1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
227 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
228 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
229 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
230 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
232 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
234 Parser C-Language Interface
236 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
237 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
238 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
241 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
243 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
244 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
245 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
248 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
250 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
251 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
252 of the token it has read.
253 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
254 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
256 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
257 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
259 The Bison Parser Algorithm
261 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
262 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
263 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
264 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
265 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
266 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
267 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
268 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
269 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
270 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
274 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
275 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
276 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
277 * How Precedence:: How they work.
281 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
282 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
283 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
284 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
286 Handling Context Dependencies
288 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
289 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
290 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
291 error recovery rules must be written.
293 Debugging Your Parser
295 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
296 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
300 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
301 in alphabetical order by short options.
302 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
303 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
305 Parsers Written In Other Languages
307 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
308 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
312 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
313 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
314 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
315 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
316 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
317 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
321 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
322 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
324 A Complete C++ Example
326 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
327 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
328 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
329 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
330 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
334 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
335 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
336 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
337 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
338 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
339 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
340 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
341 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
343 Frequently Asked Questions
345 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
346 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
347 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
348 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
349 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
350 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
351 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
352 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
353 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
354 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
355 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
356 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
360 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
366 @unnumbered Introduction
369 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
370 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
371 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
372 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
373 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
374 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
375 calculators to complex programming languages.
377 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
378 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
379 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
380 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
381 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
384 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
385 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
386 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
387 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
390 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
391 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
392 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
393 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
394 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
395 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
398 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
401 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
403 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
404 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
405 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
406 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
407 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
409 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
411 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
412 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
413 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
414 License to all of the Bison source code.
416 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
417 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
418 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
419 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
420 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
421 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
422 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
424 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
425 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
426 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
427 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
428 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
429 using the other GNU tools.
431 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
432 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
433 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
434 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
438 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
439 @include gpl-3.0.texi
442 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
444 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
445 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
446 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
449 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
450 as mathematical ideas.
451 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
452 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
453 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
454 the name of an identifier, etc.).
455 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
456 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
457 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
458 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
459 how is the output used?
460 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
461 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
464 @node Language and Grammar
465 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
467 @cindex context-free grammar
468 @cindex grammar, context-free
469 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
470 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
471 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
472 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
473 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
474 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
475 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
476 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
480 @cindex Backus-Naur form
481 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
482 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
483 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
484 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
485 essentially machine-readable BNF.
487 @cindex LALR grammars
488 @cindex IELR grammars
490 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
491 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
492 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
493 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
494 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
495 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
496 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
497 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
498 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
499 Construction}, to learn how.
502 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
503 @cindex ambiguous grammars
504 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
506 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
507 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
508 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
509 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
510 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
511 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
512 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
513 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
514 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
515 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
516 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
517 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
518 possible parses of any given string is finite.
520 @cindex symbols (abstract)
522 @cindex syntactic grouping
523 @cindex grouping, syntactic
524 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
525 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
526 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
527 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
528 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
529 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
530 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
532 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
533 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
534 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
535 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
536 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
537 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
538 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
539 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
540 lexicography, not grammar.)
542 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
545 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
546 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
547 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
548 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
549 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
550 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
551 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
554 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
555 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
556 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
557 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
558 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
559 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
560 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
561 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
563 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
564 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
565 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
566 reads informally as follows:
569 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
574 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
578 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
579 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
580 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
581 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
584 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
585 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
586 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
587 not the start symbol.
589 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
590 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
591 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
592 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
593 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
594 reports a syntax error.
596 @node Grammar in Bison
597 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
598 @cindex Bison grammar
599 @cindex grammar, Bison
600 @cindex formal grammar
602 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
603 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
604 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
606 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
607 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
608 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
610 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
611 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
612 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
613 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
614 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
615 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
616 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
619 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
620 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
621 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
622 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
624 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
625 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
627 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
628 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
629 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
630 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
634 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
638 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
640 @node Semantic Values
641 @section Semantic Values
642 @cindex semantic value
643 @cindex value, semantic
645 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
646 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
647 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
648 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
649 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
652 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
653 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
654 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
655 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
656 ,Defining Language Semantics},
659 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
660 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
661 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
662 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
665 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
666 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
667 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
668 need to have any semantic value.)
670 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
671 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
672 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
673 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
674 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
675 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
677 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
678 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
679 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
680 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
681 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
683 @node Semantic Actions
684 @section Semantic Actions
685 @cindex semantic actions
686 @cindex actions, semantic
688 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
689 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
690 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
691 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
694 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
695 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
696 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
697 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
698 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
699 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
700 newly recognized larger expression.
702 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
706 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
710 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
711 from the values of the two subexpressions.
714 @section Writing GLR Parsers
716 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
719 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
720 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
722 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
723 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
724 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
725 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
726 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
727 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
728 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
729 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
730 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
732 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
733 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
734 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
735 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
736 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
737 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
738 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
739 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
740 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
741 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
742 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
743 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
744 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
745 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
746 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
747 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
748 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
749 identical set of symbols.
751 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
752 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
753 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
754 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
755 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
756 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
757 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
758 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
759 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
763 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
764 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
765 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
766 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
769 @node Simple GLR Parsers
770 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
771 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
772 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
776 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
777 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
779 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
780 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
781 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
783 Consider a problem that
784 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
785 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
788 type subrange = lo .. hi;
789 type enum = (a, b, c);
793 The original language standard allows only numeric
794 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
795 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
796 10206) and many other
797 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
798 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
802 type subrange = (a) .. b;
806 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
807 type with only one value:
814 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
815 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
817 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
818 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
819 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
820 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
821 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
822 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
823 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
824 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
826 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
827 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
828 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
829 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
832 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
833 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
834 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
835 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
836 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
837 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
840 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
841 use the GLR algorithm.
842 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
843 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
844 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
845 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
846 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
847 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
848 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
849 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
850 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
852 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
853 reports a syntax error as usual.
855 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
856 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
857 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
858 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
859 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
861 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
862 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
863 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
864 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
865 The present example contains only one conflict between two
866 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
867 cannot be nested. So the number of
868 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
869 and the parsing time is still linear.
871 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
872 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
875 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
885 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
914 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
915 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
916 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
917 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
924 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
925 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
926 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
935 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
936 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
937 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
938 notice when the parser splits.
940 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
941 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
942 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
943 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
944 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
945 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
946 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
947 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
948 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
949 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
950 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
951 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
952 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
955 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
956 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
957 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
958 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
959 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
960 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
962 @node Merging GLR Parses
963 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
964 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
965 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
969 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
971 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
976 #define YYSTYPE char const *
978 void yyerror (char const *);
992 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1001 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1002 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1003 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1004 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1005 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1009 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1010 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1011 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1012 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1016 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1017 | '(' declarator ')'
1022 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1023 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1030 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1031 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1032 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1033 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1034 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1035 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1036 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1037 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1038 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1039 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1040 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1041 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1042 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1043 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1045 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1046 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1047 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1048 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1049 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1050 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1051 The parser therefore prints
1054 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1057 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1058 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1065 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1066 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1067 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1068 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1069 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1070 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1071 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1072 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1073 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1074 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1080 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1081 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1082 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1083 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1088 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1089 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1094 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1098 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1106 with an accompanying forward declaration
1107 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1111 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1112 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1117 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1118 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1121 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1124 Bison requires that all of the
1125 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1126 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1127 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1128 the offending merge.
1130 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1131 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1133 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1134 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1135 the associated reduction.
1136 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1137 action in a GLR parser.
1140 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1142 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1144 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1145 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1146 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1147 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1148 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1149 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1150 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1151 influence syntax analysis.
1152 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1156 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1157 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1158 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1159 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1160 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1161 future versions of Bison.
1162 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1163 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1164 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1168 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1169 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1170 initiate error recovery.
1171 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1172 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1173 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1174 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1176 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1177 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1179 @node Compiler Requirements
1180 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1181 @cindex @code{inline}
1182 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1184 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1185 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1186 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1187 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1188 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1189 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1198 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1202 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1203 && ! defined inline)
1212 @cindex textual location
1213 @cindex location, textual
1215 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1216 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1217 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1218 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1220 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1221 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1222 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1223 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1226 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1227 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1228 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1231 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1232 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1233 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1234 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1235 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1236 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1237 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1240 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1241 @cindex Bison parser
1242 @cindex Bison utility
1243 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1246 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1247 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1248 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1249 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1250 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1251 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1252 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1255 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1256 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1257 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1260 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1261 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1262 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1263 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1264 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1265 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1266 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1268 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1269 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1270 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1271 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1272 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1273 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1274 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1275 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1276 C-Language Interface}.
1278 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1279 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1280 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1281 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1282 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1283 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1284 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1285 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1286 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1287 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1288 anything other than their usual meanings.
1290 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1291 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1292 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1293 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1294 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1295 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1296 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1297 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1298 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1301 @section Stages in Using Bison
1302 @cindex stages in using Bison
1305 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1306 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1310 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1311 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1312 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1313 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1314 sequence of C statements.
1317 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1318 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1319 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1320 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1323 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1326 Write error-reporting routines.
1329 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1330 must follow these steps:
1334 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1337 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1340 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1343 @node Grammar Layout
1344 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1345 @cindex grammar file
1347 @cindex format of grammar file
1348 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1350 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1351 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1358 @var{Bison declarations}
1367 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1368 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1370 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1371 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1372 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1373 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1374 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1375 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1377 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1378 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1379 semantic values of various symbols.
1381 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1384 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1385 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1386 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1390 @cindex simple examples
1391 @cindex examples, simple
1393 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1394 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1395 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1396 and a multi-function calculator. All
1397 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1399 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1400 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1401 source file to try them.
1404 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1405 a first example with no operator precedence.
1406 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1407 Operator precedence is introduced.
1408 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1409 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1410 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1411 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1412 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1416 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1417 @cindex reverse polish notation
1418 @cindex polish notation calculator
1419 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1420 @cindex calculator, simple
1422 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1423 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1424 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1425 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1427 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1428 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1431 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1432 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1433 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1434 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1435 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1436 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1437 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1440 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1441 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1443 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1444 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1447 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1450 #define YYSTYPE double
1453 void yyerror (char const *);
1458 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1461 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1462 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1464 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1465 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1466 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1467 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1468 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1469 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1470 which is a floating point number.
1472 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1473 function @code{pow}.
1475 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1476 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1477 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1478 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1481 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1482 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1483 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1484 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1485 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1486 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1487 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1488 type for numeric constants.
1491 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1493 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1506 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1513 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1514 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1515 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1516 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1517 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1518 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1524 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1525 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1526 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1527 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1528 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1531 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1532 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1533 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1535 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1536 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1537 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1538 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1539 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1540 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1549 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1551 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1560 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1561 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1562 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1563 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1564 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1566 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1567 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1568 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1569 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1570 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1571 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1573 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1574 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1575 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1576 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1579 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1580 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1581 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1584 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1586 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1591 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1595 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1596 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1597 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1598 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1599 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1600 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1601 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1603 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1604 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1605 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1606 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1607 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1610 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1612 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1613 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1614 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1615 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1620 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1621 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1626 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1627 equally well have written them separately:
1631 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1632 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1636 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1637 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1638 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1639 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1640 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1641 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1642 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1643 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1645 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1646 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1647 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1649 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1650 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1654 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1658 means the same thing as this:
1663 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1669 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1672 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1673 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1674 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1676 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1677 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1678 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1679 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1681 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1683 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1684 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1685 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1686 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1688 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1689 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1690 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1691 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1692 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1693 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1694 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1695 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1696 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1698 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1699 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1700 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1701 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1702 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1704 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1705 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1707 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1711 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1712 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1713 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1714 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1725 /* Skip white space. */
1726 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1730 /* Process numbers. */
1731 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1734 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1739 /* Return end-of-input. */
1742 /* Return a single char. */
1749 @subsection The Controlling Function
1750 @cindex controlling function
1751 @cindex main function in simple example
1753 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1754 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1755 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1768 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1769 @cindex error reporting routine
1771 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1772 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1773 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1774 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1775 here is the definition we will use:
1783 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1785 yyerror (char const *s)
1787 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1792 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1793 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1794 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1795 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1796 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1797 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1799 @node Rpcalc Generate
1800 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1801 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1803 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1804 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1805 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1806 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1807 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1808 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1810 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1811 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1813 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1814 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1821 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1822 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1823 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1824 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1825 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1826 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1827 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1829 @node Rpcalc Compile
1830 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1831 @cindex compiling the parser
1833 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1837 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1839 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1843 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1844 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1845 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1849 # @r{List files again.}
1851 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1855 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1856 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1862 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1864 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1868 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1870 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1875 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1876 @cindex infix notation calculator
1878 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1880 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1881 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1882 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1883 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1886 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1890 #define YYSTYPE double
1894 void yyerror (char const *);
1899 /* Bison declarations. */
1903 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1904 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1907 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1918 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1925 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1926 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1927 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1928 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1929 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1930 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1931 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1938 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1941 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1943 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1944 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1945 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1946 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1947 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1948 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1951 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1952 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1953 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1954 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1955 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1958 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1959 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1960 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1961 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1962 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1964 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1969 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1977 @node Simple Error Recovery
1978 @section Simple Error Recovery
1979 @cindex error recovery, simple
1981 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1982 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1983 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1984 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1985 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1986 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1988 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1989 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1990 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1996 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1997 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2002 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2003 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2004 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2005 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2006 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2007 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2008 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2009 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2012 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2013 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2014 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2015 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2016 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2017 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2020 @node Location Tracking Calc
2021 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2022 @cindex location tracking calculator
2023 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2024 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2026 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2027 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2028 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2029 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2033 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2034 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2035 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2038 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2039 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2041 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2042 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2045 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2051 void yyerror (char const *);
2054 /* Bison declarations. */
2062 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2066 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2067 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2068 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2069 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2070 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2071 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2072 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2076 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2078 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2079 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2080 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2081 from the new information.
2083 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2084 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2097 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2104 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2105 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2106 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2116 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2117 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2118 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2123 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2124 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2125 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2129 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2130 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2131 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2133 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2134 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2135 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2136 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2137 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2138 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2142 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2144 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2145 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2146 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2149 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2150 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2161 /* Skip white space. */
2162 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2163 ++yylloc.last_column;
2168 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2169 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2173 /* Process numbers. */
2177 ++yylloc.last_column;
2178 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2180 ++yylloc.last_column;
2181 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2188 /* Return end-of-input. */
2193 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2197 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2200 ++yylloc.last_column;
2206 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2207 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2208 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2209 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2211 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2212 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2213 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2214 controlling function:
2221 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2222 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2228 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2229 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2230 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2232 @node Multi-function Calc
2233 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2234 @cindex multi-function calculator
2235 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2236 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2238 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2239 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2240 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2241 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2242 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2244 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2245 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2246 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2247 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2248 functions whose syntax has this form:
2251 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2255 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2256 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2257 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2261 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2265 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2271 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2276 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2279 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2280 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2281 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2284 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2285 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2287 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2289 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2293 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2294 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2296 void yyerror (char const *);
2301 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2302 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2305 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2306 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2313 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2314 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2316 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2319 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2320 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2321 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2323 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2324 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2325 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2326 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2328 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2329 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2330 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2331 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2332 between angle brackets).
2334 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2335 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2336 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2337 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2338 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2339 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2342 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2344 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2345 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2346 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2348 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2360 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2361 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2368 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2369 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2370 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2371 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2372 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2373 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2374 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2375 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2376 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2377 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2380 /* End of grammar. */
2384 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2385 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2386 @cindex symbol table example
2388 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2389 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2390 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2391 requires some additional C functions for support.
2393 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2394 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2395 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2397 @comment file: calc.h
2400 /* Function type. */
2401 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2405 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2408 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2409 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2412 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2413 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2415 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2420 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2422 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2423 extern symrec *sym_table;
2425 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2426 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2430 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2431 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2432 @code{init_table} as well:
2438 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2440 yyerror (char const *s)
2450 double (*fnct) (double);
2455 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2468 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2473 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2478 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2480 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2481 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2496 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2497 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2499 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2500 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2501 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2502 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2503 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2504 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2506 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2508 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2509 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2513 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2515 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2516 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2517 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2518 ptr->type = sym_type;
2519 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2520 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2528 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2531 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2532 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2533 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2540 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2541 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2542 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2543 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2545 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2546 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2547 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2548 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2549 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2550 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2552 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2553 operators in @code{yylex}.
2555 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2567 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2568 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2576 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2577 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2580 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2586 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2589 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2590 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2591 static size_t length = 40;
2592 static char *symbuf = 0;
2598 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2604 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2608 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2610 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2612 /* Get another character. */
2617 while (isalnum (c));
2624 s = getsym (symbuf);
2626 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2631 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2637 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2638 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2639 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2647 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2650 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2651 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2652 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2655 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2656 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2660 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2662 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2663 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2665 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2666 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2669 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2670 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2671 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2672 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2673 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2674 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2675 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2676 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2677 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2680 @node Grammar Outline
2681 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2683 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2684 appropriate delimiters:
2691 @var{Bison declarations}
2700 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2701 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2702 continues until end of line.
2705 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2706 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2707 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2708 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2709 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2713 @subsection The prologue
2714 @cindex declarations section
2716 @cindex declarations
2718 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2719 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2720 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2721 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2722 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2723 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2724 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2726 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2727 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2730 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2731 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2732 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2733 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2734 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2735 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2736 @code{%union} declaration.
2747 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2751 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2752 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2758 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2759 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2760 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2761 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2762 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2763 @code{#include} directives.
2765 @node Prologue Alternatives
2766 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2767 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2770 @findex %code requires
2771 @findex %code provides
2774 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2775 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2776 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2777 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2778 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2779 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2780 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2782 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2793 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2797 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2798 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2805 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2806 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2807 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2808 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2809 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2810 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2811 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2812 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2813 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2814 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2815 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2817 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2818 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2819 This behavior raises a few questions.
2820 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2821 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2822 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2823 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2824 This behavior is not intuitive.
2826 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2827 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2828 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2829 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2836 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2837 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2840 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2841 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2853 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2857 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2858 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2859 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2866 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2867 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2868 explicit which kind you intend.
2869 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2871 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2872 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2873 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2874 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2875 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2876 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2877 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2878 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2879 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2882 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2883 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2885 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2903 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2909 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2910 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2923 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2924 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2925 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2933 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2934 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2935 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2936 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2937 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2938 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2940 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2941 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2942 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2943 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2944 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2945 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2946 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2947 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2948 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2949 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2950 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2953 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2954 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2955 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2956 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2957 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2958 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2959 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2960 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2961 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2962 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2980 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2986 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2987 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3000 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3006 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3007 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3015 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3016 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3017 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3020 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3021 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3022 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3023 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3024 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3025 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3028 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3029 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3030 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3031 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3033 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3034 organize your grammar file.
3035 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3040 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3041 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3042 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3043 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3047 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3048 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3049 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3050 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3055 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3056 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3058 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3060 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3061 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3062 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3063 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3065 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3066 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3067 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3068 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3069 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3070 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3071 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3072 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3075 @node Bison Declarations
3076 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3077 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3078 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3080 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3081 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3082 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3083 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3086 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3087 @cindex grammar rules section
3088 @cindex rules section for grammar
3090 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3091 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3093 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3094 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3095 if it is the first thing in the file.
3098 @subsection The epilogue
3099 @cindex additional C code section
3101 @cindex C code, section for additional
3103 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3104 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3105 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3106 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3107 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3108 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3109 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3110 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3111 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3112 C-Language Interface}.
3114 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3115 from the grammar rules.
3117 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3118 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3119 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3120 of the grammar file.
3123 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3124 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3125 @cindex terminal symbol
3129 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3132 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3133 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3134 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3135 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3136 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3137 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3138 the symbol to stand for it.
3140 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3141 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3142 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3144 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3145 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3146 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3147 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3148 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3149 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3150 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3152 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3156 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3157 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3158 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3159 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3162 @cindex character token
3163 @cindex literal token
3164 @cindex single-character literal
3165 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3166 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3167 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3168 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3169 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3170 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3171 ,Operator Precedence}).
3173 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3174 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3175 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3176 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3177 your program will confuse other readers.
3179 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3180 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3181 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3182 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3183 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3184 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3188 @cindex string token
3189 @cindex literal string token
3190 @cindex multicharacter literal
3191 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3192 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3193 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3194 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3195 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3197 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3198 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3199 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3200 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3201 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3203 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3205 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3206 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3207 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3208 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3209 read your program will be confused.
3211 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3212 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3213 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3214 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3215 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3216 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3219 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3220 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3221 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3223 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3224 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3225 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3226 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3227 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3228 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3229 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3230 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3231 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3232 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3233 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3234 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3236 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3237 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3238 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3239 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3240 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3242 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3243 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3244 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3245 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3246 characters in the following C-language string:
3249 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3252 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3253 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3254 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3255 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3256 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3257 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3258 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3259 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3260 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3261 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3264 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3265 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3266 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3267 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3268 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3271 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3273 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3274 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3276 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3280 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3285 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3286 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3287 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3298 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3299 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3301 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3302 extra white space as you wish.
3304 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3305 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3308 @{@var{C statements}@}
3313 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3314 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3315 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3316 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3317 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3318 compiler can check it.
3320 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3321 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3322 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3323 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3324 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3325 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3326 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3327 character constants.
3329 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3333 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3334 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3339 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3340 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3347 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3349 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3350 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3351 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3370 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3374 @section Recursive Rules
3375 @cindex recursive rule
3377 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3378 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3379 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3380 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3381 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3392 @cindex left recursion
3393 @cindex right recursion
3395 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3396 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3397 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3409 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3410 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3411 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3412 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3413 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3414 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3415 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3418 @cindex mutual recursion
3419 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3420 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3421 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3430 | primary '+' primary
3443 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3447 @section Defining Language Semantics
3448 @cindex defining language semantics
3449 @cindex language semantics, defining
3451 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3452 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3453 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3455 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3456 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3457 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3458 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3461 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3462 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3463 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3464 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3465 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3466 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3467 action in the middle of a rule.
3471 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3472 @cindex semantic value type
3473 @cindex value type, semantic
3474 @cindex data types of semantic values
3475 @cindex default data type
3477 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3478 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3479 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3480 Notation Calculator}).
3482 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3483 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3484 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3487 #define YYSTYPE double
3491 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3492 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3493 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3494 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3496 @node Multiple Types
3497 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3499 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3500 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3501 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3502 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3505 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3506 requires you to do two things:
3510 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3511 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3512 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3513 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3517 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3518 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3519 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3520 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3521 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3530 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3532 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3533 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3534 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3535 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3537 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3538 placed at any position in the rule;
3539 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3540 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3541 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3542 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3544 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3545 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3546 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3547 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3548 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3549 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3550 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3551 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3552 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3553 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3556 Here is a typical example:
3562 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3566 Or, in terms of named references:
3572 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3577 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3578 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3579 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3580 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3581 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3582 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3584 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3585 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3586 referred to as @code{$2}.
3588 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3589 references construct.
3591 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3592 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3593 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3594 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3595 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3599 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3603 @cindex default action
3604 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3605 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3606 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3607 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3608 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3609 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3611 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3612 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3613 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3614 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3615 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3620 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3621 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3627 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3632 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3633 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3634 definition of @code{foo}.
3637 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3638 any, from a semantic action.
3639 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3640 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3643 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3644 @cindex action data types
3645 @cindex data types in actions
3647 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3648 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3650 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3651 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3652 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3653 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3654 in the rule. In this example,
3660 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3665 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3666 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3667 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3668 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3670 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3671 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3672 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3684 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3685 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3687 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3688 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3689 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3690 @cindex mid-rule actions
3692 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3693 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3694 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3696 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3697 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3698 it is run before they are parsed.
3700 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3701 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3702 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3703 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3706 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3707 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3708 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3709 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3710 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3711 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3713 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3714 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3715 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3716 at the end of the rule.
3718 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3719 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3720 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3721 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3722 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3723 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3729 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3731 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3736 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3737 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3738 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3739 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3740 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3741 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3742 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3743 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3745 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3746 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3747 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3748 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3749 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3752 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3753 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3754 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3755 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3756 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3758 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3759 Discarded Symbols}).
3760 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3761 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3763 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3764 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3769 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3783 $$ = push_context ();
3784 declare_variable ($3);
3791 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3792 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3793 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3795 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3796 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3797 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3798 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3799 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3805 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3806 | '@{' statements '@}'
3812 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3817 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3818 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3821 | '@{' statements '@}'
3827 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3828 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3829 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3830 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3831 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3832 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3834 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3835 actions into the two rules, like this:
3840 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3841 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3842 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3843 '@{' statements '@}'
3849 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3850 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3852 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3853 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3854 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3859 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3860 declarations statements '@}'
3861 | '@{' statements '@}'
3867 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3868 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3870 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3871 serves as a subroutine:
3876 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3882 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3883 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3889 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3890 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3892 @node Tracking Locations
3893 @section Tracking Locations
3895 @cindex textual location
3896 @cindex location, textual
3898 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3899 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3900 especially symbol locations.
3902 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3903 actions to take when rules are matched.
3906 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3907 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3908 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3912 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3913 @cindex data type of locations
3914 @cindex default location type
3916 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3917 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3919 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3920 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3921 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3922 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3926 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3935 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3936 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3937 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3938 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3939 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3941 @node Actions and Locations
3942 @subsection Actions and Locations
3943 @cindex location actions
3944 @cindex actions, location
3947 @vindex @@@var{name}
3948 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3950 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3951 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3953 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3954 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3955 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3956 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3957 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3960 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3961 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3962 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3963 references construct.
3965 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3973 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3974 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3975 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3976 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3983 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3984 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3985 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3991 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3992 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3993 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3996 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3997 example above simply rewrites this way:
4011 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4012 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4013 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4020 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4021 from a semantic action.
4022 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4023 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4025 @node Location Default Action
4026 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4027 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4028 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4030 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4031 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4032 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4033 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4034 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4035 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4036 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4037 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4040 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4041 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4043 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4044 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4045 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4046 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4047 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4048 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4049 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4050 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4051 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4052 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4054 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4058 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4062 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4063 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4064 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4065 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4069 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4070 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4071 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4072 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4079 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4080 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4081 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4083 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4087 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4088 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4091 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4092 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4093 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4094 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4097 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4098 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4099 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4100 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4103 @node Named References
4104 @section Named References
4105 @cindex named references
4107 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4108 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4109 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4110 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4111 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4112 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4114 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4115 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4116 used as named references. For example:
4120 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4121 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4126 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4130 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4131 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4136 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4142 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4145 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4148 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4153 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4154 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4155 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4158 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4159 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4164 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4165 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4166 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4169 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4170 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4176 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4177 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4180 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4181 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4185 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4186 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4187 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4188 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4189 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4190 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4191 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4193 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4197 @section Bison Declarations
4198 @cindex declarations, Bison
4199 @cindex Bison declarations
4201 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4202 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4205 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4206 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4207 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4208 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4210 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4211 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4212 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4213 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4216 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4217 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4218 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4219 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4220 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4221 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4222 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4223 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4224 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4225 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4226 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4227 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4228 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4229 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4233 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4234 @cindex version requirement
4235 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4238 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4239 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4243 %require "@var{version}"
4247 @subsection Token Type Names
4248 @cindex declaring token type names
4249 @cindex token type names, declaring
4250 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4253 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4259 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4260 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4261 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4263 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4264 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4265 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4268 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4269 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4270 following the token name:
4274 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4278 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4279 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4280 with each other or with normal characters.
4282 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4283 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4284 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4285 Than One Value Type}).
4291 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4295 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4299 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4300 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4301 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4308 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4309 equivalent literal string tokens:
4312 %token <operator> OR "||"
4313 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4318 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4319 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4320 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4321 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4322 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4323 the literal string instead of the token name.
4325 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4326 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4330 %token END 0 "end of file"
4333 @node Precedence Decl
4334 @subsection Operator Precedence
4335 @cindex precedence declarations
4336 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4337 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4339 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4340 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4341 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4342 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4343 operator precedence.
4345 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4346 @code{%token}: either
4349 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4356 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4359 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4360 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4361 all the @var{symbols}:
4365 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4366 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4367 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4368 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4369 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4370 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4371 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4372 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4373 considered a syntax error.
4376 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4377 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4378 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4379 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4380 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4383 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4384 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4385 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4386 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4391 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4392 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4396 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4397 @cindex declaring value types
4398 @cindex value types, declaring
4401 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4402 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4403 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4418 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4419 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4420 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4421 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4423 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4424 @code{union}. For example:
4436 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4437 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4440 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4441 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4442 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4444 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4445 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4447 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4448 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4449 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4450 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4458 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4463 and then your grammar can use the following
4464 instead of @code{%union}:
4477 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4478 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4479 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4483 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4484 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4485 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4488 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4492 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4493 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4494 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4495 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4496 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4499 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4500 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4501 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4502 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4504 @node Initial Action Decl
4505 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4506 @findex %initial-action
4508 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4509 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4512 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4513 @findex %initial-action
4514 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4515 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4516 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4517 @code{%parse-param}.
4520 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4523 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4526 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4531 @node Destructor Decl
4532 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4533 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4537 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4538 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4539 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4540 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4541 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4542 must discard the start symbol.
4544 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4545 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4546 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4547 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4549 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4550 symbol is automatically discarded.
4552 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4554 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4556 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4557 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4558 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4559 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4561 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4562 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4563 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4564 tag among @var{symbols}.
4565 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4566 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4567 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4569 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4570 (These default forms are experimental.
4571 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4573 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4574 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4575 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4576 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4578 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4579 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4580 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4581 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4582 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4589 %union @{ char *string; @}
4590 %token <string> STRING1
4591 %token <string> STRING2
4592 %type <string> string1
4593 %type <string> string2
4594 %union @{ char character; @}
4595 %token <character> CHR
4596 %type <character> chr
4599 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4600 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4601 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4602 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4606 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4607 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4608 to @code{free} by default.
4609 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4610 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4611 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4612 @code{free} only once.
4613 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4614 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4616 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4617 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4618 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4619 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4620 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4621 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4622 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4623 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4624 reference it in your grammar.
4625 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4626 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4632 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4633 @cindex mid-rule actions
4634 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4635 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4636 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4637 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4638 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4639 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4640 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4641 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4645 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4646 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4647 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4652 @cindex discarded symbols
4653 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4657 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4659 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4661 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4662 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4664 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4667 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4668 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4671 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4672 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4673 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4677 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4678 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4679 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4680 @cindex warnings, preventing
4681 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4685 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4686 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4687 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4688 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4689 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4690 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4692 The declaration looks like this:
4698 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4699 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4700 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4701 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4703 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4704 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4705 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4706 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4707 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4708 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4709 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4715 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4719 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4720 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4721 print the number of conflicts.
4724 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4725 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4726 go back to the beginning.
4729 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4730 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4731 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4734 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4735 but will keep silent otherwise.
4738 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4739 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4740 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4741 @cindex default start symbol
4744 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4745 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4746 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4753 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4754 @cindex reentrant parser
4756 @findex %define api.pure
4758 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4759 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4760 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4761 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4762 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4763 program must be called only within interlocks.
4765 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4766 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4767 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4768 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4769 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4771 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4772 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4773 reentrant. It looks like this:
4779 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4780 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4781 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4782 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4783 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4784 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4785 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4786 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4787 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4789 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4790 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4794 @subsection A Push Parser
4797 @findex %define api.push-pull
4799 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4800 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4802 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4803 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4804 each time a new token is made available.
4806 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4807 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4808 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4809 within a certain time period.
4811 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4812 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4813 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4816 %define api.push-pull push
4819 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4820 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4821 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4822 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4823 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4827 %define api.push-pull push
4830 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4831 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4832 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4833 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4835 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4836 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4837 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4838 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4839 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4840 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4841 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4842 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4846 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4848 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4849 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4850 yypstate_delete (ps);
4853 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4854 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4855 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4856 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4857 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4858 example would thus look like this:
4863 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4866 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4867 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4868 yypstate_delete (ps);
4871 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4872 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4874 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4875 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4876 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4877 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4878 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4879 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4880 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4881 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4882 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4883 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4884 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4885 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4886 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4887 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4888 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4889 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4890 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4894 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4895 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4896 yypstate_delete (ps);
4899 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4900 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4901 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4904 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4905 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4906 @cindex declaration summary
4907 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4909 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4911 @deffn {Directive} %union
4912 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4913 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4916 @deffn {Directive} %token
4917 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4918 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4921 @deffn {Directive} %right
4922 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4923 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4926 @deffn {Directive} %left
4927 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4928 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4931 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4932 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4933 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4934 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4938 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4939 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4940 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4944 @deffn {Directive} %type
4945 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4946 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4949 @deffn {Directive} %start
4950 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4954 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4955 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4956 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4962 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4965 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4966 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4968 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4969 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4970 @xref{%code Summary}.
4973 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4974 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4975 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4976 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4979 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4980 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4981 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4982 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
4985 @deffn {Directive} %defines
4986 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
4987 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
4988 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
4989 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
4991 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
4992 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
4993 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
4994 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
4995 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
4996 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
4997 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
4998 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
4999 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5000 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5002 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5003 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5004 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5006 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5007 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5008 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5010 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5011 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5012 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5013 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5014 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5016 @findex %code requires
5017 @findex %code provides
5018 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5019 header also contains their code.
5020 @xref{%code Summary}.
5023 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5024 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5027 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5028 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5029 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5032 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5033 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5034 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5037 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5038 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5039 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5040 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5042 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5046 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5047 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5048 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5049 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5050 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5051 accurate syntax error messages.
5054 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5055 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5056 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5058 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5059 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5060 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5061 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5062 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5063 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5064 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5065 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5067 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5071 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5072 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5073 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5078 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5079 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5080 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5081 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5082 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5083 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5084 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5088 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5089 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5092 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5093 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5094 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5098 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5099 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5100 Require a Version of Bison}.
5103 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5104 Specify the skeleton to use.
5106 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5107 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5108 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5109 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5111 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5112 file in the Bison installation directory.
5113 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5114 directory of the grammar file.
5115 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5118 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5119 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5120 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5121 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5122 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5123 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5124 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5127 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5128 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5129 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5130 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5131 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5132 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5133 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5136 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5137 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5138 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5142 The highest token number, plus one.
5144 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5146 The number of grammar rules,
5148 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5152 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5153 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5154 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5155 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5159 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5160 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5161 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5165 @node %define Summary
5166 @subsection %define Summary
5168 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5169 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5170 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5171 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5172 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5173 @code{%define} directive:
5175 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5176 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5177 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5178 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5180 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5181 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5182 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5183 to specifying @code{""}.
5185 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5186 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5187 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5190 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5191 @code{%define} accepts.
5193 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5194 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5198 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5200 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5201 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5203 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5205 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5206 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5209 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5210 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5211 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5212 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5213 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5214 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5217 @c ================================================== api.pure
5219 @findex %define api.pure
5222 @item Language(s): C
5224 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5225 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5227 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5229 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5233 @findex %define api.push-pull
5236 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5238 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5239 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5240 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5241 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5243 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5245 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5248 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5250 @item lr.default-reductions
5251 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5254 @item Language(s): all
5256 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5257 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5258 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5259 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5261 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5262 @item Default Value:
5264 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5265 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5269 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5271 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5272 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5275 @item Language(s): all
5276 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5277 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5278 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5279 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5282 @c ================================================== lr.type
5285 @findex %define lr.type
5288 @item Language(s): all
5290 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5291 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5292 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5294 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5296 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5300 @findex %define namespace
5303 @item Languages(s): C++
5305 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5306 For example, if you specify:
5309 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5312 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5315 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5318 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5319 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5322 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5328 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5329 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5330 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5332 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5334 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5335 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5336 lexical analyzer function.
5337 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5338 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5339 lexical analyzer function.
5340 For example, if you specify:
5343 %define namespace "foo"
5344 %name-prefix "bar::"
5347 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5351 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5353 @findex %define parse.lac
5356 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5358 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5359 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5360 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5361 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5367 @subsection %code Summary
5371 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5372 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5373 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5374 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5375 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5376 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5377 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5378 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5380 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5381 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5382 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5383 in the parser implementation.
5385 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5386 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5387 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5389 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5392 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5393 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5394 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5395 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5396 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5397 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5401 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5402 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5403 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5406 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5407 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5411 @findex %code requires
5414 @item Language(s): C, C++
5416 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5417 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5418 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5419 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5420 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5422 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5423 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5428 @findex %code provides
5431 @item Language(s): C, C++
5433 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5434 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5436 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5437 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5445 @item Language(s): C, C++
5447 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5448 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5449 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5450 parser implementation file. For example:
5459 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5463 @findex %code imports
5466 @item Language(s): Java
5468 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5470 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5471 before any class definitions.
5475 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5476 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5477 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5478 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5481 @node Multiple Parsers
5482 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5484 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5485 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5486 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5487 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5489 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5490 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5491 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5492 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5493 names that do not conflict.
5495 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5496 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5497 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5498 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5499 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5500 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5501 @code{clex}, and so on.
5503 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5504 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5505 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5506 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5507 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5509 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5510 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5511 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5512 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5515 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5516 @cindex C-language interface
5519 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5520 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5521 functions that it needs to use.
5523 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5524 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5525 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5526 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5529 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5530 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5531 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5532 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5533 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5534 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5536 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5537 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5538 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5542 @node Parser Function
5543 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5546 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5547 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5548 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5549 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5550 without reading further.
5553 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5554 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5555 is due to end-of-input).
5557 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5558 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5561 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5564 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5569 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5574 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5577 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5578 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5579 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5581 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5582 @findex %parse-param
5583 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5584 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5585 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5586 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5587 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5590 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5593 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5594 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5598 Then call the parser like this:
5602 int nastiness, randomness;
5603 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5604 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5610 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5613 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5616 @node Push Parser Function
5617 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5618 @findex yypush_parse
5620 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5621 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5623 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5624 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5625 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5626 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5628 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5629 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5630 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5631 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5634 @node Pull Parser Function
5635 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5636 @findex yypull_parse
5638 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5639 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5641 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5642 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5643 declaration is used.
5644 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5646 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5647 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5650 @node Parser Create Function
5651 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5652 @findex yypstate_new
5654 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5655 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5657 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5658 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5659 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5660 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5662 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5663 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5664 or 0 if no memory was available.
5665 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5669 @node Parser Delete Function
5670 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5671 @findex yypstate_delete
5673 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5674 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5676 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5677 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5678 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5679 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5681 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5682 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5683 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5687 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5689 @cindex lexical analyzer
5691 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5692 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5693 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5694 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5696 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5697 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5698 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5699 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5700 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5701 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5702 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5706 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5707 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5708 of the token it has read.
5709 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5710 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5712 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5713 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5716 @node Calling Convention
5717 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5719 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5720 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5721 signifies end-of-input.
5723 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5724 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5725 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5726 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5728 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5729 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5730 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5731 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5732 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5733 signifies end-of-input.
5735 Here is an example showing these things:
5742 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5745 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5746 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5748 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5754 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5755 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5757 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5758 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5762 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5763 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5764 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5765 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5768 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5769 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5770 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5771 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5772 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5775 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5776 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5777 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5778 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5781 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5784 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5785 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5786 strlen (token_buffer))
5787 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5788 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5793 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5794 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5798 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5801 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5802 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5803 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5804 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5810 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5811 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5816 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5817 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5818 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5819 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5820 declaration looks like this:
5833 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5838 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5839 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5844 @node Token Locations
5845 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5848 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
5849 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
5850 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
5851 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
5852 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
5853 data in that variable.
5855 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5856 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5857 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5858 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5859 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5862 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5865 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5867 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5868 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5869 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5870 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5871 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5872 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5877 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5880 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5881 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5886 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5887 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5888 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5892 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5893 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5896 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5898 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5899 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5905 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5906 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5907 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5911 results in the following signature:
5914 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5915 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5918 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
5921 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
5922 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5926 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
5929 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
5930 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5933 @node Error Reporting
5934 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
5935 @cindex error reporting function
5938 @cindex syntax error
5940 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
5941 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
5942 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
5943 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
5946 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
5947 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
5948 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
5949 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
5950 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
5952 @findex %error-verbose
5953 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
5954 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
5955 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
5956 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
5957 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
5959 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
5960 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
5961 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
5962 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
5963 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
5964 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
5966 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
5967 translated automatically from English to some other language before
5968 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
5970 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
5975 yyerror (char const *s)
5979 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
5984 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
5985 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
5986 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
5987 immediately return 1.
5989 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
5990 an access to the current location.
5991 This is indeed the case for the GLR
5992 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
5993 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5997 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5998 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6001 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6004 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6005 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6008 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6009 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6010 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6011 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6015 /* Location tracking. */
6019 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6021 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6022 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6026 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6029 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6030 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6031 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6032 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6037 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6038 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6039 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6040 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6041 message is always passed last.
6043 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6044 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6045 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6049 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6050 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6051 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6052 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6054 @node Action Features
6055 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6056 @cindex summary, action features
6057 @cindex action features summary
6059 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6060 are useful in actions.
6062 @deffn {Variable} $$
6063 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6064 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6067 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6068 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6069 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6072 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6073 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6074 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6075 Types of Values in Actions}.
6078 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6079 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6080 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6081 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6084 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6085 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6086 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6089 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6090 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6091 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6094 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6096 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6097 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6098 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6099 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6100 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6101 going to be reduced by this rule.
6103 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6104 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6105 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6108 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6111 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6112 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6115 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6116 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6120 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6121 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6122 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6123 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6124 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6125 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6128 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6129 @findex YYRECOVERING
6130 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6131 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6132 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6135 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6136 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6137 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6138 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6139 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6141 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6144 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6145 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6147 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6149 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6152 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6153 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6154 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6155 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6158 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6159 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6160 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6161 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6163 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6166 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6167 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6168 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6169 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6171 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6176 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6177 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6180 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6184 @c int first_line, last_line;
6185 @c int first_column, last_column;
6189 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6190 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6192 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6193 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6194 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6197 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6200 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6202 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6203 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6207 @node Internationalization
6208 @section Parser Internationalization
6209 @cindex internationalization
6215 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6216 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6217 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6218 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6219 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6220 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6221 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6222 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6225 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6226 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6227 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6232 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6233 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6234 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6235 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6236 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6240 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6245 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6246 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6247 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6248 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6249 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6250 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6251 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6252 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6253 Bison-generated parser.
6256 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6257 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6258 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6262 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6265 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6266 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6267 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6271 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6272 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6273 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6276 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6282 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6286 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6292 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6293 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6294 @cindex algorithm of parser
6297 @cindex parser stack
6298 @cindex stack, parser
6300 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6301 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6302 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6304 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6305 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6308 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6309 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6310 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6311 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6312 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6313 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6314 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6316 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6323 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6324 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6327 expr: expr '*' expr;
6331 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6338 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6339 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6341 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6342 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6343 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6345 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6348 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6349 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6350 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6351 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6352 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6353 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6354 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6355 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6356 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6357 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6361 @section Lookahead Tokens
6362 @cindex lookahead token
6364 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6365 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6366 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6367 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6368 token in order to decide what to do.
6370 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6371 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6372 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6373 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6374 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6375 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6376 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6379 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6380 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6381 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6400 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6401 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6402 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6403 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6404 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6406 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6407 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6408 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6409 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6410 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6411 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6416 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6417 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6418 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6419 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6422 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6424 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6425 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6426 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6428 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6429 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6435 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6441 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6442 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6444 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6445 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6446 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6447 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6450 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6451 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6452 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6453 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6454 contrast it with the other alternative.
6456 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6457 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6461 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6463 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6466 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6467 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6468 making these two inputs equivalent:
6471 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6473 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6476 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6477 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6478 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6479 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6480 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6481 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6482 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6483 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6485 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6486 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6487 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6488 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6490 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6492 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6493 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6494 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6499 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6512 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6522 @section Operator Precedence
6523 @cindex operator precedence
6524 @cindex precedence of operators
6526 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6527 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6528 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6529 shift and when to reduce.
6532 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6533 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6534 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6535 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6538 @node Why Precedence
6539 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6541 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6542 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6557 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6558 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6559 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6560 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6561 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6562 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6563 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6566 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6567 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6568 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6569 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6570 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6571 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6572 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6573 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6576 @cindex associativity
6577 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6578 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6579 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6580 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6581 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6582 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6583 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6584 makes right-associativity.
6586 @node Using Precedence
6587 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6592 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6593 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6594 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6595 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6596 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6597 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6598 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6601 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6602 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6603 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6604 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6605 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6607 @node Precedence Examples
6608 @subsection Precedence Examples
6610 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6618 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6619 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6620 declared with @code{'-'}:
6623 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6629 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6630 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6631 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6633 @node How Precedence
6634 @subsection How Precedence Works
6636 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6637 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6638 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6639 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6640 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6641 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6643 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6644 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6645 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6646 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6647 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6648 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6649 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6652 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6653 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6655 @node Contextual Precedence
6656 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6657 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6658 @cindex unary operator precedence
6659 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6660 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6663 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6664 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6665 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6666 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6668 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6669 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6670 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6671 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6674 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6675 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6676 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6677 modifier's syntax is:
6680 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6684 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6685 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6686 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6687 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6688 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6690 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6691 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6692 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6702 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6710 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6715 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6716 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6717 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6718 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6720 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6721 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6722 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6723 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6725 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6726 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6727 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6728 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6729 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6730 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6732 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6733 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6737 @section Parser States
6738 @cindex finite-state machine
6739 @cindex parser state
6740 @cindex state (of parser)
6742 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6743 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6744 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6745 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6746 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6748 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6749 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6750 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6751 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6752 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6753 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6754 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6755 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6758 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6759 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6760 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6763 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6764 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6765 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6767 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6768 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6771 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6772 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6777 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6779 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6785 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6786 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6792 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6793 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6794 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6795 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6796 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6797 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6799 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6800 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6801 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6803 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6804 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6805 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6806 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6807 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6809 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6810 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6811 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6812 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6816 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6817 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6821 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6827 | sequence redirects
6837 | redirects redirect
6842 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6843 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6844 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6845 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6846 in infinitely many ways!
6848 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6849 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6850 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6851 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6853 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6864 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6872 | sequence redirects
6886 | redirects redirect
6891 @node Mysterious Conflicts
6892 @section Mysterious Conflicts
6893 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
6895 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6903 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
6906 | name_list ':' type
6922 | name ',' name_list
6927 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6928 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6929 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6930 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6934 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6936 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
6937 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
6938 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
6940 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
6941 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
6942 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
6943 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
6944 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
6945 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
6946 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
6949 @cindex canonical LR
6950 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
6951 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
6952 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
6953 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
6954 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
6955 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
6956 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
6957 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
6959 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
6960 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
6961 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
6962 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
6963 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
6974 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
6979 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
6980 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
6981 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
6982 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
6983 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
6984 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
6986 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
6987 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
6988 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
6989 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
6990 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
6991 rather than the one for @code{name}.
6996 | name_list ':' type
7004 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7005 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7010 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7011 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7012 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7013 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7014 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7015 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7016 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7018 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7019 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7020 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7021 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7023 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7024 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7027 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7028 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7029 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7030 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7033 @node LR Table Construction
7034 @subsection LR Table Construction
7035 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7038 @cindex canonical LR
7039 @findex %define lr.type
7041 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7042 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7043 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7044 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7047 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7048 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7049 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7050 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7053 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7054 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7055 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7058 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7059 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7060 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7063 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7065 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7068 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7072 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7076 %define lr.type ielr
7079 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7080 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7081 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7082 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7083 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7084 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7085 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7086 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7087 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7088 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7090 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7091 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7092 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7093 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7099 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7102 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7104 @cindex GLR with LALR
7105 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7106 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7107 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7108 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7109 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7110 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7111 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7112 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7113 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7114 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7116 @item Malformed grammars.
7118 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7119 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7120 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7121 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7122 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7127 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7128 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7129 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7130 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7131 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7132 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7133 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7134 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7135 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7139 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7142 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7143 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7144 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7145 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7146 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7147 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7148 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7149 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7150 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7151 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7152 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7153 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7156 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7157 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7158 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7160 @node Default Reductions
7161 @subsection Default Reductions
7162 @cindex default reductions
7163 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7166 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7167 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7168 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7169 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7170 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7172 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7173 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7176 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7178 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7179 @cindex consistent states
7180 @cindex defaulted states
7181 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7182 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7183 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7184 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7185 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7186 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7187 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7188 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7189 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7190 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7191 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7193 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7194 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7195 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7196 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7197 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7198 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7199 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7200 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7201 should already be considered closed.
7203 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7205 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7206 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7207 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7208 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7209 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7210 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7211 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7212 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7213 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7217 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7218 @c sentence from being rejected.
7219 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7220 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7221 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7222 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7223 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7224 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7227 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7228 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7229 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7230 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7231 because the accept action ends the parse.
7233 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7234 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7235 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7236 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7237 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7238 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7239 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7240 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7241 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7242 split the parse instead.
7244 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7245 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7247 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7248 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7249 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7251 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7252 @item @code{consistent}
7253 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7256 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7257 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7262 @findex %define parse.lac
7264 @cindex lookahead correction
7266 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7267 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7268 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7269 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7270 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7271 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7272 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7273 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7274 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7276 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7277 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7278 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7279 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7280 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7282 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7283 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7284 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7285 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7287 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7288 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7290 @item @code{none} (default)
7293 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7294 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7298 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7299 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7300 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7301 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7302 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7303 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7304 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7305 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7306 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7307 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7310 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7311 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7312 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7313 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7314 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7315 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7316 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7317 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7318 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7319 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7321 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7322 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7323 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7324 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7325 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7326 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7327 language-recognition power.
7329 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7332 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7334 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7335 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7336 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7337 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7340 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7342 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7343 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7344 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7345 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7346 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7347 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7351 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7352 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7353 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7354 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7355 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7356 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7357 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7358 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7359 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7360 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7361 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7364 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7365 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7366 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7368 @node Unreachable States
7369 @subsection Unreachable States
7370 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7371 @cindex unreachable states
7373 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7374 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7375 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7376 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7378 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7379 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7380 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7381 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7383 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7384 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7385 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7388 There are a few caveats to consider:
7391 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7393 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7394 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7395 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7396 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7397 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7398 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7400 @item Other useless states.
7402 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7403 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7404 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7405 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7406 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7407 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7408 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7411 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7412 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7414 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7415 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7416 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7418 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7419 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7420 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7421 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7422 context-free languages.
7423 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7424 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7425 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7426 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7427 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7428 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7429 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7430 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7432 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7433 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7434 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7435 parser uses the same basic
7436 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7437 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7438 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7439 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7441 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7442 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7443 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7444 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7445 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7447 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7448 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7449 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7450 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7451 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7452 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7453 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7454 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7455 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7456 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7457 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7460 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7461 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7462 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7463 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7464 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7465 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7466 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7467 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7468 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7469 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7470 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7471 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7473 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7474 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7475 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7477 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7478 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7479 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7480 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7481 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7482 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7483 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7484 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7485 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7486 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7487 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7488 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7490 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7493 @node Memory Management
7494 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7495 @cindex memory exhaustion
7496 @cindex memory management
7497 @cindex stack overflow
7498 @cindex parser stack overflow
7499 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7501 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7502 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7503 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7505 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7506 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7507 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7510 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7511 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7512 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7513 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7515 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7516 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7517 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7518 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7519 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7520 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7522 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7523 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7524 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7527 @cindex default stack limit
7528 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7532 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7533 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7534 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7535 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7536 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7538 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7540 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7541 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7542 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7543 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7544 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7545 this deficiency in a future release.
7547 @node Error Recovery
7548 @chapter Error Recovery
7549 @cindex error recovery
7550 @cindex recovery from errors
7552 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7553 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7554 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7557 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7558 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7559 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7560 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7561 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7562 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7563 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7566 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7567 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7568 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7569 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7570 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7571 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7583 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7584 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7586 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7587 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7588 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7589 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7590 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7591 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7592 applicable in the ordinary way.
7594 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7595 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7596 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7597 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7598 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7599 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7600 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7601 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7602 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7603 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7604 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7605 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7607 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7608 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7609 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7612 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7615 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7616 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7617 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7618 spurious error message:
7628 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7629 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7630 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7631 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7632 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7633 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7634 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7637 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7638 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7639 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7640 error messages resume.
7642 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7643 as any other rules can.
7646 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7647 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7648 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7649 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7652 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7653 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7654 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7656 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7658 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7659 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7660 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7661 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7662 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7664 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7665 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7666 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7667 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7670 @node Context Dependency
7671 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7673 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7674 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7675 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7676 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7680 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7681 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7682 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7683 error recovery rules must be written.
7686 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7687 neither clean nor robust.)
7689 @node Semantic Tokens
7690 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7692 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7693 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7699 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7700 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7701 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7703 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7704 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7705 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7706 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7707 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7709 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7710 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7711 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7712 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7713 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7714 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7715 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7717 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7718 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7719 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7720 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7724 typedef int foo, bar;
7728 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7729 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7735 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7736 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7738 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7739 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7740 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7741 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7742 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7747 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7748 | declarator maybeasm
7754 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7755 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7761 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7762 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7763 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7765 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7766 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7767 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7768 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7769 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7770 the syntactic context.
7772 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7773 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7774 @cindex lexical tie-in
7776 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7777 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7780 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7781 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7782 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7783 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7784 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7791 void yyerror (char const *);
7800 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
7801 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
7802 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7816 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7817 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7818 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7820 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7821 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7822 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7825 @node Tie-in Recovery
7826 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7828 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7829 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7831 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7832 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7833 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7834 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7839 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7841 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
7845 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7846 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7847 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7848 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7849 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7851 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7853 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7854 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7855 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7861 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
7867 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7868 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7869 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7870 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7872 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7873 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7874 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7875 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7876 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7877 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7880 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7883 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7885 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7886 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7887 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7888 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7889 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7890 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7893 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7894 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7898 @section Understanding Your Parser
7900 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7901 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7902 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7903 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7904 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7906 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7907 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7908 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7909 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7910 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7911 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7912 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7914 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7932 @command{bison} reports:
7935 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7936 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7937 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7938 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7939 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7942 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7943 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7944 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7945 interpretation is the same.
7948 @cindex token, useless
7949 @cindex useless token
7950 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7951 @cindex useless nonterminal
7952 @cindex rule, useless
7953 @cindex useless rule
7954 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
7955 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
7956 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
7957 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
7960 Nonterminals useless in grammar
7963 Terminals unused in grammar
7966 Rules useless in grammar
7971 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7974 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7975 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7976 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7977 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7981 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
7996 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8000 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8013 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8018 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8024 @cindex pointed rule
8025 @cindex rule, pointed
8026 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8027 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8028 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8029 the location of the input cursor.
8034 0 $accept: . exp $end
8036 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8041 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8042 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8043 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8044 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8045 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8046 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8047 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8048 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8050 @cindex core, item set
8051 @cindex item set core
8052 @cindex kernel, item set
8053 @cindex item set core
8054 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8055 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8056 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8057 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8058 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8059 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8064 0 $accept: . exp $end
8065 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8071 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8077 In the state 1@dots{}
8084 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8088 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8089 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8090 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8091 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8096 0 $accept: exp . $end
8097 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8102 $end shift, and go to state 3
8103 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8104 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8105 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8106 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8110 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8111 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8112 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8113 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8114 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8117 @cindex accepting state
8118 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8124 0 $accept: exp $end .
8130 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8131 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8133 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8139 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8141 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8148 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8150 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8157 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8159 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8166 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8168 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8173 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8179 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8185 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8186 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8188 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8189 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8192 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8193 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8194 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8195 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8196 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8197 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8198 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8199 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8201 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8202 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8203 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8206 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8207 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8208 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8209 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8210 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8211 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8212 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8213 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8214 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8215 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8216 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8217 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8222 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8223 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8228 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8229 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8231 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8232 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8235 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8236 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8237 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8238 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8239 conflicts in the report:
8242 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8243 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8244 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8248 The remaining states are similar:
8254 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8260 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8261 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8263 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8264 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8270 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8276 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8278 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8279 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8285 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8291 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8292 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8293 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8294 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8296 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8297 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8298 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8299 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8300 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8305 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8306 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8307 @samp{*}, but also because the
8308 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8312 @section Tracing Your Parser
8315 @cindex tracing the parser
8317 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8318 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8320 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8323 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8325 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8326 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8327 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8328 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8331 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8332 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8333 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8335 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8337 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8338 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8339 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8340 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8342 the preferred solution.
8345 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8348 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8349 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8350 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8351 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8352 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8353 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8355 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8356 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8357 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8358 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8360 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8361 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8362 messages tell you these things:
8366 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8369 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8370 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8373 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8374 of the state stack afterward.
8377 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8378 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8379 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8380 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8381 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8382 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8383 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8384 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8385 grammar are to blame.
8387 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8388 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8389 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8390 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8391 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8394 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8395 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8396 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8397 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8398 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8399 value (from @code{yylval}).
8401 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8402 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8406 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8407 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) \
8408 print_token_value (file, type, value)
8411 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8414 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8417 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8418 else if (type == NUM)
8419 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8423 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8426 @chapter Invoking Bison
8427 @cindex invoking Bison
8428 @cindex Bison invocation
8429 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8431 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8437 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8438 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8439 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8440 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8441 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8442 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8443 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8444 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8445 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8446 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8447 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8452 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8455 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8458 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8461 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8463 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8464 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8465 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8468 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8469 in alphabetical order by short options.
8470 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8471 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8475 @section Bison Options
8477 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8478 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8479 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8480 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8481 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8484 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8485 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8488 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8494 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8498 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8500 @item --print-localedir
8501 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8503 @item --print-datadir
8504 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8508 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8509 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8510 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8511 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8512 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8513 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8514 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8515 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8516 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8517 for compatibility with POSIX:
8524 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8525 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8526 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8527 this option is specified.
8529 @item -W [@var{category}]
8530 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8531 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8534 @item midrule-values
8535 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8537 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8540 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8543 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8544 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8547 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8550 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8551 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8552 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8555 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8559 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8560 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8561 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8562 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8563 no effect on the conflict report.
8566 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8568 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8569 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8575 Turn off all the warnings.
8577 Treat warnings as errors.
8580 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8581 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8582 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8591 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8592 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8593 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8595 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8596 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8597 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8598 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8599 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8600 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8601 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8605 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8608 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8609 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8610 definition for @var{name}.
8612 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8613 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8614 definitions for @var{name}.
8616 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8617 definitions for @var{name}.
8620 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8621 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8622 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8624 @item -L @var{language}
8625 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8626 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8627 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8628 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8629 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8631 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8635 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8637 @item -p @var{prefix}
8638 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8639 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8640 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8644 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8645 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8646 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8647 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8648 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8649 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8652 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8653 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8654 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8656 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8657 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8658 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8659 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8661 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8662 file in the Bison installation directory.
8663 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8664 current working directory.
8665 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8668 @itemx --token-table
8669 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8676 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8677 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8678 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8679 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8682 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8683 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8684 with other short options.
8686 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8687 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8688 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8689 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8691 @item -r @var{things}
8692 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8693 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8694 separated list of @var{things} among:
8698 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8702 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8703 each rule's lookahead set.
8706 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8707 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8710 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8711 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8715 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8716 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8717 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8720 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8721 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8723 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8724 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8726 @item -g [@var{file}]
8727 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8728 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8729 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8730 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8731 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8732 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8735 @item -x [@var{file}]
8736 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8737 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8738 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8739 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8741 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8742 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8745 @node Option Cross Key
8746 @section Option Cross Key
8748 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8749 the corresponding short option and directive.
8751 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8752 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8753 @include cross-options.texi
8757 @section Yacc Library
8759 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8760 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8761 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8762 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8763 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8764 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8765 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8767 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8768 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8771 int yyerror (char const *);
8774 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8775 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8776 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8782 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8784 @node Other Languages
8785 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8788 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8789 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8793 @section C++ Parsers
8796 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8797 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8798 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8799 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8800 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8801 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8804 @node C++ Bison Interface
8805 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8806 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8810 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8811 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8812 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8813 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8815 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8817 @findex %define namespace
8818 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
8819 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
8820 generated in the following files:
8825 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8826 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8829 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8832 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8833 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8834 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8835 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8836 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8838 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8839 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8840 @samp{%defines} directive.
8843 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8844 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8846 @node C++ Semantic Values
8847 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8848 @c - No objects in unions
8850 @c - Printer and destructor
8852 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8853 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8854 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8855 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8856 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8859 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8860 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8861 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8863 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8864 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8865 to such objects are allowed.
8868 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8869 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8870 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8874 @node C++ Location Values
8875 @subsection C++ Location Values
8879 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8881 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8882 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
8883 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
8884 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
8888 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
8889 genuine code only the latter is used.
8892 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
8893 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
8897 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
8899 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
8900 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
8901 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
8905 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
8906 Reset the position to the given values.
8909 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
8910 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8911 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8912 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8913 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8916 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
8917 The line, starting at 1.
8920 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8921 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8924 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
8925 The column, starting at 1.
8928 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8929 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8932 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
8933 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
8934 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
8935 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
8936 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8939 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
8940 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
8941 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
8944 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8945 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8946 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8947 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8951 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
8953 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
8954 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
8957 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
8958 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
8959 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
8962 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
8963 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
8966 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
8967 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
8968 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8971 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8972 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8973 Advance the @code{end} position.
8976 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
8977 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
8978 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
8979 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8982 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8983 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8986 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
8987 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
8988 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
8992 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
8993 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
8994 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
8997 @node C++ Parser Interface
8998 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8999 @c - define parser_class_name
9001 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9003 @c - Reporting errors
9005 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9006 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9007 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9008 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9009 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9010 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9011 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9012 additional argument for its constructor.
9014 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9015 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9016 The types for semantics value and locations.
9019 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9020 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9021 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9022 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9023 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9024 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9027 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9028 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9029 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9032 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9033 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9036 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9037 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9038 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9042 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9043 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9044 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9045 or nonzero, full tracing.
9048 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9049 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9050 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9051 described by @var{m}.
9055 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9056 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9057 @c - prefix for yylex.
9058 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9061 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9062 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9063 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9065 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9066 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9067 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9068 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9072 @node A Complete C++ Example
9073 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9075 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9076 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9077 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9078 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9079 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9080 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9081 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9082 actually easier to interface with.
9085 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9086 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9087 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9088 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9089 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9092 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9093 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9095 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9096 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9097 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9098 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9099 of valid input follows.
9103 seven := one + two * three
9107 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9108 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9110 @c - A place to store error messages
9111 @c - A place for the result
9113 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9114 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9115 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9116 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9117 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9118 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9119 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9121 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9122 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9123 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9126 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9128 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9129 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9132 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9137 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9138 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9139 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9140 factor both as follows.
9142 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9144 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9146 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9147 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9148 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9149 calcxx_driver& driver)
9150 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9155 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9158 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9160 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9165 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9167 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9173 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9174 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9176 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9178 // Handling the scanner.
9181 bool trace_scanning;
9185 Similarly for the parser itself.
9187 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9189 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9190 int parse (const std::string& f);
9196 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9197 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9198 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9199 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9201 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9204 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9205 void error (const std::string& m);
9207 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9210 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9211 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9212 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9213 messages and set error state.
9215 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9217 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9218 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9220 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9221 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9223 variables["one"] = 1;
9224 variables["two"] = 2;
9227 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9232 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9236 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9237 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9238 int res = parser.parse ();
9244 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9246 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9250 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9252 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9257 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9259 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9260 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9261 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9262 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9265 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9267 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9268 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9270 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9274 @findex %code requires
9275 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9276 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9277 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9278 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9279 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9280 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9281 @xref{%code Summary}.
9283 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9287 class calcxx_driver;
9292 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9293 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9296 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9298 // The parsing context.
9299 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9300 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9304 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9305 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9306 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9307 automatically propagated.
9309 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9314 // Initialize the initial location.
9315 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9320 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9321 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9324 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9331 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9334 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9346 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9347 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9349 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9352 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9358 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9359 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9360 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9361 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
9364 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9366 %token END 0 "end of file"
9368 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9369 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
9374 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
9377 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9378 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9380 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
9381 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
9383 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
9387 The grammar itself is straightforward.
9389 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9393 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9397 | assignments assignment @{@};
9400 "identifier" ":=" exp
9401 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
9405 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9406 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9407 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9408 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9409 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9410 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9415 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9418 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9421 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9422 const std::string& m)
9424 driver.error (l, m);
9428 @node Calc++ Scanner
9429 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9431 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9432 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9434 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9436 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9441 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9442 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9444 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9445 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9446 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9447 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9451 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9452 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9453 not of token_type. */
9454 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9459 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9460 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9461 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9462 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9464 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9466 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9470 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9472 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9474 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9480 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9481 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9482 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9483 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9484 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9485 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9486 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9488 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9492 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9499 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9500 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9504 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9505 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9506 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9507 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9509 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9512 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9514 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9515 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9516 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9519 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9520 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9521 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9523 return token::NUMBER;
9525 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9526 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9531 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9532 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9534 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9538 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9540 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9543 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9545 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
9546 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
9553 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9560 @node Calc++ Top Level
9561 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9563 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9565 @comment file: calc++.cc
9568 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9572 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9574 calcxx_driver driver;
9575 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9576 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9577 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9578 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9579 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9580 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9581 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9587 @section Java Parsers
9590 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9591 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9592 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9593 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9594 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9595 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9596 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9597 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9600 @node Java Bison Interface
9601 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9602 @c - %language "Java"
9604 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9605 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9607 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9608 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9610 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9611 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9612 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9613 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9614 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9615 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9616 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9617 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9618 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9619 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9621 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9623 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9624 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9625 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9626 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9629 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9630 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9632 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9633 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9635 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9636 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9638 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9639 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9640 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9641 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9642 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9643 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9644 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9645 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9646 access the token names and codes.
9648 @node Java Semantic Values
9649 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9650 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9652 @c - Printer and destructor
9654 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9655 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9656 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9659 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9660 %type <Integer> number
9663 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9664 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9665 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9666 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9667 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9670 %define stype "ASTNode"
9674 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9675 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9677 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9678 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9679 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9680 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9681 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9682 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9684 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9685 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9686 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9688 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9689 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9690 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9693 @node Java Location Values
9694 @subsection Java Location Values
9699 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
9700 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
9701 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
9702 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9703 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
9704 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
9705 renamed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9707 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9708 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9709 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9710 be supplied by the user.
9713 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9714 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9715 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9718 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9719 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9722 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9723 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9726 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9727 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9728 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9729 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9733 @node Java Parser Interface
9734 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9735 @c - define parser_class_name
9737 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9739 @c - Reporting errors
9741 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9742 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9743 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9744 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9745 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9747 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9748 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9749 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9750 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9751 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9752 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9754 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9755 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9756 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9757 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9759 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9760 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9761 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9762 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9763 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9764 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9766 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9767 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9769 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9770 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9771 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9772 which initialize them automatically.
9774 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9775 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9777 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9778 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9779 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9783 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9784 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9785 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9787 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9788 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9789 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9792 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9793 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9794 @code{false} otherwise.
9797 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9798 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9799 from a syntax error.
9800 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9803 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9804 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9805 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9809 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9810 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9811 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9812 or nonzero, full tracing.
9816 @node Java Scanner Interface
9817 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9820 @c - Lexer interface
9822 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9823 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9824 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9825 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9827 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9828 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9829 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9830 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9833 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9834 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9835 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9836 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9839 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9841 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9842 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9843 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9844 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9847 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9848 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9849 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9852 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9853 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9856 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9857 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9858 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9859 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9860 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9862 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9863 "@var{class-name}".}
9866 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9867 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9869 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9870 "@var{class-name}".}
9874 @node Java Action Features
9875 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9877 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9878 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9880 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9881 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9884 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9885 This may not be assigned to.
9886 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9889 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9890 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9891 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9895 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9896 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9897 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9898 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9899 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9900 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9903 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9904 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9905 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9906 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9908 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9912 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9913 This may not be assigned to.
9914 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9918 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9919 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9922 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
9923 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9924 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9927 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
9928 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9929 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9932 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
9933 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
9934 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9937 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9938 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9939 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9941 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9944 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9945 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9946 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9947 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9952 @node Java Differences
9953 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9955 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9956 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9957 section summarizes these differences.
9961 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9962 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9963 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9964 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9965 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9966 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9967 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9969 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9970 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9971 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9972 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9973 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9976 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9977 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9978 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9979 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9980 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9981 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9982 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9983 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9984 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9987 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9989 @item @code{%code imports}
9990 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9991 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9992 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9994 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9995 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9997 @item @code{%code lexer}
9998 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9999 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10000 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10004 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10005 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10006 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10008 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10009 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10014 @node Java Declarations Summary
10015 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10017 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10018 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10020 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10021 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10024 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10025 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10026 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10027 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10028 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10031 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10032 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10033 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10034 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10037 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10038 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10039 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10040 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10043 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10044 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10045 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10048 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10049 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10050 a Java @emph{type}.
10051 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10054 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10055 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10056 @xref{Java Differences}.
10059 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10060 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10061 @xref{Java Differences}.
10064 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10065 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10066 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10069 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10070 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10071 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10072 @xref{Java Differences}.
10075 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10076 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10077 @xref{Java Differences}.
10080 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10081 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10082 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10085 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10086 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10087 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10090 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10091 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10092 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10095 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10096 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10098 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10101 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10102 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10103 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10104 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10107 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10108 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10109 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10110 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10111 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10114 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10115 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10116 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10119 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10120 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10121 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10122 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10125 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10126 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10127 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10128 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10131 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10132 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10133 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10136 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10137 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10138 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10141 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10142 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10143 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10146 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10147 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10148 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10149 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10153 @c ================================================= FAQ
10156 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10157 @cindex frequently asked questions
10160 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10164 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10165 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10166 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10167 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10168 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10169 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10170 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10171 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10172 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10173 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10174 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10175 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10178 @node Memory Exhausted
10179 @section Memory Exhausted
10182 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10183 message. What can I do?
10186 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10189 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10190 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10192 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10193 following typical questions:
10196 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10197 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10198 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10205 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10206 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10207 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10210 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10211 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10212 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10213 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10214 @file{first-line.l}:
10220 #include <stdlib.h>
10224 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10228 yyparse (char const *file)
10230 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10234 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10238 /* One token only. */
10240 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10243 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10261 If the file @file{input} contains
10269 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10272 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10273 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10274 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10279 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10280 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10281 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10282 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10283 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10284 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10285 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10286 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10289 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10290 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10291 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10292 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10294 @node Strings are Destroyed
10295 @section Strings are Destroyed
10298 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10299 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10300 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10303 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10304 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10305 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10311 char *yylval = NULL;
10316 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10324 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10325 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10326 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10327 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10333 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10336 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10337 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10338 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10344 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10345 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10346 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10347 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10348 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10349 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10352 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10353 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10354 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10359 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10360 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10363 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10364 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10367 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10368 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10369 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10370 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10371 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10372 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10373 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10375 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10377 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10378 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10379 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10380 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10381 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10382 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10385 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10386 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10389 @node Multiple start-symbols
10390 @section Multiple start-symbols
10393 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
10394 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
10395 multiple entry points.
10398 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
10399 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
10400 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
10401 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
10405 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
10412 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
10413 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
10415 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
10416 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
10417 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
10418 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
10419 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
10420 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
10421 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
10422 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
10425 /* @r{Prologue.} */
10430 int t = start_token;
10435 /* @r{The rules.} */
10439 @node Secure? Conform?
10440 @section Secure? Conform?
10443 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10446 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10447 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10448 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10449 please send us a bug report.
10451 @node I can't build Bison
10452 @section I can't build Bison
10455 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10456 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10460 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10461 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10462 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10463 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10464 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10465 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10466 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10469 @node Where can I find help?
10470 @section Where can I find help?
10473 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10476 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10477 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10478 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10479 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10480 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10481 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10482 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10483 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10487 @section Bug Reports
10490 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10493 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10494 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10495 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10496 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10497 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10499 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10500 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10501 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10502 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10503 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10505 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10506 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10507 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10508 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10509 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10510 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10512 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10513 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
10515 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10517 @node More Languages
10518 @section More Languages
10521 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10522 favorite language here}?
10525 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10526 languages; contributions are welcome.
10529 @section Beta Testing
10532 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10535 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10536 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10537 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10538 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10539 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10540 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10541 essentially halted.
10543 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10544 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10545 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10546 systems are especially welcome.
10548 @node Mailing Lists
10549 @section Mailing Lists
10552 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10555 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10557 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10559 @node Table of Symbols
10560 @appendix Bison Symbols
10561 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10562 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10564 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10565 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10566 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10569 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10570 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
10571 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
10574 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10575 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10579 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10580 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
10584 @deffn {Variable} $$
10585 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10589 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10590 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10591 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10594 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10595 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10599 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10600 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10604 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10605 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10606 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10607 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10610 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10611 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10612 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10613 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10614 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10618 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10619 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10622 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10623 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10627 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10628 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10631 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10632 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10633 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10636 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10637 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10640 This feature is experimental.
10641 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10644 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10647 @deffn {Directive} <>
10648 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10651 This feature is experimental.
10652 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10655 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10658 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10659 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10660 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10661 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10664 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10665 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10666 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
10667 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
10668 @xref{%code Summary}.
10671 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10672 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10676 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10677 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10678 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10683 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
10684 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
10685 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
10686 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
10689 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10690 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10691 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10694 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10695 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10696 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10699 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10700 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10701 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10704 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10705 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10706 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10710 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10711 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10712 used in the grammar.
10715 @deffn {Symbol} error
10716 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10717 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10718 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10719 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10720 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10721 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10722 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10723 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10726 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10727 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10728 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10731 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10732 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10736 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10737 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10738 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10741 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10742 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10745 @deffn {Directive} %language
10746 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10747 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10750 @deffn {Directive} %left
10751 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10752 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10755 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10756 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10757 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10761 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10762 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10763 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10764 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10765 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10768 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10769 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10773 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10774 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10775 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10780 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10781 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10782 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10785 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10786 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10787 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10790 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10791 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10792 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10795 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10796 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10797 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10798 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10801 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10802 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10803 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10806 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10807 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
10808 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
10809 unreasonable usage.
10812 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10813 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10814 Require a Version of Bison}.
10817 @deffn {Directive} %right
10818 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10819 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10822 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10823 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10824 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10827 @deffn {Directive} %start
10828 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10832 @deffn {Directive} %token
10833 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10834 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10837 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10838 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10839 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10842 @deffn {Directive} %type
10843 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10844 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10847 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10848 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10849 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10853 @deffn {Directive} %union
10854 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10855 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10858 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10859 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10860 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10861 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10862 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10864 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10868 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10869 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10870 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10871 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10873 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10877 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10878 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10879 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10882 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10883 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10884 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10885 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10886 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10889 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10890 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10891 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10894 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10895 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10896 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10899 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10900 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10901 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10902 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10905 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10906 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10907 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10910 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10911 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
10912 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
10913 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
10914 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
10915 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10917 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10921 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10922 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10923 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10924 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10927 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10928 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10929 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10930 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10931 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10932 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
10935 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10936 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10937 @xref{Memory Management}.
10940 @deffn {Function} yylex
10941 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10942 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10946 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10947 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10948 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10949 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10950 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10953 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10954 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10955 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10956 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10958 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10960 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10961 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10962 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10965 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10966 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10967 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10970 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10971 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10972 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10973 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10975 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10976 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10977 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10980 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10981 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10985 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10986 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10987 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10988 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10989 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10992 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10993 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10994 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10997 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10998 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10999 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11000 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11001 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11002 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11003 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11006 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11007 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11008 call this function to create a new parser.
11009 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11010 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11011 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11012 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11015 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11016 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11017 parse the rest of the input stream.
11018 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11019 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11020 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11021 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11024 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11025 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11026 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11027 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11028 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11029 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11032 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11033 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11034 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11035 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11036 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11039 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11040 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11041 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11042 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11045 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11046 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11047 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11048 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11049 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11050 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11051 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11053 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11054 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11055 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11056 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11057 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11058 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11059 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11062 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11063 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11064 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11072 @item Accepting state
11073 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11074 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11075 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11077 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11078 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11079 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11080 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11081 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11083 @item Consistent state
11084 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11086 @item Context-free grammars
11087 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11088 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11089 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11090 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11093 @item Default reduction
11094 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11095 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11096 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11097 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11100 @item Defaulted state
11101 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11103 @item Dynamic allocation
11104 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11105 compile time or on entry to a function.
11108 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11109 character string of length zero.
11111 @item Finite-state stack machine
11112 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11113 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11114 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11115 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11116 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11117 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11119 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11120 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11121 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11122 deterministic parsing
11123 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11124 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11125 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11129 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11130 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11131 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11133 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11134 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11135 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11136 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11137 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11138 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11139 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11140 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11141 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11142 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11144 @item Infix operator
11145 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11146 performs some operation.
11149 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11151 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11152 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11153 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11154 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11155 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11156 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11157 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11159 @item Language construct
11160 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11161 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11162 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11164 @item Left associativity
11165 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11166 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11167 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11169 @item Left recursion
11170 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11171 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11174 @item Left-to-right parsing
11175 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11176 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11178 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11179 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11180 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11182 @item Lexical tie-in
11183 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11184 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11186 @item Literal string token
11187 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11189 @item Lookahead token
11190 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11194 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11195 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11196 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11199 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11200 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11202 @item Nonterminal symbol
11203 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11204 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11205 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11208 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11209 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11212 @item Postfix operator
11213 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11214 performs some operation.
11217 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11218 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11222 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11223 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11224 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11226 @item Reverse polish notation
11227 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11229 @item Right recursion
11230 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11231 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11235 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11236 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11237 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11240 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11241 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11242 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11244 @item Single-character literal
11245 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11246 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11249 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11250 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11251 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11252 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11255 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11256 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11257 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11260 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11261 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11264 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11265 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11266 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11267 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11269 @item Terminal symbol
11270 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11271 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11272 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11274 @item Unreachable state
11275 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11276 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11277 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11280 @node Copying This Manual
11281 @appendix Copying This Manual
11285 @unnumbered Bibliography
11289 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11290 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11291 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11292 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11294 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11295 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11296 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11297 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11298 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11300 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11301 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11302 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11303 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11304 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11306 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11307 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11308 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11309 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11310 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11313 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11314 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11315 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11318 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11319 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11320 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11321 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11331 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11332 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11333 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11334 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11335 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11336 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11337 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11338 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11339 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11340 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11341 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11342 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11343 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11344 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
11345 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11346 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11347 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11348 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11349 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11350 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11351 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11352 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11353 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11354 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
11355 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11356 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11357 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11358 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11359 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11360 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11361 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
11362 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
11363 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11364 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
11365 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11366 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11367 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11368 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
11369 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
11370 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
11371 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
11372 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
11373 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
11374 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
11375 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
11376 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
11377 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
11378 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
11379 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
11380 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
11381 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
11382 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy
11383 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american
11385 @c Local Variables:
11386 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"