1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
217 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
218 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
222 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
223 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
224 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
228 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
229 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
230 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
231 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
232 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
233 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
234 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
235 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
236 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
237 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
238 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
239 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
240 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
241 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
242 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
244 Parser C-Language Interface
246 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
247 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
248 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
249 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
250 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
251 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
253 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
254 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
255 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
258 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
260 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
261 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
262 of the token it has read.
263 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
264 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
266 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
267 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
269 The Bison Parser Algorithm
271 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
272 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
273 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
274 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
275 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
276 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
277 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
278 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
279 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
280 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
284 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
285 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
286 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
287 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
288 * How Precedence:: How they work.
289 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
293 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
294 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
295 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
296 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
298 Handling Context Dependencies
300 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
301 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
302 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
303 error recovery rules must be written.
305 Debugging Your Parser
307 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
308 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
309 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
310 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
314 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
315 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
316 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
320 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
321 in alphabetical order by short options.
322 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
323 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
325 Parsers Written In Other Languages
327 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
328 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
332 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
333 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
334 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
335 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
336 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
337 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
341 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
342 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
343 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
345 A Complete C++ Example
347 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
348 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
349 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
350 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
351 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
355 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
356 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
357 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
358 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
359 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
360 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
361 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
362 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
364 Frequently Asked Questions
366 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
367 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
368 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
369 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
370 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
371 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
372 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
373 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
374 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
375 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
376 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
377 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
381 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
387 @unnumbered Introduction
390 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
391 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
392 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
393 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
394 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
395 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
396 calculators to complex programming languages.
398 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
399 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
400 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
401 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
402 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
405 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
406 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
407 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
408 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
411 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
412 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
413 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
414 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
415 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
416 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
419 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
422 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
424 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
425 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
426 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
427 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
428 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
430 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
432 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
433 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
434 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
435 License to all of the Bison source code.
437 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
438 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
439 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
440 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
441 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
442 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
443 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
445 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
446 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
447 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
448 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
449 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
450 using the other GNU tools.
452 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
453 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
454 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
455 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
459 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
460 @include gpl-3.0.texi
463 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
465 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
466 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
467 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
470 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
471 as mathematical ideas.
472 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
473 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
474 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
475 the name of an identifier, etc.).
476 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
477 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
478 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
479 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
480 how is the output used?
481 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
482 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
485 @node Language and Grammar
486 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
488 @cindex context-free grammar
489 @cindex grammar, context-free
490 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
491 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
492 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
493 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
494 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
495 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
496 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
497 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
501 @cindex Backus-Naur form
502 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
503 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
504 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
505 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
506 essentially machine-readable BNF.
508 @cindex LALR grammars
509 @cindex IELR grammars
511 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
512 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
513 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
514 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
515 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
516 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
517 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
518 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
519 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
520 Construction}, to learn how.
523 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
524 @cindex ambiguous grammars
525 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
527 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
528 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
529 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
530 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
531 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
532 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
533 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
534 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
535 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
536 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
537 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
538 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
539 possible parses of any given string is finite.
541 @cindex symbols (abstract)
543 @cindex syntactic grouping
544 @cindex grouping, syntactic
545 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
546 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
547 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
548 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
549 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
550 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
551 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
553 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
554 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
555 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
556 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
557 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
558 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
559 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
560 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
561 lexicography, not grammar.)
563 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
566 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
567 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
568 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
569 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
570 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
571 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
572 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
575 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
576 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
577 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
578 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
579 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
580 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
581 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
582 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
584 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
585 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
586 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
587 reads informally as follows:
590 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
595 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
599 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
600 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
601 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
602 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
605 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
606 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
607 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
608 not the start symbol.
610 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
611 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
612 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
613 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
614 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
615 reports a syntax error.
617 @node Grammar in Bison
618 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
619 @cindex Bison grammar
620 @cindex grammar, Bison
621 @cindex formal grammar
623 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
624 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
625 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
627 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
628 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
629 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
631 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
632 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
633 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
634 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
635 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
636 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
637 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
640 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
641 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
642 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
643 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
645 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
646 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
648 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
649 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
650 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
651 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
655 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
659 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
661 @node Semantic Values
662 @section Semantic Values
663 @cindex semantic value
664 @cindex value, semantic
666 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
667 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
668 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
669 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
670 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
673 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
674 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
675 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
676 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
677 ,Defining Language Semantics},
680 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
681 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
682 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
683 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
686 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
687 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
688 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
689 need to have any semantic value.)
691 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
692 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
693 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
694 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
695 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
696 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
698 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
699 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
700 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
701 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
702 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
704 @node Semantic Actions
705 @section Semantic Actions
706 @cindex semantic actions
707 @cindex actions, semantic
709 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
710 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
711 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
712 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
715 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
716 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
717 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
718 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
719 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
720 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
721 newly recognized larger expression.
723 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
727 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
731 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
732 from the values of the two subexpressions.
735 @section Writing GLR Parsers
737 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
740 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
741 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
743 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
744 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
745 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
746 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
747 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
748 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
749 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
750 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
751 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
753 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
754 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
755 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
756 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
757 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
758 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
759 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
760 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
761 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
762 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
763 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
764 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
765 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
766 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
767 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
768 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
769 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
770 identical set of symbols.
772 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
773 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
774 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
775 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
776 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
777 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
778 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
779 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
780 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
784 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
785 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
786 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
787 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
788 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
791 @node Simple GLR Parsers
792 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
793 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
794 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
798 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
799 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
801 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
802 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
803 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
805 Consider a problem that
806 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
807 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
810 type subrange = lo .. hi;
811 type enum = (a, b, c);
815 The original language standard allows only numeric
816 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
817 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
818 10206) and many other
819 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
820 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
824 type subrange = (a) .. b;
828 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
829 type with only one value:
836 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
837 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
839 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
840 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
841 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
842 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
843 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
844 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
845 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
846 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
848 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
849 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
850 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
851 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
854 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
855 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
856 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
857 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
858 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
859 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
862 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
863 use the GLR algorithm.
864 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
865 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
866 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
867 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
868 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
869 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
870 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
871 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
872 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
874 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
875 reports a syntax error as usual.
877 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
878 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
879 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
880 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
881 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
883 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
884 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
885 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
886 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
887 The present example contains only one conflict between two
888 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
889 cannot be nested. So the number of
890 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
891 and the parsing time is still linear.
893 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
894 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
897 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
905 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
933 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
934 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
935 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
936 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
943 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
944 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
945 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
954 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
955 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
956 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
957 notice when the parser splits.
959 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
960 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
961 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
962 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
963 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
964 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
965 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
966 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
967 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
968 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
969 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
970 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
971 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
974 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
975 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
976 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
977 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
978 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
979 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
981 @node Merging GLR Parses
982 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
983 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
984 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
988 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
990 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
995 #define YYSTYPE char const *
997 void yyerror (char const *);
1011 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1020 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1021 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1022 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1023 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1024 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1028 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1029 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1030 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1031 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1035 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1036 | '(' declarator ')'
1041 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1042 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1049 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1050 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1051 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1052 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1053 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1054 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1055 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1056 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1057 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1058 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1059 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1060 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1061 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1062 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1064 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1065 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1066 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1067 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1068 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1069 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1070 The parser therefore prints
1073 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1076 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1077 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1084 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1085 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1086 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1087 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1088 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1089 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1090 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1091 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1092 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1093 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1099 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1100 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1101 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1102 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1107 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1108 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1113 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1117 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1125 with an accompanying forward declaration
1126 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1130 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1131 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1136 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1137 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1140 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1143 Bison requires that all of the
1144 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1145 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1146 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1147 the offending merge.
1149 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1150 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1152 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1153 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1155 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1156 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1157 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1158 the associated reduction.
1159 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1160 action in a GLR parser.
1163 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1165 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1167 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1168 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1169 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1170 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1171 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1172 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1173 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1174 influence syntax analysis.
1175 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1179 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1180 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1181 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1182 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1183 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1184 future versions of Bison.
1185 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1186 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1187 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1189 @subsubsection YYERROR
1191 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1192 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1193 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1194 initiate error recovery.
1195 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1196 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1197 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1198 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1199 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1200 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1201 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1202 the parse that invoked the test.
1204 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1205 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1206 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1209 @node Semantic Predicates
1210 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1212 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1214 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1216 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1217 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1218 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1219 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1223 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1224 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1229 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1230 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1231 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1232 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1233 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1234 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1235 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1237 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1238 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1239 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1240 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1243 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1244 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1245 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1249 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1250 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1251 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1252 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1257 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1258 false). However, this
1259 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1260 have overlapping syntax.
1261 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1262 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1263 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1264 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1267 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1268 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1270 @node Compiler Requirements
1271 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1272 @cindex @code{inline}
1273 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1275 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1276 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1277 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1278 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1279 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1280 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1289 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1293 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1294 && ! defined inline)
1303 @cindex textual location
1304 @cindex location, textual
1306 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1307 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1308 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1309 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1311 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1312 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1313 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1314 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1317 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1318 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1319 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1322 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1323 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1324 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1325 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1326 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1327 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1328 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1331 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1332 @cindex Bison parser
1333 @cindex Bison utility
1334 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1337 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1338 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1339 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1340 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1341 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1342 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1343 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1346 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1347 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1348 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1351 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1352 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1353 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1354 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1355 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1356 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1357 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1359 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1360 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1361 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1362 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1363 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1364 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1365 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1366 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1367 C-Language Interface}.
1369 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1370 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1371 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1372 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1373 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1374 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1375 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1376 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1377 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1378 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1379 anything other than their usual meanings.
1381 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1382 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1383 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1384 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1385 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1386 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1387 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1388 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1389 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1392 @section Stages in Using Bison
1393 @cindex stages in using Bison
1396 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1397 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1401 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1402 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1403 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1404 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1405 sequence of C statements.
1408 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1409 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1410 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1411 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1414 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1417 Write error-reporting routines.
1420 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1421 must follow these steps:
1425 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1428 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1431 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1434 @node Grammar Layout
1435 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1436 @cindex grammar file
1438 @cindex format of grammar file
1439 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1441 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1442 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1449 @var{Bison declarations}
1458 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1459 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1461 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1462 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1463 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1464 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1465 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1466 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1468 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1469 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1470 semantic values of various symbols.
1472 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1475 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1476 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1477 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1481 @cindex simple examples
1482 @cindex examples, simple
1484 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1485 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1486 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1487 and a multi-function calculator. All
1488 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1490 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1491 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1492 source file to try them.
1495 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1496 a first example with no operator precedence.
1497 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1498 Operator precedence is introduced.
1499 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1500 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1501 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1502 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1503 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1507 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1508 @cindex reverse polish notation
1509 @cindex polish notation calculator
1510 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1511 @cindex calculator, simple
1513 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1514 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1515 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1516 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1518 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1519 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1522 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1523 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1524 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1525 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1526 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1527 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1528 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1531 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1532 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1534 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1535 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1537 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1539 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1543 #define YYSTYPE double
1547 void yyerror (char const *);
1553 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1556 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1557 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1559 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1560 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1561 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1562 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1563 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1564 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1565 which is a floating point number.
1567 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1568 function @code{pow}.
1570 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1571 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1572 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1573 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1576 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1577 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1578 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1579 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1580 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1581 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1582 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1583 type for numeric constants.
1586 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1588 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1590 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1602 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1609 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1610 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1611 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1612 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1613 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1614 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1620 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1621 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1622 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1623 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1624 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1627 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1628 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1629 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1631 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1632 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1633 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1634 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1635 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1636 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1639 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1640 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1641 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1645 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1647 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1656 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1657 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1658 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1659 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1660 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1662 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1663 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1664 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1665 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1666 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1667 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1669 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1670 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1671 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1672 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1675 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1676 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1677 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1680 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1682 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1687 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1691 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1692 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1693 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1694 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1695 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1696 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1697 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1699 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1700 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1701 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1702 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1703 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1706 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1708 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1709 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1710 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1711 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1716 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1717 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1722 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1723 equally well have written them separately:
1727 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1728 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1732 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1733 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1734 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1735 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1736 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1737 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1738 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1739 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1741 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1742 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1743 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1745 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1746 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1750 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1754 means the same thing as this:
1759 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1765 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1768 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1769 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1770 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1772 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1773 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1774 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1775 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1777 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1779 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1780 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1781 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1782 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1784 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1785 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1786 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1787 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1788 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1789 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1790 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1791 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1792 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1794 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1795 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1796 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1797 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1798 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1800 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1801 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1803 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1805 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1808 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1809 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1810 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1811 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1822 /* Skip white space. */
1823 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1827 /* Process numbers. */
1828 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1831 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1836 /* Return end-of-input. */
1839 /* Return a single char. */
1846 @subsection The Controlling Function
1847 @cindex controlling function
1848 @cindex main function in simple example
1850 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1851 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1852 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1854 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1866 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1867 @cindex error reporting routine
1869 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1870 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1871 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1872 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1873 here is the definition we will use:
1875 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1880 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1882 yyerror (char const *s)
1884 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1889 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1890 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1891 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1892 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1893 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1894 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1896 @node Rpcalc Generate
1897 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1898 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1900 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1901 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1902 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1903 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1904 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1905 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1907 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1908 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1910 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1911 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1918 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1919 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1920 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1921 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1922 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1923 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1924 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1926 @node Rpcalc Compile
1927 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1928 @cindex compiling the parser
1930 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1934 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1936 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1940 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1941 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1942 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1946 # @r{List files again.}
1948 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1952 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1953 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1959 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1961 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1964 @result{} -3.166666667
1965 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1967 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1972 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1973 @cindex infix notation calculator
1975 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1977 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1978 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1979 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1980 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1983 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1987 #define YYSTYPE double
1991 void yyerror (char const *);
1996 /* Bison declarations. */
2000 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2001 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2004 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2015 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2022 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2023 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2024 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2025 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2026 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2027 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2028 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2035 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2038 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2040 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2041 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2042 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2043 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2044 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2045 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2046 the associativity/precedence.)
2048 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2049 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2050 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2051 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2052 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2053 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2056 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2057 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2058 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2059 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2060 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2062 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2067 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2075 @node Simple Error Recovery
2076 @section Simple Error Recovery
2077 @cindex error recovery, simple
2079 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2080 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2081 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2082 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2083 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2084 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2086 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2087 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2088 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2094 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2095 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2100 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2101 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2102 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2103 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2104 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2105 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2106 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2107 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2110 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2111 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2112 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2113 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2114 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2115 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2118 @node Location Tracking Calc
2119 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2120 @cindex location tracking calculator
2121 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2122 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2124 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2125 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2126 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2127 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2131 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2132 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2133 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2136 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2137 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2139 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2140 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2143 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2149 void yyerror (char const *);
2152 /* Bison declarations. */
2160 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2164 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2165 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2166 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2167 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2168 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2169 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2170 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2174 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2176 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2177 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2178 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2179 from the new information.
2181 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2182 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2195 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2202 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2203 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2204 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2214 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2215 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2216 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2221 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2222 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2223 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2227 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2228 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2229 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2231 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2232 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2233 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2234 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2235 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2236 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2240 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2242 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2243 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2244 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2247 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2248 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2259 /* Skip white space. */
2260 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2261 ++yylloc.last_column;
2266 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2267 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2271 /* Process numbers. */
2275 ++yylloc.last_column;
2276 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2278 ++yylloc.last_column;
2279 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2286 /* Return end-of-input. */
2291 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2295 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2298 ++yylloc.last_column;
2304 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2305 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2306 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2307 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2309 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2310 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2311 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2312 controlling function:
2319 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2320 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2326 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2327 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2328 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2330 @node Multi-function Calc
2331 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2332 @cindex multi-function calculator
2333 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2334 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2336 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2337 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2338 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2339 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2340 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2342 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2343 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2344 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2345 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2346 functions whose syntax has this form:
2349 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2353 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2354 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2355 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2360 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2361 @result{} 3.1415926536
2365 @result{} 0.0000000000
2367 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2368 @result{} 2.3000000000
2370 @result{} 2.3000000000
2372 @result{} 0.8329091229
2373 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2374 @result{} 2.3000000000
2378 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2381 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2382 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2383 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2384 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2385 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2388 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2389 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2391 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2393 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2397 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2398 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2399 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2401 void yyerror (char const *);
2407 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2408 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2411 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2412 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2419 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2420 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2424 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2425 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2426 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2428 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2429 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2430 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2431 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2433 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2434 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2435 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2436 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2437 between angle brackets).
2439 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2440 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2441 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2442 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2443 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2444 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2447 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2449 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2450 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2451 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2453 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2455 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2466 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2467 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2474 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2475 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2476 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2477 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2478 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2479 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2480 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2481 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2482 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2483 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2486 /* End of grammar. */
2490 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2491 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2492 @cindex symbol table example
2494 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2495 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2496 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2497 requires some additional C functions for support.
2499 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2500 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2501 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2503 @comment file: calc.h
2506 /* Function type. */
2507 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2511 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2514 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2515 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2518 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2519 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2521 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2526 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2528 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2529 extern symrec *sym_table;
2531 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2532 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2536 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2539 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2545 double (*fnct) (double);
2550 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2563 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2568 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2574 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2576 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2577 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2583 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2584 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2586 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2587 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2588 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2589 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2590 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2591 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2593 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2595 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2596 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2600 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2602 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2603 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2604 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2605 ptr->type = sym_type;
2606 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2607 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2615 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2618 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2619 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2620 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2628 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2630 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2631 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2632 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2633 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2635 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2636 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2637 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2638 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2639 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2640 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2642 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2643 operators in @code{yylex}.
2645 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2655 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2656 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2664 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2665 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2668 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2674 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2677 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2678 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2679 static size_t length = 40;
2680 static char *symbuf = 0;
2685 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2691 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2695 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2697 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2699 /* Get another character. */
2704 while (isalnum (c));
2711 s = getsym (symbuf);
2713 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2718 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2725 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2727 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2728 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2729 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2731 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2734 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2736 yyerror (char const *s)
2738 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2744 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2747 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2748 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2749 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2757 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2758 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2759 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2767 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2770 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2771 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2772 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2775 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2776 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2780 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2782 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2783 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2785 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2786 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2789 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2790 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2791 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2792 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2793 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2794 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2795 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2796 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2797 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2800 @node Grammar Outline
2801 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2804 @findex /* @dots{} */
2806 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2807 appropriate delimiters:
2814 @var{Bison declarations}
2823 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2824 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2828 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2829 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2830 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2831 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2832 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2836 @subsection The prologue
2837 @cindex declarations section
2839 @cindex declarations
2841 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2842 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2843 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2844 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2845 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2846 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2847 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2849 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2850 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2853 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2854 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2855 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2856 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2857 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2858 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2859 @code{%union} declaration.
2873 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2879 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2880 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2887 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2888 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2889 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2890 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2891 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2892 @code{#include} directives.
2894 @node Prologue Alternatives
2895 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2896 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2899 @findex %code requires
2900 @findex %code provides
2903 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2904 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2905 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2906 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2907 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2908 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2909 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2911 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2925 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2931 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2932 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2940 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2941 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2942 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2943 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2944 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2945 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2946 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2947 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2948 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2949 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2950 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2952 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2953 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2954 This behavior raises a few questions.
2955 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2956 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2957 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2958 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2959 This behavior is not intuitive.
2961 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2962 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2963 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2964 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2971 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2972 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2975 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2976 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2989 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2995 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2996 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2997 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3005 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3006 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3007 explicit which kind you intend.
3008 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3010 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3011 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3012 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3013 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3014 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3015 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3016 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3017 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3018 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3021 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3022 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3024 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3042 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3048 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3049 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3062 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3063 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3064 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3072 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3073 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3074 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3075 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3076 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3077 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3079 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3080 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3081 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3082 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3083 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3084 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3085 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3086 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3087 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3088 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3089 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3092 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3093 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3094 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3095 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3096 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3097 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3098 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3099 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3100 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3101 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3119 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3125 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3126 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3139 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3145 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3146 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3154 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3155 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3156 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3159 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3160 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3161 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3162 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3163 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3164 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3167 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3168 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3169 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3170 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3172 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3173 organize your grammar file.
3174 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3179 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3180 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3181 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3182 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3186 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3187 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3188 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3189 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3194 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3195 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3197 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3199 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3200 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3201 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3202 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3204 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3205 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3206 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3207 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3208 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3209 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3210 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3211 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3214 @node Bison Declarations
3215 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3216 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3217 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3219 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3220 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3221 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3222 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3225 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3226 @cindex grammar rules section
3227 @cindex rules section for grammar
3229 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3230 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3232 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3233 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3234 if it is the first thing in the file.
3237 @subsection The epilogue
3238 @cindex additional C code section
3240 @cindex C code, section for additional
3242 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3243 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3244 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3245 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3246 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3247 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3248 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3249 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3250 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3251 C-Language Interface}.
3253 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3254 from the grammar rules.
3256 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3257 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3258 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3259 of the grammar file.
3262 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3263 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3264 @cindex terminal symbol
3268 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3271 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3272 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3273 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3274 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3275 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3276 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3277 the symbol to stand for it.
3279 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3280 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3281 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3283 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3284 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3285 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3286 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3287 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3288 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3289 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3291 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3295 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3296 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3297 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3298 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3301 @cindex character token
3302 @cindex literal token
3303 @cindex single-character literal
3304 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3305 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3306 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3307 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3308 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3309 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3310 ,Operator Precedence}).
3312 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3313 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3314 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3315 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3316 your program will confuse other readers.
3318 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3319 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3320 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3321 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3322 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3323 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3327 @cindex string token
3328 @cindex literal string token
3329 @cindex multicharacter literal
3330 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3331 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3332 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3333 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3334 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3336 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3337 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3338 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3339 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3340 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3342 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3344 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3345 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3346 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3347 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3348 read your program will be confused.
3350 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3351 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3352 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3353 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3354 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3355 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3358 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3359 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3360 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3362 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3363 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3364 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3365 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3366 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3367 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3368 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3369 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3370 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3371 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3372 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3373 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3375 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3376 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3377 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3378 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3379 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3381 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3382 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3383 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3384 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3385 characters in the following C-language string:
3388 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3391 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3392 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3393 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3394 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3395 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3396 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3397 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3398 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3399 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3400 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3403 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3404 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3405 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3406 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3407 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3410 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3412 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3413 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3415 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3418 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3422 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3423 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3424 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3433 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3434 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3436 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3437 extra white space as you wish.
3439 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3440 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3443 @{@var{C statements}@}
3448 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3449 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3450 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3451 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3452 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3453 compiler can check it.
3455 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3456 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3457 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3458 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3459 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3460 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3461 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3462 character constants.
3464 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3468 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3469 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3474 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3475 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3482 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3484 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3485 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3486 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3505 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3509 @section Recursive Rules
3510 @cindex recursive rule
3512 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3513 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3514 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3515 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3516 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3527 @cindex left recursion
3528 @cindex right recursion
3530 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3531 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3532 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3544 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3545 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3546 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3547 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3548 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3549 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3550 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3553 @cindex mutual recursion
3554 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3555 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3556 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3565 | primary '+' primary
3578 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3582 @section Defining Language Semantics
3583 @cindex defining language semantics
3584 @cindex language semantics, defining
3586 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3587 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3588 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3590 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3591 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3592 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3593 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3596 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3597 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3598 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3599 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3600 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3601 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3602 action in the middle of a rule.
3606 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3607 @cindex semantic value type
3608 @cindex value type, semantic
3609 @cindex data types of semantic values
3610 @cindex default data type
3612 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3613 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3614 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3615 Notation Calculator}).
3617 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3618 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3619 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3622 #define YYSTYPE double
3626 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3627 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3628 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3629 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3631 @node Multiple Types
3632 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3634 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3635 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3636 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3637 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3640 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3641 requires you to do two things:
3645 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3646 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3647 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3648 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3652 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3653 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3654 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3655 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3656 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3665 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3667 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3668 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3669 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3670 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3672 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3673 placed at any position in the rule;
3674 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3675 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3676 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3677 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3679 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3680 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3681 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3682 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3683 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3684 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3685 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3686 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3687 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3688 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3691 Here is a typical example:
3697 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3701 Or, in terms of named references:
3707 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3712 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3713 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3714 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3715 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3716 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3717 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3719 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3720 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3721 referred to as @code{$2}.
3723 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3724 references construct.
3726 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3727 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3728 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3729 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3730 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3733 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3736 @cindex default action
3737 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3738 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3739 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3740 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3741 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3742 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3744 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3745 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3746 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3747 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3748 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3753 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3754 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3760 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3765 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3766 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3767 definition of @code{foo}.
3770 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3771 any, from a semantic action.
3772 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3773 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3776 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3777 @cindex action data types
3778 @cindex data types in actions
3780 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3781 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3783 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3784 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3785 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3786 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3787 in the rule. In this example,
3793 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3798 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3799 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3800 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3801 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3803 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3804 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3805 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3817 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3818 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3820 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3821 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3822 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3823 @cindex mid-rule actions
3825 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3826 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3827 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3830 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
3831 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
3832 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
3835 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
3836 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
3838 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3839 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3840 it is run before they are parsed.
3842 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3843 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3844 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3845 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3848 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3849 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3850 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3851 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3852 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3853 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3855 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3856 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3857 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3858 at the end of the rule.
3860 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3861 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3862 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3863 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3864 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3865 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3872 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3873 declare_variable ($3);
3878 pop_context ($<context>5);
3884 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3885 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3886 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3887 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3888 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3889 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3892 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
3893 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
3894 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
3901 $<context>let = push_context ();
3902 declare_variable ($3);
3907 pop_context ($<context>let);
3912 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3913 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3914 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3915 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3916 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3919 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3920 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3921 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3922 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3923 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3925 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3926 Discarded Symbols}).
3927 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3928 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3930 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3931 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3936 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3950 $let = push_context ();
3951 declare_variable ($3);
3958 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3959 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3960 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3962 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
3963 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
3967 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
3968 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
3969 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
3970 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
3974 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
3981 $@@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
3982 $@@2: /* empty */ @{ c(); @};
3983 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
3984 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
3988 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
3990 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
3991 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
3992 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
3995 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4002 @@1: /* empty */ @{ a(); @};
4003 @@2: /* empty */ @{ $$ = c(); @};
4004 $@@3: /* empty */ @{ d(); @};
4005 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4008 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4009 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4010 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4011 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4012 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4016 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4018 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4019 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4023 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4024 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4030 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4031 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4032 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4033 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4034 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4035 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4036 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4042 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4043 | '@{' statements '@}'
4049 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4054 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4055 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4058 | '@{' statements '@}'
4064 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4065 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4066 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4067 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4068 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4069 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4071 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4072 actions into the two rules, like this:
4077 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4078 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4079 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4080 '@{' statements '@}'
4086 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4087 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4089 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4090 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4091 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4096 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4097 declarations statements '@}'
4098 | '@{' statements '@}'
4104 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4105 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4107 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4108 serves as a subroutine:
4113 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4119 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4120 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4126 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4127 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4130 @node Tracking Locations
4131 @section Tracking Locations
4133 @cindex textual location
4134 @cindex location, textual
4136 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4137 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4138 especially symbol locations.
4140 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4141 actions to take when rules are matched.
4144 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4145 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4146 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4150 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4151 @cindex data type of locations
4152 @cindex default location type
4154 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4155 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4157 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4158 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4159 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4160 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4164 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4173 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4174 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4175 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4176 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4177 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4179 @node Actions and Locations
4180 @subsection Actions and Locations
4181 @cindex location actions
4182 @cindex actions, location
4185 @vindex @@@var{name}
4186 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4188 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4189 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4191 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4192 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4193 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4194 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4195 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4198 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4199 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4200 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4201 references construct.
4203 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4211 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4212 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4213 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4214 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4221 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4222 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4223 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4229 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4230 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4231 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4234 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4235 example above simply rewrites this way:
4249 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4250 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4251 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4258 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4259 from a semantic action.
4260 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4261 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4263 @node Location Default Action
4264 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4265 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4266 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4268 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4269 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4270 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4271 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4272 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4273 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4274 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4275 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4278 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4279 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4281 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4282 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4283 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4284 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4285 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4286 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4287 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4288 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4289 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4290 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4292 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4296 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4300 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4301 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4302 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4303 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4307 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4308 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4309 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4310 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4317 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4318 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4319 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4321 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4325 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4326 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4329 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4330 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4331 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4332 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4335 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4336 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4337 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4338 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4341 @node Named References
4342 @section Named References
4343 @cindex named references
4345 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4346 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4347 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4348 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4349 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4350 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4352 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4353 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4354 used as named references. For example:
4358 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4359 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4364 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4368 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4369 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4374 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4380 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4383 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4386 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4391 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4392 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4393 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4396 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4397 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4402 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4403 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4404 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4407 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4408 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4414 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4415 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4418 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4419 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4423 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4424 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4425 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4426 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4427 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4428 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4429 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4431 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4435 @section Bison Declarations
4436 @cindex declarations, Bison
4437 @cindex Bison declarations
4439 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4440 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4443 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4444 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4445 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4446 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4448 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4449 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4450 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4451 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4454 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4455 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4456 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4457 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4458 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4459 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4460 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4461 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4462 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4463 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4464 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4465 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4466 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4467 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4468 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4472 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4473 @cindex version requirement
4474 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4477 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4478 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4482 %require "@var{version}"
4486 @subsection Token Type Names
4487 @cindex declaring token type names
4488 @cindex token type names, declaring
4489 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4492 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4498 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4499 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4500 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4502 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4503 @code{%precedence}, or
4504 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4505 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4508 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4509 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4510 following the token name:
4514 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4518 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4519 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4520 with each other or with normal characters.
4522 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4523 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4524 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4525 Than One Value Type}).
4531 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4535 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4539 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4540 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4541 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4548 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4549 equivalent literal string tokens:
4552 %token <operator> OR "||"
4553 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4558 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4559 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4560 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4561 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4562 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4563 the literal string instead of the token name.
4565 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4566 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4570 %token END 0 "end of file"
4573 @node Precedence Decl
4574 @subsection Operator Precedence
4575 @cindex precedence declarations
4576 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4577 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4579 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4580 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4581 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4582 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4583 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4584 operator precedence.
4586 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4587 @code{%token}: either
4590 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4597 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4600 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4601 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4602 all the @var{symbols}:
4606 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4607 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4608 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4609 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4610 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4611 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4612 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4613 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4614 considered a syntax error.
4616 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4617 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4618 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4621 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4622 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4623 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4624 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4625 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4628 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4629 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4630 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4631 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4636 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4637 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4641 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4642 @cindex declaring value types
4643 @cindex value types, declaring
4646 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4647 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4648 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4663 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4664 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4665 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4666 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4668 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4669 @code{union}. For example:
4681 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4682 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4685 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4686 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4687 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4689 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4690 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4692 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4693 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4694 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4695 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4703 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4708 and then your grammar can use the following
4709 instead of @code{%union}:
4722 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4723 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4724 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4728 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4729 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4730 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4733 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4737 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4738 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4739 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4740 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4741 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4744 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4745 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4746 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4747 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4749 @node Initial Action Decl
4750 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4751 @findex %initial-action
4753 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4754 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4757 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4758 @findex %initial-action
4759 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4760 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4761 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4762 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4765 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4768 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4771 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4776 @node Destructor Decl
4777 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4778 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4782 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4783 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4784 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4785 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4786 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4787 must discard the start symbol.
4789 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4790 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4791 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4792 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4794 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4795 symbol is automatically discarded.
4797 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4799 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4800 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4801 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4802 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4803 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4806 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4807 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4808 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4809 tag among @var{symbols}.
4810 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4811 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4812 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4814 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4815 (These default forms are experimental.
4816 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4818 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4819 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4820 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4821 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4823 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4824 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4825 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4826 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4827 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4834 %union @{ char *string; @}
4835 %token <string> STRING1
4836 %token <string> STRING2
4837 %type <string> string1
4838 %type <string> string2
4839 %union @{ char character; @}
4840 %token <character> CHR
4841 %type <character> chr
4844 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4845 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4846 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4847 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4851 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4852 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4853 to @code{free} by default.
4854 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4855 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4856 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4857 @code{free} only once.
4858 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4859 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4861 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4862 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4863 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4864 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4865 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4866 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4867 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4868 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4869 reference it in your grammar.
4870 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4871 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4877 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4878 @cindex mid-rule actions
4879 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4880 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4881 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4882 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4883 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4884 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4885 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4886 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4890 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4891 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4892 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4897 @cindex discarded symbols
4898 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4902 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4904 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4906 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4907 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4909 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4910 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4913 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4916 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4917 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4920 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4921 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4922 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4926 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4927 @cindex printing semantic values
4931 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4932 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4933 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4934 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4936 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4937 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4938 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4940 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4943 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4944 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4945 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4946 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4947 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4948 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4949 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4952 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4953 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4954 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4955 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4963 %union @{ char *string; @}
4964 %token <string> STRING1
4965 %token <string> STRING2
4966 %type <string> string1
4967 %type <string> string2
4968 %union @{ char character; @}
4969 %token <character> CHR
4970 %type <character> chr
4973 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4974 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4975 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4976 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4980 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4981 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4982 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4983 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4984 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4985 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4986 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4990 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4991 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4992 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4993 @cindex warnings, preventing
4994 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4998 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4999 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5000 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5001 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5002 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5003 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5005 The declaration looks like this:
5011 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5012 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5013 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5014 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5016 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5017 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5018 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5019 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5020 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5021 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5022 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5028 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5032 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5033 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5034 print the number of conflicts.
5037 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5038 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5039 go back to the beginning.
5042 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5043 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5044 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5047 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5048 but will keep silent otherwise.
5051 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5052 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5053 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5054 @cindex default start symbol
5057 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5058 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5059 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5066 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5067 @cindex reentrant parser
5069 @findex %define api.pure
5071 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5072 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5073 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5074 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5075 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5076 program must be called only within interlocks.
5078 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5079 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5080 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5081 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5082 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5084 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5085 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5086 reentrant. It looks like this:
5089 %define api.pure full
5092 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5093 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5094 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5095 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5096 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5097 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5098 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5099 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5100 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5102 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5103 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5107 @subsection A Push Parser
5110 @findex %define api.push-pull
5112 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5113 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5115 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5116 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5117 each time a new token is made available.
5119 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5120 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5121 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5122 within a certain time period.
5124 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5125 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5126 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5129 %define api.push-pull push
5132 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5133 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5134 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5135 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5136 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5139 %define api.pure full
5140 %define api.push-pull push
5143 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5144 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5145 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5146 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5148 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5149 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5150 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5151 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5152 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5153 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5154 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5155 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5159 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5161 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5162 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5163 yypstate_delete (ps);
5166 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5167 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5168 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5169 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5170 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5171 example would thus look like this:
5176 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5179 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5180 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5181 yypstate_delete (ps);
5184 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5185 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5187 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5188 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5189 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5190 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5191 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5192 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5193 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5194 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5195 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5196 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5197 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5198 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5199 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5200 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5201 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5202 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5203 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5207 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5208 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5209 yypstate_delete (ps);
5212 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5213 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5214 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5217 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5218 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5219 @cindex declaration summary
5220 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5222 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5224 @deffn {Directive} %union
5225 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5226 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5229 @deffn {Directive} %token
5230 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5231 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5234 @deffn {Directive} %right
5235 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5236 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5239 @deffn {Directive} %left
5240 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5241 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5244 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5245 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5246 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5247 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5251 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5252 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5253 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5257 @deffn {Directive} %type
5258 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5259 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5262 @deffn {Directive} %start
5263 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5267 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5268 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5269 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5275 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5278 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5279 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5281 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5282 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5283 @xref{%code Summary}.
5286 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5287 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5289 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5292 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5293 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5294 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5295 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5298 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5299 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5300 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5301 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5302 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5304 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5305 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5306 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5307 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5308 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5309 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5310 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5311 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5312 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5313 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5315 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5316 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5317 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5319 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5320 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5321 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5323 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5324 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5325 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5326 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5327 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5329 @findex %code requires
5330 @findex %code provides
5331 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5332 header also contains their code.
5333 @xref{%code Summary}.
5335 @cindex Header guard
5336 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5337 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5338 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5339 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5340 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5343 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5344 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5346 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5347 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5349 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5353 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5354 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5357 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5358 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5359 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5362 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5363 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5364 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5367 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5368 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5369 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5370 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5374 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5375 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5376 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5377 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5378 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5379 accurate syntax error messages.
5382 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5383 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5384 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5386 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5387 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5388 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5389 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5390 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5391 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5392 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5393 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5395 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5399 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5400 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5401 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5406 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5407 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5408 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5409 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5410 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5411 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5412 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5416 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5417 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5420 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5421 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5422 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5426 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5427 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5428 Require a Version of Bison}.
5431 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5432 Specify the skeleton to use.
5434 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5435 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5436 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5437 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5439 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5440 file in the Bison installation directory.
5441 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5442 directory of the grammar file.
5443 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5446 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5447 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5448 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5449 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5450 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5451 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5452 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5455 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5456 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5457 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5458 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5459 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5460 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5461 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5464 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5465 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5466 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5470 The highest token number, plus one.
5472 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5474 The number of grammar rules,
5476 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5480 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5481 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5482 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5483 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5487 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5488 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5489 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5493 @node %define Summary
5494 @subsection %define Summary
5496 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5497 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5498 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5499 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5500 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5501 @code{%define} directive:
5503 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5504 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5505 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5506 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5508 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5509 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5510 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5511 to specifying @code{""}.
5513 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5514 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5515 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5518 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5519 @code{%define} accepts.
5521 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5522 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5526 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5528 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5529 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5531 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5533 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5534 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5537 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5538 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5539 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5540 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5541 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5542 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5544 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} "@var{namespace}"
5546 @item Languages(s): C++
5548 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5549 For example, if you specify:
5552 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5555 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5558 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5561 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5562 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5565 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5571 @item Accepted Values:
5572 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5573 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5575 @item Default Value:
5576 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5577 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5578 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5579 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5580 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5581 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5582 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5585 %define api.namespace "foo"
5586 %name-prefix "bar::"
5589 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5595 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5596 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @var{type}
5599 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5601 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5602 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5604 @item Accepted Values: String
5606 @item Default Value: none
5609 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5610 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5614 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5615 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @var{prefix}
5618 @item Language(s): All
5620 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5621 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5623 @item Accepted Values: String
5625 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5627 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5631 @c ================================================== api.pure
5632 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure}
5635 @item Language(s): C
5637 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5638 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5640 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5642 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5643 the case for Boolean values.
5645 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5646 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5647 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5650 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5651 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5652 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5654 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5658 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5659 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5662 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5663 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5666 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5669 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5670 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5672 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5675 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5682 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5683 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5686 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5688 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5689 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5690 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5691 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5693 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5695 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5702 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5703 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5710 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5711 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5712 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5714 @item Accepted Values:
5717 @item Default Value:
5720 introduced in Bison 2.8
5723 @c api.token.constructor
5726 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5727 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @var{prefix}
5730 @item Languages(s): all
5733 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5734 target language. For instance
5737 %token FILE for ERROR
5738 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5740 start: FILE for ERROR;
5744 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5745 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5746 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5747 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5748 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5749 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5750 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5752 @item Accepted Values:
5753 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5754 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5755 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5757 @item Default Value:
5760 introduced in Bison 2.8
5766 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5767 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{type}
5773 Request variant-based semantic values.
5774 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5776 @item Default Value:
5779 introduced in Bison 2.8. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
5786 @c ================================================== location_type
5787 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
5788 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
5792 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5794 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
5797 @item Language(s): all
5799 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5800 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5801 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5802 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5804 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5805 @item Default Value:
5807 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5808 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5811 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5812 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5816 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5818 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
5821 @item Language(s): all
5822 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5823 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5824 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5825 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5827 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5828 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
5829 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5832 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5834 @c ================================================== lr.type
5836 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
5839 @item Language(s): all
5841 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5842 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5843 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5845 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5847 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5851 @c ================================================== namespace
5852 @deffn Directive %define namespace @var{namespace}
5853 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5857 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5858 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
5861 @item Languages(s): C++
5863 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5864 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5866 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5868 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5870 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5876 @c ================================================== parse.error
5877 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error}
5882 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5883 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5885 @item Accepted Values:
5888 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5890 @item @code{verbose}
5891 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5892 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5896 @item Default Value:
5903 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5904 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac}
5907 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5909 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5910 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5911 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5912 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5917 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5918 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
5921 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
5923 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5924 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5926 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
5927 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
5928 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
5929 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5932 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5934 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5940 @subsection %code Summary
5944 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5945 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5946 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5947 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5948 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5949 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5950 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5951 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5953 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5954 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5955 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5956 in the parser implementation.
5958 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5959 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5960 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5962 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5965 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5966 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5967 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5968 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5969 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5970 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5974 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5975 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5976 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5979 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5980 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5984 @findex %code requires
5987 @item Language(s): C, C++
5989 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5990 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5991 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5992 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5993 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5995 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5996 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6001 @findex %code provides
6004 @item Language(s): C, C++
6006 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6007 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6009 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6010 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6018 @item Language(s): C, C++
6020 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6021 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6022 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6023 parser implementation file. For example:
6032 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6036 @findex %code imports
6039 @item Language(s): Java
6041 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6043 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6044 before any class definitions.
6048 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6049 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6050 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6051 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6054 @node Multiple Parsers
6055 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6057 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6058 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6059 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6060 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6061 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6062 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6063 exported in the generated header.
6065 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6066 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6067 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6068 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6069 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
6070 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6071 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6072 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6073 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6075 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6076 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6077 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6078 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6079 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6080 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6081 specifically --- more about this below.
6083 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
6084 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6087 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6088 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6089 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6090 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6093 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6094 #define yyparse cparse
6095 #define yylval clval
6101 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6102 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6103 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6105 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6109 extern CSTYPE clval;
6113 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6114 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6115 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6120 # if defined YYDEBUG
6137 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6138 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6139 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6142 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6143 @cindex C-language interface
6146 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6147 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6148 functions that it needs to use.
6150 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6151 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6152 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6153 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6156 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6157 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6158 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6159 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6160 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6161 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6163 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6164 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6165 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6169 @node Parser Function
6170 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6173 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6174 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6175 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6176 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6177 without reading further.
6180 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6181 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6182 is due to end-of-input).
6184 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6185 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6188 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6191 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6196 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6201 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6204 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6205 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6206 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6208 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6209 @findex %parse-param
6210 Declare that one or more
6211 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6212 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6213 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6214 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6217 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6220 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6224 Then call the parser like this:
6228 int nastiness, randomness;
6229 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6230 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6236 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6239 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6243 Using the following:
6245 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6248 Results in these signatures:
6250 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6251 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6255 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6256 and @code{%locations} are used:
6259 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6260 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6263 @node Push Parser Function
6264 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6265 @findex yypush_parse
6267 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6268 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6270 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6271 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6272 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6273 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6275 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6276 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6277 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6278 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6281 @node Pull Parser Function
6282 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6283 @findex yypull_parse
6285 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6286 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6288 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6289 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6290 declaration is used.
6291 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6293 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6294 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6297 @node Parser Create Function
6298 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6299 @findex yypstate_new
6301 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6302 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6304 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6305 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6306 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6307 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6309 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6310 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6311 or 0 if no memory was available.
6312 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6316 @node Parser Delete Function
6317 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6318 @findex yypstate_delete
6320 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6321 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6323 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6324 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6325 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6326 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6328 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6329 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6330 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6334 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6336 @cindex lexical analyzer
6338 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6339 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6340 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6341 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6343 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6344 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6345 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6346 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6347 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6348 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6349 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6353 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6354 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6355 of the token it has read.
6356 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6357 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6359 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6360 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6363 @node Calling Convention
6364 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6366 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6367 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6368 signifies end-of-input.
6370 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6371 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6372 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6373 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6375 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6376 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6377 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6378 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6379 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6380 signifies end-of-input.
6382 Here is an example showing these things:
6389 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6392 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6393 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6395 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6401 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6402 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6404 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6405 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6409 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6410 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6411 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6412 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6415 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6416 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6417 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6418 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6419 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6422 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6423 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6424 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6425 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6428 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6431 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6432 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6433 strlen (token_buffer))
6434 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6435 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6440 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6441 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6445 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6448 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6449 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6450 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6451 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6457 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6458 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6463 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6464 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6465 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6466 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6467 declaration looks like this:
6480 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6485 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6486 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6491 @node Token Locations
6492 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6495 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6496 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6497 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6498 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6499 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6500 data in that variable.
6502 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6503 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6504 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6505 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6506 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6509 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6512 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6514 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6515 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6516 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6517 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6518 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6519 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6524 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6527 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6528 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6533 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6534 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6535 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6538 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6539 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6540 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6541 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6543 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6545 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6546 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6547 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6550 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6552 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6553 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6554 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6555 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6556 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6563 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6564 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6565 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6569 results in the following signatures:
6572 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6573 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6576 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6579 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6580 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6584 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6588 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6589 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6590 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6593 @node Error Reporting
6594 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6595 @cindex error reporting function
6598 @cindex syntax error
6600 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6601 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6602 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6603 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6606 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6607 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6608 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6609 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6610 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6612 @findex %define parse.error
6613 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6614 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6615 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6616 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6617 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6619 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6620 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6621 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6622 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6623 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6624 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6626 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6627 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6628 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6630 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6635 yyerror (char const *s)
6639 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6644 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6645 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6646 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6647 immediately return 1.
6649 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6650 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6651 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6652 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6653 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6655 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6656 following signature:
6659 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6663 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6664 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6665 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6666 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6667 message is always passed last.
6669 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6670 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6671 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6675 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6676 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6677 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6678 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6680 @node Action Features
6681 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6682 @cindex summary, action features
6683 @cindex action features summary
6685 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6686 are useful in actions.
6688 @deffn {Variable} $$
6689 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6690 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6693 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6694 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6695 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6698 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6699 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6700 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6701 Types of Values in Actions}.
6704 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6705 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6706 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6707 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6710 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6711 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6712 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6715 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6716 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6717 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6720 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6722 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6723 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6724 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6725 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6726 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6727 going to be reduced by this rule.
6729 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6730 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6731 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6734 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6737 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6738 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6741 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6742 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6746 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6747 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6748 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6749 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6750 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6751 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6754 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6755 @findex YYRECOVERING
6756 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6757 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6758 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6761 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6762 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6763 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6764 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6765 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6767 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6770 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6771 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6773 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6775 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6778 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6779 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6780 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6781 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6784 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6785 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6786 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6787 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6789 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6792 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6793 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6794 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6795 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6797 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6801 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6802 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6805 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6809 @c int first_line, last_line;
6810 @c int first_column, last_column;
6814 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6815 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6817 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6818 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6819 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6822 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6825 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6827 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6828 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6832 @node Internationalization
6833 @section Parser Internationalization
6834 @cindex internationalization
6840 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6841 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6842 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6843 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6844 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6845 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6846 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6847 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6850 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6851 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6852 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6857 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6858 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6859 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6860 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6861 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6865 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6870 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6871 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6872 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6873 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6874 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6875 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6876 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6877 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6878 Bison-generated parser.
6881 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6882 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6883 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6887 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6890 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6891 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6892 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6896 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6897 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6898 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6901 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6907 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6911 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6917 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6918 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6919 @cindex algorithm of parser
6922 @cindex parser stack
6923 @cindex stack, parser
6925 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6926 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6927 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6929 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6930 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6933 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6934 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6935 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6936 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6937 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6938 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6939 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6941 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6948 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6949 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6952 expr: expr '*' expr;
6956 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6963 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6964 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6966 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6967 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6968 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6970 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6973 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6974 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6975 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6976 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6977 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6978 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6979 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6980 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6981 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6982 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6986 @section Lookahead Tokens
6987 @cindex lookahead token
6989 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6990 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6991 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6992 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6993 token in order to decide what to do.
6995 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6996 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6997 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6998 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6999 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7000 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7001 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7004 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7005 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7006 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7025 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7026 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7027 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7028 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7029 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7031 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7032 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7033 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7034 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7035 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7036 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7041 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7042 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7043 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7044 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7047 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7049 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7050 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7051 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7053 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7054 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7059 "if" expr "then" stmt
7060 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7066 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7067 specific keyword tokens.
7069 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7070 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7071 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7072 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7075 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7076 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7077 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7078 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7079 contrast it with the other alternative.
7081 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7082 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7086 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7088 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7091 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7092 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7093 making these two inputs equivalent:
7096 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7098 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7101 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7102 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7103 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7104 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7105 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7106 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7107 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7108 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7110 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7111 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7112 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7113 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7115 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7116 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7117 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7118 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7119 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7122 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7123 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7124 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7138 "if" expr "then" stmt
7139 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7149 @section Operator Precedence
7150 @cindex operator precedence
7151 @cindex precedence of operators
7153 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7154 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7155 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7156 shift and when to reduce.
7159 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7160 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7161 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7162 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7163 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7164 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7167 @node Why Precedence
7168 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7170 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7171 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7186 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7187 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7188 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7189 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7190 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7191 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7192 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7195 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7196 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7197 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7198 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7199 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7200 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7201 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7202 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7205 @cindex associativity
7206 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7207 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7208 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7209 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7210 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7211 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7212 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7213 makes right-associativity.
7215 @node Using Precedence
7216 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7222 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7223 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7224 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7225 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7226 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7227 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7228 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7230 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7231 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7232 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7233 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7234 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7235 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7236 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7237 what expected the grammar author.
7239 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7240 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7241 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7242 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7243 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7245 @node Precedence Only
7246 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7249 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7250 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7251 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7252 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7253 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7254 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7255 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7257 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7258 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7259 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7263 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7266 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7267 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7268 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7269 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7270 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7271 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7272 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7279 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7280 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7281 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7282 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7283 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7284 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7285 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7287 @node Precedence Examples
7288 @subsection Precedence Examples
7290 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7298 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7299 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7300 declared with @code{'-'}:
7303 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7308 @node How Precedence
7309 @subsection How Precedence Works
7311 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7312 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7313 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7314 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7315 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7316 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7318 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7319 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7320 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7321 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7322 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7323 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7324 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7327 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7328 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7331 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7333 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7334 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7335 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7336 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7338 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7339 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7340 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7341 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7342 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7343 instance as follows:
7352 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7353 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7354 use right associativity:
7357 %right "then" "else"
7360 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7361 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7362 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7363 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7364 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7365 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7366 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7368 @node Contextual Precedence
7369 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7370 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7371 @cindex unary operator precedence
7372 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7373 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7376 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7377 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7378 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7379 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7381 The Bison precedence declarations
7382 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7383 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7384 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7387 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7388 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7389 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7390 modifier's syntax is:
7393 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7397 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7398 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7399 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7400 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7401 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7403 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7404 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7405 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7415 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7423 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7428 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7429 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7430 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7431 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7433 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7434 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7435 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7436 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7438 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7439 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7440 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7441 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7442 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7443 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7445 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7446 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7450 @section Parser States
7451 @cindex finite-state machine
7452 @cindex parser state
7453 @cindex state (of parser)
7455 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7456 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7457 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7458 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7459 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7461 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7462 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7463 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7464 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7465 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7466 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7467 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7468 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7471 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7472 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7473 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7476 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7477 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7478 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7480 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7481 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7484 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7485 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7490 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7492 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7498 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7499 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7505 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7506 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7507 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7508 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7509 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7510 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7512 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7513 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7514 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7516 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7517 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7518 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7519 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7520 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7522 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7523 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7524 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7525 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7530 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7531 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7536 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7543 | sequence redirects
7557 | redirects redirect
7563 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7564 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7565 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7566 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7567 in infinitely many ways!
7569 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7570 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7571 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7572 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7574 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7585 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7593 | sequence redirects
7607 | redirects redirect
7612 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7613 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7614 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7615 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7616 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7619 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7620 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7622 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7623 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7624 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7625 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7626 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7631 %precedence "sequence"
7636 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7637 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7649 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7650 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7653 %right "word" "redirect"
7658 | sequence word %prec "word"
7659 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7664 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7665 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7666 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7668 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7674 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7677 | name_list ':' type
7694 | name ',' name_list
7699 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7700 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7701 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7702 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7706 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7708 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7709 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7710 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7712 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7713 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7714 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7715 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7716 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7717 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7718 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7721 @cindex canonical LR
7722 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7723 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7724 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7725 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7726 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7727 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7728 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7729 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7731 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7732 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7733 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7734 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7735 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7743 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7748 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7749 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7750 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7751 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7752 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7753 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7755 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7756 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7757 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7758 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7759 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7760 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7766 | name_list ':' type
7778 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7779 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7784 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7785 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7786 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7787 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7788 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7789 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7790 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7792 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7793 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7794 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7795 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7797 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7798 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7801 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7802 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7803 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7804 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7807 @node LR Table Construction
7808 @subsection LR Table Construction
7809 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7812 @cindex canonical LR
7813 @findex %define lr.type
7815 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7816 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7817 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7818 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7821 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7822 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7823 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7824 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7827 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7828 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7829 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7832 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7833 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7834 values for @var{type} are:
7837 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7839 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7842 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7846 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7850 %define lr.type ielr
7853 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7854 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7855 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7856 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7857 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7858 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7859 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7860 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7861 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7862 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7864 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7865 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7866 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7867 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7873 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7876 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7878 @cindex GLR with LALR
7879 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7880 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
7882 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7883 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7884 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7885 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7886 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7887 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7888 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7889 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7891 @item Malformed grammars.
7893 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7894 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7895 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7896 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7897 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7902 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7903 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7904 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7905 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7906 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7907 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7908 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7909 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7910 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7914 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7917 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7918 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7919 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7920 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7921 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7922 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7923 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7924 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7925 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7926 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7927 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7928 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7931 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7932 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7933 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7935 @node Default Reductions
7936 @subsection Default Reductions
7937 @cindex default reductions
7938 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
7941 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7942 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7943 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7944 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7945 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7947 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7948 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7951 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7953 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7954 @cindex consistent states
7955 @cindex defaulted states
7956 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7957 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7958 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7959 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7960 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7961 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7962 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7963 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7964 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7965 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7966 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7968 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7969 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7970 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7971 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7972 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7973 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7974 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7975 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7976 should already be considered closed.
7978 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7980 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7981 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7982 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7983 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7984 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7985 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7986 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7987 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7988 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7992 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7993 @c sentence from being rejected.
7994 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7995 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7996 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7997 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7998 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7999 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8002 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8003 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8004 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8005 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8006 because the accept action ends the parse.
8008 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8009 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8010 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8011 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8012 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8013 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8014 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8015 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8016 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8017 split the parse instead.
8019 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8020 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8022 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8023 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8024 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8026 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8027 @item @code{consistent}
8028 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8031 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8032 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8037 @findex %define parse.lac
8039 @cindex lookahead correction
8041 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8042 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8043 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8044 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8045 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8046 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8047 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8048 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8049 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8051 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8052 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8053 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8054 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8055 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8057 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8058 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8059 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8060 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8062 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8063 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8065 @item @code{none} (default)
8068 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8069 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8073 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8074 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8075 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8076 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8077 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8078 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8079 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8080 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8081 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8082 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8085 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8086 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8087 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8088 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8089 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8090 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8091 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8092 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8093 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8094 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8096 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8097 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8098 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8099 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8100 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8101 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8102 language-recognition power.
8104 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8107 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8109 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8110 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8111 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8112 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8115 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8117 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8118 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8119 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8120 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8121 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8122 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8126 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8127 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8128 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8129 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8130 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8131 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8132 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8133 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8134 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8135 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8136 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8139 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8140 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8141 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8143 @node Unreachable States
8144 @subsection Unreachable States
8145 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8146 @cindex unreachable states
8148 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8149 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8150 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8151 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8153 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8154 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8155 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8156 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8158 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8159 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8160 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8163 There are a few caveats to consider:
8166 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8168 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8169 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8170 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8171 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8172 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8173 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8175 @item Other useless states.
8177 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8178 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8179 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8180 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8181 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8182 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8183 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8186 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8187 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8189 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8190 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8191 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8193 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8194 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8195 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8196 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8197 context-free languages.
8198 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8199 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8200 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8201 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8202 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8203 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8204 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8205 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8207 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8208 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8209 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8210 parser uses the same basic
8211 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8212 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8213 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8214 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8216 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8217 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8218 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8219 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8220 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8222 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8223 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8224 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8225 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8226 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8227 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8228 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8229 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8230 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8231 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8232 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8235 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8236 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8237 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8238 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8239 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8240 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8241 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8242 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8243 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8244 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8245 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8246 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8248 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8249 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8250 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8252 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8253 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8254 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8255 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8256 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8257 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8258 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8259 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8260 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8261 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8262 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8263 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8265 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8268 @node Memory Management
8269 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8270 @cindex memory exhaustion
8271 @cindex memory management
8272 @cindex stack overflow
8273 @cindex parser stack overflow
8274 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8276 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8277 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8278 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8280 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8281 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8282 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8285 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8286 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8287 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8288 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8290 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8291 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8292 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8293 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8294 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8295 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8297 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8298 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8299 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8302 @cindex default stack limit
8303 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8307 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8308 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8309 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8310 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8311 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8313 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8315 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8316 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8317 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8318 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8319 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8320 non-trivial copy constructors.
8321 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8324 @node Error Recovery
8325 @chapter Error Recovery
8326 @cindex error recovery
8327 @cindex recovery from errors
8329 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8330 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8331 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8334 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8335 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8336 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8337 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8338 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8339 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8340 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8343 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8344 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8345 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8346 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8347 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8348 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8360 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8361 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8363 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8364 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8365 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8366 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8367 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8368 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8369 applicable in the ordinary way.
8371 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8372 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8373 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8374 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8375 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8376 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8377 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8378 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8379 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8380 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8381 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8382 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8384 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8385 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8386 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8389 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8392 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8393 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8394 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8395 spurious error message:
8405 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8406 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8407 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8408 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8409 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8410 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8411 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8414 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8415 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8416 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8417 error messages resume.
8419 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8420 as any other rules can.
8423 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8424 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8425 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8426 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8429 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8430 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8431 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8433 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8435 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8436 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8437 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8438 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8439 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8441 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8442 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8443 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8444 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8447 @node Context Dependency
8448 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8450 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8451 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8452 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8453 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8457 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8458 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8459 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8460 error recovery rules must be written.
8463 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8464 neither clean nor robust.)
8466 @node Semantic Tokens
8467 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8469 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8470 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8476 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8477 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8478 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8480 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8481 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8482 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8483 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8484 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8486 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8487 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8488 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8489 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8490 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8491 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8492 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8494 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8495 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8496 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8497 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8501 typedef int foo, bar;
8505 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8506 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8512 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8513 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8515 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8516 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8517 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8518 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8519 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8524 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8525 | declarator maybeasm
8531 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8532 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8538 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8539 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8540 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8542 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8543 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8544 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8545 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8546 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8547 the syntactic context.
8549 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8550 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8551 @cindex lexical tie-in
8553 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8554 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8557 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8558 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8559 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8560 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8561 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8568 void yyerror (char const *);
8577 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8578 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8579 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8593 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8594 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8595 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8597 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8598 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8599 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8602 @node Tie-in Recovery
8603 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8605 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8606 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8608 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8609 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8610 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8611 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8616 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8618 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8622 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8623 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8624 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8625 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8626 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8628 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8630 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8631 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8632 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8638 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8644 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8645 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8646 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8647 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8649 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8650 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8651 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8652 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8653 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8654 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8657 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8660 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8662 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8663 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8664 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8666 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8667 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8668 automaton. There are several formats available:
8671 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8674 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8677 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8678 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8681 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8682 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8686 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8687 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8688 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8689 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8693 @section Understanding Your Parser
8695 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8696 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8697 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8698 tune or simply fix a parser.
8700 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8701 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8702 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8703 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8704 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8705 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8706 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8708 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8730 @command{bison} reports:
8733 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8734 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8735 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8736 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8737 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8740 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8741 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8742 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8743 interpretation is the same.
8746 @cindex token, useless
8747 @cindex useless token
8748 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8749 @cindex useless nonterminal
8750 @cindex rule, useless
8751 @cindex useless rule
8752 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8753 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8754 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8755 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8758 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8761 Terminals unused in grammar
8764 Rules useless in grammar
8769 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8772 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8773 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8774 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8775 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8779 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8794 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8798 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8811 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8816 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8822 @cindex pointed rule
8823 @cindex rule, pointed
8824 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8825 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8826 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8827 the location of the input cursor.
8832 0 $accept: . exp $end
8834 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8839 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8840 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8841 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8842 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8843 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8844 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8845 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8846 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8848 @cindex core, item set
8849 @cindex item set core
8850 @cindex kernel, item set
8851 @cindex item set core
8852 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8853 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8854 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8855 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8856 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8857 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8862 0 $accept: . exp $end
8863 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8869 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8875 In the state 1@dots{}
8882 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8886 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8887 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8888 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8889 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8894 0 $accept: exp . $end
8895 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8900 $end shift, and go to state 3
8901 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8902 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8903 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8904 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8908 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8909 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8910 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8911 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8912 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8915 @cindex accepting state
8916 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8922 0 $accept: exp $end .
8928 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8929 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8931 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8937 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8939 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8946 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8948 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8955 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8957 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8964 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8966 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8971 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8977 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8983 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8984 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8986 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8987 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8990 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8991 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8992 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8993 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8994 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8995 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8996 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8997 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8999 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9000 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9001 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9004 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9005 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9006 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9007 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9008 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9009 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9010 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9011 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9012 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9013 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9014 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9015 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9020 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9021 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9026 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9027 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9029 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9030 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9033 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9034 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9035 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9036 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9037 conflicts in the report:
9040 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9041 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9042 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9046 The remaining states are similar:
9052 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9058 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9059 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9061 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9062 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9068 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9074 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9076 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9077 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9083 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9089 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9090 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9091 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9092 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9094 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9095 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9096 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9097 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9098 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9103 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9104 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9105 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9107 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9108 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9110 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9113 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9116 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9117 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9118 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9119 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9120 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9121 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9122 to help them understand LR parsers.
9124 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9125 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9126 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9127 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9128 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9129 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9130 parser in multiple formats}).
9133 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9144 The graphical output
9146 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9148 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9149 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9150 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9153 @float Figure,fig:graph
9154 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9155 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9159 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9161 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9162 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9163 about transitions, for examples
9165 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9166 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9167 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9172 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9175 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9177 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9178 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9186 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9190 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9192 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9194 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9196 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9197 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9198 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9199 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9201 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9208 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9209 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9212 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9214 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9216 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9217 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9218 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9219 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9220 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9222 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9223 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9225 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9227 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9228 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9230 @c ================================================= XML
9233 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9236 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9237 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9238 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9239 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9240 option @option{--graph}. However,
9241 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9242 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9243 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9244 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9245 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9246 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9248 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9249 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9250 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9251 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9252 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9253 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9255 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9256 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9260 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9262 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9264 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9267 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9271 $ bison --print-datadir
9272 /usr/local/share/bison
9274 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9277 @c ================================================= Tracing
9280 @section Tracing Your Parser
9283 @cindex tracing the parser
9285 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9286 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9289 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9290 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9291 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9294 @node Enabling Traces
9295 @subsection Enabling Traces
9296 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9299 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9301 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9302 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9303 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9304 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9307 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9308 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9309 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9310 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9311 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9313 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9314 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9315 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9316 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9317 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9319 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9321 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9322 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9323 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9325 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9326 @findex %define parse.trace
9327 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9328 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9329 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9330 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9331 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9334 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9338 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9339 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9340 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9341 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9342 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9343 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9345 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9346 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9347 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9348 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9350 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9351 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9352 messages tell you these things:
9356 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9359 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9360 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9363 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9364 of the state stack afterward.
9367 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9368 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9369 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9370 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9371 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9372 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9373 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9374 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9375 grammar are to blame.
9377 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9378 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9379 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9380 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9381 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9384 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9386 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9387 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9388 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9389 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9390 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9391 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9393 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9394 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9395 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9398 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9400 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9402 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9405 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9406 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9407 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9408 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9411 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9412 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9413 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9414 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9415 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9416 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9418 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9419 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9420 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9421 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9422 printer will be used for them.
9424 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9425 are sent onto standard error.
9428 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9431 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9432 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9438 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9439 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9440 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9441 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9443 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9445 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9446 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9451 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9452 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9453 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9457 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9458 Shifting token '(' ()
9460 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9461 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9463 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9464 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9465 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9471 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9472 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9473 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9476 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9477 Shifting token '-' ()
9479 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9480 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9482 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9483 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9484 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9485 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9487 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9488 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9489 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9491 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9492 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9498 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9499 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9502 Next token is token ')' ()
9503 Shifting token ')' ()
9505 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9506 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9508 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9510 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9516 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9520 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9521 Shifting token '\n' ()
9523 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9524 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9527 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9530 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9533 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9538 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9539 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9540 completion of the parsing.
9543 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9544 Shifting token $end ()
9547 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9548 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9552 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9553 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9556 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9557 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9558 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9560 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9562 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9563 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9564 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9566 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9569 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9570 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9574 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9575 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9576 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9579 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9582 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9585 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9586 else if (type == NUM)
9587 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9591 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9594 @chapter Invoking Bison
9595 @cindex invoking Bison
9596 @cindex Bison invocation
9597 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9599 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9605 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9606 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9607 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9608 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9609 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9610 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9611 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9612 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9613 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9614 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9615 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9620 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9623 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9626 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9629 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9631 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9632 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9633 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9636 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9637 in alphabetical order by short options.
9638 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9639 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9643 @section Bison Options
9645 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9646 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9647 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9648 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9649 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9652 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9653 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9656 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9662 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9666 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9668 @item --print-localedir
9669 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9671 @item --print-datadir
9672 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9676 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9677 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9678 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9679 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9680 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9681 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9682 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9683 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9684 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9685 for compatibility with POSIX:
9692 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9693 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9694 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9695 this option is specified.
9697 @item -W [@var{category}]
9698 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9699 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9702 @item midrule-values
9703 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9705 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9708 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9711 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9712 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9715 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9718 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9719 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9720 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9723 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9727 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9728 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9729 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9730 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9731 no effect on the conflict report.
9734 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9738 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9740 Consider for instance the following grammar:
9769 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
9773 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
9778 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
9783 warning: useless precedence for "("
9789 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
9799 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9801 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9802 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9808 Turn off all the warnings.
9810 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9813 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9814 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9815 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9817 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9818 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9819 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9820 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9822 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9823 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9825 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9826 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9829 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9830 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9831 S/R conflicts as errors.
9834 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9835 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9838 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9839 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9840 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9843 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9844 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9845 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9846 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9847 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9848 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9853 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9856 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
9860 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9861 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9865 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9866 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9870 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9871 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9875 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9876 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9880 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
9881 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9886 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
9890 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
9891 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9892 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9893 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
9894 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
9898 This option is activated by default.
9909 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9910 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9911 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9913 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9914 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9915 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9916 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9917 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9918 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9919 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9923 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9926 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9927 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9928 definition for @var{name}.
9930 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9931 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9932 definitions for @var{name}.
9934 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9935 definitions for @var{name}.
9938 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9939 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9940 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9942 @item -L @var{language}
9943 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9944 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9945 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9946 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9947 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9950 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9952 @item -p @var{prefix}
9953 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9954 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9955 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9956 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9960 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9961 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9962 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9963 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9964 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9965 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9968 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9969 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9970 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9972 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9973 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9974 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9975 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9977 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9978 file in the Bison installation directory.
9979 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9980 current working directory.
9981 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9984 @itemx --token-table
9985 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9992 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9993 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9994 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9995 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9998 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9999 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10000 with other short options.
10002 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10003 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10004 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10005 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10007 @item -r @var{things}
10008 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10009 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10010 separated list of @var{things} among:
10014 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10015 parser's automaton.
10018 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10019 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10022 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10023 each rule's lookahead set.
10026 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10027 precedence and associativity directives.
10030 Enable all the items.
10033 Do not generate the report.
10036 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10037 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10041 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10042 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10043 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10045 @item -o @var{file}
10046 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10047 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10049 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10050 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10052 @item -g [@var{file}]
10053 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10054 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10055 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10056 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10057 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10058 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10061 @item -x [@var{file}]
10062 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10063 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10064 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10065 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10067 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10068 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10071 @node Option Cross Key
10072 @section Option Cross Key
10074 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10075 the corresponding short option and directive.
10077 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10078 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10079 @include cross-options.texi
10083 @section Yacc Library
10085 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10086 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10087 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10088 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10089 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10090 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10091 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10093 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10094 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10097 int yyerror (char const *);
10100 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10101 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10102 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10105 int yyparse (void);
10108 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10110 @node Other Languages
10111 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10114 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10115 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10119 @section C++ Parsers
10122 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10123 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10124 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10125 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10126 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10127 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10130 @node C++ Bison Interface
10131 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10132 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10134 @c - initial action
10136 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10137 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10138 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10139 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10141 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10143 @findex %define api.namespace
10144 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10145 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10146 in the following files:
10151 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10152 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10153 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10157 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10159 @item @var{file}.hh
10160 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10161 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10162 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10163 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10164 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10166 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10167 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10168 @samp{%defines} directive.
10171 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10172 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10174 @node C++ Semantic Values
10175 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10176 @c - No objects in unions
10178 @c - Printer and destructor
10180 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10181 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10182 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10183 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10186 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10187 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10191 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10193 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10194 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
10195 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10198 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10199 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10200 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10202 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10203 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10204 to such objects are allowed.
10207 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10208 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10209 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10213 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10215 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10216 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10217 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10219 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10220 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10221 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10222 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10224 For instance, instead of
10232 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10233 %token <sval> STRING;
10240 %token <int> NUMBER;
10241 %token <std::string> STRING;
10244 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10245 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10248 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10249 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10250 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10252 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10253 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10254 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10255 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10256 eventually, destroyed.
10258 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10259 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10260 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10263 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10264 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10268 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10269 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10270 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10271 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10272 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10273 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10274 that would be duplicating the information.
10276 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10277 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10278 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10279 (the current implementation of) variants:
10282 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10283 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10284 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10285 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10286 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10287 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10290 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10293 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10294 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10296 @node C++ Location Values
10297 @subsection C++ Location Values
10299 @c - class Position
10300 @c - class Location
10301 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10303 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10304 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10306 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10307 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10308 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10309 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10310 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10313 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10314 genuine code only the latter is used.
10317 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10318 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10319 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10323 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10325 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10326 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10327 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10331 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10332 Reset the position to the given values.
10335 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10336 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10337 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10338 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10339 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10342 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10343 The line, starting at 1.
10346 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10347 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10350 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10351 The column, starting at 1.
10354 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10355 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10358 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10359 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10360 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10361 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10362 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10365 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10366 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10367 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10370 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10371 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10372 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10373 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10377 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10379 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10380 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10383 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10384 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10385 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10388 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10389 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10392 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10393 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10394 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10397 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10398 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10399 Advance the @code{end} position.
10402 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10403 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10404 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10405 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10408 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10409 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10412 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10413 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10414 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10418 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10419 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10420 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10423 @node User Defined Location Type
10424 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10425 @findex %define api.location.type
10427 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10428 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10431 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10434 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10437 it must be copyable;
10440 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10441 parser basically runs
10443 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10444 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10447 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10450 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10451 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10454 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10455 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10460 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10461 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10462 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10463 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10468 %define namespace "master::"
10472 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10473 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10476 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10477 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10480 @node C++ Parser Interface
10481 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10482 @c - define parser_class_name
10484 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10486 @c - Reporting errors
10488 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10489 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10490 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10491 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10492 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10493 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10494 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10495 additional argument for its constructor.
10497 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10498 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10499 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10502 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10503 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10504 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10505 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10506 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10507 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10510 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10511 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10512 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10513 equivalent with first
10514 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10515 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10516 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10517 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10518 function invoked from the user action.
10521 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10522 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10523 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10526 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10527 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10528 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10531 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10532 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10535 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10536 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10537 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10540 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10541 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10542 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10546 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10547 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10548 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10549 or nonzero, full tracing.
10552 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10553 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10554 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10555 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10556 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10561 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10562 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10563 @c - prefix for yylex.
10564 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10567 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10568 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10569 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10570 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10573 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10574 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10577 @node Split Symbols
10578 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10580 The interface is as follows.
10582 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10583 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10584 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10585 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10586 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10589 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10590 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10592 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10596 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10597 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10600 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10601 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10605 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10606 initialized. So the code would look like:
10610 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10611 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10614 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10615 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10624 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10625 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10628 yylval.build(yytext);
10629 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10634 @node Complete Symbols
10635 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10637 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10638 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10639 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10640 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10641 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10642 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10644 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10645 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10646 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10647 the @var{location}.
10650 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10651 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10652 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10653 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10655 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10657 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10658 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10659 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10660 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10661 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10662 also pass the @var{location}.
10665 For instance, given the following declarations:
10668 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10669 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10670 %token <int> INTEGER;
10675 Bison generates the following functions:
10678 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10679 const location_type& l);
10680 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10681 const location_type& loc);
10682 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10686 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10689 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10690 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10691 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10694 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10695 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10697 @node A Complete C++ Example
10698 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10700 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10701 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10702 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10703 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10704 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10705 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10706 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10707 actually easier to interface with.
10710 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10711 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10712 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10713 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10714 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10717 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10718 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10720 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10721 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10722 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10723 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10724 of valid input follows.
10728 seven := one + two * three
10732 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10733 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10735 @c - A place to store error messages
10736 @c - A place for the result
10738 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10739 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10740 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10741 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10742 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10743 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10744 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10746 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10747 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10748 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10751 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10753 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10754 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10757 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10762 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10763 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10764 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10765 factor both as follows.
10767 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10769 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10771 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10772 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10777 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10780 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10782 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10783 class calcxx_driver
10787 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10789 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10795 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10796 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10798 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10800 // Handling the scanner.
10801 void scan_begin ();
10803 bool trace_scanning;
10807 Similarly for the parser itself.
10809 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10811 // Run the parser on file F.
10812 // Return 0 on success.
10813 int parse (const std::string& f);
10814 // The name of the file being parsed.
10815 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10817 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10818 bool trace_parsing;
10822 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10823 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10824 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10825 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10827 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10830 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10831 void error (const std::string& m);
10833 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10836 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10837 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10838 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10839 messages and set error state.
10841 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10843 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10844 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10846 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10847 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10849 variables["one"] = 1;
10850 variables["two"] = 2;
10853 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10858 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10862 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10863 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10864 int res = parser.parse ();
10870 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10872 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10876 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10878 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10882 @node Calc++ Parser
10883 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10885 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10886 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10887 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10888 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10891 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10893 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10894 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10896 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10900 @findex %define api.token.constructor
10901 @findex %define api.value.type variant
10902 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10903 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10904 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10905 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
10907 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10909 %define api.token.constructor
10910 %define api.value.type variant
10911 %define parse.assert
10915 @findex %code requires
10916 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10917 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10918 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10919 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10920 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10921 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10922 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10924 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10929 class calcxx_driver;
10934 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10935 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10938 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10940 // The parsing context.
10941 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10945 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10946 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10947 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10950 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10955 // Initialize the initial location.
10956 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10961 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10962 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10965 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10967 %define parse.trace
10968 %define parse.error verbose
10973 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10974 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10976 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10980 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10986 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10987 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10988 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10989 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10990 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
10992 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10994 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10996 END 0 "end of file"
11008 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11009 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11012 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11014 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11015 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11020 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11021 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11022 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11023 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11025 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11027 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11031 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11032 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11034 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11038 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11041 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
11042 | assignments assignment @{@};
11045 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11050 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11051 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11052 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11053 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11054 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11055 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11056 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11061 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11064 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11067 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11068 const std::string& m)
11070 driver.error (l, m);
11074 @node Calc++ Scanner
11075 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11077 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11078 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11080 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11082 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11084 # include <climits>
11085 # include <cstdlib>
11087 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11088 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11090 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11091 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11092 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11093 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11095 # define yywrap() 1
11097 // The location of the current token.
11098 static yy::location loc;
11103 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11104 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11105 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11106 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11108 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11110 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11114 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11116 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11118 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11124 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11125 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11126 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11127 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11128 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11129 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11130 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11132 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11136 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11137 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11143 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11147 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11148 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11152 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11154 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11156 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11157 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11158 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11159 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11160 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11161 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11162 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11167 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11168 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11169 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11170 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11173 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11174 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11175 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11180 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11181 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11183 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11187 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11189 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11190 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11192 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11194 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11195 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11202 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11209 @node Calc++ Top Level
11210 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11212 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11214 @comment file: calc++.cc
11216 #include <iostream>
11217 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11221 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11224 calcxx_driver driver;
11225 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11226 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11227 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11228 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11229 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11230 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11231 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11240 @section Java Parsers
11243 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11244 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11245 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11246 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11247 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11248 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11249 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11250 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11253 @node Java Bison Interface
11254 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11255 @c - %language "Java"
11257 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11258 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11260 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11261 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11263 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11264 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11265 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11266 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11267 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11268 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11269 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11270 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11271 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11272 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11274 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11276 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11277 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11278 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11279 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11281 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11282 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11284 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11285 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11287 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11288 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11290 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11291 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11292 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11294 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11295 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11296 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11298 if needed. Also, in the future the
11299 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11300 access the token names and codes.
11302 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11303 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11304 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11305 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11308 @node Java Semantic Values
11309 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11310 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11312 @c - Printer and destructor
11314 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11315 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11316 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11319 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11320 %type <Integer> number
11323 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11324 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11325 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11326 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11327 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11330 %define api.value.type "ASTNode"
11334 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11335 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11337 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11338 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11339 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11340 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11341 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11342 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11344 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11345 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11346 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11348 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11349 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11350 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11353 @node Java Location Values
11354 @subsection Java Location Values
11356 @c - class Position
11357 @c - class Location
11359 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11360 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11361 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11362 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11363 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11364 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11365 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11367 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11368 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11369 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11370 be supplied by the user.
11373 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11374 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11375 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11378 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11379 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11382 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11383 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11386 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11387 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11388 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11389 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11393 @node Java Parser Interface
11394 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11395 @c - define parser_class_name
11397 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11399 @c - Reporting errors
11401 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11402 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11403 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11404 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11405 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11407 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11408 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11409 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11410 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11411 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11412 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11413 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11414 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11416 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11417 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11418 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11419 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11421 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11422 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11423 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11424 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11425 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11426 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11428 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11429 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11430 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11431 which initialize them automatically.
11433 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11434 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11435 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11436 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11438 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11439 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11440 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11443 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11444 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11445 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11448 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11449 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11450 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11452 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11453 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11454 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11457 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11458 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11459 @code{false} otherwise.
11462 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11463 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11464 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11465 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11466 verbose error messages.
11469 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11470 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11471 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11472 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11473 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11474 available only if location tracking is active.
11477 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11478 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11479 from a syntax error.
11480 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11483 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11484 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11485 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11489 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11490 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11491 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11492 or nonzero, full tracing.
11495 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11496 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11497 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11501 @node Java Scanner Interface
11502 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11505 @c - Lexer interface
11507 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11508 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11509 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11510 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11511 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11514 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11515 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11516 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11517 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11520 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11521 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11522 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11523 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11526 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11528 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11529 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11530 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11531 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11534 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11535 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11536 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11539 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11540 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11543 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11544 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11545 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11546 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11547 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11549 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11550 "@var{class-name}".}
11553 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11554 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11556 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11557 "@var{class-name}".}
11561 @node Java Action Features
11562 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11564 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11565 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11567 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11568 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11571 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11572 This may not be assigned to.
11573 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11576 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11577 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11578 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11582 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11583 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11584 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11585 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11586 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11587 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11590 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11591 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11592 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11593 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11595 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11599 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11600 This may not be assigned to.
11601 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11605 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11606 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11609 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11610 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11611 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11614 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11615 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11616 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11619 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11620 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11621 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11624 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11625 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11626 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11628 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11631 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11632 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11633 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11634 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11635 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11636 available only if location tracking is active.
11640 @node Java Differences
11641 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11643 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11644 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11645 section summarizes these differences.
11649 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11650 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11651 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11652 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11653 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11654 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11655 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11657 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11658 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11659 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11660 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11661 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11664 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11665 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11666 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11667 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11668 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11669 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11670 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11671 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11672 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11675 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11677 @item @code{%code imports}
11678 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11679 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11680 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11682 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11683 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11685 @item @code{%code lexer}
11686 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11687 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11688 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11692 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11693 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11694 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11696 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11697 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11702 @node Java Declarations Summary
11703 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11705 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11706 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11708 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11709 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11712 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11713 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11714 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11715 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11716 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11719 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11720 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11721 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11722 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11725 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11726 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11727 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11728 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11731 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11732 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11733 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11736 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11737 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11738 a Java @emph{type}.
11739 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11742 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11743 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11744 @xref{Java Differences}.
11747 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11748 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11749 @xref{Java Differences}.
11752 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11753 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11754 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11757 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11758 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11759 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11762 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11763 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11764 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11765 @xref{Java Differences}.
11768 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11769 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11770 @xref{Java Differences}.
11773 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11774 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11775 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11778 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11779 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11780 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11783 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11784 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11785 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11788 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11789 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11790 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11793 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11794 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11796 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11799 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11800 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11801 constructor. Default is none.
11802 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11805 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11806 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11807 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11808 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11811 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11812 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11813 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11814 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11815 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11816 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11819 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11820 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11821 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11824 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11825 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11826 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11827 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11830 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11831 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11832 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11833 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11834 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11837 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11838 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11839 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11842 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} "@var{class}"
11843 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11844 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11847 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11848 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11849 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11852 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11853 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11854 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11855 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11859 @c ================================================= FAQ
11862 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11863 @cindex frequently asked questions
11866 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11870 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11871 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11872 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11873 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11874 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11875 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11876 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11877 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11878 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11879 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11880 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11881 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11884 @node Memory Exhausted
11885 @section Memory Exhausted
11888 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11889 message. What can I do?
11892 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11895 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11896 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11898 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11899 following typical questions:
11902 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11903 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11904 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11911 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11912 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11913 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
11916 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11917 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11918 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11919 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11920 @file{first-line.l}:
11926 #include <stdlib.h>
11930 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11934 yyparse (char const *file)
11936 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11940 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11944 /* One token only. */
11946 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11949 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11967 If the file @file{input} contains
11975 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11978 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11979 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11980 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11985 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11986 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11987 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11988 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11989 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11990 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11991 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11992 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11995 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11996 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11997 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11998 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12000 @node Strings are Destroyed
12001 @section Strings are Destroyed
12004 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12005 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12006 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12009 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12010 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12011 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12017 char *yylval = NULL;
12022 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12030 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12031 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12032 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12033 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12039 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12042 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12043 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12044 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12050 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12051 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12052 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12053 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12054 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12055 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12058 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12059 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12060 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12065 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12066 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12069 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12070 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12073 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12074 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12075 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12076 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12077 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12078 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12079 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12081 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12083 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12084 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12085 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12086 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12087 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12088 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12091 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12092 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12095 @node Multiple start-symbols
12096 @section Multiple start-symbols
12099 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12100 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12101 multiple entry points.
12104 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12105 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12106 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12107 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12111 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12118 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12119 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12121 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12122 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12123 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12124 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12125 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12126 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12127 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12128 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12131 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12136 int t = start_token;
12141 /* @r{The rules.} */
12145 @node Secure? Conform?
12146 @section Secure? Conform?
12149 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12152 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12153 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12154 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12155 please send us a bug report.
12157 @node I can't build Bison
12158 @section I can't build Bison
12161 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12162 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12166 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12167 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12168 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12169 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12170 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12171 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12172 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12175 @node Where can I find help?
12176 @section Where can I find help?
12179 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12182 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12183 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12184 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12185 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12186 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12187 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12188 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12189 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12193 @section Bug Reports
12196 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12199 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12200 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12201 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12202 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12203 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12205 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12206 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12207 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12208 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12209 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12211 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12212 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12213 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12214 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12215 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12216 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
12218 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12219 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12221 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12223 @node More Languages
12224 @section More Languages
12227 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12228 favorite language here}?
12231 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12232 languages; contributions are welcome.
12235 @section Beta Testing
12238 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12241 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12242 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12243 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12244 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12245 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12246 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12247 essentially halted.
12249 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12250 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12251 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12252 systems are especially welcome.
12254 @node Mailing Lists
12255 @section Mailing Lists
12258 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12261 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12263 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12265 @node Table of Symbols
12266 @appendix Bison Symbols
12267 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12268 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12270 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12271 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12272 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12275 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12276 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12277 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12278 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12280 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12281 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12284 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12285 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12286 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12287 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12290 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12291 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12292 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12295 @deffn {Variable} $$
12296 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12300 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12301 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12302 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12305 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12306 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12307 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12311 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12312 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12313 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12314 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12317 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12318 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12319 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12320 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12321 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12325 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12326 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12327 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12328 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12329 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12330 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12331 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12333 This feature is experimental.
12334 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12338 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12339 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12340 Comments, as in C/C++.
12343 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12344 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12348 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12349 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12352 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12353 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12354 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12357 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12358 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12361 This feature is experimental.
12362 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12365 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12368 @deffn {Directive} <>
12369 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12372 This feature is experimental.
12373 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12376 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12379 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12380 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12381 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12382 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12385 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12386 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12387 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12388 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12389 @xref{%code Summary}.
12392 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12393 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12397 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12398 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12399 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12404 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12405 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12406 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12407 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12410 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12411 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12412 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12415 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12416 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12417 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12420 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12421 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12422 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12425 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12426 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12427 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12431 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12432 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12433 used in the grammar.
12436 @deffn {Symbol} error
12437 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12438 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12439 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12440 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12441 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12442 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12443 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12444 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12447 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12448 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12449 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12452 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12453 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12457 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12458 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12459 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12462 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12463 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12466 @deffn {Directive} %language
12467 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12468 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12471 @deffn {Directive} %left
12472 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12473 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12476 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12477 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12478 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12482 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12483 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12484 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12485 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12486 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12489 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12490 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12491 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12493 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12494 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12495 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12497 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12498 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12499 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12500 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12501 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12502 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12503 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12504 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12509 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12510 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12511 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12516 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12517 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12518 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12521 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12522 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12523 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12526 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12527 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12528 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12531 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12532 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12533 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12534 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12537 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12538 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12539 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12542 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12543 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12544 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12547 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12548 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12549 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12552 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12553 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12554 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12555 unreasonable usage.
12558 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12559 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12560 Require a Version of Bison}.
12563 @deffn {Directive} %right
12564 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12565 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12568 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12569 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12570 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12573 @deffn {Directive} %start
12574 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12578 @deffn {Directive} %token
12579 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12580 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12583 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12584 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12585 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12588 @deffn {Directive} %type
12589 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12590 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12593 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12594 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12595 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12599 @deffn {Directive} %union
12600 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12601 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12604 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12605 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12606 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12607 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12608 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12610 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12614 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12615 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12616 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12617 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12619 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12623 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12624 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12625 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12628 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12629 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12630 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12631 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12632 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12635 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12636 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12637 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12640 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12641 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12642 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12645 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12646 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12647 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12648 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12651 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12652 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12653 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12656 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12657 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12658 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12659 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12660 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12661 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12663 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12667 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12668 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12669 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12672 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12673 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12674 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12675 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12676 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12677 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12678 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12681 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12682 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12683 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12686 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12687 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12688 @xref{Memory Management}.
12691 @deffn {Function} yylex
12692 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12693 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12697 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12698 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12699 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12700 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12702 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12704 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12705 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12706 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12709 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12710 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12711 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12714 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12715 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12716 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12717 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12719 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12720 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12721 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12724 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12725 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12729 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12730 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12731 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12732 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12733 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12736 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12737 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12738 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12741 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12742 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12743 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12744 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12747 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12748 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12749 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12750 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12751 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12752 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12753 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12756 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12757 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12758 call this function to create a new parser.
12759 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12760 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12761 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12762 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12765 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12766 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12767 parse the rest of the input stream.
12768 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12769 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12770 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12771 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12774 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12775 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12776 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12777 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12778 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12779 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12782 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12783 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12784 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12785 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12788 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12789 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12790 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12791 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12792 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12793 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12794 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12796 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12797 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12798 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12799 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12800 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12801 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12802 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12805 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12806 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12807 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12815 @item Accepting state
12816 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12817 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12818 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
12820 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12821 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12822 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12823 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12824 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12826 @item Consistent state
12827 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12829 @item Context-free grammars
12830 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12831 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12832 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12833 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12836 @item Default reduction
12837 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12838 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12839 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12840 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12843 @item Defaulted state
12844 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12846 @item Dynamic allocation
12847 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12848 compile time or on entry to a function.
12851 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12852 character string of length zero.
12854 @item Finite-state stack machine
12855 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12856 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12857 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12858 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12859 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12860 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12862 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12863 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12864 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12865 deterministic parsing
12866 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12867 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12868 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12872 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12873 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12874 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12876 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12877 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12878 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12879 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12880 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12881 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12882 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12883 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12884 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12885 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12887 @item Infix operator
12888 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12889 performs some operation.
12892 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12894 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12895 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12896 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12897 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12898 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12899 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12900 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12902 @item Language construct
12903 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12904 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12905 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12907 @item Left associativity
12908 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12909 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12910 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12912 @item Left recursion
12913 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12914 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12917 @item Left-to-right parsing
12918 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12919 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12921 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12922 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12923 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12925 @item Lexical tie-in
12926 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12927 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12929 @item Literal string token
12930 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12932 @item Lookahead token
12933 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12937 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12938 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12939 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12942 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12943 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12945 @item Nonterminal symbol
12946 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12947 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12948 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12951 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12952 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12955 @item Postfix operator
12956 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12957 performs some operation.
12960 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12961 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12965 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12966 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12967 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12969 @item Reverse polish notation
12970 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12972 @item Right recursion
12973 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12974 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12978 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12979 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12980 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12983 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12984 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12985 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12987 @item Single-character literal
12988 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12989 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12992 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12993 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12994 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12995 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12998 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12999 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13000 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13003 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13004 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13007 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13008 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13009 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13010 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13012 @item Terminal symbol
13013 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13014 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13015 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13017 @item Unreachable state
13018 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13019 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13020 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13023 @node Copying This Manual
13024 @appendix Copying This Manual
13028 @unnumbered Bibliography
13032 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13033 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13034 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13035 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13037 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13038 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13039 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13040 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13041 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13043 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13044 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13045 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13046 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13047 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13049 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13050 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13051 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13052 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13053 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13056 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13057 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13058 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13061 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13062 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13063 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13064 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13067 @node Index of Terms
13068 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13074 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13075 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13076 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13077 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13078 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13079 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13080 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13081 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13082 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13083 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13084 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13085 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13086 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13087 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13088 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13089 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13090 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13091 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13092 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13093 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13094 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13095 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13096 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13097 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13098 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13099 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13100 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13101 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13102 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13103 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13104 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13105 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13106 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13107 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13108 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13109 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13110 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13111 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13112 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13113 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13114 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13115 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13116 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13117 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13118 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13119 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13120 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13121 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13122 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13123 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13124 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13125 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13126 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13127 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13128 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13129 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13130 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13131 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13133 @c Local Variables:
13134 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"