 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3625 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3626 referred to as @code{$2}.
3628 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3629 references construct.
3631 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3632 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3633 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3634 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3635 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3639 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3643 @cindex default action
3644 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3645 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3646 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3647 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3648 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3649 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3651 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3652 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3653 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3654 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3655 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3660 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3661 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3667 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3672 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3673 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3674 definition of @code{foo}.
3677 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3678 any, from a semantic action.
3679 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3680 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3683 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3684 @cindex action data types
3685 @cindex data types in actions
3687 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3688 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3690 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3691 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3692 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3693 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3694 in the rule. In this example,
3700 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3705 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3706 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3707 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3708 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3710 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3711 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3712 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3724 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3725 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3727 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3728 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3729 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3730 @cindex mid-rule actions
3732 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3733 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3734 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3736 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3737 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3738 it is run before they are parsed.
3740 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3741 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3742 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3743 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3746 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3747 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3748 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3749 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3750 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3751 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3753 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3754 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3755 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3756 at the end of the rule.
3758 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3759 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3760 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3761 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3762 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3763 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3769 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3771 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3776 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3777 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3778 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3779 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3780 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3781 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3782 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3783 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3785 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3786 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3787 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3788 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3789 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3792 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3793 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3794 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3795 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3796 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3798 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3799 Discarded Symbols}).
3800 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3801 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3803 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3804 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3809 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3823 $$ = push_context ();
3824 declare_variable ($3);
3831 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3832 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3833 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3835 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3836 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3837 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3838 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3839 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3845 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3846 | '@{' statements '@}'
3852 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3857 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3858 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3861 | '@{' statements '@}'
3867 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3868 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3869 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3870 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3871 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3872 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3874 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3875 actions into the two rules, like this:
3880 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3881 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3882 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3883 '@{' statements '@}'
3889 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3890 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3892 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3893 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3894 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3899 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3900 declarations statements '@}'
3901 | '@{' statements '@}'
3907 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3908 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3910 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3911 serves as a subroutine:
3916 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3922 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3923 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3929 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3930 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3932 @node Tracking Locations
3933 @section Tracking Locations
3935 @cindex textual location
3936 @cindex location, textual
3938 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3939 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3940 especially symbol locations.
3942 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3943 actions to take when rules are matched.
3946 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3947 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3948 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3952 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3953 @cindex data type of locations
3954 @cindex default location type
3956 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3957 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3959 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3960 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3961 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3962 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3966 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3975 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3976 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3977 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3978 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3979 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3981 @node Actions and Locations
3982 @subsection Actions and Locations
3983 @cindex location actions
3984 @cindex actions, location
3987 @vindex @@@var{name}
3988 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3990 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3991 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3993 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3994 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3995 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3996 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3997 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4000 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4001 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4002 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4003 references construct.
4005 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4013 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4014 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4015 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4016 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4023 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4024 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4025 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4031 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4032 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4033 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4036 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4037 example above simply rewrites this way:
4051 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4052 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4053 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4060 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4061 from a semantic action.
4062 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4063 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4065 @node Location Default Action
4066 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4067 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4068 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4070 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4071 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4072 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4073 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4074 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4075 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4076 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4077 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4080 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4081 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4083 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4084 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4085 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4086 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4087 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4088 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4089 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4090 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4091 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4092 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4094 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4098 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4102 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4103 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4104 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4105 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4109 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4110 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4111 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4112 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4119 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4120 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4121 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4123 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4127 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4128 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4131 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4132 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4133 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4134 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4137 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4138 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4139 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4140 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4143 @node Named References
4144 @section Named References
4145 @cindex named references
4147 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4148 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4149 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4150 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4151 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4152 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4154 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4155 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4156 used as named references. For example:
4160 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4161 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4166 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4170 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4171 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4176 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4182 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4185 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4188 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4193 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4194 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4195 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4198 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4199 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4204 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4205 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4206 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4209 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4210 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4216 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4217 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4220 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4221 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4225 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4226 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4227 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4228 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4229 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4230 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4231 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4233 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4237 @section Bison Declarations
4238 @cindex declarations, Bison
4239 @cindex Bison declarations
4241 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4242 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4245 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4246 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4247 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4248 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4250 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4251 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4252 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4253 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4256 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4257 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4258 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4259 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4260 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4261 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4262 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4263 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4264 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4265 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4266 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4267 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4268 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4269 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4270 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4274 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4275 @cindex version requirement
4276 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4279 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4280 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4284 %require "@var{version}"
4288 @subsection Token Type Names
4289 @cindex declaring token type names
4290 @cindex token type names, declaring
4291 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4294 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4300 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4301 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4302 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4304 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4305 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4306 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4309 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4310 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4311 following the token name:
4315 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4319 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4320 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4321 with each other or with normal characters.
4323 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4324 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4325 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4326 Than One Value Type}).
4332 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4336 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4340 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4341 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4342 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4349 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4350 equivalent literal string tokens:
4353 %token <operator> OR "||"
4354 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4359 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4360 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4361 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4362 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4363 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4364 the literal string instead of the token name.
4366 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4367 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4371 %token END 0 "end of file"
4374 @node Precedence Decl
4375 @subsection Operator Precedence
4376 @cindex precedence declarations
4377 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4378 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4380 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4381 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4382 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4383 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4384 operator precedence.
4386 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4387 @code{%token}: either
4390 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4397 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4400 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4401 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4402 all the @var{symbols}:
4406 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4407 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4408 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4409 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4410 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4411 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4412 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4413 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4414 considered a syntax error.
4417 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4418 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4419 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4420 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4421 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4424 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4425 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4426 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4427 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4432 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4433 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4437 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4438 @cindex declaring value types
4439 @cindex value types, declaring
4442 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4443 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4444 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4459 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4460 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4461 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4462 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4464 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4465 @code{union}. For example:
4477 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4478 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4481 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4482 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4483 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4485 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4486 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4488 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4489 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4490 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4491 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4499 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4504 and then your grammar can use the following
4505 instead of @code{%union}:
4518 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4519 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4520 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4524 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4525 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4526 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4529 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4533 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4534 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4535 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4536 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4537 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4540 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4541 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4542 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4543 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4545 @node Initial Action Decl
4546 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4547 @findex %initial-action
4549 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4550 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4553 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4554 @findex %initial-action
4555 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4556 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4557 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4558 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4561 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4564 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4567 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4572 @node Destructor Decl
4573 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4574 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4578 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4579 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4580 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4581 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4582 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4583 must discard the start symbol.
4585 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4586 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4587 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4588 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4590 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4591 symbol is automatically discarded.
4593 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4595 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4596 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4597 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4598 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4599 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4602 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4603 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4604 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4605 tag among @var{symbols}.
4606 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4607 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4608 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4610 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4611 (These default forms are experimental.
4612 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4614 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4615 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4616 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4617 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4619 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4620 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4621 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4622 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4623 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4630 %union @{ char *string; @}
4631 %token <string> STRING1
4632 %token <string> STRING2
4633 %type <string> string1
4634 %type <string> string2
4635 %union @{ char character; @}
4636 %token <character> CHR
4637 %type <character> chr
4640 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4641 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4642 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4643 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4647 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4648 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4649 to @code{free} by default.
4650 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4651 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4652 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4653 @code{free} only once.
4654 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4655 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4657 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4658 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4659 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4660 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4661 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4662 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4663 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4664 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4665 reference it in your grammar.
4666 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4667 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4673 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4674 @cindex mid-rule actions
4675 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4676 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4677 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4678 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4679 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4680 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4681 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4682 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4686 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4687 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4688 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4693 @cindex discarded symbols
4694 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4698 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4700 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4702 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4703 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4705 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4708 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4709 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4712 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4713 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4714 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4718 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4719 @cindex printing semantic values
4723 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4724 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4725 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4726 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4728 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4729 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4730 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4732 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4735 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4736 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4737 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4738 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4739 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4740 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4741 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4744 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4745 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4746 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4747 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4755 %union @{ char *string; @}
4756 %token <string> STRING1
4757 %token <string> STRING2
4758 %type <string> string1
4759 %type <string> string2
4760 %union @{ char character; @}
4761 %token <character> CHR
4762 %type <character> chr
4765 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4766 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4767 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4768 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4772 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4773 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4774 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4775 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4776 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4777 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4778 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4782 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4783 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4784 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4785 @cindex warnings, preventing
4786 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4790 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4791 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4792 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4793 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4794 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4795 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4797 The declaration looks like this:
4803 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4804 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4805 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4806 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4808 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4809 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4810 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4811 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4812 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4813 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4814 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4820 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4824 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4825 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4826 print the number of conflicts.
4829 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4830 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4831 go back to the beginning.
4834 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4835 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4836 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4839 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4840 but will keep silent otherwise.
4843 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4844 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4845 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4846 @cindex default start symbol
4849 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4850 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4851 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4858 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4859 @cindex reentrant parser
4861 @findex %define api.pure
4863 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4864 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4865 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4866 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4867 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4868 program must be called only within interlocks.
4870 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4871 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4872 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4873 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4874 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4876 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4877 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4878 reentrant. It looks like this:
4884 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4885 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4886 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4887 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4888 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4889 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4890 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4891 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4892 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4894 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4895 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4899 @subsection A Push Parser
4902 @findex %define api.push-pull
4904 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4905 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4907 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4908 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4909 each time a new token is made available.
4911 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4912 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4913 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4914 within a certain time period.
4916 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4917 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4918 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4921 %define api.push-pull push
4924 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4925 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4926 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4927 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4928 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4932 %define api.push-pull push
4935 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4936 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4937 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4938 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4940 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4941 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4942 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4943 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4944 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4945 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4946 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4947 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4951 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4953 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4954 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4955 yypstate_delete (ps);
4958 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4959 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4960 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4961 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4962 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4963 example would thus look like this:
4968 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4971 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4972 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4973 yypstate_delete (ps);
4976 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4977 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4979 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4980 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4981 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4982 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4983 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4984 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4985 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4986 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4987 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4988 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4989 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4990 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4991 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4992 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4993 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4994 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4995 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4999 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5000 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5001 yypstate_delete (ps);
5004 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5005 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5006 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5009 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5010 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5011 @cindex declaration summary
5012 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5014 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5016 @deffn {Directive} %union
5017 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5018 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5021 @deffn {Directive} %token
5022 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5023 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5026 @deffn {Directive} %right
5027 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5028 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5031 @deffn {Directive} %left
5032 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5033 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5036 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5037 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5038 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5039 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5043 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5044 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5045 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5049 @deffn {Directive} %type
5050 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5051 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5054 @deffn {Directive} %start
5055 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5059 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5060 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5061 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5067 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5070 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5071 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5073 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5074 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5075 @xref{%code Summary}.
5078 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5079 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5080 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5081 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5082 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5083 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5086 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5087 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5088 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5089 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5092 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5093 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5094 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5095 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5096 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5098 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5099 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5100 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5101 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5102 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5103 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5104 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5105 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5106 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5107 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5109 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5110 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5111 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5113 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5114 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5115 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5117 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5118 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5119 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5120 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5121 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5123 @findex %code requires
5124 @findex %code provides
5125 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5126 header also contains their code.
5127 @xref{%code Summary}.
5129 @cindex Header guard
5130 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5131 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5132 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5133 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5134 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5137 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5138 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5140 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5141 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5143 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5147 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5148 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5151 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5152 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5153 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5156 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5157 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5158 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5161 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5162 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5163 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5164 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5166 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5170 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5171 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5172 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5173 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5174 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5175 accurate syntax error messages.
5179 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5180 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5181 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5186 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5187 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5188 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5189 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5190 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5191 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5192 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5196 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5197 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5200 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5201 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5202 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5206 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5207 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5208 Require a Version of Bison}.
5211 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5212 Specify the skeleton to use.
5214 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5215 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5216 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5217 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5219 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5220 file in the Bison installation directory.
5221 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5222 directory of the grammar file.
5223 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5226 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5227 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5228 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5229 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5230 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5231 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5232 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5235 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5236 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5237 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5238 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5239 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5240 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5241 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5244 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5245 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5246 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5250 The highest token number, plus one.
5252 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5254 The number of grammar rules,
5256 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5260 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5261 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5262 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5263 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5267 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5268 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5269 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5273 @node %define Summary
5274 @subsection %define Summary
5276 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5277 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5278 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5279 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5280 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5281 @code{%define} directive:
5283 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5284 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5285 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5286 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5288 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5289 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5290 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5291 to specifying @code{""}.
5293 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5294 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5295 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5298 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5299 @code{%define} accepts.
5301 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5302 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5306 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5308 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5309 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5311 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5313 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5314 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5317 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5318 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5319 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5320 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5321 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5322 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5325 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5326 @item @code{api.prefix}
5327 @findex %define api.prefix
5330 @item Language(s): All
5332 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols
5333 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5335 @item Accepted Values: String
5337 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5339 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5342 @c ================================================== api.pure
5343 @item @code{api.pure}
5344 @findex %define api.pure
5347 @item Language(s): C
5349 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5350 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5352 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5354 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5357 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5359 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5360 @findex %define api.push-pull
5363 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5365 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5366 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5367 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5368 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5370 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5372 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5375 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5377 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5378 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5381 @item Language(s): all
5383 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5384 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5385 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5386 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5388 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5389 @item Default Value:
5391 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5392 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5396 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5398 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5399 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5402 @item Language(s): all
5403 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5404 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5405 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5406 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5409 @c ================================================== lr.type
5411 @item @code{lr.type}
5412 @findex %define lr.type
5415 @item Language(s): all
5417 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5418 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5419 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5421 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5423 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5426 @c ================================================== namespace
5428 @item @code{namespace}
5429 @findex %define namespace
5432 @item Languages(s): C++
5434 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5435 For example, if you specify:
5438 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5441 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5444 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5447 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5448 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5451 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5457 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5458 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5459 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5461 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5463 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5464 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5465 lexical analyzer function.
5466 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5467 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5468 lexical analyzer function.
5469 For example, if you specify:
5472 %define namespace "foo"
5473 %name-prefix "bar::"
5476 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5480 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5481 @item @code{parse.lac}
5482 @findex %define parse.lac
5485 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5487 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5488 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5489 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5490 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5496 @subsection %code Summary
5500 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5501 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5502 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5503 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5504 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5505 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5506 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5507 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5509 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5510 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5511 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5512 in the parser implementation.
5514 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5515 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5516 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5518 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5521 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5522 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5523 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5524 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5525 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5526 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5530 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5531 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5532 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5535 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5536 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5540 @findex %code requires
5543 @item Language(s): C, C++
5545 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5546 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5547 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5548 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5549 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5551 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5552 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5557 @findex %code provides
5560 @item Language(s): C, C++
5562 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5563 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5565 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5566 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5574 @item Language(s): C, C++
5576 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5577 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5578 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5579 parser implementation file. For example:
5588 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5592 @findex %code imports
5595 @item Language(s): Java
5597 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5599 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5600 before any class definitions.
5604 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5605 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5606 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5607 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5610 @node Multiple Parsers
5611 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5613 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5614 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5615 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5616 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5617 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5618 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5619 exported in the generated header.
5621 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5622 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5623 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5624 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5625 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5626 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5627 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5628 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5629 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5631 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5632 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5633 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5634 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5635 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5636 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5637 specifically --- more about this below.
5639 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5640 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5643 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5644 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5645 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5646 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5649 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5650 #define yyparse cparse
5651 #define yylval clval
5657 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5658 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5659 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5661 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5665 extern CSTYPE clval;
5669 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5670 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5671 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5674 /* Enabling traces. */
5676 # if defined YYDEBUG
5693 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5694 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5695 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5698 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5699 @cindex C-language interface
5702 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5703 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5704 functions that it needs to use.
5706 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5707 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5708 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5709 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5712 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5713 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5714 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5715 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5716 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5717 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5719 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5720 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5721 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5725 @node Parser Function
5726 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5729 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5730 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5731 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5732 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5733 without reading further.
5736 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5737 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5738 is due to end-of-input).
5740 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5741 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5744 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5747 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5752 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5757 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5760 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5761 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5762 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5764 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5765 @findex %parse-param
5766 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5767 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5768 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5769 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5770 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5773 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5776 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5777 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5781 Then call the parser like this:
5785 int nastiness, randomness;
5786 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5787 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5793 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5796 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5799 @node Push Parser Function
5800 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5801 @findex yypush_parse
5803 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5804 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5806 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5807 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5808 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5809 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5811 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5812 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5813 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5814 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5817 @node Pull Parser Function
5818 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5819 @findex yypull_parse
5821 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5822 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5824 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5825 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5826 declaration is used.
5827 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5829 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5830 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5833 @node Parser Create Function
5834 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5835 @findex yypstate_new
5837 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5838 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5840 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5841 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5842 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5843 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5845 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5846 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5847 or 0 if no memory was available.
5848 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5852 @node Parser Delete Function
5853 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5854 @findex yypstate_delete
5856 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5857 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5859 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5860 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5861 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5862 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5864 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5865 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5866 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5870 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5872 @cindex lexical analyzer
5874 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5875 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5876 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5877 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5879 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5880 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5881 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5882 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5883 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5884 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5885 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5889 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5890 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5891 of the token it has read.
5892 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5893 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5895 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5896 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5899 @node Calling Convention
5900 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5902 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5903 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5904 signifies end-of-input.
5906 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5907 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5908 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5909 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5911 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5912 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5913 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5914 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5915 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5916 signifies end-of-input.
5918 Here is an example showing these things:
5925 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5928 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5929 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5931 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5937 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5938 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5940 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5941 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5945 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5946 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5947 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5948 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5951 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5952 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5953 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5954 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5955 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5958 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5959 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5960 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5961 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5964 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5967 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5968 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5969 strlen (token_buffer))
5970 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5971 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5976 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5977 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5981 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5984 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5985 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5986 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5987 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5993 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5994 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5999 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6000 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6001 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6002 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6003 declaration looks like this:
6016 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6021 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6022 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6027 @node Token Locations
6028 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6031 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6032 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6033 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6034 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6035 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6036 data in that variable.
6038 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6039 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6040 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6041 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6042 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6045 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6048 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6050 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
6051 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6052 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6053 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6054 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6055 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6060 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6063 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6064 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6069 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6070 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6071 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6075 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6076 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6079 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6081 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6082 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6088 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6089 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6090 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6094 results in the following signatures:
6097 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6098 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6101 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6104 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6105 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6109 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6112 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6113 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6116 @node Error Reporting
6117 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6118 @cindex error reporting function
6121 @cindex syntax error
6123 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6124 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6125 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6126 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6129 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6130 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6131 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6132 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6133 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6135 @findex %error-verbose
6136 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6137 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6138 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6139 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6140 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6142 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6143 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6144 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6145 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6146 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6147 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6149 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6150 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6151 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6153 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6158 yyerror (char const *s)
6162 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6167 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6168 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6169 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6170 immediately return 1.
6172 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6173 an access to the current location.
6174 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6175 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6176 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6180 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6181 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6184 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6187 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6188 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6191 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6192 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6193 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6194 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6198 /* Location tracking. */
6202 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6204 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6205 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6209 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6212 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6213 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6214 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6215 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6220 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6221 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6222 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6223 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6224 message is always passed last.
6226 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6227 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6228 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6232 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6233 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6234 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6235 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6237 @node Action Features
6238 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6239 @cindex summary, action features
6240 @cindex action features summary
6242 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6243 are useful in actions.
6245 @deffn {Variable} $$
6246 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6247 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6250 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6251 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6252 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6255 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6256 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6257 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6258 Types of Values in Actions}.
6261 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6262 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6263 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6264 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6267 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6268 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6269 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6272 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6273 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6274 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6277 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6279 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6280 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6281 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6282 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6283 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6284 going to be reduced by this rule.
6286 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6287 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6288 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6291 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6294 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6295 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6298 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6299 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6303 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6304 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6305 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6306 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6307 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6308 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6311 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6312 @findex YYRECOVERING
6313 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6314 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6315 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6318 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6319 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6320 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6321 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6322 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6324 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6327 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6328 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6330 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6332 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6335 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6336 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6337 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6338 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6341 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6342 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6343 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6344 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6346 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6349 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6350 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6351 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6352 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6354 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6359 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6360 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6363 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6367 @c int first_line, last_line;
6368 @c int first_column, last_column;
6372 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6373 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6375 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6376 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6377 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6380 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6383 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6385 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6386 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6390 @node Internationalization
6391 @section Parser Internationalization
6392 @cindex internationalization
6398 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6399 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6400 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6401 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6402 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6403 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6404 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6405 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6408 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6409 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6410 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6415 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6416 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6417 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6418 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6419 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6423 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6428 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6429 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6430 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6431 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6432 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6433 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6434 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6435 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6436 Bison-generated parser.
6439 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6440 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6441 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6445 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6448 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6449 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6450 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6454 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6455 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6456 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6459 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6465 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6469 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6475 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6476 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6477 @cindex algorithm of parser
6480 @cindex parser stack
6481 @cindex stack, parser
6483 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6484 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6485 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6487 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6488 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6491 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6492 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6493 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6494 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6495 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6496 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6497 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6499 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6506 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6507 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6510 expr: expr '*' expr;
6514 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6521 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6522 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6524 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6525 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6526 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6528 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6531 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6532 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6533 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6534 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6535 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6536 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6537 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6538 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6539 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6540 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6544 @section Lookahead Tokens
6545 @cindex lookahead token
6547 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6548 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6549 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6550 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6551 token in order to decide what to do.
6553 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6554 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6555 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6556 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6557 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6558 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6559 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6562 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6563 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6564 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6583 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6584 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6585 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6586 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6587 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6589 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6590 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6591 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6592 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6593 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6594 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6599 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6600 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6601 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6602 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6605 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6607 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6608 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6609 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6611 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6612 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6617 "if" expr "then" stmt
6618 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6624 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6625 specific keyword tokens.
6627 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6628 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6629 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6630 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6633 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6634 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6635 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6636 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6637 contrast it with the other alternative.
6639 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6640 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6644 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6646 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6649 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6650 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6651 making these two inputs equivalent:
6654 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6656 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6659 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6660 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6661 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6662 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6663 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6664 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6665 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6666 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6668 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6669 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6670 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6671 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6673 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6674 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6675 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6676 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6677 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6680 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6681 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6682 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6698 "if" expr "then" stmt
6699 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6709 @section Operator Precedence
6710 @cindex operator precedence
6711 @cindex precedence of operators
6713 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6714 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6715 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6716 shift and when to reduce.
6719 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6720 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6721 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6722 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6723 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
6726 @node Why Precedence
6727 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6729 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6730 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6745 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6746 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6747 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6748 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6749 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6750 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6751 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6754 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6755 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6756 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6757 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6758 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6759 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6760 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6761 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6764 @cindex associativity
6765 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6766 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6767 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6768 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6769 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6770 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6771 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6772 makes right-associativity.
6774 @node Using Precedence
6775 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6780 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6781 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6782 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6783 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6784 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6785 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6786 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6789 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6790 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6791 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6792 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6793 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6795 @node Precedence Examples
6796 @subsection Precedence Examples
6798 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6806 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6807 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6808 declared with @code{'-'}:
6811 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
6816 @node How Precedence
6817 @subsection How Precedence Works
6819 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6820 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6821 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6822 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6823 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6824 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6826 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6827 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6828 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6829 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6830 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6831 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6832 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6835 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6836 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6839 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
6841 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
6842 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
6843 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6844 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
6846 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
6847 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
6848 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
6849 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
6850 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
6851 instance as follows:
6860 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
6861 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
6862 use right associativity:
6865 %right "then" "else"
6868 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
6869 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
6870 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
6871 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
6872 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
6873 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
6874 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
6876 @node Contextual Precedence
6877 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6878 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6879 @cindex unary operator precedence
6880 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6881 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6884 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6885 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6886 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6887 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6889 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6890 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6891 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6892 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6895 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6896 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6897 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6898 modifier's syntax is:
6901 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6905 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6906 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6907 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6908 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6909 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6911 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6912 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6913 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6923 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6931 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6936 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6937 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6938 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6939 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6941 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6942 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6943 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6944 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6946 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6947 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6948 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6949 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6950 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6951 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6953 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6954 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6958 @section Parser States
6959 @cindex finite-state machine
6960 @cindex parser state
6961 @cindex state (of parser)
6963 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6964 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6965 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6966 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6967 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6969 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6970 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6971 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6972 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6973 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6974 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6975 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6976 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6979 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6980 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6981 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6984 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6985 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6986 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6988 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6989 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6992 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6993 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6998 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7000 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7006 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7007 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7013 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7014 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7015 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7016 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7017 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7018 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7020 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7021 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7022 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7024 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7025 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7026 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7027 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7028 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7030 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7031 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7032 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7033 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7038 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7039 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7044 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7051 | sequence redirects
7065 | redirects redirect
7071 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7072 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7073 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7074 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7075 in infinitely many ways!
7077 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7078 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7079 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7080 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7082 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7093 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7101 | sequence redirects
7115 | redirects redirect
7120 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7121 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7122 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7124 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7130 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7133 | name_list ':' type
7149 | name ',' name_list
7154 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7155 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7156 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7157 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7161 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7163 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7164 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7165 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7167 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7168 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7169 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7170 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7171 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7172 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7173 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7176 @cindex canonical LR
7177 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7178 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7179 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7180 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7181 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7182 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7183 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7184 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7186 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7187 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7188 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7189 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7190 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7198 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7203 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7204 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7205 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7206 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7207 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7208 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7210 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7211 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7212 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7213 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7214 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7215 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7220 | name_list ':' type
7228 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7229 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7234 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7235 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7236 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7237 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7238 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7239 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7240 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7242 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7243 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7244 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7245 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7247 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7248 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7251 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7252 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7253 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7254 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7257 @node LR Table Construction
7258 @subsection LR Table Construction
7259 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7262 @cindex canonical LR
7263 @findex %define lr.type
7265 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7266 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7267 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7268 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7271 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7272 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7273 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7274 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7277 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7278 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7279 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7282 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7283 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7284 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7287 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7289 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7292 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7296 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7300 %define lr.type ielr
7303 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7304 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7305 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7306 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7307 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7308 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7309 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7310 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7311 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7312 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7314 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7315 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7316 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7317 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7323 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7326 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7328 @cindex GLR with LALR
7329 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7330 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7331 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7332 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7333 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7334 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7335 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7336 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7337 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7338 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7340 @item Malformed grammars.
7342 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7343 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7344 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7345 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7346 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7351 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7352 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7353 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7354 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7355 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7356 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7357 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7358 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7359 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7363 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7366 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7367 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7368 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7369 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7370 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7371 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7372 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7373 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7374 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7375 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7376 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7377 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7380 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7381 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7382 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7384 @node Default Reductions
7385 @subsection Default Reductions
7386 @cindex default reductions
7387 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7390 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7391 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7392 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7393 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7394 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7396 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7397 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7400 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7402 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7403 @cindex consistent states
7404 @cindex defaulted states
7405 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7406 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7407 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7408 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7409 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7410 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7411 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7412 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7413 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7414 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7415 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7417 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7418 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7419 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7420 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7421 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7422 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7423 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7424 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7425 should already be considered closed.
7427 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7429 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7430 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7431 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7432 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7433 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7434 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7435 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7436 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7437 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7441 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7442 @c sentence from being rejected.
7443 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7444 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7445 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7446 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7447 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7448 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7451 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7452 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7453 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7454 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7455 because the accept action ends the parse.
7457 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7458 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7459 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7460 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7461 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7462 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7463 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7464 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7465 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7466 split the parse instead.
7468 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7469 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7471 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7472 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7473 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7475 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7476 @item @code{consistent}
7477 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7480 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7481 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7486 @findex %define parse.lac
7488 @cindex lookahead correction
7490 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7491 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7492 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7493 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7494 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7495 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7496 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7497 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7498 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7500 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7501 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7502 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7503 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7504 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7506 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7507 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7508 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7509 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7511 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7512 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7514 @item @code{none} (default)
7517 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7518 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7522 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7523 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7524 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7525 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7526 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7527 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7528 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7529 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7530 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7531 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7534 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7535 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7536 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7537 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7538 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7539 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7540 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7541 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7542 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7543 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7545 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7546 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7547 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7548 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7549 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7550 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7551 language-recognition power.
7553 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7556 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7558 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7559 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7560 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7561 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7564 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7566 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7567 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7568 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7569 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7570 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7571 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7575 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7576 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7577 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7578 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7579 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7580 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7581 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7582 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7583 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7584 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7585 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7588 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7589 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7590 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7592 @node Unreachable States
7593 @subsection Unreachable States
7594 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7595 @cindex unreachable states
7597 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7598 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7599 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7600 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7602 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7603 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7604 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7605 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7607 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7608 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7609 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7612 There are a few caveats to consider:
7615 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7617 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7618 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7619 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7620 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7621 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7622 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7624 @item Other useless states.
7626 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7627 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7628 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7629 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7630 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7631 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7632 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7635 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7636 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7638 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7639 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7640 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7642 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7643 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7644 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7645 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7646 context-free languages.
7647 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7648 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7649 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7650 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7651 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7652 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7653 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7654 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7656 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7657 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7658 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7659 parser uses the same basic
7660 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7661 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7662 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7663 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7665 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7666 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7667 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7668 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7669 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7671 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7672 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7673 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7674 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7675 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7676 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7677 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7678 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7679 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7680 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7681 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7684 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7685 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7686 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7687 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7688 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7689 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7690 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7691 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7692 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7693 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7694 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7695 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7697 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7698 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7699 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7701 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7702 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7703 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7704 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7705 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7706 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7707 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7708 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7709 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7710 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7711 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7712 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7714 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7717 @node Memory Management
7718 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7719 @cindex memory exhaustion
7720 @cindex memory management
7721 @cindex stack overflow
7722 @cindex parser stack overflow
7723 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7725 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7726 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7727 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7729 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7730 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7731 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7734 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7735 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7736 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7737 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7739 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7740 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7741 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7742 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7743 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7744 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7746 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7747 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7748 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7751 @cindex default stack limit
7752 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7756 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7757 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7758 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7759 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7760 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7762 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7764 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7765 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7766 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7767 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7768 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7769 this deficiency in a future release.
7771 @node Error Recovery
7772 @chapter Error Recovery
7773 @cindex error recovery
7774 @cindex recovery from errors
7776 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7777 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7778 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7781 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7782 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7783 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7784 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7785 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7786 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7787 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7790 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7791 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7792 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7793 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7794 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7795 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7807 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7808 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7810 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7811 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7812 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7813 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7814 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7815 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7816 applicable in the ordinary way.
7818 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7819 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7820 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7821 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7822 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7823 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7824 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7825 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7826 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7827 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7828 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7829 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7831 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7832 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7833 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7836 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7839 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7840 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7841 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7842 spurious error message:
7852 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7853 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7854 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7855 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7856 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7857 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7858 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7861 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7862 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7863 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7864 error messages resume.
7866 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7867 as any other rules can.
7870 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7871 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7872 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7873 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7876 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7877 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7878 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7880 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7882 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7883 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7884 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7885 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7886 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7888 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7889 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7890 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7891 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7894 @node Context Dependency
7895 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7897 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7898 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7899 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7900 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7904 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7905 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7906 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7907 error recovery rules must be written.
7910 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7911 neither clean nor robust.)
7913 @node Semantic Tokens
7914 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7916 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7917 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7923 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7924 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7925 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7927 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7928 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7929 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7930 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7931 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7933 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7934 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7935 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7936 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7937 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7938 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7939 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7941 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7942 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7943 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7944 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7948 typedef int foo, bar;
7952 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7953 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7959 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7960 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7962 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7963 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7964 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7965 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7966 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7971 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7972 | declarator maybeasm
7978 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7979 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7985 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7986 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7987 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7989 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7990 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7991 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7992 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7993 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7994 the syntactic context.
7996 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7997 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7998 @cindex lexical tie-in
8000 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8001 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8004 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8005 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8006 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8007 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8008 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8015 void yyerror (char const *);
8024 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8025 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8026 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8040 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8041 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8042 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8044 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8045 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8046 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8049 @node Tie-in Recovery
8050 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8052 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8053 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8055 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8056 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8057 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8058 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8063 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8065 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8069 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8070 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8071 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8072 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8073 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8075 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8077 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8078 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8079 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8085 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8091 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8092 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8093 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8094 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8096 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8097 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8098 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8099 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8100 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8101 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8104 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8107 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8109 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8110 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8111 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8112 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8115 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8116 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8120 @section Understanding Your Parser
8122 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8123 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8124 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8125 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8126 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8128 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8129 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8130 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8131 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8132 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8133 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8134 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8136 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8154 @command{bison} reports:
8157 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8158 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8159 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8160 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8161 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8164 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8165 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8166 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8167 interpretation is the same.
8170 @cindex token, useless
8171 @cindex useless token
8172 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8173 @cindex useless nonterminal
8174 @cindex rule, useless
8175 @cindex useless rule
8176 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8177 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8178 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8179 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8182 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8185 Terminals unused in grammar
8188 Rules useless in grammar
8193 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8196 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8197 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8198 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8199 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8203 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8218 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8222 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8235 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8240 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8246 @cindex pointed rule
8247 @cindex rule, pointed
8248 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8249 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8250 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8251 the location of the input cursor.
8256 0 $accept: . exp $end
8258 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8263 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8264 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8265 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8266 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8267 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8268 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8269 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8270 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8272 @cindex core, item set
8273 @cindex item set core
8274 @cindex kernel, item set
8275 @cindex item set core
8276 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8277 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8278 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8279 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8280 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8281 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8286 0 $accept: . exp $end
8287 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8293 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8299 In the state 1@dots{}
8306 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8310 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8311 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8312 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8313 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8318 0 $accept: exp . $end
8319 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8324 $end shift, and go to state 3
8325 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8326 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8327 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8328 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8332 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8333 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8334 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8335 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8336 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8339 @cindex accepting state
8340 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8346 0 $accept: exp $end .
8352 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8353 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8355 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8361 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8363 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8370 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8372 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8379 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8381 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8388 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8390 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8395 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8401 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8407 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8408 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8410 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8411 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8414 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8415 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8416 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8417 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8418 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8419 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8420 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8421 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8423 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8424 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8425 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8428 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8429 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8430 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8431 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8432 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8433 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8434 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8435 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8436 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8437 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8438 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8439 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8444 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8445 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8450 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8451 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8453 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8454 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8457 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8458 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8459 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8460 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8461 conflicts in the report:
8464 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8465 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8466 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8470 The remaining states are similar:
8476 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8482 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8483 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8485 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8486 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8492 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8498 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8500 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8501 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8507 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8513 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8514 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8515 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8516 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8518 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8519 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8520 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8521 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8522 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8527 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8528 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8529 @samp{*}, but also because the
8530 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8534 @section Tracing Your Parser
8537 @cindex tracing the parser
8539 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8540 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8543 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8544 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8545 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8548 @node Enabling Traces
8549 @subsection Enabling Traces
8550 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8553 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8555 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8556 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8557 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8558 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8561 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8562 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8563 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8564 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8565 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8567 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8568 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8569 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8570 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8571 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8573 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8575 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8576 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8577 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8578 this is the preferred solution.
8581 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8585 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8586 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8587 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8588 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8589 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8590 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8592 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8593 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8594 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8595 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8597 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8598 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8599 messages tell you these things:
8603 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8606 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8607 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8610 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8611 of the state stack afterward.
8614 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8615 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8616 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8617 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8618 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8619 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8620 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8621 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8622 grammar are to blame.
8624 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8625 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8626 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8627 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8628 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8631 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8633 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8634 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8635 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8636 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8637 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8638 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8640 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8641 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8642 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8645 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8647 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8649 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8652 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8653 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8654 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8655 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8658 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8659 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8660 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8661 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8662 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8663 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8665 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8666 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8667 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8668 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8669 printer will be used for them.
8671 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8672 are sent onto standard error.
8675 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8678 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8679 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8685 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8686 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8687 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8688 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8690 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8692 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8693 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8698 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8699 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8700 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8704 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8705 Shifting token '(' ()
8707 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8708 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8710 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8711 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8712 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8718 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8719 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8720 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8723 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8724 Shifting token '-' ()
8726 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8727 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8729 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8730 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8731 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8732 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8734 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8735 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8736 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8738 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8739 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8745 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8746 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8749 Next token is token ')' ()
8750 Shifting token ')' ()
8752 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8753 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8755 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8757 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8763 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8767 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8768 Shifting token '\n' ()
8770 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8771 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8774 -> $$ = nterm line ()
8777 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8780 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8785 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8786 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8787 completion of the parsing.
8790 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8791 Shifting token $end ()
8794 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8795 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8799 @node The YYPRINT Macro
8800 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8803 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8804 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8805 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8807 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8809 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8810 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8811 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
8813 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
8816 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8817 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8821 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8822 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
8823 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
8826 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8829 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8832 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8833 else if (type == NUM)
8834 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8838 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8841 @chapter Invoking Bison
8842 @cindex invoking Bison
8843 @cindex Bison invocation
8844 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8846 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8852 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8853 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8854 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8855 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8856 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8857 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8858 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8859 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8860 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8861 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8862 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8867 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8870 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8873 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8876 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8878 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8879 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8880 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8883 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8884 in alphabetical order by short options.
8885 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8886 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8890 @section Bison Options
8892 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8893 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8894 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8895 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8896 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8899 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8900 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8903 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8909 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8913 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8915 @item --print-localedir
8916 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8918 @item --print-datadir
8919 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8923 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8924 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8925 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8926 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8927 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8928 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8929 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8930 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8931 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8932 for compatibility with POSIX:
8939 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8940 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8941 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8942 this option is specified.
8944 @item -W [@var{category}]
8945 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8946 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8949 @item midrule-values
8950 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8952 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8955 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8958 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8959 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8962 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8965 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8966 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8967 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8970 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8974 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8975 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8976 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8977 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8978 no effect on the conflict report.
8981 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8983 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8984 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8990 Turn off all the warnings.
8992 Treat warnings as errors.
8995 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8996 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8997 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9006 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9007 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9008 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9010 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9011 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9012 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9013 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9014 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9015 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9016 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9020 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9023 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9024 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9025 definition for @var{name}.
9027 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9028 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9029 definitions for @var{name}.
9031 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9032 definitions for @var{name}.
9035 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9036 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9037 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9039 @item -L @var{language}
9040 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9041 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9042 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9043 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9044 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9046 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9050 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9052 @item -p @var{prefix}
9053 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9054 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9055 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9056 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9060 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9061 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9062 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9063 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9064 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9065 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9068 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9069 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9070 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9072 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9073 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9074 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9075 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9077 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9078 file in the Bison installation directory.
9079 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9080 current working directory.
9081 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9084 @itemx --token-table
9085 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9092 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9093 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9094 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9095 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9098 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9099 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9100 with other short options.
9102 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9103 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9104 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9105 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9107 @item -r @var{things}
9108 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9109 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9110 separated list of @var{things} among:
9114 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9118 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9119 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9122 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9123 each rule's lookahead set.
9126 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9127 precedence and associativity directives.
9130 Enable all the items.
9133 Do not generate the report.
9136 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9137 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9141 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9142 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9143 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9146 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9147 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9149 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9150 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9152 @item -g [@var{file}]
9153 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9154 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9155 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9156 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9157 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9158 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9161 @item -x [@var{file}]
9162 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9163 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9164 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9165 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9167 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9168 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9171 @node Option Cross Key
9172 @section Option Cross Key
9174 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9175 the corresponding short option and directive.
9177 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9178 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9179 @include cross-options.texi
9183 @section Yacc Library
9185 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9186 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9187 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9188 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9189 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9190 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9191 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9193 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9194 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9197 int yyerror (char const *);
9200 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9201 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9202 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9208 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9210 @node Other Languages
9211 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9214 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9215 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9219 @section C++ Parsers
9222 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9223 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9224 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9225 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9226 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9227 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9230 @node C++ Bison Interface
9231 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9232 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9236 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9237 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9238 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9239 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9241 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9243 @findex %define namespace
9244 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9245 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9246 generated in the following files:
9251 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9252 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9255 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9258 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9259 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9260 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9261 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9262 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9264 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9265 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9266 @samp{%defines} directive.
9269 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9270 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9272 @node C++ Semantic Values
9273 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9274 @c - No objects in unions
9276 @c - Printer and destructor
9278 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9279 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9280 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9281 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9282 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9285 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9286 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9287 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9289 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9290 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9291 to such objects are allowed.
9294 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9295 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9296 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9300 @node C++ Location Values
9301 @subsection C++ Location Values
9305 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9307 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9308 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9309 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9310 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9314 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9315 genuine code only the latter is used.
9318 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9319 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9323 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9325 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9326 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9327 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9331 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9332 Reset the position to the given values.
9335 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9336 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9337 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9338 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9339 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9342 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9343 The line, starting at 1.
9346 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9347 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9350 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9351 The column, starting at 1.
9354 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9355 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9358 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9359 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9360 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9361 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9362 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9365 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9366 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9367 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9370 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9371 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9372 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9373 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9377 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9379 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9380 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9383 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9384 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9385 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9388 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9389 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9392 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9393 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9394 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9397 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9398 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9399 Advance the @code{end} position.
9402 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9403 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9404 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9405 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9408 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9409 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9412 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9413 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9414 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9418 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9419 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9420 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9423 @node C++ Parser Interface
9424 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9425 @c - define parser_class_name
9427 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9429 @c - Reporting errors
9431 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9432 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9433 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9434 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9435 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9436 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9437 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9438 additional argument for its constructor.
9440 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9441 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9442 The types for semantics value and locations.
9445 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9446 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9447 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9448 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9449 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9450 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9453 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9454 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9455 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9458 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9459 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9462 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9463 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9464 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9468 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9469 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9470 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9471 or nonzero, full tracing.
9474 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9475 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9476 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9477 described by @var{m}.
9481 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9482 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9483 @c - prefix for yylex.
9484 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9487 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9488 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9489 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9491 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9492 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9493 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9494 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9498 @node A Complete C++ Example
9499 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9501 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9502 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9503 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9504 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9505 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9506 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9507 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9508 actually easier to interface with.
9511 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9512 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9513 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9514 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9515 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9518 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9519 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9521 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9522 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9523 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9524 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9525 of valid input follows.
9529 seven := one + two * three
9533 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9534 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9536 @c - A place to store error messages
9537 @c - A place for the result
9539 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9540 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9541 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9542 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9543 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9544 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9545 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9547 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9548 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9549 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9552 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9554 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9555 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9558 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9563 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9564 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9565 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9566 factor both as follows.
9568 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9570 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9572 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9573 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type *yylval, \
9574 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type *yylloc, \
9575 calcxx_driver& driver)
9576 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9581 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9584 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9586 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9591 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9593 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9599 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9600 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9602 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9604 // Handling the scanner.
9607 bool trace_scanning;
9611 Similarly for the parser itself.
9613 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9615 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9616 int parse (const std::string& f);
9622 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9623 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9624 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9625 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9627 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9630 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9631 void error (const std::string& m);
9633 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9636 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9637 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9638 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9639 messages and set error state.
9641 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9643 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9644 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9646 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9647 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9649 variables["one"] = 1;
9650 variables["two"] = 2;
9653 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9658 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9662 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9663 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9664 int res = parser.parse ();
9670 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9672 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9676 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9678 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9683 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9685 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9686 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9687 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9688 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9691 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9693 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9694 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9696 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9700 @findex %code requires
9701 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9702 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9703 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9704 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9705 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9706 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9707 @xref{%code Summary}.
9709 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9713 class calcxx_driver;
9718 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9719 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9722 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9724 // The parsing context.
9725 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9726 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9730 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9731 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9732 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9733 automatically propagated.
9735 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9740 // Initialize the initial location.
9741 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9746 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9747 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9750 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9757 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9760 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9772 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9773 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9775 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9778 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9784 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9785 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9786 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9787 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9790 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9792 %token END 0 "end of file"
9794 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9795 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9800 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9803 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9804 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9806 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
9807 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9809 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
9813 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9815 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9819 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9823 | assignments assignment @{@};
9826 "identifier" ":=" exp
9827 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9831 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9832 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9833 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9834 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9835 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9836 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9841 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9844 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9847 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9848 const std::string& m)
9850 driver.error (l, m);
9854 @node Calc++ Scanner
9855 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9857 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9858 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9860 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9862 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9867 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9868 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9870 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9871 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9872 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9873 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9877 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9878 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9879 not of token_type. */
9880 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9885 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9886 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9887 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9888 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9890 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9892 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9896 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9898 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9900 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9906 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9907 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9908 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9909 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9910 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9911 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9912 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9914 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9918 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9925 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9926 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9930 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9931 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9932 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9933 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9935 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9938 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9940 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9941 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9942 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9945 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9946 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9947 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9949 return token::NUMBER;
9951 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9952 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9957 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9958 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9960 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9964 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9966 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9967 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
9969 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9971 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9972 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9979 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9986 @node Calc++ Top Level
9987 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9989 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9991 @comment file: calc++.cc
9994 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9998 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10000 calcxx_driver driver;
10001 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10002 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10003 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10004 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10005 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10006 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10007 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10013 @section Java Parsers
10016 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10017 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10018 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10019 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10020 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10021 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10022 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10023 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10026 @node Java Bison Interface
10027 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10028 @c - %language "Java"
10030 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10031 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10033 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10034 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10036 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10037 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10038 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10039 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10040 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10041 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10042 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10043 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10044 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10045 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10047 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10049 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10050 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10051 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10052 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10055 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10056 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10058 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10059 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10061 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10062 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10064 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10065 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10066 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10067 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10068 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10069 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10070 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10071 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10072 access the token names and codes.
10074 @node Java Semantic Values
10075 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10076 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10078 @c - Printer and destructor
10080 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10081 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10082 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10085 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10086 %type <Integer> number
10089 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10090 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10091 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10092 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10093 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10096 %define stype "ASTNode"
10100 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10101 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10103 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10104 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10105 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10106 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10107 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10108 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10110 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10111 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10112 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10114 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10115 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10116 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10119 @node Java Location Values
10120 @subsection Java Location Values
10122 @c - class Position
10123 @c - class Location
10125 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10126 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10127 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10128 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10129 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10130 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10131 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10133 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10134 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10135 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10136 be supplied by the user.
10139 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10140 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10141 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10144 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10145 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10148 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10149 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10152 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10153 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10154 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10155 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10159 @node Java Parser Interface
10160 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10161 @c - define parser_class_name
10163 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10165 @c - Reporting errors
10167 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10168 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10169 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10170 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10171 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10173 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10174 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10175 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10176 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10177 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10178 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10180 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10181 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10182 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10183 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10185 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10186 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10187 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10188 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10189 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10190 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10192 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10193 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10195 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10196 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10197 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10198 which initialize them automatically.
10200 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10201 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10203 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10204 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10205 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10209 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10210 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10211 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10213 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10214 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10215 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10218 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10219 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10220 @code{false} otherwise.
10223 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10224 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10225 from a syntax error.
10226 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10229 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10230 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10231 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10235 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10236 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10237 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10238 or nonzero, full tracing.
10242 @node Java Scanner Interface
10243 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10246 @c - Lexer interface
10248 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10249 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10250 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10251 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10253 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10254 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10255 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10256 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10259 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10260 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10261 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10262 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10265 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10267 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10268 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10269 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10270 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10273 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10274 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10275 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10278 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10279 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10282 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10283 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10284 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10285 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10286 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10288 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
10289 "@var{class-name}".}
10292 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10293 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10295 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10296 "@var{class-name}".}
10300 @node Java Action Features
10301 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10303 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10304 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10306 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10307 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10310 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10311 This may not be assigned to.
10312 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10315 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10316 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10317 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10321 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10322 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10323 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10324 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10325 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10326 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10329 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10330 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10331 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10332 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10334 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10338 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10339 This may not be assigned to.
10340 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10344 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10345 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10348 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10349 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10350 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10353 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10354 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10355 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10358 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10359 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10360 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10363 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10364 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10365 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10367 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10370 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10371 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10372 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10373 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10378 @node Java Differences
10379 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10381 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10382 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10383 section summarizes these differences.
10387 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10388 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10389 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10390 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10391 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10392 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10393 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10395 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10396 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10397 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10398 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10399 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10402 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10403 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10404 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10405 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10406 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10407 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10408 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10409 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10410 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10413 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10415 @item @code{%code imports}
10416 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10417 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10418 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10420 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10421 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10423 @item @code{%code lexer}
10424 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10425 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10426 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10430 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10431 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10432 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10434 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10435 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10440 @node Java Declarations Summary
10441 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10443 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10444 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10446 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10447 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10450 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10451 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10452 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10453 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10454 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10457 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10458 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10459 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10460 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10463 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10464 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10465 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10466 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10469 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10470 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10471 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10474 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10475 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10476 a Java @emph{type}.
10477 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10480 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10481 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10482 @xref{Java Differences}.
10485 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10486 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10487 @xref{Java Differences}.
10490 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10491 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10492 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10495 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10496 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10497 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10498 @xref{Java Differences}.
10501 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10502 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10503 @xref{Java Differences}.
10506 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10507 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10508 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10511 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10512 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10513 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10516 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10517 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10518 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10521 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10522 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10524 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10527 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10528 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10529 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10530 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10533 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10534 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10535 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10536 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10537 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10540 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10541 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10542 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10545 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10546 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10547 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10548 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10551 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10552 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10553 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10554 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10557 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10558 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10559 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10562 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10563 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10564 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10567 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10568 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10569 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10572 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10573 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10574 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10575 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10579 @c ================================================= FAQ
10582 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10583 @cindex frequently asked questions
10586 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10590 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10591 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10592 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10593 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10594 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10595 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10596 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10597 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10598 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10599 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10600 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10601 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10604 @node Memory Exhausted
10605 @section Memory Exhausted
10608 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10609 message. What can I do?
10612 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10615 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10616 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10618 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10619 following typical questions:
10622 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10623 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10624 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10631 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10632 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10633 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10636 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10637 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10638 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10639 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10640 @file{first-line.l}:
10646 #include <stdlib.h>
10650 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10654 yyparse (char const *file)
10656 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10660 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10664 /* One token only. */
10666 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10669 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10687 If the file @file{input} contains
10695 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10698 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10699 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10700 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10705 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10706 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10707 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10708 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10709 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10710 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10711 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10712 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10715 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10716 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10717 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10718 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10720 @node Strings are Destroyed
10721 @section Strings are Destroyed
10724 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10725 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10726 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10729 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10730 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10731 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10737 char *yylval = NULL;
10742 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10750 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10751 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10752 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10753 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10759 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10762 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10763 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10764 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10770 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10771 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10772 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10773 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10774 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10775 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10778 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10779 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10780 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10785 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10786 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10789 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10790 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10793 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10794 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10795 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10796 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10797 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10798 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10799 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10801 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10803 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10804 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10805 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10806 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10807 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10808 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10811 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10812 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10815 @node Multiple start-symbols
10816 @section Multiple start-symbols
10819 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10820 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10821 multiple entry points.
10824 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10825 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10826 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10827 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10831 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10838 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10839 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10841 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10842 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10843 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10844 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10845 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10846 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10847 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10848 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10851 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10856 int t = start_token;
10861 /* @r{The rules.} */
10865 @node Secure? Conform?
10866 @section Secure? Conform?
10869 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10872 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10873 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10874 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10875 please send us a bug report.
10877 @node I can't build Bison
10878 @section I can't build Bison
10881 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10882 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10886 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10887 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10888 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10889 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10890 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10891 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10892 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10895 @node Where can I find help?
10896 @section Where can I find help?
10899 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10902 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10903 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10904 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10905 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10906 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10907 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10908 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10909 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10913 @section Bug Reports
10916 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10919 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10920 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10921 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10922 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10923 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10925 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10926 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10927 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10928 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10929 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10931 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10932 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10933 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10934 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10935 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10936 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10938 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10939 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10941 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10943 @node More Languages
10944 @section More Languages
10947 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10948 favorite language here}?
10951 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10952 languages; contributions are welcome.
10955 @section Beta Testing
10958 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10961 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10962 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10963 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10964 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10965 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10966 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10967 essentially halted.
10969 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10970 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10971 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10972 systems are especially welcome.
10974 @node Mailing Lists
10975 @section Mailing Lists
10978 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10981 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10983 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10985 @node Table of Symbols
10986 @appendix Bison Symbols
10987 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10988 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10990 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10991 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10992 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10995 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10996 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10997 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11000 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11001 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11005 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11006 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11010 @deffn {Variable} $$
11011 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11015 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11016 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11017 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11020 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11021 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11025 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11026 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11030 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11031 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11032 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11033 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11036 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11037 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11038 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11039 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11040 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11044 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11045 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11048 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11049 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11053 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11054 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11057 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11058 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11059 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11062 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11063 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11066 This feature is experimental.
11067 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11070 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11073 @deffn {Directive} <>
11074 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11077 This feature is experimental.
11078 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11081 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11084 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11085 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11086 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11087 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11090 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11091 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11092 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11093 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11094 @xref{%code Summary}.
11097 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11098 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11102 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11103 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11104 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11109 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11110 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11111 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11112 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11115 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11116 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11117 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11120 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11121 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11122 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11125 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11126 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11127 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11130 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11131 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11132 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11136 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11137 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11138 used in the grammar.
11141 @deffn {Symbol} error
11142 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11143 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11144 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11145 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11146 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11147 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11148 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11149 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11152 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11153 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11154 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11157 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11158 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11162 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11163 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11164 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11167 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11168 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11171 @deffn {Directive} %language
11172 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11173 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11176 @deffn {Directive} %left
11177 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11178 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11181 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11182 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11183 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11187 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11188 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11189 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11190 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11191 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11194 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11195 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11196 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11198 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11199 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11200 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11202 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11203 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11204 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11205 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11206 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11207 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11208 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11209 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11214 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11215 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11216 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11221 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11222 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11223 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11226 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11227 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11228 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11231 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11232 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11233 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11236 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11237 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11238 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11239 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11242 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11243 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11244 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11247 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11248 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11249 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11250 unreasonable usage.
11253 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11254 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11255 Require a Version of Bison}.
11258 @deffn {Directive} %right
11259 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11260 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11263 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11264 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11265 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11268 @deffn {Directive} %start
11269 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11273 @deffn {Directive} %token
11274 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11275 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11278 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11279 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11280 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11283 @deffn {Directive} %type
11284 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11285 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11288 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11289 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11290 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11294 @deffn {Directive} %union
11295 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11296 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11299 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11300 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11301 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11302 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11303 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11305 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11309 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11310 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11311 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11312 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11314 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11318 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11319 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11320 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11323 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11324 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11325 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11326 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11327 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11330 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11331 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11332 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11335 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11336 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11337 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11340 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11341 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11342 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11343 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11346 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11347 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11348 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11351 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11352 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11353 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11354 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11355 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11356 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11358 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11362 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11363 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11364 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11365 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11368 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11369 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11370 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11371 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11372 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11373 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11374 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11377 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11378 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11379 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11382 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11383 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11384 @xref{Memory Management}.
11387 @deffn {Function} yylex
11388 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11389 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11393 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11394 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11395 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11396 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11397 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11400 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11401 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11402 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11403 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11405 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11407 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11408 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11409 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11412 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11413 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11414 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11417 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11418 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11419 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11420 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11422 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11423 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11424 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11427 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11428 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11432 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11433 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11434 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11435 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11436 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11439 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11440 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11441 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11444 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11445 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11446 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11447 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11450 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11451 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11452 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11453 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11454 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11455 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11456 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11459 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11460 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11461 call this function to create a new parser.
11462 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11463 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11464 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11465 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11468 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11469 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11470 parse the rest of the input stream.
11471 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11472 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11473 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11474 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11477 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11478 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11479 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11480 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11481 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11482 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11485 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11486 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11487 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11488 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11489 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11492 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11493 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11494 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11495 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11498 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11499 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11500 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11501 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11502 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11503 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11504 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11506 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11507 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11508 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11509 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11510 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11511 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11512 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11515 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11516 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11517 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11525 @item Accepting state
11526 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11527 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11528 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11530 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11531 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11532 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11533 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11534 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11536 @item Consistent state
11537 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11539 @item Context-free grammars
11540 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11541 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11542 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11543 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11546 @item Default reduction
11547 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11548 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11549 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11550 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11553 @item Defaulted state
11554 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11556 @item Dynamic allocation
11557 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11558 compile time or on entry to a function.
11561 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11562 character string of length zero.
11564 @item Finite-state stack machine
11565 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11566 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11567 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11568 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11569 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11570 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11572 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11573 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11574 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11575 deterministic parsing
11576 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11577 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11578 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11582 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11583 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11584 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11586 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11587 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11588 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11589 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11590 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11591 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11592 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11593 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11594 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11595 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11597 @item Infix operator
11598 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11599 performs some operation.
11602 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11604 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11605 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11606 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11607 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11608 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11609 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11610 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11612 @item Language construct
11613 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11614 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11615 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11617 @item Left associativity
11618 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11619 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11620 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11622 @item Left recursion
11623 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11624 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11627 @item Left-to-right parsing
11628 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11629 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11631 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11632 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11633 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11635 @item Lexical tie-in
11636 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11637 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11639 @item Literal string token
11640 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11642 @item Lookahead token
11643 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11647 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11648 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11649 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11652 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11653 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11655 @item Nonterminal symbol
11656 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11657 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11658 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11661 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11662 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11665 @item Postfix operator
11666 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11667 performs some operation.
11670 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11671 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11675 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11676 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11677 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11679 @item Reverse polish notation
11680 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11682 @item Right recursion
11683 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11684 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11688 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11689 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11690 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11693 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11694 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11695 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11697 @item Single-character literal
11698 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11699 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11702 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11703 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11704 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11705 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11708 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11709 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11710 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11713 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11714 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11717 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11718 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11719 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11720 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11722 @item Terminal symbol
11723 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11724 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11725 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11727 @item Unreachable state
11728 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11729 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11730 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11733 @node Copying This Manual
11734 @appendix Copying This Manual
11738 @unnumbered Bibliography
11742 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11743 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11744 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11745 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11747 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11748 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11749 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11750 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11751 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11753 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11754 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11755 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11756 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11757 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11759 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11760 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11761 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11762 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11763 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11766 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11767 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11768 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11771 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11772 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11773 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11774 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11777 @node Index of Terms
11778 @unnumbered Index of Terms
11784 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11785 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11786 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11787 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11788 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11789 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11790 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11791 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11792 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11793 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11794 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11795 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11796 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11797 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
11798 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11799 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11800 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11801 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11802 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11803 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11804 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11805 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11806 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11807 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
11808 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11809 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11810 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11811 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11812 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11813 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11814 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
11815 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
11816 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11817 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
11818 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11819 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11820 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11821 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
11822 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11823 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
11824 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11825 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11826 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11827 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11828 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
11829 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11830 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11831 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11832 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11833 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
11834 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
11835 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
11836 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
11837 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate
11839 @c Local Variables:
11840 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"