1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2013 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
190 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
191 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
192 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
193 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
195 Outline of a Bison Grammar
197 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
198 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
199 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
200 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
201 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
205 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
206 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
207 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
210 Defining Language Semantics
212 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
213 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
214 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
215 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
216 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
217 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
218 action in the middle of a rule.
222 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
223 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
224 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
228 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
229 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
230 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
234 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
235 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
236 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
237 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
238 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
239 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
240 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
241 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
242 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
243 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
244 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
245 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
246 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
247 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
248 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
250 Parser C-Language Interface
252 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
253 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
254 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
255 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
256 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
257 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
259 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
260 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
261 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
264 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
266 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
267 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
268 of the token it has read.
269 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
270 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
272 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
273 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
275 The Bison Parser Algorithm
277 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
278 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
279 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
280 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
281 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
282 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
283 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
284 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
285 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
286 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
290 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
291 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
292 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
293 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
294 * How Precedence:: How they work.
295 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
299 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
300 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
301 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
302 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
304 Handling Context Dependencies
306 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
307 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
308 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
309 error recovery rules must be written.
311 Debugging Your Parser
313 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
314 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
315 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
316 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
320 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
321 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
322 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
326 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
327 in alphabetical order by short options.
328 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
329 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
331 Parsers Written In Other Languages
333 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
334 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
338 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
339 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
340 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
341 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
342 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
343 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
347 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
348 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
349 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
351 A Complete C++ Example
353 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
354 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
355 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
356 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
357 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
361 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
362 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
363 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
364 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
365 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
366 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
367 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
368 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
370 Frequently Asked Questions
372 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
373 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
374 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
375 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
376 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
377 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
378 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
379 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
380 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
381 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
382 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
383 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
387 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
393 @unnumbered Introduction
396 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
397 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
398 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
399 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
400 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
401 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
402 calculators to complex programming languages.
404 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
405 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
406 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
407 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
408 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
411 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
412 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
413 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
414 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
417 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
418 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
419 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
420 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
421 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
422 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
425 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
428 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
430 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
431 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
432 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
433 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
434 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
436 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
438 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
439 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
440 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
441 License to all of the Bison source code.
443 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
444 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
445 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
446 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
447 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
448 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
449 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
451 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
452 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
453 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
454 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
455 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
456 using the other GNU tools.
458 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
459 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
460 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
461 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
465 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
466 @include gpl-3.0.texi
469 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
471 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
472 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
473 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
476 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
477 as mathematical ideas.
478 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
479 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
480 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
481 the name of an identifier, etc.).
482 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
483 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
484 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
485 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
486 how is the output used?
487 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
488 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
491 @node Language and Grammar
492 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
494 @cindex context-free grammar
495 @cindex grammar, context-free
496 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
497 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
498 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
499 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
500 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
501 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
502 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
503 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
507 @cindex Backus-Naur form
508 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
509 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
510 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
511 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
512 essentially machine-readable BNF.
514 @cindex LALR grammars
515 @cindex IELR grammars
517 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
518 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
519 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
520 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
521 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
522 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
523 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
524 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
525 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
526 Construction}, to learn how.
529 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
530 @cindex ambiguous grammars
531 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
533 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
534 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
535 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
536 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
537 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
538 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
539 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
540 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
541 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
542 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
543 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
544 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
545 possible parses of any given string is finite.
547 @cindex symbols (abstract)
549 @cindex syntactic grouping
550 @cindex grouping, syntactic
551 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
552 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
553 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
554 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
555 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
556 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
557 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
559 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
560 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
561 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
562 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
563 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
564 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
565 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
566 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
567 lexicography, not grammar.)
569 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
572 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
573 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
574 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
575 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
576 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
577 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
578 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
581 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
582 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
583 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
584 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
585 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
586 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
587 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
588 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
590 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
591 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
592 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
593 reads informally as follows:
596 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
601 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
605 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
606 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
607 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
608 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
611 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
612 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
613 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
614 not the start symbol.
616 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
617 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
618 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
619 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
620 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
621 reports a syntax error.
623 @node Grammar in Bison
624 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
625 @cindex Bison grammar
626 @cindex grammar, Bison
627 @cindex formal grammar
629 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
630 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
631 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
633 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
634 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
635 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
637 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
638 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
639 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
640 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
641 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
642 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
643 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
646 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
647 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
648 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
649 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
651 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
652 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
654 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
655 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
656 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
657 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
661 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
665 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
667 @node Semantic Values
668 @section Semantic Values
669 @cindex semantic value
670 @cindex value, semantic
672 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
673 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
674 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
675 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
676 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
679 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
680 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
681 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
682 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
683 ,Defining Language Semantics},
686 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
687 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
688 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
689 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
692 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
693 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
694 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
695 need to have any semantic value.)
697 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
698 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
699 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
700 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
701 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
702 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
704 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
705 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
706 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
707 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
708 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
710 @node Semantic Actions
711 @section Semantic Actions
712 @cindex semantic actions
713 @cindex actions, semantic
715 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
716 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
717 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
718 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
721 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
722 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
723 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
724 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
725 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
726 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
727 newly recognized larger expression.
729 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
733 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
737 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
738 from the values of the two subexpressions.
741 @section Writing GLR Parsers
743 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
746 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
747 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
749 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
750 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
751 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
752 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
753 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
754 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
755 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
756 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
757 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
759 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
760 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
761 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
762 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
763 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
764 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
765 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
766 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
767 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
768 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
769 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
770 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
771 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
772 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
773 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
774 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
775 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
776 identical set of symbols.
778 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
779 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
780 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
781 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
782 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
783 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
784 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
785 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
786 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
790 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
791 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
792 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
793 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
794 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
797 @node Simple GLR Parsers
798 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
799 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
800 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
804 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
805 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
807 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
808 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
809 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
811 Consider a problem that
812 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
813 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
816 type subrange = lo .. hi;
817 type enum = (a, b, c);
821 The original language standard allows only numeric
822 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
823 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
824 10206) and many other
825 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
826 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
830 type subrange = (a) .. b;
834 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
835 type with only one value:
842 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
843 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
845 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
846 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
847 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
848 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
849 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
850 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
851 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
852 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
854 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
855 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
856 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
857 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
860 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
861 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
862 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
863 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
864 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
865 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
868 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
869 use the GLR algorithm.
870 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
871 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
872 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
873 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
874 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
875 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
876 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
877 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
878 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
880 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
881 reports a syntax error as usual.
883 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
884 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
885 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
886 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
887 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
889 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
890 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
891 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
892 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
893 The present example contains only one conflict between two
894 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
895 cannot be nested. So the number of
896 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
897 and the parsing time is still linear.
899 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
900 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
903 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
911 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
939 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
940 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
941 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
942 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
949 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
950 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
951 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
960 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
961 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
962 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
963 notice when the parser splits.
965 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
966 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
967 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
968 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
969 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
970 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
971 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
972 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
973 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
974 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
975 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
976 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
977 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
980 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
981 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
982 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
983 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
984 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
985 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
987 @node Merging GLR Parses
988 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
989 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
990 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
994 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
996 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
1001 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1003 void yyerror (char const *);
1017 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1026 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1027 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1028 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1029 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1030 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1034 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1035 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1036 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1037 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1041 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1042 | '(' declarator ')'
1047 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1048 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1055 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1056 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1057 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1058 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1059 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1060 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1061 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1062 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1063 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1064 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1065 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1066 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1067 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1068 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1070 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1071 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1072 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1073 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1074 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1075 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1076 The parser therefore prints
1079 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1082 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1083 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1090 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1091 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1092 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1093 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1094 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1095 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1096 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1097 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1098 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1099 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1105 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1106 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1107 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1108 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1113 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1114 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1119 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1123 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1131 with an accompanying forward declaration
1132 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1136 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1137 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1142 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1143 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1146 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1149 Bison requires that all of the
1150 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1151 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1152 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1153 the offending merge.
1155 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1156 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1158 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1159 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1161 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1162 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1163 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1164 the associated reduction.
1165 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1166 action in a GLR parser.
1169 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1171 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1173 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1174 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1175 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1176 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1177 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1178 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1179 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1180 influence syntax analysis.
1181 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1184 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1185 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1186 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1187 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1188 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1189 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1190 future versions of Bison.
1191 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1192 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1193 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1195 @subsubsection YYERROR
1197 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1198 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1199 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1200 initiate error recovery.
1201 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1202 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1203 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1204 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1205 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1206 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1207 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1208 the parse that invoked the test.
1210 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1211 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1212 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1215 @node Semantic Predicates
1216 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1218 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1220 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1222 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1223 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1224 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1225 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1229 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1230 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1235 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1236 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1237 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1238 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1239 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1240 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1241 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1243 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1244 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1245 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1246 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1249 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1250 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1251 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1255 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1256 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1257 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1258 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1263 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1264 false). However, this
1265 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1266 have overlapping syntax.
1267 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1268 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1269 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1270 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1273 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1274 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1276 @node Compiler Requirements
1277 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1278 @cindex @code{inline}
1279 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1281 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1282 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1283 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1284 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1285 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1286 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1295 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1299 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1300 && ! defined inline)
1309 @cindex textual location
1310 @cindex location, textual
1312 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1313 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1314 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1315 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1317 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1318 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1319 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1320 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1323 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1324 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1325 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1328 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1329 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1330 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1331 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1332 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1333 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1334 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1337 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1338 @cindex Bison parser
1339 @cindex Bison utility
1340 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1343 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1344 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1345 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1346 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1347 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1348 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1349 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1352 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1353 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1354 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1357 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1358 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1359 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1360 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1361 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1362 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1363 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1365 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1366 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1367 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1368 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1369 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1370 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1371 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1372 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1373 C-Language Interface}.
1375 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1376 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1377 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1378 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1379 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1380 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1381 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1382 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1383 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1384 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1385 anything other than their usual meanings.
1387 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1388 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1389 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1390 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1391 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1392 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1393 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1394 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1395 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1398 @section Stages in Using Bison
1399 @cindex stages in using Bison
1402 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1403 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1407 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1408 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1409 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1410 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1411 sequence of C statements.
1414 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1415 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1416 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1417 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1420 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1423 Write error-reporting routines.
1426 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1427 must follow these steps:
1431 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1434 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1437 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1440 @node Grammar Layout
1441 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1442 @cindex grammar file
1444 @cindex format of grammar file
1445 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1447 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1448 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1455 @var{Bison declarations}
1464 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1465 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1467 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1468 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1469 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1470 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1471 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1472 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1474 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1475 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1476 semantic values of various symbols.
1478 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1481 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1482 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1483 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1487 @cindex simple examples
1488 @cindex examples, simple
1490 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1491 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1492 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1493 and a multi-function calculator. All
1494 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1496 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1497 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1498 source file to try them.
1501 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1502 a first example with no operator precedence.
1503 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1504 Operator precedence is introduced.
1505 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1506 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1507 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1508 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1509 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1513 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1514 @cindex reverse polish notation
1515 @cindex polish notation calculator
1516 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1517 @cindex calculator, simple
1519 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1520 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1521 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1522 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1524 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1525 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1528 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1529 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1530 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1531 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1532 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1533 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1534 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1537 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1538 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1540 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1541 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1543 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1545 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1549 #define YYSTYPE double
1553 void yyerror (char const *);
1559 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1562 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1563 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1565 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1566 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1567 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1568 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1569 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1570 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1571 which is a floating point number.
1573 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1574 function @code{pow}.
1576 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1577 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1578 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1579 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1582 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1583 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1584 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1585 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1586 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1587 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1588 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1589 type for numeric constants.
1592 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1594 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1596 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1608 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1615 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1616 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1617 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1618 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1619 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1620 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1626 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1627 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1628 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1629 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1630 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1633 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1634 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1635 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1637 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1638 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1639 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1640 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1641 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1642 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1645 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1646 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1647 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1651 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1653 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1662 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1663 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1664 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1665 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1666 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1668 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1669 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1670 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1671 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1672 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and to use the
1673 (optional) @code{%empty} directive, or to write the comment @samp{/* empty
1674 */} in it (@pxref{Empty Rules}).
1676 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1677 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1678 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1679 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1682 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1683 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1684 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1687 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1689 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1694 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1698 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1699 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1700 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1701 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1702 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1703 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1704 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1706 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1707 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1708 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1709 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1710 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1713 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1715 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1716 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1717 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1718 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1723 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1724 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1729 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1730 equally well have written them separately:
1734 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1735 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1739 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1740 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1741 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1742 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1743 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1744 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1745 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1746 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1748 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1749 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1750 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1752 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1753 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1757 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1761 means the same thing as this:
1766 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1772 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1775 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1776 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1777 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1779 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1780 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1781 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1782 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1784 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1786 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1787 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1788 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1789 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1791 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1792 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1793 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1794 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1795 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1796 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1797 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1798 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1799 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1801 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1802 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1803 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1804 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1805 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1807 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1808 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1810 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1812 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1815 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1816 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1817 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1818 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1829 /* Skip white space. */
1830 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1834 /* Process numbers. */
1835 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1838 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1843 /* Return end-of-input. */
1846 /* Return a single char. */
1853 @subsection The Controlling Function
1854 @cindex controlling function
1855 @cindex main function in simple example
1857 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1858 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1859 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1861 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1873 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1874 @cindex error reporting routine
1876 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1877 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1878 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1879 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1880 here is the definition we will use:
1882 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1887 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1889 yyerror (char const *s)
1891 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1896 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1897 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1898 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1899 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1900 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1901 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1903 @node Rpcalc Generate
1904 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1905 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1907 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1908 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1909 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1910 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1911 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1912 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1914 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1915 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1917 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1918 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1925 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1926 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1927 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1928 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1929 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1930 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1931 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1933 @node Rpcalc Compile
1934 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1935 @cindex compiling the parser
1937 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1941 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1943 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1947 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1948 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1949 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1953 # @r{List files again.}
1955 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1959 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1960 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1966 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1968 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1971 @result{} -3.166666667
1972 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1974 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1979 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1980 @cindex infix notation calculator
1982 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1984 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1985 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1986 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1987 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1990 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1994 #define YYSTYPE double
1998 void yyerror (char const *);
2003 /* Bison declarations. */
2007 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2008 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2011 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2022 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2029 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2030 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2031 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2032 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2033 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2034 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2035 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2042 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2045 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2047 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2048 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2049 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2050 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2051 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2052 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2053 the associativity/precedence.)
2055 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2056 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2057 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2058 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2059 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2060 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2063 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2064 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2065 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2066 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2067 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2069 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2074 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2082 @node Simple Error Recovery
2083 @section Simple Error Recovery
2084 @cindex error recovery, simple
2086 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2087 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2088 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2089 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2090 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2091 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2093 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2094 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2095 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2101 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2102 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2107 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2108 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2109 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2110 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2111 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2112 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2113 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2114 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2117 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2118 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2119 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2120 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2121 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2122 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2125 @node Location Tracking Calc
2126 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2127 @cindex location tracking calculator
2128 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2129 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2131 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2132 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2133 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2134 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2138 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2139 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2140 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2143 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2144 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2146 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2147 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2150 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2156 void yyerror (char const *);
2159 /* Bison declarations. */
2167 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2171 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2172 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2173 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2174 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2175 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2176 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2177 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2181 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2183 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2184 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2185 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2186 from the new information.
2188 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2189 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2202 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2209 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2210 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2211 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2221 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2222 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2223 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2228 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2229 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2230 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2234 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2235 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2236 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2238 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2239 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2240 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2241 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2242 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2243 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2247 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2249 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2250 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2251 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2254 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2255 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2266 /* Skip white space. */
2267 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2268 ++yylloc.last_column;
2273 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2274 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2278 /* Process numbers. */
2282 ++yylloc.last_column;
2283 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2285 ++yylloc.last_column;
2286 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2293 /* Return end-of-input. */
2298 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2302 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2305 ++yylloc.last_column;
2311 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2312 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2313 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2314 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2316 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2317 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2318 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2319 controlling function:
2326 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2327 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2333 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2334 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2335 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2337 @node Multi-function Calc
2338 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2339 @cindex multi-function calculator
2340 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2341 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2343 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2344 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2345 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2346 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2347 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2349 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2350 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2351 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2352 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2353 functions whose syntax has this form:
2356 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2360 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2361 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2362 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2367 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2368 @result{} 3.1415926536
2372 @result{} 0.0000000000
2374 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2375 @result{} 2.3000000000
2377 @result{} 2.3000000000
2379 @result{} 0.8329091229
2380 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2381 @result{} 2.3000000000
2385 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2388 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2389 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2390 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2391 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2392 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2395 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2396 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2398 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2400 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2404 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2405 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2406 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of 'symrec'. */
2408 void yyerror (char const *);
2414 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2415 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2418 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2419 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2426 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2427 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2431 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2432 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2433 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2435 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2436 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2437 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2438 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2440 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2441 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2442 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2443 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2444 between angle brackets).
2446 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2447 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2448 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2449 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2450 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2451 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2454 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2456 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2457 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2458 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2460 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2462 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2473 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2474 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2481 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2482 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2483 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2484 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2485 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2486 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2487 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2488 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2489 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2490 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2493 /* End of grammar. */
2497 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2498 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2499 @cindex symbol table example
2501 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2502 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2503 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2504 requires some additional C functions for support.
2506 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2507 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2508 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2510 @comment file: calc.h
2513 /* Function type. */
2514 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2518 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2521 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2522 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2525 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2526 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2528 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2533 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2535 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2536 extern symrec *sym_table;
2538 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2539 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2543 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2546 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2552 double (*fnct) (double);
2557 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2570 /* The symbol table: a chain of 'struct symrec'. */
2575 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2581 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2583 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2584 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2590 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2591 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2593 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2594 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2595 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2596 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2597 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2598 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2600 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2602 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2603 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2607 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2609 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2610 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2611 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2612 ptr->type = sym_type;
2613 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2614 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2622 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2625 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2626 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2627 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2635 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2637 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2638 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2639 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2640 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2642 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2643 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2644 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2645 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2646 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2647 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2649 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2650 operators in @code{yylex}.
2652 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2662 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2663 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2671 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2672 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2675 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2681 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2684 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2685 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2686 static size_t length = 40;
2687 static char *symbuf = 0;
2692 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2698 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2702 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2704 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2706 /* Get another character. */
2711 while (isalnum (c));
2718 s = getsym (symbuf);
2720 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2725 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2732 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2734 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2735 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2736 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2738 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2741 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2743 yyerror (char const *s)
2745 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2751 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2754 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2755 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2756 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2764 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2765 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2766 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2774 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2777 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2778 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2779 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2782 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2783 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2787 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2789 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2790 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2792 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2793 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2796 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2797 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2798 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2799 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2800 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2801 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2802 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2803 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2806 @node Grammar Outline
2807 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2810 @findex /* @dots{} */
2812 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2813 appropriate delimiters:
2820 @var{Bison declarations}
2829 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2830 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that continues until end
2834 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2835 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2836 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2837 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2838 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2842 @subsection The prologue
2843 @cindex declarations section
2845 @cindex declarations
2847 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2848 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2849 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2850 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2851 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2852 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2853 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2855 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2856 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2859 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2860 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2861 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2862 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2863 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2864 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2865 @code{%union} declaration.
2879 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2885 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2886 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2893 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2894 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2895 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2896 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2897 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2898 @code{#include} directives.
2900 @node Prologue Alternatives
2901 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2902 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2905 @findex %code requires
2906 @findex %code provides
2909 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2910 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2911 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2912 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2913 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2914 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2915 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2917 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2931 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2937 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2938 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2946 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2947 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2948 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2949 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2950 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2951 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2952 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2953 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2954 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2955 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2956 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2958 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2959 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2960 This behavior raises a few questions.
2961 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2962 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2963 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2964 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2965 This behavior is not intuitive.
2967 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2968 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2969 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2970 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2977 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2978 * in a '%code requires'; see below. */
2981 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2982 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2995 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3001 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3002 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3003 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3011 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
3012 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
3013 explicit which kind you intend.
3014 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
3016 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
3017 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
3018 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
3019 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
3020 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
3021 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
3022 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
3023 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
3024 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
3027 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
3028 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
3030 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3048 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3054 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3055 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3068 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3069 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3070 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3078 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3079 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3080 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3081 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3082 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3083 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3085 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3086 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3087 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3088 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3089 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3090 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3091 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3092 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3093 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3094 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3095 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3098 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3099 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3100 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3101 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3102 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3103 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3104 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3105 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3106 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3107 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3125 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3131 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3132 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3145 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3151 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3152 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3160 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3161 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3162 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3165 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3166 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3167 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3168 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3169 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3170 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3173 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3174 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3175 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3176 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3178 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3179 organize your grammar file.
3180 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3185 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3186 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3187 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3188 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3192 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3193 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3194 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3195 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3200 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3201 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3203 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3205 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3206 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3207 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3208 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3210 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3211 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3212 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3213 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3214 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3215 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3216 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3217 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3220 @node Bison Declarations
3221 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3222 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3223 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3225 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3226 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3227 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3228 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3231 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3232 @cindex grammar rules section
3233 @cindex rules section for grammar
3235 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3236 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3238 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3239 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3240 if it is the first thing in the file.
3243 @subsection The epilogue
3244 @cindex additional C code section
3246 @cindex C code, section for additional
3248 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3249 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3250 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3251 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3252 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3253 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3254 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3255 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3256 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3257 C-Language Interface}.
3259 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3260 from the grammar rules.
3262 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3263 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3264 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3265 of the grammar file.
3268 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3269 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3270 @cindex terminal symbol
3274 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3277 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3278 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3279 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3280 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3281 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3282 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3283 the symbol to stand for it.
3285 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3286 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3287 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3289 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3290 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3291 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3292 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3293 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3294 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3295 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3297 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3301 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3302 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3303 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3304 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3307 @cindex character token
3308 @cindex literal token
3309 @cindex single-character literal
3310 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3311 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3312 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3313 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3314 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3315 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3316 ,Operator Precedence}).
3318 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3319 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3320 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3321 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3322 your program will confuse other readers.
3324 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3325 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3326 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3327 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3328 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3329 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3333 @cindex string token
3334 @cindex literal string token
3335 @cindex multicharacter literal
3336 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3337 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3338 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3339 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3340 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3342 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3343 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3344 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3345 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3346 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3348 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3350 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3351 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3352 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3353 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3354 read your program will be confused.
3356 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3357 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3358 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3359 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3360 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3361 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3364 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3365 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3366 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3368 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3369 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3370 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3371 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3372 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3373 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3374 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3375 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3376 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3377 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3378 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3379 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3381 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3382 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3383 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3384 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3385 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3387 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3388 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3389 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3390 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3391 characters in the following C-language string:
3394 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3397 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3398 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3399 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3400 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3401 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3402 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3403 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3404 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3405 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3406 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3409 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3410 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3411 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3412 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3413 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3416 @section Grammar Rules
3418 A Bison grammar is a list of rules.
3421 * Rules Syntax:: Syntax of the rules.
3422 * Empty Rules:: Symbols that can match the empty string.
3423 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
3427 @subsection Syntax of Grammar Rules
3429 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3430 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3432 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3435 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3439 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3440 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3441 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3450 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3451 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3453 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3454 extra white space as you wish.
3456 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3457 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3460 @{@var{C statements}@}
3465 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3466 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3467 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3468 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3469 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3470 compiler can check it.
3472 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3473 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3474 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3475 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3476 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3477 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3478 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3479 character constants.
3481 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3485 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3486 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3491 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3492 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3499 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3502 @subsection Empty Rules
3507 A rule is said to be @dfn{empty} if its right-hand side (@var{components})
3508 is empty. It means that @var{result} can match the empty string. For
3509 example, here is how to define an optional semicolon:
3512 semicolon.opt: | ";";
3516 It is easy not to see an empty rule, especially when @code{|} is used. The
3517 @code{%empty} directive allows to make explicit that a rule is empty on
3529 Flagging a non-empty rule with @code{%empty} is an error. If run with
3530 @option{-Wempty-rule}, @command{bison} will report empty rules without
3531 @code{%empty}. Using @code{%empty} enables this warning, unless
3532 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
3534 The @code{%empty} directive is a Bison extension, it does not work with
3535 Yacc. To remain compatible with POSIX Yacc, it is customary to write a
3536 comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule with no components:
3549 @subsection Recursive Rules
3550 @cindex recursive rule
3551 @cindex rule, recursive
3553 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3554 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3555 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3556 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3557 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3568 @cindex left recursion
3569 @cindex right recursion
3571 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3572 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3573 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3585 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3586 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3587 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3588 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3589 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3590 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3591 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3594 @cindex mutual recursion
3595 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3596 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3597 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3606 | primary '+' primary
3619 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3623 @section Defining Language Semantics
3624 @cindex defining language semantics
3625 @cindex language semantics, defining
3627 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3628 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3629 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3631 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3632 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3633 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3634 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3637 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3638 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3639 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3640 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3641 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3642 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3643 action in the middle of a rule.
3647 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3648 @cindex semantic value type
3649 @cindex value type, semantic
3650 @cindex data types of semantic values
3651 @cindex default data type
3653 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3654 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3655 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3656 Notation Calculator}).
3658 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3659 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3660 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3663 #define YYSTYPE double
3667 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3668 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3669 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3670 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3672 @node Multiple Types
3673 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3675 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3676 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3677 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3678 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3681 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3682 requires you to do two things:
3686 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3687 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3688 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3689 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3693 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3694 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3695 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3696 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3697 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3706 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3708 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3709 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3710 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3711 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3713 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3714 placed at any position in the rule;
3715 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3716 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3717 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3718 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3720 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3721 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3722 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3723 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3724 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3725 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3726 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3727 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3728 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3729 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3732 Here is a typical example:
3738 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3742 Or, in terms of named references:
3748 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3753 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3754 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3755 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3756 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3757 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3758 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3760 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3761 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3762 referred to as @code{$2}.
3764 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3765 references construct.
3767 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3768 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3769 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3770 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3771 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3774 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3777 @cindex default action
3778 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3779 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3780 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3781 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3782 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3783 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3785 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3786 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3787 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3788 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3789 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3794 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3795 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3801 %empty @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3806 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3807 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3808 definition of @code{foo}.
3811 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3812 any, from a semantic action.
3813 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3814 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3817 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3818 @cindex action data types
3819 @cindex data types in actions
3821 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3822 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3824 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3825 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3826 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3827 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3828 in the rule. In this example,
3834 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3839 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3840 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3841 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3842 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3844 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3845 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3846 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3858 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3859 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3861 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3862 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3863 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3864 @cindex mid-rule actions
3866 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3867 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3868 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3871 * Using Mid-Rule Actions:: Putting an action in the middle of a rule.
3872 * Mid-Rule Action Translation:: How mid-rule actions are actually processed.
3873 * Mid-Rule Conflicts:: Mid-rule actions can cause conflicts.
3876 @node Using Mid-Rule Actions
3877 @subsubsection Using Mid-Rule Actions
3879 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3880 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3881 it is run before they are parsed.
3883 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3884 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3885 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3886 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3889 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3890 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3891 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3892 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3893 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3894 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3896 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3897 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3898 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3899 at the end of the rule.
3901 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3902 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3903 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3904 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3905 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3906 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3913 $<context>$ = push_context ();
3914 declare_variable ($3);
3919 pop_context ($<context>5);
3925 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3926 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3927 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3928 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3929 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3930 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3933 Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the @samp{stmt} is
3934 component number 6. Named references can be used to improve the readability
3935 and maintainability (@pxref{Named References}):
3942 $<context>let = push_context ();
3943 declare_variable ($3);
3948 pop_context ($<context>let);
3953 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3954 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3955 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3956 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3957 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3960 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3961 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3962 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3963 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3964 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3966 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3967 Discarded Symbols}).
3968 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3969 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3971 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3972 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3977 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3995 $let = push_context ();
3996 declare_variable ($3);
4003 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
4004 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
4005 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
4007 @node Mid-Rule Action Translation
4008 @subsubsection Mid-Rule Action Translation
4012 As hinted earlier, mid-rule actions are actually transformed into regular
4013 rules and actions. The various reports generated by Bison (textual,
4014 graphical, etc., see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser})
4015 reveal this translation, best explained by means of an example. The
4019 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f(); @};
4026 $@@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4027 $@@2: %empty @{ c(); @};
4028 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4029 exp: $@@1 "b" $@@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f(); @};
4033 with new nonterminal symbols @code{$@@@var{n}}, where @var{n} is a number.
4035 A mid-rule action is expected to generate a value if it uses @code{$$}, or
4036 the (final) action uses @code{$@var{n}} where @var{n} denote the mid-rule
4037 action. In that case its nonterminal is rather named @code{@@@var{n}}:
4040 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4047 @@1: %empty @{ a(); @};
4048 @@2: %empty @{ $$ = c(); @};
4049 $@@3: %empty @{ d(); @};
4050 exp: @@1 "b" @@2 $@@3 "e" @{ f = $1; @}
4053 There are probably two errors in the above example: the first mid-rule
4054 action does not generate a value (it does not use @code{$$} although the
4055 final action uses it), and the value of the second one is not used (the
4056 final action does not use @code{$3}). Bison reports these errors when the
4057 @code{midrule-value} warnings are enabled (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
4061 $ bison -fcaret -Wmidrule-value mid.y
4063 mid.y:2.6-13: warning: unset value: $$
4064 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4068 mid.y:2.19-31: warning: unused value: $3
4069 exp: @{ a(); @} "b" @{ $$ = c(); @} @{ d(); @} "e" @{ f = $1; @};
4075 @node Mid-Rule Conflicts
4076 @subsubsection Conflicts due to Mid-Rule Actions
4077 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
4078 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
4079 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
4080 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
4081 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
4087 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4088 | '@{' statements '@}'
4094 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
4099 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4100 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4103 | '@{' statements '@}'
4109 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
4110 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
4111 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
4112 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
4113 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
4114 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
4116 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
4117 actions into the two rules, like this:
4122 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4123 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4124 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4125 '@{' statements '@}'
4131 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
4132 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
4134 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
4135 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
4136 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
4141 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4142 declarations statements '@}'
4143 | '@{' statements '@}'
4149 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
4150 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
4152 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
4153 serves as a subroutine:
4158 %empty @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
4164 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
4165 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
4171 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
4172 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
4175 @node Tracking Locations
4176 @section Tracking Locations
4178 @cindex textual location
4179 @cindex location, textual
4181 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4182 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4183 especially symbol locations.
4185 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4186 actions to take when rules are matched.
4189 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4190 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4191 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4195 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4196 @cindex data type of locations
4197 @cindex default location type
4199 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4200 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4202 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4203 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4204 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4205 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4209 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4218 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4219 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4220 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4221 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4222 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4224 @node Actions and Locations
4225 @subsection Actions and Locations
4226 @cindex location actions
4227 @cindex actions, location
4230 @vindex @@@var{name}
4231 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4233 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4234 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4236 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4237 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4238 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4239 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4240 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4243 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4244 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4245 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4246 references construct.
4248 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4256 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4257 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4258 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4259 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4266 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4267 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4268 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4274 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4275 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4276 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4279 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4280 example above simply rewrites this way:
4294 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4295 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4296 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4303 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4304 from a semantic action.
4305 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4306 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4308 @node Location Default Action
4309 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4310 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4311 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4313 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4314 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4315 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4316 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4317 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4318 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4319 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4320 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4323 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4324 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4326 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4327 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4328 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4329 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4330 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4331 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4332 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4333 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4334 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4335 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4337 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4341 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4345 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4346 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4347 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4348 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4352 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4353 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4354 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4355 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4362 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4363 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4364 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4366 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4370 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4371 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4374 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4375 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4376 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4377 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4380 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4381 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4382 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4383 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4386 @node Named References
4387 @section Named References
4388 @cindex named references
4390 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4391 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4392 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4393 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4394 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4395 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4397 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4398 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4399 used as named references. For example:
4403 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4404 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4409 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4413 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4414 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4419 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4425 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4428 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4431 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4436 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4437 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4438 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4441 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4442 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4447 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4448 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4449 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4452 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4453 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4459 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4460 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4463 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4464 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4468 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4469 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4470 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4471 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4472 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4473 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4474 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4476 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4480 @section Bison Declarations
4481 @cindex declarations, Bison
4482 @cindex Bison declarations
4484 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4485 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4488 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4489 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4490 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4491 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4493 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4494 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4495 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4496 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4499 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4500 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4501 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4502 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4503 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4504 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4505 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4506 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4507 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4508 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4509 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4510 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4511 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4512 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4513 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4517 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4518 @cindex version requirement
4519 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4522 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4523 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4527 %require "@var{version}"
4531 @subsection Token Type Names
4532 @cindex declaring token type names
4533 @cindex token type names, declaring
4534 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4537 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4543 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4544 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4545 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4547 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4548 @code{%precedence}, or
4549 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4550 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4553 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4554 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4555 following the token name:
4559 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4563 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4564 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4565 with each other or with normal characters.
4567 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4568 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4569 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4570 Than One Value Type}).
4576 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4580 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4584 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4585 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4586 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4593 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4594 equivalent literal string tokens:
4597 %token <operator> OR "||"
4598 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4603 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4604 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4605 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4606 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4607 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4608 the literal string instead of the token name.
4610 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4611 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4615 %token END 0 "end of file"
4618 @node Precedence Decl
4619 @subsection Operator Precedence
4620 @cindex precedence declarations
4621 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4622 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4624 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4625 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4626 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4627 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4628 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4629 operator precedence.
4631 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4632 @code{%token}: either
4635 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4642 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4645 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4646 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4647 all the @var{symbols}:
4651 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4652 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4653 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4654 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4655 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4656 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4657 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4658 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4659 considered a syntax error.
4661 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4662 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4663 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4666 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4667 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4668 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4669 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4670 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4673 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4674 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4675 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4676 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4681 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4682 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4686 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4687 @cindex declaring value types
4688 @cindex value types, declaring
4691 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4692 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4693 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4708 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4709 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4710 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4711 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4713 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4714 @code{union}. For example:
4726 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4727 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4730 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4731 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4732 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4734 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4735 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4737 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4738 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4739 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4740 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4748 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4753 and then your grammar can use the following
4754 instead of @code{%union}:
4767 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4768 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4769 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4773 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4774 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4775 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4778 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4782 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4783 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4784 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4785 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4786 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4789 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4790 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4791 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4792 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4794 @node Initial Action Decl
4795 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4796 @findex %initial-action
4798 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4799 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4802 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4803 @findex %initial-action
4804 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4805 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4806 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4807 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4810 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4813 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4816 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4821 @node Destructor Decl
4822 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4823 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4827 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4828 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4829 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4830 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4831 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4832 must discard the start symbol.
4834 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4835 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4836 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4837 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4839 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4840 symbol is automatically discarded.
4842 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4844 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4845 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4846 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4847 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4848 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4851 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4852 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4853 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4854 tag among @var{symbols}.
4855 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4856 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4857 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4859 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4860 (These default forms are experimental.
4861 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4863 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4864 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4865 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4866 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4868 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4869 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4870 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4871 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4872 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4879 %union @{ char *string; @}
4880 %token <string> STRING1
4881 %token <string> STRING2
4882 %type <string> string1
4883 %type <string> string2
4884 %union @{ char character; @}
4885 %token <character> CHR
4886 %type <character> chr
4889 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4890 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4891 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4892 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4896 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4897 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4898 to @code{free} by default.
4899 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4900 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4901 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4902 @code{free} only once.
4903 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4904 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4906 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4907 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4908 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4909 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4910 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4911 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4912 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4913 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4914 reference it in your grammar.
4915 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4916 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4922 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4923 @cindex mid-rule actions
4924 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4925 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4926 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4927 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4928 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4929 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4930 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4931 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4935 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4936 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4937 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4942 @cindex discarded symbols
4943 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4947 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4949 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4951 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4952 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4954 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4955 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4958 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4961 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4962 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4965 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4966 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4967 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4971 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4972 @cindex printing semantic values
4976 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4977 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4978 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4979 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4981 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4982 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4983 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4985 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4988 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4989 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4990 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4991 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4992 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4993 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4994 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4997 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4998 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4999 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
5000 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
5008 %union @{ char *string; @}
5009 %token <string> STRING1
5010 %token <string> STRING2
5011 %type <string> string1
5012 %type <string> string2
5013 %union @{ char character; @}
5014 %token <character> CHR
5015 %type <character> chr
5018 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
5019 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
5020 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
5021 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
5025 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
5026 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
5027 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
5028 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
5029 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
5030 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
5031 that has no semantic type tag. See also
5035 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
5036 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
5037 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
5038 @cindex warnings, preventing
5039 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
5043 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
5044 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
5045 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
5046 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
5047 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
5048 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
5050 The declaration looks like this:
5056 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
5057 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
5058 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
5059 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
5061 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
5062 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
5063 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
5064 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
5065 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
5066 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
5067 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
5073 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
5077 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
5078 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
5079 print the number of conflicts.
5082 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
5083 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
5084 go back to the beginning.
5087 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
5088 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
5089 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
5092 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
5093 but will keep silent otherwise.
5096 @subsection The Start-Symbol
5097 @cindex declaring the start symbol
5098 @cindex start symbol, declaring
5099 @cindex default start symbol
5102 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
5103 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
5104 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
5111 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
5112 @cindex reentrant parser
5114 @findex %define api.pure
5116 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
5117 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
5118 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
5119 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
5120 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
5121 program must be called only within interlocks.
5123 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
5124 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
5125 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
5126 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
5127 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
5129 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
5130 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
5131 reentrant. It looks like this:
5134 %define api.pure full
5137 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
5138 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
5139 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
5140 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
5141 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
5142 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
5143 of @code{yypstate} in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5144 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
5145 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
5147 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
5148 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
5152 @subsection A Push Parser
5155 @findex %define api.push-pull
5157 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5158 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5160 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
5161 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
5162 each time a new token is made available.
5164 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
5165 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
5166 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
5167 within a certain time period.
5169 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
5170 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
5171 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
5174 %define api.push-pull push
5177 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
5178 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
5179 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
5180 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
5181 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
5184 %define api.pure full
5185 %define api.push-pull push
5188 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
5189 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
5190 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
5191 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
5193 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
5194 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
5195 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
5196 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
5197 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
5198 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
5199 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
5200 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
5204 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5206 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
5207 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5208 yypstate_delete (ps);
5211 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
5212 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
5213 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5214 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
5215 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
5216 example would thus look like this:
5221 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5224 status = yypush_parse (ps);
5225 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
5226 yypstate_delete (ps);
5229 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
5230 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
5232 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
5233 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
5234 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
5235 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
5236 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
5237 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
5238 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
5239 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
5240 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
5241 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
5242 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
5243 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
5244 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5245 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5246 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5247 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5248 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5252 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5253 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5254 yypstate_delete (ps);
5257 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5258 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5259 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5262 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5263 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5264 @cindex declaration summary
5265 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5267 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5269 @deffn {Directive} %union
5270 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5271 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5274 @deffn {Directive} %token
5275 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5276 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5279 @deffn {Directive} %right
5280 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5281 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5284 @deffn {Directive} %left
5285 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5286 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5289 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5290 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5291 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5292 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5296 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5297 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5298 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5302 @deffn {Directive} %type
5303 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5304 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5307 @deffn {Directive} %start
5308 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5312 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5313 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5314 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5320 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5323 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5324 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5326 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5327 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5328 @xref{%code Summary}.
5331 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5332 Instrument the parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5334 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5337 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5338 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5339 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5340 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5343 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5344 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5345 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5346 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5347 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5349 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5350 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5351 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5352 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5353 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5354 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5355 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5356 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5357 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5358 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5360 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5361 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5362 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5364 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5365 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5366 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5368 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5369 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5370 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5371 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5372 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5374 @findex %code requires
5375 @findex %code provides
5376 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5377 header also contains their code.
5378 @xref{%code Summary}.
5380 @cindex Header guard
5381 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5382 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5383 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5384 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5385 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5388 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5389 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5391 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5392 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5394 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5398 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5399 Same as above, but save in the file @file{@var{defines-file}}.
5402 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5403 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5404 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5407 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5408 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5409 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5412 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5413 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5414 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5415 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5419 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5420 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5421 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5422 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5423 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5424 accurate syntax error messages.
5427 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5428 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5429 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5431 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5432 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5433 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5434 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5435 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5436 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5437 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5438 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5440 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5444 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5445 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5446 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5451 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5452 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5453 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5454 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5455 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5456 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5457 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5461 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5462 Generate the parser implementation in @file{@var{file}}.
5465 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5466 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5467 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5471 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5472 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5473 Require a Version of Bison}.
5476 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5477 Specify the skeleton to use.
5479 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5480 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5481 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5482 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5484 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5485 file in the Bison installation directory.
5486 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5487 directory of the grammar file.
5488 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5491 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5492 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5493 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5494 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5495 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5496 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5497 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5500 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5501 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5502 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5503 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5504 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5505 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5506 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5509 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5510 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5511 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5515 The highest token number, plus one.
5517 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5519 The number of grammar rules,
5521 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5525 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5526 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5527 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5528 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5532 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5533 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5534 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5538 @node %define Summary
5539 @subsection %define Summary
5541 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5542 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5543 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5544 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5545 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5546 @code{%define} directive:
5548 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5549 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5550 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5551 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5553 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5554 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5555 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5556 to specifying @code{""}.
5558 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5559 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5560 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5563 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5564 @code{%define} accepts.
5566 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5567 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5571 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5573 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5574 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5576 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5578 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5579 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5582 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5583 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5584 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5585 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5586 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5587 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are described below.
5589 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5590 @deffn Directive {%define api.namespace} @{@var{namespace}@}
5592 @item Languages(s): C++
5594 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5595 For example, if you specify:
5598 %define api.namespace @{foo::bar@}
5601 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5604 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5607 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5608 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5611 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5617 @item Accepted Values:
5618 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5619 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5621 @item Default Value:
5622 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5623 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5624 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5625 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5626 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5627 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5628 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5631 %define api.namespace @{foo@}
5632 %name-prefix "bar::"
5635 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5641 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5642 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} @var{type}
5645 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5647 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5648 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5650 @item Accepted Values: String
5652 @item Default Value: none
5655 Introduced in Bison 2.7 for C, C++ and Java. Introduced under the name
5656 @code{location_type} for C++ in Bison 2.5 and for Java in Bison 2.4.
5660 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5661 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.prefix} @var{prefix}
5664 @item Language(s): All
5666 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5667 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5669 @item Accepted Values: String
5671 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5673 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5677 @c ================================================== api.pure
5678 @deffn Directive {%define api.pure}
5681 @item Language(s): C
5683 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5684 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5686 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5688 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5689 the case for Boolean values.
5691 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5692 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5693 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5696 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5697 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5698 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5700 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5704 void yyerror (char const *msg); // Yacc parsers.
5705 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); // GLR parsers.
5708 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5709 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5712 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5715 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5716 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5718 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5721 the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5728 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5729 @deffn Directive {%define api.push-pull} @var{kind}
5732 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5734 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5735 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5736 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5737 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5739 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5741 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5748 @c ================================================== api.token.constructor
5749 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.constructor}
5756 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5757 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5758 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5760 @item Accepted Values:
5763 @item Default Value:
5766 introduced in Bison 2.8
5769 @c api.token.constructor
5772 @c ================================================== api.token.prefix
5773 @deffn Directive {%define api.token.prefix} @var{prefix}
5776 @item Languages(s): all
5779 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5780 target language. For instance
5783 %token FILE for ERROR
5784 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
5786 start: FILE for ERROR;
5790 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5791 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5792 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5793 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5794 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5795 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5796 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5798 @item Accepted Values:
5799 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5800 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5801 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5803 @item Default Value:
5806 introduced in Bison 2.8
5812 @c ================================================== api.value.type
5813 @deffn Directive {%define api.value.type} @var{type}
5819 The type for semantic values.
5821 @item Accepted Values:
5824 This grammar has no semantic value at all. This is not properly supported
5826 @item @code{%union} (C, C++)
5827 The type is defined thanks to the @code{%union} directive. You don't have
5828 to define @code{api.value.type} in that case, using @code{%union} suffices.
5829 @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
5832 %define api.value.type "%union"
5838 %token <ival> INT "integer"
5839 %token <sval> STR "string"
5842 @item @code{union} (C, C++)
5843 The symbols are defined with type names, from which Bison will generate a
5844 @code{union}. For instance:
5846 %define api.value.type "union"
5847 %token <int> INT "integer"
5848 %token <char *> STR "string"
5850 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize. Note that most C++ objects
5851 cannot be stored in a @code{union}.
5853 @item @code{variant} (C++)
5854 This is similar to @code{union}, but special storage techniques are used to
5855 allow any kind of C++ object to be used. For instance:
5857 %define api.value.type "variant"
5858 %token <int> INT "integer"
5859 %token <std::string> STR "string"
5861 This feature needs user feedback to stabilize.
5862 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5864 @item any other identifier
5865 Use this name as semantic value.
5882 %define api.value.type "struct my_value"
5883 %token <u.ival> INT "integer"
5884 %token <u.sval> STR "string"
5888 @item Default Value:
5891 @code{%union} if @code{%union} is used, otherwise @dots{}
5893 @code{int} if type tags are used (i.e., @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} or
5894 @samp{%token <@var{type}>@dots{}} is used), otherwise @dots{}
5900 introduced in Bison 2.8. Was introduced for Java only in 2.3b as
5907 @c ================================================== location_type
5908 @deffn Directive {%define location_type}
5909 Obsoleted by @code{api.location.type} since Bison 2.7.
5913 @c ================================================== lr.default-reduction
5915 @deffn Directive {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{when}
5918 @item Language(s): all
5920 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5921 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5922 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5923 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5925 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5926 @item Default Value:
5928 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5929 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5932 introduced as @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.5, renamed as
5933 @code{lr.default-reduction} in 2.8.
5937 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-state
5939 @deffn Directive {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state}
5942 @item Language(s): all
5943 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5944 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5945 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5946 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5948 introduced as @code{lr.keep_unreachable_states} in 2.3b, renamed as
5949 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states} in 2.5, and as
5950 @code{lr.keep-unreachable-state} in 2.8.
5953 @c lr.keep-unreachable-state
5955 @c ================================================== lr.type
5957 @deffn Directive {%define lr.type} @var{type}
5960 @item Language(s): all
5962 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5963 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5964 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5966 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5968 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5972 @c ================================================== namespace
5973 @deffn Directive %define namespace @{@var{namespace}@}
5974 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5978 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5979 @deffn Directive {%define parse.assert}
5982 @item Languages(s): C++
5984 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5985 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5987 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5989 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5991 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5997 @c ================================================== parse.error
5998 @deffn Directive {%define parse.error}
6003 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
6004 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
6006 @item Accepted Values:
6009 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
6011 @item @code{verbose}
6012 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
6013 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
6017 @item Default Value:
6024 @c ================================================== parse.lac
6025 @deffn Directive {%define parse.lac}
6028 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
6030 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
6031 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
6032 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
6033 @item Default Value: @code{none}
6038 @c ================================================== parse.trace
6039 @deffn Directive {%define parse.trace}
6042 @item Languages(s): C, C++, Java
6044 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
6045 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
6047 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with
6048 @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}), see @ref{Multiple Parsers,
6049 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 in the parser implementation
6050 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
6053 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
6055 @item Default Value: @code{false}
6061 @subsection %code Summary
6065 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
6066 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
6067 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
6068 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
6069 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
6070 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
6071 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
6072 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
6074 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
6075 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
6076 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
6077 in the parser implementation.
6079 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
6080 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
6081 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
6083 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
6086 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
6087 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
6088 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
6089 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
6090 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
6091 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
6095 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
6096 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
6097 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
6100 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
6101 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
6105 @findex %code requires
6108 @item Language(s): C, C++
6110 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
6111 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
6112 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
6113 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
6114 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
6116 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
6117 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
6122 @findex %code provides
6125 @item Language(s): C, C++
6127 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
6128 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
6130 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
6131 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
6139 @item Language(s): C, C++
6141 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
6142 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
6143 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
6144 parser implementation file. For example:
6153 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
6157 @findex %code imports
6160 @item Language(s): Java
6162 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
6164 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
6165 before any class definitions.
6169 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
6170 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
6171 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
6172 of the standard Bison skeletons.
6175 @node Multiple Parsers
6176 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
6178 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
6179 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
6180 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
6181 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
6182 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
6183 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
6184 exported in the generated header.
6186 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
6187 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
6188 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
6189 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
6190 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
6191 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
6192 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
6193 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
6194 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
6196 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
6197 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
6198 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
6199 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
6200 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
6201 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
6202 specifically --- more about this below.
6204 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
6205 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
6208 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
6209 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
6210 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
6211 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
6214 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
6215 #define yyparse cparse
6216 #define yylval clval
6222 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
6223 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
6224 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
6226 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
6230 extern CSTYPE clval;
6234 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
6235 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
6236 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
6241 # if defined YYDEBUG
6258 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
6259 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
6260 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
6263 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
6264 @cindex C-language interface
6267 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
6268 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
6269 functions that it needs to use.
6271 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
6272 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
6273 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
6274 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
6277 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
6278 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
6279 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
6280 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
6281 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
6282 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
6284 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
6285 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
6286 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
6290 @node Parser Function
6291 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
6294 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
6295 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
6296 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
6297 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
6298 without reading further.
6301 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
6302 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
6303 is due to end-of-input).
6305 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
6306 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
6309 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
6312 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
6317 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
6322 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
6325 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
6326 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
6327 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
6329 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6330 @findex %parse-param
6331 Declare that one or more
6332 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
6333 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
6334 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
6335 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
6338 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
6341 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
6345 Then call the parser like this:
6349 int nastiness, randomness;
6350 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
6351 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
6357 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
6360 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
6364 Using the following:
6366 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6369 Results in these signatures:
6371 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
6372 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6376 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
6377 and @code{%locations} are used:
6380 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
6381 int yyparse (int *randomness);
6384 @node Push Parser Function
6385 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
6386 @findex yypush_parse
6388 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6389 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6391 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
6392 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6393 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6394 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6396 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6397 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
6398 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
6399 required to finish parsing the grammar.
6402 @node Pull Parser Function
6403 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
6404 @findex yypull_parse
6406 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6407 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6409 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
6410 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
6411 declaration is used.
6412 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6414 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6415 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
6418 @node Parser Create Function
6419 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
6420 @findex yypstate_new
6422 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6423 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6425 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
6426 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6427 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6428 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6430 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
6431 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
6432 or 0 if no memory was available.
6433 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
6437 @node Parser Delete Function
6438 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
6439 @findex yypstate_delete
6441 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
6442 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
6444 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
6445 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
6446 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
6447 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
6449 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *@var{yyps})
6450 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
6451 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
6455 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
6457 @cindex lexical analyzer
6459 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
6460 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
6461 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
6462 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
6464 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
6465 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
6466 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
6467 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
6468 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
6469 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
6470 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
6474 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
6475 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
6476 of the token it has read.
6477 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
6478 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
6480 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
6481 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
6484 @node Calling Convention
6485 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
6487 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
6488 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
6489 signifies end-of-input.
6491 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
6492 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6493 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6494 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6496 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6497 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6498 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6499 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6500 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6501 signifies end-of-input.
6503 Here is an example showing these things:
6510 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6513 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6514 return c; /* Assume token type for '+' is '+'. */
6516 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6522 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6523 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6525 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6526 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6530 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6531 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6532 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6533 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6536 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6537 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6538 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6539 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6540 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6543 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6544 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6545 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6546 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6549 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6552 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6553 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6554 strlen (token_buffer))
6555 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6556 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6561 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6562 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6566 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6569 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6570 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6571 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6572 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6578 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6579 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6584 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6585 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6586 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6587 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6588 declaration looks like this:
6601 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6606 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6607 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6612 @node Token Locations
6613 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6616 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6617 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6618 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6619 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6620 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6621 data in that variable.
6623 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6624 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6625 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6626 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6627 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6630 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6633 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6635 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6636 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6637 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6638 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6639 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6640 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6645 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6648 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6649 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6654 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6655 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6656 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6659 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6660 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6661 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6662 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6664 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6666 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6667 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6668 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6671 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6673 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6674 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6675 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6676 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6677 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6684 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6685 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6686 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6690 results in the following signatures:
6693 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6694 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6697 If @samp{%define api.pure full} is added:
6700 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6701 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6705 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure full} and @code{%locations} are
6709 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6710 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6711 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6714 @node Error Reporting
6715 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6716 @cindex error reporting function
6719 @cindex syntax error
6721 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6722 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6723 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6724 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6727 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6728 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6729 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6730 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6731 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6733 @findex %define parse.error
6734 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6735 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6736 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6737 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6738 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6740 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6741 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6742 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6743 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6744 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6745 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6747 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6748 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6749 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6751 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6756 yyerror (char const *s)
6760 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6765 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6766 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6767 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6768 immediately return 1.
6770 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6771 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6772 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6773 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6774 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6776 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6777 following signature:
6780 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6784 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6785 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6786 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6787 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6788 message is always passed last.
6790 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6791 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6792 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6796 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6797 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6798 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6799 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6801 @node Action Features
6802 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6803 @cindex summary, action features
6804 @cindex action features summary
6806 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6807 are useful in actions.
6809 @deffn {Variable} $$
6810 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6811 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6814 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6815 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6816 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6819 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6820 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6821 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6822 Types of Values in Actions}.
6825 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6826 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6827 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6828 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6831 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6832 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6833 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6836 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6837 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6838 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6841 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6843 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6844 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6845 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6846 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6847 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6848 going to be reduced by this rule.
6850 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6851 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6852 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6855 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6858 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6859 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6862 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6863 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6867 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6868 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6869 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6870 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6871 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6872 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6875 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6876 @findex YYRECOVERING
6877 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6878 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6879 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6882 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6883 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6884 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6885 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6886 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6888 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6891 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6892 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6894 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6896 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6899 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6900 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6901 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6902 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6905 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6906 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6907 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6908 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6910 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6913 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6914 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6915 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6916 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6918 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6922 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6923 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6926 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6930 @c int first_line, last_line;
6931 @c int first_column, last_column;
6935 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6936 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6938 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6939 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6940 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6943 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6946 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6948 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6949 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6953 @node Internationalization
6954 @section Parser Internationalization
6955 @cindex internationalization
6961 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6962 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6963 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6964 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6965 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6966 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6967 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6968 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6971 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6972 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6973 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6978 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6979 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6980 by the package ---often called @file{m4}--- copy the
6981 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6982 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6986 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6991 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6992 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6993 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6994 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6995 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6996 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6997 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6998 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6999 Bison-generated parser.
7002 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
7003 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
7004 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
7008 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
7011 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
7012 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
7013 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
7017 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
7018 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
7019 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
7022 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7028 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
7032 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
7038 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
7039 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
7040 @cindex algorithm of parser
7043 @cindex parser stack
7044 @cindex stack, parser
7046 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
7047 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
7048 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
7050 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
7051 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
7054 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
7055 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
7056 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
7057 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
7058 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
7059 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
7060 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
7062 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
7069 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
7070 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
7073 expr: expr '*' expr;
7077 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
7084 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
7085 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
7087 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
7088 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
7089 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
7091 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
7094 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
7095 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
7096 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
7097 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
7098 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
7099 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
7100 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
7101 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
7102 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
7103 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
7107 @section Lookahead Tokens
7108 @cindex lookahead token
7110 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
7111 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
7112 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
7113 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
7114 token in order to decide what to do.
7116 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
7117 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
7118 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
7119 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
7120 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
7121 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
7122 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
7125 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
7126 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
7127 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
7146 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
7147 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
7148 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
7149 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
7150 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
7152 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
7153 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
7154 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
7155 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
7156 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
7157 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
7162 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
7163 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
7164 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
7165 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7168 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
7170 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
7171 @cindex dangling @code{else}
7172 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
7174 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
7175 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
7180 "if" expr "then" stmt
7181 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7187 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
7188 specific keyword tokens.
7190 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
7191 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
7192 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
7193 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
7196 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
7197 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
7198 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
7199 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
7200 contrast it with the other alternative.
7202 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
7203 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
7207 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7209 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
7212 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
7213 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
7214 making these two inputs equivalent:
7217 if x then if y then win; else lose;
7219 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
7222 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
7223 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
7224 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
7225 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
7226 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
7227 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
7228 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
7229 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
7231 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
7232 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
7233 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
7234 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
7236 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
7237 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
7238 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
7239 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
7240 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
7243 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
7244 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
7245 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
7259 "if" expr "then" stmt
7260 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
7270 @section Operator Precedence
7271 @cindex operator precedence
7272 @cindex precedence of operators
7274 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
7275 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
7276 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
7277 shift and when to reduce.
7280 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
7281 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
7282 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
7283 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
7284 * How Precedence:: How they work.
7285 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
7288 @node Why Precedence
7289 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
7291 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
7292 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
7307 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
7308 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
7309 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
7310 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
7311 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
7312 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
7313 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
7316 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
7317 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
7318 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
7319 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
7320 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
7321 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
7322 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
7323 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
7326 @cindex associativity
7327 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
7328 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
7329 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
7330 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
7331 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
7332 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
7333 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
7334 makes right-associativity.
7336 @node Using Precedence
7337 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
7343 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
7344 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
7345 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
7346 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
7347 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
7348 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
7349 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
7351 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
7352 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
7353 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
7354 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
7355 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
7356 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
7357 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
7358 what expected the grammar author.
7360 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
7361 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
7362 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
7363 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
7364 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
7366 @node Precedence Only
7367 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
7370 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
7371 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
7372 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
7373 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
7374 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
7375 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
7376 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
7378 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
7379 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
7380 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
7384 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
7387 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
7388 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
7389 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
7390 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
7391 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
7392 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
7393 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
7400 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
7401 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
7402 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
7403 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
7404 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
7405 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
7406 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
7408 @node Precedence Examples
7409 @subsection Precedence Examples
7411 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
7419 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
7420 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
7421 declared with @code{'-'}:
7424 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
7429 @node How Precedence
7430 @subsection How Precedence Works
7432 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
7433 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
7434 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
7435 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
7436 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
7437 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
7439 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
7440 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
7441 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
7442 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
7443 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
7444 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
7445 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
7448 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
7449 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
7452 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
7454 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
7455 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
7456 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
7457 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
7459 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
7460 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
7461 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
7462 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
7463 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
7464 instance as follows:
7473 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
7474 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
7475 use right associativity:
7478 %right "then" "else"
7481 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
7482 ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
7483 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
7484 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
7485 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
7486 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
7487 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
7489 @node Contextual Precedence
7490 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
7491 @cindex context-dependent precedence
7492 @cindex unary operator precedence
7493 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7494 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7497 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7498 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7499 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7500 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7502 The Bison precedence declarations
7503 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7504 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7505 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7508 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7509 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7510 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7511 modifier's syntax is:
7514 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7518 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7519 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7520 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7521 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7522 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7524 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7525 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7526 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7536 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7544 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7549 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7550 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7551 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7552 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7554 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7555 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7556 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7557 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7559 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7560 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7561 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7562 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7563 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7564 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7566 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7567 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7571 @section Parser States
7572 @cindex finite-state machine
7573 @cindex parser state
7574 @cindex state (of parser)
7576 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7577 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7578 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7579 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7580 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7582 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7583 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7584 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7585 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7586 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7587 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7588 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7589 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7592 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7593 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7594 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7597 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7598 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7599 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7601 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7602 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7605 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7606 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7611 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7613 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7619 %empty @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7620 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7626 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7627 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7628 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7629 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7630 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7631 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7633 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7634 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7635 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7637 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7638 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7639 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7640 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7641 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7643 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7644 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7645 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7646 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7651 %empty @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7652 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7657 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7664 | sequence redirects
7678 | redirects redirect
7684 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7685 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7686 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7687 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7688 in infinitely many ways!
7690 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7691 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7692 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7693 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7695 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7706 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7714 | sequence redirects
7728 | redirects redirect
7733 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7734 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7735 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7736 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7737 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7740 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7741 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7743 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7744 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7745 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7746 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7747 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7752 %precedence "sequence"
7757 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7758 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7770 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7771 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7774 %right "word" "redirect"
7779 | sequence word %prec "word"
7780 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7785 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7786 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7787 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7789 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7795 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7798 | name_list ':' type
7815 | name ',' name_list
7820 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7821 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7822 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7823 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7827 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7829 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7830 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7831 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7833 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7834 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7835 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7836 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7837 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7838 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7839 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7842 @cindex canonical LR
7843 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7844 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7845 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7846 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7847 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7848 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7849 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7850 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7852 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7853 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7854 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7855 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7856 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7864 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7869 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7870 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7871 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7872 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7873 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7874 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7876 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7877 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7878 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7879 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7880 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7881 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7887 | name_list ':' type
7899 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7900 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7905 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7906 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7907 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7908 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7909 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7910 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7911 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7913 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7914 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7915 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7916 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7918 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7919 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7922 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7923 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7924 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7925 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7928 @node LR Table Construction
7929 @subsection LR Table Construction
7930 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7933 @cindex canonical LR
7934 @findex %define lr.type
7936 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7937 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7938 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7939 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7942 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7943 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7944 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7945 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7948 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7949 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7950 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7953 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7954 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7955 values for @var{type} are:
7958 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7960 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7963 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7967 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7971 %define lr.type ielr
7974 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7975 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7976 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7977 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7978 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7979 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7980 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7981 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7982 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7983 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7985 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7986 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7987 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7988 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7994 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7997 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7999 @cindex GLR with LALR
8000 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
8001 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%precedence}),
8003 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
8004 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
8005 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
8006 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
8007 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
8008 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
8009 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
8010 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
8012 @item Malformed grammars.
8014 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
8015 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
8016 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
8017 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
8018 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
8023 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
8024 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
8025 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
8026 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
8027 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
8028 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
8029 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
8030 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
8031 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
8035 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8038 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
8039 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
8040 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
8041 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
8042 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
8043 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
8044 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
8045 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
8046 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
8047 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
8048 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
8049 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
8052 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
8053 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
8054 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
8056 @node Default Reductions
8057 @subsection Default Reductions
8058 @cindex default reductions
8059 @findex %define lr.default-reduction
8062 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
8063 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
8064 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
8065 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
8066 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
8068 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
8069 also affect the behavior of the parser:
8072 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
8074 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
8075 @cindex consistent states
8076 @cindex defaulted states
8077 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
8078 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
8079 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
8080 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
8081 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
8082 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
8083 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
8084 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
8085 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
8086 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
8087 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
8089 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
8090 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
8091 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
8092 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
8093 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
8094 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
8095 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
8096 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
8097 should already be considered closed.
8099 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
8101 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
8102 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
8103 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
8104 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
8105 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
8106 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
8107 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
8108 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
8109 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
8113 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
8114 @c sentence from being rejected.
8115 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
8116 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
8117 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
8118 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
8119 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
8120 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
8123 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
8124 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
8125 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
8126 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
8127 because the accept action ends the parse.
8129 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
8130 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
8131 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
8132 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
8133 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
8134 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
8135 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
8136 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
8137 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
8138 split the parse instead.
8140 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
8141 @code{%define lr.default-reduction} directive.
8143 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reduction} @var{where}
8144 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
8145 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
8147 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
8148 @item @code{consistent}
8149 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
8152 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
8153 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
8158 @findex %define parse.lac
8160 @cindex lookahead correction
8162 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
8163 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
8164 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
8165 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
8166 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
8167 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
8168 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
8169 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
8170 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
8172 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
8173 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
8174 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
8175 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
8176 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
8178 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
8179 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
8180 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
8181 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
8183 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
8184 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
8186 @item @code{none} (default)
8189 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
8190 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
8194 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
8195 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
8196 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
8197 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
8198 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
8199 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
8200 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
8201 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
8202 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
8203 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
8206 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
8207 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
8208 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
8209 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
8210 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
8211 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
8212 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
8213 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
8214 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
8215 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
8217 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
8218 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
8219 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
8220 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
8221 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
8222 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
8223 language-recognition power.
8225 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
8228 @item Infinite parsing loops.
8230 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
8231 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
8232 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
8233 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
8236 @item Verbose error message limitations.
8238 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
8239 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
8240 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
8241 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
8242 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
8243 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
8247 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
8248 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
8249 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
8250 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
8251 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
8252 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
8253 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
8254 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
8255 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
8256 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
8257 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
8260 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
8261 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
8262 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
8264 @node Unreachable States
8265 @subsection Unreachable States
8266 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-state
8267 @cindex unreachable states
8269 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
8270 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
8271 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
8272 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
8274 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
8275 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
8276 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
8277 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
8279 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-state} @var{value}
8280 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
8281 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
8284 There are a few caveats to consider:
8287 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
8289 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
8290 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
8291 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
8292 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
8293 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
8294 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
8296 @item Other useless states.
8298 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
8299 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
8300 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
8301 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
8302 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
8303 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
8304 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
8307 @node Generalized LR Parsing
8308 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
8310 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
8311 @cindex ambiguous grammars
8312 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
8314 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
8315 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
8316 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
8317 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
8318 context-free languages.
8319 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
8320 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
8321 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
8322 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
8323 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
8324 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
8325 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
8326 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
8328 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
8329 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
8330 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
8331 parser uses the same basic
8332 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
8333 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
8334 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
8335 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
8337 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
8338 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
8339 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
8340 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
8341 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
8343 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
8344 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
8345 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
8346 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
8347 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
8348 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
8349 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
8350 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
8351 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
8352 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
8353 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
8356 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
8357 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
8358 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
8359 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
8360 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
8361 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
8362 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
8363 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
8364 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
8365 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
8366 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
8367 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
8369 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
8370 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
8371 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
8373 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
8374 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
8375 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
8376 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
8377 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
8378 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
8379 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
8380 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
8381 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
8382 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
8383 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
8384 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
8386 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
8389 @node Memory Management
8390 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
8391 @cindex memory exhaustion
8392 @cindex memory management
8393 @cindex stack overflow
8394 @cindex parser stack overflow
8395 @cindex overflow of parser stack
8397 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
8398 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
8399 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
8401 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
8402 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
8403 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
8406 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
8407 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
8408 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
8409 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
8411 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
8412 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
8413 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
8414 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
8415 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
8416 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
8418 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
8419 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
8420 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
8423 @cindex default stack limit
8424 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
8428 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
8429 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
8430 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
8431 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
8432 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
8434 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
8436 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
8437 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
8438 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
8439 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
8440 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
8441 non-trivial copy constructors.
8442 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
8445 @node Error Recovery
8446 @chapter Error Recovery
8447 @cindex error recovery
8448 @cindex recovery from errors
8450 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
8451 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
8452 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
8455 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
8456 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
8457 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
8458 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
8459 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
8460 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
8461 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
8464 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
8465 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
8466 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
8467 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
8468 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
8469 in the current context, the parse can continue.
8481 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
8482 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
8484 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
8485 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
8486 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
8487 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
8488 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
8489 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
8490 applicable in the ordinary way.
8492 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
8493 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
8494 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
8495 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
8496 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
8497 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
8498 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
8499 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
8500 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
8501 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
8502 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
8503 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
8505 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
8506 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
8507 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
8510 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
8513 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
8514 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
8515 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
8516 spurious error message:
8526 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
8527 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
8528 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
8529 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
8530 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
8531 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
8532 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
8535 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
8536 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
8537 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
8538 error messages resume.
8540 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
8541 as any other rules can.
8544 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
8545 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
8546 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
8547 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
8550 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
8551 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
8552 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
8554 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8556 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8557 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8558 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8559 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8560 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8562 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8563 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8564 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8565 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8568 @node Context Dependency
8569 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8571 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8572 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8573 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8574 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8578 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8579 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8580 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8581 error recovery rules must be written.
8584 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8585 neither clean nor robust.)
8587 @node Semantic Tokens
8588 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8590 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8591 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8597 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8598 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8599 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8601 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8602 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8603 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8604 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8605 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8607 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8608 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8609 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8610 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8611 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8612 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8613 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8615 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8616 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8617 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8618 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8622 typedef int foo, bar;
8626 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8627 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8633 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8634 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8636 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8637 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8638 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8639 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8640 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8645 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8646 | declarator maybeasm
8652 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8653 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8659 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8660 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8661 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8663 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8664 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8665 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8666 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8667 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8668 the syntactic context.
8670 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8671 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8672 @cindex lexical tie-in
8674 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8675 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8678 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8679 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8680 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8681 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8682 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8689 void yyerror (char const *);
8698 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8699 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8700 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8714 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8715 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8716 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8718 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8719 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8720 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8723 @node Tie-in Recovery
8724 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8726 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8727 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8729 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8730 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8731 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8732 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8737 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8739 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8743 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8744 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8745 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8746 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8747 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8749 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8751 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8752 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8753 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8759 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8765 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8766 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8767 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8768 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8770 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8771 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8772 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8773 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8774 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8775 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8778 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8781 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8783 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8784 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8785 chapter explains how understand and debug a parser.
8787 The first sections focus on the static part of the parser: its structure.
8788 They explain how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8789 automaton. There are several formats available:
8792 as text, see @ref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser};
8795 as a graph, see @ref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser};
8798 or as a markup report that can be turned, for instance, into HTML, see
8799 @ref{Xml,, Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}.
8802 The last section focuses on the dynamic part of the parser: how to enable
8803 and understand the parser run-time traces (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your
8807 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8808 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8809 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8810 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8814 @section Understanding Your Parser
8816 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8817 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8818 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8819 tune or simply fix a parser.
8821 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8822 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8823 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8824 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8825 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8826 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8827 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8829 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8851 @command{bison} reports:
8854 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8855 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8856 calc.y:12.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8857 calc.y:12.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8858 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8861 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8862 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8863 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8864 interpretation is the same.
8867 @cindex token, useless
8868 @cindex useless token
8869 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8870 @cindex useless nonterminal
8871 @cindex rule, useless
8872 @cindex useless rule
8873 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8874 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8875 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8876 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8879 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8882 Terminals unused in grammar
8885 Rules useless in grammar
8890 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8893 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8894 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8895 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8896 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8900 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8915 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8919 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8932 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8937 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8943 @cindex pointed rule
8944 @cindex rule, pointed
8945 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8946 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8947 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8948 the location of the input cursor.
8953 0 $accept: . exp $end
8955 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8960 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8961 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8962 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8963 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8964 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8965 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8966 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8967 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8969 @cindex core, item set
8970 @cindex item set core
8971 @cindex kernel, item set
8972 @cindex item set core
8973 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8974 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8975 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8976 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8977 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8978 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8983 0 $accept: . exp $end
8984 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8990 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8996 In the state 1@dots{}
9003 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
9007 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
9008 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
9009 State 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
9010 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
9015 0 $accept: exp . $end
9016 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9021 $end shift, and go to state 3
9022 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9023 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9024 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9025 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9029 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
9030 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
9031 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
9032 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
9033 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
9036 @cindex accepting state
9037 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
9043 0 $accept: exp $end .
9049 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
9050 read), the parsing exits successfully.
9052 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
9058 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
9060 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9067 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
9069 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9076 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
9078 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9085 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
9087 NUM shift, and go to state 1
9092 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
9098 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9104 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9105 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9107 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9108 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9111 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
9112 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
9113 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
9114 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
9115 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
9116 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
9117 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
9118 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
9120 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
9121 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
9122 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
9125 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
9126 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
9127 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
9128 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
9129 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
9130 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
9131 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
9132 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
9133 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
9134 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
9135 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
9136 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
9141 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9142 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
9147 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9148 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9150 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
9151 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
9154 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
9155 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
9156 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
9157 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
9158 conflicts in the report:
9161 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
9162 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
9163 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
9167 The remaining states are similar:
9173 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9179 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9180 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9182 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
9183 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
9189 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9195 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9197 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
9198 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
9204 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
9210 '+' shift, and go to state 4
9211 '-' shift, and go to state 5
9212 '*' shift, and go to state 6
9213 '/' shift, and go to state 7
9215 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9216 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9217 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9218 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
9219 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
9224 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
9225 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and @samp{*}, but
9226 also because the associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
9228 Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML file and
9229 XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your parser in multiple formats}).
9231 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
9234 @section Visualizing Your Parser
9237 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
9238 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
9239 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
9240 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
9241 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
9242 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
9243 to help them understand LR parsers.
9245 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
9246 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
9247 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
9248 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
9249 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}. A DOT file may also be
9250 produced via an XML file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml,,Visualizing your
9251 parser in multiple formats}).
9254 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
9265 The graphical output
9267 (see @ref{fig:graph})
9269 is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is easier understood by
9270 making direct comparisons between them. @xref{Debugging, , Debugging Your
9271 Parser}, for a detailled analysis of the textual report.
9274 @float Figure,fig:graph
9275 @image{figs/example, 430pt}
9276 @caption{A graphical rendering of the parser.}
9280 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
9282 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
9283 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
9284 about transitions, for examples
9286 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
9287 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
9288 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
9293 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
9296 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
9298 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
9299 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
9307 ";" shift, and go to state 6
9311 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9313 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
9315 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
9317 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
9318 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
9319 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
9320 action for the given state, there is no such label.
9322 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
9329 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
9330 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
9333 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
9335 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
9337 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
9338 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
9339 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
9340 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
9341 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
9343 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation
9344 state. It is shown as a blue diamond, labelled ``Acc''.
9346 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
9348 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
9349 the name of the rule being jumped to.
9351 @c ================================================= XML
9354 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
9357 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
9358 (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}) when invoked
9359 with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
9360 (@pxref{Graphviz,, Visualizing Your Parser}) when invoked with
9361 option @option{--graph}. However,
9362 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
9363 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
9364 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
9365 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
9366 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
9367 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
9369 The XML file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
9370 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
9371 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
9372 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
9373 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
9374 file is @file{foo.xml}.
9376 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
9377 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
9381 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
9383 Used to output a copy of the @samp{.output} file.
9385 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the @samp{.output} file.
9388 Sample usage (requires @command{xsltproc}):
9392 $ bison --print-datadir
9393 /usr/local/share/bison
9395 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl gr.xml >gr.html
9398 @c ================================================= Tracing
9401 @section Tracing Your Parser
9404 @cindex tracing the parser
9406 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
9407 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
9410 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
9411 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
9412 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
9415 @node Enabling Traces
9416 @subsection Enabling Traces
9417 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
9420 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
9422 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
9423 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
9424 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
9425 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
9428 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
9429 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
9430 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
9431 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
9432 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
9434 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
9435 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
9436 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
9437 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
9438 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
9440 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
9442 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
9443 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
9444 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
9446 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
9447 @findex %define parse.trace
9448 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
9449 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
9450 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
9451 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
9452 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
9455 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
9459 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
9460 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
9461 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
9462 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
9463 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
9464 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
9466 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
9467 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
9468 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
9469 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
9471 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
9472 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
9473 messages tell you these things:
9477 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
9480 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
9481 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
9484 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
9485 of the state stack afterward.
9488 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
9489 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
9490 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
9491 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
9492 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
9493 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
9494 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
9495 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
9496 grammar are to blame.
9498 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
9499 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
9500 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
9501 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
9502 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
9505 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
9507 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
9508 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
9509 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
9510 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
9511 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
9512 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
9514 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
9515 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
9516 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
9519 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
9521 /* Generate the parser description file. */
9523 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
9526 /* Formatting semantic values. */
9527 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
9528 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
9529 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
9532 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
9533 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
9534 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
9535 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
9536 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
9537 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
9539 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
9540 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
9541 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
9542 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
9543 printer will be used for them.
9545 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
9546 are sent onto standard error.
9549 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
9552 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
9553 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9559 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
9560 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
9561 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
9562 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
9564 Then the parser calls the scanner.
9566 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
9567 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
9572 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
9573 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
9574 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
9578 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
9579 Shifting token '(' ()
9581 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9582 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9584 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9585 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9586 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9592 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
9593 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting nonterminal
9594 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
9597 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
9598 Shifting token '-' ()
9600 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
9601 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
9603 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
9604 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
9605 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
9606 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
9608 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
9609 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
9610 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9612 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
9613 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9619 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
9620 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
9623 Next token is token ')' ()
9624 Shifting token ')' ()
9626 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
9627 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9629 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9631 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9637 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9641 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9642 Shifting token '\n' ()
9644 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9645 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9648 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9651 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9654 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9659 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9660 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9661 completion of the parsing.
9664 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9665 Shifting token $end ()
9668 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9669 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9673 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9674 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9677 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9678 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9679 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9681 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9683 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9684 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9685 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9687 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9690 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9691 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9695 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9696 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9697 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9700 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9703 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9706 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9707 else if (type == NUM)
9708 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9712 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9715 @chapter Invoking Bison
9716 @cindex invoking Bison
9717 @cindex Bison invocation
9718 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9720 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9726 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9727 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9728 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9729 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9730 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9731 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9732 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9733 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9734 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9735 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9736 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9741 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9744 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9747 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9750 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9752 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9753 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9754 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9757 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9758 in alphabetical order by short options.
9759 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9760 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9764 @section Bison Options
9766 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9767 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9768 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9769 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9770 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9773 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9774 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9777 @c Please, keep this ordered as in 'bison --help'.
9783 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9787 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9789 @item --print-localedir
9790 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9792 @item --print-datadir
9793 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9797 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9798 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9799 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9800 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9801 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9802 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9803 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9804 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9805 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9806 for compatibility with POSIX:
9813 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9814 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9815 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9816 this option is specified.
9818 @item -W [@var{category}]
9819 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9820 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9823 @item midrule-values
9824 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9826 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9829 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9832 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9833 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9836 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9839 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9840 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9841 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9844 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9848 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9849 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9850 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9851 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9852 no effect on the conflict report.
9855 Deprecated constructs whose support will be removed in future versions of
9859 Empty rules without @code{%empty}. @xref{Empty Rules}. Disabled by
9860 default, but enabled by uses of @code{%empty}, unless
9861 @option{-Wno-empty-rule} was specified.
9864 Useless precedence and associativity directives. Disabled by default.
9866 Consider for instance the following grammar:
9895 @c cannot leave the location and the [-Wprecedence] for lack of
9899 warning: useless precedence and associativity for "="
9904 warning: useless associativity for "*", use %precedence
9909 warning: useless precedence for "("
9915 One would get the exact same parser with the following directives instead:
9925 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9927 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9928 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9932 All the warnings except @code{yacc}.
9935 Turn off all the warnings.
9938 See @option{-Werror}, below.
9941 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9942 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9943 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9945 @item -Werror[=@var{category}]
9946 @itemx -Wno-error[=@var{category}]
9947 Enable warnings falling in @var{category}, and treat them as errors. If no
9948 @var{category} is given, it defaults to making all enabled warnings into errors.
9950 @var{category} is the same as for @option{--warnings}, with the exception that
9951 it may not be prefixed with @samp{no-} (see above).
9953 Prefixed with @samp{no}, it deactivates the error treatment for this
9954 @var{category}. However, the warning itself won't be disabled, or enabled, by
9957 Note that the precedence of the @samp{=} and @samp{,} operators is such that
9958 the following commands are @emph{not} equivalent, as the first will not treat
9959 S/R conflicts as errors.
9962 $ bison -Werror=yacc,conflicts-sr input.y
9963 $ bison -Werror=yacc,error=conflicts-sr input.y
9966 @item -f [@var{feature}]
9967 @itemx --feature[=@var{feature}]
9968 Activate miscellaneous @var{feature}. @var{feature} can be one of:
9971 @itemx diagnostics-show-caret
9972 Show caret errors, in a manner similar to GCC's
9973 @option{-fdiagnostics-show-caret}, or Clang's @option{-fcaret-diagnotics}. The
9974 location provided with the message is used to quote the corresponding line of
9975 the source file, underlining the important part of it with carets (^). Here is
9976 an example, using the following file @file{in.y}:
9981 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9984 When invoked with @option{-fcaret} (or nothing), Bison will report:
9988 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: '$exp'
9989 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9993 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
9994 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
9998 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
9999 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10003 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10004 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10008 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of 'exp' has no declared type
10009 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $exp = $1 + $2; @};
10014 Whereas, when invoked with @option{-fno-caret}, Bison will only report:
10018 in.y:3.20-23: error: ambiguous reference: ‘$exp’
10019 in.y:3.1-3: refers to: $exp at $$
10020 in.y:3.6-8: refers to: $exp at $1
10021 in.y:3.14-16: refers to: $exp at $3
10022 in.y:3.32-33: error: $2 of ‘exp’ has no declared type
10026 This option is activated by default.
10037 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
10038 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
10039 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
10041 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10042 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10043 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
10044 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
10045 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
10046 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
10047 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
10051 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
10054 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
10055 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
10056 definition for @var{name}.
10058 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
10059 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
10060 definitions for @var{name}.
10062 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
10063 definitions for @var{name}.
10066 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
10067 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
10068 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
10070 @item -L @var{language}
10071 @itemx --language=@var{language}
10072 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
10073 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
10074 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
10075 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
10078 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10080 @item -p @var{prefix}
10081 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
10082 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
10083 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
10084 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
10088 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
10089 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
10090 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
10091 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
10092 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
10093 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
10095 @item -S @var{file}
10096 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
10097 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
10098 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
10100 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
10101 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
10102 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
10103 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
10105 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
10106 file in the Bison installation directory.
10107 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
10108 current working directory.
10109 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
10112 @itemx --token-table
10113 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10120 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
10121 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10122 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
10123 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10126 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
10127 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
10128 with other short options.
10130 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
10131 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
10132 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
10133 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10135 @item -r @var{things}
10136 @itemx --report=@var{things}
10137 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
10138 separated list of @var{things} among:
10142 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
10143 parser's automaton.
10146 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10147 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
10150 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
10151 each rule's lookahead set.
10154 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
10155 precedence and associativity directives.
10158 Enable all the items.
10161 Do not generate the report.
10164 @item --report-file=@var{file}
10165 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
10169 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
10170 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
10171 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
10173 @item -o @var{file}
10174 @itemx --output=@var{file}
10175 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
10177 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
10178 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
10180 @item -g [@var{file}]
10181 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
10182 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
10183 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
10184 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
10185 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10186 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10189 @item -x [@var{file}]
10190 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
10191 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
10192 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
10193 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
10195 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
10196 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10199 @node Option Cross Key
10200 @section Option Cross Key
10202 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
10203 the corresponding short option and directive.
10205 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
10206 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
10207 @include cross-options.texi
10211 @section Yacc Library
10213 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
10214 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
10215 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
10216 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
10217 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
10218 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
10219 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
10221 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
10222 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
10225 int yyerror (char const *);
10228 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
10229 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
10230 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
10233 int yyparse (void);
10236 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
10238 @node Other Languages
10239 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
10242 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
10243 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
10247 @section C++ Parsers
10250 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
10251 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
10252 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
10253 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10254 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
10255 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
10258 @node C++ Bison Interface
10259 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
10260 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
10262 @c - initial action
10264 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
10265 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
10266 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
10267 @xref{Decl Summary}.
10269 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
10271 @findex %define api.namespace
10272 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
10273 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
10274 in the following files:
10279 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
10280 location tracking when enabled. These files are not generated if the
10281 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++
10285 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
10287 @item @var{file}.hh
10288 @itemx @var{file}.cc
10289 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
10290 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
10291 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
10292 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
10294 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
10295 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
10296 @samp{%defines} directive.
10299 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
10300 for a complete and accurate documentation.
10302 @node C++ Semantic Values
10303 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
10304 @c - No objects in unions
10306 @c - Printer and destructor
10308 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
10309 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
10310 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
10311 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
10314 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
10315 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
10319 @subsubsection C++ Unions
10321 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
10322 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
10323 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
10326 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
10327 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
10328 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
10330 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
10331 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
10332 to such objects are allowed.
10335 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
10336 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
10337 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
10341 @subsubsection C++ Variants
10343 Bison provides a @emph{variant} based implementation of semantic values for
10344 C++. This alleviates all the limitations reported in the previous section,
10345 and in particular, object types can be used without pointers.
10347 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
10348 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
10349 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
10350 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
10352 For instance, instead of
10360 %token <ival> NUMBER;
10361 %token <sval> STRING;
10368 %token <int> NUMBER;
10369 %token <std::string> STRING;
10372 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
10373 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
10376 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
10377 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
10378 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
10380 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
10381 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
10382 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
10383 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
10384 eventually, destroyed.
10386 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
10387 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
10388 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
10391 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
10392 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
10396 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
10397 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
10398 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
10399 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
10400 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
10401 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
10402 that would be duplicating the information.
10404 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
10405 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
10406 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
10407 (the current implementation of) variants:
10410 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
10411 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
10412 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
10413 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
10414 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
10415 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
10418 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
10421 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
10422 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
10424 @node C++ Location Values
10425 @subsection C++ Location Values
10427 @c - class Position
10428 @c - class Location
10429 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
10431 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
10432 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
10434 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
10435 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10436 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
10437 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
10438 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
10441 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
10442 genuine code only the latter is used.
10445 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
10446 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
10447 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
10451 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
10453 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10454 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
10455 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
10459 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10460 Reset the position to the given values.
10463 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
10464 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
10465 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
10466 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
10467 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
10470 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
10471 The line, starting at 1.
10474 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10475 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
10478 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
10479 The column, starting at 1.
10482 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10483 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
10486 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
10487 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
10488 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
10489 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
10490 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
10493 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
10494 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
10495 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
10498 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
10499 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
10500 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
10501 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
10505 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
10507 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
10508 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10511 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
10512 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
10513 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10516 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
10517 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
10520 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
10521 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
10522 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10525 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
10526 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
10527 Advance the @code{end} position.
10530 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
10531 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
10532 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
10533 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
10536 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
10537 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
10540 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
10541 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
10542 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
10546 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
10547 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
10548 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
10551 @node User Defined Location Type
10552 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
10553 @findex %define api.location.type
10555 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
10556 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
10559 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
10562 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
10565 it must be copyable;
10568 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
10569 parser basically runs
10571 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
10572 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
10575 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
10578 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
10579 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
10582 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
10583 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
10588 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
10589 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
10590 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
10591 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
10596 %define namespace "master::"
10600 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
10601 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
10604 %define api.location.type "master::location"
10605 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
10608 @node C++ Parser Interface
10609 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
10610 @c - define parser_class_name
10612 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10614 @c - Reporting errors
10616 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
10617 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
10618 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
10619 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
10620 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
10621 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
10622 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
10623 additional argument for its constructor.
10625 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
10626 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
10627 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
10630 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
10631 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
10632 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
10633 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
10634 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
10635 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
10638 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
10639 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
10640 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
10641 equivalent with first
10642 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
10643 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
10644 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
10645 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
10646 function invoked from the user action.
10649 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10650 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
10651 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
10654 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10655 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
10656 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
10659 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
10660 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
10663 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
10664 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
10665 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
10668 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
10669 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
10670 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10674 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
10675 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
10676 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10677 or nonzero, full tracing.
10680 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
10681 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
10682 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
10683 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
10684 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
10689 @node C++ Scanner Interface
10690 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
10691 @c - prefix for yylex.
10692 @c - Pure interface to yylex
10695 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
10696 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
10697 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
10698 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
10701 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
10702 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
10705 @node Split Symbols
10706 @subsubsection Split Symbols
10708 The interface is as follows.
10710 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10711 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
10712 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
10713 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
10714 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
10717 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
10718 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
10720 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
10724 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
10725 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10728 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
10729 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10733 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
10734 initialized. So the code would look like:
10738 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
10739 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10742 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
10743 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10752 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
10753 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
10756 yylval.build(yytext);
10757 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
10762 @node Complete Symbols
10763 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
10765 If you specified both @code{%define api.value.type variant} and
10766 @code{%define api.token.constructor},
10767 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
10768 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
10769 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
10770 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
10772 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10773 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
10774 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
10775 the @var{location}.
10778 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
10779 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
10780 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
10781 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
10783 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
10785 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
10786 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
10787 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
10788 including the @code{api.token.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
10789 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
10790 also pass the @var{location}.
10793 For instance, given the following declarations:
10796 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
10797 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
10798 %token <int> INTEGER;
10803 Bison generates the following functions:
10806 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
10807 const location_type& l);
10808 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
10809 const location_type& loc);
10810 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
10814 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
10817 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
10818 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10819 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
10822 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
10823 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
10825 @node A Complete C++ Example
10826 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
10828 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
10829 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
10830 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
10831 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
10832 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
10833 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
10834 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
10835 actually easier to interface with.
10838 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
10839 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
10840 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
10841 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
10842 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
10845 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10846 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
10848 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
10849 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
10850 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
10851 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
10852 of valid input follows.
10856 seven := one + two * three
10860 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
10861 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
10863 @c - A place to store error messages
10864 @c - A place for the result
10866 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
10867 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
10868 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
10869 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
10870 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
10871 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
10872 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
10874 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
10875 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
10876 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
10879 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10881 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10882 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10885 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10890 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
10891 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
10892 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
10893 factor both as follows.
10895 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10897 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
10899 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
10900 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
10905 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
10908 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10910 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
10911 class calcxx_driver
10915 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
10917 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
10923 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
10924 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
10926 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10928 // Handling the scanner.
10929 void scan_begin ();
10931 bool trace_scanning;
10935 Similarly for the parser itself.
10937 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10939 // Run the parser on file F.
10940 // Return 0 on success.
10941 int parse (const std::string& f);
10942 // The name of the file being parsed.
10943 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
10945 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
10946 bool trace_parsing;
10950 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
10951 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
10952 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
10953 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
10955 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
10958 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
10959 void error (const std::string& m);
10961 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
10964 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
10965 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
10966 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
10967 messages and set error state.
10969 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
10971 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10972 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
10974 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
10975 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
10977 variables["one"] = 1;
10978 variables["two"] = 2;
10981 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
10986 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
10990 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
10991 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
10992 int res = parser.parse ();
10998 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
11000 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
11004 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
11006 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
11010 @node Calc++ Parser
11011 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
11013 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
11014 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
11015 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
11016 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
11019 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11021 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
11022 %require "@value{VERSION}"
11024 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
11028 @findex %define api.token.constructor
11029 @findex %define api.value.type variant
11030 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
11031 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
11032 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
11033 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{api.token.constructor}.
11035 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11037 %define api.token.constructor
11038 %define api.value.type variant
11039 %define parse.assert
11043 @findex %code requires
11044 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
11045 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
11046 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
11047 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
11048 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
11049 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
11050 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
11052 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11057 class calcxx_driver;
11062 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
11063 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
11066 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11068 // The parsing context.
11069 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
11073 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
11074 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
11075 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
11078 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11083 // Initialize the initial location.
11084 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
11089 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
11090 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
11093 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11095 %define parse.trace
11096 %define parse.error verbose
11101 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
11102 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
11104 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11108 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11114 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
11115 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
11116 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
11117 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
11118 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.token.prefix}).
11120 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11122 %define api.token.prefix "TOK_"
11124 END 0 "end of file"
11136 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
11137 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
11140 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11142 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
11143 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
11148 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
11149 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
11150 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
11151 @code{operator<<} (@pxref{Printer Decl, , Printing Semantic Values}).
11153 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11155 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <*>;
11159 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
11160 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
11162 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11166 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
11170 | assignments assignment @{@};
11173 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
11178 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
11179 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
11180 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
11181 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
11182 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
11183 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
11184 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
11189 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
11192 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
11195 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
11196 const std::string& m)
11198 driver.error (l, m);
11202 @node Calc++ Scanner
11203 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
11205 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
11206 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
11208 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11210 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
11212 # include <climits>
11213 # include <cstdlib>
11215 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
11216 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
11218 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
11219 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
11220 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
11221 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
11223 # define yywrap() 1
11225 // The location of the current token.
11226 static yy::location loc;
11231 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
11232 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
11233 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
11234 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
11236 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11238 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug noinput
11242 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
11244 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11246 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
11252 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
11253 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
11254 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
11255 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
11256 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
11257 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
11258 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
11260 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11264 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
11265 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
11271 // Code run each time yylex is called.
11275 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
11276 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
11280 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
11282 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11284 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
11285 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
11286 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
11287 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
11288 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
11289 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
11290 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
11295 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
11296 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
11297 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
11298 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
11301 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
11302 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
11303 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
11308 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
11309 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
11311 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
11315 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
11317 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
11318 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
11320 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
11322 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
11323 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11330 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
11337 @node Calc++ Top Level
11338 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
11340 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
11342 @comment file: calc++.cc
11344 #include <iostream>
11345 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
11349 main (int argc, char *argv[])
11352 calcxx_driver driver;
11353 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
11354 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
11355 driver.trace_parsing = true;
11356 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
11357 driver.trace_scanning = true;
11358 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
11359 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
11368 @section Java Parsers
11371 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
11372 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
11373 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
11374 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
11375 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
11376 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
11377 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11378 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
11381 @node Java Bison Interface
11382 @subsection Java Bison Interface
11383 @c - %language "Java"
11385 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
11386 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11388 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
11389 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
11391 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11392 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
11393 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
11394 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
11395 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
11396 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
11397 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
11398 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
11399 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
11400 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
11402 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
11404 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
11405 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
11406 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
11407 and @code{%define api.pure} directives do nothing when used in Java.
11409 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
11410 api.push-pull} have no effect.
11412 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
11413 @code{glr-parser} directive.
11415 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
11416 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
11418 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
11419 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
11420 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
11422 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
11423 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
11424 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
11426 if needed. Also, in the future the
11427 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
11428 access the token names and codes.
11430 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
11431 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
11432 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
11433 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
11436 @node Java Semantic Values
11437 @subsection Java Semantic Values
11438 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
11440 @c - Printer and destructor
11442 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
11443 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
11444 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
11447 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
11448 %type <Integer> number
11451 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
11452 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
11453 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
11454 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define api.value.type}
11455 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
11458 %define api.value.type "ASTNode"
11462 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
11463 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
11465 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
11466 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
11467 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
11468 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
11469 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
11470 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
11472 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
11473 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
11474 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
11476 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
11477 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
11478 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
11481 @node Java Location Values
11482 @subsection Java Location Values
11484 @c - class Position
11485 @c - class Location
11487 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
11488 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
11489 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
11490 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
11491 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
11492 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
11493 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
11495 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
11496 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
11497 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
11498 be supplied by the user.
11501 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
11502 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
11503 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
11506 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
11507 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
11510 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
11511 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
11514 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
11515 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
11516 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
11517 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
11521 @node Java Parser Interface
11522 @subsection Java Parser Interface
11523 @c - define parser_class_name
11525 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
11527 @c - Reporting errors
11529 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
11530 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
11531 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
11532 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
11533 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
11535 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
11536 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
11537 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
11538 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
11539 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
11540 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
11541 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
11542 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
11544 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
11545 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
11546 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
11547 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
11549 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
11550 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
11551 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
11552 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
11553 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
11554 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
11556 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
11557 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
11558 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
11559 which initialize them automatically.
11561 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11562 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
11563 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
11564 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
11566 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11567 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11568 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11571 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
11572 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
11573 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
11576 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
11577 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
11578 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
11580 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
11581 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
11582 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11585 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
11586 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
11587 @code{false} otherwise.
11590 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
11591 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
11592 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
11593 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
11594 verbose error messages.
11597 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11598 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
11599 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11600 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11601 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11602 available only if location tracking is active.
11605 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
11606 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
11607 from a syntax error.
11608 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11611 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
11612 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
11613 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
11617 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
11618 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
11619 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
11620 or nonzero, full tracing.
11623 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
11624 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
11625 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
11629 @node Java Scanner Interface
11630 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
11633 @c - Lexer interface
11635 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
11636 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
11637 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
11638 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
11639 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
11642 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
11643 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
11644 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
11645 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
11648 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
11649 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
11650 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
11651 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
11654 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
11656 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11657 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
11658 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
11659 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
11662 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
11663 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
11664 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
11667 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
11668 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11671 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
11672 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
11673 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
11674 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
11675 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
11677 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
11678 "@var{class-name}".}
11681 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
11682 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
11684 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define api.value.type
11685 "@var{class-name}".}
11689 @node Java Action Features
11690 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
11692 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
11693 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
11695 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
11696 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
11699 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11700 This may not be assigned to.
11701 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11704 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
11705 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
11706 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11710 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
11711 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
11712 @samp{%define api.value.type}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
11713 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
11714 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
11715 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11718 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
11719 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
11720 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
11721 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
11723 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11727 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
11728 This may not be assigned to.
11729 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11733 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
11734 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11737 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
11738 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
11739 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11742 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
11743 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
11744 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11747 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
11748 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
11749 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11752 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
11753 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
11754 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
11756 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11759 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
11760 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11761 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
11762 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
11763 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
11764 available only if location tracking is active.
11768 @node Java Differences
11769 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
11771 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
11772 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
11773 section summarizes these differences.
11777 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
11778 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
11779 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
11780 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
11781 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
11782 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
11783 @xref{Java Action Features}.
11785 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
11786 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
11787 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
11788 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
11789 corresponds to these C macros.}.
11792 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
11793 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
11794 @samp{%define api.value.type}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
11795 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
11796 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
11797 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
11798 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
11799 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
11800 @ref{Java Action Features}.
11803 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
11805 @item @code{%code imports}
11806 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
11807 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
11808 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
11810 @item unqualified @code{%code}
11811 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
11813 @item @code{%code lexer}
11814 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
11815 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
11816 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
11820 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
11821 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
11822 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
11824 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
11825 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
11830 @node Java Declarations Summary
11831 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
11833 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
11834 meaning when used in a Java parser.
11836 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
11837 Generate a Java class for the parser.
11840 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11841 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
11842 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
11843 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
11844 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11847 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11848 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
11849 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
11850 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11853 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
11854 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
11855 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
11856 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11859 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
11860 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
11861 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11864 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
11865 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
11866 a Java @emph{type}.
11867 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11870 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11871 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
11872 @xref{Java Differences}.
11875 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11876 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
11877 @xref{Java Differences}.
11880 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11881 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
11882 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11885 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
11886 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
11887 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11890 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
11891 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
11892 @emph{outside} the parser class.
11893 @xref{Java Differences}.
11896 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
11897 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
11898 @xref{Java Differences}.
11901 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
11902 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
11903 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11906 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
11907 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
11908 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11911 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
11912 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
11913 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11916 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
11917 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
11918 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11921 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
11922 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
11924 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11927 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11928 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
11929 constructor. Default is none.
11930 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11933 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11934 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
11935 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
11936 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
11939 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
11940 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
11941 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
11942 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
11943 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
11944 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11947 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
11948 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
11949 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11952 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
11953 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
11954 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
11955 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11958 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
11959 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
11960 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
11961 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
11962 @xref{Java Location Values}.
11965 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
11966 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
11967 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11970 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.value.type} "@var{class}"
11971 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
11972 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
11975 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
11976 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
11977 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
11980 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
11981 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
11982 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
11983 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
11987 @c ================================================= FAQ
11990 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
11991 @cindex frequently asked questions
11994 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
11998 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
11999 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
12000 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
12001 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
12002 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
12003 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
12004 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
12005 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
12006 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
12007 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
12008 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
12009 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
12012 @node Memory Exhausted
12013 @section Memory Exhausted
12016 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
12017 message. What can I do?
12020 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12023 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
12024 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
12026 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
12027 following typical questions:
12030 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
12031 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
12032 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
12039 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
12040 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
12041 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
12044 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
12045 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
12046 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
12047 demonstration, consider the following source file,
12048 @file{first-line.l}:
12054 #include <stdlib.h>
12058 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
12062 yyparse (char const *file)
12064 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
12068 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12072 /* One token only. */
12074 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
12077 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
12095 If the file @file{input} contains
12103 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
12106 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
12107 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
12108 $ @kbd{./first-line}
12113 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
12114 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
12115 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
12116 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
12117 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
12118 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
12119 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
12120 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
12123 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
12124 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
12125 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
12126 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
12128 @node Strings are Destroyed
12129 @section Strings are Destroyed
12132 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
12133 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
12134 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
12137 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
12138 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
12139 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
12145 char *yylval = NULL;
12150 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
12158 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
12159 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
12160 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
12161 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
12167 If you compile and run this code, you get:
12170 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12171 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12172 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12178 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
12179 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
12180 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
12181 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
12182 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
12183 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
12186 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
12187 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
12188 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
12193 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
12194 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
12197 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
12198 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
12201 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
12202 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
12203 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
12204 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
12205 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
12206 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
12207 execute simple instructions one after the others.
12209 @cindex abstract syntax tree
12211 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
12212 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
12213 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
12214 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
12215 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
12216 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
12219 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
12220 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
12223 @node Multiple start-symbols
12224 @section Multiple start-symbols
12227 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
12228 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
12229 multiple entry points.
12232 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
12233 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
12234 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
12235 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
12239 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
12246 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
12247 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
12249 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
12250 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
12251 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
12252 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
12253 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
12254 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
12255 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
12256 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
12259 /* @r{Prologue.} */
12264 int t = start_token;
12269 /* @r{The rules.} */
12273 @node Secure? Conform?
12274 @section Secure? Conform?
12277 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
12280 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
12281 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
12282 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
12283 please send us a bug report.
12285 @node I can't build Bison
12286 @section I can't build Bison
12289 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
12290 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
12294 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
12295 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
12296 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
12297 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
12298 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
12299 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
12300 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
12303 @node Where can I find help?
12304 @section Where can I find help?
12307 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
12310 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
12311 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
12312 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
12313 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
12314 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
12315 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
12316 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
12317 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
12321 @section Bug Reports
12324 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
12327 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
12328 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
12329 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
12330 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
12331 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
12333 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
12334 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
12335 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
12336 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
12337 easier it will be to fix the bug.
12339 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
12340 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
12341 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
12342 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
12343 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
12344 send additional files as well (such as @file{config.h} or @file{config.cache}).
12346 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
12347 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
12349 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
12351 @node More Languages
12352 @section More Languages
12355 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
12356 favorite language here}?
12359 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
12360 languages; contributions are welcome.
12363 @section Beta Testing
12366 What is involved in being a beta tester?
12369 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
12370 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
12371 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
12372 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
12373 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
12374 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
12375 essentially halted.
12377 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
12378 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
12379 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
12380 systems are especially welcome.
12382 @node Mailing Lists
12383 @section Mailing Lists
12386 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
12389 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
12391 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
12393 @node Table of Symbols
12394 @appendix Bison Symbols
12395 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
12396 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
12398 @deffn {Variable} @@$
12399 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
12400 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12403 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
12404 @deffnx {Symbol} @@@var{n}
12405 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
12406 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12408 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12409 with a semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12412 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
12413 @deffnx {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
12414 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12415 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
12418 @deffn {Symbol} $@@@var{n}
12419 In a grammar, the Bison-generated nonterminal symbol for a mid-rule action
12420 with no semantical value. @xref{Mid-Rule Action Translation}.
12423 @deffn {Variable} $$
12424 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
12428 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
12429 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
12430 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
12433 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
12434 @deffnx {Variable} $[@var{name}]
12435 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by @var{name}.
12439 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
12440 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
12441 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
12442 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
12445 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
12446 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
12447 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
12448 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
12449 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
12453 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
12454 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
12455 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
12456 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
12457 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
12458 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
12459 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
12461 This feature is experimental.
12462 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12466 @deffn {Construct} /* @dots{} */
12467 @deffnx {Construct} // @dots{}
12468 Comments, as in C/C++.
12471 @deffn {Delimiter} :
12472 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
12476 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
12477 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12480 @deffn {Delimiter} |
12481 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
12482 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
12485 @deffn {Directive} <*>
12486 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
12489 This feature is experimental.
12490 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12493 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12496 @deffn {Directive} <>
12497 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
12500 This feature is experimental.
12501 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
12504 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12507 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
12508 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
12509 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
12510 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
12513 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
12514 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
12515 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
12516 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
12517 @xref{%code Summary}.
12520 @deffn {Directive} %debug
12521 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12525 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
12526 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12527 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12532 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
12533 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
12534 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
12535 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
12538 @deffn {Directive} %defines
12539 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
12540 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12543 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
12544 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
12545 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12548 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
12549 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
12550 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
12553 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
12554 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
12555 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
12559 @deffn {Directive} %empty
12560 Bison declaration to declare make explicit that a rule has an empty
12561 right-hand side. @xref{Empty Rules}.
12564 @deffn {Symbol} $end
12565 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
12566 used in the grammar.
12569 @deffn {Symbol} error
12570 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
12571 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
12572 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
12573 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
12574 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
12575 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
12576 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
12577 @xref{Error Recovery}.
12580 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
12581 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
12582 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12585 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12586 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
12590 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
12591 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
12592 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12595 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
12596 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
12599 @deffn {Directive} %language
12600 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
12601 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12604 @deffn {Directive} %left
12605 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
12606 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12609 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12610 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
12611 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
12615 @deffn {Directive} %merge
12616 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
12617 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
12618 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
12619 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
12622 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
12623 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
12624 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
12626 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
12627 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
12628 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
12630 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
12631 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
12632 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
12633 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
12634 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
12635 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
12636 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
12637 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
12642 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
12643 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
12644 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
12649 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
12650 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
12651 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12654 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
12655 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
12656 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12659 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
12660 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
12661 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12664 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12665 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
12666 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
12667 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12670 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
12671 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
12672 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12675 @deffn {Directive} %prec
12676 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
12677 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
12680 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
12681 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
12682 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12685 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
12686 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
12687 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
12688 unreasonable usage.
12691 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
12692 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
12693 Require a Version of Bison}.
12696 @deffn {Directive} %right
12697 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
12698 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
12701 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
12702 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
12703 @xref{Decl Summary}.
12706 @deffn {Directive} %start
12707 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
12711 @deffn {Directive} %token
12712 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
12713 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
12716 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
12717 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
12718 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
12721 @deffn {Directive} %type
12722 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
12723 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
12726 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
12727 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
12728 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
12732 @deffn {Directive} %union
12733 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
12734 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
12737 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
12738 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
12739 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
12740 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
12741 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12743 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
12747 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
12748 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
12749 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
12750 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12752 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
12756 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
12757 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
12758 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12761 @deffn {Variable} yychar
12762 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
12763 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
12764 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
12765 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12768 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
12769 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
12770 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12773 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
12774 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
12775 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12778 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
12779 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
12780 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
12781 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
12784 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
12785 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
12786 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12789 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
12790 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
12791 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
12792 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
12793 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
12794 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12796 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
12800 @deffn {Function} yyerror
12801 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
12802 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12805 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
12806 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
12807 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
12808 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
12809 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
12810 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
12811 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
12814 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
12815 Macro used to output run-time traces.
12816 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
12819 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
12820 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
12821 @xref{Memory Management}.
12824 @deffn {Function} yylex
12825 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
12826 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
12830 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
12831 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
12832 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12833 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12835 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
12837 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
12838 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
12839 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
12842 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
12843 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
12844 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
12847 @deffn {Variable} yylval
12848 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
12849 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
12850 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
12852 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
12853 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
12854 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
12857 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
12858 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
12862 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
12863 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
12864 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
12865 pure push parser, it is a member of @code{yypstate}.)
12866 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
12869 @deffn {Function} yyparse
12870 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
12871 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
12874 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
12875 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
12876 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
12877 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
12880 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
12881 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12882 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
12883 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
12884 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
12885 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12886 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12889 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
12890 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
12891 call this function to create a new parser.
12892 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
12893 @code{yypstate_new}}.
12894 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12895 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12898 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
12899 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12900 parse the rest of the input stream.
12901 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
12902 @code{yypull_parse}}.
12903 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12904 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12907 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
12908 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
12909 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
12910 @code{yypush_parse}}.
12911 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
12912 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
12915 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
12916 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
12917 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
12918 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
12921 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
12922 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
12923 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
12924 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
12925 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
12926 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
12927 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
12929 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
12930 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
12931 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
12932 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
12933 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
12934 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
12935 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
12938 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
12939 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
12940 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
12948 @item Accepting state
12949 A state whose only action is the accept action.
12950 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
12951 @xref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}.
12953 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
12954 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
12955 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
12956 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
12957 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12959 @item Consistent state
12960 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12962 @item Context-free grammars
12963 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
12964 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
12965 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
12966 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
12969 @item Default reduction
12970 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
12971 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
12972 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
12973 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
12976 @item Defaulted state
12977 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
12979 @item Dynamic allocation
12980 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
12981 compile time or on entry to a function.
12984 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
12985 character string of length zero.
12987 @item Finite-state stack machine
12988 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
12989 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
12990 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
12991 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
12992 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
12993 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12995 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
12996 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
12997 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
12998 deterministic parsing
12999 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
13000 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
13001 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
13005 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
13006 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
13007 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13009 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
13010 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
13011 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
13012 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
13013 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
13014 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
13015 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
13016 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
13017 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
13018 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
13020 @item Infix operator
13021 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
13022 performs some operation.
13025 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
13027 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
13028 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
13029 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
13030 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
13031 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
13032 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
13033 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
13035 @item Language construct
13036 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
13037 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
13038 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13040 @item Left associativity
13041 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
13042 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
13043 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
13045 @item Left recursion
13046 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
13047 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13050 @item Left-to-right parsing
13051 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
13052 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13054 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
13055 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
13056 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
13058 @item Lexical tie-in
13059 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
13060 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
13062 @item Literal string token
13063 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
13065 @item Lookahead token
13066 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
13070 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
13071 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
13072 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
13075 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
13076 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
13078 @item Nonterminal symbol
13079 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
13080 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
13081 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
13084 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
13085 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
13088 @item Postfix operator
13089 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
13090 performs some operation.
13093 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
13094 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
13098 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
13099 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
13100 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
13102 @item Reverse polish notation
13103 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
13105 @item Right recursion
13106 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
13107 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
13111 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
13112 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
13113 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
13116 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
13117 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
13118 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
13120 @item Single-character literal
13121 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
13122 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
13125 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
13126 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
13127 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
13128 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
13131 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
13132 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
13133 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
13136 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
13137 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
13140 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
13141 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
13142 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
13143 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
13145 @item Terminal symbol
13146 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
13147 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
13148 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
13150 @item Unreachable state
13151 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
13152 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
13153 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
13156 @node Copying This Manual
13157 @appendix Copying This Manual
13161 @unnumbered Bibliography
13165 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
13166 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
13167 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
13168 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
13170 @item [Denny 2010 May]
13171 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
13172 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
13173 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
13174 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
13176 @item [Denny 2010 November]
13177 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
13178 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
13179 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
13180 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
13182 @item [DeRemer 1982]
13183 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
13184 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
13185 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
13186 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
13189 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
13190 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
13191 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
13194 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
13195 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
13196 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
13197 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
13200 @node Index of Terms
13201 @unnumbered Index of Terms
13207 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
13208 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
13209 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
13210 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
13211 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
13212 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
13213 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
13214 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
13215 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
13216 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
13217 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
13218 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
13219 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
13220 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
13221 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
13222 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
13223 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
13224 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
13225 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
13226 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
13227 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
13228 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
13229 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
13230 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
13231 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
13232 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
13233 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
13234 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
13235 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
13236 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
13237 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
13238 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
13239 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
13240 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
13241 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
13242 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
13243 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
13244 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
13245 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
13246 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
13247 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
13248 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
13249 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
13250 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
13251 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
13252 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
13253 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
13254 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
13255 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
13256 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
13257 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
13258 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
13259 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
13260 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
13261 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
13262 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
13263 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
13264 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
13266 @c Local Variables:
13267 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"