]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - tests/conflicts.at
doc: fixes in the C++ part
[bison.git] / tests / conflicts.at
1 # Exercising Bison on conflicts. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3 # Copyright (C) 2002-2005, 2007-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
9 #
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
14 #
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18 AT_BANNER([[Conflicts.]])
19
20 ## ------------------------- ##
21 ## Token declaration order. ##
22 ## ------------------------- ##
23
24 # This test checks that token are declared left to right when in a precedence
25 # statement.
26
27 AT_SETUP([Token declaration order])
28
29 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
30
31 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
32 [[%code {
33 #include <stdio.h>
34 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
35 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
36 }
37 %token A B C
38 %token D
39 %right E F G
40 %right H I
41 %right J
42 %left K
43 %left L M N
44 %nonassoc O P Q
45 %precedence R S T U
46 %precedence V W
47 %%
48 exp: A
49 %%
50 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
51 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE[
52 int main (void)
53 {
54 assert (A < B);
55 assert (B < C);
56 assert (C < D);
57 assert (D < E);
58 assert (E < F);
59 assert (F < G);
60 assert (G < H);
61 assert (H < I);
62 assert (I < J);
63 assert (J < K);
64 assert (K < L);
65 assert (L < M);
66 assert (M < N);
67 assert (N < O);
68 assert (O < P);
69 assert (P < Q);
70 assert (Q < R);
71 assert (R < S);
72 assert (S < T);
73 assert (T < U);
74 assert (U < V);
75 assert (V < W);
76 return 0;
77 }
78 ]])
79
80 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
81 AT_COMPILE([input])
82
83 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input])
84
85 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
86
87 AT_CLEANUP
88
89
90 ## --------------------------------------------------- ##
91 ## Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers. ##
92 ## --------------------------------------------------- ##
93
94 # This test checks that when several tokens are declared by the same keyword,
95 # some of them defined as a character ('a'), others as simple textual reference
96 # (A), they are declared correctly left to right.
97 # Previously, the following test would declare the states in the order 'o' 'p'
98 # M N, instead of M N 'o' 'p'.
99
100 AT_SETUP([Token declaration order: literals vs. identifiers])
101
102 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
103 [[%token 'a' 'b' C D
104 %token E F 'g' 'h'
105 %right 'i' 'j' K L
106 %right M N 'o' 'p'
107 %%
108 exp: 'a'
109 | 'b'
110 | C
111 | D
112 | E
113 | F
114 | 'g'
115 | 'h'
116 | 'i'
117 | 'j'
118 | K
119 | L
120 | M
121 | N
122 | 'o'
123 | 'p'
124 ;
125 %%
126 ]])
127
128 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
129 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
130 [[State 0
131
132 0 $accept: . exp $end
133 1 exp: . 'a'
134 2 | . 'b'
135 3 | . C
136 4 | . D
137 5 | . E
138 6 | . F
139 7 | . 'g'
140 8 | . 'h'
141 9 | . 'i'
142 10 | . 'j'
143 11 | . K
144 12 | . L
145 13 | . M
146 14 | . N
147 15 | . 'o'
148 16 | . 'p'
149
150 'a' shift, and go to state 1
151 'b' shift, and go to state 2
152 C shift, and go to state 3
153 D shift, and go to state 4
154 E shift, and go to state 5
155 F shift, and go to state 6
156 'g' shift, and go to state 7
157 'h' shift, and go to state 8
158 'i' shift, and go to state 9
159 'j' shift, and go to state 10
160 K shift, and go to state 11
161 L shift, and go to state 12
162 M shift, and go to state 13
163 N shift, and go to state 14
164 'o' shift, and go to state 15
165 'p' shift, and go to state 16
166
167 exp go to state 17
168
169
170 State 1
171 ]])
172
173 AT_CLEANUP
174
175
176 ## ------------------------------- ##
177 ## Useless associativity warning. ##
178 ## ------------------------------- ##
179
180 AT_SETUP([Useless associativity warning])
181
182 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
183 [[%token EQ "=" PL "+" ST "*" LP "("
184 %nonassoc "="
185 %left "+"
186 %left "*"
187 %precedence "("
188 %%
189 stmt:
190 exp
191 | "var" "=" exp
192 ;
193
194 exp:
195 exp "+" exp
196 | exp "*" "num"
197 | "(" exp ")"
198 | "num"
199 ;
200 ]])
201
202 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence input.y], 0, [],
203 [[input.y:2.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for "=" [-Wprecedence]
204 input.y:4.1-5: warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence [-Wprecedence]
205 input.y:5.1-11: warning: useless precedence for "(" [-Wprecedence]
206 ]])
207
208 AT_CLEANUP
209
210
211 ## ---------------------------- ##
212 ## Useless precedence warning. ##
213 ## ---------------------------- ##
214
215 AT_SETUP([Useless precedence warning])
216
217 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
218 [[%token A B U V W X Y Z
219 %precedence Z
220 %left X
221 %precedence Y
222 %left W
223 %right V
224 %nonassoc U
225 %%
226 a: b
227 | a U b
228 | f
229 ;
230 b: c
231 | b V c
232 ;
233 c: d
234 | c W d
235 ;
236 d: A
237 | d X d
238 | d Y A
239 ;
240 f: B
241 | f Z B
242 ;
243 ]])
244
245 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wprecedence -fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
246 [[input.y:7.1-9: warning: useless precedence and associativity for U [-Wprecedence]
247 %nonassoc U
248 ^^^^^^^^^
249 input.y:6.1-6: warning: useless precedence and associativity for V [-Wprecedence]
250 %right V
251 ^^^^^^
252 input.y:5.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for W [-Wprecedence]
253 %left W
254 ^^^^^
255 input.y:2.1-11: warning: useless precedence for Z [-Wprecedence]
256 %precedence Z
257 ^^^^^^^^^^^
258 ]])
259
260 AT_CLEANUP
261
262
263 ## ---------------- ##
264 ## S/R in initial. ##
265 ## ---------------- ##
266
267 # I once hacked Bison in such a way that it lost its reductions on the
268 # initial state (because it was confusing it with the last state). It
269 # took me a while to strip down my failures to this simple case. So
270 # make sure it finds the s/r conflict below.
271
272 AT_SETUP([S/R in initial])
273
274 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
275 [[%expect 1
276 %%
277 exp: e 'e';
278 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
279 ]])
280
281 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
282 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
283 ]])
284
285 AT_BISON_CHECK([-fcaret -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
286 [[input.y:4.9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
287 e: 'e' | /* Nothing. */;
288 ^
289 ]])
290
291 AT_CLEANUP
292
293
294 ## ------------------- ##
295 ## %nonassoc and eof. ##
296 ## ------------------- ##
297
298 AT_SETUP([%nonassoc and eof])
299
300 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
301 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([input.y],
302 [[
303 %{
304 #include <stdio.h>
305 #include <stdlib.h>
306 #include <string.h>
307 #include <assert.h>
308
309 #define YYERROR_VERBOSE 1
310 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
311 /* The current argument. */
312 static const char *input;
313
314 static int
315 yylex (void)
316 {
317 static size_t toknum;
318 assert (toknum <= strlen (input));
319 return input[toknum++];
320 }
321
322 %}
323
324 %nonassoc '<' '>'
325
326 %%
327 expr: expr '<' expr
328 | expr '>' expr
329 | '0'
330 ;
331 %%
332 int
333 main (int argc, const char *argv[])
334 {
335 input = argc <= 1 ? "" : argv[1];
336 return yyparse ();
337 }
338 ]])
339 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
340
341 m4_pushdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK],
342 [AT_BISON_CHECK([$1[ -o input.c input.y]])
343 AT_COMPILE([input])
344
345 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($2, [correct], [[, expecting $end]])])
346
347 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0'])
348 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0<0'], [1], [],
349 [syntax error, unexpected '<'AT_EXPECTING
350 ])
351
352 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0'])
353 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0>0>0'], [1], [],
354 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
355 ])
356
357 AT_PARSER_CHECK([./input '0<0>0'], [1], [],
358 [syntax error, unexpected '>'AT_EXPECTING
359 ])
360
361 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])])
362
363 # Expected token list is missing.
364 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([], [[incorrect]])
365
366 # We must disable default reductions in inconsistent states in order to
367 # have an explicit list of all expected tokens.
368 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.default-reduction=consistent]],
369 [[correct]])
370
371 # lr.default-reduction=consistent happens to work for this test case.
372 # However, for other grammars, lookahead sets can be merged for
373 # different left contexts, so it is still possible to have an incorrect
374 # expected list. Canonical LR is almost a general solution (that is, it
375 # can fail only when %nonassoc is used), so make sure it gives the same
376 # result as above.
377 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr]], [[correct]])
378
379 # parse.lac=full is a completely general solution that does not require
380 # any of the above sacrifices. Of course, it does not extend the
381 # language-recognition power of LALR to (IE)LR, but it does ensure that
382 # the reported list of expected tokens matches what the given parser
383 # would have accepted in place of the unexpected token.
384 AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK([[-Dparse.lac=full]], [[correct]])
385
386 m4_popdef([AT_NONASSOC_AND_EOF_CHECK])
387
388 AT_CLEANUP
389
390
391
392 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
393 ## parse.error=verbose and consistent errors. ##
394 ## ------------------------------------------- ##
395
396 m4_pushdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK], [
397
398 AT_SETUP([[parse.error=verbose and consistent errors: ]$1])
399
400 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS([$1])
401
402 m4_pushdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE],
403 [AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[int yylex (yy::parser::semantic_type *lvalp)]],
404 [[int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp)]])])
405
406 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_DATA], [AT_DATA_GRAMMAR])([input.y],
407 [AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
408
409 %code imports {
410 import java.io.IOException;
411 }]], [[
412
413 %code {]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[
414 #include <string>]], [[
415 #include <assert.h>
416 #include <stdio.h>
417 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE])[
418 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[;
419 #define USE(Var)
420 }
421
422 ]AT_SKEL_CC_IF([[%defines]], [[%define api.pure]])])[
423
424 ]$1[
425
426 %define parse.error verbose
427
428 %%
429
430 ]$2[
431
432 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[%code lexer {]], [[%%]])[
433
434 /*--------.
435 | yylex. |
436 `--------*/]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
437
438 public String input = "]$3[";
439 public int index = 0;
440 public int yylex ()
441 {
442 if (index < input.length ())
443 return input.charAt (index++);
444 else
445 return 0;
446 }
447 public Object getLVal ()
448 {
449 return new Integer(1);
450 }]], [[
451
452 ]AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE[
453 {
454 static char const *input = "]$3[";
455 *lvalp = 1;
456 return *input++;
457 }]])[
458 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
459 ]AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([[
460 };
461
462 %%]])[
463
464 /*-------.
465 | main. |
466 `-------*/
467 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
468 ])
469
470 AT_FULL_COMPILE([[input]])
471
472 m4_pushdef([AT_EXPECTING], [m4_if($5, [ab], [[, expecting 'a' or 'b']],
473 $5, [a], [[, expecting 'a']],
474 $5, [b], [[, expecting 'b']])])
475
476 AT_SKEL_JAVA_IF([AT_JAVA_PARSER_CHECK([[input]], [[0]]],
477 [AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]]]),
478 [[]],
479 [[syntax error, unexpected ]$4[]AT_EXPECTING[
480 ]])
481
482 m4_popdef([AT_EXPECTING])
483 m4_popdef([AT_YYLEX_PROTOTYPE])
484 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
485
486 AT_CLEANUP
487 ]) dnl AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK
488
489
490
491
492 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
493 [[%nonassoc 'a';
494
495 start: consistent-error-on-a-a 'a' ;
496
497 consistent-error-on-a-a:
498 'a' default-reduction
499 | 'a' default-reduction 'a'
500 | 'a' shift
501 ;
502
503 default-reduction: /*empty*/ ;
504 shift: 'b' ;
505
506 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
507 // test case looks a little more realistic.
508 start: 'b' consistent-error-on-a-a 'c' ;
509 ]])
510
511 m4_pushdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT], [[a]])
512
513 # Unfortunately, no expected tokens are reported even though 'b' can be
514 # accepted. Nevertheless, the main point of this test is to make sure
515 # that at least the unexpected token is reported. In a previous version
516 # of Bison, it wasn't reported because the error is detected in a
517 # consistent state with an error action, and that case always triggered
518 # the simple "syntax error" message.
519 #
520 # The point isn't to test IELR here, but state merging happens to
521 # complicate this example.
522 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr]],
523 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
524 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
525 [[$end]], [[none]])
526 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
527 %glr-parser]],
528 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
529 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
530 [[$end]], [[none]])
531 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
532 %language "c++"]],
533 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
534 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
535 [[$end]], [[none]])
536 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
537 %language "java"]],
538 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
539 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
540 [[end of input]], [[none]])
541
542 # Even canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
543 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
544 %define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
545 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
546 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
547 [[$end]], [[ab]])
548 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
549 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
550 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
551 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
552 [[$end]], [[ab]])
553 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
554 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
555 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
556 [[$end]], [[ab]])
557
558 # Only LAC gets it right.
559 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr
560 %define parse.lac full]],
561 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
562 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
563 [[$end]], [[b]])
564 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type ielr
565 %define parse.lac full]],
566 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR],
567 [AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT],
568 [[$end]], [[b]])
569
570 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_GRAMMAR])
571 m4_popdef([AT_PREVIOUS_STATE_INPUT])
572
573 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
574 [[%nonassoc 'a';
575
576 // If $$ = 0 here, then we know that the 'a' destructor is being invoked
577 // incorrectly for the 'b' set in the semantic action below. All 'a'
578 // tokens are returned by yylex, which sets $$ = 1.
579 %destructor {
580 if (!$$)
581 fprintf (stderr, "Wrong destructor.\n");
582 } 'a';
583
584 // Rather than depend on an inconsistent state to induce reading a
585 // lookahead as in the previous grammar, just assign the lookahead in a
586 // semantic action. That lookahead isn't needed before either error
587 // action is encountered. In a previous version of Bison, this was a
588 // problem as it meant yychar was not translated into yytoken before
589 // either error action. The second error action thus invoked a
590 // destructor that it selected according to the incorrect yytoken. The
591 // first error action would have reported an incorrect unexpected token
592 // except that, due to the bug described in the previous grammar, the
593 // unexpected token was not reported at all.
594 start: error-reduce consistent-error 'a' { USE ($][3); } ;
595
596 error-reduce:
597 'a' 'a' consistent-reduction consistent-error 'a'
598 { USE (($][1, $][2, $][5)); }
599 | 'a' error
600 { USE ($][1); }
601 ;
602
603 consistent-reduction: /*empty*/ {
604 assert (yychar == YYEMPTY);
605 yylval = 0;
606 yychar = 'b';
607 } ;
608
609 consistent-error:
610 'a' { USE ($][1); }
611 | /*empty*/ %prec 'a'
612 ;
613
614 // Provide another context in which all rules are useful so that this
615 // test case looks a little more realistic.
616 start: 'b' consistent-error 'b' ;
617 ]])
618 m4_pushdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT], [[aa]])
619
620 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[]],
621 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
622 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
623 [['b']], [[none]])
624 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%glr-parser]],
625 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
626 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
627 [['b']], [[none]])
628 # No C++ or Java test because yychar cannot be manipulated by users.
629
630 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
631 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
632 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
633 [['b']], [[none]])
634
635 # Canonical LR doesn't foresee the error for 'a'!
636 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
637 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
638 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
639 [[$end]], [[a]])
640 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define lr.type canonical-lr]],
641 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
642 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
643 [[$end]], [[a]])
644
645 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full]],
646 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
647 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
648 [['b']], [[none]])
649 AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK([[%define parse.lac full
650 %define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
651 [AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR],
652 [AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT],
653 [[$end]], [[none]])
654
655 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_GRAMMAR])
656 m4_popdef([AT_USER_ACTION_INPUT])
657
658 m4_popdef([AT_CONSISTENT_ERRORS_CHECK])
659
660
661
662
663 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
664 ## LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states. ##
665 ## ------------------------------------------------------- ##
666
667 # This test case demonstrates that, when %nonassoc is used, canonical
668 # LR(1) parser table construction followed by conflict resolution
669 # without further state splitting is not always sufficient to produce a
670 # parser that can detect all syntax errors as soon as possible on one
671 # token of lookahead. However, LAC solves the problem completely even
672 # with minimal LR parser tables.
673
674 AT_SETUP([[LAC: %nonassoc requires splitting canonical LR states]])
675 AT_BISON_OPTION_PUSHDEFS
676 AT_DATA_GRAMMAR([[input.y]],
677 [[%code {
678 #include <stdio.h>
679 ]AT_YYERROR_DECLARE[
680 ]AT_YYLEX_DECLARE[
681 }
682
683 %error-verbose
684 %nonassoc 'a'
685
686 %%
687
688 start:
689 'a' problem 'a' // First context.
690 | 'b' problem 'b' // Second context.
691 | 'c' reduce-nonassoc // Just makes reduce-nonassoc useful.
692 ;
693
694 problem:
695 look reduce-nonassoc
696 | look 'a'
697 | look 'b'
698 ;
699
700 // For the state reached after shifting the 'a' in these productions,
701 // lookahead sets are the same in both the first and second contexts.
702 // Thus, canonical LR reuses the same state for both contexts. However,
703 // the lookahead 'a' for the reduction "look: 'a'" later becomes an
704 // error action only in the first context. In order to immediately
705 // detect the syntax error on 'a' here for only the first context, this
706 // canonical LR state would have to be split into two states, and the
707 // 'a' lookahead would have to be removed from only one of the states.
708 look:
709 'a' // Reduction lookahead set is always ['a', 'b'].
710 | 'a' 'b'
711 | 'a' 'c' // 'c' is forgotten as an expected token.
712 ;
713
714 reduce-nonassoc: %prec 'a';
715
716 %%
717 ]AT_YYERROR_DEFINE[
718 ]AT_YYLEX_DEFINE(["aaa"])[
719 ]AT_MAIN_DEFINE
720 ])
721 AT_BISON_OPTION_POPDEFS
722
723 # Show canonical LR's failure.
724 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -o input.c input.y]],
725 [[0]], [[]],
726 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
727 ]])
728 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
729 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
730 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b'
731 ]])
732
733 # It's corrected by LAC.
734 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=canonical-lr -Dparse.lac=full \
735 -o input.c input.y]], [[0]], [[]],
736 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
737 ]])
738 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
739 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
740 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
741 ]])
742
743 # IELR is sufficient when LAC is used.
744 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Dlr.type=ielr -Dparse.lac=full -o input.c input.y]],
745 [[0]], [[]],
746 [[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
747 ]])
748 AT_COMPILE([[input]])
749 AT_PARSER_CHECK([[./input]], [[1]], [[]],
750 [[syntax error, unexpected 'a', expecting 'b' or 'c'
751 ]])
752
753 AT_CLEANUP
754
755 ## ------------------------- ##
756 ## Unresolved SR Conflicts. ##
757 ## ------------------------- ##
758
759 AT_SETUP([Unresolved SR Conflicts])
760
761 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
762
763 AT_DATA([input.y],
764 [[%token NUM OP
765 %%
766 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
767 ]])
768
769 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
770 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
771 ]])
772
773 # Check the contents of the report.
774 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
775 [[State 5 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
776
777
778 Grammar
779
780 0 $accept: exp $end
781
782 1 exp: exp OP exp
783 2 | NUM
784
785
786 Terminals, with rules where they appear
787
788 $end (0) 0
789 error (256)
790 NUM (258) 2
791 OP (259) 1
792
793
794 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
795
796 $accept (5)
797 on left: 0
798 exp (6)
799 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
800
801
802 State 0
803
804 0 $accept: . exp $end
805 1 exp: . exp OP exp
806 2 | . NUM
807
808 NUM shift, and go to state 1
809
810 exp go to state 2
811
812
813 State 1
814
815 2 exp: NUM .
816
817 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
818
819
820 State 2
821
822 0 $accept: exp . $end
823 1 exp: exp . OP exp
824
825 $end shift, and go to state 3
826 OP shift, and go to state 4
827
828
829 State 3
830
831 0 $accept: exp $end .
832
833 $default accept
834
835
836 State 4
837
838 1 exp: . exp OP exp
839 1 | exp OP . exp
840 2 | . NUM
841
842 NUM shift, and go to state 1
843
844 exp go to state 5
845
846
847 State 5
848
849 1 exp: exp . OP exp
850 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
851
852 OP shift, and go to state 4
853
854 OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
855 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
856 ]])
857
858 AT_CLEANUP
859
860
861
862 ## ----------------------- ##
863 ## Resolved SR Conflicts. ##
864 ## ----------------------- ##
865
866 AT_SETUP([Resolved SR Conflicts])
867
868 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
869
870 AT_DATA([input.y],
871 [[%token NUM OP
872 %left OP
873 %%
874 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
875 ]])
876
877 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y])
878
879 # Check the contents of the report.
880 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
881 [[Grammar
882
883 0 $accept: exp $end
884
885 1 exp: exp OP exp
886 2 | NUM
887
888
889 Terminals, with rules where they appear
890
891 $end (0) 0
892 error (256)
893 NUM (258) 2
894 OP (259) 1
895
896
897 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
898
899 $accept (5)
900 on left: 0
901 exp (6)
902 on left: 1 2, on right: 0 1
903
904
905 State 0
906
907 0 $accept: . exp $end
908 1 exp: . exp OP exp
909 2 | . NUM
910
911 NUM shift, and go to state 1
912
913 exp go to state 2
914
915
916 State 1
917
918 2 exp: NUM .
919
920 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
921
922
923 State 2
924
925 0 $accept: exp . $end
926 1 exp: exp . OP exp
927
928 $end shift, and go to state 3
929 OP shift, and go to state 4
930
931
932 State 3
933
934 0 $accept: exp $end .
935
936 $default accept
937
938
939 State 4
940
941 1 exp: . exp OP exp
942 1 | exp OP . exp
943 2 | . NUM
944
945 NUM shift, and go to state 1
946
947 exp go to state 5
948
949
950 State 5
951
952 1 exp: exp . OP exp
953 1 | exp OP exp . [$end, OP]
954
955 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
956
957 Conflict between rule 1 and token OP resolved as reduce (%left OP).
958 ]])
959
960 AT_CLEANUP
961
962
963 ## ---------------------- ##
964 ## %precedence suffices. ##
965 ## ---------------------- ##
966
967 AT_SETUP([%precedence suffices])
968
969 AT_DATA([input.y],
970 [[%precedence "then"
971 %precedence "else"
972 %%
973 stmt:
974 "if" cond "then" stmt
975 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
976 | "stmt"
977 ;
978
979 cond:
980 "exp"
981 ;
982 ]])
983
984 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
985
986 AT_CLEANUP
987
988
989 ## ------------------------------ ##
990 ## %precedence does not suffice. ##
991 ## ------------------------------ ##
992
993 AT_SETUP([%precedence does not suffice])
994
995 AT_DATA([input.y],
996 [[%precedence "then"
997 %precedence "else"
998 %%
999 stmt:
1000 "if" cond "then" stmt
1001 | "if" cond "then" stmt "else" stmt
1002 | "stmt"
1003 ;
1004
1005 cond:
1006 "exp"
1007 | cond "then" cond
1008 ;
1009 ]])
1010
1011 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1012 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1013 input.y:12.3-18: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1014 ]])
1015
1016 AT_CLEANUP
1017
1018
1019 ## -------------------------------- ##
1020 ## Defaulted Conflicted Reduction. ##
1021 ## -------------------------------- ##
1022
1023 # When there are RR conflicts, some rules are disabled. Usually it is
1024 # simply displayed as:
1025 #
1026 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1027 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1028 #
1029 # But when 'reduce 3' is the default action, we'd produce:
1030 #
1031 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1032 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1033 #
1034 # In this precise case (a reduction is masked by the default
1035 # reduction), we make the 'reduce 3' explicit:
1036 #
1037 # $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1038 # $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1039 # $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1040 #
1041 # Maybe that's not the best display, but then, please propose something
1042 # else.
1043
1044 AT_SETUP([Defaulted Conflicted Reduction])
1045 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
1046
1047 AT_DATA([input.y],
1048 [[%%
1049 exp: num | id;
1050 num: '0';
1051 id : '0';
1052 %%
1053 ]])
1054
1055 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c --report=all input.y], 0, [],
1056 [[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1057 input.y:4.6-8: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1058 ]])
1059
1060 # Check the contents of the report.
1061 AT_CHECK([cat input.output], [],
1062 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1063
1064 4 id: '0'
1065
1066
1067 State 1 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1068
1069
1070 Grammar
1071
1072 0 $accept: exp $end
1073
1074 1 exp: num
1075 2 | id
1076
1077 3 num: '0'
1078
1079 4 id: '0'
1080
1081
1082 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1083
1084 $end (0) 0
1085 '0' (48) 3 4
1086 error (256)
1087
1088
1089 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1090
1091 $accept (4)
1092 on left: 0
1093 exp (5)
1094 on left: 1 2, on right: 0
1095 num (6)
1096 on left: 3, on right: 1
1097 id (7)
1098 on left: 4, on right: 2
1099
1100
1101 State 0
1102
1103 0 $accept: . exp $end
1104 1 exp: . num
1105 2 | . id
1106 3 num: . '0'
1107 4 id: . '0'
1108
1109 '0' shift, and go to state 1
1110
1111 exp go to state 2
1112 num go to state 3
1113 id go to state 4
1114
1115
1116 State 1
1117
1118 3 num: '0' . [$end]
1119 4 id: '0' . [$end]
1120
1121 $end reduce using rule 3 (num)
1122 $end [reduce using rule 4 (id)]
1123 $default reduce using rule 3 (num)
1124
1125
1126 State 2
1127
1128 0 $accept: exp . $end
1129
1130 $end shift, and go to state 5
1131
1132
1133 State 3
1134
1135 1 exp: num .
1136
1137 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
1138
1139
1140 State 4
1141
1142 2 exp: id .
1143
1144 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
1145
1146
1147 State 5
1148
1149 0 $accept: exp $end .
1150
1151 $default accept
1152 ]])
1153
1154 AT_CLEANUP
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159 ## -------------------- ##
1160 ## %expect not enough. ##
1161 ## -------------------- ##
1162
1163 AT_SETUP([%expect not enough])
1164
1165 AT_DATA([input.y],
1166 [[%token NUM OP
1167 %expect 0
1168 %%
1169 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1170 ]])
1171
1172 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1173 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
1174 ]])
1175 AT_CLEANUP
1176
1177
1178 ## --------------- ##
1179 ## %expect right. ##
1180 ## --------------- ##
1181
1182 AT_SETUP([%expect right])
1183
1184 AT_DATA([input.y],
1185 [[%token NUM OP
1186 %expect 1
1187 %%
1188 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1189 ]])
1190
1191 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1192 AT_CLEANUP
1193
1194
1195 ## ------------------ ##
1196 ## %expect too much. ##
1197 ## ------------------ ##
1198
1199 AT_SETUP([%expect too much])
1200
1201 AT_DATA([input.y],
1202 [[%token NUM OP
1203 %expect 2
1204 %%
1205 exp: exp OP exp | NUM;
1206 ]])
1207
1208 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1209 [[input.y: error: shift/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 2 expected
1210 ]])
1211 AT_CLEANUP
1212
1213
1214 ## ------------------------------- ##
1215 ## %expect with reduce conflicts. ##
1216 ## ------------------------------- ##
1217
1218 AT_SETUP([%expect with reduce conflicts])
1219
1220 AT_DATA([input.y],
1221 [[%expect 0
1222 %%
1223 program: a 'a' | a a;
1224 a: 'a';
1225 ]])
1226
1227 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y], 1, [],
1228 [[input.y: error: reduce/reduce conflicts: 1 found, 0 expected
1229 ]])
1230 AT_CLEANUP
1231
1232
1233 ## ------------------------- ##
1234 ## %prec with user strings. ##
1235 ## ------------------------- ##
1236
1237 AT_SETUP([%prec with user string])
1238
1239 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1240 [[%%
1241 exp:
1242 "foo" %prec "foo"
1243 ;
1244 ]])
1245
1246 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1247 AT_CLEANUP
1248
1249
1250 ## -------------------------------- ##
1251 ## %no-default-prec without %prec. ##
1252 ## -------------------------------- ##
1253
1254 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec without %prec])
1255
1256 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1257 [[%left '+'
1258 %left '*'
1259
1260 %%
1261
1262 %no-default-prec;
1263
1264 e: e '+' e
1265 | e '*' e
1266 | '0'
1267 ;
1268 ]])
1269
1270 AT_BISON_CHECK([-Wall -o input.c input.y], 0, [],
1271 [[input.y: warning: 4 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1272 input.y:1.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '+' [-Wprecedence]
1273 input.y:2.1-5: warning: useless precedence and associativity for '*' [-Wprecedence]
1274 ]])
1275 AT_CLEANUP
1276
1277
1278 ## ----------------------------- ##
1279 ## %no-default-prec with %prec. ##
1280 ## ----------------------------- ##
1281
1282 AT_SETUP([%no-default-prec with %prec])
1283
1284 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1285 [[%left '+'
1286 %left '*'
1287
1288 %%
1289
1290 %no-default-prec;
1291
1292 e: e '+' e %prec '+'
1293 | e '*' e %prec '*'
1294 | '0'
1295 ;
1296 ]])
1297
1298 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1299 AT_CLEANUP
1300
1301
1302 ## --------------- ##
1303 ## %default-prec. ##
1304 ## --------------- ##
1305
1306 AT_SETUP([%default-prec])
1307
1308 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1309 [[%left '+'
1310 %left '*'
1311
1312 %%
1313
1314 %default-prec;
1315
1316 e: e '+' e
1317 | e '*' e
1318 | '0'
1319 ;
1320 ]])
1321
1322 AT_BISON_CHECK([-o input.c input.y])
1323 AT_CLEANUP
1324
1325
1326 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1327 ## Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution. ##
1328 ## ---------------------------------------------- ##
1329
1330 AT_SETUP([[Unreachable States After Conflict Resolution]])
1331
1332 # If conflict resolution makes states unreachable, remove those states, report
1333 # rules that are then unused, and don't report conflicts in those states. Test
1334 # what happens when a nonterminal becomes useless as a result of state removal
1335 # since that causes lalr.o's goto map to be rewritten.
1336
1337 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1338 [[%output "input.c"
1339 %left 'a'
1340
1341 %%
1342
1343 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' ;
1344
1345 /* S/R conflict resolved as reduce, so the state with item
1346 * (resolved_conflict: 'a' . unreachable1) and all it transition successors are
1347 * unreachable, and the associated production is useless. */
1348 resolved_conflict:
1349 'a' unreachable1
1350 | %prec 'a'
1351 ;
1352
1353 /* S/R conflict that need not be reported since it is unreachable because of
1354 * the previous conflict resolution. Nonterminal unreachable1 and all its
1355 * productions are useless. */
1356 unreachable1:
1357 'a' unreachable2
1358 |
1359 ;
1360
1361 /* Likewise for a R/R conflict and nonterminal unreachable2. */
1362 unreachable2: | ;
1363
1364 /* Make sure remaining S/R and R/R conflicts are still reported correctly even
1365 * when their states are renumbered due to state removal. */
1366 reported_conflicts:
1367 'a'
1368 | 'a'
1369 |
1370 ;
1371
1372 ]])
1373
1374 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all input.y]], 0, [],
1375 [[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1376 input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1377 input.y:12.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1378 input.y:20.5-20: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1379 input.y:21.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1380 input.y:25.13: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1381 input.y:25.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1382 input.y:31.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1383 input.y:32.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1384 ]])
1385
1386 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output]], 0,
1387 [[Rules useless in parser due to conflicts
1388
1389 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1390
1391 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1392 5 | %empty
1393
1394 6 unreachable2: %empty
1395 7 | %empty
1396
1397 9 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1398 10 | %empty
1399
1400
1401 State 4 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
1402 State 5 conflicts: 1 reduce/reduce
1403
1404
1405 Grammar
1406
1407 0 $accept: start $end
1408
1409 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1410
1411 2 resolved_conflict: 'a' unreachable1
1412 3 | %empty
1413
1414 4 unreachable1: 'a' unreachable2
1415 5 | %empty
1416
1417 6 unreachable2: %empty
1418 7 | %empty
1419
1420 8 reported_conflicts: 'a'
1421 9 | 'a'
1422 10 | %empty
1423
1424
1425 Terminals, with rules where they appear
1426
1427 $end (0) 0
1428 'a' (97) 1 2 4 8 9
1429 error (256)
1430
1431
1432 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
1433
1434 $accept (4)
1435 on left: 0
1436 start (5)
1437 on left: 1, on right: 0
1438 resolved_conflict (6)
1439 on left: 2 3, on right: 1
1440 unreachable1 (7)
1441 on left: 4 5, on right: 2
1442 unreachable2 (8)
1443 on left: 6 7, on right: 4
1444 reported_conflicts (9)
1445 on left: 8 9 10, on right: 1
1446
1447
1448 State 0
1449
1450 0 $accept: . start $end
1451 1 start: . resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1452 2 resolved_conflict: . 'a' unreachable1
1453 3 | . %empty ['a']
1454
1455 $default reduce using rule 3 (resolved_conflict)
1456
1457 start go to state 1
1458 resolved_conflict go to state 2
1459
1460 Conflict between rule 3 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1461
1462
1463 State 1
1464
1465 0 $accept: start . $end
1466
1467 $end shift, and go to state 3
1468
1469
1470 State 2
1471
1472 1 start: resolved_conflict . 'a' reported_conflicts 'a'
1473
1474 'a' shift, and go to state 4
1475
1476
1477 State 3
1478
1479 0 $accept: start $end .
1480
1481 $default accept
1482
1483
1484 State 4
1485
1486 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' . reported_conflicts 'a'
1487 8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
1488 9 | . 'a'
1489 10 | . %empty ['a']
1490
1491 'a' shift, and go to state 5
1492
1493 'a' [reduce using rule 10 (reported_conflicts)]
1494
1495 reported_conflicts go to state 6
1496
1497
1498 State 5
1499
1500 8 reported_conflicts: 'a' . ['a']
1501 9 | 'a' . ['a']
1502
1503 'a' reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1504 'a' [reduce using rule 9 (reported_conflicts)]
1505 $default reduce using rule 8 (reported_conflicts)
1506
1507
1508 State 6
1509
1510 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts . 'a'
1511
1512 'a' shift, and go to state 7
1513
1514
1515 State 7
1516
1517 1 start: resolved_conflict 'a' reported_conflicts 'a' .
1518
1519 $default reduce using rule 1 (start)
1520 ]])
1521
1522 AT_DATA([[input-keep.y]],
1523 [[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state
1524 ]])
1525 AT_CHECK([[cat input.y >> input-keep.y]])
1526
1527 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input-keep.y]], 0, [],
1528 [[input-keep.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
1529 input-keep.y: warning: 2 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
1530 input-keep.y:22.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1531 input-keep.y:26.16: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1532 input-keep.y:32.5-7: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1533 input-keep.y:33.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1534 ]])
1535
1536 AT_CLEANUP
1537
1538
1539 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1540 ## Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1541 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1542
1543 AT_SETUP([[Solved conflicts report for multiple reductions in a state]])
1544
1545 # Used to lose earlier solved conflict messages even within a single S/R/R.
1546
1547 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1548 [[%left 'a'
1549 %right 'b'
1550 %right 'c'
1551 %right 'd'
1552 %%
1553 start:
1554 'a'
1555 | empty_a 'a'
1556 | 'b'
1557 | empty_b 'b'
1558 | 'c'
1559 | empty_c1 'c'
1560 | empty_c2 'c'
1561 | empty_c3 'c'
1562 ;
1563 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1564 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1565 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1566 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1567 empty_c3: %prec 'd' ;
1568 ]])
1569 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1570 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1571 [[State 0
1572
1573 0 $accept: . start $end
1574 1 start: . 'a'
1575 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1576 3 | . 'b'
1577 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1578 5 | . 'c'
1579 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1580 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1581 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1582 9 empty_a: . %empty ['a']
1583 10 empty_b: . %empty []
1584 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
1585 12 empty_c2: . %empty []
1586 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
1587
1588 'b' shift, and go to state 1
1589
1590 'c' reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)
1591 $default reduce using rule 9 (empty_a)
1592
1593 start go to state 2
1594 empty_a go to state 3
1595 empty_b go to state 4
1596 empty_c1 go to state 5
1597 empty_c2 go to state 6
1598 empty_c3 go to state 7
1599
1600 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1601 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as shift (%right 'b').
1602 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1603 Conflict between rule 12 and token 'c' resolved as shift (%right 'c').
1604 Conflict between rule 13 and token 'c' resolved as reduce ('c' < 'd').
1605
1606
1607 State 1
1608 ]])
1609
1610 AT_CLEANUP
1611
1612
1613 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1614 ## %nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state. ##
1615 ## ------------------------------------------------------------ ##
1616
1617 # Used to abort when trying to resolve conflicts as %nonassoc error actions for
1618 # multiple reductions in a state.
1619
1620 # For a %nonassoc error action token, used to print the first remaining
1621 # reduction on that token without brackets.
1622
1623 AT_SETUP([[%nonassoc error actions for multiple reductions in a state]])
1624
1625 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
1626 [[%nonassoc 'a' 'b' 'c'
1627 %%
1628 start:
1629 'a'
1630 | empty_a 'a'
1631 | 'b'
1632 | empty_b 'b'
1633 | 'c'
1634 | empty_c1 'c'
1635 | empty_c2 'c'
1636 | empty_c3 'c'
1637 ;
1638 empty_a: %prec 'a' ;
1639 empty_b: %prec 'b' ;
1640 empty_c1: %prec 'c' ;
1641 empty_c2: %prec 'c' ;
1642 empty_c3: %prec 'c' ;
1643 ]])
1644
1645 AT_BISON_CHECK([[--report=all -o input.c input.y]], 0, [], [ignore])
1646 AT_CHECK([[cat input.output | sed -n '/^State 0$/,/^State 1$/p']], 0,
1647 [[State 0
1648
1649 0 $accept: . start $end
1650 1 start: . 'a'
1651 2 | . empty_a 'a'
1652 3 | . 'b'
1653 4 | . empty_b 'b'
1654 5 | . 'c'
1655 6 | . empty_c1 'c'
1656 7 | . empty_c2 'c'
1657 8 | . empty_c3 'c'
1658 9 empty_a: . %empty []
1659 10 empty_b: . %empty []
1660 11 empty_c1: . %empty []
1661 12 empty_c2: . %empty ['c']
1662 13 empty_c3: . %empty ['c']
1663
1664 'a' error (nonassociative)
1665 'b' error (nonassociative)
1666 'c' error (nonassociative)
1667
1668 'c' [reduce using rule 12 (empty_c2)]
1669 'c' [reduce using rule 13 (empty_c3)]
1670
1671 start go to state 1
1672 empty_a go to state 2
1673 empty_b go to state 3
1674 empty_c1 go to state 4
1675 empty_c2 go to state 5
1676 empty_c3 go to state 6
1677
1678 Conflict between rule 9 and token 'a' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'a').
1679 Conflict between rule 10 and token 'b' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'b').
1680 Conflict between rule 11 and token 'c' resolved as an error (%nonassoc 'c').
1681
1682
1683 State 1
1684 ]])
1685 AT_CLEANUP
1686
1687
1688 ## -------------------- ##
1689 ## %expect-rr non GLR. ##
1690 ## -------------------- ##
1691
1692 AT_SETUP([[%expect-rr non GLR]])
1693
1694 AT_DATA([[1.y]],
1695 [[%expect-rr 0
1696 %%
1697 exp: 'a'
1698 ]])
1699
1700 AT_BISON_CHECK([[1.y]], [[0]], [],
1701 [[1.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1702 ]])
1703
1704 AT_DATA([[2.y]],
1705 [[%expect-rr 1
1706 %%
1707 exp: 'a' | 'a';
1708 ]])
1709
1710 AT_BISON_CHECK([[2.y]], [[0]], [],
1711 [[2.y: warning: %expect-rr applies only to GLR parsers [-Wother]
1712 2.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1713 2.y:3.12-14: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
1714 ]])
1715
1716 AT_CLEANUP
1717
1718
1719 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1720 ## -W versus %expect and %expect-rr. ##
1721 ## ---------------------------------- ##
1722
1723 AT_SETUP([[-W versus %expect and %expect-rr]])
1724
1725 AT_DATA([[sr-rr.y]],
1726 [[%glr-parser
1727 %%
1728 start: 'a' | A 'a' | B 'a' ;
1729 A: ;
1730 B: ;
1731 ]])
1732 AT_DATA([[sr.y]],
1733 [[%glr-parser
1734 %%
1735 start: 'a' | A 'a' ;
1736 A: ;
1737 ]])
1738 AT_DATA([[rr.y]],
1739 [[%glr-parser
1740 %%
1741 start: A | B ;
1742 A: ;
1743 B: ;
1744 ]])
1745
1746 AT_BISON_CHECK([[sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1747 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1748 sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1749 ]])
1750 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-sr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1751 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1752 ]])
1753 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wno-conflicts-rr sr-rr.y]], [[0]], [[]],
1754 [[sr-rr.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
1755 ]])
1756
1757 [
1758 # This is piece of code is rather complex for a simple task: try every
1759 # combinaison of (0 or 1 real SR) x (0 or 1 real RR) x (don't %expect
1760 # or %expect 0, 1, or 2 SR) x (don't %expect-rr or %expect-rr 0, 1, or 2
1761 # RR).
1762
1763 # Number and types of genuine conflicts in the grammar.
1764 for gram in sr-rr sr rr; do
1765 # Number of expected s/r conflicts.
1766 for sr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1767 # Number of expected r/r conflicts.
1768 for rr_exp_i in '' 0 1 2; do
1769 test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test -z "$rr_exp_i" && continue
1770
1771 # Build grammar file.
1772 sr_exp=0
1773 rr_exp=0
1774 file=$gram
1775 directives=
1776 if test -n "$sr_exp_i"; then
1777 sr_exp=$sr_exp_i
1778 file=$file-expect-$sr_exp
1779 directives="%expect $sr_exp"
1780 fi
1781 if test -n "$rr_exp_i"; then
1782 rr_exp=$rr_exp_i
1783 file=$file-expect-rr-$rr_exp
1784 directives="$directives %expect-rr $rr_exp"
1785 fi
1786 file=$file.y
1787 echo "$directives" > $file
1788 cat $gram.y >> $file
1789
1790 # Number of found conflicts.
1791 case $gram in
1792 (sr) sr_count=1; rr_count=0;;
1793 (rr) sr_count=0; rr_count=1;;
1794 (sr-rr) sr_count=1; rr_count=1;;
1795 esac
1796
1797 # Update number of expected conflicts: if %expect is given then
1798 # %expect-rr defaults to 0, and vice-versa. Leave empty if
1799 # nothing expected.
1800 case $sr_exp_i:$rr_exp_i in
1801 ?:) rr_exp_i=0;;
1802 :?) sr_exp_i=0;;
1803 esac
1804
1805 # Run tests.
1806 if test $sr_count -eq $sr_exp && test $rr_count -eq $rr_exp; then
1807 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]])[
1808 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]])[
1809 else
1810 {
1811 if test -z "$sr_exp_i" && test "$sr_count" -ne 0; then
1812 echo "warning: $sr_count shift/reduce conflicts"
1813 elif test "$sr_exp_i" -ne "$sr_count"; then
1814 echo "error: shift/reduce conflicts: $sr_count found, $sr_exp_i expected"
1815 fi
1816 if test -z "$rr_exp_i" && test "$rr_count" -ne 0; then
1817 echo "warning: $rr_count reduce/reduce conflicts"
1818 elif test "$rr_exp_i" -ne "$rr_count"; then
1819 echo "error: reduce/reduce conflicts: $rr_count found, $rr_exp_i expected"
1820 fi
1821 } | sed -e "s/^/$file: /" > experr
1822 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Wnone $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1823 ]AT_BISON_CHECK([[-Werror $file]], [[1]], [[]], [[experr]])[
1824 fi
1825 done
1826 done
1827 done]
1828
1829 AT_CLEANUP