4 Maybe we could expand unit rules, i.e., transform
12 exp: exp '+' exp | exp '&' exp;
14 when there are no actions. This can significantly speed up some
18 Currently, not only is Bison unable to handle huge grammars because of
19 internal limitations, but the test `big triangle' also demonstrates
20 that it can produce SEGVing executables! Push the limit beyond 124,
21 and have a core dump. Be my guest: fix this!
24 This is not portable to DOS for instance. Implement a more portable
25 scheme. Sources of inspiration include GNU diff, and Free Recode.
31 The %union is declared after the user C declarations. It can be
32 a problem if YYSTYPE is declared after the user part. []
34 Actually, the real problem seems that the %union ought to be output
35 where it was defined. For instance, in gettext/intl/plural.y, we
45 unsigned long int num;
47 struct expression *exp;
52 static int yylex PARAMS ((YYSTYPE *lval, const char **pexp));
56 Where the first part defines struct expression, the second uses it to
57 define YYSTYPE, and the last uses YYSTYPE. Only this order is valid.
66 ** %semantic-parser []
68 ** Options which could use parse_dquoted_param ().
69 Maybe transfered in lex.c.
75 ** Skeleton strategy. []
76 Must we keep %no-parser?
81 Find the best graph parameters. []
85 informations about ERROR_VERBOSE. []
86 ** Add explainations about
91 ** tests/pure-parser.at []
98 akim demaille <akim.demaille@epita.fr> writes:
100 > With great pleasure! Nonetheless, things which are debatable
101 > (or not, but just `big') should be discuss in `public': something
102 > like help- or bug-bison@gnu.org is just fine. Jesse and I are there,
103 > but there is also Jim and some other people.
105 I have no idea whether it qualifies as big or controversial, so I'll
106 just summarize for you. I proposed this change years ago and was
107 surprised that it was met with utter indifference!
109 This debug feature is for the programs/grammars one develops with
110 bison, not for debugging bison itself. I find that the YYDEBUG
111 output comes in a very inconvenient format for my purposes.
112 When debugging gcc, for instance, what I want is to see a trace of
113 the sequence of reductions and the line#s for the semantic actions
114 so I can follow what's happening. Single-step in gdb doesn't cut it
115 because to move from one semantic action to the next takes you through
116 lots of internal machinery of the parser, which is uninteresting.
118 The change I made was to the format of the debug output, so that it
119 comes out in the format of C error messages, digestible by emacs
120 compile mode, like so:
122 grammar.y:1234: foo: bar(0x123456) baz(0x345678)
124 where "foo: bar baz" is the reduction rule, whose semantic action
125 appears on line 1234 of the bison grammar file grammar.y. The hex
126 numbers on the rhs tokens are the parse-stack values associated with
127 those tokens. Of course, yytype might be something totally
128 incompatible with that representation, but for the most part, yytype
129 values are single words (scalars or pointers). In the case of gcc,
130 they're most often pointers to tree nodes. Come to think of it, the
131 right thing to do is to make the printing of stack values be
132 user-definable. It would also be useful to include the filename &
133 line# of the file being parsed, but the main filename & line# should
134 continue to be that of grammar.y
136 Anyway, this feature has saved my life on numerous occasions. The way
137 I customarily use it is to first run bison with the traces on, isolate
138 the sequence of reductions that interests me, put those traces in a
139 buffer and force it into compile-mode, then visit each of those lines
140 in the grammar and set breakpoints with C-x SPACE. Then, I can run
141 again under the control of gdb and stop at each semantic action.
142 With the hex addresses of tree nodes, I can inspect the values
143 associated with any rhs token.
148 Some users create their foo.y files, and equip them with #line. Bison
149 should recognize these, and preserve them.