1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
230 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
231 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
232 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
233 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
234 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
235 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
236 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
238 Parser C-Language Interface
240 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
241 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
244 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
245 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
247 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
248 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
249 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
252 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
254 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
255 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
256 of the token it has read.
257 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
258 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
260 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
261 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
263 The Bison Parser Algorithm
265 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
266 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
267 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
268 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
269 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
270 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
271 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
272 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
273 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
274 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
278 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
279 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
280 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
281 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
282 * How Precedence:: How they work.
286 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
287 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
288 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
289 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
291 Handling Context Dependencies
293 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
294 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
295 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
296 error recovery rules must be written.
298 Debugging Your Parser
300 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
301 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
305 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
306 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
307 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
311 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
312 in alphabetical order by short options.
313 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
314 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
316 Parsers Written In Other Languages
318 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
319 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
323 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
324 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
325 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
326 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
327 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
328 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
332 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
333 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
335 A Complete C++ Example
337 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
338 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
339 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
340 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
341 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
345 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
346 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
347 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
348 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
349 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
350 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
351 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
352 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
354 Frequently Asked Questions
356 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
357 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
358 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
359 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
360 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
361 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
362 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
363 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
364 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
365 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
366 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
367 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
371 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
377 @unnumbered Introduction
380 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
381 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
382 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
383 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
384 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
385 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
386 calculators to complex programming languages.
388 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
389 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
390 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
391 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
392 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
395 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
396 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
397 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
398 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
401 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
402 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
403 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
404 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
405 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
406 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
409 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
412 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
414 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
415 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
416 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
417 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
418 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
420 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
422 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
423 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
424 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
425 License to all of the Bison source code.
427 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
428 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
429 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
430 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
431 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
432 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
433 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
435 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
436 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
437 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
438 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
439 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
440 using the other GNU tools.
442 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
443 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
444 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
445 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
449 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
450 @include gpl-3.0.texi
453 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
455 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
456 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
457 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
460 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
461 as mathematical ideas.
462 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
463 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
464 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
465 the name of an identifier, etc.).
466 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
467 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
468 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
469 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
470 how is the output used?
471 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
472 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
475 @node Language and Grammar
476 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
478 @cindex context-free grammar
479 @cindex grammar, context-free
480 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
481 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
482 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
483 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
484 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
485 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
486 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
487 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
491 @cindex Backus-Naur form
492 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
493 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
494 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
495 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
496 essentially machine-readable BNF.
498 @cindex LALR grammars
499 @cindex IELR grammars
501 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
502 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
503 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
504 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
505 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
506 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
507 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
508 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
509 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
510 Construction}, to learn how.
513 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
514 @cindex ambiguous grammars
515 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
517 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
518 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
519 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
520 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
521 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
522 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
523 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
524 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
525 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
526 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
527 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
528 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
529 possible parses of any given string is finite.
531 @cindex symbols (abstract)
533 @cindex syntactic grouping
534 @cindex grouping, syntactic
535 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
536 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
537 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
538 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
539 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
540 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
541 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
543 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
544 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
545 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
546 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
547 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
548 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
549 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
550 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
551 lexicography, not grammar.)
553 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
558 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
559 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
560 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
561 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
562 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
565 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
566 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
567 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
568 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
569 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
570 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
571 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
572 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
574 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
575 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
576 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
577 reads informally as follows:
580 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
585 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
589 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
590 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
591 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
592 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
595 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
596 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
597 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
598 not the start symbol.
600 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
601 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
602 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
603 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
604 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
605 reports a syntax error.
607 @node Grammar in Bison
608 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
609 @cindex Bison grammar
610 @cindex grammar, Bison
611 @cindex formal grammar
613 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
614 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
615 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
617 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
618 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
619 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
621 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
622 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
623 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
624 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
625 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
626 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
627 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
630 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
631 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
632 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
633 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
635 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
636 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
638 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
639 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
640 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
641 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
645 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
649 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
651 @node Semantic Values
652 @section Semantic Values
653 @cindex semantic value
654 @cindex value, semantic
656 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
657 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
658 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
659 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
660 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
663 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
664 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
665 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
666 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
667 ,Defining Language Semantics},
670 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
671 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
672 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
673 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
676 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
677 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
678 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
679 need to have any semantic value.)
681 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
682 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
683 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
684 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
685 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
686 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
688 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
689 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
690 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
691 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
692 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
694 @node Semantic Actions
695 @section Semantic Actions
696 @cindex semantic actions
697 @cindex actions, semantic
699 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
700 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
701 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
702 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
705 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
706 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
707 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
708 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
709 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
710 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
711 newly recognized larger expression.
713 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
717 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
721 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
722 from the values of the two subexpressions.
725 @section Writing GLR Parsers
727 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
730 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
731 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
733 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
734 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
735 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
736 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
737 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
738 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
739 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
743 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
744 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
745 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
746 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
747 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
748 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
749 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
750 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
751 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
752 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
753 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
754 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
755 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
756 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
757 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
758 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
759 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
760 identical set of symbols.
762 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
763 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
764 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
765 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
766 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
767 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
768 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
769 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
770 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
774 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
775 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
776 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
777 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
778 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
781 @node Simple GLR Parsers
782 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
783 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
784 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
788 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
789 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
791 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
792 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
793 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
795 Consider a problem that
796 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
797 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
800 type subrange = lo .. hi;
801 type enum = (a, b, c);
805 The original language standard allows only numeric
806 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
807 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
808 10206) and many other
809 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
810 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
814 type subrange = (a) .. b;
818 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
819 type with only one value:
826 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
827 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
829 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
830 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
831 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
832 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
833 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
834 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
835 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
836 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
838 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
839 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
840 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
841 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
844 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
845 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
846 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
847 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
848 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
849 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
852 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
853 use the GLR algorithm.
854 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
855 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
856 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
857 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
858 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
859 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
860 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
861 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
862 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
864 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
865 reports a syntax error as usual.
867 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
868 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
869 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
870 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
871 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
873 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
874 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
875 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
876 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
877 The present example contains only one conflict between two
878 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
879 cannot be nested. So the number of
880 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
881 and the parsing time is still linear.
883 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
884 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
887 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
897 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
926 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
927 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
928 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
929 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
936 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
937 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
938 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
947 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
948 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
949 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
950 notice when the parser splits.
952 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
953 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
954 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
955 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
956 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
957 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
958 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
959 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
960 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
961 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
962 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
963 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
964 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
967 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
968 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
969 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
970 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
971 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
972 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
974 @node Merging GLR Parses
975 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
976 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
977 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
981 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
983 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
988 #define YYSTYPE char const *
990 void yyerror (char const *);
1004 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1013 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1014 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1015 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1016 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1017 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1021 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1022 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1023 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1024 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1028 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1029 | '(' declarator ')'
1034 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1035 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1042 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1043 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1044 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1045 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1046 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1047 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1048 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1049 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1050 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1051 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1052 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1053 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1054 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1055 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1057 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1058 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1059 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1060 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1061 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1062 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1063 The parser therefore prints
1066 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1069 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1070 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1077 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1078 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1079 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1080 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1081 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1082 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1083 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1084 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1085 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1086 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1092 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1093 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1094 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1095 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1100 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1101 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1106 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1110 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1118 with an accompanying forward declaration
1119 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1123 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1124 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1129 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1130 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1133 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1136 Bison requires that all of the
1137 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1138 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1139 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1140 the offending merge.
1142 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1143 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1145 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1146 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1148 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1149 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1150 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1151 the associated reduction.
1152 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1153 action in a GLR parser.
1156 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1158 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1160 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1161 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1162 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1163 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1164 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1165 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1166 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1167 influence syntax analysis.
1168 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1171 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1172 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1173 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1174 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1175 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1176 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1177 future versions of Bison.
1178 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1179 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1180 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1182 @subsubsection YYERROR
1184 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1185 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1186 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1187 initiate error recovery.
1188 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1189 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1190 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1191 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1192 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1193 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1194 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1195 the parse that invoked the test.
1197 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1198 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1199 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1202 @node Semantic Predicates
1203 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1205 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1207 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1209 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1210 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1211 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1212 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1216 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1217 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1222 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1223 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1224 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1225 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1226 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1227 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1228 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1230 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1231 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1232 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1233 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1236 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1237 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1238 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1242 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1243 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1244 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1245 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1250 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1251 false). However, this
1252 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1253 have overlapping syntax.
1254 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1255 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1256 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1257 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1260 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1261 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1263 @node Compiler Requirements
1264 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1265 @cindex @code{inline}
1266 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1268 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1269 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1270 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1271 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1272 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1273 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1282 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1286 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1287 && ! defined inline)
1296 @cindex textual location
1297 @cindex location, textual
1299 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1300 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1301 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1302 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1304 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1305 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1306 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1307 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1310 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1311 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1312 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1315 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1316 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1317 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1318 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1319 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1320 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1321 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1324 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1325 @cindex Bison parser
1326 @cindex Bison utility
1327 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1330 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1331 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1332 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1333 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1334 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1335 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1336 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1339 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1340 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1341 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1344 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1345 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1346 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1347 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1348 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1349 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1350 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1352 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1353 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1354 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1355 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1356 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1357 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1358 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1359 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1360 C-Language Interface}.
1362 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1363 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1364 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1365 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1366 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1367 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1368 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1369 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1370 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1371 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1372 anything other than their usual meanings.
1374 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1375 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1376 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1377 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1378 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1379 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1380 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1381 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1382 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1385 @section Stages in Using Bison
1386 @cindex stages in using Bison
1389 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1390 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1394 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1395 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1396 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1397 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1398 sequence of C statements.
1401 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1402 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1403 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1404 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1407 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1410 Write error-reporting routines.
1413 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1414 must follow these steps:
1418 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1421 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1424 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1427 @node Grammar Layout
1428 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1429 @cindex grammar file
1431 @cindex format of grammar file
1432 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1434 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1435 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1442 @var{Bison declarations}
1451 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1452 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1454 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1455 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1456 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1457 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1458 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1459 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1461 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1462 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1463 semantic values of various symbols.
1465 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1468 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1469 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1470 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1474 @cindex simple examples
1475 @cindex examples, simple
1477 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1478 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1479 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1480 and a multi-function calculator. All
1481 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1483 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1484 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1485 source file to try them.
1488 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1489 a first example with no operator precedence.
1490 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1491 Operator precedence is introduced.
1492 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1493 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1494 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1495 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1496 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1500 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1501 @cindex reverse polish notation
1502 @cindex polish notation calculator
1503 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1504 @cindex calculator, simple
1506 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1507 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1508 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1509 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1511 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1512 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1515 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1516 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1517 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1518 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1519 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1520 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1521 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1524 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1525 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1527 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1528 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1530 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1532 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1535 #define YYSTYPE double
1539 void yyerror (char const *);
1544 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1547 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1548 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1550 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1551 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1552 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1553 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1554 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1555 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1556 which is a floating point number.
1558 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1559 function @code{pow}.
1561 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1562 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1563 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1564 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1567 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1568 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1569 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1570 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1571 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1572 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1573 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1574 type for numeric constants.
1577 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1579 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1581 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1593 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1600 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1601 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1602 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1604 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1605 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1611 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1612 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1613 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1614 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1615 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1618 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1619 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1620 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1622 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1623 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1624 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1625 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1626 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1627 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1630 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1631 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1632 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1636 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1638 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1647 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1648 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1649 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1650 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1651 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1653 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1654 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1655 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1656 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1657 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1658 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1660 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1661 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1662 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1663 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1666 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1667 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1668 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1671 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1673 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1678 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1682 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1683 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1684 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1685 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1686 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1687 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1688 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1690 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1691 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1692 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1693 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1694 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1697 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1699 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1700 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1701 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1702 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1707 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1708 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1713 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1714 equally well have written them separately:
1718 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1719 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1723 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1724 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1725 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1726 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1727 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1728 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1729 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1730 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1732 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1733 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1734 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1736 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1737 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1741 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1745 means the same thing as this:
1750 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1756 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1759 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1760 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1761 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1763 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1764 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1765 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1766 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1768 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1770 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1771 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1772 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1773 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1775 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1776 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1777 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1778 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1779 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1780 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1781 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1782 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1783 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1785 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1786 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1787 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1788 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1789 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1791 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1792 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1794 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1796 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1799 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1800 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1801 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1802 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1813 /* Skip white space. */
1814 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1818 /* Process numbers. */
1819 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1822 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1827 /* Return end-of-input. */
1830 /* Return a single char. */
1837 @subsection The Controlling Function
1838 @cindex controlling function
1839 @cindex main function in simple example
1841 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1842 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1843 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1845 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1857 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1858 @cindex error reporting routine
1860 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1861 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1862 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1863 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1864 here is the definition we will use:
1866 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1873 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1875 yyerror (char const *s)
1877 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1882 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1883 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1884 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1885 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1886 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1887 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1889 @node Rpcalc Generate
1890 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1891 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1893 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1894 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1895 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1896 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1897 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1898 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1900 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1901 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1903 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1904 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1911 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1912 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1913 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1914 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1915 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1916 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1917 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1919 @node Rpcalc Compile
1920 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1921 @cindex compiling the parser
1923 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1927 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1929 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1933 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1934 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1935 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1939 # @r{List files again.}
1941 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1945 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1946 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1952 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1954 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1957 @result{} -3.166666667
1958 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1960 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1965 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1966 @cindex infix notation calculator
1968 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1970 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1971 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1972 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1973 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1976 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1980 #define YYSTYPE double
1984 void yyerror (char const *);
1989 /* Bison declarations. */
1993 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1994 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1997 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2008 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2015 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2016 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2017 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2018 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2019 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2020 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2021 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2028 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2031 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2033 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2034 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2035 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2036 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2037 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2038 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2039 the associativity/precedence.)
2041 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2042 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2043 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2044 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2045 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2046 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2049 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2050 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2051 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2052 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2053 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2055 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2060 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2068 @node Simple Error Recovery
2069 @section Simple Error Recovery
2070 @cindex error recovery, simple
2072 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2073 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2074 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2075 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2076 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2077 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2079 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2080 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2081 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2087 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2088 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2093 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2094 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2095 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2096 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2097 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2098 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2099 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2100 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2103 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2104 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2105 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2106 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2107 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2108 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2111 @node Location Tracking Calc
2112 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2113 @cindex location tracking calculator
2114 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2115 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2117 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2118 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2119 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2120 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2124 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2125 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2126 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2129 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2130 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2132 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2133 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2136 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2142 void yyerror (char const *);
2145 /* Bison declarations. */
2153 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2157 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2158 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2159 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2160 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2161 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2162 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2163 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2167 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2169 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2170 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2171 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2172 from the new information.
2174 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2175 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2188 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2195 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2196 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2197 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2207 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2208 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2209 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2214 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2215 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2216 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2220 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2221 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2222 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2224 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2225 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2226 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2227 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2228 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2229 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2233 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2235 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2236 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2237 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2240 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2241 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2252 /* Skip white space. */
2253 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2254 ++yylloc.last_column;
2259 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2260 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2264 /* Process numbers. */
2268 ++yylloc.last_column;
2269 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2271 ++yylloc.last_column;
2272 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2279 /* Return end-of-input. */
2284 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2288 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2291 ++yylloc.last_column;
2297 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2298 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2299 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2300 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2302 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2303 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2304 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2305 controlling function:
2312 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2313 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2319 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2320 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2321 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2323 @node Multi-function Calc
2324 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2325 @cindex multi-function calculator
2326 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2327 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2329 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2330 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2331 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2332 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2333 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2335 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2336 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2337 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2338 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2339 functions whose syntax has this form:
2342 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2346 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2347 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2348 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2353 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2354 @result{} 3.1415926536
2358 @result{} 0.0000000000
2360 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2361 @result{} 2.3000000000
2363 @result{} 2.3000000000
2365 @result{} 0.8329091229
2366 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2367 @result{} 2.3000000000
2371 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2374 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2375 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2376 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2377 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2378 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2381 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2382 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2384 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2386 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2390 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2391 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2392 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2394 void yyerror (char const *);
2400 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2401 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2404 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2405 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2412 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2413 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2417 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2418 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2419 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2421 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2422 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2423 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2424 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2426 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2427 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2428 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2429 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2430 between angle brackets).
2432 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2433 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2434 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2435 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2436 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2437 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2440 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2442 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2443 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2444 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2446 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2448 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2459 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2460 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2467 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2468 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2469 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2470 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2471 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2472 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2473 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2474 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2475 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2476 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2479 /* End of grammar. */
2483 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2484 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2485 @cindex symbol table example
2487 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2488 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2489 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2490 requires some additional C functions for support.
2492 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2493 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2494 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2496 @comment file: calc.h
2499 /* Function type. */
2500 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2504 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2507 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2508 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2511 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2512 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2514 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2519 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2521 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2522 extern symrec *sym_table;
2524 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2525 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2529 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2532 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2538 double (*fnct) (double);
2543 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2556 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2561 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2567 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2569 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2570 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2576 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2577 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2579 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2580 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2581 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2582 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2583 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2584 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2586 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2588 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2589 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2593 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2595 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2596 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2597 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2598 ptr->type = sym_type;
2599 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2600 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2608 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2611 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2612 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2613 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2621 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2623 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2624 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2625 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2626 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2628 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2629 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2630 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2631 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2632 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2633 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2635 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2636 operators in @code{yylex}.
2638 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2650 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2651 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2659 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2660 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2663 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2669 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2672 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2673 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2674 static size_t length = 40;
2675 static char *symbuf = 0;
2680 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2686 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2690 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2692 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2694 /* Get another character. */
2699 while (isalnum (c));
2706 s = getsym (symbuf);
2708 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2713 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2720 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2722 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2723 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2724 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2726 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2729 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2731 yyerror (char const *s)
2733 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2739 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2742 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2743 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2744 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2752 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2753 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2754 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2762 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2765 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2766 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2767 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2770 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2771 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2775 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2777 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2778 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2780 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2781 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2784 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2785 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2786 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2787 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2788 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2789 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2790 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2791 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2792 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2795 @node Grammar Outline
2796 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2798 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2799 appropriate delimiters:
2806 @var{Bison declarations}
2815 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2816 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2817 continues until end of line.
2820 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2821 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2822 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2823 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2824 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2828 @subsection The prologue
2829 @cindex declarations section
2831 @cindex declarations
2833 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2834 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2835 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2836 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2837 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2838 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2839 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2841 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2842 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2845 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2846 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2847 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2848 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2849 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2850 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2851 @code{%union} declaration.
2862 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2866 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2867 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2873 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2874 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2875 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2876 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2877 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2878 @code{#include} directives.
2880 @node Prologue Alternatives
2881 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2882 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2885 @findex %code requires
2886 @findex %code provides
2889 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2890 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2891 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2892 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2893 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2894 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2895 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2897 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2908 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2912 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2913 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2920 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2921 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2922 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2923 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2924 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2925 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2926 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2927 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2928 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2929 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2930 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2932 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2933 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2934 This behavior raises a few questions.
2935 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2936 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2937 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2938 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2939 This behavior is not intuitive.
2941 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2942 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2943 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2944 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2951 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2952 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2955 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2956 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2968 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2972 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2973 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2974 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2981 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2982 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2983 explicit which kind you intend.
2984 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2986 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2987 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2988 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2989 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2990 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2991 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2992 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2993 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2994 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2997 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2998 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3000 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3018 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3024 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3025 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3038 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3039 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3040 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3048 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3049 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3050 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3051 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3052 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3053 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3055 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3056 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3057 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3058 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3059 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3060 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3061 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3062 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3063 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3064 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3065 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3068 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3069 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3070 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3071 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3072 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3073 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3074 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3075 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3076 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3077 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3095 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3101 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3102 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3115 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3121 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3122 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3130 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3131 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3132 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3135 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3136 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3137 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3138 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3139 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3140 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3143 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3144 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3145 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3146 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3148 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3149 organize your grammar file.
3150 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3155 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3156 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3157 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3158 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3162 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3163 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3164 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3165 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3170 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3171 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3173 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3175 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3176 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3177 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3178 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3180 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3181 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3182 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3183 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3184 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3185 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3186 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3187 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3190 @node Bison Declarations
3191 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3192 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3193 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3195 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3196 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3197 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3198 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3201 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3202 @cindex grammar rules section
3203 @cindex rules section for grammar
3205 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3206 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3208 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3209 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3210 if it is the first thing in the file.
3213 @subsection The epilogue
3214 @cindex additional C code section
3216 @cindex C code, section for additional
3218 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3219 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3220 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3221 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3222 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3223 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3224 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3225 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3226 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3227 C-Language Interface}.
3229 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3230 from the grammar rules.
3232 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3233 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3234 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3235 of the grammar file.
3238 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3239 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3240 @cindex terminal symbol
3244 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3247 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3248 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3249 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3250 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3251 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3252 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3253 the symbol to stand for it.
3255 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3256 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3257 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3259 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3260 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3261 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3262 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3263 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3264 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3265 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3267 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3271 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3272 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3273 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3274 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3277 @cindex character token
3278 @cindex literal token
3279 @cindex single-character literal
3280 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3281 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3282 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3283 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3284 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3285 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3286 ,Operator Precedence}).
3288 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3289 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3290 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3291 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3292 your program will confuse other readers.
3294 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3295 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3296 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3297 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3298 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3299 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3303 @cindex string token
3304 @cindex literal string token
3305 @cindex multicharacter literal
3306 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3307 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3308 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3309 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3310 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3312 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3313 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3314 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3315 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3316 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3318 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3320 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3321 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3322 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3323 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3324 read your program will be confused.
3326 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3327 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3328 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3329 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3330 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3331 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3334 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3335 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3336 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3338 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3339 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3340 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3341 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3342 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3343 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3344 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3345 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3346 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3347 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3348 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3349 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3351 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3352 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3353 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3354 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3355 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3357 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3358 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3359 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3360 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3361 characters in the following C-language string:
3364 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3367 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3368 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3369 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3370 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3371 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3372 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3373 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3374 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3375 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3376 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3379 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3380 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3381 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3382 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3383 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3386 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3388 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3389 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3391 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3395 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3400 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3401 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3402 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3413 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3414 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3416 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3417 extra white space as you wish.
3419 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3420 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3423 @{@var{C statements}@}
3428 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3429 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3430 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3431 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3432 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3433 compiler can check it.
3435 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3436 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3437 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3438 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3439 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3440 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3441 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3442 character constants.
3444 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3448 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3449 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3454 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3455 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3462 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3464 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3465 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3466 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3485 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3489 @section Recursive Rules
3490 @cindex recursive rule
3492 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3493 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3494 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3495 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3496 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3507 @cindex left recursion
3508 @cindex right recursion
3510 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3511 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3512 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3524 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3525 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3526 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3527 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3528 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3529 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3530 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3533 @cindex mutual recursion
3534 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3535 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3536 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3545 | primary '+' primary
3558 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3562 @section Defining Language Semantics
3563 @cindex defining language semantics
3564 @cindex language semantics, defining
3566 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3567 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3568 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3570 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3571 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3572 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3573 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3576 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3577 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3578 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3579 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3580 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3581 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3582 action in the middle of a rule.
3586 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3587 @cindex semantic value type
3588 @cindex value type, semantic
3589 @cindex data types of semantic values
3590 @cindex default data type
3592 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3593 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3594 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3595 Notation Calculator}).
3597 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3598 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3599 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3602 #define YYSTYPE double
3606 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3607 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3608 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3609 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3611 @node Multiple Types
3612 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3614 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3615 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3616 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3617 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3620 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3621 requires you to do two things:
3625 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3626 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3627 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3628 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3632 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3633 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3634 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3635 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3636 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3645 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3647 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3648 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3649 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3650 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3652 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3653 placed at any position in the rule;
3654 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3655 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3656 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3657 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3659 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3660 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3661 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3662 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3663 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3664 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3665 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3666 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3667 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3668 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3671 Here is a typical example:
3677 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3681 Or, in terms of named references:
3687 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3692 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3693 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3694 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3695 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3696 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3697 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3699 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3700 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3701 referred to as @code{$2}.
3703 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3704 references construct.
3706 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3707 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3708 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3709 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3710 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3714 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3718 @cindex default action
3719 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3720 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3721 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3722 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3723 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3724 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3726 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3727 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3728 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3729 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3730 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3735 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3736 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3742 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3747 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3748 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3749 definition of @code{foo}.
3752 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3753 any, from a semantic action.
3754 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3755 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3758 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3759 @cindex action data types
3760 @cindex data types in actions
3762 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3763 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3765 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3766 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3767 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3768 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3769 in the rule. In this example,
3775 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3780 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3781 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3782 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3783 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3785 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3786 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3787 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3799 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3800 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3802 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3803 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3804 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3805 @cindex mid-rule actions
3807 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3808 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3809 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3811 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3812 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3813 it is run before they are parsed.
3815 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3816 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3817 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3818 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3821 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3822 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3823 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3824 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3825 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3826 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3828 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3829 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3830 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3831 at the end of the rule.
3833 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3834 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3835 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3836 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3837 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3838 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3844 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3846 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3851 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3852 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3853 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3854 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3855 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3856 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3857 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3858 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3860 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3861 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3862 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3863 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3864 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3867 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3868 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3869 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3870 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3871 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3873 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3874 Discarded Symbols}).
3875 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3876 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3878 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3879 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3884 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3898 $$ = push_context ();
3899 declare_variable ($3);
3906 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3907 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3908 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3910 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3911 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3912 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3913 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3914 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3920 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3921 | '@{' statements '@}'
3927 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3932 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3933 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3936 | '@{' statements '@}'
3942 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3943 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3944 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3945 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3946 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3947 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3949 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3950 actions into the two rules, like this:
3955 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3956 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3957 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3958 '@{' statements '@}'
3964 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3965 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3967 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3968 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3969 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3974 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3975 declarations statements '@}'
3976 | '@{' statements '@}'
3982 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3983 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3985 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3986 serves as a subroutine:
3991 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3997 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3998 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4004 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4005 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4007 @node Tracking Locations
4008 @section Tracking Locations
4010 @cindex textual location
4011 @cindex location, textual
4013 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4014 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4015 especially symbol locations.
4017 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4018 actions to take when rules are matched.
4021 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4022 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4023 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4027 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4028 @cindex data type of locations
4029 @cindex default location type
4031 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4032 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4034 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4035 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4036 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4037 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4041 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4050 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4051 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4052 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4053 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4054 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4056 @node Actions and Locations
4057 @subsection Actions and Locations
4058 @cindex location actions
4059 @cindex actions, location
4062 @vindex @@@var{name}
4063 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4065 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4066 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4068 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4069 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4070 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4071 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4072 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4075 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4076 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4077 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4078 references construct.
4080 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4088 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4089 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4090 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4091 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4098 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4099 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4100 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4106 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4107 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4108 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4111 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4112 example above simply rewrites this way:
4126 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4127 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4128 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4135 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4136 from a semantic action.
4137 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4138 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4140 @node Location Default Action
4141 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4142 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4143 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4145 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4146 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4147 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4148 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4149 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4150 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4151 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4152 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4155 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4156 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4158 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4159 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4160 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4161 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4162 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4163 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4164 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4165 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4166 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4167 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4169 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4173 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4177 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4178 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4179 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4180 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4184 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4185 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4186 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4187 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4194 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4195 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4196 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4198 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4202 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4203 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4206 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4207 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4208 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4209 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4212 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4213 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4214 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4215 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4218 @node Named References
4219 @section Named References
4220 @cindex named references
4222 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4223 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4224 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4225 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4226 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4227 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4229 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4230 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4231 used as named references. For example:
4235 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4236 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4241 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4245 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4246 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4251 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4257 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4260 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4263 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4268 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4269 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4270 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4273 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4274 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4279 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4280 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4281 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4284 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4285 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4291 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4292 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4295 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4296 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4300 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4301 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4302 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4303 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4304 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4305 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4306 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4308 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4312 @section Bison Declarations
4313 @cindex declarations, Bison
4314 @cindex Bison declarations
4316 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4317 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4320 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4321 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4322 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4323 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4325 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4326 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4327 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4328 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4331 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4332 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4333 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4334 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4335 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4336 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4337 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4338 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4339 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4340 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4341 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4342 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4343 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4344 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4345 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4349 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4350 @cindex version requirement
4351 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4354 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4355 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4359 %require "@var{version}"
4363 @subsection Token Type Names
4364 @cindex declaring token type names
4365 @cindex token type names, declaring
4366 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4369 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4375 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4376 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4377 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4379 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4380 @code{%precedence}, or
4381 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4382 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4385 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4386 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4387 following the token name:
4391 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4395 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4396 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4397 with each other or with normal characters.
4399 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4400 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4401 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4402 Than One Value Type}).
4408 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4412 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4416 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4417 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4418 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4425 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4426 equivalent literal string tokens:
4429 %token <operator> OR "||"
4430 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4435 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4436 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4437 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4438 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4439 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4440 the literal string instead of the token name.
4442 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4443 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4447 %token END 0 "end of file"
4450 @node Precedence Decl
4451 @subsection Operator Precedence
4452 @cindex precedence declarations
4453 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4454 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4456 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4457 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4458 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4459 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4460 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4461 operator precedence.
4463 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4464 @code{%token}: either
4467 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4474 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4477 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4478 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4479 all the @var{symbols}:
4483 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4484 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4485 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4486 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4487 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4488 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4489 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4490 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4491 considered a syntax error.
4493 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4494 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4495 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4498 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4499 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4500 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4501 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4502 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4505 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4506 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4507 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4508 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4513 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4514 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4518 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4519 @cindex declaring value types
4520 @cindex value types, declaring
4523 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4524 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4525 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4540 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4541 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4542 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4543 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4545 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4546 @code{union}. For example:
4558 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4559 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4562 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4563 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4564 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4566 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4567 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4569 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4570 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4571 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4572 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4580 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4585 and then your grammar can use the following
4586 instead of @code{%union}:
4599 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4600 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4601 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4605 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4606 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4607 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4610 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4614 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4615 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4616 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4617 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4618 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4621 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4622 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4623 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4624 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4626 @node Initial Action Decl
4627 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4628 @findex %initial-action
4630 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4631 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4634 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4635 @findex %initial-action
4636 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4637 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4638 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4639 @code{%parse-param}.
4642 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4645 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4648 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4653 @node Destructor Decl
4654 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4655 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4659 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4660 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4661 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4662 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4663 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4664 must discard the start symbol.
4666 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4667 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4668 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4669 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4671 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4672 symbol is automatically discarded.
4674 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4676 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4678 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4679 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4680 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4681 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4683 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4684 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4685 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4686 tag among @var{symbols}.
4687 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4688 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4689 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4691 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4692 (These default forms are experimental.
4693 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4695 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4696 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4697 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4698 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4700 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4701 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4702 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4703 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4704 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4711 %union @{ char *string; @}
4712 %token <string> STRING1
4713 %token <string> STRING2
4714 %type <string> string1
4715 %type <string> string2
4716 %union @{ char character; @}
4717 %token <character> CHR
4718 %type <character> chr
4721 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4722 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4723 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4724 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4728 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4729 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4730 to @code{free} by default.
4731 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4732 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4733 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4734 @code{free} only once.
4735 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4736 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4738 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4739 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4740 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4741 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4742 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4743 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4744 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4745 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4746 reference it in your grammar.
4747 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4748 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4754 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4755 @cindex mid-rule actions
4756 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4757 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4758 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4759 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4760 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4761 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4762 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4763 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4767 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4768 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4769 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4774 @cindex discarded symbols
4775 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4779 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4781 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4783 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4784 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4786 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4789 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4790 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4793 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4794 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4795 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4799 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4800 @cindex printing semantic values
4804 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4805 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4806 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4807 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4809 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4810 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4811 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4813 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4816 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4817 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4818 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4819 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++),
4820 @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated with the symbol, and
4821 @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are also
4822 available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4824 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4825 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4826 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4827 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4835 %union @{ char *string; @}
4836 %token <string> STRING1
4837 %token <string> STRING2
4838 %type <string> string1
4839 %type <string> string2
4840 %union @{ char character; @}
4841 %token <character> CHR
4842 %type <character> chr
4845 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4846 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4847 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4848 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4852 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4853 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4854 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4855 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4856 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4857 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4858 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4862 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4863 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4864 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4865 @cindex warnings, preventing
4866 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4870 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4871 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4872 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4873 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4874 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4875 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4877 The declaration looks like this:
4883 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4884 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4885 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4886 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4888 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4889 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4890 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4891 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4892 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4893 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4894 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4900 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4904 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4905 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4906 print the number of conflicts.
4909 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4910 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4911 go back to the beginning.
4914 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4915 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4916 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4919 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4920 but will keep silent otherwise.
4923 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4924 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4925 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4926 @cindex default start symbol
4929 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4930 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4931 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4938 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4939 @cindex reentrant parser
4941 @findex %define api.pure
4943 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4944 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4945 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4946 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4947 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4948 program must be called only within interlocks.
4950 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4951 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4952 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4953 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4954 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4956 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4957 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4958 reentrant. It looks like this:
4964 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4965 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4966 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4967 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4968 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4969 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4970 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4971 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4972 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4974 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4975 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4979 @subsection A Push Parser
4982 @findex %define api.push-pull
4984 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4985 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4987 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4988 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4989 each time a new token is made available.
4991 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4992 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4993 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4994 within a certain time period.
4996 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4997 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4998 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5001 %define api.push-pull push
5004 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5005 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5006 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5007 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5008 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5012 %define api.push-pull push
5015 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5016 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5017 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5018 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5020 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5021 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5022 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5023 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5024 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5025 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5026 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5027 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5031 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5033 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5034 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5035 yypstate_delete (ps);
5038 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5039 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5040 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5041 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5042 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5043 example would thus look like this:
5048 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5051 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5052 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5053 yypstate_delete (ps);
5056 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5057 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5059 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5060 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5061 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5062 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5063 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5064 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5065 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5066 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5067 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5068 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5069 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5070 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5071 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5072 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5073 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5074 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5075 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5079 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5080 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5081 yypstate_delete (ps);
5084 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5085 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5086 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5089 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5090 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5091 @cindex declaration summary
5092 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5094 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5096 @deffn {Directive} %union
5097 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5098 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5101 @deffn {Directive} %token
5102 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5103 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5106 @deffn {Directive} %right
5107 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5108 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5111 @deffn {Directive} %left
5112 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5113 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5116 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5117 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5118 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5119 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5123 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5124 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5125 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5129 @deffn {Directive} %type
5130 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5131 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5134 @deffn {Directive} %start
5135 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5139 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5140 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5141 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5147 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5150 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5151 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5153 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5154 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5155 @xref{%code Summary}.
5158 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5159 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5161 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5164 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5165 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5166 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5167 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5170 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5171 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5172 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5173 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5174 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5176 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5177 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5178 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5179 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5180 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5181 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5182 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5183 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5184 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5185 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5187 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5188 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5189 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5191 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5192 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5193 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5195 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5196 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5197 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5198 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5199 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5201 @findex %code requires
5202 @findex %code provides
5203 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5204 header also contains their code.
5205 @xref{%code Summary}.
5208 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5209 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5212 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5213 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5214 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5217 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5218 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5219 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5222 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5223 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5224 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5225 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5227 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5231 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5232 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5233 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5234 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5235 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5236 accurate syntax error messages.
5239 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5240 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5241 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5243 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5244 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5245 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5246 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5247 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5248 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5249 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5250 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5252 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5256 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5257 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5258 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5263 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5264 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5265 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5266 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5267 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5268 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5269 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5273 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5274 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5277 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5278 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5279 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5283 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5284 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5285 Require a Version of Bison}.
5288 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5289 Specify the skeleton to use.
5291 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5292 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5293 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5294 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5296 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5297 file in the Bison installation directory.
5298 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5299 directory of the grammar file.
5300 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5303 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5304 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5305 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5306 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5307 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5308 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5309 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5312 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5313 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5314 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5315 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5316 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5317 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5318 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5321 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5322 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5323 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5327 The highest token number, plus one.
5329 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5331 The number of grammar rules,
5333 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5337 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5338 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5339 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5340 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5344 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5345 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5346 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5350 @node %define Summary
5351 @subsection %define Summary
5353 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5354 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5355 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5356 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5357 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5358 @code{%define} directive:
5360 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5361 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5362 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5363 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5365 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5366 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5367 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5368 to specifying @code{""}.
5370 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5371 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5372 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5375 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5376 @code{%define} accepts.
5378 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5379 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5383 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5385 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5386 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5388 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5390 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5391 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5394 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5395 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5396 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5397 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5398 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5399 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5402 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5404 @findex %define api.namespace
5406 @item Languages(s): C++
5408 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5409 For example, if you specify:
5412 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5415 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5418 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5421 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5422 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5425 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5431 @item Accepted Values:
5432 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5433 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5435 @item Default Value:
5436 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5437 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5438 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5439 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5440 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5441 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5442 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5445 %define api.namespace "foo"
5446 %name-prefix "bar::"
5449 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5456 @c ================================================== api.pure
5458 @findex %define api.pure
5461 @item Language(s): C
5463 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5464 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5466 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5468 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5474 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5476 @findex %define api.push-pull
5479 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5481 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5482 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5483 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5484 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5486 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5488 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5494 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5495 @item api.tokens.prefix
5496 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5499 @item Languages(s): all
5502 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5503 target language. For instance
5506 %token FILE for ERROR
5507 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5509 start: FILE for ERROR;
5513 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5514 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5515 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5516 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5517 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5518 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5519 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5521 @item Accepted Values:
5522 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5523 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5524 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5526 @item Default Value:
5529 @c api.tokens.prefix
5532 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5534 @findex %define lex_symbol
5541 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5542 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5543 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5545 @item Accepted Values:
5548 @item Default Value:
5554 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5556 @item lr.default-reductions
5557 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5560 @item Language(s): all
5562 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5563 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5564 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5565 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5567 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5568 @item Default Value:
5570 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5571 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5575 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5577 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5578 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5581 @item Language(s): all
5582 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5583 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5584 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5585 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5587 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5589 @c ================================================== lr.type
5592 @findex %define lr.type
5595 @item Language(s): all
5597 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5598 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5599 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5601 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5603 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5607 @c ================================================== namespace
5609 @findex %define namespace
5610 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5614 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5616 @findex %define parse.assert
5619 @item Languages(s): C++
5621 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5622 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5624 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5626 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5628 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5633 @c ================================================== parse.error
5635 @findex %define parse.error
5640 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5641 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5643 @item Accepted Values:
5646 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5648 @item @code{verbose}
5649 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5650 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5654 @item Default Value:
5660 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5662 @findex %define parse.lac
5665 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5667 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5668 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5669 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5670 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5674 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5676 @findex %define parse.trace
5679 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5681 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5682 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser implementation
5683 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5684 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5686 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5688 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5692 @c ================================================== variant
5694 @findex %define variant
5701 Request variant-based semantic values.
5702 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5704 @item Accepted Values:
5707 @item Default Value:
5715 @subsection %code Summary
5719 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5720 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5721 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5722 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5723 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5724 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5725 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5726 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5728 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5729 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5730 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5731 in the parser implementation.
5733 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5734 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5735 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5737 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5740 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5741 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5742 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5743 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5744 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5745 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5749 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5750 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5751 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5754 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5755 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5759 @findex %code requires
5762 @item Language(s): C, C++
5764 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5765 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5766 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5767 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5768 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5770 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5771 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5776 @findex %code provides
5779 @item Language(s): C, C++
5781 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5782 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5784 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5785 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5793 @item Language(s): C, C++
5795 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5796 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5797 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5798 parser implementation file. For example:
5807 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5811 @findex %code imports
5814 @item Language(s): Java
5816 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5818 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5819 before any class definitions.
5823 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5824 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5825 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5826 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5829 @node Multiple Parsers
5830 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5832 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5833 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5834 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5835 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5837 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5838 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5839 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5840 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5841 names that do not conflict.
5843 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5844 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5845 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5846 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5847 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5848 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5849 @code{clex}, and so on.
5851 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5852 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5853 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5854 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5855 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5857 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5858 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5859 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5860 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5863 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5864 @cindex C-language interface
5867 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5868 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5869 functions that it needs to use.
5871 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5872 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5873 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5874 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5877 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5878 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5879 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5880 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5881 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5882 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5884 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5885 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5886 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5890 @node Parser Function
5891 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5894 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5895 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5896 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5897 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5898 without reading further.
5901 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5902 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5903 is due to end-of-input).
5905 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5906 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5909 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5912 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5917 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5922 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5925 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5926 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5927 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5929 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5930 @findex %parse-param
5931 Declare that one or more
5932 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5933 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5934 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5935 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5938 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5941 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5945 Then call the parser like this:
5949 int nastiness, randomness;
5950 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5951 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5957 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5960 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5963 @node Push Parser Function
5964 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5965 @findex yypush_parse
5967 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5968 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5970 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5971 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5972 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5973 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5975 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5976 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5977 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5978 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5981 @node Pull Parser Function
5982 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5983 @findex yypull_parse
5985 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5986 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5988 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5989 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5990 declaration is used.
5991 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5993 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5994 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5997 @node Parser Create Function
5998 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5999 @findex yypstate_new
6001 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6002 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6004 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6005 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6006 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6007 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6009 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6010 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6011 or 0 if no memory was available.
6012 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6016 @node Parser Delete Function
6017 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6018 @findex yypstate_delete
6020 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6021 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6023 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6024 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6025 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6026 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6028 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
6029 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6030 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6034 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6036 @cindex lexical analyzer
6038 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6039 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6040 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6041 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6043 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6044 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6045 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6046 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6047 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6048 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6049 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6053 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6054 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6055 of the token it has read.
6056 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6057 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6059 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6060 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6063 @node Calling Convention
6064 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6066 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6067 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6068 signifies end-of-input.
6070 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6071 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6072 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6073 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6075 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6076 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6077 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6078 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6079 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6080 signifies end-of-input.
6082 Here is an example showing these things:
6089 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6092 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6093 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6095 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6101 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6102 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6104 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6105 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6109 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6110 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6111 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6112 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6115 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6116 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6117 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6118 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6119 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6122 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6123 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6124 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6125 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6128 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6131 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6132 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6133 strlen (token_buffer))
6134 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6135 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6140 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6141 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6145 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6148 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6149 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6150 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6151 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6157 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6158 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6163 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6164 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6165 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6166 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6167 declaration looks like this:
6180 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6185 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6186 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6191 @node Token Locations
6192 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6195 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6196 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6197 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6198 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6199 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6200 data in that variable.
6202 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6203 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6204 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6205 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6206 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6209 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6212 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6214 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6215 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6216 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6217 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6218 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6219 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6224 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6227 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6228 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6233 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6234 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6235 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6238 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6239 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6240 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6241 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6243 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6245 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6246 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6247 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6250 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6252 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6253 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6254 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6255 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6256 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6262 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6263 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6264 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6268 results in the following signatures:
6271 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6272 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6275 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6278 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6279 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6283 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6286 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6287 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6288 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6291 @node Error Reporting
6292 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6293 @cindex error reporting function
6296 @cindex syntax error
6298 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6299 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6300 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6301 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6304 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6305 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6306 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6307 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6308 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6310 @findex %define parse.error
6311 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6312 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6313 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6314 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6315 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6317 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6318 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6319 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6320 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6321 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6322 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6324 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6325 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6326 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6328 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6333 yyerror (char const *s)
6337 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6342 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6343 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6344 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6345 immediately return 1.
6347 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6348 an access to the current location.
6349 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6350 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6351 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6355 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6356 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6359 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6362 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6363 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6366 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6367 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6368 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6369 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6373 /* Location tracking. */
6377 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6379 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6380 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6384 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6387 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6388 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6389 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6390 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6395 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6396 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6397 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6398 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6399 message is always passed last.
6401 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6402 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6403 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6407 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6408 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6409 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6410 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6412 @node Action Features
6413 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6414 @cindex summary, action features
6415 @cindex action features summary
6417 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6418 are useful in actions.
6420 @deffn {Variable} $$
6421 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6422 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6425 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6426 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6427 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6430 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6431 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6432 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6433 Types of Values in Actions}.
6436 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6437 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6438 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6439 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6442 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6443 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6444 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6447 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6448 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6449 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6452 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6454 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6455 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6456 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6457 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6458 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6459 going to be reduced by this rule.
6461 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6462 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6463 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6466 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6469 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6470 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6473 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6474 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6478 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6479 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6480 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6481 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6482 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6483 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6486 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6487 @findex YYRECOVERING
6488 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6489 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6490 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6493 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6494 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6495 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6496 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6497 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6499 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6502 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6503 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6505 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6507 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6510 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6511 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6512 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6513 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6516 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6517 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6518 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6519 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6521 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6524 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6525 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6526 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6527 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6529 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6534 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6535 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6538 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6542 @c int first_line, last_line;
6543 @c int first_column, last_column;
6547 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6548 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6550 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6551 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6552 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6555 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6558 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6560 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6561 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6565 @node Internationalization
6566 @section Parser Internationalization
6567 @cindex internationalization
6573 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6574 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6575 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6576 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6577 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6578 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6579 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6580 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6583 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6584 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6585 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6590 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6591 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6592 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6593 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6594 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6598 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6603 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6604 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6605 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6606 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6607 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6608 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6609 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6610 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6611 Bison-generated parser.
6614 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6615 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6616 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6620 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6623 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6624 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6625 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6629 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6630 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6631 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6634 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6640 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6644 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6650 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6651 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6652 @cindex algorithm of parser
6655 @cindex parser stack
6656 @cindex stack, parser
6658 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6659 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6660 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6662 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6663 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6666 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6667 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6668 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6669 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6670 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6671 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6672 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6674 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6681 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6682 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6685 expr: expr '*' expr;
6689 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6696 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6697 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6699 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6700 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6701 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6703 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6706 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6707 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6708 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6709 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6710 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6711 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6712 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6713 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6714 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6715 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6719 @section Lookahead Tokens
6720 @cindex lookahead token
6722 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6723 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6724 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6725 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6726 token in order to decide what to do.
6728 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6729 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6730 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6731 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6732 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6733 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6734 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6737 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6738 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6739 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6758 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6759 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6760 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6761 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6762 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6764 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6765 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6766 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6767 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6768 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6769 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6774 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6775 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6776 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6777 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6780 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6782 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6783 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6784 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6786 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6787 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6793 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6799 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6800 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6802 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6803 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6804 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6805 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6808 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6809 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6810 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6811 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6812 contrast it with the other alternative.
6814 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6815 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6819 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6821 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6824 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6825 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6826 making these two inputs equivalent:
6829 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6831 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6834 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6835 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6836 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6837 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6838 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6839 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6840 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6841 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6843 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6844 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6845 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6846 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6848 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6850 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6851 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6852 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6857 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6870 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6880 @section Operator Precedence
6881 @cindex operator precedence
6882 @cindex precedence of operators
6884 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6885 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6886 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6887 shift and when to reduce.
6890 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6891 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6892 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6893 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6894 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6897 @node Why Precedence
6898 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6900 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6901 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6916 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6917 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6918 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6919 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6920 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6921 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6922 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6925 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6926 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6927 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6928 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6929 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6930 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6931 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6932 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6935 @cindex associativity
6936 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6937 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6938 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6939 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6940 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6941 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6942 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6943 makes right-associativity.
6945 @node Using Precedence
6946 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6952 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6953 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6954 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6955 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6956 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6957 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6958 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6960 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6961 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6962 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6963 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6964 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6965 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6966 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6967 what expected the grammar author.
6969 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6970 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6971 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6972 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6973 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6975 @node Precedence Only
6976 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6979 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6980 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6981 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6982 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6983 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6984 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6985 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6987 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6988 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6989 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6993 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6996 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6997 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6998 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6999 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7000 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7001 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7002 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7009 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7010 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7011 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7012 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7013 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7014 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7015 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7017 @node Precedence Examples
7018 @subsection Precedence Examples
7020 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7028 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7029 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7030 declared with @code{'-'}:
7033 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
7039 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
7040 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
7041 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
7043 @node How Precedence
7044 @subsection How Precedence Works
7046 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7047 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7048 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7049 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7050 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7051 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7053 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7054 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7055 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7056 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7057 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7058 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7059 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7062 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7063 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7065 @node Contextual Precedence
7066 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7067 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7068 @cindex unary operator precedence
7069 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7070 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7073 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7074 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7075 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7076 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7078 The Bison precedence declarations
7079 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7080 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7081 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7084 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7085 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7086 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7087 modifier's syntax is:
7090 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7094 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7095 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7096 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7097 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7098 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7100 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7101 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7102 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7112 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7120 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7125 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7126 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7127 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7128 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7130 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7131 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7132 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7133 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7135 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7136 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7137 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7138 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7139 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7140 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7142 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7143 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7147 @section Parser States
7148 @cindex finite-state machine
7149 @cindex parser state
7150 @cindex state (of parser)
7152 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7153 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7154 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7155 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7156 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7158 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7159 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7160 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7161 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7162 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7163 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7164 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7165 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7168 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7169 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7170 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7173 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7174 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7175 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7177 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7178 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7181 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7182 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7187 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7189 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7195 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7196 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7202 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7203 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7204 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7205 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7206 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7207 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7209 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7210 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7211 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7213 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7214 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7215 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7216 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7217 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7219 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7220 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7221 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7222 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7226 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7227 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7231 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7237 | sequence redirects
7247 | redirects redirect
7252 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7253 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7254 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7255 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7256 in infinitely many ways!
7258 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7259 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7260 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7261 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7263 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7274 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7282 | sequence redirects
7296 | redirects redirect
7301 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7302 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7303 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7305 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7313 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7316 | name_list ':' type
7332 | name ',' name_list
7337 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7338 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7339 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7340 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7344 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7346 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7347 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7348 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7350 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7351 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7352 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7353 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7354 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7355 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7356 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7359 @cindex canonical LR
7360 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7361 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7362 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7363 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7364 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7365 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7366 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7367 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7369 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7370 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7371 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7372 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7373 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7384 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7389 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7390 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7391 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7392 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7393 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7394 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7396 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7397 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7398 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7399 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7400 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7401 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7406 | name_list ':' type
7414 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7415 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7420 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7421 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7422 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7423 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7424 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7425 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7426 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7428 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7429 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7430 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7431 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7433 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7434 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7437 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7438 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7439 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7440 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7443 @node LR Table Construction
7444 @subsection LR Table Construction
7445 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7448 @cindex canonical LR
7449 @findex %define lr.type
7451 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7452 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7453 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7454 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7457 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7458 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7459 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7460 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7463 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7464 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7465 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7468 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7469 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7470 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7473 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7475 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7478 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7482 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7486 %define lr.type ielr
7489 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7490 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7491 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7492 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7493 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7494 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7495 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7496 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7497 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7498 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7500 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7501 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7502 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7503 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7509 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7512 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7514 @cindex GLR with LALR
7515 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7516 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7517 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7518 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7519 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7520 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7521 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7522 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7523 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7524 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7526 @item Malformed grammars.
7528 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7529 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7530 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7531 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7532 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7537 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7538 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7539 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7540 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7541 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7542 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7543 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7544 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7545 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7549 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7552 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7553 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7554 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7555 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7556 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7557 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7558 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7559 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7560 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7561 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7562 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7563 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7566 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7567 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7568 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7570 @node Default Reductions
7571 @subsection Default Reductions
7572 @cindex default reductions
7573 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7576 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7577 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7578 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7579 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7580 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7582 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7583 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7586 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7588 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7589 @cindex consistent states
7590 @cindex defaulted states
7591 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7592 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7593 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7594 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7595 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7596 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7597 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7598 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7599 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7600 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7601 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7603 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7604 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7605 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7606 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7607 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7608 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7609 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7610 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7611 should already be considered closed.
7613 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7615 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7616 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7617 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7618 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7619 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7620 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7621 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7622 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7623 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7627 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7628 @c sentence from being rejected.
7629 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7630 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7631 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7632 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7633 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7634 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7637 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7638 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7639 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7640 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7641 because the accept action ends the parse.
7643 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7644 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7645 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7646 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7647 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7648 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7649 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7650 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7651 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7652 split the parse instead.
7654 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7655 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7657 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7658 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7659 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7661 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7662 @item @code{consistent}
7663 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7666 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7667 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7672 @findex %define parse.lac
7674 @cindex lookahead correction
7676 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7677 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7678 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7679 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7680 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7681 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7682 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7683 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7684 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7686 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7687 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7688 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7689 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7690 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7692 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7693 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7694 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7695 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7697 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7698 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7700 @item @code{none} (default)
7703 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7704 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7708 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7709 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7710 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7711 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7712 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7713 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7714 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7715 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7716 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7717 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7720 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7721 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7722 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7723 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7724 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7725 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7726 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7727 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7728 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7729 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7731 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7732 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7733 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7734 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7735 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7736 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7737 language-recognition power.
7739 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7742 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7744 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7745 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7746 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7747 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7750 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7752 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7753 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7754 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7755 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7756 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7757 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7761 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7762 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7763 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7764 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7765 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7766 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7767 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7768 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7769 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7770 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7771 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7774 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7775 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7776 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7778 @node Unreachable States
7779 @subsection Unreachable States
7780 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7781 @cindex unreachable states
7783 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7784 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7785 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7786 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7788 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7789 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7790 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7791 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7793 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7794 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7795 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7798 There are a few caveats to consider:
7801 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7803 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7804 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7805 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7806 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7807 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7808 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7810 @item Other useless states.
7812 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7813 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7814 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7815 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7816 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7817 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7818 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7821 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7822 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7824 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7825 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7826 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7828 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7829 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7830 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7831 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7832 context-free languages.
7833 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7834 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7835 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7836 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7837 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7838 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7839 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7840 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7842 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7843 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7844 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7845 parser uses the same basic
7846 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7847 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7848 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7849 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7851 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7852 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7853 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7854 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7855 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7857 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7858 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7859 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7860 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7861 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7862 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7863 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7864 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7865 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7866 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7867 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7870 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7871 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7872 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7873 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7874 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7875 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7876 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7877 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7878 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7879 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7880 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7881 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7883 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7884 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7885 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7887 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7888 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7889 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7890 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7891 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7892 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7893 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7894 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7895 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7896 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7897 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7898 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7900 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7903 @node Memory Management
7904 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7905 @cindex memory exhaustion
7906 @cindex memory management
7907 @cindex stack overflow
7908 @cindex parser stack overflow
7909 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7911 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7912 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7913 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7915 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7916 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7917 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7920 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7921 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7922 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7923 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7925 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7926 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7927 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7928 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7929 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7930 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7932 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7933 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7934 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7937 @cindex default stack limit
7938 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7942 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7943 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7944 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7945 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7946 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7948 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7950 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7951 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7952 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7953 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7954 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7955 non-trivial copy constructors.
7956 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7959 @node Error Recovery
7960 @chapter Error Recovery
7961 @cindex error recovery
7962 @cindex recovery from errors
7964 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7965 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7966 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7969 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7970 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7971 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7972 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7973 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7974 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7975 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7978 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7979 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7980 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7981 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7982 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7983 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7995 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7996 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7998 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7999 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8000 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8001 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8002 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8003 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8004 applicable in the ordinary way.
8006 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8007 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8008 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8009 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8010 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8011 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8012 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8013 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8014 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8015 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8016 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8017 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8019 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8020 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8021 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8024 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8027 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8028 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8029 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8030 spurious error message:
8040 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8041 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8042 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8043 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8044 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8045 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8046 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8049 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8050 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8051 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8052 error messages resume.
8054 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8055 as any other rules can.
8058 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8059 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8060 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8061 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8064 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8065 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8066 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8068 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8070 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8071 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8072 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8073 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8074 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8076 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8077 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8078 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8079 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8082 @node Context Dependency
8083 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8085 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8086 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8087 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8088 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8092 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8093 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8094 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8095 error recovery rules must be written.
8098 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8099 neither clean nor robust.)
8101 @node Semantic Tokens
8102 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8104 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8105 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8111 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8112 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8113 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8115 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8116 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8117 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8118 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8119 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8121 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8122 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8123 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8124 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8125 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8126 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8127 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8129 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8130 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8131 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8132 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8136 typedef int foo, bar;
8140 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8141 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8147 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8148 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8150 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8151 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8152 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8153 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8154 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8159 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8160 | declarator maybeasm
8166 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8167 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8173 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8174 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8175 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8177 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8178 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8179 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8180 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8181 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8182 the syntactic context.
8184 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8185 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8186 @cindex lexical tie-in
8188 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8189 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8192 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8193 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8194 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8195 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8196 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8203 void yyerror (char const *);
8212 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8213 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8214 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8228 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8229 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8230 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8232 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8233 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8234 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8237 @node Tie-in Recovery
8238 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8240 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8241 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8243 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8244 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8245 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8246 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8251 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8253 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8257 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8258 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8259 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8260 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8261 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8263 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8265 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8266 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8267 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8273 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8279 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8280 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8281 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8282 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8284 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8285 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8286 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8287 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8288 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8289 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8292 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8295 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8297 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8298 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8299 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8300 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8303 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8304 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8308 @section Understanding Your Parser
8310 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8311 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8312 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8313 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8314 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8316 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8317 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8318 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8319 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8320 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8321 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8322 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8324 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8342 @command{bison} reports:
8345 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8346 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8347 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8348 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8349 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8352 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8353 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8354 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8355 interpretation is the same.
8358 @cindex token, useless
8359 @cindex useless token
8360 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8361 @cindex useless nonterminal
8362 @cindex rule, useless
8363 @cindex useless rule
8364 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8365 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8366 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8367 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8370 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8373 Terminals unused in grammar
8376 Rules useless in grammar
8381 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8384 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8385 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8386 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8387 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8391 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8406 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8410 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8423 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8428 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8434 @cindex pointed rule
8435 @cindex rule, pointed
8436 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8437 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8438 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8439 the location of the input cursor.
8444 0 $accept: . exp $end
8446 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8451 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8452 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8453 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8454 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8455 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8456 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8457 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8458 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8460 @cindex core, item set
8461 @cindex item set core
8462 @cindex kernel, item set
8463 @cindex item set core
8464 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8465 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8466 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8467 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8468 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8469 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8474 0 $accept: . exp $end
8475 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8481 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8487 In the state 1@dots{}
8494 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8498 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8499 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8500 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8501 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8506 0 $accept: exp . $end
8507 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8512 $end shift, and go to state 3
8513 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8514 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8515 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8516 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8520 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8521 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8522 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8523 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8524 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8527 @cindex accepting state
8528 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8534 0 $accept: exp $end .
8540 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8541 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8543 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8549 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8551 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8558 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8560 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8567 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8569 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8576 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8578 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8583 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8589 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8595 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8596 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8598 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8599 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8602 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8603 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8604 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8605 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8606 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8607 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8608 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8609 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8611 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8612 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8613 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8616 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8617 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8618 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8619 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8620 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8621 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8622 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8623 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8624 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8625 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8626 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8627 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8632 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8633 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8638 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8639 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8641 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8642 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8645 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8646 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8647 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8648 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8649 conflicts in the report:
8652 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8653 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8654 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8658 The remaining states are similar:
8664 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8670 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8671 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8673 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8674 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8680 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8686 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8688 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8689 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8695 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8701 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8702 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8703 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8704 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8706 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8707 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8708 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8709 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8710 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8715 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8716 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8717 @samp{*}, but also because the
8718 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8722 @section Tracing Your Parser
8725 @cindex tracing the parser
8727 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8728 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8731 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8732 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8733 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8736 @node Enabling Traces
8737 @subsection Enabling Traces
8738 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8741 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8743 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8744 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8745 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8746 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8749 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8750 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8751 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8753 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8755 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8756 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8757 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8759 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8760 @findex %define parse.trace
8761 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
8762 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8763 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8764 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
8765 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
8768 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8772 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8773 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8774 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8775 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8776 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8777 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8779 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8780 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8781 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8782 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8784 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8785 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8786 messages tell you these things:
8790 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8793 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8794 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8797 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8798 of the state stack afterward.
8801 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8802 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8803 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8804 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8805 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8806 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8807 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8808 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8809 grammar are to blame.
8811 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8812 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8813 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8814 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8815 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8818 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8820 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8821 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8822 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8823 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8824 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8825 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8827 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8828 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8829 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8832 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8834 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8836 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8839 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8840 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8841 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8842 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8845 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8846 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8847 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8848 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8849 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8850 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8852 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8853 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8854 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8855 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8856 printer will be used for them.
8858 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8859 are sent onto standard error.
8862 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8865 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8866 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8872 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8873 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8874 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8875 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8877 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8879 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8880 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8885 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8886 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8887 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8891 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8892 Shifting token '(' ()
8894 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8895 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8897 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8898 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8899 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8905 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8906 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8907 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8910 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8911 Shifting token '-' ()
8913 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8914 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8916 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8917 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8918 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8919 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8921 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8922 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8923 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8925 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8926 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8932 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8933 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8936 Next token is token ')' ()
8937 Shifting token ')' ()
8939 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8940 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8942 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8944 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8950 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8954 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8955 Shifting token '\n' ()
8957 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8958 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8961 -> $$ = nterm line ()
8964 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8967 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8972 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8973 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8974 completion of the parsing.
8977 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8978 Shifting token $end ()
8981 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8982 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8986 @node The YYPRINT Macro
8987 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8990 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8991 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8992 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8994 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8996 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8997 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8998 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9000 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9003 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9004 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9008 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9009 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9010 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9013 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9016 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9019 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9020 else if (type == NUM)
9021 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9025 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9028 @chapter Invoking Bison
9029 @cindex invoking Bison
9030 @cindex Bison invocation
9031 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9033 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9039 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9040 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9041 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9042 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9043 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9044 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9045 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9046 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9047 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9048 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9049 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9054 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9057 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9060 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9063 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9065 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9066 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9067 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9070 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9071 in alphabetical order by short options.
9072 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9073 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9077 @section Bison Options
9079 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9080 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9081 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9082 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9083 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9086 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9087 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9090 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9096 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9100 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9102 @item --print-localedir
9103 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9105 @item --print-datadir
9106 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9110 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9111 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9112 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9113 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9114 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9115 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9116 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9117 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9118 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9119 for compatibility with POSIX:
9126 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9127 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9128 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9129 this option is specified.
9131 @item -W [@var{category}]
9132 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9133 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9136 @item midrule-values
9137 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9139 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9142 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9145 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9146 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9149 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9152 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9153 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9154 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9157 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9161 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9162 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9163 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9164 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9165 no effect on the conflict report.
9168 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9170 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9171 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9177 Turn off all the warnings.
9179 Treat warnings as errors.
9182 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9183 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9184 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9193 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9194 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9195 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9197 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9198 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9199 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9200 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9201 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9202 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9203 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9207 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9210 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9211 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9212 definition for @var{name}.
9214 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9215 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9216 definitions for @var{name}.
9218 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9219 definitions for @var{name}.
9222 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9223 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9224 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9226 @item -L @var{language}
9227 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9228 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9229 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9230 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9231 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9233 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9237 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9239 @item -p @var{prefix}
9240 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9241 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
9242 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9246 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9247 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9248 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9249 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9250 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9251 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9254 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9255 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9256 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9258 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9259 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9260 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9261 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9263 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9264 file in the Bison installation directory.
9265 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9266 current working directory.
9267 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9270 @itemx --token-table
9271 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9278 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9279 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9280 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9281 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9284 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9285 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9286 with other short options.
9288 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9289 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9290 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9291 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9293 @item -r @var{things}
9294 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9295 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9296 separated list of @var{things} among:
9300 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9304 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9305 each rule's lookahead set.
9308 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9309 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9312 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9313 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9317 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9318 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9319 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9322 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9323 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9325 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9326 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9328 @item -g [@var{file}]
9329 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9330 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9331 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9332 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9333 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9334 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9337 @item -x [@var{file}]
9338 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9339 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9340 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9341 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9343 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9344 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9347 @node Option Cross Key
9348 @section Option Cross Key
9350 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9351 the corresponding short option and directive.
9353 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9354 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9355 @include cross-options.texi
9359 @section Yacc Library
9361 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9362 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9363 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9364 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9365 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9366 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9367 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9369 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9370 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9373 int yyerror (char const *);
9376 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9377 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9378 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9384 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9386 @node Other Languages
9387 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9390 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9391 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9395 @section C++ Parsers
9398 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9399 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9400 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9401 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9402 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9403 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9406 @node C++ Bison Interface
9407 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9408 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9412 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9413 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9414 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9415 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9417 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9419 @findex %define api.namespace
9420 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9421 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9422 in the following files:
9427 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9428 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9431 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9434 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9435 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9436 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9437 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9438 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9440 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9441 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9442 @samp{%defines} directive.
9445 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9446 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9448 @node C++ Semantic Values
9449 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9450 @c - No objects in unions
9452 @c - Printer and destructor
9454 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9455 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9456 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9457 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9460 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9461 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9465 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9467 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9468 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9469 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9472 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9473 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9474 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9476 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9477 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9478 to such objects are allowed.
9481 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9482 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9483 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9487 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9489 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9490 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9491 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9492 types can be used without pointers.
9494 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9495 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9496 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9497 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9499 For instance, instead of
9507 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9508 %token <sval> STRING;
9515 %token <int> NUMBER;
9516 %token <std::string> STRING;
9519 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9520 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9523 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9524 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9525 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9527 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9528 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9529 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9530 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9531 eventually, destroyed.
9533 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9534 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9535 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9538 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9539 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9543 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9544 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9545 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9546 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9547 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9548 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9549 that would be duplicating the information.
9551 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9552 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9553 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9554 (the current implementation of) variants:
9557 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9558 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9559 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9560 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9561 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9562 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9565 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9566 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9567 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9568 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9569 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9570 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9573 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9576 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9577 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9579 @node C++ Location Values
9580 @subsection C++ Location Values
9584 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9586 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9587 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9588 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9589 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9593 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9594 genuine code only the latter is used.
9597 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9598 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9602 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9604 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9605 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9606 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9610 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9611 Reset the position to the given values.
9614 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9615 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9616 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9617 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9618 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9621 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9622 The line, starting at 1.
9625 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9626 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9629 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9630 The column, starting at 1.
9633 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9634 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9637 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9638 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9639 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9640 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9641 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9644 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9645 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9646 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9649 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9650 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9651 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9652 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9656 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9658 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9659 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9662 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9663 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9664 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9667 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9668 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9671 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9672 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9673 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9676 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9677 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9678 Advance the @code{end} position.
9681 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9682 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9683 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9684 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9687 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9688 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9691 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9692 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9693 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9697 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9698 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9699 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9702 @node C++ Parser Interface
9703 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9704 @c - define parser_class_name
9706 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9708 @c - Reporting errors
9710 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9711 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9712 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9713 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9714 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9715 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9716 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9717 additional argument for its constructor.
9719 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9720 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9721 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9724 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9725 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9726 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9727 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9728 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9729 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9732 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9733 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9734 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
9735 equivalent with first
9736 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9737 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9738 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9739 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9740 function invoked from the user action.
9743 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9744 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9745 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9748 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9749 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9750 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9753 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9754 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9757 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9758 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9759 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9763 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9764 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9765 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9766 or nonzero, full tracing.
9769 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9770 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9771 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9772 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9773 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9778 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9779 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9780 @c - prefix for yylex.
9781 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9784 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9785 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9786 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9787 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9790 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9791 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9795 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9797 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9799 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9800 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9801 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9802 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9803 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9806 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9807 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9809 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9813 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9814 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9817 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9818 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9822 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9823 initialized. So the code would look like:
9827 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9828 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9831 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9832 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9841 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9842 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9845 yylval.build(yytext);
9846 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9851 @node Complete Symbols
9852 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9854 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9855 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9856 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9857 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9858 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9860 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9861 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9862 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9866 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9867 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9868 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9869 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9871 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9873 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9874 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9875 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9876 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9877 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9878 also pass the @var{location}.
9881 For instance, given the following declarations:
9884 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9885 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9886 %token <int> INTEGER;
9891 Bison generates the following functions:
9894 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9895 const location_type& l);
9896 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9897 const location_type& loc);
9898 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9902 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9905 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9906 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9907 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9910 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9911 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9913 @node A Complete C++ Example
9914 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9916 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9917 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9918 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9919 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9920 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9921 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9922 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9923 actually easier to interface with.
9926 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9927 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9928 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9929 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9930 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9933 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9934 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9936 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9937 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9938 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9939 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9940 of valid input follows.
9944 seven := one + two * three
9948 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9949 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9951 @c - A place to store error messages
9952 @c - A place for the result
9954 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9955 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9956 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9957 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9958 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9959 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9960 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9962 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9963 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9964 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9967 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9969 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9970 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9973 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9978 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9979 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9980 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9981 factor both as follows.
9983 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9985 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9987 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9988 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9993 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9996 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9998 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10003 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10005 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10011 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10012 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10014 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10016 // Handling the scanner.
10017 void scan_begin ();
10019 bool trace_scanning;
10023 Similarly for the parser itself.
10025 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10027 // Run the parser on file F.
10028 // Return 0 on success.
10029 int parse (const std::string& f);
10030 // The name of the file being parsed.
10031 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10033 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10034 bool trace_parsing;
10038 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10039 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10040 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10041 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10043 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10046 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10047 void error (const std::string& m);
10049 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10052 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10053 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10054 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10055 messages and set error state.
10057 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10059 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10060 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10062 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10063 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10065 variables["one"] = 1;
10066 variables["two"] = 2;
10069 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10074 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10078 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10079 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10080 int res = parser.parse ();
10086 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
10088 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
10092 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
10094 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
10098 @node Calc++ Parser
10099 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
10101 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
10102 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10103 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10104 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10107 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10109 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10110 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10112 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10116 @findex %define variant
10117 @findex %define lex_symbol
10118 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
10119 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
10120 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
10121 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
10123 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10126 %define parse.assert
10131 @findex %code requires
10132 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
10133 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
10134 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
10135 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
10136 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10137 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
10138 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
10140 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10145 class calcxx_driver;
10150 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10151 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10154 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10156 // The parsing context.
10157 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10161 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
10162 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10163 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10166 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10171 // Initialize the initial location.
10172 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10177 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10178 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10181 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10183 %define parse.trace
10184 %define parse.error verbose
10189 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10190 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10192 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10196 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10202 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10203 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
10204 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
10205 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
10206 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.tokens.prefix}).
10208 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10210 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
10212 END 0 "end of file"
10224 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
10225 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
10228 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10230 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10231 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
10236 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
10237 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
10238 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
10241 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10242 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10244 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
10248 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
10249 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
10251 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10255 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10258 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10259 | assignments assignment @{@};
10262 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
10267 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10268 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10269 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10270 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10271 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
10272 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
10273 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
10278 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10281 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10284 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
10285 const std::string& m)
10287 driver.error (l, m);
10291 @node Calc++ Scanner
10292 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10294 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10295 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10297 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10299 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10301 # include <climits>
10302 # include <cstdlib>
10304 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10305 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10307 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10308 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10309 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10310 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10312 # define yywrap() 1
10314 // The location of the current token.
10315 static yy::location loc;
10320 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10321 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10322 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10323 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10325 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10327 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10331 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10333 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10335 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10341 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10342 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10343 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10344 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10345 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10346 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10347 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10349 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10353 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10354 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10360 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10364 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10365 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10369 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10371 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10373 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10374 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10375 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10376 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10377 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10378 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10379 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10384 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10385 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10386 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10387 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10390 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10391 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10392 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10397 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10398 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10400 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10404 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10406 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10407 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10409 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10411 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10412 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10419 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10426 @node Calc++ Top Level
10427 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10429 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10431 @comment file: calc++.cc
10433 #include <iostream>
10434 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10438 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10441 calcxx_driver driver;
10442 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10443 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10444 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10445 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10446 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10447 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10448 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10457 @section Java Parsers
10460 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10461 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10462 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10463 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10464 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10465 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10466 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10467 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10470 @node Java Bison Interface
10471 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10472 @c - %language "Java"
10474 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10475 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10477 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10478 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10480 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10481 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10482 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10483 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10484 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10485 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10486 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10487 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10488 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10489 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10491 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10493 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10494 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10495 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10496 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10499 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10500 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10502 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10503 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10505 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10506 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10508 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10509 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10510 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10512 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10513 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10514 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10516 if needed. Also, in the future the
10517 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10518 access the token names and codes.
10520 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10521 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10522 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10523 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10526 @node Java Semantic Values
10527 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10528 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10530 @c - Printer and destructor
10532 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10533 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10534 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10537 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10538 %type <Integer> number
10541 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10542 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10543 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10544 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10545 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10548 %define stype "ASTNode"
10552 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10553 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10555 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10556 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10557 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10558 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10559 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10560 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10562 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10563 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10564 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10566 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10567 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10568 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10571 @node Java Location Values
10572 @subsection Java Location Values
10574 @c - class Position
10575 @c - class Location
10577 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10578 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10579 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10580 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10581 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10582 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10583 renamed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10585 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10586 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10587 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10588 be supplied by the user.
10591 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10592 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10593 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10596 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10597 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10600 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10601 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10604 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10605 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10606 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10607 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10611 @node Java Parser Interface
10612 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10613 @c - define parser_class_name
10615 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10617 @c - Reporting errors
10619 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10620 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10621 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10622 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10623 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10625 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10626 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10627 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10628 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10629 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10630 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10631 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10632 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10634 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10635 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10636 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10637 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10639 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10640 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10641 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10642 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10643 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10644 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10646 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10647 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10648 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10649 which initialize them automatically.
10651 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10652 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10653 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10654 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10656 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10657 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10658 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10661 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10662 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10663 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
10666 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10667 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10668 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
10670 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10671 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10672 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10675 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10676 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10677 @code{false} otherwise.
10680 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
10681 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
10682 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
10683 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
10684 verbose error messages.
10687 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10688 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
10689 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10690 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10691 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10692 available only if location tracking is active.
10695 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10696 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10697 from a syntax error.
10698 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10701 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10702 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10703 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10707 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10708 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10709 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10710 or nonzero, full tracing.
10713 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
10714 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
10715 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
10719 @node Java Scanner Interface
10720 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10723 @c - Lexer interface
10725 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10726 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10727 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10728 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10729 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10732 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10733 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10734 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10735 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10738 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10739 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10740 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10741 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10744 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10746 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10747 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10748 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10749 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10752 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10753 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10754 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10757 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10758 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10761 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10762 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10763 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10764 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10765 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10767 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10768 "@var{class-name}".}
10771 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10772 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10774 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10775 "@var{class-name}".}
10779 @node Java Action Features
10780 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10782 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10783 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10785 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10786 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10789 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10790 This may not be assigned to.
10791 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10794 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10795 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10796 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10800 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10801 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10802 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10803 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10804 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10805 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10808 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10809 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10810 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10811 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10813 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10817 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10818 This may not be assigned to.
10819 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10823 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10824 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10827 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10828 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10829 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10832 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10833 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10834 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10837 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10838 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10839 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10842 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10843 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10844 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10846 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10849 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10850 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10851 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10852 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10853 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10854 available only if location tracking is active.
10858 @node Java Differences
10859 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10861 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10862 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10863 section summarizes these differences.
10867 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10868 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10869 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10870 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10871 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10872 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10873 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10875 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10876 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10877 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10878 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10879 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10882 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10883 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10884 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10885 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10886 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10887 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10888 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10889 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10890 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10893 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10895 @item @code{%code imports}
10896 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10897 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10898 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10900 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10901 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10903 @item @code{%code lexer}
10904 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10905 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10906 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10910 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10911 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10912 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10914 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10915 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10920 @node Java Declarations Summary
10921 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10923 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10924 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10926 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10927 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10930 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10931 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10932 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10933 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10934 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10937 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10938 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10939 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10940 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10943 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10944 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10945 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10946 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10949 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10950 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10951 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10954 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10955 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10956 a Java @emph{type}.
10957 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10960 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10961 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10962 @xref{Java Differences}.
10965 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10966 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10967 @xref{Java Differences}.
10970 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10971 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10972 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10975 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10976 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10977 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10980 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10981 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10982 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10983 @xref{Java Differences}.
10986 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10987 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10988 @xref{Java Differences}.
10991 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10992 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10993 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10996 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10997 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10998 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11001 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11002 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11003 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11006 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11007 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11008 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11011 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11012 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11014 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11017 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11018 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11019 constructor. Default is none.
11020 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11023 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11024 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11025 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11026 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11029 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
11030 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11031 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11032 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11033 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11036 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11037 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11038 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11041 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11042 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11043 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11044 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11047 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
11048 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11049 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11050 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11053 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11054 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11055 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11058 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
11059 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11060 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11063 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11064 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11065 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11068 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11069 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11070 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11071 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11075 @c ================================================= FAQ
11078 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11079 @cindex frequently asked questions
11082 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11086 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11087 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
11088 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
11089 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
11090 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
11091 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
11092 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
11093 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
11094 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
11095 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
11096 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
11097 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
11100 @node Memory Exhausted
11101 @section Memory Exhausted
11104 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
11105 message. What can I do?
11108 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11111 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
11112 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
11114 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
11115 following typical questions:
11118 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
11119 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
11120 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
11127 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
11128 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
11129 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
11132 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
11133 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
11134 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
11135 demonstration, consider the following source file,
11136 @file{first-line.l}:
11142 #include <stdlib.h>
11146 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
11150 yyparse (char const *file)
11152 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
11156 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11160 /* One token only. */
11162 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
11165 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11183 If the file @file{input} contains
11191 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11194 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11195 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11196 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11201 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11202 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11203 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11204 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11205 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11206 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11207 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11208 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11211 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11212 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11213 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11214 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11216 @node Strings are Destroyed
11217 @section Strings are Destroyed
11220 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11221 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11222 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11225 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11226 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11227 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11233 char *yylval = NULL;
11238 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11246 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11247 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11248 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11249 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11255 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11258 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11259 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11260 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11266 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11267 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11268 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11269 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11270 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11271 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11274 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11275 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11276 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11281 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11282 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11285 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11286 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11289 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11290 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11291 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11292 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11293 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11294 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11295 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11297 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11299 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11300 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11301 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11302 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11303 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11304 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11307 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11308 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11311 @node Multiple start-symbols
11312 @section Multiple start-symbols
11315 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11316 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11317 multiple entry points.
11320 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11321 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11322 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11323 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11327 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11334 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11335 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11337 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11338 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11339 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11340 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11341 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11342 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11343 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11344 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11347 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11352 int t = start_token;
11357 /* @r{The rules.} */
11361 @node Secure? Conform?
11362 @section Secure? Conform?
11365 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11368 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11369 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11370 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11371 please send us a bug report.
11373 @node I can't build Bison
11374 @section I can't build Bison
11377 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11378 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11382 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11383 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11384 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11385 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11386 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11387 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11388 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11391 @node Where can I find help?
11392 @section Where can I find help?
11395 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11398 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11399 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11400 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11401 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11402 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11403 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11404 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11405 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11409 @section Bug Reports
11412 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11415 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11416 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11417 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11418 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11419 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11421 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11422 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11423 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11424 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11425 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11427 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11428 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11429 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11430 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11431 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11432 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11434 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11435 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11437 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11439 @node More Languages
11440 @section More Languages
11443 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11444 favorite language here}?
11447 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11448 languages; contributions are welcome.
11451 @section Beta Testing
11454 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11457 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11458 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11459 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11460 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11461 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11462 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11463 essentially halted.
11465 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11466 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11467 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11468 systems are especially welcome.
11470 @node Mailing Lists
11471 @section Mailing Lists
11474 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11477 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11479 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11481 @node Table of Symbols
11482 @appendix Bison Symbols
11483 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11484 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11486 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11487 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11488 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11491 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11492 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11493 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11496 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11497 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11501 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11502 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11506 @deffn {Variable} $$
11507 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11511 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11512 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11513 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11516 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11517 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11521 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11522 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11526 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11527 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11528 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11529 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11532 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11533 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11534 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11535 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11536 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11540 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11541 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11542 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11543 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11544 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11545 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11546 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11548 This feature is experimental.
11549 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11553 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11554 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11557 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11558 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11562 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11563 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11566 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11567 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11568 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11571 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11572 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11575 This feature is experimental.
11576 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11579 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11582 @deffn {Directive} <>
11583 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11586 This feature is experimental.
11587 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11590 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11593 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11594 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11595 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11596 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11599 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11600 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11601 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11602 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11603 @xref{%code Summary}.
11606 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11607 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11611 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11612 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11613 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11618 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11619 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11620 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11621 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11624 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11625 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11626 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11629 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11630 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11631 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11634 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11635 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11636 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11639 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11640 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11641 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11645 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11646 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11647 used in the grammar.
11650 @deffn {Symbol} error
11651 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11652 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11653 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11654 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11655 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11656 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11657 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11658 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11661 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11662 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
11663 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11666 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11667 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11671 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11672 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11673 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11676 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11677 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11680 @deffn {Directive} %language
11681 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11682 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11685 @deffn {Directive} %left
11686 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
11687 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11690 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11691 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
11692 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11696 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11697 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11698 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11699 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11700 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11703 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11704 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11708 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11709 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11710 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11715 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11716 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11717 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11720 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11721 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
11722 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11725 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11726 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11727 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11730 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11731 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
11732 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
11733 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11736 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11737 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
11738 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11741 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11742 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11743 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11746 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
11747 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
11748 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11751 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11752 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11753 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11754 unreasonable usage.
11757 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11758 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11759 Require a Version of Bison}.
11762 @deffn {Directive} %right
11763 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11764 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11767 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11768 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11769 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11772 @deffn {Directive} %start
11773 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11777 @deffn {Directive} %token
11778 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11779 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11782 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11783 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11784 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11787 @deffn {Directive} %type
11788 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11789 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11792 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11793 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11794 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11798 @deffn {Directive} %union
11799 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11800 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11803 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11804 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11805 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11806 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11807 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11809 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11813 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11814 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11815 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11816 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11818 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11822 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11823 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11824 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11827 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11828 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11829 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11830 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11831 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11834 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11835 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11836 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11839 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11840 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11841 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11844 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11845 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11846 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11847 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11850 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11851 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11852 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11855 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11856 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11857 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11858 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11859 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11860 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11862 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11866 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11867 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11868 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11871 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11872 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11873 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11874 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11875 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11876 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11877 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11880 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11881 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11882 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11885 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11886 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11887 @xref{Memory Management}.
11890 @deffn {Function} yylex
11891 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11892 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11896 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11897 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11898 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11899 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11900 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11903 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11904 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11905 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11906 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11908 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11910 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11911 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11912 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11915 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11916 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11917 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11920 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11921 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11922 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11923 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11925 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11926 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11927 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11930 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11931 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11935 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11936 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11937 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11938 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11939 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11942 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11943 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11944 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11947 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11948 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11949 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11950 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11953 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11954 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11955 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11956 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11957 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11958 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11959 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11962 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11963 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11964 call this function to create a new parser.
11965 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11966 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11967 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11968 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11971 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11972 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11973 parse the rest of the input stream.
11974 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11975 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11976 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11977 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11980 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11981 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11982 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11983 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11984 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11985 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11988 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11989 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11990 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11991 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11992 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11995 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11996 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11997 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11998 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12001 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12002 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12003 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12004 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12005 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12006 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12007 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12009 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12010 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12011 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12012 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12013 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12014 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12015 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12018 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12019 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12020 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12028 @item Accepting state
12029 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12030 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12031 @xref{Understanding,,}.
12033 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12034 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12035 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12036 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12037 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12039 @item Consistent state
12040 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12042 @item Context-free grammars
12043 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12044 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12045 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12046 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12049 @item Default reduction
12050 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12051 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12052 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12053 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12056 @item Defaulted state
12057 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12059 @item Dynamic allocation
12060 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12061 compile time or on entry to a function.
12064 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12065 character string of length zero.
12067 @item Finite-state stack machine
12068 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12069 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12070 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12071 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12072 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12073 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12075 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12076 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12077 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12078 deterministic parsing
12079 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
12080 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
12081 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
12085 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
12086 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
12087 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12089 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
12090 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
12091 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
12092 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
12093 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
12094 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
12095 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
12096 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
12097 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
12098 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
12100 @item Infix operator
12101 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
12102 performs some operation.
12105 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
12107 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
12108 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
12109 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
12110 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
12111 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
12112 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
12113 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
12115 @item Language construct
12116 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
12117 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
12118 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12120 @item Left associativity
12121 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
12122 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
12123 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
12125 @item Left recursion
12126 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
12127 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12130 @item Left-to-right parsing
12131 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
12132 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12134 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
12135 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
12136 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
12138 @item Lexical tie-in
12139 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
12140 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
12142 @item Literal string token
12143 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
12145 @item Lookahead token
12146 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
12150 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
12151 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
12152 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
12155 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
12156 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
12158 @item Nonterminal symbol
12159 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
12160 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
12161 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
12164 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
12165 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
12168 @item Postfix operator
12169 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
12170 performs some operation.
12173 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
12174 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
12178 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
12179 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
12180 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
12182 @item Reverse polish notation
12183 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
12185 @item Right recursion
12186 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
12187 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12191 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12192 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12193 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12196 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12197 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12198 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12200 @item Single-character literal
12201 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12202 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12205 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12206 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12207 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12208 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12211 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12212 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12213 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12216 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12217 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12220 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12221 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12222 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12223 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12225 @item Terminal symbol
12226 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12227 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12228 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12230 @item Unreachable state
12231 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12232 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12233 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12236 @node Copying This Manual
12237 @appendix Copying This Manual
12241 @unnumbered Bibliography
12245 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12246 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12247 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12248 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12250 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12251 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12252 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12253 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12254 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12256 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12257 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12258 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12259 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12260 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12262 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12263 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12264 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12265 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12266 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12269 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12270 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12271 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12274 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12275 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12276 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12277 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12287 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12288 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12289 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12290 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12291 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12292 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12293 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12294 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12295 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12296 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12297 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12298 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12299 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12300 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12301 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12302 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12303 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12304 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12305 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12306 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12307 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12308 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12309 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12310 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12311 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12312 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12313 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12314 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12315 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12316 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12317 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12318 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12319 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12320 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12321 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12322 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12323 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12324 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12325 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12326 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12327 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12328 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12329 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12330 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12331 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12332 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12333 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12334 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12335 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12336 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
12337 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12338 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy
12339 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american
12341 @c Local Variables:
12342 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"