1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
282 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
283 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
284 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
285 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
287 Handling Context Dependencies
289 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
290 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
291 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
292 error recovery rules must be written.
294 Debugging Your Parser
296 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
297 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
298 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
299 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
303 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
304 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
305 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
309 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
310 in alphabetical order by short options.
311 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
312 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
314 Parsers Written In Other Languages
316 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
317 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
321 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
322 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
323 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
324 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
325 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
326 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
330 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
331 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
332 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
334 A Complete C++ Example
336 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
337 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
338 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
339 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
340 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
344 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
345 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
346 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
347 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
348 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
349 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
350 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
351 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
353 Frequently Asked Questions
355 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
356 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
357 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
358 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
359 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
360 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
361 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
362 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
363 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
364 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
365 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
366 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
370 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
376 @unnumbered Introduction
379 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
380 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
381 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
382 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
383 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
384 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
385 calculators to complex programming languages.
387 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
388 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
389 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
390 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
391 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
394 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
395 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
396 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
397 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
400 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
401 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
402 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
403 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
404 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
405 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
408 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
411 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
413 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
414 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
415 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
416 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
417 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
419 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
421 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
422 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
423 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
424 License to all of the Bison source code.
426 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
427 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
428 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
429 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
430 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
431 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
432 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
434 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
435 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
436 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
437 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
438 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
439 using the other GNU tools.
441 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
442 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
443 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
444 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
448 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
449 @include gpl-3.0.texi
452 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
454 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
455 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
456 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
459 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
460 as mathematical ideas.
461 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
462 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
463 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
464 the name of an identifier, etc.).
465 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
466 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
467 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
468 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
469 how is the output used?
470 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
471 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
474 @node Language and Grammar
475 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
477 @cindex context-free grammar
478 @cindex grammar, context-free
479 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
480 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
481 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
482 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
483 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
484 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
485 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
486 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
490 @cindex Backus-Naur form
491 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
492 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
493 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
494 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
495 essentially machine-readable BNF.
497 @cindex LALR grammars
498 @cindex IELR grammars
500 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
501 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
502 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
503 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
504 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
505 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
506 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
507 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
508 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
509 Construction}, to learn how.
512 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
513 @cindex ambiguous grammars
514 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
516 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
517 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
518 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
519 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
520 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
521 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
522 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
523 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
524 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
525 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
526 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
527 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
528 possible parses of any given string is finite.
530 @cindex symbols (abstract)
532 @cindex syntactic grouping
533 @cindex grouping, syntactic
534 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
535 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
536 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
537 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
538 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
539 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
540 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
542 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
543 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
544 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
545 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
546 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
547 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
548 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
549 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
550 lexicography, not grammar.)
552 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
555 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
556 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
557 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
558 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
559 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
560 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
561 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
564 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
565 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
566 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
567 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
568 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
569 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
570 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
571 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
573 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
574 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
575 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
576 reads informally as follows:
579 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
584 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
588 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
589 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
590 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
591 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
594 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
595 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
596 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
597 not the start symbol.
599 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
600 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
601 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
602 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
603 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
604 reports a syntax error.
606 @node Grammar in Bison
607 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
608 @cindex Bison grammar
609 @cindex grammar, Bison
610 @cindex formal grammar
612 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
613 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
614 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
616 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
617 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
618 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
620 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
621 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
622 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
623 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
624 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
625 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
626 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
629 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
630 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
631 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
632 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
634 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
635 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
637 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
638 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
639 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
640 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
644 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
648 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
650 @node Semantic Values
651 @section Semantic Values
652 @cindex semantic value
653 @cindex value, semantic
655 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
656 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
657 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
658 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
659 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
662 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
663 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
664 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
665 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
666 ,Defining Language Semantics},
669 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
670 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
671 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
672 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
675 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
676 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
677 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
678 need to have any semantic value.)
680 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
681 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
682 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
683 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
684 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
685 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
687 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
688 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
689 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
690 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
691 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
693 @node Semantic Actions
694 @section Semantic Actions
695 @cindex semantic actions
696 @cindex actions, semantic
698 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
699 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
700 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
701 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
704 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
705 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
706 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
707 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
708 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
709 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
710 newly recognized larger expression.
712 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
716 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
720 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
721 from the values of the two subexpressions.
724 @section Writing GLR Parsers
726 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
729 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
730 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
732 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
733 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
734 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
735 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
736 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
737 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
738 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
739 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
742 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
743 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
744 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
745 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
746 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
747 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
748 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
749 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
750 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
751 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
752 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
753 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
754 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
755 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
756 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
757 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
758 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
759 identical set of symbols.
761 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
762 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
763 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
764 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
765 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
766 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
767 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
768 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
769 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
773 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
774 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
775 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
776 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
779 @node Simple GLR Parsers
780 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
781 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
782 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
786 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
787 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
789 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
790 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
791 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
793 Consider a problem that
794 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
795 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
798 type subrange = lo .. hi;
799 type enum = (a, b, c);
803 The original language standard allows only numeric
804 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
805 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
806 10206) and many other
807 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
808 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
812 type subrange = (a) .. b;
816 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
817 type with only one value:
824 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
825 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
827 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
828 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
829 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
830 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
831 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
832 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
833 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
834 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
836 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
837 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
838 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
839 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
842 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
843 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
844 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
845 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
846 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
847 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
850 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
851 use the GLR algorithm.
852 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
853 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
854 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
855 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
856 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
857 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
858 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
859 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
860 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
862 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
863 reports a syntax error as usual.
865 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
866 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
867 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
868 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
869 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
871 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
872 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
873 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
874 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
875 The present example contains only one conflict between two
876 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
877 cannot be nested. So the number of
878 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
879 and the parsing time is still linear.
881 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
882 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
885 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
895 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
924 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
925 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
926 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
927 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
934 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
935 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
936 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
945 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
946 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
947 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
948 notice when the parser splits.
950 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
951 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
952 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
953 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
954 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
955 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
956 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
957 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
958 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
959 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
960 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
961 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
962 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
965 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
966 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
967 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
968 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
969 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
970 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
972 @node Merging GLR Parses
973 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
974 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
975 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
979 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
981 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
986 #define YYSTYPE char const *
988 void yyerror (char const *);
1002 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1011 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1012 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1013 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1014 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1015 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1019 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1020 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1021 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1022 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1026 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1027 | '(' declarator ')'
1032 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1033 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1040 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1041 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1042 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1043 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1044 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1045 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1046 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1047 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1048 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1049 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1050 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1051 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1052 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1053 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1055 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1056 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1057 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1058 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1059 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1060 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1061 The parser therefore prints
1064 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1067 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1068 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1075 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1076 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1077 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1078 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1079 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1080 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1081 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1082 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1083 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1084 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1090 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1091 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1092 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1093 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1098 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1099 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1104 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1108 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1116 with an accompanying forward declaration
1117 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1121 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1122 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1127 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1128 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1131 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1134 Bison requires that all of the
1135 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1136 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1137 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1138 the offending merge.
1140 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1141 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1143 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1144 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1145 the associated reduction.
1146 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1147 action in a GLR parser.
1150 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1152 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1154 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1155 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1156 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1157 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1158 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1159 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1160 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1161 influence syntax analysis.
1162 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1165 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1166 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1167 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1168 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1169 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1170 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1171 future versions of Bison.
1172 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1173 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1174 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1177 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1178 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1179 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1180 initiate error recovery.
1181 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1182 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1183 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1184 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1186 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1187 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1189 @node Compiler Requirements
1190 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1191 @cindex @code{inline}
1192 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1194 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1195 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1196 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1197 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1198 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1199 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1208 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1212 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1213 && ! defined inline)
1222 @cindex textual location
1223 @cindex location, textual
1225 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1226 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1227 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1228 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1230 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1231 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1232 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1233 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1236 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1237 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1238 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1241 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1242 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1243 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1244 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1245 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1246 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1247 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1250 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1251 @cindex Bison parser
1252 @cindex Bison utility
1253 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1256 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1257 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1258 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1259 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1260 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1261 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1262 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1265 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1266 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1267 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1270 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1271 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1272 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1273 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1274 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1275 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1276 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1278 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1279 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1280 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1281 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1282 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1283 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1284 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1285 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1286 C-Language Interface}.
1288 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1289 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1290 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1291 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1292 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1293 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1294 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1295 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1296 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1297 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1298 anything other than their usual meanings.
1300 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1301 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1302 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1303 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1304 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1305 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1306 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1307 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1308 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1311 @section Stages in Using Bison
1312 @cindex stages in using Bison
1315 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1316 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1320 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1321 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1322 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1323 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1324 sequence of C statements.
1327 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1328 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1329 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1330 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1333 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1336 Write error-reporting routines.
1339 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1340 must follow these steps:
1344 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1347 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1350 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1353 @node Grammar Layout
1354 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1355 @cindex grammar file
1357 @cindex format of grammar file
1358 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1360 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1361 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1368 @var{Bison declarations}
1377 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1378 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1380 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1381 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1382 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1383 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1384 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1385 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1387 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1388 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1389 semantic values of various symbols.
1391 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1394 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1395 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1396 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1400 @cindex simple examples
1401 @cindex examples, simple
1403 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1404 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1405 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1406 and a multi-function calculator. All
1407 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1409 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1410 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1411 source file to try them.
1414 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1415 a first example with no operator precedence.
1416 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1417 Operator precedence is introduced.
1418 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1419 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1420 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1421 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1422 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1426 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1427 @cindex reverse polish notation
1428 @cindex polish notation calculator
1429 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1430 @cindex calculator, simple
1432 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1433 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1434 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1435 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1437 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1438 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1441 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1442 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1443 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1444 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1445 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1446 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1447 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1450 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1451 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1453 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1454 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1457 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1460 #define YYSTYPE double
1463 void yyerror (char const *);
1468 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1471 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1472 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1474 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1475 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1476 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1477 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1478 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1479 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1480 which is a floating point number.
1482 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1483 function @code{pow}.
1485 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1486 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1487 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1488 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1491 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1492 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1493 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1494 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1495 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1496 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1497 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1498 type for numeric constants.
1501 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1503 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1516 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1523 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1524 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1527 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1528 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1534 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1535 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1536 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1537 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1538 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1541 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1542 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1543 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1545 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1546 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1547 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1548 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1549 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1550 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1559 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1561 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1570 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1571 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1572 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1573 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1574 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1576 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1577 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1578 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1579 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1580 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1581 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1583 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1584 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1585 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1586 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1589 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1590 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1591 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1594 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1596 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1601 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1605 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1606 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1607 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1608 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1609 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1610 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1611 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1613 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1614 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1615 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1616 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1617 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1620 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1622 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1623 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1624 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1625 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1630 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1631 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1636 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1637 equally well have written them separately:
1641 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1642 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1646 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1647 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1648 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1649 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1650 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1651 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1652 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1653 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1655 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1656 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1657 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1659 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1660 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1664 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1668 means the same thing as this:
1673 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1679 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1682 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1683 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1684 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1686 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1687 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1688 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1689 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1691 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1693 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1694 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1695 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1696 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1698 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1699 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1700 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1701 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1702 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1703 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1704 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1705 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1706 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1708 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1709 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1710 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1711 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1712 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1714 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1715 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1717 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1721 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1722 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1723 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1724 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1735 /* Skip white space. */
1736 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1740 /* Process numbers. */
1741 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1744 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1749 /* Return end-of-input. */
1752 /* Return a single char. */
1759 @subsection The Controlling Function
1760 @cindex controlling function
1761 @cindex main function in simple example
1763 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1764 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1765 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1778 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1779 @cindex error reporting routine
1781 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1782 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1783 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1784 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1785 here is the definition we will use:
1793 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1795 yyerror (char const *s)
1797 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1802 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1803 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1804 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1805 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1806 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1807 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1809 @node Rpcalc Generate
1810 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1811 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1813 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1814 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1815 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1816 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1817 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1818 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1820 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1821 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1823 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1824 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1831 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1832 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1833 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1834 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1835 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1836 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1837 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1839 @node Rpcalc Compile
1840 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1841 @cindex compiling the parser
1843 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1847 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1849 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1853 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1854 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1855 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1859 # @r{List files again.}
1861 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1865 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1866 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1872 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1874 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1878 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1880 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1885 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1886 @cindex infix notation calculator
1888 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1890 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1891 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1892 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1893 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1896 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1900 #define YYSTYPE double
1904 void yyerror (char const *);
1909 /* Bison declarations. */
1913 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1914 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1917 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1928 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1935 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1936 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1937 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1938 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1939 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1940 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1941 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1948 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1951 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1953 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1954 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1955 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1956 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1957 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1958 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1961 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1962 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1963 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1964 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1965 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1968 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1969 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1970 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1971 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1972 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1974 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1979 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1987 @node Simple Error Recovery
1988 @section Simple Error Recovery
1989 @cindex error recovery, simple
1991 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1992 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1993 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1994 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1995 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1996 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1998 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
1999 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2000 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2006 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2007 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2012 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2013 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2014 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2015 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2016 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2017 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2018 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2019 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2022 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2023 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2024 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2025 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2026 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2027 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2030 @node Location Tracking Calc
2031 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2032 @cindex location tracking calculator
2033 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2034 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2036 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2037 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2038 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2039 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2043 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2044 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2045 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2048 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2049 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2051 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2052 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2055 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2061 void yyerror (char const *);
2064 /* Bison declarations. */
2072 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2076 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2077 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2078 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2079 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2080 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2081 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2082 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2086 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2088 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2089 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2090 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2091 from the new information.
2093 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2094 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2107 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2114 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2115 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2116 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2126 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2127 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2128 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2133 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2134 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2135 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2139 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2140 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2141 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2143 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2144 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2145 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2146 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2147 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2148 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2152 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2154 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2155 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2156 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2159 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2160 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2171 /* Skip white space. */
2172 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2173 ++yylloc.last_column;
2178 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2179 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2183 /* Process numbers. */
2187 ++yylloc.last_column;
2188 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2190 ++yylloc.last_column;
2191 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2198 /* Return end-of-input. */
2203 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2207 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2210 ++yylloc.last_column;
2216 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2217 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2218 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2219 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2221 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2222 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2223 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2224 controlling function:
2231 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2232 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2238 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2239 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2240 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2242 @node Multi-function Calc
2243 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2244 @cindex multi-function calculator
2245 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2246 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2248 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2249 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2250 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2251 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2252 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2254 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2255 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2256 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2257 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2258 functions whose syntax has this form:
2261 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2265 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2266 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2267 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2271 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2275 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2281 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2286 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2289 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2290 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2291 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2294 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2295 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2297 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2299 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2303 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2304 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2306 void yyerror (char const *);
2312 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2313 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2316 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2317 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2324 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2325 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2329 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2330 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2331 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2333 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2334 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2335 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2336 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2338 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2339 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2340 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2341 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2342 between angle brackets).
2344 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2345 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2346 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2347 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2348 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2349 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2352 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2354 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2355 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2356 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2358 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2360 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2371 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2372 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2379 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2380 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2381 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2382 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2383 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2384 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2385 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2386 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2387 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2388 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2391 /* End of grammar. */
2395 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2396 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2397 @cindex symbol table example
2399 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2400 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2401 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2402 requires some additional C functions for support.
2404 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2405 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2406 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2408 @comment file: calc.h
2411 /* Function type. */
2412 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2416 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2419 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2420 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2423 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2424 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2426 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2431 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2433 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2434 extern symrec *sym_table;
2436 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2437 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2441 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2442 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2443 @code{init_table} as well:
2445 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2450 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2452 yyerror (char const *s)
2462 double (*fnct) (double);
2467 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2480 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2485 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2490 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2492 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2493 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2508 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2509 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2511 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2512 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2513 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2514 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2515 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2516 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2518 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2520 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2521 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2525 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2527 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2528 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2529 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2530 ptr->type = sym_type;
2531 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2532 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2540 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2543 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2544 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2545 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2552 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2553 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2554 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2555 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2557 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2558 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2559 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2560 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2561 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2562 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2564 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2565 operators in @code{yylex}.
2567 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2579 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2580 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2588 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2589 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2592 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2598 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2601 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2602 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2603 static size_t length = 40;
2604 static char *symbuf = 0;
2610 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2616 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2620 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2622 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2624 /* Get another character. */
2629 while (isalnum (c));
2636 s = getsym (symbuf);
2638 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2643 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2649 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2650 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2651 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2653 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2656 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2658 yyerror (char const *s)
2660 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2666 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2669 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2670 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2671 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2679 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2680 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2681 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2689 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2692 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2693 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2694 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2697 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2698 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2702 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2704 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2705 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2707 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2708 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2711 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2712 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2713 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2714 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2715 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2716 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2717 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2718 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2719 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2722 @node Grammar Outline
2723 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2725 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2726 appropriate delimiters:
2733 @var{Bison declarations}
2742 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2743 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2744 continues until end of line.
2747 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2748 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2749 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2750 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2751 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2755 @subsection The prologue
2756 @cindex declarations section
2758 @cindex declarations
2760 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2761 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2762 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2763 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2764 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2765 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2766 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2768 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2769 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2772 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2773 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2774 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2775 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2776 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2777 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2778 @code{%union} declaration.
2789 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2793 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2794 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2800 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2801 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2802 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2803 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2804 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2805 @code{#include} directives.
2807 @node Prologue Alternatives
2808 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2809 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2812 @findex %code requires
2813 @findex %code provides
2816 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2817 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2818 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2819 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2820 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2821 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2822 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2824 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2835 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2839 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2840 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2847 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2848 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2849 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2850 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2851 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2852 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2853 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2854 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2855 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2856 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2857 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2859 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2860 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2861 This behavior raises a few questions.
2862 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2863 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2864 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2865 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2866 This behavior is not intuitive.
2868 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2869 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2870 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2871 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2878 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2879 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2882 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2883 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2895 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2899 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2900 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2901 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2908 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2909 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2910 explicit which kind you intend.
2911 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2913 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2914 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2915 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2916 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2917 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2918 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2919 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2920 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2921 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2924 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2925 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2927 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2945 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2951 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2952 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2965 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2966 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2967 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2975 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2976 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2977 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2978 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2979 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2980 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2982 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2983 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2984 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2985 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2986 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2987 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2988 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2989 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2990 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2991 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2992 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2995 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2996 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2997 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2998 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
2999 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3000 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3001 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3002 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3003 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3004 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3022 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3028 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3029 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3042 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3048 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3049 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3057 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3058 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3059 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3062 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3063 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3064 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3065 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3066 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3067 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3070 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3071 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3072 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3073 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3075 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3076 organize your grammar file.
3077 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3082 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3083 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3084 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3085 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3089 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3090 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3091 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3092 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3097 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3098 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3100 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3102 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3103 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3104 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3105 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3107 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3108 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3109 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3110 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3111 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3112 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3113 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3114 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3117 @node Bison Declarations
3118 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3119 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3120 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3122 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3123 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3124 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3125 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3128 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3129 @cindex grammar rules section
3130 @cindex rules section for grammar
3132 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3133 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3135 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3136 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3137 if it is the first thing in the file.
3140 @subsection The epilogue
3141 @cindex additional C code section
3143 @cindex C code, section for additional
3145 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3146 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3147 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3148 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3149 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3150 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3151 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3152 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3153 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3154 C-Language Interface}.
3156 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3157 from the grammar rules.
3159 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3160 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3161 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3162 of the grammar file.
3165 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3166 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3167 @cindex terminal symbol
3171 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3174 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3175 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3176 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3177 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3178 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3179 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3180 the symbol to stand for it.
3182 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3183 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3184 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3186 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3187 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3188 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3189 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3190 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3191 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3192 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3194 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3198 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3199 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3200 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3201 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3204 @cindex character token
3205 @cindex literal token
3206 @cindex single-character literal
3207 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3208 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3209 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3210 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3211 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3212 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3213 ,Operator Precedence}).
3215 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3216 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3217 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3218 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3219 your program will confuse other readers.
3221 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3222 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3223 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3224 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3225 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3226 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3230 @cindex string token
3231 @cindex literal string token
3232 @cindex multicharacter literal
3233 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3234 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3235 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3236 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3237 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3239 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3240 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3241 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3242 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3243 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3245 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3247 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3248 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3249 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3250 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3251 read your program will be confused.
3253 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3254 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3255 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3256 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3257 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3258 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3261 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3262 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3263 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3265 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3266 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3267 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3268 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3269 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3270 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3271 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3272 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3273 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3274 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3275 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3276 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3278 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3279 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3280 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3281 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3282 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3284 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3285 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3286 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3287 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3288 characters in the following C-language string:
3291 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3294 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3295 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3296 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3297 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3298 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3299 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3300 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3301 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3302 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3303 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3306 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3307 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3308 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3309 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3310 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3313 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3315 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3316 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3318 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3322 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3327 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3328 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3329 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3340 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3341 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3343 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3344 extra white space as you wish.
3346 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3347 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3350 @{@var{C statements}@}
3355 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3356 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3357 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3358 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3359 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3360 compiler can check it.
3362 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3363 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3364 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3365 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3366 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3367 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3368 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3369 character constants.
3371 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3375 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3376 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3381 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3382 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3389 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3391 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3392 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3393 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3412 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3416 @section Recursive Rules
3417 @cindex recursive rule
3419 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3420 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3421 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3422 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3423 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3434 @cindex left recursion
3435 @cindex right recursion
3437 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3438 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3439 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3451 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3452 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3453 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3454 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3455 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3456 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3457 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3460 @cindex mutual recursion
3461 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3462 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3463 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3472 | primary '+' primary
3485 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3489 @section Defining Language Semantics
3490 @cindex defining language semantics
3491 @cindex language semantics, defining
3493 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3494 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3495 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3497 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3498 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3499 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3500 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3503 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3504 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3505 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3506 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3507 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3508 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3509 action in the middle of a rule.
3513 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3514 @cindex semantic value type
3515 @cindex value type, semantic
3516 @cindex data types of semantic values
3517 @cindex default data type
3519 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3520 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3521 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3522 Notation Calculator}).
3524 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3525 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3526 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3529 #define YYSTYPE double
3533 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3534 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3535 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3536 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3538 @node Multiple Types
3539 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3541 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3542 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3543 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3544 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3547 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3548 requires you to do two things:
3552 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3553 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3554 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3555 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3559 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3560 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3561 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3562 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3563 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3572 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3574 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3575 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3576 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3577 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3579 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3580 placed at any position in the rule;
3581 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3582 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3583 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3584 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3586 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3587 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3588 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3589 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3590 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3591 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3592 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3593 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3594 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3595 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3598 Here is a typical example:
3604 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3608 Or, in terms of named references:
3614 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3619 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3620 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3621 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3622 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3623 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3624 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3626 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3627 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3628 referred to as @code{$2}.
3630 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3631 references construct.
3633 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3634 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3635 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3636 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3637 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3641 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3645 @cindex default action
3646 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3647 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3648 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3649 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3650 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3651 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3653 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3654 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3655 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3656 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3657 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3662 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3663 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3669 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3674 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3675 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3676 definition of @code{foo}.
3679 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3680 any, from a semantic action.
3681 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3682 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3685 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3686 @cindex action data types
3687 @cindex data types in actions
3689 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3690 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3692 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3693 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3694 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3695 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3696 in the rule. In this example,
3702 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3707 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3708 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3709 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3710 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3712 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3713 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3714 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3726 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3727 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3729 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3730 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3731 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3732 @cindex mid-rule actions
3734 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3735 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3736 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3738 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3739 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3740 it is run before they are parsed.
3742 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3743 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3744 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3745 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3748 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3749 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3750 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3751 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3752 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3753 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3755 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3756 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3757 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3758 at the end of the rule.
3760 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3761 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3762 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3763 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3764 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3765 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3771 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3773 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3778 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3779 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3780 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3781 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3782 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3783 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3784 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3785 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3787 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3788 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3789 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3790 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3791 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3794 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3795 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3796 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3797 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3798 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3800 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3801 Discarded Symbols}).
3802 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3803 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3805 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3806 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3811 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3825 $$ = push_context ();
3826 declare_variable ($3);
3833 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3834 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3835 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3837 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3838 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3839 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3840 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3841 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3847 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3848 | '@{' statements '@}'
3854 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3859 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3860 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3863 | '@{' statements '@}'
3869 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3870 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3871 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3872 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3873 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3874 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3876 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3877 actions into the two rules, like this:
3882 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3883 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3884 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3885 '@{' statements '@}'
3891 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3892 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3894 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3895 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3896 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3901 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3902 declarations statements '@}'
3903 | '@{' statements '@}'
3909 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3910 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3912 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3913 serves as a subroutine:
3918 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3924 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3925 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3931 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3932 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3934 @node Tracking Locations
3935 @section Tracking Locations
3937 @cindex textual location
3938 @cindex location, textual
3940 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3941 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3942 especially symbol locations.
3944 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3945 actions to take when rules are matched.
3948 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3949 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3950 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3954 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3955 @cindex data type of locations
3956 @cindex default location type
3958 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3959 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3961 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3962 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3963 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3964 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3968 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3977 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3978 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3979 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3980 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3981 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3983 @node Actions and Locations
3984 @subsection Actions and Locations
3985 @cindex location actions
3986 @cindex actions, location
3989 @vindex @@@var{name}
3990 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3992 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3993 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3995 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3996 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3997 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3998 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
3999 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4002 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4003 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4004 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4005 references construct.
4007 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4015 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4016 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4017 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4018 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4025 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4026 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4027 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4033 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4034 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4035 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4038 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4039 example above simply rewrites this way:
4053 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4054 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4055 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4062 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4063 from a semantic action.
4064 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4065 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4067 @node Location Default Action
4068 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4069 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4070 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4072 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4073 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4074 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4075 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4076 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4077 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4078 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4079 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4082 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4083 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4085 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4086 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4087 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4088 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4089 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4090 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4091 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4092 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4093 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4094 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4096 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4100 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4104 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4105 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4106 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4107 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4111 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4112 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4113 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4114 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4121 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4122 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4123 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4125 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4129 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4130 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4133 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4134 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4135 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4136 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4139 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4140 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4141 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4142 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4145 @node Named References
4146 @section Named References
4147 @cindex named references
4149 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4150 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4151 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4152 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4153 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4154 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4156 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4157 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4158 used as named references. For example:
4162 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4163 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4168 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4172 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4173 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4178 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4184 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4187 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4190 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4195 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4196 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4197 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4200 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4201 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4206 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4207 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4208 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4211 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4212 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4218 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4219 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4222 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4223 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4227 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4228 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4229 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4230 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4231 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4232 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4233 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4235 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4239 @section Bison Declarations
4240 @cindex declarations, Bison
4241 @cindex Bison declarations
4243 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4244 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4247 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4248 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4249 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4250 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4252 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4253 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4254 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4255 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4258 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4259 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4260 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4261 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4262 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4263 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4264 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4265 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4266 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4267 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4268 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4269 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4270 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4271 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4272 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4276 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4277 @cindex version requirement
4278 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4281 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4282 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4286 %require "@var{version}"
4290 @subsection Token Type Names
4291 @cindex declaring token type names
4292 @cindex token type names, declaring
4293 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4296 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4302 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4303 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4304 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4306 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4307 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4308 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4311 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4312 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4313 following the token name:
4317 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4321 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4322 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4323 with each other or with normal characters.
4325 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4326 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4327 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4328 Than One Value Type}).
4334 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4338 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4342 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4343 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4344 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4351 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4352 equivalent literal string tokens:
4355 %token <operator> OR "||"
4356 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4361 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4362 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4363 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4364 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4365 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4366 the literal string instead of the token name.
4368 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4369 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4373 %token END 0 "end of file"
4376 @node Precedence Decl
4377 @subsection Operator Precedence
4378 @cindex precedence declarations
4379 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4380 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4382 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4383 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4384 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4385 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4386 operator precedence.
4388 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4389 @code{%token}: either
4392 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4399 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4402 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4403 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4404 all the @var{symbols}:
4408 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4409 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4410 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4411 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4412 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4413 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4414 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4415 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4416 considered a syntax error.
4419 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4420 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4421 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4422 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4423 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4426 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4427 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4428 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4429 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4434 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4435 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4439 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4440 @cindex declaring value types
4441 @cindex value types, declaring
4444 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4445 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4446 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4461 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4462 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4463 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4464 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4466 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4467 @code{union}. For example:
4479 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4480 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4483 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4484 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4485 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4487 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4488 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4490 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4491 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4492 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4493 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4501 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4506 and then your grammar can use the following
4507 instead of @code{%union}:
4520 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4521 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4522 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4526 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4527 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4528 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4531 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4535 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4536 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4537 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4538 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4539 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4542 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4543 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4544 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4545 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4547 @node Initial Action Decl
4548 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4549 @findex %initial-action
4551 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4552 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4555 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4556 @findex %initial-action
4557 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4558 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4559 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4560 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4563 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4566 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4569 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4574 @node Destructor Decl
4575 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4576 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4580 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4581 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4582 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4583 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4584 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4585 must discard the start symbol.
4587 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4588 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4589 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4590 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4592 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4593 symbol is automatically discarded.
4595 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4597 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4598 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4599 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4600 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4601 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4604 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4605 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4606 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4607 tag among @var{symbols}.
4608 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4609 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4610 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4612 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4613 (These default forms are experimental.
4614 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4616 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4617 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4618 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4619 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4621 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4622 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4623 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4624 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4625 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4632 %union @{ char *string; @}
4633 %token <string> STRING1
4634 %token <string> STRING2
4635 %type <string> string1
4636 %type <string> string2
4637 %union @{ char character; @}
4638 %token <character> CHR
4639 %type <character> chr
4642 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4643 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4644 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4645 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4649 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4650 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4651 to @code{free} by default.
4652 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4653 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4654 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4655 @code{free} only once.
4656 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4657 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4659 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4660 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4661 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4662 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4663 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4664 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4665 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4666 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4667 reference it in your grammar.
4668 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4669 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4675 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4676 @cindex mid-rule actions
4677 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4678 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4679 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4680 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4681 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4682 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4683 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4684 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4688 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4689 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4690 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4695 @cindex discarded symbols
4696 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4700 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4702 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4704 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4705 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4707 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4708 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4711 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4714 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4715 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4718 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4719 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4720 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4724 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4725 @cindex printing semantic values
4729 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4730 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4731 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4732 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4734 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4735 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4736 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4738 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4741 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4742 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4743 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4744 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4745 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4746 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4747 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4750 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4751 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4752 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4753 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4761 %union @{ char *string; @}
4762 %token <string> STRING1
4763 %token <string> STRING2
4764 %type <string> string1
4765 %type <string> string2
4766 %union @{ char character; @}
4767 %token <character> CHR
4768 %type <character> chr
4771 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4772 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4773 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4774 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4778 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4779 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4780 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4781 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4782 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4783 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4784 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4788 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4789 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4790 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4791 @cindex warnings, preventing
4792 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4796 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4797 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4798 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4799 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4800 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4801 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4803 The declaration looks like this:
4809 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4810 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4811 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4812 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4814 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4815 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4816 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4817 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4818 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4819 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4820 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4826 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4830 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4831 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4832 print the number of conflicts.
4835 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4836 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4837 go back to the beginning.
4840 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4841 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4842 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4845 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4846 but will keep silent otherwise.
4849 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4850 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4851 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4852 @cindex default start symbol
4855 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4856 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4857 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4864 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4865 @cindex reentrant parser
4867 @findex %define api.pure
4869 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4870 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4871 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4872 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4873 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4874 program must be called only within interlocks.
4876 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4877 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4878 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4879 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4880 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4882 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4883 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4884 reentrant. It looks like this:
4890 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4891 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4892 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4893 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4894 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4895 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4896 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4897 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4898 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4900 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4901 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4905 @subsection A Push Parser
4908 @findex %define api.push-pull
4910 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4911 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4913 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4914 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4915 each time a new token is made available.
4917 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4918 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4919 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4920 within a certain time period.
4922 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4923 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4924 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4927 %define api.push-pull push
4930 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4931 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4932 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4933 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4934 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4938 %define api.push-pull push
4941 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4942 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4943 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4944 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4946 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4947 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4948 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4949 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4950 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4951 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4952 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4953 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4957 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4959 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4960 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4961 yypstate_delete (ps);
4964 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4965 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4966 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4967 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4968 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4969 example would thus look like this:
4974 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4977 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4978 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4979 yypstate_delete (ps);
4982 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4983 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4985 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4986 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4987 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4988 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4989 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4990 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4991 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4992 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4993 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4994 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4995 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4996 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4997 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4998 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
4999 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5000 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5001 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5005 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5006 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5007 yypstate_delete (ps);
5010 Adding the @code{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5011 the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5012 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5015 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5016 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5017 @cindex declaration summary
5018 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5020 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5022 @deffn {Directive} %union
5023 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5024 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5027 @deffn {Directive} %token
5028 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5029 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5032 @deffn {Directive} %right
5033 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5034 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5037 @deffn {Directive} %left
5038 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5039 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5042 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5043 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5044 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5045 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5049 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5050 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5051 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5055 @deffn {Directive} %type
5056 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5057 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5060 @deffn {Directive} %start
5061 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5065 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5066 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5067 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5073 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5076 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5077 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5079 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5080 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5081 @xref{%code Summary}.
5084 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5085 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5086 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5087 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5088 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5089 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5092 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5093 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5094 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5095 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5098 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5099 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5100 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5101 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5102 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5104 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5105 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5106 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5107 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5108 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5109 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5110 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5111 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5112 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5113 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5115 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5116 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5117 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5119 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5120 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5121 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5123 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5124 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5125 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5126 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5127 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5129 @findex %code requires
5130 @findex %code provides
5131 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5132 header also contains their code.
5133 @xref{%code Summary}.
5135 @cindex Header guard
5136 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5137 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5138 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5139 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5140 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5143 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5144 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5146 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5147 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5149 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5153 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5154 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5157 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5158 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5159 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5162 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5163 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5164 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5167 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5168 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5169 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5170 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5172 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5176 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5177 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5178 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5179 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5180 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5181 accurate syntax error messages.
5185 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5186 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5187 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5192 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5193 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5194 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5195 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5196 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5197 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5198 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5202 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5203 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5206 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5207 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5208 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5212 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5213 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5214 Require a Version of Bison}.
5217 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5218 Specify the skeleton to use.
5220 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5221 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5222 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5223 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5225 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5226 file in the Bison installation directory.
5227 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5228 directory of the grammar file.
5229 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5232 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5233 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5234 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5235 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5236 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5237 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5238 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5241 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5242 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5243 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5244 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5245 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5246 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5247 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5250 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5251 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5252 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5256 The highest token number, plus one.
5258 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5260 The number of grammar rules,
5262 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5266 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5267 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5268 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5269 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5273 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5274 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5275 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5279 @node %define Summary
5280 @subsection %define Summary
5282 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5283 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5284 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5285 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5286 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5287 @code{%define} directive:
5289 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5290 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5291 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5292 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5294 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5295 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5296 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5297 to specifying @code{""}.
5299 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5300 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5301 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5304 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5305 @code{%define} accepts.
5307 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5308 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5312 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5314 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5315 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5317 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5319 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5320 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5323 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5324 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5325 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5326 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5327 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5328 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5331 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5332 @item @code{api.location.type}
5333 @findex %define api.location.type
5336 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5338 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5339 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5341 @item Accepted Values: String
5343 @item Default Value: none
5345 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5348 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5349 @item @code{api.prefix}
5350 @findex %define api.prefix
5353 @item Language(s): All
5355 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5356 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5358 @item Accepted Values: String
5360 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5362 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5365 @c ================================================== api.pure
5366 @item @code{api.pure}
5367 @findex %define api.pure
5370 @item Language(s): C
5372 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5373 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5375 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5377 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5380 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5382 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5383 @findex %define api.push-pull
5386 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5388 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5389 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5390 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5391 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5393 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5395 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5398 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5400 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5401 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5404 @item Language(s): all
5406 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5407 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5408 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5409 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5411 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5412 @item Default Value:
5414 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5415 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5419 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5421 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5422 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5425 @item Language(s): all
5426 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5427 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5428 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5429 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5432 @c ================================================== lr.type
5434 @item @code{lr.type}
5435 @findex %define lr.type
5438 @item Language(s): all
5440 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5441 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5442 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5444 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5446 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5449 @c ================================================== namespace
5451 @item @code{namespace}
5452 @findex %define namespace
5455 @item Languages(s): C++
5457 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5458 For example, if you specify:
5461 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5464 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5467 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5470 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5471 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5474 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5480 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5481 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5482 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5484 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5486 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5487 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5488 lexical analyzer function.
5489 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5490 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5491 lexical analyzer function.
5492 For example, if you specify:
5495 %define namespace "foo"
5496 %name-prefix "bar::"
5499 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5503 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5504 @item @code{parse.lac}
5505 @findex %define parse.lac
5508 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5510 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5511 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5512 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5513 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5519 @subsection %code Summary
5523 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5524 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5525 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5526 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5527 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5528 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5529 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5530 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5532 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5533 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5534 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5535 in the parser implementation.
5537 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5538 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5539 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5541 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5544 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5545 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5546 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5547 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5548 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5549 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5553 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5554 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5555 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5558 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5559 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5563 @findex %code requires
5566 @item Language(s): C, C++
5568 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5569 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5570 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5571 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5572 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5574 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5575 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5580 @findex %code provides
5583 @item Language(s): C, C++
5585 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5586 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5588 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5589 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5597 @item Language(s): C, C++
5599 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5600 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5601 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5602 parser implementation file. For example:
5611 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5615 @findex %code imports
5618 @item Language(s): Java
5620 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5622 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5623 before any class definitions.
5627 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5628 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5629 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5630 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5633 @node Multiple Parsers
5634 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5636 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5637 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5638 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5639 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5640 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5641 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5642 exported in the generated header.
5644 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5645 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5646 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5647 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5648 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5649 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5650 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5651 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5652 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5654 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5655 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5656 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5657 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5658 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5659 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5660 specifically --- more about this below.
5662 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5663 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5666 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5667 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5668 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5669 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5672 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5673 #define yyparse cparse
5674 #define yylval clval
5680 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5681 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5682 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5684 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5688 extern CSTYPE clval;
5692 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5693 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5694 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5697 /* Enabling traces. */
5699 # if defined YYDEBUG
5716 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5717 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5718 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5721 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5722 @cindex C-language interface
5725 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5726 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5727 functions that it needs to use.
5729 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5730 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5731 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5732 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5735 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5736 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5737 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5738 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5739 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5740 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5742 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5743 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5744 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5748 @node Parser Function
5749 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5752 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5753 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5754 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5755 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5756 without reading further.
5759 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5760 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5761 is due to end-of-input).
5763 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5764 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5767 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5770 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5775 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5780 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5783 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5784 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5785 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5787 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5788 @findex %parse-param
5789 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5790 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5791 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5792 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5793 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5796 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5799 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5800 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5804 Then call the parser like this:
5808 int nastiness, randomness;
5809 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5810 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5816 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5819 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5822 @node Push Parser Function
5823 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5824 @findex yypush_parse
5826 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5827 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5829 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5830 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5831 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5832 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5834 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5835 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5836 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5837 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5840 @node Pull Parser Function
5841 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5842 @findex yypull_parse
5844 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5845 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5847 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5848 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5849 declaration is used.
5850 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5852 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5853 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5856 @node Parser Create Function
5857 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5858 @findex yypstate_new
5860 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5861 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5863 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5864 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5865 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5866 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5868 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5869 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5870 or 0 if no memory was available.
5871 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5875 @node Parser Delete Function
5876 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5877 @findex yypstate_delete
5879 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5880 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5882 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5883 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5884 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5885 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5887 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5888 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5889 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5893 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5895 @cindex lexical analyzer
5897 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5898 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5899 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5900 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5902 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5903 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5904 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5905 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5906 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5907 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5908 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5912 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5913 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5914 of the token it has read.
5915 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5916 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5918 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5919 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5922 @node Calling Convention
5923 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5925 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5926 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5927 signifies end-of-input.
5929 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5930 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5931 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5932 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5934 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5935 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5936 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5937 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5938 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5939 signifies end-of-input.
5941 Here is an example showing these things:
5948 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
5951 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
5952 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
5954 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
5960 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
5961 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
5963 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
5964 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
5968 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
5969 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
5970 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
5971 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
5974 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
5975 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
5976 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
5977 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
5978 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
5981 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
5982 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
5983 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
5984 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
5987 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
5990 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
5991 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
5992 strlen (token_buffer))
5993 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
5994 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
5999 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6000 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6004 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6007 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6008 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6009 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6010 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6016 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6017 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6022 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6023 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6024 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6025 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6026 declaration looks like this:
6039 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6044 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6045 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6050 @node Token Locations
6051 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6054 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6055 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6056 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6057 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6058 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6059 data in that variable.
6061 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6062 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6063 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6064 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6065 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6068 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6071 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6073 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure} to request a
6074 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6075 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6076 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6077 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6078 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6083 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6086 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6087 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6092 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6093 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6094 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6098 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6099 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6102 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6104 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6105 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6111 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6112 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6113 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6117 results in the following signatures:
6120 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6121 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6124 If @code{%define api.pure} is added:
6127 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6128 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6132 and finally, if both @code{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6135 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6136 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6139 @node Error Reporting
6140 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6141 @cindex error reporting function
6144 @cindex syntax error
6146 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6147 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6148 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6149 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6152 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6153 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6154 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6155 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6156 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6158 @findex %error-verbose
6159 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6160 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6161 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6162 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6163 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6165 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6166 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6167 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6168 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6169 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6170 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6172 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6173 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6174 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6176 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6181 yyerror (char const *s)
6185 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6190 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6191 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6192 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6193 immediately return 1.
6195 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6196 an access to the current location.
6197 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6198 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6199 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6203 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6204 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6207 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6210 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6211 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6214 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6215 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6216 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6217 @code{%define api.pure} are pure.
6221 /* Location tracking. */
6225 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6227 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6228 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6232 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6235 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6236 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6237 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6238 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6243 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6244 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6245 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6246 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6247 message is always passed last.
6249 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6250 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6251 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6255 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6256 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6257 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6258 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6260 @node Action Features
6261 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6262 @cindex summary, action features
6263 @cindex action features summary
6265 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6266 are useful in actions.
6268 @deffn {Variable} $$
6269 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6270 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6273 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6274 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6275 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6278 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6279 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6280 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6281 Types of Values in Actions}.
6284 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6285 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6286 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6287 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6290 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6291 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6292 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6295 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6296 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6297 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6300 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6302 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6303 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6304 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6305 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6306 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6307 going to be reduced by this rule.
6309 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6310 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6311 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6314 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6317 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6318 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6321 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6322 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6326 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6327 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6328 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6329 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6330 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6331 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6334 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6335 @findex YYRECOVERING
6336 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6337 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6338 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6341 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6342 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6343 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6344 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6345 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6347 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6350 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6351 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6353 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6355 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6358 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6359 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6360 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6361 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6364 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6365 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6366 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6367 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6369 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6372 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6373 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6374 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6375 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6377 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6382 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6383 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6386 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6390 @c int first_line, last_line;
6391 @c int first_column, last_column;
6395 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6396 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6398 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6399 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6400 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6403 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6406 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6408 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6409 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6413 @node Internationalization
6414 @section Parser Internationalization
6415 @cindex internationalization
6421 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6422 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6423 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6424 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6425 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6426 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6427 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6428 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6431 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6432 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6433 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6438 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6439 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6440 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6441 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6442 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6446 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6451 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6452 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6453 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6454 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6455 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6456 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6457 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6458 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6459 Bison-generated parser.
6462 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6463 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6464 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6468 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6471 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6472 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6473 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6477 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6478 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6479 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6482 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6488 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6492 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6498 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6499 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6500 @cindex algorithm of parser
6503 @cindex parser stack
6504 @cindex stack, parser
6506 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6507 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6508 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6510 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6511 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6514 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6515 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6516 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6517 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6518 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6519 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6520 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6522 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6529 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6530 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6533 expr: expr '*' expr;
6537 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6544 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6545 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6547 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6548 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6549 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6551 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6554 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6555 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6556 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6557 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6558 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6559 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6560 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6561 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6562 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6563 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6567 @section Lookahead Tokens
6568 @cindex lookahead token
6570 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6571 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6572 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6573 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6574 token in order to decide what to do.
6576 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6577 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6578 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6579 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6580 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6581 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6582 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6585 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6586 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6587 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6606 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6607 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6608 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6609 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6610 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6612 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6613 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6614 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6615 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6616 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6617 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6622 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6623 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6624 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6625 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6628 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6630 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6631 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6632 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6634 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6635 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6641 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6647 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6648 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6650 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6651 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6652 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6653 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6656 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6657 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6658 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6659 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6660 contrast it with the other alternative.
6662 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6663 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6667 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6669 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6672 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6673 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6674 making these two inputs equivalent:
6677 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6679 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6682 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6683 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6684 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6685 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6686 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6687 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6688 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6689 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6691 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6692 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6693 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6694 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6696 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6698 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6699 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6700 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6705 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6718 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6728 @section Operator Precedence
6729 @cindex operator precedence
6730 @cindex precedence of operators
6732 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6733 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6734 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6735 shift and when to reduce.
6738 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6739 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6740 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6741 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6744 @node Why Precedence
6745 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6747 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6748 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6763 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6764 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6765 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6766 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6767 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6768 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6769 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6772 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6773 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6774 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6775 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6776 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6777 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6778 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6779 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6782 @cindex associativity
6783 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6784 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6785 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6786 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6787 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6788 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6789 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6790 makes right-associativity.
6792 @node Using Precedence
6793 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6798 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6799 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6800 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6801 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6802 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6803 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6804 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6807 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6808 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6809 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6810 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6811 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6813 @node Precedence Examples
6814 @subsection Precedence Examples
6816 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6824 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6825 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6826 declared with @code{'-'}:
6829 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6835 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6836 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6837 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6839 @node How Precedence
6840 @subsection How Precedence Works
6842 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6843 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6844 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6845 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6846 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6847 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6849 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6850 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6851 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6852 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6853 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6854 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6855 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6858 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6859 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6861 @node Contextual Precedence
6862 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6863 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6864 @cindex unary operator precedence
6865 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6866 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6869 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6870 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6871 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6872 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6874 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6875 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6876 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6877 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6880 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6881 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6882 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6883 modifier's syntax is:
6886 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6890 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6891 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6892 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6893 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6894 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6896 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6897 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6898 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6908 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6916 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6921 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6922 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6923 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6924 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6926 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6927 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6928 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6929 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6931 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6932 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6933 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6934 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6935 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6936 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6938 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6939 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6943 @section Parser States
6944 @cindex finite-state machine
6945 @cindex parser state
6946 @cindex state (of parser)
6948 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6949 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6950 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6951 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
6952 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
6954 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
6955 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
6956 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
6957 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
6958 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
6959 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
6960 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
6961 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
6964 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
6965 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
6966 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
6969 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
6970 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
6971 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
6973 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
6974 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
6977 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
6978 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
6983 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
6985 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
6991 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
6992 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
6998 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
6999 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7000 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7001 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7002 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7003 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7005 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7006 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7007 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7009 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7010 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7011 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7012 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7013 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7015 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7016 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7017 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7018 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7022 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7023 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7027 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7033 | sequence redirects
7043 | redirects redirect
7048 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7049 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7050 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7051 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7052 in infinitely many ways!
7054 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7055 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7056 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7057 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7059 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7070 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7078 | sequence redirects
7092 | redirects redirect
7097 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7098 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7099 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7101 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7109 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7112 | name_list ':' type
7128 | name ',' name_list
7133 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7134 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7135 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7136 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7140 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7142 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7143 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7144 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7146 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7147 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7148 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7149 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7150 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7151 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7152 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7155 @cindex canonical LR
7156 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7157 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7158 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7159 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7160 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7161 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7162 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7163 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7165 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7166 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7167 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7168 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7169 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7180 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7185 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7186 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7187 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7188 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7189 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7190 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7192 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7193 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7194 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7195 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7196 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7197 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7202 | name_list ':' type
7210 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7211 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7216 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7217 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7218 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7219 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7220 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7221 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7222 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7224 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7225 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7226 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7227 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7229 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7230 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7233 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7234 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7235 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7236 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7239 @node LR Table Construction
7240 @subsection LR Table Construction
7241 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7244 @cindex canonical LR
7245 @findex %define lr.type
7247 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7248 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7249 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7250 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7253 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7254 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7255 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7256 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7259 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7260 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7261 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7264 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7265 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7266 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7269 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7271 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7274 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7278 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7282 %define lr.type ielr
7285 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7286 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7287 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7288 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7289 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7290 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7291 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7292 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7293 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7294 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7296 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7297 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7298 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7299 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7305 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7308 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7310 @cindex GLR with LALR
7311 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7312 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7313 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7314 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7315 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7316 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7317 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7318 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7319 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7320 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7322 @item Malformed grammars.
7324 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7325 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7326 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7327 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7328 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7333 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7334 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7335 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7336 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7337 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7338 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7339 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7340 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7341 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7345 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7348 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7349 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7350 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7351 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7352 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7353 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7354 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7355 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7356 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7357 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7358 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7359 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7362 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7363 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7364 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7366 @node Default Reductions
7367 @subsection Default Reductions
7368 @cindex default reductions
7369 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7372 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7373 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7374 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7375 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7376 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7378 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7379 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7382 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7384 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7385 @cindex consistent states
7386 @cindex defaulted states
7387 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7388 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7389 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7390 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7391 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7392 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7393 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7394 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7395 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7396 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7397 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7399 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7400 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7401 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7402 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7403 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7404 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7405 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7406 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7407 should already be considered closed.
7409 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7411 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7412 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7413 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7414 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7415 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7416 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7417 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7418 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7419 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7423 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7424 @c sentence from being rejected.
7425 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7426 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7427 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7428 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7429 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7430 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7433 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7434 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7435 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7436 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7437 because the accept action ends the parse.
7439 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7440 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7441 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7442 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7443 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7444 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7445 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7446 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7447 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7448 split the parse instead.
7450 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7451 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7453 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7454 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7455 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7457 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7458 @item @code{consistent}
7459 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7462 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7463 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7468 @findex %define parse.lac
7470 @cindex lookahead correction
7472 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7473 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7474 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7475 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7476 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7477 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7478 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7479 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7480 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7482 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7483 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7484 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7485 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7486 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7488 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7489 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7490 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7491 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7493 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7494 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7496 @item @code{none} (default)
7499 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7500 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7504 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7505 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7506 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7507 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7508 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7509 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7510 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7511 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7512 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7513 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7516 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7517 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7518 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7519 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7520 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7521 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7522 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7523 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7524 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7525 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7527 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7528 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7529 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7530 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7531 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7532 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7533 language-recognition power.
7535 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7538 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7540 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7541 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7542 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7543 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7546 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7548 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7549 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7550 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7551 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7552 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7553 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7557 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7558 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7559 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7560 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7561 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7562 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7563 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7564 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7565 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7566 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7567 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7570 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7571 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7572 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7574 @node Unreachable States
7575 @subsection Unreachable States
7576 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7577 @cindex unreachable states
7579 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7580 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7581 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7582 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7584 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7585 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7586 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7587 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7589 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7590 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7591 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7594 There are a few caveats to consider:
7597 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7599 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7600 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7601 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7602 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7603 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7604 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7606 @item Other useless states.
7608 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7609 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7610 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7611 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7612 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7613 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7614 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7617 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7618 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7620 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7621 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7622 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7624 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7625 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7626 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7627 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7628 context-free languages.
7629 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7630 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7631 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7632 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7633 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7634 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7635 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7636 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7638 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7639 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7640 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7641 parser uses the same basic
7642 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7643 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7644 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7645 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7647 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7648 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7649 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7650 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7651 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7653 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7654 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7655 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7656 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7657 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7658 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7659 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7660 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7661 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7662 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7663 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7666 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7667 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7668 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7669 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7670 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7671 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7672 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7673 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7674 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7675 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7676 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7677 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7679 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7680 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7681 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7683 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7684 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7685 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7686 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7687 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7688 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7689 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7690 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7691 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7692 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7693 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7694 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7696 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7699 @node Memory Management
7700 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7701 @cindex memory exhaustion
7702 @cindex memory management
7703 @cindex stack overflow
7704 @cindex parser stack overflow
7705 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7707 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7708 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7709 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7711 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7712 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7713 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7716 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7717 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7718 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7719 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7721 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7722 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7723 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7724 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7725 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7726 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7728 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7729 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7730 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7733 @cindex default stack limit
7734 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7738 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7739 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7740 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7741 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7742 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7744 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7746 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7747 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7748 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7749 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7750 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7751 this deficiency in a future release.
7753 @node Error Recovery
7754 @chapter Error Recovery
7755 @cindex error recovery
7756 @cindex recovery from errors
7758 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7759 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7760 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7763 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7764 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7765 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7766 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7767 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7768 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7769 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7772 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7773 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7774 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7775 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7776 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7777 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7789 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7790 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7792 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7793 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7794 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7795 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7796 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7797 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7798 applicable in the ordinary way.
7800 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7801 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7802 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7803 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7804 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7805 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7806 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7807 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7808 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7809 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7810 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7811 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7813 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7814 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7815 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7818 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7821 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7822 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7823 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7824 spurious error message:
7834 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7835 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7836 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7837 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7838 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7839 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7840 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7843 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7844 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7845 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7846 error messages resume.
7848 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7849 as any other rules can.
7852 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7853 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7854 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7855 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7858 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7859 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7860 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7862 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7864 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7865 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7866 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7867 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7868 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7870 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7871 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7872 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7873 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7876 @node Context Dependency
7877 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7879 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7880 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7881 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7882 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7886 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7887 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7888 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7889 error recovery rules must be written.
7892 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7893 neither clean nor robust.)
7895 @node Semantic Tokens
7896 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
7898 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
7899 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
7905 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
7906 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
7907 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
7909 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
7910 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
7911 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
7912 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
7913 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
7915 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
7916 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
7917 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
7918 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
7919 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
7920 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
7921 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
7923 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
7924 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
7925 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
7926 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
7930 typedef int foo, bar;
7934 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
7935 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
7941 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
7942 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
7944 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
7945 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
7946 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
7947 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
7948 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
7953 declarator maybeasm '=' init
7954 | declarator maybeasm
7960 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
7961 | notype_declarator maybeasm
7967 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
7968 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
7969 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
7971 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
7972 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
7973 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
7974 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
7975 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
7976 the syntactic context.
7978 @node Lexical Tie-ins
7979 @section Lexical Tie-ins
7980 @cindex lexical tie-in
7982 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
7983 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
7986 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
7987 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
7988 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
7989 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
7990 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
7997 void yyerror (char const *);
8006 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8007 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8008 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8022 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8023 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8024 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8026 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8027 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8028 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8031 @node Tie-in Recovery
8032 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8034 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8035 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8037 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8038 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8039 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8040 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8045 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8047 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8051 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8052 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8053 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8054 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8055 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8057 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8059 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8060 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8061 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8067 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8073 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8074 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8075 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8076 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8078 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8079 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8080 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8081 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8082 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8083 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8086 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8089 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8091 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8092 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8093 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8094 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8097 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8098 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8099 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8100 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8104 @section Understanding Your Parser
8106 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8107 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8108 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8109 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8110 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8112 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8113 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8114 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8115 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8116 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8117 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8118 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8120 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8138 @command{bison} reports:
8141 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8142 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8143 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8144 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8145 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8148 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8149 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8150 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8151 interpretation is the same.
8154 @cindex token, useless
8155 @cindex useless token
8156 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8157 @cindex useless nonterminal
8158 @cindex rule, useless
8159 @cindex useless rule
8160 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8161 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8162 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8163 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8166 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8169 Terminals unused in grammar
8172 Rules useless in grammar
8177 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8180 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8181 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8182 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8183 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8187 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8202 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8206 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8219 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8224 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8230 @cindex pointed rule
8231 @cindex rule, pointed
8232 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8233 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8234 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8235 the location of the input cursor.
8240 0 $accept: . exp $end
8242 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8247 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8248 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8249 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8250 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8251 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8252 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8253 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8254 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8256 @cindex core, item set
8257 @cindex item set core
8258 @cindex kernel, item set
8259 @cindex item set core
8260 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8261 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8262 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8263 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8264 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8265 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8270 0 $accept: . exp $end
8271 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8277 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8283 In the state 1@dots{}
8290 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8294 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8295 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8296 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8297 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8302 0 $accept: exp . $end
8303 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8308 $end shift, and go to state 3
8309 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8310 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8311 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8312 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8316 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8317 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8318 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8319 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8320 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8323 @cindex accepting state
8324 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8330 0 $accept: exp $end .
8336 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8337 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8339 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8345 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8347 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8354 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8356 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8363 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8365 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8372 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8374 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8379 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8385 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8391 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8392 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8394 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8395 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8398 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8399 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8400 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8401 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8402 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8403 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8404 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8405 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8407 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8408 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8409 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8412 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8413 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8414 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8415 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8416 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8417 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8418 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8419 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8420 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8421 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8422 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8423 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8428 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8429 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8434 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8435 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8437 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8438 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8441 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8442 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8443 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8444 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8445 conflicts in the report:
8448 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8449 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8450 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8454 The remaining states are similar:
8460 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8466 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8467 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8469 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8470 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8476 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8482 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8484 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8485 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8491 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8497 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8498 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8499 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8500 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8502 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8503 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8504 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8505 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8506 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8511 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8512 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8513 @samp{*}, but also because the
8514 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8516 Note that Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
8517 file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8519 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8522 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8525 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8526 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8527 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8528 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8529 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8530 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8531 to help them understand LR parsers.
8533 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8534 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8535 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8536 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8537 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8539 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8550 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8551 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8552 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8555 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8557 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8558 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8559 about transitions, for examples
8561 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8562 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8563 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8568 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8571 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8573 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8574 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8582 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8586 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8588 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8590 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8592 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8593 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8594 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8595 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8597 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8604 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8605 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8608 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8610 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8612 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8613 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8614 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8615 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8616 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8618 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8619 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8621 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8623 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8624 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8626 Note that a DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and XSLT
8627 processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8629 @c ================================================= XML
8632 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
8635 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
8636 (@pxref{Understanding}) when invoked with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
8637 (@pxref{Graphviz}) when invoked with option @option{--graph}. However,
8638 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
8639 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
8640 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
8641 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
8642 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
8643 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
8645 The textual file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
8646 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
8647 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
8648 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
8649 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
8650 file is @file{foo.xml}.
8652 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
8653 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
8657 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
8659 Used to output a copy of the .output file.
8661 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the .output file.
8664 Sample usage (requires @code{xsltproc}):
8668 $ bison --print-datadir
8669 /usr/local/share/bison
8671 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl input.xml > input.html
8674 @c ================================================= Tracing
8677 @section Tracing Your Parser
8680 @cindex tracing the parser
8682 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8683 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8686 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8687 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8688 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8691 @node Enabling Traces
8692 @subsection Enabling Traces
8693 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8696 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8698 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8699 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8700 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8701 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8704 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8705 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8706 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8707 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8708 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8710 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8711 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8712 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8713 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8714 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8716 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8718 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8719 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8720 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8721 this is the preferred solution.
8724 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8728 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8729 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8730 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8731 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8732 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8733 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8735 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8736 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8737 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8738 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8740 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8741 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8742 messages tell you these things:
8746 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8749 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8750 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8753 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8754 of the state stack afterward.
8757 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8758 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8759 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8760 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8761 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8762 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8763 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8764 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8765 grammar are to blame.
8767 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8768 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8769 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8770 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8771 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8774 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8776 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8777 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8778 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8779 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8780 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8781 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8783 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8784 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8785 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8788 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8790 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8792 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8795 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8796 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8797 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8798 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8801 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8802 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8803 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8804 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8805 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8806 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8808 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8809 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8810 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8811 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8812 printer will be used for them.
8814 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8815 are sent onto standard error.
8818 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8821 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8822 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8828 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8829 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8830 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8831 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8833 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8835 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8836 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8841 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8842 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8843 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8847 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8848 Shifting token '(' ()
8850 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8851 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8853 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8854 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8855 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8861 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8862 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8863 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8866 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8867 Shifting token '-' ()
8869 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8870 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8872 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8873 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8874 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8875 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8877 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8878 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8879 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8881 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8882 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8888 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8889 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8892 Next token is token ')' ()
8893 Shifting token ')' ()
8895 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8896 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
8898 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8900 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8906 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
8910 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
8911 Shifting token '\n' ()
8913 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
8914 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
8917 -> $$ = nterm line ()
8920 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
8923 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8928 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
8929 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
8930 completion of the parsing.
8933 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
8934 Shifting token $end ()
8937 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
8938 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
8942 @node The YYPRINT Macro
8943 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
8946 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
8947 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
8948 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
8950 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
8952 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
8953 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
8954 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
8956 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
8959 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8960 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8964 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8965 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
8966 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
8969 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8972 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8975 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8976 else if (type == NUM)
8977 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8981 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8984 @chapter Invoking Bison
8985 @cindex invoking Bison
8986 @cindex Bison invocation
8987 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8989 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8995 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8996 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8997 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8998 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8999 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9000 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9001 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9002 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9003 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9004 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9005 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9010 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9013 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9016 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9019 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9021 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9022 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9023 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9026 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9027 in alphabetical order by short options.
9028 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9029 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9033 @section Bison Options
9035 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9036 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9037 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9038 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9039 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9042 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9043 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9046 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9052 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9056 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9058 @item --print-localedir
9059 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9061 @item --print-datadir
9062 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9066 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9067 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9068 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9069 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9070 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9071 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9072 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9073 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9074 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9075 for compatibility with POSIX:
9082 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9083 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9084 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9085 this option is specified.
9087 @item -W [@var{category}]
9088 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9089 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9092 @item midrule-values
9093 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9095 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9098 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9101 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9102 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9105 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9108 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9109 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9110 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9113 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9117 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9118 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9119 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9120 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9121 no effect on the conflict report.
9124 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9126 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9127 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9133 Turn off all the warnings.
9135 Treat warnings as errors.
9138 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9139 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9140 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9149 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9150 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9151 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9153 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9154 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9155 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9156 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9157 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9158 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9159 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9163 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9166 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9167 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9168 definition for @var{name}.
9170 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9171 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9172 definitions for @var{name}.
9174 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9175 definitions for @var{name}.
9178 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9179 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9180 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9182 @item -L @var{language}
9183 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9184 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9185 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9186 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9187 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9189 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9193 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9195 @item -p @var{prefix}
9196 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9197 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9198 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9199 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9203 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9204 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9205 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9206 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9207 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9208 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9211 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9212 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9213 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9215 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9216 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9217 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9218 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9220 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9221 file in the Bison installation directory.
9222 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9223 current working directory.
9224 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9227 @itemx --token-table
9228 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9235 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9236 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9237 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9238 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9241 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9242 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9243 with other short options.
9245 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9246 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9247 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9248 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9250 @item -r @var{things}
9251 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9252 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9253 separated list of @var{things} among:
9257 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9261 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9262 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9265 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9266 each rule's lookahead set.
9269 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9270 precedence and associativity directives.
9273 Enable all the items.
9276 Do not generate the report.
9279 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9280 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9284 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9285 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9286 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9289 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9290 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9292 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9293 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9295 @item -g [@var{file}]
9296 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9297 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9298 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9299 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9300 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9301 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9304 @item -x [@var{file}]
9305 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9306 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9307 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9308 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9310 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9311 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9314 @node Option Cross Key
9315 @section Option Cross Key
9317 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9318 the corresponding short option and directive.
9320 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9321 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9322 @include cross-options.texi
9326 @section Yacc Library
9328 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9329 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9330 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9331 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9332 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9333 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9334 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9336 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9337 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9340 int yyerror (char const *);
9343 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9344 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9345 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9351 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9353 @node Other Languages
9354 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9357 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9358 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9362 @section C++ Parsers
9365 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9366 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9367 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9368 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9369 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9370 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9373 @node C++ Bison Interface
9374 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9375 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9379 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9380 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9381 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9382 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9384 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9386 @findex %define namespace
9387 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9388 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9389 generated in the following files:
9394 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9395 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9396 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9399 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9402 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9403 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9404 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9405 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9406 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9408 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9409 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9410 @samp{%defines} directive.
9413 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9414 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9416 @node C++ Semantic Values
9417 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9418 @c - No objects in unions
9420 @c - Printer and destructor
9422 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9423 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9424 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9425 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9426 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9429 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9430 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9431 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9433 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9434 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9435 to such objects are allowed.
9438 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9439 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9440 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9444 @node C++ Location Values
9445 @subsection C++ Location Values
9449 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9451 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9452 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9454 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9455 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9456 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9457 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9458 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9461 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9462 genuine code only the latter is used.
9465 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9466 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9467 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9471 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9473 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9474 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9475 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9479 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9480 Reset the position to the given values.
9483 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9484 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9485 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9486 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9487 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9490 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9491 The line, starting at 1.
9494 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9495 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9498 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9499 The column, starting at 1.
9502 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9503 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9506 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9507 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9508 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9509 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9510 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9513 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9514 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9515 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9518 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9519 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9520 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9521 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9525 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9527 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9528 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9531 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9532 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9533 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9536 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9537 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9540 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9541 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9542 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9545 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9546 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9547 Advance the @code{end} position.
9550 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9551 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9552 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9553 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9556 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9557 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9560 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9561 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9562 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9566 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9567 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9568 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9571 @node User Defined Location Type
9572 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9573 @findex %define api.location.type
9575 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9576 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9579 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9582 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9585 it must be copyable;
9588 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9589 parser basically runs
9591 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9592 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9595 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9598 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9599 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9602 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9603 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9608 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9609 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9610 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9611 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9616 %define namespace "master::"
9620 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9621 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9624 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9625 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9628 @node C++ Parser Interface
9629 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9630 @c - define parser_class_name
9632 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9634 @c - Reporting errors
9636 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9637 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9638 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9639 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9640 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9641 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9642 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9643 additional argument for its constructor.
9645 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9646 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9647 The types for semantics value and locations.
9650 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9651 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9652 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9653 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9654 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9655 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9658 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9659 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9660 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9663 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9664 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9667 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9668 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9669 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9672 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9673 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9674 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9678 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9679 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9680 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9681 or nonzero, full tracing.
9684 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9685 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9686 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9687 described by @var{m}.
9691 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9692 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9693 @c - prefix for yylex.
9694 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9697 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9698 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9699 @code{%define api.pure} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9701 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9702 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9703 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9704 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9708 @node A Complete C++ Example
9709 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9711 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9712 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9713 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9714 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9715 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9716 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9717 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9718 actually easier to interface with.
9721 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9722 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9723 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9724 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9725 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9728 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9729 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9731 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9732 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9733 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9734 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9735 of valid input follows.
9739 seven := one + two * three
9743 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9744 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9746 @c - A place to store error messages
9747 @c - A place for the result
9749 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9750 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9751 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9752 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9753 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9754 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9755 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9757 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9758 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9759 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9762 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9764 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9765 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9768 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9773 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9774 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9775 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9776 factor both as follows.
9778 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9780 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9782 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9783 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9784 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9785 calcxx_driver& driver)
9786 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9791 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9794 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9796 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9801 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9803 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9809 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9810 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9812 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9814 // Handling the scanner.
9817 bool trace_scanning;
9821 Similarly for the parser itself.
9823 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9825 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9826 int parse (const std::string& f);
9832 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9833 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9834 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9835 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9837 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9840 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9841 void error (const std::string& m);
9843 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9846 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9847 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9848 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9849 messages and set error state.
9851 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9853 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9854 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9856 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9857 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9859 variables["one"] = 1;
9860 variables["two"] = 2;
9863 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9868 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9872 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9873 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9874 int res = parser.parse ();
9880 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9882 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9886 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9888 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9893 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9895 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9896 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9897 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9898 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9901 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9903 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9904 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9906 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9910 @findex %code requires
9911 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
9912 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
9913 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
9914 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9915 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
9916 use a forward declaration of the driver.
9917 @xref{%code Summary}.
9919 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9923 class calcxx_driver;
9928 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9929 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9932 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9934 // The parsing context.
9935 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9936 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9940 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
9941 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9942 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9943 automatically propagated.
9945 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9950 // Initialize the initial location.
9951 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9956 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9957 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9960 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9967 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
9970 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9982 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9983 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9985 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9988 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9994 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9995 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
9996 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
9997 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
10000 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10002 %token END 0 "end of file"
10004 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10005 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
10010 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
10011 @code{%destructor}.
10013 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10014 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10016 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
10017 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
10019 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
10023 The grammar itself is straightforward.
10025 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10029 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10032 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10033 | assignments assignment @{@};
10036 "identifier" ":=" exp
10037 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
10041 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10042 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10043 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10044 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10045 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
10046 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
10051 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10054 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10057 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10058 const std::string& m)
10060 driver.error (l, m);
10064 @node Calc++ Scanner
10065 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10067 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10068 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10070 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10072 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10073 # include <cstdlib>
10075 # include <climits>
10077 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10078 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10080 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10081 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10082 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10083 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10085 # define yywrap() 1
10087 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10088 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10089 not of token_type. */
10090 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10095 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10096 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10097 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10098 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10100 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10102 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10106 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10108 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10110 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10116 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10117 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10118 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10119 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10120 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10121 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10122 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10124 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10128 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10135 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10136 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10140 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10141 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10142 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10143 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10145 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10148 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10150 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10151 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10152 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10155 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10156 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10157 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10159 return token::NUMBER;
10161 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
10162 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10167 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10168 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10170 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10174 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10176 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10177 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10179 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10181 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10182 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10189 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10196 @node Calc++ Top Level
10197 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10199 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10201 @comment file: calc++.cc
10203 #include <iostream>
10204 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10208 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10210 calcxx_driver driver;
10211 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10212 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10213 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10214 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10215 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10216 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10217 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10223 @section Java Parsers
10226 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10227 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10228 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10229 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10230 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10231 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10232 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10233 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10236 @node Java Bison Interface
10237 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10238 @c - %language "Java"
10240 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10241 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10243 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10244 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10246 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10247 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10248 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10249 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10250 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10251 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10252 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10253 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10254 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10255 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10257 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10259 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10260 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10261 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10262 and @code{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10265 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10266 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10268 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10269 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10271 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10272 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10274 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10275 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10276 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10277 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10278 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10279 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10280 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10281 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10282 access the token names and codes.
10284 @node Java Semantic Values
10285 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10286 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10288 @c - Printer and destructor
10290 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10291 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10292 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10295 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10296 %type <Integer> number
10299 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10300 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10301 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10302 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10303 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10306 %define stype "ASTNode"
10310 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10311 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10313 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10314 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10315 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10316 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10317 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10318 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10320 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10321 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10322 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10324 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10325 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10326 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10329 @node Java Location Values
10330 @subsection Java Location Values
10332 @c - class Position
10333 @c - class Location
10335 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10336 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10337 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10338 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10339 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10340 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10341 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10343 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10344 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10345 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10346 be supplied by the user.
10349 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10350 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10351 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10354 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10355 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10358 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10359 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10362 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10363 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10364 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10365 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10369 @node Java Parser Interface
10370 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10371 @c - define parser_class_name
10373 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10375 @c - Reporting errors
10377 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10378 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10379 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10380 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10381 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10383 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10384 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10385 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10386 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10387 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10388 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10390 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10391 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10392 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10393 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10395 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10396 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10397 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10398 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10399 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10400 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10402 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10403 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10405 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10406 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10407 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10408 which initialize them automatically.
10410 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10411 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10413 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10414 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10415 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10419 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10420 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10421 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10423 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10424 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10425 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10428 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10429 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10430 @code{false} otherwise.
10433 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10434 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10435 from a syntax error.
10436 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10439 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10440 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10441 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10445 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10446 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10447 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10448 or nonzero, full tracing.
10452 @node Java Scanner Interface
10453 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10456 @c - Lexer interface
10458 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10459 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10460 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10461 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10463 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10464 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10465 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10466 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10469 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10470 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10471 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10472 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10475 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10477 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10478 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10479 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10480 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10483 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10484 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10485 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10488 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10489 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10492 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10493 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10494 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10495 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10496 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10498 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10499 "@var{class-name}".}
10502 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10503 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10505 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10506 "@var{class-name}".}
10510 @node Java Action Features
10511 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10513 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10514 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10516 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10517 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10520 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10521 This may not be assigned to.
10522 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10525 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10526 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10527 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10531 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10532 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10533 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10534 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10535 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10536 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10539 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10540 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10541 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10542 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10544 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10548 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10549 This may not be assigned to.
10550 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10554 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10555 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10558 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10559 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10560 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10563 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10564 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10565 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10568 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10569 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10570 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10573 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10574 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10575 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10577 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10580 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10581 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10582 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10583 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10588 @node Java Differences
10589 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10591 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10592 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10593 section summarizes these differences.
10597 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10598 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10599 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10600 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10601 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10602 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10603 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10605 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10606 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10607 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10608 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10609 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10612 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10613 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10614 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10615 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10616 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10617 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10618 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10619 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10620 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10623 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10625 @item @code{%code imports}
10626 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10627 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10628 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10630 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10631 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10633 @item @code{%code lexer}
10634 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10635 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10636 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10640 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10641 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10642 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10644 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10645 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10650 @node Java Declarations Summary
10651 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10653 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10654 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10656 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10657 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10660 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10661 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10662 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10663 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10664 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10667 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10668 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10669 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10670 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10673 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10674 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10675 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10676 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10679 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10680 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10681 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10684 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10685 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10686 a Java @emph{type}.
10687 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10690 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10691 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10692 @xref{Java Differences}.
10695 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10696 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10697 @xref{Java Differences}.
10700 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10701 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10702 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10705 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10706 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10707 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10708 @xref{Java Differences}.
10711 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10712 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10713 @xref{Java Differences}.
10716 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10717 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10718 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10721 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10722 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10723 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10726 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10727 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10728 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10731 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10732 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10734 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10737 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10738 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10739 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10740 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10743 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
10744 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10745 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10746 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10747 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
10748 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10751 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10752 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10753 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10756 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10757 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10758 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10759 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10762 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
10763 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10764 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10765 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
10766 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10769 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10770 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10771 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10774 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10775 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10776 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10779 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10780 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10781 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10784 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10785 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10786 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10787 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10791 @c ================================================= FAQ
10794 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10795 @cindex frequently asked questions
10798 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10802 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10803 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10804 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10805 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10806 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10807 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10808 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10809 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10810 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10811 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10812 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10813 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10816 @node Memory Exhausted
10817 @section Memory Exhausted
10820 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10821 message. What can I do?
10824 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10827 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10828 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10830 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10831 following typical questions:
10834 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10835 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10836 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10843 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10844 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10845 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10848 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10849 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10850 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10851 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10852 @file{first-line.l}:
10858 #include <stdlib.h>
10862 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10866 yyparse (char const *file)
10868 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10872 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10876 /* One token only. */
10878 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10881 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10899 If the file @file{input} contains
10907 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10910 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10911 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10912 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10917 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10918 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10919 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10920 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10921 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10922 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10923 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10924 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10927 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10928 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10929 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10930 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10932 @node Strings are Destroyed
10933 @section Strings are Destroyed
10936 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10937 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10938 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10941 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10942 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10943 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10949 char *yylval = NULL;
10954 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10962 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10963 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10964 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10965 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10971 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10974 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10975 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10976 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10982 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10983 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10984 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10985 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10986 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10987 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10990 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10991 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10992 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10997 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10998 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11001 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11002 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11005 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11006 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11007 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11008 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11009 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11010 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11011 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11013 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11015 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11016 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11017 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11018 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11019 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11020 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11023 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11024 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11027 @node Multiple start-symbols
11028 @section Multiple start-symbols
11031 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11032 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11033 multiple entry points.
11036 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11037 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11038 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11039 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11043 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11050 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11051 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11053 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11054 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11055 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11056 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11057 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11058 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11059 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11060 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11063 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11068 int t = start_token;
11073 /* @r{The rules.} */
11077 @node Secure? Conform?
11078 @section Secure? Conform?
11081 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11084 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11085 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11086 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11087 please send us a bug report.
11089 @node I can't build Bison
11090 @section I can't build Bison
11093 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11094 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11098 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11099 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11100 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11101 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11102 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11103 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11104 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11107 @node Where can I find help?
11108 @section Where can I find help?
11111 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11114 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11115 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11116 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11117 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11118 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11119 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11120 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11121 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11125 @section Bug Reports
11128 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11131 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11132 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11133 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11134 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11135 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11137 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11138 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11139 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11140 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11141 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11143 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11144 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11145 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11146 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11147 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11148 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11150 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11151 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11153 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11155 @node More Languages
11156 @section More Languages
11159 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11160 favorite language here}?
11163 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11164 languages; contributions are welcome.
11167 @section Beta Testing
11170 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11173 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11174 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11175 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11176 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11177 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11178 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11179 essentially halted.
11181 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11182 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11183 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11184 systems are especially welcome.
11186 @node Mailing Lists
11187 @section Mailing Lists
11190 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11193 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11195 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11197 @node Table of Symbols
11198 @appendix Bison Symbols
11199 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11200 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11202 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11203 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11204 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11207 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11208 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11209 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11212 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11213 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11217 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11218 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11222 @deffn {Variable} $$
11223 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11227 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11228 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11229 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11232 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11233 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11237 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11238 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11242 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11243 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11244 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11245 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11248 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11249 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11250 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11251 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11252 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11256 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11257 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11260 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11261 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11265 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11266 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11269 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11270 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11271 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11274 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11275 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11278 This feature is experimental.
11279 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11282 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11285 @deffn {Directive} <>
11286 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11289 This feature is experimental.
11290 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11293 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11296 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11297 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11298 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11299 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11302 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11303 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11304 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11305 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11306 @xref{%code Summary}.
11309 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11310 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11314 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11315 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11316 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11321 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11322 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11323 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11324 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11327 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11328 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11329 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11332 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11333 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11334 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11337 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11338 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11339 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11342 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11343 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11344 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11348 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11349 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11350 used in the grammar.
11353 @deffn {Symbol} error
11354 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11355 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11356 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11357 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11358 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11359 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11360 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11361 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11364 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11365 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11366 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11369 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11370 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11374 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11375 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11376 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11379 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11380 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11383 @deffn {Directive} %language
11384 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11385 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11388 @deffn {Directive} %left
11389 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11390 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11393 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11394 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11395 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11399 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11400 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11401 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11402 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11403 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11406 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11407 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11408 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11410 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11411 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11412 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11414 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11415 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11416 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11417 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11418 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11419 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11420 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11421 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11426 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11427 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11428 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11433 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11434 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11435 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11438 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11439 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11440 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11443 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11444 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11445 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11448 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11449 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11450 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11451 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11454 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11455 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11456 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11459 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11460 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11461 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11462 unreasonable usage.
11465 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11466 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11467 Require a Version of Bison}.
11470 @deffn {Directive} %right
11471 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11472 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11475 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11476 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11477 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11480 @deffn {Directive} %start
11481 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11485 @deffn {Directive} %token
11486 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11487 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11490 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11491 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11492 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11495 @deffn {Directive} %type
11496 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11497 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11500 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11501 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11502 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11506 @deffn {Directive} %union
11507 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11508 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11511 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11512 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11513 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11514 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11515 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11517 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11521 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11522 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11523 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11524 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11526 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11530 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11531 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11532 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11535 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11536 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11537 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11538 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11539 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11542 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11543 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11544 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11547 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11548 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11549 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11552 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11553 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11554 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11555 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11558 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11559 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11560 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11563 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11564 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11565 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11566 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11567 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11568 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11570 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11574 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11575 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11576 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11577 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11580 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11581 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11582 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11583 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11584 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11585 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11586 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11589 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11590 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11591 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11594 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11595 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11596 @xref{Memory Management}.
11599 @deffn {Function} yylex
11600 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11601 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11605 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11606 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11607 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11608 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11609 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11612 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11613 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11614 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11615 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11617 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11619 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11620 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11621 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11624 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11625 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11626 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11629 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11630 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11631 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11632 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11634 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11635 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11636 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11639 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11640 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11644 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11645 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11646 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11647 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11648 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11651 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11652 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11653 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11656 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11657 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11658 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11659 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11662 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11663 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11664 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11665 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11666 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11667 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11668 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11671 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11672 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11673 call this function to create a new parser.
11674 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11675 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11676 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11677 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11680 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11681 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11682 parse the rest of the input stream.
11683 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11684 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11685 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11686 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11689 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11690 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11691 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11692 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11693 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11694 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11697 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11698 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11699 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11700 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11701 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11704 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11705 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11706 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11707 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11710 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11711 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11712 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11713 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11714 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11715 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11716 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11718 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11719 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11720 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11721 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11722 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11723 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11724 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11727 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11728 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11729 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11737 @item Accepting state
11738 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11739 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11740 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11742 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11743 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11744 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11745 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11746 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11748 @item Consistent state
11749 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11751 @item Context-free grammars
11752 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11753 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11754 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11755 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11758 @item Default reduction
11759 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11760 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11761 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11762 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11765 @item Defaulted state
11766 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11768 @item Dynamic allocation
11769 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11770 compile time or on entry to a function.
11773 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11774 character string of length zero.
11776 @item Finite-state stack machine
11777 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11778 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11779 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11780 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11781 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11782 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11784 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11785 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11786 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11787 deterministic parsing
11788 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11789 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11790 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11794 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11795 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11796 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11798 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11799 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11800 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11801 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11802 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11803 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11804 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11805 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11806 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11807 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11809 @item Infix operator
11810 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11811 performs some operation.
11814 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11816 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11817 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11818 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11819 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11820 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11821 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11822 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11824 @item Language construct
11825 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11826 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11827 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11829 @item Left associativity
11830 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11831 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11832 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11834 @item Left recursion
11835 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11836 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11839 @item Left-to-right parsing
11840 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11841 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11843 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11844 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11845 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11847 @item Lexical tie-in
11848 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11849 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11851 @item Literal string token
11852 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11854 @item Lookahead token
11855 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11859 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11860 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11861 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11864 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11865 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11867 @item Nonterminal symbol
11868 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11869 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11870 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11873 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11874 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11877 @item Postfix operator
11878 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11879 performs some operation.
11882 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11883 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11887 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11888 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11889 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11891 @item Reverse polish notation
11892 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11894 @item Right recursion
11895 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11896 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11900 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11901 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11902 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11905 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11906 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11907 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11909 @item Single-character literal
11910 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11911 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11914 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11915 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11916 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11917 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11920 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11921 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11922 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11925 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11926 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11929 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11930 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11931 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11932 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11934 @item Terminal symbol
11935 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11936 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11937 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11939 @item Unreachable state
11940 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11941 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11942 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11945 @node Copying This Manual
11946 @appendix Copying This Manual
11950 @unnumbered Bibliography
11954 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11955 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11956 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11957 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11959 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11960 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11961 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11962 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11963 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11965 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11966 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11967 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11968 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11969 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11971 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11972 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11973 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11974 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11975 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11978 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11979 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11980 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11983 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11984 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11985 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11986 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11989 @node Index of Terms
11990 @unnumbered Index of Terms
11996 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11997 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11998 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11999 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12000 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12001 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12002 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12003 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12004 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12005 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12006 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12007 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12008 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12009 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12010 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12011 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12012 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12013 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12014 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12015 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12016 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12017 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12018 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12019 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12020 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12021 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12022 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12023 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12024 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12025 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12026 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12027 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12028 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12029 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12030 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12031 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12032 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12033 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12034 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12035 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12036 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12037 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12038 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12039 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12040 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12041 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12042 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12043 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12044 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12045 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12046 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12047 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12048 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12049 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12050 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose
12052 @c Local Variables:
12053 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"