1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for @acronym{GNU} Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the @acronym{GNU} parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1998,
37 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software
41 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
42 under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License,
43 Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software
44 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
45 being ``A @acronym{GNU} Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
46 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
47 ``@acronym{GNU} Free Documentation License.''
49 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
50 modify this @acronym{GNU} manual. Buying copies from the @acronym{FSF}
51 supports it in developing @acronym{GNU} and promoting software
56 @dircategory Software development
58 * bison: (bison). @acronym{GNU} parser generator (Yacc replacement).
63 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
64 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
66 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
69 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
72 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
73 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
74 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
75 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
76 @acronym{ISBN} 1-882114-44-2
78 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
92 * Copying:: The @acronym{GNU} General Public License says
93 how you can copy and share Bison
96 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
97 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
100 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
101 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
102 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
103 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
104 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
105 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
106 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
107 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser source file).
108 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
109 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
110 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
111 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
112 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
134 Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
158 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
159 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
160 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
190 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
192 Outline of a Bison Grammar
194 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
195 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
196 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
197 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
198 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
200 Defining Language Semantics
202 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
203 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
204 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
205 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
206 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
207 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
208 action in the middle of a rule.
212 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
213 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
214 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
218 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
219 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
220 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
221 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
222 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
223 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
224 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
225 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
226 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
227 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
228 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
229 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 Parser C-Language Interface
233 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
234 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
236 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
237 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
238 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
241 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
243 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
244 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
245 of the token it has read.
246 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
247 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
249 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
250 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
252 The Bison Parser Algorithm
254 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
255 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
256 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
257 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
258 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
259 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
260 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
261 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
262 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
266 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
267 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
268 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
269 * How Precedence:: How they work.
271 Handling Context Dependencies
273 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
274 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
275 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
276 error recovery rules must be written.
278 Debugging Your Parser
280 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
281 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
285 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
286 in alphabetical order by short options.
287 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
288 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
290 Parsers Written In Other Languages
292 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
293 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
297 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
298 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
299 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
300 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
301 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
302 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
304 A Complete C++ Example
306 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
307 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
308 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
309 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
310 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
314 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
315 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
316 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
317 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
318 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
319 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
320 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
321 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
323 Frequently Asked Questions
325 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
326 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
327 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
328 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
329 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
330 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
331 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
332 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
333 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
334 * Other Languages:: Parsers in Java and others
335 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
336 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
340 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
346 @unnumbered Introduction
349 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
350 annotated context-free grammar into an @acronym{LALR}(1) or
351 @acronym{GLR} parser for that grammar. Once you are proficient with
352 Bison, you can use it to develop a wide range of language parsers, from those
353 used in simple desk calculators to complex programming languages.
355 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc grammars
356 ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar with Yacc
357 should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need to be fluent in
358 C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to understand this manual.
360 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of using
361 Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the last. If you
362 don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these chapters. Reference
363 chapters follow which describe specific aspects of Bison in detail.
365 Bison was written primarily by Robert Corbett; Richard Stallman made it
366 Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University added
367 multi-character string literals and other features.
369 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
372 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
374 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
375 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
376 permissions applied only when Bison was generating @acronym{LALR}(1)
377 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
378 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
380 The other @acronym{GNU} programming tools, such as the @acronym{GNU} C
382 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
383 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
384 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
385 License to all of the Bison source code.
387 The output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser file---contains a
388 verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is the code for the
389 parser's implementation. (The actions from your grammar are inserted
390 into this implementation at one point, but most of the rest of the
391 implementation is not changed.) When we applied the @acronym{GPL}
392 terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
393 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
395 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
396 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
397 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
398 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
399 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
400 using the other @acronym{GNU} tools.
402 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
403 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
404 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
405 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
409 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
410 @include gpl-3.0.texi
413 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
415 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
416 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
417 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
420 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
421 as mathematical ideas.
422 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
423 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
424 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
425 the name of an identifier, etc.).
426 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
427 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
428 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
429 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
430 how is the output used?
431 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
432 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
435 @node Language and Grammar
436 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
438 @cindex context-free grammar
439 @cindex grammar, context-free
440 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
441 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
442 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
443 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
444 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
445 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
446 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
447 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
450 @cindex @acronym{BNF}
451 @cindex Backus-Naur form
452 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
453 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``@acronym{BNF}'', which was developed in
454 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
455 @acronym{BNF} is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
456 essentially machine-readable @acronym{BNF}.
458 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars
459 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1) grammars
460 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammar. Although it
461 can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
462 are called @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars.
463 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to
464 tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single
465 token of lookahead. Strictly speaking, that is a description of an
466 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar, and @acronym{LALR}(1) involves additional
467 restrictions that are
468 hard to explain simply; but it is rare in actual practice to find an
469 @acronym{LR}(1) grammar that fails to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
470 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
471 more information on this.
473 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
474 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
475 @cindex ambiguous grammars
476 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
478 Parsers for @acronym{LALR}(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
479 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
480 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
481 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
482 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
483 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
484 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
485 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
486 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
487 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as @acronym{GLR}
488 parsing (for Generalized @acronym{LR}). Bison's @acronym{GLR} parsers
489 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
490 possible parses of any given string is finite.
492 @cindex symbols (abstract)
494 @cindex syntactic grouping
495 @cindex grouping, syntactic
496 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
497 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
498 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
499 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
500 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
501 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
502 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
504 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
505 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
506 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
507 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
508 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
509 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
510 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
511 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
512 lexicography, not grammar.)
514 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
518 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
519 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
520 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
521 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
522 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
523 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
524 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
529 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
530 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
531 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
532 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
533 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
537 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
538 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
539 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
540 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
541 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
542 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
543 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
544 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
546 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
547 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
548 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
549 reads informally as follows:
552 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
557 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
561 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
562 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
563 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
564 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
567 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
568 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
569 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
570 not the start symbol.
572 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
573 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
574 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
575 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
576 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
577 reports a syntax error.
579 @node Grammar in Bison
580 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
581 @cindex Bison grammar
582 @cindex grammar, Bison
583 @cindex formal grammar
585 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
586 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
587 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
589 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
590 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
591 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
593 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
594 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
595 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
596 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
597 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
598 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
599 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
602 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
603 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
604 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
605 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
607 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
608 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
610 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
611 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
612 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
613 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
617 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
622 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
624 @node Semantic Values
625 @section Semantic Values
626 @cindex semantic value
627 @cindex value, semantic
629 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
630 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
631 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
632 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
633 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
636 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
637 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
638 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
639 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
640 ,Defining Language Semantics},
643 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
644 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
645 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
646 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
649 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
650 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
651 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
652 need to have any semantic value.)
654 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
655 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
656 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
657 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
658 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
659 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
661 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
662 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
663 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
664 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
665 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
667 @node Semantic Actions
668 @section Semantic Actions
669 @cindex semantic actions
670 @cindex actions, semantic
672 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
673 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
674 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
675 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
678 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
679 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
680 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
681 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
682 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
683 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
684 newly recognized larger expression.
686 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
690 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
695 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
696 from the values of the two subexpressions.
699 @section Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers
700 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
701 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
704 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
705 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
707 In some grammars, Bison's standard
708 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
709 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
710 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
711 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
712 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
713 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
714 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
715 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
717 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be @acronym{LALR}(1), a
718 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
719 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
720 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized @acronym{LR}
721 (@acronym{GLR}) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
722 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
723 declarations) identically to @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers. However, when
724 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
725 @acronym{GLR} parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
726 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
727 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
728 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
729 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
730 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
731 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
732 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
733 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
734 identical set of symbols.
736 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
737 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
738 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
739 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
740 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
741 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
742 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
743 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
744 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
748 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers on unambiguous grammars.
749 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using @acronym{GLR} parsers to resolve ambiguities.
750 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
751 * Compiler Requirements:: @acronym{GLR} parsers require a modern C compiler.
754 @node Simple GLR Parsers
755 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} on Unambiguous Grammars
756 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, unambiguous grammars
757 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, unambiguous grammars
761 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
762 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
764 In the simplest cases, you can use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm
765 to parse grammars that are unambiguous, but fail to be @acronym{LALR}(1).
766 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead,
767 or (in rare cases) fall into the category of grammars in which the
768 @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm throws away too much information (they are in
769 @acronym{LR}(1), but not @acronym{LALR}(1), @ref{Mystery Conflicts}).
771 Consider a problem that
772 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
773 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
776 type subrange = lo .. hi;
777 type enum = (a, b, c);
781 The original language standard allows only numeric
782 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
783 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (@acronym{ISO}/@acronym{IEC}
784 10206) and many other
785 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
786 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
790 type subrange = (a) .. b;
794 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
795 type with only one value:
802 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
803 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
805 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
806 With normal @acronym{LALR}(1) one-token lookahead it is not
807 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
808 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
809 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
810 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
811 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
812 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
814 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
815 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
816 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
817 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
820 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
821 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
822 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
823 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
824 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
825 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
828 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
829 use the @acronym{GLR} algorithm.
830 When the @acronym{GLR} parser reaches the critical state, it
831 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
832 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
833 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
834 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
835 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
836 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
837 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
838 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
840 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
841 reports a syntax error as usual.
843 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
844 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
845 lookahead than the underlying @acronym{LALR}(1) algorithm actually allows
846 for. In this example, @acronym{LALR}(2) would suffice, but also some cases
847 that are not @acronym{LALR}(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
849 In general, a @acronym{GLR} parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
850 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
851 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
852 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
853 The present example contains only one conflict between two
854 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
855 cannot be nested. So the number of
856 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
857 and the parsing time is still linear.
859 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
860 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
863 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
873 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
878 type : '(' id_list ')'
900 When used as a normal @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
901 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
902 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
903 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
910 The parser can be turned into a @acronym{GLR} parser, while also telling Bison
911 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by
912 adding these two declarations to the Bison input file (before the first
921 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
922 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
923 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
924 notice when the parser splits.
926 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of @acronym{GLR},
927 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
928 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
929 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that @acronym{GLR}
930 splitting is only done where it is intended. A @acronym{GLR} parser
931 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
932 @acronym{LALR} parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
933 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
934 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
935 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
936 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
937 eliminated by using @acronym{GLR} to shift the complications from the
938 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
941 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
942 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
943 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
944 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
945 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
946 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
948 @node Merging GLR Parses
949 @subsection Using @acronym{GLR} to Resolve Ambiguities
950 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing, ambiguous grammars
951 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing, ambiguous grammars
955 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
957 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
962 #define YYSTYPE char const *
964 void yyerror (char const *);
977 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
980 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
984 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
985 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
986 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
987 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
988 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
991 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
992 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
993 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
994 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
997 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1003 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1004 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1011 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1012 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1013 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1014 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1015 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1016 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1017 @acronym{GLR} parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1018 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1019 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1020 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1021 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1022 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1023 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1024 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1026 At this point, the @acronym{GLR} parser requires a specification in the
1027 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1028 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1029 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1030 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1031 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1032 The parser therefore prints
1035 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1038 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1039 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1046 This is another example of using @acronym{GLR} to parse an unambiguous
1047 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1048 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1049 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1050 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1051 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1052 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1053 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1054 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1055 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1061 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1062 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1063 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1064 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1068 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1069 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1074 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1078 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1086 with an accompanying forward declaration
1087 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1091 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1092 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1097 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1098 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1101 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1104 Bison requires that all of the
1105 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1106 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1107 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1108 the offending merge.
1110 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1111 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1113 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1114 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1115 the associated reduction.
1116 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1117 action in a @acronym{GLR} parser.
1120 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yychar}
1122 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylval}
1124 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yylloc}
1125 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1126 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1127 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1128 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1129 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1130 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1131 influence syntax analysis.
1132 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1135 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1136 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1137 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1138 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1139 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1140 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1141 future versions of Bison.
1142 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1143 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1144 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1147 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1148 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1149 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1150 initiate error recovery.
1151 During deterministic @acronym{GLR} operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1152 the same as its effect in an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser.
1153 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1154 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1156 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1157 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
1159 @node Compiler Requirements
1160 @subsection Considerations when Compiling @acronym{GLR} Parsers
1161 @cindex @code{inline}
1162 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{inline}
1164 The @acronym{GLR} parsers require a compiler for @acronym{ISO} C89 or
1165 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1166 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1167 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1168 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1169 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1178 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1182 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1188 @node Locations Overview
1191 @cindex textual location
1192 @cindex location, textual
1194 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1195 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1196 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1197 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1199 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1200 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1201 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1202 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1204 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1205 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1206 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1209 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1210 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1211 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1212 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1213 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1214 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1215 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1218 @section Bison Output: the Parser File
1219 @cindex Bison parser
1220 @cindex Bison utility
1221 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1224 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The output
1225 is a C source file that parses the language described by the grammar.
1226 This file is called a @dfn{Bison parser}. Keep in mind that the Bison
1227 utility and the Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility
1228 is a program whose output is the Bison parser that becomes part of your
1231 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1232 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1233 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1236 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1237 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1238 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1239 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1240 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1241 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1242 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1244 The Bison parser file is C code which defines a function named
1245 @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This function does not make
1246 a complete C program: you must supply some additional functions. One is
1247 the lexical analyzer. Another is an error-reporting function which the
1248 parser calls to report an error. In addition, a complete C program must
1249 start with a function called @code{main}; you have to provide this, and
1250 arrange for it to call @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run.
1251 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
1253 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1254 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser file itself
1255 begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface functions
1256 such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the error reporting
1257 function @code{yyerror} and the parser function @code{yyparse} itself.
1258 This also includes numerous identifiers used for internal purposes.
1259 Therefore, you should avoid using C identifiers starting with @samp{yy}
1260 or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar file except for the ones defined in
1261 this manual. Also, you should avoid using the C identifiers
1262 @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for anything other than their usual
1265 In some cases the Bison parser file includes system headers, and in
1266 those cases your code should respect the identifiers reserved by those
1267 headers. On some non-@acronym{GNU} hosts, @code{<alloca.h>}, @code{<malloc.h>},
1268 @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are included as needed to
1269 declare memory allocators and related types. @code{<libintl.h>} is
1270 included if message translation is in use
1271 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may
1272 be included if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value
1273 (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1276 @section Stages in Using Bison
1277 @cindex stages in using Bison
1280 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1281 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1285 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1286 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1287 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1288 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1289 sequence of C statements.
1292 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1293 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1294 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1295 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1298 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1301 Write error-reporting routines.
1304 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1305 must follow these steps:
1309 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1312 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1315 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1318 @node Grammar Layout
1319 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1320 @cindex grammar file
1322 @cindex format of grammar file
1323 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1325 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1326 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1333 @var{Bison declarations}
1342 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1343 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1345 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1346 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1347 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1348 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1349 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1350 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1352 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1353 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1354 semantic values of various symbols.
1356 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1359 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1360 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1361 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1365 @cindex simple examples
1366 @cindex examples, simple
1368 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1369 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1370 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1371 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1372 desk-top calculator.
1374 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1375 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1376 source file to try them.
1379 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1380 a first example with no operator precedence.
1381 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1382 Operator precedence is introduced.
1383 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1384 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1385 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1386 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1387 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1391 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1392 @cindex reverse polish notation
1393 @cindex polish notation calculator
1394 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1395 @cindex calculator, simple
1397 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1398 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1399 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1400 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1402 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1403 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison input files.
1406 * Decls: Rpcalc Decls. Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1407 * Rules: Rpcalc Rules. Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1408 * Lexer: Rpcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1409 * Main: Rpcalc Main. The controlling function.
1410 * Error: Rpcalc Error. The error reporting function.
1411 * Gen: Rpcalc Gen. Running Bison on the grammar file.
1412 * Comp: Rpcalc Compile. Run the C compiler on the output code.
1416 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1418 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1419 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1422 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1425 #define YYSTYPE double
1428 void yyerror (char const *);
1433 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1436 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1437 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1439 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1440 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1441 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1442 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1443 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1444 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1445 which is a floating point number.
1447 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1448 function @code{pow}.
1450 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1451 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1452 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1453 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1456 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1457 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1458 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1459 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1460 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1461 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1462 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1463 type for numeric constants.
1466 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1468 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1476 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1479 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1480 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1481 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1482 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1483 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1484 /* Exponentiation */
1485 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1487 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1492 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1493 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1494 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1495 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1496 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1499 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1500 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1501 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1503 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1504 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1505 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1506 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1507 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1508 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1517 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1519 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1527 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1528 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1529 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1530 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1531 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1533 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1534 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1535 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1536 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1537 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1538 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1540 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1541 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1542 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1543 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1546 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1547 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1548 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1551 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1553 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1557 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1561 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1562 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1563 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1564 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1565 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1566 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1567 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1569 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1570 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1571 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1572 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1573 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1576 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1578 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1579 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1580 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1581 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1585 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1586 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1591 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1592 equally well have written them separately:
1596 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1597 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1601 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1602 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1603 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1604 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1605 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1606 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1607 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1608 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1610 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1611 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1612 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1614 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1615 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1619 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1623 means the same thing as this:
1627 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1633 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1636 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1637 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1638 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1640 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1641 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1642 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1643 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1645 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the @acronym{RPN}
1647 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1648 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1649 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1650 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1652 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1653 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1654 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1655 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1656 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1657 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1658 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1659 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1660 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1662 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1663 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1664 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1665 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Decls,
1666 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1668 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1669 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1671 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1675 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1676 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1677 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1678 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1689 /* Skip white space. */
1690 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1694 /* Process numbers. */
1695 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1698 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1703 /* Return end-of-input. */
1706 /* Return a single char. */
1713 @subsection The Controlling Function
1714 @cindex controlling function
1715 @cindex main function in simple example
1717 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1718 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1719 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1732 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1733 @cindex error reporting routine
1735 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1736 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1737 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1738 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1739 here is the definition we will use:
1745 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1747 yyerror (char const *s)
1749 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1754 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1755 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1756 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1757 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1758 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1759 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1762 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1763 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1765 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1766 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1767 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file. The
1768 definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} go at the
1769 end, in the epilogue of the file
1770 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1772 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1773 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1775 With all the source in a single file, you use the following command to
1776 convert it into a parser file:
1783 In this example the file was called @file{rpcalc.y} (for ``Reverse Polish
1784 @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c},
1785 removing the @samp{.y} from the original file name. The file output by
1786 Bison contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional
1787 functions in the input file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main})
1788 are copied verbatim to the output.
1790 @node Rpcalc Compile
1791 @subsection Compiling the Parser File
1792 @cindex compiling the parser
1794 Here is how to compile and run the parser file:
1798 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1800 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1804 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1805 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1806 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1810 # @r{List files again.}
1812 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1816 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1817 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1823 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1825 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1829 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1831 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1836 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1837 @cindex infix notation calculator
1839 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1841 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1842 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1843 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1844 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1847 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1850 #define YYSTYPE double
1854 void yyerror (char const *);
1857 /* Bison declarations. */
1861 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1862 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1864 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1870 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1873 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1874 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1875 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1876 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1877 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1878 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1879 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1880 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1886 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1889 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1891 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1892 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1893 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1894 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1895 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1896 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1899 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1900 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1901 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1902 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1903 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1906 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1907 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1908 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1909 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1910 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1912 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1917 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1925 @node Simple Error Recovery
1926 @section Simple Error Recovery
1927 @cindex error recovery, simple
1929 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1930 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1931 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1932 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1933 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1934 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1936 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1937 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1938 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1943 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1944 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1949 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1950 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1951 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1952 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1953 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1954 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1955 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1956 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1959 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1960 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1961 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1962 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1963 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1964 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1967 @node Location Tracking Calc
1968 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1969 @cindex location tracking calculator
1970 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1971 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1973 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1974 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1975 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1976 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1980 * Decls: Ltcalc Decls. Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1981 * Rules: Ltcalc Rules. Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1982 * Lexer: Ltcalc Lexer. The lexical analyzer.
1986 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
1988 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
1989 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
1992 /* Location tracking calculator. */
1998 void yyerror (char const *);
2001 /* Bison declarations. */
2009 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2013 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2014 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2015 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2016 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2017 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2018 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2019 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2023 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2025 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2026 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2027 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2028 from the new information.
2030 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2031 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2042 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2047 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2048 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2049 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2050 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2060 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2061 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2062 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2067 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2068 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2069 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2073 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2074 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2075 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2077 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2078 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2079 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2080 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2081 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2082 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2086 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2088 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2089 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2090 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2093 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2094 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2105 /* Skip white space. */
2106 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2107 ++yylloc.last_column;
2112 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2113 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2117 /* Process numbers. */
2121 ++yylloc.last_column;
2122 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2124 ++yylloc.last_column;
2125 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2132 /* Return end-of-input. */
2136 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2140 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2143 ++yylloc.last_column;
2148 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2149 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2150 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2151 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2153 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2154 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2155 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2156 controlling function:
2163 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2164 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2170 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2171 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2172 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2174 @node Multi-function Calc
2175 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2176 @cindex multi-function calculator
2177 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2178 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2180 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2181 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2182 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2183 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2184 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2186 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2187 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2188 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2189 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2190 functions whose syntax has this form:
2193 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2197 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2198 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2199 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2203 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2207 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2213 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2218 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2221 * Decl: Mfcalc Decl. Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2222 * Rules: Mfcalc Rules. Grammar rules for the calculator.
2223 * Symtab: Mfcalc Symtab. Symbol table management subroutines.
2227 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2229 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2234 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2235 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2237 void yyerror (char const *);
2242 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2243 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2246 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2247 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2254 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2255 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2257 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2260 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2261 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2262 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2264 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2265 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2266 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2267 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2269 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2270 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2271 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2272 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2273 between angle brackets).
2275 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2276 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2277 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2278 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2279 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2280 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2283 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2285 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2286 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2287 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2299 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2300 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2305 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2306 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2307 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2308 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2309 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2310 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2311 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2312 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2313 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2314 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2315 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2318 /* End of grammar. */
2323 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2324 @cindex symbol table example
2326 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2327 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2328 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2329 requires some additional C functions for support.
2331 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2332 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2333 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2337 /* Function type. */
2338 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2342 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2345 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2346 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2349 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2350 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2352 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2357 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2359 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2360 extern symrec *sym_table;
2362 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2363 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2367 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2368 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2369 @code{init_table} as well:
2375 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2377 yyerror (char const *s)
2387 double (*fnct) (double);
2392 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2405 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2410 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2416 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2418 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2419 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2434 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2435 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2437 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2438 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2439 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2440 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2441 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2442 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2446 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2449 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2450 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2451 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2452 ptr->type = sym_type;
2453 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2454 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2460 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2463 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2464 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2465 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2471 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2472 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2473 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2474 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2476 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2477 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2478 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2479 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2480 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2481 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2483 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2484 operators in @code{yylex}.
2497 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2498 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2505 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2506 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2509 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2515 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2519 static char *symbuf = 0;
2520 static int length = 0;
2525 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2526 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2528 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2535 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2539 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2541 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2543 /* Get another character. */
2548 while (isalnum (c));
2555 s = getsym (symbuf);
2557 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2562 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2568 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2569 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2570 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2578 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2581 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2582 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2583 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2586 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2587 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2591 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2593 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2594 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2596 The Bison grammar input file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2597 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2600 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2601 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2602 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2603 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2604 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2605 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2606 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2607 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2610 @node Grammar Outline
2611 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2613 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2614 appropriate delimiters:
2621 @var{Bison declarations}
2630 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2631 As a @acronym{GNU} extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2632 continues until end of line.
2635 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2636 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2637 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2638 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2639 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2643 @subsection The prologue
2644 @cindex declarations section
2646 @cindex declarations
2648 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2649 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2650 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser file so that
2651 they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can use
2652 @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If you
2653 don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2654 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2656 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2657 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2660 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2661 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2662 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2663 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2664 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2665 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2666 @code{%union} declaration.
2677 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2681 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2682 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2688 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2689 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2690 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2691 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2692 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2693 @code{#include} directives.
2695 @node Prologue Alternatives
2696 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2697 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2700 @findex %code requires
2701 @findex %code provides
2703 (The prologue alternatives described here are experimental.
2704 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
2707 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2709 As an alternative, Bison provides a %code directive with an explicit qualifier
2710 field, which identifies the purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where
2711 Bison should generate it.
2712 For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default location, or it can be
2713 one of @code{requires}, @code{provides}, @code{top}.
2714 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2716 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2727 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2731 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2732 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2739 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a subtle
2740 distinction between their functionality.
2741 For example, if you decide to override Bison's default definition for
2742 @code{YYLTYPE}, in which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new
2744 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code into the
2745 parser source code file @emph{before} the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition.
2746 In which @var{Prologue} section should you prototype an internal function,
2747 @code{trace_token}, that accepts @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as
2749 You should prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2750 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2752 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2753 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2754 This behavior raises a few questions.
2755 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2756 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2757 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2758 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2759 This behavior is not intuitive.
2761 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2762 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2763 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2764 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2771 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2772 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2775 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2776 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2788 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2792 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2793 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2794 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2801 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2802 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2803 explicit which kind you intend.
2804 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2806 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts.
2807 The first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2808 parser source code file.
2809 The first line after the warning is required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also
2810 needs to appear in the parser source code file.
2811 However, if you've instructed Bison to generate a parser header file
2812 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably want that line to appear before
2813 the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that header file as well.
2814 The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear in the parser header file to
2815 override the default @code{YYLTYPE} definition there.
2817 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2818 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2820 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2833 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2837 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2838 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2849 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2850 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2851 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2858 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new @code{YYLTYPE}
2859 definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2860 definitions in both the parser source code file and the parser header file.
2861 (By the same reasoning, @code{%code requires} would also be the appropriate
2862 place to write your own definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2864 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}, you
2865 should prefer @code{%code requires} over @code{%code top} regardless of whether
2866 you instruct Bison to generate a parser header file.
2867 When you are writing code that you need Bison to insert only into the parser
2868 source code file and that has no special need to appear at the top of that
2869 file, you should prefer the unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}.
2870 These practices will make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to
2871 Bison and to other developers reading your grammar file.
2872 Following these practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and
2873 @code{%code requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2876 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to provide
2877 @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your parser.
2878 Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into both the parser
2879 header file and the parser source code file.
2880 Since this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2881 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2882 @code{%code requires}.
2883 More importantly, since it depends upon @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype},
2884 @code{%code requires} is not sufficient.
2885 Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified @code{%code} to a
2886 @code{%code provides}:
2899 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2903 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2904 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2915 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2919 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2920 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2927 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the parser header
2928 file and the parser source code file after the definitions for
2929 @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYSTYPE}.
2931 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that reflects
2932 the layout of the generated parser source code and header files:
2933 @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, and then
2935 While your grammar files may generally be easier to read if you also follow
2936 this order, Bison does not require it.
2937 Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense to you.
2939 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2940 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2941 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2942 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2944 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2945 organize your grammar file.
2946 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2950 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2951 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2952 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2953 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2955 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2956 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2957 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2958 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2962 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2963 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2965 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2967 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2968 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2969 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2970 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2972 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2973 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2974 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2975 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2976 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2977 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2978 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2979 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2982 @node Bison Declarations
2983 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2984 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2985 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2987 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
2988 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
2989 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
2990 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
2993 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
2994 @cindex grammar rules section
2995 @cindex rules section for grammar
2997 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
2998 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3000 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3001 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3002 if it is the first thing in the file.
3005 @subsection The epilogue
3006 @cindex additional C code section
3008 @cindex C code, section for additional
3010 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser file, just as
3011 the @var{Prologue} is copied to the beginning. This is the most convenient
3012 place to put anything that you want to have in the parser file but which need
3013 not come before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the
3014 definitions of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because
3015 C requires functions to be declared before being used, you often need
3016 to declare functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue,
3017 even if you define them in the Epilogue.
3018 @xref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}.
3020 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3021 from the grammar rules.
3023 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3024 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3025 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3026 of the grammar file.
3029 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3030 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3031 @cindex terminal symbol
3035 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3038 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3039 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3040 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3041 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3042 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3043 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3044 the symbol to stand for it.
3046 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3047 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3048 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3050 Symbol names can contain letters, digits (not at the beginning),
3051 underscores and periods. Periods make sense only in nonterminals.
3053 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3057 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3058 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3059 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3060 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3063 @cindex character token
3064 @cindex literal token
3065 @cindex single-character literal
3066 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3067 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3068 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3069 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3070 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3071 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3072 ,Operator Precedence}).
3074 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3075 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3076 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3077 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3078 your program will confuse other readers.
3080 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3081 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3082 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3083 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3084 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3085 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3089 @cindex string token
3090 @cindex literal string token
3091 @cindex multicharacter literal
3092 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3093 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3094 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3095 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3096 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3098 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3099 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3100 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3101 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3102 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3104 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3106 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3107 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3108 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3109 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3110 read your program will be confused.
3112 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3113 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3114 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3115 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3116 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3117 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3120 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3121 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3122 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3124 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3125 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3126 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3127 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3128 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3129 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3130 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3131 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3132 Each named token type becomes a C macro in
3133 the parser file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code.
3134 (This is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.)
3135 @xref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3137 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3138 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3139 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3140 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3141 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3143 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3144 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3145 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3146 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3147 characters in the following C-language string:
3150 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3153 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3154 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3155 @acronym{ASCII} environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3156 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3157 @acronym{EBCDIC}, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3158 generated by Bison will assume @acronym{ASCII} numeric values for
3159 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3160 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3161 @acronym{ASCII} environment, so installers on platforms that are
3162 incompatible with @acronym{ASCII} must rebuild those files before
3165 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3166 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3167 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3168 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3169 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3172 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3174 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3175 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3177 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3181 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3187 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3188 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3189 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3201 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3202 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3204 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3205 extra white space as you wish.
3207 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3208 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3211 @{@var{C statements}@}
3216 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3217 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3218 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3219 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3220 copies the code to the output file, where the C compiler can check it.
3222 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3223 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3224 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3225 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3226 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3227 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3228 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3229 character constants.
3231 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3235 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3236 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3240 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3241 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3248 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3250 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3251 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3252 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3269 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3273 @section Recursive Rules
3274 @cindex recursive rule
3276 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3277 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3278 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3279 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3280 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3290 @cindex left recursion
3291 @cindex right recursion
3293 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3294 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3295 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3306 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3307 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3308 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3309 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3310 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3311 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3312 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3315 @cindex mutual recursion
3316 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3317 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3318 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3326 | primary '+' primary
3338 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3342 @section Defining Language Semantics
3343 @cindex defining language semantics
3344 @cindex language semantics, defining
3346 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3347 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3348 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3350 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3351 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3352 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3353 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3356 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3357 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3358 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3359 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3360 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3361 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3362 action in the middle of a rule.
3366 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3367 @cindex semantic value type
3368 @cindex value type, semantic
3369 @cindex data types of semantic values
3370 @cindex default data type
3372 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3373 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3374 @acronym{RPN} and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3375 Notation Calculator}).
3377 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3378 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3379 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3382 #define YYSTYPE double
3386 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3387 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3388 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3389 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3391 @node Multiple Types
3392 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3394 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3395 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3396 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3397 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3400 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3401 requires you to do two things:
3405 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3406 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3407 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3408 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3412 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3413 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3414 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3415 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3416 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3425 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3426 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3427 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3428 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3430 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3431 placed at any position in the rule;
3432 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3433 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3434 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3435 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3437 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the components
3438 matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}}, which stands for
3439 the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic value for the grouping
3440 being constructed is @code{$$}. Bison translates both of these
3441 constructs into expressions of the appropriate type when it copies the
3442 actions into the parser file. @code{$$} is translated to a modifiable
3443 lvalue, so it can be assigned to.
3445 Here is a typical example:
3456 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3457 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3458 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3459 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3460 The sum is stored into @code{$$} so that it becomes the semantic value of
3461 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3462 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3463 referred to as @code{$2}.
3465 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3466 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3467 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3468 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3469 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3473 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3477 @cindex default action
3478 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3479 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3480 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3481 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3482 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3483 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3485 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3486 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3487 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3488 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3489 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3493 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3494 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3500 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3505 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3506 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3507 definition of @code{foo}.
3510 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3511 any, from a semantic action.
3512 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3513 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3516 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3517 @cindex action data types
3518 @cindex data types in actions
3520 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3521 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3523 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3524 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3525 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3526 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3527 in the rule. In this example,
3538 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3539 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3540 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3541 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3543 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3544 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3545 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3557 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3558 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3560 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3561 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3562 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3563 @cindex mid-rule actions
3565 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3566 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3567 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3569 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3570 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3571 it is run before they are parsed.
3573 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3574 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3575 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3576 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3579 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3580 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3581 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3582 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3583 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3584 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3586 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3587 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3588 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3589 at the end of the rule.
3591 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3592 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3593 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3594 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3595 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3596 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3600 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3601 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3602 declare_variable ($3); @}
3604 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3609 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3610 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3611 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3612 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3613 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3614 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3615 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3616 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3618 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3619 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3620 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3621 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3622 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3625 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3626 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3627 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3628 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3629 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3631 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3632 Discarded Symbols}).
3633 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3634 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3636 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3637 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3642 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3648 pop_context ($1); @}
3651 let: LET '(' var ')'
3652 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3653 declare_variable ($3); @}
3660 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3661 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3662 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3664 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3665 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3666 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3667 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3668 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3673 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3674 | '@{' statements '@}'
3680 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3684 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3685 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3688 | '@{' statements '@}'
3694 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3695 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3696 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3697 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3698 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3699 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3701 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3702 actions into the two rules, like this:
3706 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3707 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3708 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3709 '@{' statements '@}'
3715 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3716 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3718 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3719 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3720 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3724 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3725 declarations statements '@}'
3726 | '@{' statements '@}'
3732 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3733 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3735 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3736 serves as a subroutine:
3740 subroutine: /* empty */
3741 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3747 compound: subroutine
3748 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3750 '@{' statements '@}'
3756 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3757 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3760 @section Tracking Locations
3762 @cindex textual location
3763 @cindex location, textual
3765 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3766 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3767 especially symbol locations.
3769 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3770 actions to take when rules are matched.
3773 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3774 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3775 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3779 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3780 @cindex data type of locations
3781 @cindex default location type
3783 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3784 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3786 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3787 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3788 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3789 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3793 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3802 At the beginning of the parsing, Bison initializes all these fields to 1
3805 @node Actions and Locations
3806 @subsection Actions and Locations
3807 @cindex location actions
3808 @cindex actions, location
3812 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3813 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3815 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3816 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3817 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3818 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3819 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3822 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3829 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3830 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3831 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3832 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3839 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3840 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3841 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3847 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3848 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3849 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3852 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3853 example above simply rewrites this way:
3866 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3867 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3868 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3875 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3876 from a semantic action.
3877 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3878 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3880 @node Location Default Action
3881 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3882 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3883 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3885 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3886 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3887 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3888 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3889 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3890 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3891 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a @acronym{GLR}
3892 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3895 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3896 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3898 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3899 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3900 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3901 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3902 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
3903 When a @acronym{GLR} parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
3904 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
3905 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
3906 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
3907 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
3909 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
3913 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
3917 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
3918 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
3919 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
3920 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
3924 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
3925 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
3926 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
3927 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
3933 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
3934 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
3935 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
3937 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
3941 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
3942 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
3945 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
3946 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
3947 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
3948 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
3951 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
3952 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
3953 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
3954 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
3958 @section Bison Declarations
3959 @cindex declarations, Bison
3960 @cindex Bison declarations
3962 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
3963 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
3966 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
3967 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
3968 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
3969 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
3971 The first rule in the file also specifies the start symbol, by default.
3972 If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you must declare
3973 it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
3977 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
3978 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
3979 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
3980 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
3981 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
3982 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
3983 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
3984 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
3985 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
3986 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
3987 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
3988 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
3992 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
3993 @cindex version requirement
3994 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
3997 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
3998 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4002 %require "@var{version}"
4006 @subsection Token Type Names
4007 @cindex declaring token type names
4008 @cindex token type names, declaring
4009 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4012 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4018 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4019 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4020 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4022 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4023 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4024 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4027 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4028 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4029 following the token name:
4033 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4037 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4038 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4039 with each other or with normal characters.
4041 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4042 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4043 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4044 Than One Value Type}).
4050 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4054 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4058 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4059 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4060 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4067 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4068 equivalent literal string tokens:
4071 %token <operator> OR "||"
4072 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4077 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4078 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4079 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4080 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4081 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4082 the literal string instead of the token name.
4084 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4085 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4089 %token END 0 "end of file"
4092 @node Precedence Decl
4093 @subsection Operator Precedence
4094 @cindex precedence declarations
4095 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4096 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4098 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4099 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4100 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4101 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4102 operator precedence.
4104 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4105 @code{%token}: either
4108 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4115 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4118 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4119 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4120 all the @var{symbols}:
4124 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4125 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4126 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4127 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4128 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4129 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4130 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4131 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4132 considered a syntax error.
4135 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4136 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4137 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4138 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4139 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4142 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4143 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4144 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4145 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4150 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4151 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4155 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4156 @cindex declaring value types
4157 @cindex value types, declaring
4160 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4161 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4162 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4177 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4178 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4179 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4180 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4182 As an extension to @acronym{POSIX}, a tag is allowed after the
4183 @code{union}. For example:
4195 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4196 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4199 As another extension to @acronym{POSIX}, you may specify multiple
4200 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4201 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4203 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4204 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4206 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4207 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4208 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4209 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4217 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4222 and then your grammar can use the following
4223 instead of @code{%union}:
4236 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4237 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4238 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4242 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4243 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4244 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4247 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4251 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4252 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4253 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4254 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4255 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4258 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4259 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4260 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4261 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4263 @node Initial Action Decl
4264 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4265 @findex %initial-action
4267 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4268 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4271 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4272 @findex %initial-action
4273 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4274 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4275 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4276 @code{%parse-param}.
4279 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4282 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4285 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4290 @node Destructor Decl
4291 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4292 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4296 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4297 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4298 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4299 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4300 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4301 must discard the start symbol.
4303 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4304 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4305 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4306 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4308 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4309 symbol is automatically discarded.
4311 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4313 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4315 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4316 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4317 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4318 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4320 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4321 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4322 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4323 tag among @var{symbols}.
4324 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4325 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4326 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4328 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4329 (These default forms are experimental.
4330 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4332 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4333 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4334 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4335 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4337 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4338 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4339 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4340 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4341 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4348 %union @{ char *string; @}
4349 %token <string> STRING1
4350 %token <string> STRING2
4351 %type <string> string1
4352 %type <string> string2
4353 %union @{ char character; @}
4354 %token <character> CHR
4355 %type <character> chr
4358 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4359 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4360 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4361 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4365 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4366 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4367 to @code{free} by default.
4368 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4369 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4370 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4371 @code{free} only once.
4372 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4373 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4375 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4376 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4377 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4378 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4379 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4380 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4381 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4382 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4383 reference it in your grammar.
4384 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4385 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4391 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4392 @cindex mid-rule actions
4393 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4394 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4395 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4396 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4397 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4399 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4400 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4404 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4405 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4406 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4411 @cindex discarded symbols
4412 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4416 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4418 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4420 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4421 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4423 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4426 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4427 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4430 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4431 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4432 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4436 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4437 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4438 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4439 @cindex warnings, preventing
4440 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4444 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4445 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4446 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4447 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4448 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4449 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4451 The declaration looks like this:
4457 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4458 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4459 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4460 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4462 For normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4463 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4464 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With @acronym{GLR}
4465 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4466 there would be no need to use @acronym{GLR} parsing. Therefore, it is
4467 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4468 in @acronym{GLR} parsers, using the declaration:
4474 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4478 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4479 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4480 print the number of conflicts.
4483 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4484 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4485 go back to the beginning.
4488 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4489 number which Bison printed. With @acronym{GLR} parsers, add an
4490 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4493 Now Bison will warn you if you introduce an unexpected conflict, but
4494 will keep silent otherwise.
4497 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4498 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4499 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4500 @cindex default start symbol
4503 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4504 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4505 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4512 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4513 @cindex reentrant parser
4515 @findex %define api.pure
4517 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4518 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4519 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4520 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4521 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4522 program must be called only within interlocks.
4524 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4525 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4526 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4527 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4528 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4530 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4531 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4532 reentrant. It looks like this:
4538 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4539 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4540 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4541 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4542 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4543 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4544 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4545 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4546 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4548 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4549 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4553 @subsection A Push Parser
4556 @findex %define api.push_pull
4558 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4559 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4561 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4562 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4563 each time a new token is made available.
4565 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4566 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4567 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4568 within a certain time period.
4570 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4571 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4572 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define api.push_pull}):
4575 %define api.push_pull "push"
4578 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4579 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4580 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4581 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4582 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4586 %define api.push_pull "push"
4589 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4590 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4591 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4592 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4594 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4595 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4596 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4597 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4598 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4599 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4600 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4601 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4605 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4607 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4608 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4609 yypstate_delete (ps);
4612 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4613 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4614 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4615 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4616 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4617 example would thus look like this:
4622 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4625 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4626 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4627 yypstate_delete (ps);
4630 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4631 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4633 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4634 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4635 you should replace the @code{%define api.push_pull "push"} declaration with the
4636 @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4637 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4638 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4639 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4640 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4641 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4642 @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} declaration slower than the normal
4643 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4644 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4645 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4646 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4647 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4648 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4649 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4653 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4654 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4655 yypstate_delete (ps);
4658 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4659 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} as it did for
4660 @code{%define api.push_pull "push"}.
4663 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4664 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4665 @cindex declaration summary
4666 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4668 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4670 @deffn {Directive} %union
4671 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4672 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4675 @deffn {Directive} %token
4676 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4677 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4680 @deffn {Directive} %right
4681 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4682 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4685 @deffn {Directive} %left
4686 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4687 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4690 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4691 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4692 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4693 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4697 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4698 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4699 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4703 @deffn {Directive} %type
4704 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4705 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4708 @deffn {Directive} %start
4709 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4713 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4714 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4715 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4721 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4724 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4726 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4727 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4728 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4729 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4730 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4733 For C/C++, the default location is the parser source code
4734 file after the usual contents of the parser header file.
4735 Thus, @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4736 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes.
4737 For a detailed discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4739 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4741 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4742 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4746 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4747 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4748 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4749 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4750 use this form instead.
4752 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4753 where Bison should generate it.
4754 Not all values of @var{qualifier} are available for all target languages:
4758 @findex %code requires
4761 @item Language(s): C, C++
4763 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4764 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4765 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4766 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4767 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4769 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file
4770 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4774 @findex %code provides
4777 @item Language(s): C, C++
4779 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4780 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4782 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser source code file after
4783 the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and token definitions.
4790 @item Language(s): C, C++
4792 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires} should
4793 usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}.
4794 However, occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
4795 parser source code file.
4805 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser source code file.
4809 @findex %code imports
4812 @item Language(s): Java
4814 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
4816 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
4817 before any class definitions.
4821 (Like all the Yacc prologue alternatives, this directive is experimental.
4822 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
4826 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
4827 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4830 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4831 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
4832 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
4834 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4836 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4837 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4838 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
4839 The possible choices for @var{variable}, as well as their meanings, depend on
4840 the selected target language and/or the parser skeleton (@pxref{Decl
4841 Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl Summary,,%skeleton}).
4843 Bison will warn if a @var{variable} is defined multiple times.
4845 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} is always equivalent to specifying it as
4848 Some @var{variable}s may be used as Booleans.
4849 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
4850 of the following four conditions:
4853 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"true"}
4855 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is omitted (or is @code{""}).
4856 This is equivalent to @code{"true"}.
4858 @item @code{"@var{value}"} is @code{"false"}.
4860 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
4861 In this case, Bison selects a default value, which may depend on the selected
4862 target language and/or parser skeleton.
4865 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
4869 @findex %define api.pure
4872 @item Language(s): C
4874 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
4875 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
4877 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
4879 @item Default Value: @code{"false"}
4883 @findex %define api.push_pull
4886 @item Language(s): C (LALR(1) only)
4888 @item Purpose: Requests a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
4889 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
4890 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4891 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4893 @item Accepted Values: @code{"pull"}, @code{"push"}, @code{"both"}
4895 @item Default Value: @code{"pull"}
4898 @item lr.keep_unreachable_states
4899 @findex %define lr.keep_unreachable_states
4902 @item Language(s): all
4904 @item Purpose: Requests that Bison allow unreachable parser states to remain in
4906 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
4907 transitions from the start state to that state.
4908 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
4909 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
4910 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
4911 are useless in the generated parser.
4913 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
4915 @item Default Value: @code{"false"}
4921 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
4923 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
4924 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
4925 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
4926 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
4927 remain in future Bison releases.
4929 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
4930 remove other kinds of useless states.
4931 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
4932 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
4934 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
4935 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
4937 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
4942 @findex %define namespace
4945 @item Languages(s): C++
4947 @item Purpose: Specifies the namespace for the parser class.
4948 For example, if you specify:
4951 %define namespace "foo::bar"
4954 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
4957 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
4960 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
4961 splits on any remaining occurrences:
4964 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
4970 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
4971 a trailing @code{"::"}.
4972 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
4974 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
4976 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
4977 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
4978 lexical analyzer function.
4979 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
4980 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
4981 lexical analyzer function.
4982 For example, if you specify:
4985 %define namespace "foo"
4986 %name-prefix "bar::"
4989 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
4996 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4997 Write a header file containing macro definitions for the token type
4998 names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4999 If the parser output file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then this file
5000 is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5002 For C parsers, the output header declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5003 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5004 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}.
5005 Therefore, if you are using a @code{%union}
5006 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}) with components that
5007 require other definitions, or if you have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro
5009 (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to
5010 arrange for these definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by
5011 putting them in a prerequisite header that is included both by your
5012 parser and by any other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5014 Unless your parser is pure, the output header declares @code{yylval}
5015 as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5018 If you have also used locations, the output header declares
5019 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
5020 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations, ,Tracking
5023 This output file is normally essential if you wish to put the definition
5024 of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because @code{yylex}
5025 typically needs to be able to refer to the above-mentioned declarations
5026 and to the token type codes. @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of
5029 @findex %code requires
5030 @findex %code provides
5031 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5032 header also contains their code.
5033 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
5036 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5037 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5040 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5041 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5042 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5045 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5046 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names are
5047 chosen as if the input file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5050 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5051 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5052 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5053 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5055 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5059 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5060 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5061 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5062 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5063 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5064 accurate syntax error messages.
5067 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5068 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5069 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5071 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5072 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5073 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5074 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5075 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5076 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5077 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5078 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5080 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5084 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5085 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5086 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5091 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5092 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5093 file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the parser file so that
5094 the C compiler and debuggers will associate errors and object code with
5095 your source file (the grammar file). This directive causes them to
5096 associate errors with the parser file, treating it an independent source
5097 file in its own right.
5100 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5101 Specify @var{file} for the parser file.
5104 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5105 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
5106 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
5109 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5110 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5111 Require a Version of Bison}.
5114 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5115 Specify the skeleton to use.
5117 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5118 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5119 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5120 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5122 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5123 file in the Bison installation directory.
5124 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5125 directory of the grammar file.
5126 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5129 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5130 Generate an array of token names in the parser file. The name of the
5131 array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is the name of the
5132 token whose internal Bison token code number is @var{i}. The first
5133 three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the predefined tokens
5135 @code{"error"}, and @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols
5136 defined in the grammar file.
5138 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5139 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5140 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5141 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5142 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5143 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5144 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5147 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5148 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5149 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5153 The highest token number, plus one.
5155 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5157 The number of grammar rules,
5159 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5163 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5164 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5165 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5166 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5170 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5171 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5172 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5176 @node Multiple Parsers
5177 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5179 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5180 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5181 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5182 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5184 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5185 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5186 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5187 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5188 names that do not conflict.
5190 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5191 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5192 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5193 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5194 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5195 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5196 @code{clex}, and so on.
5198 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5199 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5200 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5201 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5202 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5204 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the beginning
5205 of the parser source file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5206 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes one
5207 name for the other in the entire parser file.
5210 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5211 @cindex C-language interface
5214 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5215 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5216 functions that it needs to use.
5218 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5219 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5220 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5221 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5224 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5225 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5226 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5227 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it
5229 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it
5231 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5233 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5234 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5235 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5239 @node Parser Function
5240 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5243 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5244 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5245 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5246 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5247 without reading further.
5250 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5251 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5252 is due to end-of-input).
5254 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5255 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5258 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5261 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5266 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5271 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5274 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5275 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5276 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5278 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5279 @findex %parse-param
5280 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5281 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5282 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5283 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5284 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5287 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5290 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5291 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5295 Then call the parser like this:
5299 int nastiness, randomness;
5300 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5301 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5307 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5310 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5313 @node Push Parser Function
5314 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5315 @findex yypush_parse
5317 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5318 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5320 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5321 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push_pull "push"} or
5322 @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5323 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5325 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5326 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5327 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5328 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5331 @node Pull Parser Function
5332 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5333 @findex yypull_parse
5335 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5336 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5338 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5339 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push_pull "both"}
5340 declaration is used.
5341 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5343 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5344 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5347 @node Parser Create Function
5348 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5349 @findex yypstate_new
5351 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5352 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5354 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5355 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push_pull "push"} or
5356 @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5357 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5359 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5360 The fuction will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5361 or 0 if no memory was available.
5362 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5366 @node Parser Delete Function
5367 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5368 @findex yypstate_delete
5370 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5371 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5373 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5374 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push_pull "push"} or
5375 @code{%define api.push_pull "both"} declaration is used.
5376 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5378 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5379 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5380 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5384 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5386 @cindex lexical analyzer
5388 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5389 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5390 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5391 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5393 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the Bison
5394 grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source file, you
5395 need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be available there.
5396 To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run Bison, so that it will
5397 write these macro definitions into a separate header file
5398 @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include in the other source files
5399 that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
5402 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5403 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5404 of the token it has read.
5405 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5406 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5408 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs
5409 in a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5412 @node Calling Convention
5413 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5415 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5416 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5417 signifies end-of-input.
5419 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5420 in the parser file becomes a C macro whose definition is the proper
5421 numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can use the name
5422 to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5424 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5425 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5426 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5427 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5428 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5429 signifies end-of-input.
5431 Here is an example showing these things:
5438 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5441 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5442 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5444 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5450 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5451 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5453 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5454 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5458 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5459 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5460 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5461 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5464 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5465 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5466 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5467 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5468 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5471 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5472 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5473 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5474 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5477 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5480 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5481 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5482 strlen (token_buffer))
5483 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5484 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5489 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5490 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5494 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5497 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5498 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5499 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5500 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5506 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5507 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5512 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5513 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5514 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5515 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5516 declaration looks like this:
5529 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5534 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5535 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5540 @node Token Locations
5541 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5544 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5545 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5546 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5547 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5548 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5549 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5551 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5552 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5553 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5554 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5555 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5558 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5561 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5563 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5564 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5565 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5566 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5567 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5568 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5573 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5576 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5577 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5582 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5583 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5584 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5588 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5589 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5592 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5594 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5595 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5601 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5602 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5603 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5607 results in the following signature:
5610 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5611 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5614 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5617 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5618 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5622 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5625 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5626 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5629 @node Error Reporting
5630 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5631 @cindex error reporting function
5634 @cindex syntax error
5636 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5637 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5638 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5639 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5642 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5643 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5644 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5645 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5646 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5648 @findex %error-verbose
5649 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
5650 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
5651 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
5652 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5654 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5655 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5656 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5657 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5658 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5659 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5661 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5662 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5663 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5665 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5670 yyerror (char const *s)
5674 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5679 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5680 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5681 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5682 immediately return 1.
5684 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5685 an access to the current location.
5686 This is indeed the case for the @acronym{GLR}
5687 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5688 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5692 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5693 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5696 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5699 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5700 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5703 Finally, @acronym{GLR} and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5704 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5705 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5706 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
5710 /* Location tracking. */
5714 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5716 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5717 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5721 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5724 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5725 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5726 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5727 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
5732 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
5733 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
5734 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
5735 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
5736 message is always passed last.
5738 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
5739 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
5740 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
5744 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
5745 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
5746 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
5747 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
5749 @node Action Features
5750 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
5751 @cindex summary, action features
5752 @cindex action features summary
5754 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
5755 are useful in actions.
5757 @deffn {Variable} $$
5758 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5759 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5762 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
5763 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
5764 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
5767 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
5768 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
5769 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
5770 Types of Values in Actions}.
5773 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
5774 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
5775 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
5776 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
5779 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
5780 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
5781 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5784 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
5785 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
5786 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
5789 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
5791 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
5792 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
5793 It is also disallowed in @acronym{GLR} parsers.
5794 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
5795 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
5796 going to be reduced by this rule.
5798 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
5799 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
5800 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
5803 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
5806 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
5808 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
5811 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
5813 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
5817 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
5819 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
5820 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
5821 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
5822 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
5823 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
5826 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
5827 @findex YYRECOVERING
5828 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
5829 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
5830 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5833 @deffn {Variable} yychar
5834 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
5835 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
5836 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
5837 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5839 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
5842 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
5843 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
5845 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
5847 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5850 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
5851 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
5852 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
5853 @xref{Error Recovery}.
5856 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
5857 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
5858 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5859 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5861 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
5864 @deffn {Variable} yylval
5865 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
5866 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
5867 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
5869 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
5874 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5875 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5876 Tracking Locations}.
5878 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
5882 @c int first_line, last_line;
5883 @c int first_column, last_column;
5887 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
5888 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
5890 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
5891 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
5892 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
5895 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5898 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
5900 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
5901 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
5902 Tracking Locations}.
5905 @node Internationalization
5906 @section Parser Internationalization
5907 @cindex internationalization
5913 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
5914 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
5915 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
5916 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
5917 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
5918 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
5919 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the @acronym{UTF}-8
5920 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
5923 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
5924 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
5925 steps. Here we assume a package that uses @acronym{GNU} Autoconf and
5926 @acronym{GNU} Automake.
5930 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
5931 Into the directory containing the @acronym{GNU} Autoconf macros used
5932 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
5933 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
5934 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
5938 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
5943 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
5944 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
5945 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
5946 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
5947 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
5948 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
5949 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
5950 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
5951 Bison-generated parser.
5954 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
5955 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
5956 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
5960 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
5963 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
5964 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
5965 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
5969 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
5970 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
5971 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
5974 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5980 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
5984 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
5990 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
5991 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
5992 @cindex algorithm of parser
5995 @cindex parser stack
5996 @cindex stack, parser
5998 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
5999 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6000 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6002 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6003 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6006 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6007 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6008 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6009 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6010 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6011 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6012 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6014 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6021 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6022 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6025 expr: expr '*' expr;
6029 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6036 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6037 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6039 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6040 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6041 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6043 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6046 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6047 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6048 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6049 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6050 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6051 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6052 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6053 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6054 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6058 @section Lookahead Tokens
6059 @cindex lookahead token
6061 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6062 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6063 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6064 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6065 token in order to decide what to do.
6067 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6068 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6069 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6070 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6071 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6072 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6073 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6076 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6077 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6078 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6095 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6096 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6097 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6098 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6099 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6101 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6102 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6103 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6104 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6105 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6106 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6111 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6112 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6113 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6114 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6117 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6119 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6120 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6121 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6123 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6124 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6130 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6136 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6137 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6139 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6140 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6141 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6142 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6145 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6146 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6147 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6148 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6149 contrast it with the other alternative.
6151 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6152 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6156 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6158 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6161 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6162 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6163 making these two inputs equivalent:
6166 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6168 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6171 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6172 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6173 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6174 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6175 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6176 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6177 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6178 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6180 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6181 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration. There will be no
6182 warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts is exactly @var{n}.
6183 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6185 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6186 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6187 rules. Here is a complete Bison input file that actually manifests the
6192 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6204 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6213 @section Operator Precedence
6214 @cindex operator precedence
6215 @cindex precedence of operators
6217 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6218 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6219 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6220 shift and when to reduce.
6223 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6224 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6225 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6226 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6229 @node Why Precedence
6230 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6232 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6233 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6247 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6248 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6249 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6250 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6251 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6252 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6253 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6256 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6257 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6258 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6259 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6260 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6261 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6262 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6263 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6266 @cindex associativity
6267 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6268 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6269 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6270 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6271 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6272 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6273 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6274 makes right-associativity.
6276 @node Using Precedence
6277 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6282 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6283 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6284 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6285 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6286 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6287 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6288 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6291 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6292 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6293 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6294 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6295 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6297 @node Precedence Examples
6298 @subsection Precedence Examples
6300 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6308 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6309 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6310 declared with @code{'-'}:
6313 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6319 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6320 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6321 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6323 @node How Precedence
6324 @subsection How Precedence Works
6326 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6327 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6328 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6329 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6330 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6331 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6333 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6334 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6335 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6336 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6337 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6338 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6339 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6342 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6343 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6345 @node Contextual Precedence
6346 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6347 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6348 @cindex unary operator precedence
6349 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6350 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6353 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6354 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6355 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6356 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6358 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6359 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6360 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6361 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6364 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6365 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6366 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6367 modifier's syntax is:
6370 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6374 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6375 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6376 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6377 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6378 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6380 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6381 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6382 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6392 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6399 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6404 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6405 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6406 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6407 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6409 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6410 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6411 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6412 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6414 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6415 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6416 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6417 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6418 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6419 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6421 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6422 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6426 @section Parser States
6427 @cindex finite-state machine
6428 @cindex parser state
6429 @cindex state (of parser)
6431 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6432 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6433 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6434 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6435 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6437 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6438 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6439 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6440 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6441 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6442 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6443 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6444 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6447 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6448 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6449 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6452 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6453 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6454 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6456 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6457 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6460 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6461 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6464 sequence: /* empty */
6465 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6468 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6471 maybeword: /* empty */
6472 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6474 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6479 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6480 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6481 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6482 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6483 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6484 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6486 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6487 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6488 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6490 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6491 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6492 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6493 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6494 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6496 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6497 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6498 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6499 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6502 sequence: /* empty */
6503 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6505 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6509 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6512 sequence: /* empty */
6514 | sequence redirects
6521 redirects:/* empty */
6522 | redirects redirect
6527 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6528 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6529 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6530 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6531 in infinitely many ways!
6533 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6534 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6535 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6536 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6538 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6542 sequence: /* empty */
6548 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6552 sequence: /* empty */
6554 | sequence redirects
6562 | redirects redirect
6566 @node Mystery Conflicts
6567 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6569 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6577 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6581 | name_list ':' type
6599 | name ',' name_list
6604 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6605 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6606 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6607 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is @acronym{LR}(1).
6609 @cindex @acronym{LR}(1)
6610 @cindex @acronym{LALR}(1)
6611 However, Bison, like most parser generators, cannot actually handle all
6612 @acronym{LR}(1) grammars. In this grammar, two contexts, that after
6614 at the beginning of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of
6615 a @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6616 same. They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6617 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6618 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6619 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6620 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6621 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6622 occurrence means that the grammar is not @acronym{LALR}(1).
6624 In general, it is better to fix deficiencies than to document them. But
6625 this particular deficiency is intrinsically hard to fix; parser
6626 generators that can handle @acronym{LR}(1) grammars are hard to write
6628 produce parsers that are very large. In practice, Bison is more useful
6631 When the problem arises, you can often fix it by identifying the two
6632 parser states that are being confused, and adding something to make them
6633 look distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6634 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6645 /* This rule is never used. */
6651 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6652 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6653 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6654 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6655 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6656 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6658 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6659 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6660 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6661 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6662 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6663 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6668 | name_list ':' type
6676 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers and parser
6677 generators, please see:
6678 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
6679 @acronym{LALR}(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{@acronym{ACM} Transactions on
6680 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
6681 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
6683 @node Generalized LR Parsing
6684 @section Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) Parsing
6685 @cindex @acronym{GLR} parsing
6686 @cindex generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR}) parsing
6687 @cindex ambiguous grammars
6688 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
6690 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
6691 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
6692 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
6693 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
6694 context-free languages.
6695 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
6696 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
6697 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
6698 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
6699 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
6700 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
6701 there are languages where Bison's particular choice of how to
6702 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
6704 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
6705 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
6706 Generalized @acronym{LR} (or @acronym{GLR}). A Bison @acronym{GLR}
6707 parser uses the same basic
6708 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
6709 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
6710 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
6711 reduce-reduce conflict. When a @acronym{GLR} parser encounters such a
6713 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
6714 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
6715 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
6716 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
6717 a Bison @acronym{GLR} parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
6719 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
6720 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
6721 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
6722 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
6723 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
6724 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
6725 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
6726 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
6727 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
6728 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
6729 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
6732 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
6733 states to having one, it reverts to the normal @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing
6734 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
6735 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
6736 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
6737 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
6738 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
6739 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
6740 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
6741 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
6742 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
6743 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
6745 It is possible to use a data structure for the @acronym{GLR} parsing tree that
6746 permits the processing of any @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar in linear time (in the
6747 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
6748 @acronym{LALR}(1)) grammar in
6749 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
6750 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
6751 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
6752 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
6753 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
6754 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
6755 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
6756 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
6757 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
6758 structure should generally be adequate. On @acronym{LALR}(1) portions of a
6759 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the default
6762 For a more detailed exposition of @acronym{GLR} parsers, please see: Elizabeth
6763 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
6764 Generalised @acronym{LR} Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
6765 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
6766 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
6769 @node Memory Management
6770 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
6771 @cindex memory exhaustion
6772 @cindex memory management
6773 @cindex stack overflow
6774 @cindex parser stack overflow
6775 @cindex overflow of parser stack
6777 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
6778 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
6779 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
6781 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
6782 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
6783 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
6786 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
6787 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
6788 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
6789 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
6791 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
6792 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
6793 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
6794 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
6795 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
6796 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
6798 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
6799 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
6800 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
6803 @cindex default stack limit
6804 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
6808 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
6809 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the C
6810 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser, this value must be a compile-time constant
6811 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
6812 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
6814 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
6816 @c FIXME: C++ output.
6817 Because of semantical differences between C and C++, the
6818 @acronym{LALR}(1) parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
6819 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
6820 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
6821 this deficiency in a future release.
6823 @node Error Recovery
6824 @chapter Error Recovery
6825 @cindex error recovery
6826 @cindex recovery from errors
6828 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
6829 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
6830 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
6833 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
6834 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
6835 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
6836 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
6837 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
6838 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
6839 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
6842 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
6843 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
6844 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
6845 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
6846 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
6847 in the current context, the parse can continue.
6852 stmnts: /* empty string */
6858 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
6859 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
6861 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
6862 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
6863 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
6864 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
6865 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
6866 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
6867 applicable in the ordinary way.
6869 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
6870 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
6871 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
6872 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
6873 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
6874 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
6875 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
6876 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
6877 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
6878 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
6879 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
6880 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
6882 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
6883 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
6884 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
6887 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
6890 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
6891 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
6892 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
6893 spurious error message:
6896 primary: '(' expr ')'
6902 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
6903 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
6904 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
6905 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
6906 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
6907 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
6908 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
6911 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
6912 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
6913 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
6914 error messages resume.
6916 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
6917 as any other rules can.
6920 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
6921 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
6922 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
6923 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
6926 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
6927 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
6928 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
6930 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6932 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
6933 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
6934 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
6935 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
6936 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
6938 @vindex YYRECOVERING
6939 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6940 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6941 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
6944 @node Context Dependency
6945 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
6947 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
6948 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
6949 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
6950 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
6954 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
6955 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
6956 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
6957 error recovery rules must be written.
6960 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
6961 neither clean nor robust.)
6963 @node Semantic Tokens
6964 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
6966 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
6967 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
6973 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
6974 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
6975 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
6977 The method used in @acronym{GNU} C is to have two different token types,
6978 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
6979 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
6980 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
6981 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
6983 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
6984 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
6985 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
6986 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
6987 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
6988 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
6989 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
6991 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
6992 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
6993 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
6994 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
6998 typedef int foo, bar;
7001 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7002 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7007 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7008 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7010 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7011 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7012 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7013 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7014 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7018 declarator maybeasm '='
7020 | declarator maybeasm
7024 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7026 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7031 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7032 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7033 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7035 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7036 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7037 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7038 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7039 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7040 the syntactic context.
7042 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7043 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7044 @cindex lexical tie-in
7046 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7047 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7050 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7051 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7052 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7053 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7054 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7061 void yyerror (char const *);
7075 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7089 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7090 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7091 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7093 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the parser file
7094 is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue, ,The Prologue}).
7095 You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey the flag.
7097 @node Tie-in Recovery
7098 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7100 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7101 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7103 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7104 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7105 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7106 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7110 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7117 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7118 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7119 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7120 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7121 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7123 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7125 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7126 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7127 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7139 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7140 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7141 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7142 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7144 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7145 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7146 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7147 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7148 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7149 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7152 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7155 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7157 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7158 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7159 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7160 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7161 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7162 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7165 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7166 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7170 @section Understanding Your Parser
7172 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7173 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7174 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7175 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7176 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7178 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7179 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7180 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7181 the parser output file name, and adding @samp{.output} instead.
7182 Therefore, if the input file is @file{foo.y}, then the parser file is
7183 called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As a consequence, the verbose
7184 output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7186 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7203 @command{bison} reports:
7206 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal and 1 rule useless in grammar
7207 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7208 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7209 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7212 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7213 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7214 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7215 interpretation is the same.
7217 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7218 to precedence and/or associativity:
7221 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7222 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7223 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7228 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7231 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7232 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7233 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7234 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7238 @cindex token, useless
7239 @cindex useless token
7240 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7241 @cindex useless nonterminal
7242 @cindex rule, useless
7243 @cindex useless rule
7244 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7245 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7246 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7247 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7251 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7254 Terminals unused in grammar:
7257 Rules useless in grammar:
7262 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7268 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7269 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7270 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7271 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7272 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7277 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7280 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7290 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7295 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7300 @cindex pointed rule
7301 @cindex rule, pointed
7302 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7303 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7304 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7305 that the input cursor.
7310 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7312 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7317 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7318 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7319 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7320 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7321 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7322 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7323 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7324 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7326 @cindex core, item set
7327 @cindex item set core
7328 @cindex kernel, item set
7329 @cindex item set core
7330 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7331 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7332 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7333 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7334 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7335 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7341 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7342 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7343 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7344 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7345 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7346 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7348 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7359 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7361 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7365 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7366 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7367 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7368 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7373 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7374 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7375 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7376 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7377 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7379 $ shift, and go to state 3
7380 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7381 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7382 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7383 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7387 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7388 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7389 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7390 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7391 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7392 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7394 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7400 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7406 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7407 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7409 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7415 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7417 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7423 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7425 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7431 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7433 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7439 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7441 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7446 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7452 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7453 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7454 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7455 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7456 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7458 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7459 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7461 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7462 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7465 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7466 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7467 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7468 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7469 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7470 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7471 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7472 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7474 Because in @acronym{LALR}(1) parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7475 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7476 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7479 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7480 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7481 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7482 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7483 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7484 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7485 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7486 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7487 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7488 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7489 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7490 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7495 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7496 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7497 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7498 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7499 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7501 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7502 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7504 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7505 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7508 The remaining states are similar:
7513 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7514 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7515 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7516 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7517 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7519 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7520 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7522 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7523 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7527 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7528 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7529 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7530 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7531 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7533 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7535 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7536 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7540 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7541 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7542 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7543 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7544 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7546 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7547 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7548 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7549 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7551 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7552 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7553 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7554 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7555 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7559 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7560 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7561 @samp{*}, but also because the
7562 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7566 @section Tracing Your Parser
7569 @cindex tracing the parser
7571 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
7572 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
7574 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
7577 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
7579 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
7580 parser. This is compliant with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc. You could use
7581 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
7582 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
7585 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
7586 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
7587 ,Invoking Bison}). This is @acronym{POSIX} compliant too.
7589 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
7591 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
7592 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
7593 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
7594 preprocessor. Unless @acronym{POSIX} and Yacc portability matter to
7596 the preferred solution.
7599 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
7602 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
7603 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
7604 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
7605 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
7606 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
7607 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
7609 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
7610 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
7611 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
7612 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
7614 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
7615 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
7616 messages tell you these things:
7620 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
7623 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
7624 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
7627 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
7628 of the state stack afterward.
7631 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
7632 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
7633 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
7634 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
7635 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
7636 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
7637 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
7638 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
7639 grammar are to blame.
7641 The parser file is a C program and you can use C debuggers on it, but it's
7642 not easy to interpret what it is doing. The parser function is a
7643 finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from the actions it executes
7644 the same code over and over. Only the values of variables show where in
7645 the grammar it is working.
7648 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
7649 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
7650 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
7651 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
7652 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
7653 value (from @code{yylval}).
7655 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
7656 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Decl, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
7660 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
7661 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
7664 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
7667 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
7670 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
7671 else if (type == NUM)
7672 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
7676 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
7679 @chapter Invoking Bison
7680 @cindex invoking Bison
7681 @cindex Bison invocation
7682 @cindex options for invoking Bison
7684 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
7690 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
7691 @samp{.y}. The parser file's name is made by replacing the @samp{.y}
7692 with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory. Thus, the
7693 @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields
7694 @file{foo.tab.c}, and the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields
7695 @file{foo.tab.c}. It's also possible, in case you are writing
7696 C++ code instead of C in your grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp}
7697 or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the output files will take an extension like
7698 the given one as input (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and
7699 @file{foo.tab.c++}).
7700 This feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
7701 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
7706 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
7709 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
7712 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
7715 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
7717 For compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}, the standard Bison
7718 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
7719 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
7722 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
7723 in alphabetical order by short options.
7724 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
7725 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
7729 @section Bison Options
7731 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
7732 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
7733 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
7734 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
7735 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
7738 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
7739 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
7742 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
7748 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
7752 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
7754 @item --print-localedir
7755 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
7757 @item --print-datadir
7758 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
7762 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause
7763 different diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in
7764 other minor ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output
7765 file name conventions, so that the parser output file is called
7766 @file{y.tab.c}, and the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and
7768 Also, if generating an @acronym{LALR}(1) parser in C, generate @code{#define}
7769 statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate token numbers with token
7771 Thus, the following shell script can substitute for Yacc, and the Bison
7772 distribution contains such a script for compatibility with @acronym{POSIX}:
7779 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
7780 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
7781 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
7782 this option is specified.
7786 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
7789 @item midrule-values
7790 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
7792 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
7795 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
7798 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
7799 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
7802 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
7805 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
7806 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
7807 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
7811 Incompatibilities with @acronym{POSIX} Yacc.
7816 Turn off all the warnings.
7818 Treat warnings as errors.
7821 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
7822 instance, @option{-Wno-syntax} will hide the warnings about unused
7832 In the parser file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 if it is not
7833 already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
7834 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
7836 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
7837 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
7838 Same as running @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"} (@pxref{Decl
7839 Summary, ,%define}).
7841 @item -L @var{language}
7842 @itemx --language=@var{language}
7843 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
7844 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
7845 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
7846 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
7848 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
7852 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7854 @item -p @var{prefix}
7855 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
7856 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
7857 @xref{Decl Summary}.
7861 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser file.
7862 Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser file so that the C compiler
7863 and debuggers will associate errors with your source file, the
7864 grammar file. This option causes them to associate errors with the
7865 parser file, treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
7868 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
7869 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
7870 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
7872 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
7873 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
7874 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
7875 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
7877 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
7878 file in the Bison installation directory.
7879 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
7880 current working directory.
7881 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
7884 @itemx --token-table
7885 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7892 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
7893 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7894 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
7895 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7898 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
7899 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
7900 with other short options.
7902 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
7903 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
7904 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
7905 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7907 @item -r @var{things}
7908 @itemx --report=@var{things}
7909 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
7910 separated list of @var{things} among:
7914 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
7915 @acronym{LALR} automaton.
7918 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7919 each rule's lookahead set.
7922 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
7923 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
7926 @item --report-file=@var{file}
7927 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
7931 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
7932 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
7933 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
7936 @itemx --output=@var{file}
7937 Specify the @var{file} for the parser file.
7939 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
7940 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
7942 @item -g[@var{file}]
7943 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
7944 Output a graphical representation of the @acronym{LALR}(1) grammar
7945 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
7946 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, @acronym{DOT}} format.
7947 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
7948 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
7951 @item -x[@var{file}]
7952 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
7953 Output an XML report of the @acronym{LALR}(1) automaton computed by Bison.
7954 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
7955 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
7957 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
7958 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7961 @node Option Cross Key
7962 @section Option Cross Key
7964 @c FIXME: How about putting the directives too?
7965 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
7966 the corresponding short option.
7968 @multitable {@option{--defines=@var{defines-file}}} {@option{-b @var{file-prefix}XXX}}
7969 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option
7970 @include cross-options.texi
7974 @section Yacc Library
7976 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
7977 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
7978 implementations are normally not useful, but @acronym{POSIX} requires
7979 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
7980 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
7981 library is distributed under the terms of the @acronym{GNU} General
7982 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
7984 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
7985 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
7988 int yyerror (char const *);
7991 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
7992 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
7993 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
7999 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8001 @node Other Languages
8002 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8005 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8006 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8010 @section C++ Parsers
8013 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8014 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8015 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8016 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8017 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8018 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8021 @node C++ Bison Interface
8022 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8023 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8027 The C++ @acronym{LALR}(1) parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8028 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.c"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8029 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.c}.
8030 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8032 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8034 @findex %define namespace
8035 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace name, see
8037 The various classes are generated in the following files:
8042 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8043 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8046 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8049 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8050 (Assuming the extension of the input file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8051 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8052 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8053 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8055 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8056 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8057 @samp{%defines} directive.
8060 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8061 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8063 @node C++ Semantic Values
8064 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8065 @c - No objects in unions
8067 @c - Printer and destructor
8069 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8070 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8071 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8072 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8073 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8076 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8077 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8078 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8080 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8081 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8082 to such objects are allowed.
8085 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8086 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8087 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8091 @node C++ Location Values
8092 @subsection C++ Location Values
8096 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8098 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8099 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8100 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8101 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8102 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8104 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8105 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8106 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8107 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8108 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8111 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8112 The line, starting at 1.
8115 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8116 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8119 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8120 The column, starting at 0.
8123 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8124 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8127 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8128 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8129 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8130 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8131 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8134 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8135 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8136 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8137 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8140 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8141 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8142 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8145 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8146 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8147 Advance the @code{end} position.
8150 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8151 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8152 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8153 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8156 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8157 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8161 @node C++ Parser Interface
8162 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8163 @c - define parser_class_name
8165 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8167 @c - Reporting errors
8169 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8170 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8171 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8172 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8173 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8174 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8175 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8176 additional argument for its constructor.
8178 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_value_type}
8179 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_value_type}
8180 The types for semantics value and locations.
8183 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8184 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8185 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8188 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8189 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8192 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8193 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8194 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8198 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8199 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8200 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8201 or nonzero, full tracing.
8204 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8205 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8206 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8207 described by @var{m}.
8211 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8212 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8213 @c - prefix for yylex.
8214 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8217 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8218 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8219 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8221 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_value_type& @var{yylval}, location_type& @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8222 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8223 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8224 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8228 @node A Complete C++ Example
8229 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8231 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8232 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8233 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8234 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8235 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8236 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8237 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8238 actually easier to interface with.
8241 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8242 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8243 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8244 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8245 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8248 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8249 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8251 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8252 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8253 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8254 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8255 of valid input follows.
8259 seven := one + two * three
8263 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8264 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8266 @c - A place to store error messages
8267 @c - A place for the result
8269 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8270 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8271 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8272 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8273 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8274 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8275 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8277 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8278 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8279 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8282 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8284 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8285 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8288 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8293 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8294 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8295 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8296 factor both as follows.
8298 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8300 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8302 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8303 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8304 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8305 calcxx_driver& driver)
8306 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8311 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8314 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8316 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8321 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8323 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8329 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8330 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8332 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8334 // Handling the scanner.
8337 bool trace_scanning;
8341 Similarly for the parser itself.
8343 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8345 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8346 int parse (const std::string& f);
8352 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8353 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8354 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8355 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8357 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8360 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8361 void error (const std::string& m);
8363 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8366 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8367 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8368 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8369 messages and set error state.
8371 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8373 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8374 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8376 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8377 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8379 variables["one"] = 1;
8380 variables["two"] = 2;
8383 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8388 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8392 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8393 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8394 int res = parser.parse ();
8400 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8402 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8406 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8408 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8413 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8415 The parser definition file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for
8416 the C++ LALR(1) skeleton, the creation of the parser header file, and
8417 specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8418 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8421 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8423 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8424 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8426 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8430 @findex %code requires
8431 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8432 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8433 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8434 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8435 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8436 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8437 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
8439 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8443 class calcxx_driver;
8448 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8449 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8452 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8454 // The parsing context.
8455 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8456 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8460 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8461 first location's file name. Afterwards new locations are computed
8462 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8463 automatically propagated.
8465 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8470 // Initialize the initial location.
8471 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8476 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8479 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8486 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8489 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8501 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8502 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8504 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8507 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8513 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8514 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8515 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8516 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8519 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8521 %token END 0 "end of file"
8523 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8524 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8529 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8532 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8533 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8535 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8536 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8538 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
8542 The grammar itself is straightforward.
8544 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8548 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
8550 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
8551 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
8554 "identifier" ":=" exp
8555 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
8559 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
8560 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
8561 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
8562 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
8563 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
8564 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
8569 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
8572 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8575 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
8576 const std::string& m)
8578 driver.error (l, m);
8582 @node Calc++ Scanner
8583 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
8585 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
8586 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
8588 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8590 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
8593 # include <limits.h>
8595 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8596 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8598 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
8599 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
8600 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
8601 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
8605 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
8606 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
8607 not of token_type. */
8608 #define yyterminate() return token::END
8613 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
8614 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
8615 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
8616 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
8618 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8620 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
8624 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
8626 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8628 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
8634 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
8635 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
8636 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
8637 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
8638 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
8639 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
8640 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
8642 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8645 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
8651 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
8652 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
8656 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
8657 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
8658 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
8659 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
8661 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8664 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
8666 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
8667 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
8668 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
8671 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
8672 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
8673 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
8675 return token::NUMBER;
8677 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
8678 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
8683 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
8684 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
8686 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
8689 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
8691 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
8694 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
8696 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
8702 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
8708 @node Calc++ Top Level
8709 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
8711 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
8713 @comment file: calc++.cc
8716 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8719 main (int argc, char *argv[])
8722 calcxx_driver driver;
8723 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
8724 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
8725 driver.trace_parsing = true;
8726 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
8727 driver.trace_scanning = true;
8728 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
8729 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
8737 @section Java Parsers
8740 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
8741 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
8742 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
8743 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8744 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
8745 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
8746 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
8747 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
8750 @node Java Bison Interface
8751 @subsection Java Bison Interface
8752 @c - %language "Java"
8754 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
8755 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8757 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
8758 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
8760 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
8761 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will create
8762 a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}. Using an
8763 input file without a @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename
8764 of the output file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix} directive
8765 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The entire output file
8766 name can be changed by the @code{%output} directive or the
8767 @option{-o}/@option{--output} option. The output file contains a single
8768 class for the parser.
8770 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
8772 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
8773 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
8774 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
8775 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
8778 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
8779 api.push_pull} have no effect.
8781 @acronym{GLR} parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
8782 @code{glr-parser} directive.
8784 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
8785 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
8787 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
8788 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
8789 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
8790 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
8791 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
8792 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
8793 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
8794 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
8795 access the token names and codes.
8797 @node Java Semantic Values
8798 @subsection Java Semantic Values
8799 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
8801 @c - Printer and destructor
8803 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
8804 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
8805 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
8808 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
8809 %type <Integer> number
8812 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
8813 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
8814 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
8815 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
8816 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
8819 %define stype "ASTNode"
8823 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
8824 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
8826 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
8827 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
8828 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
8829 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
8830 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
8831 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
8833 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
8834 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
8835 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
8837 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
8838 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
8839 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
8842 @node Java Location Values
8843 @subsection Java Location Values
8848 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
8849 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
8850 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
8851 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
8852 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
8853 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
8854 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
8855 @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}}.
8857 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
8858 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
8859 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
8860 be supplied by the user.
8863 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
8864 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
8865 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8868 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
8869 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
8872 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
8873 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
8876 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
8877 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
8878 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
8879 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
8883 @node Java Parser Interface
8884 @subsection Java Parser Interface
8885 @c - define parser_class_name
8887 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8889 @c - Reporting errors
8891 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
8892 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
8893 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
8894 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
8895 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
8897 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
8898 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
8899 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
8900 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
8901 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
8902 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
8904 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
8905 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
8906 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
8907 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
8909 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
8910 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
8911 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
8912 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
8913 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
8914 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
8916 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
8917 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
8919 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
8920 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
8921 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
8922 which initialize them automatically.
8924 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
8925 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
8927 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
8928 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
8929 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
8933 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
8934 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
8935 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
8937 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
8938 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
8939 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
8942 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
8943 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
8944 @code{false} otherwise.
8947 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
8948 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
8949 from a syntax error.
8950 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8953 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
8954 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
8955 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8959 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
8960 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
8961 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8962 or nonzero, full tracing.
8966 @node Java Scanner Interface
8967 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
8970 @c - Lexer interface
8972 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
8973 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
8974 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
8975 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
8977 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
8978 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
8979 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
8980 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
8983 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
8984 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
8985 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
8986 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
8989 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
8991 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
8992 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
8993 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
8994 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
8997 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
8998 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8999 value and location are saved and returned by the ther methods in the
9002 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9003 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9006 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9007 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9008 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9009 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9010 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9012 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9013 "@var{class-name}".}
9016 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9017 Return the semantical value of the last token that yylex returned.
9019 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9020 "@var{class-name}".}
9024 @node Java Action Features
9025 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9027 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9028 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9030 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9031 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9034 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9035 This may not be assigned to.
9036 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9039 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9040 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9041 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9045 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9046 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9047 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9048 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9049 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9050 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9053 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9054 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9055 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9056 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9058 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9062 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9063 This may not be assigned to.
9064 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9068 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9069 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9072 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9073 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9074 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9077 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9078 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9079 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9082 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9083 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9084 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9087 @deffn {Statement} {return YYFAIL;}
9088 Print an error message and start error recovery.
9089 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9092 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9093 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9094 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9096 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9099 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9100 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9101 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9102 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9107 @node Java Differences
9108 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9110 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9111 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9112 section summarizes these differences.
9116 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9117 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9118 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9119 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9120 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9121 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9122 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9124 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9125 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9126 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9127 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9128 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9131 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9132 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9133 @code{%define stype}. Angle backets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9134 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9135 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9136 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9137 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9138 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9139 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9142 The prolog declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9144 @item @code{%code imports}
9145 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9146 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9147 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9149 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9150 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9152 @item @code{%code lexer}
9153 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9154 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9155 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9159 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9160 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9161 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9163 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9164 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9169 @node Java Declarations Summary
9170 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9172 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9173 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9175 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9176 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9179 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9180 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9181 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9182 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9183 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9186 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9187 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9188 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9189 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9192 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9193 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9194 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9195 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9198 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9199 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9200 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9203 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9204 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9206 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9209 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9210 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9211 @xref{Java Differences}.
9214 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9215 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9216 @xref{Java Differences}.
9219 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9220 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9221 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9224 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9225 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9226 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9227 @xref{Java Differences}.
9230 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9231 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9232 @xref{Java Differences}.
9235 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9236 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9237 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9240 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9241 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9242 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9245 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9246 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9247 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9250 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9251 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9253 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9256 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9257 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9258 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9259 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9262 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9263 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9264 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9265 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9266 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9269 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9270 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9271 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9274 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9275 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9276 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9277 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9280 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9281 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9282 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9283 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9286 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9287 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9288 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9291 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9292 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9293 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9296 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9297 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9298 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9301 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9302 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9303 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9304 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9308 @c ================================================= FAQ
9311 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9312 @cindex frequently asked questions
9315 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9319 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9320 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9321 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9322 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9323 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9324 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison @acronym{POSIX} safe?
9325 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9326 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9327 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9328 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9329 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9330 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9333 @node Memory Exhausted
9334 @section Memory Exhausted
9337 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
9338 message. What can I do?
9341 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
9344 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
9345 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
9347 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
9348 following typical questions:
9351 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
9352 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
9353 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
9360 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
9361 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
9362 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
9365 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9366 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9367 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9368 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9369 @file{first-line.l}:
9377 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9380 yyparse (char const *file)
9382 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9385 /* One token only. */
9387 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9402 If the file @file{input} contains
9410 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9413 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9414 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9415 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9420 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9421 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9422 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9423 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9424 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9425 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9426 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9427 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9430 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9431 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9432 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9433 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9435 @node Strings are Destroyed
9436 @section Strings are Destroyed
9439 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9440 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9441 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9444 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9445 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9446 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9451 char *yylval = NULL;
9454 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9460 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9461 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9462 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9463 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9468 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9471 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9472 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9473 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9479 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9480 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9481 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9482 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9483 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9484 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9487 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9488 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9489 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9494 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9495 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9498 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9499 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9502 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9503 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9504 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9505 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9506 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9507 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9508 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9510 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9511 @cindex @acronym{AST}
9512 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9513 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9514 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9515 or @dfn{@acronym{AST}} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9516 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9517 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9520 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9521 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9524 @node Multiple start-symbols
9525 @section Multiple start-symbols
9528 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9529 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9530 multiple entry points.
9533 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9534 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9535 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9536 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
9540 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
9542 start: START_FOO foo
9546 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
9547 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
9549 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
9550 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
9551 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
9552 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
9553 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
9554 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
9555 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
9556 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
9564 int t = start_token;
9569 /* @r{The rules.} */
9573 @node Secure? Conform?
9574 @section Secure? Conform?
9577 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
9580 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
9581 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
9582 @acronym{POSIX} specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
9583 please send us a bug report.
9585 @node I can't build Bison
9586 @section I can't build Bison
9589 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
9590 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
9594 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
9595 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
9596 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
9597 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
9598 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
9599 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
9600 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
9603 @node Where can I find help?
9604 @section Where can I find help?
9607 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
9610 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
9611 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
9612 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
9613 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
9614 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
9615 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
9616 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
9617 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
9621 @section Bug Reports
9624 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
9627 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
9628 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
9629 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
9630 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
9631 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
9633 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
9634 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
9635 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
9636 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
9637 easier it will be to fix the bug.
9639 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
9640 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
9641 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
9642 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
9643 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
9644 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
9646 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
9647 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
9649 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
9651 @node More Languages
9652 @section More Languages
9655 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
9656 favorite language here}?
9659 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
9660 languages; contributions are welcome.
9663 @section Beta Testing
9666 What is involved in being a beta tester?
9669 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
9670 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
9671 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
9672 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
9673 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
9674 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
9677 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
9678 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
9679 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
9680 systems are especially welcome.
9683 @section Mailing Lists
9686 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
9689 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
9691 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
9693 @node Table of Symbols
9694 @appendix Bison Symbols
9695 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
9696 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
9698 @deffn {Variable} @@$
9699 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
9700 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9703 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
9704 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
9705 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9708 @deffn {Variable} $$
9709 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
9713 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
9714 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
9715 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
9718 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
9719 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
9720 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
9721 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
9724 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
9725 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
9726 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied directly to
9727 the output file uninterpreted. Such code forms the prologue of the input
9728 file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
9732 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
9733 Comment delimiters, as in C.
9736 @deffn {Delimiter} :
9737 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
9741 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
9742 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9745 @deffn {Delimiter} |
9746 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
9747 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
9750 @deffn {Directive} <*>
9751 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
9754 This feature is experimental.
9755 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9758 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9761 @deffn {Directive} <>
9762 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
9765 This feature is experimental.
9766 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
9769 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9772 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
9773 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
9774 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
9775 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
9778 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
9779 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
9780 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
9781 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
9784 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9785 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9788 @deffn {Directive} %debug
9789 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9793 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
9794 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9795 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9800 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
9801 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
9802 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
9803 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
9806 @deffn {Directive} %defines
9807 Bison declaration to create a header file meant for the scanner.
9808 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9811 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
9812 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
9813 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9816 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
9817 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
9818 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
9821 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
9822 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
9823 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
9824 @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9827 @deffn {Symbol} $end
9828 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
9829 used in the grammar.
9832 @deffn {Symbol} error
9833 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
9834 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
9835 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
9836 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
9837 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
9838 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
9839 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
9840 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9843 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
9844 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
9845 when @code{yyerror} is called.
9848 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9849 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
9853 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
9854 Bison declaration to produce a @acronym{GLR} parser. @xref{GLR
9855 Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9858 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
9859 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
9862 @deffn {Directive} %language
9863 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
9864 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9867 @deffn {Directive} %left
9868 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
9869 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9872 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9873 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9874 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
9878 @deffn {Directive} %merge
9879 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
9880 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
9881 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
9882 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing @acronym{GLR} Parsers}.
9885 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9886 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9890 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
9891 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
9892 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
9897 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
9898 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
9899 parser file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9902 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
9903 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
9904 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9907 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
9908 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser file. @xref{Decl
9912 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
9913 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
9914 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
9915 Function @code{yyparse}}.
9918 @deffn {Directive} %prec
9919 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
9920 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
9923 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
9924 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
9925 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
9928 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
9929 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
9930 Require a Version of Bison}.
9933 @deffn {Directive} %right
9934 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
9935 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
9938 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
9939 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
9940 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9943 @deffn {Directive} %start
9944 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
9948 @deffn {Directive} %token
9949 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
9950 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
9953 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
9954 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser file.
9955 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9958 @deffn {Directive} %type
9959 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
9960 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
9963 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
9964 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
9965 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
9969 @deffn {Directive} %union
9970 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
9971 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
9974 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
9975 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
9976 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
9977 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
9978 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9980 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
9984 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
9985 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
9986 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
9987 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
9989 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
9993 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
9994 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
9995 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
9998 @deffn {Variable} yychar
9999 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10000 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10001 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10002 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10005 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10006 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10007 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10010 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10011 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10012 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10015 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10016 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10017 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10018 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10021 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10022 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10023 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10026 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10027 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10028 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10029 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10030 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10032 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10036 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10037 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10038 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10039 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10042 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10043 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10044 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10045 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10046 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10047 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
10050 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10051 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10052 @xref{Memory Management}.
10055 @deffn {Function} yylex
10056 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10057 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10061 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10062 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10063 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10064 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10065 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10068 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10069 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10070 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10071 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10073 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10075 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10076 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10077 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10080 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10081 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10082 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10085 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10086 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10087 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10088 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10090 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10091 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10092 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10095 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10096 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10100 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10101 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10102 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10103 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10104 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10107 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10108 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10109 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10112 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10113 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10114 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10115 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10116 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10117 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10118 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10121 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10122 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10123 call this function to create a new parser.
10124 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10125 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10126 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10127 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10130 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10131 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10132 parse the rest of the input stream.
10133 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10134 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10135 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10136 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10139 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10140 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10141 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10142 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10143 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10144 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10147 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10148 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10149 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10150 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10151 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10154 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10155 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10156 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10157 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10160 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10161 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the C
10162 @acronym{LALR}(1) parser needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10163 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10164 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10165 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10166 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10168 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10169 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10170 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10171 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10172 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10173 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10174 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10177 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10178 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10179 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10187 @item Backus-Naur Form (@acronym{BNF}; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10188 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10189 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10190 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10191 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10193 @item Context-free grammars
10194 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10195 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10196 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10197 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10200 @item Dynamic allocation
10201 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10202 compile time or on entry to a function.
10205 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10206 character string of length zero.
10208 @item Finite-state stack machine
10209 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10210 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10211 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10212 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10213 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10214 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10216 @item Generalized @acronym{LR} (@acronym{GLR})
10217 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10218 that are not @acronym{LALR}(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10219 usual @acronym{LALR}(1)
10220 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10221 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10222 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10223 @acronym{LR} Parsing}.
10226 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10227 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10228 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10230 @item Infix operator
10231 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10232 performs some operation.
10235 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10237 @item Language construct
10238 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10239 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10240 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10242 @item Left associativity
10243 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10244 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10245 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10247 @item Left recursion
10248 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10249 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10252 @item Left-to-right parsing
10253 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10254 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10256 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10257 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10258 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10260 @item Lexical tie-in
10261 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10262 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10264 @item Literal string token
10265 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10267 @item Lookahead token
10268 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10271 @item @acronym{LALR}(1)
10272 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10273 generators) can handle; a subset of @acronym{LR}(1). @xref{Mystery
10274 Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
10276 @item @acronym{LR}(1)
10277 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
10278 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
10280 @item Nonterminal symbol
10281 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
10282 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
10283 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
10286 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
10287 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
10290 @item Postfix operator
10291 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
10292 performs some operation.
10295 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
10296 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
10300 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
10301 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
10302 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
10304 @item Reverse polish notation
10305 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
10307 @item Right recursion
10308 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
10309 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10313 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
10314 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
10315 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
10318 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
10319 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
10320 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10322 @item Single-character literal
10323 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
10324 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
10327 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
10328 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
10329 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
10330 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
10333 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
10334 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
10335 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
10338 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
10339 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10342 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
10343 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
10344 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
10345 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
10347 @item Terminal symbol
10348 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
10349 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
10350 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10353 @node Copying This Manual
10354 @appendix Copying This Manual
10364 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout
10365 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex
10366 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry
10367 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa
10368 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc
10369 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Gen Comp Expr ltcalc mfcalc Decl Symtab yylex
10370 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref
10371 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex
10372 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge
10373 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG
10374 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit
10375 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok
10376 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln
10377 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym
10378 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof
10379 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum
10380 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype
10381 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs
10382 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES
10383 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param
10384 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP
10385 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword
10386 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH
10387 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype
10388 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args
10389 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill
10390 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll
10391 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST
10392 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex