]> git.saurik.com Git - bison.git/blob - tests/reduce.at
c++: silence warnings
[bison.git] / tests / reduce.at
1 # Exercising Bison Grammar Reduction. -*- Autotest -*-
2
3 # Copyright (C) 2001-2002, 2007-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
4
5 # This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
7 # the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
8 # (at your option) any later version.
9 #
10 # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
11 # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
12 # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
13 # GNU General Public License for more details.
14 #
15 # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
16 # along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
17
18 AT_BANNER([[Grammar Reduction.]])
19
20
21 ## ------------------- ##
22 ## Useless Terminals. ##
23 ## ------------------- ##
24
25 AT_SETUP([Useless Terminals])
26
27 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
28 [[%verbose
29 %output "input.c"
30
31 %token useless1
32 %token useless2
33 %token useless3
34 %token useless4
35 %token useless5
36 %token useless6
37 %token useless7
38 %token useless8
39 %token useless9
40
41 %token useful
42 %%
43 exp: useful;
44 ]])
45
46 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input.y]])
47
48 AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^Grammar/q;/^$/!p' input.output]], 0,
49 [[Terminals unused in grammar
50 useless1
51 useless2
52 useless3
53 useless4
54 useless5
55 useless6
56 useless7
57 useless8
58 useless9
59 ]])
60
61 AT_CLEANUP
62
63
64
65 ## ---------------------- ##
66 ## Useless Nonterminals. ##
67 ## ---------------------- ##
68
69 AT_SETUP([Useless Nonterminals])
70
71 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
72 [[%verbose
73 %output "input.c"
74
75 %nterm useless1
76 %nterm useless2
77 %nterm useless3
78 %nterm useless4
79 %nterm useless5
80 %nterm useless6
81 %nterm useless7
82 %nterm useless8
83 %nterm useless9
84
85 %token useful
86 %%
87 exp: useful;
88 ]])
89
90 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input.y]], 0, [],
91 [[input.y: warning: 9 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
92 input.y:4.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless1 [-Wother]
93 input.y:5.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless2 [-Wother]
94 input.y:6.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless3 [-Wother]
95 input.y:7.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless4 [-Wother]
96 input.y:8.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless5 [-Wother]
97 input.y:9.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless6 [-Wother]
98 input.y:10.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless7 [-Wother]
99 input.y:11.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless8 [-Wother]
100 input.y:12.8-15: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless9 [-Wother]
101 ]])
102
103 AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^Grammar/q;/^$/!p' input.output]], 0,
104 [[Nonterminals useless in grammar
105 useless1
106 useless2
107 useless3
108 useless4
109 useless5
110 useless6
111 useless7
112 useless8
113 useless9
114 ]])
115
116 AT_CLEANUP
117
118
119
120 ## --------------- ##
121 ## Useless Rules. ##
122 ## --------------- ##
123
124 AT_SETUP([Useless Rules])
125
126 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
127
128 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
129 [[%verbose
130 %output "input.c"
131 %token useful
132 %%
133 exp: useful;
134 useless1: '1';
135 useless2: '2';
136 useless3: '3';
137 useless4: '4';
138 useless5: '5';
139 useless6: '6';
140 useless7: '7';
141 useless8: '8';
142 useless9: '9';
143 ]])
144
145 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-fcaret input.y]], 0, [],
146 [[input.y: warning: 9 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
147 input.y: warning: 9 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
148 input.y:6.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless1 [-Wother]
149 useless1: '1';
150 ^^^^^^^^
151 input.y:7.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless2 [-Wother]
152 useless2: '2';
153 ^^^^^^^^
154 input.y:8.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless3 [-Wother]
155 useless3: '3';
156 ^^^^^^^^
157 input.y:9.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless4 [-Wother]
158 useless4: '4';
159 ^^^^^^^^
160 input.y:10.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless5 [-Wother]
161 useless5: '5';
162 ^^^^^^^^
163 input.y:11.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless6 [-Wother]
164 useless6: '6';
165 ^^^^^^^^
166 input.y:12.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless7 [-Wother]
167 useless7: '7';
168 ^^^^^^^^
169 input.y:13.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless8 [-Wother]
170 useless8: '8';
171 ^^^^^^^^
172 input.y:14.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless9 [-Wother]
173 useless9: '9';
174 ^^^^^^^^
175 input.y:6.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
176 useless1: '1';
177 ^^^
178 input.y:7.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
179 useless2: '2';
180 ^^^
181 input.y:8.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
182 useless3: '3';
183 ^^^
184 input.y:9.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
185 useless4: '4';
186 ^^^
187 input.y:10.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
188 useless5: '5';
189 ^^^
190 input.y:11.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
191 useless6: '6';
192 ^^^
193 input.y:12.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
194 useless7: '7';
195 ^^^
196 input.y:13.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
197 useless8: '8';
198 ^^^
199 input.y:14.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
200 useless9: '9';
201 ^^^
202 ]])
203
204 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input.y]], 0, [],
205 [[input.y: warning: 9 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
206 input.y: warning: 9 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
207 input.y:6.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless1 [-Wother]
208 input.y:7.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless2 [-Wother]
209 input.y:8.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless3 [-Wother]
210 input.y:9.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless4 [-Wother]
211 input.y:10.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless5 [-Wother]
212 input.y:11.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless6 [-Wother]
213 input.y:12.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless7 [-Wother]
214 input.y:13.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless8 [-Wother]
215 input.y:14.1-8: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless9 [-Wother]
216 input.y:6.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless1: '1' [-Wother]
217 input.y:7.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless2: '2' [-Wother]
218 input.y:8.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless3: '3' [-Wother]
219 input.y:9.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless4: '4' [-Wother]
220 input.y:10.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless5: '5' [-Wother]
221 input.y:11.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless6: '6' [-Wother]
222 input.y:12.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless7: '7' [-Wother]
223 input.y:13.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless8: '8' [-Wother]
224 input.y:14.11-13: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless9: '9' [-Wother]
225 ]])
226
227 AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^Grammar/q;/^$/!p' input.output]], 0,
228 [[Nonterminals useless in grammar
229 useless1
230 useless2
231 useless3
232 useless4
233 useless5
234 useless6
235 useless7
236 useless8
237 useless9
238 Terminals unused in grammar
239 '1'
240 '2'
241 '3'
242 '4'
243 '5'
244 '6'
245 '7'
246 '8'
247 '9'
248 Rules useless in grammar
249 2 useless1: '1'
250 3 useless2: '2'
251 4 useless3: '3'
252 5 useless4: '4'
253 6 useless5: '5'
254 7 useless6: '6'
255 8 useless7: '7'
256 9 useless8: '8'
257 10 useless9: '9'
258 ]])
259
260 AT_CLEANUP
261
262
263
264 ## ------------------- ##
265 ## Reduced Automaton. ##
266 ## ------------------- ##
267
268 # Check that the automaton is that as the for the grammar reduced by
269 # hand.
270
271 AT_SETUP([Reduced Automaton])
272
273 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
274
275 # The non reduced grammar.
276 # ------------------------
277 AT_DATA([[not-reduced.y]],
278 [[/* A useless token. */
279 %token useless_token
280 /* A useful one. */
281 %token useful
282 %verbose
283 %output "not-reduced.c"
284
285 %%
286
287 exp: useful { /* A useful action. */ }
288 | non_productive { /* A non productive action. */ }
289 ;
290
291 not_reachable: useful { /* A not reachable action. */ }
292 ;
293
294 non_productive: non_productive useless_token
295 { /* Another non productive action. */ }
296 ;
297 %%
298 ]])
299
300 AT_BISON_CHECK([[-fcaret not-reduced.y]], 0, [],
301 [[not-reduced.y: warning: 2 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
302 not-reduced.y: warning: 3 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
303 not-reduced.y:14.1-13: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: not_reachable [-Wother]
304 not_reachable: useful { /* A not reachable action. */ }
305 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
306 not-reduced.y:11.6-19: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: non_productive [-Wother]
307 | non_productive { /* A non productive action. */ }
308 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
309 not-reduced.y:11.6-57: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
310 | non_productive { /* A non productive action. */ }
311 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
312 not-reduced.y:14.16-56: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
313 not_reachable: useful { /* A not reachable action. */ }
314 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
315 not-reduced.y:17.17-18.63: warning: rule useless in grammar [-Wother]
316 non_productive: non_productive useless_token
317 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
318 ]])
319
320 AT_BISON_CHECK([[not-reduced.y]], 0, [],
321 [[not-reduced.y: warning: 2 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
322 not-reduced.y: warning: 3 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
323 not-reduced.y:14.1-13: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: not_reachable [-Wother]
324 not-reduced.y:11.6-19: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: non_productive [-Wother]
325 not-reduced.y:11.6-57: warning: rule useless in grammar: exp: non_productive [-Wother]
326 not-reduced.y:14.16-56: warning: rule useless in grammar: not_reachable: useful [-Wother]
327 not-reduced.y:17.17-18.63: warning: rule useless in grammar: non_productive: non_productive useless_token [-Wother]
328 ]])
329
330 AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^Grammar/q;/^$/!p' not-reduced.output]], 0,
331 [[Nonterminals useless in grammar
332 not_reachable
333 non_productive
334 Terminals unused in grammar
335 useless_token
336 Rules useless in grammar
337 2 exp: non_productive
338 3 not_reachable: useful
339 4 non_productive: non_productive useless_token
340 ]])
341
342 # The reduced grammar.
343 # --------------------
344 AT_DATA([[reduced.y]],
345 [[/* A useless token. */
346 %token useless_token
347 /* A useful one. */
348 %token useful
349 %verbose
350 %output "reduced.c"
351
352 %%
353
354 exp: useful { /* A useful action. */ }
355 // | non_productive { /* A non productive action. */ } */
356 ;
357
358 //not_reachable: useful { /* A not reachable action. */ }
359 // ;
360
361 //non_productive: non_productive useless_token
362 // { /* Another non productive action. */ }
363 // ;
364 %%
365 ]])
366
367 AT_BISON_CHECK([[reduced.y]])
368
369 # Comparing the parsers.
370 cp reduced.c expout
371 AT_CHECK([sed 's/not-reduced/reduced/g' not-reduced.c], 0, [expout])
372
373 AT_CLEANUP
374
375
376
377 ## ------------------- ##
378 ## Underivable Rules. ##
379 ## ------------------- ##
380
381 AT_SETUP([Underivable Rules])
382
383 AT_KEYWORDS([report])
384
385 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
386 [[%verbose
387 %output "input.c"
388 %token useful
389 %%
390 exp: useful | underivable;
391 underivable: indirection;
392 indirection: underivable;
393 ]])
394
395 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input.y]], 0, [],
396 [[input.y: warning: 2 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
397 input.y: warning: 3 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
398 input.y:5.15-25: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: underivable [-Wother]
399 input.y:6.14-24: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: indirection [-Wother]
400 input.y:5.15-25: warning: rule useless in grammar: exp: underivable [-Wother]
401 input.y:6.14-24: warning: rule useless in grammar: underivable: indirection [-Wother]
402 input.y:7.14-24: warning: rule useless in grammar: indirection: underivable [-Wother]
403 ]])
404
405 AT_CHECK([[sed -n '/^Grammar/q;/^$/!p' input.output]], 0,
406 [[Nonterminals useless in grammar
407 underivable
408 indirection
409 Rules useless in grammar
410 2 exp: underivable
411 3 underivable: indirection
412 4 indirection: underivable
413 ]])
414
415 AT_CLEANUP
416
417
418
419 ## ---------------- ##
420 ## Empty Language. ##
421 ## ---------------- ##
422
423 AT_SETUP([Empty Language])
424
425 AT_DATA([[input.y]],
426 [[%output "input.c"
427 %%
428 exp: exp;
429 ]])
430
431 AT_BISON_CHECK([[input.y]], 1, [],
432 [[input.y: warning: 2 nonterminals useless in grammar [-Wother]
433 input.y: warning: 2 rules useless in grammar [-Wother]
434 input.y:3.1-3: fatal error: start symbol exp does not derive any sentence
435 ]])
436
437 AT_CLEANUP
438
439
440
441 ## ----------------- ##
442 ## %define lr.type. ##
443 ## ----------------- ##
444
445 # AT_TEST_LR_TYPE(DESCRIPTION,
446 # DECLS, GRAMMAR, INPUT,
447 # BISON-STDERR, TABLES,
448 # [OTHER-CHECKS],
449 # [PARSER-EXIT-VALUE],
450 # [PARSER-STDOUT], [PARSER-STDERR])
451 # -------------------------------------------------
452 m4_define([AT_TEST_LR_TYPE],
453 [
454 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[no %define lr.type: ]$1],
455 [[LALR]], [[]],
456 [$2], m4_shiftn(2, $@))
457 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.type lalr: ]$1],
458 [[LALR]], [[]],
459 [[%define lr.type lalr
460 ]$2],
461 m4_shiftn(2, $@))
462 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.type ielr: ]$1],
463 [[IELR]], [[]],
464 [[%define lr.type ielr
465 ]$2],
466 m4_shiftn(2, $@))
467 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.type canonical-lr: ]$1],
468 [[canonical LR]], [[]],
469 [[%define lr.type canonical-lr
470 ]$2],
471 m4_shiftn(2, $@))
472 ])
473
474 AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Single State Split]],
475 [[%left 'a'
476 // Conflict resolution renders state 12 unreachable for canonical LR(1). We
477 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
478 %define lr.keep-unreachable-state]],
479 [[
480 S: 'a' A 'a' /* rule 1 */
481 | 'b' A 'b' /* rule 2 */
482 | 'c' c /* rule 3 */
483 ;
484
485 /* A conflict should appear after the first 'a' in rules 4 and 5 but only after
486 having shifted the first 'a' in rule 1. However, when LALR(1) merging is
487 chosen, the state containing that conflict is reused after having seen the
488 first 'b' in rule 2 and then the first 'a' in rules 4 and 5. In both cases,
489 because of the merged state, if the next token is an 'a', the %left forces a
490 reduction action with rule 5. In the latter case, only a shift is actually
491 grammatically correct. Thus, the parser would report a syntax error for the
492 grammatically correct sentence "baab" because it would encounter a syntax
493 error after that incorrect reduction.
494
495 Despite not being LALR(1), Menhir version 20070322 suffers from this problem
496 as well. It uses David Pager's weak compatibility test for merging states.
497 Bison and Menhir accept non-LR(1) grammars with conflict resolution. Pager
498 designed his algorithm only for LR(1) grammars. */
499 A: 'a' 'a' /* rule 4 */
500 | 'a' /* rule 5 */
501 ;
502
503 /* Rule 3, rule 6, and rule 7 ensure that Bison does not report rule 4 as
504 useless after conflict resolution. This proves that, even though LALR(1)
505 generates incorrect parser tables sometimes, Bison will not necessarily
506 produce any warning to help the user realize it. */
507 c: 'a' 'b' /* rule 6 */
508 | A /* rule 7 */
509 ;
510 ]],
511
512 dnl INPUT
513 [['b', 'a', 'a', 'b']],
514
515 dnl BISON-STDERR
516 [],
517
518 dnl TABLES
519 [[State 0
520
521 0 $accept: . S $end
522 1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
523 2 | . 'b' A 'b'
524 3 | . 'c' c
525
526 'a' shift, and go to state 1
527 'b' shift, and go to state 2
528 'c' shift, and go to state 3
529
530 S go to state 4
531
532
533 State 1
534
535 1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
536 4 A: . 'a' 'a'
537 5 | . 'a'
538
539 'a' shift, and go to state 5
540
541 A go to state 6
542
543
544 State 2
545
546 2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
547 4 A: . 'a' 'a'
548 5 | . 'a'
549
550 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[5]], [[16]])[
551
552 A go to state 7
553
554
555 State 3
556
557 3 S: 'c' . c
558 4 A: . 'a' 'a'
559 5 | . 'a'
560 6 c: . 'a' 'b'
561 7 | . A
562
563 'a' shift, and go to state 8
564
565 A go to state 9
566 c go to state 10
567
568
569 State 4
570
571 0 $accept: S . $end
572
573 $end shift, and go to state 11
574
575
576 State 5
577
578 4 A: 'a' . 'a'
579 5 | 'a' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[['a', 'b']]], [[['a']]])[
580
581 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
582 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
583
584 Conflict between rule 5 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
585
586
587 State 6
588
589 1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
590
591 'a' shift, and go to state 13
592
593
594 State 7
595
596 2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
597
598 'b' shift, and go to state 14
599
600
601 State 8
602
603 4 A: 'a' . 'a'
604 5 | 'a' . [$end]
605 6 c: 'a' . 'b'
606
607 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[17]],
608 [[12]])[
609 'b' shift, and go to state 15
610
611 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
612 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
613
614
615 State 9
616
617 7 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
618
619 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
620 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)
621
622
623 State 10
624
625 3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
626
627 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
628 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
629
630
631 State 11
632
633 0 $accept: S $end .
634
635 $default accept
636
637
638 State 12
639
640 4 A: 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
641
642 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
643 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
644
645
646 State 13
647
648 1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
649
650 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
651 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
652
653
654 State 14
655
656 2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
657
658 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
659 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
660
661
662 State 15
663
664 6 c: 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
665
666 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
667 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (c)]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
668 [[]], [[
669
670
671 State 16
672
673 4 A: 'a' . 'a'
674 5 | 'a' . ['b']
675
676 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[18]],
677 [[12]])[
678
679 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['b']],
680 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
681
682
683 State 17
684
685 4 A: 'a' 'a' . [$end]
686
687 $end reduce using rule 4 (A)
688
689
690 State 18
691
692 4 A: 'a' 'a' . ['b']
693
694 'b' reduce using rule 4 (A)]])])[
695 ]],
696
697 dnl OTHER-CHECKS
698 [],
699
700 dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
701 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[1]], [[0]])],
702 [],
703 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
704 [[syntax error
705 ]])])
706
707 AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Lane Split]],
708 [[%left 'a'
709 // Conflict resolution renders state 16 unreachable for canonical LR(1). We
710 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
711 %define lr.keep-unreachable-state]],
712 [[
713 /* Similar to the last test case set but two states must be split. */
714 S: 'a' A 'a' /* rule 1 */
715 | 'b' A 'b' /* rule 2 */
716 | 'c' c /* rule 3 */
717 ;
718
719 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' /* rule 4 */
720 | 'a' 'a' /* rule 5 */
721 ;
722
723 c: 'a' 'a' 'b' /* rule 6 */
724 | A /* rule 7 */
725 ;
726 ]],
727
728 dnl INPUT
729 [['b', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b']],
730
731 dnl BISON-STDERR
732 [],
733
734 dnl TABLES
735 [[State 0
736
737 0 $accept: . S $end
738 1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
739 2 | . 'b' A 'b'
740 3 | . 'c' c
741
742 'a' shift, and go to state 1
743 'b' shift, and go to state 2
744 'c' shift, and go to state 3
745
746 S go to state 4
747
748
749 State 1
750
751 1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
752 4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
753 5 | . 'a' 'a'
754
755 'a' shift, and go to state 5
756
757 A go to state 6
758
759
760 State 2
761
762 2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
763 4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
764 5 | . 'a' 'a'
765
766 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[5]], [[18]])[
767
768 A go to state 7
769
770
771 State 3
772
773 3 S: 'c' . c
774 4 A: . 'a' 'a' 'a'
775 5 | . 'a' 'a'
776 6 c: . 'a' 'a' 'b'
777 7 | . A
778
779 'a' shift, and go to state 8
780
781 A go to state 9
782 c go to state 10
783
784
785 State 4
786
787 0 $accept: S . $end
788
789 $end shift, and go to state 11
790
791
792 State 5
793
794 4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
795 5 | 'a' . 'a'
796
797 'a' shift, and go to state 12
798
799
800 State 6
801
802 1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
803
804 'a' shift, and go to state 13
805
806
807 State 7
808
809 2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
810
811 'b' shift, and go to state 14
812
813
814 State 8
815
816 4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
817 5 | 'a' . 'a'
818 6 c: 'a' . 'a' 'b'
819
820 'a' shift, and go to state 15
821
822
823 State 9
824
825 7 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
826
827 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
828 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)
829
830
831 State 10
832
833 3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
834
835 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
836 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
837
838
839 State 11
840
841 0 $accept: S $end .
842
843 $default accept
844
845
846 State 12
847
848 4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
849 5 | 'a' 'a' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[['a', 'b']]], [[['a']]])[
850
851 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
852 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
853
854 Conflict between rule 5 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
855
856
857 State 13
858
859 1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
860
861 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
862 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
863
864
865 State 14
866
867 2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
868
869 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
870 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
871
872
873 State 15
874
875 4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
876 5 | 'a' 'a' . [$end]
877 6 c: 'a' 'a' . 'b'
878
879 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[19]],
880 [[16]])[
881 'b' shift, and go to state 17
882
883 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
884 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)
885
886
887 State 16
888
889 4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
890
891 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
892 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
893
894
895 State 17
896
897 6 c: 'a' 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
898
899 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
900 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (c)]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
901 [[]], [[
902
903
904 State 18
905
906 4 A: 'a' . 'a' 'a'
907 5 | 'a' . 'a'
908
909 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[20]],
910 [[19]])[
911
912
913 State 19]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
914
915 4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
916
917 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
918 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
919
920
921 State 20]])[
922
923 4 A: 'a' 'a' . 'a'
924 5 | 'a' 'a' . ['b']
925
926 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[21]],
927 [[16]])[
928
929 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['b']],
930 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (A)]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
931
932
933 State 21
934
935 4 A: 'a' 'a' 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['b']]])[
936
937 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['b']],
938 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)]])])[
939 ]],
940
941 dnl OTHER-CHECKS
942 [],
943
944 dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
945 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[1]], [[0]])],
946 [],
947 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
948 [[syntax error
949 ]])])
950
951 AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Complex Lane Split]],
952 [[%left 'a'
953 // Conflict resolution renders state 16 unreachable for canonical LR(1). We
954 // keep it so that the paser table diff is easier to code.
955 %define lr.keep-unreachable-state]],
956 [[
957 /* Similar to the last test case set but forseeing the S/R conflict from the
958 first state that must be split is becoming difficult. Imagine if B were
959 even more complex. Imagine if A had other RHS's ending in other
960 nonterminals. */
961 S: 'a' A 'a'
962 | 'b' A 'b'
963 | 'c' c
964 ;
965 A: 'a' 'a' B
966 ;
967 B: 'a'
968 | %prec 'a'
969 ;
970 c: 'a' 'a' 'b'
971 | A
972 ;
973 ]],
974
975 dnl INPUT
976 [['b', 'a', 'a', 'a', 'b']],
977
978 dnl BISON-STDERR
979 [],
980
981 dnl TABLES
982 [[State 0
983
984 0 $accept: . S $end
985 1 S: . 'a' A 'a'
986 2 | . 'b' A 'b'
987 3 | . 'c' c
988
989 'a' shift, and go to state 1
990 'b' shift, and go to state 2
991 'c' shift, and go to state 3
992
993 S go to state 4
994
995
996 State 1
997
998 1 S: 'a' . A 'a'
999 4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
1000
1001 'a' shift, and go to state 5
1002
1003 A go to state 6
1004
1005
1006 State 2
1007
1008 2 S: 'b' . A 'b'
1009 4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
1010
1011 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[5]], [[19]])[
1012
1013 A go to state 7
1014
1015
1016 State 3
1017
1018 3 S: 'c' . c
1019 4 A: . 'a' 'a' B
1020 7 c: . 'a' 'a' 'b'
1021 8 | . A
1022
1023 'a' shift, and go to state 8
1024
1025 A go to state 9
1026 c go to state 10
1027
1028
1029 State 4
1030
1031 0 $accept: S . $end
1032
1033 $end shift, and go to state 11
1034
1035
1036 State 5
1037
1038 4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
1039
1040 'a' shift, and go to state 12
1041
1042
1043 State 6
1044
1045 1 S: 'a' A . 'a'
1046
1047 'a' shift, and go to state 13
1048
1049
1050 State 7
1051
1052 2 S: 'b' A . 'b'
1053
1054 'b' shift, and go to state 14
1055
1056
1057 State 8
1058
1059 4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
1060 7 c: 'a' . 'a' 'b'
1061
1062 'a' shift, and go to state 15
1063
1064
1065 State 9
1066
1067 8 c: A .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1068
1069 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1070 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 8 (c)
1071
1072
1073 State 10
1074
1075 3 S: 'c' c .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1076
1077 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1078 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
1079
1080
1081 State 11
1082
1083 0 $accept: S $end .
1084
1085 $default accept
1086
1087
1088 State 12
1089
1090 4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
1091 5 B: . 'a'
1092 6 | . ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[['a', 'b']]], [[['a']]])[
1093
1094 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
1095 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (B)
1096
1097 B go to state 17
1098
1099 Conflict between rule 6 and token 'a' resolved as reduce (%left 'a').
1100
1101
1102 State 13
1103
1104 1 S: 'a' A 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1105
1106 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1107 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
1108
1109
1110 State 14
1111
1112 2 S: 'b' A 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1113
1114 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1115 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
1116
1117
1118 State 15
1119
1120 4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
1121 5 B: . 'a'
1122 6 | . [$end]
1123 7 c: 'a' 'a' . 'b'
1124
1125 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[20]],
1126 [[16]])[
1127 'b' shift, and go to state 18
1128
1129 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1130 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (B)
1131
1132 B go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[21]], [[17]])[
1133
1134
1135 State 16
1136
1137 5 B: 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
1138
1139 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
1140 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (B)
1141
1142
1143 State 17
1144
1145 4 A: 'a' 'a' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ ['a']]])[
1146
1147 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['a']],
1148 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (A)
1149
1150
1151 State 18
1152
1153 7 c: 'a' 'a' 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1154
1155 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1156 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (c)]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [], [[
1157
1158
1159 State 19
1160
1161 4 A: 'a' . 'a' B
1162
1163 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[22]],
1164 [[20]])[
1165
1166
1167 State 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
1168
1169 5 B: 'a' . [$end]
1170
1171 $end reduce using rule 5 (B)
1172
1173
1174 State 21
1175
1176 4 A: 'a' 'a' B . [$end]
1177
1178 $end reduce using rule 4 (A)
1179
1180
1181 State 22]])[
1182
1183 4 A: 'a' 'a' . B
1184 5 B: . 'a'
1185 6 | . ['b']
1186
1187 'a' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[23]],
1188 [[16]])[
1189
1190 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['b']],
1191 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (B)
1192
1193 B go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[24
1194
1195
1196 State 23
1197
1198 5 B: 'a' . ['b']
1199
1200 'b' reduce using rule 5 (B)
1201
1202
1203 State 24
1204
1205 4 A: 'a' 'a' B . ['b']
1206
1207 'b' reduce using rule 4 (A)]], [[17]])])[
1208 ]],
1209
1210 dnl OTHER-CHECKS
1211 [],
1212
1213 dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
1214 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[1]], [[0]])],
1215 [],
1216 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
1217 [[syntax error
1218 ]])])
1219
1220 AT_TEST_LR_TYPE([[Split During Added Lookahead Propagation]],
1221 [[%define lr.keep-unreachable-state]],
1222 [[
1223 /* The partial state chart diagram below is for LALR(1). State 0 is the start
1224 state. States are iterated for successor construction in numerical order.
1225 Transitions are downwards.
1226
1227 State 13 has a R/R conflict that cannot be predicted by Bison's LR(1)
1228 algorithm using annotations alone. That is, when state 11's successor on
1229 'd' is merged with state 5 (which is originally just state 1's successor on
1230 'd'), state 5's successor on 'e' must then be changed because the resulting
1231 lookaheads that propagate to it now make it incompatible with state 8's
1232 successor on 'e'. In other words, state 13 must be split to avoid the
1233 conflict.
1234
1235 0
1236 / | \
1237 a / c| \ b
1238 1 3 2
1239 | | |
1240 d| |c | d
1241 | 11 |
1242 | | |
1243 \ /d |
1244 5 8
1245 \ |
1246 e \ / e
1247 13
1248 R/R
1249
1250 This grammar is designed carefully to make sure that, despite Bison's LR(1)
1251 algorithm's bread-first iteration of transitions to reconstruct states,
1252 state 11's successors are constructed after state 5's and state 8's.
1253 Otherwise (for example, if you remove the first 'c' in each of rules 6 and
1254 7), state 5's successor on 'e' would never be merged with state 8's, so the
1255 split of the resulting state 13 would never need to be performed. */
1256 S: 'a' A 'f'
1257 | 'a' B
1258 | 'b' A 'f'
1259 | 'b' B 'g'
1260 | 'b' 'd'
1261 | 'c' 'c' A 'g'
1262 | 'c' 'c' B
1263 ;
1264 A: 'd' 'e' ;
1265 B: 'd' 'e' ;
1266 ]],
1267
1268 dnl INPUT
1269 [['b', 'd', 'e', 'g']],
1270
1271 dnl BISON-STDERR
1272 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
1273 [[input.y: warning: 1 reduce/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-rr]
1274 ]], [])],
1275
1276 dnl TABLES
1277 [[State 0
1278
1279 0 $accept: . S $end
1280 1 S: . 'a' A 'f'
1281 2 | . 'a' B
1282 3 | . 'b' A 'f'
1283 4 | . 'b' B 'g'
1284 5 | . 'b' 'd'
1285 6 | . 'c' 'c' A 'g'
1286 7 | . 'c' 'c' B
1287
1288 'a' shift, and go to state 1
1289 'b' shift, and go to state 2
1290 'c' shift, and go to state 3
1291
1292 S go to state 4
1293
1294
1295 State 1
1296
1297 1 S: 'a' . A 'f'
1298 2 | 'a' . B
1299 8 A: . 'd' 'e'
1300 9 B: . 'd' 'e'
1301
1302 'd' shift, and go to state 5
1303
1304 A go to state 6
1305 B go to state 7
1306
1307
1308 State 2
1309
1310 3 S: 'b' . A 'f'
1311 4 | 'b' . B 'g'
1312 5 | 'b' . 'd'
1313 8 A: . 'd' 'e'
1314 9 B: . 'd' 'e'
1315
1316 'd' shift, and go to state 8
1317
1318 A go to state 9
1319 B go to state 10
1320
1321
1322 State 3
1323
1324 6 S: 'c' . 'c' A 'g'
1325 7 | 'c' . 'c' B
1326
1327 'c' shift, and go to state 11
1328
1329
1330 State 4
1331
1332 0 $accept: S . $end
1333
1334 $end shift, and go to state 12
1335
1336
1337 State 5
1338
1339 8 A: 'd' . 'e'
1340 9 B: 'd' . 'e'
1341
1342 'e' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[13]],
1343 [[canonical LR]], [[13]],
1344 [[20]])[
1345
1346
1347 State 6
1348
1349 1 S: 'a' A . 'f'
1350
1351 'f' shift, and go to state 14
1352
1353
1354 State 7
1355
1356 2 S: 'a' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1357
1358 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1359 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 2 (S)
1360
1361
1362 State 8
1363
1364 5 S: 'b' 'd' . [$end]
1365 8 A: 'd' . 'e'
1366 9 B: 'd' . 'e'
1367
1368 'e' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[20]],
1369 [[13]])[
1370
1371 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1372 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 5 (S)
1373
1374
1375 State 9
1376
1377 3 S: 'b' A . 'f'
1378
1379 'f' shift, and go to state 15
1380
1381
1382 State 10
1383
1384 4 S: 'b' B . 'g'
1385
1386 'g' shift, and go to state 16
1387
1388
1389 State 11
1390
1391 6 S: 'c' 'c' . A 'g'
1392 7 | 'c' 'c' . B
1393 8 A: . 'd' 'e'
1394 9 B: . 'd' 'e'
1395
1396 'd' shift, and go to state ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[21]],
1397 [[5]])[
1398
1399 A go to state 17
1400 B go to state 18
1401
1402
1403 State 12
1404
1405 0 $accept: S $end .
1406
1407 $default accept]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[
1408
1409
1410 State 13
1411
1412 8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f', 'g']
1413 9 B: 'd' 'e' . [$end, 'g']
1414
1415 $end reduce using rule 9 (B)
1416 'g' reduce using rule 8 (A)
1417 'g' [reduce using rule 9 (B)]
1418 $default reduce using rule 8 (A)]], [[
1419
1420
1421 State 13
1422
1423 8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f']
1424 9 B: 'd' 'e' . ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[[$end]]], [[['g']]])[
1425
1426 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1427 [['g' ]])[ reduce using rule 9 (B)
1428 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [['f' ]],
1429 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 8 (A)]])[
1430
1431
1432 State 14
1433
1434 1 S: 'a' A 'f' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1435
1436 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1437 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 1 (S)
1438
1439
1440 State 15
1441
1442 3 S: 'b' A 'f' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1443
1444 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1445 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 3 (S)
1446
1447
1448 State 16
1449
1450 4 S: 'b' B 'g' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1451
1452 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1453 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 4 (S)
1454
1455
1456 State 17
1457
1458 6 S: 'c' 'c' A . 'g'
1459
1460 'g' shift, and go to state 19
1461
1462
1463 State 18
1464
1465 7 S: 'c' 'c' B .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1466
1467 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1468 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 7 (S)
1469
1470
1471 State 19
1472
1473 6 S: 'c' 'c' A 'g' .]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[ [$end]]])[
1474
1475 ]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[$end]],
1476 [[$default]])[ reduce using rule 6 (S)]AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
1477 [[]], [[
1478
1479
1480 State 20]AT_COND_CASE([[canonical LR]], [[
1481
1482 8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f']
1483 9 B: 'd' 'e' . ['g']
1484
1485 'f' reduce using rule 8 (A)
1486 'g' reduce using rule 9 (B)
1487
1488
1489 State 21
1490
1491 8 A: 'd' . 'e'
1492 9 B: 'd' . 'e'
1493
1494 'e' shift, and go to state 22
1495
1496
1497 State 22
1498
1499 8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['g']
1500 9 B: 'd' 'e' . [$end]
1501
1502 $end reduce using rule 9 (B)
1503 'g' reduce using rule 8 (A)]], [[
1504
1505 8 A: 'd' 'e' . ['f', 'g']
1506 9 B: 'd' 'e' . [$end]
1507
1508 $end reduce using rule 9 (B)
1509 $default reduce using rule 8 (A)]])])[
1510 ]],
1511
1512 dnl OTHER-CHECKS
1513 [],
1514
1515 dnl PARSER-EXIT-VALUE, PARSER-STDOUT, PARSER-STDERR
1516 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]], [[1]], [[0]])],
1517 [],
1518 [AT_COND_CASE([[LALR]],
1519 [[syntax error
1520 ]])])
1521
1522
1523
1524 ## ------------------------------- ##
1525 ## %define lr.default-reduction. ##
1526 ## ------------------------------- ##
1527
1528 # AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS(GRAMMAR, INPUT, TABLES)
1529 # -----------------------------------------------------
1530 m4_define([AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS],
1531 [
1532 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[no %define lr.default-reduction]],
1533 [[most]], [[]],
1534 [[]],
1535 [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
1536 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reduction most]],
1537 [[most]], [[]],
1538 [[%define lr.default-reduction most]],
1539 [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
1540 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
1541 [[consistent]], [[]],
1542 [[%define lr.default-reduction consistent]],
1543 [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
1544 AT_TEST_TABLES_AND_PARSE([[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
1545 [[accepting]], [[]],
1546 [[%define lr.default-reduction accepting]],
1547 [$1], [$2], [[]], [$3])
1548 ])
1549
1550 AT_TEST_LR_DEFAULT_REDUCTIONS([[
1551 /* The start state is consistent and has a shift on 'a' and no reductions.
1552 After pushing the b below, enter an inconsistent state that has a shift and
1553 one reduction with one lookahead. */
1554 start:
1555 a b
1556 | a b 'a'
1557 | a c 'b'
1558 ;
1559
1560 /* After shifting this 'a', enter a consistent state that has no shift and 1
1561 reduction with multiple lookaheads. */
1562 a: 'a' ;
1563
1564 /* After the previous reduction, enter an inconsistent state that has no shift
1565 and multiple reductions. The first reduction has more lookaheads than the
1566 second, so the first should always be preferred as the default reduction if
1567 enabled. The second reduction has one lookahead. */
1568 b: ;
1569 c: ;
1570 ]],
1571 dnl Visit each state mentioned above.
1572 [['a', 'a']],
1573 [[State 0
1574
1575 0 $accept: . start $end
1576 1 start: . a b
1577 2 | . a b 'a'
1578 3 | . a c 'b'
1579 4 a: . 'a'
1580
1581 'a' shift, and go to state 1
1582
1583 start go to state 2
1584 a go to state 3
1585
1586
1587 State 1
1588
1589 4 a: 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end, 'a', 'b']
1590
1591 $end reduce using rule 4 (a)
1592 'a' reduce using rule 4 (a)
1593 'b' reduce using rule 4 (a)]], [[
1594
1595 $default reduce using rule 4 (a)]])[
1596
1597
1598 State 2
1599
1600 0 $accept: start . $end
1601
1602 $end shift, and go to state 4
1603
1604
1605 State 3
1606
1607 1 start: a . b
1608 2 | a . b 'a'
1609 3 | a . c 'b'
1610 5 b: . [$end, 'a']
1611 6 c: . ['b']]AT_COND_CASE([[most]], [[
1612
1613 'b' reduce using rule 6 (c)
1614 $default reduce using rule 5 (b)]], [[
1615
1616 $end reduce using rule 5 (b)
1617 'a' reduce using rule 5 (b)
1618 'b' reduce using rule 6 (c)]])[
1619
1620 b go to state 5
1621 c go to state 6
1622
1623
1624 State 4
1625
1626 0 $accept: start $end .
1627
1628 $default accept
1629
1630
1631 State 5
1632
1633 1 start: a b . [$end]
1634 2 | a b . 'a'
1635
1636 'a' shift, and go to state 7
1637
1638 ]AT_COND_CASE([[most]], [[$default]],
1639 [[$end]])[ reduce using rule 1 (start)
1640
1641
1642 State 6
1643
1644 3 start: a c . 'b'
1645
1646 'b' shift, and go to state 8
1647
1648
1649 State 7
1650
1651 2 start: a b 'a' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end]
1652
1653 $end reduce using rule 2 (start)]], [[
1654
1655 $default reduce using rule 2 (start)]])[
1656
1657
1658 State 8
1659
1660 3 start: a c 'b' .]AT_COND_CASE([[accepting]], [[ [$end]
1661
1662 $end reduce using rule 3 (start)]], [[
1663
1664 $default reduce using rule 3 (start)]])[
1665 ]])