1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
319 A Complete C++ Example
321 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
322 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
323 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
324 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
325 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
338 Frequently Asked Questions
340 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
341 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
342 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
343 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
344 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
345 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
346 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
347 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
348 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
349 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
350 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
351 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
355 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
361 @unnumbered Introduction
364 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
365 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
366 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
367 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
368 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
369 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
370 calculators to complex programming languages.
372 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
373 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
374 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
375 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
376 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
379 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
380 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
381 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
382 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
385 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
386 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
387 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
388 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
389 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
390 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
393 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
396 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
398 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
399 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
400 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
401 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
402 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
404 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
406 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
407 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
408 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
409 License to all of the Bison source code.
411 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
412 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
413 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
414 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
415 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
416 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
417 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
419 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
420 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
421 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
422 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
423 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
424 using the other GNU tools.
426 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
427 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
428 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
429 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
433 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
434 @include gpl-3.0.texi
437 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
439 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
440 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
441 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
444 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
445 as mathematical ideas.
446 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
447 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
448 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
449 the name of an identifier, etc.).
450 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
451 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
452 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
453 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
454 how is the output used?
455 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
456 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
459 @node Language and Grammar
460 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
462 @cindex context-free grammar
463 @cindex grammar, context-free
464 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
465 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
466 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
467 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
468 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
469 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
470 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
471 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
475 @cindex Backus-Naur form
476 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
477 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
478 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
479 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
480 essentially machine-readable BNF.
482 @cindex LALR grammars
483 @cindex IELR grammars
485 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
486 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
487 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
488 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
489 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
490 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
491 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
492 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
493 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
494 Construction}, to learn how.
497 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
498 @cindex ambiguous grammars
499 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
501 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
502 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
503 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
504 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
505 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
506 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
507 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
508 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
509 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
510 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
511 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
512 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
513 possible parses of any given string is finite.
515 @cindex symbols (abstract)
517 @cindex syntactic grouping
518 @cindex grouping, syntactic
519 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
520 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
521 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
522 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
523 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
524 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
525 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
527 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
528 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
529 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
530 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
531 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
532 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
533 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
534 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
535 lexicography, not grammar.)
537 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
541 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
542 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
543 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
544 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
545 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
546 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
553 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
554 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
555 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
556 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
560 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
561 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
562 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
563 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
564 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
565 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
566 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
567 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
569 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
570 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
571 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
572 reads informally as follows:
575 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
580 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
584 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
585 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
586 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
587 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
590 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
591 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
592 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
593 not the start symbol.
595 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
596 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
597 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
598 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
599 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
600 reports a syntax error.
602 @node Grammar in Bison
603 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
604 @cindex Bison grammar
605 @cindex grammar, Bison
606 @cindex formal grammar
608 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
609 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
610 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
612 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
613 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
614 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
616 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
617 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
618 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
619 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
620 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
621 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
622 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
625 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
626 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
627 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
628 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
630 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
631 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
633 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
634 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
635 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
636 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
640 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
645 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
647 @node Semantic Values
648 @section Semantic Values
649 @cindex semantic value
650 @cindex value, semantic
652 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
653 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
654 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
655 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
656 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
659 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
660 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
661 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
662 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
663 ,Defining Language Semantics},
666 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
667 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
668 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
669 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
672 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
673 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
674 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
675 need to have any semantic value.)
677 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
678 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
679 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
680 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
681 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
682 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
684 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
685 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
686 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
687 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
688 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
690 @node Semantic Actions
691 @section Semantic Actions
692 @cindex semantic actions
693 @cindex actions, semantic
695 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
696 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
697 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
698 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
701 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
702 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
703 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
704 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
705 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
706 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
707 newly recognized larger expression.
709 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
713 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
718 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
719 from the values of the two subexpressions.
722 @section Writing GLR Parsers
724 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
727 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
728 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
730 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
731 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
732 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
733 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
734 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
735 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
736 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
737 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
738 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
740 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
741 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
742 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
743 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
744 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
745 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
746 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
747 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
748 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
749 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
750 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
751 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
752 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
753 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
754 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
755 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
756 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
757 identical set of symbols.
759 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
760 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
761 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
762 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
763 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
764 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
765 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
766 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
767 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
771 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
772 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
773 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
774 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
777 @node Simple GLR Parsers
778 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
779 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
780 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
785 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
787 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
788 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
789 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
791 Consider a problem that
792 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
793 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
796 type subrange = lo .. hi;
797 type enum = (a, b, c);
801 The original language standard allows only numeric
802 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
803 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
804 10206) and many other
805 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
806 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
810 type subrange = (a) .. b;
814 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
815 type with only one value:
822 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
823 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
825 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
826 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
827 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
828 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
829 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
830 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
831 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
832 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
834 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
835 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
836 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
837 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
840 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
841 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
842 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
843 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
844 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
845 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
848 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
849 use the GLR algorithm.
850 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
851 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
852 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
853 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
854 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
855 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
856 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
857 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
858 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
860 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
861 reports a syntax error as usual.
863 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
864 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
865 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
866 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
867 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
869 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
870 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
871 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
872 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
873 The present example contains only one conflict between two
874 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
875 cannot be nested. So the number of
876 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
877 and the parsing time is still linear.
879 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
880 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
883 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
893 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
898 type : '(' id_list ')'
920 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
921 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
922 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
923 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
930 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
931 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
932 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
941 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
942 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
943 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
944 notice when the parser splits.
946 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
947 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
948 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
949 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
950 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
951 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
952 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
953 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
954 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
955 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
956 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
957 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
958 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
961 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
962 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
963 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
964 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
965 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
966 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
968 @node Merging GLR Parses
969 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
970 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
971 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
977 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
982 #define YYSTYPE char const *
984 void yyerror (char const *);
997 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1000 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
1004 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1005 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1007 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1008 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1011 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1013 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1017 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1018 | '(' declarator ')'
1023 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1024 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1031 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1032 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1033 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1034 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1035 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1036 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1037 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1038 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1039 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1040 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1041 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1042 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1043 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1044 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1046 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1047 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1048 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1049 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1050 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1051 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1052 The parser therefore prints
1055 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1058 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1059 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1066 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1067 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1068 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1069 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1070 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1071 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1072 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1073 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1074 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1075 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1081 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1082 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1083 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1084 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1088 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1089 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1098 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106 with an accompanying forward declaration
1107 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1111 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1112 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1117 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1118 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1121 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1124 Bison requires that all of the
1125 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1126 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1127 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1128 the offending merge.
1130 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1131 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1133 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1134 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1135 the associated reduction.
1136 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1137 action in a GLR parser.
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1145 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1146 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1147 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1148 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1149 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1150 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1151 influence syntax analysis.
1152 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1156 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1157 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1158 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1159 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1160 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1161 future versions of Bison.
1162 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1163 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1164 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1168 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1169 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1170 initiate error recovery.
1171 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1172 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1173 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1174 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1176 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1177 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1179 @node Compiler Requirements
1180 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1181 @cindex @code{inline}
1182 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1184 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1185 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1186 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1187 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1188 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1189 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1198 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1202 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1211 @cindex textual location
1212 @cindex location, textual
1214 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1215 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1216 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1217 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1219 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1220 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1221 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1222 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1225 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1226 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1227 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1230 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1231 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1232 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1233 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1234 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1235 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1236 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1239 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1240 @cindex Bison parser
1241 @cindex Bison utility
1242 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1245 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1246 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1247 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1248 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1249 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1250 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1251 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1254 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1255 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1256 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1259 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1260 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1261 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1262 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1263 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1264 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1265 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1267 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1268 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1269 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1270 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1271 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1272 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1273 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1274 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1275 C-Language Interface}.
1277 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1278 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1279 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1280 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1281 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1282 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1283 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1284 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1285 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1286 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1287 anything other than their usual meanings.
1289 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1290 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1291 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1292 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1293 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1294 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1295 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1296 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1297 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1300 @section Stages in Using Bison
1301 @cindex stages in using Bison
1304 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1305 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1309 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1310 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1311 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1312 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1313 sequence of C statements.
1316 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1317 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1318 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1319 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1322 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1325 Write error-reporting routines.
1328 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1329 must follow these steps:
1333 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1336 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1339 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1342 @node Grammar Layout
1343 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1344 @cindex grammar file
1346 @cindex format of grammar file
1347 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1349 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1350 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1357 @var{Bison declarations}
1366 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1367 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1369 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1370 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1371 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1372 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1373 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1374 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1376 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1377 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1378 semantic values of various symbols.
1380 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1383 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1384 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1385 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1389 @cindex simple examples
1390 @cindex examples, simple
1392 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1393 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1394 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1395 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1396 desk-top calculator.
1398 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1399 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1400 source file to try them.
1403 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1404 a first example with no operator precedence.
1405 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1406 Operator precedence is introduced.
1407 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1408 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1409 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1410 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1411 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1415 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1416 @cindex reverse polish notation
1417 @cindex polish notation calculator
1418 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1419 @cindex calculator, simple
1421 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1422 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1423 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1424 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1426 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1427 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1430 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1431 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1432 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1433 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1434 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1435 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1436 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1439 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1440 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1442 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1443 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1446 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1449 #define YYSTYPE double
1452 void yyerror (char const *);
1457 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1460 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1461 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1463 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1464 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1465 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1466 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1467 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1468 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1469 which is a floating point number.
1471 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1472 function @code{pow}.
1474 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1475 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1476 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1477 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1480 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1481 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1482 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1483 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1484 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1485 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1486 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1487 type for numeric constants.
1490 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1492 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1500 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1503 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1504 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1505 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1506 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1507 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1508 /* Exponentiation */
1509 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1511 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1516 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1517 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1518 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1519 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1520 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1523 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1524 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1525 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1527 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1528 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1529 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1530 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1531 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1532 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1541 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1543 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1551 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1552 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1553 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1554 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1555 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1557 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1558 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1559 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1560 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1561 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1562 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1564 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1565 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1566 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1567 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1570 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1571 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1572 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1575 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1577 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1581 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1585 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1586 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1587 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1588 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1589 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1590 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1591 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1593 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1594 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1595 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1596 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1597 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1600 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1602 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1603 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1604 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1605 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1609 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1610 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1615 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1616 equally well have written them separately:
1620 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1621 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1625 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1626 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1627 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1628 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1629 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1630 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1631 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1632 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1634 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1635 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1636 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1638 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1639 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1643 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1647 means the same thing as this:
1651 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1657 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1660 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1661 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1662 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1664 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1665 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1666 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1667 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1669 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1671 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1672 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1673 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1674 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1676 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1677 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1678 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1679 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1680 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1681 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1682 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1683 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1684 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1686 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1687 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1688 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1689 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1690 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1692 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1693 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1695 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1699 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1700 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1701 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1702 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1713 /* Skip white space. */
1714 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1718 /* Process numbers. */
1719 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1722 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1727 /* Return end-of-input. */
1730 /* Return a single char. */
1737 @subsection The Controlling Function
1738 @cindex controlling function
1739 @cindex main function in simple example
1741 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1742 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1743 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1756 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1757 @cindex error reporting routine
1759 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1760 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1761 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1762 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1763 here is the definition we will use:
1769 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1771 yyerror (char const *s)
1773 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1778 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1779 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1780 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1781 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1782 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1783 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1785 @node Rpcalc Generate
1786 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1787 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1789 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1790 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1791 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1792 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1793 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1794 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1796 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1797 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1799 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1800 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1807 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1808 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1809 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1810 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1811 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1812 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1813 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1815 @node Rpcalc Compile
1816 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1817 @cindex compiling the parser
1819 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1823 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1825 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1829 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1830 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1831 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1835 # @r{List files again.}
1837 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1841 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1842 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1848 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1850 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1854 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1856 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1861 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1862 @cindex infix notation calculator
1864 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1866 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1867 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1868 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1869 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1872 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1875 #define YYSTYPE double
1879 void yyerror (char const *);
1882 /* Bison declarations. */
1886 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1887 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1889 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1895 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1898 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1899 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1900 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1901 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1902 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1903 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1904 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1905 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1911 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1914 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1916 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1917 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1918 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1919 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1920 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1921 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1924 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1925 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1926 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1927 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1928 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1931 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1932 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1933 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1934 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1935 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1937 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1942 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1950 @node Simple Error Recovery
1951 @section Simple Error Recovery
1952 @cindex error recovery, simple
1954 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1955 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1956 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1957 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1958 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1959 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1961 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1962 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1963 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1968 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1969 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1974 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1975 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1976 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1977 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1978 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1979 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1980 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1981 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1984 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1985 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1986 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1987 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1988 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1989 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1992 @node Location Tracking Calc
1993 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1994 @cindex location tracking calculator
1995 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1996 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1998 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1999 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2000 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2001 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2005 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2006 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2007 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2010 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2011 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2013 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2014 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2017 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2023 void yyerror (char const *);
2026 /* Bison declarations. */
2034 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2038 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2039 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2040 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2041 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2042 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2043 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2044 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2048 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2050 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2051 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2052 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2053 from the new information.
2055 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2056 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2067 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2072 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2073 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2074 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2075 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2085 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2086 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2087 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2092 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2093 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2094 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2098 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2099 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2100 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2102 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2103 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2104 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2105 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2106 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2107 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2111 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2113 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2114 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2115 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2118 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2119 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2130 /* Skip white space. */
2131 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2132 ++yylloc.last_column;
2137 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2138 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2142 /* Process numbers. */
2146 ++yylloc.last_column;
2147 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2149 ++yylloc.last_column;
2150 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2157 /* Return end-of-input. */
2162 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2166 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2169 ++yylloc.last_column;
2175 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2176 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2177 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2178 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2180 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2181 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2182 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2183 controlling function:
2190 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2191 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2197 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2198 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2199 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2201 @node Multi-function Calc
2202 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2203 @cindex multi-function calculator
2204 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2205 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2207 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2208 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2209 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2210 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2211 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2213 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2214 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2215 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2216 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2217 functions whose syntax has this form:
2220 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2224 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2225 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2226 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2230 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2234 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2240 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2245 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2248 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2249 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2250 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2253 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2254 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2256 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2261 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2262 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2264 void yyerror (char const *);
2269 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2270 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2273 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2274 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2281 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2282 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2284 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2287 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2288 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2289 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2291 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2292 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2293 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2294 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2296 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2297 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2298 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2299 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2300 between angle brackets).
2302 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2303 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2304 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2305 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2306 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2307 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2310 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2312 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2313 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2314 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2326 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2327 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2332 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2333 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2334 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2335 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2336 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2337 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2338 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2339 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2340 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2341 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2342 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2345 /* End of grammar. */
2349 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2350 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2351 @cindex symbol table example
2353 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2354 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2355 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2356 requires some additional C functions for support.
2358 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2359 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2360 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2364 /* Function type. */
2365 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2369 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2372 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2373 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2376 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2377 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2379 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2384 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2386 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2387 extern symrec *sym_table;
2389 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2390 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2394 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2395 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2396 @code{init_table} as well:
2402 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2404 yyerror (char const *s)
2414 double (*fnct) (double);
2419 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2432 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2437 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2443 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2445 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2446 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2461 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2462 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2464 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2465 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2466 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2467 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2468 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2469 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2472 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2473 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2477 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2480 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2481 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2482 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2483 ptr->type = sym_type;
2484 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2485 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2493 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2496 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2497 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2498 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2505 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2506 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2507 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2508 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2510 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2511 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2512 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2513 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2514 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2515 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2517 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2518 operators in @code{yylex}.
2531 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2532 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2540 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2541 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2544 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2550 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2554 static char *symbuf = 0;
2555 static int length = 0;
2560 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2561 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2563 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2570 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2574 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2576 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2578 /* Get another character. */
2583 while (isalnum (c));
2590 s = getsym (symbuf);
2592 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2597 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2603 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2604 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2605 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2613 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2616 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2617 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2618 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2621 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2622 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2626 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2628 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2629 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2631 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2632 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2635 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2636 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2637 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2638 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2639 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2640 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2641 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2642 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2643 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2646 @node Grammar Outline
2647 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2649 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2650 appropriate delimiters:
2657 @var{Bison declarations}
2666 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2667 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2668 continues until end of line.
2671 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2672 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2673 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2674 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2675 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2679 @subsection The prologue
2680 @cindex declarations section
2682 @cindex declarations
2684 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2685 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2686 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2687 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2688 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2689 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2690 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2692 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2693 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2696 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2697 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2698 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2699 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2700 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2701 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2702 @code{%union} declaration.
2713 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2717 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2718 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2724 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2725 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2726 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2727 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2728 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2729 @code{#include} directives.
2731 @node Prologue Alternatives
2732 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2733 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2736 @findex %code requires
2737 @findex %code provides
2740 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2741 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2742 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2743 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2744 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2745 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2746 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2748 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2759 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2763 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2764 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2771 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2772 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2773 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2774 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2775 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2776 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2777 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2778 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2779 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2780 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2781 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2783 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2784 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2785 This behavior raises a few questions.
2786 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2787 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2788 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2789 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2790 This behavior is not intuitive.
2792 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2793 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2794 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2795 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2802 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2803 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2806 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2807 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2819 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2823 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2824 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2825 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2832 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2833 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2834 explicit which kind you intend.
2835 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2837 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2838 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2839 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2840 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2841 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2842 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2843 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2844 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2845 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2848 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2849 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2851 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2869 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2875 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2876 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2889 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2890 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2891 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2899 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2900 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2901 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2902 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2903 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2904 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2906 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2907 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2908 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2909 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2910 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2911 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2912 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2913 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2914 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2915 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2916 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2919 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2920 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2921 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2922 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2923 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2924 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2925 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2926 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2927 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2928 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2946 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2952 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2953 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2966 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2972 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2973 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2981 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2982 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2983 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2986 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2987 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2988 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2989 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2990 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2991 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2994 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2995 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2996 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2997 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2999 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3000 organize your grammar file.
3001 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3006 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3007 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3008 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3009 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3013 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3014 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3015 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3016 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3021 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3022 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3024 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3026 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3027 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3028 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3029 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3031 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3032 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3033 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3034 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3035 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3036 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3037 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3038 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3041 @node Bison Declarations
3042 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3043 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3044 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3046 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3047 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3048 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3049 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3052 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3053 @cindex grammar rules section
3054 @cindex rules section for grammar
3056 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3057 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3059 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3060 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3061 if it is the first thing in the file.
3064 @subsection The epilogue
3065 @cindex additional C code section
3067 @cindex C code, section for additional
3069 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3070 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3071 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3072 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3073 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3074 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3075 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3076 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3077 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3078 C-Language Interface}.
3080 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3081 from the grammar rules.
3083 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3084 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3085 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3086 of the grammar file.
3089 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3090 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3091 @cindex terminal symbol
3095 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3098 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3099 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3100 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3101 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3102 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3103 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3104 the symbol to stand for it.
3106 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3107 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3108 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3110 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3111 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3112 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3113 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3114 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3115 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3116 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3118 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3122 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3123 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3124 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3125 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3128 @cindex character token
3129 @cindex literal token
3130 @cindex single-character literal
3131 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3132 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3133 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3134 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3135 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3136 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3137 ,Operator Precedence}).
3139 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3140 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3141 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3142 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3143 your program will confuse other readers.
3145 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3146 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3147 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3148 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3149 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3150 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3154 @cindex string token
3155 @cindex literal string token
3156 @cindex multicharacter literal
3157 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3158 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3159 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3160 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3161 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3163 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3164 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3165 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3166 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3167 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3169 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3171 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3172 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3173 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3174 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3175 read your program will be confused.
3177 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3178 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3179 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3180 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3181 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3182 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3185 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3186 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3187 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3189 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3190 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3191 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3192 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3193 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3194 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3195 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3196 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3197 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3198 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3199 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3200 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3202 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3203 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3204 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3205 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3206 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3208 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3209 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3210 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3211 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3212 characters in the following C-language string:
3215 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3218 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3219 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3220 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3221 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3222 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3223 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3224 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3225 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3226 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3227 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3230 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3231 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3232 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3233 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3234 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3237 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3239 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3240 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3242 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3246 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3252 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3253 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3254 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3266 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3267 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3269 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3270 extra white space as you wish.
3272 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3273 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3276 @{@var{C statements}@}
3281 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3282 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3283 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3284 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3285 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3286 compiler can check it.
3288 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3289 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3290 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3291 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3292 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3293 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3294 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3295 character constants.
3297 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3301 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3302 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3306 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3307 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3314 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3316 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3317 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3318 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3335 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3339 @section Recursive Rules
3340 @cindex recursive rule
3342 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3343 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3344 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3345 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3346 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3356 @cindex left recursion
3357 @cindex right recursion
3359 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3360 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3361 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3372 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3373 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3374 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3375 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3376 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3377 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3378 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3381 @cindex mutual recursion
3382 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3383 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3384 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3392 | primary '+' primary
3404 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3408 @section Defining Language Semantics
3409 @cindex defining language semantics
3410 @cindex language semantics, defining
3412 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3413 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3414 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3416 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3417 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3418 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3419 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3422 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3423 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3424 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3425 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3426 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3427 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3428 action in the middle of a rule.
3432 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3433 @cindex semantic value type
3434 @cindex value type, semantic
3435 @cindex data types of semantic values
3436 @cindex default data type
3438 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3439 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3440 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3441 Notation Calculator}).
3443 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3444 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3445 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3448 #define YYSTYPE double
3452 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3453 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3454 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3455 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3457 @node Multiple Types
3458 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3460 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3461 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3462 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3463 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3466 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3467 requires you to do two things:
3471 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3472 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3473 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3474 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3478 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3479 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3480 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3481 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3482 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3491 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3493 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3494 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3495 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3496 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3498 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3499 placed at any position in the rule;
3500 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3501 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3502 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3503 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3505 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3506 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3507 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3508 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3509 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3510 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3511 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3512 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3513 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3514 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3517 Here is a typical example:
3527 Or, in terms of named references:
3531 exp[result]: @dots{}
3532 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3533 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3538 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3539 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3540 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3541 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3542 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3543 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3545 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3546 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3547 referred to as @code{$2}.
3549 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3550 references construct.
3552 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3553 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3554 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3555 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3556 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3560 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3564 @cindex default action
3565 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3566 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3567 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3568 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3569 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3570 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3572 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3573 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3574 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3575 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3576 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3580 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3581 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3587 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3592 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3593 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3594 definition of @code{foo}.
3597 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3598 any, from a semantic action.
3599 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3600 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3603 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3604 @cindex action data types
3605 @cindex data types in actions
3607 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3608 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3610 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3611 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3612 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3613 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3614 in the rule. In this example,
3625 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3626 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3627 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3628 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3630 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3631 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3632 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3644 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3645 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3647 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3648 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3649 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3650 @cindex mid-rule actions
3652 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3653 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3654 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3656 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3657 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3658 it is run before they are parsed.
3660 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3661 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3662 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3663 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3666 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3667 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3668 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3669 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3670 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3671 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3673 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3674 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3675 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3676 at the end of the rule.
3678 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3679 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3680 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3681 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3682 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3683 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3687 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3688 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3689 declare_variable ($3); @}
3691 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3696 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3697 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3698 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3699 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3700 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3701 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3702 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3703 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3705 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3706 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3707 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3708 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3709 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3712 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3713 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3714 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3715 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3716 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3718 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3719 Discarded Symbols}).
3720 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3721 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3723 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3724 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3729 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3735 pop_context ($1); @}
3738 let: LET '(' var ')'
3739 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3740 declare_variable ($3); @}
3747 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3748 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3749 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3751 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3752 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3753 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3754 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3755 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3760 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3761 | '@{' statements '@}'
3767 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3771 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3772 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3775 | '@{' statements '@}'
3781 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3782 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3783 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3784 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3785 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3786 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3788 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3789 actions into the two rules, like this:
3793 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3794 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3795 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3796 '@{' statements '@}'
3802 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3803 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3805 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3806 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3807 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3811 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3812 declarations statements '@}'
3813 | '@{' statements '@}'
3819 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3820 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3822 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3823 serves as a subroutine:
3827 subroutine: /* empty */
3828 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3834 compound: subroutine
3835 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3837 '@{' statements '@}'
3843 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3844 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3846 @node Tracking Locations
3847 @section Tracking Locations
3849 @cindex textual location
3850 @cindex location, textual
3852 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3853 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3854 especially symbol locations.
3856 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3857 actions to take when rules are matched.
3860 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3861 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3862 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3866 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3867 @cindex data type of locations
3868 @cindex default location type
3870 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3871 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3873 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3874 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3875 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3876 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3880 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3889 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3890 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3891 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3892 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3893 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3895 @node Actions and Locations
3896 @subsection Actions and Locations
3897 @cindex location actions
3898 @cindex actions, location
3901 @vindex @@@var{name}
3902 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3904 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3905 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3907 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3908 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3909 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3910 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3911 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3914 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3915 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3916 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3917 references construct.
3919 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3926 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3927 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3928 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3929 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3936 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3937 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3938 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3944 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3945 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3946 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3949 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3950 example above simply rewrites this way:
3963 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3964 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3965 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3972 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
3973 from a semantic action.
3974 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
3975 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3977 @node Location Default Action
3978 @subsection Default Action for Locations
3979 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
3980 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
3982 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
3983 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
3984 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
3985 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
3986 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
3987 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
3988 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
3989 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
3992 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
3993 dedicated code from semantic actions.
3995 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
3996 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
3997 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
3998 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
3999 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4000 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4001 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4002 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4003 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4004 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4006 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4010 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4014 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4015 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4016 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4017 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4021 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4022 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4023 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4024 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4030 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4031 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4032 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4034 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4038 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4039 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4042 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4043 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4044 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4045 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4048 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4049 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4050 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4051 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4054 @node Named References
4055 @section Named References
4056 @cindex named references
4058 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4059 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4060 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4061 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4062 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4063 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4065 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4066 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4067 used as named references. For example:
4071 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4072 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4077 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4081 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4082 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4087 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4093 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4096 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4099 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4104 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4105 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4106 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4109 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4110 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4115 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4116 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4117 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4120 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4121 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4127 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4128 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4131 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4132 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4136 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4137 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4138 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4139 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4140 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4141 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4142 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4144 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4148 @section Bison Declarations
4149 @cindex declarations, Bison
4150 @cindex Bison declarations
4152 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4153 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4156 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4157 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4158 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4159 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4161 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4162 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4163 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4164 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4167 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4168 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4169 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4170 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4171 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4172 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4173 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4174 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4175 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4176 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4177 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4178 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4179 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4180 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4184 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4185 @cindex version requirement
4186 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4189 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4190 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4194 %require "@var{version}"
4198 @subsection Token Type Names
4199 @cindex declaring token type names
4200 @cindex token type names, declaring
4201 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4204 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4210 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4211 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4212 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4214 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4215 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4216 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4219 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4220 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4221 following the token name:
4225 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4229 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4230 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4231 with each other or with normal characters.
4233 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4234 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4235 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4236 Than One Value Type}).
4242 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4246 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4250 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4251 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4252 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4259 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4260 equivalent literal string tokens:
4263 %token <operator> OR "||"
4264 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4269 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4270 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4271 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4272 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4273 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4274 the literal string instead of the token name.
4276 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4277 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4281 %token END 0 "end of file"
4284 @node Precedence Decl
4285 @subsection Operator Precedence
4286 @cindex precedence declarations
4287 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4288 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4290 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4291 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4292 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4293 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4294 operator precedence.
4296 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4297 @code{%token}: either
4300 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4307 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4310 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4311 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4312 all the @var{symbols}:
4316 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4317 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4318 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4319 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4320 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4321 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4322 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4323 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4324 considered a syntax error.
4327 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4328 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4329 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4330 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4331 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4334 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4335 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4336 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4337 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4342 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4343 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4347 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4348 @cindex declaring value types
4349 @cindex value types, declaring
4352 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4353 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4354 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4369 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4370 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4371 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4372 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4374 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4375 @code{union}. For example:
4387 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4388 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4391 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4392 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4393 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4395 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4396 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4398 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4399 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4400 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4401 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4409 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4414 and then your grammar can use the following
4415 instead of @code{%union}:
4428 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4429 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4430 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4434 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4435 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4436 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4439 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4443 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4444 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4445 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4446 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4447 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4450 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4451 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4452 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4453 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4455 @node Initial Action Decl
4456 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4457 @findex %initial-action
4459 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4460 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4463 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4464 @findex %initial-action
4465 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4466 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4467 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4468 @code{%parse-param}.
4471 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4474 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4477 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4482 @node Destructor Decl
4483 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4484 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4488 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4489 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4490 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4491 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4492 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4493 must discard the start symbol.
4495 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4496 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4497 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4498 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4500 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4501 symbol is automatically discarded.
4503 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4505 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4507 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4508 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4509 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4510 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4512 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4513 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4514 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4515 tag among @var{symbols}.
4516 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4517 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4518 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4520 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4521 (These default forms are experimental.
4522 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4524 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4525 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4526 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4527 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4529 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4530 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4531 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4532 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4533 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4540 %union @{ char *string; @}
4541 %token <string> STRING1
4542 %token <string> STRING2
4543 %type <string> string1
4544 %type <string> string2
4545 %union @{ char character; @}
4546 %token <character> CHR
4547 %type <character> chr
4550 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4551 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4552 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4553 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4557 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4558 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4559 to @code{free} by default.
4560 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4561 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4562 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4563 @code{free} only once.
4564 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4565 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4567 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4568 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4569 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4570 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4571 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4572 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4573 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4574 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4575 reference it in your grammar.
4576 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4577 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4583 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4584 @cindex mid-rule actions
4585 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4586 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4587 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4588 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4589 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4590 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4591 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4592 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4596 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4597 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4598 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4603 @cindex discarded symbols
4604 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4608 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4610 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4612 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4613 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4615 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4618 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4619 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4622 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4623 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4624 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4628 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4629 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4630 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4631 @cindex warnings, preventing
4632 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4636 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4637 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4638 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4639 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4640 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4641 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4643 The declaration looks like this:
4649 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4650 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4651 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4652 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4654 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4655 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4656 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4657 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4658 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4659 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4660 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4666 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4670 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4671 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4672 print the number of conflicts.
4675 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4676 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4677 go back to the beginning.
4680 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4681 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4682 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4685 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4686 but will keep silent otherwise.
4689 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4690 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4691 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4692 @cindex default start symbol
4695 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4696 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4697 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4704 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4705 @cindex reentrant parser
4707 @findex %define api.pure
4709 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4710 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4711 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4712 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4713 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4714 program must be called only within interlocks.
4716 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4717 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4718 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4719 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4720 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4722 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4723 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4724 reentrant. It looks like this:
4730 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4731 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4732 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4733 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4734 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4735 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4736 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4737 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4738 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4740 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4741 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4745 @subsection A Push Parser
4748 @findex %define api.push-pull
4750 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4751 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4753 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4754 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4755 each time a new token is made available.
4757 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4758 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4759 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4760 within a certain time period.
4762 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4763 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4764 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4767 %define api.push-pull push
4770 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4771 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4772 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4773 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4774 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4778 %define api.push-pull push
4781 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4782 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4783 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4784 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4786 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4787 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4788 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4789 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4790 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4791 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4792 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4793 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4797 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4799 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4800 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4801 yypstate_delete (ps);
4804 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4805 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4806 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4807 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4808 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4809 example would thus look like this:
4814 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4817 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4818 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4819 yypstate_delete (ps);
4822 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4823 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4825 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4826 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4827 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4828 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4829 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4830 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4831 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4832 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4833 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4834 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4835 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4836 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4837 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4838 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4839 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4840 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4841 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4845 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4846 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4847 yypstate_delete (ps);
4850 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4851 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4852 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4855 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4856 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4857 @cindex declaration summary
4858 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4860 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4862 @deffn {Directive} %union
4863 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4864 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4867 @deffn {Directive} %token
4868 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4869 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4872 @deffn {Directive} %right
4873 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4874 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4877 @deffn {Directive} %left
4878 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4879 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4882 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4883 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4884 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4885 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4889 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4890 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4891 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4895 @deffn {Directive} %type
4896 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4897 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4900 @deffn {Directive} %start
4901 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4905 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4906 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4907 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4913 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4916 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4917 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4919 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4920 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4921 @xref{%code Summary}.
4924 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4925 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4926 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4927 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4930 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4931 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4932 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4933 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4936 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4937 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4938 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4939 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4940 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4942 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4943 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4944 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4945 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4946 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4947 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4948 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4949 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4950 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
4951 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
4953 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
4954 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
4955 (Reentrant) Parser}.
4957 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
4958 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
4959 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
4961 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
4962 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
4963 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
4964 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
4965 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
4967 @findex %code requires
4968 @findex %code provides
4969 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
4970 header also contains their code.
4971 @xref{%code Summary}.
4974 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
4975 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
4978 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
4979 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
4980 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
4983 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
4984 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
4985 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
4988 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
4989 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
4990 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
4991 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
4993 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
4997 @deffn {Directive} %locations
4998 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
4999 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5000 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5001 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5002 accurate syntax error messages.
5005 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5006 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5007 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5009 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5010 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5011 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5012 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5013 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5014 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5015 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5016 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5018 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5022 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5023 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5024 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5029 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5030 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5031 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5032 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5033 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5034 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5035 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5039 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5040 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5043 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5044 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5045 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5049 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5050 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5051 Require a Version of Bison}.
5054 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5055 Specify the skeleton to use.
5057 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5058 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5059 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5060 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5062 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5063 file in the Bison installation directory.
5064 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5065 directory of the grammar file.
5066 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5069 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5070 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5071 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5072 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5073 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5074 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5075 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5078 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5079 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5080 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5081 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5082 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5083 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5084 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5087 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5088 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5089 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5093 The highest token number, plus one.
5095 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5097 The number of grammar rules,
5099 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5103 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5104 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5105 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5106 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5110 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5111 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5112 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5116 @node %define Summary
5117 @subsection %define Summary
5119 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5120 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5121 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5122 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5123 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5124 @code{%define} directive:
5126 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5127 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5128 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5129 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5131 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5132 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5133 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5134 to specifying @code{""}.
5136 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5137 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5138 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5141 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5142 @code{%define} accepts.
5144 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5145 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5149 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5151 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5152 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5154 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5156 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5157 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5160 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5161 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5162 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5163 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5164 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5165 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5169 @findex %define api.pure
5172 @item Language(s): C
5174 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5175 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5177 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5179 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5183 @findex %define api.push-pull
5186 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5188 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5189 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5190 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5191 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5193 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5195 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5198 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5200 @item lr.default-reductions
5201 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5204 @item Language(s): all
5206 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5207 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5208 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5209 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5211 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5212 @item Default Value:
5214 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5215 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5219 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5221 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5222 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5225 @item Language(s): all
5226 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5227 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5228 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5229 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5232 @c ================================================== lr.type
5235 @findex %define lr.type
5238 @item Language(s): all
5240 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5241 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5242 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5244 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5246 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5250 @findex %define namespace
5253 @item Languages(s): C++
5255 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5256 For example, if you specify:
5259 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5262 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5265 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5268 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5269 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5272 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5278 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5279 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5280 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5282 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5284 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5285 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5286 lexical analyzer function.
5287 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5288 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5289 lexical analyzer function.
5290 For example, if you specify:
5293 %define namespace "foo"
5294 %name-prefix "bar::"
5297 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5301 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5303 @findex %define parse.lac
5306 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5308 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5309 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5310 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5311 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5317 @subsection %code Summary
5321 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5322 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5323 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5324 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5325 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5326 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5327 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5328 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5330 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5331 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5332 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5333 in the parser implementation.
5335 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5336 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5337 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5339 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5342 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5343 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5344 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5345 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5346 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5347 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5351 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5352 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5353 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5356 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5357 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5361 @findex %code requires
5364 @item Language(s): C, C++
5366 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5367 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5368 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5369 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5370 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5372 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5373 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5378 @findex %code provides
5381 @item Language(s): C, C++
5383 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5384 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5386 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5387 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5395 @item Language(s): C, C++
5397 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5398 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5399 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5400 parser implementation file. For example:
5409 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5413 @findex %code imports
5416 @item Language(s): Java
5418 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5420 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5421 before any class definitions.
5425 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5426 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5427 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5428 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5431 @node Multiple Parsers
5432 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5434 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5435 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5436 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5437 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5439 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5440 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5441 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5442 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5443 names that do not conflict.
5445 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5446 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5447 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5448 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5449 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5450 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5451 @code{clex}, and so on.
5453 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5454 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5455 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5456 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5457 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5459 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5460 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5461 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5462 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5465 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5466 @cindex C-language interface
5469 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5470 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5471 functions that it needs to use.
5473 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5474 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5475 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5476 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5479 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5480 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5481 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5482 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5483 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5484 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5486 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5487 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5488 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5492 @node Parser Function
5493 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5496 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5497 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5498 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5499 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5500 without reading further.
5503 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5504 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5505 is due to end-of-input).
5507 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5508 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5511 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5514 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5519 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5524 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5527 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5528 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5529 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5531 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5532 @findex %parse-param
5533 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5534 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5535 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5536 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5537 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5540 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5543 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5544 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5548 Then call the parser like this:
5552 int nastiness, randomness;
5553 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5554 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5560 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5563 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5566 @node Push Parser Function
5567 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5568 @findex yypush_parse
5570 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5571 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5573 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5574 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5575 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5576 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5578 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5579 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5580 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5581 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5584 @node Pull Parser Function
5585 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5586 @findex yypull_parse
5588 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5589 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5591 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5592 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5593 declaration is used.
5594 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5596 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5597 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5600 @node Parser Create Function
5601 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5602 @findex yypstate_new
5604 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5605 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5607 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5608 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5609 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5610 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5612 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5613 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5614 or 0 if no memory was available.
5615 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5619 @node Parser Delete Function
5620 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5621 @findex yypstate_delete
5623 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5624 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5626 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5627 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5628 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5629 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5631 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5632 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5633 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5637 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5639 @cindex lexical analyzer
5641 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5642 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5643 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5644 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5646 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5647 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5648 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5649 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5650 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5651 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5652 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5656 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5657 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5658 of the token it has read.
5659 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5660 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5662 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5663 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5666 @node Calling Convention
5667 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5669 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5670 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5671 signifies end-of-input.
5673 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5674 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5675 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5676 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5678 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5679 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5680 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5681 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5682 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5683 signifies end-of-input.
5685 Here is an example showing these things:
5692 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5695 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5696 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5698 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5704 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5705 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5707 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5708 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5712 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5713 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5714 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5715 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5718 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5719 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5720 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5721 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5722 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5725 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5726 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5727 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5728 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5731 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5734 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5735 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5736 strlen (token_buffer))
5737 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5738 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5743 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5744 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5748 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5751 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5752 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5753 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5754 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5760 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5761 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5766 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5767 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5768 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5769 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5770 declaration looks like this:
5783 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5788 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5789 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5794 @node Token Locations
5795 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5798 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5799 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5800 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5801 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5802 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5803 data in that variable.
5805 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5806 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5807 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5808 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5809 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5812 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5815 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5817 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5818 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5819 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5820 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5821 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5822 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5827 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5830 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5831 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5836 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5837 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5838 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5842 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5843 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5846 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5848 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5849 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5855 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5856 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5857 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5861 results in the following signature:
5864 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5865 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5868 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5871 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5872 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5876 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5879 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5880 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5883 @node Error Reporting
5884 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5885 @cindex error reporting function
5888 @cindex syntax error
5890 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5891 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5892 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5893 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5896 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5897 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5898 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5899 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5900 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5902 @findex %error-verbose
5903 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5904 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5905 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5906 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5907 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5909 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5910 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5911 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5912 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5913 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5914 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5916 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5917 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5918 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5920 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5925 yyerror (char const *s)
5929 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5934 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5935 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5936 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5937 immediately return 1.
5939 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5940 an access to the current location.
5941 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5942 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5943 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5947 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5948 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5951 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
5954 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5955 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5958 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
5959 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
5960 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
5961 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
5965 /* Location tracking. */
5969 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5971 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5972 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5976 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
5979 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5980 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5981 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
5982 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
5987 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
5988 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
5989 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
5990 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
5991 message is always passed last.
5993 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
5994 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
5995 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
5999 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6000 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6001 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6002 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6004 @node Action Features
6005 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6006 @cindex summary, action features
6007 @cindex action features summary
6009 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6010 are useful in actions.
6012 @deffn {Variable} $$
6013 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6014 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6017 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6018 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6019 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6022 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6023 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6024 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6025 Types of Values in Actions}.
6028 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6029 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6030 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6031 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6034 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6035 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6036 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6039 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6040 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6041 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6044 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6046 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6047 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6048 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6049 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6050 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6051 going to be reduced by this rule.
6053 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6054 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6055 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6058 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6061 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6063 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6066 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6068 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6072 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6074 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6075 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6076 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6077 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6078 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6081 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6082 @findex YYRECOVERING
6083 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6084 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6085 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6088 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6089 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6090 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6091 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6092 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6094 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6097 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6098 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6100 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6102 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6105 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6106 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6107 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6108 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6111 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6112 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6113 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6114 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6116 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6119 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6120 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6121 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6122 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6124 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6129 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6130 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6133 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6137 @c int first_line, last_line;
6138 @c int first_column, last_column;
6142 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6143 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6145 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6146 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6147 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6150 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6153 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6155 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6156 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6160 @node Internationalization
6161 @section Parser Internationalization
6162 @cindex internationalization
6168 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6169 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6170 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6171 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6172 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6173 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6174 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6175 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6178 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6179 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6180 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6185 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6186 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6187 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6188 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6189 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6193 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6198 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6199 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6200 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6201 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6202 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6203 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6204 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6205 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6206 Bison-generated parser.
6209 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6210 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6211 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6215 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6218 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6219 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6220 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6224 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6225 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6226 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6229 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6235 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6239 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6245 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6246 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6247 @cindex algorithm of parser
6250 @cindex parser stack
6251 @cindex stack, parser
6253 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6254 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6255 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6257 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6258 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6261 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6262 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6263 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6264 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6265 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6266 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6267 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6269 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6276 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6277 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6280 expr: expr '*' expr;
6284 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6291 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6292 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6294 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6295 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6296 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6298 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6301 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6302 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6303 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6304 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6305 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6306 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6307 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6308 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6309 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6310 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6314 @section Lookahead Tokens
6315 @cindex lookahead token
6317 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6318 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6319 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6320 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6321 token in order to decide what to do.
6323 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6324 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6325 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6326 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6327 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6328 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6329 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6332 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6333 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6334 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6351 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6352 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6353 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6354 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6355 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6357 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6358 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6359 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6360 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6361 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6362 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6367 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6368 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6369 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6370 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6373 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6375 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6376 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6377 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6379 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6380 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6386 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6392 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6393 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6395 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6396 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6397 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6398 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6401 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6402 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6403 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6404 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6405 contrast it with the other alternative.
6407 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6408 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6412 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6414 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6417 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6418 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6419 making these two inputs equivalent:
6422 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6424 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6427 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6428 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6429 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6430 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6431 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6432 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6433 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6434 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6436 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6437 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6438 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6439 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6441 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6443 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6444 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6445 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6450 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6462 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6471 @section Operator Precedence
6472 @cindex operator precedence
6473 @cindex precedence of operators
6475 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6476 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6477 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6478 shift and when to reduce.
6481 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6482 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6483 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6484 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6487 @node Why Precedence
6488 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6490 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6491 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6505 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6506 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6507 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6508 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6509 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6510 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6511 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6514 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6515 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6516 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6517 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6518 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6519 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6520 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6521 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6524 @cindex associativity
6525 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6526 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6527 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6528 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6529 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6530 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6531 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6532 makes right-associativity.
6534 @node Using Precedence
6535 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6540 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6541 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6542 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6543 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6544 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6545 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6546 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6549 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6550 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6551 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6552 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6553 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6555 @node Precedence Examples
6556 @subsection Precedence Examples
6558 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6566 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6567 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6568 declared with @code{'-'}:
6571 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6577 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6578 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6579 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6581 @node How Precedence
6582 @subsection How Precedence Works
6584 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6585 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6586 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6587 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6588 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6589 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6591 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6592 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6593 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6594 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6595 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6596 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6597 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6600 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6601 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6603 @node Contextual Precedence
6604 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6605 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6606 @cindex unary operator precedence
6607 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6608 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6611 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6612 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6613 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6614 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6616 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6617 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6618 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6619 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6622 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6623 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6624 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6625 modifier's syntax is:
6628 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6632 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6633 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6634 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6635 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6636 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6638 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6639 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6640 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6650 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6657 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6662 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6663 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6664 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6665 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6667 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6668 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6669 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6670 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6672 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6673 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6674 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6675 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6676 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6677 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6679 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6680 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6684 @section Parser States
6685 @cindex finite-state machine
6686 @cindex parser state
6687 @cindex state (of parser)
6689 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6690 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6691 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6692 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6693 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6695 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6696 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6697 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6698 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6699 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6700 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6701 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6702 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6705 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6706 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6707 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6710 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6711 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6712 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6714 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6715 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6718 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6719 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6723 sequence: /* empty */
6724 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6727 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6732 maybeword: /* empty */
6733 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6735 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6741 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6742 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6743 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6744 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6745 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6746 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6748 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6749 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6750 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6752 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6753 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6754 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6755 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6756 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6758 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6759 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6760 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6761 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6764 sequence: /* empty */
6765 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6767 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6771 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6774 sequence: /* empty */
6776 | sequence redirects
6783 redirects:/* empty */
6784 | redirects redirect
6789 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6790 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6791 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6792 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6793 in infinitely many ways!
6795 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6796 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6797 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6798 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6800 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6804 sequence: /* empty */
6810 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6815 sequence: /* empty */
6817 | sequence redirects
6829 | redirects redirect
6834 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6835 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6836 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6838 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6846 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6850 | name_list ':' type
6868 | name ',' name_list
6873 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6874 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6875 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6876 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6880 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6882 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6883 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6884 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6886 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6887 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6888 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6889 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6890 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6891 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6892 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6895 @cindex canonical LR
6896 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6897 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6898 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6899 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6900 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6901 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6902 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6903 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6905 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6906 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6907 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6908 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6909 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6920 /* This rule is never used. */
6926 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6927 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6928 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6929 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6930 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6931 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6933 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6934 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6935 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6936 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6937 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6938 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6943 | name_list ':' type
6951 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
6952 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
6957 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
6958 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
6959 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
6960 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
6961 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
6962 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
6963 sometimes contain incorrect information.
6965 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
6966 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
6967 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
6968 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
6970 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
6971 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
6974 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
6975 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
6976 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
6977 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
6980 @node LR Table Construction
6981 @subsection LR Table Construction
6982 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
6985 @cindex canonical LR
6986 @findex %define lr.type
6988 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
6989 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
6990 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
6991 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
6994 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
6995 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
6996 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
6997 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7000 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7001 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7002 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7005 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7006 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7007 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7010 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7012 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7015 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7019 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7023 %define lr.type ielr
7026 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7027 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7028 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7029 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7030 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7031 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7032 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7033 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7034 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7035 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7037 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7038 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7039 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7040 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7046 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7049 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7051 @cindex GLR with LALR
7052 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7053 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7054 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7055 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7056 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7057 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7058 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7059 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7060 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7061 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7063 @item Malformed grammars.
7065 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7066 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7067 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7068 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7069 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7074 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7075 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7076 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7077 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7078 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7079 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7080 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7081 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7082 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7086 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7089 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7090 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7091 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7092 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7093 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7094 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7095 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7096 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7097 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7098 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7099 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7100 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7103 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7104 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7105 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7107 @node Default Reductions
7108 @subsection Default Reductions
7109 @cindex default reductions
7110 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7113 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7114 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7115 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7116 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7117 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7119 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7120 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7123 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7125 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7126 @cindex consistent states
7127 @cindex defaulted states
7128 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7129 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7130 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7131 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7132 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7133 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7134 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7135 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7136 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7137 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7138 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7140 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7141 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7142 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7143 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7144 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7145 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7146 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7147 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7148 should already be considered closed.
7150 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7152 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7153 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7154 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7155 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7156 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7157 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7158 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7159 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7160 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7164 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7165 @c sentence from being rejected.
7166 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7167 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7168 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7169 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7170 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7171 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7174 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7175 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7176 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7177 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7178 because the accept action ends the parse.
7180 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7181 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7182 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7183 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7184 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7185 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7186 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7187 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7188 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7189 split the parse instead.
7191 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7192 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7194 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7195 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7196 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7198 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7199 @item @code{consistent}
7200 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7203 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7204 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7209 @findex %define parse.lac
7211 @cindex lookahead correction
7213 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7214 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7215 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7216 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7217 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7218 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7219 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7220 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7221 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7223 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7224 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7225 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7226 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7227 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7229 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7230 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7231 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7232 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7234 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7235 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7237 @item @code{none} (default)
7240 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7241 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7245 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7246 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7247 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7248 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7249 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7250 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7251 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7252 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7253 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7254 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7257 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7258 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7259 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7260 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7261 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7262 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7263 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7264 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7265 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7266 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7268 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7269 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7270 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7271 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7272 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7273 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7274 language-recognition power.
7276 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7279 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7281 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7282 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7283 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7284 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7287 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7289 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7290 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7291 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7292 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7293 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7294 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7298 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7299 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7300 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7301 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7302 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7303 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7304 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7305 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7306 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7307 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7308 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7311 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7312 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7313 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7315 @node Unreachable States
7316 @subsection Unreachable States
7317 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7318 @cindex unreachable states
7320 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7321 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7322 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7323 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7325 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7326 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7327 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7328 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7330 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7331 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7332 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7335 There are a few caveats to consider:
7338 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7340 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7341 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7342 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7343 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7344 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7345 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7347 @item Other useless states.
7349 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7350 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7351 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7352 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7353 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7354 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7355 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7358 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7359 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7361 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7362 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7363 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7365 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7366 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7367 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7368 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7369 context-free languages.
7370 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7371 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7372 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7373 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7374 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7375 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7376 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7377 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7379 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7380 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7381 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7382 parser uses the same basic
7383 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7384 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7385 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7386 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7388 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7389 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7390 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7391 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7392 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7394 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7395 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7396 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7397 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7398 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7399 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7400 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7401 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7402 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7403 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7404 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7407 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7408 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7409 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7410 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7411 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7412 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7413 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7414 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7415 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7416 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7417 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7418 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7420 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7421 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7422 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7424 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7425 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7426 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7427 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7428 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7429 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7430 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7431 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7432 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7433 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7434 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7435 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7437 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7440 @node Memory Management
7441 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7442 @cindex memory exhaustion
7443 @cindex memory management
7444 @cindex stack overflow
7445 @cindex parser stack overflow
7446 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7448 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7449 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7450 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7452 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7453 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7454 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7457 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7458 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7459 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7460 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7462 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7463 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7464 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7465 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7466 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7467 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7469 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7470 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7471 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7474 @cindex default stack limit
7475 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7479 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7480 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7481 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7482 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7483 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7485 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7487 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7488 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7489 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7490 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7491 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7492 this deficiency in a future release.
7494 @node Error Recovery
7495 @chapter Error Recovery
7496 @cindex error recovery
7497 @cindex recovery from errors
7499 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7500 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7501 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7504 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7505 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7506 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7507 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7508 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7509 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7510 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7513 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7514 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7515 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7516 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7517 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7518 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7523 stmnts: /* empty string */
7529 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7530 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7532 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7533 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7534 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7535 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7536 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7537 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7538 applicable in the ordinary way.
7540 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7541 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7542 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7543 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7544 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7545 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7546 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7547 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7548 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7549 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7550 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7551 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7553 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7554 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7555 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7558 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7561 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7562 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7563 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7564 spurious error message:
7567 primary: '(' expr ')'
7573 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7574 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7575 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7576 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7577 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7578 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7579 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7582 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7583 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7584 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7585 error messages resume.
7587 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7588 as any other rules can.
7591 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7592 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7593 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7594 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7597 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7598 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7599 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7601 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7603 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7604 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7605 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7606 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7607 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7609 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7610 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7611 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7612 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7615 @node Context Dependency
7616 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7618 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7619 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7620 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7621 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7625 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7626 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7627 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7628 error recovery rules must be written.
7631 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7632 neither clean nor robust.)
7634 @node Semantic Tokens
7635 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7637 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7638 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7644 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7645 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7646 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7648 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7649 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7650 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7651 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7652 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7654 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7655 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7656 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7657 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7658 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7659 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7660 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7662 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7663 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7664 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7665 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7669 typedef int foo, bar;
7673 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7674 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7680 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7681 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7683 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7684 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7685 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7686 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7687 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7692 declarator maybeasm '='
7694 | declarator maybeasm
7700 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7702 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7708 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7709 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7710 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7712 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7713 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7714 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7715 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7716 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7717 the syntactic context.
7719 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7720 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7721 @cindex lexical tie-in
7723 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7724 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7727 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7728 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7729 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7730 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7731 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7738 void yyerror (char const *);
7752 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7766 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7767 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7768 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7770 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7771 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7772 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7775 @node Tie-in Recovery
7776 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7778 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7779 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7781 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7782 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7783 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7784 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7788 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7795 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7796 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7797 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7798 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7799 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7801 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7803 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7804 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7805 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7817 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7818 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7819 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7820 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7822 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7823 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7824 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7825 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7826 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7827 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7830 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7833 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7835 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7836 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7837 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7838 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7839 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7840 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7843 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7844 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7848 @section Understanding Your Parser
7850 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7851 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7852 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7853 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7854 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7856 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7857 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7858 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7859 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7860 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7861 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7862 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7864 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7881 @command{bison} reports:
7884 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7885 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7886 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7887 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7888 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7891 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7892 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7893 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7894 interpretation is the same.
7896 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7897 to precedence and/or associativity:
7900 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7901 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7902 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7907 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7910 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7911 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7912 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7913 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7917 @cindex token, useless
7918 @cindex useless token
7919 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7920 @cindex useless nonterminal
7921 @cindex rule, useless
7922 @cindex useless rule
7923 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7924 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7925 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7926 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7930 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7933 Terminals unused in grammar:
7936 Rules useless in grammar:
7941 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7947 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7948 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7949 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7950 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7951 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7956 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7960 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7972 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7977 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7983 @cindex pointed rule
7984 @cindex rule, pointed
7985 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7986 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7987 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7988 that the input cursor.
7993 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7995 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8000 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8001 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8002 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8003 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8004 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8005 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
8006 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8007 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8009 @cindex core, item set
8010 @cindex item set core
8011 @cindex kernel, item set
8012 @cindex item set core
8013 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8014 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8015 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8016 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8017 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8018 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
8024 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8025 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8026 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8027 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8028 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8029 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8031 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8042 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8044 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8048 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8049 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8050 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8051 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8056 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8057 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8058 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8059 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8060 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8062 $ shift, and go to state 3
8063 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8064 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8065 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8066 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8070 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8071 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
8072 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
8073 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
8074 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
8075 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
8077 @cindex accepting state
8078 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8084 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8090 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8091 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8093 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8099 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8101 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8107 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8109 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8115 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8117 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8123 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8125 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8130 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8136 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8137 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8138 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8139 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8140 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8142 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8143 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8145 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8146 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8149 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8150 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8151 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8152 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8153 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8154 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8155 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8156 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8158 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8159 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8160 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8163 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8164 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8165 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8166 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8167 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8168 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8169 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8170 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8171 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8172 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8173 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8174 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8179 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8180 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8181 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8182 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8183 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8185 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8186 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8188 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8189 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8192 The remaining states are similar:
8198 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8199 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8200 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8201 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8202 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8204 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8205 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8207 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8208 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8214 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8215 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8216 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8217 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8218 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8220 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8222 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8223 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8229 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8230 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8231 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8232 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8233 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8235 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8236 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8237 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8238 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8240 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8241 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8242 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8243 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8244 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8249 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8250 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8251 @samp{*}, but also because the
8252 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8256 @section Tracing Your Parser
8259 @cindex tracing the parser
8261 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8262 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8264 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8267 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8269 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8270 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8271 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8272 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8275 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8276 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8277 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8279 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8281 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8282 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8283 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8284 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8286 the preferred solution.
8289 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8292 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8293 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8294 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8295 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8296 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8297 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8299 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8300 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8301 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8302 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8304 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8305 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8306 messages tell you these things:
8310 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8313 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8314 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8317 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8318 of the state stack afterward.
8321 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8322 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8323 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8324 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8325 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8326 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8327 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8328 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8329 grammar are to blame.
8331 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8332 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8333 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8334 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8335 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8338 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8339 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8340 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8341 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8342 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8343 value (from @code{yylval}).
8345 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8346 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8350 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8351 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8354 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8357 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8360 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8361 else if (type == NUM)
8362 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8366 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8369 @chapter Invoking Bison
8370 @cindex invoking Bison
8371 @cindex Bison invocation
8372 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8374 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8380 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8381 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8382 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8383 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8384 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8385 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8386 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8387 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8388 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8389 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8390 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8395 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8398 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8401 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8404 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8406 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8407 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8408 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8411 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8412 in alphabetical order by short options.
8413 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8414 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8418 @section Bison Options
8420 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8421 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8422 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8423 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8424 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8427 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8428 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8431 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8437 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8441 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8443 @item --print-localedir
8444 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8446 @item --print-datadir
8447 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8451 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8452 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8453 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8454 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8455 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8456 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8457 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8458 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8459 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8460 for compatibility with POSIX:
8467 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8468 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8469 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8470 this option is specified.
8472 @item -W [@var{category}]
8473 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8474 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8477 @item midrule-values
8478 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8480 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8483 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8486 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8487 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8490 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8493 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8494 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8495 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8498 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8502 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8503 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8504 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8505 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8506 no effect on the conflict report.
8509 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8511 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8512 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8518 Turn off all the warnings.
8520 Treat warnings as errors.
8523 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8524 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8525 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8534 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8535 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8536 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8538 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8539 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8540 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8541 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8542 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8543 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8544 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8548 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8551 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8552 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8553 definition for @var{name}.
8555 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8556 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8557 definitions for @var{name}.
8559 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8560 definitions for @var{name}.
8563 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8564 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8565 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8567 @item -L @var{language}
8568 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8569 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8570 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8571 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8572 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8574 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8578 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8580 @item -p @var{prefix}
8581 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8582 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8583 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8587 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8588 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8589 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8590 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8591 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8592 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8595 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8596 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8597 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8599 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8600 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8601 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8602 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8604 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8605 file in the Bison installation directory.
8606 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8607 current working directory.
8608 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8611 @itemx --token-table
8612 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8619 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8620 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8621 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8622 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8625 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8626 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8627 with other short options.
8629 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8630 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8631 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8632 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8634 @item -r @var{things}
8635 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8636 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8637 separated list of @var{things} among:
8641 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8645 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8646 each rule's lookahead set.
8649 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8650 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8653 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8654 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8658 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8659 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8660 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8663 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8664 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8666 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8667 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8669 @item -g [@var{file}]
8670 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8671 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8672 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8673 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8674 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8675 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8678 @item -x [@var{file}]
8679 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8680 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8681 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8682 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8684 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8685 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8688 @node Option Cross Key
8689 @section Option Cross Key
8691 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8692 the corresponding short option and directive.
8694 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8695 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8696 @include cross-options.texi
8700 @section Yacc Library
8702 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8703 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8704 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8705 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8706 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8707 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8708 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8710 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8711 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8714 int yyerror (char const *);
8717 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8718 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8719 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8725 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8727 @node Other Languages
8728 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8731 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8732 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8736 @section C++ Parsers
8739 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8740 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8741 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8742 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8743 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8744 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8747 @node C++ Bison Interface
8748 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8749 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8753 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8754 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8755 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8756 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8758 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8760 @findex %define namespace
8761 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8762 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8763 generated in the following files:
8768 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8769 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8772 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8775 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8776 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8777 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8778 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8779 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8781 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8782 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8783 @samp{%defines} directive.
8786 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8787 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8789 @node C++ Semantic Values
8790 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8791 @c - No objects in unions
8793 @c - Printer and destructor
8795 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8796 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8797 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8798 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8799 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8802 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8803 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8804 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8806 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8807 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8808 to such objects are allowed.
8811 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8812 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8813 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8817 @node C++ Location Values
8818 @subsection C++ Location Values
8822 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8824 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8825 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8826 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8827 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8830 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8831 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8832 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8833 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8834 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8837 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8838 The line, starting at 1.
8841 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8842 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8845 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8846 The column, starting at 0.
8849 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8850 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8853 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8854 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8855 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8856 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8857 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8860 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8861 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8862 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8863 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8866 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8867 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8868 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8871 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8872 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8873 Advance the @code{end} position.
8876 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8877 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8878 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8879 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8882 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8883 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8887 @node C++ Parser Interface
8888 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8889 @c - define parser_class_name
8891 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8893 @c - Reporting errors
8895 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8896 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8897 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8898 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8899 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8900 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8901 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8902 additional argument for its constructor.
8904 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8905 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8906 The types for semantics value and locations.
8909 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8910 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8911 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8912 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8913 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8914 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8917 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8918 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8919 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8922 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8923 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8926 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8927 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8928 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8932 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8933 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8934 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8935 or nonzero, full tracing.
8938 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8939 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8940 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8941 described by @var{m}.
8945 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8946 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8947 @c - prefix for yylex.
8948 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8951 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8952 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8953 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8955 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8956 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8957 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8958 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8962 @node A Complete C++ Example
8963 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8965 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8966 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8967 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8968 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8969 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8970 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8971 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8972 actually easier to interface with.
8975 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8976 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8977 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8978 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8979 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8982 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8983 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8985 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8986 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8987 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8988 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8989 of valid input follows.
8993 seven := one + two * three
8997 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8998 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9000 @c - A place to store error messages
9001 @c - A place for the result
9003 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9004 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9005 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9006 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9007 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9008 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9009 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9011 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9012 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9013 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9016 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9018 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9019 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9022 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9027 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9028 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9029 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9030 factor both as follows.
9032 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9034 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9036 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9037 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9038 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9039 calcxx_driver& driver)
9040 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9045 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9048 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9050 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9055 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9057 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9063 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9064 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9066 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9068 // Handling the scanner.
9071 bool trace_scanning;
9075 Similarly for the parser itself.
9077 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9079 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9080 int parse (const std::string& f);
9086 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9087 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9088 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9089 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9091 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9094 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9095 void error (const std::string& m);
9097 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9100 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9101 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9102 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9103 messages and set error state.
9105 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9107 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9108 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9110 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9111 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9113 variables["one"] = 1;
9114 variables["two"] = 2;
9117 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9122 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9126 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9127 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9128 int res = parser.parse ();
9134 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9136 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9140 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9142 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9147 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9149 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9150 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9151 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9152 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9155 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9157 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9158 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9160 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9164 @findex %code requires
9165 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9166 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9167 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9168 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9169 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9170 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9171 @xref{%code Summary}.
9173 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9177 class calcxx_driver;
9182 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9183 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9186 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9188 // The parsing context.
9189 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9190 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9194 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9195 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9196 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9197 automatically propagated.
9199 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9204 // Initialize the initial location.
9205 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9210 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9211 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9214 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9221 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9224 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9236 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9237 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9239 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9242 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9248 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9249 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9250 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9251 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9254 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9256 %token END 0 "end of file"
9258 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9259 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9264 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9267 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9268 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9270 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9271 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9273 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9277 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9279 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9283 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9285 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
9286 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
9289 "identifier" ":=" exp
9290 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9294 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9295 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9296 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9297 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9298 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9299 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9304 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9307 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9310 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9311 const std::string& m)
9313 driver.error (l, m);
9317 @node Calc++ Scanner
9318 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9320 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9321 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9323 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9325 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9330 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9331 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9333 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9334 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9335 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9336 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9340 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9341 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9342 not of token_type. */
9343 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9348 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9349 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9350 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9351 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9353 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9355 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9359 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9361 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9363 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9369 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9370 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9371 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9372 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9373 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9374 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9375 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9377 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9381 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9388 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9389 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9393 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9394 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9395 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9396 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9398 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9401 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9403 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9404 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9405 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9408 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9409 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9410 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9412 return token::NUMBER;
9414 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9415 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9420 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9421 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9423 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9427 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9429 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9432 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9434 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9435 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9442 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9449 @node Calc++ Top Level
9450 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9452 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9454 @comment file: calc++.cc
9457 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9461 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9463 calcxx_driver driver;
9464 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9465 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9466 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9467 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9468 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9469 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9470 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9476 @section Java Parsers
9479 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9480 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9481 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9482 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9483 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9484 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9485 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9486 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9489 @node Java Bison Interface
9490 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9491 @c - %language "Java"
9493 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9494 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9496 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9497 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9499 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9500 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9501 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9502 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9503 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9504 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9505 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9506 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9507 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9508 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9510 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9512 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9513 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9514 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9515 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9518 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9519 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9521 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9522 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9524 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9525 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9527 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9528 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9529 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9530 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9531 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9532 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9533 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9534 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9535 access the token names and codes.
9537 @node Java Semantic Values
9538 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9539 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9541 @c - Printer and destructor
9543 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9544 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9545 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9548 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9549 %type <Integer> number
9552 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9553 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9554 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9555 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9556 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9559 %define stype "ASTNode"
9563 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9564 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9566 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9567 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9568 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9569 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9570 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9571 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9573 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9574 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9575 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9577 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9578 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9579 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9582 @node Java Location Values
9583 @subsection Java Location Values
9588 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9589 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9590 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9591 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9592 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9593 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9594 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9596 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9597 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9598 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9599 be supplied by the user.
9602 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9603 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9604 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9607 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9608 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9611 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9612 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9615 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9616 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9617 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9618 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9622 @node Java Parser Interface
9623 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9624 @c - define parser_class_name
9626 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9628 @c - Reporting errors
9630 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9631 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9632 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9633 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9634 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9636 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9637 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9638 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9639 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9640 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9641 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9643 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9644 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9645 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9646 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9648 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9649 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9650 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9651 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9652 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9653 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9655 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9656 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9658 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9659 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9660 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9661 which initialize them automatically.
9663 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9664 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9666 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9667 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9668 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9672 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9673 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9674 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9676 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9677 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9678 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9681 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9682 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9683 @code{false} otherwise.
9686 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9687 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9688 from a syntax error.
9689 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9692 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9693 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9694 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9698 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9699 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9700 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9701 or nonzero, full tracing.
9705 @node Java Scanner Interface
9706 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9709 @c - Lexer interface
9711 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9712 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9713 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9714 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9716 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9717 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9718 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9719 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9722 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9723 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9724 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9725 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9728 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9730 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9731 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9732 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9733 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9736 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9737 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9738 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9741 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9742 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9745 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9746 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9747 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9748 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9749 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9751 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9752 "@var{class-name}".}
9755 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9756 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9758 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9759 "@var{class-name}".}
9763 @node Java Action Features
9764 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9766 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9767 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9769 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9770 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9773 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9774 This may not be assigned to.
9775 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9778 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9779 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9780 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9784 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9785 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9786 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9787 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9788 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9789 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9792 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9793 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9794 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9795 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9797 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9801 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9802 This may not be assigned to.
9803 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9807 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9808 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9811 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9812 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9813 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9816 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9817 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9818 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9821 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9822 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9823 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9826 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9827 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9828 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9830 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9833 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9834 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9835 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9836 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9841 @node Java Differences
9842 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9844 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9845 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9846 section summarizes these differences.
9850 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9851 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9852 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9853 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9854 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9855 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9856 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9858 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9859 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9860 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9861 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9862 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9865 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9866 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9867 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9868 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9869 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9870 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9871 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9872 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9873 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9876 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9878 @item @code{%code imports}
9879 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9880 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9881 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9883 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9884 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9886 @item @code{%code lexer}
9887 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9888 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9889 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9893 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9894 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9895 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9897 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9898 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9903 @node Java Declarations Summary
9904 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9906 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9907 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9909 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9910 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9913 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9914 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9915 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9916 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9917 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9920 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9921 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9922 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9923 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9926 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9927 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9928 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9929 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9932 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9933 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9934 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9937 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9938 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9940 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9943 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9944 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9945 @xref{Java Differences}.
9948 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9949 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9950 @xref{Java Differences}.
9953 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9954 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9955 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9958 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9959 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9960 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9961 @xref{Java Differences}.
9964 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9965 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9966 @xref{Java Differences}.
9969 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9970 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9971 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9974 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9975 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9976 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9979 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9980 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9981 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9984 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9985 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9987 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9990 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9991 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9992 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9993 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9996 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9997 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9998 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9999 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10000 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10003 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10004 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10005 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10008 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10009 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10010 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10011 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10014 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10015 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10016 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10017 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10020 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10021 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10022 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10025 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10026 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10027 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10030 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10031 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10032 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10035 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10036 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10037 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10038 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10042 @c ================================================= FAQ
10045 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10046 @cindex frequently asked questions
10049 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10053 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10054 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10055 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10056 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10057 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10058 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10059 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10060 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10061 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10062 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10063 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10064 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10067 @node Memory Exhausted
10068 @section Memory Exhausted
10071 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10072 message. What can I do?
10075 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10078 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10079 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10081 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10082 following typical questions:
10085 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10086 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10087 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10094 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10095 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10096 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10099 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10100 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10101 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10102 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10103 @file{first-line.l}:
10109 #include <stdlib.h>
10113 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10117 yyparse (char const *file)
10119 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10123 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10127 /* One token only. */
10129 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10132 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10150 If the file @file{input} contains
10158 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10161 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10162 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10163 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10168 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10169 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10170 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10171 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10172 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10173 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10174 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10175 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10178 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10179 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10180 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10181 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10183 @node Strings are Destroyed
10184 @section Strings are Destroyed
10187 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10188 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10189 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10192 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10193 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10194 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10200 char *yylval = NULL;
10205 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10213 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10214 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10215 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10216 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10222 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10225 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10226 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10227 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10233 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10234 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10235 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10236 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10237 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10238 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10241 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10242 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10243 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10248 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10249 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10252 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10253 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10256 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10257 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10258 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10259 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10260 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10261 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10262 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10264 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10266 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10267 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10268 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10269 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10270 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10271 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10274 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10275 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10278 @node Multiple start-symbols
10279 @section Multiple start-symbols
10282 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10283 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10284 multiple entry points.
10287 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10288 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10289 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10290 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10294 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10296 start: START_FOO foo
10300 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10301 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10303 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10304 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10305 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10306 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10307 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10308 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10309 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10310 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10313 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10318 int t = start_token;
10323 /* @r{The rules.} */
10327 @node Secure? Conform?
10328 @section Secure? Conform?
10331 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10334 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10335 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10336 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10337 please send us a bug report.
10339 @node I can't build Bison
10340 @section I can't build Bison
10343 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10344 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10348 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10349 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10350 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10351 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10352 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10353 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10354 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10357 @node Where can I find help?
10358 @section Where can I find help?
10361 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10364 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10365 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10366 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10367 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10368 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10369 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10370 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10371 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10375 @section Bug Reports
10378 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10381 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10382 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10383 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10384 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10385 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10387 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10388 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10389 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10390 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10391 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10393 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10394 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10395 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10396 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10397 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10398 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10400 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10401 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10403 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10405 @node More Languages
10406 @section More Languages
10409 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10410 favorite language here}?
10413 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10414 languages; contributions are welcome.
10417 @section Beta Testing
10420 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10423 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10424 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10425 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10426 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10427 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10428 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10429 essentially halted.
10431 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10432 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10433 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10434 systems are especially welcome.
10436 @node Mailing Lists
10437 @section Mailing Lists
10440 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10443 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10445 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10447 @node Table of Symbols
10448 @appendix Bison Symbols
10449 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10450 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10452 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10453 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10454 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10457 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10458 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10459 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10462 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10463 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10467 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10468 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10472 @deffn {Variable} $$
10473 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10477 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10478 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10479 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10482 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10483 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10487 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10488 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10492 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10493 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10494 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10495 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10498 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10499 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10500 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10501 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10502 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10506 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10507 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10510 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10511 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10515 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10516 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10519 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10520 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10521 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10524 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10525 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10528 This feature is experimental.
10529 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10532 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10535 @deffn {Directive} <>
10536 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10539 This feature is experimental.
10540 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10543 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10546 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10547 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10548 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10549 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10552 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10553 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10554 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10555 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10556 @xref{%code Summary}.
10559 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10560 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10564 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10565 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10566 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10571 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10572 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10573 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10574 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10577 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10578 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10579 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10582 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10583 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10584 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10587 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10588 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10589 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10592 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10593 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10594 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10598 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10599 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10600 used in the grammar.
10603 @deffn {Symbol} error
10604 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10605 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10606 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10607 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10608 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10609 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10610 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10611 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10614 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10615 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10616 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10619 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10620 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10624 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10625 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10626 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10629 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10630 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10633 @deffn {Directive} %language
10634 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10635 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10638 @deffn {Directive} %left
10639 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10640 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10643 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10644 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10645 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10649 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10650 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10651 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10652 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10653 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10656 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10657 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10661 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10662 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10663 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10668 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10669 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10670 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10673 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10674 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10675 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10678 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10679 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10680 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10683 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10684 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10685 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10686 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10689 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10690 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10691 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10694 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10695 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10696 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10697 unreasonable usage.
10700 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10701 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10702 Require a Version of Bison}.
10705 @deffn {Directive} %right
10706 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10707 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10710 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10711 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10712 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10715 @deffn {Directive} %start
10716 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10720 @deffn {Directive} %token
10721 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10722 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10725 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10726 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10727 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10730 @deffn {Directive} %type
10731 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10732 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10735 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10736 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10737 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10741 @deffn {Directive} %union
10742 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10743 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10746 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10747 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10748 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10749 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10750 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10752 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10756 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10757 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10758 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10759 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10761 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10765 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10766 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10767 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10770 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10771 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10772 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10773 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10774 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10777 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10778 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10779 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10782 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10783 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10784 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10787 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10788 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10789 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10790 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10793 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10794 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10795 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10798 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10799 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10800 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10801 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10802 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10804 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10808 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10809 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10810 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10811 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10814 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10815 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10816 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10817 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10818 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10819 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10822 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10823 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10824 @xref{Memory Management}.
10827 @deffn {Function} yylex
10828 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10829 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10833 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10834 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10835 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10836 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10837 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10840 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10841 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10842 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10843 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10845 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10847 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10848 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10849 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10852 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10853 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10854 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10857 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10858 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10859 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10860 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10862 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10863 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10864 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10867 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10868 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10872 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10873 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10874 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10875 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10876 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10879 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10880 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10881 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10884 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10885 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10886 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10887 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10888 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10889 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10890 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10893 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10894 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10895 call this function to create a new parser.
10896 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10897 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10898 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10899 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10902 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10903 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10904 parse the rest of the input stream.
10905 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10906 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10907 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10908 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10911 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10912 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10913 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10914 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10915 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10916 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10919 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10920 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10921 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10922 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10923 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10926 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10927 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10928 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10929 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10932 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10933 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10934 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10935 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10936 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10937 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10938 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10940 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10941 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10942 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10943 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10944 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10945 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10946 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10949 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10950 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10951 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10959 @item Accepting state
10960 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10961 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10962 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10964 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10965 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10966 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10967 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10968 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10970 @item Consistent state
10971 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10973 @item Context-free grammars
10974 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10975 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10976 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10977 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10980 @item Default reduction
10981 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10982 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
10983 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
10984 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
10987 @item Defaulted state
10988 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
10990 @item Dynamic allocation
10991 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10992 compile time or on entry to a function.
10995 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10996 character string of length zero.
10998 @item Finite-state stack machine
10999 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11000 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11001 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11002 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11003 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11004 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11006 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11007 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11008 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11009 deterministic parsing
11010 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11011 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11012 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11016 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11017 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11018 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11020 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11021 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11022 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11023 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11024 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11025 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11026 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11027 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11028 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11029 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11031 @item Infix operator
11032 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11033 performs some operation.
11036 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11038 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11039 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11040 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11041 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11042 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11043 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11044 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11046 @item Language construct
11047 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11048 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11049 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11051 @item Left associativity
11052 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11053 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11054 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11056 @item Left recursion
11057 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11058 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11061 @item Left-to-right parsing
11062 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11063 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11065 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11066 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11067 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11069 @item Lexical tie-in
11070 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11071 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11073 @item Literal string token
11074 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11076 @item Lookahead token
11077 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11081 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11082 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11083 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11086 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11087 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11089 @item Nonterminal symbol
11090 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11091 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11092 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11095 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11096 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11099 @item Postfix operator
11100 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11101 performs some operation.
11104 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11105 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11109 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11110 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11111 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11113 @item Reverse polish notation
11114 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11116 @item Right recursion
11117 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11118 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11122 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11123 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11124 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11127 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11128 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11129 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11131 @item Single-character literal
11132 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11133 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11136 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11137 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11138 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11139 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11142 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11143 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11144 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11147 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11148 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11151 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11152 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11153 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11154 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11156 @item Terminal symbol
11157 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11158 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11159 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11161 @item Unreachable state
11162 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11163 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11164 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11167 @node Copying This Manual
11168 @appendix Copying This Manual
11172 @unnumbered Bibliography
11176 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11177 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11178 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11179 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11181 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11182 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11183 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11184 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11185 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11187 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11188 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11189 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11190 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11191 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11193 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11194 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11195 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11196 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11197 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11200 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11201 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11202 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11205 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11206 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11207 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11208 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11218 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11219 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11220 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11221 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11222 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11223 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11224 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11225 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11226 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11227 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11228 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11229 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11230 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11231 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11232 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11233 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11234 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11235 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11236 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11237 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11238 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11239 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11240 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11241 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11242 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11243 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11244 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11245 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11246 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11247 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11248 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11249 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11250 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11251 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11252 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11253 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11254 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11255 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
11256 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11257 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
11258 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11259 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11260 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11261 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11262 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
11263 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11264 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11265 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11266 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11267 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11268 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
11269 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
11271 @c Local Variables:
11272 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"