4 Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform
12 exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
14 when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
18 We have all the needed material to actually remove them. Do it.
19 Or maybe not, but at least do not include them in the automaton.
22 This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable
23 scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode.
29 The %union is declared after the user C declarations. It can be
30 a problem if YYSTYPE is declared after the user part. []
32 Actually, the real problem seems that the %union ought to be output
33 where it was defined. For instance, in gettext/intl/plural.y, we
43 unsigned long int num;
45 struct expression *exp;
50 static int yylex PARAMS ((YYSTYPE *lval, const char **pexp));
54 Where the first part defines struct expression, the second uses it to
55 define YYSTYPE, and the last uses YYSTYPE. Only this order is valid.
64 ** %semantic-parser []
66 ** Options which could use parse_dquoted_param ().
67 Maybe transfered in lex.c.
73 ** Skeleton strategy. []
74 Must we keep %no-parser?
79 Find the best graph parameters. []
83 informations about ERROR_VERBOSE. []
84 ** Add explainations about
89 ** tests/pure-parser.at []
96 akim demaille <akim.demaille@epita.fr> writes:
98 > With great pleasure! Nonetheless, things which are debatable
99 > (or not, but just `big') should be discuss in `public': something
100 > like help- or bug-bison@gnu.org is just fine. Jesse and I are there,
101 > but there is also Jim and some other people.
103 I have no idea whether it qualifies as big or controversial, so I'll
104 just summarize for you. I proposed this change years ago and was
105 surprised that it was met with utter indifference!
107 This debug feature is for the programs/grammars one develops with
108 bison, not for debugging bison itself. I find that the YYDEBUG
109 output comes in a very inconvenient format for my purposes.
110 When debugging gcc, for instance, what I want is to see a trace of
111 the sequence of reductions and the line#s for the semantic actions
112 so I can follow what's happening. Single-step in gdb doesn't cut it
113 because to move from one semantic action to the next takes you through
114 lots of internal machinery of the parser, which is uninteresting.
116 The change I made was to the format of the debug output, so that it
117 comes out in the format of C error messages, digestible by emacs
118 compile mode, like so:
120 grammar.y:1234: foo: bar(0x123456) baz(0x345678)
122 where "foo: bar baz" is the reduction rule, whose semantic action
123 appears on line 1234 of the bison grammar file grammar.y. The hex
124 numbers on the rhs tokens are the parse-stack values associated with
125 those tokens. Of course, yytype might be something totally
126 incompatible with that representation, but for the most part, yytype
127 values are single words (scalars or pointers). In the case of gcc,
128 they're most often pointers to tree nodes. Come to think of it, the
129 right thing to do is to make the printing of stack values be
130 user-definable. It would also be useful to include the filename &
131 line# of the file being parsed, but the main filename & line# should
132 continue to be that of grammar.y
134 Anyway, this feature has saved my life on numerous occasions. The way
135 I customarily use it is to first run bison with the traces on, isolate
136 the sequence of reductions that interests me, put those traces in a
137 buffer and force it into compile-mode, then visit each of those lines
138 in the grammar and set breakpoints with C-x SPACE. Then, I can run
139 again under the control of gdb and stop at each semantic action.
140 With the hex addresses of tree nodes, I can inspect the values
141 associated with any rhs token.
146 Some users create their foo.y files, and equip them with #line. Bison
147 should recognize these, and preserve them.