1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2011 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
115 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
117 The Concepts of Bison
119 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
120 as mathematical ideas.
121 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
122 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
123 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
124 the name of an identifier, etc.).
125 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
126 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
127 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
128 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
129 how is the output used?
130 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
131 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
135 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
136 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
137 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
138 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
142 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
143 a first example with no operator precedence.
144 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
145 Operator precedence is introduced.
146 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
147 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
148 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
149 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
150 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
152 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
154 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
155 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
156 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
157 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
158 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
159 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
160 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
162 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
168 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
170 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
171 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
172 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
174 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
176 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
177 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
182 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
183 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
184 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
185 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
186 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
187 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
188 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
189 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
191 Outline of a Bison Grammar
193 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
194 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
195 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
196 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
197 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
199 Defining Language Semantics
201 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
202 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
203 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
204 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
205 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
206 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
207 action in the middle of a rule.
208 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
212 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
213 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
214 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
218 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
219 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
220 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
221 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
222 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
223 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
224 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
225 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
226 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
227 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
228 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
229 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
230 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
232 Parser C-Language Interface
234 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
235 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
236 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
237 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
238 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
239 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
241 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
242 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
243 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
246 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
248 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
249 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
250 of the token it has read.
251 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
252 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
254 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
255 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
257 The Bison Parser Algorithm
259 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
260 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
261 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
262 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
263 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
264 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
265 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
266 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
267 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
271 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
272 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
273 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
274 * How Precedence:: How they work.
276 Handling Context Dependencies
278 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
279 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
280 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
281 error recovery rules must be written.
283 Debugging Your Parser
285 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
286 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
290 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
291 in alphabetical order by short options.
292 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
293 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
295 Parsers Written In Other Languages
297 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
298 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
302 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
303 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
304 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
305 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
306 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
307 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
309 A Complete C++ Example
311 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
312 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
313 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
314 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
315 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
319 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
320 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
321 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
322 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
323 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
324 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
325 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
326 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
328 Frequently Asked Questions
330 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
331 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
332 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
333 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
334 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
335 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
336 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
337 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
338 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
339 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
340 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
341 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
345 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
351 @unnumbered Introduction
354 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
355 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
356 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
357 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
358 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
359 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
360 calculators to complex programming languages.
362 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
363 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
364 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
365 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
366 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
369 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
370 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
371 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
372 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
375 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
376 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
377 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
378 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
379 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
380 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
383 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
386 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
388 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
389 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
390 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
391 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
392 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
394 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
396 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
397 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
398 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
399 License to all of the Bison source code.
401 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
402 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
403 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
404 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
405 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
406 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
407 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
409 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
410 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
411 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
412 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
413 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
414 using the other GNU tools.
416 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
417 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
418 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
419 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
423 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
424 @include gpl-3.0.texi
427 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
429 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
430 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
431 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
434 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
435 as mathematical ideas.
436 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
437 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
438 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
439 the name of an identifier, etc.).
440 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
441 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
442 * Locations Overview:: Tracking Locations.
443 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
444 how is the output used?
445 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
446 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
449 @node Language and Grammar
450 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
452 @cindex context-free grammar
453 @cindex grammar, context-free
454 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
455 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
456 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
457 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
458 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
459 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
460 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
461 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
465 @cindex Backus-Naur form
466 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
467 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
468 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
469 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
470 essentially machine-readable BNF.
472 @cindex LALR(1) grammars
473 @cindex IELR(1) grammars
474 @cindex LR(1) grammars
475 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars.
476 Although it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is
477 optimized for what are called LR(1) grammars.
478 In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible to tell how to parse
479 any portion of an input string with just a single token of lookahead.
480 For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the additional
481 restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
482 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}, for
483 more information on this.
484 As an experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
485 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables.
486 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, to learn how.
489 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
490 @cindex ambiguous grammars
491 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
493 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
494 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
495 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
496 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
497 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
498 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
499 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
500 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
501 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
502 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
503 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
504 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
505 possible parses of any given string is finite.
507 @cindex symbols (abstract)
509 @cindex syntactic grouping
510 @cindex grouping, syntactic
511 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
512 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
513 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
514 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
515 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
516 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
517 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
519 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
520 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
521 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
522 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
523 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
524 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
525 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
526 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
527 lexicography, not grammar.)
529 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
533 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
534 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
535 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
536 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
537 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
538 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
539 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
544 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
545 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
546 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
547 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
548 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
552 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
553 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
554 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
555 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
556 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
557 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
558 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
559 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
561 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
562 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
563 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
564 reads informally as follows:
567 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
572 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
576 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
577 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
578 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
579 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
582 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
583 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
584 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
585 not the start symbol.
587 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
588 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
589 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
590 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
591 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
592 reports a syntax error.
594 @node Grammar in Bison
595 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
596 @cindex Bison grammar
597 @cindex grammar, Bison
598 @cindex formal grammar
600 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
601 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
602 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
604 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
605 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
606 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
608 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
609 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
610 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
611 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
612 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
613 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
614 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
617 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
618 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
619 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
620 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
622 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
623 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
625 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
626 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
627 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
628 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
632 stmt: RETURN expr ';'
637 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
639 @node Semantic Values
640 @section Semantic Values
641 @cindex semantic value
642 @cindex value, semantic
644 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
645 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
646 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
647 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
648 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
651 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
652 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
653 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
654 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
655 ,Defining Language Semantics},
658 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
659 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
660 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
661 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
664 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
665 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
666 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
667 need to have any semantic value.)
669 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
670 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
671 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
672 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
673 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
674 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
676 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
677 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
678 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
679 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
680 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
682 @node Semantic Actions
683 @section Semantic Actions
684 @cindex semantic actions
685 @cindex actions, semantic
687 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
688 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
689 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
690 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
693 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
694 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
695 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
696 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
697 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
698 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
699 newly recognized larger expression.
701 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
705 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
710 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
711 from the values of the two subexpressions.
714 @section Writing GLR Parsers
716 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
719 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
720 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
722 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
723 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
724 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
725 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
726 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
727 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
728 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
729 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
730 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
732 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
733 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
734 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
735 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
736 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
737 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
738 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
739 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
740 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
741 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
742 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
743 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
744 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
745 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
746 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
747 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
748 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
749 identical set of symbols.
751 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
752 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
753 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
754 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
755 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
756 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
757 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
758 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
759 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
763 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
764 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
765 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
766 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
769 @node Simple GLR Parsers
770 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
771 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
772 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
776 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
777 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
779 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
780 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
781 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
783 Consider a problem that
784 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
785 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
788 type subrange = lo .. hi;
789 type enum = (a, b, c);
793 The original language standard allows only numeric
794 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
795 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
796 10206) and many other
797 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
798 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
802 type subrange = (a) .. b;
806 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
807 type with only one value:
814 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
815 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
817 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
818 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
819 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
820 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
821 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
822 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
823 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
824 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
826 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
827 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
828 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
829 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
832 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
833 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
834 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
835 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
836 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
837 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
840 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
841 use the GLR algorithm.
842 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
843 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
844 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
845 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
846 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
847 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
848 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
849 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
850 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
852 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
853 reports a syntax error as usual.
855 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
856 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
857 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
858 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
859 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
861 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
862 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
863 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
864 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
865 The present example contains only one conflict between two
866 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
867 cannot be nested. So the number of
868 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
869 and the parsing time is still linear.
871 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
872 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
875 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
885 type_decl : TYPE ID '=' type ';'
890 type : '(' id_list ')'
912 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
913 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
914 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
915 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
922 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
923 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
924 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
933 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
934 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
935 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
936 notice when the parser splits.
938 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
939 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
940 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
941 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
942 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
943 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
944 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
945 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
946 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
947 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
948 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
949 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
950 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
953 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
954 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
955 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
956 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
957 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
958 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
960 @node Merging GLR Parses
961 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
962 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
963 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
967 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
969 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
974 #define YYSTYPE char const *
976 void yyerror (char const *);
989 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
992 stmt : expr ';' %dprec 1
996 expr : ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
997 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
998 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
999 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1000 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1003 decl : TYPENAME declarator ';'
1004 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1005 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1006 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1009 declarator : ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1010 | '(' declarator ')'
1015 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1016 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1023 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1024 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1025 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1026 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1027 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1028 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1029 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1030 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1031 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1032 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1033 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1034 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1035 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1036 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1038 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1039 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1040 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1041 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1042 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1043 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1044 The parser therefore prints
1047 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1050 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1051 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1058 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1059 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1060 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1061 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1062 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1063 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1064 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1065 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1066 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1067 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1073 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1074 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1075 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1076 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1080 stmt : expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1081 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1086 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1090 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1098 with an accompanying forward declaration
1099 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1103 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1104 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1109 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1110 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1113 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1116 Bison requires that all of the
1117 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1118 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1119 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1120 the offending merge.
1122 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1123 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1125 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1126 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1127 the associated reduction.
1128 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1129 action in a GLR parser.
1132 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1134 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1136 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1137 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1138 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1139 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1140 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1141 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1142 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1143 influence syntax analysis.
1144 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1147 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1148 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1149 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1150 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1151 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1152 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1153 future versions of Bison.
1154 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1155 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1156 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1159 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1160 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1161 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1162 initiate error recovery.
1163 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1164 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1165 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1166 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1168 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1169 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1171 @node Compiler Requirements
1172 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1173 @cindex @code{inline}
1174 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1176 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1177 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1178 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1179 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1180 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1181 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1190 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1194 #if __STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ && ! defined inline
1200 @node Locations Overview
1203 @cindex textual location
1204 @cindex location, textual
1206 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1207 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1208 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1209 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1211 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1212 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens and
1213 groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1214 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Locations}, for more details).
1216 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1217 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1218 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1221 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1222 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1223 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1224 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1225 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1226 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1227 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1230 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1231 @cindex Bison parser
1232 @cindex Bison utility
1233 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1236 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1237 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1238 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1239 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1240 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1241 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1242 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1245 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1246 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1247 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1250 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1251 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1252 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1253 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1254 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1255 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1256 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1258 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1259 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1260 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1261 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1262 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1263 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1264 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1265 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1266 C-Language Interface}.
1268 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1269 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1270 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1271 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1272 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1273 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1274 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1275 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1276 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1277 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1278 anything other than their usual meanings.
1280 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1281 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1282 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1283 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1284 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1285 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1286 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1287 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1288 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1291 @section Stages in Using Bison
1292 @cindex stages in using Bison
1295 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1296 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1300 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1301 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1302 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1303 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1304 sequence of C statements.
1307 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1308 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1309 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1310 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1313 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1316 Write error-reporting routines.
1319 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1320 must follow these steps:
1324 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1327 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1330 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1333 @node Grammar Layout
1334 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1335 @cindex grammar file
1337 @cindex format of grammar file
1338 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1340 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1341 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1348 @var{Bison declarations}
1357 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1358 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1360 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1361 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1362 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1363 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1364 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1365 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1367 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1368 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1369 semantic values of various symbols.
1371 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1374 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1375 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1376 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1380 @cindex simple examples
1381 @cindex examples, simple
1383 Now we show and explain three sample programs written using Bison: a
1384 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1385 calculator, and a multi-function calculator. All three have been tested
1386 under BSD Unix 4.3; each produces a usable, though limited, interactive
1387 desk-top calculator.
1389 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1390 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1391 source file to try them.
1394 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1395 a first example with no operator precedence.
1396 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1397 Operator precedence is introduced.
1398 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1399 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1400 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1401 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1402 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1406 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1407 @cindex reverse polish notation
1408 @cindex polish notation calculator
1409 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1410 @cindex calculator, simple
1412 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1413 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1414 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1415 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1417 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1418 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1421 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1422 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1423 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1424 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1425 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1426 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1427 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1430 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1431 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1433 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1434 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1437 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1440 #define YYSTYPE double
1443 void yyerror (char const *);
1448 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1451 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1452 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1454 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1455 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1456 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1457 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1458 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1459 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1460 which is a floating point number.
1462 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1463 function @code{pow}.
1465 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1466 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1467 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1468 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1471 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1472 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1473 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1474 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1475 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1476 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1477 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1478 type for numeric constants.
1481 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1483 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1491 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1494 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1495 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1496 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1497 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1498 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1499 /* Exponentiation */
1500 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @}
1502 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @}
1507 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1508 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1509 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1510 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1511 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1514 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1515 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1516 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1518 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1519 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1520 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1521 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1522 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1523 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1532 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1534 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1542 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1543 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1544 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1545 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1546 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1548 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1549 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1550 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1551 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1552 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1553 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1555 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1556 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1557 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1558 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1561 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1562 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1563 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1566 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1568 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1572 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1576 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1577 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1578 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1579 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1580 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1581 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1582 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1584 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1585 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1586 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1587 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1588 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1591 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1593 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1594 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1595 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1596 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1600 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1601 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1606 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1607 equally well have written them separately:
1611 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @} ;
1612 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @} ;
1616 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1617 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1618 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1619 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1620 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1621 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1622 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1623 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1625 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1626 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1627 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1629 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1630 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1634 exp : NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1638 means the same thing as this:
1642 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1648 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1651 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1652 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1653 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1655 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1656 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1657 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1658 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1660 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1662 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1663 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1664 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1665 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1667 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1668 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1669 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1670 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1671 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1672 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1673 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1674 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1675 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1677 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1678 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1679 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1680 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1681 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1683 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1684 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1686 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1690 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1691 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1692 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1693 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1704 /* Skip white space. */
1705 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1709 /* Process numbers. */
1710 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1713 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1718 /* Return end-of-input. */
1721 /* Return a single char. */
1728 @subsection The Controlling Function
1729 @cindex controlling function
1730 @cindex main function in simple example
1732 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1733 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1734 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1747 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1748 @cindex error reporting routine
1750 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1751 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1752 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1753 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1754 here is the definition we will use:
1760 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1762 yyerror (char const *s)
1764 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1769 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1770 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1771 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1772 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1773 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1774 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1776 @node Rpcalc Generate
1777 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1778 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1780 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1781 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1782 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1783 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1784 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1785 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1787 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1788 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1790 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1791 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1798 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1799 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1800 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1801 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1802 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1803 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1804 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1806 @node Rpcalc Compile
1807 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1808 @cindex compiling the parser
1810 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1814 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1816 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1820 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1821 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1822 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1826 # @r{List files again.}
1828 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1832 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1833 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1839 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1841 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1845 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1847 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1852 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1853 @cindex infix notation calculator
1855 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1857 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1858 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1859 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1860 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1863 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1866 #define YYSTYPE double
1870 void yyerror (char const *);
1873 /* Bison declarations. */
1877 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1878 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1880 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1886 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1889 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
1890 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1891 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1892 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1893 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1894 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1895 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1896 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1902 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1905 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1907 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1908 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1909 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1910 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1911 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1912 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1915 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1916 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1917 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1918 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1919 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1922 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1923 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1924 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1925 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1926 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1928 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1933 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1941 @node Simple Error Recovery
1942 @section Simple Error Recovery
1943 @cindex error recovery, simple
1945 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1946 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1947 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1948 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1949 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1950 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1952 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1953 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
1954 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
1959 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1960 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
1965 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
1966 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
1967 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
1968 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
1969 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
1970 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
1971 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
1972 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
1975 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
1976 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
1977 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
1978 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
1979 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
1980 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
1983 @node Location Tracking Calc
1984 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
1985 @cindex location tracking calculator
1986 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
1987 @cindex calculator, location tracking
1989 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
1990 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
1991 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
1992 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
1996 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
1997 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
1998 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2001 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2002 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2004 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2005 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2008 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2014 void yyerror (char const *);
2017 /* Bison declarations. */
2025 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2029 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2030 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2031 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2032 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2033 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2034 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2035 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2039 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2041 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2042 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2043 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2044 from the new information.
2046 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2047 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2058 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2063 exp : NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2064 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2065 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2066 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2076 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2077 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2078 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2083 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2084 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2085 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2089 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2090 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2091 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2093 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2094 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2095 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2096 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2097 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2098 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2102 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2104 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2105 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2106 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2109 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2110 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2121 /* Skip white space. */
2122 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2123 ++yylloc.last_column;
2128 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2129 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2133 /* Process numbers. */
2137 ++yylloc.last_column;
2138 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2140 ++yylloc.last_column;
2141 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2148 /* Return end-of-input. */
2152 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2156 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2159 ++yylloc.last_column;
2164 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2165 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2166 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2167 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2169 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2170 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2171 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2172 controlling function:
2179 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2180 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2186 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2187 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2188 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2190 @node Multi-function Calc
2191 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2192 @cindex multi-function calculator
2193 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2194 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2196 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2197 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2198 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2199 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2200 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2202 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2203 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2204 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2205 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2206 functions whose syntax has this form:
2209 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2213 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2214 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2215 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2219 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2223 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2229 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2234 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2237 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2238 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2239 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2242 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2243 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2245 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2250 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2251 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2253 void yyerror (char const *);
2258 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2259 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2262 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2263 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2270 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2271 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2273 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2276 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2277 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2278 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2280 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2281 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2282 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2283 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2285 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2286 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2287 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2288 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2289 between angle brackets).
2291 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2292 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2293 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2294 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2295 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2296 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2299 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2301 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2302 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2303 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2315 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2316 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2321 exp: NUM @{ $$ = $1; @}
2322 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2323 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2324 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2325 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2326 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2327 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2328 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2329 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2330 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2331 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2334 /* End of grammar. */
2338 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2339 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2340 @cindex symbol table example
2342 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2343 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2344 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2345 requires some additional C functions for support.
2347 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2348 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2349 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2353 /* Function type. */
2354 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2358 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2361 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2362 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2365 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2366 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2368 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2373 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2375 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2376 extern symrec *sym_table;
2378 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2379 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2383 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2384 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2385 @code{init_table} as well:
2391 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2393 yyerror (char const *s)
2403 double (*fnct) (double);
2408 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2421 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2426 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2432 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2434 ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2435 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2450 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2451 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2453 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2454 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2455 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2456 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2457 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2458 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2462 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2465 ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2466 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2467 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2468 ptr->type = sym_type;
2469 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2470 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2476 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2479 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2480 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2481 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2487 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2488 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2489 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2490 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2492 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2493 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2494 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2495 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2496 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2497 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2499 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2500 operators in @code{yylex}.
2513 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2514 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t');
2521 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2522 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2525 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2531 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2535 static char *symbuf = 0;
2536 static int length = 0;
2541 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2542 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2544 length = 40, symbuf = (char *)malloc (length + 1);
2551 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2555 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2557 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2559 /* Get another character. */
2564 while (isalnum (c));
2571 s = getsym (symbuf);
2573 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2578 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2584 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2585 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2586 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2594 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2597 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2598 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2599 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2602 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2603 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2607 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2609 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2610 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2612 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2613 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2616 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2617 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2618 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2619 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2620 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2621 * Locations:: Locations and actions.
2622 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2623 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2626 @node Grammar Outline
2627 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2629 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2630 appropriate delimiters:
2637 @var{Bison declarations}
2646 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2647 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2648 continues until end of line.
2651 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2652 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2653 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2654 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2655 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2659 @subsection The prologue
2660 @cindex declarations section
2662 @cindex declarations
2664 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2665 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2666 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2667 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2668 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2669 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2670 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2672 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2673 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2676 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2677 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2678 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2679 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2680 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2681 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2682 @code{%union} declaration.
2693 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2697 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2698 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2704 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2705 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2706 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2707 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2708 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2709 @code{#include} directives.
2711 @node Prologue Alternatives
2712 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2713 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2716 @findex %code requires
2717 @findex %code provides
2720 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2721 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2722 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2723 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2724 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2725 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2726 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2728 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2739 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2743 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2744 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2751 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2752 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2753 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2754 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2755 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2756 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2757 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2758 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2759 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2760 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2761 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2763 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2764 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2765 This behavior raises a few questions.
2766 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2767 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2768 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2769 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2770 This behavior is not intuitive.
2772 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2773 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2774 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2775 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2782 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2783 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2786 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2787 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2799 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2803 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2804 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2805 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2812 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2813 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2814 explicit which kind you intend.
2815 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2817 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2818 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2819 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2820 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2821 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2822 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2823 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2824 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2825 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2828 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2829 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2831 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2844 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2848 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2849 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2860 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2861 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2862 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2869 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2870 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2871 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2872 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2873 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2874 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2876 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2877 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2878 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2879 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2880 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2881 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2882 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2883 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2884 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2885 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2886 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2889 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2890 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2891 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2892 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2893 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
2894 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
2895 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
2896 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
2897 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
2898 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
2911 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2915 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2916 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2927 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2931 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2932 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2939 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
2940 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
2941 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
2944 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
2945 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
2946 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
2947 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
2948 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
2949 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
2952 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
2953 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
2954 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
2955 the grammar file affects its functionality.
2957 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
2958 organize your grammar file.
2959 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
2963 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
2964 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
2965 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
2966 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
2968 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
2969 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
2970 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
2971 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
2975 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
2976 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
2978 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
2980 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
2981 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
2982 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
2983 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
2985 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
2986 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
2987 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
2988 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
2989 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
2990 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
2991 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
2992 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
2995 @node Bison Declarations
2996 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
2997 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
2998 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3000 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3001 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3002 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3003 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3006 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3007 @cindex grammar rules section
3008 @cindex rules section for grammar
3010 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3011 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3013 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3014 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3015 if it is the first thing in the file.
3018 @subsection The epilogue
3019 @cindex additional C code section
3021 @cindex C code, section for additional
3023 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3024 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3025 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3026 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3027 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3028 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3029 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3030 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3031 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3032 C-Language Interface}.
3034 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3035 from the grammar rules.
3037 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3038 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3039 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3040 of the grammar file.
3043 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3044 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3045 @cindex terminal symbol
3049 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3052 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3053 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3054 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3055 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3056 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3057 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3058 the symbol to stand for it.
3060 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3061 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3062 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3064 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3065 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3066 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3067 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3068 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3069 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3070 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3072 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3076 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3077 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3078 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3079 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3082 @cindex character token
3083 @cindex literal token
3084 @cindex single-character literal
3085 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3086 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3087 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3088 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3089 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3090 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3091 ,Operator Precedence}).
3093 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3094 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3095 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3096 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3097 your program will confuse other readers.
3099 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3100 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3101 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3102 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3103 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3104 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3108 @cindex string token
3109 @cindex literal string token
3110 @cindex multicharacter literal
3111 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3112 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3113 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3114 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3115 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3117 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3118 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3119 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3120 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3121 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3123 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3125 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3126 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3127 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3128 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3129 read your program will be confused.
3131 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3132 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3133 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3134 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3135 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3136 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3139 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3140 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3141 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3143 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3144 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3145 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3146 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3147 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3148 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3149 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3150 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3151 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3152 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3153 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3154 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3156 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3157 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3158 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3159 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3160 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3162 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3163 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3164 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3165 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3166 characters in the following C-language string:
3169 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3172 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3173 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3174 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3175 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3176 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3177 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3178 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3179 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3180 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3181 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3184 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3185 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3186 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3187 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3188 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3191 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3193 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3194 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3196 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3200 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{}
3206 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3207 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3208 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3220 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3221 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3223 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3224 extra white space as you wish.
3226 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3227 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3230 @{@var{C statements}@}
3235 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3236 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3237 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3238 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3239 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3240 compiler can check it.
3242 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3243 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3244 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3245 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3246 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3247 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3248 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3249 character constants.
3251 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3255 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3256 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3260 @var{result}: @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3261 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3268 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3270 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3271 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3272 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3289 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3293 @section Recursive Rules
3294 @cindex recursive rule
3296 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3297 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3298 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3299 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3300 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3310 @cindex left recursion
3311 @cindex right recursion
3313 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3314 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3315 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3326 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3327 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3328 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3329 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3330 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3331 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3332 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3335 @cindex mutual recursion
3336 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3337 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3338 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3346 | primary '+' primary
3358 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3362 @section Defining Language Semantics
3363 @cindex defining language semantics
3364 @cindex language semantics, defining
3366 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3367 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3368 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3370 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3371 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3372 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3373 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3376 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3377 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3378 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3379 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3380 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3381 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3382 action in the middle of a rule.
3383 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
3387 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3388 @cindex semantic value type
3389 @cindex value type, semantic
3390 @cindex data types of semantic values
3391 @cindex default data type
3393 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3394 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3395 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3396 Notation Calculator}).
3398 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3399 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3400 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3403 #define YYSTYPE double
3407 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3408 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3409 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3410 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3412 @node Multiple Types
3413 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3415 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3416 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3417 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3418 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3421 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3422 requires you to do two things:
3426 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3427 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3428 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3429 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3433 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3434 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3435 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3436 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3437 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3446 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3448 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3449 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3450 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3451 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3453 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3454 placed at any position in the rule;
3455 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3456 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3457 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3458 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3460 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3461 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3462 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3463 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3464 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3465 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3466 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3467 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3468 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3469 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3472 Here is a typical example:
3482 Or, in terms of named references:
3486 exp[result]: @dots{}
3487 | exp[left] '+' exp[right]
3488 @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3493 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3494 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3495 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3496 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3497 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3498 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3500 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3501 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3502 referred to as @code{$2}.
3504 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3505 about using the named references construct.
3507 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3508 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3509 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3510 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3511 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3515 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3519 @cindex default action
3520 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3521 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3522 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3523 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3524 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3525 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3527 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3528 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3529 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3530 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3531 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3535 foo: expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3536 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3542 @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3547 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3548 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3549 definition of @code{foo}.
3552 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3553 any, from a semantic action.
3554 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3555 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3558 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3559 @cindex action data types
3560 @cindex data types in actions
3562 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3563 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3565 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3566 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3567 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3568 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3569 in the rule. In this example,
3580 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3581 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3582 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3583 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3585 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3586 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3587 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3599 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3600 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3602 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3603 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3604 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3605 @cindex mid-rule actions
3607 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3608 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3609 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3611 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3612 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3613 it is run before they are parsed.
3615 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3616 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3617 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3618 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3621 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3622 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3623 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3624 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3625 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3626 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3628 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3629 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3630 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3631 at the end of the rule.
3633 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3634 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3635 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3636 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3637 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3638 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3642 stmt: LET '(' var ')'
3643 @{ $<context>$ = push_context ();
3644 declare_variable ($3); @}
3646 pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3651 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3652 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3653 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3654 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3655 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3656 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3657 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3658 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3660 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3661 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3662 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3663 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3664 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3667 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3668 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3669 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3670 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3671 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3673 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3674 Discarded Symbols}).
3675 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3676 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3678 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3679 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3684 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3690 pop_context ($1); @}
3693 let: LET '(' var ')'
3694 @{ $$ = push_context ();
3695 declare_variable ($3); @}
3702 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3703 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3704 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3706 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3707 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3708 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3709 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3710 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3715 compound: '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3716 | '@{' statements '@}'
3722 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3726 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3727 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3730 | '@{' statements '@}'
3736 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3737 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3738 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3739 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3740 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3741 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3743 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3744 actions into the two rules, like this:
3748 compound: @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3749 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3750 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3751 '@{' statements '@}'
3757 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3758 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3760 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3761 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3762 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3766 compound: '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3767 declarations statements '@}'
3768 | '@{' statements '@}'
3774 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3775 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3777 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3778 serves as a subroutine:
3782 subroutine: /* empty */
3783 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3789 compound: subroutine
3790 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3792 '@{' statements '@}'
3798 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3799 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3801 @node Named References
3802 @subsection Using Named References
3803 @cindex named references
3805 While every semantic value can be accessed with positional references
3806 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$}, it's often much more convenient to refer to
3807 them by name. First of all, original symbol names may be used as named
3808 references. For example:
3812 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3813 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
3818 The positional @code{$$}, @code{@@$}, @code{$n}, and @code{@@n} can be
3819 mixed with @code{$name} and @code{@@name} arbitrarily. For example:
3823 invocation: op '(' args ')'
3824 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
3829 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
3835 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
3838 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
3841 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
3846 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
3847 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
3848 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
3851 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
3852 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
3857 Explicit names may be declared for RHS and for LHS symbols as well. In order
3858 to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an explicit name
3859 may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the closing brace of
3860 the mid-rule action code:
3863 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
3864 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
3870 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
3871 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
3874 if-stmt: IF '(' expr ')' THEN then.stmt ';'
3875 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
3879 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
3880 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
3881 @code{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
3882 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @samp{suffix} field of the semantic
3883 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @code{name.suffix} in its entirety
3884 as the name of a semantic value, bracketed syntax @code{$[name.suffix]}
3889 @section Tracking Locations
3891 @cindex textual location
3892 @cindex location, textual
3894 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3895 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3896 especially symbol locations.
3898 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3899 actions to take when rules are matched.
3902 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3903 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3904 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3908 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3909 @cindex data type of locations
3910 @cindex default location type
3912 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3913 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3915 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3916 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3917 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3918 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3922 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3931 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3932 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3933 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3934 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3935 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3937 @node Actions and Locations
3938 @subsection Actions and Locations
3939 @cindex location actions
3940 @cindex actions, location
3943 @vindex @@@var{name}
3944 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3946 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3947 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3949 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3950 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3951 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3952 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3953 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
3956 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
3957 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
3958 @xref{Named References,,Using Named References}, for more information
3959 about using the named references construct.
3961 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
3968 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
3969 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
3970 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
3971 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
3978 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
3979 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
3980 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
3986 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
3987 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
3988 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
3991 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
3992 example above simply rewrites this way:
4005 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4006 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4007 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4014 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4015 from a semantic action.
4016 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4017 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4019 @node Location Default Action
4020 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4021 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4022 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4024 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4025 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4026 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4027 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4028 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4029 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4030 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4031 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4034 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4035 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4037 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4038 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4039 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4040 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4041 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4042 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4043 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4044 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4045 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4046 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4048 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4052 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Current, Rhs, N) \
4056 (Current).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4057 (Current).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4058 (Current).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4059 (Current).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4063 (Current).first_line = (Current).last_line = \
4064 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4065 (Current).first_column = (Current).last_column = \
4066 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4072 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4073 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4074 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4076 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4080 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4081 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4084 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4085 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4086 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4087 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4090 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4091 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4092 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4093 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4097 @section Bison Declarations
4098 @cindex declarations, Bison
4099 @cindex Bison declarations
4101 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4102 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4105 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4106 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4107 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4108 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4110 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4111 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4112 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4113 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4116 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4117 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4118 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4119 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4120 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4121 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4122 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4123 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4124 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4125 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4126 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4127 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4128 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4132 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4133 @cindex version requirement
4134 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4137 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4138 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4142 %require "@var{version}"
4146 @subsection Token Type Names
4147 @cindex declaring token type names
4148 @cindex token type names, declaring
4149 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4152 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4158 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4159 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4160 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4162 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4163 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4164 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4167 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4168 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4169 following the token name:
4173 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4177 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4178 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4179 with each other or with normal characters.
4181 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4182 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4183 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4184 Than One Value Type}).
4190 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4194 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4198 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4199 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4200 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4207 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4208 equivalent literal string tokens:
4211 %token <operator> OR "||"
4212 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4217 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4218 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4219 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4220 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4221 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4222 the literal string instead of the token name.
4224 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4225 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4229 %token END 0 "end of file"
4232 @node Precedence Decl
4233 @subsection Operator Precedence
4234 @cindex precedence declarations
4235 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4236 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4238 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4239 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4240 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4241 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4242 operator precedence.
4244 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4245 @code{%token}: either
4248 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4255 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4258 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4259 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4260 all the @var{symbols}:
4264 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4265 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4266 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4267 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4268 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4269 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4270 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4271 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4272 considered a syntax error.
4275 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4276 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4277 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4278 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4279 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4282 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4283 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4284 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4285 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4290 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4291 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4295 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4296 @cindex declaring value types
4297 @cindex value types, declaring
4300 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4301 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4302 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4317 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4318 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4319 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4320 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4322 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4323 @code{union}. For example:
4335 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4336 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4339 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4340 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4341 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4343 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4344 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4346 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4347 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4348 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4349 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4357 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4362 and then your grammar can use the following
4363 instead of @code{%union}:
4376 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4377 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4378 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4382 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4383 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4384 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4387 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4391 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4392 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4393 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4394 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4395 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4398 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4399 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4400 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4401 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4403 @node Initial Action Decl
4404 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4405 @findex %initial-action
4407 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4408 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4411 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4412 @findex %initial-action
4413 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4414 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4415 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4416 @code{%parse-param}.
4419 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4422 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4425 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4430 @node Destructor Decl
4431 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4432 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4436 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4437 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4438 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4439 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4440 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4441 must discard the start symbol.
4443 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4444 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4445 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4446 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4448 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4449 symbol is automatically discarded.
4451 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4453 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4455 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4456 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4457 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4458 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4460 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4461 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4462 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4463 tag among @var{symbols}.
4464 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4465 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4466 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4468 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4469 (These default forms are experimental.
4470 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4472 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4473 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4474 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4475 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4477 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4478 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4479 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4480 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4481 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4488 %union @{ char *string; @}
4489 %token <string> STRING1
4490 %token <string> STRING2
4491 %type <string> string1
4492 %type <string> string2
4493 %union @{ char character; @}
4494 %token <character> CHR
4495 %type <character> chr
4498 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4499 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4500 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4501 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4505 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4506 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4507 to @code{free} by default.
4508 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4509 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4510 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4511 @code{free} only once.
4512 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4513 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4515 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4516 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4517 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4518 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4519 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4520 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4521 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4522 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4523 reference it in your grammar.
4524 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4525 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4531 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4532 @cindex mid-rule actions
4533 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4534 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4535 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you do
4536 not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}} (where
4537 @var{n} is the RHS symbol position of the mid-rule) in any later action in that
4539 However, if you do reference either, the Bison-generated parser will invoke the
4540 @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4544 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4545 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4546 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4551 @cindex discarded symbols
4552 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4556 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4558 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4560 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4561 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4563 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4566 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4567 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4570 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4571 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4572 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4576 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4577 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4578 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4579 @cindex warnings, preventing
4580 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4584 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4585 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4586 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4587 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4588 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4589 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4591 The declaration looks like this:
4597 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4598 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4599 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4600 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4602 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4603 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4604 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4605 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4606 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4607 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4608 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4614 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4618 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4619 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4620 print the number of conflicts.
4623 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4624 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4625 go back to the beginning.
4628 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4629 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4630 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4633 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4634 but will keep silent otherwise.
4637 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4638 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4639 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4640 @cindex default start symbol
4643 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4644 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4645 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4652 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4653 @cindex reentrant parser
4655 @findex %define api.pure
4657 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4658 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4659 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4660 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4661 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4662 program must be called only within interlocks.
4664 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4665 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4666 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4667 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4668 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4670 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4671 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4672 reentrant. It looks like this:
4678 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4679 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4680 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4681 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4682 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4683 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4684 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4685 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4686 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4688 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4689 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4693 @subsection A Push Parser
4696 @findex %define api.push-pull
4698 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4699 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4701 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4702 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4703 each time a new token is made available.
4705 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4706 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4707 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4708 within a certain time period.
4710 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4711 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4712 parser (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%define api.push-pull}):
4715 %define api.push-pull push
4718 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4719 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4720 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4721 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4722 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4726 %define api.push-pull push
4729 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4730 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4731 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4732 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4734 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4735 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4736 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4737 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4738 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4739 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4740 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4741 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4745 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4747 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4748 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4749 yypstate_delete (ps);
4752 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4753 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4754 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4755 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4756 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4757 example would thus look like this:
4762 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4765 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4766 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4767 yypstate_delete (ps);
4770 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4771 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4773 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4774 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4775 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4776 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4777 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4778 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4779 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4780 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4781 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4782 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4783 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4784 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4785 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4786 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4787 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
4788 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
4789 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
4793 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4794 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
4795 yypstate_delete (ps);
4798 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
4799 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
4800 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
4803 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
4804 @cindex Bison declaration summary
4805 @cindex declaration summary
4806 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
4808 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
4810 @deffn {Directive} %union
4811 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
4812 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
4815 @deffn {Directive} %token
4816 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
4817 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
4820 @deffn {Directive} %right
4821 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
4822 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4825 @deffn {Directive} %left
4826 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
4827 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4830 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
4831 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
4832 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
4833 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
4837 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
4838 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
4839 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
4843 @deffn {Directive} %type
4844 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
4845 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4848 @deffn {Directive} %start
4849 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
4853 @deffn {Directive} %expect
4854 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
4855 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
4861 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
4864 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
4865 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
4867 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
4868 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
4869 @xref{%code Summary}.
4872 @deffn {Directive} %debug
4873 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
4874 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
4875 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
4878 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
4879 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
4880 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
4881 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
4883 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define} multiple
4884 times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
4886 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any character
4887 other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash or digit.
4889 Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent to specifying
4892 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values.
4893 In this case, Bison will complain if the variable definition does not meet one
4894 of the following four conditions:
4897 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
4899 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
4900 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
4902 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
4904 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
4905 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
4908 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
4909 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
4910 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
4911 Summary,,%skeleton}).
4912 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
4913 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
4917 @findex %define api.pure
4920 @item Language(s): C
4922 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
4923 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
4925 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
4927 @item Default Value: @code{false}
4931 @findex %define api.push-pull
4934 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
4936 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
4937 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
4938 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4939 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4941 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
4943 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
4946 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
4948 @item lr.default-reductions
4949 @cindex default reductions
4950 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
4951 @cindex delayed syntax errors
4952 @cindex syntax errors delayed
4957 @item Language(s): all
4959 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
4960 contain default reductions.
4961 That is, in such a state, Bison selects the reduction with the largest
4962 lookahead set to be the default parser action and then removes that
4964 (The ability to specify where default reductions should be used is
4966 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4968 @item Accepted Values:
4971 This is the traditional Bison behavior.
4972 The main advantage is a significant decrease in the size of the parser
4974 The disadvantage is that, when the generated parser encounters a
4975 syntactically unacceptable token, the parser might then perform
4976 unnecessary default reductions before it can detect the syntax error.
4977 Such delayed syntax error detection is usually inherent in
4978 LALR and IELR parser tables anyway due to
4979 LR state merging (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}).
4980 Furthermore, the use of @code{%nonassoc} can contribute to delayed
4981 syntax error detection even in the case of canonical LR.
4982 As an experimental feature, delayed syntax error detection can be
4983 overcome in all cases by enabling LAC (@pxref{Decl
4984 Summary,,parse.lac}, for details, including a discussion of the effects
4985 of delayed syntax error detection).
4987 @item @code{consistent}.
4988 @cindex consistent states
4989 A consistent state is a state that has only one possible action.
4990 If that action is a reduction, then the parser does not need to request
4991 a lookahead token from the scanner before performing that action.
4992 However, the parser recognizes the ability to ignore the lookahead token
4993 in this way only when such a reduction is encoded as a default
4995 Thus, if default reductions are permitted only in consistent states,
4996 then a canonical LR parser that does not employ
4997 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{needs} the
4998 syntactically unacceptable token from the scanner.
5000 @item @code{accepting}.
5001 @cindex accepting state
5002 In the accepting state, the default reduction is actually the accept
5004 In this case, a canonical LR parser that does not employ
5005 @code{%nonassoc} detects a syntax error as soon as it @emph{reaches} the
5006 syntactically unacceptable token in the input.
5007 That is, it does not perform any extra reductions.
5010 @item Default Value:
5012 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5013 @item @code{all} otherwise.
5017 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5019 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5020 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5023 @item Language(s): all
5025 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5026 remain in the parser tables.
5027 Bison considers a state to be unreachable if there exists no sequence of
5028 transitions from the start state to that state.
5029 A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison disables a
5030 shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
5031 Keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful for analysis purposes, but they
5032 are useless in the generated parser.
5034 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5036 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5042 @item Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in
5044 Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are irrelevant to
5045 your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are relevant.
5046 Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a parser table
5047 analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this behavior will likely
5048 remain in future Bison releases.
5050 @item While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
5051 remove other kinds of useless states.
5052 Specifically, when Bison disables reduce actions during conflict resolution,
5053 some goto actions may become useless, and thus some additional states may
5055 If Bison were to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those
5056 actions, it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those
5058 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
5062 @c ================================================== lr.type
5065 @findex %define lr.type
5071 @item Language(s): all
5073 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5075 (This feature is experimental.
5076 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5078 @item Accepted Values:
5081 While Bison generates LALR parser tables by default for
5082 historical reasons, IELR or canonical LR is almost
5083 always preferable for deterministic parsers.
5084 The trouble is that LALR parser tables can suffer from
5085 mysterious conflicts and thus may not accept the full set of sentences
5086 that IELR and canonical LR accept.
5087 @xref{Mystery Conflicts}, for details.
5088 However, there are at least two scenarios where LALR may be
5091 @cindex GLR with LALR
5092 @item When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you
5093 do not resolve any conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left}
5094 or @code{%prec}), then the parser explores all potential parses of any
5096 In this case, the use of LALR parser tables is guaranteed not
5097 to alter the language accepted by the parser.
5098 LALR parser tables are the smallest parser tables Bison can
5099 currently generate, so they may be preferable.
5100 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically,
5101 GLR begins to behave more like a deterministic parser, and so
5102 IELR and canonical LR can be helpful to avoid
5103 LALR's mysterious behavior.
5105 @item Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar
5106 with a major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or
5107 canonical LR parser table generation algorithm.
5108 LALR can be a quick way to generate parser tables in order to
5109 investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle differences
5110 from IELR and canonical LR.
5114 IELR is a minimal LR algorithm.
5115 That is, given any grammar (LR or non-LR),
5116 IELR and canonical LR always accept exactly the same
5118 However, as for LALR, the number of parser states is often an
5119 order of magnitude less for IELR than for canonical
5121 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states
5122 may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR
5123 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR is often an order
5124 of magnitude less as well.
5125 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
5127 @item @code{canonical-lr}.
5128 @cindex delayed syntax errors
5129 @cindex syntax errors delayed
5132 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an
5133 interesting means to explore a grammar because they have a property that
5134 IELR and LALR tables do not.
5135 That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are left
5136 disabled (@pxref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}), then, for every
5137 left context of every canonical LR state, the set of tokens
5138 accepted by that state is guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that
5139 is syntactically acceptable in that left context.
5140 It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR parsers
5141 in production is that, under the above constraints, they are guaranteed
5142 to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing any
5143 unnecessary reductions.
5144 However, IELR parsers using LAC (@pxref{Decl
5145 Summary,,parse.lac}) are also able to achieve this behavior without
5146 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or default reductions.
5149 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5153 @findex %define namespace
5156 @item Languages(s): C++
5158 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5159 For example, if you specify:
5162 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5165 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5168 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5171 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5172 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5175 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5181 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5182 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5183 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5185 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5187 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5188 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5189 lexical analyzer function.
5190 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5191 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5192 lexical analyzer function.
5193 For example, if you specify:
5196 %define namespace "foo"
5197 %name-prefix "bar::"
5200 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5204 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5206 @findex %define parse.lac
5208 @cindex lookahead correction
5211 @item Languages(s): C
5213 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5214 syntax error handling.
5216 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer
5217 from a couple of problems upon encountering a syntax error. First, the
5218 parser might perform additional parser stack reductions before
5219 discovering the syntax error. Such reductions perform user semantic
5220 actions that are unexpected because they are based on an invalid token,
5221 and they cause error recovery to begin in a different syntactic context
5222 than the one in which the invalid token was encountered. Second, when
5223 verbose error messages are enabled (with @code{%error-verbose} or
5224 @code{#define YYERROR_VERBOSE}), the expected token list in the syntax
5225 error message can both contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
5227 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default
5228 reductions in inconsistent states, and parser state merging. Thus,
5229 IELR and LALR suffer the most. Canonical
5230 LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
5231 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
5233 LAC is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm that
5234 completely solves these problems for canonical LR,
5235 IELR, and LALR without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc},
5236 default reductions, or state mering. Conceptually, the mechanism is
5237 straight-forward. Whenever the parser fetches a new token from the
5238 scanner so that it can determine the next parser action, it immediately
5239 suspends normal parsing and performs an exploratory parse using a
5240 temporary copy of the normal parser state stack. During this
5241 exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic actions.
5242 If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing then
5243 resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
5244 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
5245 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
5246 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each
5247 token in the grammar.
5249 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in
5250 a consistent parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not
5251 attempt to fetch a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed
5252 to determine the next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions
5253 are enabled in consistent states (@pxref{Decl
5254 Summary,,lr.default-reductions}) affects how soon the parser detects a
5255 syntax error: when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous token or when it
5256 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead. The latter behavior
5257 is probably more intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to
5258 achieve the former behavior while default reductions are fully enabled.
5260 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether
5261 to enable default reductions in consistent states, canonical
5262 LR and IELR behave exactly the same for both
5263 syntactically acceptable and syntactically unacceptable input. While
5264 LALR still does not support the full language-recognition
5265 power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at
5266 least enables LALR's syntax error handling to correctly
5267 reflect LALR's language-recognition power.
5269 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice,
5270 it can have a performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must
5271 be performed twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions
5272 in consistent states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate
5273 an exploratory parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a
5274 parse are often the file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the
5275 scanner, and the user's semantic actions, but none of these are
5276 performed during the exploratory parse. Finally, the base of the
5277 temporary stack used during an exploratory parse is a pointer into the
5278 normal parser state stack so that the stack is never physically copied.
5279 In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC has proven
5280 insignificant for practical grammars.
5282 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5284 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5290 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5291 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5292 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5293 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5294 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5296 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5297 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5298 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5299 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5300 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5301 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5302 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5303 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5304 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5305 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5307 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5308 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5309 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5311 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5312 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of
5313 the @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Locations,
5314 ,Tracking Locations}.
5316 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5317 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5318 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5319 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5320 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5322 @findex %code requires
5323 @findex %code provides
5324 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5325 header also contains their code.
5326 @xref{%code Summary}.
5329 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5330 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5333 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5334 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5335 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5338 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5339 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5340 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5343 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5344 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5345 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5346 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5348 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5352 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5353 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5354 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5355 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5356 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5357 accurate syntax error messages.
5360 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5361 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5362 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5364 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5365 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5366 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5367 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5368 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5369 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5370 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5371 For C++ parsers, see the @code{%define namespace} documentation in this
5373 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5377 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5378 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5379 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5384 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5385 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5386 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5387 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5388 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5389 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5390 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5394 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5395 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5398 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5399 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
5400 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
5403 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5404 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5405 Require a Version of Bison}.
5408 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5409 Specify the skeleton to use.
5411 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5412 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5413 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5414 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5416 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5417 file in the Bison installation directory.
5418 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5419 directory of the grammar file.
5420 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5423 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5424 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5425 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5426 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5427 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5428 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5429 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5432 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5433 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5434 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5435 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5436 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5437 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5438 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5441 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5442 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5443 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5447 The highest token number, plus one.
5449 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5451 The number of grammar rules,
5453 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5457 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5458 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5459 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5460 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5464 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5465 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5466 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5470 @subsection %code Summary
5471 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5473 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5474 It inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location in the
5475 output@footnote{The default location is actually skeleton-dependent;
5476 writers of non-standard skeletons however should choose the default location
5477 consistently with the behavior of the standard Bison skeletons.}.
5480 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5481 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus,
5482 @code{%code} replaces the traditional Yacc prologue,
5483 @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}, for most purposes. For a detailed
5484 discussion, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5486 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5489 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5490 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5491 If you need to specify location-sensitive verbatim @var{code} that does not
5492 belong at the default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form,
5493 use this form instead.
5495 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the location(s)
5496 where Bison should generate it.
5497 Not all @var{qualifier}s are accepted for all target languages.
5498 Unaccepted @var{qualifier}s produce an error.
5499 Some of the accepted @var{qualifier}s are:
5503 @findex %code requires
5506 @item Language(s): C, C++
5508 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5509 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5510 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5511 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5512 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5514 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5515 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5520 @findex %code provides
5523 @item Language(s): C, C++
5525 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5526 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5528 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5529 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5537 @item Language(s): C, C++
5539 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5540 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5541 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5542 parser implementation file. For example:
5551 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5555 @findex %code imports
5558 @item Language(s): Java
5560 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5562 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5563 before any class definitions.
5568 For a detailed discussion of how to use @code{%code} in place of the
5569 traditional Yacc prologue for C/C++, see @ref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5573 @node Multiple Parsers
5574 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5576 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5577 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5578 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5579 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5581 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5582 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5583 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5584 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5585 names that do not conflict.
5587 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5588 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5589 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5590 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5591 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5592 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5593 @code{clex}, and so on.
5595 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5596 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5597 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5598 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5599 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5601 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5602 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5603 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5604 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5607 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5608 @cindex C-language interface
5611 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5612 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5613 functions that it needs to use.
5615 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5616 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5617 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5618 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5621 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5622 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5623 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5624 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5625 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5626 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5628 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5629 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5630 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5634 @node Parser Function
5635 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5638 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5639 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5640 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5641 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5642 without reading further.
5645 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5646 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5647 is due to end-of-input).
5649 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5650 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5653 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5656 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5661 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5666 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5669 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5670 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5671 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5673 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5674 @findex %parse-param
5675 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5676 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5677 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5678 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5679 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5682 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5685 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5686 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5690 Then call the parser like this:
5694 int nastiness, randomness;
5695 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5696 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5702 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5705 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5708 @node Push Parser Function
5709 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5710 @findex yypush_parse
5712 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5713 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5715 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5716 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5717 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5718 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5720 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5721 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5722 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5723 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5726 @node Pull Parser Function
5727 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5728 @findex yypull_parse
5730 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5731 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5733 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5734 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5735 declaration is used.
5736 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5738 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5739 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5742 @node Parser Create Function
5743 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5744 @findex yypstate_new
5746 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5747 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5749 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5750 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5751 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5752 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5754 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5755 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5756 or 0 if no memory was available.
5757 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5761 @node Parser Delete Function
5762 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5763 @findex yypstate_delete
5765 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5766 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5768 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5769 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5770 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5771 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5773 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5774 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5775 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5779 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5781 @cindex lexical analyzer
5783 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5784 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5785 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5786 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5788 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5789 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5790 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5791 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5792 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5793 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5794 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5798 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5799 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5800 of the token it has read.
5801 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5802 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5804 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5805 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5808 @node Calling Convention
5809 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5811 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5812 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5813 signifies end-of-input.
5815 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5816 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5817 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5818 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5820 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5821 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5822 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5823 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5824 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5825 signifies end-of-input.
5827 Here is an example showing these things:
5834 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5837 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5838 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5840 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5846 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5847 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5849 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5850 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5854 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5855 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5856 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5857 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5860 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5861 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5862 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5863 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5864 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5867 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5868 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5869 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5870 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5873 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5876 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5877 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5878 strlen (token_buffer))
5879 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5880 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5885 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
5886 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
5890 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
5893 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
5894 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
5895 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
5896 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
5902 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5903 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5908 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
5909 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
5910 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
5911 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
5912 declaration looks like this:
5925 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
5930 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5931 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5936 @node Token Locations
5937 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
5940 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Locations, ,
5941 Tracking Locations}) in actions to keep track of the textual locations
5942 of tokens and groupings, then you must provide this information in
5943 @code{yylex}. The function @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual
5944 location of a token just parsed in the global variable @code{yylloc}.
5945 So @code{yylex} must store the proper data in that variable.
5947 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
5948 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
5949 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
5950 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
5951 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
5954 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
5957 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
5959 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
5960 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
5961 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
5962 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
5963 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
5964 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
5969 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
5972 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
5973 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5978 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
5979 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
5980 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
5984 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
5985 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
5988 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5990 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
5991 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
5997 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5998 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
5999 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6003 results in the following signature:
6006 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6007 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6010 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6013 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6014 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6018 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6021 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6022 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6025 @node Error Reporting
6026 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6027 @cindex error reporting function
6030 @cindex syntax error
6032 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6033 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6034 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6035 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6038 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6039 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6040 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6041 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6042 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6044 @findex %error-verbose
6045 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison
6046 declarations section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations
6047 Section}), then Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message
6048 string instead of just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6050 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6051 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6052 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6053 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6054 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6055 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6057 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6058 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6059 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6061 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6066 yyerror (char const *s)
6070 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6075 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6076 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6077 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6078 immediately return 1.
6080 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6081 an access to the current location.
6082 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6083 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6084 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6088 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6089 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6092 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6095 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6096 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6099 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6100 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6101 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6102 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6106 /* Location tracking. */
6110 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6112 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6113 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6117 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6120 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6121 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6122 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6123 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6128 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6129 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6130 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6131 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6132 message is always passed last.
6134 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6135 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6136 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6140 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6141 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6142 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6143 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6145 @node Action Features
6146 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6147 @cindex summary, action features
6148 @cindex action features summary
6150 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6151 are useful in actions.
6153 @deffn {Variable} $$
6154 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6155 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6158 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6159 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6160 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6163 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6164 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6165 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6166 Types of Values in Actions}.
6169 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6170 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6171 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6172 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6175 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6176 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6177 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6180 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6181 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6182 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6185 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6187 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6188 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6189 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6190 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6191 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6192 going to be reduced by this rule.
6194 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6195 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6196 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6199 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6202 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6204 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6207 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6209 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6213 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6215 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6216 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6217 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6218 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6219 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6222 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6223 @findex YYRECOVERING
6224 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6225 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6226 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6229 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6230 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6231 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6232 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6233 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6235 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6238 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6239 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6241 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6243 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6246 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6247 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6248 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6249 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6252 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6253 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6254 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6255 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6257 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6260 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6261 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6262 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6263 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6265 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6270 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6271 of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6272 Tracking Locations}.
6274 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6278 @c int first_line, last_line;
6279 @c int first_column, last_column;
6283 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6284 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6286 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6287 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6288 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6291 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6294 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6296 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual location
6297 of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Locations, ,
6298 Tracking Locations}.
6301 @node Internationalization
6302 @section Parser Internationalization
6303 @cindex internationalization
6309 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6310 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6311 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6312 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6313 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6314 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6315 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6316 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6319 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6320 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6321 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6326 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6327 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6328 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6329 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6330 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6334 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6339 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6340 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6341 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6342 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6343 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6344 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6345 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6346 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6347 Bison-generated parser.
6350 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6351 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6352 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6356 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6359 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6360 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6361 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6365 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6366 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6367 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6370 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6376 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6380 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6386 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6387 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6388 @cindex algorithm of parser
6391 @cindex parser stack
6392 @cindex stack, parser
6394 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6395 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6396 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6398 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6399 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6402 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6403 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6404 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6405 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6406 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6407 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6408 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6410 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6417 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6418 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6421 expr: expr '*' expr;
6425 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6432 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6433 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6435 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6436 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6437 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6439 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6442 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6443 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6444 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6445 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6446 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6447 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6448 * Mystery Conflicts:: Reduce/reduce conflicts that look unjustified.
6449 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6450 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6454 @section Lookahead Tokens
6455 @cindex lookahead token
6457 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6458 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6459 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6460 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6461 token in order to decide what to do.
6463 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6464 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6465 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6466 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6467 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6468 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6469 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6472 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6473 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6474 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6491 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6492 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6493 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6494 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6495 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6497 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6498 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6499 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6500 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6501 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6502 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6507 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6508 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6509 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6510 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6513 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6515 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6516 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6517 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6519 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6520 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6526 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6532 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6533 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6535 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6536 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6537 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6538 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6541 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6542 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6543 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6544 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6545 contrast it with the other alternative.
6547 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6548 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6552 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6554 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6557 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6558 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6559 making these two inputs equivalent:
6562 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6564 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6567 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6568 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6569 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6570 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6571 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6572 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6573 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6574 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6576 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6577 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6578 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6579 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6581 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6583 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6584 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6585 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6590 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6602 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6611 @section Operator Precedence
6612 @cindex operator precedence
6613 @cindex precedence of operators
6615 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6616 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6617 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6618 shift and when to reduce.
6621 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6622 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6623 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6624 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6627 @node Why Precedence
6628 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6630 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6631 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6645 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6646 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6647 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6648 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6649 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6650 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6651 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6654 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6655 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6656 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6657 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6658 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6659 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6660 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6661 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6664 @cindex associativity
6665 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6666 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6667 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6668 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6669 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6670 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6671 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6672 makes right-associativity.
6674 @node Using Precedence
6675 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6680 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6681 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6682 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6683 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6684 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6685 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6686 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6689 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6690 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6691 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6692 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6693 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6695 @node Precedence Examples
6696 @subsection Precedence Examples
6698 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6706 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6707 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6708 declared with @code{'-'}:
6711 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6717 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6718 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6719 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6721 @node How Precedence
6722 @subsection How Precedence Works
6724 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6725 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6726 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6727 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6728 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6729 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6731 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6732 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6733 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6734 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6735 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6736 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6737 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6740 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6741 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6743 @node Contextual Precedence
6744 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6745 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6746 @cindex unary operator precedence
6747 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6748 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6751 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6752 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6753 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6754 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6756 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6757 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6758 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6759 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6762 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6763 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6764 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6765 modifier's syntax is:
6768 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6772 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6773 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6774 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6775 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6776 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6778 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6779 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6780 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6790 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6797 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6802 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6803 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6804 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6805 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6807 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6808 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6809 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6810 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6812 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6813 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6814 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6815 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6816 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6817 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6819 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6820 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6824 @section Parser States
6825 @cindex finite-state machine
6826 @cindex parser state
6827 @cindex state (of parser)
6829 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6830 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6831 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6832 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6833 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6835 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6836 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6837 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6838 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6839 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6840 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6841 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6842 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6845 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6846 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6847 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6850 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6851 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6852 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6854 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6855 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6858 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6859 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6862 sequence: /* empty */
6863 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6866 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6869 maybeword: /* empty */
6870 @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6872 @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6877 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6878 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
6879 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
6880 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
6881 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
6882 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
6884 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
6885 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
6886 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
6888 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
6889 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
6890 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
6891 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
6892 In this example, the output of the program changes.
6894 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
6895 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
6896 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
6897 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
6900 sequence: /* empty */
6901 @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6903 @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6907 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
6910 sequence: /* empty */
6912 | sequence redirects
6919 redirects:/* empty */
6920 | redirects redirect
6925 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
6926 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
6927 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
6928 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
6929 in infinitely many ways!
6931 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
6932 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
6933 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
6934 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
6936 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
6940 sequence: /* empty */
6946 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
6950 sequence: /* empty */
6952 | sequence redirects
6960 | redirects redirect
6964 @node Mystery Conflicts
6965 @section Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6967 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
6975 def: param_spec return_spec ','
6979 | name_list ':' type
6997 | name ',' name_list
7002 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7003 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7004 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7005 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7009 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7011 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7012 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7013 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7015 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7016 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7017 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7018 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7019 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7020 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7021 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7023 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the
7024 non-LR(1) class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in
7025 difficulties beyond just mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts.
7026 The best way to fix all these problems is to select a different parser
7027 table generation algorithm.
7028 Either IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but
7029 the former is more efficient and easier to debug during development.
7030 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}, for details.
7031 (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations
7033 More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7035 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7036 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7037 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7038 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7039 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7050 /* This rule is never used. */
7056 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7057 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7058 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7059 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7060 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7061 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7063 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7064 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7065 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7066 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7067 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7068 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7073 | name_list ':' type
7081 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7082 generators, please see:
7083 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of
7084 LALR(1) Look-Ahead Sets, @cite{ACM Transactions on
7085 Programming Languages and Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982),
7086 pp.@: 615--649 @uref{http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/69622.357187}.
7088 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7089 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7091 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7092 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7093 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7095 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7096 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7097 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7098 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7099 context-free languages.
7100 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7101 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7102 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7103 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7104 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7105 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mystery Conflicts}),
7106 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7107 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7109 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7110 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7111 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7112 parser uses the same basic
7113 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7114 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7115 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7116 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7118 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7119 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7120 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7121 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7122 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7124 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7125 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7126 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7127 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7128 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7129 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7130 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7131 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7132 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7133 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7134 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7137 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7138 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7139 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7140 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7141 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7142 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7143 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7144 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7145 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7146 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7147 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7148 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7150 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7151 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7152 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7154 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7155 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7156 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7157 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7158 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7159 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7160 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7161 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7162 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7163 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7164 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7165 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7167 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, please see: Elizabeth
7168 Scott, Adrian Johnstone and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain, Tomita-Style
7169 Generalised LR Parsers, Royal Holloway, University of
7170 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12,
7171 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps},
7174 @node Memory Management
7175 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7176 @cindex memory exhaustion
7177 @cindex memory management
7178 @cindex stack overflow
7179 @cindex parser stack overflow
7180 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7182 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7183 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7184 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7186 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7187 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7188 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7191 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7192 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7193 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7194 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7196 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7197 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7198 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7199 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7200 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7201 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7203 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7204 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7205 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7208 @cindex default stack limit
7209 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7213 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7214 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7215 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7216 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7217 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7219 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7221 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7222 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7223 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7224 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7225 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7226 this deficiency in a future release.
7228 @node Error Recovery
7229 @chapter Error Recovery
7230 @cindex error recovery
7231 @cindex recovery from errors
7233 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7234 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7235 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7238 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7239 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7240 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7241 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7242 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7243 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7244 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7247 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7248 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7249 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7250 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7251 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7252 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7257 stmnts: /* empty string */
7263 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7264 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7266 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7267 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7268 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7269 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7270 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7271 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7272 applicable in the ordinary way.
7274 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7275 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7276 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7277 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7278 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7279 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7280 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7281 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7282 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7283 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7284 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7285 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7287 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7288 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7289 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7292 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7295 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7296 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7297 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7298 spurious error message:
7301 primary: '(' expr ')'
7307 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7308 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7309 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7310 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7311 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7312 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7313 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7316 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7317 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7318 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7319 error messages resume.
7321 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7322 as any other rules can.
7325 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7326 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7327 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7328 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7331 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7332 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7333 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7335 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7337 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7338 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7339 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7340 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7341 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7343 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7344 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7345 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7346 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7349 @node Context Dependency
7350 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7352 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7353 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7354 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7355 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7359 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7360 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7361 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7362 error recovery rules must be written.
7365 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7366 neither clean nor robust.)
7368 @node Semantic Tokens
7369 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7371 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7372 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7378 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7379 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7380 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7382 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7383 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7384 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7385 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7386 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7388 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7389 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7390 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7391 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7392 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7393 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7394 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7396 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7397 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7398 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7399 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7403 typedef int foo, bar;
7406 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7407 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7412 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7413 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7415 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7416 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7417 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7418 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7419 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7423 declarator maybeasm '='
7425 | declarator maybeasm
7429 notype_declarator maybeasm '='
7431 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7436 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7437 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7438 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7440 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7441 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7442 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7443 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7444 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7445 the syntactic context.
7447 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7448 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7449 @cindex lexical tie-in
7451 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7452 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7455 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7456 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7457 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7458 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7459 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7466 void yyerror (char const *);
7480 @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
7494 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
7495 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
7496 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
7498 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
7499 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
7500 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
7503 @node Tie-in Recovery
7504 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
7506 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
7507 @xref{Error Recovery}.
7509 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
7510 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
7511 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
7512 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
7516 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
7523 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
7524 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
7525 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
7526 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
7527 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
7529 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
7531 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
7532 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
7533 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
7545 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
7546 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
7547 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
7548 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
7550 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
7551 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
7552 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
7553 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
7554 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
7555 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
7558 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
7561 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
7563 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
7564 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
7565 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
7566 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
7567 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
7568 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
7571 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
7572 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
7576 @section Understanding Your Parser
7578 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
7579 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
7580 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
7581 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
7582 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
7584 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
7585 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
7586 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
7587 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
7588 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
7589 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
7590 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
7592 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
7609 @command{bison} reports:
7612 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
7613 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
7614 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
7615 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
7616 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
7619 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
7620 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
7621 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
7622 interpretation is the same.
7624 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
7625 to precedence and/or associativity:
7628 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
7629 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
7630 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
7635 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
7638 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7639 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7640 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
7641 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
7645 @cindex token, useless
7646 @cindex useless token
7647 @cindex nonterminal, useless
7648 @cindex useless nonterminal
7649 @cindex rule, useless
7650 @cindex useless rule
7651 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
7652 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
7653 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
7654 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
7658 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
7661 Terminals unused in grammar:
7664 Rules useless in grammar:
7669 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
7675 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
7676 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
7677 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
7678 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
7679 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
7684 and reports the uses of the symbols:
7687 Terminals, with rules where they appear
7697 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
7702 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
7707 @cindex pointed rule
7708 @cindex rule, pointed
7709 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
7710 with it set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
7711 item is a production rule together with a point (marked by @samp{.})
7712 that the input cursor.
7717 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7719 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7724 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
7725 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
7726 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
7727 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
7728 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
7729 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted on
7730 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
7731 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
7733 @cindex core, item set
7734 @cindex item set core
7735 @cindex kernel, item set
7736 @cindex item set core
7737 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
7738 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
7739 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
7740 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
7741 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
7742 @option{--report=itemset} to list all the items, include those that can
7748 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
7749 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
7750 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
7751 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
7752 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
7753 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
7755 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7766 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
7768 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
7772 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
7773 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
7774 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
7775 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
7780 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
7781 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7782 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7783 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7784 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7786 $ shift, and go to state 3
7787 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7788 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7789 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7790 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7794 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
7795 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead if
7796 @samp{+}, it will be shifted on the parse stack, and the automaton
7797 control will jump to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp
7798 '+' . exp}. Since there is no default action, any other token than
7799 those listed above will trigger a syntax error.
7801 @cindex accepting state
7802 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
7808 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
7814 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
7815 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
7817 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
7823 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
7825 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7831 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
7833 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7839 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
7841 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7847 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
7849 NUM shift, and go to state 1
7854 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
7860 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7861 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
7862 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7863 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7864 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7866 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7867 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7869 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7870 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7873 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
7874 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
7875 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
7876 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
7877 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
7878 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
7879 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
7880 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
7882 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
7883 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7884 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
7887 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
7888 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
7889 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
7890 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
7891 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
7892 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
7893 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
7894 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
7895 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
7896 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
7897 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
7898 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
7903 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7904 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
7905 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7906 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7907 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7909 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7910 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7912 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
7913 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
7916 The remaining states are similar:
7921 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7922 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7923 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
7924 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7925 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7927 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7928 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7930 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
7931 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
7935 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7936 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7937 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7938 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
7939 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7941 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7943 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
7944 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
7948 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
7949 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
7950 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
7951 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
7952 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
7954 '+' shift, and go to state 4
7955 '-' shift, and go to state 5
7956 '*' shift, and go to state 6
7957 '/' shift, and go to state 7
7959 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7960 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7961 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7962 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
7963 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
7967 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
7968 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
7969 @samp{*}, but also because the
7970 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
7974 @section Tracing Your Parser
7977 @cindex tracing the parser
7979 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
7980 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
7982 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
7985 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
7987 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
7988 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
7989 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
7990 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
7993 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
7994 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
7995 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
7997 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
7999 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison
8000 Declaration Summary}). This is a Bison extension, which will prove
8001 useful when Bison will output parsers for languages that don't use a
8002 preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to
8004 the preferred solution.
8007 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8010 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8011 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8012 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8013 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8014 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8015 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8017 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8018 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8019 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8020 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8022 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8023 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8024 messages tell you these things:
8028 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8031 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8032 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8035 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8036 of the state stack afterward.
8039 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8040 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8041 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8042 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8043 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8044 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8045 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8046 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8047 grammar are to blame.
8049 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8050 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8051 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8052 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8053 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8056 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8057 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8058 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8059 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8060 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8061 value (from @code{yylval}).
8063 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8064 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8068 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8069 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) print_token_value (file, type, value)
8072 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8075 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8078 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8079 else if (type == NUM)
8080 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8084 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8087 @chapter Invoking Bison
8088 @cindex invoking Bison
8089 @cindex Bison invocation
8090 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8092 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8098 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8099 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8100 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8101 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8102 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8103 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8104 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8105 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8106 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8107 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8108 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8113 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8116 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8119 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8122 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8124 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8125 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8126 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8129 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8130 in alphabetical order by short options.
8131 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8132 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8136 @section Bison Options
8138 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8139 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8140 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8141 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8142 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8145 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8146 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8149 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8155 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8159 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8161 @item --print-localedir
8162 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8164 @item --print-datadir
8165 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8169 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8170 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8171 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8172 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8173 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8174 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8175 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8176 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8177 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8178 for compatibility with POSIX:
8185 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8186 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8187 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8188 this option is specified.
8190 @item -W [@var{category}]
8191 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8192 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8195 @item midrule-values
8196 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8198 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8201 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8204 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8205 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8208 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8211 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8212 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8213 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8217 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8222 Turn off all the warnings.
8224 Treat warnings as errors.
8227 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8228 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8229 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8238 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8239 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8240 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8242 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8243 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8244 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8245 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8246 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8247 (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}) except that Bison processes multiple
8248 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8252 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8255 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8256 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8257 definition for @var{name}.
8259 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8260 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8261 definitions for @var{name}.
8263 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8264 definitions for @var{name}.
8267 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8268 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8269 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8271 @item -L @var{language}
8272 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8273 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8274 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8275 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8276 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8278 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8282 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8284 @item -p @var{prefix}
8285 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8286 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8287 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8291 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8292 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8293 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8294 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8295 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8296 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8299 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8300 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8301 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8303 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8304 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
8305 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
8306 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
8308 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
8309 file in the Bison installation directory.
8310 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
8311 current working directory.
8312 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
8315 @itemx --token-table
8316 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8323 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
8324 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8325 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
8326 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8329 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
8330 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
8331 with other short options.
8333 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
8334 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
8335 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
8336 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8338 @item -r @var{things}
8339 @itemx --report=@var{things}
8340 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
8341 separated list of @var{things} among:
8345 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
8349 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8350 each rule's lookahead set.
8353 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
8354 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
8357 @item --report-file=@var{file}
8358 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
8362 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
8363 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
8364 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8367 @itemx --output=@var{file}
8368 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
8370 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
8371 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
8373 @item -g [@var{file}]
8374 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
8375 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
8376 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
8377 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
8378 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8379 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8382 @item -x [@var{file}]
8383 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
8384 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
8385 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
8386 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
8388 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
8389 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8392 @node Option Cross Key
8393 @section Option Cross Key
8395 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
8396 the corresponding short option and directive.
8398 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
8399 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
8400 @include cross-options.texi
8404 @section Yacc Library
8406 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
8407 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
8408 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
8409 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
8410 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
8411 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
8412 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
8414 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
8415 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
8418 int yyerror (char const *);
8421 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
8422 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
8423 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
8429 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
8431 @node Other Languages
8432 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
8435 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
8436 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
8440 @section C++ Parsers
8443 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
8444 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
8445 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
8446 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
8447 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
8448 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
8451 @node C++ Bison Interface
8452 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
8453 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
8457 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
8458 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
8459 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
8460 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8462 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
8464 @findex %define namespace
8465 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace name, see
8467 The various classes are generated in the following files:
8472 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
8473 used for location tracking. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
8476 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
8479 @itemx @var{file}.cc
8480 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
8481 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
8482 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
8483 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
8485 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
8486 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
8487 @samp{%defines} directive.
8490 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
8491 for a complete and accurate documentation.
8493 @node C++ Semantic Values
8494 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
8495 @c - No objects in unions
8497 @c - Printer and destructor
8499 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
8500 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
8501 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
8502 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
8503 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
8506 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
8507 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
8508 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
8510 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
8511 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
8512 to such objects are allowed.
8515 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
8516 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
8517 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
8521 @node C++ Location Values
8522 @subsection C++ Location Values
8526 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
8528 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
8529 location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}. Two
8530 auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point in a file,
8531 and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
8532 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files).
8534 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
8535 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
8536 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
8537 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
8538 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
8541 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
8542 The line, starting at 1.
8545 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8546 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
8549 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
8550 The column, starting at 0.
8553 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8554 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
8557 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8558 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8559 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8560 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
8561 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
8564 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
8565 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
8566 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
8567 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
8570 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
8571 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
8572 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
8575 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
8576 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
8577 Advance the @code{end} position.
8580 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
8581 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
8582 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
8583 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
8586 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
8587 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
8591 @node C++ Parser Interface
8592 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
8593 @c - define parser_class_name
8595 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
8597 @c - Reporting errors
8599 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
8600 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
8601 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
8602 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
8603 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
8604 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
8605 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
8606 additional argument for its constructor.
8608 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
8609 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
8610 The types for semantics value and locations.
8613 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
8614 A structure that contains (only) the definition of the tokens as the
8615 @code{yytokentype} enumeration. To refer to the token @code{FOO}, the
8616 scanner should use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
8617 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
8618 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
8621 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8622 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
8623 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
8626 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
8627 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
8630 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
8631 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
8632 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
8636 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
8637 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
8638 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
8639 or nonzero, full tracing.
8642 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
8643 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
8644 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
8645 described by @var{m}.
8649 @node C++ Scanner Interface
8650 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
8651 @c - prefix for yylex.
8652 @c - Pure interface to yylex
8655 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
8656 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
8657 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
8659 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
8660 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
8661 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
8662 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
8666 @node A Complete C++ Example
8667 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
8669 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
8670 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
8671 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
8672 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
8673 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
8674 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
8675 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
8676 actually easier to interface with.
8679 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
8680 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
8681 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
8682 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
8683 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
8686 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8687 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
8689 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
8690 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
8691 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
8692 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
8693 of valid input follows.
8697 seven := one + two * three
8701 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
8702 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
8704 @c - A place to store error messages
8705 @c - A place for the result
8707 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
8708 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
8709 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
8710 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
8711 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
8712 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
8713 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
8715 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
8716 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
8717 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
8720 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8722 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8723 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8726 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
8731 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
8732 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
8733 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
8734 factor both as follows.
8736 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8738 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
8740 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
8741 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
8742 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
8743 calcxx_driver& driver)
8744 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
8749 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
8752 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8754 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
8759 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
8761 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
8767 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
8768 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
8770 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8772 // Handling the scanner.
8775 bool trace_scanning;
8779 Similarly for the parser itself.
8781 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8783 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
8784 int parse (const std::string& f);
8790 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
8791 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
8792 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
8793 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
8795 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
8798 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
8799 void error (const std::string& m);
8801 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
8804 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
8805 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
8806 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
8807 messages and set error state.
8809 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
8811 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
8812 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
8814 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
8815 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
8817 variables["one"] = 1;
8818 variables["two"] = 2;
8821 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
8826 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
8830 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
8831 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
8832 int res = parser.parse ();
8838 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
8840 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
8844 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
8846 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
8851 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
8853 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
8854 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
8855 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
8856 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
8859 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8861 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
8862 %require "@value{VERSION}"
8864 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
8868 @findex %code requires
8869 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
8870 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
8871 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
8872 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
8873 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
8874 use a forward declaration of the driver.
8875 @xref{%code Summary}.
8877 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8881 class calcxx_driver;
8886 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
8887 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
8890 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8892 // The parsing context.
8893 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8894 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
8898 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
8899 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
8900 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
8901 automatically propagated.
8903 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8908 // Initialize the initial location.
8909 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
8914 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose
8917 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8924 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
8927 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8939 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
8940 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
8942 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8945 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
8951 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
8952 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
8953 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
8954 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
8957 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8959 %token END 0 "end of file"
8961 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
8962 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
8967 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
8970 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
8971 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8973 %printer @{ debug_stream () << *$$; @} "identifier"
8974 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
8976 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <ival>
8980 The grammar itself is straightforward.
8982 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
8986 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
8988 assignments: assignments assignment @{@}
8989 | /* Nothing. */ @{@};
8992 "identifier" ":=" exp
8993 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
8997 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
8998 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
8999 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9000 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9001 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
9002 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
9007 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9010 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9013 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
9014 const std::string& m)
9016 driver.error (l, m);
9020 @node Calc++ Scanner
9021 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9023 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9024 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9026 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9028 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9033 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9034 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9036 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9037 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9038 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9039 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
9043 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
9044 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
9045 not of token_type. */
9046 #define yyterminate() return token::END
9051 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
9052 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
9053 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
9054 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
9056 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9058 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
9062 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
9064 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9066 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
9072 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
9073 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
9074 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
9075 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
9076 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
9077 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
9078 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
9080 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9083 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
9089 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
9090 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
9094 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
9095 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
9096 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
9097 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
9099 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9102 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
9104 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
9105 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
9106 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
9109 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
9110 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
9111 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
9113 return token::NUMBER;
9115 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
9116 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
9121 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
9122 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
9124 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9127 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
9129 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
9132 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
9134 error (std::string ("cannot open ") + file);
9140 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
9146 @node Calc++ Top Level
9147 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
9149 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
9151 @comment file: calc++.cc
9154 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9157 main (int argc, char *argv[])
9159 calcxx_driver driver;
9160 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
9161 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
9162 driver.trace_parsing = true;
9163 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
9164 driver.trace_scanning = true;
9165 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
9166 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
9171 @section Java Parsers
9174 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
9175 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
9176 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
9177 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9178 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
9179 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
9180 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9181 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
9184 @node Java Bison Interface
9185 @subsection Java Bison Interface
9186 @c - %language "Java"
9188 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
9189 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9191 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
9192 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
9194 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9195 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
9196 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
9197 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
9198 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
9199 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
9200 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
9201 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
9202 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
9203 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
9205 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
9207 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
9208 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
9209 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
9210 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
9213 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
9214 api.push-pull} have no effect.
9216 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
9217 @code{glr-parser} directive.
9219 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
9220 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
9222 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
9223 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
9224 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
9225 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
9226 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
9227 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
9228 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
9229 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
9230 access the token names and codes.
9232 @node Java Semantic Values
9233 @subsection Java Semantic Values
9234 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
9236 @c - Printer and destructor
9238 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
9239 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
9240 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
9243 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
9244 %type <Integer> number
9247 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
9248 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
9249 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
9250 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
9251 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
9254 %define stype "ASTNode"
9258 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
9259 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
9261 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
9262 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
9263 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
9264 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
9265 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
9266 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
9268 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
9269 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
9270 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
9272 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
9273 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
9274 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
9277 @node Java Location Values
9278 @subsection Java Location Values
9283 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser
9284 supports location tracking, see @ref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
9285 An auxiliary user-defined class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point
9286 in a file; Bison itself defines a class representing a @dfn{location},
9287 a range composed of a pair of positions (possibly spanning several
9288 files). The location class is an inner class of the parser; the name
9289 is @code{Location} by default, and may also be renamed using
9290 @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
9292 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
9293 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
9294 with @code{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
9295 be supplied by the user.
9298 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
9299 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
9300 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9303 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
9304 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9307 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
9308 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9311 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
9312 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
9313 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
9314 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
9318 @node Java Parser Interface
9319 @subsection Java Parser Interface
9320 @c - define parser_class_name
9322 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9324 @c - Reporting errors
9326 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
9327 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
9328 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
9329 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
9330 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
9332 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
9333 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
9334 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
9335 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
9336 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
9337 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
9339 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
9340 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
9341 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
9342 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
9344 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
9345 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
9346 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
9347 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
9348 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
9349 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
9351 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
9352 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
9354 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
9355 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
9356 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
9357 which initialize them automatically.
9359 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
9360 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
9362 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9363 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
9364 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
9368 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
9369 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
9370 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
9372 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
9373 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
9374 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
9377 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
9378 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
9379 @code{false} otherwise.
9382 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
9383 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
9384 from a syntax error.
9385 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9388 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
9389 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
9390 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9394 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
9395 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
9396 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9397 or nonzero, full tracing.
9401 @node Java Scanner Interface
9402 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
9405 @c - Lexer interface
9407 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
9408 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
9409 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
9410 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
9412 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
9413 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
9414 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
9415 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
9418 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
9419 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
9420 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
9421 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
9424 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
9426 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
9427 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
9428 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
9429 changed using @code{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
9432 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
9433 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9434 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
9437 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
9438 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9441 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
9442 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
9443 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
9444 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
9445 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
9447 The return type can be changed using @code{%define position_type
9448 "@var{class-name}".}
9451 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
9452 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
9454 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
9455 "@var{class-name}".}
9459 @node Java Action Features
9460 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
9462 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
9463 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
9465 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
9466 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
9469 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9470 This may not be assigned to.
9471 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9474 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
9475 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
9476 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9480 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
9481 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
9482 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
9483 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
9484 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
9485 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9488 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
9489 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
9490 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
9491 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
9493 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9497 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
9498 This may not be assigned to.
9499 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9503 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
9504 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9507 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
9508 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
9509 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9512 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
9513 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
9514 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9517 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
9518 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
9519 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9522 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
9523 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
9524 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
9526 @xref{Error Recovery}.
9529 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
9530 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
9531 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
9532 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
9537 @node Java Differences
9538 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
9540 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
9541 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
9542 section summarizes these differences.
9546 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
9547 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
9548 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
9549 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
9550 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
9551 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
9552 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9554 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
9555 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
9556 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
9557 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
9558 corresponds to these C macros.}.
9561 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
9562 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
9563 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
9564 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
9565 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
9566 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
9567 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
9568 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
9569 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
9572 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
9574 @item @code{%code imports}
9575 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
9576 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
9577 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
9579 @item unqualified @code{%code}
9580 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
9582 @item @code{%code lexer}
9583 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
9584 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
9585 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
9589 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
9590 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
9591 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
9593 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
9594 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
9599 @node Java Declarations Summary
9600 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
9602 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
9603 meaning when used in a Java parser.
9605 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
9606 Generate a Java class for the parser.
9609 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9610 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
9611 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
9612 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
9613 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9616 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
9617 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
9618 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
9619 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9622 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
9623 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
9624 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
9625 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9628 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
9629 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
9630 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9633 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
9634 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
9636 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9639 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9640 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
9641 @xref{Java Differences}.
9644 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9645 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
9646 @xref{Java Differences}.
9649 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
9650 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
9651 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9654 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
9655 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
9656 @emph{outside} the parser class.
9657 @xref{Java Differences}.
9660 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
9661 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
9662 @xref{Java Differences}.
9665 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
9666 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
9667 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9670 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
9671 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
9672 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9675 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
9676 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
9677 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9680 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
9681 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
9683 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9686 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9687 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
9688 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
9689 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
9692 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
9693 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
9694 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
9695 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
9696 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9699 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
9700 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
9701 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9704 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
9705 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
9706 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
9707 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9710 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
9711 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
9712 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
9713 @xref{Java Location Values}.
9716 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
9717 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
9718 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9721 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
9722 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
9723 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
9726 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
9727 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
9728 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
9731 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
9732 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
9733 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
9734 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
9738 @c ================================================= FAQ
9741 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
9742 @cindex frequently asked questions
9745 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
9749 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
9750 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
9751 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
9752 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
9753 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
9754 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
9755 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
9756 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
9757 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
9758 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
9759 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
9760 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
9763 @node Memory Exhausted
9764 @section Memory Exhausted
9767 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
9768 message. What can I do?
9771 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
9774 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
9775 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
9777 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
9778 following typical questions:
9781 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
9782 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
9783 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
9790 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
9791 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
9792 although I did specify @code{%define api.pure}.
9795 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
9796 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
9797 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
9798 demonstration, consider the following source file,
9799 @file{first-line.l}:
9807 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
9810 yyparse (char const *file)
9812 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
9815 /* One token only. */
9817 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
9832 If the file @file{input} contains
9840 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
9843 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
9844 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
9845 $ @kbd{./first-line}
9850 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
9851 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
9852 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
9853 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
9854 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
9855 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
9856 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
9857 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
9860 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
9861 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
9862 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
9863 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
9865 @node Strings are Destroyed
9866 @section Strings are Destroyed
9869 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
9870 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
9871 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
9874 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
9875 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
9876 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
9881 char *yylval = NULL;
9884 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
9890 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
9891 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
9892 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
9893 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
9898 If you compile and run this code, you get:
9901 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9902 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9903 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9909 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
9910 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
9911 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
9912 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
9913 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
9914 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
9917 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
9918 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
9919 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
9924 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
9925 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
9928 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
9929 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
9932 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
9933 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
9934 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
9935 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
9936 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
9937 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
9938 execute simple instructions one after the others.
9940 @cindex abstract syntax tree
9942 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
9943 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
9944 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
9945 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
9946 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
9947 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
9950 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
9951 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
9954 @node Multiple start-symbols
9955 @section Multiple start-symbols
9958 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
9959 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
9960 multiple entry points.
9963 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
9964 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
9965 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
9966 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
9970 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
9972 start: START_FOO foo
9976 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
9977 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
9979 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
9980 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
9981 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
9982 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
9983 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
9984 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
9985 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
9986 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
9994 int t = start_token;
9999 /* @r{The rules.} */
10003 @node Secure? Conform?
10004 @section Secure? Conform?
10007 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
10010 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
10011 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
10012 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
10013 please send us a bug report.
10015 @node I can't build Bison
10016 @section I can't build Bison
10019 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
10020 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
10024 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
10025 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
10026 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
10027 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
10028 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
10029 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
10030 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
10033 @node Where can I find help?
10034 @section Where can I find help?
10037 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
10040 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
10041 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
10042 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
10043 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
10044 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
10045 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
10046 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
10047 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
10051 @section Bug Reports
10054 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
10057 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
10058 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
10059 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
10060 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
10061 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
10063 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
10064 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
10065 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
10066 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
10067 easier it will be to fix the bug.
10069 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
10070 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
10071 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
10072 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
10073 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
10074 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
10076 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
10077 send a bug report just because you can not provide a fix.
10079 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
10081 @node More Languages
10082 @section More Languages
10085 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
10086 favorite language here}?
10089 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
10090 languages; contributions are welcome.
10093 @section Beta Testing
10096 What is involved in being a beta tester?
10099 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
10100 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
10101 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
10102 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
10103 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
10104 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
10105 essentially halted.
10107 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
10108 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
10109 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
10110 systems are especially welcome.
10112 @node Mailing Lists
10113 @section Mailing Lists
10116 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
10119 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
10121 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
10123 @node Table of Symbols
10124 @appendix Bison Symbols
10125 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
10126 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
10128 @deffn {Variable} @@$
10129 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
10130 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10133 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
10134 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand
10135 side of the rule. @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10138 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
10139 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10140 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10143 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
10144 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name.
10145 @xref{Locations, , Locations Overview}.
10148 @deffn {Variable} $$
10149 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
10153 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
10154 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
10155 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
10158 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
10159 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10163 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
10164 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
10168 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
10169 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
10170 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
10171 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
10174 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
10175 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
10176 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
10177 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
10178 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
10182 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
10183 Comment delimiters, as in C.
10186 @deffn {Delimiter} :
10187 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
10191 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
10192 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10195 @deffn {Delimiter} |
10196 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
10197 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
10200 @deffn {Directive} <*>
10201 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
10204 This feature is experimental.
10205 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10208 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10211 @deffn {Directive} <>
10212 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
10215 This feature is experimental.
10216 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
10219 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10222 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
10223 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
10224 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
10225 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
10228 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
10229 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
10230 Insert @var{code} verbatim into output parser source.
10231 @xref{%code Summary}.
10234 @deffn {Directive} %debug
10235 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10239 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
10240 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10241 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10246 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{define-variable}
10247 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} @var{value}
10248 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{define-variable} "@var{value}"
10249 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior.
10250 @xref{Decl Summary,,%define}.
10253 @deffn {Directive} %defines
10254 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
10255 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10258 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
10259 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
10260 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10263 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
10264 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
10265 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
10268 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
10269 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
10270 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
10274 @deffn {Symbol} $end
10275 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
10276 used in the grammar.
10279 @deffn {Symbol} error
10280 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
10281 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
10282 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
10283 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
10284 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
10285 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
10286 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
10287 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10290 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
10291 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
10292 when @code{yyerror} is called.
10295 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10296 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
10300 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
10301 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
10302 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10305 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
10306 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
10309 @deffn {Directive} %language
10310 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
10311 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10314 @deffn {Directive} %left
10315 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
10316 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10319 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10320 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10321 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
10325 @deffn {Directive} %merge
10326 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
10327 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
10328 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
10329 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
10332 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10333 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10337 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
10338 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
10339 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
10344 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
10345 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
10346 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10349 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
10350 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
10351 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10354 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
10355 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
10356 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10359 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
10360 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
10361 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
10362 Function @code{yyparse}}.
10365 @deffn {Directive} %prec
10366 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
10367 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
10370 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
10371 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%define}),
10372 for which Bison is more careful to warn about unreasonable usage.
10375 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
10376 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
10377 Require a Version of Bison}.
10380 @deffn {Directive} %right
10381 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
10382 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
10385 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
10386 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
10387 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10390 @deffn {Directive} %start
10391 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
10395 @deffn {Directive} %token
10396 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
10397 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
10400 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
10401 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
10402 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10405 @deffn {Directive} %type
10406 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
10407 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
10410 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
10411 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
10412 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
10416 @deffn {Directive} %union
10417 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
10418 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
10421 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
10422 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
10423 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
10424 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
10425 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10427 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
10431 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
10432 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
10433 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
10434 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10436 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
10440 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
10441 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
10442 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10445 @deffn {Variable} yychar
10446 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
10447 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
10448 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
10449 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10452 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
10453 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
10454 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10457 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
10458 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
10459 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10462 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
10463 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
10464 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
10465 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10468 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
10469 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
10470 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10473 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
10474 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
10475 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
10476 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
10477 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10479 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
10483 @deffn {Function} yyerror
10484 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
10485 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
10486 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10489 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
10490 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
10491 to request verbose, specific error message strings
10492 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
10493 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it. Using
10494 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred.
10497 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
10498 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
10499 @xref{Memory Management}.
10502 @deffn {Function} yylex
10503 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
10504 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
10508 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
10509 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
10510 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
10511 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
10512 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10515 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
10516 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
10517 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10518 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10520 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
10522 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
10523 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
10524 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
10527 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
10528 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
10529 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
10532 @deffn {Variable} yylval
10533 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
10534 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
10535 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
10537 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
10538 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
10539 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
10542 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
10543 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
10547 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
10548 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
10549 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
10550 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
10551 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
10554 @deffn {Function} yyparse
10555 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
10556 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
10559 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
10560 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10561 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
10562 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
10563 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
10564 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10565 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10568 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
10569 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
10570 call this function to create a new parser.
10571 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
10572 @code{yypstate_new}}.
10573 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10574 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10577 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
10578 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10579 parse the rest of the input stream.
10580 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
10581 @code{yypull_parse}}.
10582 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10583 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10586 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
10587 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
10588 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
10589 @code{yypush_parse}}.
10590 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
10591 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10594 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
10595 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
10596 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
10597 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
10598 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
10601 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
10602 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
10603 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
10604 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
10607 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
10608 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
10609 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
10610 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
10611 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
10612 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
10613 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
10615 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
10616 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
10617 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
10618 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
10619 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
10620 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
10621 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
10624 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
10625 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
10626 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
10634 @item Accepting State
10635 A state whose only action is the accept action.
10636 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
10637 @xref{Understanding,,}.
10639 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
10640 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
10641 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
10642 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
10643 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10645 @item Consistent State
10646 A state containing only one possible action.
10647 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10649 @item Context-free grammars
10650 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
10651 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
10652 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
10653 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
10656 @item Default Reduction
10657 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
10658 contains no other action for the lookahead token.
10659 In permitted parser states, Bison declares the reduction with the
10660 largest lookahead set to be the default reduction and removes that
10662 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.default-reductions}.
10664 @item Dynamic allocation
10665 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
10666 compile time or on entry to a function.
10669 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
10670 character string of length zero.
10672 @item Finite-state stack machine
10673 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
10674 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
10675 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
10676 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
10677 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
10678 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10680 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
10681 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
10682 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
10683 deterministic parsing
10684 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
10685 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
10686 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
10690 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
10691 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
10692 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10695 A minimal LR(1) parser table generation algorithm.
10696 That is, given any context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates
10697 parser tables with the full language recognition power of canonical
10698 LR(1) but with nearly the same number of parser states as
10700 This reduction in parser states is often an order of magnitude.
10701 More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s extra parser
10702 states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of
10703 non-LR(1) grammars, the number of conflicts for
10704 IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude less as well.
10705 This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing of a grammar.
10706 @xref{Decl Summary,,lr.type}.
10708 @item Infix operator
10709 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
10710 performs some operation.
10713 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
10715 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
10716 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
10717 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and
10718 the use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
10719 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
10720 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
10721 syntax error message. @xref{Decl Summary,,parse.lac}.
10723 @item Language construct
10724 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
10725 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
10726 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10728 @item Left associativity
10729 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
10730 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
10731 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
10733 @item Left recursion
10734 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
10735 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10738 @item Left-to-right parsing
10739 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
10740 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10742 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
10743 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
10744 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
10746 @item Lexical tie-in
10747 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
10748 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
10750 @item Literal string token
10751 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
10753 @item Lookahead token
10754 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
10758 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
10759 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
10760 @xref{Mystery Conflicts, ,Mysterious Reduce/Reduce Conflicts}.
10763 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
10764 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
10766 @item Nonterminal symbol
10767 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
10768 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
10769 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
10772 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
10773 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
10776 @item Postfix operator
10777 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
10778 performs some operation.
10781 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
10782 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
10786 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
10787 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
10788 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
10790 @item Reverse polish notation
10791 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
10793 @item Right recursion
10794 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
10795 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10799 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
10800 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
10801 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
10804 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
10805 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
10806 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
10808 @item Single-character literal
10809 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
10810 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
10813 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
10814 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
10815 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
10816 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
10819 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
10820 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
10821 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
10824 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
10825 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
10828 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
10829 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
10830 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
10831 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
10833 @item Terminal symbol
10834 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
10835 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
10836 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
10839 @node Copying This Manual
10840 @appendix Copying This Manual
10850 @c Local Variables:
10854 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
10855 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
10856 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
10857 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
10858 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
10859 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
10860 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
10861 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
10862 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
10863 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
10864 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
10865 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
10866 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
10867 @c LocalWords: smallexample symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
10868 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
10869 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
10870 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
10871 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
10872 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
10873 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
10874 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
10875 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
10876 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
10877 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
10878 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
10879 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
10880 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
10881 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
10882 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
10883 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
10884 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
10885 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
10886 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
10887 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
10888 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
10889 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
10890 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
10891 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
10892 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
10893 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
10894 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
10895 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
10896 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
10897 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
10898 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
10899 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
10900 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
10901 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
10902 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
10903 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
10904 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
10905 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity