1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
139 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
140 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
144 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
145 a first example with no operator precedence.
146 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
147 Operator precedence is introduced.
148 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
149 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
150 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
151 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
152 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
154 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
156 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
157 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
158 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
159 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
160 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
161 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
162 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
164 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
166 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
167 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
168 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
170 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
172 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
173 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
174 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
176 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
178 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
180 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
181 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
182 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
186 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
187 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
188 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
189 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
190 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
191 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
192 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
193 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
194 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
196 Outline of a Bison Grammar
198 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
199 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
200 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
201 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
202 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
204 Defining Language Semantics
206 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
207 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
208 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
209 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
210 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
211 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
212 action in the middle of a rule.
216 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
217 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
218 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
222 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
223 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
224 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
225 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
226 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
227 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
228 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
229 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
230 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
231 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
232 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
233 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
234 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
235 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
237 Parser C-Language Interface
239 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
240 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
241 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
242 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
243 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
244 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
246 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
247 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
248 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
251 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
253 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
254 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
255 of the token it has read.
256 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
257 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
259 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
260 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
262 The Bison Parser Algorithm
264 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
265 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
266 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
267 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
268 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
269 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
270 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
271 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
272 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
273 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
277 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
278 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
279 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
280 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
281 * How Precedence:: How they work.
285 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
286 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
287 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
288 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
290 Handling Context Dependencies
292 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
293 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
294 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
295 error recovery rules must be written.
297 Debugging Your Parser
299 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
300 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
304 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
305 in alphabetical order by short options.
306 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
307 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
309 Parsers Written In Other Languages
311 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
312 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
316 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
317 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
318 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
319 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
320 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
321 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
323 A Complete C++ Example
325 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
326 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
327 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
328 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
329 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
333 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
334 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
335 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
336 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
337 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
338 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
339 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
340 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
342 Frequently Asked Questions
344 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
345 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
346 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
347 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
348 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
349 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
350 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
351 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
352 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
353 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
354 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
355 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
359 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
365 @unnumbered Introduction
368 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
369 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
370 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
371 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
372 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
373 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
374 calculators to complex programming languages.
376 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
377 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
378 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
379 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
380 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
383 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
384 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
385 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
386 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
389 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
390 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
391 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
392 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
393 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
394 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
397 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
400 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
402 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
403 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
404 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
405 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
406 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
408 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
410 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
411 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
412 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
413 License to all of the Bison source code.
415 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
416 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
417 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
418 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
419 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
420 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
421 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
423 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
424 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
425 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
426 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
427 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
428 using the other GNU tools.
430 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
431 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
432 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
433 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
437 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
438 @include gpl-3.0.texi
441 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
443 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
444 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
445 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
448 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
449 as mathematical ideas.
450 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
451 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
452 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
453 the name of an identifier, etc.).
454 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
455 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
456 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
457 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
458 how is the output used?
459 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
460 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
463 @node Language and Grammar
464 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
466 @cindex context-free grammar
467 @cindex grammar, context-free
468 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
469 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
470 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
471 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
472 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
473 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
474 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
475 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
479 @cindex Backus-Naur form
480 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
481 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
482 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
483 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
484 essentially machine-readable BNF.
486 @cindex LALR grammars
487 @cindex IELR grammars
489 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
490 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
491 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
492 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
493 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
494 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
495 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
496 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
497 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
498 Construction}, to learn how.
501 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
502 @cindex ambiguous grammars
503 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
505 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
506 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
507 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
508 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
509 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
510 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
511 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
512 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
513 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
514 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
515 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
516 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
517 possible parses of any given string is finite.
519 @cindex symbols (abstract)
521 @cindex syntactic grouping
522 @cindex grouping, syntactic
523 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
524 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
525 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
526 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
527 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
528 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
529 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
531 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
532 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
533 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
534 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
535 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
536 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
537 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
538 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
539 lexicography, not grammar.)
541 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
545 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
546 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
547 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
548 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
549 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
550 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
551 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int', identifier, close-paren} */
558 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
559 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk, identifier, semicolon} */
560 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
564 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
565 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
566 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
567 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
568 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
569 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
570 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
571 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
573 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
574 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
575 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
576 reads informally as follows:
579 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
584 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
588 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
589 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
590 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
591 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
594 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
595 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
596 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
597 not the start symbol.
599 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
600 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
601 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
602 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
603 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
604 reports a syntax error.
606 @node Grammar in Bison
607 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
608 @cindex Bison grammar
609 @cindex grammar, Bison
610 @cindex formal grammar
612 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
613 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
614 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
616 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
617 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
618 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
620 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
621 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
622 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
623 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
624 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
625 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
626 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
629 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
630 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
631 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
632 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
634 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
635 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
637 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
638 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
639 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
640 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
644 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
648 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
650 @node Semantic Values
651 @section Semantic Values
652 @cindex semantic value
653 @cindex value, semantic
655 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
656 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
657 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
658 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
659 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
662 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
663 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
664 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
665 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
666 ,Defining Language Semantics},
669 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
670 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
671 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
672 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
675 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
676 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
677 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
678 need to have any semantic value.)
680 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
681 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
682 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
683 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
684 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
685 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
687 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
688 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
689 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
690 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
691 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
693 @node Semantic Actions
694 @section Semantic Actions
695 @cindex semantic actions
696 @cindex actions, semantic
698 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
699 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
700 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
701 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
704 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
705 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
706 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
707 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
708 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
709 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
710 newly recognized larger expression.
712 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
716 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
720 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
721 from the values of the two subexpressions.
724 @section Writing GLR Parsers
726 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
729 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
730 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
732 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
733 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
734 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
735 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
736 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
737 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
738 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
739 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
742 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
743 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
744 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
745 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
746 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
747 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
748 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
749 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
750 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
751 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
752 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
753 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
754 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
755 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
756 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
757 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
758 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
759 identical set of symbols.
761 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
762 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
763 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
764 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
765 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
766 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
767 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
768 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
769 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
773 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
774 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
775 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Considerations for semantic values and deferred actions.
776 * Semantic Predicates:: Controlling a parse with arbitrary computations.
777 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
780 @node Simple GLR Parsers
781 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
782 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
787 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
788 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
790 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
791 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
792 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
794 Consider a problem that
795 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
796 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
799 type subrange = lo .. hi;
800 type enum = (a, b, c);
804 The original language standard allows only numeric
805 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
806 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
807 10206) and many other
808 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
809 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
813 type subrange = (a) .. b;
817 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
818 type with only one value:
825 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
826 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
828 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
829 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
830 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
831 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
832 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
833 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
834 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
835 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
837 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
838 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
839 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
840 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
843 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
844 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
845 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
846 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
847 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
848 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
851 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
852 use the GLR algorithm.
853 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
854 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
855 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
856 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
857 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
858 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
859 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
860 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
861 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
863 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
864 reports a syntax error as usual.
866 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
867 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
868 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
869 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
870 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
872 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
873 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
874 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
875 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
876 The present example contains only one conflict between two
877 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
878 cannot be nested. So the number of
879 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
880 and the parsing time is still linear.
882 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
883 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
886 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
896 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
925 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
926 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
927 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
928 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
935 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
936 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
937 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
946 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
947 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
948 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
949 notice when the parser splits.
951 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
952 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
953 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
954 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
955 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
956 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
957 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
958 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
959 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
960 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
961 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
962 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
963 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
966 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
967 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
968 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
969 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
970 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
971 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
973 @node Merging GLR Parses
974 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
975 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
980 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
982 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
987 #define YYSTYPE char const *
989 void yyerror (char const *);
1003 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1012 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1013 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1015 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1016 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1020 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1021 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1022 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1027 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1028 | '(' declarator ')'
1033 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1034 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1041 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1042 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1043 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1044 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1045 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1046 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1047 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1048 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1049 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1050 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1051 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1052 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1053 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1054 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1056 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1057 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1058 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1059 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1060 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1061 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1062 The parser therefore prints
1065 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1068 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1069 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1076 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1077 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1078 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1079 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1080 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1081 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1082 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1083 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1084 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1085 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1091 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1092 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1093 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1094 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1099 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1100 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1105 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1109 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1117 with an accompanying forward declaration
1118 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1122 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1123 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1128 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1129 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1132 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1135 Bison requires that all of the
1136 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1137 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1138 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1139 the offending merge.
1141 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1142 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1144 The nature of GLR parsing and the structure of the generated
1145 parsers give rise to certain restrictions on semantic values and actions.
1147 @subsubsection Deferred semantic actions
1148 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1149 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1150 the associated reduction.
1151 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1152 action in a GLR parser.
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1157 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1159 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1160 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1161 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1162 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1163 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1164 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1165 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1166 influence syntax analysis.
1167 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1170 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1171 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1172 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1173 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1174 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1175 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1176 future versions of Bison.
1177 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1178 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1179 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1181 @subsubsection YYERROR
1183 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1184 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1185 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1186 initiate error recovery.
1187 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1188 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1189 The effect in a deferred action is similar, but the precise point of the
1190 error is undefined; instead, the parser reverts to deterministic operation,
1191 selecting an unspecified stack on which to continue with a syntax error.
1192 In a semantic predicate (see @ref{Semantic Predicates}) during nondeterministic
1193 parsing, @code{YYERROR} silently prunes
1194 the parse that invoked the test.
1196 @subsubsection Restrictions on semantic values and locations
1197 GLR parsers require that you use POD (Plain Old Data) types for
1198 semantic values and location types when using the generated parsers as
1201 @node Semantic Predicates
1202 @subsection Controlling a Parse with Arbitrary Predicates
1204 @cindex Semantic predicates in GLR parsers
1206 In addition to the @code{%dprec} and @code{%merge} directives,
1208 allow you to reject parses on the basis of arbitrary computations executed
1209 in user code, without having Bison treat this rejection as an error
1210 if there are alternative parses. (This feature is experimental and may
1211 evolve. We welcome user feedback.) For example,
1215 %?@{ new_syntax @} "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1216 | %?@{ !new_syntax @} "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1221 is one way to allow the same parser to handle two different syntaxes for
1222 widgets. The clause preceded by @code{%?} is treated like an ordinary
1223 action, except that its text is treated as an expression and is always
1224 evaluated immediately (even when in nondeterministic mode). If the
1225 expression yields 0 (false), the clause is treated as a syntax error,
1226 which, in a nondeterministic parser, causes the stack in which it is reduced
1227 to die. In a deterministic parser, it acts like YYERROR.
1229 As the example shows, predicates otherwise look like semantic actions, and
1230 therefore you must be take them into account when determining the numbers
1231 to use for denoting the semantic values of right-hand side symbols.
1232 Predicate actions, however, have no defined value, and may not be given
1235 There is a subtle difference between semantic predicates and ordinary
1236 actions in nondeterministic mode, since the latter are deferred.
1237 For example, we could try to rewrite the previous example as
1241 @{ if (!new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1242 "widget" id new_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1243 | @{ if (new_syntax) YYERROR; @}
1244 "widget" id old_args @{ $$ = f($3, $4); @}
1249 (reversing the sense of the predicate tests to cause an error when they are
1250 false). However, this
1251 does @emph{not} have the same effect if @code{new_args} and @code{old_args}
1252 have overlapping syntax.
1253 Since the mid-rule actions testing @code{new_syntax} are deferred,
1254 a GLR parser first encounters the unresolved ambiguous reduction
1255 for cases where @code{new_args} and @code{old_args} recognize the same string
1256 @emph{before} performing the tests of @code{new_syntax}. It therefore
1259 Finally, be careful in writing predicates: deferred actions have not been
1260 evaluated, so that using them in a predicate will have undefined effects.
1262 @node Compiler Requirements
1263 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1264 @cindex @code{inline}
1265 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1267 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1268 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1269 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1270 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1271 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1272 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1281 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1285 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1286 && ! defined inline)
1295 @cindex textual location
1296 @cindex location, textual
1298 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1299 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1300 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1301 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1303 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1304 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1305 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1306 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1309 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1310 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1311 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1314 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1315 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1316 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1317 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1318 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1319 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1320 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1323 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1324 @cindex Bison parser
1325 @cindex Bison utility
1326 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1329 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1330 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1331 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1332 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1333 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1334 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1335 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1338 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1339 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1340 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1343 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1344 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1345 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1346 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1347 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1348 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1349 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1351 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1352 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1353 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1354 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1355 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1356 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1357 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1358 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1359 C-Language Interface}.
1361 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1362 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1363 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1364 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1365 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1366 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1367 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1368 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1369 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1370 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1371 anything other than their usual meanings.
1373 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1374 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1375 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1376 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1377 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1378 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1379 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1380 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1381 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1384 @section Stages in Using Bison
1385 @cindex stages in using Bison
1388 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1389 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1393 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1394 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1395 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1396 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1397 sequence of C statements.
1400 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1401 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1402 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1403 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1406 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1409 Write error-reporting routines.
1412 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1413 must follow these steps:
1417 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1420 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1423 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1426 @node Grammar Layout
1427 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1428 @cindex grammar file
1430 @cindex format of grammar file
1431 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1433 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1434 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1441 @var{Bison declarations}
1450 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1451 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1453 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1454 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1455 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1456 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1457 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1458 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1460 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1461 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1462 semantic values of various symbols.
1464 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1467 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1468 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1469 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1473 @cindex simple examples
1474 @cindex examples, simple
1476 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1477 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1478 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1479 and a multi-function calculator. All
1480 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1482 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1483 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1484 source file to try them.
1487 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1488 a first example with no operator precedence.
1489 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1490 Operator precedence is introduced.
1491 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1492 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1493 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1494 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1495 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1499 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1500 @cindex reverse polish notation
1501 @cindex polish notation calculator
1502 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1503 @cindex calculator, simple
1505 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1506 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1507 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1508 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1510 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1511 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1514 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1515 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1516 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1517 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1518 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1519 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1520 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1523 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1524 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1526 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1527 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1529 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1531 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1534 #define YYSTYPE double
1538 void yyerror (char const *);
1543 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1546 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1547 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1549 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1550 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1551 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1552 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1553 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1554 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1555 which is a floating point number.
1557 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1558 function @code{pow}.
1560 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1561 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1562 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1563 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1566 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1567 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1568 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1569 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1570 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1571 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1572 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1573 type for numeric constants.
1576 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1578 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1580 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1592 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1599 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1600 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1601 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1602 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1603 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1604 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1610 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1611 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1612 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1613 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1614 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1617 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1618 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1619 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1621 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1622 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1623 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1624 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1625 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1626 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1629 * Rpcalc Input:: Explanation of the @code{input} nonterminal
1630 * Rpcalc Line:: Explanation of the @code{line} nonterminal
1631 * Rpcalc Expr:: Explanation of the @code{expr} nonterminal
1635 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1637 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1646 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1647 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1648 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1649 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1650 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1652 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1653 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1654 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1655 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1656 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1657 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1659 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1660 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1661 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1662 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1665 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1666 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1667 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1670 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1672 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1677 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1681 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1682 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1683 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1684 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1685 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1686 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1687 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1689 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1690 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1691 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1692 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1693 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1696 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1698 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1699 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1700 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1701 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1706 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1707 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1712 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1713 equally well have written them separately:
1717 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1718 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1722 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1723 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1724 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1725 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1726 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1727 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1728 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1729 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1731 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1732 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1733 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1735 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1736 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1740 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1744 means the same thing as this:
1749 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1755 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1758 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1759 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1760 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1762 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1763 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1764 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1765 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1767 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1769 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1770 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1771 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1772 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1774 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1775 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1776 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1777 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1778 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1779 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1780 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1781 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1782 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1784 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1785 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1786 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1787 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1788 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1790 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1791 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1793 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1795 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1798 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1799 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1800 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1801 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1812 /* Skip white space. */
1813 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1817 /* Process numbers. */
1818 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1821 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1826 /* Return end-of-input. */
1829 /* Return a single char. */
1836 @subsection The Controlling Function
1837 @cindex controlling function
1838 @cindex main function in simple example
1840 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1841 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1842 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1844 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1856 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1857 @cindex error reporting routine
1859 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1860 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1861 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1862 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1863 here is the definition we will use:
1865 @comment file: rpcalc.y
1872 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1874 yyerror (char const *s)
1876 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1881 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1882 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1883 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1884 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1885 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1886 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1888 @node Rpcalc Generate
1889 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1890 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1892 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1893 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1894 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1895 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1896 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1897 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1899 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1900 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1902 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1903 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1910 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1911 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1912 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1913 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1914 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1915 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1916 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1918 @node Rpcalc Compile
1919 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1920 @cindex compiling the parser
1922 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1926 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1928 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1932 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1933 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1934 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1938 # @r{List files again.}
1940 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1944 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1945 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1951 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1953 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1956 @result{} -3.166666667
1957 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1959 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1964 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1965 @cindex infix notation calculator
1967 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1969 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1970 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1971 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1972 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1975 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1979 #define YYSTYPE double
1983 void yyerror (char const *);
1988 /* Bison declarations. */
1992 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1993 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1996 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2007 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2014 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2015 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2016 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2017 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2018 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2019 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2020 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2027 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
2030 There are two important new features shown in this code.
2032 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
2033 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
2034 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
2035 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
2036 associativity/precedence. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
2037 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
2038 the associativity/precedence.)
2040 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
2041 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
2042 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
2043 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
2044 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. Unary minus is not associative,
2045 only precedence matters (@code{%precedence}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
2048 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
2049 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
2050 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
2051 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
2052 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
2054 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
2059 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
2067 @node Simple Error Recovery
2068 @section Simple Error Recovery
2069 @cindex error recovery, simple
2071 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
2072 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
2073 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
2074 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
2075 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
2076 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
2078 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2079 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2080 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2086 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2087 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2092 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2093 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2094 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2095 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2096 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2097 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2098 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2099 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2102 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2103 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2104 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2105 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2106 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2107 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2110 @node Location Tracking Calc
2111 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2112 @cindex location tracking calculator
2113 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2114 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2116 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2117 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2118 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2119 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2123 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2124 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2125 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2128 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2129 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2131 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2132 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2135 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2141 void yyerror (char const *);
2144 /* Bison declarations. */
2152 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2156 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2157 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2158 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2159 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2160 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2161 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2162 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2166 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2168 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2169 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2170 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2171 from the new information.
2173 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2174 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2187 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2194 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2195 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2196 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2206 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2207 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2208 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2213 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2214 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2215 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2219 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2220 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2221 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2223 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2224 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2225 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2226 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2227 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2228 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2232 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2234 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2235 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2236 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2239 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2240 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2251 /* Skip white space. */
2252 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2253 ++yylloc.last_column;
2258 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2259 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2263 /* Process numbers. */
2267 ++yylloc.last_column;
2268 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2270 ++yylloc.last_column;
2271 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2278 /* Return end-of-input. */
2283 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2287 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2290 ++yylloc.last_column;
2296 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2297 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2298 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2299 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2301 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2302 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2303 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2304 controlling function:
2311 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2312 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2318 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2319 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2320 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2322 @node Multi-function Calc
2323 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2324 @cindex multi-function calculator
2325 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2326 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2328 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2329 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2330 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2331 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2332 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2334 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2335 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2336 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2337 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2338 functions whose syntax has this form:
2341 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2345 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2346 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2347 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2352 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2353 @result{} 3.1415926536
2357 @result{} 0.0000000000
2359 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2360 @result{} 2.3000000000
2362 @result{} 2.3000000000
2364 @result{} 0.8329091229
2365 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2366 @result{} 2.3000000000
2370 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2373 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2374 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2375 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2376 * Mfcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2377 * Mfcalc Main:: The controlling function.
2380 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2381 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2383 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2385 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2389 #include <stdio.h> /* For printf, etc. */
2390 #include <math.h> /* For pow, used in the grammar. */
2391 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2393 void yyerror (char const *);
2398 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2399 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2402 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2403 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and Function. */
2410 %precedence NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2411 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2413 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2416 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2417 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2418 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2420 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2421 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2422 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2423 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2425 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2426 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2427 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2428 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2429 between angle brackets).
2431 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2432 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2433 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2434 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2435 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2436 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2439 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2441 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2442 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2443 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2445 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2457 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2458 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2465 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2466 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2467 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2468 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2469 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2470 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2471 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2472 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2473 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2474 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2477 /* End of grammar. */
2481 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2482 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2483 @cindex symbol table example
2485 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2486 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2487 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2488 requires some additional C functions for support.
2490 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2491 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2492 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2494 @comment file: calc.h
2497 /* Function type. */
2498 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2502 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2505 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2506 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2509 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2510 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2512 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2517 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2519 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2520 extern symrec *sym_table;
2522 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2523 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2527 The new version of @code{main} will call @code{init_table} to initialize
2530 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2536 double (*fnct) (double);
2541 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2554 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2559 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2565 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2567 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2568 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2574 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2575 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2577 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2578 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2579 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2580 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2581 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2582 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2584 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2586 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2587 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2591 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2593 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2594 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2595 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2596 ptr->type = sym_type;
2597 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2598 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2606 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2609 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2610 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2611 if (strcmp (ptr->name, sym_name) == 0)
2619 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Lexer
2621 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2622 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2623 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2624 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2626 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2627 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2628 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2629 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2630 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2631 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2633 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2634 operators in @code{yylex}.
2636 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2648 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2649 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2657 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2658 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2661 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2667 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2670 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2671 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2672 static size_t length = 40;
2673 static char *symbuf = 0;
2678 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2684 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2688 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2690 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2692 /* Get another character. */
2697 while (isalnum (c));
2704 s = getsym (symbuf);
2706 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2711 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2718 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Main
2720 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2721 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}:
2723 @comment file: mfcalc.y
2726 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2728 yyerror (char const *s)
2730 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2736 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2744 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2745 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2746 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2754 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2757 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2758 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2759 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2762 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2763 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2767 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2769 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2770 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2772 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2773 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2776 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2777 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2778 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2779 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2780 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2781 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2782 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2783 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2784 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2787 @node Grammar Outline
2788 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2790 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2791 appropriate delimiters:
2798 @var{Bison declarations}
2807 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2808 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2809 continues until end of line.
2812 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2813 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2814 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2815 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2816 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2820 @subsection The prologue
2821 @cindex declarations section
2823 @cindex declarations
2825 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2826 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2827 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2828 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2829 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2830 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2831 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2833 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2834 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2837 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2838 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2839 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2840 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2841 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2842 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2843 @code{%union} declaration.
2854 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2858 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2859 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2865 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2866 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2867 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2868 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2869 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2870 @code{#include} directives.
2872 @node Prologue Alternatives
2873 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2874 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2877 @findex %code requires
2878 @findex %code provides
2881 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2882 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2883 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2884 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2885 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2886 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2887 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2889 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2900 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2904 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2905 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2912 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2913 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2914 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2915 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2916 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2917 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2918 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2919 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2920 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2921 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2922 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2924 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2925 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2926 This behavior raises a few questions.
2927 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2928 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2929 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2930 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2931 This behavior is not intuitive.
2933 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2934 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2935 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2936 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2943 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2944 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2947 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2948 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2960 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2964 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2965 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2966 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2973 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2974 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2975 explicit which kind you intend.
2976 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2978 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2979 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2980 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2981 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2982 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2983 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2984 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2985 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2986 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2989 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2990 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2992 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
3010 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3016 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3017 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3030 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3031 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3032 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3040 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
3041 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
3042 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
3043 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
3044 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
3045 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
3047 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
3048 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
3049 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
3050 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
3051 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
3052 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
3053 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
3054 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
3055 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
3056 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
3057 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
3060 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
3061 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
3062 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
3063 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3064 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3065 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3066 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3067 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3068 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3069 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3087 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3093 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3094 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3107 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3113 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3114 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3122 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3123 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3124 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3127 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3128 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3129 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3130 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3131 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3132 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3135 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3136 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3137 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3138 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3140 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3141 organize your grammar file.
3142 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3147 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3148 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3149 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3150 %printer @{ type1_print ($$); @} <field1>
3154 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3155 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3156 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3157 %printer @{ type2_print ($$); @} <field2>
3162 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3163 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3165 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3167 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3168 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3169 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3170 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3172 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3173 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3174 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3175 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3176 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3177 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3178 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3179 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3182 @node Bison Declarations
3183 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3184 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3185 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3187 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3188 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3189 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3190 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3193 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3194 @cindex grammar rules section
3195 @cindex rules section for grammar
3197 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3198 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3200 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3201 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3202 if it is the first thing in the file.
3205 @subsection The epilogue
3206 @cindex additional C code section
3208 @cindex C code, section for additional
3210 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3211 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3212 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3213 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3214 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3215 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3216 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3217 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3218 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3219 C-Language Interface}.
3221 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3222 from the grammar rules.
3224 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3225 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3226 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3227 of the grammar file.
3230 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3231 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3232 @cindex terminal symbol
3236 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3239 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3240 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3241 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3242 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3243 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3244 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3245 the symbol to stand for it.
3247 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3248 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3249 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3251 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3252 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3253 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3254 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3255 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3256 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3257 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3259 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3263 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3264 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3265 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3266 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3269 @cindex character token
3270 @cindex literal token
3271 @cindex single-character literal
3272 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3273 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3274 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3275 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3276 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3277 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3278 ,Operator Precedence}).
3280 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3281 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3282 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3283 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3284 your program will confuse other readers.
3286 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3287 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3288 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3289 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3290 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3291 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3295 @cindex string token
3296 @cindex literal string token
3297 @cindex multicharacter literal
3298 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3299 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3300 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3301 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3302 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3304 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3305 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3306 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3307 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3308 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3310 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3312 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3313 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3314 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3315 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3316 read your program will be confused.
3318 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3319 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3320 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3321 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3322 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3323 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3326 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3327 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3328 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3330 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3331 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3332 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3333 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3334 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3335 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3336 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3337 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3338 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3339 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3340 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3341 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3343 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3344 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3345 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3346 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3347 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3349 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3350 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3351 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3352 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3353 characters in the following C-language string:
3356 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3359 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3360 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3361 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3362 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3363 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3364 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3365 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3366 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3367 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3368 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3371 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3372 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3373 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3374 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3375 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3378 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3380 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3381 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3383 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3387 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3392 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3393 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3394 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3405 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3406 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3408 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3409 extra white space as you wish.
3411 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3412 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3415 @{@var{C statements}@}
3420 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3421 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3422 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3423 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3424 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3425 compiler can check it.
3427 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3428 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3429 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3430 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3431 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3432 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3433 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3434 character constants.
3436 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3440 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3441 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3446 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3447 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3454 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3456 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3457 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3458 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3477 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3481 @section Recursive Rules
3482 @cindex recursive rule
3484 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3485 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3486 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3487 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3488 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3499 @cindex left recursion
3500 @cindex right recursion
3502 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3503 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3504 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3516 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3517 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3518 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3519 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3520 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3521 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3522 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3525 @cindex mutual recursion
3526 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3527 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3528 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3537 | primary '+' primary
3550 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3554 @section Defining Language Semantics
3555 @cindex defining language semantics
3556 @cindex language semantics, defining
3558 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3559 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3560 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3562 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3563 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3564 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3565 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3568 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3569 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3570 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3571 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3572 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3573 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3574 action in the middle of a rule.
3578 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3579 @cindex semantic value type
3580 @cindex value type, semantic
3581 @cindex data types of semantic values
3582 @cindex default data type
3584 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3585 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3586 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3587 Notation Calculator}).
3589 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3590 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3591 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3594 #define YYSTYPE double
3598 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3599 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3600 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3601 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3603 @node Multiple Types
3604 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3606 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3607 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3608 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3609 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3612 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3613 requires you to do two things:
3617 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3618 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3619 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3620 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3624 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3625 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3626 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3627 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3628 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3637 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3639 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3640 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3641 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3642 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3644 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3645 placed at any position in the rule;
3646 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3647 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3648 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3649 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3651 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3652 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3653 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3654 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3655 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3656 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3657 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3658 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3659 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3660 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3663 Here is a typical example:
3669 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3673 Or, in terms of named references:
3679 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3684 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3685 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3686 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3687 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3688 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3689 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3691 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3692 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3693 referred to as @code{$2}.
3695 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3696 references construct.
3698 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3699 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3700 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3701 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3702 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3706 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3710 @cindex default action
3711 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3712 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3713 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3714 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3715 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3716 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3718 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3719 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3720 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3721 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3722 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3727 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3728 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3734 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3739 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3740 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3741 definition of @code{foo}.
3744 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3745 any, from a semantic action.
3746 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3747 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3750 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3751 @cindex action data types
3752 @cindex data types in actions
3754 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3755 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3757 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3758 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3759 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3760 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3761 in the rule. In this example,
3767 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3772 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3773 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3774 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3775 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3777 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3778 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3779 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3791 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3792 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3794 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3795 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3796 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3797 @cindex mid-rule actions
3799 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3800 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3801 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3803 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3804 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3805 it is run before they are parsed.
3807 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3808 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3809 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3810 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3813 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3814 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3815 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3816 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3817 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3818 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3820 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3821 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3822 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3823 at the end of the rule.
3825 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3826 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3827 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3828 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3829 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3830 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3836 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3838 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3843 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3844 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3845 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3846 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3847 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3848 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3849 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3850 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3852 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3853 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3854 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3855 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3856 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3859 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3860 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3861 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3862 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3863 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3865 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3866 Discarded Symbols}).
3867 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3868 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3870 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3871 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3876 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3890 $$ = push_context ();
3891 declare_variable ($3);
3898 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3899 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3900 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3902 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3903 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3904 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3905 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3906 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3912 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3913 | '@{' statements '@}'
3919 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3924 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3925 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3928 | '@{' statements '@}'
3934 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3935 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3936 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3937 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3938 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3939 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3941 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3942 actions into the two rules, like this:
3947 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3948 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3949 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3950 '@{' statements '@}'
3956 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3957 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3959 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3960 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3961 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3966 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3967 declarations statements '@}'
3968 | '@{' statements '@}'
3974 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3975 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3977 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3978 serves as a subroutine:
3983 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3989 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3990 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3996 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3997 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3999 @node Tracking Locations
4000 @section Tracking Locations
4002 @cindex textual location
4003 @cindex location, textual
4005 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
4006 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
4007 especially symbol locations.
4009 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
4010 actions to take when rules are matched.
4013 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
4014 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
4015 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
4019 @subsection Data Type of Locations
4020 @cindex data type of locations
4021 @cindex default location type
4023 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
4024 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
4026 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
4027 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
4028 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
4029 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
4033 typedef struct YYLTYPE
4042 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
4043 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
4044 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
4045 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
4046 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
4048 @node Actions and Locations
4049 @subsection Actions and Locations
4050 @cindex location actions
4051 @cindex actions, location
4054 @vindex @@@var{name}
4055 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
4057 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
4058 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
4060 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
4061 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
4062 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
4063 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4064 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4067 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4068 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4069 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4070 references construct.
4072 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4080 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4081 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4082 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4083 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4090 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4091 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4092 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4098 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4099 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4100 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4103 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4104 example above simply rewrites this way:
4118 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4119 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4120 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4127 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4128 from a semantic action.
4129 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4130 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4132 @node Location Default Action
4133 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4134 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4135 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4137 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4138 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4139 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4140 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4141 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4142 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4143 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4144 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4147 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4148 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4150 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4151 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4152 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4153 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4154 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4155 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4156 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4157 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4158 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4159 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4161 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4165 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4169 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4170 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4171 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4172 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4176 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4177 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4178 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4179 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4186 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4187 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4188 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4190 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4194 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4195 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4198 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4199 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4200 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4201 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4204 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4205 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4206 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4207 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4210 @node Named References
4211 @section Named References
4212 @cindex named references
4214 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4215 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4216 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4217 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4218 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4219 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4221 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4222 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4223 used as named references. For example:
4227 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4228 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4233 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4237 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4238 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4243 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4249 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4252 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4255 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4260 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4261 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4262 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4265 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4266 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4271 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4272 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4273 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4276 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4277 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4283 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4284 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4287 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4288 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4292 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4293 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4294 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4295 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4296 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4297 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4298 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4300 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4304 @section Bison Declarations
4305 @cindex declarations, Bison
4306 @cindex Bison declarations
4308 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4309 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4312 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4313 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4314 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4315 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4317 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4318 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4319 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4320 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4323 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4324 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4325 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4326 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4327 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4328 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4329 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4330 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4331 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4332 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4333 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4334 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4335 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4336 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4340 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4341 @cindex version requirement
4342 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4345 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4346 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4350 %require "@var{version}"
4354 @subsection Token Type Names
4355 @cindex declaring token type names
4356 @cindex token type names, declaring
4357 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4360 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4366 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4367 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4368 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4370 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right},
4371 @code{%precedence}, or
4372 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4373 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4376 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4377 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4378 following the token name:
4382 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4386 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4387 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4388 with each other or with normal characters.
4390 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4391 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4392 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4393 Than One Value Type}).
4399 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4403 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4407 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4408 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4409 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4416 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4417 equivalent literal string tokens:
4420 %token <operator> OR "||"
4421 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4426 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4427 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4428 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4429 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4430 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4431 the literal string instead of the token name.
4433 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4434 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4438 %token END 0 "end of file"
4441 @node Precedence Decl
4442 @subsection Operator Precedence
4443 @cindex precedence declarations
4444 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4445 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4447 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right}, @code{%nonassoc}, or
4448 @code{%precedence} declaration to
4449 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4450 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4451 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4452 operator precedence.
4454 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4455 @code{%token}: either
4458 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4465 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4468 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4469 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4470 all the @var{symbols}:
4474 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4475 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4476 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4477 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4478 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4479 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4480 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4481 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4482 considered a syntax error.
4484 @code{%precedence} gives only precedence to the @var{symbols}, and
4485 defines no associativity at all. Use this to define precedence only,
4486 and leave any potential conflict due to associativity enabled.
4489 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4490 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4491 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4492 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4493 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4496 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4497 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4498 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4499 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4504 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4505 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4509 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4510 @cindex declaring value types
4511 @cindex value types, declaring
4514 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4515 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4516 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4531 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4532 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4533 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4534 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4536 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4537 @code{union}. For example:
4549 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4550 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4553 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4554 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4555 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4557 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4558 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4560 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4561 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4562 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4563 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4571 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4576 and then your grammar can use the following
4577 instead of @code{%union}:
4590 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4591 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4592 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4596 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4597 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4598 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4601 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4605 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4606 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4607 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4608 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4609 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4612 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4613 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4614 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4615 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4617 @node Initial Action Decl
4618 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4619 @findex %initial-action
4621 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4622 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4625 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4626 @findex %initial-action
4627 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4628 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} and
4629 @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the lookahead --- and the
4630 @code{%parse-param}.
4633 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4636 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4639 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4644 @node Destructor Decl
4645 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4646 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4650 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4651 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4652 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4653 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4654 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4655 must discard the start symbol.
4657 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4658 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4659 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4660 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4662 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4663 symbol is automatically discarded.
4665 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4667 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4669 Within @var{code}, @code{$$} designates the semantic value associated
4670 with the discarded symbol, and @code{@@$} designates its location.
4671 The additional parser parameters are also available (@pxref{Parser Function, ,
4672 The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}).
4674 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4675 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4676 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4677 tag among @var{symbols}.
4678 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4679 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4680 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4682 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4683 (These default forms are experimental.
4684 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4686 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4687 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4688 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4689 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4691 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4692 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4693 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4694 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4695 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4702 %union @{ char *string; @}
4703 %token <string> STRING1
4704 %token <string> STRING2
4705 %type <string> string1
4706 %type <string> string2
4707 %union @{ char character; @}
4708 %token <character> CHR
4709 %type <character> chr
4712 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4713 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4714 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4715 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4719 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4720 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4721 to @code{free} by default.
4722 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4723 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4724 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4725 @code{free} only once.
4726 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4727 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4729 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4730 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4731 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4732 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4733 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4734 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4735 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4736 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4737 reference it in your grammar.
4738 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4739 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4745 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4746 @cindex mid-rule actions
4747 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4748 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4749 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4750 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4751 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4752 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4753 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4754 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4758 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4759 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4760 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4765 @cindex discarded symbols
4766 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4770 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4772 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4774 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4775 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4777 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4780 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4781 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4784 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4785 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4786 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4790 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4791 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4792 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4793 @cindex warnings, preventing
4794 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4798 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4799 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4800 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4801 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4802 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4803 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4805 The declaration looks like this:
4811 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4812 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4813 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4814 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4816 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4817 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4818 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4819 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4820 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4821 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4822 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4828 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4832 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4833 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4834 print the number of conflicts.
4837 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4838 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4839 go back to the beginning.
4842 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4843 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4844 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4847 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4848 but will keep silent otherwise.
4851 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4852 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4853 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4854 @cindex default start symbol
4857 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4858 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4859 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4866 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4867 @cindex reentrant parser
4869 @findex %define api.pure
4871 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4872 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4873 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4874 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4875 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4876 program must be called only within interlocks.
4878 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4879 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4880 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4881 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4882 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4884 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4885 declaration @samp{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4886 reentrant. It looks like this:
4892 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4893 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4894 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4895 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4896 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4897 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4898 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4899 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4900 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4902 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4903 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4907 @subsection A Push Parser
4910 @findex %define api.push-pull
4912 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4913 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4915 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4916 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4917 each time a new token is made available.
4919 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4920 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4921 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4922 within a certain time period.
4924 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4925 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4926 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4929 %define api.push-pull push
4932 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4933 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4934 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4935 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4936 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4940 %define api.push-pull push
4943 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4944 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4945 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4946 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4948 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4949 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4950 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4951 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4952 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4953 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4954 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4955 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4959 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4961 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4962 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4963 yypstate_delete (ps);
4966 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4967 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4968 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4969 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4970 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4971 example would thus look like this:
4976 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4979 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4980 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4981 yypstate_delete (ps);
4984 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4985 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4987 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4988 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4989 you should replace the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4990 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4991 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4992 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4993 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4994 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4995 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4996 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4997 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4998 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4999 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
5000 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5001 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5002 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5003 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5007 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5008 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5009 yypstate_delete (ps);
5012 Adding the @samp{%define api.pure} declaration does exactly the same thing to
5013 the generated parser with @samp{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5014 @samp{%define api.push-pull push}.
5017 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5018 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5019 @cindex declaration summary
5020 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5022 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5024 @deffn {Directive} %union
5025 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5026 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5029 @deffn {Directive} %token
5030 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5031 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5034 @deffn {Directive} %right
5035 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5036 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5039 @deffn {Directive} %left
5040 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5041 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5044 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5045 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5046 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5047 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5051 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5052 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5053 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5057 @deffn {Directive} %type
5058 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5059 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5062 @deffn {Directive} %start
5063 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5067 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5068 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5069 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5075 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5078 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5079 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5081 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5082 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5083 @xref{%code Summary}.
5086 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5087 Instrument the output parser for traces. Obsoleted by @samp{%define
5089 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5092 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5093 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5094 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5095 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5098 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5099 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5100 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5101 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5102 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5104 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5105 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5106 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5107 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5108 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5109 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5110 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5111 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5112 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5113 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5115 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5116 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5117 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5119 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5120 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5121 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5123 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5124 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5125 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5126 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5127 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5129 @findex %code requires
5130 @findex %code provides
5131 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5132 header also contains their code.
5133 @xref{%code Summary}.
5136 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5137 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5140 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5141 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5142 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5145 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5146 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5147 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5150 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5151 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5152 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5153 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5155 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5159 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5160 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5161 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5162 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5163 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5164 accurate syntax error messages.
5167 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5168 Rename the external symbols used in the parser so that they start with
5169 @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. The precise list of symbols renamed
5171 is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs},
5172 @code{yylval}, @code{yychar}, @code{yydebug}, and
5173 (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a push parser,
5174 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5175 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will
5176 also be renamed. For example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the
5177 names become @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on.
5178 For C++ parsers, see the @samp{%define api.namespace} documentation in this
5180 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5184 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5185 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5186 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5191 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5192 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5193 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5194 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5195 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5196 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5197 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5201 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5202 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5205 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5206 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5207 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5211 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5212 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5213 Require a Version of Bison}.
5216 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5217 Specify the skeleton to use.
5219 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5220 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5221 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5222 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5224 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5225 file in the Bison installation directory.
5226 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5227 directory of the grammar file.
5228 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5231 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5232 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5233 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5234 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5235 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5236 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5237 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5240 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5241 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5242 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5243 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5244 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5245 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5246 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5249 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5250 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5251 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5255 The highest token number, plus one.
5257 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5259 The number of grammar rules,
5261 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5265 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5266 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5267 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5268 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5272 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5273 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5274 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5278 @node %define Summary
5279 @subsection %define Summary
5281 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5282 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5283 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5284 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5285 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5286 @code{%define} directive:
5288 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5289 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5290 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5291 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5293 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5294 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5295 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5296 to specifying @code{""}.
5298 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5299 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5300 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5303 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5304 @code{%define} accepts.
5306 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5307 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5311 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5313 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5314 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5316 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5318 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5319 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5322 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5323 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5324 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5325 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5326 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5327 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5330 @c ================================================== api.namespace
5332 @findex %define api.namespace
5334 @item Languages(s): C++
5336 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5337 For example, if you specify:
5340 %define api.namespace "foo::bar"
5343 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5346 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5349 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5350 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5353 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5359 @item Accepted Values:
5360 Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without a trailing
5361 @code{"::"}. For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5363 @item Default Value:
5364 The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults to @code{yy}.
5365 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can
5366 be confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix
5367 for the lexical analyzer function. Thus, if you specify
5368 @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify @samp{%define
5369 api.namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5370 lexical analyzer function. For example, if you specify:
5373 %define api.namespace "foo"
5374 %name-prefix "bar::"
5377 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5384 @c ================================================== api.pure
5386 @findex %define api.pure
5389 @item Language(s): C
5391 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5392 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5394 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5396 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5402 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5404 @findex %define api.push-pull
5407 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5409 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5410 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5411 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5412 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5414 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5416 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5422 @c ================================================== api.tokens.prefix
5423 @item api.tokens.prefix
5424 @findex %define api.tokens.prefix
5427 @item Languages(s): all
5430 Add a prefix to the token names when generating their definition in the
5431 target language. For instance
5434 %token FILE for ERROR
5435 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
5437 start: FILE for ERROR;
5441 generates the definition of the symbols @code{TOK_FILE}, @code{TOK_for},
5442 and @code{TOK_ERROR} in the generated source files. In particular, the
5443 scanner must use these prefixed token names, while the grammar itself
5444 may still use the short names (as in the sample rule given above). The
5445 generated informational files (@file{*.output}, @file{*.xml},
5446 @file{*.dot}) are not modified by this prefix. See @ref{Calc++ Parser}
5447 and @ref{Calc++ Scanner}, for a complete example.
5449 @item Accepted Values:
5450 Any string. Should be a valid identifier prefix in the target language,
5451 in other words, it should typically be an identifier itself (sequence of
5452 letters, underscores, and ---not at the beginning--- digits).
5454 @item Default Value:
5457 @c api.tokens.prefix
5460 @c ================================================== lex_symbol
5462 @findex %define lex_symbol
5469 When variant-based semantic values are enabled (@pxref{C++ Variants}),
5470 request that symbols be handled as a whole (type, value, and possibly
5471 location) in the scanner. @xref{Complete Symbols}, for details.
5473 @item Accepted Values:
5476 @item Default Value:
5482 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5484 @item lr.default-reductions
5485 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5488 @item Language(s): all
5490 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5491 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5492 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5493 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5495 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5496 @item Default Value:
5498 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5499 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5503 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5505 @item lr.keep-unreachable-states
5506 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5509 @item Language(s): all
5510 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5511 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5512 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5513 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5515 @c lr.keep-unreachable-states
5517 @c ================================================== lr.type
5520 @findex %define lr.type
5523 @item Language(s): all
5525 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5526 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5527 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5529 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5531 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5535 @c ================================================== namespace
5537 @findex %define namespace
5538 Obsoleted by @code{api.namespace}
5542 @c ================================================== parse.assert
5544 @findex %define parse.assert
5547 @item Languages(s): C++
5549 @item Purpose: Issue runtime assertions to catch invalid uses.
5550 In C++, when variants are used (@pxref{C++ Variants}), symbols must be
5552 destroyed properly. This option checks these constraints.
5554 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5556 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5561 @c ================================================== parse.error
5563 @findex %define parse.error
5568 Control the kind of error messages passed to the error reporting
5569 function. @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function
5571 @item Accepted Values:
5574 Error messages passed to @code{yyerror} are simply @w{@code{"syntax
5576 @item @code{verbose}
5577 Error messages report the unexpected token, and possibly the expected ones.
5578 However, this report can often be incorrect when LAC is not enabled
5582 @item Default Value:
5588 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5590 @findex %define parse.lac
5593 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5595 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5596 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5597 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5598 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5602 @c ================================================== parse.trace
5604 @findex %define parse.trace
5607 @item Languages(s): C, C++
5609 @item Purpose: Require parser instrumentation for tracing.
5610 In C/C++, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to 1 in the parser implementation
5611 file if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
5612 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5614 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5616 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5620 @c ================================================== variant
5622 @findex %define variant
5629 Request variant-based semantic values.
5630 @xref{C++ Variants}.
5632 @item Accepted Values:
5635 @item Default Value:
5643 @subsection %code Summary
5647 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5648 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5649 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5650 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5651 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5652 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5653 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5654 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5656 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5657 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5658 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5659 in the parser implementation.
5661 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5662 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5663 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5665 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5668 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5669 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5670 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5671 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5672 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5673 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5677 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5678 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5679 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5682 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5683 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5687 @findex %code requires
5690 @item Language(s): C, C++
5692 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5693 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5694 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5695 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5696 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5698 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5699 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5704 @findex %code provides
5707 @item Language(s): C, C++
5709 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5710 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5712 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5713 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5721 @item Language(s): C, C++
5723 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5724 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5725 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5726 parser implementation file. For example:
5735 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5739 @findex %code imports
5742 @item Language(s): Java
5744 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5746 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5747 before any class definitions.
5751 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5752 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5753 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5754 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5757 @node Multiple Parsers
5758 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5760 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5761 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one
5762 language with the same program? Then you need to avoid a name conflict
5763 between different definitions of @code{yyparse}, @code{yylval}, and so on.
5765 The easy way to do this is to use the option @samp{-p @var{prefix}}
5766 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}). This renames the interface
5767 functions and variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix}
5768 instead of @samp{yy}. You can use this to give each parser distinct
5769 names that do not conflict.
5771 The precise list of symbols renamed is @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex},
5772 @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc},
5773 @code{yychar} and @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser,
5774 @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
5775 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed.
5776 For example, if you use @samp{-p c}, the names become @code{cparse},
5777 @code{clex}, and so on.
5779 @strong{All the other variables and macros associated with Bison are not
5780 renamed.} These others are not global; there is no conflict if the same
5781 name is used in different parsers. For example, @code{YYSTYPE} is not
5782 renamed, but defining this in different ways in different parsers causes
5783 no trouble (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}).
5785 The @samp{-p} option works by adding macro definitions to the
5786 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse}
5787 as @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on. This effectively substitutes
5788 one name for the other in the entire parser implementation file.
5791 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5792 @cindex C-language interface
5795 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5796 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5797 functions that it needs to use.
5799 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5800 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5801 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5802 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5805 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5806 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5807 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5808 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5809 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5810 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5812 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5813 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5814 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5818 @node Parser Function
5819 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5822 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5823 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5824 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5825 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5826 without reading further.
5829 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5830 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5831 is due to end-of-input).
5833 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5834 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5837 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5840 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5845 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5850 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5853 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5854 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5855 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5857 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
5858 @findex %parse-param
5859 Declare that one or more
5860 @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yyparse} arguments.
5861 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5862 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5863 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5866 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5869 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@} @{int *randomness@}
5873 Then call the parser like this:
5877 int nastiness, randomness;
5878 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5879 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5885 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5888 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5891 @node Push Parser Function
5892 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5893 @findex yypush_parse
5895 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5896 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5898 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5899 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5900 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5901 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5903 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5904 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with the
5905 following exception. @code{yypush_parse} will return YYPUSH_MORE if more input
5906 is required to finish parsing the grammar.
5909 @node Pull Parser Function
5910 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5911 @findex yypull_parse
5913 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5914 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5916 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5917 stream. This function is available if the @samp{%define api.push-pull both}
5918 declaration is used.
5919 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5921 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5922 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5925 @node Parser Create Function
5926 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5927 @findex yypstate_new
5929 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5930 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5932 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5933 This function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5934 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5935 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5937 @deftypefun yypstate *yypstate_new (void)
5938 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5939 or 0 if no memory was available.
5940 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5944 @node Parser Delete Function
5945 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5946 @findex yypstate_delete
5948 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5949 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5951 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5952 function is available if either the @samp{%define api.push-pull push} or
5953 @samp{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5954 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5956 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5957 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5958 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5962 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5964 @cindex lexical analyzer
5966 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5967 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5968 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5969 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5971 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5972 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5973 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5974 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5975 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5976 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5977 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5981 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5982 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5983 of the token it has read.
5984 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5985 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5987 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5988 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5991 @node Calling Convention
5992 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5994 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5995 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5996 signifies end-of-input.
5998 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5999 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
6000 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
6001 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
6003 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
6004 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
6005 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
6006 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
6007 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
6008 signifies end-of-input.
6010 Here is an example showing these things:
6017 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6020 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6021 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6023 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6029 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6030 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6032 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6033 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6037 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6038 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6039 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6040 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6043 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6044 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6045 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6046 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6047 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6050 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6051 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6052 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6053 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6056 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6059 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6060 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6061 strlen (token_buffer))
6062 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6063 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6068 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6069 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6073 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6076 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6077 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6078 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6079 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6085 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6086 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6091 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6092 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6093 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6094 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6095 declaration looks like this:
6108 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6113 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6114 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6119 @node Token Locations
6120 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6123 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6124 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6125 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6126 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6127 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6128 data in that variable.
6130 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6131 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6132 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6133 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6134 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6137 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6140 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6142 When you use the Bison declaration @samp{%define api.pure} to request a
6143 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6144 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6145 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6146 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6147 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6152 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6155 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6156 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6161 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6162 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6163 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6166 If you wish to pass additional arguments to @code{yylex}, use
6167 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6168 Function}). To pass additional arguments to both @code{yylex} and
6169 @code{yyparse}, use @code{%param}.
6171 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6173 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional @code{yylex} argument
6174 declarations. You may pass one or more such declarations, which is
6175 equivalent to repeating @code{%lex-param}.
6178 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
6180 Specify that @var{argument-declaration} are additional
6181 @code{yylex}/@code{yyparse} argument declaration. This is equivalent to
6182 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{} %parse-param
6183 @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}}. You may pass one or more
6184 declarations, which is equivalent to repeating @code{%param}.
6190 %lex-param @{scanner_mode *mode@}
6191 %parse-param @{parser_mode *mode@}
6192 %param @{environment_type *env@}
6196 results in the following signature:
6199 int yylex (scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6200 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6203 If @samp{%define api.pure} is added:
6206 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6207 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6211 and finally, if both @samp{%define api.pure} and @code{%locations} are used:
6214 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp,
6215 scanner_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6216 int yyparse (parser_mode *mode, environment_type *env);
6219 @node Error Reporting
6220 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6221 @cindex error reporting function
6224 @cindex syntax error
6226 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} (or @dfn{parse error})
6227 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6228 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6229 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6232 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6233 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6234 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6235 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6236 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6238 @findex %define parse.error
6239 If you invoke @samp{%define parse.error verbose} in the Bison declarations
6240 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6241 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6242 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6243 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6245 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6246 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6247 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6248 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6249 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6250 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6252 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6253 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6254 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6256 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6261 yyerror (char const *s)
6265 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6270 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6271 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6272 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6273 immediately return 1.
6275 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6276 an access to the current location.
6277 This is indeed the case for the GLR
6278 parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for historical reasons. I.e., if
6279 @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
6283 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6284 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6287 If @samp{%parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is used, then:
6290 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
6291 void yyerror (int *nastiness, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
6294 Finally, GLR and Yacc parsers share the same @code{yyerror} calling
6295 convention for absolutely pure parsers, i.e., when the calling
6296 convention of @code{yylex} @emph{and} the calling convention of
6297 @samp{%define api.pure} are pure.
6301 /* Location tracking. */
6305 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6307 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
6308 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
6312 results in the following signatures for all the parser kinds:
6315 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness);
6316 int yyparse (int *nastiness, int *randomness);
6317 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp,
6318 int *nastiness, int *randomness,
6323 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6324 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6325 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6326 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6327 message is always passed last.
6329 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6330 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6331 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6335 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6336 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6337 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6338 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6340 @node Action Features
6341 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6342 @cindex summary, action features
6343 @cindex action features summary
6345 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6346 are useful in actions.
6348 @deffn {Variable} $$
6349 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6350 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6353 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6354 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6355 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6358 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6359 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6360 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6361 Types of Values in Actions}.
6364 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6365 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6366 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6367 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6370 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT;
6371 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6372 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6375 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT;
6376 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6377 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6380 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value});
6382 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6383 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6384 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6385 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6386 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6387 going to be reduced by this rule.
6389 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6390 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6391 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6394 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6397 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6399 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6402 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6404 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6408 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR;
6410 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6411 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6412 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6413 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6414 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6417 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6418 @findex YYRECOVERING
6419 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6420 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6421 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6424 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6425 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6426 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6427 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6428 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6430 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6433 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin;
6434 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6436 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6438 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6441 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok;
6442 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6443 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6444 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6447 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6448 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6449 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6450 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6452 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6455 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6456 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6457 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6458 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6460 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6465 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6466 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6469 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6473 @c int first_line, last_line;
6474 @c int first_column, last_column;
6478 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6479 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6481 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6482 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6483 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6486 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6489 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6491 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6492 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6496 @node Internationalization
6497 @section Parser Internationalization
6498 @cindex internationalization
6504 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6505 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6506 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6507 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6508 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6509 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6510 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6511 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6514 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6515 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6516 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6521 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6522 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6523 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6524 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6525 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6529 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6534 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6535 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6536 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6537 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6538 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6539 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6540 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6541 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6542 Bison-generated parser.
6545 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6546 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6547 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6551 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6554 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6555 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6556 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6560 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6561 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6562 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6565 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6571 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6575 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6581 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6582 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6583 @cindex algorithm of parser
6586 @cindex parser stack
6587 @cindex stack, parser
6589 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6590 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6591 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6593 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6594 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6597 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6598 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6599 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6600 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6601 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6602 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6603 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6605 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6612 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6613 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6616 expr: expr '*' expr;
6620 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6627 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6628 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6630 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6631 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6632 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6634 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6637 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6638 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6639 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6640 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6641 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6642 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6643 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6644 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6645 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6646 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6650 @section Lookahead Tokens
6651 @cindex lookahead token
6653 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6654 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6655 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6656 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6657 token in order to decide what to do.
6659 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6660 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6661 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6662 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6663 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6664 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6665 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6668 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6669 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6670 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6689 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6690 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6691 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6692 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6693 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6695 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6696 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6697 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6698 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6699 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6700 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6705 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6706 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6707 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6708 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6711 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6713 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6714 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6715 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6717 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6718 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6724 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6730 Here we assume that @code{IF}, @code{THEN} and @code{ELSE} are
6731 terminal symbols for specific keyword tokens.
6733 When the @code{ELSE} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6734 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6735 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6736 @code{ELSE}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6739 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6740 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6741 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6742 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6743 contrast it with the other alternative.
6745 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{ELSE}, the result is to attach
6746 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6750 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6752 if x then do; if y then win (); else lose; end;
6755 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6756 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6757 making these two inputs equivalent:
6760 if x then if y then win (); else lose;
6762 if x then do; if y then win (); end; else lose;
6765 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6766 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6767 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6768 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6769 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6770 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6771 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6772 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6774 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6775 conflicts, use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6776 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6777 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6779 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}.
6781 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6782 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6783 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6788 %token IF THEN ELSE variable
6801 | IF expr THEN stmt ELSE stmt
6811 @section Operator Precedence
6812 @cindex operator precedence
6813 @cindex precedence of operators
6815 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6816 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6817 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6818 shift and when to reduce.
6821 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6822 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence and associativity.
6823 * Precedence Only:: How to specify precedence only.
6824 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6825 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6828 @node Why Precedence
6829 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6831 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6832 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6847 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6848 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6849 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6850 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6851 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6852 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6853 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6856 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6857 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6858 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6859 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6860 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6861 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6862 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6863 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6866 @cindex associativity
6867 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6868 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6869 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6870 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6871 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6872 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6873 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6874 makes right-associativity.
6876 @node Using Precedence
6877 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6883 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6884 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6885 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6886 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6887 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6888 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6889 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6891 The last alternative, @code{%precedence}, allows to define only
6892 precedence and no associativity at all. As a result, any
6893 associativity-related conflict that remains will be reported as an
6894 compile-time error. The directive @code{%nonassoc} creates run-time
6895 error: using the operator in a associative way is a syntax error. The
6896 directive @code{%precedence} creates compile-time errors: an operator
6897 @emph{can} be involved in an associativity-related conflict, contrary to
6898 what expected the grammar author.
6900 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6901 order in which they are declared. The first precedence/associativity
6902 declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6903 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6904 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6906 @node Precedence Only
6907 @subsection Specifying Precedence Only
6910 Since POSIX Yacc defines only @code{%left}, @code{%right}, and
6911 @code{%nonassoc}, which all defines precedence and associativity, little
6912 attention is paid to the fact that precedence cannot be defined without
6913 defining associativity. Yet, sometimes, when trying to solve a
6914 conflict, precedence suffices. In such a case, using @code{%left},
6915 @code{%right}, or @code{%nonassoc} might hide future (associativity
6916 related) conflicts that would remain hidden.
6918 The dangling @code{else} ambiguity (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce
6919 Conflicts}) can be solved explicitly. This shift/reduce conflicts occurs
6920 in the following situation, where the period denotes the current parsing
6924 if @var{e1} then if @var{e2} then @var{s1} . else @var{s2}
6927 The conflict involves the reduction of the rule @samp{IF expr THEN
6928 stmt}, which precedence is by default that of its last token
6929 (@code{THEN}), and the shifting of the token @code{ELSE}. The usual
6930 disambiguation (attach the @code{else} to the closest @code{if}),
6931 shifting must be preferred, i.e., the precedence of @code{ELSE} must be
6932 higher than that of @code{THEN}. But neither is expected to be involved
6933 in an associativity related conflict, which can be specified as follows.
6940 The unary-minus is another typical example where associativity is
6941 usually over-specified, see @ref{Infix Calc, , Infix Notation
6942 Calculator: @code{calc}}. The @code{%left} directive is traditionally
6943 used to declare the precedence of @code{NEG}, which is more than needed
6944 since it also defines its associativity. While this is harmless in the
6945 traditional example, who knows how @code{NEG} might be used in future
6946 evolutions of the grammar@dots{}
6948 @node Precedence Examples
6949 @subsection Precedence Examples
6951 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6959 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6960 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6961 declared with @code{'-'}:
6964 %left '<' '>' '=' NE LE GE
6970 (Here @code{NE} and so on stand for the operators for ``not equal''
6971 and so on. We assume that these tokens are more than one character long
6972 and therefore are represented by names, not character literals.)
6974 @node How Precedence
6975 @subsection How Precedence Works
6977 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6978 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6979 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6980 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6981 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6982 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6984 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6985 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6986 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6987 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6988 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6989 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6990 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6993 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6994 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6996 @node Contextual Precedence
6997 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6998 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6999 @cindex unary operator precedence
7000 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
7001 @cindex precedence, unary operator
7004 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
7005 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
7006 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
7007 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
7009 The Bison precedence declarations
7010 can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
7011 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
7012 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
7015 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
7016 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
7017 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
7018 modifier's syntax is:
7021 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
7025 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
7026 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
7027 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
7028 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
7029 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
7031 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
7032 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
7033 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
7043 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
7051 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
7056 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
7057 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
7058 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
7059 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
7061 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
7062 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
7063 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
7064 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
7066 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
7067 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
7068 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
7069 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
7070 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
7071 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
7073 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
7074 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
7078 @section Parser States
7079 @cindex finite-state machine
7080 @cindex parser state
7081 @cindex state (of parser)
7083 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
7084 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
7085 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
7086 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7087 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7089 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7090 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7091 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7092 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7093 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7094 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7095 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7096 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7099 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7100 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7101 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7104 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7105 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7106 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7108 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7109 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7112 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7113 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7118 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7120 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7126 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7127 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7133 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7134 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7135 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7136 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7137 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7138 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7140 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7141 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7142 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7144 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7145 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7146 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7147 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7148 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7150 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7151 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7152 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7153 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7157 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7158 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7162 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7168 | sequence redirects
7178 | redirects redirect
7183 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7184 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7185 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7186 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7187 in infinitely many ways!
7189 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7190 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7191 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7192 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7194 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7205 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7213 | sequence redirects
7227 | redirects redirect
7232 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7233 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7234 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7236 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7244 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7247 | name_list ':' type
7263 | name ',' name_list
7268 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token
7269 of lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{ID} is
7270 a @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7271 @code{ID} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7275 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7277 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{ID} at the beginning
7278 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7279 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7281 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7282 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7283 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7284 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7285 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7286 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7287 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7290 @cindex canonical LR
7291 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7292 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7293 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7294 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7295 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7296 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7297 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7298 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7300 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7301 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7302 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7303 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7304 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7315 | ID BOGUS /* This rule is never used. */
7320 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7321 additional active rule in the context after the @code{ID} at the beginning of
7322 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7323 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7324 As long as the token @code{BOGUS} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7325 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7327 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7328 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{ID} directly
7329 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7330 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7331 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7332 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7337 | name_list ':' type
7345 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7346 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7351 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7352 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7353 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7354 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7355 Another example is Bison's @code{%define parse.error verbose} directive,
7356 which instructs the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error
7357 messages, which can sometimes contain incorrect information.
7359 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7360 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7361 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7362 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7364 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7365 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7368 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7369 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7370 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7371 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7374 @node LR Table Construction
7375 @subsection LR Table Construction
7376 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7379 @cindex canonical LR
7380 @findex %define lr.type
7382 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7383 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7384 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7385 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7388 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7389 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7390 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7391 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7394 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7395 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7396 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7399 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type @var{TYPE}}
7400 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7401 values for @var{TYPE} are:
7404 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7406 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7409 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7413 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7417 %define lr.type ielr
7420 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7421 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7422 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7423 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7424 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7425 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7426 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7427 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7428 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7429 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7431 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7432 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7433 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7434 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7440 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7443 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7445 @cindex GLR with LALR
7446 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7447 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7448 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7449 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7450 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7451 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7452 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7453 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7454 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7455 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7457 @item Malformed grammars.
7459 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7460 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7461 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7462 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7463 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7468 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7469 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7470 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7471 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7472 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7473 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7474 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7475 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7476 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7480 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7483 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7484 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7485 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7486 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7487 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7488 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7489 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7490 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7491 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7492 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7493 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7494 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7497 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7498 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7499 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7501 @node Default Reductions
7502 @subsection Default Reductions
7503 @cindex default reductions
7504 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7507 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7508 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7509 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7510 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7511 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7513 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7514 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7517 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7519 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7520 @cindex consistent states
7521 @cindex defaulted states
7522 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7523 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7524 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7525 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7526 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7527 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7528 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7529 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7530 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7531 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7532 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7534 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7535 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7536 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7537 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7538 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7539 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7540 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7541 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7542 should already be considered closed.
7544 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7546 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7547 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7548 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7549 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7550 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7551 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7552 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7553 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7554 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7558 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7559 @c sentence from being rejected.
7560 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7561 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7562 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7563 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7564 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7565 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7568 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7569 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7570 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7571 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7572 because the accept action ends the parse.
7574 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7575 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7576 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7577 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7578 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7579 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7580 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7581 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7582 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7583 split the parse instead.
7585 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7586 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7588 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions @var{WHERE}}
7589 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7590 The accepted values of @var{WHERE} are:
7592 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7593 @item @code{consistent}
7594 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7597 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7598 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7603 @findex %define parse.lac
7605 @cindex lookahead correction
7607 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7608 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7609 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7610 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7611 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7612 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7613 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7614 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7615 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7617 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7618 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7619 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7620 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7621 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7623 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7624 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7625 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7626 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7628 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac @var{VALUE}}
7629 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7631 @item @code{none} (default)
7634 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7635 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7639 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7640 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7641 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7642 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7643 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7644 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7645 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7646 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7647 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7648 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7651 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7652 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7653 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7654 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7655 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7656 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7657 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7658 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7659 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7660 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7662 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7663 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7664 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7665 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7666 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7667 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7668 language-recognition power.
7670 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7673 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7675 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7676 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7677 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7678 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7681 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7683 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7684 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7685 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7686 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7687 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7688 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7692 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7693 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7694 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7695 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7696 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7697 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7698 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7699 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7700 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7701 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7702 has proven insignificant for practical grammars.
7705 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7706 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7707 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7709 @node Unreachable States
7710 @subsection Unreachable States
7711 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7712 @cindex unreachable states
7714 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7715 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7716 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7717 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7719 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7720 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7721 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7722 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7724 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states @var{VALUE}}
7725 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7726 @var{VALUE} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7729 There are a few caveats to consider:
7732 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7734 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7735 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7736 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7737 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7738 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7739 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7741 @item Other useless states.
7743 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7744 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7745 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7746 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7747 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7748 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7749 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7752 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7753 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7755 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7756 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7757 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7759 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7760 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7761 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7762 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7763 context-free languages.
7764 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7765 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7766 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7767 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7768 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7769 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7770 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7771 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7773 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7774 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7775 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7776 parser uses the same basic
7777 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7778 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7779 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7780 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7782 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7783 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7784 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7785 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7786 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7788 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7789 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7790 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7791 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7792 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7793 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7794 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7795 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7796 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7797 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7798 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7801 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7802 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7803 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7804 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7805 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7806 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7807 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7808 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7809 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7810 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7811 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7812 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7814 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7815 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7816 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7818 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7819 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7820 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7821 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7822 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7823 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7824 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7825 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7826 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7827 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7828 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7829 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7831 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7834 @node Memory Management
7835 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7836 @cindex memory exhaustion
7837 @cindex memory management
7838 @cindex stack overflow
7839 @cindex parser stack overflow
7840 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7842 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7843 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7844 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7846 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7847 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7848 recursion, @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7851 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7852 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7853 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7854 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7856 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7857 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7858 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7859 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7860 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7861 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7863 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7864 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7865 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7868 @cindex default stack limit
7869 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7873 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7874 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7875 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7876 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7877 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7879 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7881 You can generate a deterministic parser containing C++ user code from
7882 the default (C) skeleton, as well as from the C++ skeleton
7883 (@pxref{C++ Parsers}). However, if you do use the default skeleton
7884 and want to allow the parsing stack to grow,
7885 be careful not to use semantic types or location types that require
7886 non-trivial copy constructors.
7887 The C skeleton bypasses these constructors when copying data to
7890 @node Error Recovery
7891 @chapter Error Recovery
7892 @cindex error recovery
7893 @cindex recovery from errors
7895 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7896 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7897 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7900 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7901 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7902 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7903 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7904 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7905 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7906 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7909 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7910 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7911 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7912 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7913 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7914 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7926 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7927 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmnts}.
7929 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7930 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7931 of a @code{stmnts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7932 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7933 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmnts}, and there
7934 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7935 applicable in the ordinary way.
7937 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7938 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7939 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7940 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7941 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmnts}.)
7942 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7943 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7944 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7945 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7946 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7947 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7948 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7950 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7951 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7952 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7955 stmnt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7958 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7959 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7960 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7961 spurious error message:
7971 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7972 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7973 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7974 @code{stmnt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7975 middle of a valid @code{stmnt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7976 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7977 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7980 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7981 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7982 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7983 error messages resume.
7985 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7986 as any other rules can.
7989 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7990 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7991 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7992 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7995 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7996 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7997 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7999 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
8001 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
8002 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
8003 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
8004 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
8005 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
8007 @vindex YYRECOVERING
8008 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
8009 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
8010 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
8013 @node Context Dependency
8014 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
8016 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
8017 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
8018 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
8019 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
8023 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
8024 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
8025 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
8026 error recovery rules must be written.
8029 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
8030 neither clean nor robust.)
8032 @node Semantic Tokens
8033 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8035 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8036 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8042 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8043 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8044 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8046 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8047 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8048 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8049 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8050 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8052 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8053 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8054 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8055 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8056 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8057 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8058 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8060 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8061 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8062 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8063 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8067 typedef int foo, bar;
8071 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8072 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8078 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8079 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8081 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8082 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8083 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8084 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8085 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8090 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8091 | declarator maybeasm
8097 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8098 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8104 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8105 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8106 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8108 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8109 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8110 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8111 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8112 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8113 the syntactic context.
8115 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8116 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8117 @cindex lexical tie-in
8119 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8120 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8123 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8124 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8125 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8126 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8127 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8134 void yyerror (char const *);
8143 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8144 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8145 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8159 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8160 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8161 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8163 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8164 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8165 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8168 @node Tie-in Recovery
8169 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8171 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8172 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8174 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8175 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8176 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8177 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8182 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8184 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8188 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8189 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8190 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8191 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8192 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8194 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8196 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8197 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8198 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8204 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8210 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8211 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8212 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8213 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8215 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8216 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8217 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8218 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8219 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8220 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8223 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8226 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8228 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't
8229 understand the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser
8230 Algorithm}). Even so, sometimes a detailed description of the automaton
8231 can help (@pxref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}), or
8232 tracing the execution of the parser can give some insight on why it
8233 behaves improperly (@pxref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}).
8236 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8237 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8241 @section Understanding Your Parser
8243 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8244 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8245 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8246 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8247 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8249 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8250 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @xref{Invocation, , Invoking
8251 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8252 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8253 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8254 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8255 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8257 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8275 @command{bison} reports:
8278 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8279 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8280 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8281 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8282 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8285 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8286 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8287 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8288 interpretation is the same.
8290 The first section includes details on conflicts that were solved thanks
8291 to precedence and/or associativity:
8294 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '+' resolved as reduce.
8295 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '-' resolved as reduce.
8296 Conflict in state 8 between rule 2 and token '*' resolved as shift.
8301 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8304 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8305 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8306 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8307 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8311 @cindex token, useless
8312 @cindex useless token
8313 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8314 @cindex useless nonterminal
8315 @cindex rule, useless
8316 @cindex useless rule
8317 The next section reports useless tokens, nonterminal and rules. Useless
8318 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser,
8319 but useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the
8320 scanner (note the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused''
8324 Nonterminals useless in grammar:
8327 Terminals unused in grammar:
8330 Rules useless in grammar:
8335 The next section reproduces the exact grammar that Bison used:
8341 0 5 $accept -> exp $end
8342 1 5 exp -> exp '+' exp
8343 2 6 exp -> exp '-' exp
8344 3 7 exp -> exp '*' exp
8345 4 8 exp -> exp '/' exp
8350 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8354 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8366 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8371 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8377 @cindex pointed rule
8378 @cindex rule, pointed
8379 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8380 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8381 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8382 the location of the input cursor.
8387 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8389 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8394 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8395 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8396 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8397 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8398 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8399 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8400 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8401 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8403 @cindex core, item set
8404 @cindex item set core
8405 @cindex kernel, item set
8406 @cindex item set core
8407 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8408 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8409 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8410 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8411 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8412 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8417 $accept -> . exp $ (rule 0)
8418 exp -> . exp '+' exp (rule 1)
8419 exp -> . exp '-' exp (rule 2)
8420 exp -> . exp '*' exp (rule 3)
8421 exp -> . exp '/' exp (rule 4)
8422 exp -> . NUM (rule 5)
8424 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8435 exp -> NUM . (rule 5)
8437 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8441 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8442 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8443 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8444 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8449 $accept -> exp . $ (rule 0)
8450 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8451 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8452 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8453 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8455 $ shift, and go to state 3
8456 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8457 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8458 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8459 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8463 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8464 because of the item @samp{exp -> exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8465 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8466 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp -> exp '+' . exp}.
8467 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8470 @cindex accepting state
8471 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8477 $accept -> exp $ . (rule 0)
8483 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end
8484 of input were read), the parsing exits successfully.
8486 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8492 exp -> exp '+' . exp (rule 1)
8494 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8500 exp -> exp '-' . exp (rule 2)
8502 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8508 exp -> exp '*' . exp (rule 3)
8510 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8516 exp -> exp '/' . exp (rule 4)
8518 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8523 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8529 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8530 exp -> exp '+' exp . (rule 1)
8531 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8532 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8533 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8535 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8536 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8538 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8539 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8542 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8543 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8544 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8545 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8546 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8547 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8548 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8549 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8551 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8552 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8553 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported in between
8556 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8557 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8558 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8559 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8560 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8561 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8562 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8563 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8564 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8565 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8566 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8567 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8572 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8573 exp -> exp '+' exp . [$, '+', '-', '/'] (rule 1)
8574 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8575 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8576 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8578 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8579 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8581 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8582 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8585 The remaining states are similar:
8591 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8592 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8593 exp -> exp '-' exp . (rule 2)
8594 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8595 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8597 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8598 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8600 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8601 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8607 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8608 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8609 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8610 exp -> exp '*' exp . (rule 3)
8611 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8613 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8615 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8616 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8622 exp -> exp . '+' exp (rule 1)
8623 exp -> exp . '-' exp (rule 2)
8624 exp -> exp . '*' exp (rule 3)
8625 exp -> exp . '/' exp (rule 4)
8626 exp -> exp '/' exp . (rule 4)
8628 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8629 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8630 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8631 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8633 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8634 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8635 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8636 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8637 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8642 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8643 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8644 @samp{*}, but also because the
8645 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8649 @section Tracing Your Parser
8652 @cindex tracing the parser
8654 If a Bison grammar compiles properly but doesn't do what you want when it
8655 runs, the @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature can help you figure out why.
8657 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8660 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8662 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8663 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8664 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8665 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8668 @item the option @option{-t}, @option{--debug}
8669 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation,
8670 ,Invoking Bison}). This is POSIX compliant too.
8672 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8674 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8675 Summary}). This Bison extension is maintained for backward
8676 compatibility with previous versions of Bison.
8678 @item the variable @samp{parse.trace}
8679 @findex %define parse.trace
8680 Add the @samp{%define parse.trace} directive (@pxref{%define
8681 Summary,,parse.trace}), or pass the @option{-Dparse.trace} option
8682 (@pxref{Bison Options}). This is a Bison extension, which is especially
8683 useful for languages that don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc
8684 portability matter to you, this is the preferred solution.
8687 We suggest that you always enable the trace option so that debugging is
8690 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8691 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8692 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8693 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8694 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8695 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8697 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8698 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8699 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8700 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8702 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8703 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8704 messages tell you these things:
8708 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8711 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8712 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8715 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8716 of the state stack afterward.
8719 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the listing file
8720 produced by the Bison @samp{-v} option (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8721 Bison}). This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8722 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8723 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8724 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8725 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8726 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8727 grammar are to blame.
8729 The parser implementation file is a C program and you can use C
8730 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8731 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8732 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8733 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8736 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token
8737 read, but not its semantic value. You can optionally define a macro
8738 named @code{YYPRINT} to provide a way to print the value. If you define
8739 @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser will pass a
8740 standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and the token
8741 value (from @code{yylval}).
8743 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
8744 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
8748 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
8749 #define YYPRINT(file, type, value) \
8750 print_token_value (file, type, value)
8753 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
8756 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
8759 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
8760 else if (type == NUM)
8761 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
8765 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
8768 @chapter Invoking Bison
8769 @cindex invoking Bison
8770 @cindex Bison invocation
8771 @cindex options for invoking Bison
8773 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
8779 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
8780 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
8781 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
8782 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
8783 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
8784 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
8785 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
8786 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
8787 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
8788 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
8789 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
8794 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
8797 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
8800 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
8803 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
8805 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
8806 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
8807 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
8810 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
8811 in alphabetical order by short options.
8812 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
8813 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
8817 @section Bison Options
8819 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
8820 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
8821 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
8822 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
8823 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
8826 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
8827 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
8830 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
8836 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
8840 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
8842 @item --print-localedir
8843 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
8845 @item --print-datadir
8846 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
8850 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
8851 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
8852 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
8853 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
8854 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
8855 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
8856 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
8857 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
8858 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
8859 for compatibility with POSIX:
8866 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
8867 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
8868 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
8869 this option is specified.
8871 @item -W [@var{category}]
8872 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
8873 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
8876 @item midrule-values
8877 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
8879 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
8882 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
8885 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
8886 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
8889 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
8892 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
8893 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
8894 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
8897 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
8901 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
8902 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
8903 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
8904 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
8905 no effect on the conflict report.
8908 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
8910 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
8911 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
8917 Turn off all the warnings.
8919 Treat warnings as errors.
8922 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
8923 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
8924 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
8933 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
8934 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
8935 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
8937 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8938 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8939 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
8940 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
8941 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
8942 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
8943 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
8947 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
8950 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
8951 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
8952 definition for @var{name}.
8954 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
8955 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
8956 definitions for @var{name}.
8958 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
8959 definitions for @var{name}.
8962 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
8963 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
8964 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
8966 @item -L @var{language}
8967 @itemx --language=@var{language}
8968 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
8969 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
8970 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
8971 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
8973 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
8977 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
8979 @item -p @var{prefix}
8980 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
8981 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified.
8982 @xref{Decl Summary}.
8986 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
8987 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
8988 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
8989 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
8990 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
8991 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
8994 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
8995 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
8996 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
8998 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
8999 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9000 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9001 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9003 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9004 file in the Bison installation directory.
9005 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9006 current working directory.
9007 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9010 @itemx --token-table
9011 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9018 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9019 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9020 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9021 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9024 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9025 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9026 with other short options.
9028 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9029 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9030 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9031 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9033 @item -r @var{things}
9034 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9035 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9036 separated list of @var{things} among:
9040 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9044 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9045 each rule's lookahead set.
9048 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9049 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9052 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9053 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9057 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9058 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9059 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9062 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9063 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9065 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9066 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9068 @item -g [@var{file}]
9069 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9070 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9071 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9072 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9073 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9074 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9077 @item -x [@var{file}]
9078 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9079 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9080 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9081 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9083 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9084 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9087 @node Option Cross Key
9088 @section Option Cross Key
9090 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9091 the corresponding short option and directive.
9093 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9094 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9095 @include cross-options.texi
9099 @section Yacc Library
9101 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9102 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9103 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9104 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9105 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9106 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9107 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9109 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9110 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9113 int yyerror (char const *);
9116 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9117 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9118 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9124 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9126 @node Other Languages
9127 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9130 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9131 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9135 @section C++ Parsers
9138 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9139 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9140 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9141 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9142 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9143 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9146 @node C++ Bison Interface
9147 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9148 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9152 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9153 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9154 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9155 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9157 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9159 @findex %define api.namespace
9160 Use the @samp{%define api.namespace} directive to change the namespace name,
9161 see @ref{%define Summary,,api.namespace}. The various classes are generated
9162 in the following files:
9167 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location},
9168 used for location tracking when enabled. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9171 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9174 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9175 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9176 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9177 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9178 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9180 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9181 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9182 @samp{%defines} directive.
9185 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9186 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9188 @node C++ Semantic Values
9189 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9190 @c - No objects in unions
9192 @c - Printer and destructor
9194 Bison supports two different means to handle semantic values in C++. One is
9195 alike the C interface, and relies on unions (@pxref{C++ Unions}). As C++
9196 practitioners know, unions are inconvenient in C++, therefore another
9197 approach is provided, based on variants (@pxref{C++ Variants}).
9200 * C++ Unions:: Semantic values cannot be objects
9201 * C++ Variants:: Using objects as semantic values
9205 @subsubsection C++ Unions
9207 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9208 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9209 @code{union}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9212 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9213 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9214 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9216 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9217 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9218 to such objects are allowed.
9221 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9222 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9223 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9227 @subsubsection C++ Variants
9229 Starting with version 2.6, Bison provides a @emph{variant} based
9230 implementation of semantic values for C++. This alleviates all the
9231 limitations reported in the previous section, and in particular, object
9232 types can be used without pointers.
9234 To enable variant-based semantic values, set @code{%define} variable
9235 @code{variant} (@pxref{%define Summary,, variant}). Once this defined,
9236 @code{%union} is ignored, and instead of using the name of the fields of the
9237 @code{%union} to ``type'' the symbols, use genuine types.
9239 For instance, instead of
9247 %token <ival> NUMBER;
9248 %token <sval> STRING;
9255 %token <int> NUMBER;
9256 %token <std::string> STRING;
9259 @code{STRING} is no longer a pointer, which should fairly simplify the user
9260 actions in the grammar and in the scanner (in particular the memory
9263 Since C++ features destructors, and since it is customary to specialize
9264 @code{operator<<} to support uniform printing of values, variants also
9265 typically simplify Bison printers and destructors.
9267 Variants are stricter than unions. When based on unions, you may play any
9268 dirty game with @code{yylval}, say storing an @code{int}, reading a
9269 @code{char*}, and then storing a @code{double} in it. This is no longer
9270 possible with variants: they must be initialized, then assigned to, and
9271 eventually, destroyed.
9273 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> ()
9274 Initialize, but leave empty. Returns the address where the actual value may
9275 be stored. Requires that the variant was not initialized yet.
9278 @deftypemethod {semantic_type} {T&} build<T> (const T& @var{t})
9279 Initialize, and copy-construct from @var{t}.
9283 @strong{Warning}: We do not use Boost.Variant, for two reasons. First, it
9284 appeared unacceptable to require Boost on the user's machine (i.e., the
9285 machine on which the generated parser will be compiled, not the machine on
9286 which @command{bison} was run). Second, for each possible semantic value,
9287 Boost.Variant not only stores the value, but also a tag specifying its
9288 type. But the parser already ``knows'' the type of the semantic value, so
9289 that would be duplicating the information.
9291 Therefore we developed light-weight variants whose type tag is external (so
9292 they are really like @code{unions} for C++ actually). But our code is much
9293 less mature that Boost.Variant. So there is a number of limitations in
9294 (the current implementation of) variants:
9297 Alignment must be enforced: values should be aligned in memory according to
9298 the most demanding type. Computing the smallest alignment possible requires
9299 meta-programming techniques that are not currently implemented in Bison, and
9300 therefore, since, as far as we know, @code{double} is the most demanding
9301 type on all platforms, alignments are enforced for @code{double} whatever
9302 types are actually used. This may waste space in some cases.
9305 Our implementation is not conforming with strict aliasing rules. Alias
9306 analysis is a technique used in optimizing compilers to detect when two
9307 pointers are disjoint (they cannot ``meet''). Our implementation breaks
9308 some of the rules that G++ 4.4 uses in its alias analysis, so @emph{strict
9309 alias analysis must be disabled}. Use the option
9310 @option{-fno-strict-aliasing} to compile the generated parser.
9313 There might be portability issues we are not aware of.
9316 As far as we know, these limitations @emph{can} be alleviated. All it takes
9317 is some time and/or some talented C++ hacker willing to contribute to Bison.
9319 @node C++ Location Values
9320 @subsection C++ Location Values
9324 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9326 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9327 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. Two auxiliary classes
9328 define a @code{position}, a single point in a file, and a @code{location}, a
9329 range composed of a pair of @code{position}s (possibly spanning several
9332 @deftypemethod {position} {std::string*} file
9333 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9334 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9335 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9336 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9339 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} line
9340 The line, starting at 1.
9343 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9344 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9347 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} column
9348 The column, starting at 0.
9351 @deftypemethod {position} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9352 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9355 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9356 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9357 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (const position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9358 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (position& @var{pos}, int @var{width})
9359 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9362 @deftypemethod {position} {position} operator<< (std::ostream @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9363 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9364 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9365 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9368 @deftypemethod {location} {position} begin
9369 @deftypemethodx {location} {position} end
9370 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9373 @deftypemethod {location} {unsigned int} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9374 @deftypemethodx {location} {unsigned int} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9375 Advance the @code{end} position.
9378 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, const location& @var{end})
9379 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{begin}, int @var{width})
9380 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (const location& @var{loc}, int @var{width})
9381 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9384 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9385 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9389 @node C++ Parser Interface
9390 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9391 @c - define parser_class_name
9393 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9395 @c - Reporting errors
9397 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9398 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9399 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9400 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9401 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9402 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9403 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9404 additional argument for its constructor.
9406 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9407 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9408 The types for semantic values and locations (if enabled).
9411 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9412 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9413 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9414 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9415 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9416 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9419 @defcv {Type} {parser} {syntax_error}
9420 This class derives from @code{std::runtime_error}. Throw instances of it
9421 from the scanner or from the user actions to raise parse errors. This is
9422 equivalent with first
9423 invoking @code{error} to report the location and message of the syntax
9424 error, and then to invoke @code{YYERROR} to enter the error-recovery mode.
9425 But contrary to @code{YYERROR} which can only be invoked from user actions
9426 (i.e., written in the action itself), the exception can be thrown from
9427 function invoked from the user action.
9430 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9431 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9432 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9435 @deftypemethod {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9436 @deftypemethodx {syntax_error} {} syntax_error (const std::string& @var{m})
9437 Instantiate a syntax-error exception.
9440 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9441 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9444 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9445 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9446 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9450 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9451 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9452 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9453 or nonzero, full tracing.
9456 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9457 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} error (const std::string& @var{m})
9458 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9459 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9460 described by @var{m}. If location tracking is not enabled, the second
9465 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9466 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9467 @c - prefix for yylex.
9468 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9471 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9472 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9473 @samp{%define api.pure} directive. The actual interface with @code{yylex}
9474 depends whether you use unions, or variants.
9477 * Split Symbols:: Passing symbols as two/three components
9478 * Complete Symbols:: Making symbols a whole
9482 @subsubsection Split Symbols
9484 Therefore the interface is as follows.
9486 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9487 @deftypemethodx {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9488 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic value and
9489 location (if enabled) being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9490 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9493 Note that when using variants, the interface for @code{yylex} is the same,
9494 but @code{yylval} is handled differently.
9496 Regular union-based code in Lex scanner typically look like:
9500 yylval.ival = text_to_int (yytext);
9501 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9504 yylval.sval = new std::string (yytext);
9505 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9509 Using variants, @code{yylval} is already constructed, but it is not
9510 initialized. So the code would look like:
9514 yylval.build<int>() = text_to_int (yytext);
9515 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9518 yylval.build<std::string> = yytext;
9519 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9528 yylval.build(text_to_int (yytext));
9529 return yy::parser::INTEGER;
9532 yylval.build(yytext);
9533 return yy::parser::IDENTIFIER;
9538 @node Complete Symbols
9539 @subsubsection Complete Symbols
9541 If you specified both @code{%define variant} and @code{%define lex_symbol},
9542 the @code{parser} class also defines the class @code{parser::symbol_type}
9543 which defines a @emph{complete} symbol, aggregating its type (i.e., the
9544 traditional value returned by @code{yylex}), its semantic value (i.e., the
9545 value passed in @code{yylval}, and possibly its location (@code{yylloc}).
9547 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} symbol_type (token_type @var{type}, const semantic_type& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9548 Build a complete terminal symbol which token type is @var{type}, and which
9549 semantic value is @var{value}. If location tracking is enabled, also pass
9553 This interface is low-level and should not be used for two reasons. First,
9554 it is inconvenient, as you still have to build the semantic value, which is
9555 a variant, and second, because consistency is not enforced: as with unions,
9556 it is still possible to give an integer as semantic value for a string.
9558 So for each token type, Bison generates named constructors as follows.
9560 @deftypemethod {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const @var{value_type}& @var{value}, const location_type& @var{location})
9561 @deftypemethodx {symbol_type} {} make_@var{token} (const location_type& @var{location})
9562 Build a complete terminal symbol for the token type @var{token} (not
9563 including the @code{api.tokens.prefix}) whose possible semantic value is
9564 @var{value} of adequate @var{value_type}. If location tracking is enabled,
9565 also pass the @var{location}.
9568 For instance, given the following declarations:
9571 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9572 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER;
9573 %token <int> INTEGER;
9578 Bison generates the following functions:
9581 symbol_type make_IDENTIFIER(const std::string& v,
9582 const location_type& l);
9583 symbol_type make_INTEGER(const int& v,
9584 const location_type& loc);
9585 symbol_type make_COLON(const location_type& loc);
9589 which should be used in a Lex-scanner as follows.
9592 [0-9]+ return yy::parser::make_INTEGER(text_to_int (yytext), loc);
9593 [a-z]+ return yy::parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
9594 ":" return yy::parser::make_COLON(loc);
9597 Tokens that do not have an identifier are not accessible: you cannot simply
9598 use characters such as @code{':'}, they must be declared with @code{%token}.
9600 @node A Complete C++ Example
9601 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9603 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9604 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9605 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{.../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9606 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9607 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9608 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9609 demonstrate the various interactions. A hand-written scanner is
9610 actually easier to interface with.
9613 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9614 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9615 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9616 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9617 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9620 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9621 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9623 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9624 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9625 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9626 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9627 of valid input follows.
9631 seven := one + two * three
9635 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9636 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9638 @c - A place to store error messages
9639 @c - A place for the result
9641 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9642 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9643 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9644 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9645 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9646 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9647 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9649 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9650 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9651 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9654 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9656 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9657 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9660 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9665 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9666 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9667 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9668 factor both as follows.
9670 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9672 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9674 yy::calcxx_parser::symbol_type yylex (calcxx_driver& driver)
9675 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9680 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9683 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9685 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9690 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9692 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9698 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to have
9699 member functions to open and close the scanning phase.
9701 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9703 // Handling the scanner.
9706 bool trace_scanning;
9710 Similarly for the parser itself.
9712 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9714 // Run the parser on file F.
9715 // Return 0 on success.
9716 int parse (const std::string& f);
9717 // The name of the file being parsed.
9718 // Used later to pass the file name to the location tracker.
9720 // Whether parser traces should be generated.
9725 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9726 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9727 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9728 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9730 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9733 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9734 void error (const std::string& m);
9736 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9739 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9740 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9741 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9742 messages and set error state.
9744 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9746 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9747 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9749 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9750 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9752 variables["one"] = 1;
9753 variables["two"] = 2;
9756 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9761 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9765 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9766 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9767 int res = parser.parse ();
9773 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9775 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9779 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9781 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9786 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9788 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9789 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
9790 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
9791 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
9794 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9796 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
9797 %require "@value{VERSION}"
9799 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
9803 @findex %define variant
9804 @findex %define lex_symbol
9805 This example will use genuine C++ objects as semantic values, therefore, we
9806 require the variant-based interface. To make sure we properly use it, we
9807 enable assertions. To fully benefit from type-safety and more natural
9808 definition of ``symbol'', we enable @code{lex_symbol}.
9810 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9813 %define parse.assert
9818 @findex %code requires
9819 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed by the semantic values.
9820 Because the parser uses the parsing driver and reciprocally, both would like
9821 to include the header of the other, which is, of course, insane. This
9822 mutual dependency will be broken using forward declarations. Because the
9823 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
9824 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will use a
9825 forward declaration of the driver. @xref{%code Summary}.
9827 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9832 class calcxx_driver;
9837 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
9838 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
9841 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9843 // The parsing context.
9844 %param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
9848 Then we request location tracking, and initialize the
9849 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
9850 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
9853 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9858 // Initialize the initial location.
9859 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
9864 Use the following two directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
9865 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
9868 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9871 %define parse.error verbose
9876 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
9877 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
9879 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9883 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9889 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
9890 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead of
9891 ``$end''. Similarly user friendly names are provided for each symbol. To
9892 avoid name clashes in the generated files (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}), prefix
9893 tokens with @code{TOK_} (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.tokens.prefix}).
9895 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9897 %define api.tokens.prefix "TOK_"
9911 Since we use variant-based semantic values, @code{%union} is not used, and
9912 both @code{%type} and @code{%token} expect genuine types, as opposed to type
9915 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9917 %token <std::string> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
9918 %token <int> NUMBER "number"
9923 No @code{%destructor} is needed to enable memory deallocation during error
9924 recovery; the memory, for strings for instance, will be reclaimed by the
9925 regular destructors. All the values are printed using their
9928 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
9929 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9931 %printer @{ debug_stream () << $$; @} <*>;
9935 The grammar itself is straightforward (@pxref{Location Tracking Calc, ,
9936 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}}).
9938 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9942 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
9946 | assignments assignment @{@};
9949 "identifier" ":=" exp @{ driver.variables[$1] = $3; @};
9954 exp "+" exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
9955 | exp "-" exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
9956 | exp "*" exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
9957 | exp "/" exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
9958 | "(" exp ")" @{ std::swap ($$, $2); @}
9959 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[$1]; @}
9960 | "number" @{ std::swap ($$, $1); @};
9965 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
9968 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
9971 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const location_type& l,
9972 const std::string& m)
9974 driver.error (l, m);
9978 @node Calc++ Scanner
9979 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
9981 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
9982 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
9984 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
9986 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
9991 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
9992 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9994 // Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
9995 // 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
9996 // not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
9997 // <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>.
10001 // The location of the current token.
10002 static yy::location loc;
10007 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10008 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10009 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10010 Finally, we enable scanner tracing.
10012 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10014 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10018 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10020 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10022 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10028 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10029 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10030 position. Then when a pattern is matched, its width is added to the end
10031 column. When matching ends of lines, the end
10032 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10033 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10034 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10036 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10040 // Code run each time a pattern is matched.
10041 # define YY_USER_ACTION loc.columns (yyleng);
10047 // Code run each time yylex is called.
10051 @{blank@}+ loc.step ();
10052 [\n]+ loc.lines (yyleng); loc.step ();
10056 The rules are simple. The driver is used to report errors.
10058 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10060 "-" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_MINUS(loc);
10061 "+" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_PLUS(loc);
10062 "*" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_STAR(loc);
10063 "/" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_SLASH(loc);
10064 "(" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_LPAREN(loc);
10065 ")" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_RPAREN(loc);
10066 ":=" return yy::calcxx_parser::make_ASSIGN(loc);
10071 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10072 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10073 driver.error (loc, "integer is out of range");
10074 return yy::calcxx_parser::make_NUMBER(n, loc);
10077 @{id@} return yy::calcxx_parser::make_IDENTIFIER(yytext, loc);
10078 . driver.error (loc, "invalid character");
10079 <<EOF>> return yy::calcxx_parser::make_END(loc);
10084 Finally, because the scanner-related driver's member-functions depend
10085 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10087 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10091 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10093 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10096 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10098 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10099 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10106 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10113 @node Calc++ Top Level
10114 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10116 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10118 @comment file: calc++.cc
10120 #include <iostream>
10121 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10125 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10128 calcxx_driver driver;
10129 for (++argv; argv[0]; ++argv)
10130 if (*argv == std::string ("-p"))
10131 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10132 else if (*argv == std::string ("-s"))
10133 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10134 else if (!driver.parse (*argv))
10135 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10144 @section Java Parsers
10147 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10148 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10149 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10150 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10151 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10152 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10153 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10154 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10157 @node Java Bison Interface
10158 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10159 @c - %language "Java"
10161 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10162 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10164 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10165 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10167 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10168 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10169 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10170 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10171 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10172 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10173 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10174 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10175 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10176 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10178 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10180 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10181 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10182 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10183 and @samp{%define api.pure} directives does not do anything when used in
10186 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10187 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10189 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10190 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10192 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10193 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10195 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10196 Currently, support for tracing is always compiled
10197 in. Thus the @samp{%define parse.trace} and @samp{%token-table}
10199 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10200 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10201 unused code in the generated parser, so use @samp{%define parse.trace}
10203 if needed. Also, in the future the
10204 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10205 access the token names and codes.
10207 Getting a ``code too large'' error from the Java compiler means the code
10208 hit the 64KB bytecode per method limitation of the Java class file.
10209 Try reducing the amount of code in actions and static initializers;
10210 otherwise, report a bug so that the parser skeleton will be improved.
10213 @node Java Semantic Values
10214 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10215 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10217 @c - Printer and destructor
10219 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10220 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10221 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10224 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10225 %type <Integer> number
10228 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10229 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10230 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10231 superclass of all the semantic values using the @samp{%define stype}
10232 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10235 %define stype "ASTNode"
10239 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10240 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10242 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10243 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10244 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10245 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10246 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10247 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10249 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10250 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10251 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10253 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10254 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10255 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10258 @node Java Location Values
10259 @subsection Java Location Values
10261 @c - class Position
10262 @c - class Location
10264 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10265 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10266 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10267 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10268 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10269 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10270 renamed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}"}.
10272 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10273 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10274 with @samp{%define position_type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10275 be supplied by the user.
10278 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10279 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10280 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10283 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10284 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10287 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10288 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10291 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10292 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10293 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10294 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10298 @node Java Parser Interface
10299 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10300 @c - define parser_class_name
10302 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10304 @c - Reporting errors
10306 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10307 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10308 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10309 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10310 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10312 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10313 @samp{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10314 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10315 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10316 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10317 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10318 A single @samp{%define annotations "@var{annotations}"} directive can
10319 be used to add any number of annotations to the parser class.
10321 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10322 @samp{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10323 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10324 extends} and @samp{%define implements} directives.
10326 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10327 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10328 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10329 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10330 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10331 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10333 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10334 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10335 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10336 which initialize them automatically.
10338 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10339 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10340 no parameters, unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s and/or
10341 @code{%lex-param}s are used.
10343 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10344 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10345 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10348 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10349 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10350 additional parameters unless @code{%param}s and/or @code{%parse-param}s are
10353 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10354 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10355 created with the correct @code{%param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s.
10357 Use @code{%code init} for code added to the start of the constructor
10358 body. This is especially useful to initialize superclasses. Use
10359 @samp{%define init_throws} to specify any uncatch exceptions.
10362 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10363 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10364 @code{false} otherwise.
10367 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} getErrorVerbose ()
10368 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setErrorVerbose (boolean @var{verbose})
10369 Get or set the option to produce verbose error messages. These are only
10370 available with @samp{%define parse.error verbose}, which also turns on
10371 verbose error messages.
10374 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10375 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Position @var{pos}, String @var{msg})
10376 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10377 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10378 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10379 available only if location tracking is active.
10382 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10383 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10384 from a syntax error.
10385 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10388 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10389 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10390 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10394 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10395 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10396 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10397 or nonzero, full tracing.
10400 @deftypecv {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonVersion}
10401 @deftypecvx {Constant} {YYParser} {String} {bisonSkeleton}
10402 Identify the Bison version and skeleton used to generate this parser.
10406 @node Java Scanner Interface
10407 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10410 @c - Lexer interface
10412 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10413 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10414 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10415 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class. This interface also
10416 contain constants for all user-defined token names and the predefined
10419 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10420 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10421 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10422 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10425 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10426 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10427 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10428 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10431 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10433 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10434 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10435 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10436 changed using @samp{%define location_type "@var{class-name}".}
10439 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10440 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10441 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10444 Use @samp{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10445 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10448 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10449 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10450 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10451 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10452 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10454 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define position_type
10455 "@var{class-name}".}
10458 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10459 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10461 The return type can be changed using @samp{%define stype
10462 "@var{class-name}".}
10466 @node Java Action Features
10467 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10469 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10470 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10472 Use @samp{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10473 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10476 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10477 This may not be assigned to.
10478 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10481 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10482 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10483 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10487 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10488 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10489 @samp{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10490 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10491 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10492 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10495 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10496 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10497 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10498 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10500 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10504 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10505 This may not be assigned to.
10506 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10510 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10511 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10514 @deffn {Statement} {return YYABORT;}
10515 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10516 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10519 @deffn {Statement} {return YYACCEPT;}
10520 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10521 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10524 @deffn {Statement} {return YYERROR;}
10525 Start error recovery without printing an error message.
10526 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10529 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10530 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10531 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10533 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10536 @deftypefn {Function} {void} yyerror (String @var{msg})
10537 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Position @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10538 @deftypefnx {Function} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10539 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10540 instance in use. The @code{Location} and @code{Position} parameters are
10541 available only if location tracking is active.
10545 @node Java Differences
10546 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10548 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10549 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10550 section summarizes these differences.
10554 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10555 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10556 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10557 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10558 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10559 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10560 See @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10562 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10563 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10564 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10565 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10566 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10569 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10570 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10571 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10572 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10573 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10574 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10575 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10576 left-hand side of assignments. See @pxref{Java Semantic Values} and
10577 @pxref{Java Action Features}.
10580 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10582 @item @code{%code imports}
10583 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10584 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10585 suggested to use @samp{%define package} instead.
10587 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10588 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10590 @item @code{%code lexer}
10591 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10592 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10593 that implements the appropriate interface (see @pxref{Java Scanner
10597 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10598 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10599 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10601 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10602 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10607 @node Java Declarations Summary
10608 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10610 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10611 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10613 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10614 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10617 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10618 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10619 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10620 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10621 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10624 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10625 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10626 @samp{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10627 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10630 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10631 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10632 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10633 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10636 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10637 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10638 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10641 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10642 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10643 a Java @emph{type}.
10644 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10647 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10648 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10649 @xref{Java Differences}.
10652 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10653 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10654 @xref{Java Differences}.
10657 @deffn {Directive} {%code init} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10658 Code inserted at the beginning of the parser constructor body.
10659 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10662 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10663 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10664 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10667 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10668 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10669 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10670 @xref{Java Differences}.
10673 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10674 Not supported. Use @code{%code imports} instead.
10675 @xref{Java Differences}.
10678 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10679 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10680 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10683 @deffn {Directive} {%define annotations} "@var{annotations}"
10684 The Java annotations for the parser class. Default is none.
10685 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10688 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10689 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10690 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10693 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10694 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10695 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10698 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10699 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10701 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10704 @deffn {Directive} {%define init_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10705 The exceptions thrown by @code{%code init} from the parser class
10706 constructor. Default is none.
10707 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10710 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10711 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10712 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10713 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10716 @deffn {Directive} {%define location_type} "@var{class}"
10717 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10718 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10719 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10720 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10723 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10724 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10725 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10728 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10729 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10730 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10731 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10734 @deffn {Directive} {%define position_type} "@var{class}"
10735 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10736 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10737 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10740 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10741 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10742 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10745 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10746 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10747 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10750 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10751 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10752 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10755 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10756 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10757 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10758 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10762 @c ================================================= FAQ
10765 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10766 @cindex frequently asked questions
10769 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10773 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10774 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10775 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10776 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10777 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10778 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10779 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10780 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10781 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10782 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10783 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10784 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10787 @node Memory Exhausted
10788 @section Memory Exhausted
10791 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10792 message. What can I do?
10795 This question is already addressed elsewhere, @xref{Recursion,
10798 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10799 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10801 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10802 following typical questions:
10805 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10806 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10807 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10814 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10815 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10816 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure}.
10819 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10820 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10821 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10822 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10823 @file{first-line.l}:
10829 #include <stdlib.h>
10833 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10837 yyparse (char const *file)
10839 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10843 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10847 /* One token only. */
10849 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10852 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10870 If the file @file{input} contains
10878 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
10881 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
10882 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
10883 $ @kbd{./first-line}
10888 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
10889 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
10890 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
10891 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
10892 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
10893 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
10894 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
10895 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
10898 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
10899 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
10900 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
10901 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
10903 @node Strings are Destroyed
10904 @section Strings are Destroyed
10907 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
10908 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
10909 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
10912 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
10913 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
10914 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
10920 char *yylval = NULL;
10925 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
10933 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
10934 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
10935 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
10936 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
10942 If you compile and run this code, you get:
10945 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10946 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10947 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10953 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
10954 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
10955 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
10956 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
10957 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
10958 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
10961 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
10962 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
10963 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
10968 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
10969 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
10972 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
10973 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
10976 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
10977 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
10978 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
10979 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
10980 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
10981 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
10982 execute simple instructions one after the others.
10984 @cindex abstract syntax tree
10986 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
10987 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
10988 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
10989 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
10990 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
10991 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
10994 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
10995 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
10998 @node Multiple start-symbols
10999 @section Multiple start-symbols
11002 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11003 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11004 multiple entry points.
11007 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11008 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11009 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11010 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11014 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11021 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11022 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11024 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11025 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11026 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11027 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11028 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11029 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11030 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11031 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11034 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11039 int t = start_token;
11044 /* @r{The rules.} */
11048 @node Secure? Conform?
11049 @section Secure? Conform?
11052 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11055 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11056 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11057 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11058 please send us a bug report.
11060 @node I can't build Bison
11061 @section I can't build Bison
11064 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11065 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11069 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11070 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11071 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11072 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11073 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11074 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11075 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11078 @node Where can I find help?
11079 @section Where can I find help?
11082 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11085 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11086 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11087 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11088 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11089 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11090 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11091 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11092 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11096 @section Bug Reports
11099 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11102 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11103 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11104 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11105 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11106 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11108 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11109 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11110 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11111 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11112 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11114 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11115 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11116 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11117 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11118 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11119 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11121 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11122 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11124 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11126 @node More Languages
11127 @section More Languages
11130 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11131 favorite language here}?
11134 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11135 languages; contributions are welcome.
11138 @section Beta Testing
11141 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11144 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11145 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11146 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11147 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11148 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11149 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11150 essentially halted.
11152 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11153 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11154 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11155 systems are especially welcome.
11157 @node Mailing Lists
11158 @section Mailing Lists
11161 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11164 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11166 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11168 @node Table of Symbols
11169 @appendix Bison Symbols
11170 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11171 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11173 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11174 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11175 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11178 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11179 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11180 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11183 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11184 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11188 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11189 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11193 @deffn {Variable} $$
11194 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11198 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11199 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11200 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11203 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11204 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11208 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11209 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11213 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11214 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11215 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11216 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11219 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11220 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11221 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11222 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11223 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11227 @deffn {Directive} %?@{@var{expression}@}
11228 Predicate actions. This is a type of action clause that may appear in
11229 rules. The expression is evaluated, and if false, causes a syntax error. In
11230 GLR parsers during nondeterministic operation,
11231 this silently causes an alternative parse to die. During deterministic
11232 operation, it is the same as the effect of YYERROR.
11233 @xref{Semantic Predicates}.
11235 This feature is experimental.
11236 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11240 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11241 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11244 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11245 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11249 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11250 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11253 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11254 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11255 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11258 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11259 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11262 This feature is experimental.
11263 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11266 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11269 @deffn {Directive} <>
11270 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11273 This feature is experimental.
11274 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11277 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11280 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11281 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11282 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11283 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11286 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11287 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11288 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11289 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11290 @xref{%code Summary}.
11293 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11294 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11298 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11299 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11300 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11305 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11306 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11307 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11308 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11311 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11312 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11313 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11316 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11317 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11318 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11321 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11322 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11323 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11326 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11327 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11328 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11332 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11333 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11334 used in the grammar.
11337 @deffn {Symbol} error
11338 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11339 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11340 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11341 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11342 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11343 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11344 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11345 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11348 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11349 An obsolete directive standing for @samp{%define parse.error verbose}
11350 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11353 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11354 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11358 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11359 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11360 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11363 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11364 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11367 @deffn {Directive} %language
11368 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11369 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11372 @deffn {Directive} %left
11373 Bison declaration to assign precedence and left associativity to token(s).
11374 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11377 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11378 Bison declaration to specifying additional arguments that
11379 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11383 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11384 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11385 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11386 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11387 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11390 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11391 Bison declaration to rename the external symbols. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11395 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11396 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11397 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11402 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11403 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11404 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11407 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11408 Bison declaration to assign precedence and nonassociativity to token(s).
11409 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11412 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11413 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11414 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11417 @deffn {Directive} %param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11418 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that both
11419 @code{yylex} and @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The
11420 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11423 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@} @dots{}
11424 Bison declaration to specify additional arguments that @code{yyparse}
11425 should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11428 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11429 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11430 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11433 @deffn {Directive} %precedence
11434 Bison declaration to assign precedence to token(s), but no associativity
11435 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11438 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11439 Deprecated version of @samp{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11440 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11441 unreasonable usage.
11444 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11445 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11446 Require a Version of Bison}.
11449 @deffn {Directive} %right
11450 Bison declaration to assign precedence and right associativity to token(s).
11451 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11454 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11455 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11456 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11459 @deffn {Directive} %start
11460 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11464 @deffn {Directive} %token
11465 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11466 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11469 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11470 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11471 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11474 @deffn {Directive} %type
11475 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11476 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11479 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11480 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11481 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11485 @deffn {Directive} %union
11486 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11487 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11490 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11491 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11492 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11493 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11494 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11496 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11500 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11501 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11502 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11503 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11505 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11509 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11510 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11511 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11514 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11515 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11516 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11517 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11518 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11521 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11522 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11523 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11526 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11527 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11528 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11531 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11532 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11533 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11534 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11537 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11538 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11539 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11542 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11543 Macro to pretend that a syntax error has just been detected: call
11544 @code{yyerror} and then perform normal error recovery if possible
11545 (@pxref{Error Recovery}), or (if recovery is impossible) make
11546 @code{yyparse} return 1. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11548 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11552 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11553 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11554 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11557 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11558 An obsolete macro used in the @file{yacc.c} skeleton, that you define
11559 with @code{#define} in the prologue to request verbose, specific error
11560 message strings when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what
11561 definition you use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define
11562 it. Using @samp{%define parse.error verbose} is preferred
11563 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}).
11566 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11567 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11568 @xref{Memory Management}.
11571 @deffn {Function} yylex
11572 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11573 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11577 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11578 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11579 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11580 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11581 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11584 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11585 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11586 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11587 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11589 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11591 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11592 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11593 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11596 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11597 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11598 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11601 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11602 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11603 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11604 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11606 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11607 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11608 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11611 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11612 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11616 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11617 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11618 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11619 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11620 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11623 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11624 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11625 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11628 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11629 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11630 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11631 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11632 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11633 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11634 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11637 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11638 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11639 call this function to create a new parser.
11640 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11641 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11642 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11643 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11646 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11647 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11648 parse the rest of the input stream.
11649 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11650 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11651 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11652 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11655 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11656 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11657 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11658 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11659 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11660 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11663 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11664 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11665 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11666 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11667 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11670 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11671 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11672 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11673 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11676 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11677 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11678 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11679 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11680 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11681 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11682 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11684 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11685 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11686 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11687 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11688 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11689 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11690 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11693 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11694 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11695 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11703 @item Accepting state
11704 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11705 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11706 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11708 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11709 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11710 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11711 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11712 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11714 @item Consistent state
11715 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11717 @item Context-free grammars
11718 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11719 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11720 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11721 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11724 @item Default reduction
11725 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11726 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11727 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11728 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11731 @item Defaulted state
11732 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11734 @item Dynamic allocation
11735 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11736 compile time or on entry to a function.
11739 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11740 character string of length zero.
11742 @item Finite-state stack machine
11743 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11744 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11745 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11746 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11747 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11748 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11750 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11751 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11752 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11753 deterministic parsing
11754 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11755 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11756 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11760 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11761 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11762 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11764 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11765 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11766 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11767 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11768 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11769 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11770 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11771 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11772 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11773 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11775 @item Infix operator
11776 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11777 performs some operation.
11780 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11782 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11783 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11784 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11785 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11786 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11787 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11788 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11790 @item Language construct
11791 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11792 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11793 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11795 @item Left associativity
11796 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11797 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11798 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11800 @item Left recursion
11801 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11802 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11805 @item Left-to-right parsing
11806 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11807 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11809 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11810 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11811 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11813 @item Lexical tie-in
11814 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11815 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11817 @item Literal string token
11818 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11820 @item Lookahead token
11821 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11825 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11826 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11827 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11830 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11831 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11833 @item Nonterminal symbol
11834 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11835 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11836 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11839 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11840 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11843 @item Postfix operator
11844 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11845 performs some operation.
11848 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11849 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11853 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11854 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11855 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11857 @item Reverse polish notation
11858 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11860 @item Right recursion
11861 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11862 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11866 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
11867 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
11868 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
11871 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
11872 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
11873 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11875 @item Single-character literal
11876 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
11877 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
11880 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
11881 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
11882 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
11883 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
11886 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
11887 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
11888 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
11891 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
11892 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11895 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
11896 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
11897 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
11898 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
11900 @item Terminal symbol
11901 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
11902 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
11903 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11905 @item Unreachable state
11906 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
11907 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
11908 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
11911 @node Copying This Manual
11912 @appendix Copying This Manual
11916 @unnumbered Bibliography
11920 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
11921 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
11922 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
11923 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
11925 @item [Denny 2010 May]
11926 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
11927 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
11928 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
11929 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
11931 @item [Denny 2010 November]
11932 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
11933 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
11934 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
11935 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
11937 @item [DeRemer 1982]
11938 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
11939 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
11940 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
11941 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
11944 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
11945 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
11946 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
11949 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
11950 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
11951 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
11952 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
11962 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
11963 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
11964 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
11965 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
11966 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
11967 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
11968 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
11969 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
11970 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
11971 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
11972 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
11973 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
11974 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
11975 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum
11976 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
11977 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
11978 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
11979 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
11980 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
11981 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
11982 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
11983 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
11984 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
11985 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmnts ref stmnt initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead
11986 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
11987 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
11988 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
11989 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
11990 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
11991 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
11992 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs
11993 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC
11994 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
11995 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative
11996 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
11997 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
11998 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
11999 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz
12000 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12001 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno
12002 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12003 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12004 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12005 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12006 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc
12007 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12008 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12009 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12010 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12011 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos
12012 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett
12013 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity
12015 @c Local Variables:
12016 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"