3 What should we name `variant' and `lex_symbol'?
5 ** Use b4_symbol in all the skeleton
6 Move its definition in the more standard places and deploy it in other
7 skeletons. Then remove the older system, including the tables
10 ** Update the documentation on gnu.org
12 ** Get rid of fake #lines [Bison: ...]
13 Possibly as simple as checking whether the column number is nonnegative.
15 I have seen messages like the following from GCC.
17 <built-in>:0: fatal error: opening dependency file .deps/libltdl/argz.Tpo: No such file or directory
20 ** Discuss about %printer/%destroy in the case of C++.
21 It would be very nice to provide the symbol classes with an operator<<
22 and a destructor. Unfortunately the syntax we have chosen for
23 %destroy and %printer make them hard to reuse. For instance, the user
24 is invited to write something like
26 %printer { debug_stream() << $$; } <my_type>;
28 which is hard to reuse elsewhere since it wants to use
29 "debug_stream()" to find the stream to use. The same applies to
30 %destroy: we told the user she could use the members of the Parser
31 class in the printers/destructors, which is not good for an operator<<
32 since it is no longer bound to a particular parser, it's just a
36 as lr0.cc, why upper case?
38 ** bench several bisons.
39 Enhance bench.pl with %b to run different bisons.
43 Warnings about type tags that are used in printer and dtors, but not
47 Defined to 256, but not used, not documented. Probably the token
48 number for the error token, which POSIX wants to be 256, but which
49 Bison might renumber if the user used number 256. Keep fix and doc?
52 Also, why don't we output the token name of the error token in the
53 output? It is explicitly skipped:
55 /* Skip error token and tokens without identifier. */
56 if (sym != errtoken && id)
58 Of course there are issues with name spaces, but if we disable we have
59 something which seems to be more simpler and more consistent instead
60 of the special case YYERRCODE.
68 We could (should?) also treat the case of the undef_token, which is
69 numbered 257 for yylex, and 2 internal. Both appear for instance in
72 const unsigned short int
73 parser::yytoken_number_[] =
75 0, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264,
83 so both 256 and 257 are "mysterious".
86 const parser::yytname_[] =
88 "\"end of command\"", "error", "$undefined", "\"=\"", "\"break\"",
92 It is seems to be *really* obsolete now, shall we remove it?
95 The code in yyerrlab reads:
99 /* Return failure if at end of input. */
104 There are only two yychar that can be <= YYEOF: YYEMPTY and YYEOF.
105 But I can't produce the situation where yychar is YYEMPTY here, is it
106 really possible? The test suite does not exercise this case.
108 This shows that it would be interesting to manage to install skeleton
109 coverage analysis to the test suite.
112 It should be very easy to factor the definition of the various tables,
113 including the separation bw declaration and definition. See for
114 instance b4_table_define in lalr1.cc. This way, we could even factor
115 C vs. C++ definitions.
117 * From lalr1.cc to yacc.c
119 Merging the three stacks in lalr1.cc simplified the code, prompted for
120 other improvements and also made it faster (probably because memory
121 management is performed once instead of three times). I suggest that
122 we do the same in yacc.c.
125 The code bw glr.c and yacc.c is really alike, we can certainly factor
132 Some statistics about the grammar and the parser would be useful,
133 especially when asking the user to send some information about the
134 grammars she is working on. We should probably also include some
135 information about the variables (I'm not sure for instance we even
136 specify what LR variant was used).
139 How would Paul like to display the conflicted actions? In particular,
140 what when two reductions are possible on a given lookahead token, but one is
141 part of $default. Should we make the two reductions explicit, or just
142 keep $default? See the following point.
144 ** Disabled Reductions
145 See `tests/conflicts.at (Defaulted Conflicted Reduction)', and decide
149 Extend with error productions. The hard part will probably be finding
150 the right rule so that a single state does not exhibit too many yet
151 undocumented ``features''. Maybe an empty action ought to be
152 presented too. Shall we try to make a single grammar with all these
153 features, or should we have several very small grammars?
155 ** --report=conflict-path
156 Provide better assistance for understanding the conflicts by providing
157 a sample text exhibiting the (LALR) ambiguity. See the paper from
158 DeRemer and Penello: they already provide the algorithm.
160 ** Statically check for potential ambiguities in GLR grammars. See
161 <http://www.i3s.unice.fr/~schmitz/papers.html#expamb> for an approach.
167 We should find a means to provide an access to values deep in the
168 stack. For instance, instead of
170 baz: qux { $$ = $<foo>-1 + $<bar>0 + $1; }
172 we should be able to have:
174 foo($foo) bar($bar) baz($bar): qux($qux) { $baz = $foo + $bar + $qux; }
176 Or something like this.
179 It should be possible to have %if/%else/%endif. The implementation is
180 not clear: should it be lexical or syntactic. Vadim Maslow thinks it
181 must be in the scanner: we must not parse what is in a switched off
182 part of %if. Akim Demaille thinks it should be in the parser, so as
183 to avoid falling into another CPP mistake.
186 There are couple of available extensions of Bison targeting some XML
187 output. Some day we should consider including them. One issue is
188 that they seem to be quite orthogonal to the parsing technique, and
189 seem to depend mostly on the possibility to have some code triggered
190 for each reduction. As a matter of fact, such hooks could also be
191 used to generate the yydebug traces. Some generic scheme probably
194 XML output for GNU Bison and gcc
195 http://www.cs.may.ie/~jpower/Research/bisonXML/
197 XML output for GNU Bison
198 http://yaxx.sourceforge.net/
201 Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform
209 exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
211 when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
212 grammars. I can't find the papers. In particular the book `LR
213 parsing: Theory and Practice' is impossible to find, but according to
214 `Parsing Techniques: a Practical Guide', it includes information about
215 this issue. Does anybody have it?
221 ** History/Bibliography
222 Some history of Bison and some bibliography would be most welcome.
223 Are there any Texinfo standards for bibliography?
225 * Coding system independence
228 Currently Bison assumes 8-bit bytes (i.e. that UCHAR_MAX is
229 255). It also assumes that the 8-bit character encoding is
230 the same for the invocation of 'bison' as it is for the
231 invocation of 'cc', but this is not necessarily true when
232 people run bison on an ASCII host and then use cc on an EBCDIC
233 host. I don't think these topics are worth our time
234 addressing (unless we find a gung-ho volunteer for EBCDIC or
235 PDP-10 ports :-) but they should probably be documented
238 More importantly, Bison does not currently allow NUL bytes in
239 tokens, either via escapes (e.g., "x\0y") or via a NUL byte in
240 the source code. This should get fixed.
248 Must we keep %token-table?
253 It is unfortunate that there is a total order for precedence. It
254 makes it impossible to have modular precedence information. We should
255 move to partial orders (sounds like series/parallel orders to me).
258 See if we can use precedence between rules to solve RR conflicts. See
264 - If the Bison generated parser experiences an undefined number in the
265 character range, that character is written out in diagnostic messages, an
266 addition to the $undefined value.
268 Suggest: Change the name $undefined to undefined; looks better in outputs.
273 - For use with my C++ parser, I transported the "switch (yyn)" statement
274 that Bison writes to the bison.simple skeleton file. This way, I can remove
275 the current default rule $$ = $1 implementation, which causes a double
276 assignment to $$ which may not be OK under C++, replacing it with a
277 "default:" part within the switch statement.
279 Note that the default rule $$ = $1, when typed, is perfectly OK under C,
280 but in the C++ implementation I made, this rule is different from
281 $<type_name>$ = $<type_name>1. I therefore think that one should implement
282 a Bison option where every typed default rule is explicitly written out
283 (same typed ruled can of course be grouped together).
285 * Pre and post actions.
286 From: Florian Krohm <florian@edamail.fishkill.ibm.com>
287 Subject: YYACT_EPILOGUE
288 To: bug-bison@gnu.org
289 X-Sent: 1 week, 4 days, 14 hours, 38 minutes, 11 seconds ago
291 The other day I had the need for explicitly building the parse tree. I
292 used %locations for that and defined YYLLOC_DEFAULT to call a function
293 that returns the tree node for the production. Easy. But I also needed
294 to assign the S-attribute to the tree node. That cannot be done in
295 YYLLOC_DEFAULT, because it is invoked before the action is executed.
296 The way I solved this was to define a macro YYACT_EPILOGUE that would
297 be invoked after the action. For reasons of symmetry I also added
298 YYACT_PROLOGUE. Although I had no use for that I can envision how it
299 might come in handy for debugging purposes.
300 All is needed is to add
303 YYACT_EPILOGUE (yyval, (yyvsp - yylen), yylen, yyloc, (yylsp - yylen));
305 YYACT_EPILOGUE (yyval, (yyvsp - yylen), yylen);
308 at the proper place to bison.simple. Ditto for YYACT_PROLOGUE.
310 I was wondering what you think about adding YYACT_PROLOGUE/EPILOGUE
311 to bison. If you're interested, I'll work on a patch.
314 Equip the parser with a means to create the (visual) parse tree.
316 * Complaint submessage indentation.
317 We already have an implementation that works fairly well for named
318 reference messages, but it would be nice to use it consistently for all
319 submessages from Bison. For example, the "previous definition"
320 submessage or the list of correct values for a %define variable might
321 look better with indentation.
323 However, the current implementation makes the assumption that the
324 location printed on the first line is not usually much shorter than the
325 locations printed on the submessage lines that follow. That assumption
326 may not hold true as often for some kinds of submessages especially if
327 we ever support multiple grammar files.
329 Here's a proposal for how a new implementation might look:
331 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2009-09/msg00086.html
341 Copyright (C) 2001-2004, 2006, 2008-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
343 This file is part of Bison, the GNU Compiler Compiler.
345 This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
346 it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
347 the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
348 (at your option) any later version.
350 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
351 but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
352 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
353 GNU General Public License for more details.
355 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
356 along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.