1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
138 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
190 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
192 Outline of a Bison Grammar
194 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
195 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
196 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
197 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
198 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
200 Defining Language Semantics
202 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
203 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
204 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
205 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
206 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
207 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
208 action in the middle of a rule.
209 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 Parser C-Language Interface
234 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
235 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
236 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
237 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
238 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
239 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
241 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
242 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
243 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
246 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
248 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
249 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
250 of the token it has read.
251 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
252 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
254 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
255 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
257 The Bison Parser Algorithm
259 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
260 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
261 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
262 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
263 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
264 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
265 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
266 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
267 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
271 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
272 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
273 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
274 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
275 * How Precedence:: How they work.
277 Handling Context Dependencies
279 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
280 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
281 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
282 error recovery rules must be written.
284 Debugging Your Parser
286 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
287 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
291 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
292 in alphabetical order by short options.
293 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
294 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
296 Parsers Written In Other Languages
298 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
299 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
303 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
304 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
305 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
306 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
307 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
308 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
310 A Complete C++ Example
312 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
313 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
314 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
315 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
316 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
320 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
321 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
322 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
323 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
324 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
325 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
326 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
327 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
329 Frequently Asked Questions
331 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
332 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
333 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
334 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
335 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
336 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
337 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
338 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
339 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
340 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
341 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
342 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
346 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
352 @unnumbered Introduction
355 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
356 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or
357 generalized LR (GLR) parser employing
358 LALR(1), IELR(1), or canonical LR(1)
360 Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop a wide
361 range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk calculators to
362 complex programming languages.
364 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
365 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
366 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
367 C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
369 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
370 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
371 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
372 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
374 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
375 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
376 multi-character string literals and other features.
378 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
381 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
383 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
384 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
385 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
386 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
387 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
389 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
391 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
392 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
393 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
394 License to all of the Bison source code.
396 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
397 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
398 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
399 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
400 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the GPL
401 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
402 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
404 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
405 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
406 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
407 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
408 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
409 using the other GNU tools.
411 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
412 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
413 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
414 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
418 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
419 @include gpl-3.0.texi
422 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
424 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
425 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
426 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
429 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
430 as mathematical ideas.
431 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
432 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
433 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
434 the name of an identifier, etc.).
435 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
436 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
437 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
438 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
439 how is the output used?
440 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
441 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
444 @node Language and Grammar
445 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
447 @cindex context-free grammar
448 @cindex grammar, context-free
449 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
450 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
451 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
452 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
453 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
454 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
455 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
456 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
460 @cindex Backus-Naur form
461 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
462 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
463 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
464 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
465 essentially machine-readable BNF.
467 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
468 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
469 @cindex LR(1) grammars
470 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
471 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
472 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
473 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
474 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
475 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
476 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
477 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
478 more information on this.
479 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
480 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
481 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
484 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
485 @cindex ambiguous grammars
486 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
488 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
489 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
490 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
491 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
492 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
493 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
494 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
495 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
496 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
497 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
498 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
499 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
500 possible parses of any given string is finite.
502 @cindex symbols (abstract)
504 @cindex syntactic grouping
505 @cindex grouping, syntactic
506 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
507 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
508 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
509 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
510 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
511 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
512 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
514 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
515 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
516 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
517 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
518 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
519 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
520 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
521 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
522 lexicography, not grammar.)
524 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
528 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
529 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
530 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
531 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
532 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
533 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
534 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
539 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
540 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
541 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
542 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
543 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
547 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
548 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
549 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
550 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
551 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
552 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
553 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
554 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
556 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
557 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
558 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
559 reads informally as follows:
562 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
567 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
571 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
572 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
573 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
574 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
577 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
578 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
579 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
580 not the start symbol.
582 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
583 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
584 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
585 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
586 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
587 reports a syntax error.
589 @node Grammar in Bison
590 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
591 @cindex Bison grammar
592 @cindex grammar, Bison
593 @cindex formal grammar
595 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
596 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
597 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
599 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
600 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
601 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
603 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
604 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
605 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
606 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
607 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
608 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
609 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
612 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
613 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
614 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
615 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
617 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
618 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
620 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
621 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
622 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
623 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
627 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
632 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
634 @node Semantic Values
635 @section Semantic Values
636 @cindex semantic value
637 @cindex value, semantic
639 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
640 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
641 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
642 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
643 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
646 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
647 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
648 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
649 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
650 ,Defining Language Semantics},
653 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
654 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
655 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
656 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
659 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
660 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
661 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
662 need to have any semantic value.)
664 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
665 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
666 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
667 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
668 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
669 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
671 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
672 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
673 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
674 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
675 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
677 @node Semantic Actions
678 @section Semantic Actions
679 @cindex semantic actions
680 @cindex actions, semantic
682 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
683 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
684 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
685 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
688 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
689 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
690 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
691 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
692 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
693 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
694 newly recognized larger expression.
696 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
700 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
705 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
706 from the values of the two subexpressions.
709 @section Writing GLR Parsers
711 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
714 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
715 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
717 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
718 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
719 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
720 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
721 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
722 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
723 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
724 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
725 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
727 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
728 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
729 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
730 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
731 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
732 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
733 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
734 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
735 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
736 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
737 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
738 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
739 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
740 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
741 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
742 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
743 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
744 identical set of symbols.
746 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
747 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
748 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
749 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
750 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
751 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
752 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
753 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
754 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
758 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
759 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
760 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
761 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
762 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
765 @node Simple GLR Parsers
766 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
767 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
768 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
772 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
773 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
775 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
776 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
777 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
779 Consider a problem that
780 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
781 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
784 type subrange = lo .. hi;
785 type enum = (a, b, c);
789 The original language standard allows only numeric
790 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
791 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
792 10206) and many other
793 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
794 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
798 type subrange = (a) .. b;
802 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
803 type with only one value:
810 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
811 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
813 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
814 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
815 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
816 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
817 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
818 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
819 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
820 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
822 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
823 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
824 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
825 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
828 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
829 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
830 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
831 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
832 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
833 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
836 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
837 use the GLR algorithm.
838 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
839 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
840 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
841 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
842 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
843 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
844 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
845 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
846 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
848 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
849 reports a syntax error as usual.
851 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
852 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
853 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
854 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
855 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
857 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
858 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
859 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
860 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
861 The present example contains only one conflict between two
862 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
863 cannot be nested. So the number of
864 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
865 and the parsing time is still linear.
867 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
868 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
871 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
881 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
886 type : '(' id_list ')'
908 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
909 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
910 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
911 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
918 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
919 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
920 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
929 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
930 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
931 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
932 notice when the parser splits.
934 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
935 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
936 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
937 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
938 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
939 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
940 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
941 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
942 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
943 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
944 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
945 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
946 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
949 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
950 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
951 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
952 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
953 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
954 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
956 @node Merging GLR Parses
957 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
958 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
959 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
963 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
965 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
970 #define YYSTYPE char const *
972 void yyerror (char const *);
985 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
988 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
992 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
993 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
994 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
995 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
996 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
999 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1000 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1001 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1002 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1005 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1006 | '(' declarator ')'
1011 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1012 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1019 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1020 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1021 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1022 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1023 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1024 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1025 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1026 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1027 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1028 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1029 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1030 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1031 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1032 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1034 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1035 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1036 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1037 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1038 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1039 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1040 The parser therefore prints
1043 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1046 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1047 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1054 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1055 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1056 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1057 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1058 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1059 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1060 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1061 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1062 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1063 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1069 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1070 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1071 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1072 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1076 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1077 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1082 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1086 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1094 with an accompanying forward declaration
1095 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1099 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1100 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1105 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1106 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1109 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1112 Bison requires that all of the
1113 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1114 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1115 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1116 the offending merge.
1118 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1119 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1121 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1122 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1124 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1125 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1126 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1127 the associated reduction.
1128 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1129 action in a GLR parser.
1132 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1134 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1136 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1137 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1138 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1139 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1140 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1141 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1142 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1143 influence syntax analysis.
1144 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1147 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1148 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1149 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1150 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1151 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1152 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1153 future versions of Bison.
1154 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1155 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1156 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1158 @subsubsection YYERROR
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1161 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1162 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1163 initiate error recovery.
1164 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1165 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1166 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1167 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1168 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1169 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1170 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1171 the parse that invoked the test.
1173 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1174 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1175 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1178 @node Semantic Predicates
1179 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1181 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1183 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1185 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1186 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1187 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1188 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1192 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1193 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1198 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1199 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1200 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1201 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1202 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1203 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1204 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1206 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1207 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1208 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1209 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1212 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1213 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1214 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1218 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1219 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1224 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1225 false). However, this
1226 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1227 have overlapping syntax.
1228 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1229 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1230 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1231 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1234 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1235 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1237 @node Compiler Requirements
1238 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1239 @cindex @code{inline}
1240 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1242 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1243 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1244 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1245 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1246 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1247 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1256 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1260 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1266 @node Locations Overview
1269 @cindex textual location
1270 @cindex location, textual
1272 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1273 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1274 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1275 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1277 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1278 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1279 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1280 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1282 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1283 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1284 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1287 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1288 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1289 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1290 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1291 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1292 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1293 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1296 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1297 @cindex Bison parser
1298 @cindex Bison utility
1299 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1302 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1303 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1304 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1305 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1306 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1309 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1310 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1311 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1314 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1315 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1316 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1317 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1318 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1319 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1320 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1322 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1323 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1324 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1325 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1326 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1327 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1328 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1329 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1331 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1332 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1333 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1334 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1335 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1336 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1337 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1338 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1339 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1340 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1343 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1344 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1345 headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1346 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1347 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1348 included if message translation is in use
1349 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1350 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1351 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1354 @section Stages in Using Bison
1355 @cindex stages in using Bison
1358 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1359 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1363 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1364 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1365 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1366 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1367 sequence of C statements.
1370 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1371 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1372 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1373 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1376 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1379 Write error-reporting routines.
1382 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1383 must follow these steps:
1387 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1390 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1393 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1396 @node Grammar Layout
1397 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1398 @cindex grammar file
1400 @cindex format of grammar file
1401 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1403 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1404 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1411 @var{Bison declarations}
1420 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1421 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1423 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1424 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1425 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1426 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1427 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1428 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1430 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1431 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1432 semantic values of various symbols.
1434 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1437 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1438 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1439 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1443 @cindex simple examples
1444 @cindex examples, simple
1446 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1447 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1448 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1449 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1450 desk-top calculator.
1452 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1453 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1454 source file to try them.
1457 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1458 a first example with no operator precedence.
1459 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1460 Operator precedence is introduced.
1461 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1462 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1463 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1464 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1465 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1469 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1470 @cindex reverse polish notation
1471 @cindex polish notation calculator
1472 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1473 @cindex calculator, simple
1475 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1476 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1477 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1478 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1480 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1481 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1484 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1485 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1486 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1487 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1488 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1489 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1490 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1493 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1494 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1496 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1497 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1500 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1503 #define YYSTYPE double
1506 void yyerror (char const *);
1511 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1514 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1515 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1517 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1518 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1519 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1520 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1521 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1522 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1523 which is a floating point number.
1525 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1526 function @code{pow}.
1528 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1529 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1530 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1531 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1534 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1535 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1536 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1537 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1538 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1539 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1540 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1541 type for numeric constants.
1544 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1546 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1554 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1557 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1558 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1559 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1560 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1561 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1562 /* Exponentiation */
1563 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1565 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1570 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1571 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1572 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1573 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1574 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1577 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1578 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1579 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1581 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1582 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1583 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1584 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1585 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1586 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1595 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1597 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1605 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1606 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1607 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1608 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1609 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1611 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1612 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1613 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1614 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1615 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1616 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1618 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1619 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1620 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1621 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1624 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1625 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1626 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1629 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1631 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1635 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1639 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1640 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1641 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1642 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1643 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1644 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1645 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1647 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1648 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1649 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1650 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1651 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1654 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1656 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1657 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1658 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1659 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1663 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1664 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1669 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1670 equally well have written them separately:
1674 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1675 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1679 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1680 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1681 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1682 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1683 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1684 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1685 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1686 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1688 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1689 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1690 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1692 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1693 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1697 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1701 means the same thing as this:
1705 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1711 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1714 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1715 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1716 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1718 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1719 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1720 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1721 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1723 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1725 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1726 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1727 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1728 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1730 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1731 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1732 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1733 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1734 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1735 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1736 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1737 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1738 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1740 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1741 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1742 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1743 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1744 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1746 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1747 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1749 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1753 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1754 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1755 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1756 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1767 /* Skip white space. */
1768 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1772 /* Process numbers. */
1773 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1776 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1781 /* Return end-of-input. */
1784 /* Return a single char. */
1791 @subsection The Controlling Function
1792 @cindex controlling function
1793 @cindex main function in simple example
1795 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1796 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1797 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1810 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1811 @cindex error reporting routine
1813 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1814 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1815 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1816 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1817 here is the definition we will use:
1823 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1825 yyerror (char const *s)
1827 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1832 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1833 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1834 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1835 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1836 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1837 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1839 @node Rpcalc Generate
1840 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1841 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1843 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1844 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1845 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1846 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1847 end, in the epilogue of the file
1848 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1850 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1851 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1853 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1854 convert it into a parser file:
1861 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1862 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1863 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1864 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1865 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1866 are copied verbatim to the output.
1868 @node Rpcalc Compile
1869 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1870 @cindex compiling the parser
1872 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1876 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1878 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1882 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1883 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1884 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1888 # @r{List files again.}
1890 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1894 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1895 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1901 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1903 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1907 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1909 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1914 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1915 @cindex infix notation calculator
1917 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1919 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1920 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1921 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1922 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1925 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1928 #define YYSTYPE double
1932 void yyerror (char const *);
1935 /* Bison declarations. */
1939 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1940 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1942 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1948 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1951 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1952 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1953 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1954 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1955 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1956 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1957 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1958 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1964 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1967 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1969 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1970 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1971 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1972 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1973 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1974 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1975 the associativity/precedence.)
1977 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1978 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1979 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1980 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1981 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
1982 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1985 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1986 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1987 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1988 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1989 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1991 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1996 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2004 @node Simple Error Recovery
2005 @section Simple Error Recovery
2006 @cindex error recovery, simple
2008 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2009 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2010 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2011 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2012 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2013 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2015 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2016 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2017 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2022 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2023 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2028 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2029 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2030 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2031 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2032 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2033 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2034 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2035 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2038 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2039 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2040 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2041 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2042 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2043 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2046 @node Location Tracking Calc
2047 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2048 @cindex location tracking calculator
2049 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2050 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2052 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2053 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2054 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2055 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2059 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2060 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2061 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2064 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2065 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2067 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2068 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2071 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2077 void yyerror (char const *);
2080 /* Bison declarations. */
2088 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2092 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2093 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2094 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2095 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2096 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2097 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2098 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2102 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2104 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2105 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2106 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2107 from the new information.
2109 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2110 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2121 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2126 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2127 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2128 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2129 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2139 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2140 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2141 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2146 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2147 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2148 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2152 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2153 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2154 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2156 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2157 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2158 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2159 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2160 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2161 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2165 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2167 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2168 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2169 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2172 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2173 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2184 /* Skip white space. */
2185 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2186 ++yylloc.last_column;
2191 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2192 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2196 /* Process numbers. */
2200 ++yylloc.last_column;
2201 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2203 ++yylloc.last_column;
2204 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2211 /* Return end-of-input. */
2215 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2219 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2222 ++yylloc.last_column;
2227 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2228 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2229 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2230 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2232 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2233 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2234 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2235 controlling function:
2242 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2243 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2249 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2250 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2251 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2253 @node Multi-function Calc
2254 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2255 @cindex multi-function calculator
2256 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2257 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2259 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2260 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2261 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2262 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2263 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2265 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2266 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2267 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2268 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2269 functions whose syntax has this form:
2272 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2276 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2277 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2278 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2282 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2286 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2292 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2297 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2300 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2301 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2302 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2305 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2306 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2308 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2313 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2314 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2316 void yyerror (char const *);
2321 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2322 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2325 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2326 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2333 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2334 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2336 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2339 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2340 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2341 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2343 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2344 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2345 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2346 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2348 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2349 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2350 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2351 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2352 between angle brackets).
2354 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2355 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2356 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2357 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2358 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2359 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2362 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2364 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2365 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2366 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2378 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2379 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2384 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2385 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2386 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2387 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2388 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2389 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2390 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2391 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2392 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2393 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2394 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2397 /* End of grammar. */
2401 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2402 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2403 @cindex symbol table example
2405 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2406 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2407 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2408 requires some additional C functions for support.
2410 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2411 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2412 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2416 /* Function type. */
2417 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2421 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2424 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2425 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2428 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2429 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2431 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2436 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2438 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2439 extern symrec *sym_table;
2441 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2442 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2446 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2447 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2448 @code{init_table} as well:
2454 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2456 yyerror (char const *s)
2466 double (*fnct) (double);
2471 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2484 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2489 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2495 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2497 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2498 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2513 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2514 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2516 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2517 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2518 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2519 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2520 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2521 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2525 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2528 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2529 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2530 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2531 ptr->type = sym_type;
2532 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2533 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2539 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2542 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2543 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2544 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2550 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2551 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2552 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2553 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2555 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2556 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2557 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2558 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2559 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2560 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2562 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2563 operators in @code{yylex}.
2576 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2577 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2584 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2585 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2588 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2594 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2598 static char *symbuf = 0;
2599 static int length = 0;
2604 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2605 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2607 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2614 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2618 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2620 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2622 /* Get another character. */
2627 while (isalnum (c));
2634 s = getsym (symbuf);
2636 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2641 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2647 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2648 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2649 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2657 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2660 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2661 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2662 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2665 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2666 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2670 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2672 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2673 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2675 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2676 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2679 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2680 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2681 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2682 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2683 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2684 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2685 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2686 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2689 @node Grammar Outline
2690 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2692 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2693 appropriate delimiters:
2700 @var{Bison declarations}
2709 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2710 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2711 continues until end of line.
2714 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2715 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2716 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2717 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2718 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2722 @subsection The prologue
2723 @cindex declarations section
2725 @cindex declarations
2727 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2728 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2729 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2730 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2731 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2732 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2733 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2735 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2736 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2739 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2740 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2741 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2742 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2743 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2744 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2745 @code{%union} declaration.
2756 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2760 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2761 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2767 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2768 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2769 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2770 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2771 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2772 @code{#include} directives.
2774 @node Prologue Alternatives
2775 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2776 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2779 @findex %code requires
2780 @findex %code provides
2783 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2785 As an alternative, Bison provides a %code directive with an explicit qualifier
2786 field, which identifies the purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where
2787 Bison should generate it.
2788 For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be
2789 one of @code{requires}, @code{provides}, @code{top}.
2790 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2792 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2803 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2807 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2808 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2815 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a subtle
2816 distinction between their functionality.
2817 For example, if you decide to override Bison's default definition for
2818 @code{YYLTYPE}, in which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new
2820 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code into the
2821 parser source code file @emph{before} the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition.
2822 In which @var{Prologue} section should you prototype an internal function,
2823 @code{trace_token}, that accepts @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as
2825 You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2826 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2828 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2829 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2830 This behavior raises a few questions.
2831 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2832 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2833 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2834 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2835 This behavior is not intuitive.
2837 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2838 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2839 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2840 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2847 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2848 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2851 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2852 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2864 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2868 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2869 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2870 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2877 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2878 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2879 explicit which kind you intend.
2880 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2882 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts.
2883 The first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2884 parser source code file.
2885 The first line after the warning is required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also
2886 needs to appear in the parser source code file.
2887 However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header file
2888 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably want that line to appear before
2889 the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that header file as well.
2890 The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear in the parser header file to
2891 override the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition there.
2893 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2894 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2896 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2909 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2913 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2914 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2925 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2926 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2927 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2934 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new @code{YYLTYPE}
2935 definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2936 definitions in both the parser source code file and the parser header file.
2937 (By the same reasoning, @code{%code requires} would also be the appropriate
2938 place to write your own definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2940 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}, you
2941 should prefer @code{%code requires} over @code{%code top} regardless of whether
2942 you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file.
2943 When you are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
2944 source code file and that has no special need to appear at the top of that
2945 file, you should prefer the unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}.
2946 These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to
2947 Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
2948 Following these practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and
2949 @code{%code requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2952 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to provide
2953 @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your parser.
2954 Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the parser
2955 header file and the parser source code file.
2956 Since this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2957 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2958 @code{%code requires}.
2959 More importantly, since it depends upon @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype},
2960 @code{%code requires} is not sufficient.
2961 Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified @code{%code} to a
2962 @code{%code provides}:
2975 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2979 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2980 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2991 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2995 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2996 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3003 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the parser header
3004 file and the parser source code file after the definitions for
3005 @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYSTYPE}.
3007 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that reflects
3008 the layout of the generated parser source code and header files:
3009 @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, and then
3011 While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if you also follow
3012 this order, Bison does not require it.
3013 Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
3015 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3016 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3017 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3018 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3020 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3021 organize your grammar file.
3022 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3026 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3027 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3028 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3029 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3031 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3032 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3033 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3034 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3038 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3039 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3041 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3043 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3044 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3045 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3046 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3048 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3049 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3050 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3051 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3052 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3053 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3054 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3055 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3058 @node Bison Declarations
3059 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3060 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3061 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3063 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3064 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3065 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3066 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3069 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3070 @cindex grammar rules section
3071 @cindex rules section for grammar
3073 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3074 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3076 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3077 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3078 if it is the first thing in the file.
3081 @subsection The epilogue
3082 @cindex additional C code section
3084 @cindex C code, section for additional
3086 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
3087 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
3088 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
3089 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
3090 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
3091 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
3092 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
3093 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
3094 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
3096 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3097 from the grammar rules.
3099 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3100 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3101 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3102 of the grammar file.
3105 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3106 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3107 @cindex terminal symbol
3111 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3114 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3115 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3116 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3117 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3118 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3119 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3120 the symbol to stand for it.
3122 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3123 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3124 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3126 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, dashes, and (not
3127 at the beginning) digits. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU
3128 extension, incompatible with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol
3129 names less convenient to use with named references, which require brackets
3130 around such names (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols
3131 that contain periods or dashes make little sense: since they are not
3132 valid symbols (in most programming languages) they are not exported as
3135 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3139 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3140 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3141 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3142 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3145 @cindex character token
3146 @cindex literal token
3147 @cindex single-character literal
3148 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3149 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3150 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3151 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3152 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3153 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3154 ,Operator Precedence}).
3156 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3157 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3158 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3159 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3160 your program will confuse other readers.
3162 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3163 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3164 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3165 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3166 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3167 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3171 @cindex string token
3172 @cindex literal string token
3173 @cindex multicharacter literal
3174 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3175 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3176 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3177 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3178 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3180 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3181 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3182 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3183 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3184 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3186 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3188 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3189 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3190 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3191 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3192 read your program will be confused.
3194 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3195 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3196 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3197 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3198 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3199 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3202 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3203 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3204 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3206 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3207 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3208 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3209 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3210 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3211 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3212 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3213 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3214 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
3215 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
3216 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
3217 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3219 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3220 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3221 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3222 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3223 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3225 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3226 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3227 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3228 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3229 characters in the following C-language string:
3232 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3235 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3236 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3237 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3238 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3239 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3240 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3241 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3242 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3243 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3244 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3247 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3248 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3249 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3250 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3251 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3254 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3256 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3257 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3259 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3263 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3269 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3270 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3271 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3283 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3284 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3286 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3287 extra white space as you wish.
3289 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3290 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3293 @{@var{C statements}@}
3298 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3299 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3300 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3301 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3302 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
3304 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3305 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3306 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3307 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3308 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3309 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3310 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3311 character constants.
3313 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3317 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3318 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3322 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3323 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3330 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3332 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3333 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3334 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3351 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3355 @section Recursive Rules
3356 @cindex recursive rule
3358 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3359 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3360 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3361 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3362 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3372 @cindex left recursion
3373 @cindex right recursion
3375 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3376 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3377 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3388 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3389 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3390 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3391 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3392 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3393 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3394 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3397 @cindex mutual recursion
3398 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3399 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3400 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3408 | primary '+' primary
3420 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3424 @section Defining Language Semantics
3425 @cindex defining language semantics
3426 @cindex language semantics, defining
3428 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3429 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3430 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3432 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3433 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3434 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3435 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3438 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3439 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3440 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3441 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3442 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3443 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3444 action in the middle of a rule.
3445 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3449 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3450 @cindex semantic value type
3451 @cindex value type, semantic
3452 @cindex data types of semantic values
3453 @cindex default data type
3455 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3456 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3457 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3458 Notation Calculator}).
3460 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3461 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3462 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3465 #define YYSTYPE double
3469 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3470 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3471 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3472 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3474 @node Multiple Types
3475 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3477 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3478 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3479 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3480 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3483 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3484 requires you to do two things:
3488 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3489 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3490 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3491 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3495 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3496 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3497 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3498 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3499 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3508 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3510 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3511 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3512 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3513 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3515 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3516 placed at any position in the rule;
3517 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3518 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3519 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3520 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3522 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3523 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3524 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3525 being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition, the semantic values of
3526 symbols can be accessed with the named references construct
3527 @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}. Bison translates both of these
3528 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3529 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it
3530 stands for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable
3531 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3533 Here is a typical example:
3543 Or, in terms of named references:
3547 exp[result]: @dots{}
3548 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3549 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3554 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3555 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3556 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3557 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3558 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3559 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3561 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3562 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3563 referred to as @code{$2}.
3565 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3566 about using the named references construct.
3568 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3569 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3570 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3571 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3572 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3576 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3580 @cindex default action
3581 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3582 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3583 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3584 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3585 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3586 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3588 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3589 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3590 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3591 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3592 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3596 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3597 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3603 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3608 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3609 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3610 definition of @code{foo}.
3613 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3614 any, from a semantic action.
3615 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3616 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3619 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3620 @cindex action data types
3621 @cindex data types in actions
3623 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3624 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3626 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3627 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3628 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3629 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3630 in the rule. In this example,
3641 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3642 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3643 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3644 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3646 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3647 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3648 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3660 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3661 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3663 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3664 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3665 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3666 @cindex mid-rule actions
3668 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3669 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3670 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3672 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3673 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3674 it is run before they are parsed.
3676 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3677 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3678 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3679 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3682 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3683 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3684 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3685 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3686 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3687 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3689 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3690 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3691 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3692 at the end of the rule.
3694 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3695 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3696 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3697 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3698 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3699 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3703 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3704 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3705 declare_variable ($3); @}
3707 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3712 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3713 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3714 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3715 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3716 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3717 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3718 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3719 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3721 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3722 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3723 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3724 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3725 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3728 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3729 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3730 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3731 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3732 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3734 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3735 Discarded Symbols}).
3736 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3737 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3739 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3740 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3745 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3751 pop_context ($1); @}
3754 let: LET '(' var ')'
3755 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3756 declare_variable ($3); @}
3763 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3764 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3765 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3767 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3768 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3769 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3770 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3771 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3776 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3777 | '@{' statements '@}'
3783 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3787 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3788 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3791 | '@{' statements '@}'
3797 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3798 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3799 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3800 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3801 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3802 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3804 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3805 actions into the two rules, like this:
3809 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3810 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3811 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3812 '@{' statements '@}'
3818 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3819 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3821 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3822 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3823 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3827 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3828 declarations statements '@}'
3829 | '@{' statements '@}'
3835 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3836 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3838 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3839 serves as a subroutine:
3843 subroutine: /* empty */
3844 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3850 compound: subroutine
3851 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3853 '@{' statements '@}'
3859 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3860 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3862 @node Named References
3863 @subsection Using Named References
3864 @cindex named references
3866 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3867 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3868 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3869 references. For example:
3873 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3874 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3879 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3880 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3884 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3885 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3890 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3896 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3899 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3902 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3907 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3908 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3909 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3912 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3913 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3918 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3919 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3920 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3921 the mid-rule action code:
3924 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3925 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3931 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3932 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3935 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3936 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3940 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3941 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3942 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3943 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3944 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3945 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3950 @section Tracking Locations
3952 @cindex textual location
3953 @cindex location, textual
3955 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3956 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3957 especially symbol locations.
3959 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3960 actions to take when rules are matched.
3963 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3964 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3965 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3969 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3970 @cindex data type of locations
3971 @cindex default location type
3973 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3974 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3976 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3977 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3978 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3979 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3983 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3992 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3993 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3994 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3995 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3996 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3998 @node Actions and Locations
3999 @subsection Actions and Locations
4000 @cindex location actions
4001 @cindex actions, location
4004 @vindex @@@var{name}
4005 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4007 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4008 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4010 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4011 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4012 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4013 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4014 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4017 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4018 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4019 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
4020 about using the named references construct.
4022 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4029 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4030 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4031 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4032 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4039 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4040 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4041 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4047 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4048 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4049 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4052 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4053 example above simply rewrites this way:
4066 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4067 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4068 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4075 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4076 from a semantic action.
4077 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4078 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4080 @node Location Default Action
4081 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4082 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4083 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4085 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4086 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4087 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4088 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4089 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4090 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4091 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4092 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4095 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4096 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4098 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4099 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4100 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4101 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4102 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4103 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4104 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4105 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4106 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4107 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4109 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4113 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4117 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4118 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4119 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4120 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4124 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4125 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4126 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4127 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4133 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4134 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4135 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4137 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4141 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4142 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4145 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4146 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4147 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4148 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4151 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4152 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4153 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4154 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4158 @section Bison Declarations
4159 @cindex declarations, Bison
4160 @cindex Bison declarations
4162 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4163 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4166 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4167 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4168 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4169 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4171 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
4172 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
4173 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
4177 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4178 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4179 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4180 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4181 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4182 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4183 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4184 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4185 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4186 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4187 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4188 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4192 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4193 @cindex version requirement
4194 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4197 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4198 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4202 %require "@var{version}"
4206 @subsection Token Type Names
4207 @cindex declaring token type names
4208 @cindex token type names, declaring
4209 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4212 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4218 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4219 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4220 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4222 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4223 @code{%precedence}, or
4224 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4225 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4228 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4229 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4230 following the token name:
4234 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4238 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4239 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4240 with each other or with normal characters.
4242 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4243 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4244 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4245 Than One Value Type}).
4251 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4255 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4259 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4260 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4261 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4268 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4269 equivalent literal string tokens:
4272 %token <operator> OR "||"
4273 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4278 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4279 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4280 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4281 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4282 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4283 the literal string instead of the token name.
4285 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4286 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4290 %token END 0 "end of file"
4293 @node Precedence Decl
4294 @subsection Operator Precedence
4295 @cindex precedence declarations
4296 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4297 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4299 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4300 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4301 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4302 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4303 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4304 operator precedence.
4306 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4307 @code{%token}: either
4310 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4317 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4320 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4321 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4322 all the @var{symbols}:
4326 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4327 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4328 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4329 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4330 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4331 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4332 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4333 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4334 considered a syntax error.
4336 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4337 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4338 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4341 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4342 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4343 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4344 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4345 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4348 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4349 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4350 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4351 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4356 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4357 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4361 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4362 @cindex declaring value types
4363 @cindex value types, declaring
4366 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4367 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4368 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4383 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4384 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4385 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4386 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4388 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4389 @code{union}. For example:
4401 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4402 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4405 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4406 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4407 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4409 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4410 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4412 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4413 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4414 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4415 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4423 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4428 and then your grammar can use the following
4429 instead of @code{%union}:
4442 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4443 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4444 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4448 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4449 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4450 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4453 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4457 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4458 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4459 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4460 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4461 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4464 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4465 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4466 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4467 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4469 @node Initial Action Decl
4470 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4471 @findex %initial-action
4473 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4474 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4477 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4478 @findex %initial-action
4479 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4480 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4481 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4482 @code{%parse-param}.
4485 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4488 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4491 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4496 @node Destructor Decl
4497 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4498 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4502 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4503 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4504 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4505 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4506 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4507 must discard the start symbol.
4509 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4510 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4511 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4512 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4514 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4515 symbol is automatically discarded.
4517 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4519 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4521 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4522 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4523 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4524 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4526 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4527 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4528 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4529 tag among @var{symbols}.
4530 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4531 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4532 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4534 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4535 (These default forms are experimental.
4536 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4538 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4539 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4540 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4541 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4543 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4544 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4545 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4546 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4547 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4554 %union @{ char *string; @}
4555 %token <string> STRING1
4556 %token <string> STRING2
4557 %type <string> string1
4558 %type <string> string2
4559 %union @{ char character; @}
4560 %token <character> CHR
4561 %type <character> chr
4564 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4565 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4566 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4567 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4571 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4572 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4573 to @code{free} by default.
4574 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4575 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4576 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4577 @code{free} only once.
4578 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4579 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4581 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4582 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4583 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4584 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4585 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4586 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4587 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4588 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4589 reference it in your grammar.
4590 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4591 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4597 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4598 @cindex mid-rule actions
4599 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4600 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4601 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4602 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4603 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4605 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4606 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4610 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4611 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4612 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4617 @cindex discarded symbols
4618 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4622 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4624 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4626 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4627 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4629 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4632 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4633 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4636 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4637 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4638 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4642 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4643 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4644 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4645 @cindex warnings, preventing
4646 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4650 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4651 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4652 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4653 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4654 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4655 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4657 The declaration looks like this:
4663 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4664 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4665 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4666 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4668 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4669 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4670 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4671 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4672 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4673 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4674 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4680 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4684 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4685 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4686 print the number of conflicts.
4689 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4690 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4691 go back to the beginning.
4694 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4695 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4696 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4699 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4700 but will keep silent otherwise.
4703 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4704 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4705 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4706 @cindex default start symbol
4709 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4710 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4711 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4718 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4719 @cindex reentrant parser
4721 @findex %define api.pure
4723 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4724 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4725 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4726 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4727 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4728 program must be called only within interlocks.
4730 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4731 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4732 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4733 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4734 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4736 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4737 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4738 reentrant. It looks like this:
4744 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4745 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4746 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4747 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4748 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4749 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4750 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4751 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4752 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4754 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4755 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4759 @subsection A Push Parser
4762 @findex %define api.push-pull
4764 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4765 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4767 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4768 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4769 each time a new token is made available.
4771 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4772 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4773 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4774 within a certain time period.
4776 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4777 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4778 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define api.push-pull}):
4781 %define api.push-pull push
4784 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4785 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4786 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4787 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4788 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4792 %define api.push-pull push
4795 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4796 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4797 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4798 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4800 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4801 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4802 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4803 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4804 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4805 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4806 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4807 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4811 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4813 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4814 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4815 yypstate_delete (ps);
4818 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4819 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4820 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4821 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4822 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4823 example would thus look like this:
4828 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4831 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4832 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4833 yypstate_delete (ps);
4836 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4837 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4839 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4840 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4841 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4842 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4843 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4844 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4845 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4846 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4847 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4848 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4849 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4850 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4851 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4852 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4853 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4854 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4855 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4859 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4860 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4861 yypstate_delete (ps);
4864 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4865 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4866 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
4869 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4870 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4871 @cindex declaration summary
4872 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4874 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4876 @deffn {Directive} %union
4877 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4878 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4881 @deffn {Directive} %token
4882 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4883 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4886 @deffn {Directive} %right
4887 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4888 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4891 @deffn {Directive} %left
4892 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4893 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4896 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4897 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4898 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4899 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4903 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4904 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4905 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4909 @deffn {Directive} %type
4910 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4911 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4914 @deffn {Directive} %start
4915 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4919 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4920 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4921 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4927 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4930 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4932 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4933 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4934 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4935 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4936 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4939 For C/C++, the default location is the parser source code
4940 file after the usual contents of the parser header file.
4941 Thus, @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4942 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes.
4943 For a detailed discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4945 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4948 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4949 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4950 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4951 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4952 use this form instead.
4954 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4955 where Bison should generate it.
4956 Not all @var{qualifier}s are accepted for all target languages.
4957 Unaccepted @var{qualifier}s produce an error.
4958 Some of the accepted @var{qualifier}s are:
4962 @findex %code requires
4965 @item Language(s): C, C++
4967 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4968 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4969 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4970 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4971 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4973 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file
4974 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4978 @findex %code provides
4981 @item Language(s): C, C++
4983 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4984 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4986 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file after
4987 the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and token definitions.
4994 @item Language(s): C, C++
4996 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires} should
4997 usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}.
4998 However, occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
4999 parser source code file.
5009 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser source code file.
5013 @findex %code imports
5016 @item Language(s): Java
5018 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5020 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5021 before any class definitions.
5026 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
5027 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5030 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5031 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5033 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5036 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5037 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5038 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5039 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
5041 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
5042 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5044 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5045 character other than a letter, underscore, period, dash, or non-initial
5048 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent to specifying
5051 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values.
5052 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
5053 of the following four conditions:
5056 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5058 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5059 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5061 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5063 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5064 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5067 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5068 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5069 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5070 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5071 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5072 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5075 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5077 @findex %define api.namespace
5079 @item Languages(s): C++
5081 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5082 For example, if you specify:
5085 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5088 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5091 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5094 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5095 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5098 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5104 @item Accepted Values:
5105 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5106 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5108 @item Default Value:
5109 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5110 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5111 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5112 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5113 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5114 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5115 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5118 %define api.namespace "foo"
5119 %name-prefix "bar::"
5122 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5129 @c ================================================== api.pure
5131 @findex %define api.pure
5134 @item Language(s): C
5136 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5137 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5139 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5141 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5147 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5149 @findex %define api.push-pull
5152 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5154 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5155 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5156 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5157 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5159 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5161 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5167 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5168 @item api.tokens.prefix
5169 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5172 @item Languages(s): all
5175 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5176 target language. For instance
5179 %token FILE for ERROR
5180 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5182 start: FILE for ERROR;
5186 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5187 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5188 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5189 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5190 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5191 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5192 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5194 @item Accepted Values:
5195 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5196 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5197 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5199 @item Default Value:
5202 @c api.tokens.prefix
5205 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5207 @findex %define lex_symbol
5214 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5215 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5216 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5218 @item Accepted Values:
5221 @item Default Value:
5227 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5229 @item lr.default-reductions
5230 @cindex default reductions
5231 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5232 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5233 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5238 @item Language(s): all
5240 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5241 contain default reductions.
5242 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
5243 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
5245 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
5247 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5249 @item Accepted Values:
5252 This is the traditional Bison behavior.
5253 The main advantage is a significant decrease in the size of the parser
5255 The disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
5256 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
5257 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
5258 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in
5259 LALR and IELR parser tables anyway due to
5260 LR state merging (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}).
5261 Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can contribute to delayed
5262 syntax error detection even in the case of canonical LR.
5263 As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error detection can be
5264 overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{Decl
5265 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the effects
5266 of delayed syntax error detection).
5268 @item @code{consistent}.
5269 @cindex consistent states
5270 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
5271 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
5272 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
5273 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
5274 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
5276 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
5277 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5278 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
5279 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5281 @item @code{accepting}.
5282 @cindex accepting state
5283 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5285 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5286 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5287 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5288 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5291 @item Default Value:
5293 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5294 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5298 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5300 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5301 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5304 @item Language(s): all
5306 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5307 remain in the parser tables.
5308 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5309 transitions from the start state to that state.
5310 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5311 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5312 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5313 are useless in the generated parser.
5315 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5317 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5323 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5325 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5326 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5327 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5328 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5329 remain in future Bison releases.
5331 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5332 remove other kinds of useless states.
5333 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5334 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5336 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5337 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5339 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5342 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5344 @c ================================================== lr.type
5347 @findex %define lr.type
5353 @item Language(s): all
5355 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5357 (This feature is experimental.
5358 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5360 @item Accepted Values:
5363 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5364 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5365 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5366 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5367 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5368 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5369 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5370 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5373 @cindex GLR with LALR
5374 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5375 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5376 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5378 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5379 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5380 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5381 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5382 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5383 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5384 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5385 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5387 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5388 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5389 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5390 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5391 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5392 from IELR and canonical LR.
5396 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5397 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5398 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5400 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5401 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5403 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5404 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5405 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5406 of magnitude less as well.
5407 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5409 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5410 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5411 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5414 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an
5415 interesting means to explore a grammar because they have a property that
5416 IELR and LALR tables do not.
5417 That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are left
5418 disabled (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every
5419 left context of every canonical LR state, the set of tokens
5420 accepted by that state is guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that
5421 is syntactically acceptable in that left context.
5422 It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR parsers
5423 in production is that, under the above constraints, they are guaranteed
5424 to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing any
5425 unnecessary reductions.
5426 However, IELR parsers using LAC (@pxref{Decl
5427 Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able to achieve this behavior without
5428 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or default reductions.
5431 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5435 @c ================================================== namespace
5437 @findex %define namespace
5438 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5442 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5444 @findex %define parse.assert
5447 @item Languages(s): C++
5449 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5450 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5452 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5454 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5456 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5461 @c ================================================== parse.error
5463 @findex %define parse.error
5468 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5469 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5471 @item Accepted Values:
5474 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5476 @item @code{verbose}
5477 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected
5481 @item Default Value:
5487 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5489 @findex %define parse.lac
5491 @cindex lookahead correction
5494 @item Languages(s): C
5496 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5497 syntax error handling.
5499 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5500 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5501 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5502 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5503 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5504 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5505 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5506 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5507 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5508 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5510 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5511 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5512 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5513 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5514 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5516 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5517 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5518 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5519 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5520 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5521 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5522 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5523 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5524 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5525 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5526 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5527 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5528 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5529 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5530 token in the grammar.
5532 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in
5533 a consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5534 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed
5535 to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions
5536 are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{Decl
5537 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5538 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5539 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter behavior
5540 is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to
5541 achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully enabled.
5543 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5544 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5545 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5546 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5547 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5548 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5549 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5550 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5552 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5553 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5554 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5555 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5556 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5557 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5558 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5559 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5560 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5561 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5562 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5563 insignificant for practical grammars.
5565 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5567 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5571 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5573 @findex %define parse.trace
5576 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5578 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5579 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser file if it
5580 is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5581 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5583 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5585 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5589 @c ================================================== variant
5591 @findex %define variant
5598 Request variant-based semantic values.
5599 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5601 @item Accepted Values:
5604 @item Default Value:
5612 @c ---------------------------------------------------------- %define
5614 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5615 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
5616 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5617 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
5618 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5620 For C parsers, the output header declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5621 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5622 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}.
5623 Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
5624 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
5625 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
5627 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
5628 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
5629 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
5630 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5632 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
5633 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5636 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
5637 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
5638 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
5641 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
5642 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
5643 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
5644 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
5647 @findex %code requires
5648 @findex %code provides
5649 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5650 header also contains their code.
5651 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
5654 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5655 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5658 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5659 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5660 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5663 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5664 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
5665 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5668 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5669 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5670 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5671 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5673 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5677 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5678 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5679 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5680 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5681 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5682 accurate syntax error messages.
5685 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5686 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5687 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5689 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5690 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5691 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5692 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5693 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5694 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5695 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5696 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5698 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5702 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5703 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5704 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5709 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5710 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5711 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
5712 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
5713 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
5714 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
5715 file in its own right.
5718 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5719 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
5722 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5723 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
5724 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
5727 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5728 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5729 Require a Version of Bison}.
5732 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5733 Specify the skeleton to use.
5735 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5736 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5737 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5738 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5740 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5741 file in the Bison installation directory.
5742 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5743 directory of the grammar file.
5744 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5747 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5748 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
5749 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
5750 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
5751 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
5753 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
5754 defined in the grammar file.
5756 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5757 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5758 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5759 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5760 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5761 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5762 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5765 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5766 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5767 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5771 The highest token number, plus one.
5773 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5775 The number of grammar rules,
5777 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5781 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5782 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5783 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5784 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5788 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5789 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5790 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5794 @node Multiple Parsers
5795 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5797 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5798 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5799 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5800 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5802 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5803 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5804 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5805 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5806 names that do not conflict.
5808 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5809 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5810 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5811 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5812 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5813 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5814 @code{clex}, and so on.
5816 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5817 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5818 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5819 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5820 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5822 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
5823 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5824 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
5825 name for the other in the entire parser file.
5828 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5829 @cindex C-language interface
5832 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5833 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5834 functions that it needs to use.
5836 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5837 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5838 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5839 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5842 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5843 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5844 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5845 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5846 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5847 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5849 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5850 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5851 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5855 @node Parser Function
5856 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5859 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5860 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5861 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5862 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5863 without reading further.
5866 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5867 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5868 is due to end-of-input).
5870 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5871 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5874 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5877 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5882 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5887 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5890 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5891 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5892 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5894 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5895 @findex %parse-param
5896 Declare that one or more
5897 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5898 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5899 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5900 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5903 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5906 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5910 Then call the parser like this:
5914 int nastiness, randomness;
5915 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5916 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5922 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5925 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5928 @node Push Parser Function
5929 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5930 @findex yypush_parse
5932 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5933 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5935 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5936 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5937 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5938 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5940 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5941 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5942 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5943 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5946 @node Pull Parser Function
5947 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5948 @findex yypull_parse
5950 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5951 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5953 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5954 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5955 declaration is used.
5956 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5958 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5959 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5962 @node Parser Create Function
5963 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5964 @findex yypstate_new
5966 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5967 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5969 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5970 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5971 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5972 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5974 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5975 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5976 or 0 if no memory was available.
5977 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5981 @node Parser Delete Function
5982 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5983 @findex yypstate_delete
5985 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5986 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5988 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5989 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5990 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5991 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5993 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5994 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5995 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5999 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6001 @cindex lexical analyzer
6003 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6004 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6005 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6006 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6008 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
6009 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
6010 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
6011 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
6012 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
6013 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
6014 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
6017 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6018 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6019 of the token it has read.
6020 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6021 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6023 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6024 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6027 @node Calling Convention
6028 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6030 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6031 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6032 signifies end-of-input.
6034 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6035 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
6036 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
6037 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6039 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6040 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6041 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6042 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6043 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6044 signifies end-of-input.
6046 Here is an example showing these things:
6053 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6056 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6057 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6059 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6065 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6066 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6068 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6069 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6073 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6074 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6075 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6076 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6079 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6080 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6081 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6082 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6083 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6086 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6087 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6088 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6089 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6092 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6095 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6096 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6097 strlen (token_buffer))
6098 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6099 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6104 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6105 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6109 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6112 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6113 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6114 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6115 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6121 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6122 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6127 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6128 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6129 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6130 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6131 declaration looks like this:
6144 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6149 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6150 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6155 @node Token Locations
6156 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6159 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
6160 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
6161 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
6162 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
6163 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
6164 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
6166 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6167 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6168 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6169 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6170 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6173 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6176 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6178 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6179 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6180 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6181 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6182 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6183 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6188 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6191 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6192 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6197 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6198 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6199 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6202 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6203 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6204 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6205 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6207 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6209 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6210 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6211 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6214 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6216 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6217 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6218 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6219 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6220 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6226 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6227 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6228 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6232 results in the following signature:
6235 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6236 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6239 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6242 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6243 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6247 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6250 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6251 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6252 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6255 @node Error Reporting
6256 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6257 @cindex error reporting function
6260 @cindex syntax error
6262 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6263 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6264 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6265 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6268 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6269 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6270 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6271 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6272 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6274 @findex %define parse.error
6275 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison
6276 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6277 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6278 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6280 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6281 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6282 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6283 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6284 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6285 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6287 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6288 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6289 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6291 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6296 yyerror (char const *s)
6300 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6305 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6306 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6307 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6308 immediately return 1.
6310 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6311 an access to the current location.
6312 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6313 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6314 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6318 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6319 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6322 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6325 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6326 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6329 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6330 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6331 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6332 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6336 /* Location tracking. */
6340 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6342 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6343 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6347 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6350 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6351 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6352 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6353 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6358 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6359 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6360 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6361 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6362 message is always passed last.
6364 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6365 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6366 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6370 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6371 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6372 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6373 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6375 @node Action Features
6376 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6377 @cindex summary, action features
6378 @cindex action features summary
6380 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6381 are useful in actions.
6383 @deffn {Variable} $$
6384 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6385 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6388 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6389 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6390 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6393 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6394 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6395 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6396 Types of Values in Actions}.
6399 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6400 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6401 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6402 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6405 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6406 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6407 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6410 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6411 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6412 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6415 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6417 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6418 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6419 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6420 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6421 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6422 going to be reduced by this rule.
6424 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6425 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6426 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6429 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6432 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6434 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6437 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6439 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6443 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6445 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6446 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6447 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6448 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6449 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6452 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6453 @findex YYRECOVERING
6454 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6455 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6456 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6459 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6460 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6461 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6462 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6463 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6465 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6468 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6469 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6471 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6473 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6476 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6477 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6478 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6479 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6482 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6483 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6484 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6485 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6487 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6490 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6491 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6492 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6493 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6495 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6500 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6501 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6502 Tracking Locations}.
6504 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6508 @c int first_line, last_line;
6509 @c int first_column, last_column;
6513 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6514 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6516 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6517 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6518 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6521 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6524 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6526 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6527 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6528 Tracking Locations}.
6531 @node Internationalization
6532 @section Parser Internationalization
6533 @cindex internationalization
6539 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6540 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6541 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6542 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6543 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6544 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6545 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6546 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6549 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6550 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6551 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6556 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6557 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6558 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6559 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6560 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6564 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6569 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6570 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6571 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6572 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6573 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6574 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6575 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6576 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6577 Bison-generated parser.
6580 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6581 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6582 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6586 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6589 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6590 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6591 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6595 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6596 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6597 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6600 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6606 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6610 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6616 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6617 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6618 @cindex algorithm of parser
6621 @cindex parser stack
6622 @cindex stack, parser
6624 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6625 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6626 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6628 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6629 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6632 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6633 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6634 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6635 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6636 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6637 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6638 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6640 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6647 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6648 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6651 expr: expr '*' expr;
6655 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6662 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6663 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6665 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6666 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6667 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6669 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6672 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6673 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6674 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6675 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6676 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6677 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6678 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6679 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6680 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6684 @section Lookahead Tokens
6685 @cindex lookahead token
6687 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6688 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6689 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6690 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6691 token in order to decide what to do.
6693 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6694 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6695 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6696 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6697 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6698 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6699 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6702 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6703 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6704 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6721 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6722 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6723 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6724 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6725 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6727 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6728 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6729 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6730 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6731 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6732 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6737 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6738 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6739 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6740 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6743 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6745 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6746 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6747 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6749 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6750 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6756 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6762 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6763 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6765 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6766 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6767 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6768 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6771 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6772 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6773 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6774 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6775 contrast it with the other alternative.
6777 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6778 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6782 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6784 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6787 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6788 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6789 making these two inputs equivalent:
6792 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6794 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6797 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6798 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6799 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6800 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6801 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6802 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6803 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6804 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6806 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6807 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6808 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6809 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6811 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6813 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6814 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6815 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
6820 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6832 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6841 @section Operator Precedence
6842 @cindex operator precedence
6843 @cindex precedence of operators
6845 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6846 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6847 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6848 shift and when to reduce.
6851 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6852 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6853 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6854 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6855 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6858 @node Why Precedence
6859 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6861 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6862 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6876 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6877 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6878 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6879 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6880 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6881 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6882 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6885 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6886 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6887 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6888 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6889 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6890 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6891 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6892 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6895 @cindex associativity
6896 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6897 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6898 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6899 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6900 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6901 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6902 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6903 makes right-associativity.
6905 @node Using Precedence
6906 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6912 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6913 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6914 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6915 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6916 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6917 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6918 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6920 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6921 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6922 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6923 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6924 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6925 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6926 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6927 what expected the grammar author.
6929 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6930 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6931 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6932 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6933 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6935 @node Precedence Only
6936 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6939 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6940 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6941 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6942 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6943 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6944 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6945 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6947 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6948 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6949 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6953 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6956 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6957 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6958 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6959 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
6960 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
6961 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
6962 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
6969 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
6970 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
6971 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
6972 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
6973 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
6974 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
6975 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
6977 @node Precedence Examples
6978 @subsection Precedence Examples
6980 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6988 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6989 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6990 declared with @code{'-'}:
6993 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6999 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7000 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7001 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7003 @node How Precedence
7004 @subsection How Precedence Works
7006 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7007 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7008 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7009 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7010 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7011 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7013 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7014 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7015 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7016 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7017 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7018 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7019 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7022 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7023 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7025 @node Contextual Precedence
7026 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7027 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7028 @cindex unary operator precedence
7029 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7030 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7033 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7034 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7035 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7036 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7038 The Bison precedence declarations
7039 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7040 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7041 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7044 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7045 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7046 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7047 modifier's syntax is:
7050 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7054 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7055 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7056 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7057 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7058 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7060 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7061 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7062 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7072 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7079 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7084 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7085 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7086 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7087 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7089 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7090 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7091 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7092 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7094 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7095 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7096 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7097 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7098 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7099 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7101 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7102 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7106 @section Parser States
7107 @cindex finite-state machine
7108 @cindex parser state
7109 @cindex state (of parser)
7111 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7112 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7113 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7114 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7115 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7117 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7118 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7119 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7120 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7121 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7122 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7123 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7124 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7127 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7128 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7129 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7132 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7133 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7134 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7136 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7137 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7140 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7141 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7144 sequence: /* empty */
7145 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7148 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7151 maybeword: /* empty */
7152 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7154 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7159 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7160 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7161 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7162 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7163 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7164 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7166 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7167 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7168 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7170 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7171 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7172 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7173 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7174 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7176 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7177 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7178 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7179 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7182 sequence: /* empty */
7183 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7185 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7189 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7192 sequence: /* empty */
7194 | sequence redirects
7201 redirects:/* empty */
7202 | redirects redirect
7207 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7208 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7209 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7210 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7211 in infinitely many ways!
7213 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7214 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7215 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7216 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7218 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7222 sequence: /* empty */
7228 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7232 sequence: /* empty */
7234 | sequence redirects
7242 | redirects redirect
7246 @node Mystery Conflicts
7247 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7249 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7257 def: param_spec return_spec ','
7261 | name_list ':' type
7279 | name ',' name_list
7284 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7285 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7286 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7287 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7291 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7293 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7294 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7295 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7297 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7298 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7299 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7300 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7301 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7302 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7303 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7305 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7306 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in
7307 difficulties beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts.
7308 The best way to fix all these problems is to select a different parser
7309 table generation algorithm.
7310 Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but
7311 the former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7312 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, for details.
7313 (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations
7315 More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7317 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7318 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7319 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7320 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7321 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7332 /* This rule is never used. */
7338 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7339 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7340 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7341 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7342 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7343 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7345 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7346 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7347 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7348 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7349 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7350 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7355 | name_list ':' type
7363 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7364 generators, please see:
7365 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
7366 LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{ACM Transactions on
7367 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
7368 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
7370 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7371 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7373 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7374 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7375 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7377 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7378 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7379 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7380 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7381 context-free languages.
7382 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7383 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7384 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7385 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7386 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7387 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7388 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7389 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7391 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7392 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7393 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7394 parser uses the same basic
7395 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7396 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7397 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7398 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7400 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7401 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7402 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7403 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7404 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7406 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7407 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7408 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7409 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7410 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7411 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7412 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7413 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7414 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7415 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7416 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7419 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7420 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7421 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7422 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7423 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7424 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7425 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7426 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7427 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7428 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7429 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7430 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7432 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7433 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7434 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7436 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7437 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7438 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7439 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7440 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7441 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7442 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7443 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7444 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7445 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7446 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7447 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7449 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, please see: Elizabeth
7450 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
7451 Generalised LR Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
7452 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
7453 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
7456 @node Memory Management
7457 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7458 @cindex memory exhaustion
7459 @cindex memory management
7460 @cindex stack overflow
7461 @cindex parser stack overflow
7462 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7464 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7465 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7466 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7468 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7469 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7470 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7473 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7474 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7475 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7476 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7478 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7479 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7480 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7481 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7482 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7483 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7485 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7486 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7487 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7490 @cindex default stack limit
7491 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7495 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7496 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7497 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7498 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7499 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7501 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7503 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7504 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7505 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7506 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7507 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7508 non-trivial copy constructors.
7509 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7512 @node Error Recovery
7513 @chapter Error Recovery
7514 @cindex error recovery
7515 @cindex recovery from errors
7517 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7518 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7519 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7522 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7523 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7524 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7525 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7526 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7527 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7528 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7531 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7532 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7533 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7534 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7535 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7536 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7541 stmnts: /* empty string */
7547 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7548 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7550 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7551 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7552 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7553 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7554 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7555 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7556 applicable in the ordinary way.
7558 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7559 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7560 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7561 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7562 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7563 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7564 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7565 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7566 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7567 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7568 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7569 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7571 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7572 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7573 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7576 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7579 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7580 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7581 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7582 spurious error message:
7585 primary: '(' expr ')'
7591 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7592 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7593 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7594 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7595 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7596 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7597 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7600 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7601 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7602 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7603 error messages resume.
7605 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7606 as any other rules can.
7609 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7610 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7611 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7612 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7615 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7616 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7617 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7619 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7621 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7622 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7623 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7624 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7625 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7627 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7628 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7629 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7630 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7633 @node Context Dependency
7634 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7636 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7637 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7638 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7639 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7643 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7644 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7645 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7646 error recovery rules must be written.
7649 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7650 neither clean nor robust.)
7652 @node Semantic Tokens
7653 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7655 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7656 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7662 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7663 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7664 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7666 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7667 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7668 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7669 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7670 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7672 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7673 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7674 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7675 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7676 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7677 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7678 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7680 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7681 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7682 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7683 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7687 typedef int foo, bar;
7690 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7691 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7696 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7697 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7699 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7700 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7701 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7702 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7703 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7707 declarator maybeasm '='
7709 | declarator maybeasm
7713 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7715 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7720 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7721 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7722 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7724 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7725 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7726 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7727 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7728 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7729 the syntactic context.
7731 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7732 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7733 @cindex lexical tie-in
7735 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7736 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7739 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7740 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7741 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7742 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7743 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7750 void yyerror (char const *);
7764 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7778 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7779 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7780 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7782 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
7783 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
7784 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
7786 @node Tie-in Recovery
7787 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7789 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7790 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7792 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7793 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7794 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7795 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7799 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7806 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7807 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7808 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7809 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7810 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7812 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7814 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7815 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7816 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7828 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7829 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7830 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7831 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7833 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7834 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7835 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7836 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7837 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7838 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7841 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7844 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7846 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7847 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7848 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7849 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7850 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7851 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7854 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7855 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7859 @section Understanding Your Parser
7861 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7862 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7863 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7864 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7865 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7867 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7868 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7869 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7870 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
7871 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
7872 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
7873 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7875 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7892 @command{bison} reports:
7895 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7896 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7897 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7898 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7899 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7902 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7903 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7904 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7905 interpretation is the same.
7907 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7908 to precedence and/or associativity:
7911 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7912 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7913 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7918 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7921 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7922 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7923 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7924 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7928 @cindex token, useless
7929 @cindex useless token
7930 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7931 @cindex useless nonterminal
7932 @cindex rule, useless
7933 @cindex useless rule
7934 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7935 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7936 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7937 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7941 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7944 Terminals unused in grammar:
7947 Rules useless in grammar:
7952 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7958 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7959 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7960 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7961 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7962 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7967 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7970 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7980 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7985 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7990 @cindex pointed rule
7991 @cindex rule, pointed
7992 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7993 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7994 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7995 that the input cursor.
8000 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8002 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8007 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8008 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8009 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8010 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8011 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8012 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
8013 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8014 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8016 @cindex core, item set
8017 @cindex item set core
8018 @cindex kernel, item set
8019 @cindex item set core
8020 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8021 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8022 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8023 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8024 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8025 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
8031 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8032 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8033 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8034 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8035 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8036 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8038 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8049 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8051 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8055 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8056 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8057 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8058 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8063 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8064 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8065 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8066 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8067 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8069 $ shift, and go to state 3
8070 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8071 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8072 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8073 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8077 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8078 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
8079 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
8080 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
8081 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
8082 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
8084 @cindex accepting state
8085 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8091 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8097 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8098 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8100 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8106 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8108 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8114 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8116 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8122 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8124 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8130 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8132 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8137 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8143 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8144 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8145 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8146 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8147 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8149 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8150 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8152 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8153 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8156 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8157 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8158 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8159 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8160 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8161 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8162 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8163 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8165 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8166 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8167 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8170 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8171 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8172 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8173 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8174 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8175 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8176 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8177 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8178 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8179 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8180 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8181 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8186 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8187 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8188 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8189 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8190 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8192 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8193 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8195 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8196 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8199 The remaining states are similar:
8204 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8205 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8206 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8207 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8208 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8210 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8211 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8213 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8214 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8218 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8219 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8220 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8221 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8222 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8224 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8226 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8227 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8231 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8232 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8233 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8234 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8235 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8237 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8238 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8239 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8240 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8242 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8243 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8244 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8245 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8246 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8250 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8251 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8252 @samp{*}, but also because the
8253 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8257 @section Tracing Your Parser
8260 @cindex tracing the parser
8262 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8263 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8265 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8268 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8270 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8271 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8272 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8273 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8276 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8277 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8278 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8280 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8282 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8283 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8284 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8286 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8287 @findex %define parse.trace
8288 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary,
8289 ,Bison Declaration Summary}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8290 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8291 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless
8292 POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you, this is the
8296 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8299 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8300 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8301 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8302 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8303 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8304 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8306 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8307 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8308 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8309 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8311 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8312 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8313 messages tell you these things:
8317 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8320 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8321 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8324 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8325 of the state stack afterward.
8328 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8329 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8330 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8331 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8332 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8333 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8334 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8335 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8336 grammar are to blame.
8338 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
8339 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
8340 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
8341 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
8342 the grammar it is working.
8345 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8346 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8347 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8348 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8349 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8350 value (from @code{yylval}).
8352 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8353 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8357 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8358 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8361 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8364 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8367 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8368 else if (type == NUM)
8369 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8373 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8376 @chapter Invoking Bison
8377 @cindex invoking Bison
8378 @cindex Bison invocation
8379 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8381 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8387 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8388 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
8389 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
8390 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
8391 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
8392 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
8393 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
8394 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
8395 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
8396 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
8397 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8398 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8403 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8406 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8409 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8412 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8414 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8415 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8416 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8419 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8420 in alphabetical order by short options.
8421 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8422 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8426 @section Bison Options
8428 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8429 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8430 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8431 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8432 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8435 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8436 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8439 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8445 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8449 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8451 @item --print-localedir
8452 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8454 @item --print-datadir
8455 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8459 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
8460 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
8461 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
8462 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
8463 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
8465 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate @code{#define}
8466 statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate token numbers with token
8468 Thus, the following shell script can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison
8469 distribution contains such a script for compatibility with POSIX:
8476 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8477 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8478 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8479 this option is specified.
8481 @item -W [@var{category}]
8482 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8483 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8486 @item midrule-values
8487 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8489 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8492 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8495 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8496 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8499 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8502 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8503 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8504 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8508 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8513 Turn off all the warnings.
8515 Treat warnings as errors.
8518 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8519 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8520 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8529 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
8530 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
8531 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8533 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8534 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8535 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8536 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8537 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8538 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}) except that Bison processes multiple
8539 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8543 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8546 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8547 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8548 definition for @var{name}.
8550 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8551 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8552 definitions for @var{name}.
8554 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8555 definitions for @var{name}.
8558 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8559 makefiles unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore any
8560 conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8562 @item -L @var{language}
8563 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8564 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8565 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8566 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8567 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8569 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8573 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8575 @item -p @var{prefix}
8576 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8577 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8578 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8582 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
8583 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
8584 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
8585 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
8586 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8589 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8590 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8591 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8593 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8594 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8595 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8596 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8598 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8599 file in the Bison installation directory.
8600 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8601 current working directory.
8602 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8605 @itemx --token-table
8606 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8613 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8614 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8615 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8616 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8619 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8620 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8621 with other short options.
8623 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8624 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8625 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8626 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8628 @item -r @var{things}
8629 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8630 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8631 separated list of @var{things} among:
8635 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8639 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8640 each rule's lookahead set.
8643 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8644 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8647 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8648 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8652 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8653 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8654 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8657 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8658 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
8660 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8661 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8663 @item -g [@var{file}]
8664 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8665 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8666 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8667 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8668 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8669 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8672 @item -x [@var{file}]
8673 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8674 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8675 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8676 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8678 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8679 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8682 @node Option Cross Key
8683 @section Option Cross Key
8685 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8686 the corresponding short option and directive.
8688 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8689 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8690 @include cross-options.texi
8694 @section Yacc Library
8696 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8697 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8698 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8699 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8700 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8701 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8702 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8704 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8705 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8708 int yyerror (char const *);
8711 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8712 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8713 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8719 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8721 @node Other Languages
8722 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8725 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8726 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8730 @section C++ Parsers
8733 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8734 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8735 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8736 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8737 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8738 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8741 @node C++ Bison Interface
8742 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8743 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8747 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8748 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8749 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8750 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8752 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8754 @findex %define api.namespace
8755 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace
8758 The various classes are generated in the following files:
8763 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8764 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8767 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8770 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8771 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8772 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8773 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8774 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8776 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8777 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8778 @samp{%defines} directive.
8781 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8782 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8784 @node C++ Semantic Values
8785 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8786 @c - No objects in unions
8788 @c - Printer and destructor
8790 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
8791 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
8792 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
8793 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
8796 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
8797 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
8801 @subsubsection C++ Unions
8803 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8804 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8805 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8808 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8809 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8810 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8812 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8813 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8814 to such objects are allowed.
8817 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8818 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8819 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8823 @subsubsection C++ Variants
8825 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
8826 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
8827 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
8828 types can be used without pointers.
8830 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
8831 @code{variant} (@pxref{Decl Summary, , variant}). Once this defined,
8832 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
8833 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
8835 For instance, instead of
8843 %token <ival> NUMBER;
8844 %token <sval> STRING;
8851 %token <int> NUMBER;
8852 %token <std::string> STRING;
8855 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
8856 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
8859 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
8860 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
8861 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
8863 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
8864 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
8865 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
8866 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
8867 eventually, destroyed.
8869 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
8870 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
8871 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
8874 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
8875 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
8879 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
8880 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
8881 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
8882 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
8883 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
8884 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
8885 that would be duplicating the information.
8887 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
8888 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
8889 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
8890 (the current implementation of) variants:
8893 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
8894 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
8895 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
8896 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
8897 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
8898 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
8901 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
8902 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
8903 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
8904 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
8905 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
8906 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
8909 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
8912 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
8913 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
8915 @node C++ Location Values
8916 @subsection C++ Location Values
8920 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8922 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8923 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8924 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8925 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8926 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8928 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8929 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8930 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8931 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8932 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8935 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8936 The line, starting at 1.
8939 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8940 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8943 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8944 The column, starting at 0.
8947 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8948 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8951 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8952 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8953 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8954 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8955 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8958 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8959 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8960 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8961 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8964 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8965 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8966 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8969 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8970 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8971 Advance the @code{end} position.
8974 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8975 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8976 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8977 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8980 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8981 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8985 @node C++ Parser Interface
8986 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8987 @c - define parser_class_name
8989 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8991 @c - Reporting errors
8993 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8994 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8995 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8996 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8997 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8998 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8999 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9000 additional argument for its constructor.
9002 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9003 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9004 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9007 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9008 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
9009 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
9010 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9011 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9012 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9015 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9016 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9017 from user actions to raise parse errors. This is equivalent with first
9018 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9019 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9020 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9021 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9022 function invoked from the user action.
9025 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9026 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9027 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9030 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9031 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9032 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9035 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9036 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9039 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9040 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9041 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9045 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9046 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9047 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9048 or nonzero, full tracing.
9051 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9052 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9053 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9054 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9055 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9060 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9061 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9062 @c - prefix for yylex.
9063 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9066 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9067 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9068 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9069 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9072 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9073 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9077 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9079 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9081 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9082 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9083 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9084 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9085 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9088 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9089 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9091 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9095 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9096 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9099 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9100 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9104 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9105 initialized. So the code would look like:
9109 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9110 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9113 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9114 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9123 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9124 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9127 yylval.build(yytext);
9128 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9133 @node Complete Symbols
9134 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9136 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9137 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9138 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9139 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9140 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9142 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9143 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9144 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9148 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9149 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9150 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9151 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9153 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9155 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9156 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9157 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9158 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9159 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9160 also pass the @var{location}.
9163 For instance, given the following declarations:
9166 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9167 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9168 %token <int> INTEGER;
9173 Bison generates the following functions:
9176 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9177 const location_type& l);
9178 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9179 const location_type& loc);
9180 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9184 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9187 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9188 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9189 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9192 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9193 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9195 @node A Complete C++ Example
9196 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9198 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9199 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9200 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9201 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9202 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9203 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9204 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9205 actually easier to interface with.
9208 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9209 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9210 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9211 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9212 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9215 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9216 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9218 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9219 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9220 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9221 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9222 of valid input follows.
9226 seven := one + two * three
9230 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9231 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9233 @c - A place to store error messages
9234 @c - A place for the result
9236 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9237 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9238 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9239 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9240 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9241 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9242 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9244 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9245 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9246 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9249 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9251 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9252 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9255 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9260 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9261 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9262 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9263 factor both as follows.
9265 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9267 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9269 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9270 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9275 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9278 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9280 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9285 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9287 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9293 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
9294 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
9296 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9298 // Handling the scanner.
9301 bool trace_scanning;
9305 Similarly for the parser itself.
9307 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9309 // Run the parser on file F.
9310 // Return 0 on success.
9311 int parse (const std::string& f);
9312 // The name of the file being parsed.
9313 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
9315 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
9320 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9321 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9322 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9323 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9325 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9328 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9329 void error (const std::string& m);
9331 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9334 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9335 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9336 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9337 messages and set error state.
9339 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9341 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9342 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9344 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9345 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9347 variables["one"] = 1;
9348 variables["two"] = 2;
9351 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9356 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9360 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9361 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9362 int res = parser.parse ();
9368 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9370 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9374 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9376 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9381 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9383 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
9384 the C++ deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header
9385 file, and specifies the name of the parser class.
9386 Because the C++ skeleton changed several times, it is safer to require
9387 the version you designed the grammar for.
9389 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9391 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9392 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9394 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9398 @findex %define variant
9399 @findex %define lex_symbol
9400 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
9401 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
9402 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
9403 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
9405 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9408 %define parse.assert
9413 @findex %code requires
9414 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
9415 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
9416 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
9417 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
9418 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9419 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
9420 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
9422 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9427 class calcxx_driver;
9432 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9433 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9436 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9438 // The parsing context.
9439 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9443 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
9444 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9445 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9448 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9453 // Initialize the initial location.
9454 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9459 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
9462 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9465 %define parse.error verbose
9470 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9471 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9473 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9477 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9483 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9484 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
9485 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol.
9486 To avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}),
9487 prefix tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{Decl Summary,, api.tokens.prefix}).
9489 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9491 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9505 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
9506 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
9509 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9511 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9512 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
9517 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
9518 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
9519 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
9522 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9523 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9525 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <*>;
9529 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
9530 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
9532 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9536 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9539 assignments assignment @{@}
9540 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9543 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
9548 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9549 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9550 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9551 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9552 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
9553 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
9554 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
9559 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9562 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9565 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
9566 const std::string& m)
9568 driver.error (l, m);
9572 @node Calc++ Scanner
9573 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9575 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9576 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9578 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9580 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9585 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9586 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9588 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9589 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9590 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9591 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
9595 // The location of the current token.
9596 static yy::location loc;
9601 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9602 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9603 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9604 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
9606 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9608 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9612 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9614 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9616 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9622 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9623 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9624 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
9625 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
9626 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9627 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9628 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9630 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9633 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
9634 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
9638 // Code run each time yylex is called.
9641 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
9642 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
9646 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
9648 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9650 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
9651 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
9652 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
9653 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
9654 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
9655 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
9656 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
9660 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9661 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9662 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
9663 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
9665 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9666 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
9667 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
9672 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
9673 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9675 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9678 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9680 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9683 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9685 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9691 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9697 @node Calc++ Top Level
9698 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9700 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9702 @comment file: calc++.cc
9705 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9708 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9711 calcxx_driver driver;
9712 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9713 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9714 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9715 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9716 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9717 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9718 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9726 @section Java Parsers
9729 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9730 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9731 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9732 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9733 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9734 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9735 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9736 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9739 @node Java Bison Interface
9740 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9741 @c - %language "Java"
9743 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9744 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9746 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9747 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9749 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9750 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will create
9751 a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}. Using an
9752 input file without a @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename
9753 of the output file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix} directive
9754 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The entire output file
9755 name can be changed by the @code{%output} directive or the
9756 @option{-o}/@option{--output} option. The output file contains a single
9757 class for the parser.
9759 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9761 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9762 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9763 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9764 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9767 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9768 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9770 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9771 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9773 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9774 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9776 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9777 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
9778 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
9780 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9781 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9782 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
9784 if needed. Also, in the future the
9785 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9786 access the token names and codes.
9788 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
9789 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
9790 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
9791 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
9794 @node Java Semantic Values
9795 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9796 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9798 @c - Printer and destructor
9800 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9801 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9802 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9805 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9806 %type <Integer> number
9809 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9810 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9811 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9812 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
9813 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9816 %define stype "ASTNode"
9820 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9821 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9823 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9824 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9825 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9826 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9827 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9828 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9830 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9831 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9832 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9834 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9835 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9836 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9839 @node Java Location Values
9840 @subsection Java Location Values
9845 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9846 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9847 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9848 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9849 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9850 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9851 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9852 @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9854 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9855 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9856 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9857 be supplied by the user.
9860 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9861 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9862 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9865 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9866 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9869 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9870 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9873 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9874 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9875 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9876 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9880 @node Java Parser Interface
9881 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9882 @c - define parser_class_name
9884 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9886 @c - Reporting errors
9888 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9889 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9890 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9891 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9892 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9894 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9895 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9896 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9897 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9898 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9899 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9900 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
9901 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
9903 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9904 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9905 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9906 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
9908 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9909 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9910 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9911 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9912 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9913 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9915 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9916 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9917 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9918 which initialize them automatically.
9920 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9921 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9922 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
9923 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
9925 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
9926 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
9927 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9930 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9931 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9932 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
9935 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9936 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9937 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
9939 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
9940 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
9941 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncatch exceptions.
9944 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9945 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9946 @code{false} otherwise.
9949 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
9950 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
9951 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
9952 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
9953 verbose error messages.
9956 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
9957 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
9958 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9959 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9960 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
9961 available only if location tracking is active.
9964 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9965 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9966 from a syntax error.
9967 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9970 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9971 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9972 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9976 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9977 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9978 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9979 or nonzero, full tracing.
9982 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
9983 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
9984 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
9988 @node Java Scanner Interface
9989 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9992 @c - Lexer interface
9994 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9995 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9996 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9997 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
9998 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10001 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10002 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10003 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10004 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10007 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10008 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10009 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10010 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10013 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10015 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10016 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10017 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10018 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10021 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10022 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10023 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10026 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10027 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10030 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10031 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10032 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10033 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10034 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10036 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10037 "@var{class-name}".}
10040 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10041 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10043 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10044 "@var{class-name}".}
10048 @node Java Action Features
10049 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10051 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10052 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10054 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10055 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10058 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10059 This may not be assigned to.
10060 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10063 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10064 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10065 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10069 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10070 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10071 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10072 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10073 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10074 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10077 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10078 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10079 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10080 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10082 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10086 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10087 This may not be assigned to.
10088 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10092 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10093 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10096 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
10097 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10098 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10101 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
10102 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10103 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10106 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
10107 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
10108 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10111 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10112 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10113 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10115 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10118 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10119 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10120 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10121 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10122 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10123 available only if location tracking is active.
10127 @node Java Differences
10128 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10130 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10131 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10132 section summarizes these differences.
10136 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10137 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10138 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10139 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10140 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10141 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10142 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10144 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10145 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10146 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10147 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10148 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10151 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10152 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10153 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10154 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10155 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10156 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10157 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10158 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10159 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10162 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10164 @item @code{%code imports}
10165 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10166 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10167 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10169 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10170 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10172 @item @code{%code lexer}
10173 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10174 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10175 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10179 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10180 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10181 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10183 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10184 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10189 @node Java Declarations Summary
10190 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10192 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10193 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10195 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10196 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10199 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10200 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10201 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10202 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10203 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10206 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10207 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10208 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10209 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10212 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10213 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10214 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10215 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10218 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10219 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10220 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10223 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10224 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10225 a Java @emph{type}.
10226 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10229 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10230 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10231 @xref{Java Differences}.
10234 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10235 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10236 @xref{Java Differences}.
10239 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10240 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10241 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10244 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10245 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10246 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10249 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10250 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10251 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10252 @xref{Java Differences}.
10255 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10256 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10257 @xref{Java Differences}.
10260 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10261 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10262 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10265 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10266 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10267 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10270 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10271 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10272 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10275 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10276 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10277 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10280 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10281 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10283 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10286 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10287 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
10288 constructor. Default is none.
10289 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10292 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10293 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10294 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10295 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10298 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10299 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10300 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10301 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10302 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10305 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10306 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10307 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10310 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10311 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10312 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10313 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10316 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10317 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10318 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10319 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10322 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10323 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10324 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10327 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10328 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10329 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10332 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10333 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10334 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10337 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10338 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10339 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10340 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10344 @c ================================================= FAQ
10347 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10348 @cindex frequently asked questions
10351 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10355 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10356 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10357 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10358 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10359 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10360 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10361 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10362 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10363 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10364 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10365 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10366 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10369 @node Memory Exhausted
10370 @section Memory Exhausted
10373 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10374 message. What can I do?
10377 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10380 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10381 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10383 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10384 following typical questions:
10387 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10388 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10389 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10396 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10397 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10398 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10401 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10402 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10403 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10404 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10405 @file{first-line.l}:
10410 #include <stdlib.h>
10413 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10416 yyparse (char const *file)
10418 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10421 /* One token only. */
10423 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10438 If the file @file{input} contains
10446 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10449 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10450 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10451 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10456 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10457 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10458 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10459 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10460 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10461 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10462 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10463 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10466 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10467 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10468 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10469 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10471 @node Strings are Destroyed
10472 @section Strings are Destroyed
10475 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10476 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10477 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10480 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10481 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10482 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10487 char *yylval = NULL;
10490 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10496 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10497 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10498 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10499 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10504 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10507 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10508 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10509 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10515 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10516 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10517 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10518 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10519 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10520 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10523 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10524 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10525 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10530 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10531 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10534 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10535 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10538 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10539 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10540 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10541 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10542 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10543 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10544 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10546 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10548 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10549 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10550 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10551 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10552 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10553 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10556 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10557 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10560 @node Multiple start-symbols
10561 @section Multiple start-symbols
10564 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10565 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10566 multiple entry points.
10569 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10570 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10571 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10572 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10576 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10578 start: START_FOO foo
10582 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10583 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10585 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10586 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10587 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10588 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10589 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10590 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10591 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10592 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10595 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10600 int t = start_token;
10605 /* @r{The rules.} */
10609 @node Secure? Conform?
10610 @section Secure? Conform?
10613 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10616 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10617 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10618 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10619 please send us a bug report.
10621 @node I can't build Bison
10622 @section I can't build Bison
10625 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10626 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10630 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10631 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10632 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10633 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10634 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10635 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10636 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10639 @node Where can I find help?
10640 @section Where can I find help?
10643 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10646 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10647 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10648 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10649 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10650 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10651 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10652 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10653 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10657 @section Bug Reports
10660 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10663 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10664 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10665 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10666 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10667 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10669 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10670 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10671 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10672 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10673 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10675 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10676 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10677 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10678 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10679 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10680 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10682 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10683 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10685 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10687 @node More Languages
10688 @section More Languages
10691 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10692 favorite language here}?
10695 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10696 languages; contributions are welcome.
10699 @section Beta Testing
10702 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10705 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10706 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10707 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10708 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10709 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10710 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10711 essentially halted.
10713 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10714 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10715 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10716 systems are especially welcome.
10718 @node Mailing Lists
10719 @section Mailing Lists
10722 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10725 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10727 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10729 @node Table of Symbols
10730 @appendix Bison Symbols
10731 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10732 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10734 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10735 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10736 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10739 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10740 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10741 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10744 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10745 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10746 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10749 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10750 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10751 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10754 @deffn {Variable} $$
10755 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10759 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10760 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10761 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10764 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10765 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10769 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10770 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10774 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10775 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10776 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10777 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10780 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10781 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10782 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
10783 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
10784 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10788 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
10789 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
10790 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
10791 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
10792 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
10793 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
10794 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
10796 This feature is experimental.
10797 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10801 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10802 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10805 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10806 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10810 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10811 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10814 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10815 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10816 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10819 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10820 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10823 This feature is experimental.
10824 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10827 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10830 @deffn {Directive} <>
10831 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10834 This feature is experimental.
10835 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10838 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10841 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10842 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10843 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10844 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10847 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10848 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10849 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
10850 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
10853 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10854 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10858 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10859 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10860 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10865 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10866 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10867 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10868 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
10869 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
10872 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10873 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
10874 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10877 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10878 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10879 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10882 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10883 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10884 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10887 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10888 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10889 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10893 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10894 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10895 used in the grammar.
10898 @deffn {Symbol} error
10899 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10900 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10901 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10902 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10903 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10904 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10905 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10906 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10909 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10910 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}.
10913 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10914 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10918 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10919 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10920 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10923 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10924 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10927 @deffn {Directive} %language
10928 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10929 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10932 @deffn {Directive} %left
10933 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
10934 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10937 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10938 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
10939 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10943 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10944 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10945 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10946 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10947 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10950 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10951 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10955 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10956 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10957 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10962 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10963 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10964 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10967 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10968 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
10969 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10972 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10973 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
10977 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10978 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
10979 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
10980 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10983 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
10984 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
10985 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10988 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10989 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10990 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10993 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
10994 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
10995 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10998 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10999 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
11000 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
11003 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11004 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11005 Require a Version of Bison}.
11008 @deffn {Directive} %right
11009 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11010 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11013 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11014 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11015 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11018 @deffn {Directive} %start
11019 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11023 @deffn {Directive} %token
11024 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11025 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11028 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11029 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
11030 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11033 @deffn {Directive} %type
11034 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11035 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11038 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11039 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11040 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11044 @deffn {Directive} %union
11045 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11046 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11049 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11050 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11051 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11052 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11053 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11055 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11059 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11060 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11061 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11062 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11064 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11068 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11069 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11070 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11073 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11074 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11075 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11076 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11077 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11080 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11081 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11082 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11085 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11086 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11087 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11090 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11091 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11092 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11093 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11096 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11097 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11098 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11101 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11102 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
11103 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
11104 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
11105 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11107 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11111 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11112 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11113 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11116 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11117 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11118 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11119 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11120 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11121 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11122 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11125 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11126 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11127 @xref{Memory Management}.
11130 @deffn {Function} yylex
11131 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11132 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11136 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11137 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11138 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11139 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11140 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11143 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11144 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11145 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11146 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11148 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11150 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11151 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11152 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11155 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11156 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11157 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11160 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11161 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11162 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11163 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11165 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11166 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11167 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11170 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11171 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11175 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11176 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11177 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11178 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11179 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11182 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11183 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11184 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11187 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11188 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11189 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11190 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11191 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11192 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11193 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11196 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11197 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11198 call this function to create a new parser.
11199 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11200 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11201 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11202 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11205 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11206 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11207 parse the rest of the input stream.
11208 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11209 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11210 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11211 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11214 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11215 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11216 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11217 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11218 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11219 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11222 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11223 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11224 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11225 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11226 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11229 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11230 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11231 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11232 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11235 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11236 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11237 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11238 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11239 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11240 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11241 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11243 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11244 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11245 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11246 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11247 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11248 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11249 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11252 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11253 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11254 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11262 @item Accepting State
11263 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11264 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11265 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11267 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11268 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11269 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11270 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11271 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11273 @item Consistent State
11274 A state containing only one possible action.
11275 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
11277 @item Context-free grammars
11278 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11279 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11280 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11281 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11284 @item Default Reduction
11285 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11286 contains no other action for the lookahead token.
11287 In permitted parser states, Bison declares the reduction with the
11288 largest lookahead set to be the default reduction and removes that
11290 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
11292 @item Dynamic allocation
11293 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11294 compile time or on entry to a function.
11297 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11298 character string of length zero.
11300 @item Finite-state stack machine
11301 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11302 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11303 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11304 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11305 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11306 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11308 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11309 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11310 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11311 deterministic parsing
11312 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11313 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11314 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11318 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11319 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11320 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11323 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm.
11324 That is, given any context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates
11325 parser tables with the full language recognition power of canonical
11326 LR(1) but with nearly the same number of parser states as
11328 This reduction in parser states is often an order of magnitude.
11329 More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s extra parser
11330 states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of
11331 non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for
11332 IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude less as well.
11333 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
11334 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}.
11336 @item Infix operator
11337 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11338 performs some operation.
11341 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11343 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11344 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11345 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and
11346 the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11347 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11348 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11349 syntax error message. @xref{Decl Summary,,parse.lac}.
11351 @item Language construct
11352 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11353 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11354 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11356 @item Left associativity
11357 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11358 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11359 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11361 @item Left recursion
11362 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11363 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11366 @item Left-to-right parsing
11367 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11368 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11370 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11371 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11372 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11374 @item Lexical tie-in
11375 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11376 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11378 @item Literal string token
11379 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11381 @item Lookahead token
11382 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11386 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11387 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11388 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
11391 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11392 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11394 @item Nonterminal symbol
11395 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11396 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11397 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11400 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11401 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11404 @item Postfix operator
11405 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11406 performs some operation.
11409 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11410 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11414 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11415 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11416 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11418 @item Reverse polish notation
11419 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11421 @item Right recursion
11422 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11423 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11427 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11428 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11429 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11432 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11433 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11434 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11436 @item Single-character literal
11437 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11438 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11441 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11442 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11443 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11444 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11447 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11448 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11449 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11452 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11453 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11456 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11457 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11458 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11459 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11461 @item Terminal symbol
11462 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11463 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11464 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11467 @node Copying This Manual
11468 @appendix Copying This Manual
11478 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11479 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11480 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11481 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11482 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11483 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11484 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11485 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11486 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11487 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11488 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11489 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11490 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11491 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11492 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11493 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11494 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11495 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11496 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11497 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11498 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11499 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11500 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11501 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11502 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11503 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11504 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11505 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11506 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11507 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11508 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11509 @c LocalWords: yytokentype filename destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11510 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11511 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11512 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11513 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11514 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11515 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11516 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11517 @c LocalWords: makefiles Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11518 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11519 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11520 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11521 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11522 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11523 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11524 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11525 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11526 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11527 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11528 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt
11529 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11531 @c Local Variables:
11532 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"