1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
157 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
158 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
159 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
195 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
196 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
197 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
199 Defining Language Semantics
201 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
202 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
203 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
204 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
205 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
206 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
207 action in the middle of a rule.
208 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
212 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
213 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
214 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
218 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
219 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
220 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
221 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
222 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
223 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
224 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
225 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
226 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
227 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
228 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
229 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
231 Parser C-Language Interface
233 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
234 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
235 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
236 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
237 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
238 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
240 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
241 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
242 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
245 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
247 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
248 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
249 of the token it has read.
250 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
251 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
253 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
254 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
256 The Bison Parser Algorithm
258 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
259 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
260 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
261 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
262 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
263 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
264 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
265 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
266 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
270 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
271 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
272 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
273 * How Precedence:: How they work.
275 Handling Context Dependencies
277 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
278 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
279 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
280 error recovery rules must be written.
282 Debugging Your Parser
284 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
285 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
289 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
290 in alphabetical order by short options.
291 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
292 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
294 Parsers Written In Other Languages
296 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
297 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
301 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
302 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
303 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
304 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
305 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
306 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
308 A Complete C++ Example
310 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
311 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
312 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
313 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
314 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
318 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
319 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
320 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
321 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
322 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
323 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
324 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
325 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
327 Frequently Asked Questions
329 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
330 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
331 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
332 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
333 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
334 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
335 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
336 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
337 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
338 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
339 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
340 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
344 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
350 @unnumbered Introduction
353 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
354 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
355 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
356 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
357 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
358 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
359 calculators to complex programming languages.
361 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
362 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
363 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
364 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
365 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
368 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
369 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
370 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
371 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
374 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
375 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
376 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
377 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
378 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
379 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
382 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
385 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
387 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
388 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
389 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
390 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
391 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
393 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
395 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
396 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
397 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
398 License to all of the Bison source code.
400 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
401 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
402 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
403 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
404 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
405 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
406 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
408 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
409 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
410 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
411 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
412 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
413 using the other GNU tools.
415 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
416 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
417 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
418 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
422 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
423 @include gpl-3.0.texi
426 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
428 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
429 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
430 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
433 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
434 as mathematical ideas.
435 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
436 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
437 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
438 the name of an identifier, etc.).
439 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
440 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
441 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
442 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
443 how is the output used?
444 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
445 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
448 @node Language and Grammar
449 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
451 @cindex context-free grammar
452 @cindex grammar, context-free
453 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
454 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
455 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
456 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
457 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
458 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
459 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
460 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
464 @cindex Backus-Naur form
465 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
466 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
467 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
468 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
469 essentially machine-readable BNF.
471 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
472 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
473 @cindex LR(1) grammars
474 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
475 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
476 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
477 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
478 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
479 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
480 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
481 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
482 more information on this.
483 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
484 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
485 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
488 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
489 @cindex ambiguous grammars
490 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
492 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
493 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
494 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
495 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
496 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
497 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
498 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
499 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
500 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
501 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
502 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
503 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
504 possible parses of any given string is finite.
506 @cindex symbols (abstract)
508 @cindex syntactic grouping
509 @cindex grouping, syntactic
510 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
511 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
512 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
513 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
514 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
515 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
516 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
518 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
519 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
520 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
521 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
522 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
523 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
524 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
525 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
526 lexicography, not grammar.)
528 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
532 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
533 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
534 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
535 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
536 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
537 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
538 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
543 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
544 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
545 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
546 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
547 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
551 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
552 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
553 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
554 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
555 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
556 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
557 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
558 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
560 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
561 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
562 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
563 reads informally as follows:
566 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
571 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
575 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
576 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
577 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
578 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
581 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
582 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
583 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
584 not the start symbol.
586 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
587 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
588 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
589 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
590 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
591 reports a syntax error.
593 @node Grammar in Bison
594 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
595 @cindex Bison grammar
596 @cindex grammar, Bison
597 @cindex formal grammar
599 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
600 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
601 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
603 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
604 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
605 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
607 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
608 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
609 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
610 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
611 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
612 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
613 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
616 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
617 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
618 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
619 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
621 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
622 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
624 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
625 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
626 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
627 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
631 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
636 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
638 @node Semantic Values
639 @section Semantic Values
640 @cindex semantic value
641 @cindex value, semantic
643 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
644 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
645 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
646 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
647 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
650 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
651 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
652 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
653 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
654 ,Defining Language Semantics},
657 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
658 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
659 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
660 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
663 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
664 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
665 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
666 need to have any semantic value.)
668 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
669 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
670 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
671 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
672 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
673 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
675 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
676 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
677 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
678 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
679 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
681 @node Semantic Actions
682 @section Semantic Actions
683 @cindex semantic actions
684 @cindex actions, semantic
686 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
687 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
688 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
689 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
692 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
693 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
694 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
695 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
696 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
697 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
698 newly recognized larger expression.
700 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
704 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
709 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
710 from the values of the two subexpressions.
713 @section Writing GLR Parsers
715 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
718 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
719 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
721 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
722 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
723 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
724 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
725 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
726 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
727 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
728 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
729 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
731 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
732 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
733 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
734 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
735 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
736 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
737 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
738 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
739 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
740 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
741 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
742 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
743 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
744 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
745 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
746 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
747 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
748 identical set of symbols.
750 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
751 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
752 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
753 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
754 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
755 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
756 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
757 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
758 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
762 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
763 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
764 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
765 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
768 @node Simple GLR Parsers
769 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
770 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
771 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
775 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
776 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
778 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
779 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
780 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
782 Consider a problem that
783 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
784 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
787 type subrange = lo .. hi;
788 type enum = (a, b, c);
792 The original language standard allows only numeric
793 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
794 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
795 10206) and many other
796 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
797 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
801 type subrange = (a) .. b;
805 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
806 type with only one value:
813 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
814 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
816 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
817 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
818 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
819 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
820 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
821 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
822 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
823 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
825 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
826 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
827 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
828 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
831 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
832 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
833 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
834 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
835 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
836 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
839 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
840 use the GLR algorithm.
841 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
842 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
843 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
844 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
845 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
846 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
847 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
848 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
849 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
851 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
852 reports a syntax error as usual.
854 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
855 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
856 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
857 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
858 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
860 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
861 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
862 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
863 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
864 The present example contains only one conflict between two
865 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
866 cannot be nested. So the number of
867 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
868 and the parsing time is still linear.
870 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
871 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
874 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
884 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
889 type : '(' id_list ')'
911 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
912 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
913 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
914 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
921 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
922 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
923 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
932 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
933 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
934 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
935 notice when the parser splits.
937 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
938 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
939 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
940 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
941 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
942 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
943 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
944 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
945 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
946 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
947 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
948 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
949 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
952 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
953 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
954 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
955 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
956 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
957 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
959 @node Merging GLR Parses
960 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
961 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
962 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
966 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
968 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
973 #define YYSTYPE char const *
975 void yyerror (char const *);
988 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
991 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
995 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
996 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
997 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
998 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
999 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1002 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1003 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1004 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1005 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1008 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1009 | '(' declarator ')'
1014 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1015 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1022 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1023 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1024 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1025 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1026 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1027 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1028 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1029 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1030 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1031 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1032 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1033 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1034 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1035 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1037 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1038 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1039 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1040 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1041 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1042 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1043 The parser therefore prints
1046 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1049 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1050 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1057 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1058 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1059 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1060 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1061 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1062 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1063 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1064 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1065 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1066 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1072 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1073 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1074 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1075 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1079 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1080 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1085 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1089 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1097 with an accompanying forward declaration
1098 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1102 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1103 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1108 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1109 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1112 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1115 Bison requires that all of the
1116 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1117 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1118 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1119 the offending merge.
1121 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1122 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1124 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1125 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1126 the associated reduction.
1127 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1128 action in a GLR parser.
1131 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1133 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1135 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1136 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1137 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1138 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1139 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1140 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1141 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1142 influence syntax analysis.
1143 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1146 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1147 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1148 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1149 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1150 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1151 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1152 future versions of Bison.
1153 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1154 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1155 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1158 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1159 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1160 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1161 initiate error recovery.
1162 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1163 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1164 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1165 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1167 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1168 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1170 @node Compiler Requirements
1171 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1172 @cindex @code{inline}
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1175 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1176 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1177 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1178 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1179 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1180 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1189 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1193 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1199 @node Locations Overview
1202 @cindex textual location
1203 @cindex location, textual
1205 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1206 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1207 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1208 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1210 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1211 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1212 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1213 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1215 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1216 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1217 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1220 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1221 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1222 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1223 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1224 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1225 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1226 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1229 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1230 @cindex Bison parser
1231 @cindex Bison utility
1232 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1235 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1236 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1237 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1238 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1239 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1240 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1241 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1244 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1245 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1246 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1249 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1250 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1251 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1252 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1253 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1254 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1255 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1257 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1258 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1259 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1260 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1261 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1262 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1263 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1264 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1265 C-Language Interface}.
1267 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1268 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1269 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1270 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1271 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1272 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1273 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1274 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1275 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1276 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1277 anything other than their usual meanings.
1279 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1280 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1281 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1282 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1283 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1284 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1285 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1286 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1287 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1290 @section Stages in Using Bison
1291 @cindex stages in using Bison
1294 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1295 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1299 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1300 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1301 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1302 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1303 sequence of C statements.
1306 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1307 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1308 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1309 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1312 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1315 Write error-reporting routines.
1318 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1319 must follow these steps:
1323 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1326 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1329 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1332 @node Grammar Layout
1333 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1334 @cindex grammar file
1336 @cindex format of grammar file
1337 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1339 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1340 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1347 @var{Bison declarations}
1356 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1357 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1359 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1360 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1361 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1362 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1363 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1364 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1366 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1367 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1368 semantic values of various symbols.
1370 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1373 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1374 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1375 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1379 @cindex simple examples
1380 @cindex examples, simple
1382 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1383 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1384 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1385 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1386 desk-top calculator.
1388 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1389 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1390 source file to try them.
1393 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1394 a first example with no operator precedence.
1395 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1396 Operator precedence is introduced.
1397 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1398 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1399 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1400 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1401 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1405 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1406 @cindex reverse polish notation
1407 @cindex polish notation calculator
1408 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1409 @cindex calculator, simple
1411 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1412 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1413 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1414 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1416 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1417 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1420 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1421 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1422 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1423 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1424 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1425 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1426 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1429 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1430 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1432 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1433 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1436 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1439 #define YYSTYPE double
1442 void yyerror (char const *);
1447 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1450 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1451 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1453 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1454 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1455 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1456 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1457 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1458 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1459 which is a floating point number.
1461 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1462 function @code{pow}.
1464 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1465 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1466 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1467 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1470 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1471 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1472 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1473 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1474 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1475 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1476 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1477 type for numeric constants.
1480 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1482 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1490 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1493 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1494 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1495 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1496 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1497 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1498 /* Exponentiation */
1499 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1501 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1506 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1507 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1508 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1509 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1510 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1513 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1514 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1515 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1517 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1518 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1519 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1520 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1521 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1522 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1531 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1533 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1541 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1542 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1543 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1544 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1545 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1547 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1548 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1549 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1550 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1551 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1552 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1554 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1555 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1556 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1557 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1560 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1561 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1562 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1565 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1567 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1571 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1575 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1576 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1577 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1578 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1579 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1580 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1581 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1583 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1584 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1585 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1586 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1587 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1590 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1592 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1593 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1594 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1595 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1599 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1600 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1605 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1606 equally well have written them separately:
1610 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1611 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1615 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1616 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1617 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1618 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1619 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1620 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1621 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1622 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1624 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1625 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1626 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1628 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1629 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1633 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1637 means the same thing as this:
1641 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1647 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1650 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1651 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1652 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1654 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1655 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1656 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1657 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1659 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1661 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1662 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1663 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1664 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1666 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1667 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1668 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1669 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1670 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1671 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1672 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1673 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1674 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1676 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1677 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1678 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1679 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1680 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1682 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1683 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1685 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1689 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1690 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1691 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1692 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1703 /* Skip white space. */
1704 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1708 /* Process numbers. */
1709 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1712 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1717 /* Return end-of-input. */
1720 /* Return a single char. */
1727 @subsection The Controlling Function
1728 @cindex controlling function
1729 @cindex main function in simple example
1731 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1732 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1733 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1746 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1747 @cindex error reporting routine
1749 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1750 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1751 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1752 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1753 here is the definition we will use:
1759 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1761 yyerror (char const *s)
1763 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1768 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1769 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1770 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1771 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1772 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1773 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1775 @node Rpcalc Generate
1776 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1777 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1779 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1780 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1781 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1782 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1783 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1784 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1786 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1787 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1789 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1790 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1797 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1798 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1799 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1800 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1801 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1802 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1803 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1805 @node Rpcalc Compile
1806 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1807 @cindex compiling the parser
1809 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1813 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1815 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1819 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1820 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1821 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1825 # @r{List files again.}
1827 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1831 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1832 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1838 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1840 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1844 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1846 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1851 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1852 @cindex infix notation calculator
1854 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1856 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1857 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1858 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1859 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1862 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1865 #define YYSTYPE double
1869 void yyerror (char const *);
1872 /* Bison declarations. */
1876 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1877 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1879 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1885 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1888 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1889 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1890 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1891 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1892 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1893 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1894 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1895 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1901 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1904 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1906 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1907 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1908 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1909 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1910 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1911 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1914 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1915 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1916 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1917 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1918 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1921 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1922 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1923 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1924 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1925 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1927 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1932 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1940 @node Simple Error Recovery
1941 @section Simple Error Recovery
1942 @cindex error recovery, simple
1944 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1945 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1946 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1947 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1948 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1949 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1951 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1952 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1953 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1958 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1959 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1964 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1965 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1966 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1967 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1968 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1969 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1970 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1971 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1974 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1975 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1976 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1977 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1978 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1979 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1982 @node Location Tracking Calc
1983 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1984 @cindex location tracking calculator
1985 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1986 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1988 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1989 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1990 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1991 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1995 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1996 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1997 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2000 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2001 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2003 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2004 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2007 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2013 void yyerror (char const *);
2016 /* Bison declarations. */
2024 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2028 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2029 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2030 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2031 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2032 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2033 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2034 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2038 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2040 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2041 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2042 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2043 from the new information.
2045 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2046 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2057 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2062 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2063 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2064 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2065 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2075 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2076 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2077 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2082 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2083 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2084 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2088 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2089 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2090 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2092 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2093 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2094 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2095 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2096 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2097 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2101 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2103 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2104 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2105 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2108 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2109 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2120 /* Skip white space. */
2121 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2122 ++yylloc.last_column;
2127 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2128 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2132 /* Process numbers. */
2136 ++yylloc.last_column;
2137 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2139 ++yylloc.last_column;
2140 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2147 /* Return end-of-input. */
2151 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2155 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2158 ++yylloc.last_column;
2163 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2164 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2165 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2166 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2168 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2169 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2170 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2171 controlling function:
2178 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2179 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2185 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2186 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2187 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2189 @node Multi-function Calc
2190 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2191 @cindex multi-function calculator
2192 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2193 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2195 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2196 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2197 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2198 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2199 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2201 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2202 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2203 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2204 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2205 functions whose syntax has this form:
2208 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2212 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2213 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2214 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2218 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2222 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2228 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2233 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2236 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2237 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2238 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2241 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2242 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2244 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2249 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2250 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2252 void yyerror (char const *);
2257 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2258 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2261 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2262 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2269 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2270 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2272 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2275 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2276 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2277 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2279 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2280 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2281 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2282 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2284 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2285 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2286 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2287 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2288 between angle brackets).
2290 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2291 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2292 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2293 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2294 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2295 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2298 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2300 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2301 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2302 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2314 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2315 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2320 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2321 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2322 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2323 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2324 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2325 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2326 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2327 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2328 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2329 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2330 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2333 /* End of grammar. */
2337 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2338 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2339 @cindex symbol table example
2341 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2342 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2343 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2344 requires some additional C functions for support.
2346 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2347 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2348 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2352 /* Function type. */
2353 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2357 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2360 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2361 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2364 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2365 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2367 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2372 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2374 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2375 extern symrec *sym_table;
2377 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2378 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2382 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2383 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2384 @code{init_table} as well:
2390 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2392 yyerror (char const *s)
2402 double (*fnct) (double);
2407 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2420 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2425 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2431 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2433 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2434 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2449 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2450 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2452 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2453 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2454 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2455 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2456 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2457 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2461 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2464 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2465 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2466 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2467 ptr->type = sym_type;
2468 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2469 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2475 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2478 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2479 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2480 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2486 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2487 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2488 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2489 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2491 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2492 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2493 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2494 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2495 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2496 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2498 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2499 operators in @code{yylex}.
2512 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2513 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2520 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2521 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2524 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2530 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2534 static char *symbuf = 0;
2535 static int length = 0;
2540 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2541 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2543 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2550 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2554 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2556 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2558 /* Get another character. */
2563 while (isalnum (c));
2570 s = getsym (symbuf);
2572 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2577 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2583 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2584 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2585 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2593 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2596 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2597 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2598 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2601 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2602 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2606 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2608 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2609 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2611 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2612 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2615 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2616 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2617 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2618 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2619 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2620 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2621 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2622 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2625 @node Grammar Outline
2626 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2628 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2629 appropriate delimiters:
2636 @var{Bison declarations}
2645 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2646 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2647 continues until end of line.
2650 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2651 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2652 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2653 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2654 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2658 @subsection The prologue
2659 @cindex declarations section
2661 @cindex declarations
2663 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2664 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2665 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2666 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2667 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2668 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2669 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2671 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2672 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2675 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2676 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2677 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2678 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2679 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2680 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2681 @code{%union} declaration.
2692 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2696 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2697 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2703 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2704 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2705 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2706 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2707 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2708 @code{#include} directives.
2710 @node Prologue Alternatives
2711 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2712 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2715 @findex %code requires
2716 @findex %code provides
2719 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2720 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2721 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2722 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2723 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2724 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2725 @code{top}. @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
2727 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2738 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2742 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2743 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2750 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2751 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2752 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2753 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2754 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2755 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2756 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2757 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2758 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2759 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2760 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2762 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2763 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2764 This behavior raises a few questions.
2765 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2766 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2767 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2768 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2769 This behavior is not intuitive.
2771 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2772 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2773 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2774 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2781 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2782 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2785 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2786 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2798 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2802 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2803 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2804 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2811 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2812 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2813 explicit which kind you intend.
2814 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2816 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2817 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2818 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2819 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2820 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2821 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2822 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2823 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2824 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2827 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2828 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2830 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2843 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2847 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2848 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2859 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2860 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2861 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2868 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2869 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2870 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2871 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2872 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2873 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2875 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2876 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2877 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2878 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2879 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2880 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2881 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2882 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2883 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2884 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2885 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2888 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2889 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2890 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2891 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2892 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2893 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2894 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2895 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2896 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2897 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2910 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2914 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2915 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2926 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2930 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2931 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2938 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2939 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2940 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2943 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2944 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2945 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2946 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2947 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2948 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2951 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2952 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2953 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2954 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2956 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2957 organize your grammar file.
2958 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2962 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2963 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2964 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2965 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2967 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2968 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2969 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2970 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2974 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2975 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2977 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2979 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2980 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2981 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2982 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2984 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2985 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2986 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2987 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2988 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2989 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2990 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2991 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2994 @node Bison Declarations
2995 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2996 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2997 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
2999 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3000 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3001 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3002 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3005 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3006 @cindex grammar rules section
3007 @cindex rules section for grammar
3009 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3010 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3012 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3013 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3014 if it is the first thing in the file.
3017 @subsection The epilogue
3018 @cindex additional C code section
3020 @cindex C code, section for additional
3022 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3023 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3024 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3025 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3026 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3027 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3028 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3029 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3030 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3031 C-Language Interface}.
3033 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3034 from the grammar rules.
3036 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3037 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3038 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3039 of the grammar file.
3042 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3043 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3044 @cindex terminal symbol
3048 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3051 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3052 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3053 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3054 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3055 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3056 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3057 the symbol to stand for it.
3059 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3060 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3061 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3063 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3064 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3065 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3066 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3067 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3068 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3069 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3071 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3075 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3076 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3077 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3078 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3081 @cindex character token
3082 @cindex literal token
3083 @cindex single-character literal
3084 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3085 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3086 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3087 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3088 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3089 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3090 ,Operator Precedence}).
3092 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3093 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3094 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3095 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3096 your program will confuse other readers.
3098 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3099 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3100 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3101 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3102 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3103 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3107 @cindex string token
3108 @cindex literal string token
3109 @cindex multicharacter literal
3110 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3111 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3112 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3113 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3114 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3116 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3117 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3118 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3119 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3120 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3122 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3124 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3125 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3126 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3127 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3128 read your program will be confused.
3130 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3131 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3132 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3133 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3134 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3135 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3138 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3139 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3140 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3142 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3143 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3144 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3145 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3146 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3147 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3148 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3149 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3150 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3151 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3152 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3153 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3155 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3156 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3157 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3158 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3159 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3161 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3162 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3163 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3164 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3165 characters in the following C-language string:
3168 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3171 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3172 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3173 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3174 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3175 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3176 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3177 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3178 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3179 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3180 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3183 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3184 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3185 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3186 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3187 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3190 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3192 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3193 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3195 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3199 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3205 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3206 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3207 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3219 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3220 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3222 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3223 extra white space as you wish.
3225 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3226 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3229 @{@var{C statements}@}
3234 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3235 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3236 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3237 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3238 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3239 compiler can check it.
3241 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3242 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3243 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3244 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3245 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3246 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3247 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3248 character constants.
3250 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3254 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3255 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3259 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3260 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3267 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3269 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3270 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3271 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3288 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3292 @section Recursive Rules
3293 @cindex recursive rule
3295 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3296 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3297 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3298 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3299 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3309 @cindex left recursion
3310 @cindex right recursion
3312 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3313 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3314 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3325 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3326 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3327 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3328 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3329 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3330 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3331 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3334 @cindex mutual recursion
3335 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3336 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3337 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3345 | primary '+' primary
3357 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3361 @section Defining Language Semantics
3362 @cindex defining language semantics
3363 @cindex language semantics, defining
3365 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3366 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3367 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3369 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3370 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3371 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3372 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3375 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3376 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3377 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3378 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3379 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3380 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3381 action in the middle of a rule.
3382 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3386 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3387 @cindex semantic value type
3388 @cindex value type, semantic
3389 @cindex data types of semantic values
3390 @cindex default data type
3392 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3393 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3394 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3395 Notation Calculator}).
3397 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3398 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3399 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3402 #define YYSTYPE double
3406 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3407 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3408 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3409 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3411 @node Multiple Types
3412 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3414 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3415 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3416 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3417 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3420 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3421 requires you to do two things:
3425 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3426 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3427 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3428 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3432 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3433 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3434 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3435 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3436 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3445 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3447 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3448 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3449 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3450 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3452 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3453 placed at any position in the rule;
3454 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3455 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3456 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3457 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3459 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3460 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3461 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3462 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3463 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3464 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3465 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3466 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3467 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3468 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3471 Here is a typical example:
3481 Or, in terms of named references:
3485 exp[result]: @dots{}
3486 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3487 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3492 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3493 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3494 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3495 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3496 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3497 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3499 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3500 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3501 referred to as @code{$2}.
3503 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3504 about using the named references construct.
3506 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3507 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3508 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3509 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3510 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3514 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3518 @cindex default action
3519 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3520 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3521 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3522 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3523 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3524 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3526 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3527 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3528 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3529 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3530 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3534 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3535 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3541 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3546 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3547 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3548 definition of @code{foo}.
3551 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3552 any, from a semantic action.
3553 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3554 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3557 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3558 @cindex action data types
3559 @cindex data types in actions
3561 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3562 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3564 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3565 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3566 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3567 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3568 in the rule. In this example,
3579 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3580 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3581 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3582 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3584 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3585 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3586 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3598 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3599 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3601 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3602 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3603 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3604 @cindex mid-rule actions
3606 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3607 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3608 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3610 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3611 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3612 it is run before they are parsed.
3614 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3615 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3616 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3617 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3620 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3621 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3622 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3623 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3624 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3625 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3627 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3628 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3629 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3630 at the end of the rule.
3632 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3633 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3634 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3635 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3636 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3637 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3641 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3642 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3643 declare_variable ($3); @}
3645 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3650 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3651 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3652 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3653 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3654 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3655 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3656 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3657 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3659 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3660 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3661 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3662 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3663 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3666 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3667 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3668 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3669 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3670 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3672 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3673 Discarded Symbols}).
3674 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3675 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3677 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3678 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3683 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3689 pop_context ($1); @}
3692 let: LET '(' var ')'
3693 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3694 declare_variable ($3); @}
3701 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3702 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3703 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3705 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3706 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3707 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3708 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3709 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3714 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3715 | '@{' statements '@}'
3721 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3725 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3726 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3729 | '@{' statements '@}'
3735 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3736 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3737 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3738 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3739 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3740 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3742 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3743 actions into the two rules, like this:
3747 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3748 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3749 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3750 '@{' statements '@}'
3756 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3757 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3759 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3760 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3761 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3765 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3766 declarations statements '@}'
3767 | '@{' statements '@}'
3773 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3774 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3776 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3777 serves as a subroutine:
3781 subroutine: /* empty */
3782 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3788 compound: subroutine
3789 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3791 '@{' statements '@}'
3797 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3798 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3800 @node Named References
3801 @subsection Using Named References
3802 @cindex named references
3804 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3805 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3806 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3807 references. For example:
3811 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3812 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3817 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3818 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3822 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3823 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3828 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3834 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3837 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3840 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3845 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3846 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3847 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3850 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3851 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3856 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3857 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3858 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3859 the mid-rule action code:
3862 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3863 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3869 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3870 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3873 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3874 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3878 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3879 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3880 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3881 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3882 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3883 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3888 @section Tracking Locations
3890 @cindex textual location
3891 @cindex location, textual
3893 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3894 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3895 especially symbol locations.
3897 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3898 actions to take when rules are matched.
3901 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3902 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3903 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3907 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3908 @cindex data type of locations
3909 @cindex default location type
3911 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3912 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3914 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3915 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3916 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3917 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3921 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3930 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3931 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3932 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3933 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3934 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3936 @node Actions and Locations
3937 @subsection Actions and Locations
3938 @cindex location actions
3939 @cindex actions, location
3942 @vindex @@@var{name}
3943 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3945 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3946 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3948 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3949 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3950 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3951 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3952 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3955 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3956 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3957 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3958 about using the named references construct.
3960 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3967 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3968 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3969 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3970 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3977 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3978 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3979 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3985 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3986 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3987 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3990 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3991 example above simply rewrites this way:
4004 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4005 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4006 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4013 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4014 from a semantic action.
4015 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4016 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4018 @node Location Default Action
4019 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4020 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4021 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4023 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4024 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4025 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4026 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4027 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4028 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4029 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4030 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4033 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4034 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4036 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4037 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4038 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4039 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4040 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4041 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4042 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4043 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4044 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4045 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4047 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4051 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4055 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4056 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4057 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4058 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4062 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4063 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4064 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4065 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4071 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4072 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4073 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4075 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4079 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4080 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4083 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4084 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4085 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4086 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4089 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4090 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4091 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4092 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4096 @section Bison Declarations
4097 @cindex declarations, Bison
4098 @cindex Bison declarations
4100 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4101 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4104 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4105 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4106 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4107 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4109 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4110 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4111 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4112 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4115 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4116 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4117 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4118 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4119 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4120 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4121 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4122 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4123 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4124 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4125 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4126 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4130 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4131 @cindex version requirement
4132 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4135 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4136 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4140 %require "@var{version}"
4144 @subsection Token Type Names
4145 @cindex declaring token type names
4146 @cindex token type names, declaring
4147 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4150 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4156 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4157 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4158 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4160 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4161 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4162 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4165 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4166 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4167 following the token name:
4171 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4175 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4176 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4177 with each other or with normal characters.
4179 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4180 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4181 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4182 Than One Value Type}).
4188 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4192 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4196 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4197 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4198 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4205 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4206 equivalent literal string tokens:
4209 %token <operator> OR "||"
4210 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4215 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4216 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4217 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4218 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4219 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4220 the literal string instead of the token name.
4222 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4223 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4227 %token END 0 "end of file"
4230 @node Precedence Decl
4231 @subsection Operator Precedence
4232 @cindex precedence declarations
4233 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4234 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4236 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4237 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4238 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4239 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4240 operator precedence.
4242 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4243 @code{%token}: either
4246 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4253 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4256 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4257 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4258 all the @var{symbols}:
4262 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4263 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4264 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4265 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4266 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4267 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4268 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4269 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4270 considered a syntax error.
4273 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4274 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4275 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4276 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4277 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4280 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4281 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4282 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4283 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4288 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4289 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4293 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4294 @cindex declaring value types
4295 @cindex value types, declaring
4298 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4299 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4300 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4315 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4316 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4317 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4318 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4320 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4321 @code{union}. For example:
4333 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4334 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4337 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4338 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4339 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4341 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4342 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4344 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4345 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4346 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4347 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4355 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4360 and then your grammar can use the following
4361 instead of @code{%union}:
4374 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4375 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4376 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4380 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4381 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4382 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4385 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4389 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4390 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4391 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4392 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4393 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4396 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4397 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4398 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4399 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4401 @node Initial Action Decl
4402 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4403 @findex %initial-action
4405 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4406 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4409 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4410 @findex %initial-action
4411 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4412 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4413 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4414 @code{%parse-param}.
4417 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4420 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4423 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4428 @node Destructor Decl
4429 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4430 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4434 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4435 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4436 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4437 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4438 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4439 must discard the start symbol.
4441 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4442 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4443 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4444 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4446 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4447 symbol is automatically discarded.
4449 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4451 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4453 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4454 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4455 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4456 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4458 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4459 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4460 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4461 tag among @var{symbols}.
4462 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4463 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4464 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4466 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4467 (These default forms are experimental.
4468 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4470 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4471 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4472 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4473 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4475 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4476 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4477 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4478 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4479 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4486 %union @{ char *string; @}
4487 %token <string> STRING1
4488 %token <string> STRING2
4489 %type <string> string1
4490 %type <string> string2
4491 %union @{ char character; @}
4492 %token <character> CHR
4493 %type <character> chr
4496 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4497 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4498 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4499 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4503 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4504 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4505 to @code{free} by default.
4506 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4507 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4508 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4509 @code{free} only once.
4510 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4511 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4513 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4514 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4515 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4516 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4517 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4518 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4519 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4520 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4521 reference it in your grammar.
4522 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4523 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4529 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4530 @cindex mid-rule actions
4531 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4532 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4533 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4534 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4535 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4537 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4538 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4542 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4543 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4544 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4549 @cindex discarded symbols
4550 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4554 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4556 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4558 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4559 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4561 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4564 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4565 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4568 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4569 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4570 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4574 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4575 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4576 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4577 @cindex warnings, preventing
4578 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4582 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4583 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4584 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4585 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4586 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4587 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4589 The declaration looks like this:
4595 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4596 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4597 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4598 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4600 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4601 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4602 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4603 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4604 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4605 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4606 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4612 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4616 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4617 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4618 print the number of conflicts.
4621 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4622 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4623 go back to the beginning.
4626 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4627 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4628 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4631 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4632 but will keep silent otherwise.
4635 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4636 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4637 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4638 @cindex default start symbol
4641 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4642 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4643 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4650 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4651 @cindex reentrant parser
4653 @findex %define api.pure
4655 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4656 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4657 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4658 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4659 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4660 program must be called only within interlocks.
4662 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4663 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4664 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4665 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4666 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4668 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4669 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4670 reentrant. It looks like this:
4676 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4677 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4678 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4679 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4680 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4681 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4682 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4683 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4684 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4686 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4687 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4691 @subsection A Push Parser
4694 @findex %define api.push-pull
4696 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4697 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4699 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4700 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4701 each time a new token is made available.
4703 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4704 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4705 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4706 within a certain time period.
4708 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4709 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4710 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define api.push-pull}):
4713 %define api.push-pull push
4716 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4717 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4718 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4719 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4720 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4724 %define api.push-pull push
4727 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4728 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4729 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4730 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4732 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4733 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4734 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4735 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4736 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4737 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4738 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4739 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4743 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4745 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4746 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4747 yypstate_delete (ps);
4750 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4751 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4752 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4753 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4754 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4755 example would thus look like this:
4760 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4763 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4764 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4765 yypstate_delete (ps);
4768 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4769 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4771 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4772 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4773 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4774 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4775 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4776 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4777 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4778 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4779 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4780 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4781 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4782 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4783 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4784 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4785 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4786 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4787 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4791 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4792 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4793 yypstate_delete (ps);
4796 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4797 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4798 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4801 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4802 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4803 @cindex declaration summary
4804 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4806 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4808 @deffn {Directive} %union
4809 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4810 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4813 @deffn {Directive} %token
4814 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4815 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4818 @deffn {Directive} %right
4819 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4820 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4823 @deffn {Directive} %left
4824 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4825 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4828 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4829 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4830 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4831 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4835 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4836 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4837 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4841 @deffn {Directive} %type
4842 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4843 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4846 @deffn {Directive} %start
4847 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4851 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4852 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4853 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4859 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4862 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4864 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4865 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
4866 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
4867 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
4868 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
4871 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
4872 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus,
4873 @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
4874 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes. For a detailed
4875 discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4877 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
4880 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4881 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
4882 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
4883 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
4884 use this form instead.
4886 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
4887 where Bison should generate it.
4888 Not all @var{qualifier}s are accepted for all target languages.
4889 Unaccepted @var{qualifier}s produce an error.
4890 Some of the accepted @var{qualifier}s are:
4894 @findex %code requires
4897 @item Language(s): C, C++
4899 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
4900 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
4901 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
4902 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
4903 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
4905 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
4906 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
4911 @findex %code provides
4914 @item Language(s): C, C++
4916 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
4917 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
4919 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
4920 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
4928 @item Language(s): C, C++
4930 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
4931 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
4932 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
4933 parser implementation file. For example:
4942 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
4946 @findex %code imports
4949 @item Language(s): Java
4951 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
4953 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
4954 before any class definitions.
4959 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
4960 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
4963 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4964 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4965 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4966 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4969 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4970 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4971 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4972 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
4974 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
4975 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
4977 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any character
4978 other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash or digit.
4980 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent to specifying
4983 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values.
4984 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
4985 of the following four conditions:
4988 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
4990 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
4991 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
4993 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
4995 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
4996 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
4999 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5000 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5001 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5002 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5003 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5004 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5008 @findex %define api.pure
5011 @item Language(s): C
5013 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5014 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5016 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5018 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5022 @findex %define api.push-pull
5025 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5027 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5028 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5029 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5030 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5032 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5034 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5037 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5039 @item lr.default-reductions
5040 @cindex default reductions
5041 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5042 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5043 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5048 @item Language(s): all
5050 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5051 contain default reductions.
5052 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
5053 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
5055 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
5057 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5059 @item Accepted Values:
5062 This is the traditional Bison behavior.
5063 The main advantage is a significant decrease in the size of the parser
5065 The disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
5066 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
5067 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
5068 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in
5069 LALR and IELR parser tables anyway due to
5070 LR state merging (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}).
5071 Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can contribute to delayed
5072 syntax error detection even in the case of canonical LR.
5073 As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error detection can be
5074 overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{Decl
5075 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the effects
5076 of delayed syntax error detection).
5078 @item @code{consistent}.
5079 @cindex consistent states
5080 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
5081 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
5082 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
5083 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
5084 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
5086 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
5087 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5088 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
5089 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5091 @item @code{accepting}.
5092 @cindex accepting state
5093 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5095 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5096 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5097 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5098 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5101 @item Default Value:
5103 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5104 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5108 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5110 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5111 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5114 @item Language(s): all
5116 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5117 remain in the parser tables.
5118 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5119 transitions from the start state to that state.
5120 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5121 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5122 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5123 are useless in the generated parser.
5125 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5127 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5133 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5135 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5136 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5137 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5138 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5139 remain in future Bison releases.
5141 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5142 remove other kinds of useless states.
5143 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5144 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5146 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5147 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5149 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5153 @c ================================================== lr.type
5156 @findex %define lr.type
5162 @item Language(s): all
5164 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5166 (This feature is experimental.
5167 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5169 @item Accepted Values:
5172 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5173 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5174 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5175 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5176 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5177 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5178 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5179 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5182 @cindex GLR with LALR
5183 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5184 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5185 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5187 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5188 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5189 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5190 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5191 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5192 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5193 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5194 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5196 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5197 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5198 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5199 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5200 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5201 from IELR and canonical LR.
5205 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5206 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5207 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5209 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5210 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5212 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5213 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5214 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5215 of magnitude less as well.
5216 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5218 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5219 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5220 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5223 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an
5224 interesting means to explore a grammar because they have a property that
5225 IELR and LALR tables do not.
5226 That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are left
5227 disabled (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every
5228 left context of every canonical LR state, the set of tokens
5229 accepted by that state is guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that
5230 is syntactically acceptable in that left context.
5231 It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR parsers
5232 in production is that, under the above constraints, they are guaranteed
5233 to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing any
5234 unnecessary reductions.
5235 However, IELR parsers using LAC (@pxref{Decl
5236 Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able to achieve this behavior without
5237 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or default reductions.
5240 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5244 @findex %define namespace
5247 @item Languages(s): C++
5249 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5250 For example, if you specify:
5253 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5256 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5259 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5262 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5263 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5266 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5272 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5273 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5274 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5276 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5278 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5279 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5280 lexical analyzer function.
5281 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5282 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5283 lexical analyzer function.
5284 For example, if you specify:
5287 %define namespace "foo"
5288 %name-prefix "bar::"
5291 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5295 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5297 @findex %define parse.lac
5299 @cindex lookahead correction
5302 @item Languages(s): C
5304 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5305 syntax error handling.
5307 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5308 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5309 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5310 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5311 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5312 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5313 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5314 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5315 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5316 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5318 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5319 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5320 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5321 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5322 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5324 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5325 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5326 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5327 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5328 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5329 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5330 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5331 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5332 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5333 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5334 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5335 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5336 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5337 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5338 token in the grammar.
5340 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in
5341 a consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5342 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed
5343 to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions
5344 are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{Decl
5345 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5346 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5347 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter behavior
5348 is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to
5349 achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully enabled.
5351 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5352 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5353 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5354 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5355 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5356 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5357 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5358 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5360 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5361 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5362 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5363 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5364 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5365 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5366 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5367 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5368 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5369 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5370 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5371 insignificant for practical grammars.
5373 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5375 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5381 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5382 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5383 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5384 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5385 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5387 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5388 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5389 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5390 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5391 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5392 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5393 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5394 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5395 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5396 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5398 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5399 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5400 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5402 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5403 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
5404 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations,
5405 ,Tracking Locations}.
5407 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5408 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5409 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5410 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5411 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5413 @findex %code requires
5414 @findex %code provides
5415 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5416 header also contains their code.
5417 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
5420 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5421 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5424 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5425 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5426 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5429 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5430 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5431 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5434 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5435 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5436 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5437 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5439 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5443 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5444 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5445 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5446 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5447 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5448 accurate syntax error messages.
5451 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5452 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5453 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5455 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5456 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5457 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5458 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5459 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5460 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5461 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5462 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5464 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5468 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5469 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5470 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5475 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5476 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5477 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5478 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5479 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5480 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5481 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5485 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5486 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5489 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5490 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
5491 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
5494 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5495 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5496 Require a Version of Bison}.
5499 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5500 Specify the skeleton to use.
5502 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5503 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5504 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5505 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5507 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5508 file in the Bison installation directory.
5509 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5510 directory of the grammar file.
5511 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5514 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5515 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5516 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5517 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5518 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5519 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5520 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5523 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5524 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5525 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5526 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5527 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5528 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5529 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5532 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5533 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5534 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5538 The highest token number, plus one.
5540 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5542 The number of grammar rules,
5544 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5548 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5549 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5550 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5551 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5555 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5556 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5557 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5561 @node Multiple Parsers
5562 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5564 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5565 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5566 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5567 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5569 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5570 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5571 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5572 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5573 names that do not conflict.
5575 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5576 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5577 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5578 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5579 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5580 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5581 @code{clex}, and so on.
5583 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5584 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5585 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5586 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5587 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5589 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5590 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5591 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5592 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5595 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5596 @cindex C-language interface
5599 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5600 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5601 functions that it needs to use.
5603 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5604 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5605 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5606 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5609 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5610 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5611 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5612 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5613 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5614 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5616 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5617 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5618 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5622 @node Parser Function
5623 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5626 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5627 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5628 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5629 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5630 without reading further.
5633 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5634 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5635 is due to end-of-input).
5637 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5638 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5641 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5644 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5649 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5654 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5657 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5658 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5659 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5661 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5662 @findex %parse-param
5663 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5664 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5665 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5666 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5667 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5670 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5673 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5674 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5678 Then call the parser like this:
5682 int nastiness, randomness;
5683 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5684 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5690 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5693 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5696 @node Push Parser Function
5697 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5698 @findex yypush_parse
5700 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5701 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5703 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5704 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5705 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5706 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5708 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5709 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5710 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5711 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5714 @node Pull Parser Function
5715 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5716 @findex yypull_parse
5718 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5719 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5721 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5722 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5723 declaration is used.
5724 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5726 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5727 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5730 @node Parser Create Function
5731 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5732 @findex yypstate_new
5734 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5735 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5737 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5738 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5739 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5740 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5742 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5743 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5744 or 0 if no memory was available.
5745 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5749 @node Parser Delete Function
5750 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5751 @findex yypstate_delete
5753 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5754 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5756 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5757 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5758 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5759 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5761 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5762 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5763 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5767 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5769 @cindex lexical analyzer
5771 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5772 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5773 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5774 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5776 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5777 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5778 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5779 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5780 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5781 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5782 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5786 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5787 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5788 of the token it has read.
5789 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5790 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5792 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5793 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5796 @node Calling Convention
5797 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5799 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5800 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5801 signifies end-of-input.
5803 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5804 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5805 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5806 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5808 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5809 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5810 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5811 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5812 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5813 signifies end-of-input.
5815 Here is an example showing these things:
5822 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5825 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5826 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5828 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5834 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5835 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5837 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5838 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5842 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5843 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5844 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5845 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5848 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5849 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5850 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5851 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5852 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5855 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5856 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5857 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5858 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5861 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5864 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5865 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5866 strlen (token_buffer))
5867 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5868 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5873 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5874 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5878 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5881 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5882 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5883 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5884 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5890 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5891 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5896 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5897 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5898 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5899 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5900 declaration looks like this:
5913 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5918 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5919 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5924 @node Token Locations
5925 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5928 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5929 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5930 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5931 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5932 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5933 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5935 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5936 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5937 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5938 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5939 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5942 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5945 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5947 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5948 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5949 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5950 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5951 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5952 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5957 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5960 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5961 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5966 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5967 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5968 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5972 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5973 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5976 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5978 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5979 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5985 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5986 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5987 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5991 results in the following signature:
5994 int yylex (int *nastiness);
5995 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
5998 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6001 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6002 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6006 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6009 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6010 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6013 @node Error Reporting
6014 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6015 @cindex error reporting function
6018 @cindex syntax error
6020 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6021 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6022 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6023 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6026 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6027 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6028 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6029 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6030 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6032 @findex %error-verbose
6033 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
6034 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6035 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6036 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6038 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6039 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6040 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6041 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6042 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6043 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6045 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6046 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6047 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6049 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6054 yyerror (char const *s)
6058 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6063 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6064 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6065 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6066 immediately return 1.
6068 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6069 an access to the current location.
6070 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6071 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6072 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6076 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6077 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6080 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6083 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6084 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6087 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6088 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6089 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6090 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6094 /* Location tracking. */
6098 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6100 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6101 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6105 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6108 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6109 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6110 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6111 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6116 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6117 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6118 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6119 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6120 message is always passed last.
6122 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6123 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6124 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6128 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6129 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6130 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6131 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6133 @node Action Features
6134 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6135 @cindex summary, action features
6136 @cindex action features summary
6138 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6139 are useful in actions.
6141 @deffn {Variable} $$
6142 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6143 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6146 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6147 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6148 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6151 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6152 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6153 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6154 Types of Values in Actions}.
6157 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6158 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6159 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6160 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6163 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6164 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6165 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6168 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6169 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6170 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6173 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6175 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6176 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6177 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6178 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6179 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6180 going to be reduced by this rule.
6182 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6183 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6184 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6187 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6190 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6192 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6195 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6197 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6201 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6203 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6204 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6205 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6206 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6207 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6210 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6211 @findex YYRECOVERING
6212 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6213 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6214 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6217 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6218 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6219 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6220 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6221 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6223 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6226 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6227 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6229 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6231 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6234 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6235 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6236 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6237 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6240 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6241 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6242 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6243 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6245 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6248 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6249 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6250 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6251 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6253 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6258 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6259 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6260 Tracking Locations}.
6262 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6266 @c int first_line, last_line;
6267 @c int first_column, last_column;
6271 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6272 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6274 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6275 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6276 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6279 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6282 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6284 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6285 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6286 Tracking Locations}.
6289 @node Internationalization
6290 @section Parser Internationalization
6291 @cindex internationalization
6297 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6298 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6299 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6300 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6301 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6302 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6303 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6304 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6307 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6308 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6309 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6314 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6315 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6316 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6317 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6318 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6322 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6327 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6328 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6329 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6330 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6331 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6332 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6333 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6334 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6335 Bison-generated parser.
6338 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6339 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6340 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6344 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6347 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6348 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6349 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6353 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6354 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6355 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6358 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6364 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6368 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6374 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6375 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6376 @cindex algorithm of parser
6379 @cindex parser stack
6380 @cindex stack, parser
6382 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6383 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6384 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6386 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6387 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6390 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6391 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6392 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6393 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6394 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6395 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6396 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6398 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6405 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6406 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6409 expr: expr '*' expr;
6413 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6420 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6421 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6423 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6424 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6425 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6427 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6430 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6431 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6432 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6433 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6434 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6435 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6436 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6437 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6438 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6442 @section Lookahead Tokens
6443 @cindex lookahead token
6445 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6446 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6447 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6448 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6449 token in order to decide what to do.
6451 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6452 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6453 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6454 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6455 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6456 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6457 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6460 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6461 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6462 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6479 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6480 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6481 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6482 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6483 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6485 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6486 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6487 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6488 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6489 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6490 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6495 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6496 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6497 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6498 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6501 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6503 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6504 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6505 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6507 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6508 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6514 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6520 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6521 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6523 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6524 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6525 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6526 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6529 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6530 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6531 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6532 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6533 contrast it with the other alternative.
6535 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6536 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6540 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6542 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6545 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6546 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6547 making these two inputs equivalent:
6550 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6552 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6555 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6556 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6557 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6558 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6559 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6560 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6561 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6562 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6564 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6565 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6566 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6567 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6569 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6571 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6572 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6573 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6578 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6590 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6599 @section Operator Precedence
6600 @cindex operator precedence
6601 @cindex precedence of operators
6603 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6604 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6605 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6606 shift and when to reduce.
6609 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6610 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6611 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6612 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6615 @node Why Precedence
6616 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6618 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6619 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6633 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6634 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6635 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6636 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6637 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6638 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6639 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6642 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6643 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6644 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6645 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6646 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6647 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6648 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6649 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6652 @cindex associativity
6653 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6654 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6655 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6656 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6657 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6658 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6659 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6660 makes right-associativity.
6662 @node Using Precedence
6663 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6668 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6669 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6670 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6671 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6672 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6673 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6674 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6677 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6678 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6679 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6680 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6681 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6683 @node Precedence Examples
6684 @subsection Precedence Examples
6686 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6694 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6695 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6696 declared with @code{'-'}:
6699 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6705 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6706 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6707 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6709 @node How Precedence
6710 @subsection How Precedence Works
6712 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6713 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6714 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6715 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6716 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6717 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6719 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6720 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6721 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6722 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6723 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6724 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6725 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6728 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6729 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6731 @node Contextual Precedence
6732 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6733 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6734 @cindex unary operator precedence
6735 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6736 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6739 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6740 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6741 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6742 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6744 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6745 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6746 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6747 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6750 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6751 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6752 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6753 modifier's syntax is:
6756 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6760 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6761 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6762 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6763 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6764 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6766 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6767 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6768 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6778 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6785 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6790 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6791 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6792 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6793 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6795 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6796 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6797 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6798 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6800 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6801 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6802 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6803 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6804 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6805 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6807 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6808 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6812 @section Parser States
6813 @cindex finite-state machine
6814 @cindex parser state
6815 @cindex state (of parser)
6817 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6818 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6819 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6820 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6821 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6823 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6824 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6825 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6826 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6827 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6828 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6829 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6830 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6833 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6834 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6835 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6838 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6839 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6840 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6842 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6843 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6846 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6847 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6850 sequence: /* empty */
6851 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6854 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6857 maybeword: /* empty */
6858 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6860 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6865 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6866 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6867 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6868 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6869 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6870 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6872 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6873 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6874 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6876 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6877 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6878 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6879 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6880 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6882 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6883 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6884 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6885 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6888 sequence: /* empty */
6889 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6891 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6895 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6898 sequence: /* empty */
6900 | sequence redirects
6907 redirects:/* empty */
6908 | redirects redirect
6913 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6914 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6915 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6916 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6917 in infinitely many ways!
6919 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6920 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6921 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6922 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6924 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6928 sequence: /* empty */
6934 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6938 sequence: /* empty */
6940 | sequence redirects
6948 | redirects redirect
6952 @node Mystery Conflicts
6953 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6955 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6963 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6967 | name_list ':' type
6985 | name ',' name_list
6990 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
6991 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
6992 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
6993 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
6997 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
6999 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7000 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7001 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7003 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7004 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7005 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7006 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7007 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7008 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7009 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7011 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7012 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in
7013 difficulties beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts.
7014 The best way to fix all these problems is to select a different parser
7015 table generation algorithm.
7016 Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but
7017 the former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7018 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, for details.
7019 (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations
7021 More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7023 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7024 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7025 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7026 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7027 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7038 /* This rule is never used. */
7044 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7045 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7046 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7047 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7048 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7049 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7051 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7052 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7053 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7054 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7055 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7056 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7061 | name_list ':' type
7069 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7070 generators, please see:
7071 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
7072 LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{ACM Transactions on
7073 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
7074 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
7076 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7077 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7079 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7080 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7081 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7083 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7084 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7085 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7086 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7087 context-free languages.
7088 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7089 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7090 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7091 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7092 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7093 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7094 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7095 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7097 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7098 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7099 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7100 parser uses the same basic
7101 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7102 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7103 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7104 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7106 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7107 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7108 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7109 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7110 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7112 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7113 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7114 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7115 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7116 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7117 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7118 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7119 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7120 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7121 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7122 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7125 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7126 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7127 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7128 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7129 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7130 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7131 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7132 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7133 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7134 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7135 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7136 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7138 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7139 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7140 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7142 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7143 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7144 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7145 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7146 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7147 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7148 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7149 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7150 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7151 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7152 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7153 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7155 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, please see: Elizabeth
7156 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
7157 Generalised LR Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
7158 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
7159 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
7162 @node Memory Management
7163 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7164 @cindex memory exhaustion
7165 @cindex memory management
7166 @cindex stack overflow
7167 @cindex parser stack overflow
7168 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7170 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7171 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7172 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7174 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7175 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7176 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7179 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7180 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7181 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7182 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7184 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7185 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7186 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7187 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7188 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7189 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7191 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7192 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7193 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7196 @cindex default stack limit
7197 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7201 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7202 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7203 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7204 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7205 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7207 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7209 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7210 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7211 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7212 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7213 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7214 this deficiency in a future release.
7216 @node Error Recovery
7217 @chapter Error Recovery
7218 @cindex error recovery
7219 @cindex recovery from errors
7221 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7222 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7223 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7226 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7227 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7228 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7229 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7230 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7231 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7232 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7235 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7236 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7237 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7238 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7239 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7240 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7245 stmnts: /* empty string */
7251 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7252 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7254 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7255 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7256 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7257 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7258 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7259 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7260 applicable in the ordinary way.
7262 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7263 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7264 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7265 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7266 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7267 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7268 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7269 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7270 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7271 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7272 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7273 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7275 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7276 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7277 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7280 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7283 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7284 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7285 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7286 spurious error message:
7289 primary: '(' expr ')'
7295 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7296 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7297 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7298 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7299 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7300 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7301 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7304 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7305 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7306 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7307 error messages resume.
7309 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7310 as any other rules can.
7313 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7314 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7315 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7316 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7319 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7320 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7321 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7323 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7325 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7326 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7327 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7328 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7329 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7331 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7332 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7333 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7334 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7337 @node Context Dependency
7338 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7340 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7341 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7342 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7343 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7347 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7348 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7349 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7350 error recovery rules must be written.
7353 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7354 neither clean nor robust.)
7356 @node Semantic Tokens
7357 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7359 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7360 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7366 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7367 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7368 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7370 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7371 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7372 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7373 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7374 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7376 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7377 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7378 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7379 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7380 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7381 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7382 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7384 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7385 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7386 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7387 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7391 typedef int foo, bar;
7394 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7395 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7400 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7401 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7403 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7404 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7405 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7406 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7407 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7411 declarator maybeasm '='
7413 | declarator maybeasm
7417 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7419 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7424 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7425 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7426 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7428 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7429 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7430 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7431 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7432 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7433 the syntactic context.
7435 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7436 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7437 @cindex lexical tie-in
7439 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7440 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7443 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7444 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7445 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7446 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7447 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7454 void yyerror (char const *);
7468 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7482 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7483 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7484 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7486 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7487 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7488 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7491 @node Tie-in Recovery
7492 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7494 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7495 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7497 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7498 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7499 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7500 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7504 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7511 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7512 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7513 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7514 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7515 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7517 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7519 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7520 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7521 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7533 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7534 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7535 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7536 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7538 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7539 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7540 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7541 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7542 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7543 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7546 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7549 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7551 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7552 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7553 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7554 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7555 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7556 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7559 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7560 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7564 @section Understanding Your Parser
7566 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7567 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7568 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7569 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7570 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7572 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7573 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7574 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7575 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7576 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7577 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7578 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7580 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7597 @command{bison} reports:
7600 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7601 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7602 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7603 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7604 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7607 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7608 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7609 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7610 interpretation is the same.
7612 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7613 to precedence and/or associativity:
7616 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7617 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7618 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7623 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7626 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7627 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7628 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7629 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7633 @cindex token, useless
7634 @cindex useless token
7635 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7636 @cindex useless nonterminal
7637 @cindex rule, useless
7638 @cindex useless rule
7639 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7640 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7641 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7642 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7646 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7649 Terminals unused in grammar:
7652 Rules useless in grammar:
7657 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7663 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7664 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7665 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7666 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7667 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7672 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7675 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7685 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7690 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7695 @cindex pointed rule
7696 @cindex rule, pointed
7697 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7698 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7699 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7700 that the input cursor.
7705 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7707 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7712 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7713 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7714 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7715 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7716 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7717 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7718 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7719 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7721 @cindex core, item set
7722 @cindex item set core
7723 @cindex kernel, item set
7724 @cindex item set core
7725 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7726 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7727 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7728 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7729 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7730 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7736 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7737 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7738 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7739 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7740 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7741 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7743 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7754 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7756 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7760 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7761 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7762 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7763 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7768 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7769 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7770 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7771 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7772 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7774 $ shift, and go to state 3
7775 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7776 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7777 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7778 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7782 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7783 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7784 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7785 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7786 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7787 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7789 @cindex accepting state
7790 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7796 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7802 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7803 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7805 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7811 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7813 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7819 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7821 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7827 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7829 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7835 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7837 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7842 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7848 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7849 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7850 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7851 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7852 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7854 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7855 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7857 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7858 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7861 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7862 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7863 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7864 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7865 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7866 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7867 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7868 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7870 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7871 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7872 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7875 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7876 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7877 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7878 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7879 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7880 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7881 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7882 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7883 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7884 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7885 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7886 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7891 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7892 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7893 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7894 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7895 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7897 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7898 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7900 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7901 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7904 The remaining states are similar:
7909 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7910 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7911 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7912 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7913 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7915 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7916 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7918 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7919 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7923 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7924 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7925 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7926 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7927 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7929 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7931 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7932 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7936 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7937 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7938 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7939 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7940 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7942 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7943 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7944 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7945 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7947 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7948 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7949 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7950 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7951 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7955 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7956 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7957 @samp{*}, but also because the
7958 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7962 @section Tracing Your Parser
7965 @cindex tracing the parser
7967 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
7968 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
7970 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
7973 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
7975 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
7976 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
7977 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
7978 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
7981 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
7982 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
7983 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
7985 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
7987 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
7988 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
7989 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
7990 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
7992 the preferred solution.
7995 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
7998 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
7999 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8000 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8001 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8002 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8003 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8005 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8006 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8007 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8008 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8010 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8011 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8012 messages tell you these things:
8016 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8019 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8020 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8023 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8024 of the state stack afterward.
8027 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8028 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8029 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8030 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8031 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8032 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8033 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8034 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8035 grammar are to blame.
8037 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8038 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8039 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8040 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8041 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8044 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8045 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8046 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8047 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8048 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8049 value (from @code{yylval}).
8051 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8052 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8056 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8057 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8060 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8063 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8066 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8067 else if (type == NUM)
8068 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8072 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8075 @chapter Invoking Bison
8076 @cindex invoking Bison
8077 @cindex Bison invocation
8078 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8080 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8086 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8087 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8088 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8089 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8090 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8091 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8092 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8093 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8094 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8095 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8096 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8101 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8104 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8107 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8110 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8112 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8113 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8114 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8117 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8118 in alphabetical order by short options.
8119 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8120 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8124 @section Bison Options
8126 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8127 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8128 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8129 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8130 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8133 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8134 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8137 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8143 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8147 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8149 @item --print-localedir
8150 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8152 @item --print-datadir
8153 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8157 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8158 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8159 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8160 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8161 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8162 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8163 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8164 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8165 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8166 for compatibility with POSIX:
8173 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8174 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8175 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8176 this option is specified.
8178 @item -W [@var{category}]
8179 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8180 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8183 @item midrule-values
8184 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8186 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8189 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8192 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8193 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8196 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8199 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8200 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8201 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8205 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8210 Turn off all the warnings.
8212 Treat warnings as errors.
8215 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8216 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8217 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8226 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8227 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8228 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8230 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8231 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8232 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8233 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8234 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8235 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}) except that Bison processes multiple
8236 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8240 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8243 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8244 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8245 definition for @var{name}.
8247 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8248 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8249 definitions for @var{name}.
8251 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8252 definitions for @var{name}.
8255 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8256 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8257 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8259 @item -L @var{language}
8260 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8261 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8262 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8263 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8264 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8266 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8270 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8272 @item -p @var{prefix}
8273 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8274 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8275 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8279 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8280 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8281 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8282 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8283 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8284 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8287 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8288 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8289 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8291 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8292 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8293 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8294 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8296 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8297 file in the Bison installation directory.
8298 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8299 current working directory.
8300 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8303 @itemx --token-table
8304 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8311 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8312 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8313 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8314 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8317 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8318 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8319 with other short options.
8321 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8322 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8323 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8324 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8326 @item -r @var{things}
8327 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8328 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8329 separated list of @var{things} among:
8333 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8337 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8338 each rule's lookahead set.
8341 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8342 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8345 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8346 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8350 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8351 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8352 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8355 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8356 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8358 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8359 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8361 @item -g [@var{file}]
8362 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8363 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8364 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8365 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8366 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8367 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8370 @item -x [@var{file}]
8371 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8372 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8373 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8374 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8376 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8377 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8380 @node Option Cross Key
8381 @section Option Cross Key
8383 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8384 the corresponding short option and directive.
8386 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8387 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8388 @include cross-options.texi
8392 @section Yacc Library
8394 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8395 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8396 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8397 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8398 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8399 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8400 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8402 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8403 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8406 int yyerror (char const *);
8409 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8410 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8411 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8417 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8419 @node Other Languages
8420 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8423 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8424 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8428 @section C++ Parsers
8431 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8432 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8433 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8434 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8435 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8436 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8439 @node C++ Bison Interface
8440 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8441 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8445 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8446 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8447 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8448 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8450 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8452 @findex %define namespace
8453 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace name, see
8455 The various classes are generated in the following files:
8460 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8461 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8464 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8467 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8468 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8469 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8470 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8471 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8473 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8474 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8475 @samp{%defines} directive.
8478 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8479 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8481 @node C++ Semantic Values
8482 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8483 @c - No objects in unions
8485 @c - Printer and destructor
8487 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8488 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8489 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8490 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8491 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8494 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8495 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8496 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8498 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8499 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8500 to such objects are allowed.
8503 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8504 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8505 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8509 @node C++ Location Values
8510 @subsection C++ Location Values
8514 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8516 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8517 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8518 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8519 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8520 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8522 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8523 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8524 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8525 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8526 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8529 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8530 The line, starting at 1.
8533 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8534 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8537 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8538 The column, starting at 0.
8541 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8542 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8545 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8546 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8547 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8548 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8549 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8552 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8553 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8554 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8555 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8558 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8559 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8560 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8563 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8564 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8565 Advance the @code{end} position.
8568 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8569 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8570 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8571 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8574 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8575 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8579 @node C++ Parser Interface
8580 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8581 @c - define parser_class_name
8583 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8585 @c - Reporting errors
8587 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8588 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8589 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8590 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8591 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8592 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8593 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8594 additional argument for its constructor.
8596 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8597 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8598 The types for semantics value and locations.
8601 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8602 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8603 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8604 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8605 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8606 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8609 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8610 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8611 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8614 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8615 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8618 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8619 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8620 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8624 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8625 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8626 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8627 or nonzero, full tracing.
8630 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8631 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8632 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8633 described by @var{m}.
8637 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8638 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8639 @c - prefix for yylex.
8640 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8643 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8644 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8645 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8647 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8648 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8649 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8650 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8654 @node A Complete C++ Example
8655 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8657 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8658 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8659 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8660 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8661 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8662 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8663 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8664 actually easier to interface with.
8667 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8668 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8669 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8670 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8671 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8674 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8675 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8677 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8678 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8679 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8680 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8681 of valid input follows.
8685 seven := one + two * three
8689 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8690 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8692 @c - A place to store error messages
8693 @c - A place for the result
8695 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8696 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8697 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8698 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8699 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8700 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8701 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8703 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8704 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8705 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8708 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8710 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8711 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8714 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8719 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8720 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8721 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8722 factor both as follows.
8724 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8726 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8728 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8729 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8730 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8731 calcxx_driver& driver)
8732 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8737 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8740 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8742 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8747 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8749 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8755 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8756 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8758 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8760 // Handling the scanner.
8763 bool trace_scanning;
8767 Similarly for the parser itself.
8769 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8771 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8772 int parse (const std::string& f);
8778 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8779 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8780 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8781 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8783 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8786 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8787 void error (const std::string& m);
8789 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8792 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8793 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8794 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8795 messages and set error state.
8797 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8799 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8800 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8802 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8803 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8805 variables["one"] = 1;
8806 variables["two"] = 2;
8809 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8814 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8818 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8819 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8820 int res = parser.parse ();
8826 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8828 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8832 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8834 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8839 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8841 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
8842 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
8843 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8844 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8847 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8849 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8850 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8852 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8856 @findex %code requires
8857 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8858 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8859 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8860 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8861 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8862 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8863 @xref{Decl Summary, ,%code}.
8865 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8869 class calcxx_driver;
8874 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8875 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8878 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8880 // The parsing context.
8881 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8882 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8886 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8887 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
8888 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8889 automatically propagated.
8891 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8896 // Initialize the initial location.
8897 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8902 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8905 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8912 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8915 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8927 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8928 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8930 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8933 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8939 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8940 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8941 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8942 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8945 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8947 %token END 0 "end of file"
8949 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8950 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8955 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8958 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8959 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8961 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8962 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8964 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
8968 The grammar itself is straightforward.
8970 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8974 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
8976 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
8977 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
8980 "identifier" ":=" exp
8981 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
8985 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
8986 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
8987 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
8988 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
8989 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
8990 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
8995 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
8998 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9001 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9002 const std::string& m)
9004 driver.error (l, m);
9008 @node Calc++ Scanner
9009 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9011 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9012 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9014 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9016 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9021 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9022 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9024 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9025 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9026 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9027 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9031 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9032 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9033 not of token_type. */
9034 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9039 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9040 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9041 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9042 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9044 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9046 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9050 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9052 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9054 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9060 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9061 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9062 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9063 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9064 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9065 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9066 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9068 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9071 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9077 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9078 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9082 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9083 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9084 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9085 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9087 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9090 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9092 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9093 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9094 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9097 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9098 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9099 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9101 return token::NUMBER;
9103 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9104 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9109 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9110 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9112 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9115 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9117 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9120 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9122 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
9128 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9134 @node Calc++ Top Level
9135 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9137 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9139 @comment file: calc++.cc
9142 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9145 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9147 calcxx_driver driver;
9148 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9149 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9150 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9151 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9152 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9153 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9154 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9159 @section Java Parsers
9162 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9163 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9164 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9165 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9166 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9167 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9168 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9169 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9172 @node Java Bison Interface
9173 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9174 @c - %language "Java"
9176 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9177 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9179 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9180 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9182 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9183 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9184 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9185 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9186 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9187 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9188 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9189 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9190 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9191 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9193 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9195 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9196 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9197 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9198 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9201 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9202 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9204 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9205 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9207 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9208 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9210 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9211 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9212 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9213 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9214 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9215 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9216 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9217 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9218 access the token names and codes.
9220 @node Java Semantic Values
9221 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9222 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9224 @c - Printer and destructor
9226 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9227 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9228 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9231 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9232 %type <Integer> number
9235 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9236 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9237 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9238 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9239 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9242 %define stype "ASTNode"
9246 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9247 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9249 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9250 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9251 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9252 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9253 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9254 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9256 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9257 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9258 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9260 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9261 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9262 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9265 @node Java Location Values
9266 @subsection Java Location Values
9271 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9272 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9273 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9274 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9275 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9276 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9277 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9278 @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9280 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9281 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9282 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9283 be supplied by the user.
9286 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9287 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9288 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9291 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9292 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9295 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9296 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9299 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9300 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9301 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9302 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9306 @node Java Parser Interface
9307 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9308 @c - define parser_class_name
9310 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9312 @c - Reporting errors
9314 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9315 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9316 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9317 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9318 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9320 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9321 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9322 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9323 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9324 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9325 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9327 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9328 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9329 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9330 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9332 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9333 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9334 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9335 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9336 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9337 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9339 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9340 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9342 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9343 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9344 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9345 which initialize them automatically.
9347 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9348 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9350 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9351 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9352 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9356 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9357 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9358 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9360 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9361 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9362 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9365 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9366 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9367 @code{false} otherwise.
9370 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9371 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9372 from a syntax error.
9373 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9376 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9377 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9378 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9382 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9383 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9384 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9385 or nonzero, full tracing.
9389 @node Java Scanner Interface
9390 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9393 @c - Lexer interface
9395 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9396 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9397 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9398 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9400 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9401 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9402 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9403 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9406 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9407 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9408 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9409 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9412 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9414 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9415 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9416 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9417 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9420 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9421 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9422 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9425 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9426 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9429 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9430 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9431 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9432 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9433 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9435 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9436 "@var{class-name}".}
9439 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9440 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9442 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9443 "@var{class-name}".}
9447 @node Java Action Features
9448 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9450 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9451 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9453 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9454 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9457 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9458 This may not be assigned to.
9459 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9462 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9463 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9464 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9468 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9469 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9470 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9471 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9472 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9473 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9476 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9477 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9478 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9479 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9481 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9485 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9486 This may not be assigned to.
9487 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9491 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9492 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9495 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9496 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9497 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9500 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9501 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9502 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9505 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9506 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9507 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9510 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9511 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9512 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9514 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9517 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9518 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9519 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9520 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9525 @node Java Differences
9526 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9528 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9529 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9530 section summarizes these differences.
9534 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9535 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9536 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9537 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9538 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9539 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9540 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9542 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9543 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9544 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9545 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9546 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9549 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9550 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9551 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9552 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9553 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9554 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9555 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9556 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9557 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9560 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9562 @item @code{%code imports}
9563 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9564 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9565 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9567 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9568 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9570 @item @code{%code lexer}
9571 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9572 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9573 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9577 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9578 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9579 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9581 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9582 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9587 @node Java Declarations Summary
9588 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9590 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9591 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9593 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9594 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9597 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9598 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9599 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9600 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9601 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9604 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9605 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9606 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9607 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9610 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9611 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9612 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9613 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9616 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9617 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9618 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9621 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9622 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9624 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9627 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9628 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9629 @xref{Java Differences}.
9632 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9633 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9634 @xref{Java Differences}.
9637 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9638 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9639 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9642 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9643 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9644 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9645 @xref{Java Differences}.
9648 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9649 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9650 @xref{Java Differences}.
9653 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9654 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9655 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9658 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9659 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9660 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9663 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9664 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9665 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9668 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9669 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9671 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9674 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9675 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9676 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9677 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9680 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9681 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9682 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9683 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9684 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9687 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9688 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9689 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9692 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9693 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9694 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9695 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9698 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9699 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9700 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9701 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9704 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9705 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9706 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9709 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9710 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9711 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9714 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9715 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9716 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9719 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9720 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9721 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9722 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9726 @c ================================================= FAQ
9729 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9730 @cindex frequently asked questions
9733 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9737 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9738 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9739 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9740 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9741 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9742 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
9743 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9744 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9745 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9746 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9747 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9748 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9751 @node Memory Exhausted
9752 @section Memory Exhausted
9755 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
9756 message. What can I do?
9759 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
9762 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
9763 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
9765 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
9766 following typical questions:
9769 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
9770 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
9771 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
9778 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
9779 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
9780 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
9783 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9784 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9785 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9786 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9787 @file{first-line.l}:
9795 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9798 yyparse (char const *file)
9800 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9803 /* One token only. */
9805 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9820 If the file @file{input} contains
9828 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9831 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9832 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9833 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9838 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9839 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9840 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9841 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9842 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9843 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9844 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9845 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9848 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9849 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9850 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9851 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9853 @node Strings are Destroyed
9854 @section Strings are Destroyed
9857 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9858 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9859 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9862 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9863 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9864 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9869 char *yylval = NULL;
9872 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9878 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9879 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9880 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9881 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9886 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9889 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9890 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9891 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9897 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9898 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9899 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9900 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9901 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9902 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9905 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9906 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9907 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9912 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9913 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9916 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9917 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9920 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9921 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9922 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9923 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9924 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9925 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9926 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9928 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9930 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9931 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9932 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9933 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9934 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9935 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9938 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9939 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9942 @node Multiple start-symbols
9943 @section Multiple start-symbols
9946 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9947 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9948 multiple entry points.
9951 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9952 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9953 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9954 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
9958 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
9960 start: START_FOO foo
9964 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
9965 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
9967 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
9968 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
9969 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
9970 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
9971 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
9972 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
9973 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
9974 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
9982 int t = start_token;
9987 /* @r{The rules.} */
9991 @node Secure? Conform?
9992 @section Secure? Conform?
9995 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
9998 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
9999 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10000 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10001 please send us a bug report.
10003 @node I can't build Bison
10004 @section I can't build Bison
10007 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10008 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10012 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10013 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10014 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10015 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10016 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10017 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10018 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10021 @node Where can I find help?
10022 @section Where can I find help?
10025 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10028 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10029 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10030 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10031 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10032 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10033 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10034 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10035 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10039 @section Bug Reports
10042 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10045 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10046 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10047 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10048 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10049 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10051 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10052 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10053 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10054 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10055 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10057 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10058 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10059 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10060 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10061 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10062 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10064 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10065 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10067 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10069 @node More Languages
10070 @section More Languages
10073 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10074 favorite language here}?
10077 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10078 languages; contributions are welcome.
10081 @section Beta Testing
10084 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10087 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10088 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10089 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10090 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10091 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10092 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10093 essentially halted.
10095 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10096 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10097 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10098 systems are especially welcome.
10100 @node Mailing Lists
10101 @section Mailing Lists
10104 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10107 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10109 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10111 @node Table of Symbols
10112 @appendix Bison Symbols
10113 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10114 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10116 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10117 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10118 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10121 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10122 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10123 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10126 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10127 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10128 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10131 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10132 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10133 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10136 @deffn {Variable} $$
10137 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10141 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10142 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10143 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10146 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10147 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10151 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10152 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10156 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10157 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10158 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10159 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10162 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10163 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10164 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10165 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10166 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10170 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10171 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10174 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10175 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10179 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10180 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10183 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10184 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10185 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10188 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10189 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10192 This feature is experimental.
10193 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10196 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10199 @deffn {Directive} <>
10200 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10203 This feature is experimental.
10204 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10207 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10210 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10211 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10212 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10213 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10216 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10217 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10218 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
10219 @xref{Decl Summary,,%code}.
10222 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10223 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10227 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10228 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10229 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10234 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10235 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10236 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10237 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
10238 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
10241 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10242 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10243 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10246 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10247 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10248 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10251 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10252 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10253 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10256 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10257 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10258 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10262 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10263 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10264 used in the grammar.
10267 @deffn {Symbol} error
10268 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10269 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10270 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10271 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10272 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10273 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10274 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10275 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10278 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10279 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10280 when @code{yyerror} is called.
10283 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10284 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10288 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10289 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10290 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10293 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10294 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10297 @deffn {Directive} %language
10298 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10299 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10302 @deffn {Directive} %left
10303 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10304 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10307 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10308 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10309 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10313 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10314 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10315 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10316 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10317 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10320 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10321 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10325 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10326 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10327 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10332 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10333 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10334 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10337 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10338 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10339 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10342 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10343 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10344 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10347 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10348 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10349 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10350 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10353 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10354 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10355 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10358 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10359 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
10360 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
10363 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10364 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10365 Require a Version of Bison}.
10368 @deffn {Directive} %right
10369 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10370 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10373 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10374 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10375 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10378 @deffn {Directive} %start
10379 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10383 @deffn {Directive} %token
10384 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10385 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10388 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10389 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10390 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10393 @deffn {Directive} %type
10394 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10395 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10398 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10399 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10400 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10404 @deffn {Directive} %union
10405 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10406 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10409 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10410 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10411 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10412 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10413 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10415 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10419 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10420 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10421 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10422 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10424 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10428 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10429 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10430 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10433 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10434 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10435 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10436 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10437 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10440 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10441 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10442 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10445 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10446 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10447 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10450 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10451 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10452 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10453 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10456 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10457 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10458 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10461 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10462 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10463 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10464 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10465 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10467 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10471 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10472 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10473 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10474 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10477 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10478 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10479 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10480 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10481 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10482 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
10485 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10486 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10487 @xref{Memory Management}.
10490 @deffn {Function} yylex
10491 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10492 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10496 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10497 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10498 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10499 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10500 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10503 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10504 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10505 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10506 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10508 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10510 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10511 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10512 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10515 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10516 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10517 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10520 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10521 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10522 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10523 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10525 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10526 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10527 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10530 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10531 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10535 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10536 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10537 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10538 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10539 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10542 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10543 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10544 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10547 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10548 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10549 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10550 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10551 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10552 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10553 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10556 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10557 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10558 call this function to create a new parser.
10559 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10560 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10561 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10562 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10565 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10566 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10567 parse the rest of the input stream.
10568 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10569 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10570 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10571 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10574 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10575 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10576 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10577 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10578 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10579 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10582 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10583 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10584 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10585 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10586 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10589 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10590 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10591 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10592 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10595 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10596 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10597 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10598 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10599 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10600 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10601 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10603 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10604 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10605 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10606 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10607 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10608 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10609 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10612 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10613 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10614 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10622 @item Accepting State
10623 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10624 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10625 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10627 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10628 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10629 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10630 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10631 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10633 @item Consistent State
10634 A state containing only one possible action.
10635 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10637 @item Context-free grammars
10638 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10639 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10640 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10641 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10644 @item Default Reduction
10645 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10646 contains no other action for the lookahead token.
10647 In permitted parser states, Bison declares the reduction with the
10648 largest lookahead set to be the default reduction and removes that
10650 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10652 @item Dynamic allocation
10653 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10654 compile time or on entry to a function.
10657 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10658 character string of length zero.
10660 @item Finite-state stack machine
10661 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10662 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10663 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10664 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10665 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10666 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10668 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
10669 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10670 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10671 deterministic parsing
10672 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10673 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10674 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10678 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10679 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10680 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10683 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm.
10684 That is, given any context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates
10685 parser tables with the full language recognition power of canonical
10686 LR(1) but with nearly the same number of parser states as
10688 This reduction in parser states is often an order of magnitude.
10689 More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s extra parser
10690 states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of
10691 non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for
10692 IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude less as well.
10693 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
10694 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}.
10696 @item Infix operator
10697 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10698 performs some operation.
10701 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10703 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
10704 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
10705 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and
10706 the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
10707 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
10708 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
10709 syntax error message. @xref{Decl Summary,,parse.lac}.
10711 @item Language construct
10712 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10713 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10714 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10716 @item Left associativity
10717 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10718 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10719 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10721 @item Left recursion
10722 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10723 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10726 @item Left-to-right parsing
10727 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10728 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10730 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10731 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10732 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10734 @item Lexical tie-in
10735 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10736 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10738 @item Literal string token
10739 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10741 @item Lookahead token
10742 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10746 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10747 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
10748 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
10751 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
10752 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
10754 @item Nonterminal symbol
10755 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
10756 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
10757 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
10760 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
10761 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
10764 @item Postfix operator
10765 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
10766 performs some operation.
10769 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
10770 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
10774 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
10775 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
10776 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
10778 @item Reverse polish notation
10779 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
10781 @item Right recursion
10782 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
10783 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10787 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
10788 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
10789 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
10792 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
10793 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
10794 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10796 @item Single-character literal
10797 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
10798 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
10801 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
10802 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
10803 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
10804 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
10807 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
10808 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
10809 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
10812 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
10813 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10816 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
10817 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
10818 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
10819 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
10821 @item Terminal symbol
10822 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
10823 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
10824 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10827 @node Copying This Manual
10828 @appendix Copying This Manual
10838 @c Local Variables:
10842 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
10843 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
10844 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
10845 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
10846 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
10847 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
10848 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
10849 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
10850 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
10851 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
10852 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
10853 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
10854 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
10855 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
10856 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
10857 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
10858 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
10859 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
10860 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
10861 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
10862 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
10863 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
10864 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
10865 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
10866 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
10867 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
10868 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
10869 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
10870 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
10871 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
10872 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
10873 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
10874 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
10875 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
10876 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
10877 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
10878 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
10879 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
10880 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
10881 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
10882 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
10883 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
10884 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
10885 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
10886 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
10887 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
10888 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
10889 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
10890 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
10891 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
10892 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
10893 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity