1 \input texinfo @c -*-texinfo-*-
2 @comment %**start of header
3 @setfilename bison.info
5 @settitle Bison @value{VERSION}
11 @c This edition has been formatted so that you can format and print it in
12 @c the smallbook format.
15 @c Set following if you want to document %default-prec and %no-default-prec.
16 @c This feature is experimental and may change in future Bison versions.
29 @comment %**end of header
33 This manual (@value{UPDATED}) is for GNU Bison (version
34 @value{VERSION}), the GNU parser generator.
36 Copyright @copyright{} 1988-1993, 1995, 1998-2012 Free Software
40 Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
41 under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
42 Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free Software
43 Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with the Front-Cover texts
44 being ``A GNU Manual,'' and with the Back-Cover Texts as in
45 (a) below. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
46 ``GNU Free Documentation License.''
48 (a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: ``You have the freedom to copy and
49 modify this GNU manual. Buying copies from the FSF
50 supports it in developing GNU and promoting software
55 @dircategory Software development
57 * bison: (bison). GNU parser generator (Yacc replacement).
62 @subtitle The Yacc-compatible Parser Generator
63 @subtitle @value{UPDATED}, Bison Version @value{VERSION}
65 @author by Charles Donnelly and Richard Stallman
68 @vskip 0pt plus 1filll
71 Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
72 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor @*
73 Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA @*
74 Printed copies are available from the Free Software Foundation.@*
77 Cover art by Etienne Suvasa.
91 * Copying:: The GNU General Public License says
92 how you can copy and share Bison.
95 * Concepts:: Basic concepts for understanding Bison.
96 * Examples:: Three simple explained examples of using Bison.
99 * Grammar File:: Writing Bison declarations and rules.
100 * Interface:: C-language interface to the parser function @code{yyparse}.
101 * Algorithm:: How the Bison parser works at run-time.
102 * Error Recovery:: Writing rules for error recovery.
103 * Context Dependency:: What to do if your language syntax is too
104 messy for Bison to handle straightforwardly.
105 * Debugging:: Understanding or debugging Bison parsers.
106 * Invocation:: How to run Bison (to produce the parser implementation).
107 * Other Languages:: Creating C++ and Java parsers.
108 * FAQ:: Frequently Asked Questions
109 * Table of Symbols:: All the keywords of the Bison language are explained.
110 * Glossary:: Basic concepts are explained.
111 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
112 * Bibliography:: Publications cited in this manual.
113 * Index of Terms:: Cross-references to the text.
116 --- The Detailed Node Listing ---
118 The Concepts of Bison
120 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
121 as mathematical ideas.
122 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
123 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
124 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
125 the name of an identifier, etc.).
126 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
127 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
128 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
129 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
130 how is the output used?
131 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
132 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
136 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
137 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
138 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
139 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
143 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
144 a first example with no operator precedence.
145 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
146 Operator precedence is introduced.
147 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
148 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
149 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
150 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
151 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
153 Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
155 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
156 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
157 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
158 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
159 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
160 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
161 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
163 Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
169 Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
171 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
172 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
173 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
175 Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
177 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
178 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
179 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
183 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
184 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
185 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
186 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
187 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
188 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
189 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
190 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
191 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
193 Outline of a Bison Grammar
195 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
196 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
197 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
198 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
199 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
201 Defining Language Semantics
203 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
204 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
205 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
206 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
207 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
208 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
209 action in the middle of a rule.
213 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
214 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
215 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
219 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
220 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
221 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
222 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
223 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
224 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
225 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
226 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
227 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
228 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
229 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
230 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
231 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
232 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
233 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
235 Parser C-Language Interface
237 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
238 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
239 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
240 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
241 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
242 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
244 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
245 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
246 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
249 The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
251 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
252 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
253 of the token it has read.
254 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
255 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
257 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
258 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
260 The Bison Parser Algorithm
262 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
263 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
264 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
265 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
266 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
267 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
268 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
269 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
270 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
271 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
275 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
276 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
277 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
278 * How Precedence:: How they work.
279 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
283 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
284 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
285 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
286 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
288 Handling Context Dependencies
290 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
291 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
292 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
293 error recovery rules must be written.
295 Debugging Your Parser
297 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
298 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
299 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
300 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
304 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
305 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
306 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
310 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
311 in alphabetical order by short options.
312 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
313 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
315 Parsers Written In Other Languages
317 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
318 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
322 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
323 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
324 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
325 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
326 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
327 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
331 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
332 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
333 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
335 A Complete C++ Example
337 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
338 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
339 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
340 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
341 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
345 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
346 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
347 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
348 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
349 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
350 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
351 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
352 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
354 Frequently Asked Questions
356 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
357 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
358 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
359 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
360 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
361 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
362 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
363 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
364 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
365 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
366 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
367 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
371 * Copying This Manual:: License for copying this manual.
377 @unnumbered Introduction
380 @dfn{Bison} is a general-purpose parser generator that converts an
381 annotated context-free grammar into a deterministic LR or generalized
382 LR (GLR) parser employing LALR(1) parser tables. As an experimental
383 feature, Bison can also generate IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser
384 tables. Once you are proficient with Bison, you can use it to develop
385 a wide range of language parsers, from those used in simple desk
386 calculators to complex programming languages.
388 Bison is upward compatible with Yacc: all properly-written Yacc
389 grammars ought to work with Bison with no change. Anyone familiar
390 with Yacc should be able to use Bison with little trouble. You need
391 to be fluent in C or C++ programming in order to use Bison or to
392 understand this manual. Java is also supported as an experimental
395 We begin with tutorial chapters that explain the basic concepts of
396 using Bison and show three explained examples, each building on the
397 last. If you don't know Bison or Yacc, start by reading these
398 chapters. Reference chapters follow, which describe specific aspects
401 Bison was written originally by Robert Corbett. Richard Stallman made
402 it Yacc-compatible. Wilfred Hansen of Carnegie Mellon University
403 added multi-character string literals and other features. Since then,
404 Bison has grown more robust and evolved many other new features thanks
405 to the hard work of a long list of volunteers. For details, see the
406 @file{THANKS} and @file{ChangeLog} files included in the Bison
409 This edition corresponds to version @value{VERSION} of Bison.
412 @unnumbered Conditions for Using Bison
414 The distribution terms for Bison-generated parsers permit using the
415 parsers in nonfree programs. Before Bison version 2.2, these extra
416 permissions applied only when Bison was generating LALR(1)
417 parsers in C@. And before Bison version 1.24, Bison-generated
418 parsers could be used only in programs that were free software.
420 The other GNU programming tools, such as the GNU C
422 had such a requirement. They could always be used for nonfree
423 software. The reason Bison was different was not due to a special
424 policy decision; it resulted from applying the usual General Public
425 License to all of the Bison source code.
427 The main output of the Bison utility---the Bison parser implementation
428 file---contains a verbatim copy of a sizable piece of Bison, which is
429 the code for the parser's implementation. (The actions from your
430 grammar are inserted into this implementation at one point, but most
431 of the rest of the implementation is not changed.) When we applied
432 the GPL terms to the skeleton code for the parser's implementation,
433 the effect was to restrict the use of Bison output to free software.
435 We didn't change the terms because of sympathy for people who want to
436 make software proprietary. @strong{Software should be free.} But we
437 concluded that limiting Bison's use to free software was doing little to
438 encourage people to make other software free. So we decided to make the
439 practical conditions for using Bison match the practical conditions for
440 using the other GNU tools.
442 This exception applies when Bison is generating code for a parser.
443 You can tell whether the exception applies to a Bison output file by
444 inspecting the file for text beginning with ``As a special
445 exception@dots{}''. The text spells out the exact terms of the
449 @unnumbered GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
450 @include gpl-3.0.texi
453 @chapter The Concepts of Bison
455 This chapter introduces many of the basic concepts without which the
456 details of Bison will not make sense. If you do not already know how to
457 use Bison or Yacc, we suggest you start by reading this chapter carefully.
460 * Language and Grammar:: Languages and context-free grammars,
461 as mathematical ideas.
462 * Grammar in Bison:: How we represent grammars for Bison's sake.
463 * Semantic Values:: Each token or syntactic grouping can have
464 a semantic value (the value of an integer,
465 the name of an identifier, etc.).
466 * Semantic Actions:: Each rule can have an action containing C code.
467 * GLR Parsers:: Writing parsers for general context-free languages.
468 * Locations:: Overview of location tracking.
469 * Bison Parser:: What are Bison's input and output,
470 how is the output used?
471 * Stages:: Stages in writing and running Bison grammars.
472 * Grammar Layout:: Overall structure of a Bison grammar file.
475 @node Language and Grammar
476 @section Languages and Context-Free Grammars
478 @cindex context-free grammar
479 @cindex grammar, context-free
480 In order for Bison to parse a language, it must be described by a
481 @dfn{context-free grammar}. This means that you specify one or more
482 @dfn{syntactic groupings} and give rules for constructing them from their
483 parts. For example, in the C language, one kind of grouping is called an
484 `expression'. One rule for making an expression might be, ``An expression
485 can be made of a minus sign and another expression''. Another would be,
486 ``An expression can be an integer''. As you can see, rules are often
487 recursive, but there must be at least one rule which leads out of the
491 @cindex Backus-Naur form
492 The most common formal system for presenting such rules for humans to read
493 is @dfn{Backus-Naur Form} or ``BNF'', which was developed in
494 order to specify the language Algol 60. Any grammar expressed in
495 BNF is a context-free grammar. The input to Bison is
496 essentially machine-readable BNF.
498 @cindex LALR grammars
499 @cindex IELR grammars
501 There are various important subclasses of context-free grammars. Although
502 it can handle almost all context-free grammars, Bison is optimized for what
503 are called LR(1) grammars. In brief, in these grammars, it must be possible
504 to tell how to parse any portion of an input string with just a single token
505 of lookahead. For historical reasons, Bison by default is limited by the
506 additional restrictions of LALR(1), which is hard to explain simply.
507 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}, for more information on this. As an
508 experimental feature, you can escape these additional restrictions by
509 requesting IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) parser tables. @xref{LR Table
510 Construction}, to learn how.
513 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
514 @cindex ambiguous grammars
515 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
517 Parsers for LR(1) grammars are @dfn{deterministic}, meaning
518 roughly that the next grammar rule to apply at any point in the input is
519 uniquely determined by the preceding input and a fixed, finite portion
520 (called a @dfn{lookahead}) of the remaining input. A context-free
521 grammar can be @dfn{ambiguous}, meaning that there are multiple ways to
522 apply the grammar rules to get the same inputs. Even unambiguous
523 grammars can be @dfn{nondeterministic}, meaning that no fixed
524 lookahead always suffices to determine the next grammar rule to apply.
525 With the proper declarations, Bison is also able to parse these more
526 general context-free grammars, using a technique known as GLR
527 parsing (for Generalized LR). Bison's GLR parsers
528 are able to handle any context-free grammar for which the number of
529 possible parses of any given string is finite.
531 @cindex symbols (abstract)
533 @cindex syntactic grouping
534 @cindex grouping, syntactic
535 In the formal grammatical rules for a language, each kind of syntactic
536 unit or grouping is named by a @dfn{symbol}. Those which are built by
537 grouping smaller constructs according to grammatical rules are called
538 @dfn{nonterminal symbols}; those which can't be subdivided are called
539 @dfn{terminal symbols} or @dfn{token types}. We call a piece of input
540 corresponding to a single terminal symbol a @dfn{token}, and a piece
541 corresponding to a single nonterminal symbol a @dfn{grouping}.
543 We can use the C language as an example of what symbols, terminal and
544 nonterminal, mean. The tokens of C are identifiers, constants (numeric
545 and string), and the various keywords, arithmetic operators and
546 punctuation marks. So the terminal symbols of a grammar for C include
547 `identifier', `number', `string', plus one symbol for each keyword,
548 operator or punctuation mark: `if', `return', `const', `static', `int',
549 `char', `plus-sign', `open-brace', `close-brace', `comma' and many more.
550 (These tokens can be subdivided into characters, but that is a matter of
551 lexicography, not grammar.)
553 Here is a simple C function subdivided into tokens:
556 int /* @r{keyword `int'} */
557 square (int x) /* @r{identifier, open-paren, keyword `int',}
558 @r{identifier, close-paren} */
559 @{ /* @r{open-brace} */
560 return x * x; /* @r{keyword `return', identifier, asterisk,}
561 @r{identifier, semicolon} */
562 @} /* @r{close-brace} */
565 The syntactic groupings of C include the expression, the statement, the
566 declaration, and the function definition. These are represented in the
567 grammar of C by nonterminal symbols `expression', `statement',
568 `declaration' and `function definition'. The full grammar uses dozens of
569 additional language constructs, each with its own nonterminal symbol, in
570 order to express the meanings of these four. The example above is a
571 function definition; it contains one declaration, and one statement. In
572 the statement, each @samp{x} is an expression and so is @samp{x * x}.
574 Each nonterminal symbol must have grammatical rules showing how it is made
575 out of simpler constructs. For example, one kind of C statement is the
576 @code{return} statement; this would be described with a grammar rule which
577 reads informally as follows:
580 A `statement' can be made of a `return' keyword, an `expression' and a
585 There would be many other rules for `statement', one for each kind of
589 One nonterminal symbol must be distinguished as the special one which
590 defines a complete utterance in the language. It is called the @dfn{start
591 symbol}. In a compiler, this means a complete input program. In the C
592 language, the nonterminal symbol `sequence of definitions and declarations'
595 For example, @samp{1 + 2} is a valid C expression---a valid part of a C
596 program---but it is not valid as an @emph{entire} C program. In the
597 context-free grammar of C, this follows from the fact that `expression' is
598 not the start symbol.
600 The Bison parser reads a sequence of tokens as its input, and groups the
601 tokens using the grammar rules. If the input is valid, the end result is
602 that the entire token sequence reduces to a single grouping whose symbol is
603 the grammar's start symbol. If we use a grammar for C, the entire input
604 must be a `sequence of definitions and declarations'. If not, the parser
605 reports a syntax error.
607 @node Grammar in Bison
608 @section From Formal Rules to Bison Input
609 @cindex Bison grammar
610 @cindex grammar, Bison
611 @cindex formal grammar
613 A formal grammar is a mathematical construct. To define the language
614 for Bison, you must write a file expressing the grammar in Bison syntax:
615 a @dfn{Bison grammar} file. @xref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}.
617 A nonterminal symbol in the formal grammar is represented in Bison input
618 as an identifier, like an identifier in C@. By convention, it should be
619 in lower case, such as @code{expr}, @code{stmt} or @code{declaration}.
621 The Bison representation for a terminal symbol is also called a @dfn{token
622 type}. Token types as well can be represented as C-like identifiers. By
623 convention, these identifiers should be upper case to distinguish them from
624 nonterminals: for example, @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER}, @code{IF} or
625 @code{RETURN}. A terminal symbol that stands for a particular keyword in
626 the language should be named after that keyword converted to upper case.
627 The terminal symbol @code{error} is reserved for error recovery.
630 A terminal symbol can also be represented as a character literal, just like
631 a C character constant. You should do this whenever a token is just a
632 single character (parenthesis, plus-sign, etc.): use that same character in
633 a literal as the terminal symbol for that token.
635 A third way to represent a terminal symbol is with a C string constant
636 containing several characters. @xref{Symbols}, for more information.
638 The grammar rules also have an expression in Bison syntax. For example,
639 here is the Bison rule for a C @code{return} statement. The semicolon in
640 quotes is a literal character token, representing part of the C syntax for
641 the statement; the naked semicolon, and the colon, are Bison punctuation
645 stmt: RETURN expr ';' ;
649 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
651 @node Semantic Values
652 @section Semantic Values
653 @cindex semantic value
654 @cindex value, semantic
656 A formal grammar selects tokens only by their classifications: for example,
657 if a rule mentions the terminal symbol `integer constant', it means that
658 @emph{any} integer constant is grammatically valid in that position. The
659 precise value of the constant is irrelevant to how to parse the input: if
660 @samp{x+4} is grammatical then @samp{x+1} or @samp{x+3989} is equally
663 But the precise value is very important for what the input means once it is
664 parsed. A compiler is useless if it fails to distinguish between 4, 1 and
665 3989 as constants in the program! Therefore, each token in a Bison grammar
666 has both a token type and a @dfn{semantic value}. @xref{Semantics,
667 ,Defining Language Semantics},
670 The token type is a terminal symbol defined in the grammar, such as
671 @code{INTEGER}, @code{IDENTIFIER} or @code{','}. It tells everything
672 you need to know to decide where the token may validly appear and how to
673 group it with other tokens. The grammar rules know nothing about tokens
676 The semantic value has all the rest of the information about the
677 meaning of the token, such as the value of an integer, or the name of an
678 identifier. (A token such as @code{','} which is just punctuation doesn't
679 need to have any semantic value.)
681 For example, an input token might be classified as token type
682 @code{INTEGER} and have the semantic value 4. Another input token might
683 have the same token type @code{INTEGER} but value 3989. When a grammar
684 rule says that @code{INTEGER} is allowed, either of these tokens is
685 acceptable because each is an @code{INTEGER}. When the parser accepts the
686 token, it keeps track of the token's semantic value.
688 Each grouping can also have a semantic value as well as its nonterminal
689 symbol. For example, in a calculator, an expression typically has a
690 semantic value that is a number. In a compiler for a programming
691 language, an expression typically has a semantic value that is a tree
692 structure describing the meaning of the expression.
694 @node Semantic Actions
695 @section Semantic Actions
696 @cindex semantic actions
697 @cindex actions, semantic
699 In order to be useful, a program must do more than parse input; it must
700 also produce some output based on the input. In a Bison grammar, a grammar
701 rule can have an @dfn{action} made up of C statements. Each time the
702 parser recognizes a match for that rule, the action is executed.
705 Most of the time, the purpose of an action is to compute the semantic value
706 of the whole construct from the semantic values of its parts. For example,
707 suppose we have a rule which says an expression can be the sum of two
708 expressions. When the parser recognizes such a sum, each of the
709 subexpressions has a semantic value which describes how it was built up.
710 The action for this rule should create a similar sort of value for the
711 newly recognized larger expression.
713 For example, here is a rule that says an expression can be the sum of
717 expr: expr '+' expr @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @} ;
721 The action says how to produce the semantic value of the sum expression
722 from the values of the two subexpressions.
725 @section Writing GLR Parsers
727 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
730 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
731 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
733 In some grammars, Bison's deterministic
734 LR(1) parsing algorithm cannot decide whether to apply a
735 certain grammar rule at a given point. That is, it may not be able to
736 decide (on the basis of the input read so far) which of two possible
737 reductions (applications of a grammar rule) applies, or whether to apply
738 a reduction or read more of the input and apply a reduction later in the
739 input. These are known respectively as @dfn{reduce/reduce} conflicts
740 (@pxref{Reduce/Reduce}), and @dfn{shift/reduce} conflicts
741 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce}).
743 To use a grammar that is not easily modified to be LR(1), a
744 more general parsing algorithm is sometimes necessary. If you include
745 @code{%glr-parser} among the Bison declarations in your file
746 (@pxref{Grammar Outline}), the result is a Generalized LR
747 (GLR) parser. These parsers handle Bison grammars that
748 contain no unresolved conflicts (i.e., after applying precedence
749 declarations) identically to deterministic parsers. However, when
750 faced with unresolved shift/reduce and reduce/reduce conflicts,
751 GLR parsers use the simple expedient of doing both,
752 effectively cloning the parser to follow both possibilities. Each of
753 the resulting parsers can again split, so that at any given time, there
754 can be any number of possible parses being explored. The parsers
755 proceed in lockstep; that is, all of them consume (shift) a given input
756 symbol before any of them proceed to the next. Each of the cloned
757 parsers eventually meets one of two possible fates: either it runs into
758 a parsing error, in which case it simply vanishes, or it merges with
759 another parser, because the two of them have reduced the input to an
760 identical set of symbols.
762 During the time that there are multiple parsers, semantic actions are
763 recorded, but not performed. When a parser disappears, its recorded
764 semantic actions disappear as well, and are never performed. When a
765 reduction makes two parsers identical, causing them to merge, Bison
766 records both sets of semantic actions. Whenever the last two parsers
767 merge, reverting to the single-parser case, Bison resolves all the
768 outstanding actions either by precedences given to the grammar rules
769 involved, or by performing both actions, and then calling a designated
770 user-defined function on the resulting values to produce an arbitrary
774 * Simple GLR Parsers:: Using GLR parsers on unambiguous grammars.
775 * Merging GLR Parses:: Using GLR parsers to resolve ambiguities.
776 * GLR Semantic Actions:: Deferred semantic actions have special concerns.
777 * Compiler Requirements:: GLR parsers require a modern C compiler.
780 @node Simple GLR Parsers
781 @subsection Using GLR on Unambiguous Grammars
782 @cindex GLR parsing, unambiguous grammars
783 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, unambiguous grammars
787 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
788 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
790 In the simplest cases, you can use the GLR algorithm
791 to parse grammars that are unambiguous but fail to be LR(1).
792 Such grammars typically require more than one symbol of lookahead.
794 Consider a problem that
795 arises in the declaration of enumerated and subrange types in the
796 programming language Pascal. Here are some examples:
799 type subrange = lo .. hi;
800 type enum = (a, b, c);
804 The original language standard allows only numeric
805 literals and constant identifiers for the subrange bounds (@samp{lo}
806 and @samp{hi}), but Extended Pascal (ISO/IEC
807 10206) and many other
808 Pascal implementations allow arbitrary expressions there. This gives
809 rise to the following situation, containing a superfluous pair of
813 type subrange = (a) .. b;
817 Compare this to the following declaration of an enumerated
818 type with only one value:
825 (These declarations are contrived, but they are syntactically
826 valid, and more-complicated cases can come up in practical programs.)
828 These two declarations look identical until the @samp{..} token.
829 With normal LR(1) one-token lookahead it is not
830 possible to decide between the two forms when the identifier
831 @samp{a} is parsed. It is, however, desirable
832 for a parser to decide this, since in the latter case
833 @samp{a} must become a new identifier to represent the enumeration
834 value, while in the former case @samp{a} must be evaluated with its
835 current meaning, which may be a constant or even a function call.
837 You could parse @samp{(a)} as an ``unspecified identifier in parentheses'',
838 to be resolved later, but this typically requires substantial
839 contortions in both semantic actions and large parts of the
840 grammar, where the parentheses are nested in the recursive rules for
843 You might think of using the lexer to distinguish between the two
844 forms by returning different tokens for currently defined and
845 undefined identifiers. But if these declarations occur in a local
846 scope, and @samp{a} is defined in an outer scope, then both forms
847 are possible---either locally redefining @samp{a}, or using the
848 value of @samp{a} from the outer scope. So this approach cannot
851 A simple solution to this problem is to declare the parser to
852 use the GLR algorithm.
853 When the GLR parser reaches the critical state, it
854 merely splits into two branches and pursues both syntax rules
855 simultaneously. Sooner or later, one of them runs into a parsing
856 error. If there is a @samp{..} token before the next
857 @samp{;}, the rule for enumerated types fails since it cannot
858 accept @samp{..} anywhere; otherwise, the subrange type rule
859 fails since it requires a @samp{..} token. So one of the branches
860 fails silently, and the other one continues normally, performing
861 all the intermediate actions that were postponed during the split.
863 If the input is syntactically incorrect, both branches fail and the parser
864 reports a syntax error as usual.
866 The effect of all this is that the parser seems to ``guess'' the
867 correct branch to take, or in other words, it seems to use more
868 lookahead than the underlying LR(1) algorithm actually allows
869 for. In this example, LR(2) would suffice, but also some cases
870 that are not LR(@math{k}) for any @math{k} can be handled this way.
872 In general, a GLR parser can take quadratic or cubic worst-case time,
873 and the current Bison parser even takes exponential time and space
874 for some grammars. In practice, this rarely happens, and for many
875 grammars it is possible to prove that it cannot happen.
876 The present example contains only one conflict between two
877 rules, and the type-declaration context containing the conflict
878 cannot be nested. So the number of
879 branches that can exist at any time is limited by the constant 2,
880 and the parsing time is still linear.
882 Here is a Bison grammar corresponding to the example above. It
883 parses a vastly simplified form of Pascal type declarations.
886 %token TYPE DOTDOT ID
896 type_decl: TYPE ID '=' type ';' ;
925 When used as a normal LR(1) grammar, Bison correctly complains
926 about one reduce/reduce conflict. In the conflicting situation the
927 parser chooses one of the alternatives, arbitrarily the one
928 declared first. Therefore the following correct input is not
935 The parser can be turned into a GLR parser, while also telling Bison
936 to be silent about the one known reduce/reduce conflict, by adding
937 these two declarations to the Bison grammar file (before the first
946 No change in the grammar itself is required. Now the
947 parser recognizes all valid declarations, according to the
948 limited syntax above, transparently. In fact, the user does not even
949 notice when the parser splits.
951 So here we have a case where we can use the benefits of GLR,
952 almost without disadvantages. Even in simple cases like this, however,
953 there are at least two potential problems to beware. First, always
954 analyze the conflicts reported by Bison to make sure that GLR
955 splitting is only done where it is intended. A GLR parser
956 splitting inadvertently may cause problems less obvious than an
957 LR parser statically choosing the wrong alternative in a
958 conflict. Second, consider interactions with the lexer (@pxref{Semantic
959 Tokens}) with great care. Since a split parser consumes tokens without
960 performing any actions during the split, the lexer cannot obtain
961 information via parser actions. Some cases of lexer interactions can be
962 eliminated by using GLR to shift the complications from the
963 lexer to the parser. You must check the remaining cases for
966 In our example, it would be safe for the lexer to return tokens based on
967 their current meanings in some symbol table, because no new symbols are
968 defined in the middle of a type declaration. Though it is possible for
969 a parser to define the enumeration constants as they are parsed, before
970 the type declaration is completed, it actually makes no difference since
971 they cannot be used within the same enumerated type declaration.
973 @node Merging GLR Parses
974 @subsection Using GLR to Resolve Ambiguities
975 @cindex GLR parsing, ambiguous grammars
976 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing, ambiguous grammars
980 @cindex reduce/reduce conflicts
982 Let's consider an example, vastly simplified from a C++ grammar.
987 #define YYSTYPE char const *
989 void yyerror (char const *);
1003 | prog stmt @{ printf ("\n"); @}
1012 ID @{ printf ("%s ", $$); @}
1013 | TYPENAME '(' expr ')'
1014 @{ printf ("%s <cast> ", $1); @}
1015 | expr '+' expr @{ printf ("+ "); @}
1016 | expr '=' expr @{ printf ("= "); @}
1020 TYPENAME declarator ';'
1021 @{ printf ("%s <declare> ", $1); @}
1022 | TYPENAME declarator '=' expr ';'
1023 @{ printf ("%s <init-declare> ", $1); @}
1027 ID @{ printf ("\"%s\" ", $1); @}
1028 | '(' declarator ')'
1033 This models a problematic part of the C++ grammar---the ambiguity between
1034 certain declarations and statements. For example,
1041 parses as either an @code{expr} or a @code{stmt}
1042 (assuming that @samp{T} is recognized as a @code{TYPENAME} and
1043 @samp{x} as an @code{ID}).
1044 Bison detects this as a reduce/reduce conflict between the rules
1045 @code{expr : ID} and @code{declarator : ID}, which it cannot resolve at the
1046 time it encounters @code{x} in the example above. Since this is a
1047 GLR parser, it therefore splits the problem into two parses, one for
1048 each choice of resolving the reduce/reduce conflict.
1049 Unlike the example from the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}),
1050 however, neither of these parses ``dies,'' because the grammar as it stands is
1051 ambiguous. One of the parsers eventually reduces @code{stmt : expr ';'} and
1052 the other reduces @code{stmt : decl}, after which both parsers are in an
1053 identical state: they've seen @samp{prog stmt} and have the same unprocessed
1054 input remaining. We say that these parses have @dfn{merged.}
1056 At this point, the GLR parser requires a specification in the
1057 grammar of how to choose between the competing parses.
1058 In the example above, the two @code{%dprec}
1059 declarations specify that Bison is to give precedence
1060 to the parse that interprets the example as a
1061 @code{decl}, which implies that @code{x} is a declarator.
1062 The parser therefore prints
1065 "x" y z + T <init-declare>
1068 The @code{%dprec} declarations only come into play when more than one
1069 parse survives. Consider a different input string for this parser:
1076 This is another example of using GLR to parse an unambiguous
1077 construct, as shown in the previous section (@pxref{Simple GLR Parsers}).
1078 Here, there is no ambiguity (this cannot be parsed as a declaration).
1079 However, at the time the Bison parser encounters @code{x}, it does not
1080 have enough information to resolve the reduce/reduce conflict (again,
1081 between @code{x} as an @code{expr} or a @code{declarator}). In this
1082 case, no precedence declaration is used. Again, the parser splits
1083 into two, one assuming that @code{x} is an @code{expr}, and the other
1084 assuming @code{x} is a @code{declarator}. The second of these parsers
1085 then vanishes when it sees @code{+}, and the parser prints
1091 Suppose that instead of resolving the ambiguity, you wanted to see all
1092 the possibilities. For this purpose, you must merge the semantic
1093 actions of the two possible parsers, rather than choosing one over the
1094 other. To do so, you could change the declaration of @code{stmt} as
1099 expr ';' %merge <stmtMerge>
1100 | decl %merge <stmtMerge>
1105 and define the @code{stmtMerge} function as:
1109 stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1)
1117 with an accompanying forward declaration
1118 in the C declarations at the beginning of the file:
1122 #define YYSTYPE char const *
1123 static YYSTYPE stmtMerge (YYSTYPE x0, YYSTYPE x1);
1128 With these declarations, the resulting parser parses the first example
1129 as both an @code{expr} and a @code{decl}, and prints
1132 "x" y z + T <init-declare> x T <cast> y z + = <OR>
1135 Bison requires that all of the
1136 productions that participate in any particular merge have identical
1137 @samp{%merge} clauses. Otherwise, the ambiguity would be unresolvable,
1138 and the parser will report an error during any parse that results in
1139 the offending merge.
1141 @node GLR Semantic Actions
1142 @subsection GLR Semantic Actions
1144 @cindex deferred semantic actions
1145 By definition, a deferred semantic action is not performed at the same time as
1146 the associated reduction.
1147 This raises caveats for several Bison features you might use in a semantic
1148 action in a GLR parser.
1151 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yychar}
1153 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylval}
1155 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yylloc}
1156 In any semantic action, you can examine @code{yychar} to determine the type of
1157 the lookahead token present at the time of the associated reduction.
1158 After checking that @code{yychar} is not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF},
1159 you can then examine @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc} to determine the
1160 lookahead token's semantic value and location, if any.
1161 In a nondeferred semantic action, you can also modify any of these variables to
1162 influence syntax analysis.
1163 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
1166 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{yyclearin}
1167 In a deferred semantic action, it's too late to influence syntax analysis.
1168 In this case, @code{yychar}, @code{yylval}, and @code{yylloc} are set to
1169 shallow copies of the values they had at the time of the associated reduction.
1170 For this reason alone, modifying them is dangerous.
1171 Moreover, the result of modifying them is undefined and subject to change with
1172 future versions of Bison.
1173 For example, if a semantic action might be deferred, you should never write it
1174 to invoke @code{yyclearin} (@pxref{Action Features}) or to attempt to free
1175 memory referenced by @code{yylval}.
1178 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYERROR}
1179 Another Bison feature requiring special consideration is @code{YYERROR}
1180 (@pxref{Action Features}), which you can invoke in a semantic action to
1181 initiate error recovery.
1182 During deterministic GLR operation, the effect of @code{YYERROR} is
1183 the same as its effect in a deterministic parser.
1184 In a deferred semantic action, its effect is undefined.
1185 @c The effect is probably a syntax error at the split point.
1187 Also, see @ref{Location Default Action, ,Default Action for Locations}, which
1188 describes a special usage of @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} in GLR parsers.
1190 @node Compiler Requirements
1191 @subsection Considerations when Compiling GLR Parsers
1192 @cindex @code{inline}
1193 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{inline}
1195 The GLR parsers require a compiler for ISO C89 or
1196 later. In addition, they use the @code{inline} keyword, which is not
1197 C89, but is C99 and is a common extension in pre-C99 compilers. It is
1198 up to the user of these parsers to handle
1199 portability issues. For instance, if using Autoconf and the Autoconf
1200 macro @code{AC_C_INLINE}, a mere
1209 will suffice. Otherwise, we suggest
1213 #if (__STDC_VERSION__ < 199901 && ! defined __GNUC__ \
1214 && ! defined inline)
1223 @cindex textual location
1224 @cindex location, textual
1226 Many applications, like interpreters or compilers, have to produce verbose
1227 and useful error messages. To achieve this, one must be able to keep track of
1228 the @dfn{textual location}, or @dfn{location}, of each syntactic construct.
1229 Bison provides a mechanism for handling these locations.
1231 Each token has a semantic value. In a similar fashion, each token has an
1232 associated location, but the type of locations is the same for all tokens
1233 and groupings. Moreover, the output parser is equipped with a default data
1234 structure for storing locations (@pxref{Tracking Locations}, for more
1237 Like semantic values, locations can be reached in actions using a dedicated
1238 set of constructs. In the example above, the location of the whole grouping
1239 is @code{@@$}, while the locations of the subexpressions are @code{@@1} and
1242 When a rule is matched, a default action is used to compute the semantic value
1243 of its left hand side (@pxref{Actions}). In the same way, another default
1244 action is used for locations. However, the action for locations is general
1245 enough for most cases, meaning there is usually no need to describe for each
1246 rule how @code{@@$} should be formed. When building a new location for a given
1247 grouping, the default behavior of the output parser is to take the beginning
1248 of the first symbol, and the end of the last symbol.
1251 @section Bison Output: the Parser Implementation File
1252 @cindex Bison parser
1253 @cindex Bison utility
1254 @cindex lexical analyzer, purpose
1257 When you run Bison, you give it a Bison grammar file as input. The
1258 most important output is a C source file that implements a parser for
1259 the language described by the grammar. This parser is called a
1260 @dfn{Bison parser}, and this file is called a @dfn{Bison parser
1261 implementation file}. Keep in mind that the Bison utility and the
1262 Bison parser are two distinct programs: the Bison utility is a program
1263 whose output is the Bison parser implementation file that becomes part
1266 The job of the Bison parser is to group tokens into groupings according to
1267 the grammar rules---for example, to build identifiers and operators into
1268 expressions. As it does this, it runs the actions for the grammar rules it
1271 The tokens come from a function called the @dfn{lexical analyzer} that
1272 you must supply in some fashion (such as by writing it in C). The Bison
1273 parser calls the lexical analyzer each time it wants a new token. It
1274 doesn't know what is ``inside'' the tokens (though their semantic values
1275 may reflect this). Typically the lexical analyzer makes the tokens by
1276 parsing characters of text, but Bison does not depend on this.
1277 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1279 The Bison parser implementation file is C code which defines a
1280 function named @code{yyparse} which implements that grammar. This
1281 function does not make a complete C program: you must supply some
1282 additional functions. One is the lexical analyzer. Another is an
1283 error-reporting function which the parser calls to report an error.
1284 In addition, a complete C program must start with a function called
1285 @code{main}; you have to provide this, and arrange for it to call
1286 @code{yyparse} or the parser will never run. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
1287 C-Language Interface}.
1289 Aside from the token type names and the symbols in the actions you
1290 write, all symbols defined in the Bison parser implementation file
1291 itself begin with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}. This includes interface
1292 functions such as the lexical analyzer function @code{yylex}, the
1293 error reporting function @code{yyerror} and the parser function
1294 @code{yyparse} itself. This also includes numerous identifiers used
1295 for internal purposes. Therefore, you should avoid using C
1296 identifiers starting with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY} in the Bison grammar
1297 file except for the ones defined in this manual. Also, you should
1298 avoid using the C identifiers @samp{malloc} and @samp{free} for
1299 anything other than their usual meanings.
1301 In some cases the Bison parser implementation file includes system
1302 headers, and in those cases your code should respect the identifiers
1303 reserved by those headers. On some non-GNU hosts, @code{<alloca.h>},
1304 @code{<malloc.h>}, @code{<stddef.h>}, and @code{<stdlib.h>} are
1305 included as needed to declare memory allocators and related types.
1306 @code{<libintl.h>} is included if message translation is in use
1307 (@pxref{Internationalization}). Other system headers may be included
1308 if you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value (@pxref{Tracing,
1309 ,Tracing Your Parser}).
1312 @section Stages in Using Bison
1313 @cindex stages in using Bison
1316 The actual language-design process using Bison, from grammar specification
1317 to a working compiler or interpreter, has these parts:
1321 Formally specify the grammar in a form recognized by Bison
1322 (@pxref{Grammar File, ,Bison Grammar Files}). For each grammatical rule
1323 in the language, describe the action that is to be taken when an
1324 instance of that rule is recognized. The action is described by a
1325 sequence of C statements.
1328 Write a lexical analyzer to process input and pass tokens to the parser.
1329 The lexical analyzer may be written by hand in C (@pxref{Lexical, ,The
1330 Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}). It could also be produced
1331 using Lex, but the use of Lex is not discussed in this manual.
1334 Write a controlling function that calls the Bison-produced parser.
1337 Write error-reporting routines.
1340 To turn this source code as written into a runnable program, you
1341 must follow these steps:
1345 Run Bison on the grammar to produce the parser.
1348 Compile the code output by Bison, as well as any other source files.
1351 Link the object files to produce the finished product.
1354 @node Grammar Layout
1355 @section The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar
1356 @cindex grammar file
1358 @cindex format of grammar file
1359 @cindex layout of Bison grammar
1361 The input file for the Bison utility is a @dfn{Bison grammar file}. The
1362 general form of a Bison grammar file is as follows:
1369 @var{Bison declarations}
1378 The @samp{%%}, @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} are punctuation that appears
1379 in every Bison grammar file to separate the sections.
1381 The prologue may define types and variables used in the actions. You can
1382 also use preprocessor commands to define macros used there, and use
1383 @code{#include} to include header files that do any of these things.
1384 You need to declare the lexical analyzer @code{yylex} and the error
1385 printer @code{yyerror} here, along with any other global identifiers
1386 used by the actions in the grammar rules.
1388 The Bison declarations declare the names of the terminal and nonterminal
1389 symbols, and may also describe operator precedence and the data types of
1390 semantic values of various symbols.
1392 The grammar rules define how to construct each nonterminal symbol from its
1395 The epilogue can contain any code you want to use. Often the
1396 definitions of functions declared in the prologue go here. In a
1397 simple program, all the rest of the program can go here.
1401 @cindex simple examples
1402 @cindex examples, simple
1404 Now we show and explain several sample programs written using Bison: a
1405 reverse polish notation calculator, an algebraic (infix) notation
1406 calculator --- later extended to track ``locations'' ---
1407 and a multi-function calculator. All
1408 produce usable, though limited, interactive desk-top calculators.
1410 These examples are simple, but Bison grammars for real programming
1411 languages are written the same way. You can copy these examples into a
1412 source file to try them.
1415 * RPN Calc:: Reverse polish notation calculator;
1416 a first example with no operator precedence.
1417 * Infix Calc:: Infix (algebraic) notation calculator.
1418 Operator precedence is introduced.
1419 * Simple Error Recovery:: Continuing after syntax errors.
1420 * Location Tracking Calc:: Demonstrating the use of @@@var{n} and @@$.
1421 * Multi-function Calc:: Calculator with memory and trig functions.
1422 It uses multiple data-types for semantic values.
1423 * Exercises:: Ideas for improving the multi-function calculator.
1427 @section Reverse Polish Notation Calculator
1428 @cindex reverse polish notation
1429 @cindex polish notation calculator
1430 @cindex @code{rpcalc}
1431 @cindex calculator, simple
1433 The first example is that of a simple double-precision @dfn{reverse polish
1434 notation} calculator (a calculator using postfix operators). This example
1435 provides a good starting point, since operator precedence is not an issue.
1436 The second example will illustrate how operator precedence is handled.
1438 The source code for this calculator is named @file{rpcalc.y}. The
1439 @samp{.y} extension is a convention used for Bison grammar files.
1442 * Rpcalc Declarations:: Prologue (declarations) for rpcalc.
1443 * Rpcalc Rules:: Grammar Rules for rpcalc, with explanation.
1444 * Rpcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
1445 * Rpcalc Main:: The controlling function.
1446 * Rpcalc Error:: The error reporting function.
1447 * Rpcalc Generate:: Running Bison on the grammar file.
1448 * Rpcalc Compile:: Run the C compiler on the output code.
1451 @node Rpcalc Declarations
1452 @subsection Declarations for @code{rpcalc}
1454 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the reverse polish notation
1455 calculator. As in C, comments are placed between @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
1458 /* Reverse polish notation calculator. */
1461 #define YYSTYPE double
1464 void yyerror (char const *);
1469 %% /* Grammar rules and actions follow. */
1472 The declarations section (@pxref{Prologue, , The prologue}) contains two
1473 preprocessor directives and two forward declarations.
1475 The @code{#define} directive defines the macro @code{YYSTYPE}, thus
1476 specifying the C data type for semantic values of both tokens and
1477 groupings (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}). The
1478 Bison parser will use whatever type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined as; if you
1479 don't define it, @code{int} is the default. Because we specify
1480 @code{double}, each token and each expression has an associated value,
1481 which is a floating point number.
1483 The @code{#include} directive is used to declare the exponentiation
1484 function @code{pow}.
1486 The forward declarations for @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} are
1487 needed because the C language requires that functions be declared
1488 before they are used. These functions will be defined in the
1489 epilogue, but the parser calls them so they must be declared in the
1492 The second section, Bison declarations, provides information to Bison
1493 about the token types (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison
1494 Declarations Section}). Each terminal symbol that is not a
1495 single-character literal must be declared here. (Single-character
1496 literals normally don't need to be declared.) In this example, all the
1497 arithmetic operators are designated by single-character literals, so the
1498 only terminal symbol that needs to be declared is @code{NUM}, the token
1499 type for numeric constants.
1502 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{rpcalc}
1504 Here are the grammar rules for the reverse polish notation calculator.
1517 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1524 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1525 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1526 | exp exp '*' @{ $$ = $1 * $2; @}
1527 | exp exp '/' @{ $$ = $1 / $2; @}
1528 | exp exp '^' @{ $$ = pow ($1, $2); @} /* Exponentiation */
1529 | exp 'n' @{ $$ = -$1; @} /* Unary minus */
1535 The groupings of the rpcalc ``language'' defined here are the expression
1536 (given the name @code{exp}), the line of input (@code{line}), and the
1537 complete input transcript (@code{input}). Each of these nonterminal
1538 symbols has several alternate rules, joined by the vertical bar @samp{|}
1539 which is read as ``or''. The following sections explain what these rules
1542 The semantics of the language is determined by the actions taken when a
1543 grouping is recognized. The actions are the C code that appears inside
1544 braces. @xref{Actions}.
1546 You must specify these actions in C, but Bison provides the means for
1547 passing semantic values between the rules. In each action, the
1548 pseudo-variable @code{$$} stands for the semantic value for the grouping
1549 that the rule is going to construct. Assigning a value to @code{$$} is the
1550 main job of most actions. The semantic values of the components of the
1551 rule are referred to as @code{$1}, @code{$2}, and so on.
1560 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{input}
1562 Consider the definition of @code{input}:
1571 This definition reads as follows: ``A complete input is either an empty
1572 string, or a complete input followed by an input line''. Notice that
1573 ``complete input'' is defined in terms of itself. This definition is said
1574 to be @dfn{left recursive} since @code{input} appears always as the
1575 leftmost symbol in the sequence. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
1577 The first alternative is empty because there are no symbols between the
1578 colon and the first @samp{|}; this means that @code{input} can match an
1579 empty string of input (no tokens). We write the rules this way because it
1580 is legitimate to type @kbd{Ctrl-d} right after you start the calculator.
1581 It's conventional to put an empty alternative first and write the comment
1582 @samp{/* empty */} in it.
1584 The second alternate rule (@code{input line}) handles all nontrivial input.
1585 It means, ``After reading any number of lines, read one more line if
1586 possible.'' The left recursion makes this rule into a loop. Since the
1587 first alternative matches empty input, the loop can be executed zero or
1590 The parser function @code{yyparse} continues to process input until a
1591 grammatical error is seen or the lexical analyzer says there are no more
1592 input tokens; we will arrange for the latter to happen at end-of-input.
1595 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{line}
1597 Now consider the definition of @code{line}:
1602 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
1606 The first alternative is a token which is a newline character; this means
1607 that rpcalc accepts a blank line (and ignores it, since there is no
1608 action). The second alternative is an expression followed by a newline.
1609 This is the alternative that makes rpcalc useful. The semantic value of
1610 the @code{exp} grouping is the value of @code{$1} because the @code{exp} in
1611 question is the first symbol in the alternative. The action prints this
1612 value, which is the result of the computation the user asked for.
1614 This action is unusual because it does not assign a value to @code{$$}. As
1615 a consequence, the semantic value associated with the @code{line} is
1616 uninitialized (its value will be unpredictable). This would be a bug if
1617 that value were ever used, but we don't use it: once rpcalc has printed the
1618 value of the user's input line, that value is no longer needed.
1621 @subsubsection Explanation of @code{expr}
1623 The @code{exp} grouping has several rules, one for each kind of expression.
1624 The first rule handles the simplest expressions: those that are just numbers.
1625 The second handles an addition-expression, which looks like two expressions
1626 followed by a plus-sign. The third handles subtraction, and so on.
1631 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1632 | exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @}
1637 We have used @samp{|} to join all the rules for @code{exp}, but we could
1638 equally well have written them separately:
1642 exp: exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @};
1643 exp: exp exp '-' @{ $$ = $1 - $2; @};
1647 Most of the rules have actions that compute the value of the expression in
1648 terms of the value of its parts. For example, in the rule for addition,
1649 @code{$1} refers to the first component @code{exp} and @code{$2} refers to
1650 the second one. The third component, @code{'+'}, has no meaningful
1651 associated semantic value, but if it had one you could refer to it as
1652 @code{$3}. When @code{yyparse} recognizes a sum expression using this
1653 rule, the sum of the two subexpressions' values is produced as the value of
1654 the entire expression. @xref{Actions}.
1656 You don't have to give an action for every rule. When a rule has no
1657 action, Bison by default copies the value of @code{$1} into @code{$$}.
1658 This is what happens in the first rule (the one that uses @code{NUM}).
1660 The formatting shown here is the recommended convention, but Bison does
1661 not require it. You can add or change white space as much as you wish.
1665 exp: NUM | exp exp '+' @{$$ = $1 + $2; @} | @dots{} ;
1669 means the same thing as this:
1674 | exp exp '+' @{ $$ = $1 + $2; @}
1680 The latter, however, is much more readable.
1683 @subsection The @code{rpcalc} Lexical Analyzer
1684 @cindex writing a lexical analyzer
1685 @cindex lexical analyzer, writing
1687 The lexical analyzer's job is low-level parsing: converting characters
1688 or sequences of characters into tokens. The Bison parser gets its
1689 tokens by calling the lexical analyzer. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical
1690 Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
1692 Only a simple lexical analyzer is needed for the RPN
1694 lexical analyzer skips blanks and tabs, then reads in numbers as
1695 @code{double} and returns them as @code{NUM} tokens. Any other character
1696 that isn't part of a number is a separate token. Note that the token-code
1697 for such a single-character token is the character itself.
1699 The return value of the lexical analyzer function is a numeric code which
1700 represents a token type. The same text used in Bison rules to stand for
1701 this token type is also a C expression for the numeric code for the type.
1702 This works in two ways. If the token type is a character literal, then its
1703 numeric code is that of the character; you can use the same
1704 character literal in the lexical analyzer to express the number. If the
1705 token type is an identifier, that identifier is defined by Bison as a C
1706 macro whose definition is the appropriate number. In this example,
1707 therefore, @code{NUM} becomes a macro for @code{yylex} to use.
1709 The semantic value of the token (if it has one) is stored into the
1710 global variable @code{yylval}, which is where the Bison parser will look
1711 for it. (The C data type of @code{yylval} is @code{YYSTYPE}, which was
1712 defined at the beginning of the grammar; @pxref{Rpcalc Declarations,
1713 ,Declarations for @code{rpcalc}}.)
1715 A token type code of zero is returned if the end-of-input is encountered.
1716 (Bison recognizes any nonpositive value as indicating end-of-input.)
1718 Here is the code for the lexical analyzer:
1722 /* The lexical analyzer returns a double floating point
1723 number on the stack and the token NUM, or the numeric code
1724 of the character read if not a number. It skips all blanks
1725 and tabs, and returns 0 for end-of-input. */
1736 /* Skip white space. */
1737 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
1741 /* Process numbers. */
1742 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
1745 scanf ("%lf", &yylval);
1750 /* Return end-of-input. */
1753 /* Return a single char. */
1760 @subsection The Controlling Function
1761 @cindex controlling function
1762 @cindex main function in simple example
1764 In keeping with the spirit of this example, the controlling function is
1765 kept to the bare minimum. The only requirement is that it call
1766 @code{yyparse} to start the process of parsing.
1779 @subsection The Error Reporting Routine
1780 @cindex error reporting routine
1782 When @code{yyparse} detects a syntax error, it calls the error reporting
1783 function @code{yyerror} to print an error message (usually but not
1784 always @code{"syntax error"}). It is up to the programmer to supply
1785 @code{yyerror} (@pxref{Interface, ,Parser C-Language Interface}), so
1786 here is the definition we will use:
1794 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
1796 yyerror (char const *s)
1798 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
1803 After @code{yyerror} returns, the Bison parser may recover from the error
1804 and continue parsing if the grammar contains a suitable error rule
1805 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Otherwise, @code{yyparse} returns nonzero. We
1806 have not written any error rules in this example, so any invalid input will
1807 cause the calculator program to exit. This is not clean behavior for a
1808 real calculator, but it is adequate for the first example.
1810 @node Rpcalc Generate
1811 @subsection Running Bison to Make the Parser
1812 @cindex running Bison (introduction)
1814 Before running Bison to produce a parser, we need to decide how to
1815 arrange all the source code in one or more source files. For such a
1816 simple example, the easiest thing is to put everything in one file,
1817 the grammar file. The definitions of @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and
1818 @code{main} go at the end, in the epilogue of the grammar file
1819 (@pxref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}).
1821 For a large project, you would probably have several source files, and use
1822 @code{make} to arrange to recompile them.
1824 With all the source in the grammar file, you use the following command
1825 to convert it into a parser implementation file:
1832 In this example, the grammar file is called @file{rpcalc.y} (for
1833 ``Reverse Polish @sc{calc}ulator''). Bison produces a parser
1834 implementation file named @file{@var{file}.tab.c}, removing the
1835 @samp{.y} from the grammar file name. The parser implementation file
1836 contains the source code for @code{yyparse}. The additional functions
1837 in the grammar file (@code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main}) are
1838 copied verbatim to the parser implementation file.
1840 @node Rpcalc Compile
1841 @subsection Compiling the Parser Implementation File
1842 @cindex compiling the parser
1844 Here is how to compile and run the parser implementation file:
1848 # @r{List files in current directory.}
1850 rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1854 # @r{Compile the Bison parser.}
1855 # @r{@samp{-lm} tells compiler to search math library for @code{pow}.}
1856 $ @kbd{cc -lm -o rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c}
1860 # @r{List files again.}
1862 rpcalc rpcalc.tab.c rpcalc.y
1866 The file @file{rpcalc} now contains the executable code. Here is an
1867 example session using @code{rpcalc}.
1873 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 *+-}
1875 @kbd{3 7 + 3 4 5 * + - n} @r{Note the unary minus, @samp{n}}
1879 @kbd{3 4 ^} @r{Exponentiation}
1881 @kbd{^D} @r{End-of-file indicator}
1886 @section Infix Notation Calculator: @code{calc}
1887 @cindex infix notation calculator
1889 @cindex calculator, infix notation
1891 We now modify rpcalc to handle infix operators instead of postfix. Infix
1892 notation involves the concept of operator precedence and the need for
1893 parentheses nested to arbitrary depth. Here is the Bison code for
1894 @file{calc.y}, an infix desk-top calculator.
1897 /* Infix notation calculator. */
1901 #define YYSTYPE double
1905 void yyerror (char const *);
1910 /* Bison declarations. */
1914 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
1915 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
1918 %% /* The grammar follows. */
1929 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
1936 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
1937 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
1938 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
1939 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
1940 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
1941 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
1942 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
1949 The functions @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror} and @code{main} can be the
1952 There are two important new features shown in this code.
1954 In the second section (Bison declarations), @code{%left} declares token
1955 types and says they are left-associative operators. The declarations
1956 @code{%left} and @code{%right} (right associativity) take the place of
1957 @code{%token} which is used to declare a token type name without
1958 associativity. (These tokens are single-character literals, which
1959 ordinarily don't need to be declared. We declare them here to specify
1962 Operator precedence is determined by the line ordering of the
1963 declarations; the higher the line number of the declaration (lower on
1964 the page or screen), the higher the precedence. Hence, exponentiation
1965 has the highest precedence, unary minus (@code{NEG}) is next, followed
1966 by @samp{*} and @samp{/}, and so on. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator
1969 The other important new feature is the @code{%prec} in the grammar
1970 section for the unary minus operator. The @code{%prec} simply instructs
1971 Bison that the rule @samp{| '-' exp} has the same precedence as
1972 @code{NEG}---in this case the next-to-highest. @xref{Contextual
1973 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
1975 Here is a sample run of @file{calc.y}:
1980 @kbd{4 + 4.5 - (34/(8*3+-3))}
1988 @node Simple Error Recovery
1989 @section Simple Error Recovery
1990 @cindex error recovery, simple
1992 Up to this point, this manual has not addressed the issue of @dfn{error
1993 recovery}---how to continue parsing after the parser detects a syntax
1994 error. All we have handled is error reporting with @code{yyerror}.
1995 Recall that by default @code{yyparse} returns after calling
1996 @code{yyerror}. This means that an erroneous input line causes the
1997 calculator program to exit. Now we show how to rectify this deficiency.
1999 The Bison language itself includes the reserved word @code{error}, which
2000 may be included in the grammar rules. In the example below it has
2001 been added to one of the alternatives for @code{line}:
2007 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("\t%.10g\n", $1); @}
2008 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2013 This addition to the grammar allows for simple error recovery in the
2014 event of a syntax error. If an expression that cannot be evaluated is
2015 read, the error will be recognized by the third rule for @code{line},
2016 and parsing will continue. (The @code{yyerror} function is still called
2017 upon to print its message as well.) The action executes the statement
2018 @code{yyerrok}, a macro defined automatically by Bison; its meaning is
2019 that error recovery is complete (@pxref{Error Recovery}). Note the
2020 difference between @code{yyerrok} and @code{yyerror}; neither one is a
2023 This form of error recovery deals with syntax errors. There are other
2024 kinds of errors; for example, division by zero, which raises an exception
2025 signal that is normally fatal. A real calculator program must handle this
2026 signal and use @code{longjmp} to return to @code{main} and resume parsing
2027 input lines; it would also have to discard the rest of the current line of
2028 input. We won't discuss this issue further because it is not specific to
2031 @node Location Tracking Calc
2032 @section Location Tracking Calculator: @code{ltcalc}
2033 @cindex location tracking calculator
2034 @cindex @code{ltcalc}
2035 @cindex calculator, location tracking
2037 This example extends the infix notation calculator with location
2038 tracking. This feature will be used to improve the error messages. For
2039 the sake of clarity, this example is a simple integer calculator, since
2040 most of the work needed to use locations will be done in the lexical
2044 * Ltcalc Declarations:: Bison and C declarations for ltcalc.
2045 * Ltcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for ltcalc, with explanations.
2046 * Ltcalc Lexer:: The lexical analyzer.
2049 @node Ltcalc Declarations
2050 @subsection Declarations for @code{ltcalc}
2052 The C and Bison declarations for the location tracking calculator are
2053 the same as the declarations for the infix notation calculator.
2056 /* Location tracking calculator. */
2062 void yyerror (char const *);
2065 /* Bison declarations. */
2073 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2077 Note there are no declarations specific to locations. Defining a data
2078 type for storing locations is not needed: we will use the type provided
2079 by default (@pxref{Location Type, ,Data Types of Locations}), which is a
2080 four member structure with the following integer fields:
2081 @code{first_line}, @code{first_column}, @code{last_line} and
2082 @code{last_column}. By conventions, and in accordance with the GNU
2083 Coding Standards and common practice, the line and column count both
2087 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{ltcalc}
2089 Whether handling locations or not has no effect on the syntax of your
2090 language. Therefore, grammar rules for this example will be very close
2091 to those of the previous example: we will only modify them to benefit
2092 from the new information.
2094 Here, we will use locations to report divisions by zero, and locate the
2095 wrong expressions or subexpressions.
2108 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%d\n", $1); @}
2115 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2116 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2117 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2127 fprintf (stderr, "%d.%d-%d.%d: division by zero",
2128 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
2129 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
2134 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2135 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2136 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2140 This code shows how to reach locations inside of semantic actions, by
2141 using the pseudo-variables @code{@@@var{n}} for rule components, and the
2142 pseudo-variable @code{@@$} for groupings.
2144 We don't need to assign a value to @code{@@$}: the output parser does it
2145 automatically. By default, before executing the C code of each action,
2146 @code{@@$} is set to range from the beginning of @code{@@1} to the end
2147 of @code{@@@var{n}}, for a rule with @var{n} components. This behavior
2148 can be redefined (@pxref{Location Default Action, , Default Action for
2149 Locations}), and for very specific rules, @code{@@$} can be computed by
2153 @subsection The @code{ltcalc} Lexical Analyzer.
2155 Until now, we relied on Bison's defaults to enable location
2156 tracking. The next step is to rewrite the lexical analyzer, and make it
2157 able to feed the parser with the token locations, as it already does for
2160 To this end, we must take into account every single character of the
2161 input text, to avoid the computed locations of being fuzzy or wrong:
2172 /* Skip white space. */
2173 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2174 ++yylloc.last_column;
2179 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line;
2180 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column;
2184 /* Process numbers. */
2188 ++yylloc.last_column;
2189 while (isdigit (c = getchar ()))
2191 ++yylloc.last_column;
2192 yylval = yylval * 10 + c - '0';
2199 /* Return end-of-input. */
2204 /* Return a single char, and update location. */
2208 yylloc.last_column = 0;
2211 ++yylloc.last_column;
2217 Basically, the lexical analyzer performs the same processing as before:
2218 it skips blanks and tabs, and reads numbers or single-character tokens.
2219 In addition, it updates @code{yylloc}, the global variable (of type
2220 @code{YYLTYPE}) containing the token's location.
2222 Now, each time this function returns a token, the parser has its number
2223 as well as its semantic value, and its location in the text. The last
2224 needed change is to initialize @code{yylloc}, for example in the
2225 controlling function:
2232 yylloc.first_line = yylloc.last_line = 1;
2233 yylloc.first_column = yylloc.last_column = 0;
2239 Remember that computing locations is not a matter of syntax. Every
2240 character must be associated to a location update, whether it is in
2241 valid input, in comments, in literal strings, and so on.
2243 @node Multi-function Calc
2244 @section Multi-Function Calculator: @code{mfcalc}
2245 @cindex multi-function calculator
2246 @cindex @code{mfcalc}
2247 @cindex calculator, multi-function
2249 Now that the basics of Bison have been discussed, it is time to move on to
2250 a more advanced problem. The above calculators provided only five
2251 functions, @samp{+}, @samp{-}, @samp{*}, @samp{/} and @samp{^}. It would
2252 be nice to have a calculator that provides other mathematical functions such
2253 as @code{sin}, @code{cos}, etc.
2255 It is easy to add new operators to the infix calculator as long as they are
2256 only single-character literals. The lexical analyzer @code{yylex} passes
2257 back all nonnumeric characters as tokens, so new grammar rules suffice for
2258 adding a new operator. But we want something more flexible: built-in
2259 functions whose syntax has this form:
2262 @var{function_name} (@var{argument})
2266 At the same time, we will add memory to the calculator, by allowing you
2267 to create named variables, store values in them, and use them later.
2268 Here is a sample session with the multi-function calculator:
2272 @kbd{pi = 3.141592653589}
2276 @kbd{alpha = beta1 = 2.3}
2282 @kbd{exp(ln(beta1))}
2287 Note that multiple assignment and nested function calls are permitted.
2290 * Mfcalc Declarations:: Bison declarations for multi-function calculator.
2291 * Mfcalc Rules:: Grammar rules for the calculator.
2292 * Mfcalc Symbol Table:: Symbol table management subroutines.
2295 @node Mfcalc Declarations
2296 @subsection Declarations for @code{mfcalc}
2298 Here are the C and Bison declarations for the multi-function calculator.
2300 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 1
2304 #include <math.h> /* For math functions, cos(), sin(), etc. */
2305 #include "calc.h" /* Contains definition of `symrec'. */
2307 void yyerror (char const *);
2313 double val; /* For returning numbers. */
2314 symrec *tptr; /* For returning symbol-table pointers. */
2317 %token <val> NUM /* Simple double precision number. */
2318 %token <tptr> VAR FNCT /* Variable and function. */
2325 %left NEG /* negation--unary minus */
2326 %right '^' /* exponentiation */
2330 The above grammar introduces only two new features of the Bison language.
2331 These features allow semantic values to have various data types
2332 (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
2334 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire list of possible types;
2335 this is instead of defining @code{YYSTYPE}. The allowable types are now
2336 double-floats (for @code{exp} and @code{NUM}) and pointers to entries in
2337 the symbol table. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
2339 Since values can now have various types, it is necessary to associate a
2340 type with each grammar symbol whose semantic value is used. These symbols
2341 are @code{NUM}, @code{VAR}, @code{FNCT}, and @code{exp}. Their
2342 declarations are augmented with information about their data type (placed
2343 between angle brackets).
2345 The Bison construct @code{%type} is used for declaring nonterminal
2346 symbols, just as @code{%token} is used for declaring token types. We
2347 have not used @code{%type} before because nonterminal symbols are
2348 normally declared implicitly by the rules that define them. But
2349 @code{exp} must be declared explicitly so we can specify its value type.
2350 @xref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
2353 @subsection Grammar Rules for @code{mfcalc}
2355 Here are the grammar rules for the multi-function calculator.
2356 Most of them are copied directly from @code{calc}; three rules,
2357 those which mention @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}, are new.
2359 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2361 %% /* The grammar follows. */
2372 | exp '\n' @{ printf ("%.10g\n", $1); @}
2373 | error '\n' @{ yyerrok; @}
2380 | VAR @{ $$ = $1->value.var; @}
2381 | VAR '=' exp @{ $$ = $3; $1->value.var = $3; @}
2382 | FNCT '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = (*($1->value.fnctptr))($3); @}
2383 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
2384 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
2385 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
2386 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
2387 | '-' exp %prec NEG @{ $$ = -$2; @}
2388 | exp '^' exp @{ $$ = pow ($1, $3); @}
2389 | '(' exp ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
2392 /* End of grammar. */
2396 @node Mfcalc Symbol Table
2397 @subsection The @code{mfcalc} Symbol Table
2398 @cindex symbol table example
2400 The multi-function calculator requires a symbol table to keep track of the
2401 names and meanings of variables and functions. This doesn't affect the
2402 grammar rules (except for the actions) or the Bison declarations, but it
2403 requires some additional C functions for support.
2405 The symbol table itself consists of a linked list of records. Its
2406 definition, which is kept in the header @file{calc.h}, is as follows. It
2407 provides for either functions or variables to be placed in the table.
2409 @comment file: calc.h
2412 /* Function type. */
2413 typedef double (*func_t) (double);
2417 /* Data type for links in the chain of symbols. */
2420 char *name; /* name of symbol */
2421 int type; /* type of symbol: either VAR or FNCT */
2424 double var; /* value of a VAR */
2425 func_t fnctptr; /* value of a FNCT */
2427 struct symrec *next; /* link field */
2432 typedef struct symrec symrec;
2434 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2435 extern symrec *sym_table;
2437 symrec *putsym (char const *, int);
2438 symrec *getsym (char const *);
2442 The new version of @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table}, a
2443 function that initializes the symbol table. Here it is, and
2444 @code{init_table} as well:
2446 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2451 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2453 yyerror (char const *s)
2455 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2463 double (*fnct) (double);
2468 struct init const arith_fncts[] =
2481 /* The symbol table: a chain of `struct symrec'. */
2486 /* Put arithmetic functions in table. */
2491 for (i = 0; arith_fncts[i].fname != 0; i++)
2493 symrec *ptr = putsym (arith_fncts[i].fname, FNCT);
2494 ptr->value.fnctptr = arith_fncts[i].fnct;
2509 By simply editing the initialization list and adding the necessary include
2510 files, you can add additional functions to the calculator.
2512 Two important functions allow look-up and installation of symbols in the
2513 symbol table. The function @code{putsym} is passed a name and the type
2514 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) of the object to be installed. The object is
2515 linked to the front of the list, and a pointer to the object is returned.
2516 The function @code{getsym} is passed the name of the symbol to look up. If
2517 found, a pointer to that symbol is returned; otherwise zero is returned.
2519 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2521 #include <stdlib.h> /* malloc. */
2522 #include <string.h> /* strlen. */
2526 putsym (char const *sym_name, int sym_type)
2528 symrec *ptr = (symrec *) malloc (sizeof (symrec));
2529 ptr->name = (char *) malloc (strlen (sym_name) + 1);
2530 strcpy (ptr->name,sym_name);
2531 ptr->type = sym_type;
2532 ptr->value.var = 0; /* Set value to 0 even if fctn. */
2533 ptr->next = (struct symrec *)sym_table;
2541 getsym (char const *sym_name)
2544 for (ptr = sym_table; ptr != (symrec *) 0;
2545 ptr = (symrec *)ptr->next)
2546 if (strcmp (ptr->name,sym_name) == 0)
2553 The function @code{yylex} must now recognize variables, numeric values, and
2554 the single-character arithmetic operators. Strings of alphanumeric
2555 characters with a leading letter are recognized as either variables or
2556 functions depending on what the symbol table says about them.
2558 The string is passed to @code{getsym} for look up in the symbol table. If
2559 the name appears in the table, a pointer to its location and its type
2560 (@code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}) is returned to @code{yyparse}. If it is not
2561 already in the table, then it is installed as a @code{VAR} using
2562 @code{putsym}. Again, a pointer and its type (which must be @code{VAR}) is
2563 returned to @code{yyparse}.
2565 No change is needed in the handling of numeric values and arithmetic
2566 operators in @code{yylex}.
2568 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2580 /* Ignore white space, get first nonwhite character. */
2581 while ((c = getchar ()) == ' ' || c == '\t')
2589 /* Char starts a number => parse the number. */
2590 if (c == '.' || isdigit (c))
2593 scanf ("%lf", &yylval.val);
2599 /* Char starts an identifier => read the name. */
2602 /* Initially make the buffer long enough
2603 for a 40-character symbol name. */
2604 static size_t length = 40;
2605 static char *symbuf = 0;
2611 symbuf = (char *) malloc (length + 1);
2617 /* If buffer is full, make it bigger. */
2621 symbuf = (char *) realloc (symbuf, length + 1);
2623 /* Add this character to the buffer. */
2625 /* Get another character. */
2630 while (isalnum (c));
2637 s = getsym (symbuf);
2639 s = putsym (symbuf, VAR);
2644 /* Any other character is a token by itself. */
2650 The error reporting function is unchanged, and the new version of
2651 @code{main} includes a call to @code{init_table} and sets the @code{yydebug}
2652 on user demand (@xref{Tracing, , Tracing Your Parser}, for details):
2654 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 3
2657 /* Called by yyparse on error. */
2659 yyerror (char const *s)
2661 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
2667 main (int argc, char const* argv[])
2670 /* Enable parse traces on option -p. */
2671 for (i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
2672 if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-p"))
2680 This program is both powerful and flexible. You may easily add new
2681 functions, and it is a simple job to modify this code to install
2682 predefined variables such as @code{pi} or @code{e} as well.
2690 Add some new functions from @file{math.h} to the initialization list.
2693 Add another array that contains constants and their values. Then
2694 modify @code{init_table} to add these constants to the symbol table.
2695 It will be easiest to give the constants type @code{VAR}.
2698 Make the program report an error if the user refers to an
2699 uninitialized variable in any way except to store a value in it.
2703 @chapter Bison Grammar Files
2705 Bison takes as input a context-free grammar specification and produces a
2706 C-language function that recognizes correct instances of the grammar.
2708 The Bison grammar file conventionally has a name ending in @samp{.y}.
2709 @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
2712 * Grammar Outline:: Overall layout of the grammar file.
2713 * Symbols:: Terminal and nonterminal symbols.
2714 * Rules:: How to write grammar rules.
2715 * Recursion:: Writing recursive rules.
2716 * Semantics:: Semantic values and actions.
2717 * Tracking Locations:: Locations and actions.
2718 * Named References:: Using named references in actions.
2719 * Declarations:: All kinds of Bison declarations are described here.
2720 * Multiple Parsers:: Putting more than one Bison parser in one program.
2723 @node Grammar Outline
2724 @section Outline of a Bison Grammar
2726 A Bison grammar file has four main sections, shown here with the
2727 appropriate delimiters:
2734 @var{Bison declarations}
2743 Comments enclosed in @samp{/* @dots{} */} may appear in any of the sections.
2744 As a GNU extension, @samp{//} introduces a comment that
2745 continues until end of line.
2748 * Prologue:: Syntax and usage of the prologue.
2749 * Prologue Alternatives:: Syntax and usage of alternatives to the prologue.
2750 * Bison Declarations:: Syntax and usage of the Bison declarations section.
2751 * Grammar Rules:: Syntax and usage of the grammar rules section.
2752 * Epilogue:: Syntax and usage of the epilogue.
2756 @subsection The prologue
2757 @cindex declarations section
2759 @cindex declarations
2761 The @var{Prologue} section contains macro definitions and declarations
2762 of functions and variables that are used in the actions in the grammar
2763 rules. These are copied to the beginning of the parser implementation
2764 file so that they precede the definition of @code{yyparse}. You can
2765 use @samp{#include} to get the declarations from a header file. If
2766 you don't need any C declarations, you may omit the @samp{%@{} and
2767 @samp{%@}} delimiters that bracket this section.
2769 The @var{Prologue} section is terminated by the first occurrence
2770 of @samp{%@}} that is outside a comment, a string literal, or a
2773 You may have more than one @var{Prologue} section, intermixed with the
2774 @var{Bison declarations}. This allows you to have C and Bison
2775 declarations that refer to each other. For example, the @code{%union}
2776 declaration may use types defined in a header file, and you may wish to
2777 prototype functions that take arguments of type @code{YYSTYPE}. This
2778 can be done with two @var{Prologue} blocks, one before and one after the
2779 @code{%union} declaration.
2790 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2794 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2795 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2801 When in doubt, it is usually safer to put prologue code before all
2802 Bison declarations, rather than after. For example, any definitions
2803 of feature test macros like @code{_GNU_SOURCE} or
2804 @code{_POSIX_C_SOURCE} should appear before all Bison declarations, as
2805 feature test macros can affect the behavior of Bison-generated
2806 @code{#include} directives.
2808 @node Prologue Alternatives
2809 @subsection Prologue Alternatives
2810 @cindex Prologue Alternatives
2813 @findex %code requires
2814 @findex %code provides
2817 The functionality of @var{Prologue} sections can often be subtle and
2818 inflexible. As an alternative, Bison provides a @code{%code}
2819 directive with an explicit qualifier field, which identifies the
2820 purpose of the code and thus the location(s) where Bison should
2821 generate it. For C/C++, the qualifier can be omitted for the default
2822 location, or it can be one of @code{requires}, @code{provides},
2823 @code{top}. @xref{%code Summary}.
2825 Look again at the example of the previous section:
2836 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2840 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2841 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2848 Notice that there are two @var{Prologue} sections here, but there's a
2849 subtle distinction between their functionality. For example, if you
2850 decide to override Bison's default definition for @code{YYLTYPE}, in
2851 which @var{Prologue} section should you write your new definition?
2852 You should write it in the first since Bison will insert that code
2853 into the parser implementation file @emph{before} the default
2854 @code{YYLTYPE} definition. In which @var{Prologue} section should you
2855 prototype an internal function, @code{trace_token}, that accepts
2856 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} as arguments? You should
2857 prototype it in the second since Bison will insert that code
2858 @emph{after} the @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype} definitions.
2860 This distinction in functionality between the two @var{Prologue} sections is
2861 established by the appearance of the @code{%union} between them.
2862 This behavior raises a few questions.
2863 First, why should the position of a @code{%union} affect definitions related to
2864 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}?
2865 Second, what if there is no @code{%union}?
2866 In that case, the second kind of @var{Prologue} section is not available.
2867 This behavior is not intuitive.
2869 To avoid this subtle @code{%union} dependency, rewrite the example using a
2870 @code{%code top} and an unqualified @code{%code}.
2871 Let's go ahead and add the new @code{YYLTYPE} definition and the
2872 @code{trace_token} prototype at the same time:
2879 /* WARNING: The following code really belongs
2880 * in a `%code requires'; see below. */
2883 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2884 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2896 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2900 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2901 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2902 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2909 In this way, @code{%code top} and the unqualified @code{%code} achieve the same
2910 functionality as the two kinds of @var{Prologue} sections, but it's always
2911 explicit which kind you intend.
2912 Moreover, both kinds are always available even in the absence of @code{%union}.
2914 The @code{%code top} block above logically contains two parts. The
2915 first two lines before the warning need to appear near the top of the
2916 parser implementation file. The first line after the warning is
2917 required by @code{YYSTYPE} and thus also needs to appear in the parser
2918 implementation file. However, if you've instructed Bison to generate
2919 a parser header file (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,%defines}), you probably
2920 want that line to appear before the @code{YYSTYPE} definition in that
2921 header file as well. The @code{YYLTYPE} definition should also appear
2922 in the parser header file to override the default @code{YYLTYPE}
2925 In other words, in the @code{%code top} block above, all but the first two
2926 lines are dependency code required by the @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
2928 Thus, they belong in one or more @code{%code requires}:
2946 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
2952 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
2953 typedef struct YYLTYPE
2966 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
2967 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
2968 static void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
2976 Now Bison will insert @code{#include "ptypes.h"} and the new
2977 @code{YYLTYPE} definition before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}
2978 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions in both the parser implementation file
2979 and the parser header file. (By the same reasoning, @code{%code
2980 requires} would also be the appropriate place to write your own
2981 definition for @code{YYSTYPE}.)
2983 When you are writing dependency code for @code{YYSTYPE} and
2984 @code{YYLTYPE}, you should prefer @code{%code requires} over
2985 @code{%code top} regardless of whether you instruct Bison to generate
2986 a parser header file. When you are writing code that you need Bison
2987 to insert only into the parser implementation file and that has no
2988 special need to appear at the top of that file, you should prefer the
2989 unqualified @code{%code} over @code{%code top}. These practices will
2990 make the purpose of each block of your code explicit to Bison and to
2991 other developers reading your grammar file. Following these
2992 practices, we expect the unqualified @code{%code} and @code{%code
2993 requires} to be the most important of the four @var{Prologue}
2996 At some point while developing your parser, you might decide to
2997 provide @code{trace_token} to modules that are external to your
2998 parser. Thus, you might wish for Bison to insert the prototype into
2999 both the parser header file and the parser implementation file. Since
3000 this function is not a dependency required by @code{YYSTYPE} or
3001 @code{YYLTYPE}, it doesn't make sense to move its prototype to a
3002 @code{%code requires}. More importantly, since it depends upon
3003 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yytokentype}, @code{%code requires} is not
3004 sufficient. Instead, move its prototype from the unqualified
3005 @code{%code} to a @code{%code provides}:
3023 tree t; /* @r{@code{tree} is defined in @file{ptypes.h}.} */
3029 #define YYLTYPE YYLTYPE
3030 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3043 void trace_token (enum yytokentype token, YYLTYPE loc);
3049 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
3050 #define YYPRINT(F, N, L) print_token_value (F, N, L)
3058 Bison will insert the @code{trace_token} prototype into both the
3059 parser header file and the parser implementation file after the
3060 definitions for @code{yytokentype}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
3063 The above examples are careful to write directives in an order that
3064 reflects the layout of the generated parser implementation and header
3065 files: @code{%code top}, @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides},
3066 and then @code{%code}. While your grammar files may generally be
3067 easier to read if you also follow this order, Bison does not require
3068 it. Instead, Bison lets you choose an organization that makes sense
3071 You may declare any of these directives multiple times in the grammar file.
3072 In that case, Bison concatenates the contained code in declaration order.
3073 This is the only way in which the position of one of these directives within
3074 the grammar file affects its functionality.
3076 The result of the previous two properties is greater flexibility in how you may
3077 organize your grammar file.
3078 For example, you may organize semantic-type-related directives by semantic
3083 %code requires @{ #include "type1.h" @}
3084 %union @{ type1 field1; @}
3085 %destructor @{ type1_free ($$); @} <field1>
3086 %printer @{ type1_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field1>
3090 %code requires @{ #include "type2.h" @}
3091 %union @{ type2 field2; @}
3092 %destructor @{ type2_free ($$); @} <field2>
3093 %printer @{ type2_print (yyoutput, $$); @} <field2>
3098 You could even place each of the above directive groups in the rules section of
3099 the grammar file next to the set of rules that uses the associated semantic
3101 (In the rules section, you must terminate each of those directives with a
3103 And you don't have to worry that some directive (like a @code{%union}) in the
3104 definitions section is going to adversely affect their functionality in some
3105 counter-intuitive manner just because it comes first.
3106 Such an organization is not possible using @var{Prologue} sections.
3108 This section has been concerned with explaining the advantages of the four
3109 @var{Prologue} alternatives over the original Yacc @var{Prologue}.
3110 However, in most cases when using these directives, you shouldn't need to
3111 think about all the low-level ordering issues discussed here.
3112 Instead, you should simply use these directives to label each block of your
3113 code according to its purpose and let Bison handle the ordering.
3114 @code{%code} is the most generic label.
3115 Move code to @code{%code requires}, @code{%code provides}, or @code{%code top}
3118 @node Bison Declarations
3119 @subsection The Bison Declarations Section
3120 @cindex Bison declarations (introduction)
3121 @cindex declarations, Bison (introduction)
3123 The @var{Bison declarations} section contains declarations that define
3124 terminal and nonterminal symbols, specify precedence, and so on.
3125 In some simple grammars you may not need any declarations.
3126 @xref{Declarations, ,Bison Declarations}.
3129 @subsection The Grammar Rules Section
3130 @cindex grammar rules section
3131 @cindex rules section for grammar
3133 The @dfn{grammar rules} section contains one or more Bison grammar
3134 rules, and nothing else. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
3136 There must always be at least one grammar rule, and the first
3137 @samp{%%} (which precedes the grammar rules) may never be omitted even
3138 if it is the first thing in the file.
3141 @subsection The epilogue
3142 @cindex additional C code section
3144 @cindex C code, section for additional
3146 The @var{Epilogue} is copied verbatim to the end of the parser
3147 implementation file, just as the @var{Prologue} is copied to the
3148 beginning. This is the most convenient place to put anything that you
3149 want to have in the parser implementation file but which need not come
3150 before the definition of @code{yyparse}. For example, the definitions
3151 of @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} often go here. Because C requires
3152 functions to be declared before being used, you often need to declare
3153 functions like @code{yylex} and @code{yyerror} in the Prologue, even
3154 if you define them in the Epilogue. @xref{Interface, ,Parser
3155 C-Language Interface}.
3157 If the last section is empty, you may omit the @samp{%%} that separates it
3158 from the grammar rules.
3160 The Bison parser itself contains many macros and identifiers whose names
3161 start with @samp{yy} or @samp{YY}, so it is a good idea to avoid using
3162 any such names (except those documented in this manual) in the epilogue
3163 of the grammar file.
3166 @section Symbols, Terminal and Nonterminal
3167 @cindex nonterminal symbol
3168 @cindex terminal symbol
3172 @dfn{Symbols} in Bison grammars represent the grammatical classifications
3175 A @dfn{terminal symbol} (also known as a @dfn{token type}) represents a
3176 class of syntactically equivalent tokens. You use the symbol in grammar
3177 rules to mean that a token in that class is allowed. The symbol is
3178 represented in the Bison parser by a numeric code, and the @code{yylex}
3179 function returns a token type code to indicate what kind of token has
3180 been read. You don't need to know what the code value is; you can use
3181 the symbol to stand for it.
3183 A @dfn{nonterminal symbol} stands for a class of syntactically
3184 equivalent groupings. The symbol name is used in writing grammar rules.
3185 By convention, it should be all lower case.
3187 Symbol names can contain letters, underscores, periods, and non-initial
3188 digits and dashes. Dashes in symbol names are a GNU extension, incompatible
3189 with POSIX Yacc. Periods and dashes make symbol names less convenient to
3190 use with named references, which require brackets around such names
3191 (@pxref{Named References}). Terminal symbols that contain periods or dashes
3192 make little sense: since they are not valid symbols (in most programming
3193 languages) they are not exported as token names.
3195 There are three ways of writing terminal symbols in the grammar:
3199 A @dfn{named token type} is written with an identifier, like an
3200 identifier in C@. By convention, it should be all upper case. Each
3201 such name must be defined with a Bison declaration such as
3202 @code{%token}. @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
3205 @cindex character token
3206 @cindex literal token
3207 @cindex single-character literal
3208 A @dfn{character token type} (or @dfn{literal character token}) is
3209 written in the grammar using the same syntax used in C for character
3210 constants; for example, @code{'+'} is a character token type. A
3211 character token type doesn't need to be declared unless you need to
3212 specify its semantic value data type (@pxref{Value Type, ,Data Types of
3213 Semantic Values}), associativity, or precedence (@pxref{Precedence,
3214 ,Operator Precedence}).
3216 By convention, a character token type is used only to represent a
3217 token that consists of that particular character. Thus, the token
3218 type @code{'+'} is used to represent the character @samp{+} as a
3219 token. Nothing enforces this convention, but if you depart from it,
3220 your program will confuse other readers.
3222 All the usual escape sequences used in character literals in C can be
3223 used in Bison as well, but you must not use the null character as a
3224 character literal because its numeric code, zero, signifies
3225 end-of-input (@pxref{Calling Convention, ,Calling Convention
3226 for @code{yylex}}). Also, unlike standard C, trigraphs have no
3227 special meaning in Bison character literals, nor is backslash-newline
3231 @cindex string token
3232 @cindex literal string token
3233 @cindex multicharacter literal
3234 A @dfn{literal string token} is written like a C string constant; for
3235 example, @code{"<="} is a literal string token. A literal string token
3236 doesn't need to be declared unless you need to specify its semantic
3237 value data type (@pxref{Value Type}), associativity, or precedence
3238 (@pxref{Precedence}).
3240 You can associate the literal string token with a symbolic name as an
3241 alias, using the @code{%token} declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token
3242 Declarations}). If you don't do that, the lexical analyzer has to
3243 retrieve the token number for the literal string token from the
3244 @code{yytname} table (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
3246 @strong{Warning}: literal string tokens do not work in Yacc.
3248 By convention, a literal string token is used only to represent a token
3249 that consists of that particular string. Thus, you should use the token
3250 type @code{"<="} to represent the string @samp{<=} as a token. Bison
3251 does not enforce this convention, but if you depart from it, people who
3252 read your program will be confused.
3254 All the escape sequences used in string literals in C can be used in
3255 Bison as well, except that you must not use a null character within a
3256 string literal. Also, unlike Standard C, trigraphs have no special
3257 meaning in Bison string literals, nor is backslash-newline allowed. A
3258 literal string token must contain two or more characters; for a token
3259 containing just one character, use a character token (see above).
3262 How you choose to write a terminal symbol has no effect on its
3263 grammatical meaning. That depends only on where it appears in rules and
3264 on when the parser function returns that symbol.
3266 The value returned by @code{yylex} is always one of the terminal
3267 symbols, except that a zero or negative value signifies end-of-input.
3268 Whichever way you write the token type in the grammar rules, you write
3269 it the same way in the definition of @code{yylex}. The numeric code
3270 for a character token type is simply the positive numeric code of the
3271 character, so @code{yylex} can use the identical value to generate the
3272 requisite code, though you may need to convert it to @code{unsigned
3273 char} to avoid sign-extension on hosts where @code{char} is signed.
3274 Each named token type becomes a C macro in the parser implementation
3275 file, so @code{yylex} can use the name to stand for the code. (This
3276 is why periods don't make sense in terminal symbols.) @xref{Calling
3277 Convention, ,Calling Convention for @code{yylex}}.
3279 If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate file, you need to arrange for the
3280 token-type macro definitions to be available there. Use the @samp{-d}
3281 option when you run Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions
3282 into a separate header file @file{@var{name}.tab.h} which you can include
3283 in the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}.
3285 If you want to write a grammar that is portable to any Standard C
3286 host, you must use only nonnull character tokens taken from the basic
3287 execution character set of Standard C@. This set consists of the ten
3288 digits, the 52 lower- and upper-case English letters, and the
3289 characters in the following C-language string:
3292 "\a\b\t\n\v\f\r !\"#%&'()*+,-./:;<=>?[\\]^_@{|@}~"
3295 The @code{yylex} function and Bison must use a consistent character set
3296 and encoding for character tokens. For example, if you run Bison in an
3297 ASCII environment, but then compile and run the resulting
3298 program in an environment that uses an incompatible character set like
3299 EBCDIC, the resulting program may not work because the tables
3300 generated by Bison will assume ASCII numeric values for
3301 character tokens. It is standard practice for software distributions to
3302 contain C source files that were generated by Bison in an
3303 ASCII environment, so installers on platforms that are
3304 incompatible with ASCII must rebuild those files before
3307 The symbol @code{error} is a terminal symbol reserved for error recovery
3308 (@pxref{Error Recovery}); you shouldn't use it for any other purpose.
3309 In particular, @code{yylex} should never return this value. The default
3310 value of the error token is 256, unless you explicitly assigned 256 to
3311 one of your tokens with a @code{%token} declaration.
3314 @section Syntax of Grammar Rules
3316 @cindex grammar rule syntax
3317 @cindex syntax of grammar rules
3319 A Bison grammar rule has the following general form:
3323 @var{result}: @var{components}@dots{};
3328 where @var{result} is the nonterminal symbol that this rule describes,
3329 and @var{components} are various terminal and nonterminal symbols that
3330 are put together by this rule (@pxref{Symbols}).
3341 says that two groupings of type @code{exp}, with a @samp{+} token in between,
3342 can be combined into a larger grouping of type @code{exp}.
3344 White space in rules is significant only to separate symbols. You can add
3345 extra white space as you wish.
3347 Scattered among the components can be @var{actions} that determine
3348 the semantics of the rule. An action looks like this:
3351 @{@var{C statements}@}
3356 This is an example of @dfn{braced code}, that is, C code surrounded by
3357 braces, much like a compound statement in C@. Braced code can contain
3358 any sequence of C tokens, so long as its braces are balanced. Bison
3359 does not check the braced code for correctness directly; it merely
3360 copies the code to the parser implementation file, where the C
3361 compiler can check it.
3363 Within braced code, the balanced-brace count is not affected by braces
3364 within comments, string literals, or character constants, but it is
3365 affected by the C digraphs @samp{<%} and @samp{%>} that represent
3366 braces. At the top level braced code must be terminated by @samp{@}}
3367 and not by a digraph. Bison does not look for trigraphs, so if braced
3368 code uses trigraphs you should ensure that they do not affect the
3369 nesting of braces or the boundaries of comments, string literals, or
3370 character constants.
3372 Usually there is only one action and it follows the components.
3376 Multiple rules for the same @var{result} can be written separately or can
3377 be joined with the vertical-bar character @samp{|} as follows:
3382 @var{rule1-components}@dots{}
3383 | @var{rule2-components}@dots{}
3390 They are still considered distinct rules even when joined in this way.
3392 If @var{components} in a rule is empty, it means that @var{result} can
3393 match the empty string. For example, here is how to define a
3394 comma-separated sequence of zero or more @code{exp} groupings:
3413 It is customary to write a comment @samp{/* empty */} in each rule
3417 @section Recursive Rules
3418 @cindex recursive rule
3420 A rule is called @dfn{recursive} when its @var{result} nonterminal
3421 appears also on its right hand side. Nearly all Bison grammars need to
3422 use recursion, because that is the only way to define a sequence of any
3423 number of a particular thing. Consider this recursive definition of a
3424 comma-separated sequence of one or more expressions:
3435 @cindex left recursion
3436 @cindex right recursion
3438 Since the recursive use of @code{expseq1} is the leftmost symbol in the
3439 right hand side, we call this @dfn{left recursion}. By contrast, here
3440 the same construct is defined using @dfn{right recursion}:
3452 Any kind of sequence can be defined using either left recursion or right
3453 recursion, but you should always use left recursion, because it can
3454 parse a sequence of any number of elements with bounded stack space.
3455 Right recursion uses up space on the Bison stack in proportion to the
3456 number of elements in the sequence, because all the elements must be
3457 shifted onto the stack before the rule can be applied even once.
3458 @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}, for further explanation
3461 @cindex mutual recursion
3462 @dfn{Indirect} or @dfn{mutual} recursion occurs when the result of the
3463 rule does not appear directly on its right hand side, but does appear
3464 in rules for other nonterminals which do appear on its right hand
3473 | primary '+' primary
3486 defines two mutually-recursive nonterminals, since each refers to the
3490 @section Defining Language Semantics
3491 @cindex defining language semantics
3492 @cindex language semantics, defining
3494 The grammar rules for a language determine only the syntax. The semantics
3495 are determined by the semantic values associated with various tokens and
3496 groupings, and by the actions taken when various groupings are recognized.
3498 For example, the calculator calculates properly because the value
3499 associated with each expression is the proper number; it adds properly
3500 because the action for the grouping @w{@samp{@var{x} + @var{y}}} is to add
3501 the numbers associated with @var{x} and @var{y}.
3504 * Value Type:: Specifying one data type for all semantic values.
3505 * Multiple Types:: Specifying several alternative data types.
3506 * Actions:: An action is the semantic definition of a grammar rule.
3507 * Action Types:: Specifying data types for actions to operate on.
3508 * Mid-Rule Actions:: Most actions go at the end of a rule.
3509 This says when, why and how to use the exceptional
3510 action in the middle of a rule.
3514 @subsection Data Types of Semantic Values
3515 @cindex semantic value type
3516 @cindex value type, semantic
3517 @cindex data types of semantic values
3518 @cindex default data type
3520 In a simple program it may be sufficient to use the same data type for
3521 the semantic values of all language constructs. This was true in the
3522 RPN and infix calculator examples (@pxref{RPN Calc, ,Reverse Polish
3523 Notation Calculator}).
3525 Bison normally uses the type @code{int} for semantic values if your
3526 program uses the same data type for all language constructs. To
3527 specify some other type, define @code{YYSTYPE} as a macro, like this:
3530 #define YYSTYPE double
3534 @code{YYSTYPE}'s replacement list should be a type name
3535 that does not contain parentheses or square brackets.
3536 This macro definition must go in the prologue of the grammar file
3537 (@pxref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison Grammar}).
3539 @node Multiple Types
3540 @subsection More Than One Value Type
3542 In most programs, you will need different data types for different kinds
3543 of tokens and groupings. For example, a numeric constant may need type
3544 @code{int} or @code{long int}, while a string constant needs type
3545 @code{char *}, and an identifier might need a pointer to an entry in the
3548 To use more than one data type for semantic values in one parser, Bison
3549 requires you to do two things:
3553 Specify the entire collection of possible data types, either by using the
3554 @code{%union} Bison declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of
3555 Value Types}), or by using a @code{typedef} or a @code{#define} to
3556 define @code{YYSTYPE} to be a union type whose member names are
3560 Choose one of those types for each symbol (terminal or nonterminal) for
3561 which semantic values are used. This is done for tokens with the
3562 @code{%token} Bison declaration (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names})
3563 and for groupings with the @code{%type} Bison declaration (@pxref{Type
3564 Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
3573 @vindex $[@var{name}]
3575 An action accompanies a syntactic rule and contains C code to be executed
3576 each time an instance of that rule is recognized. The task of most actions
3577 is to compute a semantic value for the grouping built by the rule from the
3578 semantic values associated with tokens or smaller groupings.
3580 An action consists of braced code containing C statements, and can be
3581 placed at any position in the rule;
3582 it is executed at that position. Most rules have just one action at the
3583 end of the rule, following all the components. Actions in the middle of
3584 a rule are tricky and used only for special purposes (@pxref{Mid-Rule
3585 Actions, ,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
3587 The C code in an action can refer to the semantic values of the
3588 components matched by the rule with the construct @code{$@var{n}},
3589 which stands for the value of the @var{n}th component. The semantic
3590 value for the grouping being constructed is @code{$$}. In addition,
3591 the semantic values of symbols can be accessed with the named
3592 references construct @code{$@var{name}} or @code{$[@var{name}]}.
3593 Bison translates both of these constructs into expressions of the
3594 appropriate type when it copies the actions into the parser
3595 implementation file. @code{$$} (or @code{$@var{name}}, when it stands
3596 for the current grouping) is translated to a modifiable lvalue, so it
3599 Here is a typical example:
3605 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3609 Or, in terms of named references:
3615 | exp[left] '+' exp[right] @{ $result = $left + $right; @}
3620 This rule constructs an @code{exp} from two smaller @code{exp} groupings
3621 connected by a plus-sign token. In the action, @code{$1} and @code{$3}
3622 (@code{$left} and @code{$right})
3623 refer to the semantic values of the two component @code{exp} groupings,
3624 which are the first and third symbols on the right hand side of the rule.
3625 The sum is stored into @code{$$} (@code{$result}) so that it becomes the
3627 the addition-expression just recognized by the rule. If there were a
3628 useful semantic value associated with the @samp{+} token, it could be
3629 referred to as @code{$2}.
3631 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
3632 references construct.
3634 Note that the vertical-bar character @samp{|} is really a rule
3635 separator, and actions are attached to a single rule. This is a
3636 difference with tools like Flex, for which @samp{|} stands for either
3637 ``or'', or ``the same action as that of the next rule''. In the
3638 following example, the action is triggered only when @samp{b} is found:
3642 a-or-b: 'a'|'b' @{ a_or_b_found = 1; @};
3646 @cindex default action
3647 If you don't specify an action for a rule, Bison supplies a default:
3648 @w{@code{$$ = $1}.} Thus, the value of the first symbol in the rule
3649 becomes the value of the whole rule. Of course, the default action is
3650 valid only if the two data types match. There is no meaningful default
3651 action for an empty rule; every empty rule must have an explicit action
3652 unless the rule's value does not matter.
3654 @code{$@var{n}} with @var{n} zero or negative is allowed for reference
3655 to tokens and groupings on the stack @emph{before} those that match the
3656 current rule. This is a very risky practice, and to use it reliably
3657 you must be certain of the context in which the rule is applied. Here
3658 is a case in which you can use this reliably:
3663 expr bar '+' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3664 | expr bar '-' expr @{ @dots{} @}
3670 /* empty */ @{ previous_expr = $0; @}
3675 As long as @code{bar} is used only in the fashion shown here, @code{$0}
3676 always refers to the @code{expr} which precedes @code{bar} in the
3677 definition of @code{foo}.
3680 It is also possible to access the semantic value of the lookahead token, if
3681 any, from a semantic action.
3682 This semantic value is stored in @code{yylval}.
3683 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
3686 @subsection Data Types of Values in Actions
3687 @cindex action data types
3688 @cindex data types in actions
3690 If you have chosen a single data type for semantic values, the @code{$$}
3691 and @code{$@var{n}} constructs always have that data type.
3693 If you have used @code{%union} to specify a variety of data types, then you
3694 must declare a choice among these types for each terminal or nonterminal
3695 symbol that can have a semantic value. Then each time you use @code{$$} or
3696 @code{$@var{n}}, its data type is determined by which symbol it refers to
3697 in the rule. In this example,
3703 | exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
3708 @code{$1} and @code{$3} refer to instances of @code{exp}, so they all
3709 have the data type declared for the nonterminal symbol @code{exp}. If
3710 @code{$2} were used, it would have the data type declared for the
3711 terminal symbol @code{'+'}, whatever that might be.
3713 Alternatively, you can specify the data type when you refer to the value,
3714 by inserting @samp{<@var{type}>} after the @samp{$} at the beginning of the
3715 reference. For example, if you have defined types as shown here:
3727 then you can write @code{$<itype>1} to refer to the first subunit of the
3728 rule as an integer, or @code{$<dtype>1} to refer to it as a double.
3730 @node Mid-Rule Actions
3731 @subsection Actions in Mid-Rule
3732 @cindex actions in mid-rule
3733 @cindex mid-rule actions
3735 Occasionally it is useful to put an action in the middle of a rule.
3736 These actions are written just like usual end-of-rule actions, but they
3737 are executed before the parser even recognizes the following components.
3739 A mid-rule action may refer to the components preceding it using
3740 @code{$@var{n}}, but it may not refer to subsequent components because
3741 it is run before they are parsed.
3743 The mid-rule action itself counts as one of the components of the rule.
3744 This makes a difference when there is another action later in the same rule
3745 (and usually there is another at the end): you have to count the actions
3746 along with the symbols when working out which number @var{n} to use in
3749 The mid-rule action can also have a semantic value. The action can set
3750 its value with an assignment to @code{$$}, and actions later in the rule
3751 can refer to the value using @code{$@var{n}}. Since there is no symbol
3752 to name the action, there is no way to declare a data type for the value
3753 in advance, so you must use the @samp{$<@dots{}>@var{n}} construct to
3754 specify a data type each time you refer to this value.
3756 There is no way to set the value of the entire rule with a mid-rule
3757 action, because assignments to @code{$$} do not have that effect. The
3758 only way to set the value for the entire rule is with an ordinary action
3759 at the end of the rule.
3761 Here is an example from a hypothetical compiler, handling a @code{let}
3762 statement that looks like @samp{let (@var{variable}) @var{statement}} and
3763 serves to create a variable named @var{variable} temporarily for the
3764 duration of @var{statement}. To parse this construct, we must put
3765 @var{variable} into the symbol table while @var{statement} is parsed, then
3766 remove it afterward. Here is how it is done:
3772 @{ $<context>$ = push_context (); declare_variable ($3); @}
3774 @{ $$ = $6; pop_context ($<context>5); @}
3779 As soon as @samp{let (@var{variable})} has been recognized, the first
3780 action is run. It saves a copy of the current semantic context (the
3781 list of accessible variables) as its semantic value, using alternative
3782 @code{context} in the data-type union. Then it calls
3783 @code{declare_variable} to add the new variable to that list. Once the
3784 first action is finished, the embedded statement @code{stmt} can be
3785 parsed. Note that the mid-rule action is component number 5, so the
3786 @samp{stmt} is component number 6.
3788 After the embedded statement is parsed, its semantic value becomes the
3789 value of the entire @code{let}-statement. Then the semantic value from the
3790 earlier action is used to restore the prior list of variables. This
3791 removes the temporary @code{let}-variable from the list so that it won't
3792 appear to exist while the rest of the program is parsed.
3795 @cindex discarded symbols, mid-rule actions
3796 @cindex error recovery, mid-rule actions
3797 In the above example, if the parser initiates error recovery (@pxref{Error
3798 Recovery}) while parsing the tokens in the embedded statement @code{stmt},
3799 it might discard the previous semantic context @code{$<context>5} without
3801 Thus, @code{$<context>5} needs a destructor (@pxref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
3802 Discarded Symbols}).
3803 However, Bison currently provides no means to declare a destructor specific to
3804 a particular mid-rule action's semantic value.
3806 One solution is to bury the mid-rule action inside a nonterminal symbol and to
3807 declare a destructor for that symbol:
3812 %destructor @{ pop_context ($$); @} let
3826 $$ = push_context ();
3827 declare_variable ($3);
3834 Note that the action is now at the end of its rule.
3835 Any mid-rule action can be converted to an end-of-rule action in this way, and
3836 this is what Bison actually does to implement mid-rule actions.
3838 Taking action before a rule is completely recognized often leads to
3839 conflicts since the parser must commit to a parse in order to execute the
3840 action. For example, the following two rules, without mid-rule actions,
3841 can coexist in a working parser because the parser can shift the open-brace
3842 token and look at what follows before deciding whether there is a
3848 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3849 | '@{' statements '@}'
3855 But when we add a mid-rule action as follows, the rules become nonfunctional:
3860 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3861 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3864 | '@{' statements '@}'
3870 Now the parser is forced to decide whether to run the mid-rule action
3871 when it has read no farther than the open-brace. In other words, it
3872 must commit to using one rule or the other, without sufficient
3873 information to do it correctly. (The open-brace token is what is called
3874 the @dfn{lookahead} token at this time, since the parser is still
3875 deciding what to do about it. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.)
3877 You might think that you could correct the problem by putting identical
3878 actions into the two rules, like this:
3883 @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3884 '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3885 | @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3886 '@{' statements '@}'
3892 But this does not help, because Bison does not realize that the two actions
3893 are identical. (Bison never tries to understand the C code in an action.)
3895 If the grammar is such that a declaration can be distinguished from a
3896 statement by the first token (which is true in C), then one solution which
3897 does work is to put the action after the open-brace, like this:
3902 '@{' @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3903 declarations statements '@}'
3904 | '@{' statements '@}'
3910 Now the first token of the following declaration or statement,
3911 which would in any case tell Bison which rule to use, can still do so.
3913 Another solution is to bury the action inside a nonterminal symbol which
3914 serves as a subroutine:
3919 /* empty */ @{ prepare_for_local_variables (); @}
3925 subroutine '@{' declarations statements '@}'
3926 | subroutine '@{' statements '@}'
3932 Now Bison can execute the action in the rule for @code{subroutine} without
3933 deciding which rule for @code{compound} it will eventually use.
3935 @node Tracking Locations
3936 @section Tracking Locations
3938 @cindex textual location
3939 @cindex location, textual
3941 Though grammar rules and semantic actions are enough to write a fully
3942 functional parser, it can be useful to process some additional information,
3943 especially symbol locations.
3945 The way locations are handled is defined by providing a data type, and
3946 actions to take when rules are matched.
3949 * Location Type:: Specifying a data type for locations.
3950 * Actions and Locations:: Using locations in actions.
3951 * Location Default Action:: Defining a general way to compute locations.
3955 @subsection Data Type of Locations
3956 @cindex data type of locations
3957 @cindex default location type
3959 Defining a data type for locations is much simpler than for semantic values,
3960 since all tokens and groupings always use the same type.
3962 You can specify the type of locations by defining a macro called
3963 @code{YYLTYPE}, just as you can specify the semantic value type by
3964 defining a @code{YYSTYPE} macro (@pxref{Value Type}).
3965 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, Bison uses a default structure type with
3969 typedef struct YYLTYPE
3978 When @code{YYLTYPE} is not defined, at the beginning of the parsing, Bison
3979 initializes all these fields to 1 for @code{yylloc}. To initialize
3980 @code{yylloc} with a custom location type (or to chose a different
3981 initialization), use the @code{%initial-action} directive. @xref{Initial
3982 Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
3984 @node Actions and Locations
3985 @subsection Actions and Locations
3986 @cindex location actions
3987 @cindex actions, location
3990 @vindex @@@var{name}
3991 @vindex @@[@var{name}]
3993 Actions are not only useful for defining language semantics, but also for
3994 describing the behavior of the output parser with locations.
3996 The most obvious way for building locations of syntactic groupings is very
3997 similar to the way semantic values are computed. In a given rule, several
3998 constructs can be used to access the locations of the elements being matched.
3999 The location of the @var{n}th component of the right hand side is
4000 @code{@@@var{n}}, while the location of the left hand side grouping is
4003 In addition, the named references construct @code{@@@var{name}} and
4004 @code{@@[@var{name}]} may also be used to address the symbol locations.
4005 @xref{Named References}, for more information about using the named
4006 references construct.
4008 Here is a basic example using the default data type for locations:
4016 @@$.first_column = @@1.first_column;
4017 @@$.first_line = @@1.first_line;
4018 @@$.last_column = @@3.last_column;
4019 @@$.last_line = @@3.last_line;
4026 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4027 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4028 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4034 As for semantic values, there is a default action for locations that is
4035 run each time a rule is matched. It sets the beginning of @code{@@$} to the
4036 beginning of the first symbol, and the end of @code{@@$} to the end of the
4039 With this default action, the location tracking can be fully automatic. The
4040 example above simply rewrites this way:
4054 "Division by zero, l%d,c%d-l%d,c%d",
4055 @@3.first_line, @@3.first_column,
4056 @@3.last_line, @@3.last_column);
4063 It is also possible to access the location of the lookahead token, if any,
4064 from a semantic action.
4065 This location is stored in @code{yylloc}.
4066 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
4068 @node Location Default Action
4069 @subsection Default Action for Locations
4070 @vindex YYLLOC_DEFAULT
4071 @cindex GLR parsers and @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}
4073 Actually, actions are not the best place to compute locations. Since
4074 locations are much more general than semantic values, there is room in
4075 the output parser to redefine the default action to take for each
4076 rule. The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro is invoked each time a rule is
4077 matched, before the associated action is run. It is also invoked
4078 while processing a syntax error, to compute the error's location.
4079 Before reporting an unresolvable syntactic ambiguity, a GLR
4080 parser invokes @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} recursively to compute the location
4083 Most of the time, this macro is general enough to suppress location
4084 dedicated code from semantic actions.
4086 The @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} macro takes three parameters. The first one is
4087 the location of the grouping (the result of the computation). When a
4088 rule is matched, the second parameter identifies locations of
4089 all right hand side elements of the rule being matched, and the third
4090 parameter is the size of the rule's right hand side.
4091 When a GLR parser reports an ambiguity, which of multiple candidate
4092 right hand sides it passes to @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is undefined.
4093 When processing a syntax error, the second parameter identifies locations
4094 of the symbols that were discarded during error processing, and the third
4095 parameter is the number of discarded symbols.
4097 By default, @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT} is defined this way:
4101 # define YYLLOC_DEFAULT(Cur, Rhs, N) \
4105 (Cur).first_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_line; \
4106 (Cur).first_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 1).first_column; \
4107 (Cur).last_line = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_line; \
4108 (Cur).last_column = YYRHSLOC(Rhs, N).last_column; \
4112 (Cur).first_line = (Cur).last_line = \
4113 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_line; \
4114 (Cur).first_column = (Cur).last_column = \
4115 YYRHSLOC(Rhs, 0).last_column; \
4122 where @code{YYRHSLOC (rhs, k)} is the location of the @var{k}th symbol
4123 in @var{rhs} when @var{k} is positive, and the location of the symbol
4124 just before the reduction when @var{k} and @var{n} are both zero.
4126 When defining @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}, you should consider that:
4130 All arguments are free of side-effects. However, only the first one (the
4131 result) should be modified by @code{YYLLOC_DEFAULT}.
4134 For consistency with semantic actions, valid indexes within the
4135 right hand side range from 1 to @var{n}. When @var{n} is zero, only 0 is a
4136 valid index, and it refers to the symbol just before the reduction.
4137 During error processing @var{n} is always positive.
4140 Your macro should parenthesize its arguments, if need be, since the
4141 actual arguments may not be surrounded by parentheses. Also, your
4142 macro should expand to something that can be used as a single
4143 statement when it is followed by a semicolon.
4146 @node Named References
4147 @section Named References
4148 @cindex named references
4150 As described in the preceding sections, the traditional way to refer to any
4151 semantic value or location is a @dfn{positional reference}, which takes the
4152 form @code{$@var{n}}, @code{$$}, @code{@@@var{n}}, and @code{@@$}. However,
4153 such a reference is not very descriptive. Moreover, if you later decide to
4154 insert or remove symbols in the right-hand side of a grammar rule, the need
4155 to renumber such references can be tedious and error-prone.
4157 To avoid these issues, you can also refer to a semantic value or location
4158 using a @dfn{named reference}. First of all, original symbol names may be
4159 used as named references. For example:
4163 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4164 @{ $invocation = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@invocation); @}
4169 Positional and named references can be mixed arbitrarily. For example:
4173 invocation: op '(' args ')'
4174 @{ $$ = new_invocation ($op, $args, @@$); @}
4179 However, sometimes regular symbol names are not sufficient due to
4185 @{ $exp = $exp / $exp; @} // $exp is ambiguous.
4188 @{ $$ = $1 / $exp; @} // One usage is ambiguous.
4191 @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @} // No error.
4196 When ambiguity occurs, explicitly declared names may be used for values and
4197 locations. Explicit names are declared as a bracketed name after a symbol
4198 appearance in rule definitions. For example:
4201 exp[result]: exp[left] '/' exp[right]
4202 @{ $result = $left / $right; @}
4207 In order to access a semantic value generated by a mid-rule action, an
4208 explicit name may also be declared by putting a bracketed name after the
4209 closing brace of the mid-rule action code:
4212 exp[res]: exp[x] '+' @{$left = $x;@}[left] exp[right]
4213 @{ $res = $left + $right; @}
4219 In references, in order to specify names containing dots and dashes, an explicit
4220 bracketed syntax @code{$[name]} and @code{@@[name]} must be used:
4223 if-stmt: "if" '(' expr ')' "then" then.stmt ';'
4224 @{ $[if-stmt] = new_if_stmt ($expr, $[then.stmt]); @}
4228 It often happens that named references are followed by a dot, dash or other
4229 C punctuation marks and operators. By default, Bison will read
4230 @samp{$name.suffix} as a reference to symbol value @code{$name} followed by
4231 @samp{.suffix}, i.e., an access to the @code{suffix} field of the semantic
4232 value. In order to force Bison to recognize @samp{name.suffix} in its
4233 entirety as the name of a semantic value, the bracketed syntax
4234 @samp{$[name.suffix]} must be used.
4236 The named references feature is experimental. More user feedback will help
4240 @section Bison Declarations
4241 @cindex declarations, Bison
4242 @cindex Bison declarations
4244 The @dfn{Bison declarations} section of a Bison grammar defines the symbols
4245 used in formulating the grammar and the data types of semantic values.
4248 All token type names (but not single-character literal tokens such as
4249 @code{'+'} and @code{'*'}) must be declared. Nonterminal symbols must be
4250 declared if you need to specify which data type to use for the semantic
4251 value (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One Value Type}).
4253 The first rule in the grammar file also specifies the start symbol, by
4254 default. If you want some other symbol to be the start symbol, you
4255 must declare it explicitly (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages
4256 and Context-Free Grammars}).
4259 * Require Decl:: Requiring a Bison version.
4260 * Token Decl:: Declaring terminal symbols.
4261 * Precedence Decl:: Declaring terminals with precedence and associativity.
4262 * Union Decl:: Declaring the set of all semantic value types.
4263 * Type Decl:: Declaring the choice of type for a nonterminal symbol.
4264 * Initial Action Decl:: Code run before parsing starts.
4265 * Destructor Decl:: Declaring how symbols are freed.
4266 * Printer Decl:: Declaring how symbol values are displayed.
4267 * Expect Decl:: Suppressing warnings about parsing conflicts.
4268 * Start Decl:: Specifying the start symbol.
4269 * Pure Decl:: Requesting a reentrant parser.
4270 * Push Decl:: Requesting a push parser.
4271 * Decl Summary:: Table of all Bison declarations.
4272 * %define Summary:: Defining variables to adjust Bison's behavior.
4273 * %code Summary:: Inserting code into the parser source.
4277 @subsection Require a Version of Bison
4278 @cindex version requirement
4279 @cindex requiring a version of Bison
4282 You may require the minimum version of Bison to process the grammar. If
4283 the requirement is not met, @command{bison} exits with an error (exit
4287 %require "@var{version}"
4291 @subsection Token Type Names
4292 @cindex declaring token type names
4293 @cindex token type names, declaring
4294 @cindex declaring literal string tokens
4297 The basic way to declare a token type name (terminal symbol) is as follows:
4303 Bison will convert this into a @code{#define} directive in
4304 the parser, so that the function @code{yylex} (if it is in this file)
4305 can use the name @var{name} to stand for this token type's code.
4307 Alternatively, you can use @code{%left}, @code{%right}, or
4308 @code{%nonassoc} instead of @code{%token}, if you wish to specify
4309 associativity and precedence. @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator
4312 You can explicitly specify the numeric code for a token type by appending
4313 a nonnegative decimal or hexadecimal integer value in the field immediately
4314 following the token name:
4318 %token XNUM 0x12d // a GNU extension
4322 It is generally best, however, to let Bison choose the numeric codes for
4323 all token types. Bison will automatically select codes that don't conflict
4324 with each other or with normal characters.
4326 In the event that the stack type is a union, you must augment the
4327 @code{%token} or other token declaration to include the data type
4328 alternative delimited by angle-brackets (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More
4329 Than One Value Type}).
4335 %union @{ /* define stack type */
4339 %token <val> NUM /* define token NUM and its type */
4343 You can associate a literal string token with a token type name by
4344 writing the literal string at the end of a @code{%token}
4345 declaration which declares the name. For example:
4352 For example, a grammar for the C language might specify these names with
4353 equivalent literal string tokens:
4356 %token <operator> OR "||"
4357 %token <operator> LE 134 "<="
4362 Once you equate the literal string and the token name, you can use them
4363 interchangeably in further declarations or the grammar rules. The
4364 @code{yylex} function can use the token name or the literal string to
4365 obtain the token type code number (@pxref{Calling Convention}).
4366 Syntax error messages passed to @code{yyerror} from the parser will reference
4367 the literal string instead of the token name.
4369 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
4370 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
4374 %token END 0 "end of file"
4377 @node Precedence Decl
4378 @subsection Operator Precedence
4379 @cindex precedence declarations
4380 @cindex declaring operator precedence
4381 @cindex operator precedence, declaring
4383 Use the @code{%left}, @code{%right} or @code{%nonassoc} declaration to
4384 declare a token and specify its precedence and associativity, all at
4385 once. These are called @dfn{precedence declarations}.
4386 @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}, for general information on
4387 operator precedence.
4389 The syntax of a precedence declaration is nearly the same as that of
4390 @code{%token}: either
4393 %left @var{symbols}@dots{}
4400 %left <@var{type}> @var{symbols}@dots{}
4403 And indeed any of these declarations serves the purposes of @code{%token}.
4404 But in addition, they specify the associativity and relative precedence for
4405 all the @var{symbols}:
4409 The associativity of an operator @var{op} determines how repeated uses
4410 of the operator nest: whether @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op}
4411 @var{z}} is parsed by grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first or by
4412 grouping @var{y} with @var{z} first. @code{%left} specifies
4413 left-associativity (grouping @var{x} with @var{y} first) and
4414 @code{%right} specifies right-associativity (grouping @var{y} with
4415 @var{z} first). @code{%nonassoc} specifies no associativity, which
4416 means that @samp{@var{x} @var{op} @var{y} @var{op} @var{z}} is
4417 considered a syntax error.
4420 The precedence of an operator determines how it nests with other operators.
4421 All the tokens declared in a single precedence declaration have equal
4422 precedence and nest together according to their associativity.
4423 When two tokens declared in different precedence declarations associate,
4424 the one declared later has the higher precedence and is grouped first.
4427 For backward compatibility, there is a confusing difference between the
4428 argument lists of @code{%token} and precedence declarations.
4429 Only a @code{%token} can associate a literal string with a token type name.
4430 A precedence declaration always interprets a literal string as a reference to a
4435 %left OR "<=" // Does not declare an alias.
4436 %left OR 134 "<=" 135 // Declares 134 for OR and 135 for "<=".
4440 @subsection The Collection of Value Types
4441 @cindex declaring value types
4442 @cindex value types, declaring
4445 The @code{%union} declaration specifies the entire collection of
4446 possible data types for semantic values. The keyword @code{%union} is
4447 followed by braced code containing the same thing that goes inside a
4462 This says that the two alternative types are @code{double} and @code{symrec
4463 *}. They are given names @code{val} and @code{tptr}; these names are used
4464 in the @code{%token} and @code{%type} declarations to pick one of the types
4465 for a terminal or nonterminal symbol (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
4467 As an extension to POSIX, a tag is allowed after the
4468 @code{union}. For example:
4480 specifies the union tag @code{value}, so the corresponding C type is
4481 @code{union value}. If you do not specify a tag, it defaults to
4484 As another extension to POSIX, you may specify multiple
4485 @code{%union} declarations; their contents are concatenated. However,
4486 only the first @code{%union} declaration can specify a tag.
4488 Note that, unlike making a @code{union} declaration in C, you need not write
4489 a semicolon after the closing brace.
4491 Instead of @code{%union}, you can define and use your own union type
4492 @code{YYSTYPE} if your grammar contains at least one
4493 @samp{<@var{type}>} tag. For example, you can put the following into
4494 a header file @file{parser.h}:
4502 typedef union YYSTYPE YYSTYPE;
4507 and then your grammar can use the following
4508 instead of @code{%union}:
4521 @subsection Nonterminal Symbols
4522 @cindex declaring value types, nonterminals
4523 @cindex value types, nonterminals, declaring
4527 When you use @code{%union} to specify multiple value types, you must
4528 declare the value type of each nonterminal symbol for which values are
4529 used. This is done with a @code{%type} declaration, like this:
4532 %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal}@dots{}
4536 Here @var{nonterminal} is the name of a nonterminal symbol, and
4537 @var{type} is the name given in the @code{%union} to the alternative
4538 that you want (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}). You
4539 can give any number of nonterminal symbols in the same @code{%type}
4540 declaration, if they have the same value type. Use spaces to separate
4543 You can also declare the value type of a terminal symbol. To do this,
4544 use the same @code{<@var{type}>} construction in a declaration for the
4545 terminal symbol. All kinds of token declarations allow
4546 @code{<@var{type}>}.
4548 @node Initial Action Decl
4549 @subsection Performing Actions before Parsing
4550 @findex %initial-action
4552 Sometimes your parser needs to perform some initializations before
4553 parsing. The @code{%initial-action} directive allows for such arbitrary
4556 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action @{ @var{code} @}
4557 @findex %initial-action
4558 Declare that the braced @var{code} must be invoked before parsing each time
4559 @code{yyparse} is called. The @var{code} may use @code{$$} (or
4560 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) and @code{@@$} --- initial value and location of the
4561 lookahead --- and the @code{%parse-param}.
4564 For instance, if your locations use a file name, you may use
4567 %parse-param @{ char const *file_name @};
4570 @@$.initialize (file_name);
4575 @node Destructor Decl
4576 @subsection Freeing Discarded Symbols
4577 @cindex freeing discarded symbols
4581 During error recovery (@pxref{Error Recovery}), symbols already pushed
4582 on the stack and tokens coming from the rest of the file are discarded
4583 until the parser falls on its feet. If the parser runs out of memory,
4584 or if it returns via @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, all the
4585 symbols on the stack must be discarded. Even if the parser succeeds, it
4586 must discard the start symbol.
4588 When discarded symbols convey heap based information, this memory is
4589 lost. While this behavior can be tolerable for batch parsers, such as
4590 in traditional compilers, it is unacceptable for programs like shells or
4591 protocol implementations that may parse and execute indefinitely.
4593 The @code{%destructor} directive defines code that is called when a
4594 symbol is automatically discarded.
4596 @deffn {Directive} %destructor @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4598 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser discards one of the
4599 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{$$} (or @code{$<@var{tag}>$})
4600 designates the semantic value associated with the discarded symbol, and
4601 @code{@@$} designates its location. The additional parser parameters are
4602 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4605 When a symbol is listed among @var{symbols}, its @code{%destructor} is called a
4606 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4607 You may also define a per-type @code{%destructor} by listing a semantic type
4608 tag among @var{symbols}.
4609 In that case, the parser will invoke this @var{code} whenever it discards any
4610 grammar symbol that has that semantic type tag unless that symbol has its own
4611 per-symbol @code{%destructor}.
4613 Finally, you can define two different kinds of default @code{%destructor}s.
4614 (These default forms are experimental.
4615 More user feedback will help to determine whether they should become permanent
4617 You can place each of @code{<*>} and @code{<>} in the @var{symbols} list of
4618 exactly one @code{%destructor} declaration in your grammar file.
4619 The parser will invoke the @var{code} associated with one of these whenever it
4620 discards any user-defined grammar symbol that has no per-symbol and no per-type
4622 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<*>} in the case of such a grammar
4623 symbol for which you have formally declared a semantic type tag (@code{%type}
4624 counts as such a declaration, but @code{$<tag>$} does not).
4625 The parser uses the @var{code} for @code{<>} in the case of such a grammar
4626 symbol that has no declared semantic type tag.
4633 %union @{ char *string; @}
4634 %token <string> STRING1
4635 %token <string> STRING2
4636 %type <string> string1
4637 %type <string> string2
4638 %union @{ char character; @}
4639 %token <character> CHR
4640 %type <character> chr
4643 %destructor @{ @} <character>
4644 %destructor @{ free ($$); @} <*>
4645 %destructor @{ free ($$); printf ("%d", @@$.first_line); @} STRING1 string1
4646 %destructor @{ printf ("Discarding tagless symbol.\n"); @} <>
4650 guarantees that, when the parser discards any user-defined symbol that has a
4651 semantic type tag other than @code{<character>}, it passes its semantic value
4652 to @code{free} by default.
4653 However, when the parser discards a @code{STRING1} or a @code{string1}, it also
4654 prints its line number to @code{stdout}.
4655 It performs only the second @code{%destructor} in this case, so it invokes
4656 @code{free} only once.
4657 Finally, the parser merely prints a message whenever it discards any symbol,
4658 such as @code{TAGLESS}, that has no semantic type tag.
4660 A Bison-generated parser invokes the default @code{%destructor}s only for
4661 user-defined as opposed to Bison-defined symbols.
4662 For example, the parser will not invoke either kind of default
4663 @code{%destructor} for the special Bison-defined symbols @code{$accept},
4664 @code{$undefined}, or @code{$end} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison Symbols}),
4665 none of which you can reference in your grammar.
4666 It also will not invoke either for the @code{error} token (@pxref{Table of
4667 Symbols, ,error}), which is always defined by Bison regardless of whether you
4668 reference it in your grammar.
4669 However, it may invoke one of them for the end token (token 0) if you
4670 redefine it from @code{$end} to, for example, @code{END}:
4676 @cindex actions in mid-rule
4677 @cindex mid-rule actions
4678 Finally, Bison will never invoke a @code{%destructor} for an unreferenced
4679 mid-rule semantic value (@pxref{Mid-Rule Actions,,Actions in Mid-Rule}).
4680 That is, Bison does not consider a mid-rule to have a semantic value if you
4681 do not reference @code{$$} in the mid-rule's action or @code{$@var{n}}
4682 (where @var{n} is the right-hand side symbol position of the mid-rule) in
4683 any later action in that rule. However, if you do reference either, the
4684 Bison-generated parser will invoke the @code{<>} @code{%destructor} whenever
4685 it discards the mid-rule symbol.
4689 In the future, it may be possible to redefine the @code{error} token as a
4690 nonterminal that captures the discarded symbols.
4691 In that case, the parser will invoke the default destructor for it as well.
4696 @cindex discarded symbols
4697 @dfn{Discarded symbols} are the following:
4701 stacked symbols popped during the first phase of error recovery,
4703 incoming terminals during the second phase of error recovery,
4705 the current lookahead and the entire stack (except the current
4706 right-hand side symbols) when the parser returns immediately, and
4708 the current lookahead and the entire stack (including the current right-hand
4709 side symbols) when the C++ parser (@file{lalr1.cc}) catches an exception in
4712 the start symbol, when the parser succeeds.
4715 The parser can @dfn{return immediately} because of an explicit call to
4716 @code{YYABORT} or @code{YYACCEPT}, or failed error recovery, or memory
4719 Right-hand side symbols of a rule that explicitly triggers a syntax
4720 error via @code{YYERROR} are not discarded automatically. As a rule
4721 of thumb, destructors are invoked only when user actions cannot manage
4725 @subsection Printing Semantic Values
4726 @cindex printing semantic values
4730 When run-time traces are enabled (@pxref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}),
4731 the parser reports its actions, such as reductions. When a symbol involved
4732 in an action is reported, only its kind is displayed, as the parser cannot
4733 know how semantic values should be formatted.
4735 The @code{%printer} directive defines code that is called when a symbol is
4736 reported. Its syntax is the same as @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4737 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}).
4739 @deffn {Directive} %printer @{ @var{code} @} @var{symbols}
4742 @c This is the same text as for %destructor.
4743 Invoke the braced @var{code} whenever the parser displays one of the
4744 @var{symbols}. Within @var{code}, @code{yyoutput} denotes the output stream
4745 (a @code{FILE*} in C, and an @code{std::ostream&} in C++), @code{$$} (or
4746 @code{$<@var{tag}>$}) designates the semantic value associated with the
4747 symbol, and @code{@@$} its location. The additional parser parameters are
4748 also available (@pxref{Parser Function, , The Parser Function
4751 The @var{symbols} are defined as for @code{%destructor} (@pxref{Destructor
4752 Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.): they can be per-type (e.g.,
4753 @samp{<ival>}), per-symbol (e.g., @samp{exp}, @samp{NUM}, @samp{"float"}),
4754 typed per-default (i.e., @samp{<*>}, or untyped per-default (i.e.,
4762 %union @{ char *string; @}
4763 %token <string> STRING1
4764 %token <string> STRING2
4765 %type <string> string1
4766 %type <string> string2
4767 %union @{ char character; @}
4768 %token <character> CHR
4769 %type <character> chr
4772 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "'%c'", $$); @} <character>
4773 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "&%p", $$); @} <*>
4774 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "\"%s\"", $$); @} STRING1 string1
4775 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "<>"); @} <>
4779 guarantees that, when the parser print any symbol that has a semantic type
4780 tag other than @code{<character>}, it display the address of the semantic
4781 value by default. However, when the parser displays a @code{STRING1} or a
4782 @code{string1}, it formats it as a string in double quotes. It performs
4783 only the second @code{%printer} in this case, so it prints only once.
4784 Finally, the parser print @samp{<>} for any symbol, such as @code{TAGLESS},
4785 that has no semantic type tag. See also
4789 @subsection Suppressing Conflict Warnings
4790 @cindex suppressing conflict warnings
4791 @cindex preventing warnings about conflicts
4792 @cindex warnings, preventing
4793 @cindex conflicts, suppressing warnings of
4797 Bison normally warns if there are any conflicts in the grammar
4798 (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,Shift/Reduce Conflicts}), but most real grammars
4799 have harmless shift/reduce conflicts which are resolved in a predictable
4800 way and would be difficult to eliminate. It is desirable to suppress
4801 the warning about these conflicts unless the number of conflicts
4802 changes. You can do this with the @code{%expect} declaration.
4804 The declaration looks like this:
4810 Here @var{n} is a decimal integer. The declaration says there should
4811 be @var{n} shift/reduce conflicts and no reduce/reduce conflicts.
4812 Bison reports an error if the number of shift/reduce conflicts differs
4813 from @var{n}, or if there are any reduce/reduce conflicts.
4815 For deterministic parsers, reduce/reduce conflicts are more
4816 serious, and should be eliminated entirely. Bison will always report
4817 reduce/reduce conflicts for these parsers. With GLR
4818 parsers, however, both kinds of conflicts are routine; otherwise,
4819 there would be no need to use GLR parsing. Therefore, it is
4820 also possible to specify an expected number of reduce/reduce conflicts
4821 in GLR parsers, using the declaration:
4827 In general, using @code{%expect} involves these steps:
4831 Compile your grammar without @code{%expect}. Use the @samp{-v} option
4832 to get a verbose list of where the conflicts occur. Bison will also
4833 print the number of conflicts.
4836 Check each of the conflicts to make sure that Bison's default
4837 resolution is what you really want. If not, rewrite the grammar and
4838 go back to the beginning.
4841 Add an @code{%expect} declaration, copying the number @var{n} from the
4842 number which Bison printed. With GLR parsers, add an
4843 @code{%expect-rr} declaration as well.
4846 Now Bison will report an error if you introduce an unexpected conflict,
4847 but will keep silent otherwise.
4850 @subsection The Start-Symbol
4851 @cindex declaring the start symbol
4852 @cindex start symbol, declaring
4853 @cindex default start symbol
4856 Bison assumes by default that the start symbol for the grammar is the first
4857 nonterminal specified in the grammar specification section. The programmer
4858 may override this restriction with the @code{%start} declaration as follows:
4865 @subsection A Pure (Reentrant) Parser
4866 @cindex reentrant parser
4868 @findex %define api.pure
4870 A @dfn{reentrant} program is one which does not alter in the course of
4871 execution; in other words, it consists entirely of @dfn{pure} (read-only)
4872 code. Reentrancy is important whenever asynchronous execution is possible;
4873 for example, a nonreentrant program may not be safe to call from a signal
4874 handler. In systems with multiple threads of control, a nonreentrant
4875 program must be called only within interlocks.
4877 Normally, Bison generates a parser which is not reentrant. This is
4878 suitable for most uses, and it permits compatibility with Yacc. (The
4879 standard Yacc interfaces are inherently nonreentrant, because they use
4880 statically allocated variables for communication with @code{yylex},
4881 including @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.)
4883 Alternatively, you can generate a pure, reentrant parser. The Bison
4884 declaration @code{%define api.pure} says that you want the parser to be
4885 reentrant. It looks like this:
4888 %define api.pure full
4891 The result is that the communication variables @code{yylval} and
4892 @code{yylloc} become local variables in @code{yyparse}, and a different
4893 calling convention is used for the lexical analyzer function
4894 @code{yylex}. @xref{Pure Calling, ,Calling Conventions for Pure
4895 Parsers}, for the details of this. The variable @code{yynerrs}
4896 becomes local in @code{yyparse} in pull mode but it becomes a member
4897 of yypstate in push mode. (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
4898 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}). The convention for calling
4899 @code{yyparse} itself is unchanged.
4901 Whether the parser is pure has nothing to do with the grammar rules.
4902 You can generate either a pure parser or a nonreentrant parser from any
4906 @subsection A Push Parser
4909 @findex %define api.push-pull
4911 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
4912 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
4914 A pull parser is called once and it takes control until all its input
4915 is completely parsed. A push parser, on the other hand, is called
4916 each time a new token is made available.
4918 A push parser is typically useful when the parser is part of a
4919 main event loop in the client's application. This is typically
4920 a requirement of a GUI, when the main event loop needs to be triggered
4921 within a certain time period.
4923 Normally, Bison generates a pull parser.
4924 The following Bison declaration says that you want the parser to be a push
4925 parser (@pxref{%define Summary,,api.push-pull}):
4928 %define api.push-pull push
4931 In almost all cases, you want to ensure that your push parser is also
4932 a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}). The only
4933 time you should create an impure push parser is to have backwards
4934 compatibility with the impure Yacc pull mode interface. Unless you know
4935 what you are doing, your declarations should look like this:
4938 %define api.pure full
4939 %define api.push-pull push
4942 There is a major notable functional difference between the pure push parser
4943 and the impure push parser. It is acceptable for a pure push parser to have
4944 many parser instances, of the same type of parser, in memory at the same time.
4945 An impure push parser should only use one parser at a time.
4947 When a push parser is selected, Bison will generate some new symbols in
4948 the generated parser. @code{yypstate} is a structure that the generated
4949 parser uses to store the parser's state. @code{yypstate_new} is the
4950 function that will create a new parser instance. @code{yypstate_delete}
4951 will free the resources associated with the corresponding parser instance.
4952 Finally, @code{yypush_parse} is the function that should be called whenever a
4953 token is available to provide the parser. A trivial example
4954 of using a pure push parser would look like this:
4958 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4960 status = yypush_parse (ps, yylex (), NULL);
4961 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4962 yypstate_delete (ps);
4965 If the user decided to use an impure push parser, a few things about
4966 the generated parser will change. The @code{yychar} variable becomes
4967 a global variable instead of a variable in the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4968 For this reason, the signature of the @code{yypush_parse} function is
4969 changed to remove the token as a parameter. A nonreentrant push parser
4970 example would thus look like this:
4975 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
4978 status = yypush_parse (ps);
4979 @} while (status == YYPUSH_MORE);
4980 yypstate_delete (ps);
4983 That's it. Notice the next token is put into the global variable @code{yychar}
4984 for use by the next invocation of the @code{yypush_parse} function.
4986 Bison also supports both the push parser interface along with the pull parser
4987 interface in the same generated parser. In order to get this functionality,
4988 you should replace the @code{%define api.push-pull push} declaration with the
4989 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration. Doing this will create all of
4990 the symbols mentioned earlier along with the two extra symbols, @code{yyparse}
4991 and @code{yypull_parse}. @code{yyparse} can be used exactly as it normally
4992 would be used. However, the user should note that it is implemented in the
4993 generated parser by calling @code{yypull_parse}.
4994 This makes the @code{yyparse} function that is generated with the
4995 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration slower than the normal
4996 @code{yyparse} function. If the user
4997 calls the @code{yypull_parse} function it will parse the rest of the input
4998 stream. It is possible to @code{yypush_parse} tokens to select a subgrammar
4999 and then @code{yypull_parse} the rest of the input stream. If you would like
5000 to switch back and forth between between parsing styles, you would have to
5001 write your own @code{yypull_parse} function that knows when to quit looking
5002 for input. An example of using the @code{yypull_parse} function would look
5006 yypstate *ps = yypstate_new ();
5007 yypull_parse (ps); /* Will call the lexer */
5008 yypstate_delete (ps);
5011 Adding the @code{%define api.pure full} declaration does exactly the same thing
5012 to the generated parser with @code{%define api.push-pull both} as it did for
5013 @code{%define api.push-pull push}.
5016 @subsection Bison Declaration Summary
5017 @cindex Bison declaration summary
5018 @cindex declaration summary
5019 @cindex summary, Bison declaration
5021 Here is a summary of the declarations used to define a grammar:
5023 @deffn {Directive} %union
5024 Declare the collection of data types that semantic values may have
5025 (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}).
5028 @deffn {Directive} %token
5029 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) with no precedence
5030 or associativity specified (@pxref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}).
5033 @deffn {Directive} %right
5034 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is right-associative
5035 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5038 @deffn {Directive} %left
5039 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is left-associative
5040 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5043 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
5044 Declare a terminal symbol (token type name) that is nonassociative
5045 (@pxref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}).
5046 Using it in a way that would be associative is a syntax error.
5050 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
5051 Assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec} modifier
5052 (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}).
5056 @deffn {Directive} %type
5057 Declare the type of semantic values for a nonterminal symbol
5058 (@pxref{Type Decl, ,Nonterminal Symbols}).
5061 @deffn {Directive} %start
5062 Specify the grammar's start symbol (@pxref{Start Decl, ,The
5066 @deffn {Directive} %expect
5067 Declare the expected number of shift-reduce conflicts
5068 (@pxref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}).
5074 In order to change the behavior of @command{bison}, use the following
5077 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5078 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5080 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
5081 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
5082 @xref{%code Summary}.
5085 @deffn {Directive} %debug
5086 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} (or
5087 @code{@var{prefix}DEBUG} with @samp{%define api.prefix @var{prefix}}, see
5088 @ref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) to 1 if it is
5089 not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are compiled.
5090 @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
5093 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5094 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5095 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5096 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
5099 @deffn {Directive} %defines
5100 Write a parser header file containing macro definitions for the token
5101 type names defined in the grammar as well as a few other declarations.
5102 If the parser implementation file is named @file{@var{name}.c} then
5103 the parser header file is named @file{@var{name}.h}.
5105 For C parsers, the parser header file declares @code{YYSTYPE} unless
5106 @code{YYSTYPE} is already defined as a macro or you have used a
5107 @code{<@var{type}>} tag without using @code{%union}. Therefore, if
5108 you are using a @code{%union} (@pxref{Multiple Types, ,More Than One
5109 Value Type}) with components that require other definitions, or if you
5110 have defined a @code{YYSTYPE} macro or type definition (@pxref{Value
5111 Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}), you need to arrange for these
5112 definitions to be propagated to all modules, e.g., by putting them in
5113 a prerequisite header that is included both by your parser and by any
5114 other module that needs @code{YYSTYPE}.
5116 Unless your parser is pure, the parser header file declares
5117 @code{yylval} as an external variable. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure
5118 (Reentrant) Parser}.
5120 If you have also used locations, the parser header file declares
5121 @code{YYLTYPE} and @code{yylloc} using a protocol similar to that of the
5122 @code{YYSTYPE} macro and @code{yylval}. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
5124 This parser header file is normally essential if you wish to put the
5125 definition of @code{yylex} in a separate source file, because
5126 @code{yylex} typically needs to be able to refer to the
5127 above-mentioned declarations and to the token type codes. @xref{Token
5128 Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
5130 @findex %code requires
5131 @findex %code provides
5132 If you have declared @code{%code requires} or @code{%code provides}, the output
5133 header also contains their code.
5134 @xref{%code Summary}.
5136 @cindex Header guard
5137 The generated header is protected against multiple inclusions with a C
5138 preprocessor guard: @samp{YY_@var{PREFIX}_@var{FILE}_INCLUDED}, where
5139 @var{PREFIX} and @var{FILE} are the prefix (@pxref{Multiple Parsers,
5140 ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}) and generated file name turned
5141 uppercase, with each series of non alphanumerical characters converted to a
5144 For instance with @samp{%define api.prefix "calc"} and @samp{%defines
5145 "lib/parse.h"}, the header will be guarded as follows.
5147 #ifndef YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5148 # define YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED
5150 #endif /* ! YY_CALC_LIB_PARSE_H_INCLUDED */
5154 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
5155 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
5158 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
5159 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
5160 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
5163 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
5164 Specify a prefix to use for all Bison output file names. The names
5165 are chosen as if the grammar file were named @file{@var{prefix}.y}.
5168 @deffn {Directive} %language "@var{language}"
5169 Specify the programming language for the generated parser. Currently
5170 supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
5171 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
5173 This directive is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
5177 @deffn {Directive} %locations
5178 Generate the code processing the locations (@pxref{Action Features,
5179 ,Special Features for Use in Actions}). This mode is enabled as soon as
5180 the grammar uses the special @samp{@@@var{n}} tokens, but if your
5181 grammar does not use it, using @samp{%locations} allows for more
5182 accurate syntax error messages.
5186 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
5187 Do not assign a precedence to rules lacking an explicit @code{%prec}
5188 modifier (@pxref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
5193 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
5194 Don't generate any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
5195 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison writes these commands in the
5196 parser implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
5197 associate errors and object code with your source file (the grammar
5198 file). This directive causes them to associate errors with the parser
5199 implementation file, treating it as an independent source file in its
5203 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
5204 Specify @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
5207 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
5208 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
5209 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
5213 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
5214 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
5215 Require a Version of Bison}.
5218 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton "@var{file}"
5219 Specify the skeleton to use.
5221 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
5222 @c You should use @code{%language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
5223 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always choose the
5224 @c correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
5226 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
5227 file in the Bison installation directory.
5228 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
5229 directory of the grammar file.
5230 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
5233 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
5234 Generate an array of token names in the parser implementation file.
5235 The name of the array is @code{yytname}; @code{yytname[@var{i}]} is
5236 the name of the token whose internal Bison token code number is
5237 @var{i}. The first three elements of @code{yytname} correspond to the
5238 predefined tokens @code{"$end"}, @code{"error"}, and
5239 @code{"$undefined"}; after these come the symbols defined in the
5242 The name in the table includes all the characters needed to represent
5243 the token in Bison. For single-character literals and literal
5244 strings, this includes the surrounding quoting characters and any
5245 escape sequences. For example, the Bison single-character literal
5246 @code{'+'} corresponds to a three-character name, represented in C as
5247 @code{"'+'"}; and the Bison two-character literal string @code{"\\/"}
5248 corresponds to a five-character name, represented in C as
5251 When you specify @code{%token-table}, Bison also generates macro
5252 definitions for macros @code{YYNTOKENS}, @code{YYNNTS}, and
5253 @code{YYNRULES}, and @code{YYNSTATES}:
5257 The highest token number, plus one.
5259 The number of nonterminal symbols.
5261 The number of grammar rules,
5263 The number of parser states (@pxref{Parser States}).
5267 @deffn {Directive} %verbose
5268 Write an extra output file containing verbose descriptions of the
5269 parser states and what is done for each type of lookahead token in
5270 that state. @xref{Understanding, , Understanding Your Parser}, for more
5274 @deffn {Directive} %yacc
5275 Pretend the option @option{--yacc} was given, i.e., imitate Yacc,
5276 including its naming conventions. @xref{Bison Options}, for more.
5280 @node %define Summary
5281 @subsection %define Summary
5283 There are many features of Bison's behavior that can be controlled by
5284 assigning the feature a single value. For historical reasons, some
5285 such features are assigned values by dedicated directives, such as
5286 @code{%start}, which assigns the start symbol. However, newer such
5287 features are associated with variables, which are assigned by the
5288 @code{%define} directive:
5290 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
5291 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
5292 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
5293 Define @var{variable} to @var{value}.
5295 @var{value} must be placed in quotation marks if it contains any
5296 character other than a letter, underscore, period, or non-initial dash
5297 or digit. Omitting @code{"@var{value}"} entirely is always equivalent
5298 to specifying @code{""}.
5300 It is an error if a @var{variable} is defined by @code{%define}
5301 multiple times, but see @ref{Bison Options,,-D
5302 @var{name}[=@var{value}]}.
5305 The rest of this section summarizes variables and values that
5306 @code{%define} accepts.
5308 Some @var{variable}s take Boolean values. In this case, Bison will
5309 complain if the variable definition does not meet one of the following
5313 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{true}
5315 @item @code{@var{value}} is omitted (or @code{""} is specified).
5316 This is equivalent to @code{true}.
5318 @item @code{@var{value}} is @code{false}.
5320 @item @var{variable} is never defined.
5321 In this case, Bison selects a default value.
5324 What @var{variable}s are accepted, as well as their meanings and default
5325 values, depend on the selected target language and/or the parser
5326 skeleton (@pxref{Decl Summary,,%language}, @pxref{Decl
5327 Summary,,%skeleton}).
5328 Unaccepted @var{variable}s produce an error.
5329 Some of the accepted @var{variable}s are:
5332 @c ================================================== api.location.type
5333 @item @code{api.location.type}
5334 @findex %define api.location.type
5337 @item Language(s): C++, Java
5339 @item Purpose: Define the location type.
5340 @xref{User Defined Location Type}.
5342 @item Accepted Values: String
5344 @item Default Value: none
5346 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.7
5349 @c ================================================== api.prefix
5350 @item @code{api.prefix}
5351 @findex %define api.prefix
5354 @item Language(s): All
5356 @item Purpose: Rename exported symbols.
5357 @xref{Multiple Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
5359 @item Accepted Values: String
5361 @item Default Value: @code{yy}
5363 @item History: introduced in Bison 2.6
5366 @c ================================================== api.pure
5367 @item @code{api.pure}
5368 @findex %define api.pure
5371 @item Language(s): C
5373 @item Purpose: Request a pure (reentrant) parser program.
5374 @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
5376 @item Accepted Values: @code{true}, @code{false}, @code{full}
5378 The value may be omitted: this is equivalent to specifying @code{true}, as is
5379 the case for Boolean values.
5381 When @code{%define api.pure full} is used, the parser is made reentrant. This
5382 changes the signature for @code{yylex} (@pxref{Pure Calling}), and also that of
5383 @code{yyerror} when the tracking of locations has been activated, as shown
5386 The @code{true} value is very similar to the @code{full} value, the only
5387 difference is in the signature of @code{yyerror} on Yacc parsers without
5388 @code{%parse-param}, for historical reasons.
5390 I.e., if @samp{%locations %define api.pure} is passed then the prototypes for
5394 void yyerror (char const *msg); /* Yacc parsers. */
5395 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg); /* GLR parsers. */
5398 But if @samp{%locations %define api.pure %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}} is
5399 used, then both parsers have the same signature:
5402 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *nastiness, char const *msg);
5405 (@pxref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
5406 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}})
5408 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5410 @item History: the @code{full} value was introduced in Bison 2.7
5413 @c ================================================== api.push-pull
5415 @item @code{api.push-pull}
5416 @findex %define api.push-pull
5419 @item Language(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5421 @item Purpose: Request a pull parser, a push parser, or both.
5422 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5423 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5424 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5426 @item Accepted Values: @code{pull}, @code{push}, @code{both}
5428 @item Default Value: @code{pull}
5431 @c ================================================== lr.default-reductions
5433 @item @code{lr.default-reductions}
5434 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
5437 @item Language(s): all
5439 @item Purpose: Specify the kind of states that are permitted to
5440 contain default reductions. @xref{Default Reductions}. (The ability to
5441 specify where default reductions should be used is experimental. More user
5442 feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5444 @item Accepted Values: @code{most}, @code{consistent}, @code{accepting}
5445 @item Default Value:
5447 @item @code{accepting} if @code{lr.type} is @code{canonical-lr}.
5448 @item @code{most} otherwise.
5452 @c ============================================ lr.keep-unreachable-states
5454 @item @code{lr.keep-unreachable-states}
5455 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
5458 @item Language(s): all
5459 @item Purpose: Request that Bison allow unreachable parser states to
5460 remain in the parser tables. @xref{Unreachable States}.
5461 @item Accepted Values: Boolean
5462 @item Default Value: @code{false}
5465 @c ================================================== lr.type
5467 @item @code{lr.type}
5468 @findex %define lr.type
5471 @item Language(s): all
5473 @item Purpose: Specify the type of parser tables within the
5474 LR(1) family. @xref{LR Table Construction}. (This feature is experimental.
5475 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5477 @item Accepted Values: @code{lalr}, @code{ielr}, @code{canonical-lr}
5479 @item Default Value: @code{lalr}
5482 @c ================================================== namespace
5484 @item @code{namespace}
5485 @findex %define namespace
5488 @item Languages(s): C++
5490 @item Purpose: Specify the namespace for the parser class.
5491 For example, if you specify:
5494 %define namespace "foo::bar"
5497 Bison uses @code{foo::bar} verbatim in references such as:
5500 foo::bar::parser::semantic_type
5503 However, to open a namespace, Bison removes any leading @code{::} and then
5504 splits on any remaining occurrences:
5507 namespace foo @{ namespace bar @{
5513 @item Accepted Values: Any absolute or relative C++ namespace reference without
5514 a trailing @code{"::"}.
5515 For example, @code{"foo"} or @code{"::foo::bar"}.
5517 @item Default Value: The value specified by @code{%name-prefix}, which defaults
5519 This usage of @code{%name-prefix} is for backward compatibility and can be
5520 confusing since @code{%name-prefix} also specifies the textual prefix for the
5521 lexical analyzer function.
5522 Thus, if you specify @code{%name-prefix}, it is best to also specify
5523 @code{%define namespace} so that @code{%name-prefix} @emph{only} affects the
5524 lexical analyzer function.
5525 For example, if you specify:
5528 %define namespace "foo"
5529 %name-prefix "bar::"
5532 The parser namespace is @code{foo} and @code{yylex} is referenced as
5536 @c ================================================== parse.lac
5537 @item @code{parse.lac}
5538 @findex %define parse.lac
5541 @item Languages(s): C (deterministic parsers only)
5543 @item Purpose: Enable LAC (lookahead correction) to improve
5544 syntax error handling. @xref{LAC}.
5545 @item Accepted Values: @code{none}, @code{full}
5546 @item Default Value: @code{none}
5552 @subsection %code Summary
5556 The @code{%code} directive inserts code verbatim into the output
5557 parser source at any of a predefined set of locations. It thus serves
5558 as a flexible and user-friendly alternative to the traditional Yacc
5559 prologue, @code{%@{@var{code}%@}}. This section summarizes the
5560 functionality of @code{%code} for the various target languages
5561 supported by Bison. For a detailed discussion of how to use
5562 @code{%code} in place of @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for C/C++ and why it
5563 is advantageous to do so, @pxref{Prologue Alternatives}.
5565 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
5566 This is the unqualified form of the @code{%code} directive. It
5567 inserts @var{code} verbatim at a language-dependent default location
5568 in the parser implementation.
5570 For C/C++, the default location is the parser implementation file
5571 after the usual contents of the parser header file. Thus, the
5572 unqualified form replaces @code{%@{@var{code}%@}} for most purposes.
5574 For Java, the default location is inside the parser class.
5577 @deffn {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
5578 This is the qualified form of the @code{%code} directive.
5579 @var{qualifier} identifies the purpose of @var{code} and thus the
5580 location(s) where Bison should insert it. That is, if you need to
5581 specify location-sensitive @var{code} that does not belong at the
5582 default location selected by the unqualified @code{%code} form, use
5586 For any particular qualifier or for the unqualified form, if there are
5587 multiple occurrences of the @code{%code} directive, Bison concatenates
5588 the specified code in the order in which it appears in the grammar
5591 Not all qualifiers are accepted for all target languages. Unaccepted
5592 qualifiers produce an error. Some of the accepted qualifiers are:
5596 @findex %code requires
5599 @item Language(s): C, C++
5601 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write dependency code required for
5602 @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}.
5603 In other words, it's the best place to define types referenced in @code{%union}
5604 directives, and it's the best place to override Bison's default @code{YYSTYPE}
5605 and @code{YYLTYPE} definitions.
5607 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation file
5608 before the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE} and @code{YYLTYPE}
5613 @findex %code provides
5616 @item Language(s): C, C++
5618 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write additional definitions and
5619 declarations that should be provided to other modules.
5621 @item Location(s): The parser header file and the parser implementation
5622 file after the Bison-generated @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and
5630 @item Language(s): C, C++
5632 @item Purpose: The unqualified @code{%code} or @code{%code requires}
5633 should usually be more appropriate than @code{%code top}. However,
5634 occasionally it is necessary to insert code much nearer the top of the
5635 parser implementation file. For example:
5644 @item Location(s): Near the top of the parser implementation file.
5648 @findex %code imports
5651 @item Language(s): Java
5653 @item Purpose: This is the best place to write Java import directives.
5655 @item Location(s): The parser Java file after any Java package directive and
5656 before any class definitions.
5660 Though we say the insertion locations are language-dependent, they are
5661 technically skeleton-dependent. Writers of non-standard skeletons
5662 however should choose their locations consistently with the behavior
5663 of the standard Bison skeletons.
5666 @node Multiple Parsers
5667 @section Multiple Parsers in the Same Program
5669 Most programs that use Bison parse only one language and therefore contain
5670 only one Bison parser. But what if you want to parse more than one language
5671 with the same program? Then you need to avoid name conflicts between
5672 different definitions of functions and variables such as @code{yyparse},
5673 @code{yylval}. To use different parsers from the same compilation unit, you
5674 also need to avoid conflicts on types and macros (e.g., @code{YYSTYPE})
5675 exported in the generated header.
5677 The easy way to do this is to define the @code{%define} variable
5678 @code{api.prefix}. With different @code{api.prefix}s it is guaranteed that
5679 headers do not conflict when included together, and that compiled objects
5680 can be linked together too. Specifying @samp{%define api.prefix
5681 @var{prefix}} (or passing the option @samp{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}, see
5682 @ref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) renames the interface functions and
5683 variables of the Bison parser to start with @var{prefix} instead of
5684 @samp{yy}, and all the macros to start by @var{PREFIX} (i.e., @var{prefix}
5685 upper-cased) instead of @samp{YY}.
5687 The renamed symbols include @code{yyparse}, @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror},
5688 @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yylloc}, @code{yychar} and
5689 @code{yydebug}. If you use a push parser, @code{yypush_parse},
5690 @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate}, @code{yypstate_new} and
5691 @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. The renamed macros include
5692 @code{YYSTYPE}, @code{YYLTYPE}, and @code{YYDEBUG}, which is treated
5693 specifically --- more about this below.
5695 For example, if you use @samp{%define api.prefix c}, the names become
5696 @code{cparse}, @code{clex}, @dots{}, @code{CSTYPE}, @code{CLTYPE}, and so
5699 The @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} works in two different ways.
5700 In the implementation file, it works by adding macro definitions to the
5701 beginning of the parser implementation file, defining @code{yyparse} as
5702 @code{@var{prefix}parse}, and so on:
5705 #define YYSTYPE CTYPE
5706 #define yyparse cparse
5707 #define yylval clval
5713 This effectively substitutes one name for the other in the entire parser
5714 implementation file, thus the ``original'' names (@code{yylex},
5715 @code{YYSTYPE}, @dots{}) are also usable in the parser implementation file.
5717 However, in the parser header file, the symbols are defined renamed, for
5721 extern CSTYPE clval;
5725 The macro @code{YYDEBUG} is commonly used to enable the tracing support in
5726 parsers. To comply with this tradition, when @code{api.prefix} is used,
5727 @code{YYDEBUG} (not renamed) is used as a default value:
5730 /* Enabling traces. */
5732 # if defined YYDEBUG
5749 Prior to Bison 2.6, a feature similar to @code{api.prefix} was provided by
5750 the obsolete directive @code{%name-prefix} (@pxref{Table of Symbols, ,Bison
5751 Symbols}) and the option @code{--name-prefix} (@pxref{Bison Options}).
5754 @chapter Parser C-Language Interface
5755 @cindex C-language interface
5758 The Bison parser is actually a C function named @code{yyparse}. Here we
5759 describe the interface conventions of @code{yyparse} and the other
5760 functions that it needs to use.
5762 Keep in mind that the parser uses many C identifiers starting with
5763 @samp{yy} and @samp{YY} for internal purposes. If you use such an
5764 identifier (aside from those in this manual) in an action or in epilogue
5765 in the grammar file, you are likely to run into trouble.
5768 * Parser Function:: How to call @code{yyparse} and what it returns.
5769 * Push Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypush_parse} and what it returns.
5770 * Pull Parser Function:: How to call @code{yypull_parse} and what it returns.
5771 * Parser Create Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_new} and what it returns.
5772 * Parser Delete Function:: How to call @code{yypstate_delete} and what it returns.
5773 * Lexical:: You must supply a function @code{yylex}
5775 * Error Reporting:: You must supply a function @code{yyerror}.
5776 * Action Features:: Special features for use in actions.
5777 * Internationalization:: How to let the parser speak in the user's
5781 @node Parser Function
5782 @section The Parser Function @code{yyparse}
5785 You call the function @code{yyparse} to cause parsing to occur. This
5786 function reads tokens, executes actions, and ultimately returns when it
5787 encounters end-of-input or an unrecoverable syntax error. You can also
5788 write an action which directs @code{yyparse} to return immediately
5789 without reading further.
5792 @deftypefun int yyparse (void)
5793 The value returned by @code{yyparse} is 0 if parsing was successful (return
5794 is due to end-of-input).
5796 The value is 1 if parsing failed because of invalid input, i.e., input
5797 that contains a syntax error or that causes @code{YYABORT} to be
5800 The value is 2 if parsing failed due to memory exhaustion.
5803 In an action, you can cause immediate return from @code{yyparse} by using
5808 Return immediately with value 0 (to report success).
5813 Return immediately with value 1 (to report failure).
5816 If you use a reentrant parser, you can optionally pass additional
5817 parameter information to it in a reentrant way. To do so, use the
5818 declaration @code{%parse-param}:
5820 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
5821 @findex %parse-param
5822 Declare that an argument declared by the braced-code
5823 @var{argument-declaration} is an additional @code{yyparse} argument.
5824 The @var{argument-declaration} is used when declaring
5825 functions or prototypes. The last identifier in
5826 @var{argument-declaration} must be the argument name.
5829 Here's an example. Write this in the parser:
5832 %parse-param @{int *nastiness@}
5833 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5837 Then call the parser like this:
5841 int nastiness, randomness;
5842 @dots{} /* @r{Store proper data in @code{nastiness} and @code{randomness}.} */
5843 value = yyparse (&nastiness, &randomness);
5849 In the grammar actions, use expressions like this to refer to the data:
5852 exp: @dots{} @{ @dots{}; *randomness += 1; @dots{} @}
5856 Using the following:
5858 %parse-param @{int *randomness@}
5861 Results in these signatures:
5863 void yyerror (int *randomness, const char *msg);
5864 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5868 Or, if both @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure})
5869 and @code{%locations} are used:
5872 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *llocp, int *randomness, const char *msg);
5873 int yyparse (int *randomness);
5876 @node Push Parser Function
5877 @section The Push Parser Function @code{yypush_parse}
5878 @findex yypush_parse
5880 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5881 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5883 You call the function @code{yypush_parse} to parse a single token. This
5884 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5885 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5886 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5888 @deftypefun int yypush_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5889 The value returned by @code{yypush_parse} is the same as for yyparse with
5890 the following exception: it returns @code{YYPUSH_MORE} if more input is
5891 required to finish parsing the grammar.
5894 @node Pull Parser Function
5895 @section The Pull Parser Function @code{yypull_parse}
5896 @findex yypull_parse
5898 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5899 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5901 You call the function @code{yypull_parse} to parse the rest of the input
5902 stream. This function is available if the @code{%define api.push-pull both}
5903 declaration is used.
5904 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5906 @deftypefun int yypull_parse (yypstate *yyps)
5907 The value returned by @code{yypull_parse} is the same as for @code{yyparse}.
5910 @node Parser Create Function
5911 @section The Parser Create Function @code{yystate_new}
5912 @findex yypstate_new
5914 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5915 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5917 You call the function @code{yypstate_new} to create a new parser instance.
5918 This function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5919 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5920 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5922 @deftypefun {yypstate*} yypstate_new (void)
5923 The function will return a valid parser instance if there was memory available
5924 or 0 if no memory was available.
5925 In impure mode, it will also return 0 if a parser instance is currently
5929 @node Parser Delete Function
5930 @section The Parser Delete Function @code{yystate_delete}
5931 @findex yypstate_delete
5933 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
5934 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
5936 You call the function @code{yypstate_delete} to delete a parser instance.
5937 function is available if either the @code{%define api.push-pull push} or
5938 @code{%define api.push-pull both} declaration is used.
5939 @xref{Push Decl, ,A Push Parser}.
5941 @deftypefun void yypstate_delete (yypstate *yyps)
5942 This function will reclaim the memory associated with a parser instance.
5943 After this call, you should no longer attempt to use the parser instance.
5947 @section The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}
5949 @cindex lexical analyzer
5951 The @dfn{lexical analyzer} function, @code{yylex}, recognizes tokens from
5952 the input stream and returns them to the parser. Bison does not create
5953 this function automatically; you must write it so that @code{yyparse} can
5954 call it. The function is sometimes referred to as a lexical scanner.
5956 In simple programs, @code{yylex} is often defined at the end of the
5957 Bison grammar file. If @code{yylex} is defined in a separate source
5958 file, you need to arrange for the token-type macro definitions to be
5959 available there. To do this, use the @samp{-d} option when you run
5960 Bison, so that it will write these macro definitions into the separate
5961 parser header file, @file{@var{name}.tab.h}, which you can include in
5962 the other source files that need it. @xref{Invocation, ,Invoking
5966 * Calling Convention:: How @code{yyparse} calls @code{yylex}.
5967 * Token Values:: How @code{yylex} must return the semantic value
5968 of the token it has read.
5969 * Token Locations:: How @code{yylex} must return the text location
5970 (line number, etc.) of the token, if the
5972 * Pure Calling:: How the calling convention differs in a pure parser
5973 (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}).
5976 @node Calling Convention
5977 @subsection Calling Convention for @code{yylex}
5979 The value that @code{yylex} returns must be the positive numeric code
5980 for the type of token it has just found; a zero or negative value
5981 signifies end-of-input.
5983 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a name, that name
5984 in the parser implementation file becomes a C macro whose definition
5985 is the proper numeric code for that token type. So @code{yylex} can
5986 use the name to indicate that type. @xref{Symbols}.
5988 When a token is referred to in the grammar rules by a character literal,
5989 the numeric code for that character is also the code for the token type.
5990 So @code{yylex} can simply return that character code, possibly converted
5991 to @code{unsigned char} to avoid sign-extension. The null character
5992 must not be used this way, because its code is zero and that
5993 signifies end-of-input.
5995 Here is an example showing these things:
6002 if (c == EOF) /* Detect end-of-input. */
6005 if (c == '+' || c == '-')
6006 return c; /* Assume token type for `+' is '+'. */
6008 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6014 This interface has been designed so that the output from the @code{lex}
6015 utility can be used without change as the definition of @code{yylex}.
6017 If the grammar uses literal string tokens, there are two ways that
6018 @code{yylex} can determine the token type codes for them:
6022 If the grammar defines symbolic token names as aliases for the
6023 literal string tokens, @code{yylex} can use these symbolic names like
6024 all others. In this case, the use of the literal string tokens in
6025 the grammar file has no effect on @code{yylex}.
6028 @code{yylex} can find the multicharacter token in the @code{yytname}
6029 table. The index of the token in the table is the token type's code.
6030 The name of a multicharacter token is recorded in @code{yytname} with a
6031 double-quote, the token's characters, and another double-quote. The
6032 token's characters are escaped as necessary to be suitable as input
6035 Here's code for looking up a multicharacter token in @code{yytname},
6036 assuming that the characters of the token are stored in
6037 @code{token_buffer}, and assuming that the token does not contain any
6038 characters like @samp{"} that require escaping.
6041 for (i = 0; i < YYNTOKENS; i++)
6044 && yytname[i][0] == '"'
6045 && ! strncmp (yytname[i] + 1, token_buffer,
6046 strlen (token_buffer))
6047 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 1] == '"'
6048 && yytname[i][strlen (token_buffer) + 2] == 0)
6053 The @code{yytname} table is generated only if you use the
6054 @code{%token-table} declaration. @xref{Decl Summary}.
6058 @subsection Semantic Values of Tokens
6061 In an ordinary (nonreentrant) parser, the semantic value of the token must
6062 be stored into the global variable @code{yylval}. When you are using
6063 just one data type for semantic values, @code{yylval} has that type.
6064 Thus, if the type is @code{int} (the default), you might write this in
6070 yylval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6071 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6076 When you are using multiple data types, @code{yylval}'s type is a union
6077 made from the @code{%union} declaration (@pxref{Union Decl, ,The
6078 Collection of Value Types}). So when you store a token's value, you
6079 must use the proper member of the union. If the @code{%union}
6080 declaration looks like this:
6093 then the code in @code{yylex} might look like this:
6098 yylval.intval = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6099 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6104 @node Token Locations
6105 @subsection Textual Locations of Tokens
6108 If you are using the @samp{@@@var{n}}-feature (@pxref{Tracking Locations})
6109 in actions to keep track of the textual locations of tokens and groupings,
6110 then you must provide this information in @code{yylex}. The function
6111 @code{yyparse} expects to find the textual location of a token just parsed
6112 in the global variable @code{yylloc}. So @code{yylex} must store the proper
6113 data in that variable.
6115 By default, the value of @code{yylloc} is a structure and you need only
6116 initialize the members that are going to be used by the actions. The
6117 four members are called @code{first_line}, @code{first_column},
6118 @code{last_line} and @code{last_column}. Note that the use of this
6119 feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6122 The data type of @code{yylloc} has the name @code{YYLTYPE}.
6125 @subsection Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers
6127 When you use the Bison declaration @code{%define api.pure full} to request a
6128 pure, reentrant parser, the global communication variables @code{yylval}
6129 and @code{yylloc} cannot be used. (@xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant)
6130 Parser}.) In such parsers the two global variables are replaced by
6131 pointers passed as arguments to @code{yylex}. You must declare them as
6132 shown here, and pass the information back by storing it through those
6137 yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, YYLTYPE *llocp)
6140 *lvalp = value; /* Put value onto Bison stack. */
6141 return INT; /* Return the type of the token. */
6146 If the grammar file does not use the @samp{@@} constructs to refer to
6147 textual locations, then the type @code{YYLTYPE} will not be defined. In
6148 this case, omit the second argument; @code{yylex} will be called with
6152 If you wish to pass the additional parameter data to @code{yylex}, use
6153 @code{%lex-param} just like @code{%parse-param} (@pxref{Parser
6156 @deffn {Directive} lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
6158 Declare that the braced-code @var{argument-declaration} is an
6159 additional @code{yylex} argument declaration.
6166 %lex-param @{int *nastiness@}
6170 results in the following signature:
6173 int yylex (int *nastiness);
6177 If @code{%define api.pure full} (or just @code{%define api.pure}) is added:
6180 int yylex (YYSTYPE *lvalp, int *nastiness);
6183 @node Error Reporting
6184 @section The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}
6185 @cindex error reporting function
6188 @cindex syntax error
6190 The Bison parser detects a @dfn{syntax error} or @dfn{parse error}
6191 whenever it reads a token which cannot satisfy any syntax rule. An
6192 action in the grammar can also explicitly proclaim an error, using the
6193 macro @code{YYERROR} (@pxref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use
6196 The Bison parser expects to report the error by calling an error
6197 reporting function named @code{yyerror}, which you must supply. It is
6198 called by @code{yyparse} whenever a syntax error is found, and it
6199 receives one argument. For a syntax error, the string is normally
6200 @w{@code{"syntax error"}}.
6202 @findex %error-verbose
6203 If you invoke the directive @code{%error-verbose} in the Bison declarations
6204 section (@pxref{Bison Declarations, ,The Bison Declarations Section}), then
6205 Bison provides a more verbose and specific error message string instead of
6206 just plain @w{@code{"syntax error"}}. However, that message sometimes
6207 contains incorrect information if LAC is not enabled (@pxref{LAC}).
6209 The parser can detect one other kind of error: memory exhaustion. This
6210 can happen when the input contains constructions that are very deeply
6211 nested. It isn't likely you will encounter this, since the Bison
6212 parser normally extends its stack automatically up to a very large limit. But
6213 if memory is exhausted, @code{yyparse} calls @code{yyerror} in the usual
6214 fashion, except that the argument string is @w{@code{"memory exhausted"}}.
6216 In some cases diagnostics like @w{@code{"syntax error"}} are
6217 translated automatically from English to some other language before
6218 they are passed to @code{yyerror}. @xref{Internationalization}.
6220 The following definition suffices in simple programs:
6225 yyerror (char const *s)
6229 fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", s);
6234 After @code{yyerror} returns to @code{yyparse}, the latter will attempt
6235 error recovery if you have written suitable error recovery grammar rules
6236 (@pxref{Error Recovery}). If recovery is impossible, @code{yyparse} will
6237 immediately return 1.
6239 Obviously, in location tracking pure parsers, @code{yyerror} should have
6240 an access to the current location. With @code{%define api.pure}, this is
6241 indeed the case for the GLR parsers, but not for the Yacc parser, for
6242 historical reasons, and this is the why @code{%define api.pure full} should be
6243 prefered over @code{%define api.pure}.
6245 When @code{%locations %define api.pure full} is used, @code{yyerror} has the
6246 following signature:
6249 void yyerror (YYLTYPE *locp, char const *msg);
6253 The prototypes are only indications of how the code produced by Bison
6254 uses @code{yyerror}. Bison-generated code always ignores the returned
6255 value, so @code{yyerror} can return any type, including @code{void}.
6256 Also, @code{yyerror} can be a variadic function; that is why the
6257 message is always passed last.
6259 Traditionally @code{yyerror} returns an @code{int} that is always
6260 ignored, but this is purely for historical reasons, and @code{void} is
6261 preferable since it more accurately describes the return type for
6265 The variable @code{yynerrs} contains the number of syntax errors
6266 reported so far. Normally this variable is global; but if you
6267 request a pure parser (@pxref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser})
6268 then it is a local variable which only the actions can access.
6270 @node Action Features
6271 @section Special Features for Use in Actions
6272 @cindex summary, action features
6273 @cindex action features summary
6275 Here is a table of Bison constructs, variables and macros that
6276 are useful in actions.
6278 @deffn {Variable} $$
6279 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6280 grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6283 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
6284 Acts like a variable that contains the semantic value for the
6285 @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Actions}.
6288 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>$
6289 Like @code{$$} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the union
6290 specified by the @code{%union} declaration. @xref{Action Types, ,Data
6291 Types of Values in Actions}.
6294 @deffn {Variable} $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
6295 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies alternative @var{typealt} in the
6296 union specified by the @code{%union} declaration.
6297 @xref{Action Types, ,Data Types of Values in Actions}.
6300 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT @code{;}
6301 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating failure.
6302 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6305 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT @code{;}
6306 Return immediately from @code{yyparse}, indicating success.
6307 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
6310 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP (@var{token}, @var{value})@code{;}
6312 Unshift a token. This macro is allowed only for rules that reduce
6313 a single value, and only when there is no lookahead token.
6314 It is also disallowed in GLR parsers.
6315 It installs a lookahead token with token type @var{token} and
6316 semantic value @var{value}; then it discards the value that was
6317 going to be reduced by this rule.
6319 If the macro is used when it is not valid, such as when there is
6320 a lookahead token already, then it reports a syntax error with
6321 a message @samp{cannot back up} and performs ordinary error
6324 In either case, the rest of the action is not executed.
6327 @deffn {Macro} YYEMPTY
6328 Value stored in @code{yychar} when there is no lookahead token.
6331 @deffn {Macro} YYEOF
6332 Value stored in @code{yychar} when the lookahead is the end of the input
6336 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR @code{;}
6337 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
6338 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
6339 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
6340 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
6341 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
6344 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
6345 @findex YYRECOVERING
6346 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
6347 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
6348 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6351 @deffn {Variable} yychar
6352 Variable containing either the lookahead token, or @code{YYEOF} when the
6353 lookahead is the end of the input stream, or @code{YYEMPTY} when no lookahead
6354 has been performed so the next token is not yet known.
6355 Do not modify @code{yychar} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6357 @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead Tokens}.
6360 @deffn {Macro} yyclearin @code{;}
6361 Discard the current lookahead token. This is useful primarily in
6363 Do not invoke @code{yyclearin} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR
6365 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6368 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok @code{;}
6369 Resume generating error messages immediately for subsequent syntax
6370 errors. This is useful primarily in error rules.
6371 @xref{Error Recovery}.
6374 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
6375 Variable containing the lookahead token location when @code{yychar} is not set
6376 to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6377 Do not modify @code{yylloc} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6379 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
6382 @deffn {Variable} yylval
6383 Variable containing the lookahead token semantic value when @code{yychar} is
6384 not set to @code{YYEMPTY} or @code{YYEOF}.
6385 Do not modify @code{yylval} in a deferred semantic action (@pxref{GLR Semantic
6387 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
6392 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6393 location of the grouping made by the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6396 @c Check if those paragraphs are still useful or not.
6400 @c int first_line, last_line;
6401 @c int first_column, last_column;
6405 @c Thus, to get the starting line number of the third component, you would
6406 @c use @samp{@@3.first_line}.
6408 @c In order for the members of this structure to contain valid information,
6409 @c you must make @code{yylex} supply this information about each token.
6410 @c If you need only certain members, then @code{yylex} need only fill in
6413 @c The use of this feature makes the parser noticeably slower.
6416 @deffn {Value} @@@var{n}
6418 Acts like a structure variable containing information on the textual
6419 location of the @var{n}th component of the current rule. @xref{Tracking
6423 @node Internationalization
6424 @section Parser Internationalization
6425 @cindex internationalization
6431 A Bison-generated parser can print diagnostics, including error and
6432 tracing messages. By default, they appear in English. However, Bison
6433 also supports outputting diagnostics in the user's native language. To
6434 make this work, the user should set the usual environment variables.
6435 @xref{Users, , The User's View, gettext, GNU @code{gettext} utilities}.
6436 For example, the shell command @samp{export LC_ALL=fr_CA.UTF-8} might
6437 set the user's locale to French Canadian using the UTF-8
6438 encoding. The exact set of available locales depends on the user's
6441 The maintainer of a package that uses a Bison-generated parser enables
6442 the internationalization of the parser's output through the following
6443 steps. Here we assume a package that uses GNU Autoconf and
6448 @cindex bison-i18n.m4
6449 Into the directory containing the GNU Autoconf macros used
6450 by the package---often called @file{m4}---copy the
6451 @file{bison-i18n.m4} file installed by Bison under
6452 @samp{share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4} in Bison's installation directory.
6456 cp /usr/local/share/aclocal/bison-i18n.m4 m4/bison-i18n.m4
6461 @vindex BISON_LOCALEDIR
6462 @vindex YYENABLE_NLS
6463 In the top-level @file{configure.ac}, after the @code{AM_GNU_GETTEXT}
6464 invocation, add an invocation of @code{BISON_I18N}. This macro is
6465 defined in the file @file{bison-i18n.m4} that you copied earlier. It
6466 causes @samp{configure} to find the value of the
6467 @code{BISON_LOCALEDIR} variable, and it defines the source-language
6468 symbol @code{YYENABLE_NLS} to enable translations in the
6469 Bison-generated parser.
6472 In the @code{main} function of your program, designate the directory
6473 containing Bison's runtime message catalog, through a call to
6474 @samp{bindtextdomain} with domain name @samp{bison-runtime}.
6478 bindtextdomain ("bison-runtime", BISON_LOCALEDIR);
6481 Typically this appears after any other call @code{bindtextdomain
6482 (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR)} that your package already has. Here we rely on
6483 @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} to be defined as a string through the
6487 In the @file{Makefile.am} that controls the compilation of the @code{main}
6488 function, make @samp{BISON_LOCALEDIR} available as a C preprocessor macro,
6489 either in @samp{DEFS} or in @samp{AM_CPPFLAGS}. For example:
6492 DEFS = @@DEFS@@ -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6498 AM_CPPFLAGS = -DBISON_LOCALEDIR='"$(BISON_LOCALEDIR)"'
6502 Finally, invoke the command @command{autoreconf} to generate the build
6508 @chapter The Bison Parser Algorithm
6509 @cindex Bison parser algorithm
6510 @cindex algorithm of parser
6513 @cindex parser stack
6514 @cindex stack, parser
6516 As Bison reads tokens, it pushes them onto a stack along with their
6517 semantic values. The stack is called the @dfn{parser stack}. Pushing a
6518 token is traditionally called @dfn{shifting}.
6520 For example, suppose the infix calculator has read @samp{1 + 5 *}, with a
6521 @samp{3} to come. The stack will have four elements, one for each token
6524 But the stack does not always have an element for each token read. When
6525 the last @var{n} tokens and groupings shifted match the components of a
6526 grammar rule, they can be combined according to that rule. This is called
6527 @dfn{reduction}. Those tokens and groupings are replaced on the stack by a
6528 single grouping whose symbol is the result (left hand side) of that rule.
6529 Running the rule's action is part of the process of reduction, because this
6530 is what computes the semantic value of the resulting grouping.
6532 For example, if the infix calculator's parser stack contains this:
6539 and the next input token is a newline character, then the last three
6540 elements can be reduced to 15 via the rule:
6543 expr: expr '*' expr;
6547 Then the stack contains just these three elements:
6554 At this point, another reduction can be made, resulting in the single value
6555 16. Then the newline token can be shifted.
6557 The parser tries, by shifts and reductions, to reduce the entire input down
6558 to a single grouping whose symbol is the grammar's start-symbol
6559 (@pxref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}).
6561 This kind of parser is known in the literature as a bottom-up parser.
6564 * Lookahead:: Parser looks one token ahead when deciding what to do.
6565 * Shift/Reduce:: Conflicts: when either shifting or reduction is valid.
6566 * Precedence:: Operator precedence works by resolving conflicts.
6567 * Contextual Precedence:: When an operator's precedence depends on context.
6568 * Parser States:: The parser is a finite-state-machine with stack.
6569 * Reduce/Reduce:: When two rules are applicable in the same situation.
6570 * Mysterious Conflicts:: Conflicts that look unjustified.
6571 * Tuning LR:: How to tune fundamental aspects of LR-based parsing.
6572 * Generalized LR Parsing:: Parsing arbitrary context-free grammars.
6573 * Memory Management:: What happens when memory is exhausted. How to avoid it.
6577 @section Lookahead Tokens
6578 @cindex lookahead token
6580 The Bison parser does @emph{not} always reduce immediately as soon as the
6581 last @var{n} tokens and groupings match a rule. This is because such a
6582 simple strategy is inadequate to handle most languages. Instead, when a
6583 reduction is possible, the parser sometimes ``looks ahead'' at the next
6584 token in order to decide what to do.
6586 When a token is read, it is not immediately shifted; first it becomes the
6587 @dfn{lookahead token}, which is not on the stack. Now the parser can
6588 perform one or more reductions of tokens and groupings on the stack, while
6589 the lookahead token remains off to the side. When no more reductions
6590 should take place, the lookahead token is shifted onto the stack. This
6591 does not mean that all possible reductions have been done; depending on the
6592 token type of the lookahead token, some rules may choose to delay their
6595 Here is a simple case where lookahead is needed. These three rules define
6596 expressions which contain binary addition operators and postfix unary
6597 factorial operators (@samp{!}), and allow parentheses for grouping.
6616 Suppose that the tokens @w{@samp{1 + 2}} have been read and shifted; what
6617 should be done? If the following token is @samp{)}, then the first three
6618 tokens must be reduced to form an @code{expr}. This is the only valid
6619 course, because shifting the @samp{)} would produce a sequence of symbols
6620 @w{@code{term ')'}}, and no rule allows this.
6622 If the following token is @samp{!}, then it must be shifted immediately so
6623 that @w{@samp{2 !}} can be reduced to make a @code{term}. If instead the
6624 parser were to reduce before shifting, @w{@samp{1 + 2}} would become an
6625 @code{expr}. It would then be impossible to shift the @samp{!} because
6626 doing so would produce on the stack the sequence of symbols @code{expr
6627 '!'}. No rule allows that sequence.
6632 The lookahead token is stored in the variable @code{yychar}.
6633 Its semantic value and location, if any, are stored in the variables
6634 @code{yylval} and @code{yylloc}.
6635 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
6638 @section Shift/Reduce Conflicts
6640 @cindex shift/reduce conflicts
6641 @cindex dangling @code{else}
6642 @cindex @code{else}, dangling
6644 Suppose we are parsing a language which has if-then and if-then-else
6645 statements, with a pair of rules like this:
6650 "if" expr "then" stmt
6651 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6657 Here @code{"if"}, @code{"then"} and @code{"else"} are terminal symbols for
6658 specific keyword tokens.
6660 When the @code{"else"} token is read and becomes the lookahead token, the
6661 contents of the stack (assuming the input is valid) are just right for
6662 reduction by the first rule. But it is also legitimate to shift the
6663 @code{"else"}, because that would lead to eventual reduction by the second
6666 This situation, where either a shift or a reduction would be valid, is
6667 called a @dfn{shift/reduce conflict}. Bison is designed to resolve
6668 these conflicts by choosing to shift, unless otherwise directed by
6669 operator precedence declarations. To see the reason for this, let's
6670 contrast it with the other alternative.
6672 Since the parser prefers to shift the @code{"else"}, the result is to attach
6673 the else-clause to the innermost if-statement, making these two inputs
6677 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6679 if x then do; if y then win; else lose; end;
6682 But if the parser chose to reduce when possible rather than shift, the
6683 result would be to attach the else-clause to the outermost if-statement,
6684 making these two inputs equivalent:
6687 if x then if y then win; else lose;
6689 if x then do; if y then win; end; else lose;
6692 The conflict exists because the grammar as written is ambiguous: either
6693 parsing of the simple nested if-statement is legitimate. The established
6694 convention is that these ambiguities are resolved by attaching the
6695 else-clause to the innermost if-statement; this is what Bison accomplishes
6696 by choosing to shift rather than reduce. (It would ideally be cleaner to
6697 write an unambiguous grammar, but that is very hard to do in this case.)
6698 This particular ambiguity was first encountered in the specifications of
6699 Algol 60 and is called the ``dangling @code{else}'' ambiguity.
6701 To avoid warnings from Bison about predictable, legitimate shift/reduce
6702 conflicts, you can use the @code{%expect @var{n}} declaration.
6703 There will be no warning as long as the number of shift/reduce conflicts
6704 is exactly @var{n}, and Bison will report an error if there is a
6706 @xref{Expect Decl, ,Suppressing Conflict Warnings}. However, we don't
6707 recommend the use of @code{%expect} (except @samp{%expect 0}!), as an equal
6708 number of conflicts does not mean that they are the @emph{same}. When
6709 possible, you should rather use precedence directives to @emph{fix} the
6710 conflicts explicitly (@pxref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non
6713 The definition of @code{if_stmt} above is solely to blame for the
6714 conflict, but the conflict does not actually appear without additional
6715 rules. Here is a complete Bison grammar file that actually manifests
6731 "if" expr "then" stmt
6732 | "if" expr "then" stmt "else" stmt
6742 @section Operator Precedence
6743 @cindex operator precedence
6744 @cindex precedence of operators
6746 Another situation where shift/reduce conflicts appear is in arithmetic
6747 expressions. Here shifting is not always the preferred resolution; the
6748 Bison declarations for operator precedence allow you to specify when to
6749 shift and when to reduce.
6752 * Why Precedence:: An example showing why precedence is needed.
6753 * Using Precedence:: How to specify precedence in Bison grammars.
6754 * Precedence Examples:: How these features are used in the previous example.
6755 * How Precedence:: How they work.
6756 * Non Operators:: Using precedence for general conflicts.
6759 @node Why Precedence
6760 @subsection When Precedence is Needed
6762 Consider the following ambiguous grammar fragment (ambiguous because the
6763 input @w{@samp{1 - 2 * 3}} can be parsed in two different ways):
6778 Suppose the parser has seen the tokens @samp{1}, @samp{-} and @samp{2};
6779 should it reduce them via the rule for the subtraction operator? It
6780 depends on the next token. Of course, if the next token is @samp{)}, we
6781 must reduce; shifting is invalid because no single rule can reduce the
6782 token sequence @w{@samp{- 2 )}} or anything starting with that. But if
6783 the next token is @samp{*} or @samp{<}, we have a choice: either
6784 shifting or reduction would allow the parse to complete, but with
6787 To decide which one Bison should do, we must consider the results. If
6788 the next operator token @var{op} is shifted, then it must be reduced
6789 first in order to permit another opportunity to reduce the difference.
6790 The result is (in effect) @w{@samp{1 - (2 @var{op} 3)}}. On the other
6791 hand, if the subtraction is reduced before shifting @var{op}, the result
6792 is @w{@samp{(1 - 2) @var{op} 3}}. Clearly, then, the choice of shift or
6793 reduce should depend on the relative precedence of the operators
6794 @samp{-} and @var{op}: @samp{*} should be shifted first, but not
6797 @cindex associativity
6798 What about input such as @w{@samp{1 - 2 - 5}}; should this be
6799 @w{@samp{(1 - 2) - 5}} or should it be @w{@samp{1 - (2 - 5)}}? For most
6800 operators we prefer the former, which is called @dfn{left association}.
6801 The latter alternative, @dfn{right association}, is desirable for
6802 assignment operators. The choice of left or right association is a
6803 matter of whether the parser chooses to shift or reduce when the stack
6804 contains @w{@samp{1 - 2}} and the lookahead token is @samp{-}: shifting
6805 makes right-associativity.
6807 @node Using Precedence
6808 @subsection Specifying Operator Precedence
6813 Bison allows you to specify these choices with the operator precedence
6814 declarations @code{%left} and @code{%right}. Each such declaration
6815 contains a list of tokens, which are operators whose precedence and
6816 associativity is being declared. The @code{%left} declaration makes all
6817 those operators left-associative and the @code{%right} declaration makes
6818 them right-associative. A third alternative is @code{%nonassoc}, which
6819 declares that it is a syntax error to find the same operator twice ``in a
6822 The relative precedence of different operators is controlled by the
6823 order in which they are declared. The first @code{%left} or
6824 @code{%right} declaration in the file declares the operators whose
6825 precedence is lowest, the next such declaration declares the operators
6826 whose precedence is a little higher, and so on.
6828 @node Precedence Examples
6829 @subsection Precedence Examples
6831 In our example, we would want the following declarations:
6839 In a more complete example, which supports other operators as well, we
6840 would declare them in groups of equal precedence. For example, @code{'+'} is
6841 declared with @code{'-'}:
6844 %left '<' '>' '=' "!=" "<=" ">="
6849 @node How Precedence
6850 @subsection How Precedence Works
6852 The first effect of the precedence declarations is to assign precedence
6853 levels to the terminal symbols declared. The second effect is to assign
6854 precedence levels to certain rules: each rule gets its precedence from
6855 the last terminal symbol mentioned in the components. (You can also
6856 specify explicitly the precedence of a rule. @xref{Contextual
6857 Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.)
6859 Finally, the resolution of conflicts works by comparing the precedence
6860 of the rule being considered with that of the lookahead token. If the
6861 token's precedence is higher, the choice is to shift. If the rule's
6862 precedence is higher, the choice is to reduce. If they have equal
6863 precedence, the choice is made based on the associativity of that
6864 precedence level. The verbose output file made by @samp{-v}
6865 (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking Bison}) says how each conflict was
6868 Not all rules and not all tokens have precedence. If either the rule or
6869 the lookahead token has no precedence, then the default is to shift.
6872 @subsection Using Precedence For Non Operators
6874 Using properly precedence and associativity directives can help fixing
6875 shift/reduce conflicts that do not involve arithmetics-like operators. For
6876 instance, the ``dangling @code{else}'' problem (@pxref{Shift/Reduce, ,
6877 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}) can be solved elegantly in two different ways.
6879 In the present case, the conflict is between the token @code{"else"} willing
6880 to be shifted, and the rule @samp{if_stmt: "if" expr "then" stmt}, asking
6881 for reduction. By default, the precedence of a rule is that of its last
6882 token, here @code{"then"}, so the conflict will be solved appropriately
6883 by giving @code{"else"} a precedence higher than that of @code{"then"}, for
6884 instance as follows:
6893 Alternatively, you may give both tokens the same precedence, in which case
6894 associativity is used to solve the conflict. To preserve the shift action,
6895 use right associativity:
6898 %right "then" "else"
6901 Neither solution is perfect however. Since Bison does not provide, so far,
6902 support for ``scoped'' precedence, both force you to declare the precedence
6903 of these keywords with respect to the other operators your grammar.
6904 Therefore, instead of being warned about new conflicts you would be unaware
6905 of (e.g., a shift/reduce conflict due to @samp{if test then 1 else 2 + 3}
6906 being ambiguous: @samp{if test then 1 else (2 + 3)} or @samp{(if test then 1
6907 else 2) + 3}?), the conflict will be already ``fixed''.
6909 @node Contextual Precedence
6910 @section Context-Dependent Precedence
6911 @cindex context-dependent precedence
6912 @cindex unary operator precedence
6913 @cindex precedence, context-dependent
6914 @cindex precedence, unary operator
6917 Often the precedence of an operator depends on the context. This sounds
6918 outlandish at first, but it is really very common. For example, a minus
6919 sign typically has a very high precedence as a unary operator, and a
6920 somewhat lower precedence (lower than multiplication) as a binary operator.
6922 The Bison precedence declarations, @code{%left}, @code{%right} and
6923 @code{%nonassoc}, can only be used once for a given token; so a token has
6924 only one precedence declared in this way. For context-dependent
6925 precedence, you need to use an additional mechanism: the @code{%prec}
6928 The @code{%prec} modifier declares the precedence of a particular rule by
6929 specifying a terminal symbol whose precedence should be used for that rule.
6930 It's not necessary for that symbol to appear otherwise in the rule. The
6931 modifier's syntax is:
6934 %prec @var{terminal-symbol}
6938 and it is written after the components of the rule. Its effect is to
6939 assign the rule the precedence of @var{terminal-symbol}, overriding
6940 the precedence that would be deduced for it in the ordinary way. The
6941 altered rule precedence then affects how conflicts involving that rule
6942 are resolved (@pxref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}).
6944 Here is how @code{%prec} solves the problem of unary minus. First, declare
6945 a precedence for a fictitious terminal symbol named @code{UMINUS}. There
6946 are no tokens of this type, but the symbol serves to stand for its
6956 Now the precedence of @code{UMINUS} can be used in specific rules:
6964 | '-' exp %prec UMINUS
6969 If you forget to append @code{%prec UMINUS} to the rule for unary
6970 minus, Bison silently assumes that minus has its usual precedence.
6971 This kind of problem can be tricky to debug, since one typically
6972 discovers the mistake only by testing the code.
6974 The @code{%no-default-prec;} declaration makes it easier to discover
6975 this kind of problem systematically. It causes rules that lack a
6976 @code{%prec} modifier to have no precedence, even if the last terminal
6977 symbol mentioned in their components has a declared precedence.
6979 If @code{%no-default-prec;} is in effect, you must specify @code{%prec}
6980 for all rules that participate in precedence conflict resolution.
6981 Then you will see any shift/reduce conflict until you tell Bison how
6982 to resolve it, either by changing your grammar or by adding an
6983 explicit precedence. This will probably add declarations to the
6984 grammar, but it helps to protect against incorrect rule precedences.
6986 The effect of @code{%no-default-prec;} can be reversed by giving
6987 @code{%default-prec;}, which is the default.
6991 @section Parser States
6992 @cindex finite-state machine
6993 @cindex parser state
6994 @cindex state (of parser)
6996 The function @code{yyparse} is implemented using a finite-state machine.
6997 The values pushed on the parser stack are not simply token type codes; they
6998 represent the entire sequence of terminal and nonterminal symbols at or
6999 near the top of the stack. The current state collects all the information
7000 about previous input which is relevant to deciding what to do next.
7002 Each time a lookahead token is read, the current parser state together
7003 with the type of lookahead token are looked up in a table. This table
7004 entry can say, ``Shift the lookahead token.'' In this case, it also
7005 specifies the new parser state, which is pushed onto the top of the
7006 parser stack. Or it can say, ``Reduce using rule number @var{n}.''
7007 This means that a certain number of tokens or groupings are taken off
7008 the top of the stack, and replaced by one grouping. In other words,
7009 that number of states are popped from the stack, and one new state is
7012 There is one other alternative: the table can say that the lookahead token
7013 is erroneous in the current state. This causes error processing to begin
7014 (@pxref{Error Recovery}).
7017 @section Reduce/Reduce Conflicts
7018 @cindex reduce/reduce conflict
7019 @cindex conflicts, reduce/reduce
7021 A reduce/reduce conflict occurs if there are two or more rules that apply
7022 to the same sequence of input. This usually indicates a serious error
7025 For example, here is an erroneous attempt to define a sequence
7026 of zero or more @code{word} groupings.
7031 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7033 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7039 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty maybeword\n"); @}
7040 | word @{ printf ("single word %s\n", $1); @}
7046 The error is an ambiguity: there is more than one way to parse a single
7047 @code{word} into a @code{sequence}. It could be reduced to a
7048 @code{maybeword} and then into a @code{sequence} via the second rule.
7049 Alternatively, nothing-at-all could be reduced into a @code{sequence}
7050 via the first rule, and this could be combined with the @code{word}
7051 using the third rule for @code{sequence}.
7053 There is also more than one way to reduce nothing-at-all into a
7054 @code{sequence}. This can be done directly via the first rule,
7055 or indirectly via @code{maybeword} and then the second rule.
7057 You might think that this is a distinction without a difference, because it
7058 does not change whether any particular input is valid or not. But it does
7059 affect which actions are run. One parsing order runs the second rule's
7060 action; the other runs the first rule's action and the third rule's action.
7061 In this example, the output of the program changes.
7063 Bison resolves a reduce/reduce conflict by choosing to use the rule that
7064 appears first in the grammar, but it is very risky to rely on this. Every
7065 reduce/reduce conflict must be studied and usually eliminated. Here is the
7066 proper way to define @code{sequence}:
7071 /* empty */ @{ printf ("empty sequence\n"); @}
7072 | sequence word @{ printf ("added word %s\n", $2); @}
7077 Here is another common error that yields a reduce/reduce conflict:
7084 | sequence redirects
7098 | redirects redirect
7104 The intention here is to define a sequence which can contain either
7105 @code{word} or @code{redirect} groupings. The individual definitions of
7106 @code{sequence}, @code{words} and @code{redirects} are error-free, but the
7107 three together make a subtle ambiguity: even an empty input can be parsed
7108 in infinitely many ways!
7110 Consider: nothing-at-all could be a @code{words}. Or it could be two
7111 @code{words} in a row, or three, or any number. It could equally well be a
7112 @code{redirects}, or two, or any number. Or it could be a @code{words}
7113 followed by three @code{redirects} and another @code{words}. And so on.
7115 Here are two ways to correct these rules. First, to make it a single level
7126 Second, to prevent either a @code{words} or a @code{redirects}
7134 | sequence redirects
7148 | redirects redirect
7153 Yet this proposal introduces another kind of ambiguity! The input
7154 @samp{word word} can be parsed as a single @code{words} composed of two
7155 @samp{word}s, or as two one-@code{word} @code{words} (and likewise for
7156 @code{redirect}/@code{redirects}). However this ambiguity is now a
7157 shift/reduce conflict, and therefore it can now be addressed with precedence
7160 To simplify the matter, we will proceed with @code{word} and @code{redirect}
7161 being tokens: @code{"word"} and @code{"redirect"}.
7163 To prefer the longest @code{words}, the conflict between the token
7164 @code{"word"} and the rule @samp{sequence: sequence words} must be resolved
7165 as a shift. To this end, we use the same techniques as exposed above, see
7166 @ref{Non Operators,, Using Precedence For Non Operators}. One solution
7167 relies on precedences: use @code{%prec} to give a lower precedence to the
7172 %nonassoc "sequence"
7177 | sequence word %prec "sequence"
7178 | sequence redirect %prec "sequence"
7190 Another solution relies on associativity: provide both the token and the
7191 rule with the same precedence, but make them right-associative:
7194 %right "word" "redirect"
7199 | sequence word %prec "word"
7200 | sequence redirect %prec "redirect"
7205 @node Mysterious Conflicts
7206 @section Mysterious Conflicts
7207 @cindex Mysterious Conflicts
7209 Sometimes reduce/reduce conflicts can occur that don't look warranted.
7215 def: param_spec return_spec ',';
7218 | name_list ':' type
7234 | name ',' name_list
7239 It would seem that this grammar can be parsed with only a single token of
7240 lookahead: when a @code{param_spec} is being read, an @code{"id"} is a
7241 @code{name} if a comma or colon follows, or a @code{type} if another
7242 @code{"id"} follows. In other words, this grammar is LR(1).
7246 However, for historical reasons, Bison cannot by default handle all
7248 In this grammar, two contexts, that after an @code{"id"} at the beginning
7249 of a @code{param_spec} and likewise at the beginning of a
7250 @code{return_spec}, are similar enough that Bison assumes they are the
7252 They appear similar because the same set of rules would be
7253 active---the rule for reducing to a @code{name} and that for reducing to
7254 a @code{type}. Bison is unable to determine at that stage of processing
7255 that the rules would require different lookahead tokens in the two
7256 contexts, so it makes a single parser state for them both. Combining
7257 the two contexts causes a conflict later. In parser terminology, this
7258 occurrence means that the grammar is not LALR(1).
7261 @cindex canonical LR
7262 For many practical grammars (specifically those that fall into the non-LR(1)
7263 class), the limitations of LALR(1) result in difficulties beyond just
7264 mysterious reduce/reduce conflicts. The best way to fix all these problems
7265 is to select a different parser table construction algorithm. Either
7266 IELR(1) or canonical LR(1) would suffice, but the former is more efficient
7267 and easier to debug during development. @xref{LR Table Construction}, for
7268 details. (Bison's IELR(1) and canonical LR(1) implementations are
7269 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize them.)
7271 If you instead wish to work around LALR(1)'s limitations, you
7272 can often fix a mysterious conflict by identifying the two parser states
7273 that are being confused, and adding something to make them look
7274 distinct. In the above example, adding one rule to
7275 @code{return_spec} as follows makes the problem go away:
7283 | "id" "bogus" /* This rule is never used. */
7288 This corrects the problem because it introduces the possibility of an
7289 additional active rule in the context after the @code{"id"} at the beginning of
7290 @code{return_spec}. This rule is not active in the corresponding context
7291 in a @code{param_spec}, so the two contexts receive distinct parser states.
7292 As long as the token @code{"bogus"} is never generated by @code{yylex},
7293 the added rule cannot alter the way actual input is parsed.
7295 In this particular example, there is another way to solve the problem:
7296 rewrite the rule for @code{return_spec} to use @code{"id"} directly
7297 instead of via @code{name}. This also causes the two confusing
7298 contexts to have different sets of active rules, because the one for
7299 @code{return_spec} activates the altered rule for @code{return_spec}
7300 rather than the one for @code{name}.
7305 | name_list ':' type
7313 For a more detailed exposition of LALR(1) parsers and parser
7314 generators, @pxref{Bibliography,,DeRemer 1982}.
7319 The default behavior of Bison's LR-based parsers is chosen mostly for
7320 historical reasons, but that behavior is often not robust. For example, in
7321 the previous section, we discussed the mysterious conflicts that can be
7322 produced by LALR(1), Bison's default parser table construction algorithm.
7323 Another example is Bison's @code{%error-verbose} directive, which instructs
7324 the generated parser to produce verbose syntax error messages, which can
7325 sometimes contain incorrect information.
7327 In this section, we explore several modern features of Bison that allow you
7328 to tune fundamental aspects of the generated LR-based parsers. Some of
7329 these features easily eliminate shortcomings like those mentioned above.
7330 Others can be helpful purely for understanding your parser.
7332 Most of the features discussed in this section are still experimental. More
7333 user feedback will help to stabilize them.
7336 * LR Table Construction:: Choose a different construction algorithm.
7337 * Default Reductions:: Disable default reductions.
7338 * LAC:: Correct lookahead sets in the parser states.
7339 * Unreachable States:: Keep unreachable parser states for debugging.
7342 @node LR Table Construction
7343 @subsection LR Table Construction
7344 @cindex Mysterious Conflict
7347 @cindex canonical LR
7348 @findex %define lr.type
7350 For historical reasons, Bison constructs LALR(1) parser tables by default.
7351 However, LALR does not possess the full language-recognition power of LR.
7352 As a result, the behavior of parsers employing LALR parser tables is often
7353 mysterious. We presented a simple example of this effect in @ref{Mysterious
7356 As we also demonstrated in that example, the traditional approach to
7357 eliminating such mysterious behavior is to restructure the grammar.
7358 Unfortunately, doing so correctly is often difficult. Moreover, merely
7359 discovering that LALR causes mysterious behavior in your parser can be
7362 Fortunately, Bison provides an easy way to eliminate the possibility of such
7363 mysterious behavior altogether. You simply need to activate a more powerful
7364 parser table construction algorithm by using the @code{%define lr.type}
7367 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.type} @var{type}
7368 Specify the type of parser tables within the LR(1) family. The accepted
7369 values for @var{type} are:
7372 @item @code{lalr} (default)
7374 @item @code{canonical-lr}
7377 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7381 For example, to activate IELR, you might add the following directive to you
7385 %define lr.type ielr
7388 @noindent For the example in @ref{Mysterious Conflicts}, the mysterious
7389 conflict is then eliminated, so there is no need to invest time in
7390 comprehending the conflict or restructuring the grammar to fix it. If,
7391 during future development, the grammar evolves such that all mysterious
7392 behavior would have disappeared using just LALR, you need not fear that
7393 continuing to use IELR will result in unnecessarily large parser tables.
7394 That is, IELR generates LALR tables when LALR (using a deterministic parsing
7395 algorithm) is sufficient to support the full language-recognition power of
7396 LR. Thus, by enabling IELR at the start of grammar development, you can
7397 safely and completely eliminate the need to consider LALR's shortcomings.
7399 While IELR is almost always preferable, there are circumstances where LALR
7400 or the canonical LR parser tables described by Knuth
7401 (@pxref{Bibliography,,Knuth 1965}) can be useful. Here we summarize the
7402 relative advantages of each parser table construction algorithm within
7408 There are at least two scenarios where LALR can be worthwhile:
7411 @item GLR without static conflict resolution.
7413 @cindex GLR with LALR
7414 When employing GLR parsers (@pxref{GLR Parsers}), if you do not resolve any
7415 conflicts statically (for example, with @code{%left} or @code{%prec}), then
7416 the parser explores all potential parses of any given input. In this case,
7417 the choice of parser table construction algorithm is guaranteed not to alter
7418 the language accepted by the parser. LALR parser tables are the smallest
7419 parser tables Bison can currently construct, so they may then be preferable.
7420 Nevertheless, once you begin to resolve conflicts statically, GLR behaves
7421 more like a deterministic parser in the syntactic contexts where those
7422 conflicts appear, and so either IELR or canonical LR can then be helpful to
7423 avoid LALR's mysterious behavior.
7425 @item Malformed grammars.
7427 Occasionally during development, an especially malformed grammar with a
7428 major recurring flaw may severely impede the IELR or canonical LR parser
7429 table construction algorithm. LALR can be a quick way to construct parser
7430 tables in order to investigate such problems while ignoring the more subtle
7431 differences from IELR and canonical LR.
7436 IELR (Inadequacy Elimination LR) is a minimal LR algorithm. That is, given
7437 any grammar (LR or non-LR), parsers using IELR or canonical LR parser tables
7438 always accept exactly the same set of sentences. However, like LALR, IELR
7439 merges parser states during parser table construction so that the number of
7440 parser states is often an order of magnitude less than for canonical LR.
7441 More importantly, because canonical LR's extra parser states may contain
7442 duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR grammars, the number of conflicts
7443 for IELR is often an order of magnitude less as well. This effect can
7444 significantly reduce the complexity of developing a grammar.
7448 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7451 While inefficient, canonical LR parser tables can be an interesting means to
7452 explore a grammar because they possess a property that IELR and LALR tables
7453 do not. That is, if @code{%nonassoc} is not used and default reductions are
7454 left disabled (@pxref{Default Reductions}), then, for every left context of
7455 every canonical LR state, the set of tokens accepted by that state is
7456 guaranteed to be the exact set of tokens that is syntactically acceptable in
7457 that left context. It might then seem that an advantage of canonical LR
7458 parsers in production is that, under the above constraints, they are
7459 guaranteed to detect a syntax error as soon as possible without performing
7460 any unnecessary reductions. However, IELR parsers that use LAC are also
7461 able to achieve this behavior without sacrificing @code{%nonassoc} or
7462 default reductions. For details and a few caveats of LAC, @pxref{LAC}.
7465 For a more detailed exposition of the mysterious behavior in LALR parsers
7466 and the benefits of IELR, @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2008 March}, and
7467 @ref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 November}.
7469 @node Default Reductions
7470 @subsection Default Reductions
7471 @cindex default reductions
7472 @findex %define lr.default-reductions
7475 After parser table construction, Bison identifies the reduction with the
7476 largest lookahead set in each parser state. To reduce the size of the
7477 parser state, traditional Bison behavior is to remove that lookahead set and
7478 to assign that reduction to be the default parser action. Such a reduction
7479 is known as a @dfn{default reduction}.
7481 Default reductions affect more than the size of the parser tables. They
7482 also affect the behavior of the parser:
7485 @item Delayed @code{yylex} invocations.
7487 @cindex delayed yylex invocations
7488 @cindex consistent states
7489 @cindex defaulted states
7490 A @dfn{consistent state} is a state that has only one possible parser
7491 action. If that action is a reduction and is encoded as a default
7492 reduction, then that consistent state is called a @dfn{defaulted state}.
7493 Upon reaching a defaulted state, a Bison-generated parser does not bother to
7494 invoke @code{yylex} to fetch the next token before performing the reduction.
7495 In other words, whether default reductions are enabled in consistent states
7496 determines how soon a Bison-generated parser invokes @code{yylex} for a
7497 token: immediately when it @emph{reaches} that token in the input or when it
7498 eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to determine the next
7499 parser action. Traditionally, default reductions are enabled, and so the
7500 parser exhibits the latter behavior.
7502 The presence of defaulted states is an important consideration when
7503 designing @code{yylex} and the grammar file. That is, if the behavior of
7504 @code{yylex} can influence or be influenced by the semantic actions
7505 associated with the reductions in defaulted states, then the delay of the
7506 next @code{yylex} invocation until after those reductions is significant.
7507 For example, the semantic actions might pop a scope stack that @code{yylex}
7508 uses to determine what token to return. Thus, the delay might be necessary
7509 to ensure that @code{yylex} does not look up the next token in a scope that
7510 should already be considered closed.
7512 @item Delayed syntax error detection.
7514 @cindex delayed syntax error detection
7515 When the parser fetches a new token by invoking @code{yylex}, it checks
7516 whether there is an action for that token in the current parser state. The
7517 parser detects a syntax error if and only if either (1) there is no action
7518 for that token or (2) the action for that token is the error action (due to
7519 the use of @code{%nonassoc}). However, if there is a default reduction in
7520 that state (which might or might not be a defaulted state), then it is
7521 impossible for condition 1 to exist. That is, all tokens have an action.
7522 Thus, the parser sometimes fails to detect the syntax error until it reaches
7526 @c If there's an infinite loop, default reductions can prevent an incorrect
7527 @c sentence from being rejected.
7528 While default reductions never cause the parser to accept syntactically
7529 incorrect sentences, the delay of syntax error detection can have unexpected
7530 effects on the behavior of the parser. However, the delay can be caused
7531 anyway by parser state merging and the use of @code{%nonassoc}, and it can
7532 be fixed by another Bison feature, LAC. We discuss the effects of delayed
7533 syntax error detection and LAC more in the next section (@pxref{LAC}).
7536 For canonical LR, the only default reduction that Bison enables by default
7537 is the accept action, which appears only in the accepting state, which has
7538 no other action and is thus a defaulted state. However, the default accept
7539 action does not delay any @code{yylex} invocation or syntax error detection
7540 because the accept action ends the parse.
7542 For LALR and IELR, Bison enables default reductions in nearly all states by
7543 default. There are only two exceptions. First, states that have a shift
7544 action on the @code{error} token do not have default reductions because
7545 delayed syntax error detection could then prevent the @code{error} token
7546 from ever being shifted in that state. However, parser state merging can
7547 cause the same effect anyway, and LAC fixes it in both cases, so future
7548 versions of Bison might drop this exception when LAC is activated. Second,
7549 GLR parsers do not record the default reduction as the action on a lookahead
7550 token for which there is a conflict. The correct action in this case is to
7551 split the parse instead.
7553 To adjust which states have default reductions enabled, use the
7554 @code{%define lr.default-reductions} directive.
7556 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.default-reductions} @var{where}
7557 Specify the kind of states that are permitted to contain default reductions.
7558 The accepted values of @var{where} are:
7560 @item @code{most} (default for LALR and IELR)
7561 @item @code{consistent}
7562 @item @code{accepting} (default for canonical LR)
7565 (The ability to specify where default reductions are permitted is
7566 experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
7571 @findex %define parse.lac
7573 @cindex lookahead correction
7575 Canonical LR, IELR, and LALR can suffer from a couple of problems upon
7576 encountering a syntax error. First, the parser might perform additional
7577 parser stack reductions before discovering the syntax error. Such
7578 reductions can perform user semantic actions that are unexpected because
7579 they are based on an invalid token, and they cause error recovery to begin
7580 in a different syntactic context than the one in which the invalid token was
7581 encountered. Second, when verbose error messages are enabled (@pxref{Error
7582 Reporting}), the expected token list in the syntax error message can both
7583 contain invalid tokens and omit valid tokens.
7585 The culprits for the above problems are @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions
7586 in inconsistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}), and parser state
7587 merging. Because IELR and LALR merge parser states, they suffer the most.
7588 Canonical LR can suffer only if @code{%nonassoc} is used or if default
7589 reductions are enabled for inconsistent states.
7591 LAC (Lookahead Correction) is a new mechanism within the parsing algorithm
7592 that solves these problems for canonical LR, IELR, and LALR without
7593 sacrificing @code{%nonassoc}, default reductions, or state merging. You can
7594 enable LAC with the @code{%define parse.lac} directive.
7596 @deffn {Directive} {%define parse.lac} @var{value}
7597 Enable LAC to improve syntax error handling.
7599 @item @code{none} (default)
7602 (This feature is experimental. More user feedback will help to stabilize
7603 it. Moreover, it is currently only available for deterministic parsers in
7607 Conceptually, the LAC mechanism is straight-forward. Whenever the parser
7608 fetches a new token from the scanner so that it can determine the next
7609 parser action, it immediately suspends normal parsing and performs an
7610 exploratory parse using a temporary copy of the normal parser state stack.
7611 During this exploratory parse, the parser does not perform user semantic
7612 actions. If the exploratory parse reaches a shift action, normal parsing
7613 then resumes on the normal parser stacks. If the exploratory parse reaches
7614 an error instead, the parser reports a syntax error. If verbose syntax
7615 error messages are enabled, the parser must then discover the list of
7616 expected tokens, so it performs a separate exploratory parse for each token
7619 There is one subtlety about the use of LAC. That is, when in a consistent
7620 parser state with a default reduction, the parser will not attempt to fetch
7621 a token from the scanner because no lookahead is needed to determine the
7622 next parser action. Thus, whether default reductions are enabled in
7623 consistent states (@pxref{Default Reductions}) affects how soon the parser
7624 detects a syntax error: immediately when it @emph{reaches} an erroneous
7625 token or when it eventually @emph{needs} that token as a lookahead to
7626 determine the next parser action. The latter behavior is probably more
7627 intuitive, so Bison currently provides no way to achieve the former behavior
7628 while default reductions are enabled in consistent states.
7630 Thus, when LAC is in use, for some fixed decision of whether to enable
7631 default reductions in consistent states, canonical LR and IELR behave almost
7632 exactly the same for both syntactically acceptable and syntactically
7633 unacceptable input. While LALR still does not support the full
7634 language-recognition power of canonical LR and IELR, LAC at least enables
7635 LALR's syntax error handling to correctly reflect LALR's
7636 language-recognition power.
7638 There are a few caveats to consider when using LAC:
7641 @item Infinite parsing loops.
7643 IELR plus LAC does have one shortcoming relative to canonical LR. Some
7644 parsers generated by Bison can loop infinitely. LAC does not fix infinite
7645 parsing loops that occur between encountering a syntax error and detecting
7646 it, but enabling canonical LR or disabling default reductions sometimes
7649 @item Verbose error message limitations.
7651 Because of internationalization considerations, Bison-generated parsers
7652 limit the size of the expected token list they are willing to report in a
7653 verbose syntax error message. If the number of expected tokens exceeds that
7654 limit, the list is simply dropped from the message. Enabling LAC can
7655 increase the size of the list and thus cause the parser to drop it. Of
7656 course, dropping the list is better than reporting an incorrect list.
7660 Because LAC requires many parse actions to be performed twice, it can have a
7661 performance penalty. However, not all parse actions must be performed
7662 twice. Specifically, during a series of default reductions in consistent
7663 states and shift actions, the parser never has to initiate an exploratory
7664 parse. Moreover, the most time-consuming tasks in a parse are often the
7665 file I/O, the lexical analysis performed by the scanner, and the user's
7666 semantic actions, but none of these are performed during the exploratory
7667 parse. Finally, the base of the temporary stack used during an exploratory
7668 parse is a pointer into the normal parser state stack so that the stack is
7669 never physically copied. In our experience, the performance penalty of LAC
7670 has proved insignificant for practical grammars.
7673 While the LAC algorithm shares techniques that have been recognized in the
7674 parser community for years, for the publication that introduces LAC,
7675 @pxref{Bibliography,,Denny 2010 May}.
7677 @node Unreachable States
7678 @subsection Unreachable States
7679 @findex %define lr.keep-unreachable-states
7680 @cindex unreachable states
7682 If there exists no sequence of transitions from the parser's start state to
7683 some state @var{s}, then Bison considers @var{s} to be an @dfn{unreachable
7684 state}. A state can become unreachable during conflict resolution if Bison
7685 disables a shift action leading to it from a predecessor state.
7687 By default, Bison removes unreachable states from the parser after conflict
7688 resolution because they are useless in the generated parser. However,
7689 keeping unreachable states is sometimes useful when trying to understand the
7690 relationship between the parser and the grammar.
7692 @deffn {Directive} {%define lr.keep-unreachable-states} @var{value}
7693 Request that Bison allow unreachable states to remain in the parser tables.
7694 @var{value} must be a Boolean. The default is @code{false}.
7697 There are a few caveats to consider:
7700 @item Missing or extraneous warnings.
7702 Unreachable states may contain conflicts and may use rules not used in any
7703 other state. Thus, keeping unreachable states may induce warnings that are
7704 irrelevant to your parser's behavior, and it may eliminate warnings that are
7705 relevant. Of course, the change in warnings may actually be relevant to a
7706 parser table analysis that wants to keep unreachable states, so this
7707 behavior will likely remain in future Bison releases.
7709 @item Other useless states.
7711 While Bison is able to remove unreachable states, it is not guaranteed to
7712 remove other kinds of useless states. Specifically, when Bison disables
7713 reduce actions during conflict resolution, some goto actions may become
7714 useless, and thus some additional states may become useless. If Bison were
7715 to compute which goto actions were useless and then disable those actions,
7716 it could identify such states as unreachable and then remove those states.
7717 However, Bison does not compute which goto actions are useless.
7720 @node Generalized LR Parsing
7721 @section Generalized LR (GLR) Parsing
7723 @cindex generalized LR (GLR) parsing
7724 @cindex ambiguous grammars
7725 @cindex nondeterministic parsing
7727 Bison produces @emph{deterministic} parsers that choose uniquely
7728 when to reduce and which reduction to apply
7729 based on a summary of the preceding input and on one extra token of lookahead.
7730 As a result, normal Bison handles a proper subset of the family of
7731 context-free languages.
7732 Ambiguous grammars, since they have strings with more than one possible
7733 sequence of reductions cannot have deterministic parsers in this sense.
7734 The same is true of languages that require more than one symbol of
7735 lookahead, since the parser lacks the information necessary to make a
7736 decision at the point it must be made in a shift-reduce parser.
7737 Finally, as previously mentioned (@pxref{Mysterious Conflicts}),
7738 there are languages where Bison's default choice of how to
7739 summarize the input seen so far loses necessary information.
7741 When you use the @samp{%glr-parser} declaration in your grammar file,
7742 Bison generates a parser that uses a different algorithm, called
7743 Generalized LR (or GLR). A Bison GLR
7744 parser uses the same basic
7745 algorithm for parsing as an ordinary Bison parser, but behaves
7746 differently in cases where there is a shift-reduce conflict that has not
7747 been resolved by precedence rules (@pxref{Precedence}) or a
7748 reduce-reduce conflict. When a GLR parser encounters such a
7750 effectively @emph{splits} into a several parsers, one for each possible
7751 shift or reduction. These parsers then proceed as usual, consuming
7752 tokens in lock-step. Some of the stacks may encounter other conflicts
7753 and split further, with the result that instead of a sequence of states,
7754 a Bison GLR parsing stack is what is in effect a tree of states.
7756 In effect, each stack represents a guess as to what the proper parse
7757 is. Additional input may indicate that a guess was wrong, in which case
7758 the appropriate stack silently disappears. Otherwise, the semantics
7759 actions generated in each stack are saved, rather than being executed
7760 immediately. When a stack disappears, its saved semantic actions never
7761 get executed. When a reduction causes two stacks to become equivalent,
7762 their sets of semantic actions are both saved with the state that
7763 results from the reduction. We say that two stacks are equivalent
7764 when they both represent the same sequence of states,
7765 and each pair of corresponding states represents a
7766 grammar symbol that produces the same segment of the input token
7769 Whenever the parser makes a transition from having multiple
7770 states to having one, it reverts to the normal deterministic parsing
7771 algorithm, after resolving and executing the saved-up actions.
7772 At this transition, some of the states on the stack will have semantic
7773 values that are sets (actually multisets) of possible actions. The
7774 parser tries to pick one of the actions by first finding one whose rule
7775 has the highest dynamic precedence, as set by the @samp{%dprec}
7776 declaration. Otherwise, if the alternative actions are not ordered by
7777 precedence, but there the same merging function is declared for both
7778 rules by the @samp{%merge} declaration,
7779 Bison resolves and evaluates both and then calls the merge function on
7780 the result. Otherwise, it reports an ambiguity.
7782 It is possible to use a data structure for the GLR parsing tree that
7783 permits the processing of any LR(1) grammar in linear time (in the
7784 size of the input), any unambiguous (not necessarily
7786 quadratic worst-case time, and any general (possibly ambiguous)
7787 context-free grammar in cubic worst-case time. However, Bison currently
7788 uses a simpler data structure that requires time proportional to the
7789 length of the input times the maximum number of stacks required for any
7790 prefix of the input. Thus, really ambiguous or nondeterministic
7791 grammars can require exponential time and space to process. Such badly
7792 behaving examples, however, are not generally of practical interest.
7793 Usually, nondeterminism in a grammar is local---the parser is ``in
7794 doubt'' only for a few tokens at a time. Therefore, the current data
7795 structure should generally be adequate. On LR(1) portions of a
7796 grammar, in particular, it is only slightly slower than with the
7797 deterministic LR(1) Bison parser.
7799 For a more detailed exposition of GLR parsers, @pxref{Bibliography,,Scott
7802 @node Memory Management
7803 @section Memory Management, and How to Avoid Memory Exhaustion
7804 @cindex memory exhaustion
7805 @cindex memory management
7806 @cindex stack overflow
7807 @cindex parser stack overflow
7808 @cindex overflow of parser stack
7810 The Bison parser stack can run out of memory if too many tokens are shifted and
7811 not reduced. When this happens, the parser function @code{yyparse}
7812 calls @code{yyerror} and then returns 2.
7814 Because Bison parsers have growing stacks, hitting the upper limit
7815 usually results from using a right recursion instead of a left
7816 recursion, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive Rules}.
7819 By defining the macro @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, you can control how deep the
7820 parser stack can become before memory is exhausted. Define the
7821 macro with a value that is an integer. This value is the maximum number
7822 of tokens that can be shifted (and not reduced) before overflow.
7824 The stack space allowed is not necessarily allocated. If you specify a
7825 large value for @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, the parser normally allocates a small
7826 stack at first, and then makes it bigger by stages as needed. This
7827 increasing allocation happens automatically and silently. Therefore,
7828 you do not need to make @code{YYMAXDEPTH} painfully small merely to save
7829 space for ordinary inputs that do not need much stack.
7831 However, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be a value so large that
7832 arithmetic overflow could occur when calculating the size of the stack
7833 space. Also, do not allow @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to be less than
7836 @cindex default stack limit
7837 The default value of @code{YYMAXDEPTH}, if you do not define it, is
7841 You can control how much stack is allocated initially by defining the
7842 macro @code{YYINITDEPTH} to a positive integer. For the deterministic
7843 parser in C, this value must be a compile-time constant
7844 unless you are assuming C99 or some other target language or compiler
7845 that allows variable-length arrays. The default is 200.
7847 Do not allow @code{YYINITDEPTH} to be greater than @code{YYMAXDEPTH}.
7849 @c FIXME: C++ output.
7850 Because of semantic differences between C and C++, the deterministic
7851 parsers in C produced by Bison cannot grow when compiled
7852 by C++ compilers. In this precise case (compiling a C parser as C++) you are
7853 suggested to grow @code{YYINITDEPTH}. The Bison maintainers hope to fix
7854 this deficiency in a future release.
7856 @node Error Recovery
7857 @chapter Error Recovery
7858 @cindex error recovery
7859 @cindex recovery from errors
7861 It is not usually acceptable to have a program terminate on a syntax
7862 error. For example, a compiler should recover sufficiently to parse the
7863 rest of the input file and check it for errors; a calculator should accept
7866 In a simple interactive command parser where each input is one line, it may
7867 be sufficient to allow @code{yyparse} to return 1 on error and have the
7868 caller ignore the rest of the input line when that happens (and then call
7869 @code{yyparse} again). But this is inadequate for a compiler, because it
7870 forgets all the syntactic context leading up to the error. A syntax error
7871 deep within a function in the compiler input should not cause the compiler
7872 to treat the following line like the beginning of a source file.
7875 You can define how to recover from a syntax error by writing rules to
7876 recognize the special token @code{error}. This is a terminal symbol that
7877 is always defined (you need not declare it) and reserved for error
7878 handling. The Bison parser generates an @code{error} token whenever a
7879 syntax error happens; if you have provided a rule to recognize this token
7880 in the current context, the parse can continue.
7892 The fourth rule in this example says that an error followed by a newline
7893 makes a valid addition to any @code{stmts}.
7895 What happens if a syntax error occurs in the middle of an @code{exp}? The
7896 error recovery rule, interpreted strictly, applies to the precise sequence
7897 of a @code{stmts}, an @code{error} and a newline. If an error occurs in
7898 the middle of an @code{exp}, there will probably be some additional tokens
7899 and subexpressions on the stack after the last @code{stmts}, and there
7900 will be tokens to read before the next newline. So the rule is not
7901 applicable in the ordinary way.
7903 But Bison can force the situation to fit the rule, by discarding part of
7904 the semantic context and part of the input. First it discards states
7905 and objects from the stack until it gets back to a state in which the
7906 @code{error} token is acceptable. (This means that the subexpressions
7907 already parsed are discarded, back to the last complete @code{stmts}.)
7908 At this point the @code{error} token can be shifted. Then, if the old
7909 lookahead token is not acceptable to be shifted next, the parser reads
7910 tokens and discards them until it finds a token which is acceptable. In
7911 this example, Bison reads and discards input until the next newline so
7912 that the fourth rule can apply. Note that discarded symbols are
7913 possible sources of memory leaks, see @ref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing
7914 Discarded Symbols}, for a means to reclaim this memory.
7916 The choice of error rules in the grammar is a choice of strategies for
7917 error recovery. A simple and useful strategy is simply to skip the rest of
7918 the current input line or current statement if an error is detected:
7921 stmt: error ';' /* On error, skip until ';' is read. */
7924 It is also useful to recover to the matching close-delimiter of an
7925 opening-delimiter that has already been parsed. Otherwise the
7926 close-delimiter will probably appear to be unmatched, and generate another,
7927 spurious error message:
7937 Error recovery strategies are necessarily guesses. When they guess wrong,
7938 one syntax error often leads to another. In the above example, the error
7939 recovery rule guesses that an error is due to bad input within one
7940 @code{stmt}. Suppose that instead a spurious semicolon is inserted in the
7941 middle of a valid @code{stmt}. After the error recovery rule recovers
7942 from the first error, another syntax error will be found straightaway,
7943 since the text following the spurious semicolon is also an invalid
7946 To prevent an outpouring of error messages, the parser will output no error
7947 message for another syntax error that happens shortly after the first; only
7948 after three consecutive input tokens have been successfully shifted will
7949 error messages resume.
7951 Note that rules which accept the @code{error} token may have actions, just
7952 as any other rules can.
7955 You can make error messages resume immediately by using the macro
7956 @code{yyerrok} in an action. If you do this in the error rule's action, no
7957 error messages will be suppressed. This macro requires no arguments;
7958 @samp{yyerrok;} is a valid C statement.
7961 The previous lookahead token is reanalyzed immediately after an error. If
7962 this is unacceptable, then the macro @code{yyclearin} may be used to clear
7963 this token. Write the statement @samp{yyclearin;} in the error rule's
7965 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
7967 For example, suppose that on a syntax error, an error handling routine is
7968 called that advances the input stream to some point where parsing should
7969 once again commence. The next symbol returned by the lexical scanner is
7970 probably correct. The previous lookahead token ought to be discarded
7971 with @samp{yyclearin;}.
7973 @vindex YYRECOVERING
7974 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
7975 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
7976 Syntax error diagnostics are suppressed while recovering from a syntax
7979 @node Context Dependency
7980 @chapter Handling Context Dependencies
7982 The Bison paradigm is to parse tokens first, then group them into larger
7983 syntactic units. In many languages, the meaning of a token is affected by
7984 its context. Although this violates the Bison paradigm, certain techniques
7985 (known as @dfn{kludges}) may enable you to write Bison parsers for such
7989 * Semantic Tokens:: Token parsing can depend on the semantic context.
7990 * Lexical Tie-ins:: Token parsing can depend on the syntactic context.
7991 * Tie-in Recovery:: Lexical tie-ins have implications for how
7992 error recovery rules must be written.
7995 (Actually, ``kludge'' means any technique that gets its job done but is
7996 neither clean nor robust.)
7998 @node Semantic Tokens
7999 @section Semantic Info in Token Types
8001 The C language has a context dependency: the way an identifier is used
8002 depends on what its current meaning is. For example, consider this:
8008 This looks like a function call statement, but if @code{foo} is a typedef
8009 name, then this is actually a declaration of @code{x}. How can a Bison
8010 parser for C decide how to parse this input?
8012 The method used in GNU C is to have two different token types,
8013 @code{IDENTIFIER} and @code{TYPENAME}. When @code{yylex} finds an
8014 identifier, it looks up the current declaration of the identifier in order
8015 to decide which token type to return: @code{TYPENAME} if the identifier is
8016 declared as a typedef, @code{IDENTIFIER} otherwise.
8018 The grammar rules can then express the context dependency by the choice of
8019 token type to recognize. @code{IDENTIFIER} is accepted as an expression,
8020 but @code{TYPENAME} is not. @code{TYPENAME} can start a declaration, but
8021 @code{IDENTIFIER} cannot. In contexts where the meaning of the identifier
8022 is @emph{not} significant, such as in declarations that can shadow a
8023 typedef name, either @code{TYPENAME} or @code{IDENTIFIER} is
8024 accepted---there is one rule for each of the two token types.
8026 This technique is simple to use if the decision of which kinds of
8027 identifiers to allow is made at a place close to where the identifier is
8028 parsed. But in C this is not always so: C allows a declaration to
8029 redeclare a typedef name provided an explicit type has been specified
8033 typedef int foo, bar;
8037 static bar (bar); /* @r{redeclare @code{bar} as static variable} */
8038 extern foo foo (foo); /* @r{redeclare @code{foo} as function} */
8044 Unfortunately, the name being declared is separated from the declaration
8045 construct itself by a complicated syntactic structure---the ``declarator''.
8047 As a result, part of the Bison parser for C needs to be duplicated, with
8048 all the nonterminal names changed: once for parsing a declaration in
8049 which a typedef name can be redefined, and once for parsing a
8050 declaration in which that can't be done. Here is a part of the
8051 duplication, with actions omitted for brevity:
8056 declarator maybeasm '=' init
8057 | declarator maybeasm
8063 notype_declarator maybeasm '=' init
8064 | notype_declarator maybeasm
8070 Here @code{initdcl} can redeclare a typedef name, but @code{notype_initdcl}
8071 cannot. The distinction between @code{declarator} and
8072 @code{notype_declarator} is the same sort of thing.
8074 There is some similarity between this technique and a lexical tie-in
8075 (described next), in that information which alters the lexical analysis is
8076 changed during parsing by other parts of the program. The difference is
8077 here the information is global, and is used for other purposes in the
8078 program. A true lexical tie-in has a special-purpose flag controlled by
8079 the syntactic context.
8081 @node Lexical Tie-ins
8082 @section Lexical Tie-ins
8083 @cindex lexical tie-in
8085 One way to handle context-dependency is the @dfn{lexical tie-in}: a flag
8086 which is set by Bison actions, whose purpose is to alter the way tokens are
8089 For example, suppose we have a language vaguely like C, but with a special
8090 construct @samp{hex (@var{hex-expr})}. After the keyword @code{hex} comes
8091 an expression in parentheses in which all integers are hexadecimal. In
8092 particular, the token @samp{a1b} must be treated as an integer rather than
8093 as an identifier if it appears in that context. Here is how you can do it:
8100 void yyerror (char const *);
8109 | HEX '(' @{ hexflag = 1; @}
8110 expr ')' @{ hexflag = 0; $$ = $4; @}
8111 | expr '+' expr @{ $$ = make_sum ($1, $3); @}
8125 Here we assume that @code{yylex} looks at the value of @code{hexflag}; when
8126 it is nonzero, all integers are parsed in hexadecimal, and tokens starting
8127 with letters are parsed as integers if possible.
8129 The declaration of @code{hexflag} shown in the prologue of the grammar
8130 file is needed to make it accessible to the actions (@pxref{Prologue,
8131 ,The Prologue}). You must also write the code in @code{yylex} to obey
8134 @node Tie-in Recovery
8135 @section Lexical Tie-ins and Error Recovery
8137 Lexical tie-ins make strict demands on any error recovery rules you have.
8138 @xref{Error Recovery}.
8140 The reason for this is that the purpose of an error recovery rule is to
8141 abort the parsing of one construct and resume in some larger construct.
8142 For example, in C-like languages, a typical error recovery rule is to skip
8143 tokens until the next semicolon, and then start a new statement, like this:
8148 | IF '(' expr ')' stmt @{ @dots{} @}
8150 | error ';' @{ hexflag = 0; @}
8154 If there is a syntax error in the middle of a @samp{hex (@var{expr})}
8155 construct, this error rule will apply, and then the action for the
8156 completed @samp{hex (@var{expr})} will never run. So @code{hexflag} would
8157 remain set for the entire rest of the input, or until the next @code{hex}
8158 keyword, causing identifiers to be misinterpreted as integers.
8160 To avoid this problem the error recovery rule itself clears @code{hexflag}.
8162 There may also be an error recovery rule that works within expressions.
8163 For example, there could be a rule which applies within parentheses
8164 and skips to the close-parenthesis:
8170 | '(' expr ')' @{ $$ = $2; @}
8176 If this rule acts within the @code{hex} construct, it is not going to abort
8177 that construct (since it applies to an inner level of parentheses within
8178 the construct). Therefore, it should not clear the flag: the rest of
8179 the @code{hex} construct should be parsed with the flag still in effect.
8181 What if there is an error recovery rule which might abort out of the
8182 @code{hex} construct or might not, depending on circumstances? There is no
8183 way you can write the action to determine whether a @code{hex} construct is
8184 being aborted or not. So if you are using a lexical tie-in, you had better
8185 make sure your error recovery rules are not of this kind. Each rule must
8186 be such that you can be sure that it always will, or always won't, have to
8189 @c ================================================== Debugging Your Parser
8192 @chapter Debugging Your Parser
8194 Developing a parser can be a challenge, especially if you don't understand
8195 the algorithm (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}). This
8196 chapter explains how to generate and read the detailed description of the
8197 automaton, and how to enable and understand the parser run-time traces.
8200 * Understanding:: Understanding the structure of your parser.
8201 * Graphviz:: Getting a visual representation of the parser.
8202 * Xml:: Getting a markup representation of the parser.
8203 * Tracing:: Tracing the execution of your parser.
8207 @section Understanding Your Parser
8209 As documented elsewhere (@pxref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm})
8210 Bison parsers are @dfn{shift/reduce automata}. In some cases (much more
8211 frequent than one would hope), looking at this automaton is required to
8212 tune or simply fix a parser. Bison provides two different
8213 representation of it, either textually or graphically (as a DOT file).
8215 The textual file is generated when the options @option{--report} or
8216 @option{--verbose} are specified, see @ref{Invocation, , Invoking
8217 Bison}. Its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from
8218 the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.output}
8219 instead. Therefore, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, then the
8220 parser implementation file is called @file{foo.tab.c} by default. As
8221 a consequence, the verbose output file is called @file{foo.output}.
8223 The following grammar file, @file{calc.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8241 @command{bison} reports:
8244 calc.y: warning: 1 nonterminal useless in grammar
8245 calc.y: warning: 1 rule useless in grammar
8246 calc.y:11.1-7: warning: nonterminal useless in grammar: useless
8247 calc.y:11.10-12: warning: rule useless in grammar: useless: STR
8248 calc.y: conflicts: 7 shift/reduce
8251 When given @option{--report=state}, in addition to @file{calc.tab.c}, it
8252 creates a file @file{calc.output} with contents detailed below. The
8253 order of the output and the exact presentation might vary, but the
8254 interpretation is the same.
8257 @cindex token, useless
8258 @cindex useless token
8259 @cindex nonterminal, useless
8260 @cindex useless nonterminal
8261 @cindex rule, useless
8262 @cindex useless rule
8263 The first section reports useless tokens, nonterminals and rules. Useless
8264 nonterminals and rules are removed in order to produce a smaller parser, but
8265 useless tokens are preserved, since they might be used by the scanner (note
8266 the difference between ``useless'' and ``unused'' below):
8269 Nonterminals useless in grammar
8272 Terminals unused in grammar
8275 Rules useless in grammar
8280 The next section lists states that still have conflicts.
8283 State 8 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8284 State 9 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8285 State 10 conflicts: 1 shift/reduce
8286 State 11 conflicts: 4 shift/reduce
8290 Then Bison reproduces the exact grammar it used:
8305 and reports the uses of the symbols:
8309 Terminals, with rules where they appear
8322 Nonterminals, with rules where they appear
8327 on left: 1 2 3 4 5, on right: 0 1 2 3 4
8333 @cindex pointed rule
8334 @cindex rule, pointed
8335 Bison then proceeds onto the automaton itself, describing each state
8336 with its set of @dfn{items}, also known as @dfn{pointed rules}. Each
8337 item is a production rule together with a point (@samp{.}) marking
8338 the location of the input cursor.
8343 0 $accept: . exp $end
8345 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8350 This reads as follows: ``state 0 corresponds to being at the very
8351 beginning of the parsing, in the initial rule, right before the start
8352 symbol (here, @code{exp}). When the parser returns to this state right
8353 after having reduced a rule that produced an @code{exp}, the control
8354 flow jumps to state 2. If there is no such transition on a nonterminal
8355 symbol, and the lookahead is a @code{NUM}, then this token is shifted onto
8356 the parse stack, and the control flow jumps to state 1. Any other
8357 lookahead triggers a syntax error.''
8359 @cindex core, item set
8360 @cindex item set core
8361 @cindex kernel, item set
8362 @cindex item set core
8363 Even though the only active rule in state 0 seems to be rule 0, the
8364 report lists @code{NUM} as a lookahead token because @code{NUM} can be
8365 at the beginning of any rule deriving an @code{exp}. By default Bison
8366 reports the so-called @dfn{core} or @dfn{kernel} of the item set, but if
8367 you want to see more detail you can invoke @command{bison} with
8368 @option{--report=itemset} to list the derived items as well:
8373 0 $accept: . exp $end
8374 1 exp: . exp '+' exp
8380 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8386 In the state 1@dots{}
8393 $default reduce using rule 5 (exp)
8397 the rule 5, @samp{exp: NUM;}, is completed. Whatever the lookahead token
8398 (@samp{$default}), the parser will reduce it. If it was coming from
8399 state 0, then, after this reduction it will return to state 0, and will
8400 jump to state 2 (@samp{exp: go to state 2}).
8405 0 $accept: exp . $end
8406 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8411 $end shift, and go to state 3
8412 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8413 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8414 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8415 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8419 In state 2, the automaton can only shift a symbol. For instance,
8420 because of the item @samp{exp: exp . '+' exp}, if the lookahead is
8421 @samp{+} it is shifted onto the parse stack, and the automaton
8422 jumps to state 4, corresponding to the item @samp{exp: exp '+' . exp}.
8423 Since there is no default action, any lookahead not listed triggers a syntax
8426 @cindex accepting state
8427 The state 3 is named the @dfn{final state}, or the @dfn{accepting
8433 0 $accept: exp $end .
8439 the initial rule is completed (the start symbol and the end-of-input were
8440 read), the parsing exits successfully.
8442 The interpretation of states 4 to 7 is straightforward, and is left to
8448 1 exp: exp '+' . exp
8450 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8457 2 exp: exp '-' . exp
8459 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8466 3 exp: exp '*' . exp
8468 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8475 4 exp: exp '/' . exp
8477 NUM shift, and go to state 1
8482 As was announced in beginning of the report, @samp{State 8 conflicts:
8488 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8494 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8495 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8497 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8498 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8501 Indeed, there are two actions associated to the lookahead @samp{/}:
8502 either shifting (and going to state 7), or reducing rule 1. The
8503 conflict means that either the grammar is ambiguous, or the parser lacks
8504 information to make the right decision. Indeed the grammar is
8505 ambiguous, as, since we did not specify the precedence of @samp{/}, the
8506 sentence @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} can be parsed as @samp{NUM + (NUM /
8507 NUM)}, which corresponds to shifting @samp{/}, or as @samp{(NUM + NUM) /
8508 NUM}, which corresponds to reducing rule 1.
8510 Because in deterministic parsing a single decision can be made, Bison
8511 arbitrarily chose to disable the reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, ,
8512 Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions are reported between
8515 Note that all the previous states had a single possible action: either
8516 shifting the next token and going to the corresponding state, or
8517 reducing a single rule. In the other cases, i.e., when shifting
8518 @emph{and} reducing is possible or when @emph{several} reductions are
8519 possible, the lookahead is required to select the action. State 8 is
8520 one such state: if the lookahead is @samp{*} or @samp{/} then the action
8521 is shifting, otherwise the action is reducing rule 1. In other words,
8522 the first two items, corresponding to rule 1, are not eligible when the
8523 lookahead token is @samp{*}, since we specified that @samp{*} has higher
8524 precedence than @samp{+}. More generally, some items are eligible only
8525 with some set of possible lookahead tokens. When run with
8526 @option{--report=lookahead}, Bison specifies these lookahead tokens:
8531 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8532 1 | exp '+' exp . [$end, '+', '-', '/']
8537 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8538 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8540 '/' [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
8541 $default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
8544 Note however that while @samp{NUM + NUM / NUM} is ambiguous (which results in
8545 the conflicts on @samp{/}), @samp{NUM + NUM * NUM} is not: the conflict was
8546 solved thanks to associativity and precedence directives. If invoked with
8547 @option{--report=solved}, Bison includes information about the solved
8548 conflicts in the report:
8551 Conflict between rule 1 and token '+' resolved as reduce (%left '+').
8552 Conflict between rule 1 and token '-' resolved as reduce (%left '-').
8553 Conflict between rule 1 and token '*' resolved as shift ('+' < '*').
8557 The remaining states are similar:
8563 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8569 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8570 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8572 '/' [reduce using rule 2 (exp)]
8573 $default reduce using rule 2 (exp)
8579 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8585 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8587 '/' [reduce using rule 3 (exp)]
8588 $default reduce using rule 3 (exp)
8594 1 exp: exp . '+' exp
8600 '+' shift, and go to state 4
8601 '-' shift, and go to state 5
8602 '*' shift, and go to state 6
8603 '/' shift, and go to state 7
8605 '+' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8606 '-' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8607 '*' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8608 '/' [reduce using rule 4 (exp)]
8609 $default reduce using rule 4 (exp)
8614 Observe that state 11 contains conflicts not only due to the lack of
8615 precedence of @samp{/} with respect to @samp{+}, @samp{-}, and
8616 @samp{*}, but also because the
8617 associativity of @samp{/} is not specified.
8619 Note that Bison may also produce an HTML version of this output, via an XML
8620 file and XSLT processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8622 @c ================================================= Graphical Representation
8625 @section Visualizing Your Parser
8628 As another means to gain better understanding of the shift/reduce
8629 automaton corresponding to the Bison parser, a DOT file can be generated. Note
8630 that debugging a real grammar with this is tedious at best, and impractical
8631 most of the times, because the generated files are huge (the generation of
8632 a PDF or PNG file from it will take very long, and more often than not it will
8633 fail due to memory exhaustion). This option was rather designed for beginners,
8634 to help them understand LR parsers.
8636 This file is generated when the @option{--graph} option is specified
8637 (@pxref{Invocation, , Invoking Bison}). Its name is made by removing
8638 @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c} from the parser implementation file name, and
8639 adding @samp{.dot} instead. If the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the
8640 Graphviz output file is called @file{foo.dot}.
8642 The following grammar file, @file{rr.y}, will be used in the sequel:
8653 The graphical output is very similar to the textual one, and as such it is
8654 easier understood by making direct comparisons between them. See
8655 @ref{Debugging, , Debugging Your Parser} for a detailled analysis of the
8658 @subheading Graphical Representation of States
8660 The items (pointed rules) for each state are grouped together in graph nodes.
8661 Their numbering is the same as in the verbose file. See the following points,
8662 about transitions, for examples
8664 When invoked with @option{--report=lookaheads}, the lookahead tokens, when
8665 needed, are shown next to the relevant rule between square brackets as a
8666 comma separated list. This is the case in the figure for the representation of
8671 The transitions are represented as directed edges between the current and
8674 @subheading Graphical Representation of Shifts
8676 Shifts are shown as solid arrows, labelled with the lookahead token for that
8677 shift. The following describes a reduction in the @file{rr.output} file:
8685 ";" shift, and go to state 6
8689 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8691 @center @image{figs/example-shift, 100pt}
8693 @subheading Graphical Representation of Reductions
8695 Reductions are shown as solid arrows, leading to a diamond-shaped node
8696 bearing the number of the reduction rule. The arrow is labelled with the
8697 appropriate comma separated lookahead tokens. If the reduction is the default
8698 action for the given state, there is no such label.
8700 This is how reductions are represented in the verbose file @file{rr.output}:
8707 "." reduce using rule 4 (b)
8708 $default reduce using rule 3 (a)
8711 A Graphviz rendering of this portion of the graph could be:
8713 @center @image{figs/example-reduce, 120pt}
8715 When unresolved conflicts are present, because in deterministic parsing
8716 a single decision can be made, Bison can arbitrarily choose to disable a
8717 reduction, see @ref{Shift/Reduce, , Shift/Reduce Conflicts}. Discarded actions
8718 are distinguished by a red filling color on these nodes, just like how they are
8719 reported between square brackets in the verbose file.
8721 The reduction corresponding to the rule number 0 is the acceptation state. It
8722 is shown as a blue diamond, labelled "Acc".
8724 @subheading Graphical representation of go tos
8726 The @samp{go to} jump transitions are represented as dotted lines bearing
8727 the name of the rule being jumped to.
8729 Note that a DOT file may also be produced via an XML file and XSLT
8730 processing (@pxref{Xml}).
8732 @c ================================================= XML
8735 @section Visualizing your parser in multiple formats
8738 Bison supports two major report formats: textual output
8739 (@pxref{Understanding}) when invoked with option @option{--verbose}, and DOT
8740 (@pxref{Graphviz}) when invoked with option @option{--graph}. However,
8741 another alternative is to output an XML file that may then be, with
8742 @command{xsltproc}, rendered as either a raw text format equivalent to the
8743 verbose file, or as an HTML version of the same file, with clickable
8744 transitions, or even as a DOT. The @file{.output} and DOT files obtained via
8745 XSLT have no difference whatsoever with those obtained by invoking
8746 @command{bison} with options @option{--verbose} or @option{--graph}.
8748 The textual file is generated when the options @option{-x} or
8749 @option{--xml[=FILE]} are specified, see @ref{Invocation,,Invoking Bison}.
8750 If not specified, its name is made by removing @samp{.tab.c} or @samp{.c}
8751 from the parser implementation file name, and adding @samp{.xml} instead.
8752 For instance, if the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the default XML output
8753 file is @file{foo.xml}.
8755 Bison ships with a @file{data/xslt} directory, containing XSL Transformation
8756 files to apply to the XML file. Their names are non-ambiguous:
8760 Used to output a copy of the DOT visualization of the automaton.
8762 Used to output a copy of the .output file.
8764 Used to output an xhtml enhancement of the .output file.
8767 Sample usage (requires @code{xsltproc}):
8771 $ bison --print-datadir
8772 /usr/local/share/bison
8774 $ xsltproc /usr/local/share/bison/xslt/xml2xhtml.xsl input.xml > input.html
8777 @c ================================================= Tracing
8780 @section Tracing Your Parser
8783 @cindex tracing the parser
8785 When a Bison grammar compiles properly but parses ``incorrectly'', the
8786 @code{yydebug} parser-trace feature helps figuring out why.
8789 * Enabling Traces:: Activating run-time trace support
8790 * Mfcalc Traces:: Extending @code{mfcalc} to support traces
8791 * The YYPRINT Macro:: Obsolete interface for semantic value reports
8794 @node Enabling Traces
8795 @subsection Enabling Traces
8796 There are several means to enable compilation of trace facilities:
8799 @item the macro @code{YYDEBUG}
8801 Define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value when you compile the
8802 parser. This is compliant with POSIX Yacc. You could use
8803 @samp{-DYYDEBUG=1} as a compiler option or you could put @samp{#define
8804 YYDEBUG 1} in the prologue of the grammar file (@pxref{Prologue, , The
8807 If the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} is used (@pxref{Multiple
8808 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}), for instance @samp{%define
8809 api.prefix x}, then if @code{CDEBUG} is defined, its value controls the
8810 tracing feature (enabled if and only if nonzero); otherwise tracing is
8811 enabled if and only if @code{YYDEBUG} is nonzero.
8813 @item the option @option{-t} (POSIX Yacc compliant)
8814 @itemx the option @option{--debug} (Bison extension)
8815 Use the @samp{-t} option when you run Bison (@pxref{Invocation, ,Invoking
8816 Bison}). With @samp{%define api.prefix c}, it defines @code{CDEBUG} to 1,
8817 otherwise it defines @code{YYDEBUG} to 1.
8819 @item the directive @samp{%debug}
8821 Add the @code{%debug} directive (@pxref{Decl Summary, ,Bison Declaration
8822 Summary}). This is a Bison extension, especially useful for languages that
8823 don't use a preprocessor. Unless POSIX and Yacc portability matter to you,
8824 this is the preferred solution.
8827 We suggest that you always enable the debug option so that debugging is
8831 The trace facility outputs messages with macro calls of the form
8832 @code{YYFPRINTF (stderr, @var{format}, @var{args})} where
8833 @var{format} and @var{args} are the usual @code{printf} format and variadic
8834 arguments. If you define @code{YYDEBUG} to a nonzero value but do not
8835 define @code{YYFPRINTF}, @code{<stdio.h>} is automatically included
8836 and @code{YYFPRINTF} is defined to @code{fprintf}.
8838 Once you have compiled the program with trace facilities, the way to
8839 request a trace is to store a nonzero value in the variable @code{yydebug}.
8840 You can do this by making the C code do it (in @code{main}, perhaps), or
8841 you can alter the value with a C debugger.
8843 Each step taken by the parser when @code{yydebug} is nonzero produces a
8844 line or two of trace information, written on @code{stderr}. The trace
8845 messages tell you these things:
8849 Each time the parser calls @code{yylex}, what kind of token was read.
8852 Each time a token is shifted, the depth and complete contents of the
8853 state stack (@pxref{Parser States}).
8856 Each time a rule is reduced, which rule it is, and the complete contents
8857 of the state stack afterward.
8860 To make sense of this information, it helps to refer to the automaton
8861 description file (@pxref{Understanding, ,Understanding Your Parser}).
8862 This file shows the meaning of each state in terms of
8863 positions in various rules, and also what each state will do with each
8864 possible input token. As you read the successive trace messages, you
8865 can see that the parser is functioning according to its specification in
8866 the listing file. Eventually you will arrive at the place where
8867 something undesirable happens, and you will see which parts of the
8868 grammar are to blame.
8870 The parser implementation file is a C/C++/Java program and you can use
8871 debuggers on it, but it's not easy to interpret what it is doing. The
8872 parser function is a finite-state machine interpreter, and aside from
8873 the actions it executes the same code over and over. Only the values
8874 of variables show where in the grammar it is working.
8877 @subsection Enabling Debug Traces for @code{mfcalc}
8879 The debugging information normally gives the token type of each token read,
8880 but not its semantic value. The @code{%printer} directive allows specify
8881 how semantic values are reported, see @ref{Printer Decl, , Printing
8882 Semantic Values}. For backward compatibility, Yacc like C parsers may also
8883 use the @code{YYPRINT} (@pxref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT}
8884 Macro}), but its use is discouraged.
8886 As a demonstration of @code{%printer}, consider the multi-function
8887 calculator, @code{mfcalc} (@pxref{Multi-function Calc}). To enable run-time
8888 traces, and semantic value reports, insert the following directives in its
8891 @comment file: mfcalc.y: 2
8893 /* Generate the parser description file. */
8895 /* Enable run-time traces (yydebug). */
8898 /* Formatting semantic values. */
8899 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s", $$->name); @} VAR;
8900 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%s()", $$->name); @} FNCT;
8901 %printer @{ fprintf (yyoutput, "%g", $$); @} <val>;
8904 The @code{%define} directive instructs Bison to generate run-time trace
8905 support. Then, activation of these traces is controlled at run-time by the
8906 @code{yydebug} variable, which is disabled by default. Because these traces
8907 will refer to the ``states'' of the parser, it is helpful to ask for the
8908 creation of a description of that parser; this is the purpose of (admittedly
8909 ill-named) @code{%verbose} directive.
8911 The set of @code{%printer} directives demonstrates how to format the
8912 semantic value in the traces. Note that the specification can be done
8913 either on the symbol type (e.g., @code{VAR} or @code{FNCT}), or on the type
8914 tag: since @code{<val>} is the type for both @code{NUM} and @code{exp}, this
8915 printer will be used for them.
8917 Here is a sample of the information provided by run-time traces. The traces
8918 are sent onto standard error.
8921 $ @kbd{echo 'sin(1-1)' | ./mfcalc -p}
8924 Reducing stack by rule 1 (line 34):
8925 -> $$ = nterm input ()
8931 This first batch shows a specific feature of this grammar: the first rule
8932 (which is in line 34 of @file{mfcalc.y} can be reduced without even having
8933 to look for the first token. The resulting left-hand symbol (@code{$$}) is
8934 a valueless (@samp{()}) @code{input} non terminal (@code{nterm}).
8936 Then the parser calls the scanner.
8938 Reading a token: Next token is token FNCT (sin())
8939 Shifting token FNCT (sin())
8944 That token (@code{token}) is a function (@code{FNCT}) whose value is
8945 @samp{sin} as formatted per our @code{%printer} specification: @samp{sin()}.
8946 The parser stores (@code{Shifting}) that token, and others, until it can do
8950 Reading a token: Next token is token '(' ()
8951 Shifting token '(' ()
8953 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8954 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8956 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8957 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8958 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8964 The previous reduction demonstrates the @code{%printer} directive for
8965 @code{<val>}: both the token @code{NUM} and the resulting non-terminal
8966 @code{exp} have @samp{1} as value.
8969 Reading a token: Next token is token '-' ()
8970 Shifting token '-' ()
8972 Reading a token: Next token is token NUM (1.000000)
8973 Shifting token NUM (1.000000)
8975 Reducing stack by rule 6 (line 44):
8976 $1 = token NUM (1.000000)
8977 -> $$ = nterm exp (1.000000)
8978 Stack now 0 1 6 14 24 17
8980 Reading a token: Next token is token ')' ()
8981 Reducing stack by rule 11 (line 49):
8982 $1 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8984 $3 = nterm exp (1.000000)
8985 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
8991 The rule for the subtraction was just reduced. The parser is about to
8992 discover the end of the call to @code{sin}.
8995 Next token is token ')' ()
8996 Shifting token ')' ()
8998 Reducing stack by rule 9 (line 47):
8999 $1 = token FNCT (sin())
9001 $3 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9003 -> $$ = nterm exp (0.000000)
9009 Finally, the end-of-line allow the parser to complete the computation, and
9013 Reading a token: Next token is token '\n' ()
9014 Shifting token '\n' ()
9016 Reducing stack by rule 4 (line 40):
9017 $1 = nterm exp (0.000000)
9020 -> $$ = nterm line ()
9023 Reducing stack by rule 2 (line 35):
9026 -> $$ = nterm input ()
9031 The parser has returned into state 1, in which it is waiting for the next
9032 expression to evaluate, or for the end-of-file token, which causes the
9033 completion of the parsing.
9036 Reading a token: Now at end of input.
9037 Shifting token $end ()
9040 Cleanup: popping token $end ()
9041 Cleanup: popping nterm input ()
9045 @node The YYPRINT Macro
9046 @subsection The @code{YYPRINT} Macro
9049 Before @code{%printer} support, semantic values could be displayed using the
9050 @code{YYPRINT} macro, which works only for terminal symbols and only with
9051 the @file{yacc.c} skeleton.
9053 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT (@var{stream}, @var{token}, @var{value});
9055 If you define @code{YYPRINT}, it should take three arguments. The parser
9056 will pass a standard I/O stream, the numeric code for the token type, and
9057 the token value (from @code{yylval}).
9059 For @file{yacc.c} only. Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
9062 Here is an example of @code{YYPRINT} suitable for the multi-function
9063 calculator (@pxref{Mfcalc Declarations, ,Declarations for @code{mfcalc}}):
9067 static void print_token_value (FILE *, int, YYSTYPE);
9068 #define YYPRINT(File, Type, Value) \
9069 print_token_value (File, Type, Value)
9072 @dots{} %% @dots{} %% @dots{}
9075 print_token_value (FILE *file, int type, YYSTYPE value)
9078 fprintf (file, "%s", value.tptr->name);
9079 else if (type == NUM)
9080 fprintf (file, "%d", value.val);
9084 @c ================================================= Invoking Bison
9087 @chapter Invoking Bison
9088 @cindex invoking Bison
9089 @cindex Bison invocation
9090 @cindex options for invoking Bison
9092 The usual way to invoke Bison is as follows:
9098 Here @var{infile} is the grammar file name, which usually ends in
9099 @samp{.y}. The parser implementation file's name is made by replacing
9100 the @samp{.y} with @samp{.tab.c} and removing any leading directory.
9101 Thus, the @samp{bison foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}, and
9102 the @samp{bison hack/foo.y} file name yields @file{foo.tab.c}. It's
9103 also possible, in case you are writing C++ code instead of C in your
9104 grammar file, to name it @file{foo.ypp} or @file{foo.y++}. Then, the
9105 output files will take an extension like the given one as input
9106 (respectively @file{foo.tab.cpp} and @file{foo.tab.c++}). This
9107 feature takes effect with all options that manipulate file names like
9108 @samp{-o} or @samp{-d}.
9113 bison -d @var{infile.yxx}
9116 will produce @file{infile.tab.cxx} and @file{infile.tab.hxx}, and
9119 bison -d -o @var{output.c++} @var{infile.y}
9122 will produce @file{output.c++} and @file{outfile.h++}.
9124 For compatibility with POSIX, the standard Bison
9125 distribution also contains a shell script called @command{yacc} that
9126 invokes Bison with the @option{-y} option.
9129 * Bison Options:: All the options described in detail,
9130 in alphabetical order by short options.
9131 * Option Cross Key:: Alphabetical list of long options.
9132 * Yacc Library:: Yacc-compatible @code{yylex} and @code{main}.
9136 @section Bison Options
9138 Bison supports both traditional single-letter options and mnemonic long
9139 option names. Long option names are indicated with @samp{--} instead of
9140 @samp{-}. Abbreviations for option names are allowed as long as they
9141 are unique. When a long option takes an argument, like
9142 @samp{--file-prefix}, connect the option name and the argument with
9145 Here is a list of options that can be used with Bison, alphabetized by
9146 short option. It is followed by a cross key alphabetized by long
9149 @c Please, keep this ordered as in `bison --help'.
9155 Print a summary of the command-line options to Bison and exit.
9159 Print the version number of Bison and exit.
9161 @item --print-localedir
9162 Print the name of the directory containing locale-dependent data.
9164 @item --print-datadir
9165 Print the name of the directory containing skeletons and XSLT.
9169 Act more like the traditional Yacc command. This can cause different
9170 diagnostics to be generated, and may change behavior in other minor
9171 ways. Most importantly, imitate Yacc's output file name conventions,
9172 so that the parser implementation file is called @file{y.tab.c}, and
9173 the other outputs are called @file{y.output} and @file{y.tab.h}.
9174 Also, if generating a deterministic parser in C, generate
9175 @code{#define} statements in addition to an @code{enum} to associate
9176 token numbers with token names. Thus, the following shell script can
9177 substitute for Yacc, and the Bison distribution contains such a script
9178 for compatibility with POSIX:
9185 The @option{-y}/@option{--yacc} option is intended for use with
9186 traditional Yacc grammars. If your grammar uses a Bison extension
9187 like @samp{%glr-parser}, Bison might not be Yacc-compatible even if
9188 this option is specified.
9190 @item -W [@var{category}]
9191 @itemx --warnings[=@var{category}]
9192 Output warnings falling in @var{category}. @var{category} can be one
9195 @item midrule-values
9196 Warn about mid-rule values that are set but not used within any of the actions
9198 For example, warn about unused @code{$2} in:
9201 exp: '1' @{ $$ = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $4; @};
9204 Also warn about mid-rule values that are used but not set.
9205 For example, warn about unset @code{$$} in the mid-rule action in:
9208 exp: '1' @{ $1 = 1; @} '+' exp @{ $$ = $2 + $4; @};
9211 These warnings are not enabled by default since they sometimes prove to
9212 be false alarms in existing grammars employing the Yacc constructs
9213 @code{$0} or @code{$-@var{n}} (where @var{n} is some positive integer).
9216 Incompatibilities with POSIX Yacc.
9220 S/R and R/R conflicts. These warnings are enabled by default. However, if
9221 the @code{%expect} or @code{%expect-rr} directive is specified, an
9222 unexpected number of conflicts is an error, and an expected number of
9223 conflicts is not reported, so @option{-W} and @option{--warning} then have
9224 no effect on the conflict report.
9227 All warnings not categorized above. These warnings are enabled by default.
9229 This category is provided merely for the sake of completeness. Future
9230 releases of Bison may move warnings from this category to new, more specific
9236 Turn off all the warnings.
9238 Treat warnings as errors.
9241 A category can be turned off by prefixing its name with @samp{no-}. For
9242 instance, @option{-Wno-yacc} will hide the warnings about
9243 POSIX Yacc incompatibilities.
9252 In the parser implementation file, define the macro @code{YYDEBUG} to
9253 1 if it is not already defined, so that the debugging facilities are
9254 compiled. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
9256 @item -D @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9257 @itemx --define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9258 @itemx -F @var{name}[=@var{value}]
9259 @itemx --force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]
9260 Each of these is equivalent to @samp{%define @var{name} "@var{value}"}
9261 (@pxref{%define Summary}) except that Bison processes multiple
9262 definitions for the same @var{name} as follows:
9266 Bison quietly ignores all command-line definitions for @var{name} except
9269 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-D} or
9270 @code{--define}, Bison reports an error for any @code{%define}
9271 definition for @var{name}.
9273 If that command-line definition is specified by a @code{-F} or
9274 @code{--force-define} instead, Bison quietly ignores all @code{%define}
9275 definitions for @var{name}.
9277 Otherwise, Bison reports an error if there are multiple @code{%define}
9278 definitions for @var{name}.
9281 You should avoid using @code{-F} and @code{--force-define} in your
9282 make files unless you are confident that it is safe to quietly ignore
9283 any conflicting @code{%define} that may be added to the grammar file.
9285 @item -L @var{language}
9286 @itemx --language=@var{language}
9287 Specify the programming language for the generated parser, as if
9288 @code{%language} was specified (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration
9289 Summary}). Currently supported languages include C, C++, and Java.
9290 @var{language} is case-insensitive.
9292 This option is experimental and its effect may be modified in future
9296 Pretend that @code{%locations} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9298 @item -p @var{prefix}
9299 @itemx --name-prefix=@var{prefix}
9300 Pretend that @code{%name-prefix "@var{prefix}"} was specified (@pxref{Decl
9301 Summary}). Obsoleted by @code{-Dapi.prefix=@var{prefix}}. @xref{Multiple
9302 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}.
9306 Don't put any @code{#line} preprocessor commands in the parser
9307 implementation file. Ordinarily Bison puts them in the parser
9308 implementation file so that the C compiler and debuggers will
9309 associate errors with your source file, the grammar file. This option
9310 causes them to associate errors with the parser implementation file,
9311 treating it as an independent source file in its own right.
9314 @itemx --skeleton=@var{file}
9315 Specify the skeleton to use, similar to @code{%skeleton}
9316 (@pxref{Decl Summary, , Bison Declaration Summary}).
9318 @c You probably don't need this option unless you are developing Bison.
9319 @c You should use @option{--language} if you want to specify the skeleton for a
9320 @c different language, because it is clearer and because it will always
9321 @c choose the correct skeleton for non-deterministic or push parsers.
9323 If @var{file} does not contain a @code{/}, @var{file} is the name of a skeleton
9324 file in the Bison installation directory.
9325 If it does, @var{file} is an absolute file name or a file name relative to the
9326 current working directory.
9327 This is similar to how most shells resolve commands.
9330 @itemx --token-table
9331 Pretend that @code{%token-table} was specified. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9338 @item --defines[=@var{file}]
9339 Pretend that @code{%defines} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9340 file containing macro definitions for the token type names defined in
9341 the grammar, as well as a few other declarations. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9344 This is the same as @code{--defines} except @code{-d} does not accept a
9345 @var{file} argument since POSIX Yacc requires that @code{-d} can be bundled
9346 with other short options.
9348 @item -b @var{file-prefix}
9349 @itemx --file-prefix=@var{prefix}
9350 Pretend that @code{%file-prefix} was specified, i.e., specify prefix to use
9351 for all Bison output file names. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9353 @item -r @var{things}
9354 @itemx --report=@var{things}
9355 Write an extra output file containing verbose description of the comma
9356 separated list of @var{things} among:
9360 Description of the grammar, conflicts (resolved and unresolved), and
9364 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9365 the full set of items for each state, instead of its core only.
9368 Implies @code{state} and augments the description of the automaton with
9369 each rule's lookahead set.
9372 Implies @code{state}. Explain how conflicts were solved thanks to
9373 precedence and associativity directives.
9376 Enable all the items.
9379 Do not generate the report.
9382 @item --report-file=@var{file}
9383 Specify the @var{file} for the verbose description.
9387 Pretend that @code{%verbose} was specified, i.e., write an extra output
9388 file containing verbose descriptions of the grammar and
9389 parser. @xref{Decl Summary}.
9392 @itemx --output=@var{file}
9393 Specify the @var{file} for the parser implementation file.
9395 The other output files' names are constructed from @var{file} as
9396 described under the @samp{-v} and @samp{-d} options.
9398 @item -g [@var{file}]
9399 @itemx --graph[=@var{file}]
9400 Output a graphical representation of the parser's
9401 automaton computed by Bison, in @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/, Graphviz}
9402 @uref{http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html, DOT} format.
9403 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9404 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9407 @item -x [@var{file}]
9408 @itemx --xml[=@var{file}]
9409 Output an XML report of the parser's automaton computed by Bison.
9410 @code{@var{file}} is optional.
9411 If omitted and the grammar file is @file{foo.y}, the output file will be
9413 (The current XML schema is experimental and may evolve.
9414 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
9417 @node Option Cross Key
9418 @section Option Cross Key
9420 Here is a list of options, alphabetized by long option, to help you find
9421 the corresponding short option and directive.
9423 @multitable {@option{--force-define=@var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@option{-F @var{name}[=@var{value}]}} {@code{%nondeterministic-parser}}
9424 @headitem Long Option @tab Short Option @tab Bison Directive
9425 @include cross-options.texi
9429 @section Yacc Library
9431 The Yacc library contains default implementations of the
9432 @code{yyerror} and @code{main} functions. These default
9433 implementations are normally not useful, but POSIX requires
9434 them. To use the Yacc library, link your program with the
9435 @option{-ly} option. Note that Bison's implementation of the Yacc
9436 library is distributed under the terms of the GNU General
9437 Public License (@pxref{Copying}).
9439 If you use the Yacc library's @code{yyerror} function, you should
9440 declare @code{yyerror} as follows:
9443 int yyerror (char const *);
9446 Bison ignores the @code{int} value returned by this @code{yyerror}.
9447 If you use the Yacc library's @code{main} function, your
9448 @code{yyparse} function should have the following type signature:
9454 @c ================================================= C++ Bison
9456 @node Other Languages
9457 @chapter Parsers Written In Other Languages
9460 * C++ Parsers:: The interface to generate C++ parser classes
9461 * Java Parsers:: The interface to generate Java parser classes
9465 @section C++ Parsers
9468 * C++ Bison Interface:: Asking for C++ parser generation
9469 * C++ Semantic Values:: %union vs. C++
9470 * C++ Location Values:: The position and location classes
9471 * C++ Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
9472 * C++ Scanner Interface:: Exchanges between yylex and parse
9473 * A Complete C++ Example:: Demonstrating their use
9476 @node C++ Bison Interface
9477 @subsection C++ Bison Interface
9478 @c - %skeleton "lalr1.cc"
9482 The C++ deterministic parser is selected using the skeleton directive,
9483 @samp{%skeleton "lalr1.cc"}, or the synonymous command-line option
9484 @option{--skeleton=lalr1.cc}.
9485 @xref{Decl Summary}.
9487 When run, @command{bison} will create several entities in the @samp{yy}
9489 @findex %define namespace
9490 Use the @samp{%define namespace} directive to change the namespace
9491 name, see @ref{%define Summary,,namespace}. The various classes are
9492 generated in the following files:
9497 The definition of the classes @code{position} and @code{location}, used for
9498 location tracking. These files are not generated if the @code{%define}
9499 variable @code{api.location.type} is defined. @xref{C++ Location Values}.
9502 An auxiliary class @code{stack} used by the parser.
9505 @itemx @var{file}.cc
9506 (Assuming the extension of the grammar file was @samp{.yy}.) The
9507 declaration and implementation of the C++ parser class. The basename
9508 and extension of these two files follow the same rules as with regular C
9509 parsers (@pxref{Invocation}).
9511 The header is @emph{mandatory}; you must either pass
9512 @option{-d}/@option{--defines} to @command{bison}, or use the
9513 @samp{%defines} directive.
9516 All these files are documented using Doxygen; run @command{doxygen}
9517 for a complete and accurate documentation.
9519 @node C++ Semantic Values
9520 @subsection C++ Semantic Values
9521 @c - No objects in unions
9523 @c - Printer and destructor
9525 The @code{%union} directive works as for C, see @ref{Union Decl, ,The
9526 Collection of Value Types}. In particular it produces a genuine
9527 @code{union}@footnote{In the future techniques to allow complex types
9528 within pseudo-unions (similar to Boost variants) might be implemented to
9529 alleviate these issues.}, which have a few specific features in C++.
9532 The type @code{YYSTYPE} is defined but its use is discouraged: rather
9533 you should refer to the parser's encapsulated type
9534 @code{yy::parser::semantic_type}.
9536 Non POD (Plain Old Data) types cannot be used. C++ forbids any
9537 instance of classes with constructors in unions: only @emph{pointers}
9538 to such objects are allowed.
9541 Because objects have to be stored via pointers, memory is not
9542 reclaimed automatically: using the @code{%destructor} directive is the
9543 only means to avoid leaks. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded
9547 @node C++ Location Values
9548 @subsection C++ Location Values
9552 @c - %define filename_type "const symbol::Symbol"
9554 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the C++ parser supports
9555 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}.
9557 By default, two auxiliary classes define a @code{position}, a single point
9558 in a file, and a @code{location}, a range composed of a pair of
9559 @code{position}s (possibly spanning several files). But if the
9560 @code{%define} variable @code{api.location.type} is defined, then these
9561 classes will not be generated, and the user defined type will be used.
9564 In this section @code{uint} is an abbreviation for @code{unsigned int}: in
9565 genuine code only the latter is used.
9568 * C++ position:: One point in the source file
9569 * C++ location:: Two points in the source file
9570 * User Defined Location Type:: Required interface for locations
9574 @subsubsection C++ @code{position}
9576 @deftypeop {Constructor} {position} {} position (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9577 Create a @code{position} denoting a given point. Note that @code{file} is
9578 not reclaimed when the @code{position} is destroyed: memory managed must be
9582 @deftypemethod {position} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9583 Reset the position to the given values.
9586 @deftypeivar {position} {std::string*} file
9587 The name of the file. It will always be handled as a pointer, the
9588 parser will never duplicate nor deallocate it. As an experimental
9589 feature you may change it to @samp{@var{type}*} using @samp{%define
9590 filename_type "@var{type}"}.
9593 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} line
9594 The line, starting at 1.
9597 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9598 Advance by @var{height} lines, resetting the column number.
9601 @deftypeivar {position} {uint} column
9602 The column, starting at 1.
9605 @deftypemethod {position} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9606 Advance by @var{width} columns, without changing the line number.
9609 @deftypemethod {position} {position&} operator+= (int @var{width})
9610 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator+ (int @var{width})
9611 @deftypemethodx {position} {position&} operator-= (int @var{width})
9612 @deftypemethodx {position} {position} operator- (int @var{width})
9613 Various forms of syntactic sugar for @code{columns}.
9616 @deftypemethod {position} {bool} operator== (const position& @var{that})
9617 @deftypemethodx {position} {bool} operator!= (const position& @var{that})
9618 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different positions.
9621 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const position& @var{p})
9622 Report @var{p} on @var{o} like this:
9623 @samp{@var{file}:@var{line}.@var{column}}, or
9624 @samp{@var{line}.@var{column}} if @var{file} is null.
9628 @subsubsection C++ @code{location}
9630 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{begin}, const position& @var{end})
9631 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
9634 @deftypeop {Constructor} {location} {} location (const position& @var{pos} = position())
9635 @deftypeopx {Constructor} {location} {} location (std::string* @var{file}, uint @var{line}, uint @var{col})
9636 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
9639 @deftypemethod {location} {void} initialize (std::string* @var{file} = 0, uint @var{line} = 1, uint @var{col} = 1)
9640 Reset the location to an empty range at the given values.
9643 @deftypeivar {location} {position} begin
9644 @deftypeivarx {location} {position} end
9645 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
9648 @deftypemethod {location} {uint} columns (int @var{width} = 1)
9649 @deftypemethodx {location} {uint} lines (int @var{height} = 1)
9650 Advance the @code{end} position.
9653 @deftypemethod {location} {location} operator+ (const location& @var{end})
9654 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+ (int @var{width})
9655 @deftypemethodx {location} {location} operator+= (int @var{width})
9656 Various forms of syntactic sugar.
9659 @deftypemethod {location} {void} step ()
9660 Move @code{begin} onto @code{end}.
9663 @deftypemethod {location} {bool} operator== (const location& @var{that})
9664 @deftypemethodx {location} {bool} operator!= (const location& @var{that})
9665 Whether @code{*this} and @code{that} denote equal/different ranges of
9669 @deftypefun {std::ostream&} operator<< (std::ostream& @var{o}, const location& @var{p})
9670 Report @var{p} on @var{o}, taking care of special cases such as: no
9671 @code{filename} defined, or equal filename/line or column.
9674 @node User Defined Location Type
9675 @subsubsection User Defined Location Type
9676 @findex %define api.location.type
9678 Instead of using the built-in types you may use the @code{%define} variable
9679 @code{api.location.type} to specify your own type:
9682 %define api.location.type @var{LocationType}
9685 The requirements over your @var{LocationType} are:
9688 it must be copyable;
9691 in order to compute the (default) value of @code{@@$} in a reduction, the
9692 parser basically runs
9694 @@$.begin = @@$1.begin;
9695 @@$.end = @@$@var{N}.end; // The location of last right-hand side symbol.
9698 so there must be copyable @code{begin} and @code{end} members;
9701 alternatively you may redefine the computation of the default location, in
9702 which case these members are not required (@pxref{Location Default Action});
9705 if traces are enabled, then there must exist an @samp{std::ostream&
9706 operator<< (std::ostream& o, const @var{LocationType}& s)} function.
9711 In programs with several C++ parsers, you may also use the @code{%define}
9712 variable @code{api.location.type} to share a common set of built-in
9713 definitions for @code{position} and @code{location}. For instance, one
9714 parser @file{master/parser.yy} might use:
9719 %define namespace "master::"
9723 to generate the @file{master/position.hh} and @file{master/location.hh}
9724 files, reused by other parsers as follows:
9727 %define api.location.type "master::location"
9728 %code requires @{ #include <master/location.hh> @}
9731 @node C++ Parser Interface
9732 @subsection C++ Parser Interface
9733 @c - define parser_class_name
9735 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
9737 @c - Reporting errors
9739 The output files @file{@var{output}.hh} and @file{@var{output}.cc}
9740 declare and define the parser class in the namespace @code{yy}. The
9741 class name defaults to @code{parser}, but may be changed using
9742 @samp{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"}. The interface of
9743 this class is detailed below. It can be extended using the
9744 @code{%parse-param} feature: its semantics is slightly changed since
9745 it describes an additional member of the parser class, and an
9746 additional argument for its constructor.
9748 @defcv {Type} {parser} {semantic_type}
9749 @defcvx {Type} {parser} {location_type}
9750 The types for semantics value and locations.
9753 @defcv {Type} {parser} {token}
9754 A structure that contains (only) the @code{yytokentype} enumeration, which
9755 defines the tokens. To refer to the token @code{FOO},
9756 use @code{yy::parser::token::FOO}. The scanner can use
9757 @samp{typedef yy::parser::token token;} to ``import'' the token enumeration
9758 (@pxref{Calc++ Scanner}).
9761 @deftypemethod {parser} {} parser (@var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9762 Build a new parser object. There are no arguments by default, unless
9763 @samp{%parse-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} was used.
9766 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} parse ()
9767 Run the syntactic analysis, and return 0 on success, 1 otherwise.
9770 The whole function is wrapped in a @code{try}/@code{catch} block, so that
9771 when an exception is thrown, the @code{%destructor}s are called to release
9772 the lookahead symbol, and the symbols pushed on the stack.
9775 @deftypemethod {parser} {std::ostream&} debug_stream ()
9776 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_stream (std::ostream& @var{o})
9777 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
9781 @deftypemethod {parser} {debug_level_type} debug_level ()
9782 @deftypemethodx {parser} {void} set_debug_level (debug_level @var{l})
9783 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
9784 or nonzero, full tracing.
9787 @deftypemethod {parser} {void} error (const location_type& @var{l}, const std::string& @var{m})
9788 The definition for this member function must be supplied by the user:
9789 the parser uses it to report a parser error occurring at @var{l},
9790 described by @var{m}.
9794 @node C++ Scanner Interface
9795 @subsection C++ Scanner Interface
9796 @c - prefix for yylex.
9797 @c - Pure interface to yylex
9800 The parser invokes the scanner by calling @code{yylex}. Contrary to C
9801 parsers, C++ parsers are always pure: there is no point in using the
9802 @code{%define api.pure full} directive. Therefore the interface is as follows.
9804 @deftypemethod {parser} {int} yylex (semantic_type* @var{yylval}, location_type* @var{yylloc}, @var{type1} @var{arg1}, ...)
9805 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
9806 value and location being @var{yylval} and @var{yylloc}. Invocations of
9807 @samp{%lex-param @{@var{type1} @var{arg1}@}} yield additional arguments.
9811 @node A Complete C++ Example
9812 @subsection A Complete C++ Example
9814 This section demonstrates the use of a C++ parser with a simple but
9815 complete example. This example should be available on your system,
9816 ready to compile, in the directory @dfn{../bison/examples/calc++}. It
9817 focuses on the use of Bison, therefore the design of the various C++
9818 classes is very naive: no accessors, no encapsulation of members etc.
9819 We will use a Lex scanner, and more precisely, a Flex scanner, to
9820 demonstrate the various interaction. A hand written scanner is
9821 actually easier to interface with.
9824 * Calc++ --- C++ Calculator:: The specifications
9825 * Calc++ Parsing Driver:: An active parsing context
9826 * Calc++ Parser:: A parser class
9827 * Calc++ Scanner:: A pure C++ Flex scanner
9828 * Calc++ Top Level:: Conducting the band
9831 @node Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9832 @subsubsection Calc++ --- C++ Calculator
9834 Of course the grammar is dedicated to arithmetics, a single
9835 expression, possibly preceded by variable assignments. An
9836 environment containing possibly predefined variables such as
9837 @code{one} and @code{two}, is exchanged with the parser. An example
9838 of valid input follows.
9842 seven := one + two * three
9846 @node Calc++ Parsing Driver
9847 @subsubsection Calc++ Parsing Driver
9849 @c - A place to store error messages
9850 @c - A place for the result
9852 To support a pure interface with the parser (and the scanner) the
9853 technique of the ``parsing context'' is convenient: a structure
9854 containing all the data to exchange. Since, in addition to simply
9855 launch the parsing, there are several auxiliary tasks to execute (open
9856 the file for parsing, instantiate the parser etc.), we recommend
9857 transforming the simple parsing context structure into a fully blown
9858 @dfn{parsing driver} class.
9860 The declaration of this driver class, @file{calc++-driver.hh}, is as
9861 follows. The first part includes the CPP guard and imports the
9862 required standard library components, and the declaration of the parser
9865 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9867 #ifndef CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9868 # define CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9871 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
9876 Then comes the declaration of the scanning function. Flex expects
9877 the signature of @code{yylex} to be defined in the macro
9878 @code{YY_DECL}, and the C++ parser expects it to be declared. We can
9879 factor both as follows.
9881 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9883 // Tell Flex the lexer's prototype ...
9885 yy::calcxx_parser::token_type \
9886 yylex (yy::calcxx_parser::semantic_type* yylval, \
9887 yy::calcxx_parser::location_type* yylloc, \
9888 calcxx_driver& driver)
9889 // ... and declare it for the parser's sake.
9894 The @code{calcxx_driver} class is then declared with its most obvious
9897 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9899 // Conducting the whole scanning and parsing of Calc++.
9904 virtual ~calcxx_driver ();
9906 std::map<std::string, int> variables;
9912 To encapsulate the coordination with the Flex scanner, it is useful to
9913 have two members function to open and close the scanning phase.
9915 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9917 // Handling the scanner.
9920 bool trace_scanning;
9924 Similarly for the parser itself.
9926 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9928 // Run the parser. Return 0 on success.
9929 int parse (const std::string& f);
9935 To demonstrate pure handling of parse errors, instead of simply
9936 dumping them on the standard error output, we will pass them to the
9937 compiler driver using the following two member functions. Finally, we
9938 close the class declaration and CPP guard.
9940 @comment file: calc++-driver.hh
9943 void error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m);
9944 void error (const std::string& m);
9946 #endif // ! CALCXX_DRIVER_HH
9949 The implementation of the driver is straightforward. The @code{parse}
9950 member function deserves some attention. The @code{error} functions
9951 are simple stubs, they should actually register the located error
9952 messages and set error state.
9954 @comment file: calc++-driver.cc
9956 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
9957 #include "calc++-parser.hh"
9959 calcxx_driver::calcxx_driver ()
9960 : trace_scanning (false), trace_parsing (false)
9962 variables["one"] = 1;
9963 variables["two"] = 2;
9966 calcxx_driver::~calcxx_driver ()
9971 calcxx_driver::parse (const std::string &f)
9975 yy::calcxx_parser parser (*this);
9976 parser.set_debug_level (trace_parsing);
9977 int res = parser.parse ();
9983 calcxx_driver::error (const yy::location& l, const std::string& m)
9985 std::cerr << l << ": " << m << std::endl;
9989 calcxx_driver::error (const std::string& m)
9991 std::cerr << m << std::endl;
9996 @subsubsection Calc++ Parser
9998 The grammar file @file{calc++-parser.yy} starts by asking for the C++
9999 deterministic parser skeleton, the creation of the parser header file,
10000 and specifies the name of the parser class. Because the C++ skeleton
10001 changed several times, it is safer to require the version you designed
10004 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10006 %skeleton "lalr1.cc" /* -*- C++ -*- */
10007 %require "@value{VERSION}"
10009 %define parser_class_name "calcxx_parser"
10013 @findex %code requires
10014 Then come the declarations/inclusions needed to define the
10015 @code{%union}. Because the parser uses the parsing driver and
10016 reciprocally, both cannot include the header of the other. Because the
10017 driver's header needs detailed knowledge about the parser class (in
10018 particular its inner types), it is the parser's header which will simply
10019 use a forward declaration of the driver.
10020 @xref{%code Summary}.
10022 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10026 class calcxx_driver;
10031 The driver is passed by reference to the parser and to the scanner.
10032 This provides a simple but effective pure interface, not relying on
10035 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10037 // The parsing context.
10038 %parse-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10039 %lex-param @{ calcxx_driver& driver @}
10043 Then we request the location tracking feature, and initialize the
10044 first location's file name. Afterward new locations are computed
10045 relatively to the previous locations: the file name will be
10046 automatically propagated.
10048 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10053 // Initialize the initial location.
10054 @@$.begin.filename = @@$.end.filename = &driver.file;
10059 Use the two following directives to enable parser tracing and verbose error
10060 messages. However, verbose error messages can contain incorrect information
10063 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10070 Semantic values cannot use ``real'' objects, but only pointers to
10073 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10085 The code between @samp{%code @{} and @samp{@}} is output in the
10086 @file{*.cc} file; it needs detailed knowledge about the driver.
10088 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10091 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10097 The token numbered as 0 corresponds to end of file; the following line
10098 allows for nicer error messages referring to ``end of file'' instead
10099 of ``$end''. Similarly user friendly named are provided for each
10100 symbol. Note that the tokens names are prefixed by @code{TOKEN_} to
10101 avoid name clashes.
10103 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10105 %token END 0 "end of file"
10107 %token <sval> IDENTIFIER "identifier"
10108 %token <ival> NUMBER "number"
10113 To enable memory deallocation during error recovery, use
10114 @code{%destructor}.
10116 @c FIXME: Document %printer, and mention that it takes a braced-code operand.
10117 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10119 %printer @{ yyoutput << *$$; @} "identifier"
10120 %destructor @{ delete $$; @} "identifier"
10122 %printer @{ yyoutput << $$; @} <ival>
10126 The grammar itself is straightforward.
10128 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10132 unit: assignments exp @{ driver.result = $2; @};
10135 /* Nothing. */ @{@}
10136 | assignments assignment @{@};
10139 "identifier" ":=" exp
10140 @{ driver.variables[*$1] = $3; delete $1; @};
10144 exp: exp '+' exp @{ $$ = $1 + $3; @}
10145 | exp '-' exp @{ $$ = $1 - $3; @}
10146 | exp '*' exp @{ $$ = $1 * $3; @}
10147 | exp '/' exp @{ $$ = $1 / $3; @}
10148 | "identifier" @{ $$ = driver.variables[*$1]; delete $1; @}
10149 | "number" @{ $$ = $1; @};
10154 Finally the @code{error} member function registers the errors to the
10157 @comment file: calc++-parser.yy
10160 yy::calcxx_parser::error (const yy::calcxx_parser::location_type& l,
10161 const std::string& m)
10163 driver.error (l, m);
10167 @node Calc++ Scanner
10168 @subsubsection Calc++ Scanner
10170 The Flex scanner first includes the driver declaration, then the
10171 parser's to get the set of defined tokens.
10173 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10175 %@{ /* -*- C++ -*- */
10176 # include <cstdlib>
10178 # include <climits>
10180 # include "calc++-driver.hh"
10181 # include "calc++-parser.hh"
10183 /* Work around an incompatibility in flex (at least versions
10184 2.5.31 through 2.5.33): it generates code that does
10185 not conform to C89. See Debian bug 333231
10186 <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=333231>. */
10188 # define yywrap() 1
10190 /* By default yylex returns int, we use token_type.
10191 Unfortunately yyterminate by default returns 0, which is
10192 not of token_type. */
10193 #define yyterminate() return token::END
10198 Because there is no @code{#include}-like feature we don't need
10199 @code{yywrap}, we don't need @code{unput} either, and we parse an
10200 actual file, this is not an interactive session with the user.
10201 Finally we enable the scanner tracing features.
10203 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10205 %option noyywrap nounput batch debug
10209 Abbreviations allow for more readable rules.
10211 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10213 id [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z_0-9]*
10219 The following paragraph suffices to track locations accurately. Each
10220 time @code{yylex} is invoked, the begin position is moved onto the end
10221 position. Then when a pattern is matched, the end position is
10222 advanced of its width. In case it matched ends of lines, the end
10223 cursor is adjusted, and each time blanks are matched, the begin cursor
10224 is moved onto the end cursor to effectively ignore the blanks
10225 preceding tokens. Comments would be treated equally.
10227 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10231 # define YY_USER_ACTION yylloc->columns (yyleng);
10238 @{blank@}+ yylloc->step ();
10239 [\n]+ yylloc->lines (yyleng); yylloc->step ();
10243 The rules are simple, just note the use of the driver to report errors.
10244 It is convenient to use a typedef to shorten
10245 @code{yy::calcxx_parser::token::identifier} into
10246 @code{token::identifier} for instance.
10248 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10251 typedef yy::calcxx_parser::token token;
10253 /* Convert ints to the actual type of tokens. */
10254 [-+*/] return yy::calcxx_parser::token_type (yytext[0]);
10255 ":=" return token::ASSIGN;
10258 long n = strtol (yytext, NULL, 10);
10259 if (! (INT_MIN <= n && n <= INT_MAX && errno != ERANGE))
10260 driver.error (*yylloc, "integer is out of range");
10262 return token::NUMBER;
10264 @{id@} yylval->sval = new std::string (yytext); return token::IDENTIFIER;
10265 . driver.error (*yylloc, "invalid character");
10270 Finally, because the scanner related driver's member function depend
10271 on the scanner's data, it is simpler to implement them in this file.
10273 @comment file: calc++-scanner.ll
10277 calcxx_driver::scan_begin ()
10279 yy_flex_debug = trace_scanning;
10280 if (file.empty () || file == "-")
10282 else if (!(yyin = fopen (file.c_str (), "r")))
10284 error ("cannot open " + file + ": " + strerror(errno));
10285 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10292 calcxx_driver::scan_end ()
10299 @node Calc++ Top Level
10300 @subsubsection Calc++ Top Level
10302 The top level file, @file{calc++.cc}, poses no problem.
10304 @comment file: calc++.cc
10306 #include <iostream>
10307 #include "calc++-driver.hh"
10311 main (int argc, char *argv[])
10313 calcxx_driver driver;
10314 for (int i = 1; i < argc; ++i)
10315 if (argv[i] == std::string ("-p"))
10316 driver.trace_parsing = true;
10317 else if (argv[i] == std::string ("-s"))
10318 driver.trace_scanning = true;
10319 else if (!driver.parse (argv[i]))
10320 std::cout << driver.result << std::endl;
10326 @section Java Parsers
10329 * Java Bison Interface:: Asking for Java parser generation
10330 * Java Semantic Values:: %type and %token vs. Java
10331 * Java Location Values:: The position and location classes
10332 * Java Parser Interface:: Instantiating and running the parser
10333 * Java Scanner Interface:: Specifying the scanner for the parser
10334 * Java Action Features:: Special features for use in actions
10335 * Java Differences:: Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10336 * Java Declarations Summary:: List of Bison declarations used with Java
10339 @node Java Bison Interface
10340 @subsection Java Bison Interface
10341 @c - %language "Java"
10343 (The current Java interface is experimental and may evolve.
10344 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
10346 The Java parser skeletons are selected using the @code{%language "Java"}
10347 directive or the @option{-L java}/@option{--language=java} option.
10349 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10350 When generating a Java parser, @code{bison @var{basename}.y} will
10351 create a single Java source file named @file{@var{basename}.java}
10352 containing the parser implementation. Using a grammar file without a
10353 @file{.y} suffix is currently broken. The basename of the parser
10354 implementation file can be changed by the @code{%file-prefix}
10355 directive or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. The
10356 entire parser implementation file name can be changed by the
10357 @code{%output} directive or the @option{-o}/@option{--output} option.
10358 The parser implementation file contains a single class for the parser.
10360 You can create documentation for generated parsers using Javadoc.
10362 Contrary to C parsers, Java parsers do not use global variables; the
10363 state of the parser is always local to an instance of the parser class.
10364 Therefore, all Java parsers are ``pure'', and the @code{%pure-parser}
10365 and @code{%define api.pure full} directives does not do anything when used in
10368 Push parsers are currently unsupported in Java and @code{%define
10369 api.push-pull} have no effect.
10371 GLR parsers are currently unsupported in Java. Do not use the
10372 @code{glr-parser} directive.
10374 No header file can be generated for Java parsers. Do not use the
10375 @code{%defines} directive or the @option{-d}/@option{--defines} options.
10377 @c FIXME: Possible code change.
10378 Currently, support for debugging and verbose errors are always compiled
10379 in. Thus the @code{%debug} and @code{%token-table} directives and the
10380 @option{-t}/@option{--debug} and @option{-k}/@option{--token-table}
10381 options have no effect. This may change in the future to eliminate
10382 unused code in the generated parser, so use @code{%debug} and
10383 @code{%verbose-error} explicitly if needed. Also, in the future the
10384 @code{%token-table} directive might enable a public interface to
10385 access the token names and codes.
10387 @node Java Semantic Values
10388 @subsection Java Semantic Values
10389 @c - No %union, specify type in %type/%token.
10391 @c - Printer and destructor
10393 There is no @code{%union} directive in Java parsers. Instead, the
10394 semantic values' types (class names) should be specified in the
10395 @code{%type} or @code{%token} directive:
10398 %type <Expression> expr assignment_expr term factor
10399 %type <Integer> number
10402 By default, the semantic stack is declared to have @code{Object} members,
10403 which means that the class types you specify can be of any class.
10404 To improve the type safety of the parser, you can declare the common
10405 superclass of all the semantic values using the @code{%define stype}
10406 directive. For example, after the following declaration:
10409 %define stype "ASTNode"
10413 any @code{%type} or @code{%token} specifying a semantic type which
10414 is not a subclass of ASTNode, will cause a compile-time error.
10416 @c FIXME: Documented bug.
10417 Types used in the directives may be qualified with a package name.
10418 Primitive data types are accepted for Java version 1.5 or later. Note
10419 that in this case the autoboxing feature of Java 1.5 will be used.
10420 Generic types may not be used; this is due to a limitation in the
10421 implementation of Bison, and may change in future releases.
10423 Java parsers do not support @code{%destructor}, since the language
10424 adopts garbage collection. The parser will try to hold references
10425 to semantic values for as little time as needed.
10427 Java parsers do not support @code{%printer}, as @code{toString()}
10428 can be used to print the semantic values. This however may change
10429 (in a backwards-compatible way) in future versions of Bison.
10432 @node Java Location Values
10433 @subsection Java Location Values
10435 @c - class Position
10436 @c - class Location
10438 When the directive @code{%locations} is used, the Java parser supports
10439 location tracking, see @ref{Tracking Locations}. An auxiliary user-defined
10440 class defines a @dfn{position}, a single point in a file; Bison itself
10441 defines a class representing a @dfn{location}, a range composed of a pair of
10442 positions (possibly spanning several files). The location class is an inner
10443 class of the parser; the name is @code{Location} by default, and may also be
10444 renamed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}"}.
10446 The location class treats the position as a completely opaque value.
10447 By default, the class name is @code{Position}, but this can be changed
10448 with @code{%define api.position.type "@var{class-name}"}. This class must
10449 be supplied by the user.
10452 @deftypeivar {Location} {Position} begin
10453 @deftypeivarx {Location} {Position} end
10454 The first, inclusive, position of the range, and the first beyond.
10457 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{loc})
10458 Create a @code{Location} denoting an empty range located at a given point.
10461 @deftypeop {Constructor} {Location} {} Location (Position @var{begin}, Position @var{end})
10462 Create a @code{Location} from the endpoints of the range.
10465 @deftypemethod {Location} {String} toString ()
10466 Prints the range represented by the location. For this to work
10467 properly, the position class should override the @code{equals} and
10468 @code{toString} methods appropriately.
10472 @node Java Parser Interface
10473 @subsection Java Parser Interface
10474 @c - define parser_class_name
10476 @c - parse, error, set_debug_level, debug_level, set_debug_stream,
10478 @c - Reporting errors
10480 The name of the generated parser class defaults to @code{YYParser}. The
10481 @code{YY} prefix may be changed using the @code{%name-prefix} directive
10482 or the @option{-p}/@option{--name-prefix} option. Alternatively, use
10483 @code{%define parser_class_name "@var{name}"} to give a custom name to
10484 the class. The interface of this class is detailed below.
10486 By default, the parser class has package visibility. A declaration
10487 @code{%define public} will change to public visibility. Remember that,
10488 according to the Java language specification, the name of the @file{.java}
10489 file should match the name of the class in this case. Similarly, you can
10490 use @code{abstract}, @code{final} and @code{strictfp} with the
10491 @code{%define} declaration to add other modifiers to the parser class.
10493 The Java package name of the parser class can be specified using the
10494 @code{%define package} directive. The superclass and the implemented
10495 interfaces of the parser class can be specified with the @code{%define
10496 extends} and @code{%define implements} directives.
10498 The parser class defines an inner class, @code{Location}, that is used
10499 for location tracking (see @ref{Java Location Values}), and a inner
10500 interface, @code{Lexer} (see @ref{Java Scanner Interface}). Other than
10501 these inner class/interface, and the members described in the interface
10502 below, all the other members and fields are preceded with a @code{yy} or
10503 @code{YY} prefix to avoid clashes with user code.
10505 @c FIXME: The following constants and variables are still undocumented:
10506 @c @code{bisonVersion}, @code{bisonSkeleton} and @code{errorVerbose}.
10508 The parser class can be extended using the @code{%parse-param}
10509 directive. Each occurrence of the directive will add a @code{protected
10510 final} field to the parser class, and an argument to its constructor,
10511 which initialize them automatically.
10513 Token names defined by @code{%token} and the predefined @code{EOF} token
10514 name are added as constant fields to the parser class.
10516 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (@var{lex_param}, @dots{}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10517 Build a new parser object with embedded @code{%code lexer}. There are
10518 no parameters, unless @code{%parse-param}s and/or @code{%lex-param}s are
10522 @deftypeop {Constructor} {YYParser} {} YYParser (Lexer @var{lexer}, @var{parse_param}, @dots{})
10523 Build a new parser object using the specified scanner. There are no
10524 additional parameters unless @code{%parse-param}s are used.
10526 If the scanner is defined by @code{%code lexer}, this constructor is
10527 declared @code{protected} and is called automatically with a scanner
10528 created with the correct @code{%lex-param}s.
10531 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} parse ()
10532 Run the syntactic analysis, and return @code{true} on success,
10533 @code{false} otherwise.
10536 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {boolean} recovering ()
10537 During the syntactic analysis, return @code{true} if recovering
10538 from a syntax error.
10539 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10542 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {java.io.PrintStream} getDebugStream ()
10543 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugStream (java.io.printStream @var{o})
10544 Get or set the stream used for tracing the parsing. It defaults to
10548 @deftypemethod {YYParser} {int} getDebugLevel ()
10549 @deftypemethodx {YYParser} {void} setDebugLevel (int @var{l})
10550 Get or set the tracing level. Currently its value is either 0, no trace,
10551 or nonzero, full tracing.
10555 @node Java Scanner Interface
10556 @subsection Java Scanner Interface
10559 @c - Lexer interface
10561 There are two possible ways to interface a Bison-generated Java parser
10562 with a scanner: the scanner may be defined by @code{%code lexer}, or
10563 defined elsewhere. In either case, the scanner has to implement the
10564 @code{Lexer} inner interface of the parser class.
10566 In the first case, the body of the scanner class is placed in
10567 @code{%code lexer} blocks. If you want to pass parameters from the
10568 parser constructor to the scanner constructor, specify them with
10569 @code{%lex-param}; they are passed before @code{%parse-param}s to the
10572 In the second case, the scanner has to implement the @code{Lexer} interface,
10573 which is defined within the parser class (e.g., @code{YYParser.Lexer}).
10574 The constructor of the parser object will then accept an object
10575 implementing the interface; @code{%lex-param} is not used in this
10578 In both cases, the scanner has to implement the following methods.
10580 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {void} yyerror (Location @var{loc}, String @var{msg})
10581 This method is defined by the user to emit an error message. The first
10582 parameter is omitted if location tracking is not active. Its type can be
10583 changed using @code{%define api.location.type "@var{class-name}".}
10586 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {int} yylex ()
10587 Return the next token. Its type is the return value, its semantic
10588 value and location are saved and returned by the their methods in the
10591 Use @code{%define lex_throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions.
10592 Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10595 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Position} getStartPos ()
10596 @deftypemethodx {Lexer} {Position} getEndPos ()
10597 Return respectively the first position of the last token that
10598 @code{yylex} returned, and the first position beyond it. These
10599 methods are not needed unless location tracking is active.
10601 The return type can be changed using @code{%define api.position.type
10602 "@var{class-name}".}
10605 @deftypemethod {Lexer} {Object} getLVal ()
10606 Return the semantic value of the last token that yylex returned.
10608 The return type can be changed using @code{%define stype
10609 "@var{class-name}".}
10613 @node Java Action Features
10614 @subsection Special Features for Use in Java Actions
10616 The following special constructs can be uses in Java actions.
10617 Other analogous C action features are currently unavailable for Java.
10619 Use @code{%define throws} to specify any uncaught exceptions from parser
10620 actions, and initial actions specified by @code{%initial-action}.
10623 The semantic value for the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10624 This may not be assigned to.
10625 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10628 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>@var{n}
10629 Like @code{$@var{n}} but specifies a alternative type @var{typealt}.
10630 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10634 The semantic value for the grouping made by the current rule. As a
10635 value, this is in the base type (@code{Object} or as specified by
10636 @code{%define stype}) as in not cast to the declared subtype because
10637 casts are not allowed on the left-hand side of Java assignments.
10638 Use an explicit Java cast if the correct subtype is needed.
10639 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10642 @defvar $<@var{typealt}>$
10643 Same as @code{$$} since Java always allow assigning to the base type.
10644 Perhaps we should use this and @code{$<>$} for the value and @code{$$}
10645 for setting the value but there is currently no easy way to distinguish
10647 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10651 The location information of the @var{n}th component of the current rule.
10652 This may not be assigned to.
10653 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10657 The location information of the grouping made by the current rule.
10658 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10661 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYABORT @code{;}
10662 Return immediately from the parser, indicating failure.
10663 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10666 @deftypefn {Statement} return YYACCEPT @code{;}
10667 Return immediately from the parser, indicating success.
10668 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10671 @deftypefn {Statement} {return} YYERROR @code{;}
10672 Start error recovery (without printing an error message).
10673 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10676 @deftypefn {Function} {boolean} recovering ()
10677 Return whether error recovery is being done. In this state, the parser
10678 reads token until it reaches a known state, and then restarts normal
10680 @xref{Error Recovery}.
10683 @deftypefn {Function} {protected void} yyerror (String msg)
10684 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Position pos, String msg)
10685 @deftypefnx {Function} {protected void} yyerror (Location loc, String msg)
10686 Print an error message using the @code{yyerror} method of the scanner
10691 @node Java Differences
10692 @subsection Differences between C/C++ and Java Grammars
10694 The different structure of the Java language forces several differences
10695 between C/C++ grammars, and grammars designed for Java parsers. This
10696 section summarizes these differences.
10700 Java lacks a preprocessor, so the @code{YYERROR}, @code{YYACCEPT},
10701 @code{YYABORT} symbols (@pxref{Table of Symbols}) cannot obviously be
10702 macros. Instead, they should be preceded by @code{return} when they
10703 appear in an action. The actual definition of these symbols is
10704 opaque to the Bison grammar, and it might change in the future. The
10705 only meaningful operation that you can do, is to return them.
10706 @xref{Java Action Features}.
10708 Note that of these three symbols, only @code{YYACCEPT} and
10709 @code{YYABORT} will cause a return from the @code{yyparse}
10710 method@footnote{Java parsers include the actions in a separate
10711 method than @code{yyparse} in order to have an intuitive syntax that
10712 corresponds to these C macros.}.
10715 Java lacks unions, so @code{%union} has no effect. Instead, semantic
10716 values have a common base type: @code{Object} or as specified by
10717 @samp{%define stype}. Angle brackets on @code{%token}, @code{type},
10718 @code{$@var{n}} and @code{$$} specify subtypes rather than fields of
10719 an union. The type of @code{$$}, even with angle brackets, is the base
10720 type since Java casts are not allow on the left-hand side of assignments.
10721 Also, @code{$@var{n}} and @code{@@@var{n}} are not allowed on the
10722 left-hand side of assignments. @xref{Java Semantic Values}, and
10723 @ref{Java Action Features}.
10726 The prologue declarations have a different meaning than in C/C++ code.
10728 @item @code{%code imports}
10729 blocks are placed at the beginning of the Java source code. They may
10730 include copyright notices. For a @code{package} declarations, it is
10731 suggested to use @code{%define package} instead.
10733 @item unqualified @code{%code}
10734 blocks are placed inside the parser class.
10736 @item @code{%code lexer}
10737 blocks, if specified, should include the implementation of the
10738 scanner. If there is no such block, the scanner can be any class
10739 that implements the appropriate interface (@pxref{Java Scanner
10743 Other @code{%code} blocks are not supported in Java parsers.
10744 In particular, @code{%@{ @dots{} %@}} blocks should not be used
10745 and may give an error in future versions of Bison.
10747 The epilogue has the same meaning as in C/C++ code and it can
10748 be used to define other classes used by the parser @emph{outside}
10753 @node Java Declarations Summary
10754 @subsection Java Declarations Summary
10756 This summary only include declarations specific to Java or have special
10757 meaning when used in a Java parser.
10759 @deffn {Directive} {%language "Java"}
10760 Generate a Java class for the parser.
10763 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10764 A parameter for the lexer class defined by @code{%code lexer}
10765 @emph{only}, added as parameters to the lexer constructor and the parser
10766 constructor that @emph{creates} a lexer. Default is none.
10767 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10770 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
10771 The prefix of the parser class name @code{@var{prefix}Parser} if
10772 @code{%define parser_class_name} is not used. Default is @code{YY}.
10773 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10776 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{type} @var{name}@}
10777 A parameter for the parser class added as parameters to constructor(s)
10778 and as fields initialized by the constructor(s). Default is none.
10779 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10782 @deffn {Directive} %token <@var{type}> @var{token} @dots{}
10783 Declare tokens. Note that the angle brackets enclose a Java @emph{type}.
10784 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10787 @deffn {Directive} %type <@var{type}> @var{nonterminal} @dots{}
10788 Declare the type of nonterminals. Note that the angle brackets enclose
10789 a Java @emph{type}.
10790 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10793 @deffn {Directive} %code @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10794 Code appended to the inside of the parser class.
10795 @xref{Java Differences}.
10798 @deffn {Directive} {%code imports} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10799 Code inserted just after the @code{package} declaration.
10800 @xref{Java Differences}.
10803 @deffn {Directive} {%code lexer} @{ @var{code} @dots{} @}
10804 Code added to the body of a inner lexer class within the parser class.
10805 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10808 @deffn {Directive} %% @var{code} @dots{}
10809 Code (after the second @code{%%}) appended to the end of the file,
10810 @emph{outside} the parser class.
10811 @xref{Java Differences}.
10814 @deffn {Directive} %@{ @var{code} @dots{} %@}
10815 Not supported. Use @code{%code import} instead.
10816 @xref{Java Differences}.
10819 @deffn {Directive} {%define abstract}
10820 Whether the parser class is declared @code{abstract}. Default is false.
10821 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10824 @deffn {Directive} {%define extends} "@var{superclass}"
10825 The superclass of the parser class. Default is none.
10826 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10829 @deffn {Directive} {%define final}
10830 Whether the parser class is declared @code{final}. Default is false.
10831 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10834 @deffn {Directive} {%define implements} "@var{interfaces}"
10835 The implemented interfaces of the parser class, a comma-separated list.
10837 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10840 @deffn {Directive} {%define lex_throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10841 The exceptions thrown by the @code{yylex} method of the lexer, a
10842 comma-separated list. Default is @code{java.io.IOException}.
10843 @xref{Java Scanner Interface}.
10846 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.location.type} "@var{class}"
10847 The name of the class used for locations (a range between two
10848 positions). This class is generated as an inner class of the parser
10849 class by @command{bison}. Default is @code{Location}.
10850 Formerly named @code{location_type}.
10851 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10854 @deffn {Directive} {%define package} "@var{package}"
10855 The package to put the parser class in. Default is none.
10856 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10859 @deffn {Directive} {%define parser_class_name} "@var{name}"
10860 The name of the parser class. Default is @code{YYParser} or
10861 @code{@var{name-prefix}Parser}.
10862 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10865 @deffn {Directive} {%define api.position.type} "@var{class}"
10866 The name of the class used for positions. This class must be supplied by
10867 the user. Default is @code{Position}.
10868 Formerly named @code{position_type}.
10869 @xref{Java Location Values}.
10872 @deffn {Directive} {%define public}
10873 Whether the parser class is declared @code{public}. Default is false.
10874 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10877 @deffn {Directive} {%define stype} "@var{class}"
10878 The base type of semantic values. Default is @code{Object}.
10879 @xref{Java Semantic Values}.
10882 @deffn {Directive} {%define strictfp}
10883 Whether the parser class is declared @code{strictfp}. Default is false.
10884 @xref{Java Bison Interface}.
10887 @deffn {Directive} {%define throws} "@var{exceptions}"
10888 The exceptions thrown by user-supplied parser actions and
10889 @code{%initial-action}, a comma-separated list. Default is none.
10890 @xref{Java Parser Interface}.
10894 @c ================================================= FAQ
10897 @chapter Frequently Asked Questions
10898 @cindex frequently asked questions
10901 Several questions about Bison come up occasionally. Here some of them
10905 * Memory Exhausted:: Breaking the Stack Limits
10906 * How Can I Reset the Parser:: @code{yyparse} Keeps some State
10907 * Strings are Destroyed:: @code{yylval} Loses Track of Strings
10908 * Implementing Gotos/Loops:: Control Flow in the Calculator
10909 * Multiple start-symbols:: Factoring closely related grammars
10910 * Secure? Conform?:: Is Bison POSIX safe?
10911 * I can't build Bison:: Troubleshooting
10912 * Where can I find help?:: Troubleshouting
10913 * Bug Reports:: Troublereporting
10914 * More Languages:: Parsers in C++, Java, and so on
10915 * Beta Testing:: Experimenting development versions
10916 * Mailing Lists:: Meeting other Bison users
10919 @node Memory Exhausted
10920 @section Memory Exhausted
10923 My parser returns with error with a @samp{memory exhausted}
10924 message. What can I do?
10927 This question is already addressed elsewhere, see @ref{Recursion, ,Recursive
10930 @node How Can I Reset the Parser
10931 @section How Can I Reset the Parser
10933 The following phenomenon has several symptoms, resulting in the
10934 following typical questions:
10937 I invoke @code{yyparse} several times, and on correct input it works
10938 properly; but when a parse error is found, all the other calls fail
10939 too. How can I reset the error flag of @code{yyparse}?
10946 My parser includes support for an @samp{#include}-like feature, in
10947 which case I run @code{yyparse} from @code{yyparse}. This fails
10948 although I did specify @samp{%define api.pure full}.
10951 These problems typically come not from Bison itself, but from
10952 Lex-generated scanners. Because these scanners use large buffers for
10953 speed, they might not notice a change of input file. As a
10954 demonstration, consider the following source file,
10955 @file{first-line.l}:
10961 #include <stdlib.h>
10965 .*\n ECHO; return 1;
10969 yyparse (char const *file)
10971 yyin = fopen (file, "r");
10975 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
10979 /* One token only. */
10981 if (fclose (yyin) != 0)
10984 exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
11002 If the file @file{input} contains
11010 then instead of getting the first line twice, you get:
11013 $ @kbd{flex -ofirst-line.c first-line.l}
11014 $ @kbd{gcc -ofirst-line first-line.c -ll}
11015 $ @kbd{./first-line}
11020 Therefore, whenever you change @code{yyin}, you must tell the
11021 Lex-generated scanner to discard its current buffer and switch to the
11022 new one. This depends upon your implementation of Lex; see its
11023 documentation for more. For Flex, it suffices to call
11024 @samp{YY_FLUSH_BUFFER} after each change to @code{yyin}. If your
11025 Flex-generated scanner needs to read from several input streams to
11026 handle features like include files, you might consider using Flex
11027 functions like @samp{yy_switch_to_buffer} that manipulate multiple
11030 If your Flex-generated scanner uses start conditions (@pxref{Start
11031 conditions, , Start conditions, flex, The Flex Manual}), you might
11032 also want to reset the scanner's state, i.e., go back to the initial
11033 start condition, through a call to @samp{BEGIN (0)}.
11035 @node Strings are Destroyed
11036 @section Strings are Destroyed
11039 My parser seems to destroy old strings, or maybe it loses track of
11040 them. Instead of reporting @samp{"foo", "bar"}, it reports
11041 @samp{"bar", "bar"}, or even @samp{"foo\nbar", "bar"}.
11044 This error is probably the single most frequent ``bug report'' sent to
11045 Bison lists, but is only concerned with a misunderstanding of the role
11046 of the scanner. Consider the following Lex code:
11052 char *yylval = NULL;
11057 .* yylval = yytext; return 1;
11065 /* Similar to using $1, $2 in a Bison action. */
11066 char *fst = (yylex (), yylval);
11067 char *snd = (yylex (), yylval);
11068 printf ("\"%s\", \"%s\"\n", fst, snd);
11074 If you compile and run this code, you get:
11077 $ @kbd{flex -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11078 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11079 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11085 this is because @code{yytext} is a buffer provided for @emph{reading}
11086 in the action, but if you want to keep it, you have to duplicate it
11087 (e.g., using @code{strdup}). Note that the output may depend on how
11088 your implementation of Lex handles @code{yytext}. For instance, when
11089 given the Lex compatibility option @option{-l} (which triggers the
11090 option @samp{%array}) Flex generates a different behavior:
11093 $ @kbd{flex -l -osplit-lines.c split-lines.l}
11094 $ @kbd{gcc -osplit-lines split-lines.c -ll}
11095 $ @kbd{printf 'one\ntwo\n' | ./split-lines}
11100 @node Implementing Gotos/Loops
11101 @section Implementing Gotos/Loops
11104 My simple calculator supports variables, assignments, and functions,
11105 but how can I implement gotos, or loops?
11108 Although very pedagogical, the examples included in the document blur
11109 the distinction to make between the parser---whose job is to recover
11110 the structure of a text and to transmit it to subsequent modules of
11111 the program---and the processing (such as the execution) of this
11112 structure. This works well with so called straight line programs,
11113 i.e., precisely those that have a straightforward execution model:
11114 execute simple instructions one after the others.
11116 @cindex abstract syntax tree
11118 If you want a richer model, you will probably need to use the parser
11119 to construct a tree that does represent the structure it has
11120 recovered; this tree is usually called the @dfn{abstract syntax tree},
11121 or @dfn{AST} for short. Then, walking through this tree,
11122 traversing it in various ways, will enable treatments such as its
11123 execution or its translation, which will result in an interpreter or a
11126 This topic is way beyond the scope of this manual, and the reader is
11127 invited to consult the dedicated literature.
11130 @node Multiple start-symbols
11131 @section Multiple start-symbols
11134 I have several closely related grammars, and I would like to share their
11135 implementations. In fact, I could use a single grammar but with
11136 multiple entry points.
11139 Bison does not support multiple start-symbols, but there is a very
11140 simple means to simulate them. If @code{foo} and @code{bar} are the two
11141 pseudo start-symbols, then introduce two new tokens, say
11142 @code{START_FOO} and @code{START_BAR}, and use them as switches from the
11146 %token START_FOO START_BAR;
11153 These tokens prevents the introduction of new conflicts. As far as the
11154 parser goes, that is all that is needed.
11156 Now the difficult part is ensuring that the scanner will send these
11157 tokens first. If your scanner is hand-written, that should be
11158 straightforward. If your scanner is generated by Lex, them there is
11159 simple means to do it: recall that anything between @samp{%@{ ... %@}}
11160 after the first @code{%%} is copied verbatim in the top of the generated
11161 @code{yylex} function. Make sure a variable @code{start_token} is
11162 available in the scanner (e.g., a global variable or using
11163 @code{%lex-param} etc.), and use the following:
11166 /* @r{Prologue.} */
11171 int t = start_token;
11176 /* @r{The rules.} */
11180 @node Secure? Conform?
11181 @section Secure? Conform?
11184 Is Bison secure? Does it conform to POSIX?
11187 If you're looking for a guarantee or certification, we don't provide it.
11188 However, Bison is intended to be a reliable program that conforms to the
11189 POSIX specification for Yacc. If you run into problems,
11190 please send us a bug report.
11192 @node I can't build Bison
11193 @section I can't build Bison
11196 I can't build Bison because @command{make} complains that
11197 @code{msgfmt} is not found.
11201 Like most GNU packages with internationalization support, that feature
11202 is turned on by default. If you have problems building in the @file{po}
11203 subdirectory, it indicates that your system's internationalization
11204 support is lacking. You can re-configure Bison with
11205 @option{--disable-nls} to turn off this support, or you can install GNU
11206 gettext from @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gettext/} and re-configure
11207 Bison. See the file @file{ABOUT-NLS} for more information.
11210 @node Where can I find help?
11211 @section Where can I find help?
11214 I'm having trouble using Bison. Where can I find help?
11217 First, read this fine manual. Beyond that, you can send mail to
11218 @email{help-bison@@gnu.org}. This mailing list is intended to be
11219 populated with people who are willing to answer questions about using
11220 and installing Bison. Please keep in mind that (most of) the people on
11221 the list have aspects of their lives which are not related to Bison (!),
11222 so you may not receive an answer to your question right away. This can
11223 be frustrating, but please try not to honk them off; remember that any
11224 help they provide is purely voluntary and out of the kindness of their
11228 @section Bug Reports
11231 I found a bug. What should I include in the bug report?
11234 Before you send a bug report, make sure you are using the latest
11235 version. Check @url{ftp://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/bison/} or one of its
11236 mirrors. Be sure to include the version number in your bug report. If
11237 the bug is present in the latest version but not in a previous version,
11238 try to determine the most recent version which did not contain the bug.
11240 If the bug is parser-related, you should include the smallest grammar
11241 you can which demonstrates the bug. The grammar file should also be
11242 complete (i.e., I should be able to run it through Bison without having
11243 to edit or add anything). The smaller and simpler the grammar, the
11244 easier it will be to fix the bug.
11246 Include information about your compilation environment, including your
11247 operating system's name and version and your compiler's name and
11248 version. If you have trouble compiling, you should also include a
11249 transcript of the build session, starting with the invocation of
11250 `configure'. Depending on the nature of the bug, you may be asked to
11251 send additional files as well (such as `config.h' or `config.cache').
11253 Patches are most welcome, but not required. That is, do not hesitate to
11254 send a bug report just because you cannot provide a fix.
11256 Send bug reports to @email{bug-bison@@gnu.org}.
11258 @node More Languages
11259 @section More Languages
11262 Will Bison ever have C++ and Java support? How about @var{insert your
11263 favorite language here}?
11266 C++ and Java support is there now, and is documented. We'd love to add other
11267 languages; contributions are welcome.
11270 @section Beta Testing
11273 What is involved in being a beta tester?
11276 It's not terribly involved. Basically, you would download a test
11277 release, compile it, and use it to build and run a parser or two. After
11278 that, you would submit either a bug report or a message saying that
11279 everything is okay. It is important to report successes as well as
11280 failures because test releases eventually become mainstream releases,
11281 but only if they are adequately tested. If no one tests, development is
11282 essentially halted.
11284 Beta testers are particularly needed for operating systems to which the
11285 developers do not have easy access. They currently have easy access to
11286 recent GNU/Linux and Solaris versions. Reports about other operating
11287 systems are especially welcome.
11289 @node Mailing Lists
11290 @section Mailing Lists
11293 How do I join the help-bison and bug-bison mailing lists?
11296 See @url{http://lists.gnu.org/}.
11298 @c ================================================= Table of Symbols
11300 @node Table of Symbols
11301 @appendix Bison Symbols
11302 @cindex Bison symbols, table of
11303 @cindex symbols in Bison, table of
11305 @deffn {Variable} @@$
11306 In an action, the location of the left-hand side of the rule.
11307 @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11310 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{n}
11311 In an action, the location of the @var{n}-th symbol of the right-hand side
11312 of the rule. @xref{Tracking Locations}.
11315 @deffn {Variable} @@@var{name}
11316 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11320 @deffn {Variable} @@[@var{name}]
11321 In an action, the location of a symbol addressed by name. @xref{Tracking
11325 @deffn {Variable} $$
11326 In an action, the semantic value of the left-hand side of the rule.
11330 @deffn {Variable} $@var{n}
11331 In an action, the semantic value of the @var{n}-th symbol of the
11332 right-hand side of the rule. @xref{Actions}.
11335 @deffn {Variable} $@var{name}
11336 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11340 @deffn {Variable} $[@var{name}]
11341 In an action, the semantic value of a symbol addressed by name.
11345 @deffn {Delimiter} %%
11346 Delimiter used to separate the grammar rule section from the
11347 Bison declarations section or the epilogue.
11348 @xref{Grammar Layout, ,The Overall Layout of a Bison Grammar}.
11351 @c Don't insert spaces, or check the DVI output.
11352 @deffn {Delimiter} %@{@var{code}%@}
11353 All code listed between @samp{%@{} and @samp{%@}} is copied verbatim
11354 to the parser implementation file. Such code forms the prologue of
11355 the grammar file. @xref{Grammar Outline, ,Outline of a Bison
11359 @deffn {Construct} /*@dots{}*/
11360 Comment delimiters, as in C.
11363 @deffn {Delimiter} :
11364 Separates a rule's result from its components. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of
11368 @deffn {Delimiter} ;
11369 Terminates a rule. @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11372 @deffn {Delimiter} |
11373 Separates alternate rules for the same result nonterminal.
11374 @xref{Rules, ,Syntax of Grammar Rules}.
11377 @deffn {Directive} <*>
11378 Used to define a default tagged @code{%destructor} or default tagged
11381 This feature is experimental.
11382 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11385 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11388 @deffn {Directive} <>
11389 Used to define a default tagless @code{%destructor} or default tagless
11392 This feature is experimental.
11393 More user feedback will help to determine whether it should become a permanent
11396 @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11399 @deffn {Symbol} $accept
11400 The predefined nonterminal whose only rule is @samp{$accept: @var{start}
11401 $end}, where @var{start} is the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, , The
11402 Start-Symbol}. It cannot be used in the grammar.
11405 @deffn {Directive} %code @{@var{code}@}
11406 @deffnx {Directive} %code @var{qualifier} @{@var{code}@}
11407 Insert @var{code} verbatim into the output parser source at the
11408 default location or at the location specified by @var{qualifier}.
11409 @xref{%code Summary}.
11412 @deffn {Directive} %debug
11413 Equip the parser for debugging. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11417 @deffn {Directive} %default-prec
11418 Assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11419 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11424 @deffn {Directive} %define @var{variable}
11425 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} @var{value}
11426 @deffnx {Directive} %define @var{variable} "@var{value}"
11427 Define a variable to adjust Bison's behavior. @xref{%define Summary}.
11430 @deffn {Directive} %defines
11431 Bison declaration to create a parser header file, which is usually
11432 meant for the scanner. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11435 @deffn {Directive} %defines @var{defines-file}
11436 Same as above, but save in the file @var{defines-file}.
11437 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11440 @deffn {Directive} %destructor
11441 Specify how the parser should reclaim the memory associated to
11442 discarded symbols. @xref{Destructor Decl, , Freeing Discarded Symbols}.
11445 @deffn {Directive} %dprec
11446 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a rule that is used at parse
11447 time to resolve reduce/reduce conflicts. @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing
11451 @deffn {Symbol} $end
11452 The predefined token marking the end of the token stream. It cannot be
11453 used in the grammar.
11456 @deffn {Symbol} error
11457 A token name reserved for error recovery. This token may be used in
11458 grammar rules so as to allow the Bison parser to recognize an error in
11459 the grammar without halting the process. In effect, a sentence
11460 containing an error may be recognized as valid. On a syntax error, the
11461 token @code{error} becomes the current lookahead token. Actions
11462 corresponding to @code{error} are then executed, and the lookahead
11463 token is reset to the token that originally caused the violation.
11464 @xref{Error Recovery}.
11467 @deffn {Directive} %error-verbose
11468 Bison declaration to request verbose, specific error message strings
11469 when @code{yyerror} is called. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11472 @deffn {Directive} %file-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11473 Bison declaration to set the prefix of the output files. @xref{Decl
11477 @deffn {Directive} %glr-parser
11478 Bison declaration to produce a GLR parser. @xref{GLR
11479 Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11482 @deffn {Directive} %initial-action
11483 Run user code before parsing. @xref{Initial Action Decl, , Performing Actions before Parsing}.
11486 @deffn {Directive} %language
11487 Specify the programming language for the generated parser.
11488 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11491 @deffn {Directive} %left
11492 Bison declaration to assign left associativity to token(s).
11493 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11496 @deffn {Directive} %lex-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11497 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11498 @code{yylex} should accept. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions
11502 @deffn {Directive} %merge
11503 Bison declaration to assign a merging function to a rule. If there is a
11504 reduce/reduce conflict with a rule having the same merging function, the
11505 function is applied to the two semantic values to get a single result.
11506 @xref{GLR Parsers, ,Writing GLR Parsers}.
11509 @deffn {Directive} %name-prefix "@var{prefix}"
11510 Obsoleted by the @code{%define} variable @code{api.prefix} (@pxref{Multiple
11511 Parsers, ,Multiple Parsers in the Same Program}).
11513 Rename the external symbols (variables and functions) used in the parser so
11514 that they start with @var{prefix} instead of @samp{yy}. Contrary to
11515 @code{api.prefix}, do no rename types and macros.
11517 The precise list of symbols renamed in C parsers is @code{yyparse},
11518 @code{yylex}, @code{yyerror}, @code{yynerrs}, @code{yylval}, @code{yychar},
11519 @code{yydebug}, and (if locations are used) @code{yylloc}. If you use a
11520 push parser, @code{yypush_parse}, @code{yypull_parse}, @code{yypstate},
11521 @code{yypstate_new} and @code{yypstate_delete} will also be renamed. For
11522 example, if you use @samp{%name-prefix "c_"}, the names become
11523 @code{c_parse}, @code{c_lex}, and so on. For C++ parsers, see the
11524 @code{%define namespace} documentation in this section.
11529 @deffn {Directive} %no-default-prec
11530 Do not assign a precedence to rules that lack an explicit @samp{%prec}
11531 modifier. @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent
11536 @deffn {Directive} %no-lines
11537 Bison declaration to avoid generating @code{#line} directives in the
11538 parser implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11541 @deffn {Directive} %nonassoc
11542 Bison declaration to assign nonassociativity to token(s).
11543 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11546 @deffn {Directive} %output "@var{file}"
11547 Bison declaration to set the name of the parser implementation file.
11548 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11551 @deffn {Directive} %parse-param @{@var{argument-declaration}@}
11552 Bison declaration to specifying an additional parameter that
11553 @code{yyparse} should accept. @xref{Parser Function,, The Parser
11554 Function @code{yyparse}}.
11557 @deffn {Directive} %prec
11558 Bison declaration to assign a precedence to a specific rule.
11559 @xref{Contextual Precedence, ,Context-Dependent Precedence}.
11562 @deffn {Directive} %pure-parser
11563 Deprecated version of @code{%define api.pure} (@pxref{%define
11564 Summary,,api.pure}), for which Bison is more careful to warn about
11565 unreasonable usage.
11568 @deffn {Directive} %require "@var{version}"
11569 Require version @var{version} or higher of Bison. @xref{Require Decl, ,
11570 Require a Version of Bison}.
11573 @deffn {Directive} %right
11574 Bison declaration to assign right associativity to token(s).
11575 @xref{Precedence Decl, ,Operator Precedence}.
11578 @deffn {Directive} %skeleton
11579 Specify the skeleton to use; usually for development.
11580 @xref{Decl Summary}.
11583 @deffn {Directive} %start
11584 Bison declaration to specify the start symbol. @xref{Start Decl, ,The
11588 @deffn {Directive} %token
11589 Bison declaration to declare token(s) without specifying precedence.
11590 @xref{Token Decl, ,Token Type Names}.
11593 @deffn {Directive} %token-table
11594 Bison declaration to include a token name table in the parser
11595 implementation file. @xref{Decl Summary}.
11598 @deffn {Directive} %type
11599 Bison declaration to declare nonterminals. @xref{Type Decl,
11600 ,Nonterminal Symbols}.
11603 @deffn {Symbol} $undefined
11604 The predefined token onto which all undefined values returned by
11605 @code{yylex} are mapped. It cannot be used in the grammar, rather, use
11609 @deffn {Directive} %union
11610 Bison declaration to specify several possible data types for semantic
11611 values. @xref{Union Decl, ,The Collection of Value Types}.
11614 @deffn {Macro} YYABORT
11615 Macro to pretend that an unrecoverable syntax error has occurred, by
11616 making @code{yyparse} return 1 immediately. The error reporting
11617 function @code{yyerror} is not called. @xref{Parser Function, ,The
11618 Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11620 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYABORT;}
11624 @deffn {Macro} YYACCEPT
11625 Macro to pretend that a complete utterance of the language has been
11626 read, by making @code{yyparse} return 0 immediately.
11627 @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11629 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYACCEPT;}
11633 @deffn {Macro} YYBACKUP
11634 Macro to discard a value from the parser stack and fake a lookahead
11635 token. @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11638 @deffn {Variable} yychar
11639 External integer variable that contains the integer value of the
11640 lookahead token. (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within
11641 @code{yyparse}.) Error-recovery rule actions may examine this variable.
11642 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11645 @deffn {Variable} yyclearin
11646 Macro used in error-recovery rule actions. It clears the previous
11647 lookahead token. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11650 @deffn {Macro} YYDEBUG
11651 Macro to define to equip the parser with tracing code. @xref{Tracing,
11652 ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11655 @deffn {Variable} yydebug
11656 External integer variable set to zero by default. If @code{yydebug}
11657 is given a nonzero value, the parser will output information on input
11658 symbols and parser action. @xref{Tracing, ,Tracing Your Parser}.
11661 @deffn {Macro} yyerrok
11662 Macro to cause parser to recover immediately to its normal mode
11663 after a syntax error. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11666 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR
11667 Cause an immediate syntax error. This statement initiates error
11668 recovery just as if the parser itself had detected an error; however, it
11669 does not call @code{yyerror}, and does not print any message. If you
11670 want to print an error message, call @code{yyerror} explicitly before
11671 the @samp{YYERROR;} statement. @xref{Error Recovery}.
11673 For Java parsers, this functionality is invoked using @code{return YYERROR;}
11677 @deffn {Function} yyerror
11678 User-supplied function to be called by @code{yyparse} on error.
11679 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error
11680 Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11683 @deffn {Macro} YYERROR_VERBOSE
11684 An obsolete macro that you define with @code{#define} in the prologue
11685 to request verbose, specific error message strings
11686 when @code{yyerror} is called. It doesn't matter what definition you
11687 use for @code{YYERROR_VERBOSE}, just whether you define it.
11688 Supported by the C skeletons only; using
11689 @code{%error-verbose} is preferred. @xref{Error Reporting}.
11692 @deffn {Macro} YYFPRINTF
11693 Macro used to output run-time traces.
11694 @xref{Enabling Traces}.
11697 @deffn {Macro} YYINITDEPTH
11698 Macro for specifying the initial size of the parser stack.
11699 @xref{Memory Management}.
11702 @deffn {Function} yylex
11703 User-supplied lexical analyzer function, called with no arguments to get
11704 the next token. @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function
11708 @deffn {Macro} YYLEX_PARAM
11709 An obsolete macro for specifying an extra argument (or list of extra
11710 arguments) for @code{yyparse} to pass to @code{yylex}. The use of this
11711 macro is deprecated, and is supported only for Yacc like parsers.
11712 @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11715 @deffn {Variable} yylloc
11716 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the line and column
11717 numbers associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11718 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11720 You can ignore this variable if you don't use the @samp{@@} feature in the
11722 @xref{Token Locations, ,Textual Locations of Tokens}.
11723 In semantic actions, it stores the location of the lookahead token.
11724 @xref{Actions and Locations, ,Actions and Locations}.
11727 @deffn {Type} YYLTYPE
11728 Data type of @code{yylloc}; by default, a structure with four
11729 members. @xref{Location Type, , Data Types of Locations}.
11732 @deffn {Variable} yylval
11733 External variable in which @code{yylex} should place the semantic
11734 value associated with a token. (In a pure parser, it is a local
11735 variable within @code{yyparse}, and its address is passed to
11737 @xref{Token Values, ,Semantic Values of Tokens}.
11738 In semantic actions, it stores the semantic value of the lookahead token.
11739 @xref{Actions, ,Actions}.
11742 @deffn {Macro} YYMAXDEPTH
11743 Macro for specifying the maximum size of the parser stack. @xref{Memory
11747 @deffn {Variable} yynerrs
11748 Global variable which Bison increments each time it reports a syntax error.
11749 (In a pure parser, it is a local variable within @code{yyparse}. In a
11750 pure push parser, it is a member of yypstate.)
11751 @xref{Error Reporting, ,The Error Reporting Function @code{yyerror}}.
11754 @deffn {Function} yyparse
11755 The parser function produced by Bison; call this function to start
11756 parsing. @xref{Parser Function, ,The Parser Function @code{yyparse}}.
11759 @deffn {Macro} YYPRINT
11760 Macro used to output token semantic values. For @file{yacc.c} only.
11761 Obsoleted by @code{%printer}.
11762 @xref{The YYPRINT Macro, , The @code{YYPRINT} Macro}.
11765 @deffn {Function} yypstate_delete
11766 The function to delete a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11767 call this function to delete the memory associated with a parser.
11768 @xref{Parser Delete Function, ,The Parser Delete Function
11769 @code{yypstate_delete}}.
11770 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11771 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11774 @deffn {Function} yypstate_new
11775 The function to create a parser instance, produced by Bison in push mode;
11776 call this function to create a new parser.
11777 @xref{Parser Create Function, ,The Parser Create Function
11778 @code{yypstate_new}}.
11779 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11780 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11783 @deffn {Function} yypull_parse
11784 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11785 parse the rest of the input stream.
11786 @xref{Pull Parser Function, ,The Pull Parser Function
11787 @code{yypull_parse}}.
11788 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11789 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11792 @deffn {Function} yypush_parse
11793 The parser function produced by Bison in push mode; call this function to
11794 parse a single token. @xref{Push Parser Function, ,The Push Parser Function
11795 @code{yypush_parse}}.
11796 (The current push parsing interface is experimental and may evolve.
11797 More user feedback will help to stabilize it.)
11800 @deffn {Macro} YYPARSE_PARAM
11801 An obsolete macro for specifying the name of a parameter that
11802 @code{yyparse} should accept. The use of this macro is deprecated, and
11803 is supported only for Yacc like parsers. @xref{Pure Calling,, Calling
11804 Conventions for Pure Parsers}.
11807 @deffn {Macro} YYRECOVERING
11808 The expression @code{YYRECOVERING ()} yields 1 when the parser
11809 is recovering from a syntax error, and 0 otherwise.
11810 @xref{Action Features, ,Special Features for Use in Actions}.
11813 @deffn {Macro} YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA
11814 Macro used to control the use of @code{alloca} when the
11815 deterministic parser in C needs to extend its stacks. If defined to 0,
11816 the parser will use @code{malloc} to extend its stacks. If defined to
11817 1, the parser will use @code{alloca}. Values other than 0 and 1 are
11818 reserved for future Bison extensions. If not defined,
11819 @code{YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA} defaults to 0.
11821 In the all-too-common case where your code may run on a host with a
11822 limited stack and with unreliable stack-overflow checking, you should
11823 set @code{YYMAXDEPTH} to a value that cannot possibly result in
11824 unchecked stack overflow on any of your target hosts when
11825 @code{alloca} is called. You can inspect the code that Bison
11826 generates in order to determine the proper numeric values. This will
11827 require some expertise in low-level implementation details.
11830 @deffn {Type} YYSTYPE
11831 Data type of semantic values; @code{int} by default.
11832 @xref{Value Type, ,Data Types of Semantic Values}.
11840 @item Accepting state
11841 A state whose only action is the accept action.
11842 The accepting state is thus a consistent state.
11843 @xref{Understanding,,}.
11845 @item Backus-Naur Form (BNF; also called ``Backus Normal Form'')
11846 Formal method of specifying context-free grammars originally proposed
11847 by John Backus, and slightly improved by Peter Naur in his 1960-01-02
11848 committee document contributing to what became the Algol 60 report.
11849 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11851 @item Consistent state
11852 A state containing only one possible action. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11854 @item Context-free grammars
11855 Grammars specified as rules that can be applied regardless of context.
11856 Thus, if there is a rule which says that an integer can be used as an
11857 expression, integers are allowed @emph{anywhere} an expression is
11858 permitted. @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free
11861 @item Default reduction
11862 The reduction that a parser should perform if the current parser state
11863 contains no other action for the lookahead token. In permitted parser
11864 states, Bison declares the reduction with the largest lookahead set to be
11865 the default reduction and removes that lookahead set. @xref{Default
11868 @item Defaulted state
11869 A consistent state with a default reduction. @xref{Default Reductions}.
11871 @item Dynamic allocation
11872 Allocation of memory that occurs during execution, rather than at
11873 compile time or on entry to a function.
11876 Analogous to the empty set in set theory, the empty string is a
11877 character string of length zero.
11879 @item Finite-state stack machine
11880 A ``machine'' that has discrete states in which it is said to exist at
11881 each instant in time. As input to the machine is processed, the
11882 machine moves from state to state as specified by the logic of the
11883 machine. In the case of the parser, the input is the language being
11884 parsed, and the states correspond to various stages in the grammar
11885 rules. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11887 @item Generalized LR (GLR)
11888 A parsing algorithm that can handle all context-free grammars, including those
11889 that are not LR(1). It resolves situations that Bison's
11890 deterministic parsing
11891 algorithm cannot by effectively splitting off multiple parsers, trying all
11892 possible parsers, and discarding those that fail in the light of additional
11893 right context. @xref{Generalized LR Parsing, ,Generalized
11897 A language construct that is (in general) grammatically divisible;
11898 for example, `expression' or `declaration' in C@.
11899 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11901 @item IELR(1) (Inadequacy Elimination LR(1))
11902 A minimal LR(1) parser table construction algorithm. That is, given any
11903 context-free grammar, IELR(1) generates parser tables with the full
11904 language-recognition power of canonical LR(1) but with nearly the same
11905 number of parser states as LALR(1). This reduction in parser states is
11906 often an order of magnitude. More importantly, because canonical LR(1)'s
11907 extra parser states may contain duplicate conflicts in the case of non-LR(1)
11908 grammars, the number of conflicts for IELR(1) is often an order of magnitude
11909 less as well. This can significantly reduce the complexity of developing a
11910 grammar. @xref{LR Table Construction}.
11912 @item Infix operator
11913 An arithmetic operator that is placed between the operands on which it
11914 performs some operation.
11917 A continuous flow of data between devices or programs.
11919 @item LAC (Lookahead Correction)
11920 A parsing mechanism that fixes the problem of delayed syntax error
11921 detection, which is caused by LR state merging, default reductions, and the
11922 use of @code{%nonassoc}. Delayed syntax error detection results in
11923 unexpected semantic actions, initiation of error recovery in the wrong
11924 syntactic context, and an incorrect list of expected tokens in a verbose
11925 syntax error message. @xref{LAC}.
11927 @item Language construct
11928 One of the typical usage schemas of the language. For example, one of
11929 the constructs of the C language is the @code{if} statement.
11930 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
11932 @item Left associativity
11933 Operators having left associativity are analyzed from left to right:
11934 @samp{a+b+c} first computes @samp{a+b} and then combines with
11935 @samp{c}. @xref{Precedence, ,Operator Precedence}.
11937 @item Left recursion
11938 A rule whose result symbol is also its first component symbol; for
11939 example, @samp{expseq1 : expseq1 ',' exp;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
11942 @item Left-to-right parsing
11943 Parsing a sentence of a language by analyzing it token by token from
11944 left to right. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
11946 @item Lexical analyzer (scanner)
11947 A function that reads an input stream and returns tokens one by one.
11948 @xref{Lexical, ,The Lexical Analyzer Function @code{yylex}}.
11950 @item Lexical tie-in
11951 A flag, set by actions in the grammar rules, which alters the way
11952 tokens are parsed. @xref{Lexical Tie-ins}.
11954 @item Literal string token
11955 A token which consists of two or more fixed characters. @xref{Symbols}.
11957 @item Lookahead token
11958 A token already read but not yet shifted. @xref{Lookahead, ,Lookahead
11962 The class of context-free grammars that Bison (like most other parser
11963 generators) can handle by default; a subset of LR(1).
11964 @xref{Mysterious Conflicts}.
11967 The class of context-free grammars in which at most one token of
11968 lookahead is needed to disambiguate the parsing of any piece of input.
11970 @item Nonterminal symbol
11971 A grammar symbol standing for a grammatical construct that can
11972 be expressed through rules in terms of smaller constructs; in other
11973 words, a construct that is not a token. @xref{Symbols}.
11976 A function that recognizes valid sentences of a language by analyzing
11977 the syntax structure of a set of tokens passed to it from a lexical
11980 @item Postfix operator
11981 An arithmetic operator that is placed after the operands upon which it
11982 performs some operation.
11985 Replacing a string of nonterminals and/or terminals with a single
11986 nonterminal, according to a grammar rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison
11990 A reentrant subprogram is a subprogram which can be in invoked any
11991 number of times in parallel, without interference between the various
11992 invocations. @xref{Pure Decl, ,A Pure (Reentrant) Parser}.
11994 @item Reverse polish notation
11995 A language in which all operators are postfix operators.
11997 @item Right recursion
11998 A rule whose result symbol is also its last component symbol; for
11999 example, @samp{expseq1: exp ',' expseq1;}. @xref{Recursion, ,Recursive
12003 In computer languages, the semantics are specified by the actions
12004 taken for each instance of the language, i.e., the meaning of
12005 each statement. @xref{Semantics, ,Defining Language Semantics}.
12008 A parser is said to shift when it makes the choice of analyzing
12009 further input from the stream rather than reducing immediately some
12010 already-recognized rule. @xref{Algorithm, ,The Bison Parser Algorithm}.
12012 @item Single-character literal
12013 A single character that is recognized and interpreted as is.
12014 @xref{Grammar in Bison, ,From Formal Rules to Bison Input}.
12017 The nonterminal symbol that stands for a complete valid utterance in
12018 the language being parsed. The start symbol is usually listed as the
12019 first nonterminal symbol in a language specification.
12020 @xref{Start Decl, ,The Start-Symbol}.
12023 A data structure where symbol names and associated data are stored
12024 during parsing to allow for recognition and use of existing
12025 information in repeated uses of a symbol. @xref{Multi-function Calc}.
12028 An error encountered during parsing of an input stream due to invalid
12029 syntax. @xref{Error Recovery}.
12032 A basic, grammatically indivisible unit of a language. The symbol
12033 that describes a token in the grammar is a terminal symbol.
12034 The input of the Bison parser is a stream of tokens which comes from
12035 the lexical analyzer. @xref{Symbols}.
12037 @item Terminal symbol
12038 A grammar symbol that has no rules in the grammar and therefore is
12039 grammatically indivisible. The piece of text it represents is a token.
12040 @xref{Language and Grammar, ,Languages and Context-Free Grammars}.
12042 @item Unreachable state
12043 A parser state to which there does not exist a sequence of transitions from
12044 the parser's start state. A state can become unreachable during conflict
12045 resolution. @xref{Unreachable States}.
12048 @node Copying This Manual
12049 @appendix Copying This Manual
12053 @unnumbered Bibliography
12057 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, IELR(1): Practical LR(1) Parser Tables
12058 for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution, in @cite{Proceedings of the
12059 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing} (SAC'08), ACM, New York, NY, USA,
12060 pp.@: 240--245. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363747}
12062 @item [Denny 2010 May]
12063 Joel E. Denny, PSLR(1): Pseudo-Scannerless Minimal LR(1) for the
12064 Deterministic Parsing of Composite Languages, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson
12065 University, Clemson, SC, USA (May 2010).
12066 @uref{http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?did=2041473591&Fmt=7&clientId=79356&RQT=309&VName=PQD}
12068 @item [Denny 2010 November]
12069 Joel E. Denny and Brian A. Malloy, The IELR(1) Algorithm for Generating
12070 Minimal LR(1) Parser Tables for Non-LR(1) Grammars with Conflict Resolution,
12071 in @cite{Science of Computer Programming}, Vol.@: 75, Issue 11 (November
12072 2010), pp.@: 943--979. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2009.08.001}
12074 @item [DeRemer 1982]
12075 Frank DeRemer and Thomas Pennello, Efficient Computation of LALR(1)
12076 Look-Ahead Sets, in @cite{ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and
12077 Systems}, Vol.@: 4, No.@: 4 (October 1982), pp.@:
12078 615--649. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/69622.357187}
12081 Donald E. Knuth, On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right, in
12082 @cite{Information and Control}, Vol.@: 8, Issue 6 (December 1965), pp.@:
12083 607--639. @uref{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90426-2}
12086 Elizabeth Scott, Adrian Johnstone, and Shamsa Sadaf Hussain,
12087 @cite{Tomita-Style Generalised LR Parsers}, Royal Holloway, University of
12088 London, Department of Computer Science, TR-00-12 (December 2000).
12089 @uref{http://www.cs.rhul.ac.uk/research/languages/publications/tomita_style_1.ps}
12092 @node Index of Terms
12093 @unnumbered Index of Terms
12099 @c LocalWords: texinfo setfilename settitle setchapternewpage finalout texi FSF
12100 @c LocalWords: ifinfo smallbook shorttitlepage titlepage GPL FIXME iftex FSF's
12101 @c LocalWords: akim fn cp syncodeindex vr tp synindex dircategory direntry Naur
12102 @c LocalWords: ifset vskip pt filll insertcopying sp ISBN Etienne Suvasa Multi
12103 @c LocalWords: ifnottex yyparse detailmenu GLR RPN Calc var Decls Rpcalc multi
12104 @c LocalWords: rpcalc Lexer Expr ltcalc mfcalc yylex defaultprec Donnelly Gotos
12105 @c LocalWords: yyerror pxref LR yylval cindex dfn LALR samp gpl BNF xref yypush
12106 @c LocalWords: const int paren ifnotinfo AC noindent emph expr stmt findex lr
12107 @c LocalWords: glr YYSTYPE TYPENAME prog dprec printf decl init stmtMerge POSIX
12108 @c LocalWords: pre STDC GNUC endif yy YY alloca lf stddef stdlib YYDEBUG yypull
12109 @c LocalWords: NUM exp subsubsection kbd Ctrl ctype EOF getchar isdigit nonfree
12110 @c LocalWords: ungetc stdin scanf sc calc ulator ls lm cc NEG prec yyerrok rr
12111 @c LocalWords: longjmp fprintf stderr yylloc YYLTYPE cos ln Stallman Destructor
12112 @c LocalWords: symrec val tptr FNCT fnctptr func struct sym enum IEC syntaxes
12113 @c LocalWords: fnct putsym getsym fname arith fncts atan ptr malloc sizeof Lex
12114 @c LocalWords: strlen strcpy fctn strcmp isalpha symbuf realloc isalnum DOTDOT
12115 @c LocalWords: ptypes itype YYPRINT trigraphs yytname expseq vindex dtype Unary
12116 @c LocalWords: Rhs YYRHSLOC LE nonassoc op deffn typeless yynerrs nonterminal
12117 @c LocalWords: yychar yydebug msg YYNTOKENS YYNNTS YYNRULES YYNSTATES reentrant
12118 @c LocalWords: cparse clex deftypefun NE defmac YYACCEPT YYABORT param yypstate
12119 @c LocalWords: strncmp intval tindex lvalp locp llocp typealt YYBACKUP subrange
12120 @c LocalWords: YYEMPTY YYEOF YYRECOVERING yyclearin GE def UMINUS maybeword loc
12121 @c LocalWords: Johnstone Shamsa Sadaf Hussain Tomita TR uref YYMAXDEPTH inline
12122 @c LocalWords: YYINITDEPTH stmts ref initdcl maybeasm notype Lookahead yyoutput
12123 @c LocalWords: hexflag STR exdent itemset asis DYYDEBUG YYFPRINTF args Autoconf
12124 @c LocalWords: infile ypp yxx outfile itemx tex leaderfill Troubleshouting sqrt
12125 @c LocalWords: hbox hss hfill tt ly yyin fopen fclose ofirst gcc ll lookahead
12126 @c LocalWords: nbar yytext fst snd osplit ntwo strdup AST Troublereporting th
12127 @c LocalWords: YYSTACK DVI fdl printindex IELR nondeterministic nonterminals ps
12128 @c LocalWords: subexpressions declarator nondeferred config libintl postfix LAC
12129 @c LocalWords: preprocessor nonpositive unary nonnumeric typedef extern rhs sr
12130 @c LocalWords: yytokentype destructor multicharacter nonnull EBCDIC nterm LR's
12131 @c LocalWords: lvalue nonnegative XNUM CHR chr TAGLESS tagless stdout api TOK
12132 @c LocalWords: destructors Reentrancy nonreentrant subgrammar nonassociative Ph
12133 @c LocalWords: deffnx namespace xml goto lalr ielr runtime lex yacc yyps env
12134 @c LocalWords: yystate variadic Unshift NLS gettext po UTF Automake LOCALEDIR
12135 @c LocalWords: YYENABLE bindtextdomain Makefile DEFS CPPFLAGS DBISON DeRemer
12136 @c LocalWords: autoreconf Pennello multisets nondeterminism Generalised baz ACM
12137 @c LocalWords: redeclare automata Dparse localedir datadir XSLT midrule Wno
12138 @c LocalWords: Graphviz multitable headitem hh basename Doxygen fno filename
12139 @c LocalWords: doxygen ival sval deftypemethod deallocate pos deftypemethodx
12140 @c LocalWords: Ctor defcv defcvx arg accessors arithmetics CPP ifndef CALCXX
12141 @c LocalWords: lexer's calcxx bool LPAREN RPAREN deallocation cerrno climits
12142 @c LocalWords: cstdlib Debian undef yywrap unput noyywrap nounput zA yyleng
12143 @c LocalWords: errno strtol ERANGE str strerror iostream argc argv Javadoc PSLR
12144 @c LocalWords: bytecode initializers superclass stype ASTNode autoboxing nls
12145 @c LocalWords: toString deftypeivar deftypeivarx deftypeop YYParser strictfp
12146 @c LocalWords: superclasses boolean getErrorVerbose setErrorVerbose deftypecv
12147 @c LocalWords: getDebugStream setDebugStream getDebugLevel setDebugLevel url
12148 @c LocalWords: bisonVersion deftypecvx bisonSkeleton getStartPos getEndPos uint
12149 @c LocalWords: getLVal defvar deftypefn deftypefnx gotos msgfmt Corbett LALR's
12150 @c LocalWords: subdirectory Solaris nonassociativity perror schemas Malloy ints
12151 @c LocalWords: Scannerless ispell american ChangeLog smallexample CSTYPE CLTYPE
12152 @c LocalWords: clval CDEBUG cdebug deftypeopx yyterminate LocationType
12153 @c LocalWords: parsers parser's
12154 @c LocalWords: associativity subclasses precedences unresolvable runnable
12155 @c LocalWords: allocators subunit initializations unreferenced untyped
12156 @c LocalWords: errorVerbose subtype subtypes
12158 @c Local Variables:
12159 @c ispell-dictionary: "american"